DOCSLIB.ORG

Themes in Look Back in Anger

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Themes in Look Back in Anger IIMJ. ISSN- 23487135. IF 5.2. Approved Journal serial no. 48653. (69-72) Themes in look back in anger Adhika Hrishikesh Chougule 6-A , Nishant Soc. 585/38 Salisbury Park. Maharastra, India Abstract John James Osborne is a pioneer of ‘Kitchen Sink Drama’ which flourished during 1950’s. Many writers followed his writing style. He is also credited for his phrase “Angry Young Man”. His writing Style differs from the previous generation playwrights. The Kitchen Sink Drama’s that he wrote differed from those of ‘well-made plays’, which brought the humdrum life of working class people into light. He used the non-traditional themes which were appreciated by the working class. To appreciate his work we have to apprehend the themes. So this paper will try to examine the themes in ‘Look Back in Anger’. Keywords Kitchen Sink Drama, Anger Young Man, Well-made Plays, Humdrum life. Introduction John Osborne was born in 1929 in London and died on 1994. He was an English playwright, screenwriter and an actor. He was the first writer to address Britain’s purpose in the post- imperial age. After his schooling he shifted to London to stay with his mother. There he tried trade journalism, while working he was introduced to theatre by one of his workmate. The first work he published was ‘The Devil Inside Him’ with his mentor Stella Linden. In 1950, he published his second work ‘Personal Enemy’ with Anthony Creighton, with whom he also wrote ‘Epitaph for George Dillon’. In 1956 he wrote ‘Look Back in Anger’. The play was written within 17 days while he was performing in creaky rep show called ‘Seagulls over Sorrento’. The play was appreciated by people. The play is an element is autobiographical work of Osborne where he depicts his personal troubled life with Pamela Lane Jimmy Potter in the play is the main character, his also called the Angry young man, through his character we can see Osborne’s personal life were Alison potter is Pamela Lane. The play deals with the troubled marriage, class discrimination and sex’s differences, which can be seen through the themes. 1. Kitchen Sink Drama: the term ‘kitchen sink drama’ was used to describe the British cultural movement that was developed in1950 and 1960’s. In theatre, art, novels, etc., the heroes were usually shown as the ‘angry young men’. They used the domestic social style to depict the real life situations of the working class people. Like in ‘Look Back in Anger’ the Act 1 opens in attic room at the top of a large Victorian House. www.inventivepublication.com Volume-VI, Issue-IV, April- 2018 Page 69 IIMJ. ISSN- 23487135. IF 5.2. Approved Journal serial no. 48653. (69-72) There we can see the kitchen, gas stove, dining table, double bed, ironing board, food cupboard all on the stage. The previous living room setting was changed to kitchen. The term was derived from expressionist painting of John Bratby. The paintings by him were of kitchen sink, his themes for painting were kitchen, bathroom, and toilets. This type of drama showed the regular life of ordinary people who were struggling against the degeneration of powerlessness. The playwrights like John Osborne, John Arden, Arnold Wesker, and Shelagh Delaney called themselves as ‘Kitchen Sink Dramatist’. 2. Angry Young Man: The play was first themed as ‘Angry Young Man’. The term was described as a generation of post-world war 2 artists and working class were leftist, anarchist, politics. According to cultural critics, these young men were not a part of any organisation movement but instead, individuals angry at a post-Victorian Britain that refused to acknowledge their social and class alienation. As in the play, the protagonist Jimmy Potter is considered as the ‘Angry Young Man’ as he shows the anger against the society, class discrimination, lack of opportunities. The another reason for his anger was in 1950’s there was a movement where the people from the working class were shifting to middle class but they were not allowed to have the pleasures of the middle class people and they were still not accepted as the middle class and so the reason for Jimmy’s anger was, the strict rule and barriers of the class structure they were not able to enjoy the luxurious of the middle class. 3. Class War: In 1950’s there was a movement “Welfare of State” (it means classless structure of the society) by which the people of working class were changing to middle class, but they were halted on the margins of both the classes as the older policies were still followed and there was rigidity of the middle class and that’s why the people from the working class didn’t enjoy the privileges of the middle class. This is the reason Jimmy is angry on the society as it is maintained through his education, occupation, work, etc. this we come to know in dialogue of Cliff when he talks with Alison in Act 1, Cliff: Well, I suppose he and I think the same about a lot of things, because we’re alike in some ways. We both come from working people if you like. Oh I know some of his mother’s relatives are pretty posh, but he hates them as much as he hates yours. Don’t quite know why. Anyways, he gets on with me because I’m common. (Grins) common as dirt, that’s me. The lower class people had the desire for the power on cultural life, as the cultural life was represented only by the upper class people and lower class were not allowed to participate and that’s why Jimmy was commenting on the novels, newspaper, etc., as he wanted to be the part of cultural life but was not allowed. 4. Aimless and routine life of post-war English society: In the play there is realistic description of the post-war English society by which young generation was affected. There was dissatisfaction of the youth to routine life lead by them, like on Sunday’s it was followed by reading newspapers, drinking tea and ironing clothes. In the play, Jimmy is tired of the same routine of Sunday were he and Cliff reads newspaper and Alison irons the clothes, were they show no enthusiasm for anything. www.inventivepublication.com Volume-VI, Issue-IV, April- 2018 Page 70 IIMJ. ISSN- 23487135. IF 5.2. Approved Journal serial no. 48653. (69-72) Jimmy says, “oh heavens, how I long for a little ordinary human enthusiasm. Just enthusiasm that’s all.” He complains it and goes to Cliff. “I have an idea, why don’t we play a game? Let’s pretend that we’re human beings, and that we are alive.” Jimmy is more irritated by routine life which has no hopes, excitement, as there’s nothing happening around him like in home and society. “Nobody think, nobody cares. No beliefs, no convictions and no enthusiasm.” This shows the dullness of life and society. 5. Misogyny: misogyny basically means the hatred for women or girls. According to sociologist Allan G. Johnson, “misogyny is a cultural attitude of hatred for females because they are females.” In British society it happened when the males who were out in the colonies ruling on them, came back to their homes, their superiority in their domestic world was lost as the domestic world was ruled by women and there was no or they were not getting space to dominate their own world and this lead to misogyny. Osborne was accused of glorifying cruelty towards women and homosexuals. In the play, we see Jimmy’s anger on Alison and her mother and also on Helena, basically he hates all kinds of woman and this can be seen through his dialogue in Act 1, when he tells Cliff of the girls below his apartment, Jimmy, (moving upstage) she’d drop your guts like hair clips, and fluff all over the floor. I had a flat underneath a couple of girls once. You heard every damned thing those bastards did, all day and night. I used to plead with them. I even got to screaming the most ingenious obscenities I could think of, up the stairs at them. But nothing, nothing would move them with those two, even a simple visit to the lavatory sounded like a medieval siege. Oh, they beat me in the end- I had to go. I expect they’re still at it. Or they’re probably married now, and driving some other poor devils out of their minds. Slamming their doors, stamping their heels, banging their irons and saucepans- the eternal flaming racket of the female. 6. Loss of empire: In 1950 Britain lost its colonies and the American’s took over. When the men came back to their homeland, they didn’t had the space to show their masculinity as the homeland was dominated by the women and this also happened because of ‘The Welfare state’. After the World War 2 the women started going out for work. In the play, the loss of empire is represented by Colonel Redfern, father of Alison. Colonel Redfern was in India ruling there for many years. His happy movements were in the Edwardian Age, when Britain was in power. The world was under control of Americans, the people were sadden by the thought that they were not in power anymore. We come to know about this when Jimmy in Act 1 tells about Colonel Redfern to Cliff, Jimmy says, “Who was it? (Pause)well, you wouldn’t know anyway.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Influence of Kitchen Sink Drama in John Osborne's
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 23, Issue 9, Ver. 7 (September. 2018) 77-80 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org The Influence of Kitchen Sink Drama In John Osborne’s “ Look Back In Anger” Sadaf Zaman Lecturer University of Bisha Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Corresponding Author: Sadaf Zaman ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Date of Submission:16-09-2018 Date of acceptance: 01-10-2018 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- John Osborne was born in London, England in 1929 to Thomas Osborne, an advertisement writer, and Nellie Beatrice, a working class barmaid. His father died in 1941. Osborne used the proceeds from a life insurance settlement to send himself to Belmont College, a private boarding school. Osborne was expelled after only a few years for attacking the headmaster. He received a certificate of completion for his upper school work, but never attended a college or university. After returning home, Osborne worked several odd jobs before he found a niche in the theater. He began working with Anthony Creighton's provincial touring company where he was a stage hand, actor, and writer. Osborne co-wrote two plays -- The Devil Inside Him and Personal Enemy -- before writing and submittingLook Back in Anger for production. The play, written in a short period of only a few weeks, was summarily rejected by the agents and production companies to whom Osborne first submitted the play. It was eventually picked up by George Devine for production with his failing Royal Court Theater. Both Osborne and the Royal Court Theater were struggling to survive financially and both saw the production of Look Back in Anger as a risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Insight in Look Back in Anger Dr
    © 2020 IJRAR February 2020, Volume 7, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) Psychological insight in Look Back in Anger Dr. Swati Tande Assist. Professor, Department of English, P.N. College, Nanded Abstract: This research paper intends to study Look Back in Anger as a problem play. The paper deals with the aspects of social conflicts consequent upon individual conflicts. Sense of loss in modern generation is the key concept of the play. The sense of loss leads to depression in modern people is reflected through the paper. The plot of Look Back in Anger moves from love, jealousy, misunderstanding, hatred, and reconciliation. Osborne had dramatized communal questions in order to arouse social conscience. The play presents the frustrated outbursts of Jimmy, the angry young man. He frenzied with resentment against conservative class system. Instead of facing the problems, the protagonist just grumbles for the people and situation in which he his living. Dealing with psyche of modern world, Osborne presented degeneration of generation. Key Words: psychological, rationale, reciprocal, obligation, alienation, reconciliation, compatibility. John Osborne was a born playwright. In his creative world dramatic expression comes with a perfect naturalness and ease. He remained defiantly a popular dramatist who was capable of speaking to a mass public. His play has a sense of social complexity. His major plays, particularly problem plays have never ceased to be the ‘lessons in feeling’. The depiction of the middle age group by Osborne is true to fact. Through his plays, Osborne had opened up a much wider subject than rebelliousness or youthful anger, that of social alienation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2348-7666; Vol.7, Issue-6 June, 2020 Impact Factor: 6.023; Email: [email protected]
    International Journal of Academic Research ISSN: 2348-7666; Vol.7, Issue-6 June, 2020 Impact Factor: 6.023; Email: [email protected] Rashmi Rani Sahu Research Scholar in English Berhampur University, Ganjam, Odisha World War II destroyed the rational and moral foundations of human society which in turn produced a prevalent sense of utter meaninglessness and instability of human existence. This title attempts to look into the various issues relating to the social, economic and metaphysical life in 1950s England, explored by the three dramatists Samuel Beckett, Harold Pinter and John Osborne. Their choice of themes such as the absurdist and existential issues and the prevailing socio-economic discontentment, as well as the structure, tone and language of the plays effectively comment on these concerns. Kitchen sink realism (or kitchen sink drama) is a term coined to describe a British cultural movement that developed in the late 1950s and early 1960s in theatre, art, novels, film, and television plays, whose protagonists usually could be described as "angry young men" who were disillusioned with modern society. It used a style of social realism, which depicted the domestic situations of working class Britons, living in cramped rented accommodation and spending their off-hours drinking in grimy pubs, to explore controversial social and political issues ranging from abortion to homelessness. The harsh, realistic style contrasted sharply with the escapism of the previous generation's so-called "well-made plays". : Absurdist, Existential, modern, Social Realism. also not a proper job for a graduate man. Look Back in Anger (1956) is commonly According to Berkowitz “inability to fulfil credited with being the play in which the anticipations is a frustration” Osborne expressed a sense of frustration (McCarthy 16).
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical and Socio-Political Context of “Look Back in Anger” by John Osborne and D.H. Lawrence's Sons and Lovers
    PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ALGERIA MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ABDELHAMID IBN BADIS UNIVERITY – MOSTAGANEM- FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGUES DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH MASTER « British Studies » The Historical and STRITocio -Political Context of TITL “Look Back in Anger” By John Osborne and D.H. Lawrence's Sons and Lovers Presented by: RAFA Zohra Board of Examiners: Supervisor: Mr. SEBBAH Djamel University of Mostaganem Chair: Mrs. BENMAATI Fatima Zahra University of Mostaganem Examiner: Mr. TEGUIA Cherif University of Mostaganem Academic Year 2016/2017 Dedication: To my family, for their continual love, support, happy times and inspiration. II Acknowledgment: I would like to thank Mr. Djamel Sebbah for all his invaluable help, criticism and advice in the finishing point of this thesis. I would like to thank my dearest friend Abdel Hamid Faiza for her encouragement and priceless advice; I would also like to express my utmost gratitude to Allawa Amine for his wonderful ideas, encouragement and advice during the year. Thanks also to Ziani Nabil for providing me with a copy of the original script that I could not have without his help. I would also like to thank all who contributed in this research. To Louiza, Fatiha, Nadia and Fouzia for their encouragement, love and support. A special thank to you “Brit_Lit” class for a wonderful year of friendship, encouragement and memorable times. Finally 1 wish to thank my teachers who were the source of my inspiration: Mrs. Djafri, Mr. Teguia and Dr. Mired for their continued help and support in making lectures very worthwhile and stimulating experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Series Art Films and Events January February Filmmarch Film
    Film Program Winter 2008 National Gallery of Art, Washington Winter Series film From the Archives: 16 at 12 England’s New Wave, 1958 – 1964 István Szabó’s 20th Century Alexander Sokurov In Glorious Technicolor Art Films and Events This Sporting Life (Photofest) 19 Sat II March Edward 2:00 England’s New Wave, 1958 – 1964: A Kind of Loving 1 Sat J. M.W. Turner and Film 4:30 England’s New Wave, 1958 – 1964: 2:00 István Szabó’s 20th Century: Mephisto (two-part program) This Sporting Life 4:30 István Szabó’s 20th Century: Colonel Redl 2 Sun The Gates 20 Sun 4:30 England’s New Wave, 1958 – 1964: 4:30 István Szabó’s 20th Century: Hanussen International Festival of Films Saturday Night and Sunday Morning; 4 Tues The Angry Silence on Art 12:00 From the Archives: 16 at 12: The City 22 Tues of Washington Henri Storck’s Legacy: 12:00 From the Archives: 16 at 12: Dorothea 8 Sat Lange: Under the Trees; Eugène Atget (1856 – 1927) Belgian Films on Art 3:00 Event: Max Linder Ciné-Concert 26 Sat 9 Sun 2:00 Event: International Festival of Films on Art England’s Finest Hour: 4:30 Alexander Sokurov: The Sun (Solntse) Films by Humphrey Jennings 27 Sun 11 Tues 4:00 Event: International Festival of Films on Art Balázs Béla Stúdió: 1961 – 1970 12:00 From the Archives: 16 at 12: Washington, 29 Tues City with a Plan Max Linder Ciné-Concert 12:00 From the Archives: 16 at 12: Dorothea 15 Sat Lange: Under the Trees; Eugène Atget (1856 – 1927) 2:30 Alexander Sokurov: Elegy of Life: Silvestre Revueltas: Music for Film Rostropovich Vishnevskaya February 4:30 Alexander
    [Show full text]
  • Social Discrimination in John Osborne's Look Back in Anger
    ================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 17:12 December 2017 India’s Higher Education Authority UGC Approved List of Journals Serial Number 49042 ================================================================ Social Discrimination in John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger M. Meivizhi, M.A., M.Phil., B.Ed. ================================================== John Osborne Courtesy: http://waytofamous.com/19667-john-osborne.html Abstract British literature is a mirror initially tied-up with several historical events, reflecting many facets of British identity. English drama rose, with excellent rapidity, to the summit of its ==================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 17:12 December 2017 M. Meivizhi, M.A., M.Phil., B.Ed. Social Discrimination in John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger 249 literary glories and is reflected through the imaginative strength of famous playwrights of England. The realistic issues which took place in and around the society are revealed in British plays and that has paved the way for new talents to create awareness among the people. The foremost playwrights who merge in the middle of the fifties are Samuel Beckett, Harold Pinter and John Osborne. Of these writers, Osborne shows his concerns over the class problems of the society. His plays deal with social discrimination, alienation, man’s rebellion against the bonds of custom, anger, despair and frustration of the post-war generation, man-woman relationship and similar socio-psychological themes. He is regarded as the most brilliant dramatist of the post-Second World War period in Britain. Apart from the impressive volume of his writings, his plays have a great literary significance and bring him an enviable position among contemporary British dramatists.
    [Show full text]
  • Look Back in Anger by John Osborne
    PILOT THEATRE LOOK BACK IN ANGER RESOURCES Introduction On May 8th 1956, Look Back in Anger opened at the Royal Court Theatre as the third production of the newly formed English Stage Company. The English Stage Company had been founded in 1955 to promote the production of new plays by contemporary authors that might not find production in the commercial West End theatre (London's equivalent of Broadway in New York City). West End theatre provided quality acting and high standards of production, but very little drama that related to life in contemporary England. Most plays of the time were generally innocuous light comedies, thrillers, and foreign imports—fourteen American shows in 1955 alone. Osborne had submitted copies of Look Back in Anger to every agent in London and to many West End producers and had been rejected by all. When the script arrived at the Royal Court, the Artistic Director George Devine and his young assistant director Tony Richardson knew it was exactly what they were looking for. Look Back in Anger was viewed as a play that would, as Devine later put it, "blow a hole in the old theatre." Critical reception was strongly mixed: some detested the play and the central character, but most recognized Osborne as an important new talent and the play as emotionally powerful. They also recognized the play as one that fervently spoke of the concerns of the young in post-war England. The first production of Look Back in Anger was not initially financially successful, although after an excerpt was shown on BBC the box office was overwhelmed.
    [Show full text]
  • From Pleasure to Menace: Noel Coward, Harold Pinter, and Critical Narratives
    Fall 2009 41 From Pleasure to Menace: Noel Coward, Harold Pinter, and Critical Narratives Jackson F. Ayres For many, if not most, scholars of twentieth century British drama, the playwrights Noel Coward and Harold Pinter belong in entirely separate categories: Coward, a traditional, “drawing room dramatist,” and Pinter, an angry revolutionary redefining British theatre. In short, Coward is often used to describe what Pinter is not. Yet, this strict differentiation is curious when one considers how the two playwrights viewed each other’s work. Coward frequently praised Pinter, going so far as to christen him as his successor in the use of language on the British stage. Likewise, Pinter has publicly stated his admiration of Coward, even directing a 1976 production of Coward’s Blithe Spirit (1941). Still, regardless of their mutual respect, the placement of Coward and Pinter within a shared theatrical lineage is, at the very least, uncommon in the current critical status quo. Resistance may reside in their lack of overt similarities, but likely also in the seemingly impenetrable dividing line created by the premiere of John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger on May 8, 1956. In his book, 1956 and All That (1999), Dan Rebellato convincingly argues that Osborne’s play created such a critical sensation that eventually “1956 becomes year zero, and time seems to flow both forward and backward from it,” giving the impression that “modern British theatre divides into two eras.”1 Coward contributed to this partially generational divide by frequently railing against so-called New Movement authors, particularly Samuel Beckett and Eugene Ionesco, for being self-important and tedious.
    [Show full text]
  • Look Back in Anger
    'Ii. PLAY IN THREE ACTS BY JOHN OSBORNE Look Back in Anger THE DRAMATIC PUBLISHING COMPANY © The Dramatic Publishing Company, Woodstock, Illinois *** NOTICE *** The amateur acting righto; to this work are controlled exclusively by THE DRAMATIC PUBLISHING COMPANY without whose pennission in writing no perfonnance of it may be given. Royalty fees are given in our current catalogue and are subject to change without notice. Royalty must be paid every time a play is perfonned whether or not it is presented for profit and whether or not admission is charged. A play is performed anytime it is acted before an audience. All inquiries concerning amateur rights should be addressed to: DRAMATIC PUBLISHING P. o. Box 129, Woodstock, Illinois 60098. COPYRIGHT LA W GIVES THE A UTHOR OR THE AUTHOR'S AGENT THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO A1AKE COPIES. This law provides authors with a fair return for their creative efforts. Authors earn their living from the royalties they receive from book sales and from the performance of their work. Conscientious oh5ervance of copyright law is not only ethical, it encourages authors to continue their creative work. This work is fully protected by copyright. No alterations, deletions or substitutions may be made in the work without the prior written consent of the publisher. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any fonn or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, videotape, film, or any infonnation storage and retrieval system, without pennission in writing from the publisher. It may not be perfonned either by professionals or amateurs without payment of royalty.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetics of Anger in John Osborne's Look Back in Anger and Femi Osofisan's the Chattering and the Song
    British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences ISSN: 2046-9578, Vol.5 No.1 (2012) ©BritishJournal Publishing, Inc. 2012 http://www.bjournal.co.uk/BJASS.aspx Poetics of Anger in John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger and Femi Osofisan’s The Chattering and the Song. Bosede F. AFOLAYAN [PhD] Department of English, University of Lagos, Lagos-Nigeria. [email protected] Abstract Anger is a basic human emotion which has a force for constructive or destructive ends. Its expression in any circumstance can be a trigger for a desire to change a prevailing situation. In all cases, anger is a fundamental component of art. In Osborne and Osofisan, extreme anger as both material and style is what marks them out. Its reification by the intellect provides a potent instrument for investigating society. This study examines the use of anger in Osborne’s Look Back in Anger and Osofisan’s The Chattering and the Song. Osborne and Osofisan are two writers who are very anxious to change their societies. The paper is a comparative study of a British and a Nigerian playwright who wrote at different times yet share similar concerns. The study is primarily concerned with the early plays of Osborne and Osofisan where anger is strongest and where their artistic triumph is most poignant. The paper reveals that anger is the point of departure for their art and concludes that it is both material and motivating force for their writings. The anger expressed in these works are not mere hysterics but cerebral. Keywords: Anger, Osborne, Osofisan, Cerebral, Hysterics 123 British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences ISSN: 2046-9578 Introduction This study is a comparative analysis of Osborne’s Look Back in Anger and Osofisan's The Chattering and the Song, an English and a Nigerian play whose aim is to reform society by drawing attention to the ills in their societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Anger, Nostalgia, and the End of Empire: John Osborne's Look Back in Anger
    Anger, Nostalgia, and the End of Empire: John Osborne's Look Back in Anger Nandi Bhatia Modern Drama, Volume 42, Number 3, Fall 1999, pp. 391-400 (Article) Published by University of Toronto Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mdr.1999.0012 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/500001/summary Access provided by Columbia University (9 Jun 2017 07:13 GMT) Anger, Nostalgia, and the End of Empire: John Osborne's Look Back in Anger NANDI BHAT IA The evidence suggests that Racism had assumed an active faml in the British overseas empire right at the beginning of Victoria's reign. The Darwini an revelation injected scie n ~if i c and sociological content; and the Indian Mutiny and the "mini-mutiny" in Jamaica provided the "rivers of blood" to justify prejud ices. The last quarter of the cen­ tury saw Racism reach a plateau. being manifested, in the Empire which had then atLaincd its widest bounds. Today, in the imperial afterglow, we survey our lost domains from the same plateau of Racism in what is now our supposedly beleaguered island home. l - Hugh Tinker . As he reminisces about hi s Edwardian past during the period of British colo­ ni al rule in India, Colonel Redfern, who belongs to the class that ostensibly constitutes Jimmy Porter's "natural" enemy, is overcome by nostalgia. When Jimmy Porter, the working-class protagonist and anti-establishment hero , remembered by commentators as "represent[i ng] a postw ar generation in hi s anger, petulance, dissatisfaction, infirmity of purpose, railing, [and] complain ­ ing,'" alludes to the Colonel (after endless bouts of indiscrim inate attacks on Alison , hi s wife and the Colonel 's daughter, in an attempt to shake her out of her upper-class complacency), his anger wanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alison Porter in Look Back in Anger: Is She Responsible for Her Sufferings?
    IIUC STUDIES ISSN 1813-7733 Vol.- 10 & 11, December 2014 (p 65-80) Alison Porter in Look Back in Anger: Is She Responsible for her Sufferings? Salma Haque* Abstract: John Osborne’s play Look Back in Anger is a dramatic study of a strained marriage relationship. In it Jimmy Porter is the protagonist and Alison Porter, a retired Colonel’s daughter, is the heroine. The actual action of the play is centered around Jimmy’s relationship with her. Despite his dominance, his wife Alison Porter, is the most important supporting character on whom Jimmy inflicts pain by his tirades all the time until eventually she feels she can bear no more. Later on she leaves him in her pregnant state to seek peace. After the loss of the baby she comes back to him when both have lost faith in each other. So they will go back to their previous unhealthy relationship causing her to become deplorable again. My reading of Alison Porter is that she is a suffering person though some find Jimmy a sufferer. This paper aims at assessing her sufferings and the reasons behind them. John Osborne‟s play Look Back in Anger mainly describes a failed marriage between Jimmy and Alison who live with Jimmy‟s uneducated friend Cliff Lewis. According to Nicoll the play: “... focuses attention upon the life being led by the pair, and ends inconclusively ...” (Nicoll, 12). Through it Osborne presented „a new type of angry young hero‟ whose sense of working-class position prejudices his judgment about those of upper social status and this brings him into conflict with Alison who becomes victim of his cruelty.
    [Show full text]