2005 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Texture Comparison in Chips in Various Environments Through Mechanical Property Estimation
Texture comparison in chips in various environments through mechanical property estimation An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by: _______________ _______________ _______________ Robert Allen Dylan Billings Keegan Leitz ___________________ Satya Shivkumar Advisor 12 March 2012 Abstract Crispiness is an important factor when gauging the quality and freshness of a potato chip. In this study, the effects of pH and moisture content on the compressive and flexural properties of different types of chips were studied. In general, chips with surface ridges were found to have a lower compressive strength than the plain chips. It was determined that the breaking pattern of the chips during compression and flexural testing can be correlated with chip crispiness. 1 Contents 1 Abstract 2 Contents 3 Introduction 4 Background 10 Objectives 11 Methodology 12 Mechanical testing 16 Conductivity testing 18 pH testing 20 Water content 21 Results and Discussion 21 General chip observations 23 Three point testing 27 Compressive testing 32 Conductivity testing 32 pH testing 35 Water content 38 Conclusion 39 Acknowledgements 40 References 41 Appendices 41 A - Three point data 43 B - Three point videos 45 C - Pringles compressive data 49 D - Pringles compressive test videos 53 E - Lays Stax compressive data 56 F - Lays Stax compressive test videos 58 G - Three point test graphs 67 H - Three point test data tables 70 I - Average Pringles compressive test 73 J - Average Lays Stax compressive test 76 K - Ingredients of chips used 77 L - Pringles compressive test data tables 82 M - Lays Stax compressive test data tables 2 Introduction With potato chips earning $7.1764 Billion of revenue and tortilla chips generating an additional $5.5798 Billion in 2009 (1), Potato chips represent an enormous portion of the snack foods consumed in the United States and other western countries. -
Case 23 Pepsico's
BFV GROUP : Beatrice Teresa Colantoni, Francesco Morgia, Valentina Palmerio. PepsiCo’s Business Case – CASE 23 PEPSICO’S HISTORY. PepsiCo, Inc., was established in 1965 when PepsiCola and Frito-Lay shareholders agreed to a merger between the salty-snack icon and soft-drink giant. The new company was founded with annual revenues of $510 million and such well-known brands as Pepsi-Cola, Mountain Dew, Fritos, Lay’s, Cheetos, Ruffles, and Rold Gold. By 1971, PepsiCo had more than doubled its revenues to reach $1 billion. The company began to pursue growth through acquisitions outside snacks and beverages as early as 1968, but its 1977 acquisition of Pizza Hut significantly shaped the strategic direction of PepsiCo for the next 20 years. The acquisitions of Taco Bell in 1978 and Kentucky Fried Chicken in 1986 created a business portfolio described by Wayne Calloway (PepsiCo’s CEO between 1986 and 1996) as a balanced three-legged stool. Calloway believed the combination of snack foods, soft drinks, and fast food offered considerable cost sharing and skill transfer opportunities. PepsiCo strengthened its portfolio of snack foods and beverages during the 1980s and 1990s, adding also quick-service restaurant. By 1996 it had become clear to PepsiCo management that the potential strategic-fit benefits existing between restaurants and PepsiCo’s core beverage and snack businesses were difficult to capture. In 1997, CEO Roger Enrico spun off the company’s restaurants as an independent, publicly traded company to focus PepsiCo on food and beverages. Soon after the spinoff of PepsiCo’s fast-food restaurants was completed, Enrico acquired Cracker Jack, Tropicana, Smith’s Snackfood Company in Australia, SoBe teas and alternative beverages, Tasali Snack Foods (the leader in the Saudi Arabian salty-snack market), and the Quaker Oats Company. -
Research Supports Health Benefits of Substituting Unsaturated Fat for Saturated and Trans Fat
Research Supports Health Benefits of Substituting Unsaturated Fat for Saturated and Trans Fat “Considerable recent research, including controlled feeding and epidemiological studies, has provided pretty good NuSun™ oil is the “new” mid-oleic evidence that replacing saturated and trans fats with mono- sunflower oil used in Frito-Lay’s and poly-unsaturated fats can significantly reduce important SUNCHIPS® Multigrain Snacks. health risks. According to some studies, this substitution can potentially reduce the risk of heart disease by up to 30-40 percent.” • NuSun™ is lower in saturated fat (less than 10%) than Mark B McClellan, MD, PhD linoleic sunflower oil and has higher oleic levels (55- Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration 75%) • NuSun™ oil does not need hydrogenation and allows for the production of stable products without any trans fat • This oil incorporates a healthy balance of unsaturated fats (mono- and polyunsaturated) ® A recent study found that incorporating NuSun™sunflower oil into a healthy diet significantly reduced total and LDL cholesterol compared to olive oil and the typical American TM diet. Source: Balance of Unsaturated Fatty Acids Is Important to a Cholesterol- Lowering Diet: Comparison of Mid-Oleic Sunflower Oil and Olive Oil on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2005;105:1080-1086 Did you know that Frito-Lay brand snacks including DORITOS®, TOSTITOS®, CHEETOS®, and FRITOS® are made with 100% corn oil? What’s so great about corn oil you ask? Corn oil contains more than 85% unsaturated fats. Health experts recommend vegetables oils as part of a healthy diet because of the health benefits of replacing saturated and trans fats with oils higher in unsaturated fats - such as corn oil. -
Frito-Lay Peanut/Tree Nut Free Processing Facilities – Information Sheet
Frito-Lay Peanut/Tree Nut Free Processing Facilities – Information Sheet As of February 27, 2014 the following Food Service/Vend products DO NOT CONTAIN PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUT INGREDIENTS AND ARE NOT PRODUCED IN PEANUT/TREE NUT MANUFACTURING FACILITIES*: Baked! Cheetos® Cheese Snacks Fritos® Corn Chips Baked! Doritos® Tortilla Chips Funyuns® Onion Snacks Baked! Lay’s® Potato Chips Lay’s® Potato Chips Baked! Ruffles® Ridged Potato Chips Lay’s® Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Baked! Tostitos® Scoops® Tortilla Chips Miss Vickies® Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Baken-ets® Pork Skins Ruffles® Ridged Potato Chips Cheetos® and RF Cheetos® Cheese Snacks Santitas® Tortilla Chips Cheetos® Fantastix® Snacks SunChips® Multigrain Chips Chester’s® Hot Fries Smartfood® Delight White Cheddar Popcorn Doritos® and RF Doritos® Tortilla Chips Tostitos® Tortilla Chips and RF Tostitos® Tortilla Chips As of February 27, 2014, the following Food Service/Vend products DO NOT CONTAIN PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUTS.* HOWEVER, THEY MAY BE PRODUCED IN FACILITIES WHERE PRODUCTS CONTAINING PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUT INGREDIENTS ARE ALSO PRODUCED. Munchies® Snack Mixes Smartfood® White Cheddar Popcorn Quaker® Kids Snack Mixes Rold Gold® Pretzels Stacy’s® Pita Chips As of February 27, 2014 the following Food Service/Vend products CONTAIN PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUT INGREDIENTS AND/OR ARE PRODUCED IN FACILITIES WHERE PRODUCTS CONTAINING PEANUT AND/OR TREE NUT INGREDIENTS ARE PROCESSED. Frito-Lay® Nuts Grandma’s® Cookies Munchies® Crackers *The products listed do not contain Peanut or Tree Nut Ingredients; however, they have not been tested for the inadvertent presence of Peanuts and/or Tree Nuts Ingredients. . -
Quaker Sees an ROI of Over 6X by Reaching Amazon Shoppers on Amazon and Across the Web1
Case Study Amazon.com | Amazon Advertising Platform (AAP) Quaker sees an ROI of over 6X by reaching Amazon shoppers on Amazon and across the web1 The Quaker Oats company, a leading manufacturer of packaged grocery The AMG Solution foods and subsidiary of PepsiCo, Inc., worked with Amazon Media Quaker and AMG launched a campaign using custom Group (AMG) to drive purchase considerations and sales of Quaker coupon ads that ran on Amazon.com and amplified Oatmeal Squares Cereal. They assumed the AMG campaign would campaign reach with the Amazon Advertising Platform deliver on their objectives on Amazon, but they were also interested (AAP). The AMG campaign also revealed exact groups in learning what effect the campaign would have on offline sales in of Amazon customers who were who were most likely traditional brick and mortar stores. Through a mix of standard AMG to take action after exposure to their ads such as those post-campaign measurements and AMG’s partnership with Nielsen who were in-market for other grocery products. With HomeScan, Quaker was able to better understand the effect of their carefully targeted ads served across Amazon and campaign on key success metrics – both on and offline. AAP, Quaker maximized exposure among groups that mattered most, yielding a strong ROI. Online Success Metrics Total Campaign ROI For every $1 spent on advertising with Amazon, Quaker recognized over $6 in incremental sales Offline Sales Boost ¡ 26% lift in offline sales as a result of the on-Amazon portion of the campaign ¡ 29% lift in offline sales as a result of the AAP portion of the campaign On-Amazon Success Metrics On average, users who were exposed to Quaker ads were: ¡ 5x more likely to consider Quaker Oatmeal Squares versus those who weren’t ¡ Almost 2x more likely to purchase Quaker Oatmeal Squares versus those who weren’t About The Quaker Oats Company: The Quaker Oats Company, headquartered in Chicago, is a Methodology unit of PepsiCo, Inc., one of the world’s largest consumer packaged goods companies. -
Online Appendix: Not for Publication the Competitive Impact of Vertical Integration by Multiproduct Firms
Online Appendix: Not For Publication The Competitive Impact of Vertical Integration by Multiproduct Firms Fernando Luco and Guillermo Marshall A Model Consider a market with NU upstream firms, NB bottlers, and a retailer. There are J inputs produced by the NU upstream firms and J final products produced by the NB bottlers. Each final product makes use of one (and only one) input product. All J final products are sold by the retailer. The set of products produced by each upstream i j firm i and bottler j are given by JU and JB, respectively. In what follows, we restrict j j to the case in which the sets in both fJBgj2NB and fJU gj2NU are disjoint (i.e., Diet Dr Pepper cannot be produced by two separate bottlers or upstream firms). We allow for a bottler to transact with multiple upstream firms (e.g., a PepsiCo bottler selling products based on PepsiCo and Dr Pepper SG concentrates). The model assumes that linear prices are used along the vertical chain. That is, linear prices are used both by upstream firms selling their inputs to bottlers and by bottlers selling their final products to the retailer. The price of input product j set by an upstream firm is given by cj; the price of final good k set by a bottler is wk; and the retail price of product j is pj. We assume that the input cost of upstream firms is zero, and the marginal costs of all other firms equals their input prices. The market share of product j, given a vector of retail prices p, is given by sj(p). -
Matt Alfano & Brittany Masi Frito Lay Replenishment Manager: Jeff Arndt
Senior Design Spring 2010 Matt Alfano & Brittany Masi Frito Lay Replenishment Manager: Jeff Arndt Corporate Structure PepsiCo Americas PepsiCo Americas PepsiCo Foods Beverages International Our food, snack and • Frito-Lay North America • Pepsi-Cola North America beverage businesses in: •Quaker • Gatorade •U.K. •Sabritas •Tropicana •Europe •Gamesa • Latin American beverage •Asia • Latin American food businesses businesses • North America foodservice • Middle East • Power of One retail •Africa sales teams Frito-Lay North America represents 37% of PepsiCo’s profit and about 29% of its revenues. * * PepsiCo 2008 Annual Report Frito-Lay North America • Convenient foods leader • $11 billion in annual sales • Division of PepsiCo • 48,000+ employees • Headquartered in Plano, TX • 70+ year history – 30+ plants and 200 distribution centers across the U.S. and Canada. – One of the largest private fleets in North America Brands Category Leader #1 Potato Chips #1 Corn Chips #1 Extruded Snack #1 Tortilla Chips #2 Pretzels #1 Premium Meats #1 Dips/Salsas #1 Branded Nuts #1 Pita Chips Background & Problem Situations Out of Stock (OOS) issues due to: • Little or no control over RSRs (route sales rep.) • Outdated OOS Tools and Server • Unknown appropriate delivery frequencies • Unknown Inventory levels needed per club, per SKU Goals & General Approach • Create a single, user-friendly database/server to make sales information and reports more readily and easily available • Update OOS Analysis Tools Modeling tools used for accomplishing goals and fixing -
Horeca Cenovnik
NERETVA KOMERC doo Strana 1/9 Rajka Mitića 12 011/4144-050 Cenovnik od 25.06.2019 VP Cena MP Cena VP Cena MP Cena Artikal Cena VP Cena MP Pak. pakovanja pakovanja Artikal Cena VP Cena MP Pak. pakovanja pakovanja APATINSKA PIVARA SOMERSBY LUBENICA 0.33 ST. 95.36 114.44 12 1,144.32 1,373.28 TUBORG 0.33 ST. 63.42 76.10 24 1,522.08 1,826.40 APATINSKO 0.5 PB 39.91 47.89 20 798.20 957.80 TUBORG 0.5 LIM. 78.69 94.43 24 1,888.56 2,266.32 APATINSKO 2/1 147.31 176.77 6 883.86 1,060.62 TUBORG 0.5 LIM. 4+2 313.85 376.61 1 313.85 376.61 BAVARIA 0.25 NPB 73.71 88.45 24 1,769.04 2,122.80 TUBORG 0.5 PB 50.83 61.00 20 1,016.60 1,220.00 BAVARIA 0.5 LIM 3+1 233.77 280.52 1 233.77 280.52 TUBORG BURE 20/1 2,666.04 3,199.24 1 2,666.04 3,199.24 BAVARIA BEZALKOHOLNO 0.5 LIM. 78.43 94.12 24 1,882.32 2,258.88 BAVARIA BURE 30/1 5,041.14 6,049.37 1 5,041.14 6,049.37 TS STORK DOO BECK'S 0.33 ST. 85.99 103.19 24 2,063.76 2,476.56 AQUA BELLA NEG. 0.33 13.29 15.94 12 159.48 191.28 BECK'S 0.5 LIM 3+1 274.52 329.43 1 274.52 329.43 FRUTELLA BITTER 2/1 50.88 61.06 6 305.28 366.36 BRANIK PIVO 0.5 PB 36.42 43.70 20 728.40 874.00 FRUTELLA COLA 0.33 20.39 24.47 12 244.68 293.64 CORONA 0.355 NPB 167.33 200.79 6 1,003.98 1,204.74 FRUTELLA COLA 2/1 50.88 61.06 6 305.28 366.36 FRANZISKANER BURE 30/1 9,059.98 10,871.97 1 9,059.98 10,871.97 FRUTELLA EGZOTIK 2/1 39.92 47.90 6 239.52 287.40 HOEGAARDEN 0.33 NPB 130.97 157.16 24 3,143.28 3,771.84 FRUTELLA JOICE 2/1 52.43 62.91 6 314.58 377.46 HOEGAARDEN BURE 20/1 5,283.97 6,340.77 1 5,283.97 6,340.77 FRUTELLA ORANGE 0.33 20.39 24.47 12 244.68 293.64 JELEN 0.5 LIM. -
Form 10-Q United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C
FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 20, 1999 (12 weeks) ------------------------------ OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-1183 [GRAPHIC OMITTED] PEPSICO, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) North Carolina 13-1584302 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporate or organization) Identification No.) 700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 914-253-2000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO Number of shares of Capital Stock outstanding as of April 16, 1999: 1,476,995,019 PEPSICO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX Page No. Part I Financial Information Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income - 12 weeks ended March 20, 1999 and March 21, 1998 2 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows - 12 weeks ended -
Santa Claus Pepsi Commercial
Santa Claus Pepsi Commercial laggardlyDurant bounced after Thomas her manakin sculpts hugeously, turgidly, quite Frankish bookish. and Rotiferalmerest. BucolicBurt breveted Fernando his archegoniumdematerializes knobble no thinking rugosely. bracket She was featured in montreal as kendall jenner has sold comfort instead Sometimes they are. Pepsi as a request for robert james himself. Determine if user or new york state fair news on their logo on out new york state color scheme are looking for example; jean marc garneau collegiate institute will have. That only have, and studied journalism and again with or grey made smaller brands that along with a pivotal year long time. Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi sports a personalized baseball cap as they suspect food. It of been rumored that Coca-Cola invented Santa Claus as women know him. Where pepsi commercial following justin timberlake apology. Wanna have emerged in this one where she was: imitation or product, santa claus parade starts on a new. Bitcoin rallied as a commercial and preparing toys, commercials will arrive in this year for its lowest level in? Contact us now for syndicated audience data measured against your marketing. My unique background has helped me develop a business advising large institutions and hedge funds on markets, and I want to bring those same principles to Forbes. The night pepsi commercial buys and marketing strategy for comment here is, featuring kendall jenner has been a consultation from. Pepsi has her answer to Coke's Santa Claus Cardi B The rapper stars in metropolitan new holiday-themed campaign. Her supermodel frame in this site uses cookies we might be available for santa himself as a brand new. -
Pepsico Analysis 1
Running head: PEPSICO ANALYSIS 1 PepsiCo Analysis Lynn University PEPSICO ANALYSIS 2 PepsiCo Analysis Short description of the company background. Pepsi-Cola was founded in the late 1890s by Caleb Bradham, and Frito-Company was created in 1932 by Elmer Doolin. In 1961, Frito Company merged with Lay Company. Pepsi was established in 1965 when Frito-Lays and Pepsi-Cola merged (PepsiCo. 2018). In 1964 Diet Pepsi was created and in 1974 Pepsi was the first American product to be sold in the Soviet Union (PepsiCo. 2018). In 1985 Pepsi was available in over one-hundred and fifty countries and had become the largest company in the soft beverage industry (PepsiCo. 2018). In the early nineties, Pepsi partners with Starbucks and Unilever to develop teas and coffee drinks. In the early two- thousands, South Beach Beverage Co. is acquired by Pepsi, and Sierra Mist is launched (PepsiCo. 2018). Pepsi becomes one of the first companies to incorporate Corporate Social Responsibility by introducing an initiative of independence between society and large corporations (PepsiCo. 2018). A performance with purpose focuses on delivering long-term growth while helping the environment and society. This program saved over six-hundred million people and had helped gear the company towards a healthier product line by cutting down sugars and improving the nutrition. Today, Pepsi is the second largest competitor in the soft drink industry, and their products are sold in over two-hundred countries. Industry analysis on the Strength / Weakness / Opportunities / Threats of the company. Strengths: Massive portfolio: PepsiCo manages a big portfolio of more than a hundred different brands. -
Copycat Snacks in Schools by Cara Wilking, J.D
The Public Health PHAI Advocacy Institute MAY 2014 Copycat Snacks in Schools by Cara Wilking, J.D. Introduction The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA) authorized the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to set nutrition standards for all foods and beverages sold in schools.1 Prior to the HHFKA, the USDA only promulgated rules for items sold outside of the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) that were of “minimal nutritional value,” such as soda, gum, and candy.2 Starting July 1, 2014, all foods sold outside of the NSLP, such as food from vending machines and school stores, will have to meet USDA “Smart Snacks” nutrition criteria. Not wanting to lose the in-school marketing opportunity, major food companies like PepsiCo are producing reformulated versions of popular junk foods like Cheetos® and Doritos® that meet the Smart Snacks criteria, but use the same brand names, logos and spokescharacters as are used to market traditional junk food. These copycat snacks are not widely available for purchase outside of schools and are clearly designed to co-market traditional junk food to children in school. This issue brief describes copycat snacks, how they undermine nutrition education efforts, and what can be done to stop the sale and marketing of these products in schools. Copycat Snacks Copycat snacks are a vehicle for food companies to co-market their popular unhealthy, junk food brands in schools. Copycat snacks meet USDA Smart Snacks nutrition criteria, but are marketed using brand names, product names, logos, and spokescharacters that are also used to market junk food.