TransformingTransforming DERPDERP Panel:Panel: ArmyArmy PerspectivePerspective

Mr. Rick Newsome Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety and Occupational Health)

March 22, 2006

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 1 of 7 14 Feb 06 TopicsTopics

• Military Munitions Response Program • Performance-Based Contracting • Formerly Used Defense Sites Program • BRAC 2005 & Army Transformation

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 2 of 7 14 Feb 06 MilitaryMilitary MunitionsMunitions ResponseResponse ProgramProgram

• Inventory completed as required by Congress • DoD Goals: – Complete Preliminary Assessments by EOY 2007; Sites Inspections by EOY 2010 • Munitions Response Prioritization Protocol: – Used to assign relative priority; sequencing for responses – Involves stakeholders in process • Cross-over of Army IRP to MMRP in POM

IRP Dollars MMRP

FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 3 of 7 14 Feb 06 MMRPMMRP SiteSite InspectionsInspections

• DoD goal: complete SIs by FY2010 – Active Sites SI Schedule (154 total) funded by FY08 – FUDS Program SI Schedule (765 total) with funding thru FY10 at $25M/year

• Need for State involvement in review of SIs and application of Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 4 of 7 14 Feb 06 WhatWhat isis PBC?PBC?

• Performance-Based Contracting (PBC) - mechanism that solicits bids on basis of what RESULTS that you want achieved rather than what ACTIVITIES you want conducted: – Contract for “What,” not “How” • Characteristics of PBC: – Clearly defined performance expectations and measures (baseline vs. expected results) – Clearly defined due dates & milestones – Use of incentives for performance – Flexibility in exchange for accountability for results • Army retains Environmental Liability • Regulators concur with remedy selection and response complete

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 5 of 7 14 Feb 06 ArmyArmy PBCPBC ResultsResults

PBC Accomplishments (F01 – FY05) • 36 installation at 541 sites

# of CTC IGE Contract Sites ($M) ($M) Award Cumulative 541 $723 $608 $478 Cost Avoidance (from CTC) 34% Cost Avoidance (from IGE) 21%

IGE = Independent Government Estimate

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 6 of 7 14 Feb 06 FormerlyFormerly UsedUsed DefenseDefense SitesSites ProgramProgram

• Focus on near-term DoD goals: – Complete SIs by FY2010; Achieve Response Complete or Remedy-in-Place at all hazard Waste sites by 2020 – $18.7B cost-to-complete; largest amongst Services • MMRP CTC - $12.9B • HTRW CTC - $ 3.2B – Projects inventory requiring action: • IRP site count = 1,123 • MMRP site count = 1,177 • FUDS funding: – FY06 appropriation = $254 million – FY07 budget request = $243 million

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 7 of 7 14 Feb 06 FUDSFUDS ProgramProgram FUDS

• Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan – Applies to Active sites, BRAC, FUDS , and Compliance Cleanup – Provides goals, objectives, and metrics • Program Management Plans: – Focus on RIP/RC goal & phase progress – Emphasis on Statewide MAPs o By end of FY05 36 SMAPs complete/underway o 7 planned (DC, MD, MT, NH, RI, TN, and VI) in FY06 – Take away … FUDS Program making demonstrative progress, but dependent on funding

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 8 of 7 14 Feb 06 ArmyArmy ForceForce TransformationTransformation

IGPBS = Integrated Global Presence & Basing Strategy

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 9 of 7 14 Feb 06 ArmyArmy BRACBRAC 20052005 SnapshotSnapshot

76 Installations Touched by BRAC 800+ Individual Actions in BRAC Recommendations

• 13 Full Closures • 53 Installation Realignments • 5 HQ Installations • 50 Active Installations • 3 Chemical Depots • 3 Reserve Garrisons • 4 Ammunition Plants • 8 Leased Facilities Closed • 1 Reserve Garrison

• 211 Guard Closures • 125 New Armed Forces • 175 Reserve Closures Reserves Centers

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 10 of 7 14 Feb 06 BRACBRAC 20052005 ProcessProcess

Congress Realigned or approved BRAC Closed November 2005 within 6 Yrs

Closure Activities

Integrates IGPBS NEPA Army Modular Force MILCON Installation Military Value Realignment Doctrinal Efficiencies Closure Joint Initiatives

Disposed / Transferred ASAP

Environmental Remediation

Community Engagement and Reuse Planning

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 11 of 7 14 Feb 06 JointJoint andand MultiMulti--ComponentComponent

Human Integrated Global Presence Resources Ordnance Aberdeen and Basing Study Command School Proving Ground Hoffman Bldgs Accession Command Ft Eustis Ft Knox TRADOC Cadet Command BRIGADE COMBAT Transportation Reserve TEAM Ft Lee School Center Munitions & Ft Monroe Armor Missiles Center Culinary School AF Arts Ft Jackson Navy Chaplains AF Redstone Schools Drill Sgt Navy

Ft L’Wood Drill Sgt Ft Benning

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 12 of 7 14 Feb 06 WhatWhat DoesDoes BRACBRAC 20052005 MeanMean toto States?States?

• BRAC is different Funding source: – Identify affected installations in your state and adjust Attachment A and JEP to ensure smooth transition of funds and activities • Army Program Management shifting for closing installations: – For Cleanup from USAEC to office on Army Staff (BRAC Division) – For Compliance from Lead organizations to BRACD • Army approach - cleanup to like reuse: – Local Redevelopment Authority may proposed reuse which may require more stringent clean up ¾Environmental Services Cooperative Agreements (ESCA)

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 13 of 7 14 Feb 06 ImplementingImplementing SustainabilitySustainability

““TheThe ArmyArmy StrategyStrategy forfor thethe Environment”Environment” • Sets course to sustain Army (mission and success) in future • Requires Army to systematically think and act to integrate mission, ENV, & community

https://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/IE/default.html or Look at for Army Sustainability display

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 14 of 7 14 Feb 06 ArmyArmy SustainabilitySustainability InitiativesInitiatives

• Developed Sustainable Range or Installation Environmental Activity Responsibilities Matrix • Chartered HQDA Sustainability Committee • Developed Installation Sustainability Plans with 25 year goals at 12 Installations • Developed Army Strategic Planning Model Inculcating Sustainability into Strategic Plans at IMA installations • Developing Army Sustainability Campaign Plan: – Sustainability Website: (https://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/IE/default.html) – Sustainability Poster – Training Video

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 15 of 7 14 Feb 06 TheThe CleanupCleanup EquationEquation

Triple Bottom Line

"Sustain the Mission - Secure the Future"

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 16 of 7 14 Feb 06 Summary

• Army’s cleanup effort is driven by Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan • Focus on achieving: – Site Response Complete – Completing SIs • For FUDS program, emphasis on Statewide MAPs • BRAC 2005 will challenge all to meet Congressional execution deadlines

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 17 of 7 14 Feb 06 BackupBackup

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 18 of 7 14 Feb 06 PBCPBC ProposedProposed FY06FY06 Candidates

• Aberdeen Proving Ground • Fort McClellan, AL (Canal Creek) MD • Fort Riley, KS • Fort Richardson / Haines • , NV Terminal, AK • Kansas AAP, KS • Badger AAP, WI • Letterkenny AD, PA • Dugway Proving Ground, UT • Picatinny Arsenal (ARDEC), NJ • Fort Bragg, NC • Radford, VA • Fort Campbell, KY • Volunteer AAP, TN • Fort Story, Fort Lee and Fort Eustis, VA • White Sands Missile Range, NM • Fort Leonard Wood, MO • Remedial Action Operation/ Long Term Monitoring (RA(O)/LTM)

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 19 of 7 14 Feb 06 ScopeScope ofof FUDSFUDS ProgramProgram byby StateState

Total Number of Properties Requiring Response Action: 2,965 Data: FY05 Defense ENV Program Annual Report to Congress

ND WA NH 11 MT 4 69 19 MN VT 6 ME 20 SD WI 64 OR ID 33 25 29 WY NY 20 MI MA 112 22 IA 66 91 NE 13 PA RI 42 55 IL OH IN 68 CT 22 NV 32 UT CO 65 NJ 47 41 17 WV 19 30 KS MO DE 11 73 28 10 VA MD 43 KY 5 43 CA DC 27 OK TN 24 482 AR NC 39 AZ NM 55 103 143 14 SC MS AL GA 31 TX 35 28 46 LA 218 •Northern Mariana Islands 19 24 AK •Palau (PT) 0 130 FL •Puerto Rico (PR) 25 170 •U.S. Virgin Islands (VI) 6 •American Samoa (AS) 8 HI •Guam (GM) 16 68

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 20 of 7 14 Feb 06 BRAC 2005 (Major Closures)

• Ft Gillem, GA Reserves • Ft McPherson, GA • Charles E. Kelly Spt Ctr, PA • Ft Monmouth, NJ • Vancouver Barracks, WA • Ft Monroe, VA • Walter Reed Army Medical Center, DC • Lease – Army Judge Advocate • Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, KS General Agency, VA • Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant, TX • Lease – Crystal City Complex, VA • Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant, MS • Lease – Headquarters Army Test and Evaluation Command, VA • Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant, CA • Lease – Hoffman Building, VA • Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR • Lease – Rosslyn Complex, VA • Deseret Chemical Plant, UT • Lease – Army Personnel Center, • , IN MO • US Army Garrison – Selfridge, MI

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 21 of 7 14 Feb 06 BRAC 2005 (Major Re-alignments)

• Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD • Fort Lee, VA • Adelphi Laboratory, MD • Fort Leonard Wood, MO • , AL • Fort Lewis, WA • Bailey’s Crossroads Lease Site, VA • Fort McCoy, WI • Corpus Christi Army Depot, TX • Fort Richardson, AK • Detroit Arsenal, MI • Fort Rucker, AL • Fort Belvoir, VA • Fort Sam Houston, TX • Fort Benning, GA • Fort Sill, OK • Fort Bliss, TX • Fort Wainwright, AK • Fort Bragg, NC • Lima Tank Plant, OH • Fort Buchanan, PR • Redstone Arsenal, AL • Fort Campbell, KY • Rock Island Arsenal, IL • Fort Dix, NJ • Sierra Army Depot, CA • Fort Eustis, VA • Soldier Systems Center, Natick, MA • Fort Hood, TX • Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA • Fort Huachuca, AZ • Watervliet Arsenal, NY • Fort Jackson, SC • Fort Knox, KY

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 22 of 7 14 Feb 06 RABS for BRAC 2005

2 Ft Gillem - NO Reserves 2 Ft McPherson – NO 2 Charles E. Kelly Spt Ctr - NO 9 Ft Monmouth - YES 2 Vancouver Barracks – NO 2 Ft Monroe - NO 2 Walter Reed Med Ctr - NO Property Transfer Realignments 2 Kansas AAAP – NO 9 Red River Army Depot – YES 2 Lone Star AAP – NO 2 Watervliet Arsenal - NO 2 Mississippi AAP – NO 2 Riverbank AAP – NO 9Umatilla Chemical Depot - YES 9 - YES 9 Newport Chemical Depot - YES 9 Army Garrison Selfridge – NO

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 23 of 7 14 Feb 06 InstallationInstallation RestorationRestoration ProgramProgram

• Focus on DoD goals of Remedy-in-Place/ Response Complete targets • Efficiency initiatives: – Performance Based contracting focusing on cost and time savings • Environmental liabilities: – Chief Financial Officer Act of 1990 requires federal agencies to report liabilities – Supporting documentation and supervisory controls are key – Real property reconciliation

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 24 of 7 14 Feb 06