DOCSLIB.ORG

SD005 Richmondshire Local Plan Submission Core Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SD005 Richmondshire Local Plan Submission Core Strategy Richmondshire Local Plan Submission Core Strategy Consultation Statement April 2012 Contents 1.0 Introduction: Consultation under Regulation 18 2.0 Stages of Consultation 2.2 Plan Our Future 1 2.3 Issues and Options (Nov 2009) 2.4 Preferred Strategy (Jun/Jul 2010) 2.5 Local Strategy Statement (Feb/Mar 2011) 2.6 Sub Area Strategies and Core Policy CP14 (Sept/Oct 2011) 3.0 Sustainability Appraisal Consultation 3.1 Who was consulted 3.2 How they were consulted 3.3 What they said and the Council’s response 4.0 Appendices Appendix 1: Plan Our Future 2 Issues & Options Consultation Report Appendix 2: Plan Our Future 3 Preferred Core Strategy Consultation Statement Appendix 3: Local Strategy Statement Consultation Statement Appendix 4: Area Strategies and CP14 Consultation Statement Appendix 5: Sustainability Appraisal Comments 2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This statement describes how Richmondshire District Council has undertaken community participation and involvement in connection with the production of the Core Strategy. As such, the statement is prepared in accordance with Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 which requires that the Local Authority, in the preparation of a local plan, must notify each of the specified bodies/persons of the plan being prepared and invite them to make representations about the plan and its content. 1.2 Changes to the plan making system were introduced in March 2012 with the publication of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The previous system of Local Development Frameworks (LDF) has now been replaced by a Local Plan and the Submission Core Strategy reflects this change. However, reference to the LDF still appears throughout the Consultation Statements as that was the document title at that time. 2.0 Stages of Consultation 2.1 There have been 5 stages of public consultation in the plan preparation process. x Plan Our Future 1 (March-May 2009) x Plan Our Future 2 (November 2009) x Plan Our Future 3 Preferred Core Strategy (June-July 2010) x Local Strategy Statement (February–March 2011) x Area Strategies and Core Policy CP14 (September to October 2011) The full reports to the last four consultations can be found as Appendices to this document. Plan Our Future 1 2.2 The original ‘Plan Our Future’ consultation took place in March/May 2009 and involved a variety of different consultation methods including: a questionnaire, website responses, town centre events and a telephone survey in order to provide information on how people felt about specific issues in five identified sub-areas (A66, Centre, The Garrison, Lower Wensleydale and Upper Dales). Provocative posters were also produced to advertise the ‘Plan Our Future’ process. This work formed a scoping exercise to gain an understanding of the issues within Richmondshire. Work on Plan Our Future 1 was subsequently abandoned in favour of ‘Issues & Options’ in line with the emerging LDF process, which was the form of plan preparation at that time. Plan Our Future 2 Issues and Options 2.3 The Issues and Options consultation took place during November 2009 and papers consisted of ten separate topic papers covering settlement hierarchy; three area strategies; scale and distribution of development; economy; environmental assets; housing; infrastructure and climate change. The papers were circulated to over 300 interested individuals and organisations as well as being publicised in the Council’s Curlew newspaper, which was distributed to 24,000 homes and businesses and supported by 3 public 3 meetings. Further detail of this consultation can be found in Appendix 1 of this document. Plan Our Future 3 Preferred Strategy 2.4 The Preferred Strategy document was a single, comprehensive document which set out the strategic options for the plan area. Public consultation was undertaken June/July 2010 and 422 individuals were invited to participate in the consultation and 4 public meetings were held. Further detail of this consultation can be found in Appendix 2 of this document. Local Strategy Statement 2.5 The Local Strategy Statement took forward the discussion of strategic issues for the plan area and the overall context for the preparation of the plan. This additional stage of plan preparation took place during February/March 2011 and was considered necessary because of the expected revocation of Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS) through the Localism Act. Further detail of this consultation can be found in Appendix 3 of this document. Sub Area Strategies and Core Policy CP14 2.6 Consultation took place on the Area Strategies and a new Core Policy CP14 concerning ‘Control and release of sites for development’ in September/October 2011. This document was produced in anticipation of changes to the plan making system and additional features such as Neighbourhood Planning and the draft NPPF. It was recognised that the Council needed to adapt its approach to ensure that there were no delays in being able to assess the suitability of individual site proposals and to steer the direction of growth around the main towns. 3.0 Sustainability Appraisal Consultation Who was consulted? 3.1 Copies of the Preferred Core Strategy Sustainability Assessment (July 2010) were sent to the four SA/SEA statutory consultees and to the Planning Inspectorate and Town and Parish Councils. Other consultees were notified by letter of the documents availability. How they were consulted? 3.2 The Preferred Core Strategy Sustainability Assessment (SA) was produced for consultation alongside the Preferred Core Strategy. Consultation was carried out over the same six week period from 14th June to 31st July 2010. The SA was also made available on the Council’s website. What they said and the Council’s response 3.3 There were three comments relating to the SA. These comments and the Council’s response to them can be found at Appendix 5. The main comment from Natural England queried compliance with SEA. 4 APPENDIX 1 Richmondshire District Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy Issues and Options Plan Our Future 2 Consultation Responses June 2010 APPENDIX 1 Report of Consultations on Core Strategy and Strategic Policies : Issues And Options Report of Consultations on Core Strategy and......................... 1 Strategic Policies : Issues And Options .................................... 2 1. Introduction............................................................................ 4 2. How Did We Consult?............................................................ 5 3. Consultees ............................................................................. 6 4. What Did They Say? .............................................................. 7 4.1 Achieving Sustainable Communities – Settlement Hierarchy.....7 SC1: Localities in the Local Development Framework area .........................................7 SC2 - the Joint Principal Town of Richmond/Catterick Garrison...................................8 SC3: Leyburn the Local Service Centre........................................................................9 SC4: Service Settlements...........................................................................................10 SC5 – Shaping the future of Small Settlements..........................................................11 SC6 – Exceptional Development in Small Settlements...............................................12 SC7: Settlement Hierarchy Levels..............................................................................13 SC8: distributing development sustainably .................................................................14 4.2 Achieving Sustainable Communities in the Central Area..........16 C1 Key Features of the Central Area..........................................................................16 C2 Area Wide Issues..................................................................................................17 C3 Shaping Richmond’s future ...................................................................................17 C4 The Future of the Catterick Garrison Area ............................................................19 C5 The Enhanced Joint Principal Town of Richmond and Catterick Garrison ............20 C6 Service Settlements ..............................................................................................21 C7 Smaller Settlements..............................................................................................23 C8 Relationships within the rest of the District............................................................24 4.3. Achieving Sustainable Communities In The Lower Wensleydale Area 25 LW Key features of the Lower Wensleydale Area. .....................................................25 LW2 Area wide issues ................................................................................................25 LW3 Leyburn the Local Service Centre ......................................................................26 LW4 Service Settlement .............................................................................................27 LW5 Small Settlements ..............................................................................................28 LW6 Strategic Options................................................................................................29 4.4 Achieving Sustainable Communities in North Richmondshire.30 NR1 The North Richmondshire Area ..........................................................................30 NR2 Area wide issues
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Richmondshire Local Plan Core Strategy
    Richmondshire Local Plan Core Strategy Post Hearing Proposed Modifications Table April 2014 Pre - Pos t- M Modification Comment Hearing Hearing Mod Ref Mod Ref Chapter Chapter Paragraph Paragraph CP/SP/Title CP/SP/Title Mod Number Mod Number M / 1 / 0 / 01 1.4 Before Factual Change to reflect M001 - The Local Plan Core Strategy provides the local perspective on Regional Spatial Strategy future development consistent with the current statutory revocation in February 2013 and development plan system. The Council has responded to the results of Development Target expected abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS) by Review (August publishing its Local Strategy Statement (2011) setting a locally 2013) distinct strategic context for future development. This context reflects several stages of preparation and consultation from early 2009 to late 2011. Details of this process, its regulatory compliance and, most importantly, how the Local Plan Core Strategy has been shaped by consultation responses are given in the Local Plan Core Strategy Consultation Statement. After The Local Plan Core Strategy provides the local perspective on future development consistent with the current statutory development plan system. The Council responded to the expected abolition of Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS) by publishing its Local Strategy Statement (2011) setting a locally distinct strategic context for future development. This context reflects several stages of preparation and consultation from early 2009 to late 2011. Details of this process, its regulatory compliance and, most importantly, how the Local Plan Core Strategy has been shaped by consultation responses are given in the Local Plan Core Strategy Consultation Statement. The Yorkshire and Humber RSS was finally revoked in February 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Market For
    Intrix Corporation LLC INP – INSTITUTO NACIONAL DO PLÁSTICO Market Research Invitation # 001/2005 – United Kingdom REF: 1 Stretch Films PART I – General Aspects Intrix Corporation LLC – Brasil Intrix Corporation LLC - USA André Marzall Jerrold Owen Phone: 55-11-3877-1348 Phone 1-203- 698-4400 [email protected] [email protected] 3 West End Avenue • Old Greenwich, CT • 06870 • USA Telephone (203) 698-4400 • Facsimile (203) 698-4300 www.intrixcorporation.com 1 The UK Market for Stretch Films – Part I – General Aspects CONTENTS 6.10 Geographical Aspects.......................................................................................................................... 3 6.11 Borders & Surface Area.................................................................................................................. 5 6.12 Main Cities and Population.............................................................................................................. 6 6.13 Main Seaports and Airports ............................................................................................................ 6 6.14 Navigation Companies ................................................................................................................... 8 6.16 Other Important Characteristics.................................................................................................... 10 6.20 Economic Aspects.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prospectus 2017/18
    North and South Cowton Community Primary School Prospectus 2017/18 Enjoy School – Be Ready for Life North And South Cowton Community Primary School Prospectus 2011/12 Welcome to our school prospectus. My name is Trevor Watson and I am Executive Headteacher of North and South Cowton Community Primary School. This is my first year in post where I took over from Mr Briggs who had been Head for 6 years. The school is a happy and successful school, which was judged as good by Ofsted in March 2017. We have two buildings in the village of North Cowton, which accommodate our two classes; one infant class, catering for children from Early Years Foundation Stage up to year 2, and one junior class for years 3 to 6. However, the school is not constrained by these physical boundaries and truly extends into the heart of the community. We have a dedicated and talented team of staff, volunteers and governors, who work hard to ensure that all our children develop to their full social, sporting and academic potential. We are an inclusive school, which recognises and values the different talents and abilities of everyone who is part of our community. We strive to ensure that our children are healthy and we have a reputation for sporting success. As a small school, all our children have the chance to participate in a range of team sports; the children learn to support each other and respect each others strengths. This maturity and team work has consistently resulted in winning performances, and contributes significantly to the children’s personal and social development.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmondshire District Council Local Development Framework
    Richmondshire District Council Local Development Framework Settlement Facilities Study June 2011 Settlement Facilities Study Contents Settlement Facilities Study 1 Introduction to the Study 1 Gathering Information 1 Maintaining the Information 1 Contact Details 1 The Central Richmondshire Area Summary 3 Settlement Facilities Analysis – Central Richmondshire 4 The Settlement Facilities Study – Central Richmondshire 5 The Lower Wensleydale Area Summary 13 Settlement Facilities Analysis – Lower Wensleydale 14 The Settlement Facilities Study – Lower Wensleydale 15 The North Richmondshire Area Summary 19 Settlement Facilities Analysis – North Richmondshire 20 The Settlement Facilities Study – North Richmondshire 21 Settlement Facilities Study Introduction to the Study This study is an assessment of the availability of services and facilities in those settlements in the part of Richmondshire District which is outside of the Yorkshire Dales National Park. This is known as the Plan Area. Some settlements however fall part inside the National Park, namely Hudswell, Downholme and East Witton, yet they have been included in this study. The purpose of this study is to help us to understand the role of each settlement in the local area and to guide us in planning for the future of each settlement and the Plan Area as a whole. Gathering Information This study has been updated from its original version which was compiled in June 2009. As part of this update a range of local sources have been used, including contact with and feedback from local Parish Councils and Meetings, information held by the Council, desktop studies, web resources and site visits to the relevant settlements. Maintaining the Information It is the nature of such studies that they date very quickly; therefore we will update this study on a regular basis.
    [Show full text]
  • English Heritage / Heritage at Risk Register 2013
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2013 / YORKSHIRE Contents HERITAGE AT RISK III THE REGISTER VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register VIII Reducing the risks X Publications and guidance XIII Key to the entries XV Entries on the Register by local planning authority XVIII Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 26 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 27 North Lincolnshire (UA) 28 North Yorkshire 31 Craven 31 Hambleton 32 Harrogate 35 North York Moors (NP) 40 Richmondshire 55 Ryedale 58 Scarborough 77 Selby 80 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 85 South Yorkshire 87 Barnsley 87 Doncaster 90 Peak District (NP) 94 Rotherham 94 Sheffield 98 West Yorkshire 101 Bradford 101 Calderdale 106 Kirklees 110 Leeds 115 Wakefield 121 York (UA) 124 II Heritage at Risk is our campaign to save listed buildings and important historic sites, places and landmarks from neglect or decay. At its heart is the Heritage at Risk Register, an online database containing details of each site known to be at risk. It is analysed and updated annually and this leaflet summarises the results. Each of our nine local offices now hosts a dedicated Heritage at Risk team, delivering national expertise locally. The good news is that we are on target to save 25% (1,137) of the sites that were on the Register in 2010 by 2015. From the historic battlefield at Towton to ancient barrows on the Wolds, this success is down to good partnerships with owners, developers, the Heritage Lottery Fund, Natural England, councils and local groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / Yorkshire and the Humber
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2010 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 6 Publications and guidance 9 THE REGISTER 11 Content and assessment criteria 11 Key to the entries 13 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 16 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 41 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 41 North Lincolnshire (UA) 42 North Yorkshire 44 South Yorkshire 106 West Yorkshire 117 York (UA) 130 The Heritage at Risk Register helps us to identify the most threatened buildings, archaeological sites and landscapes in this most distinctive of English regions. For the 60% of listed buildings on this year’s Register that could have a sustainable future through commercial or residential reuse, the economic downturn has brought additional challenges to which we must now respond. This year, we undertook a pioneering 15% sample survey of England’s 14,500 listed places of worship to help us understand the condition of the thousands of designated churches, chapels, synagogues, mosques and temples and other faith buildings that are the spiritual focus for our communities. They face many different kinds of challenges and we need to ensure their future. In response to the expansion of asset types and changed Last year we included conservation areas in the Register economic conditions we have developed a new strategy. for the first time. This year, 46 of these, including Haworth, From now on we will focus our resources on types of Holbeck and Rotherham, are known to be at risk, site that make a particular contribution to the region’s but the survey of nearly 800 areas is proving a challenging character.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Moulton Lane
    S.4634 3 MOULTON LANE NORTH COWTON, NORTH YORKSHIRE DL7 0JR A Well Laid Out, Substantial Semi Detached Bungalow Residence Situated on Good Sized Plot Extending to 0.4 Acres or Thereabouts UPVC Sealed Unit Double Glazed Paddock to Rear / Substantial Hardstanding Oil Central Heating In Need of Updating & Modernisation Substantial Plot Extending to 0.4 Acres Approx Scope for Various Residential Layouts Useful General Purpose Building / Garage Scope to Extend Subject to Necessary PP ’s Offers in the Region of £295,000 143 High Street, Northallerton, DL7 8PE Tel: 01609 771959 Fax: 01609 778500 www.northallertonestateagency.co.uk 3 Moulton Lane, North Cowton, DL7 0JR SITUATION within easy reach of the North Yorkshire Moors and the North Yorkshire Dales and close to local rivers and ponds. Darlington 9 miles Northallerton 11 miles Teesside 17 miles Scorton 4 miles Racing - Catterick, Ripon, Thirsk, York, Sedgefield, Redcar, Richmond 9 miles Moulton 4 miles Beverley, Doncaster and Newcastle. Middleton Tyas 5 miles Yarm 12 miles A.1 6 miles A.19 10 miles Golf – Richmond, Catterick, Darlington, Thirsk, Romanby and Bedale. 3 Moulton Lane, North Cowton is superbly situated on the Walking - the area is well served for attractive cycling and eastern edge of the rural village of North Cowton near the walking in particularly attracti ve countryside and scenery around junction of Moulton L ane, the B1263 to Richmond and the the property. minor road leading to Dalton Gates. It occupies a quiet, semi rural position which is nonetheless ideally placed for Leisure Centre - Richmond , Darlington, Northallerton and commuting being within easy reach of Northallerton, Yarm, Scotch Corner.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications Is to Be Considered at the Meeting of the Planning Committee at the Civic Centre, Stone Cross, Northallerton on Thursday 5 January 2012
    AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 PLANNING APPLICATIONS The attached list of planning applications is to be considered at the meeting of the Planning Committee at the Civic Centre, Stone Cross, Northallerton on Thursday 5 January 2012. The meeting will commence at 1.30pm. Further information on possible timings can be obtained from the Committee Officer, Jane Hindhaugh, by telephoning Northallerton (01609) 767016 before 9.00 am on the day of the meeting. The background papers for each application may be inspected during office hours at the Civic Centre by making an appointment with the Head of Regulatory Services. Background papers include the application form with relevant certificates and plans, correspondence from the applicant, statutory bodies, other interested parties and any other relevant documents. Members are asked to note that the criteria for site visits is set out overleaf. Following consideration by the Committee, and without further reference to the Committee, the Head of Regulatory Services has delegated authority to add, delete or amend conditions to be attached to planning permissions and also add, delete or amend reasons for refusal of planning permission. Maurice Cann Head of Regulatory Services SITE VISIT CRITERIA 1. The application under consideration raises specific issues in relation to matters such as scale, design, location, access or setting which can only be fully understood from the site itself. 2. The application raises an important point of planning principle which has wider implications beyond the site itself and as a result would lead to the establishment of an approach which would be applied to other applications. 3. The application involves judgements about the applicability of approved or developing policies of the Council, particularly where those policies could be balanced against other material planning considerations which may have a greater weight.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basset Hound Club Judging List 2019 Index
    THE BASSET HOUND CLUB JUDGING LIST 2019 INDEX CRITERIA Inside Front Cover ROLL OF HONOUR Page 1 SPECIALIST:- A1 Pages 1 - 3 A2 Page 3 A3 Page 3 B Page 3 - 4 C Page 4 ALL ROUNDERS:- A1 Page 5 - 6 A2 Page 6 A3 Page 6 B Page 6 - 7 C Page 7 - 8 THE BASSET HOUND CLUB 2019 JUDGING LIST This list supersedes all previously issued by the Club. THE CLUB’S CRITERIA: Roll of Honour Senior Judges not necessarily currently active. A1 For persons who have previously been approved by the Kennel Club to award CC’s in the breed, who have carried out their first appointment and are supported by the club. A2 & A2 A/R For persons who fulfil the requirements of the A3 list, have been assessed in accordance with the KC requirements, and accepted by the KC for the A2 list, and are supported by the club. A3 Specialist 1) To have a minimum of 7 (seven) years judging experience in the breed and have the support of the Club. 2) To have judged a minimum of 40 Classes with a minimum of 70 dogs present, to include a Breed Club Open Show (and/or 3 breed club supported entry shows). 3) To have attended a seminar given by a Kennel Club Accredited Trainer, and passed the relevant examination on Kennel Club Regulations and Judging Procedures. 4) To have attended a seminar given by a Kennel Club Accredited Trainer on Conformation and Movement. 4a) To have attended a Conformation and Movement ‘Hands On’ Assessment conducted by a Kennel Club Accredited Trainer and passed the assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNED ROAD CLOSURE NOTIFICATION - Area 1 Richmond Surface Dressing 2019
    PLANNED ROAD CLOSURE NOTIFICATION - Area 1 Richmond Surface Dressing 2019 North Yorkshire County Council intends to make this Order to prohibit any vehicle from using the following locations, in the District of Richmondshire due to carriageway surface dressing works: Site 1 – U226, Mire Bank Lane, Burtersett (The entire length of the road from its junction with the C43, Burtersett East Lane, north eastwards to its junction with the A684). Site 2 – C43, Stake Road, Stalling Busk (From its junction with the C135 in Countersett, southwards to the end of the county road in Stalling Busk). Site 3 – C43, Blean Lane, Bainbridge (From its junction with the Countersett to Stalling Busk road, northwards to a point an approximate distance of 100 metres north of its junction with the Carpley Green Road). Site 4 – C135, Breconbar Road, Bainbridge (The entire length of the road from its junction with the C34 in Breconbar, southwards to its junction with the A684 in Bainbridge). Site 5 – C34, Main Street, Carperby (From the 30mph speed limit signs west of Carperby, eastwards to the 30mph speed limit signs east of Carperby). Site 6 – U913, Low Lane, Carperby (From its junction with the Carperby to Aysgarth road, eastwards to the end of the county road at the cattle grid). Site 7 – C118, Tomgill Bank and Thoralby Village Road, Thoralby (The entire length of the road from its junction with the B6160 near Street Head, northwards to its junction with the A684 in Aysgarth). Site 8 – U923, Dikehollin Lane, Aysgarth (The entire length of the road from its junction with the A684 in Aysgarth, south westwards to its junction with the road to Thoralby).
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Facilities Studyaug 2017
    Richmondshire District Council Local Plan Settlement Facilities Study August 2017 Settlement Facilities Study Contents Settlement Facilities Study 1 Introduction to the Study 1 Gathering Information 1 Maintaining the Information 1 Contact Details 1 The Central Richmondshire Area Summary 2 Settlement Facilities Analysis – Central Richmondshire 3 The Settlement Facilities Study – Central Richmondshire 4 The Lower Wensleydale Area Summary 13 Settlement Facilities Analysis – Lower Wensleydale 14 The Settlement Facilities Study – Lower Wensleydale 15 The North Richmondshire Area Summary 21 Settlement Facilities Analysis – North Richmondshire 22 The Settlement Facilities Study – North Richmondshire 23 Settlement Facilities Study Introduction to the Study This study is an assessment of the availability of services and facilities in those settlements in the part of Richmondshire District which is outside of the Yorkshire Dales National Park. This is known as the Plan Area. Some settlements however fall part inside the National Park, namely Hudswell, Downholme and East Witton, yet they have been included in this study. The purpose of this study is to help us to understand the role of each settlement in the local area and to guide us in planning for the future of each settlement and the Plan Area as a whole. Gathering Information This study has been updated from previous version which was compiled in June 2011 to support the preparation of the Local Plan Core Strategy (2012-2028). As part of this update a range of local sources have been used, including contact with and feedback from local Parish Councils and Meetings, information held by the Council, desktop studies, web resources and site visits to the relevant settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 January 2015
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 6165 PUBLICATION DATE: 14 January 2015 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 04 February 2015 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 248 8521 Website: www.gov.uk The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 28/01/2015 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e -mail. To use this service please send an e- mail with your details to: [email protected] APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede each section, where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk Copies of Applications and De cisions can be inspected free of charge at the Office of the Traffic Commissioner
    [Show full text]