The Efficacy of Park Branding in Influencing Choice Behavior of Tourists to Kenyan Parks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Efficacy of Park Branding in Influencing Choice Behavior of Tourists to Kenyan Parks i THE EFFICACY OF PARK BRANDING IN INFLUENCING CHOICE BEHAVIOR OF TOURISTS TO KENYAN PARKS MR. SHEM WAMBUGU MAINGI H87/11076/2008 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN TOURISM MANAGEMENT THE SCHOOL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM OF KENYATTA UNIVERSITY AUGUST 2014 ii DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a Degree in any other University. Signature: _________________________ Date: _________________________ Shem Wambugu Maingi H87/11076/2008 I/We confirm that the work in this thesis was done by the candidate under my/our supervision Signature: _________________________ Date: _________________________ Dr. Alice Ondigi Senior Lecturer, School of Hospitality and Tourism, Kenyatta University. Signature: _________________________ Date: _________________________ Dr. Joe Kibuye Wadawi Senior Lecturer, Institute of Tourism and Hospitality Management Strathmore University. Signature: _________________________ Date: _________________________ Dr. Delno Tromp Lecturer, Department of Tourism Management, Kenyatta University. iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to My treasured Son, Lewis Maingi Wambugu for the inspiration and an illuminating source of happiness in this journey, My dear wife Susan Wanjiku Wambugu for being by my side throughout the moments in this journey, My beloved parents Joseph Kuira Maingi and Elizabeth Wahito Maingi for educating me in my early years and instilling a source of discipline and courage that has carried me throughout the years, as well as My twin-brother, Donald Kuira Maingi for being a mentor and close-friend, that was valuable addition to me as I pursued this PhD. In all, you have been with me through this journey. God Bless You. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT In the course of the preparation and completion of this study, many people assisted, encouraged and cooperated with me for which I am entirely appreciative. I wish to recognize with earnest efforts and works of my supervisors, Dr. Alice Ondigi, Dr. Joseph Wadawi and Dr. Delno Tromp. The completion of this thesis would not have been possible without their invaluable support, guidance and mentorship. I am deeply indebted by their constructive criticisms and focus in the course of this study. I thank the Kenya Wildlife Service, particularly the former Director, Dr. Julius King‟etich and Dr. Samuel Kasiki (Deputy Director, Biodiversity Research and Monitoring - KWS) for their support in the course of this study. I am specifically grateful to the Senior Wardens of Hell‟s Gate National Park, Nairobi National Park, Lake Nakuru National Park and the Aberdares National Park for their facilitation and support in the study. I would like to acknowledge the efforts of my field assistants. I wish to also acknowledge my colleagues and friends Mr. Joseph Kurauka, field assistants Mr. William Githiomi and Ms Betty Mwangi. v TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION.......................................................................................................... ii DEDICATION............................................................................................................ iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... ix OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS ........................................................... x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................. xii ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... xiv CHAPTER ONE .......................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background of Study ..................................................................................... 1 1.2. The Tourism sector status in Kenya............................................................... 2 1.3. Problem Statement ......................................................................................... 6 1.4. Broad Purpose of the Study ........................................................................... 9 1.5. Key Objectives ............................................................................................... 9 1.6. Hypotheses ................................................................................................... 10 1.7. Significance and Anticipated Output ........................................................... 10 1.8. Delimitations ................................................................................................ 11 1.9. Limitations ................................................................................................... 11 1.10. Assumptions ................................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER TWO ....................................................................................................... 13 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 13 2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 13 2.2. Theoretical foundations of the study............................................................ 13 2.3. Empirical review .......................................................................................... 18 2.4. Conceptual Framework ................................................................................ 50 2.5. Conclusion ................................................................................................... 53 2.6. Summary of reviewed literature................................................................... 55 CHAPTER THREE ................................................................................................... 58 3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 58 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 58 3.2. Research Design........................................................................................... 58 3.3. Study Area ................................................................................................... 58 3.4. Target Population ......................................................................................... 59 3.5. Sampling Unit .............................................................................................. 59 3.6. Sampling Technique .................................................................................... 60 3.7. Type of Data ................................................................................................ 64 3.8. Pre-testing the Questionnaire ....................................................................... 64 3.8.1. Test of Validity ......................................................................................... 65 3.8.2. Test of Reliability ..................................................................................... 65 3.9. Data Collection Procedures .......................................................................... 67 vi 3.9.1. Research Instrument ................................................................................ 68 3.9.2. Measurement of Constructs and Variables .............................................. 69 3.10. Ethical Considerations ................................................................................. 72 3.11. Data Analysis Framework............................................................................ 73 3.11.1. Structural Equations Modeling ................................................................ 73 3.11.2. Univariate and Bivariate Statistics .......................................................... 74 3.11.3. One-Way ANOVA..................................................................................... 75 3.11.4. Agglomerative Cluster Analysis ............................................................... 75 3.11.5. Multinomial Logistic Regression ............................................................. 77 3.12. Summary of Analytical Framework ............................................................. 79 CHAPTER FOUR ...................................................................................................... 80 4.2.1.1. Age Profile ....................................................................................... 81 4.2.1.2. Gender Profile .................................................................................. 88 4.2.1.3. Country of Origin ............................................................................. 92 4.2.1.4. Annual Personal Income .................................................................. 96 4.2.1.5. Marital Status ................................................................................. 100 4.2.1.6. Occupation ..................................................................................... 102 4.2.1.7. Preferred Mode of Travel Arrangement
Recommended publications
  • MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Cee4life
    MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Risk of Local Extinction of Cheetah in the Mara Ecosystem, Animal Welfare Issue at Nairobi Orphanage and Alleged Illegal Cub Trade in Kenya A Report on the Mara Cheetah Cubs Removal, the Critical Status of Mara Cheetah and the Ethics of Captive Care Facilitated and par-cipated in by: cee4life MARA CHEETAH CUBS REPORT Risk of Local Extinction of Cheetah in the Mara Ecosystem, Animal Welfare Issue at Nairobi Orphanage and Alleged Illegal Cub Trade in Kenya Facilitated and par-cipated in by: cee4life.org Melbourne Victoria, Australia +61409522054 http://www.cee4life.org/ [email protected] 2 Contents Section 1 Introduction!!!!!!!! !!1.1 Location!!!!!!!!5 !!1.2 Methods!!!!!!!!5! Section 2 Cheetahs Status in Kenya!! ! ! ! ! !!2.1 Cheetah Status in Kenya!!!!!!5 !!2.2 Cheetah Status in the Masai Mara!!!!!6 !!2.3 Mara Cheetah Population Decline!!!!!7 Section 3 Mara Cub Rescue!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!3.1 Abandoned Cub Rescue!!!!!!9 !!3.2 The Mother Cheetah!!!!!!10 !!3.3 Initial Capture & Protocols!!!!!!11 !!3.4 Rehabilitation Program Design!!!!!11 !!3.5 Human Habituation Issue!!!!!!13 Section 4 Mara Cub Removal!!!!!!! !!4.1 The Relocation of the Cubs Animal Orphanage!!!15! !!4.2 The Consequence of the Mara Cub Removal!!!!16 !!4.3 The Truth Behind the Mara Cub Removal!!!!16 !!4.4 Past Captive Cheetah Advocations!!!!!18 Section 5 Cheetah Rehabilitation!!!!!!! !!5.1 Captive Wild Release of Cheetahs!!!!!19 !!5.2 Historical Cases of Cheetah Rehabilitation!!!!19 !!5.3 Cheetah Rehabilitation in Kenya!!!!!20 Section 6 KWS Justifications
    [Show full text]
  • Using Tows Matrix As a Strategic Decision-Making Tool in Managing KWS Product Portfolio
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319351999 Using Tows Matrix as a Strategic Decision-Making Tool in Managing KWS Product Portfolio Article · August 2017 CITATIONS READS 0 2,950 1 author: Mary Mugo Multimedia University College of Kenya 9 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Mary Mugo on 07 September 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Using Tows Matrix as a Strategic Decision-Making Tool in Managing KWS Product Portfolio 1. Mugo Mary 2. Kamau Florence 3. Mukabi Mary 4. Kemunto Christine 1. Multimedia University of Kenya 2. Multimedia University of Kenya 3. Multimedia University of Kenya 4. Multimedia University of Kenya Abstract In today's changing business environment, product portfolio management is a vital issue. Majority of companies are developing, applying and attaining better results from managing their product portfolio effectively, as the success of any organization is dependent on how well it manages its products and services especially in an unpredictable business environment. The aim of this study was to understand the concept of SWOT analysis as a decision making tool that can be used to manage the product portfolio of Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) with the aim of maximizing returns and staying competitive in a dynamic business environment. The study was conducted in the eight KWS conservation areas. Primary data was collected through semi structured questionnaires and in depth interviews. Collected data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Research findings revealed that each conservancy had its own strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities; some unique and others similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Kakamega National Reserve Is Accessible by All Vehicles All Year Round
    CAMPING For the more adventurous visitors, camping can never be wilder here. With guaranteed round the clock security, every second would be worth your money. Visitors can camp at the nearby Udo campsite. A number of campsites are located in the park. Please contact the warden or call KWS HQfor more information WHEN TO GO Kakamega National Reserve is accessible by all vehicles all year round. However to enjoy the beauty of the park visitors are advised to walk through the forest. WHAT TO TAKE WITH YOU Drinking water, picnic items and camping gear if you intend to stay overnight. Also useful are binoculars, camera, hat, and hiking boots. Visitors should be prepared for wet weather and wear footwear adequate for muddy and uneven trails. PLEASE RESPECT THE WILDLIFE CODE Respect the privacy of the wildlife, this is their habitat. Beware ofthe animals, they are wild and can be unpredictable. Don't crowd the animals or make sudden noises or movements. Don't feed the animals, it upsets their diet and leads to human dependence. Keep quiet, noise disturbs the wildlife and may antagonize your fellow visitors. Never drive off-road, this severely damages the habitat. When viewing wildlife keep to a minimum distance of 20 meters and pull to the side of the road so as to allow others to pass. KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE PARKS AND RESERVES Leave no litter and never leave fires unattended or discard burning objects. • ABERDARE NATIONAL PARK. AMBOSELI NATIONAL PARK. ARABUKO SOKOKE NATIONAL RESERVE. Respect the cultural heritage of Kenya, nevertake pictures of the local people or • CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ISLAND NATIONAL PARK.
    [Show full text]
  • Eia 1636 Kibos Bio Fertilizer Plant
    KIBOS FERTILIZERS LTD ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED BIO-FERTILIZER PLANT ON LR NO. 654/52, MIWANI CENTRAL LOCATION, MUHORONI SUB- COUNTY IN KISUMU COUNTY At longitude 34.50 – 350 East and latitude 00 10North and 00 25' South CONSULTANT PROPONENT The Kenya National Cleaner Kibos Fertilizers Ltd Production Centre (KNCPC) PO Box 3115-40100 Kisumu Po box 1360-00200 Nairobi Kenya Kenya [email protected] [email protected]. Phone: 0733636555, NEMA REG. 0183: Phone: 0722257555 0734412402 Website: www.kibossugar.com AUGUST 2019 i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kibos Sugar and Allied Industries (KSAIL) is one of the private key players in Kenya’s Sugar industry located in Muhoroni Sub-County; Kisumu County at longitude 34.50 – 350 East and latitude 00 10North and 00 25' South of the equator at an altitude of 1175 metres above sea level, covering about 500km² to East of Kisumu City in Miwani Division. It borders the Kibos River, one of the three major rivers flowing into the Nyanza Gulf; Lake Victoria Basin, on one side, and is across the road from the Kibos Correctional Facility and Kibos School for the Visually Impaired on the other side. KSAIL group currently has five operating facilities within its complex which are symbiotically related i.e. sugar milling plant, the sugar refinery plant, the cogeneration plant, the distillery and the paper mill. From these plants, the group has in the recent past had challenges in managing its waste namely, filter mad, fly ash, boiler ash and vinasse (spent wash). These waste streams have posed a serious pollution challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th January, 2014 LEGAL NOTICE NO. 1 the WILDLIFE
    10th January, 2014 LEGAL NOTICE NO. 1 THE WILDLIFE (CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT) ACT (Cap. 376) IN EXERCISE of the powers conferred by section 16 of the Wildlife (Conservation and Management) Act, the Cabinet Secretary for Environment, Water and Natural Resources makes the following regulations:— THE WILDLIFE (CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT) NATIONAL PARKS REGULATIONS, 2013 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Wildlife (Conservation and Management) (National Parks) Regulations 2013. 2. In these Regulations, unless the context otherwise requires- "citizens" means the citizens of the East African Community; "daily fee" means 'fee paid a single entry of upto twenty four hours in a National Park or National reserve; "residents" means the residents of the East African Community; "safaricard" means a card specially issued by the Service for purposes of payment of charges in respect of selected parks, sanctuaries and reserve managed by the Service; "students" means an individual from a recognized secondary, government or private college or university aged upto twenty-three years visiting the parks for purposes of learning about conservation through a documented and organized arrangement with that institution and excludes students on personally arranged holidays. 3. For the purposes of these regulations, National Parks shall be categorized as follows: (a) Premium Parks (ii) Amboseli National Park (iii) Lake Nakuru National Park (b) Urban Safari (i) Nairobi National Park (c) Wilderness Parks (A) (i) Tsavo East National Park (ii) Tsavo West National
    [Show full text]
  • Ecotourism Business Plan for Got Ramogi
    Sacred Habitats at Got Ramogi Cultural Landscape: Opportunities and Strategies for Ecotourism in Siaya County, Kenya ODEDE Fredrick Z. Argwenge Lecturer, Bondo University College, Kenya HAYOMBE Patrick Odhiambo Dean, School of Spatial Planning and Natural Resources Management Bondo University College, Kenya AGONG’ Stephen Gaya Principal, Bondo University College, Kenya ANANGA George Ochieng Research fellow Bondo University College, Kenya ABSTRACT Considering that tourism is one of the World’s largest industry, inter and intra-regional competition is unavoidable. The competition has been further worsened by the globalization nature of tourism. As such, tourism business is better realized when efforts are put towards destination as opposed to regional or national tourism promotion. Against this background, developing and making the ecotourism business plan operational will not only unlock the tourism potential but also help in the management, promotion and protection of the sites for future generations and enhance economic growth of Siaya County in Kenya. In the development of this business plan, a participatory approach was adopted. The participation involved stakeholders; namely Community based organizations (CBOs), boat operators, beach leaders, religious leaders, Kenya Forest Research Institute (KEFRI), operators of hospitality services in the region, local community representatives as well as Provincial administration. The stakeholders were put in a workshop setting which was facilitated by 4 consultants from Bondo University College. The plan also used secondary information sources from Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), and web sites among others. KEY WORDS: Cultural landscape, sacred habitats, ecotourism, cultural tourism, beach tourism, archaeological tourism, health tourism, heritage tourism Introduction: Background Information Location and size Got Ramogi lies between latitudes 0° 01’ 20” and 0° 01’ 30” and longitudes 34° 02’ 30” and 34 04’ 30”.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities
    WILDI N V E S T M E N T OPPORTUNITIES SAFARI LODGES AND ADVENTURE PROSPECTUS INVEST IN KENYA SAFARI LODGES PROSPECTUS INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF SAFARI LODGES & FACILITIES IN KENYA’S NATIONAL PARKS 2018 CONTENTS 2 3 PROPOSED TOURISM DEVELOPMENT SITES 34 36 38 40 42 Sibiloi NP Malka Mari NP 4 4 #019 Central Turkana Island NP Mandera Marsabit South Island NP 5#0 Marsabit NR 2 South 2 Turkana NR Wajir West Pokot Losai NR Samburu Mt. Elgon NP Elgeyo #08 Trans Marakwet Nzoia Isiolo Bungoma Uasin Baringo Shaba NR Gishu Busia 15#0 L.Bogoria NR Laikipia 12 Kakamega #0 Nandi Meru #011 ¯ Vihiga 2 Meru NP 0 Siaya #0 0 Nyandarua 18 Kisumu Mt. Kenya NP Ndere Island#0 Tharaka-Nithi Kora NP Aberdare 7 Mt. Kenya NR Kericho Nakuru NP #0 Homa Bay Nyeri Garissa Ruma #0 3 Embu NP #0 6 Kisii Bomet Murang'a Migori Kiambu Arawale Narok Nairobi NP #09 Machakos NR Masai Kitui Mara NR 10 Tana River Boni NR South Tana River Kitui NR Primate NR Dodori NR 2 2 - Lamu - Kajiado Makueni 21 16 #0 Chyulu #01 #0 Hills NP Tsavo Amboseli NP Code Site Name National Park East NP 1 Kithasyu Gate Chyulu Hills NP 14 2 Sirimon Glade Mt. Kenya NP #0 #017 3 Game Farm KWSTI 13 #0 Kilifi 4 4 Malindi Cafeteria Malindi Marine NP #0 Malindi Tsavo Marine NP 5 Sokorta Diko Marsabit NP West NP 6 Nyati Campsite Ruma NP Taita Taveta 7 Tusk Camp Aberdares NP #020 8 Kasawai Gate Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Section-Pgs I-1.Indd
    Department of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Central Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Planning and National Development Nature’s Benefits in Kenya An Atlas of Ecosystems and Human Well-Being PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS Mohammed Said (ILRI) Norbert Henninger (WRI) Stephen Adam (WRI) Amos Situma (DRSRS) Dan Tunstall (WRI) Jaspat L. Agatsiva (DRSRS) Sammy Towett (KWS) Patti Kristjanson (ILRI) Polly Akwanyi (WFP) Dan Tunstall (WRI) Robin Reid (ILRI) Michael Arunga (ILRI) Jo Tunstall (consultant) Mohammed Said (ILRI) Richard Bagine (KWS) Sandra van Dijk (ILRI) Paul Okwi (ILRI) Isabelle Baltenweck (ILRI) Ville Vuorio (ILRI) Jaspat L. Agatsiva (DRSRS) Hyacinth Billings (WRI) Patrick Wargute (DRSRS) Jamie Worms (WRI) Anthony K.M. Kilele (CBS) Emily Cooper (consultant) Godfrey Ndeng’e (CBS) Linda Cotton (consultant) REVIEWERS Carolina de Rosas (WRI) (sections or whole report) CARTOGRAPHY AND MAP DEVELOPMENT Norbert Henninger (WRI) Phil Angell (WRI) Janet Nackoney (WRI) Karen Holmes (consultant) Lauretta Burke (WRI) Florence Landsberg (WRI) Moses Ikiara (KIPPRA) Michael Colby (USAID) Russ Kruska (ILRI) Fred Kaigua (KATO) Antonio Di Gregorio (FAO) An Notenbaert (ILRI) Eunice Kariuki (ILRI) Habiba Gitay (WRI) Michael Arunga (ILRI) Shem Kifugo (ILRI) Faith Githui (ICPAC) Geoffrey Kimathi (WFP) Anthony K.M. Kilele (CBS) David Jhirad (WRI) Alan Kute (WFP) Geoffrey Kimathi (WFP) Christian Layke (WRI) Evans Kituyi (UoN) Susan Minnemeyer (WRI) EDITING AND WRITING Patti Kristjanson
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism in Kenya
    This project is funded by the European Union STATUS OF COMMUNITY BASED TOURISM IN KENYA Judy Kepher Gona Pamella Ondiek Treeza Muhando SAG partners Project implemented by This project is funded by the European Union Table of Contents PART 1 -Tourism in Kenya 3 1.1 Overview of Tourism Resources 3 1.2 Economic Value of Tourism 3 1.3 SWOT analysis of Kenya’s Tourism Sector 3 1.4 Key Tourism Legislation & Policies 6 1.5 Tourism Institutional Framework 8 1.6 Tourism Circuits 10 1.7 Source Markets 11 1.8 Product and Product Innovation 12 1.9 Consumption Patterns 12 PART 2 - Community Based Tourism in Kenya 14 2.1 Overview of CBTs in Kenya 14 2.2 Conceptualisation of CBT 14 2.3 Legal Framework 15 2.4 Institutional Framework 16 2.5 Product & Product Integration 17 2.6 Product Consumption Patterns & Market Access 17 2.7 Product Development 19 2.8 Perceptions of the CBT Product 19 2.9 Geographical Distribution of CBTS 20 2.10 Nature of Business 20 2.11 Pricing 21 2.12 Market Access & Barriers 21 2.13 Opportunities / Future for CBTs 22 PART 3 - References 23 Websites 23 Documents 23 Interviews 24 2 This project is funded by the European Union PART 1 -Tourism in Kenya 1.1 Overview of Tourism Resources The rich natural and cultural resources found in Kenya are the country’s strength for attracting tourists. Wildlife in its natural habitat has made Kenya synonymous with the word ‘Safari”. The top cultural brand is the Maasai tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Shimba Hills National Park to the Mwaluganje Forest and Its Elephant Sanctuary
    Self-Catering Acto modation Sable Bandas; Located 2 km from the Main Gate the Bandas have four units with a capacity of two, with a fully furnished kitchen. Reservations are made through the warden or KWS HQ,Nairobi. CAMPING 2 public campsites: Professional (capacity 100), Makadara (capacity 50), 2 picnic sites Ocean view (capacity 50), Sheldrick FallsWalk (Capacity 50). Best time to visit: All year round. WHAT TO TAKE WITH YOU Drinking water, picnic items and camping equipment if you intend to stay overnight. Also useful are: binoculars, camera, hat, sunscreen and guidebooks PLEASE RESPECTTHE WILDLIFE CODE Respect the privacy of the wildlife, this is their habitat. Beware of the animals, they are wild and can be unpredictable. Don't crowd the animals or make sudden noises or movements. Don't feed the animals, it upsets their diet and leads to human dependence. Keep quiet, noise disturbs the wildlife and may antagonize your fellow visitors. Stay in your vehicle at all times, except at designated picnic or walking areas. Keep below the maximum speed limit (40 kph/25 mph). Never drive off-road, this severely damages the habitat. When viewing wildlife keep to a minimum distance of 20 meters and pull to the side of the road so as to allow others to pass. KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE PARKS AND RESERVES Leave no litter and never leave fires unattended or discard burning objects. • ABERDARE NATIONAL PARK. AMBOSELI NATIONAL PARK. ARABUKO SOKOKE NATIONAL RESERVE. • CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ISLAND NATIONAL PARK. CHYULU HILLS NATIONAL PARK. Respect the cultural heritage of Kenya, never take pictures of the local people or their • HELLS CATE NATIONAL PARK.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report
    a n n u a l 2 0 1 0 r e p o r t Our Heritage, Our pride KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE CONSERVATION AREAS CONTENTS Core Statements 2 Service Charter 3 Board of Trustees 4 Chairman’s Statement 6 Director’s Message 8 Wildlife Conservation 10 Quality Service 21 Institutional Capacity 23 Pictorial 26 Financial Statements 28 List of Partners 51 Our Contacts 52 Cover Photo: Aerial shot of Nairobians who turned out to Key Contacts 56 plant trees during the launch of the Greenline Organisational Structure 57 Initiative at Nairobi National Park. Kenya Wildlife Service Annual Report 2010 • 1 OUR CORE STATEMENTS SERVICE CHARTER Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) is a State corporation established by an Act of Parliament, Cap 376 with the mandate to conserve and manage wildlife in Kenya, and to enforce related laws and regulations. Our Vision Our Services domestic animals); • Individuals, groups, governments and To be a world leader in wildlife conservation We will provide our customers with: • Manage National parks and reserves; private organisations that use the national • Provide wildlife conservation, education parks and reserves for tourism, recreation, and extension services to create public and research; Our Mission • High quality and secure parks; • Wildlife conservation education – awareness and support for wildlife policies; • Individuals, groups or organisations that To sustainably conserve and manage Kenya’s publication and information about wildlife in • Strive to achieve the competence and have any level of interest in or impact on wildlife and its habitats in collaboration with a form suitable for and accessible to all; fairness in the care and development of the the development and conservation of stakeholders for posterity • Sustainable wildlife populations; parks and reserves through the conduct wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of an Insularized and Compressed Impala Population: Rainfall, Temperature and Density Influences
    The Open Ecology Journal, 2012, 5, 1-17 1 Open Access Dynamics of an Insularized and Compressed Impala Population: Rainfall, Temperature and Density Influences Joseph O. Ogutu*,1,2, Hans-Peter Piepho1 and Erustus Kanga3 1University of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany 2International Livestock Research Institute, P. O. Box 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya 3Kenya Wildlife Service, Ecosystems and Landscapes Conservation Department, P. O. Box 40241, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: Understanding the relative contributions of different life history stages to changes in population abundance is basic to understanding population dynamics and effective management and conservation of large herbivores. We examined temporal variation in natality, recruitment and mortality rates and sex ratio in a compressed and insularized impala population monitored daily for 211 months (17.6 years), spanning June 1994-December 2011. We related the rates to contemporaneous variation in immediate and cumulative past rainfall, temperature and prior abundance. Over the course of this 17.6-year period, the population size fluctuated between 22 and 52 individuals. A total of 213 births, mortality of 96 lambs, 33 males and 58 females; recruitment of 55 juveniles into the female category and 40 juveniles into the male category were recorded. Natural mortality averaged 2.3% of the population annually with lambs contributing 52.3%, males 26.6% and females 21.2%. Lamb mortality was highest in dry months, implicating food scarcity, but female mortality peaked in the wettest months and in hot, wet seasons, suggesting increased susceptibility to diseases and pathogens in hot, damp weather conditions. Male, female and overall population mortality rates were positively correlated with prior abundance, implicating negative density feedbacks on population growth.
    [Show full text]