Human Trafficking in Germany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte German Institute for Human Rights Zimmerstr. 26/27 D-10969 Berlin Phone: (+49) (0)30 – 259 359 0 Study Fax: (+49) (0)30 – 259 359 59 [email protected] – Strengthening Victim’s Human Rights | Petra Follmar-Otto | Heike Rabe Human Rights | Petra – Strengthening Victim’s Human Trafficking in Germany Human Trafficking in Germany Human Trafficking Strengthening Victim’s Human Rights Petra Follmar-Otto Heike Rabe www.institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de Imprint Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte German Institute for Human Rights Zimmerstr. 26/27 D-10969 Berlin Phone: (+49) (0)30 – 259 359 0 Fax: (+49) (0)30 – 259 359 59 [email protected] www.institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de Cover photograph: Karen Robinson / Panos Pictures Layout: iserundschmidt Kreativagentur für PublicRelations GmbH Bonn – Berlin September 2009 ISBN 978-3-937714-87-5 (PDF-Version) © 2009 Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte / German Institute for Human Rights All rights reserved Human Trafficking in Germany Strengthening Victim’s Human Rights Petra Follmar-Otto Heike Rabe The Authors The Authors Dr. iur. Petra Follmar-Otto heads the department of Heike Rabe, qualified lawyer, has been a researcher human rights policies in Germany / Europe at the German on national and international projects since 2000, pri- Institute for Human Rights. Before joining the Institute marily in the areas of domestic violence, sex work, and in 2003, she was a consultant, expert, and trainer in human trafficking. Selected projects: Evaluation of the the areas of human trafficking, women’s rights, and German Prostitution Act for the German Federal Ministry migration for various women’s rights organisations and of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women, and Youth; international organisations. interview study on persons trafficked into sexual exploitation for the BKA (German Federal Criminal Police Office); and feasibility study for the EU Commis- sion on creation of a hotline for trafficked persons throughout the EU. 4 Preface by the Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” (EVZ) Preface by the Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” (EVZ) Slavery is illegal – What could be more obvious for a foundation that for but it still exists several years worked on behalf of former forced la­­ bourers for the Nazis than to look into forms of forced At the Nuremberg War Crime Trials, the victorious labour today? Allied powers characterised the forced labour to which the Nazis deported millions of foreigners as slavery and With this publication, the Foundation “Remembrance, a crime against humanity. Fritz Sauckel, the General Responsibility and Future” is taking the next step in its Plenipotentiary for Labour Mobilization, was con- cooperation with the German Institute for Human demned and executed. Rights in this area, which began in 2006 with a joint lecture series on the subject of “Slavery today”. The people who had been forced labourers finally received public attention when the German Act on the The study “Compensation and remuneration for trafficked Creation of a Foundation “Remembrance, Responsi- persons in Germany – Feasibility study for a legal aid bility and Future” (EVZ) entered into force in August fund” by Heike Rabe investigates the current situation 2000, although most of them had already died. Still, of trafficked persons in Germany and ways to assist the Foundation was the first attempt to pay compen- them. It is estimated that in Germany about 15,000 sation to victims of National Socialist slavery and, people have been trafficked into sex work, catering, through that gesture, to recognize that they had suf- the cleaning sector, domestic work, agriculture, the fered a grave injustice. food industry, construction, fairground entertainment, and the transport sector. These trafficked persons come The Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and primarily from Bulgaria, Romania, the Russian Federa- Future” continued after the payments ended in summer tion, Ukraine, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, 2007, and it now funds projects to promote internatio- as well as Asia and Africa. nal understanding and human rights in remembrance of the victims of Nazi injustice. As Petra Follmar-Otto convincingly shows in her article, “A human rights approach against human trafficking – The Foundation does this not only because it is part of International obligations and the status of implemen- the remit assigned to it by the Act adopted by the Ger- tation in Germany”, human trafficking does not simply man Bundestag in 2000, but also because it considers amount to reducing organised crime, and also repre- its credibility to be at stake. The professor of education sents a human rights challenge for key state players. Micha BrumlikA writes of public commemoration in German society that if such commemoration of people Against that background, the Foundation “Remem- who are personally unknown to us is to be taken serious- brance, Responsibility and Future” will take up the sug- ly, it must be measured against our active solidarity gestions developed in the feasibility study. It is funding today with those who are furthest from us and most a project of the German Institute for Human Rights foreign to us. which assists people who have been trafficked into A Brumlik, Micha, Trauer und Solidarität. Zu einer Theorie öffentlichen Gedenkens. In: Brumlik, Micha und Kunik, Petra (ed.), Reichspogromnacht. Vergangenheitsbewältigung aus jüdischer Sicht. Frankfurt a. M. (2) 1988, pp. 111–119. 5 Preface by the Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” (EVZ) contemporary forms of forced labour in exercising their for human trafficking and the associated exploitation rights to wages and compensation. The primary objec- conceal themselves on the margins between the legal tive is to use model processes to develop legal prac- and illegal economies, making it far more complex to tices that will allow victims to exercise their rights, combat this phenomenon effectively. Most victims of which in turn will have a preventive effect. As part of trafficking are defenceless and need our attention, the project, training and information materials will be advice, and assistance. The purpose of the legal aid prepared for governmental and non-governmental fund that the Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility organisations, advanced training will be given, and the and Future” and the German Institute for Human Rights ­­ people and organisations that work to combat human will jointly create this year is to make it possible for trafficking will be networked. them to assert their rights and therefore simultane- ously to prevent the crime of human trafficking. Slavery is illegal everywhere today. But, according to the International Labour Organisation, 12 million peo- ple worldwide are forced to work by being deprived of Berlin, June 2009 their liberty or through threats and often the direct use of violence. In the industrialised countries, most Dr. Martin Salm people who are in such situations similar to slavery Chairman of the Board of Directors have been trafficked. The people who are responsible Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” 6 Preface by the German Institute for Human Rights Preface by the German Institute for Human Rights The idea that human trafficking leads to contemporary their own lives. Active advocacy for one’s own rights forms of slavery and that it must be considered a offers an opportunity to restore and increase aware- human rights violation has now gained acceptance. At ness of one’s own self-worth. However, the chances of the same time, it can be said that combating human success are minimal without advice and assistance along trafficking is still primarily understood and approached this arduous path. as a crime reduction issue. In that context, trafficked persons are seen as sources of information and poten- The first part of this publication identifies needed im­­ tial witnesses in court proceedings. However, they play provements in the way trafficked persons are treated only a marginal role as subjects with their own legal and derives specific policy recommendations from rights. Although the law has long allowed victims to them. The second part discusses options for the creation participate in criminal court proceedings as part of an of a legal aid fund that can provide advisory services accessory prosecution procedure (Nebenklage) and to and assistance to trafficked persons to increase their claim wages, compensation, and damages for pain and willingness to exercise their legal rights and their pros- suffering, a corresponding legal practice in Germany pects of success. Supporting measures such as education has not become established. Advisory services and and information are also included. The German insti- assistance are lacking, and pragmatic ways to improve tute for Human Rights hopes that this publication will the chances of success in court have hardly been tested. promote the progress of a human rights approach to This situation is unacceptable from the viewpoint of combating human trafficking, particularly in German human rights. legal practice. Exercising legal rights goes beyond the hoped-for – and often desperately necessary – material compensation Berlin, June 2009 and also holds a great deal of symbolic importance for trafficked persons. This is a way for them to regain their Prof. Heiner Bielefeldt, Frauke Seidensticker sense of being independent subjects, often after
Recommended publications
  • The Supreme Court Yearbook 2020 the Supreme Court Yearbook 2020 CONTENTS

    The Supreme Court Yearbook 2020 the Supreme Court Yearbook 2020 CONTENTS

    The Supreme Court Yearbook 2020 The Supreme Court Yearbook 2020 CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT _____6 2. 3. 3. Statistical Data on the Activities of the Supreme Court’s Civil and Commercial Division ________________________________________ 26 1. THE SUPREME COURT AS THE HIGHEST JUDICIAL 2. 3. 4. Selection of the Important Decisions of the Supreme Court’s Civil and AUTHORITY IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL MATTERS _____________8 Commercial Division ________________________________________ 30 2. 4. The Supreme Court Criminal Division in 2020 __________________ 44 1. 1. Composition of the Supreme Court ____________________________ 9 2. 4. 1. Summary of Decision-Making Activity of the Supreme Court’s 1. 2. Seat of the Supreme Court___________________________________ 11 Criminal Division ___________________________________________ 44 1. 3. Organisational Structure ____________________________________ 12 2. 4. 2. Unifying Activity of the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division _________ 48 1. 4. Supreme Court Justices in 2020 ______________________________ 14 2. 4. 3. Statistical Data on the Activities of the Supreme Court Criminal 1. 4. 1. Supreme Court Trainee Justices in 2020 _________________________ 15 Division __________________________________________________ 50 1. 4. 2. Curricula Vitae of Newly Assigned Supreme Court Judges__________ 16 2. 4. 4. Selection of Important Decisions of the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court in 2020 _______________________________________ 52 2. DECISION-MAKING_____________________________________ 17 2. 5. Special Panel Established under Act No 131/2002 Sb. on 2. 1. Supreme Court Plenary Session ______________________________ 17 Adjudicating Certain Jurisdiction Disputes _____________________ 68 © The Supreme Court 2. 2. Reports of Cases and Opinions _______________________________ 17 2. 6. Awards for Supreme Court Judges ___________________________ 69 © Photographs: Supreme Court archives, Hana Brožíková – Office of 2.
  • Report Victims in Europe

    Report Victims in Europe

    Acknowledgements The team involved in Project Victims in Europe, promoted by the Portuguese Association forÊ Victim Support (APAV) on behalf of Victim Support Europe, wants to thank all the professionals and organisationst hatc ooperatedwi thus. Firstly, we want to extend our thanks to the Ê national and european partners: Victim Support Europe (Netherlands); Ê Intervict, Tilburg University(Netherlands), Portuguese Ministry of Justice (Portugal);Ê Bíly Kruh Bezpecí (Czech Republic); Victim Support Malta (Malta); Weisser Ring (Germany);Ê Brottsofferjourernas Riksförbund (Sweden); Fehér Gyuru Közhasznu Egyesület (Hungary);Ê INAVEM (France); Pomoc Obetiam Násilia (Slovakia); Slachtofferhulp Nederland (The Netherlands);Ê Steunpunt Algeemen Welzijnswerk (Belgium); Supporting Victims of Crime and CombatingÊ Corruption Foundation (Bulgaria); Victimology Society of Serbia (Serbia); Victim Support England & Wales (England); Victim Support Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland); Victim Support Scotland (Scotland);W eisserRi ngAust ria( Austria). We would also like to express our appreciation to Dame Helen Reeves, for the valuable contribu- tionsa ndc ommitmentt ot hePr oject. Wew ouldl iket oe xtendsp ecialt hanks to all the invited plenary/workshop speakers and leaders. We deeply thank all the organisations that helped us disseminating this Seminar in different countries. Many thanks to Caroline Morgan and Levent Altan for their support to the victims’ rights in Europe. We would also like to extend our appreciation to the trainee Thomas Adcock for the workÊ developed in the final phase of the Project. Authors Intervictt eam:Suza nva nd erAa LLM ,Re néva nM errienboerLLB,An tony Pemberton PhD APAVt eam:Jo ãoLá zaro,C armen Rasquete,C arlaAma ral,F rederico Marques, Marta Pita ISBN978- 972-8852-27-6 APAV Rua José Estevão, 135 - A ProjectV ictimsi nEur ope 1150-201 Lisboa 2009© AP AV- Asso ciaçãoPo rtuguesad eAp oioà Ví tima Portugal Tel.
  • Strategy for Reform of the Criminal Legislature

    Strategy for Reform of the Criminal Legislature

    Republic of Macedonia MINISTRY OF JUSTICE STRATEGY FOR REFORM OF THE CRIMINAL LEGISLATURE Skopje, July 2007 Expert team: Professor Davor Krapac, Phd., Professor of criminal-procedural law at the Law Faculty- Zagreb Academic Professor Vlado Kambovski, Phd., Professor of criminal law at the Law Faculty – Skopje Docent Gordan Kalajdziev, Phd, Professor of criminal law at the Law Faculty - Skopje Docent Gordana Buzarovska, Phd., Professor of criminal-procedural law at the Law Faculty - Skopje 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS А) REFORM OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………............................................... …………….8 1) Current state of the relevant sector………………….........................8 2) Reform Objectives........................... ................................................8 2.1. Problems to be solved..........................................................8 2.2. Wider Reform Objectives.....................................................9 2.3. Specific Reform Objectives..................................................9 2.4. Expected Results...............................................................10 3) Hypotheses and Risks....................................................... .............10 2.1 Hypotheses.........................................................................10 2.2. Risks...................................................................................10 4) Time Table – February 2007 – February 2008........... ..........................11 5) What comes after......................................................
  • Initial Report of the Czech Republic on the Implementation of the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

    Initial Report of the Czech Republic on the Implementation of the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

    INITIAL REPORT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL PERSONS FROM ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE General and cross-cutting issues Constitutional protection from enforced disappearance 1. In the Czech Republic’s legislature, the ban on enforced disappearance is constitutionally derived from Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (the “Charter”), which guarantees every individual’s personal liberty and provides that no one may be prosecuted or deprived of liberty other than on grounds and in the manner laid down by law. The Criminal Code1 elaborates on this, defining enforced disappearance as a criminal act and classifying this phenomenon as described below. International conventions on protection from enforced disappearance 2. The Czech Republic is not currently bound by any other international convention specifically regulating protection from enforced disappearance. Nor is it a state party to any bilateral or multilateral agreements specifically dealing with this area. 3. The key document guaranteeing the protection of personal liberty on an international scale that is binding on the Czech Republic is the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Article 5 of that Convention guarantees the right to liberty and security of person and precisely defines, in paragraph 1, what forms of restriction of personal liberty are admissible and under what conditions. This is an exhaustive list and cannot be extended to include further grounds. The same article also requires the state authorities to notify arrested persons immediately of the reasons for their arrest and any charges brought against them, and then to bring them before a judge, who shall decide whether the deprivation of their liberty is lawful or whether they are to be released.
  • Selected Rights of Crime Victims in Criminal Proceedings

    Selected Rights of Crime Victims in Criminal Proceedings

    Selected rights of crime victims in criminal proceedings JUDr. Tomáš Durdík1 1. Definition of terms A natural person who suffered an injury to health, pecuniary or non-pecuniary damage or at whose expense the perpetrator enriched him/herself as a result of a criminal offence pursuant to Art. 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has the position of victim in an ongoing criminal proceeding regardless of the victim’s age or the nature of the criminal offence, with all the procedural rights, to which a crime victim is entitled pursuant to the law. Also legal entities have an identical position of victim in a criminal proceeding if they suffered e.g. pecuniary damage as a result of a criminal offence or if the perpetrator enriched him/herself as a result of a criminal offence at their expense. A crime victim and thus holder of procedural rights pursuant to the law, on the other hand, is not a person/entity2 feeling to have suffered moral or other damage as a result of a criminal offence if the incurred damage was not caused by the perpetrator’s intentional act or if there is not a direct causal correlation with the criminal offence (Art. 43 par. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure). With effect from 1 August 2013 natural persons who suffered (or allegedly suffered) an injury to health, pecuniary or non-pecuniary damage or at whose expense the perpetrator enriched him/herself as a result of a criminal offence are considered in the way like the next of kin, i.e.
  • VOCIARE Synthesis Report

    AUTHORS VICTIM SUPPORT EUROPE ALEKSANDRA IVANKOVIĆ LEVENT ALTAN APAV ANDRÉ CARPINELLI MARTA CARMO MAFALDA VALÉRIO DISCLAIMER All views expressed in the present report are those of the authors and not of the European Commission. Most findings of the report are based on the research conducted by national researchers, between June 2018 and March 2019, and any inaccuracies in the interpretation of national results lays with the authors of the present report only. Additional support research, in particular regarding international experiences, was conducted by the authors of the present report. The findings compiled in the present report represent, to the best of authors’ abilities, the current situation of the practical implementation of the EU Victims’ Rights Directive. Given its scope and ambition, authors are aware that some elements may be inaccurate or out of date. However, it was still important to offer the first overall picture, even if incomplete, of the practical implementation of the Directive, to inform future work of Victim Support Europe, its members and the policy initiatives at the EU and national level. Future efforts will be plan to improve the findings and provide a more detailed analysis of key rights defined in the Directive. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 SECTION I - Introduction 14 SECTION II - How the victims rights directive works for victims of crime in practice 16 ARTICLE 2 - Definitions 16 ARTICLE 3 - Right to understand and be understood 19 ARTICLE 4 - Right to receive information from
  • 2014 Status Report on Trafficking in Human Beings in the Czech Republic

    2014 STATUS REPORT ON TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC Security Policy and Crime Prevention Department Prague 2015 Obsah: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 1. SITUATION DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 4 2. TRENDS IN TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS .......................................................... 5 3. CRIMINAL STATISTICS ................................................................................................ 8 3.1 Number of detected crimes .......................................................................................... 8 3.2. Perpetrators in criminal proceedings ........................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Czech perpetrators abroad ................................................................................... 9 3.3 Forms of trafficking in human beings ..........................................................................10 3.3.1 Sexual exploitation ...............................................................................................10 3.3.2 Labour exploitation...............................................................................................10 3.4 The regional aspect of trafficking in human beings .....................................................11 3.5 Victims of Trafficking in human beings ........................................................................12
  • Fair and Appropriate? FAIRCOM Report Part II

    Fair and Appropriate? FAIRCOM Report Part II

    Fair and Appropriate? FAIRCOM Report part II Fair and Appropriate? Compensation of Victims of Sexual Violence in EU Member States: Greece, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands and Spain Part II: State and Offender Compensation: Survey, Good Practices and Recommendations 1 November 2020 - o f f m e e t i i Project Partners - o f f m e e t i n g S e p t e m b e ii r The content of this report represents the views of the authors only and is their sole responsibility. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains. 3 Fair and Appropriate? FAIRCOM Report part II Authors Nieke Elbers,1 Arno Akkermans,1 Helena Soleto Muñoz,2 Anna Fiodorova,2 Aurea Grané,2 Josep Maria Tamarit,3 Laura Arantegui,3 Patrizia Patrizi,4 Gian Luigi Lepri,4 Ernesto Lodi,4 Doriana Chirico,4 Iluta Lāce,5 Lelde Vaivode,5 Juris Dilba,5 Antonia Brekasi,6 Nancy Zoidou Saripapa,6 Nicholas Spetsidis6 1 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU) - The Netherlands 2 University Carlos III of Madrid (UC3M) - Spain 3 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) - Spain 4 University of Sassari (UNISS) - Italy 5 Association Marta Centre (MARTA) - Latvia 6 Union of Women Associations of Heraklion Prefecture (UWAH) – Greece https://sexualviolencejustice.eu iii Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Vulnerability of victims of sexual crimes ................................................................ 1 1.2. The importance of fair and appropriate compensation ............................................. 3 1.3. European legislation and policy ............................................................................... 4 1.4. EU Strategy on victims’ rights 2020-2025 ..............................................................
  • Dg Justice Guidance Document

    Dg Justice Guidance Document

    Ref. Ares(2013)3763804 - 19/12/2013 EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG JUSTICE, December 2013 DG JUSTICE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT related to the transposition and implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA The purpose of this guidance document is to facilitate the effective and timely transposition of Directive 2012/29/EU by the European Union (EU) Member States that are bound by its provisions. This document is intended to assist the Member States to have a common understanding of the provisions contained in the Directive. This document is the result of a process of consultation of the various interested parties (Member States' national authorities, victims' support organisations, other concerned NGOs). This document is not legally binding and is intended for guidance only. It will not serve as a checklist for assessing Member States’ compliance with the Directive’s provisions. The authoritative interpretation of EU law remains within the sole remit of the European Court of Justice (CJEU) in accordance with the TFEU and TEU Treaties1. This document can therefore neither provide a formal interpretation of EU law, nor provide legal advice on issues of national law. Obligations imposed on the Member States stemming from this Directive will demand transposition by a legislative instrument, while practical and technical implementation to achieve objectives of the Directive might be ensured by appropriate non-legislative measures. Member States have to put in place a specific legal framework to enable individuals to recognise clearly their rights and obligations under this Directive.
  • Judiciary and Protection of Victims

    Judiciary and Protection of Victims

    Project of the Judicial Academy of the Slovak Republic in the Field of Criminal Justice 2014-2015 C Co-funded by the Criminal Justice Programme of the European Union Judiciary and protection of victims This project is implemented with the cooperation of Visegrad judicial academies Krajowa Szkoła Sądownictwa i Prokuratury Országos Bírósági Hivatal Justiční Akademie http://www.ja-sr.sk/victimsprotection Co-funded by the Criminal Justice Programme of the European Union Table of contents Table of contents ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Detailed content ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Vladimár Cehlár: Saturation of the Needs of Victims via Criminal Mediation. ................................................ 8 Martin Lulei: Selected aspects of criminal policy and tools to measure recidivism risk in probation............ 28 Peter Horvath: Rights of the victim of a criminal offence arising from Article 2 of the Convention on the Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms .............................................................................................. 42 Peter Horvath: Rights of the victim of a criminal offencearising from Article 6 of the Convention on the Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms .............................................................................................. 62 Peter Horvath: Link
  • Discovering Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation and Forced Labour: European Perspective

    Discovering Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation and Forced Labour: European Perspective

    Discovering Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation and Forced Labour: European Perspective Vít Střítecký, Daniel Topinka et al. The preparation and publication of this work has been made possible by the financial assistance from the project of "Discovering Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation and Forced Labour". PhDr. Vít Střítecký, M. Phil., Ph.D., PhDr. Daniel Topinka, Ph.D. et al. Discovering Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation and Forced Labour: European Perspective La Strada Česká republika, o.p.s.., Prague 2013 The text has not been proofread. © Vít Střítecký, Daniel Topinka, 2013 © La Strada Česká republika, o.p.s., Prague, 2013 PHDR. VÍT STŘÍTECKÝ, M. PHIL., PH.D., PHDR. DANIEL TOPINKA, PH.D. ET AL. 2 1. Introduction 12 2. Trafficking in human beings –Making Sense of the Concept in Practice 13 3. Sexual exploitation in prostitution, consensual sex work, and trafficking 15 4. The fight against ‘illegal’ migration 18 5. The fight against organized crime 20 6. Forced labour, slavery and exploitation 21 7. New insights and developments 24 7.1. Movement as one of the defining elements of trafficking 24 7.2. Abuse of a position of vulnerability 27 7.3. Non-criminalization and non-punishment of trafficked persons 29 7.4. Emerging forms of exploitation and trafficking involving Persons 30 7.5. Coerced involvement in petty crime, drug smuggling and drug cultivation 31 7.6. Trafficking in Persons for the purpose of organ removal 31 7.7. Coerced involvement in benefit and other types of fraud 32 7.8.
  • United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/SVK/Q/1/Add.1

    United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/SVK/Q/1/Add.1

    United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/SVK/Q/1/Add.1 Convention on the Distr.: General 5 December 2012 Rights of the Child English only Committee on the Rights of the Child Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography List of issues concerning additional and updated information related to the consideration of the initial report of Slovakia (CRC/C/OPSC/SVK/1) Addendum Written replies of Slovakia* ** * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited. ** Annexes can be consulted in the files of the Secretariat. GE.12- CRC/C/OPSC/SVK/Q/1/Add.1 Reply to the issues raised in paragraph 1(a) and (b) of the list of issues (CRC/C/OPSC/SVK/Q/1) 1. The statistical data of the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic (disaggregated by sex, age, ethnic group, socio-economic background, or affiliation to social group) on the number of perpetrators, type of penalties imposed and on the number of child indemnitees, elaborated on the grounds of statistical forms regularly filled out and forwarded by the courts (which are annually published in the form of Statistical yearbook of the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic), are provided in the annex to this additional report . The indicator “rural or urban residence” does not occur in the statistical forms used by the Ministry of Justice therefore the requested statistical data cannot be evaluated according to this indicator. Since 1 January 2012 the Ministry of Justice monitors and evaluates also the age of the child victims.