<<

NIKHEF

Gravity Geometry and Physics

JW van Holten

NIKHEF PO Box

DB Amsterdam NL

c

Lectures presented at the Summerschool of Theoretical Physics Saalburg Germany Sept

Abstract

Geometry is present in physics at many levels most prominently in the theory of

gravity In these introductory lectures geometrical concepts like manifolds geo desics

curvature and top ology are introduced as a to ol to describ e and interpret physical

phenomena in spacetime including the gravitational eld itself The fo cus is not only

on p ossible static structures eg black holes but also on dynamical eects like waves

and traveling domain walls Although itself is outside the scop e of

these lectures it is briey discussed how geometry can b e used even in that context

to characterise congurations dominating the pathintegral in various circumstances

including typical quantum pro cesses like vacuum tunneling Many of these geometrical

metho ds can also b e used in other branches of physics by linking the dynamics of a system with the geometry of its conguration space some examples are mentioned

Contents

Gravity and Geometry

The gravitational force

Fields

Geometrical interpretation of gravity

Curvature

The Einstein equations

The action principle

Geo desics

Curves and geo desics

Canonical formulation

Action principles

Symmetries and Killing vectors

Phasespace symmetries and conservation laws

Example the rigid rotor

Dynamics of spacetime

Classical solutions of the gravitational eld equations

Plane fronted waves

Nature of the spacetime

Scattering of test particles

Symmetry breaking as a source of gravitational waves

Coupling to the electromagnetic eld

Black holes

Horizons

The Schwarzschild solution

Discussion

The interior of the Schwarzschild sphere

Geo desics

Extended Schwarzschild geometry

Charged black holes

Spinning black holes i

The Kerr singularity

Blackholes and thermo dynamics

Topological invariants and selfduality

Topology and top ological invariants

Topological invariants in gravity

Selfdual solutions of the Einstein equations

RungeLenz vector and Yano ii

Chapter

Gravity and Geometry

The gravitational force

Gravity is the most universal force in nature As far as we can tell from ob

servations and exp eriments every ob ject every particle in the universe attracts

any other one by a force prop ortional to its mass For slow moving b o dies at

large distances this is a central force inversely prop ortional to the square of the

distance As the action is recipro cal and since according to Newton action and

reaction forces are equal in magnitude the expression for the gravitational force

b etween two ob jects of mass M and M at a distance R is then determined to

have the unique form

M M

F G

R

The constant of prop ortionality Newtons constant of gravity has dimensions

of acceleration p er unit of mass times an area Therefore its numerical value

obviously dep ends on the choice of units In the MKS system this is

G m kg s

It is also p ossible and sometimes convenient to x the unit of mass in such

a way that Newtons constant has the numerical value G In the natural

system of units in which also the velocity of light and Plancks constant are

unity c h this unit of mass is the Planck mass m

P

q

m h cG kg

P

GeVc

Newtons law of gravity is valid for any two massive b o dies as long as they

are far apart and do not move to o fast with resp ect to one another In particular

it describ es the motions of celestial b o dies like the mo on circling the earth or the

planets orbiting the sun as well as those of terrestrial ob jects like apples falling

from a tree or canon balls in free ight Ever since Newton this unication of

celestial and terrestial mechanics has continued to impress p eople and has had a

tremendous impact on our view of the universe It is the origin and basis for the

b elief in the general validity of physical laws indep endent of time and place

Fields

Although as a force gravity is universal Newtons law itself has only limited

validity Like Coulombs law for the electrostatic force b etween two xed charges

Newtons law holds strictly sp eaking only for static forces b etween b o dies at rest

Moreover and unlike the electric forces there are mo dications at smaller nite

distances which can b e observed exp erimentally

For example if the gravitational force would have a pure R dep endence

the orbits of particles around a very heavy central b o dy would b e conic sections

ellipses parab olas or hyperb olas dep ending on the energy and angular mo

mentum in accordance with Keplers laws The observation of an excess in the

precession of the p erihelion of the orbit of Mercury around the sun by LeVerrier

in and improved by Newcomb in was one of the rst clear indica

tions that this is actually not the case and that the gravitational force is more

complicated

The exact form of the gravitational forces exerted by moving b o dies is a

problem with many similarities to the analogous problem in electro dynamics

The understanding of electro dynamical phenomena greatly improved with the

introduction of the concept of lo cal eld of force This concept refers to the

following characteristics of electro dynamical forces

the inuence of electric charges and currents and of magnetic p oles extends

throughout empty space

the force on a standard test charge or test magnet at any given time dep ends

on its lo cation with resp ect to the source of the eld and the relative state

of motion

changes in the sources of the elds give rise to changes in the force on test

ob jects at a later time dep ending on the distance the sp eed of propagation

of disturbances in empty space is nite

In the case of electro dynamics this sp eed turned out to b e a universal constant

the sp eed of light c One of the most striking consequences of these prop erties

which follow directly from the mathematical description of the elds as expressed

by Maxwells equations is the existence of electromagnetic waves lo cal variations

in the elds which transp ort energy momentum and angular momentum over

large distances through empty space Maxwells predictions were magnicently

veried in the exp eriments of Hertz conrming the reality and characteristics of

electromagnetic waves From these results it b ecame clear for example that

light is just a sp ecial variety of such waves Therefore optical and electromagnetic

phenomena have a common origin and can b e describ ed in a single theoretical

framework

The concept of eld has found other applications in physics for example in the

phenomenological description of uids and gases Treating them as continua one

can describ e the lo cal pressure and temp erature as elds with lo cal variations in

these quantities propagating through the medium as sound waves or heat waves

As in electro dynamics also in gravity the concept of eld has taken a central

place What Maxwell achieved for electromagnetism was accomplished by Ein

stein in the case of gravity to obtain a complete description of the forces

in terms of space and timedep endent elds This eld theory is known as the

general theory of relativity One of the most remarkable asp ects of this theory

is that it provides an interpretation of gravitational phenomena in terms of the

geometry of spacetime Many detailed presentations of the geometrical descrip

tion of spacetime can b e found in the literature including a number of b o oks

included in the references at the end of these lecture notes A general

outline of the structure of the theory is presented in the following sections

Geometrical interpretation of gravity

The rst step in describing a lo cal eld b oth in electro dynamics and gravity

is to sp ecify the p otentials The force on a test particle at a certain lo cation

is then computed from the gradients of these p otentials In the case of gravity

these quantities have not only a dynamical interpretation but also a geometrical

one Whereas the electromagnetic eld is describ ed in terms of one scalar and

one vector p otential together forming the comp onents of a four vector A x

the gravitational eld is describ ed by p otentials which can b e assembled in

a symmetric four g x This tensor has a geometrical interpretation as

the metric of spacetime determining invariant spacetime intervals ds in terms

of lo cal co ordinates x

ds g x dx dx

In the absence of gravity spacetime ob eys the rules of Minkowski geometry well

known from sp ecial relativity In cartesian co ordinates ct x y z the metric of

Minkowski space is

diag

1

We use greek letters taking values to denote the spacetime comp onents of four vectors and tensors

Then the invariant ds takes the form

ds dx dx c dt dx dy dz

For a test particle there is a simple physical interpretation of invariant space

time intervals measured along its in terms of prop er time measured

by a clo ck in the lo cal rest frame of the particle As world lines are timelike

any interval along a world line satisies ds and the prop er time interval d

measured by a clo ck at rest with resp ect to the particle is given by

c d ds

The lo cal matrix inverse of the metric is denoted by g x

g x g x

where is the Kronecker delta and the Einstein summation convention has

b een used This convention implies that one should automatically p erform a full

summation over any rep eated upp er and lower indices like on the lefthand

side of this equation

From the gradients of the p otentials ie of the metric tensor one constructs a

quantity known as the connection with comp onents given by the expression

g g g g

At this p oint this expression may simply b e considered a denition It is a useful

denition b ecause this combination of gradients of the metric o ccurs very often

in equations in The deep er mathematical reason for this stems

from the transformation prop erties of expressions for physical quantities under

lo cal co ordinate transformations However it is not necessary to discuss these

asp ects at this p oint

A physical argument for the imp ortance of the connection is that it gives

directly the gravitational acceleration of a test particle in a given co ordinate

system by the following prescription due to Einstein the world lines of p oint

like test particles in general relativity are timelike geo desics of spacetime the

latter b eing considered as a continuous pseudoeuclidean space with metric g

Timelike geo desics are lines along which the total prop er time b etween two xed

R

events d is an extremum such world lines are solutions of the equation of

motion

2

The term pseudoeuclidean here refers to the fact that the metric is not p ositivedenite as

it would b e in a true euclidean space spacetime has a lorentzian signature which

implies that a general metric g has one negative timelike and three p ositive spacelike

eigenvalues

d x dx dx

d d d

A geometrical interpretation of the connection is therefore that it denes geo desics

As concerns its dynamical interpretation there is some similarity of eq with

the Lorentz force in electro dynamics in that the prop er acceleration dep ends on

the four velocity x we use an overdot to denote a derivative wrt prop er time

However whereas the Lorentz force is linear in the four velocity the gravitational

acceleration dep ends quadratically on the four velocity The co ecients of this

quadratic term are given by the connection which therefore directly determines

the force Notice that the gravitational acceleration do es not involve the mass

of the test particle This is the mathematical content of the famous equivalence

principle which states that in a xed gravitational eld all b o dies fall with the

same acceleration indep endent of their mass

Eqs and express the force on a test particle in terms of a eld

the connection and the eld in terms of p otentials the metric This provides

the basis for the eld theory of gravity formulated by Einstein in his theory of

general relativity

What is still lacking here of course is a set of equations determining the elds

or p otentials in terms of given sources like Maxwells equations allow one to

compute the electromagnetic elds in terms of charges and currents General

relativity provides such equations they are known as the Einstein equations

and they determine the gravitational elds arising from given distributions of

massenergy and momentum These distributions the sources of the gravita

tional elds are describ ed by a symmetric tensor T x with indep endent

comp onents equal to the number of indep endent comp onents of the metric T

is called the energymomentum tensor In order to give a concise formulation of

Einsteins equations it is useful to rst introduce one more geometrical concept

that of curvature

Curvature

Curvature is a imp ortant concept b ecause it characterizes the spacetime geom

etry in a way which is basically co ordinate indep endent In order to illustrate

the idea we rst present a heuristic discussion Then we turn to mathematical

denitions which allow us to write Einsteins equations in a compact way with a

direct and elegant geometrical interpretation

Curvature is dened by the prop erties of surfaces it is a measure of their

deviation from a at plane Curvature can b e expressed conveniently in terms of

the change of a vector when transp orted parallel to itself around a lo op enclosing

a twodimensional surface element In a plane displacement of a vector parallel

to itself will always result in the same vector when you return to the starting

p oint there is absolute parallelism but no curvature In a curved surface this is

no longer true Consider the example of a sphere a surface of constant curvature

If a vector is moved southward from the north p ole parallel to itself along a great

circle it ends up on the equator cutting it at a right angle Now transp ort it

along the equator over an arc of angular extension always keeping at a right

angle Finally move it back to the north p ole along a great circle keeping it

parallel to the great circle and to itself It then ends up at the north p ole rotated

by an angle with resp ect to its original orientation Thus parallel transp ort of a

vector along a closed lo op on a curved surface do es not leave the vector invariant

in general

In the example of the sphere the rotation of the vector is prop ortional to the

distance traveled along the equator as measured by the angle This is also

prop ortional to the area enclosed by the lo op consisting of the two sections of

great circles through the north p ole and the arc of the equator For a sphere with

radius R the change dV in a vector V when the lo op encloses an area dA R d

is

V

dV V d dA K V dA

R

The constant of prop ortionality K R b etween the relative change in the

vector dV V and the change in the area dA is a measure of the intrinsic curva

ture of the surface known as the Gaussian curvature Note that the Gaussian

curvature is large when the radius of the sphere is small and that it vanishes in

the limit R as one would exp ect intuitively

This idea can now b e generalized to situations in higherdimensional spaces Of

course in a space of three or more dimensions there are many surfaces one can

draw through a given p oint Each of these surfaces may have its own curva

ture Our rst conclusion is therefore that in general the curvature has many

comp onents

Fortunately it is only necessary to consider curvature comp onents in surfaces

which are linearly indep endent To this end let us choose a lo cally nondegenerate

co ordinate system x and consider in particular the surfaces dened by keeping

all co ordinates constant except two say x and x

Let d d b e the area of an oriented surface element in the x x

plane which contains the p oint with co ordinates x Any vector with comp o

nents V transp orted parallel to itself around the lo op dened by the circumfer

ence of this surface element now changes to rst order by an amount

dV R x V d

The constants of prop ortionality R x dene a tensor known as the Riemann

curvature tensor at the lo cation x A comparison with eq shows that the

Riemann tensor is a higherdimensional generalization of the Gaussian curvature

From eq it follows immediately that a spacetime is completely at if and

only if all comp onents of the Riemann curvature tensor vanish

Dening parallel transp ort of a vector along a line element dx in terms of

the RiemannChristoel connection

V dV dx

a direct computation for an innitesimal closed lo op gives the result that the

comp onents of the Riemann tensor can b e expressed as

R

where the square brackets denote an ordinary matrix commutator of two connec

tion comp onents considered as matrices the rst one with

the second one with

Using eq for the connection we can ultimately express the curvature in

terms of the metric and its rst and second derivatives It may then b e checked

from this explicit expression that it identically satises the relation

R R R

This relation is known as the Bianchi identity It is analogous to the homogeneous

Maxwellequation which implies that the electric and magnetic elds can b e

obtained from a fourvector p otential A In a similar way the Bianchi identity

for the curvature tensor implies that the curvature tensor can b e obtained from

a symmetric tensor g

We wish to emphasize here that the curvature of spacetime is not a measure

for the strength of the gravitational elds or forces rather it is a measure for

the variation of the gravitational elds in space and time the gradients

The Einstein equations

The Einstein equations are second order nonlinear partial dierential equations

for the metric of spacetime in terms of a given energymomentum distribution

As a result these equations describ e variations of the elds in space and time

rather than the elds themselves In view of the role of curvature as a measure for

such variations and the geometrical interpetation of gravitational forces it is quite

natural that the Einstein equations should admit an interpretation as equations

for the curvature of spacetime However rather than the full Riemann tensor it

turns out that these equations involve only its contracted forms the Ricci tensor

R and the curvature scalar R

R R R R g R

Note that we adhere to the general convention that contraction with an inverse

metric can b e used to raise an index of a vector or tensor turning a covariant

comp onent into a contravariant one similarly contraction of an upp er index on

a vector or tensor with the metric itself is used to lower it to make a covariant

comp onent out of a contravariant one

The reason that only the contracted forms of the Riemann curvature app ear

in the Einstein equations is that in fourdimensional spacetime the Riemann

curvature tensor has to o many comp onents twice as many as the metric There

fore xing the metric comp onents in terms of the full Riemann tensor would

generally lead to an overdetermined system of equations In contrast the Ricci

tensor is symmetric R R and has indep endent comp onents precisely

equal to the number of metric comp onents to b e solved for It is therefore to b e

exp ected that the Einstein equations take the form of an equation for the Ricci

tensor Indeed Einsteins equations for the gravitational elds can b e written in

the simple form

G

R T g R

c

or equivalently

G

R T g T

c

g T Notice the app earance of Newtons constant on the where T T

righthand side of the equations Of course in empty spacetime T the

second version of Einsteins equations then implies that the Ricci tensor

vanishes

R

Spacetime geometries which satisfy these conditions are sometimes called Ricci

at The most interesting asp ect of these equations is that an empty spacetime

can still supp ort nontrivial gravitational elds the Riemann curvature tensor

can have nonzero comp onents even if its contracted form the Ricci tensor is

zero everywhere

This observation is imp ortant b ecause it lies at the heart of the theoretical

arguments for the existence of gravitational waves Indeed as we discuss in

more detail later on one can nd nontrivial solutions of the Einstein equations

representing lumps in the gravitational eld which travel at the sp eed of light

and transp ort a nite amount of energy and momentum p er unit of volume from

one at part of empty space to another at part of empty space

There is a mo died version of Einsteins equations in which the gravitational

eld itself creates a nonvanishing energymomentum tensor even in the absence

of matter This gravitational eld b ehaves like a homogeneous continuum with

constant density and pressure one of them negative satisfying the equations

G

g R

c

with a constant Such an equation arises if the energymomentum tensor is

T g

The constant is known as the cosmological constant Contraction of eq

with the inverse metric gives

G

R

c

This shows that in the presence of a cosmological constant empty spacetime has

a constant nonzero scalar curvature Dep ending on the sign of the cosmological

constant eq then admits solutions of Einsteins equations corresp onding

to empty spacetimes in continuous expansion or contraction This mo died

version of Einsteins equations is esp ecially interesting with regard to cosmological

applications

Of course in the general case there is a contribution to the energymomentum

tensor from all matter and energy which happ ens to b e present in the part of

the universe we wish to describ e The precise form of the energymomentum

tensor dep ends on the kind of matter or radiation which constitutes the source

of the gravitational eld However it is very often justied and convenient to

treat matter and radiation as an ideal uid the energymomentum tensor of

which dep ends only on the mass and pressuredensity and its ow as decrib ed

by the lo cal four velocity of an element of uid at lo cation with co ordinates x

Denoting the mass density by x the pressure density by px and the lo cal

four velocity by u x the energymomentum tensor then takes the form

T pg p u u

Comparison with eq shows that the cosmological constant can b e reob

tained from an ideal uid with p

The action principle

The Einstein equations can b e obtained from a variational principle that

is they follow by requiring an action S to b e stationary under variations g of

the metric S The action for the gravitational eld equations including a

coupling to material energymomentum is

Z

p

c

S g R g x d

c G

Here x represents the sp ecic source term but generally it is not the energy

momentum tensor itself rather the energymomentum tensor is given in terms

by of and its covariant trace

g T

However we consider to b e the indep endent variable hence by at there

is no contribution from this tensor under variations with resp ect to the metric

Moreover in eq g x det g x and the minus sign is necessary b ecause

of the lorentzian signature of the metric which implies the pro duct of its eigen

values to b e negative everywhere The pro of of the action principle can b e stated

in a few lines but it requires some intermediate results which we discuss rst

To b egin with in stead of considering variations of the metric g one can

equivalently use the variations of the inverse metric g Indeed b ecause g g

it follows that

g g g g

or

g g g g

Thus the variation of the metric can b e expressed in terms of the variation of the

inverse metric and vice versa

Next we need a rule for computing the variation of the determinant g This

is obtained from the formula

log det M Tr log M

which holds for symmetric matrices M as can easily b e checked by diagonalizing

M and using the rule that the logarithm of the pro duct equals the sum of the

logarithms of the eigenvalues From this equation we then derive

g g g g g

g

Finally we observe that the Ricci tensor R is an expression involving only the

connection Hence

R g R g R

with the variation R expressible purely terms of the variation of the connection

The total variation of the action now b ecomes

Z

p

c c

S R g R d x g g

c G G

Z

p

R

g d x

The last term is to b e interpreted in the sense that we vary R with resp ect to

the metric only via its dep endence on the connection However it turns out that

if we insert the expression for the connection this whole variation adds up

to a total derivative As the action principle applies to variations which vanish

on the b oundary this term do es not contribute to S If we then require the

variation of the action to vanish we indeed obtain the Einstein equations

c

R g R g

G

c

R g R T

G

The equation with the cosmological constant is obtained by making the replace

ment g in the action

Chapter

Geo desics

Curves and geo desics

In this chapter we discuss how basic information ab out the geometry of spaces

or spacetimes generically manifolds can b e obtained from studying their

geo desics The geo desics of euclidean dierentiable manifolds are smo oth curves

of stationary prop er length meaning that to rst order the prop er length of an

arc do es not change under small variations of the curve More generally and more

precisely given a metric on a manifold euclidean or lorentzian the geo desics are

those smo oth curves for which the prop er interval b etween any two xed p oints

P and P through which the curve passes is b oth welldened and stationary

The interval among the xed p oints can b e either a maximum a minimum or a

saddle p oint

A direct reason for geo desics to b e imp ortant is that timelike geo desics rep

resent the allowed tra jectories of test particles in a xed background spacetime

But in general geo desics tell us interesting things ab out the symmetries and

top ology of a manifold which often have wider implications for physics

First we derive the fundamental equation characterizing geo desics The prop er

of an arbitrary smo oth curve C b etween the two of the arc C interval s C

PP PP

xed p oints P P is given by the integral

v

u

Z Z

u

dx dx

t

ds d s C g

PP

d d

C C

PP PP

This holds for all geo desics of euclidean manifolds and time or spacelike geo desics

of lorentzian manifolds is a continuous parameter on some interval of the real

line parametrizing the curve b etween the p oints P and P in any convenient way

provided the co ordinates x of p oints on the curve are monotonic dierentiable

functions of this parameter the lab el of any p oint must b e unique and the tan

gent vector x dx d must b e welldened The parameter is then called an

ane parameter Note that the integral do es not dep end on the particular choice

of ane parameter it is invariant under dierentiable changes of parametriza

tion This freedom to choose for any smo oth parametrization of

the curve is often useful but requires some care in interpreting results explicitly

containing As any invariant geometrical results with physical interpretation

can not dep end on the choice of ane parameter the b est way to pro ceed is to

remove any dep endence from equations b efore drawing physical conclusions

is stationary if the integral do es not change to The prop er interval sC

PP

rst order under arbitrary smo oth variations of the path while keeping the end

p oints of the integral xed

Z

d w x

C

PP

q

x x j Now after a partial integration where the integrand is w x jg

with vanishing b oundary terms the end p oints remain xed the variation of the

integrand can b e written

d dx g dx g dx

w x

d w d w x d d

provided w The sign on the rhs is p ositive in euclidean spaces or for

spacelike curves in lorentzian spacetimes and negative for timelike curves in

lorentzian spacetimes Lightlike curves in lorentzian spacetime need sp ecial

consideration as ds is equivalent to w d

The variational principle now implies that for any smo oth lo cal varia

tion x the induced variation w must vanish if the curve x is to describ e

a geo desic For w we can divide the righthand side of eq by w once

more and use the fact that w d ds the innitesimal prop er interval which

is measured in the lab oratory frame and indep endent of the choice of ane pa

rameter We can also replace the partial derivative of the metric in the second

term by the connection recall that the connection was dened in eq as

g g g

g

x x x

This expression is actually the solution of the equation

D g g

g g

D x x

stating that the metric is covariantly constant a condition known as the metric

p ostulate From the equation ab ove it follows that

g

g g

x

The vanishing of w is now seen to imply a dierential equation of the form

for the co ordinates of a p oint moving on the curve as a function of the prop er

interval parameter s

d x dx dx

ds ds ds

Note that the ab ove pro cedure eliminating the ane parameter is equivalent

to a choice of rate of ow of the ane parameter d equal to the prop er interval

ds measured in the co ordinate frame fx g If the signature of the manifold is

lorentzian and the curve timelike this ane parameter is the prop er time and

eq is the equation of motion of a test particle of arbitrary nonvanishing

mass in a xed spacetime with ane connection x Note also that the

choice of d ds implies an identity

dx dx

g

ds ds

where again the plus sign holds for euclidean or spacelike lorentzian curves and

the minus sign for timelike curves in lorentzian spacetimes This is a constraint

on the solutions of the geo desic equation

That this constraint is consistent with the geo desic equation follows by ob

serving that

dx dx

H s g

ds ds

is a constant of motion or more generally a constant of geo desic ow

dH d x dx dx dx

g

ds ds ds ds ds

Finally lightlike curves also called nullcurves by denition ob ey

dx dx

g

d d

In this case the ane parameter can not b e identied with prop er time or

distance As eq is to hold on all p oints of the lightlike curve the quantity

dx dx

g H

d d

must b e a constant of lightlike motion Therefore eq still holds with s

replaced by From this it follows that it is correct to interpret the solutions of

the geo desic equation

dx dx d x

d d d

satisfying the constraint H as lightlike geo desics

Remark Although we have shown that the geo desic equation implies the con

stancy of H for all types of geo desics the inverse statement is not true In par

ticular for nonnull geo desics euclidean and spacelike or timelike lorentzian

the more general condition

d x dx dx dx

B x

d d d d

with B B an antisymmetric tensor is sucient for H to b e conserved

This happ ens for example for charged particles in an electromagnetic eld with

eld strength F

q

F x B x

m

where q m is the chargetomass ratio of the particle Similar extensions exists

for particles with spin or nonab elian charges

For lightlike geo desics the equation can b e further generalized to read

dx dx dx dx d x

x B

d d d d d

with an arbitrary constant It should b e noted that if then H is only

conserved by virtue of the fact that it vanishes

Summary

The results of this discussion an b e summarized as follows All geo desic curves

in euclidean or lorentzian manifolds satisfy the equation

d x dx dx

d d d

where is an ane parameter The quantity

dx dx

g H

d d

is conserved by the geo desic ow In physical applications three cases are to b e

distinguished

For euclidean manifolds and spacelike geo desics of lorentzian manifolds one

can take d ds the prop er distance these geo desics are then character

ized by the condition H s

Timelike geo desics of lorentzian manifolds can b e parametrized by the

prop er time d d such geo desics satisfy H

Lightlike null geo desics admit no such identication of with invariant

measures of the arc length in an inertial frame lab oratory frame null

geo desics are characterized by H

Canonical formulation

In D dimensional spacetime eq represents a set of D second order dier

ential equations in the ane parameter providing a covariant description of

geo desics It is p ossible to replace this set by a set of D rst order dierential

equations by going over to the canonical formulation of the dynamics of test par

ticles in which the number of indep endent variables is doubled Introducing the

momentum variables

dx

p g x

d

the geo desic equation b ecomes

dp

p p

d

The equations and constitute a pair of rstorder dierential equa

tions equivalent to the second order geo desic equation A p owerful result

is now obtained by observing that these two equations can b e derived from the

constant of motion H eq as a pair of canonical hamiltonian equations

with H in the role of hamiltonian

g p p H

With this denition

dx dp H H

d p d x

Then any function F x p on the D dimensional phase space spanned by the

co ordinates and momenta changes along a geo desic according to

dp dx F F dF

fF H g

d d x d p

where the Poisson bracket of two functions F G on the phase space is dened

generally as

F G F G

fF Gg fG F g

x p p x

The antisymmetry of the Poisson bracket automatically guarantees the conser

vation of the hamiltonian H by

fH H g

A similar prop erty holds for all quantities which are constant along geo desics

dF

fF H g

d

Formal prop erties of the Poisson bracket include its antisymmetry and its lin

earity in each of the arguments

fF G G g fF G g fF G g

Another imp ortant prop erty is that it satises the Jacobi identity

fF fG K gg fG fK F gg fK fF Ggg

This prop erty implies that the Poisson bracket of two constants of geo desic ow

is again a constant of geo desic ow if fF H g and fG H g then

ffF Gg H g

As H is itself constant on geo desics the ab ove results are sucient to establish

that the constants of geo desic ow form a Lie algebra with the Poisson bracket

as the Lie bracket

The denition of the Poisson bracket is not manifestly covariant and

therefore at rst sight it seems to destroy the buildin covariance of the tensor

calculus of dierential geometry and of general relativity in particular However

note that in our denition the connection is alway symmetric in its lower

indices therefore we can rewrite the Poisson bracket formula as

G F

fF Gg D F D G

p p

where for scalar functions F and G on the phase space we dene the covariant

derivative

F

p D F F

p

This equation preserves manifest covariance for scalar functions F and G for

example if J x p J xp then

p D J p D J J J

The manifestly covariant form of the Poisson bracket can also b e extended to all

completely symmetric tensors T of rank n by contracting all n indices with

n

1

the momentum p to obtain the scalar

n

1

T xp p T x p

n

1

n

Inserting this scalar into the covariant Poisson bracket the bracket for a particular

n

1

tensor comp onent T is obtained by taking in the expression resulting on

the righthand side the co ecient of the nnomial in the momenta that one is

interested in For antisymmetric index structures a similar result can b e achieved

using dierential forms or more generally Grassmann algebras

Action principles

The canonical formulation of geo desic ow presented here can b e cast into the

form of a standard hamiltonian action principle Namely the canonical eqs

dene the critical p oints of the phasespace action

Z

d x p H x p S

By using the hamilton equation

H

x

p

the momentum variable can b e eliminated in favour of the velocity of geo desic

ow to give the lagrangian form of the action

Z

g xx x d S

We observe that this is not the action for the geo desics that we started from

eq In particular it is not reparametrization invariant A comparison shows

that the lagrangian in is actually the square of w used earlier eq

Clearly the critical p oints are therefore the same with the p ossible exception of

lightlike curves Actually the variational principle for the original action was

not even welldened in the case of lightlike curves

In this section we examine somewhat more closely the relation b etween the

various action principles and in particular the role of reparametrization invari

ance It makes clear how one can derive the lagrangian and hamiltonian actions

presented ab ove within a unied framework

The key to the general formulation is to incorp orate reparametrization invari

ance in an action of the type This is achieved by introduction of a

new variable e a function of the ane parameter which acts as a gauge eld

in one dimension for lo cal reparametrizations of the worldline More precisely

the variable e by denition transforms under reparametrizations as

d

e e e

d

This is the transformation rule for the square ro ot of a metric in one dimension

on a curve for which reason the variable e is called the einbein Written in a

slightly dierent way eq states that ed is dened to b e invariant under

reparametrizations This makes it straightforward to write a reparametrization

invariant form of the quadratic action

Z

dx dx c

d S e x g x e

e d d

The last term prop ortional to the constant c do es not dep end on the co ordinates

x However it is reparametrization invariant and its inclusion is imp ortant for

reasons given b elow

Variation of the full action S e x wrt the co ordinates x repro duces the

geo desic equation provided everywhere the dierentials d are replaced by

ed This replacement makes the geo desic equation reparametrization invariant

as ed e d On the other hand the substitution e which breaks

reparametrization invariance makes the old and new equations fully identical

Such a substitution is allowed b ecause it only serves to dene the ane param

eter in terms of quantities measurable by an observer in the lo cally euclidean

or lorentzian lab oratory frame like prop er length or prop er time Of course

such a choice necessarily breaks the reparametrization invariance but it pre

serves the physical content of the equations It amounts to a choice of gauge

for reparametrizations in the true sense of the expression with the result that

mo dulo a constant the action S e x reduces to the simple quadratic action

However the action S e x contains more information as one can also consider

its variation wrt the einbein e Requiring stationarity under this variation gives

a constraint on the solutions of the geo desic equation which after multiplication

by e takes the form

g xx x e c

With e comparison with the denition of H in eq shows that this

constraint expresses the constancy of the hamiltonian along a geo desic

H c

For euclidean manifolds one can always choose units such that c but for

lorentzian spacetimes c corresp onds to spacelike lightlike or

timelike geo desics resp ectively in the latter case the constant c then represents

the sp eed of light which is unity when expressed in natural units

Finally we derive the original reparametrizationinvariant geo desic action

from S e x This is achieved by using eq to solve for e instead of xing a

gauge

q

e jg x x c j

Substitution of this expression for e into the action S e x then leads back mo d

ulo a p ossible sign to the original action Therefore we conclude that b oth

this action and the quadratic action follow from the same starting p oint

provided by eq

Symmetries and Killing vectors

Often spacetimes of interest p ossess sp ecial symmetries Such symmetries are

useful in nding solutions of the geo desic equations esp ecially if they are contin

uous symmetries as these generate constants of geo desic ow This is the content

of No ethers theorem applied to the motion of test particles and its generalization

to spacelike curves see for example refs In this section the role

of continuous symmetries is explored in some detail

A manifold p ossesses a continuous symmetry or isometry if there are in

nitesimal co ordinate transformations leaving the metric invariant Finite trans

formations can b e obtained by reiteration of the innitesimal transformations

and donot require separate discussion at this p oint Consider an innitesimal

co ordinate transformation characterised by lo cal parameters x

x x x x

For the line element ds to b e invariant the metric must transform as a tensor

therefore by denition

x x

x g x g

x x

On the other hand invariance of the metric under a co ordinate transformation

implies

g x g x

Combining the two equations and to eliminate the transformed

and inserting the innitesimal transformation expansion to metric g

rst order in leads to the covariant condition

D D

This equation is known as the Killing equation and the vector elds dened by

the solutions x are called Killing vectors The existence of a Killing vector is

equivalent with the existence of an innitesimal co ordinate transformation leaving the metric invariant

Let us pause for a moment to reect on the interpretation of this result If the

co ordinate transformation is considered to b e a passive transformation the new

co ordinates represent a relab eling of the p oints of the manifold x and x in

eq refer to the same p oint P Now consider the p oint P which in the new

co ordinate system has the same value of the co ordinates as the p oint P in the

old co ordinate system x P x P Eq states that the new metric at

the p oint P has the same functional dep endence on the new co ordinates as the

old metric on the old co ordinates at the p oint P Thus in the new co ordinate

system the neighborho o d of P lo oks identical to the neighborho o d of P in the old

co ordinates In particular it is p ossible to map the p oints in the neighborho o d of

P onetoone to p oints in the neighborho o d of P in such a way that all distances

intervals are preserved As this is in fact a co ordinateinvariant statement

it implies a lo cal indistinguishability of the two neighborho o ds of the manifold

as long as it is not endowed with additional structures This then is what is

implied by a continuous symmetry of the manifold generated by the solutions of

the Killing equation

Now if two neighborho o ds of the manifold are similar in the sense describ ed

ab ove then this similarity should also extend to the geo desics passing through

the p oints mapp ed on each other by the symmetry op eration Indeed as the new

metric at the p oint P has the same functional dependence on the new co ordinates

there as the old metric at P has on the old co ordinates and not just the same

value the connections and curvature comp onents there also b ecome identical after

the co ordinate transformation The same holds for the solutions of the geo desic

equations Thus the symmetry transformation maps geo desics through the p oint

P to geo desics through the p oint P and the geo desic ow in the neighborho o d

of these p oints is completely similar

The similarity of geo desic structure generated by symmetry op erations implies

the conservation of certain dynamical quantities under geo desic ow This is most

conveniently discussed in the canonical formalism of the geo desic ow presented

ab ove in sect The quantity conserved is the generator of the symmetry

transformations obtained by contraction of the Killing vector with the canonical

momentum

J xp

This is a scalar quantity hence its value is co ordinate invariant It generates the

innitesimal co ordinate transformations through the Poisson bracket

x x fJ x g

One can similarly determine the variation of the momentum under the transfor

mation generated by J

p fJ p g

J T xp

with T This represents a co ordinatedep endent linear transformation

of the momentum

That the quantity J is conserved now follows from the observation that

the hamiltonian is invariant under the phasespace transformations dened in

eqs Indeed taking into account the canonical equations of motion

and and using the Killing equation we obtain

dJ

fJ H g

d

This result was to b e exp ected as the hamiltonian dep ends on the co ordinates

only through the metric which is invariant by denition of an isometry

As the Killing equation is linear it follows that the Killing vectors dene

a linear vector space any linear combination of two Killing vectors is again a

Killing vector Let the dimension of this vector space b e r then any Killing

vector can b e expanded in terms of r linearly indep endent basis vectors e x

i

i r

e x e x

i r r

Equivalently any innitesimal symmetry transformation dep ends linearly

on r parameters to which corresp ond an equal number of conserved generators

i

J J J where J x p e xp

r r i

i

We now show that these generators dene a Lie algebra through their Poisson

brackets The key observation is that the Poisson bracket of any two constants

of geo desic ow is itself a constant of geo desic ow This is implied by the Jacobi

identity for the Poisson bracket which can b e written as

ffF Gg H g ffF H g Gg ffG H g F g

Thus if the Poisson brackets of F and G with the hamiltonian H vanish then

the lefthand side vanishes as well and fF Gg is itself a constant of geo desic ow

A second imp ortant observation is that for two constants of motion which

are linear in the momentum like the J the Poisson bracket is also linear in the

i

momentum

p fJ J g e e e e

i j

i j

j i

r

are supp osed to form a complete set the expression on the right As the fJ g

i

i

hand side can b e expanded in terms of the basis elements with the result that

k k

we have f with a certain set of co ecients f

j i ij

k

fJ J g f J

i j k

ij

An equivalent statement is that the basis vectors of the Killing space satisfy

k

e e e e f e

i j

k j i ij

Eq combined with the observations that the J form a linear vector space

i

and that the Poisson bracket is bilinear and antisymmetric in its arguments

complete the pro of that the generators of the symmetry transformations dene a

k

Lie algebra with structure constants f

ij

Of course the linear pde enco des the same information It can b e

interpreted in terms of the Liederivative which is the op erator comparing the

value of a function at the p oint P with that at the p oint P which has the same

value of its co ordinates after an arbitrary transformation of the form as

the p oint P had b efore the transformation x P x P For a scalar x

for which x x this gives

L x lin x x x

where the lin Q denotes the part of the expression Q linear in For a vector

v x for which

x

v x v x

x

one nds similarly

L v x lin v x v x v x v x

For higherrank tensors the construction of the Liederivative gives the result

1

k

1 1

k k

x T x x lin T L T

1 1 1

k k k

T x T x T x

Now comparing eqs and we see that the Liealgebra prop erty of the

Killing vectors may b e expressed as

k

e e f e L L

k j i e e

i j

ij

Finally in the phase space where by denition p we can also write the

transformation for the momentum as

p fJ p g L p

i i e

i

Thus we have established a close relationship b etween Poisson brackets and Lie

derivatives and b etween symmetries Killing vectors and Lie algebras

Phasespace symmetries and conservation

laws

In the previous section it was established that continuous symmetries of man

ifolds are generated by Killing vectors and imply conservation laws for certain

dynamical quantities the generators J along geo desics However not every con

stant of geo desic ow is necessarily connected with a Killing vector This is most

easily seen from the example of the hamiltonian itself which is conserved but not

of the form Rather the hamiltonian is quadratic in the momenta This

leads us to consider the p ossibility of conservation laws for quantities which are

higher order expressions in the momenta

Let J x p b e any function on the phase space of co ordinates x and

momenta p asso ciated with a geo desic which is nonsingular in the momenta

In others words we supp ose it has an expansion of the type

X

k

1

k

p J x p J x p

1

k

k

k

k

Here the co ecients J can b e taken to b e completely symmetric in all k indices

We ask under what conditions such a function can b e a constant of geo desic ow

dJ

fJ H g

d

To obtain the answer insert the expansion into this equation and compare

terms at equal order of p owers of momentum At zeroth order one nds

J

ie J is a constant Such a constant can always b e absorb ed in the denition

of J and is of no consequence From now on it will b e dropp ed

At rst order one nds back the Killing equation

D J D J

These terms we have already discussed in detail

Finally for k we nd a generalization of the Killing equation for the

k

1

k

coecients J x

k

D J

1

2

k +1

The parentheses denote full symmetrization over all comp onent indices enclosed

The solutions of these generalised Killing equations are called Killing tensors It

is now obvious that the hamiltonian is included b ecause the metric g is co

variantly constant and therefore automatically a solution of eq for k

Moreover this solution always exists indep endent of the particular manifold con

sidered In addition for sp ecic manifolds sp ecic metrics g other solutions

may exist as well For example in spherically symmetric spaces the square of the

angular momentum

x p x p L

is conserved and quadratic in the momenta by construction Other examples will

b e encountered later on

Just as the Killing vectors the Killing tensors generate symmetry transforma

tions not of the manifold but rather of the corresp onding phase space spanned

by the co ordinates and the momenta tangent vectors In particular

X

k

2

k

x fJ x p x g J x p J xp

2

k

k

k

We observe that the transformations generated by the higherorder Killing tensors

are velocity dep endent

Finally we address the algebraic prop erties of the constants of geo desic ow

We have already remarked that the Poisson brackets of two such constants yields

another constant by the Jacobi identity In general the rank of quantities

on the lefthand side are additive minus one

o n

k l k l

J J J

k l k

Now for l the rank of J is the same as that of J It follows that

i for the constants of geo desic ow linear in the momentum corresp onding to

Killing vectors k l the algebra is closed in itself it is a Liealgebra G

k k

ii for any xed value of k the brackets of a J and a J close on the J

k

however the brackets of two elements J generates an element of order k

Hence in general the algebra is not closed unless one includes elements

of arbitrary rank ie all p ossible k This implies that once higherorder invari

ants app ear one may exp ect an innite series of them Sometimes this happ ens

indeed as with the Virasoro algebra for the conformal transformation in two di

mensions However in many cases the series stops b ecause the higher order

invariants are Casimirtype of op erators or they b ecome trivial in that they are

just pro ducts of commuting lowerorder elements commuting here is meant in

the sense of vanishing Poisson brackets

The Lie algebra G of Killing vectors is characterized by its structure constants

k k

f As the Poisson brackets of J with all elements of the Lie algebra spanned

ij

o n

k

1

k

x for the by the J are again of order k one may choose a basis e

A

Killing tensors of order k lab eled by the index A and decomp ose the righthand

side of the Poisson bracket again in terms of the corresp onding conserved charges

k

J

A

n o

k k

B

J g J J

i

iA B A

This denes a set of higherorder structure constants The Jacobi identities then

B B

imply that the matrices T g dene a representation of the Lie algebra

i

A iA

B

B k B k B C B C

T T T f g f g g g g

i j

k A ij k A ij j C iA iC j A

A

Therefore the constants of geo desic ow

k k

1

k

J x p p e xp

1

A k A

k

span a representation space of the Lie algebra G for the representation fT g

i

The discussion of symmetries shows that group theory and Lie algebras can b e

imp ortant to ols in the analysis of geo desic motion and the structure of manifolds

Example the rigid rotor

The ab ove concepts and pro cedures can b e illustrated by the simple example of

a rigid rotor which has a physical interpretation as a mo del for the lowenergy

b ehaviour of diatomic molecules As such the example also serves to emphasize

the usefulness of geometric metho ds in physics outside the context of general

relativity

Consider two particles of mass m and m interacting through a central p o

tential V r dep ending only on the relative distance r jr r j The lagrangian

for this system is

m m

r r V r L

Dening as usual the total mass M m m and the reduced mass

m m M the lagrangian is separable in the center of mass co ordinates dened

by

M R m r m r r r r

In terms of R r the expression b ecomes

M

R r V r L

As the center of mass moves like a free particle of mass M it is convenient to

work in the rest frame of the center of mass R Then we are only left with

the problem of describing the relative motion of the masses describ ed by the

three co ordinates represented by the vector r

Now supp ose that the p otential V r has a minimum for some separation

r r and rises steeply for all values of r near this minimum Then the rst

excited vibration state of the molecule has an energy well ab ove the ground

state and at low temp eratures the only degrees of freedom that play a role in

the dynamics are rotations of the molecule at xed interatomic distance r Thus

the distance is frozen out as one of the dynamical degrees of freedom and we are

eectively left with only two co ordinates the angles describing the relative

orientation of the two masses the p otential V r V r is constant and may

b e ignored This leaves as the eective action of the system

L sin r

ef f

This is the lagrangian of a particle of mass moving on a spherical surface of

radius r In mathematical physicists parlance the eective low energy degrees

of freedom are sometimes called the mo dular parameters or mo duli of the

system and the sphere representing the eective lowenergy conguration space

is called the mo duli space

Up to an overall scale factor r the lagrangian L represents an action of

ef f

the form in a dimensional space with euclidean signature describ ed by

the co ordinates x x and metric

g

ij

sin

As the geo desics on a sphere are great circles the great circles provide the general

solution to the equations of motion The spherical symmetry implies that the

system is invariant under dimensional rotations rotations ab out each of three

indep endent b o dy axes of the sphere and hence there are three Killing vectors

generating these rotations The corresp onding constants of motion are the

comp onents of angular momentum L L L L given explicitly by

L sin p cot cos p

L cos p cot sin p

L p

They span the Liealgebra so of the dimensional rotation group

fL L g L

i j ij k k

As the Poisson brackets of L with the hamiltonian vanish the hamiltonian can

dep end only on the Casimir constant of the rotation group ie the total angular

momentum squared L A direct computation shows that up to the constant

p otential the eective hamiltonian is in fact prop ortional to the Casimir invariant

L

H

ef f

r

Chapter

Dynamics of spacetime

Classical solutions of the gravitational eld

equations

The Einstein equations describ e the gravitational elds generated by a

sp ecic distribution of material sources as sp ecied by the energymomentum

tensor T In two or three dimensions these elds carry at b est a nite number

of physical degrees of freedom related to the sources andor the top ology In

four or higherdimensional spacetime the gravitational eld is a fully dynamical

system with innitely many degrees of freedom In particular dynamical gravi

tational elds can exist in the absence of material sources in empty spacetime

In the geometrical interpretation of general relativity such elds represent the

intrinsic dynamics of spacetime itself

In eq the curvature tensor was dened in terms of the parallel transp ort

of a vector around a closed curve A manifold is called at if after parallel

transp ort around an arbitrary closed curve in the manifold the image of any

vector coincides with the original Therefore a necessary and sucient condition

for a manifold to b e at near a given p oint is that the comp onents of the Riemann

tensor R vanish there This condition is more general than to require that

the metric takes the form

n

X

dx ds dx

i

i

with the sign dep ending on the euclidean or lorentzian signature of the manifold

Indeed in any dierentiable manifold one can always nd a lo cal co ordinate

system in the neighborho o d of a given p oint in which the line element can b e

diagonalized to this form but this is not generally the case globally Even in

cases in which it can b e done globally eq is not the most general solution

of the Einstein equations for at empty spacetime b ecause it is still allowed to

p erform an arbitrary lo cal change of coordinates in this metric The atness

criterion introduced ab ove amounting to the vanishing of the Riemanncurvature

is more useful as it holds in any coordinate system and in any top ology

The existence of nontrivial solutions of the Einstein equations with vanishing

cosmological constant in matterfree regions of spacetime is p ossible b ecause

vanishing of the Riccitensor do es not imply a vanishing of all comp onents of the

Riemanntensor A formal mathematical criterion for distinguishing solutions

of the Einstein equations in empty space from those with material sources is

through the Weyl curvature tensor dened as the completely traceless part of

the Riemann tensor

W R g R g R g R g R

d

g g g g R

d d

Here d is the dimensionality of the manifold If we similarly dene W as the

traceless part of the Ricci tensor

g R W W W W R

d

then we obtain a complete decomp osition of the Riemann tensor in terms of

traceless comp onents and the Riemann scalar

R W g W g W g W g W

d

g g g g R

dd

This decomp osition allows a classication of the solutions of the Einstein equa

tions according to which of the indep endent comp onents W W R vanish

and which dont In particular metrics for which only the Weyl tensor is non

vanishing are solutions of the sourcefree Einstein equations R On the

other hand there also exist manifolds for which the only nonzero comp onent

is the Riemann scalar R whilst the Weyl tensor and traceless Ricci tensor van

and all twodimensional surfaces x x ish the nspheres x

n

For the nspheres this follows essentially from the spherical symmetry which im

plies the absence of any prefered direction in combination with the p ermutation

symmetries b etween the comp onents of the Riemann curvature tensor

For twodimensional manifolds it is always p ossible to write the Riemann

tensor as

R g R g g g g R

For the torsionfree riemannian and pseudoriemannian manifolds we consider

in higher dimensions d the number of indep endent comp onents of the

Riemann tensor R taking account of all its symmetries is given by

d d

N R

This is counted as follows the Riemann tensor is antisymmetric in each of the

index pairs and Hence R may b e considered as a square matrix

of dimension n dd Also as an n nmatrix it is symmetric under

interchange of these index pairs As such it has nn indep endent elements

Finally the cyclic symmetry in the rst three lower indices of the fully covariant

comp onents of the Riemann tensor expressed by the Bianchi identity adds

dd d d algebraic constraints eliminating an equal number of

indep endent comp onents Combining these results one nds precisely the number

N R in eq ab ove

For d the number of comp onents of the traceless Ricci tensor and Riemann

scalar is

dd

N W N R

for d the Riemann curvature tensor has only one indep endent comp onent

corresp onding to the Riemann scalar Therefore for d the number of inde

p endent comp onents of the Weyl tensor is

dd d d N W

Clearly this vanishes for d and is p ositive nonzero only for d Thus

we nd indeed that nontrivial dynamical solutions to the sourcefree Einstein

equations can exist only in spacetimes of dimensions d As the minimal

case d happ ens to b e the number of dimensions of our macroscopic world

we observe that for this case the Weyl tensor and the Ricci tensor each have

algebraically indep endent comp onents Therefore half of the comp onents of the

curvature are determined by the material sources whilst the other half describ es

the intrinsic dynamics of spacetime

In the geometrical interpretation of the gravitational eld and its dynamics

Einsteins famous principle of the equivalence of accelerations and lo cal gravita

tional elds can b e formulated as the hypothesis that spacetime is a manifold in

each p oint of which one can establish a lo cally at cartesian co ordinate system

of the form Of course a fully geometric interpretation of all of physics

and also the breaks down in those p oints or regions where

material sources are lo cated But also solutions of the sourcefree Einstein equa

tions can violate the equivalence principle lo cally if there are singularities for

example p oints where curvature invariants b ecome innite andor the number of

dimensions changes Physics at these p oints is no longer describ ed at least not

completely by the Einstein equations and spacetime is not necessarily a mani

fold in the strict sense In some cases it can still b e a manifold with b oundaries

where sp ecic b oundary conditions hold but these b oundary conditions then

represent external data and the gravitational eld is not determined by general

relativity alone

Nevertheless singular solutions are imp ortant b ecause they are relevant for

physics as we observe it in the universe cosmological solutions of the Friedmann

RobinsonWalker type with a Big Bangsingularity and blackhole solutions

describing stellar collapse The singularities in these cases are not necessarily

physical as the shortdistance physics may b e regulated by Planckscale mo d

ications of the theory which are presently unobservable However that may

b e here we simply accept the p ossibility of singularities and discuss examples

of b oth nonsingular and singular geometries arising as solutions of the Einstein

equations They illustrate many interesting asp ects of gravitational physics

Plane fronted waves

To show that in four dimensions nontrivial gravitational elds can indeed prop

agate through empty spacetime we now consider a class of solutions known in

the literature as planefronted gravitational waves This name derives from

the prop erty that there is a coordinate system in which these eld congurations

i move with the sp eed of light along a straight line ii have a at planar wave

front and iii are of nite duration When discussing the physical prop erties of

these solutions it will b ecome clear that these wavelike solutions actually b ehave

more like dynamical domain walls

We construct a planar wave solution with the direction of motion along the

xaxis and the transverse directions dened by the y z plane Thus we lo ok

for solutions of the Einstein equations of the form

B C

B C

g x t B C

A

f x t

g x t

The corresp onding spacetime lineelement is

1

Attempts to explain matter as a manifestation of physics in higherdimensional space

time as in KaluzaKlein mo dels or the more sophisticated string theories aim to redress this situation

ds c dt dx f x tdy g x tdz

We observe the following prop erties of these metrics

in the x tplane spacetime is at Minkowskian

in the y and z directions spacetime is generally not at but the value of the

metric dep ends only on the distance along the xaxis and on time not on the val

ues of y or z themselves Hence in the coordinate system chosen the comp onents

of these gravitational p otentials are the same everywhere in the y z plane In

particular they do not fall o to unity at spatial innity showing that the space

time is not asymptotically Minkowskian at large spacelike distances Of course

they share this prop erty with plane electromagnetic waves which at a xed time

also have the same amplitude everywhere in the transverse directions

the metric has no inverse if f or g then the connections are singular

We must take sp ecial care when this happ ens

With the Ansatz for the metric one can compute the comp onents of the

connection using eq Using the notation x ct x y z for

the nonvanishing comp onents have b een assembled in the following list

f

t

f f

t

cf c

g

t

g g

t

cg c

f

x

f f

x

f

g

x

g g

x

g

The next step in solving the Einstein equations is to compute the comp onents of

the Riemann curvature tensor using eq The only indep endent covariant

g not identically zero are the following ones comp onents R R

f f R g g R

tt tt

c c

R f f R g g

xx xx

R f f R g g

tx tx

c c

R f g f g f g

x x t t

c

Before discussing the general solution of the Einstein equations for this class of

metrics we rst use the ab ove results to answer the question which of the metrics

singled out by the Ansatz describ e at If we require all

comp onents of the curvature tensor to vanish indep endently the most

general solution for f x t and g x t is

f x t a px r ct

g x t b q x l ct

with the additional constraint

pq r l

Thus metrics of the form and corresp onding lineelements describ e

a at spacetime if f and g are linear functions of x and t with the additional

constraint b etween their coecients

The comp onents of the Ricci tensor R now follow by taking a covariant trace

as in eqs The nonvanishing ones are

g f

tt tt

R

c f g

f g

tx tx

R R

c f g

f g

xx xx

R

f g

f

R f f f f g f g

xx tt x x t t

c g c

g

f g g f g R g g

x x tt t t xx

c f c

In the absence of material sources Einsteins equations require the Ricci tensor

to vanish Assuming f and g themselves not to vanish identically some manipu

lation of these equations then leads to the following ve necessary and sucient conditions

f f

xx tt

c

g g

tt xx

c

f g f g

x x t t

c

g f f g

xx xx

g f f g

tx tx

The rst two equations are free wave equations in twodimensional x t space

They imply that f and g can b e decomp osed into left and rightmoving waves

f x t f x ct f x ct

g x t g x ct g x ct

where f u g u and f v g v are functions only of the single lightcone

variable u x ct and v x ct resp ectively Each of these comp onents

then satises the wave equation by itself and at this stage they can b e taken to

b e completely indep endent The only ambiguity here is that a p ossible constant

term can b e divided in an arbitrary way b etween the left and rightmoving

comp onents of the solution

If we now substitute this decomp osition of f and g in the third equation

and assume that the rst derivatives of the comp onents with resp ect to

u or v ie f and g are all nonzero then the only solutions of the Einstein

equations corresp ond to at Minkowski space This can b e seen by dividing the

equation by g g to obtain

f f

g g

where on the righthand side of the last equality is a nite nonzero constant

This last equality holds b ecause the two previous expressions are functions of

dierent variables hence they can b e identically equal only if they are constant

It then follows that

g f g f

Inserting these results into the last two equations addition and subtraction

gives the equivalent conditions

g f g g f g

The solution g g implies f f This leads to linear dep endence

of f and g on x and t they are of the form and corresp ond to at

Minkowski space

On the other hand in case one of the second derivatives g is nonzero one of

the coecients g f must vanish note that they cannot vanish simultaneously

for nonzero f and g Hence eq gives either

f g and g f

or

f g and g f

But combining this with the results we nd again that all second deriva

tives must vanish and that the geometry is that of at spacetime

We conclude that in order to get nontrivial solutions at least one of the rst

must vanish The last three equations then imply or g derivatives f

that after absorbing any constants terms in the remaining comp onents the only

solutions are

f x t f x ct g x t g x ct

or

f x t f x ct g x t g x ct

with the additional condition

g f

f g

Although f and g represent waves traveling either to the right or to the left at the

velocity of light the nonlinear character of the Einstein equations exemplied by

the additional condition do not allow us to make arbitrary sup erp ositions

of these solutions Interestingly viewed as a twodimensional theory in x t

space f and g represent chiral b osons Wherever necessary in the following we

chose to work with rightmoving elds f x t f u and g x t g u for

deniteness

An example of a simple solution of eq is

f x t cos k x ct cos k u

g x t cosh k x ct cosh k u

Note that at u n k the comp onent f has a zero whilst the solution for

g x t grows indenitely with time or distance However this do es neither imply that the geometry is singular nor that the gravitational elds b ecome arbitrarily

strong the apparent problems turn out to b e co ordinate artifacts This p oint is

discussed in detail in the next section

Let us consider a wave which reaches x at time t and extends to

x L ie the solution holds for L u If jk Lj the metric

comp onents f and g are strictly p ositive For u spacetime is at we can

choose a coordinate system in which f g Note that the wave solution

assumes these same values at u whilst the rst derivatives match as

well As a result the solutions are smo othly connected and satisfy the Einstein

equations even at the b oundary u

For u L spacetime is again at but now we have to use the general

solution

f x t a px ct

x ct L

g x t b q x ct

The coecients a b p q in this domain of x t values are to b e determined

again by requiring the metric to b e continuous and dierentiable at the b oundary

u L b etween the dierent domains of the solution This condition is sucient

to guarantee that the Einstein equations are welldened and satised everywhere

Imp osing these requirements we nd

cos k L a pL k sin k L p

cosh k L b q L k sinh k L q

For f and g in the domain x ct L we obtain the result

f x t cos k L k L x ct sin k L

g x t cosh k L k L x ct sinh k L

Conclusion we have constructed a solution of the Einstein equations in empty

space which interpolates b etween two Minkowski halfspaces connected by a

nite region of nonzero curvature where the gravitational elds have nonzero

gradients and test particles are accelerated with resp ect to the initial inertial

frame After passage of the wave the test particles have acquired a nite but

constant velocity This shows that they have b een accelerated but the accelera

tion has ceased after t x Lc

The planefronted wave constructed here is a welldened solution of the equation

R everywhere including the wave fronts x ct and x ct L as the

contributions of the metric comp onents g f and g g always comp ensate

y y z z

each other in eq However the Riemann curvature itself which coincides

with the Weyl curvature in this case do es not vanish everywhere Indeed we

nd from eq

R R R f f

R R R g g

R

Inserting the explicit solution for f and g for each of the three regions x ct

L x ct and x ct L one nds that the curvature is zero in the two

Minkowski halfspaces b efore and after the wave as exp ected but nite and non

zero in the interior of the wave Indeed the second derivatives f and g have a

nite discontinuity on the wave front of magnitude k at x ct and k cos k L

resp k cosh k L at x ct L This nite discontinuity then also app ears in the

curvature comp onents where it must b e attributed to a nite discontinuity in

the Weyl curvature and thus can not b e attributed to a singular distribution of

sources But the RiemannChristoel connections which dep end only on the rst

derivatives of the metric are continuous Then the geo desics and the motions

of test particles in the spacetime describ ed by the wave are continuous and it

follows that the jump in the Weyl curvature presents no physical inconsistencies

Nature of the spacetime

The planar wave constructed ab ove can b e characterised as a region of non

vanishing curvature sandwiched b etween two at spacetimes and propagating

with the sp eed of light either in the p ositive or the negative xdirection such

that one of the two at spacetime regions grows at the exp ense of the other

In this section I establish the relation b etween the two at spacetimes b efore

and after the wave The analysis shows that they are not related by a simple

Lorentz transformation a set of equidistant test particles carrying synchronised

ideal clo cks and thus dening an inertial coordinate system b efore the wave

are neither equidistant nor synchronised in any inertial coordinate system after

the wave Therefore the two Minkowski spacetimes on either side of the region

of nonzero curvature are inequivalent in the sense that the Lorentz group of

rigid transformations leaving the inpro duct of fourvectors invariant in these at

regions are embedded dierently in the group of lo cal coordinate transformations

which constitutes the symmetry of the full theory

This situation is also encountered in scalar eld theories with broken sym

metry when there is a b oundary separating two domains with dierent vacuum

exp ectation values of the eld One can even show that in some mo dels these

two forms of sp ontaneous symmetry breaking of a scalar eld and of the grav

itational eld are connected Therefore we nd a new interpretation for

the planar gravitational waves they act as domain b oundaries separating dier

ent inequivalent atspace solutions vacua of the Einstein equations These

domain b oundaries are dynamical they are not static but move at the sp eed of

light for this reason they are sometimes refered to as sho ck waves However

the planar wave solutions discussed here have nite extent whereas usually the

term sho ckwave is reserved for waves with a deltafunction prole

Regions of spacetime enclosed by such dynamical b oundaries clearly grow

or shrink at the sp eed of light If we consider our planar wave solution as an

approximation to a more general domainwall geometry with a radius of curvature

large compared to the characteristic scale of the region of spacetime we are

interested in then we can use it to describ e the dynamics of gravitational domain

structure which may have interesting implications for example for the physics of

the early universe

Having sketched this general picture I now turn to describ e the sandwich

structure of the planar wave geometry more precisely A convenient pro cedure

is to introduce new coordinates X cT X Y Z related to the original x

ct x y z by

c T ct

X x

Y f y

Z g z

where in terms of the original co ordinates x

x y f f z g g

This co ordinate transformation takes an even simpler form when expressed in

lightcome variables

U X cT x ct u

V X cT x ct v

Indeed the lineelement now b ecomes

ds c dt dx f dy g dz

dU dV K U Y Z dU d Y dZ

with

f g g

Z Y K U Y Z Y Z

f g g

Both for t xc and t x Lc we have f g and therefore the line

element is manifestly at Minkowskian on b oth sides of the planar wave

However inside our particular wave solution one has

g f

k

f g

Then K k Z Y indep endent of U The co ordinate system X with

the lineelement is the closest one to an inertial frame at all times for an

observer at rest in the origin one can construct Indeed the p oint x y z

corresp onds to X Y Z at all times and b oth b efore and after the

wave the X dene a global inertial frame Furthermore inside the wave the

new co ordinate system deviates from an inertial frame only for large values of

Z Y We also observe that in this co ordinate system the line element

never b ecomes singular showing the previous zeros of det g corresp onding to

zeros of f u to b e co ordinate artifacts indeed

Computing the various geometrical quantities metric connections and cur

vature comp onents in the new co ordinates pro duces the following summary of

results

The only nonvanishing comp onents of the inverse metric are

UV VU VV

g g g k Y Z

YY ZZ

g g

The only nonvanishing comp onents of the connection are

Y V V

k Y k Y

UU YU UY

V V Z

k Z k Z

UZ ZU UU

The only nonvanishing covariant comp onents of the curvature are

R R k

UYUY UZUZ

Thus in these co ordinates the curvature comp onents are constant inside the wave

and we conclude that our particular planar wave solution is actually like a blo ck

wave at the b oundaries U U L the curvature comp onents jump from

zero to the values and back to zero whilst in b etween they are constant

This makes it easy to visualize how our particular solution can b e used to

construct general planar wave solutions with p olarization along the Y and Z

axes essentially it amounts to glueing together suciently narrow blo ck waves

of xed curvature to obtain solutions in which the curvature comp onents vary

according to some arbitrary prole

The result also allows one to verify once more by a oneline computation

that the Ricci tensor vanishes identically for these planarwave geometries

With these results in hand our next aim is to establish the relation b etween the

at halfspaces b efore and after the wave We have already observed that the

origin x y z b ecomes the origin X Y Z for all times t or

T resp ectively Next observe that the co ordinate transformation is not

a Lorentz transformation the co ordinates t x y z dening an inertial frame

b efore the passage of the wave represent a noninertial frame after passage As

a check note that the jacobian of the transformation is

X

f g for u x ct

x

Indeed a system of synchronized equidistant clo cks at rest in the rst co ordinate

system which op erationally denes an inertial frame b efore the wave arrives is

neither synchronized nor equidistant in the nal inertial frame Moreover in

general it cannot b e made so by a simple Lorentz transformation the clo cks have

b een accelerated with resp ect to each other by the wave and ultimately dene

a noninertial frame at late times This is veried by the explicit calculation of

geo desics in the next section

From this analysis it will b e clear that in principle it is p ossible to deter

mine the passage and measure the characteristics of a planar

by measuring the acceleration it imparts to test masses in the lab oratory In

deed such measurements can determine the functions f g from the relation

b etween t x y z and T X Y Z Although in this form the statement holds

only for waves of the type discussed the principles for other types of waves are

the same even if the functions characterizing the relation b etween the initial and

nal Minkowski spaces are generally dierent

Scattering of test particles

In order to study the resp onse of test masses to passing gravitational waves

it is necessary to solve for the geo desics of spacetime in the gravitational eld

generated by the wave We are particularly interested in the worldlines of particles

initially at rest in a sp ecic inertial frame the lab oratory Observing frame gives

the scattering data from which the prop erties of the gravitational wave can then

b e inferred relatively easily

In principle it is very easy to nd geo desics they corresp ond to the world

lines of particles in free fall Consider therefore a particle at rest in the initial

Minkowski frame its four coordinates are

x c

where the three vector xing the p osition of the particle is constant

note also that by denition for a particle at rest in an inertial frame the co

ordinate time equals the prop er time

In the coordinate system we use a particle with coordinates is actually

always in free fall its coordinates in the x frame do not change if it enters a

nontrivial gravitational eld Of course in an arbitrary gravitational eld the

x frame is not an inertial frame and even if at late times spacetime is at

again the particle will have acquired a nite generally nonvanishing four velocity

However its p osition in the nal Minkowski frame can b e found straightforwardly

by applying the coordinate transformation

Let us rst conrm the ab ove statements by a simple mathematical argument

Then we turn to apply the result to nd the actual motion of the test particle

in the nal Minkowski frame We b egin by noting that in the x frame the

metric for the gravitational wave is always of the form and therefore the

only nonvanishing comp onents of the connection are those given in eq In

always vanish particular in the x frame the comp onents

On the other hand for a particle with the worldline the four velocity

is purely timelike and constant

dx

u c

d

Then the four acceleration in this frame vanishes identically as do es the gravita

tional force

u u

As a result the geo desic equation is satised proving that represents

the worldline of a particle at al l times

What we are particularly interested in is the p osition and velocity of the parti

cle at the moment it comes out of the gravitational wave It has already b een

remarked that the origin remains at rest and coincides with the origin

of the nal Minkowski frame Therefore at late times the origin has lab oratory

co ordinates

X c

Let us compare this with the four coordinates of a particle away from the origin

in the y z plane For such a particle the values of the metric

comp onents at late times are

f a pc

c L

g b q c

Here a b p q have the values quoted b efore eq For one nds in the

same domain c L

c ap bq p q

As a result the Minkowski coo dinates of this particle at late prop er times are

X cT X Y Z

with

c

c T ap p bq q

c

X ap bq p q

Y a p c

Z b q c

Note that clo cks which were originally synchronized same value of t at

early prop er time are no longer so after passage of the gravitational wave T is

not equal to T at late prop er time Before we can calculate the p osition of

the test particle at synchronized coordinate time T in the nal Minkowski

frame we rst have to correct for this gravitationally induced p ositiondep endent

time shift

To determine the instantaneous prop er distance b etween the particle with

worldine X and the origin we have to ask at what prop er time the time

coordinate T equals the time T measured by a clo ck at rest in the origin

T

with the result

c ap bq

c

p q

The p osition at this prop er time X X can now b e evaluated

q c p bq ap

X

p q

aq bp q a pc

Y

p q

aq bp p b q c

Z

p q

Finally we can also determine the velocity of the test particle

v

p q p q

c p q

and as a result the kinetic energy is

p q p q

M v M c

p q

From this analysis we draw the conclusion that not only in general test particles

are accelerated by the gravitational wave but also that the acceleration and

hence the nal velocity dep end on the p osition of the particle Therefore no

Lorentz transformation with any xed b o ost velocity v can bring all test particles

initially at rest wrt one another back to rest simultaneously after passage of

the wave This result explicitly demonstrates the inequivalence of the initial and

nal Minkowski spacetimes

Symmetry breaking as a source of gravita

tional waves

The planar gravitational wave solutions describ ed in this chapter arise as transi

tion regions b etween at domains of spacetime which are related by a co ordi

nate transformation that cannot b e reduced to a linear Lorentz transformation

We have therefore interpreted them as domain b oundaries b etween regions of

spacetime trapp ed in inequivalent classical vacua of the gravitational eld in

the absence of a cosmological constant This is p ossible b ecause at space zero

curvature is asso ciated with a value of the gravitational eld the metric g

which in an appropriate co ordinate system gauge is constant nonvanishing

and Lorentzinvariant but not invariant under general co ordinate transforma

tions In this sense the general co ordinate invariance of the Einstein equations

is broken sp ontaneously by the vacuum solutions corresp onding to Minkowski

spacetime

A domain structure arising from the presence of degenerate but inequivalent

classical vacua is a wellknown consequence of sp ontaneous symmetry breaking in

scalar eld theories In this section this p oint is elab orated on and it is shown that

dynamical domain b oundaries in scalar eld theories scalartype sho ck waves

if one prefers can actually b e sources of planar gravitational waves of the kind

analysed in detail ab ove

The simplest scalar eld theory with a continuously degenerate set of classical

vacua is that of a complex scalar eld with a mexican hat type of p otential as

describ ed by the lagrangian

p

L g

g

In this lagrangian h c is a dimensionless coupling constant and is an inverse

length h c is a mass In the natural system of units in whichh c we can

take to b e dimensionless and to represent a mass In the following equations

one then can substitute c everywhere

i

This lagrangian is invariant under rigid U phase shifts e

with constant As a result for there is an innitely degenerate set

of solutions of the equations of motion minimizing the p otential refered to as

classical vacua of the form

i

p

e

with an arbitrary real constant Clearly the solutions themselves are not in

variant under the U transformations the classical vacuum solutions break the

U symmetry sp ontaneously However b ecause of the U symmetry of the

dynamics these solutions are physically indistinguishable and the absolute value

of is unobservable On the other hand variations in the vacuum angle b etween

dierent regions of spacetime can have observable eects

p

i x

Parametrizing the complex scalar eld as x xe the lagrangian

b ecomes

p

L g g

g

This shows that in the sp ontaneously broken mo de of the U symmetry the

q

obtained theory desrib es actually two real scalar elds the eld

q

by shifting by its classical vacuum value with a mass or inverse co

herence length equal to which can b ecome arbitrarily large and the strictly

q

representing the Goldstone excitations arising from massless eld

sp ontaneous symmetry breaking

Clearly at energies small compared to the scale set by the mass of the eld

the excitations of this massive eld play no role and one only has to consider

the Goldstone eld describ ed by the eective lagrangian

c

p

L R g

g G

where we have added the EinsteinHilb ert action for the gravitational eld as

this also describ es a lowenergy degree of freedom Note that with the p otential

dened in eqs there is no cosmological constant in the presence of

q

the vacuum value of the scalar eld or equivalently

The eld equations derived from this lagrangian are the KleinGordon equa

tion for the Goldstone eld

p

cov

p g g 2

g

and the Einsteinequations with a source term from the energymomentum of the

Goldstone eld

G

R

c

Remarkably this system of equations admits exact planar wave solutions similar

to the free sourceless Einstein equations Using the same Ansatz for

the metric we nd running planar gravitational waves f x ct g x ct

in combination with a scalar wave x ct running in the same direction

The continuity conditions require that this scalar wave interpolates continuously

b etween a domain in which b efore the wave and a domain where

after the wave where b oth are constants

The simplest solution of this kind is a prole of interpolating linearly b e

tween these values

u for u

q

u k u for L u

q

for u L u k L

with similar expressions for the leftmoving solutions v It follows that the

slop e parameter k in is given by

s

k

L

At this p oint it is useful to recall that actually represents the phase of the

complex scalar eld Hence with a xed value of the mo dulus a monotonic

linear increase of implies a pure mono chromatic oscillation of the real and

imaginary comp onents of the scalar eld

ik u ik xct

p

u e e

where the last equality assumes to equal its classical vacuum value and the

gauge choice It follows that the slop e parameter k actually represents

the wavenumber of these large oscillations of interpolating b etween dierent

classical vacuum values

It remains to solve the Einstein equations For the rightmoving wave

solution u f u g u these equations reduce to a slightly mo died ver

sion of eqs the only mo dication b eing a constant source term in eq

g G f

for L u k

f g c

Outside the region L u the right hand side vanishes and we have the

trivial atspace solutions f g

It is not very dicult to establish the existence of solutions to equation

In fact there are more solutions than the purely gravitational case b ecause rst

there are the planar gravitational blo ck waves of the type

f u cos u g u cosh u

with the constraint b etween the parameters

G

k

c

These waves have a purely gravitational contribution from a nonvanishing Weyl

tensor But in addition there are also purely oscillatory solutions

f u cos u g u cos u

with a relation b etween the wavenumbers of the type

G

k

c

It is quite clear that these purely oscillatory waves require a nonvanishing of

the Ricci tensor they can exist only in the presence of the scalar eld u

b ecause in the limit k one nds simultaneously that b oth This is

in contrast to the hyperb olic type of solution where k only implies

Therefore one might think of the rst type of solution as radiative

waves which have kept the quadrup ole character known from the propagation of

small p erturbations in the linearized version of gravitational eld theory whereas

the second type are matterinduced waves with a dip olelike b ehaviour

By p erforming the co ordinate transformation we can again construct a

reference frame which is manifestly Minkowskian b efore and after the wave and

has constant curvature comp onents inside the wave This is based on the choice of

the simple solution for the scalar eld with constant slop e parameter k ie

a mono chromatic wave As in the case of the purely gravitational waves more

general solutions with smo oth b ehaviour at the wavefront can b e contructed

The main lesson to b e learnt from the results in this section is that the in

terpretation of the gravitational waves as moving domain b oundaries b etween

inequivalent classical vacua has its parallel in the case of scalar elds with bro

ken symmetry and that these scalar waves are actually accompanied by planar gravitational waves of the type constructed ab ove

Coupling to the electromagnetic eld

The coupling of planar gravitational waves to scalar elds of the Goldstone type

is the result of the existence of eld congurations with constant slop e in do

main b oundaries for which the energymomentum tensor has constant nonzero

comp onents in half of the directions of spacetime A similar type of energy

momentum density can b e generated by constant electric and magnetic elds

and again one nds that these are accompanied by gravitational waves

We consider the simplest case of constant electric and magnetic eld p erp en

dicular to each other for example in the y z plane

E E B B

and a metric which is nonat only in the z z direction

ds c dt dx dy g dz

These elds provide a solution of the combined Einstein and Maxwell equations

G G

T F F g F R

mu

c c

and

D F

provided the electric and magnetic eld are constant and equal mo dulo c in

magnitude

E cB constant

whilst the metric comp onent g represents a planar wave

z z

G

g x ct cos k x ct k E

c

Here the sign in the argument ie left or right moving wave dep ends on the

sign in

It is straightforward to check that this is a solution of the Einstein equation

by substituting the g as ab ove and f in eq and writing out the energy

momentum tensor of the electromagnetic eld

T

E c B cB E

B C

B C

B C

B C

cB E E c B

B C

B C

B c C

B C

B C

E c B

B C

B C

A

2

g

E c B

Observe that the metric comp onent g itself b ecomes

z z

cos k x ct g g

z z

ans oscillates with frequency

q

E

G k c

c

It may seem surprising and worrying that constant electric and magnetic eld

generate gravitational waves of such large amplitudes however note that in

lab oratory units the frequency is

E

Hz

Vm

For ordinary electric elds in the lab oratory this means that it takes a full lifetime

of the universe or longer to go through one complete cycle Even at the high

est elds imaginable in theory when the vacuum breaks down due to electron

p ositron pair creation

m c

e

E Vm

cr it

e

e

where e is the electron charge m its mass and its Compton wave length the

e e

frequency can not get higher than ab out Hz Therefore the eect will not b e

measurable under ordinary circumstances

Nevertheless it do es seem remarkable that constant electromagnetic elds

generate timedep endent oscillating gravitational elds This eect as well

as the scalargenerated waves discussed in the previous section has quite close

similarities to the Josephson eect in sup erconductors where a constant p otential

generates an oscillating current In that case the current is related to the change

in the phase of the electron condensate which is mathematically analogous to

the phase of the complex scalar eld represented by the Goldstone mo de

Chapter

Black holes

Horizons

The example of gravitational sho ck wavesdomain walls has shown that space

time in four dimensions is a truely dynamical arena for physics even in the absence

of matter although adding matter for example in the form of scalar or elec

tromagnetic elds makes the p ossible structures even richer In this chapter

we turn to another class of very interesting structures in fourdimensional space

time static or quasistatic solutions of the Einstein equations which represent

gravitating extended b o dies whose static elds b ecome strong enough to cap

ture p ermanently anything that gets suciently close to the central core As

these quasistatic ob jects even capture light they are called black holes but it

has turned out that their prop erties are much more interesting and p eculiar than

this ominous but dull sounding name suggests

Black holes p ossess two characteristic features The rst which has given

them their name is the existence of a horizon a closed surface through which

ob jects can fall without ever b eing able to return The second is the presence of

a singularity a lo cus of p oints inside the horizon where the curvature b ecomes

innite It has even b een conjectured by some authors that these two prop erties

are so closely linked that any spacetime singularity should always b e hidden

b ehind a horizon This conjecture b ears the name of the Cosmic Censorship

hypothesis Although as an unqualied mathematical theorem the hypothesis

is certainly not correct it could b e true for singularities that arise in realistic

pro cesses from the gravitational collapse of macroscopic b o dies like implo ding

massive stars

In this chapter we restrict our attention to the sp ecial blackhole solutions that

might b e called classical eternal black holes in the sense that at least outside

the horizon they describ e stationary gravitational elds and do not require for

the description of their b ehaviour the inclusion of their formation from collapsing

matter In fact they are solutions of the sourcefree Einstein or coupled Einstein

Maxwell equations and are characterised for an outside observer completely in

terms of their mass their angular momentum and their electromagnetic charge

One might alternatively think of them as black holes that have b een formed in the

innite past and settled in a stationary state in which all trace of their previous

history has b een lost eg by emitting gravitational radiation

Because of this restriction these lectures do not include a detailed account

of the pro cess of gravitational collapse as studied by astrophysicists but they

do allow one to isolate and study in detail the sp ecial asp ects of the physics of

blackholes It may even b e that these very sp ecial simple solutions are relevant to

elementary particle physics near the Planck scale but that leads one to consider

the problems of quantum gravity a sub ject we will not deal with at length in

these lectures The interested reader can nd more information on many asp ects

of blackhole structure and formation in the literature

The Schwarzschild solution

The simplest of all stationary blackhole solutions of the sourcefree Einstein

equations is that for the static spherically symmetric spacetime asymptotically

at at spatial innity rst describ ed in the literature by Schwarzschild We

present a derivation of this solution making full use of the symmetries and their

connection to Killing vectors explained in chapter

In view of the spherical symmetry we introduce p olar co ordinates r

in threedimensional space and add a time co ordinate t measuring asymptotic

Minkowski time at r The Schwarzschild solution is obtained by requiring

that there exists at least one co ordinate system parametrized like this in which

the following two conditions hold

i the metric comp onents are tindep endent

ii the lineelement is invariant under the threedimensional rotation group

SO acting on threevectors r in the standard linear way

The rst requirement is of course equivalent to invariance of the metric under

timeshifts t t t Thus formulated b oth conditions take the form of a

symmetry requirement

In chapter we discussed how symmetries of the metric are related to Killing

vectors Rotations of threevectors are generated by the dierential op erators L

of orbital angular momentum

L sin cot cos L cos cot sin

L

1 The solution was found indep endently at the same time in

Similarly timeshifts are generated by the op erator

L

t

According to the discussion in sect the co ecients of the symmetry op era

tors L L are to b e comp onents of a set of Killing vectors L A

A A

A

D L D L

A A

These can equivalently b e characterised as a set of constants of geo desic ow as

in eq

J L p

A

A

The relation with the metric is that the Poisson brackets of these constants of

geo desic ow with the hamiltonian are to vanish

fJ H g H g p p

A

The general solution of these conditions for the hamiltonian H is tindep endent

whilst it can dep end on the angular co ordinates only through the Casimir invari

ant

p

L p

sin

It follows that the metric must b e of the form

ds h r dt g r dr k r d

where d d sin d is the angular distance on the unit sphere and

the co ecients hr g r and k r are functions of the radial co ordinate r only

Indeed the hamiltonian derived from this metric is

H p p p p

t r

h g k

sin

L

p p

t r

h g k

Note that the set of functions h g k can not b e unique as one can always

p erform a co ordinate transformation r rr to another metric of the same

general form with co ecients h g k There are several standard options

to remove this freedom to b egin with we choose one in which the spherical

2

In this chapter we employ natural units with c

symmetry is manifest and the spatial geometry is as close to that of at space as

p ossible That is we take r as the solution of

k r r g r

Then the line element b ecomes

h r dt g r dr ds h r dt g r dr r d

Clearly it is rotation invariant and the threedimensional spacelike part of the

line element is conformal to that of at space in p olar co ordinates with the

conformal factor g r dep ending only on the radius and not on the orientation

or the time In the literature the co ordinates chosen here to parametrize the

Schwarzschild metric are called isotropic co ordinates

Up to the freedom of radial reparametrizations the form of the line element

is completely determined by the symmetry requirements To x the radial

dep endence of the remaining co ecients hr and g r we nally substitute the

metric into the Einstein equations For the Einstein tensor G R g R

we nd that it is diagonal with comp onents

h hg

G hg g

tt

g r g

hg

h g hg G

r r

g h g r

G hg r

h g hg G hg

g h r g

sin

In the absence of sources or a cosmological constant these expressions have to van

ish As b oundary conditions at innity where spacetime must b ecome asymp

totically at we require that r implies h and g Then we have

three dierential equations for two unknown functions and therefore the equa

tions must b e degenerate One can check that this is the case if the following

two relations are satised

h i

hg g r g r hg

Indeed in this case the various comp onents of G b ecome prop ortional

g

G G G G

r r tt

h r

r sin

The conditions are met for any g r of the form

b c g r g

g r a hr

r r g

It turns out that eqs indeed provide solutions of the Einstein equations

satisfying the correct b oundary conditions They are most easily obtained from

the rst Einstein equation for hg it is p ossible to factor out all

hdep endence and obtain an equation for g only

g g g g g

r

There is a unique solution with the required normalization for r

m

g r

r

where m is an undetermined constant of integration Eq then immediately

provides us with the solution for h

r m

hr

r m

The complete solution for the static spherically symmetric spacetime in isotropic

co ordinates therefore is

m r m

dr r d dt ds

r m r

Clearly this solution matches Minkowski space at r by construction and h

and g change monotonically decreasing and increasing resp ectively as a func

tion of r untill r m At that value h and the metric has a zero mo de

Then the derivation of the solution we have presented breaks down and its con

tinuation to values r m requires a careful interpretation discussed b elow

In any case it turns out that this singularity of the metric is not physical as

invariants of the curvature remain nite and welldened there Indeed in the

following we construct co ordinate systems in which the metric is p erfectly regular

at these p oints and can b e continued to regions inside the surface r m In

the isotropic co ordinate system the apparent singularity of the metric for r is

another co ordinate artifact It disapp ears if one brings spatial innity to a nite

distance by an appropriate co ordinate transformation Details are given in the

next section

Discussion

Mo dulo radial reparametrizations r rr the lineelement is the most

general static and spherically symmetric solution of the sourcefree Einstein equa

tions matching at Minkowski spacetime at spatial innity r Therefore

in the nonrelativistic weakeld range v r m it should repro duce

Newtons law for the gravitational eld of a spherically symmetric p oint mass of

magnitude M according to which the acceleration of a test particle at distance

r is

d r GM

r

dt r

As the spherically symmetric solutions of the Einstein equations are dis

tinguished only by a parameter m in the Newtonian limit this parameter must

b e related to the mass M thereby representing the equivalent gravitational mass

of the ob ject describ ed by the spherically symmetric metric

We rst show that our solutions repro duce Newtons law in the limit r m

v c The equation of motion for a test particle is the geo desic equation

i

For the spatial co ordinates x this b ecomes

i

d x dx

i

terms O v c

d d

h m h

i

h x

i

g r g

Note that in the limit v one has dx dt d whilst for r the factor

hg Up on the identication m GM we thus indeed repro duce Newtons

equation

Taking into account the dimensions of Newtons constant as follows from

and is expressed in eq and our natural units in which c we nd

that m has the dimension of a length consistent with the observation that mr

should b e dimensionless We have already noted that in isotropic co ordinates the

metric comp onent h vanishes at half this distance r r m Presently this

only signals that the isotropic system cannot b e extended b eyond this range but

the surface r r do es have a sp ecial physical signicance it denes the lo cation

of the horizon of a spherically symmetric This characteristic value

r m of the radial co ordinate is known as the Schwarzschild radius

For the range m r the Schwarzschild solution in the form is

welldened and it matches the asymptotic Minkowski metric for large values of

r We noted that on the Schwarzschild sphere r m the metric is singular

but as a solution of the Einstein equations it can b e continued to smaller values

of r and then it is again welldened in the domain r m However it

turns out that this domain of r values do es not in any sense represent the physical

interior of the horizon as one might exp ect naively Rather it easy to establish

that the solution is invariant under the transformation

m

r

r

which maps the domain m to m Therefore the isotropic co ordinate

system actually represents a double cover of the region b etween the Schwarzschild

radius and the asymptotic region r Note that under this transformation

hr hr which can b e comp ensated by an accompanying timereversal

t t From these observations it follows that the apparent singularity for

r disapp ears as it simply describ es the another asymptotic region like that

for r in the original co ordinate system

The existence of such a co ordinate system presenting a double cover of the

space outside the black hole might lead one to susp ect that a test particle thrown

in radially towards the spherical Schwarzschild surface after a long enough time

would return to an asymptotic Minkowski region However this do es not happ en

in the rst place as a simple calculation to b e presented later shows in terms

of the time measured by an observer at asymptotic innity it takes an innite

p erio d of time for a test particle starting at any nite radial distance r m

with any nite velocity even to reach the Schwarzschild surface certainly such

an observer will never see it start up and set o towards innity again Apart

from this leaving the Schwarzschild surface would also take an innite amount of

asymptotic Minkowskitime Clearly these eects are due to the vanishing of hr

on the horizon which implies that an innite amount of asymptotic Minkowski

time t has to pass during any nite p erio d of prop er time But this is only

the minor part of the argument more imp ortant is the second reason to wit

that timelike geo desics do not ow from values r m to values r m

Instead as will b ecome clear they ow into a new region of spacetime describ ed

by complex values of r

Some calculational details are given later but the ab ove arguments at least

indicate that an observer at spatial innity is essentially disconnected from the do

main of spacetime b eyond the Schwarzschild sphere Therefore the Schwarzschild

surface is called a horizon from spatial innity one cannot lo ok b eyond it In

contrast things are radically dierent for an observer moving with the test par

ticle towards the horizon For such an observer in free fall comoving with the

test particle on a radial geo desic and starting from an arbitrary p oint at a

nite distance from the Schwarzschild surface only a nite amount of prop er time

passes until the radius r m is reached although for large radial distances

the required time grows linearly with the distance

Moreover having reached the horizon the particle and the observer can

continue falling inwards without noticing anything particular at least initially

The only remarkable eect they could discover once they have passed b eyond

the Schwarzschild surface is the imp ossibility to turn back to spatial innity

no matter how p owerful the engines they have at their disp osal to accelerate

and prop el them Therefore their passage to the inside of the Schwarzschild

sphere represents an irreversible event they are p ermanently trapp ed inside the

Schwarzschild sphere For this reason the Schwarzschild spacetime is called a

black hole nothing not even radiation can get out once it has fallen through

the horizon at least not in the domain of classical relativity

To describ e this motion of test particles ie the ow of geo desics through

the Schwarzschild sphere one must pass to a dierent co ordinate system one

b etter suited to particles in free fall rather than to the description of the space

time from the p oint of view of an asymptotic Minkowskian observer at rest at

spatial innity We make this passage in two steps First we show that in other

co ordinate systems there is a dierent continuation of spacetime b eyond the

Schwarzschild surface one in which the interior geometry inside the horizon is

distinct from the outside geometry and can not b e mapp ed back isometrically to

the exterior After that we show by explicit calculation of the geo desics that this

alternative continuation can b e taken to decrib e the true physical situation for a

test particle falling through the Schwarzschild sphere

The interior of the Schwarzschild sphere

To go b eyond the region of spacetime covered by the isotropic co ordinates we

p erform a radial co ordinate transformation which instead of making the spatial

part of the metric conformal to at space as in makes the angular

part directly isomorphic to the twosphere of radius r

r r g r k r r

Then the metric takes the form

ds h r dt g r dr r d

The explicit form of the radial transformation gives for the co ecients

m

h r

g r r

This leads to the standard form of the Schwarzschild solution as presented in the

original pap ers

m

dt ds dr r d

m

r

r

As to lowest order the transformation do es not include a rescaling we have

for large r and r

O

r r r

Therefore in the asymptotic region the Newtonian equation of motion for a test

particle in the eld of a p oint mass M still holds in the same form after replacing

r by r and in the nonrelativistic longdistance limit the two co ordinate systems

are indistinguishable

Note that the Schwarzschild radius r m is now lo cated at r m Again

the metric comp onents are singular there but now there is a zero mo de in the

ttcomp onent and an innity in the r r comp onent in such a way that the

determinant of the metric remains nite on the horizon On the other hand

the determinant g do es have a real zero for r This metric singularity was

not present in the isotropic co ordinate system as it did not cover this region of

spacetime but it turns out to represent a real physical singularity the curvature

b ecomes innite there in a co ordinateindep endent way

A p eculiarity of the metric is that the comp onents h and g are not

p ositive denite but change sign at the Schwarzschild radius This implies that

the role of time and radial distance are interchanged for r m r is the time

co ordinate and t the radial co ordinate At the same time the metric comp onents

have b ecome explicitly time dep endent they are functions of r and therefore

the metric is no longer static inside the horizon In return the metric is now

invariant under radial shifts t t t Hence it is the radial momentum p

t

which now commutes with the Hamiltonian the generator of prop ertime

translations and is conserved

This strange result is the price one has to pay for continuing the Schwarzschild

geometry to the interior of the Schwarzschild sphere It is quite clear that this

could never heve b een achieved in the isotropic co ordinate system at least

not for real values of r Together with the app earance of the curvature singularity

atr this shows b eyond doubt that the region inside the Schwarzschild sphere

r m has no counter part in the standard isotropic co ordinate system

To gain a b etter understanding of the dierence b etween the continuation to

r m in isotropic co ordinates and r m in Schwarzschild co ordinates it is

useful to p erform yet another radial co ordinate transformation to a dimensionless

co ordinate dened by

tanh hr

with the result that

r r g r m cosh

Then the b ecomes

ds tanh dt m cosh d d

As cosh this expression for the metric like the isotropic co ordinate sys

tem is valid only outside the horizon r m Moreover continuing to negative

values of we reobtain the double cover of the exterior of the Schwarzschild black

hole

m

tanh hr h

r

Now the interior of the Schwarzschild sphere can also b e reparametrized in a

similar way taking account of the fact that h has b ecome negative

tan h r r m cos m cos

This parametrization clearly exists only for r m In these co ordinates

the metric takes the form

d d dt m cos ds tan

The timelike nature of now is obvious It is also clear that this co ordinate

system presents an innitely rep eated periodic covering of the interior of the

Schwarzschild sphere the fundamental domain may b e chosen to b e

corresp onding to m r but continuation of b eyond this region leads to

rep eated covering of the same set of rvalues

Comparing these two parametrizations of the exterior and the interior of the

Schwarzschild sphere it is now obvious that they are related by analytic contin

uation the interior of the sphere is not describ ed by negative values of

which corresp ond to r m in isotropic co ordinates but by imaginary values

of

i

which is like a Wick rotation changing the spacelike radial co ordinate to the

timelike co ordinate In terms of the original isotropic co ordinates it can b e

describ ed as the analytic continuation of r to complex values

m

i

r e

Thus in the interior of the Schwarzschild surface the mo dulus of r is constant but

its phase changes whilst outside its phase is constant and the mo dulus changes

Note that whereas the p erio d of the fundamental domain of in describing the

interior region of the Schwarzschild sphere is the values of the isotropic radial

co ordinate r are p erio dic in with p erio d Again it seems that the isotropic

co ordinates cover the Schwarzschild solution twice We have more to say ab out

that in the following Finally we observe that as indicated in eq there are

two ways to p erform the analytic continuation from to ie from the exterior

to the interior of the Schwarzschild spacetime Also this fact has nontrivial

signicance for the geometry of the Schwarzschild spacetime

Geo desics

The analysis presented so far makes it clear that the geometry of the Schwarzschild

spacetime is quite intricate Indeed at the Schwarzschild sphere r m or

r m and resp ectively several branches of the spacetime meet

two branches of the exterior connected to an asymptotic Minkowski region and

two branches of the interior connecting the horizon with the spacetime singu

larity It is therefore of imp ortance to understand the ow of geo desics in the

neighborho o d of the horizon and see which branches test particles moving in

the Schwarzschild spacetime follow We b egin with timelike geo desics repre

senting the motion of test particles of unit mass For such a particle one has in

asymptotic Minkowski space

H g p p

This relation was already argued from the denition of prop er time in sect

eq and b elow As H is conserved the relation holds everywhere on the

particles worldline

The solution of the geo desic equations for Schwarzschild spacetime is much

simplied by the large number of its symmetries They provide us with suciently

many additional constants of motion to allow a complete solution of the equations

of motion of test particles in terms of their energy and angular momentum The

rst of these constants of motion is the momentum comp onent p conserved

t

b ecause the metric is tindep endent

dt dt

p h r

t

d d h r

At spacelike innity h also with dened as prop er time dt d for a

particle at rest there Therefore a particle at rest at r has equal to the

unit rest mass of the test particle moreover as is intuitively obvious and argued

more precisely b elow if it is not at rest it must have Indeed particles with

cannot reach spatial innity and in this sense they are in b ound states

The factor gives the usual sp ecial relativistic kinematical timedilation for a

moving particle in asymptotic Minkowski space

In contrast for nite radial distance r r the factor h r describ es the

gravitational redshift the time dilation due only to the presence of a gravitational

eld It represents a universal eect not inuenced by the state of motion of the

particle

The conservation of angular momentum gives us three conservation laws

which are however not indep endent

J sin p cot cos p

J cos p cot sin p

J p

with J J J L a constant Here the separate momentum comp o

nents are

d d

p k r sin p k r

d d

If one orients the co ordinate system such that the angular momentum is in the

x direction then constant and therefore p and p J

Then the angular co ordinates as a function of prop er time are given by

d

d k r

It remains to solve for the radial co ordinate r For this we use the conservation

of the hamiltonian setting H

dr

p g g

r

d h k

Note that consistency of this equation in the region outside the horizon requires

h k

It shows why in the region r the time dilation factor has to b e greater

or equal to unity At the same time for nonzero values of angular

momentum the radial distance r can in general not b ecome arbitrary low like

in the ordinary Kepler problem there is a centrifugal barrier to b e overcome For

details we refer to the literature

Combining eq with that for the angle by eliminating we directly

obtain the orbital equation

s

dr k

d g h k

It is clear that an orbit can have a p oint of closest approach or furthest distance

only if dr d dr d The only physical solutions are p oints where relation

b ecomes an equality When the equality holds identically for all p oints of

the orbit the orbit is circular One can show that the smallest radius allowed for a

3 Note that each of these equations is still true for arbitrary radial parametrization

stable circular orbit corresp onds in Schwarzschild co ordinates tor m m

To the set of timelike tra jectories we add the lightlike geo desics representing

the orbits of massless particles In that case the prop ertime interval vanishes

identically on any geo desic that is to say H We parametrize the tra jectories

with an ane parameter and obtain

dt

p h

t

d

allowing one to replace the ane parameter by t through

h

dt d

One can again choose the plane of motion to b e and the conservation

of angular momentum holds in the form

r d d

r

h dt d

where is a constant The radial equation now b ecomes

d d dr

k k sin h g

dt dt dt

or using the choice ab ove

dr h k

g h

dt r

Like in the massive case if one can eliminate the ane parameter also

in favour of instead of t

An interesting case as concerns the exploration of the horizon and the connection

b etween the interior and the exterior of the Schwarzschild sphere is that of radial

motion or resp ectively Let us rst consider the timelike geo desic

for a particle starting from rest near r which implies and dr dt

Then

p

dr dt

h

d h d g h

It is easy to solve these equations in the Schwarzschild co ordinates indeed with

h mr one nds a solution valid in the whole range r b oth

outside and inside the horizon

2

3

r

m m

where is the prop er time at which the particle reaches the singularity atr

Taking this time as xed denotes the prop er time prior to at which the

particle is at radial distance r Observe that this time is nite for any nite

radial distancer only when starting from innity it takes an innite prop er time

to reach the singularity Nothing sp ecial happ ens at the horizon r m it is

crossed at prop er time

m

H

a prop er p erio d m b efore the singularity is reached of course in terms of the

timeco ordinate r inside the horizon it takes a nite p erio d m

Solving for t as a function of prop er time we have to distinguish two cases

r m and r m Namely introducing the new variable

1

3

y

m

we obtain the dierential equation

y dt

m d y

the solution of which dep ends on whether the rhs is p ositive or negative We

nd for the two cases the solutions

1

3

1

r m arccoth

3

t t

m

1

3

m m m

r m arctanh

m

In b oth cases the lefthand side b ecomes innite at the horizon ie at prop er

time This conrms that an external observer at innity will never actually

H

see the particle reach the horizon Similarly the distance measured from the

horizon to the singularity at r is innite in terms of the co ordinate t

Now consider what happ ens in isotropic co ordinates In terms of a new vari

able

s

r

x

m

where we choose the p ositive branch of the square ro ot integration of the equation

for r is elementary and gives

x

m x

Clearly this is symmetric under interchange x x corresp onding to inversion

wrt the horizon r m Indeed b oth at r and r we see that

This conrms our earlier remark that a particle released from space

like innity do es not return there Instead it will cross the horizon x at

as in the previous calculation Then continuing r to complex values

H

we nd

i

2

x e cos

m

The singularity is then reached for as exp ected In terms of the

radial co ordinate related by the pseudoWick rotation the equation for

the radial distance in terms of prop er time outside the horizon b ecomes

cosh

m

The analytic continuation of co ordinates in the complex plane on crossing the

horizon is manifest

Next we consider incoming lightlike radial geo desics The equation is

h dr

dt g

Let t refer to the time at which the massless particle eg a photon passes a

xed p oint on the radius egr in Schwarzschild co ordinates Then the solution

of the geo desic equation for t is

t t r r r m

ln

m m r m

With the absolute value as argument of the logarithm this equation is valid b oth

outside and inside the horizon The time for the photon to reach the horizon

from any p oint outside diverges as do es the distance it has to move from horizon

to the curvature singularity as measured by the co ordinate t

Extended Schwarzschild geometry

As we have already noticed that for a massive particle falling across the horizon

nothing very sp ecial happ ens it is unsatisfactory that we do not have a non

singular description of the same pro cess for massless particles To improve the

description of lightlike geo desics at the end of the last section it is not su

cient to p erform a radial co ordinate transformation one has to eliminate the

tco ordinate and replace it by one which do es not b ecome innite on the horizon

Moreover to describ e lightlike geo desics it would b e convenient to have a metric

where the lightcone structure is manifest by having the radial part of the met

ric conformal to radial Minkowski space a co ordinate system in which r t are

replaced by co ordinates u v such that the radial part of the metric b ecomes

h r dt g r dr f u v du dv

Such a co ordinate system was rst prop osed by Kruskal and Szekeres dening

the new co ordinates such as to b e dimensionless the line element is written in

the form

ds

g u v d f u v dv du

m

with the standard choice for u v dened in terms of the Schwarzschild co ordi

nates r t by

t

tanh if jv j juj

m

r r u

2m

u v e

m v

t

if jv j juj coth

m

In these co ordinates the horizon r m t is lo cated at u v whilst

the curvature singularityr corresp onds to the two branches of the hyperb ola

u v one in the past and one in the future of an observer at spacelike

innity More generally from the rst result one concludes that the surfaces r

constant are mapp ed to hyperb olas u v constant where the last constant is

p ositive outside and negative inside the horizon These hyperb olas are worldlines

of particles in circular orbit ie b eing sub ject to a constant acceleration

Similarly hypersurfaces t constant corresp ond to u constant v repre

sented by straight lines in a u v diagram Note also that the singularity r

consists of a set of two spacelike surfaces in u v co ordinates

More explicitly we can write u v in terms of r t as

s

r t r

4m

u e cosh

m m

s

t r r

4m

v sinh e

m m

outside the horizon r m and

s

r

r t

4m

u e sinh

m m

s

r t r

4m

e cosh v

m m

within the horizon r m We note once again that these co ordinates pro duce

two solutions for each region of the spacetime geometry In the ab ove conventions

the dimensionless co ecient functions are given implicitly by

r

m r

2m

f u v e g u v

r m

We can also compare with the co ordinate systems and describing

explicitly the double cover of the Schwarzschild spacetime

1 t 1 t

2 2

cosh cosh

2 2 2 2

u e cosh v e sinh sinh sinh

m m

for the exterior region jv j juj and

1 t 1 t

2 2

cos cos

2 2 2 2

u e sinh v e cosh sin sin

m m

for the interior region jv j juj From these expressions we infer that the exterior

regions and corresp onding to r m and r m in isotropic

co ordinates and the two interior regions and as well coincide with

the regions u v and u v in KruskalSzekeres co ordinates resp ectively

Hence the double cover of Schwarzschild spacetime given by the two solutions for

the KruskalSzekeres co ordinates ab ove corresp ond exactly to the double cover

we found in isotropic and co ordinates

The KruskalSzekeres co ordinates were introduced and are esp ecially useful

b ecause they represent the lightlike geo desics in a very simple way In particular

the radial lightlike geo desic are given by

du

du dv

dv

These corresp ond to straight lines in the u v diagram parallel to the diagonals

The sp ecial light rays u v are the asymptotes of the singularity and describ e

the horizon itself they can b e interpreted as photons p ermanently hovering on

the horizon Any other lightlike radial geo desic eventually hits the singularity

either in the past or in the future at nite u v although this is in the region

b efore t or after t in terms of the time of an observer at spatial innity

As the light cones have a particularly simple representation in the u v

diagram for all regions inside and outside the horizon it follows that timelike

and spacelike geo desics are distinguished by having their derivatives jdudv j

for the timelike case and jdudv j for the spacelike ones One can check

by explicit computation that a particle starting from rest at any distance r and

falling into the black hole has a timelike world line everywhere also inside the

horizon dudv can change on the world line of a particle but never from time

like to spacelike or vice versa Therefore all timelike geo desics must cross the

horizon lightlike and the singularity spacelike so oner or later If they dont

reach or start from spatial innity they must come from the past singularity

across the past horizon and then cross the future horizon to travel towards the

nal singularity all within a nite amount of prop er time

The KruskalSzekeres co ordinate system also teaches us more ab out the top ol

ogy of the Schwarzschild geometry how the various regions of the spacetime are

connected First of all it shows that there is a past and a future singularity inside

a past and a future horizon juj jv j dep ending on v b eing p ositive or negative

In this resp ect it is helpful to observe that according to eq for r m the

sign of v is xed for all t In the literature these regions are sometimes refered to

as the black hole the interior of the horizon containting the future singularity and

the white hole containing the past singularity In a standard convention these

regions of spacetime are classied as regions I I future Schwarzschild sphere and

IV past Schwarzschild sphere resp ectively

There are also two exterior regions connected to asymptotic Minkowski space

They are distinguished similarly by u and u as forr m the sign of u is

xed for all t one cannot reach negative u starting from p ositive u or vice versa

by any timelike or lightlike geo desic In the same standard convention these

regions are refered to as region I and region I I I resp ectively Being connected by

spacelike geo desics only the two sheets of the exterior of the Schwarzschild space

time are not in causal contact and cannot physically communicate However the

surfaces t constant do extend from u to u indeed the regions

are spacelike connected at the lo cus u v where the two branches of the

horizon intersect To understand the top ology of Schwarzschild spacetime we

must analyze this connection in some more detail this can b e done using the

technique of embedding surfaces as explained eg in ref

Consider a surface t constant and x a plane We wish to un

derstand how the regions u and u are connected for this plane The

Schwarzschild line element restricted to this plane is

dr

ds r d

m

r

Now we embed this twodimensional surface in a threedimensional at euclidean space

ds dx dy dz

by taking x r cos y r sin and dening the surface z F r such that

ds F r dr r d

Comparison of eqs and then implies

z r F r

m m m

This denes a surface of revolution obtained by taking the parab ola z mx

m in the x z plane and rotating it around the z axis It is a single surface

with lo oks like a throat of which the upp er half z corresp onds to

s

r

or u

m

whilst the lower half z describ es the branch

s

r

or u

m

The two regions are connected along the circle r m at z Of course the

spherical symmetry implies that the same top ology would b e observed for any

choice of angle any plane with u is connected to one with u in this way

Although no timelike travel is p ossible classically b etween the regions on each

side of the throat the p ossibility of particles tunneling via quantum pro cesses

b etween the two regions p oses a curious and interesting question to theories of

quantum gravity

Charged black holes

The spherically symmetric solution of the sourcefree Einstein equations can b e

extended to a solution of the coupled EinsteinMaxwell equations including a

static spherically symmetric electric eld in the rest frame of the black hole

As the only solution of this type in at Minkowski space is the Coulomb eld we

exp ect a solution of the coupled equations to approach the Coulomb p otential at

spacelike innity

q

A A dx dt

r pr

with pr for r This is a solution of the Maxwell equation

D F

in a spherically symmetric static spacetime geometry The Maxwell eld strength

app earing in this equations is

q p r p

F dx dx dt dr F

r p

In isotropic co ordinates the energymomentum tensor of this electromagnetic

eld reads

q p r p h

g F T F F F diag r r sin

r h p g

This has the same general structure as the Einstein tensor

hg h

G h g diag r r sin hg

g h g r g

which was derived under the conditions with the general solution

Now requiring the coupled EinsteinMaxwell equations

G G T F

this reduces to a single condition on the radial functions h g p with the solution

m

pr g r

r r

r g r g

hr

g r mr

Here the constant is dened by

q G

m e e

It may b e checked that this solution satises the Maxwell equations in this grav

itational elds as well As g r can also b e written in the form

m e

g r

r r

we nd that the Schwarzschild solution is reobtained in the limit e For

the zero of the metric co ecient h is now shifted to

r

As in the Schwarzschild case this is a p oint where two asymptotically at regions

of spacetime meet the metric is again invariant under the transformation

r t t

r

under which hr dt hr dt Moreover also like in the Schwarzschild geometry

the sphere r actually denes a horizon and timelike geo desics are contin

ued into the interior of this horizon which is not covered by the real isotropic

co ordinate system

A Schwarzschildlike co ordinate system which allows continuation into the

interior of the horizon exists It was found by Reissner and Nordstrom and

is related to the isotropic co ordinates by a radial co ordinate transformation

r r g r r m

r

Then the metric of the charged spherically symmetric black hole takes the form

ds h dt g dr r d

where the co ecients h g are again inversely related

m m e

h r

g r r r r r

The horizon is now seen to b e lo cated at r m in fact there is a second

horizon at r m provided m e As in general h and g are not p osi

tive denite at each of these horizons the role of radial and time co ordinate is

interchanged Only for ie for m e the situation is dierent as the two

horizons coincide and no interchange of time and spacelike co ordinates o ccurs

This sp ecial case of ReissnerNordstrom solution is refered to in the literature as

an extremal charged black hole

The result of the second horizon for nonextremal charged black holes is

that the real curvature singularity that is found to exist at r is a time

like singularity for m e This is exp ected from the Coulomb solution in at

Minkowski space which contains a timelike singularity of the electric eld at

r Therefore such a black hole lo oks more like a p oint particle than the

Schwarzschild type of solution of the Einstein equations

The interior region b etween the horizons can b e obtained from the isotropic

co ordinates by complex analytic continuation of r from the outer horizon by

i

e r

The domain of the argument is chosen as Indeed for these values of r

the radial ReissnerNordstrom co ordinate is

r m cos

and takes all values b etween the two horizons r m precisely once In this

parametrization the isotropic ReissnerNordstrom metric b ecomes

sin

ds d d dt m cos

m cos

Again we observe the role of as the timelike variable with t spacelike b etween

the horizons For the isotropic co ordinate r b ecomes negative

r

Thus we discover that the ReissnerNordstrom spacetime can b e extended con

sistently to negative values of the radial co ordinate In particular the curvature

singularity at r is seen to b e mapp ed to

m e

r

This shows rst of all that there are two timelike branches of the singularity

and secondly that r can b ecome negative for nonextremal black holes with m e

The two branches are found also up on analytic continuation of in to

imaginary values

i

This leads to a parametrization of the ReissnerNordstrom geometry for the ex

terior regions of the form

sinh

ds d d dt m cosh

m cosh

where the plus sign holds for the exterior region connected to asymptotic at

Minkowski space and the minus sign to the region connected to the curvature

singularity Because of the doublevaluedness of the analytic continuation

there are two copies of each of these exterior regions involved

Spinning black holes

The Schwarzschild and ReissnerNordstrom black holes are static and spheri

cally symmetric wrt an asymptotic Minkowski frame at spatial innity There also exist extensions of these solutions of Einstein and coupled EinsteinMaxwell

equations which are neither static nor spherically symmetric but represent ro

tating black holes with or without charge These solutions have an axial

symmetry around the axis of rotation and are stationary in the exterior region

the metric is timeindep endent and the rate of rotation and all other observable

prop erties of the black hole are constant in time

The standard choice of co ordinates for these metrics with the axis of rotation

b eing taken as the z axis and reducing to those of Schwarzschild or Reissner and

Nordstrom for the spherically symmetric case of no rotation is that of Boyer

and Lindquist Denoting these co ordinates by t r to emphasize their

relation with the spherical co ordinate systems for the nonrotating metrics the

line element for reads

r a cos

ds dr d dt a sin d

r a cos

r a sin a

d dt

r a cos r a

Here a is a constant parametrizing the deviation of this line element from the

usual diagonal form of the SchwarzschildReissnerNordstrom metric its physical

interpretation is that of the total angular momentum p er unit of mass

J ma

As one can always choose co ordinates such that the angular momentum p oints

along the p ositive z axis the angular momentum p er unit of mass may b e taken

p ositive a For convenience of discussion this will b e assumed in the follow

ing

The quantity in the line element is short hand for

r m a e m

Note that like the metric co ecients h and g we have encountered earlier

this quantity is not p ositive denite everywhere Also the zeros of this function

determine the lo cation of the horizons of which there are two an outer and an

inner one for m a e

p

m a e r m

H

The gravitational eld represented by the metric is accompanied by an

electromagnetic eld the vector p otential of which can b e chosen as the one

form

q r

A dt a sin d

For convenience of notation we have here introduced the function dened as

r a cos

These elds are solutions of the coupled EinsteinMaxwell equations and

with the Maxwell eld strength given by the two form

q

r a cos dr dt a sin d F

r cos sin q a

d adt r a d

and with the identication of the quantity e as in eq

q G

e

To determine the prop erties of the spacetime describ ed by the KerrNewman line

element we need to analyse the geo desic ow Because the spherical symmetry

of the Schwarzschild and ReissnerNordstrom solutions is absent and only axial

symmetry remains there is one less indep endent constant of motion from angular

momentum only the comp onent along the axis of rotation the z axis say is

preserved Fortunately this is comp ensated by the app earance of a new constant

of motion quadratic in momenta which replaces the Casimir invariant of total

angular momentum As a result one can still completely solve the geo desic

equations in terms of rst integrals of motion We now give some details

First we write down the geo desic hamiltonian eectively representing the

inverse metric g

r a p a p H p a sin p p p

t t

r

sin

Clearly to b e welldened we must assume as the z axis represents

a co ordinate singularity in the BoyerLindquist system where the angle is not

welldened The ab ove hamiltonian is a constant of geo desic ow recall that for

timelike geo desics it takes the value H whilst for lightlike ones H

Next there are two Killing vectors respresenting invariance of the geometry

under timeshifts and rotations around the z axis

dt d

p g g

t tt t

d d

d dt

g p g

t

d d

Of course for timelike geo desics the ane parameter maybe taken to b e prop er

time These equations can b e viewed as establishing a linear relation b etween

b etween the constants of motion and the velocities dtd dd

t

G

with the dot denoting a derivative wrt the ane parameter The determinant

of this linear transformation is

det G g g g sin

tt

t

and changes sign whenever do es Therefore the zeros of dene the lo cus

of p oints where one of the eigenvalues of G changes sign from a timelike to

a spacelike variable or viceversa at the same time the co ecient of p in

r

the hamiltonian changes sign conrming that these values represent the

horizons of the KerrNewman spacetime It follows from this analysis that

outside the outer horizon in the region connected to spacelike innity det G

Now if from eqs the angular prop er velocity dd is eliminated one

nds the relation

det G dt

g d

where the quantity with the dimensions of an angular velocity is dened by

r a g

t

a

g r a a sin

a

r a r a r a

Observe that it is prop ortional to a with a constant of prop ortionality which

for large but nite r is p ositive Hence represents an angular velocity with

the same orientation as the angular momentum J With a canonical choice of

co ordinate system this quantity is p ositive and therefore as well

It also follows from eq that for timelike geo desics outside the horizon

with and therefore dtd an inequality holds of the form

For large r near innity one nds in fact the stronger inequality

Returning to the solution of the geo desic equations we take into account the

existence of a constant of motion K such that K K p p with K the

contravariant comp onents of a Killing tensor

D K

The explicit expression for K is

p r sin

K ap a cos p r p

t

r

sin

a cos

r a p ap

t

That K denes a constant of geo desic ow is most easily established by checking

that its Poisson bracket with the hamiltonian H vanishes

fK H g

Using these constants of motion it is straightforward to establish the solutions

for timelike geo desics in the form

dt r a r a a sin

a

d

a sin d r a

a

d

sin

dr

a r a K r

d

d

K a cos a sin

d

a sin

Note that for a particle starting from r one has These solutions are

welldened everywhere except on the horizons and at p oints where At

the latter lo cus the curvature invariant R R b ecomes innite and there is

a real physical singularity At the horizons b oth t and change innitely fast

signalling innite growth of these co ordinates wrt an observer in asymptotic

at Minkowski space

As with the innite amount of co ordinate time t to reach the horizon in the

Schwarzschild and ReissnerNordstrom solutions this merely signies a co ordi

nate singularity However here it is not only t but also which b ecomes innite

To gain a b etter understanding of the reason for this rotation of geo desics rst

notice that according to the second equation even for the prop er

angular velocity dd do es not vanish in general b ecause Hence there are

no purely radial geo desics any incoming test particle picks up a rotation Now

computing the angular velocity as measured by an observer at rest at spatial

innity from the rst two equations one nds

d g g

t tt

dt g g

t

It follows immediately that for a geo desic without orbital angular momentum

the observed angular velocity equals the sp ecial reference value

d

dt

At the horizon r r where this b ecomes

H

a d

H

dt r a

H

r r

+H

Comparison with the expression for eq shows that outside the horizon

the inequality

H

holds with equality only on the horizon As these quantities are nite the

time t can increase near the horizon at an innite rate only if increases at a

prop ortional rate For this reason b oth t and have to grow without b ound as

r approaches r

H

At spacelike innity the Killing vectors dene time translations and

plane rotations However their nature changes if one approaches the horizon

Consider the time translation generated by p The corresp onding Killing

t

vector has contravariant and covariant comp onents given by

g

t t

t t

is the usual Kronecker delta symbol Similarly the comp onents of the Here

Killing vector for plane rotations generated by p are

g

It follows that these Killing vectors have norms given by

a sin

g

t tt

and

r a a sin

g sin

whilst their inner pro duct is

r a

g a sin

t t

From these equations several observations follow First as the norms and in

ner pro ducts of Killing vectors are co ordinate indep endent quantities we can

write the expressions for the reference angular velocity eq and for the

observed angular velocity eq in a co ordinate indep endent form

d

t t

t

dt

t

The last equality is equivalent to

d

t t

dt

Second with a and excluding the z axis where the Boyer

Lindquist co ordinates are not welldened and vanishes and the invariant

inner pro duct are p ositive outside the horizon Also the p ositivity of det G

t

in the exterior region eq can b e expressed in the invariant form

t t

with the equality holding only on the horizon Then for we nd from

eq that ddt whilst for the angular velocity is less than this

reference value ddt As long as is timelike this is all that can b e

t

established in fact with and the absolute value of the angular

t

velocity ddt can b ecome arbitrarily large

However it is easily established that the norm of changes sign on the surface

t

p

r r m m e a cos

which with the exception of the p oints where the surface cuts the z axis

lies outside the horizon The region b etween this surface and the horizon

It then follows directly is called the ergosphere and is spacelike there

t

t

from eqs and that in this region the angular velocity is always

p ositive

d

for

t

dt

Thus we have established that inside the ergosphere any test particle is dragged

along with the rotation of the black hole and no freefalling observer can b e non

rotating there Related to this b oth and are spacelike Killing vectors there

t

Nevertheless outside the horizon there still exists timelike combinations of these vectors even inside the ergosphere

t

which has nonp ositive norm as a result of the inequality with

equality holding only on the horizon r r

H

The Kerr singularity

We continue the analysis of blackhole geometry with a brief discussion of the

nature of the singularity of spinning black holes To b egin we have already

noticed that like the spherical charged black hole the spinning KerrNewman

black holes have two horizons an innner and an outer one As the singularity

is lo cated inside the inner horizon we exp ect the singularity to have a

timelike character

In order to elucidate the top ological structure of the spacetime near the

singularity we introduce new co ordinates in two steps First we dene the Kerr

co ordinates V as the solution of the dierential equations

r a a

dV dt dr d d dr

With these denitions the KerrNewman line element b ecomes

h i

sin

dV a sin d r a d adV ds

dV a sin d dr d

Now we turn from quasispherical co ordinates to quasiCartesian ones known as

KerrSchild co ordinates by dening

x r cos a sin sin

y r sin a cos sin

z r cos

and we reparametrize the time co ordinate t t using

dt dV dr

We then nd that at xed the transformation

x x x r cos

y y y r sin

z z z

is equivalent to r r r This shows that like the ReissnerNordstrom case

the negative values of r are to b e taken as part of the physical domain of values

i

Next one introduces the co ecients k i by the relation

r xdx y dy a xdy y dx z dz

k dr dt

r a r

and scalar function ur

mr e r a

ur

a z

r

r

With these denitions the metric can b e written in the hybrid form

ds dx ur k dr

where the rst term on the righthand side is to b e interpreted as in at space

time with x x y z t Therefore u and k parametrize the deviation from

at spacetime

Having introduced this new parametrization the physical singularity

equivalent to r and is now seen to b e mapp ed to the ring

x y a z

with the solution

x a sin y a cos

A consequence of this structure is that in contrast to the Schwarzschild geometry

geo desic crossing the horizon do not necessarily encounter the singularity but can

pass it by

Blackholes and thermo dynamics

When a test particle falls into the ergosphere of a black hole the constant of

motion p b ecomes a momentum comp onent rather than an energy

t

This provides a means of extracting energy from a spinning black hole as rst

prop osed by Penrose if a particle enters the ergosphere with energy this

b ecomes a momentum during its stay in the ergosphere the momentum can b e

changed for example by a decay of the particle into two or more fragments in

such a way that the nal momentum of one of the fragments is larger than the

original momentum If this fragment would again escap e which is allowed as

the ergosphere is lo cated outside the horizon it leaves with a dierent energy

corresp onding to its changed momentum This energy is now larger than the

energy with which the original particle entered By this pro cess it is p ossible

to extract energy from a black hole even in classical physics

It would seem that the Penrose pro cess violates the conservation of energy

if there would b e no limit to the total amount of energy that can b e extracted

this way However it can b e established that such a violation is not p ossible and

that the pro cess is selflimiting emission of energy is always accompanied by

a decrease in the angular momentum andor electric charge of the black hole

in such a way that after extraction of a nite amount of energy the black hole

b ecomes spherical After that there is no longer an ergosphere and no energy

extraction by the Penrose pro cess is p ossible

We will now show how this comes ab out for the simplest case of an electrically

neutral black hole of the Kerr type In this case the lo cation of the horizon is at

p p

r m m a m m J

H

m

Then the angular momentum of test particles moving tangentially to the horizon

is

J a

p

H

a r m

m m J

H

This quantity can b e interpreted in terms of the area of the spherical surface

formed by horizon of the black hole

Z Z

a

p

g A d d g r a

H

H

rr

H

H

Eq thus provides an expression for the area of the horizon in terms of the

mass and the angular momentum of the black hole

p

A

H

m m J

Now we observe that

i the area A increases with increasing mass

H

ii at xed area A the mass reaches a minimum for J

H

iii by absorbing infalling test particles including Penrosetype pro cesses the

blackhole area A never decreases

H

The rst two statements are obvious from eq The last one follows if

we consider the eect of changes in the mass and angular momentum of the black

hole We assume that the absorption of a test particle with energy and angular

momentum changes a Kerr black hole of total mass m and angular momentum J

to another Kerr black hole of mass m m and angular momentum J J

This assumption is justied by the uniqueness of the Kerr solution for stationary

rotating black holes

Now under arbitrary changes m J the corresp onding change in the area

is

p

m m A J J

H

p p

m J m

m J m J

J

p

m J

H

m J

H

For an infalling test particle only sub ject to the gravitational force of the black

hole we have derived the inequality Moreover on the horizon such a par

ticle has b een shown to have the angular velocity wrt a stationary observer

H

at innity indep endent of the value of Hence with m and J we

obtain

J A

H

p

H

m J

H

Thus we can indeed conclude that by such adiabatic pro cesses adding innitesi

mal amounts of energy and angular momentum at a time the area of the black

hole never decreases

Casting the relation in the form

A J m

H H

where is given by

p

m J

mA

H

it b ears a remarkable resemblance to the laws of thermo dynamics which states

that changes of state describ ed by equilibrium thermo dynamics are such that for

isolated systems variations in energy U entropy S and angular momentum J are

related by

U T S J

where T is the temp erature and the total angular momentum and moreover

that in such pro cesses one always has S The imp ortant step needed in a

full identication of these relations is to asso ciate the area A with the entropy

H

and the quantity called the surface gravity with the temp erature

S c A T

H

c

where c is an unknown constant of prop ortionality Now if black holes have a

nite temp erature they should emit thermal radiation Using a semiclassical

approximation it was shown by Hawking that quantum uctuations near

the horizon of a black hole indeed lead to the emission of particles with a thermal

sp ectrum This is true irresp ective of the existence of an ergosphere therefore it

covers the case of vanishing angular momentum as well The temp erature of the

radiation Hawking found was

T

H

This xes the unknown constant ab ove to the value

c

It seems therefore that the thermo dynamical description of black holes is more

than a mere analogy The issue of interpreting the entropy

A

H

S S

where S is an unknown additive constant in statistical terms by counting mi

crostates is hotly debated and has recently received a lot of imp etus from devel

opments in sup erstring theory

The extension of these results to the case of charged black holes is straight

forward The relation b etween horizon area A and angular velocity remains

H H

the as in but in terms of the macroscopic observables m J e asso ciated

with the black hole the area is now

p

A e

H

m m J m e

The changes in these observable quantities by absorbing p ossibly charged test

particles are then related by

A J e m

H H H

where the electric p otential at the horizon is

er

H

H

A

H

and the constant is now dened as

p

m J m e

mA

H

Again by sending test particles into the black hole the area can never decrease

A In this way the thermo dynamical treatment is generalized to include

H

pro cesses in which the electric charge changes

We conclude this discussion with establishing the gravitational interpretation of

the constant asso ciated with the temp erature in the thermo dynamical descrip

tion This quantity is known as the surface gravity b ecause in the spherically

symmetric case it represents the outward radial acceleration necessary to keep a

test particle hovering on the horizon without actually falling into the black hole

For the case of the Schwarzschild black hole this is easily established Dene

the covariant acceleration as

D u

D

As the four velocity of a test particle has negative unit norm u it follows

that in the fourdimensional sense the acceleration is orthogonal to the velocity

u

Also a particle at rest in the frame of an asymptotic inertial observer at innity

has a velocity fourvector of the form

p u

g

tt

Combining these two equations and taking into account the spherical symmetry

a particle at rest must have a purely radial acceleration given by

m

r

g

r tt

r

Remarkably we recover Newtons law It follws in particular that on the horizon

r

H

m

This quantity is actually a prop er scalar invariant as can b e seen from writing it

as

q

t

r

H

with the invariant magnitude of the four acceleration

q

g

For the case of the spinning black holes the prop er generalization of this result

gives the surface gravity as in eq

Chapter

Topological invariants and

selfduality

Topology and top ological invariants

Gravity is a gauge theory and as such it has many similarities to YangMills the

ories In particular the nature of the gravitational vacuum is complicated by the

p ossibilities of nontrivial top ology quantum tunneling and sp ontaneous symme

try breaking In this section we briey introduce some concepts and notions of

top ology

In the geometrical context the global top ology of a manifold describ es prop er

ties characterising its connectedness like the presence of noncontractable lo ops

spheres etc Clearly the way that various parts of a manifold are connected

determines whether it can b e covered by a single globally dened co ordinate sys

tem or requires a sp ecic minimal number of co ordinate charts glued together

in a smo oth way ie such that in the overlap region of two charts the trans

formation from one co ordinate system to the other is dierentiable Generically

more than one co ordinate chart is necessary as in the case of a sphere in which

conventionally the northern and southern hemisphere are mapp ed separately on

the plane with the maps overlapping in the region of the equator Thus gen

eral manifolds are to b e considered as glued together from a number of smo othly

deformed regions of at space often in a nontrivial way

This has imp ortant consequences For example if one computes the integral of

a certain function over the manifold this integral must necessarily b e decomp osed

into a sum of integrals over each co ordinate patch Even in the case in which

the manifold as a whole has no b oundary the various co ordinate patches do have

b oundaries Thus in the application of the generalized GaussStokes theorem for

the integral of a total divergence of a vector eld K x over a manifold M

P

M with M the pieces of the manifold which can b e covered with a single

i i

i

co ordinate chart the integral b ecomes a sum of integrals over the b oundaries of

the co ordinate patches

Z Z Z

X X

i i

K r K r K

n

M M M

i i

i i

i i

where K x are the comp onents of the vector eld in the ith co ordinate

patch and de subscript n denotes the comp onent normal to the b oundary M

i

Now if the complete manifold M has no b oundary all the b oundaries M are

i

internal b oundaries and these are integrated over twice with opp osite orientation

Therefore if the integrand is the same in each case the contributions of the

integrals over these internal b oundaries cancel exactly However in the change

i

of co ordinates from one region M to the next the value of the integrand K

i

n

can sometimes change and the cancellation may b e sp oiled Then the nontrivial

top ology manifests itself in an apparent violation of the generalized GaussStokes

theorem integrals over a total divergence do not have to vanish in the absence of

an external b oundary Of course if K is a smo oth vector eld like the physically

observable electric eld it can not jump on the b oundary M a violation of

i

the GaussStokes theorem requires that the vector eld cannot b e smo oth Only

particular kinds of physically relevant vector elds can satisfy this requirement

without leading to physical or mathematical inconsistencies vector elds which

change in a controllable way with the change b etween two co ordinate patches

not leading to observable or measurable consequences Basically such vector elds

must b e gauge elds as these can change by unobservable gauge transformations

on the b oundary of co ordinate regions

Example

We illustrate these general and rather abstract arguments by a simple and well

known example of vector elds on the twosphere The standard co ordinate

system for a twosphere of radius r is the p olar co ordinate system

In these co ordinates the line element on the sphere reads

d sin d ds r

From this expression it can b e seen that the metric is singular it has a zero mo de

in the direction at the north and south p oles This co ordinate

singularity is avoided by covering the upp er and lower hemispheres H corre

sp onding to and separately with a cartesian co ordinate

system x y obtained for example by pro jection on the disc x y r

x r tan cos

for H

y r tan sin

and

cos x r cot

for H

y r cot sin

The minus sign in the expression for y is necessary to have x y form a right

handed co ordinate system on the exterior of the southern hemisphere it could

b e absorb ed in a redenition Thus the orientation of the cartesian

co ordinates is preserved in region of overlap of the two co ordinate systems which

includes the equator

x x r cos

y y r sin

but which actually can b e extended to the entire sphere with the exclusion of the

north and south p oles by continuing x y outside the disc x y r

In the cartesian co ordinates x y the line element b ecomes

r

ds dy dx

y r x

This expression is manifestly nonsingular except in the limit x y

corresp onding to one of the p oles in each case Observe that the north p ole is

now a regular p oint of the co ordinate system x y and the south p ole of the

system x y

Now consider a vector eld on the sphere dened in comp onents by

N

y x A

r x y

where N is a normalization constant This vector eld can b e represented as a

oneform

N

A y dx x dy

r x y

N

cos d

The last expression in terms of the p olar co ordinates shows that in the region of

overlap the vector elds A dier by an exact oneform

y y

A A N d arctan N d arctan N d

x x

It follows that the twoform F dA dA is unique and welldened on the

entire sphere

F dx dx F

N r N

dx dy sin d d

y r x

The dual of the twoform F is dened to b e the zeroform

N

F F

p

g r

with the representing the twodimensional p ermutation symbol

As this is a constant it is closed dF or in comp onents

F

This shows that we have constructed a nontrivial solution of the free Maxwell

equations on the sphere representing a constant magnetic eld of strength B

N r This solution can b e extended trivially to a static spherically symmetric

solution of Maxwells equations in three dimensions by taking the radial com

p onent of the vector eld to vanish A In three dimensions this solution

r

represents a magnetic monop ole of strength N lo cated in the origin

Note that we can write the gauge transformation connecting the vector elds

A in the region of overlap in terms of the elements g exp iN of a U

eld g x y in the standard form

A g A g g dg

i

For this U eld to b e welldened in the whole region of overlap of the domains

of A the whole sphere minus the p oles it must return to the same value

after a rotation This is the case only if N is an integer

The number N has a direct top ological interpretation it represents the wind

ing number of the map from the equator of the sphere to the U group man

ifold which is the unit circle in the complex plane Therefore we see that the

interpretation of the vector eld A as a connection for a U bundle a mag

netic vector p otential on the sphere requires the winding number of the gauge

transformation the magnetic charge to b e quantized a wellknown result rst

obtained by Dirac

1

Note that the equator cannot b e contracted to a p oint on the sphere whilst staying com

pletely inside the region of overlap where the gauge transformation is dened as in this con traction it must always pass one of the p oles

The example of the vector eld A on the twosphere illustrates how the

naive Stokes theorem can b e violated even though F is a lo cally exact two

form F dA in H welldened and smo oth over the entire sphere and even

though the sphere has no b oundary the integral of F over the sphere is nonzero

This is b ecause F is not an exact twoform globally and the vector eld makes a

jump on the b oundary b etween the regions H

Z Z Z

p

d x F F d x g F

2 2 2

S S S

Z Z I

F F A A N

H H C

+

In the line integral the lo op C H H denotes the equator with the

minus sign in front of H deriving from the reversal of the orientation of

This induces the minus sign in front of A in the lo op integral

Finally we observe that a smo oth deformation of the sphere will not change

the value of the integral if M denotes any closed surface which encloses

the magnetic charge and is the volume b etween this surface and the twosphere

S then

Z Z Z

F F F

2

S M

Z

dF

by the second Maxwell equation in the absence of magnetic charge the Bianchi

identity inside Geometrically we can understand this result b ecause the rst

line of eq shows that in comp onents the integral is manifestly indep endent

of the metric Hence a lo cal change of the metric which is equivalent to a lo cal

deformation do es not aect the value of the integral Such a quantity is called a

top ological invariant

Topological invariants in gravity

In gravity top ology can play a role at various levels At the macroscopic classical

level one can consider multiply connected universes and whilst at the

microscopic Planck scale spacetime top ology may b e sub ject to quantum uctu

ations spacetime foam in analogy with other eld theories like sigma mo dels

and YangMills theories it is exp ected that the quantum tunneling pro cesses b e

tween dierent top ologies are dominated by niteaction solutions of Euclidean

gravity the gravitational instantons

One way to characterise top ologically nontrivial solutions of the gravitational

eld equations is by the value of top ologically invariant integrals over certain

p olynomials of the curvature tensor In four dimensions there are essentially two

indep endent top ological invariants of this type the rst Pontrjagin number and

the Euler number To dene these we rst introduce the dual and double dual

curvatures with comp onents

R R R R

p

g

p

Here is the p ermutation symbol a tensor density requiring a factor g to

guarantee the transformation character of the dual curvature as a tensor under

lo cal co ordinate transformations The denition is adapted to manifolds

with euclidean signature but it can easily b e generalized to include the lorentzian

case

The rst Pontrjagin number of a compact manifold M without b oundary

involves the dual curvature and is dened by the expression

Z

R d x R p M

M

whilst the Euler number is dened in a similar way using the double dual of the

Riemann tensor

Z

p

M d x g R R

M

For a general pro of that b oth expressions are top ological invariants it is more

convenient to use the formulation of dierential geometry in terms of the vier

b ein and spinconnection rather than the metric and the RiemannChristoel

connection

ab

ab ab a b ab

R e e R

In this formulation the traces in the denition of the Pontrjagin and Euler num

b er are to b e taken over the tangent space ie lo cal SO indices ab and we

can write b oth top ological invariants in the form

Z

cM d x Tr R R

M

where dep ending on the top ological invariant condidered the linear op erator

acting on antisymmetric SO tensors is either the identity or the SO duality

op erator

ab ab ab abcd cd

or R R R R

resp ectively From the expression it is clear that the square ro ot of the

ab

metric has canceled inside the integral the integral dep ends on the the

top ological invariance of cM is now straightforward one proves that the value

of the integral is the same for any two spin connections which can b e smo othly

deformed into each other Let denote the original spin connection and the

deformed one The dierence is a covariant SO tensor We dene a

path in the space of connections linking and parametrized by a real number

We show that the integral expression is indep endent of

Z

dcM dR

R d x Tr

d d

M

The last result follows b ecause the integrand is a total derivative which is smo oth

and welldened everywhere if is to check this consider the explicit form of

the deformed curvature tensor R

ab

ab ab

R R D D

Here the covariant derivativer of is constructed in terms of the original unde

formed spin connection Its derivative with resp ect to is then

d

ab

ab

R D D

d

The last term involving the commutator of two s is precisely the one necessary

to complete the covariant derivatives of to covariant derivatives D wrt the

full deformed connection

d

ab

D D R

d

Inserting this in the integral in eq one obtains

Z

dR dcM

d x Tr R

d d

M

Z

h i

d x Tr D R

M

Z

d x Tr R

M

To obtain the last line we have used the Bianchi identity for the SOcurvature

ab

D R

which guarantees that the SO can b e taken outside the

trace in the integrand As b oth and the curvature are covariant tensors the

invariant SOtraces do not have a discontinuity across the b oundaries b etween

the dierent co ordinate patches and the integrand in eq is a globally de

ned total derivative on M If the manifold has no b oundary the integral then

vanishes thus proving that the original quantity cM is indep endent of the

connection indeed

It is of interest to note that the Pontrjagin density can actually b e written

lo cally as a total covariant divergence

p

Tr RR D J g J

p

P P

g

x is dened by the ChernSimons form where the current J

P

p

g J Tr

P

Tr

To interpret the middle expression correctly one should regard the Christoel

and the Riemann tensor or its symbols as a set of four matrices

The trace is then taken over a dual as a set of six matrices R

contravariant upp er and a covariant lower spacetime index In the spin connec

tion the trace is over the lo cal SO tangentspace indices This result implies

directly that the only nontrivial contributions to the Pontrjagin number come

from the b oundaries of the co ordinate patches

Z

N

X

i i i i i i

Tr d x p M

K

i

i

i i

where the x and denote the co ordinates and connections in the ith co

ordinate chart K That they can come from these b oundaries indeed follows

i

b ecause the current is not covariant only the variation of its divergence is

Therefore we can construct another simple pro of of the top ological invariance of

the Pontrjagin number under a deformation of the metric or the vierb ein the

variation of the current can b e written as

p

g J Tr R Tr

P

or a similar form in terms of the spin connection Because of the contraction with

the tensor the last term do es not contribute to the divergence of the variation

p

But as the rst term is covariant it do es not pro duce a nonvanishing g J

P

contribution to the integral by its b oundary terms its b oundary terms cancel

pairwise b etween adjoining patches Therefore the Pontrjagin number is invariant

under smo oth deformations of the manifold

p M

As there is no similar ChernSimons type current for the Euler number this pro of

cannot b e extended to that case

Selfdual solutions of the Einstein equations

There is an interesting class of spacetime geometries for which the two top ological

invariants the Pontrjagin and the Euler number are identical or identical

up to a sign the anti selfdual geometries satisfying

R R R

p

g

Because of the symmetry of the fully covariant Riemann tensor R under

interchange of the index pairs and the double dual R then also

equals the dual up to a p ossible sign and the two top ological invariants are

equivalent indeed

The interesting asp ect of these anti selfdual geometries is that they are

automatically solutions of the Einstein equations in empty space or spacetime

dep ending on the signature with zero cosmological constant To see this

construct the Ricci tensor and note that it vanishes due to the Bianchi identity

R R R

p

g

Then automatically also the Riemann curvature scalar vanishes and therefore

these solutions have vanishing action at least if the spacetime manifold has

no b oundary Euclidean solutions of this type are identied as gravitational

instantons

A considerable number of such anti selfdual fourgeometries are known but

only two represent regular compact euclidean fourmanifolds without b oundary

the fourtorus T which has a at metric but is nonsimply connected and the

famous K manifold which is nonat but simply connected Although no explicit

expression for the K metric in terms of co ordinates is known its top ological

invariants can b e calculated using cohomology arguments and index theory which

gives K p K

All other selfdual solutions of the Einstein equations violate at least one of the

other assumptions the manifold is not compact or it has a nonzero b oundary The earlier pro of of the top ological invariance of the Pontrjagin and Euler number

then fails in general there can app ear additional contributions from innity or

from the b oundaries In this class of solutions one nds the EguchiHanson

metric and the multicenter solutions of Gibb ons and Hawking

TaubNUT

A relatively simple and interesting example of these solutions is the anti self

dual TaubNUT metric It is the simplest example of the class of Gibb ons

Hawking solutions As it also has some interesting applications outside general

relativity I have chosen to discuss it here in some detail

The TaubNUT manifold is a fourdimensional Riemannian manifold involv

ing on a single scale parameter m with Euclidean signature and anti selfdual

Riemann curvature dep ending on the sign of m A convenient set of co ordinates

to describ e the manifold are the fourdimensional p olar co ordinates r

with ranges r in terms of which

the metric is given by the line element

m m

d cos d ds dr r d r sin d

m

r

r

The parameter m with dimension of length can take b oth p ositive or negative

values Up on factoring out m and rescaling the radial co ordinate jr mj r

the expression b ecomes

d cos d ds dr r d r sin d

m r

r

where the sign represents the sign of m As m has b een reduced to a multiplica

tive constant one can choose units of length such that m The right hand

side of eq then directly denes the metric In the following discussion of

the TaubNUT geometry this choice of metric is made but it is straightforward

to reinstate the general mdep endence when desired

In the app endix of this chapter we have collected the explicit expressions

for the metric the comp onents of the RiemannChristoel connections and the

covariant comp onents of the Riemann curvature tensor From these expressions

one may check that the curvature is selfdual for p ositive and anti selfdual for

negative m

The inverse metric is enco ded in the hamiltonian

2

Extensions of the construction of top ological invariants including b oundary contributions can b e found in the literature see for example the review

p p p cos p

r

H p

r r r r r sin

r

which describ es the geo desic ow The canonical momenta app earing in this

expression are derived from

r p r p

r

r r

cos p cos p r sin p

r

r

where as b efore an upp er dot denotes a derivative wrt to the ane parameter

First integrals of motion can b e constructed with the help of the constants of

geo desic ow as explained in chapter Indeed the TaubNUT manifold admits

a set of three indep endent Killing vectors which together with the conservation

of the hamiltonian allow complete solution of the geo desic equations It

is actually convenient to express the Killing vectors as a set of four dep endent

ones instead of three indep endent ones as this leads to simplications b oth in

s

computations and physical interpretations The contravariant comp onents

s of these Killing vectors can b e read o from the constants of geo desic

s s

ow J p with

cos

J sin p p cot cos p J p

sin

sin

p cot sin p J p J cos p

sin

Solving these equations we get for the angular comp onents of the fourmomentum

p sin J cos J

p J p J

whilst b etween the constants of geo desic ow there is the additional relation

J cos J sin cos J sin J The radial momentum can b e computed from the hamiltonian

H J p

r

r r

sin J cos J J cos J

r r

sin

Before discussing some features of the solutions for the geo desics we digress

briey to study the innitesimal transformations genereated by the constants

of motion this gives useful general insight into the geometry of the TaubNUT

manifold From the last two equations it is clear that J and J

generate shifts in the angles and ie mutually commuting rotations around

two orthogonal axes As J are indep endent of they commute with the

rotations in the directions generated by J However they do not commute

with J or with each other A direct computation shows that their Poisson

brackets realize the commutations relations of ordinary angular momentum

o n

ij k k i j

J i j k J J

i

As the generators J change the angle in a nontrivial way it follows that they

do not just realize threedimensional rotations on the submanifold spanned by the

co ordinates Rather threedimensional rotations on the spherical surface

dened the co ordinate directions are generated by a set of related dynamical

quantities the restricted angular momentum threevector I with comp onents

cos

I J J I J

sin

sin

I J J

sin

The comp onents of the restricted angular momentum three vector satisfy the

same Poisson bracket relations as the comp onents of the total angular

momentum J

o n

ij k k i j

I I I

but with two crucial dierences i they induce rotations only in the

directions whilst commuting with the angle ii unlike the comp onents of J

they are not conserved on geo desics This discussion of symmetries shows that it

is convenient to think of the TaubNUT manifold lo cally as a dimensional

Euclidean geometry with a threedimensional space spanned by the spherical

co ordinates r and an internal compact onedimensional space characterized

by the co ordinate but with nontrivial interplay b etween the ow of geo desics in these directions

The identity shows that in this threedimensional sense J is the

pro jection of J in the radial direction hence orthogonal to the spherical surface

spanned by

r  J

J r J

r

The contribution to the total angular momentum orthogonal to r can b e identit

ed as the orbital angular momentum

J L J r

in the sense that

L r r

r

Thus r L indeed However in comp onents

L J sin cos p sin p cot cos p cos p

L J sin sin p cos p cot sin p cos p

L J cos p p cos p

and therefore the orbital angular momentum is not identical with the restricted

angular momentum I In fact the Poisson brackets of L do not ob ey the angular

momentum algebra Also L is not conserved although its magnitude jLj is

as guaranteed by the conservation of J and J and the orthogonality to J

of the contributions from J and L in eq This claries the nontrivial

dynamical relation b etween motion in the and directions

Finally as J and J are conserved separately along geo desics it follows from

that the threedimensional p osition vector r moves at a xed angle wrt

the axis of total angular momentum and the geo desic is restricted to lie on the

cone traced out by rays from the origin around J at a xed op ening angle

J

arccos

jLj

Obviously this is a generalization of the motion b eing conned to the equatorial

plane corresp onding to J in threedimensional central force

elds like in the Kepler problem Again this testies as to the nontrivial role of

the momentum p J in the determination of the orbits

RungeLenz vector and Yano tensors

It is p ossible to obtain more information ab out the nature of geo desics by observ

i

ing that there exists a triplet of constants of motion K i which are

quadratic in the momenta and which transform among themselves as a vector

K under threedimensional rotations This conserved vector is very similar

to the RungeLenz vector in the Kepler problem It is conserved along geo desics

and for J it satises the identity

H J

r K J J

J

As K H J J are all constant it follows that the threedimensional p osition

vector r is constrained to lie in a plane We have already seen that for J

this vector takes values on a cone with op ening angle around the axis of

angular momentum Combining these two results it follows that the geo desics

are actually conic sections obtained by intersecting the cone with the plane

It remains to construct the vector K and prove the relation First it

should b e p ointed out that as they are quadratic functions of the momenta

i i

K K p p

their existence is implied by a triplet of symmetric second rank Killing tensors

i

as in eq K

i

D K

Such a triplet of Killing tensors can indeed b e found Instead of directly giving the

explicit expressions we construct them in terms of a set of simpler ob jects known

as Yano tensors A Yano tensor is an antisymmetric tensor f f

satisfying the Killinglike equation

D f D f

As a result the covariant derivative of a Yano tensor is completely antisymmetric

D f D f D f D f D f

a

Given one or more Yano tensors f one can construct symmetric Killing tensors

simply by symmetrized multiplication

b a

a b ab

f f f f K

These symmetric tensors satisfy eq by virtue of the Yano condition

It turns out that the TaubNUT manifold admits four such Yano tensors

transforming as a singlet Y and as a triplet f under threedimensional rotations

i

Their explicit expressions are given by the twoforms

Y d cos d dr r r r sin d d

dx dx d cos d dx f

j k i i ij k

r

A straightforward calculation shows that the covariant exterior derivative of

these two forms gives

r Y D Y dx dx dx r r sin dr d d

rf

i

By studying the individual terms one establishes the stronger results

D Y D Y D Y

and

D f

i

Thus b oth twoforms indeed ob ey the Yano condition with the triplet of

tensors f actually b eing covariantly constant It follows immediately that the

i

triplet of symmetric tensors dened by

K Y f f Y

i i

i

form a vector of Killing tensors For this triplet of Killing tensors eq can

b e proven First note that as a twoform

r f r r sin d d r d cos d dr

Performing matrix multiplication and contracting with the momenta to get an expression of the form it follows that

r K r f Y r Y f r K p p

r r

p r p p p cos p

r

r r sin

r H J J

Using eq this gives the desired result Note that this equation

remains true also for J in which case the geo desic ow in the three

dimensional r space is a along a hyperb ola in the plane p erp endicular to

J If J is along the z axis then the vanishing of p implies that at the

same time is constant

The constants of geo desic ow constructed ab ove may b e interpreted as an

analogue of the RungeLenz vector for the TaubNUT geometry b ecause they

can b e written in the manifest threevector form

K J J J r J r H

r

Finally we comment up on the existence of the covariantly constant twoforms f

i

They have the prop erty that as antisymmetric twotensors each of them squares

to minus the identity In fact they realize the quaternion algebra

f f f

i j ij ij k k

Thus the twoforms f dene a triplet of almost complex structures and the four

i

dimensional real geometry of the TaubNUT manifold can b e recast in terms of

analytic complex or quaternionic geometry Indeed the TaubNUT manifold b e

longs to the class of complex manifolds known as hyperKahler manifolds An

imp ortant consequence of b eing Kahleror hyperKahleris that these manifolds

have N resp N sup ersymmetric extensions Such su

p ersymmetries give much additional insight into the prop erties of manifolds like

TaubNUT

App endix

In this app endix I have collected the comp onents of the connection and curvature

tensor of the TaubNUT manifold in the co ordinate system in which the metric

takes the form with m The nonzero comp onents of the Riemann

Christoel connection are

r r

r r

r r

r r r

r

cot

r r

r r r

r

r r

r r sin r

cos cos

sin

r r

r sin r

cot

r r

r r r

and

r r r

r

sin cos cos sin

r r r

sin r cos

r r

r r

r

r

r

From these expressions one can compute the comp onents of the Riemann curva

ture tensor

R

To allow easy check of the anti selfduality we give here the completely

covariant comp onents R the nonvanishing ones are

cot sin

R R

r r r r

r r r

cos

R R

r r r r

r r

r r sin

R sin cos R

r r

r r

r sin r sin

R R

r r

r r

cot r r sin

R R

r r r

r cos r sin

R R

r r

All other comp onents not related by p ermutation symmetry of the indices are zero

Bibliography

S Newcomb Astronomical Papers Am Ephemeris

H Hertz Wied Ann

A Einstein Ann d Physik repro duced in The Principle

of Relativity ed A Sommerfeld Dover publ

H Bondi Nature

J Ehlers and W Kundt in An Introduction to Current Re

search Wiley NY ed L Witten

A Einstein The Meaning of Relativity Chapman and Hall th ed

W Pauli Theory of Relativity Engltransln Pergamon Press Dover

Publ Inc

H Weyl SpaceTimeMatter Engltransln Dover Publ Inc

W Rindler Essential Relativity Springer Verlag

S Weinberg Gravitation and Cosmology J Wiley NY

CW Misner KS Thorn and JA Wheeler Gravitation WH Freeman

San Fransisco

A Papapetrou Lectures on General Relativity Reidel Dordrecht

SW Hawking and GF Ellis The LargeScale Structure of of

Cambridge Univ Press

R Wald General Relativity Univ of Chicago Press

D Kramer H Stephani M MacCallum and E Herlt Exact Solution of

Einsteins Field Equations Cambridge Univ Press

R Arnowitt S Deser and CW Misner in Gravitation an Introduction

to Current Research Wiley NY ed L Witten

M Veltman in Methods in Field Theory Les Houches North

Holland eds R Balian and J ZinnJustin

RH Rietdijk and JW van Holten Class Quantum Grav

RH Rietdijk and JW van Holten J of Geom and Physics

GW Gibb ons RH Rietdijk and JW van Holten Nucl Phys B

L Brink P Di Vecchia and P Howe Phys Lett B

MB Green JH Schwarz and E Witten Superstring Theory vols Cam

bridge Univ Press

E Witten Nucl Phys B

JW van Holten Phys Lett B

JW van Holten preprint NIKHEF

J Goldstone Nuov Cim

Y Nambu and G JonaLasinio Phys Rev

S Chandrasekhar The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes Oxford Univ

Press

ID Novikov and VP Frolov Physics of Black Holes Kluwer Ac Publ

K Schwarzschild Sitzb er Deut Akad Wiss Berlin

J Droste Het zwaartekrachtsveld van een of meer lichamen volgens de

theorie van Einstein PhD thesis Leiden

K Peeters C Schweigert and JW van Holten Class Quantum Grav

MD Kruskal Phys Rev

G Szekeres Publ Mat Debrecen

H Reissner Ann Physik

G Nordstrom Pro c Kon Ned Ak Wet

RP Kerr Phys Rev Lett

ET Newman E Couch K Chinnapared A Exton A Prakash and R

Torrence J Math Phys

RH Boyer and RW Lindquist J Math Phys

SW Hawking Nature

Comm Math Phys

B Carter Phys Rev

M Walker and R Penrose Comm Math Phys

R Penrose Nuov Cim

T Eguchi P Gilkey and AHanson Phys Rep

T Eguchi and A Hanson Phys Lett B

GW Gibb ons and S Hawking Phys Lett B

GW Gibb ons and NS Manton Nucl Phys B

GW Gibb ons and PJ Ruback Phys Lett B

Commun Math Phys

W Dietz and R Rudiger Pro c R So c A

B Zumino Phys Lett B

T Curtright and D Freedman Phys Lett B

L AlvarezGaumeand D Freedman Phys Lett B

JW van Holten Phys Lett B