Armchair Detectives and the Social Construction of Falsehoods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Armchair Detectives and the Social Construction of Falsehoods ARMCHAIR DETECTIVES AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF FALSEHOODS: EMERGENT MOB BEHAVIOR ON THE INTERNET A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI’I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN SOCIOLOGY MAY 2017 By Penn Pantumsinchai Dissertation Committee: Patricia Steinhoff, Chairperson David Johnson Krysia Mossakowski Wayne Buente Debora Halbert Keywords: Mob justice, online communities, internet vigilantism, collective intelligence, social control, collective behavior ©2017, Penn Pantumsinchai All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I dedicate this dissertation to my father, who was the inspiration for me to pursue my PhD and become the second Doctor of the family. In really tough times, his stories of how he survived the PhD and wrote his dissertation gave me hope. Thank you to my dear mother, who always checked in on me to see how I was doing, and encouraged me to never give up, and never take the easier route. Thank you to my brother Nate, who actually gave me the idea to pursue this murky topic of mob justice in the first place. The dissertation would never have happened otherwise! Thank you to my second brother Dan and his family, Jayon and Sienna, for their endless support and encouragements, as well as a healthy supply of chocolates throughout the years of my PhD. More than anyone, thank you to my beloved aunt, Pabol, who supported my studies through all these years financially and morally. She always believed in me and I hope I have made her proud. My family’s staunch support was the pillar that kept me going. I am indebted and forever grateful to Ryan, my partner in life, who listened to my woes and celebrated my victories throughout the seven years my graduate education, both M.A. and PhD. Thank you to sweet Smokey, our dog, who brought so much joy and companionship during the lonely nights of dissertation writing. They make Hawai’i paradise for me. My deepest appreciation goes to the committee who helped this project come to fruition: Dr. Steinhoff, Dr. Johnson, Dr. Mossakowski, Dr. Buente, and Dr. Halbert. With their patience, guidance, and enthusiasm, I am very proud of the dissertation. Thank you to Nathalie, Sanna, and Mari for the almost daily writing sessions that gave me the time and focus to actually finish writing the dissertation; and Sang, for his expertise in Actor-Network Theory and everything else sociology. The same goes for Rebecka, Kristina, Emiko, Naree, Kei, Vineeda, Jenny, and many others I do not have the space to name – thank you so much. ABSTRACT ‘Truth’ in today’s society is at the center of several ongoing political debates, particularly with the influx of fake news, smear campaigns, and conspiracy theories. The problem with the ‘truth’ has been further exacerbated by the internet and new media technologies that allow multiple truths and facts to exist and fester, often with real world, offline consequences. My research examines an emergent online phenomenon called ‘mob justice,’ which embodies the problems and consequences of our ‘post-truth’ society. Broadly speaking, mob justice online is an episode of collective behavior attempting to be a force of informal control while spiraling out of control itself. Using two large scale cases – the 2013 Boston bombing and the 2015 Bangkok bombing, I analyze how everyday citizens gathered on social media channels to find the bombers in an ad hoc attempt at social justice. Despite using the power of collective intelligence, both cases failed catastrophically, as the swirl of emotions and murky status of facts and rumors caused the online community to accuse, target, and harass innocent people throughout their armchair investigations. However, my findings demonstrate that the online community is not solely responsible for such witch-hunt antics. The online community’s interactions with institutional players such as the police and mass media influence what is considered to be fact and falsehood online. Using various methods such as content analysis, actor network theory, and social mechanisms, I map out how statements online progress through a network of interactions to eventually reach the precarious status of ‘truth.’ I also construct a failure model of mob justice to understand the step-by-step processes and interactions that incite an episode of mob justice stemming from the failure of collective intelligence. The findings as well as the failure model contribute to the dearth of research on this growing phenomenon, and indicate that a typology of mob justice episodes, successful or otherwise, can be created. The research is significant for its implications regarding the power of collective behavior on the internet, how facts and falsehoods are constructed online, and the ever-changing nature of truth in today’s society. Contents CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................ 4 Social Control Theory ............................................................................................................. 5 Collective Behavior ............................................................................................................... 12 A Short History of Collective Violence ................................................................................ 21 Moral Panics .......................................................................................................................... 23 The Internet and the Mob ...................................................................................................... 25 Research Questions ................................................................................................................... 32 CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH SETTING AND METHODOLOGY ............................................... 34 Case Selection ........................................................................................................................... 34 Data Sources .............................................................................................................................. 37 US: Reddit ............................................................................................................................. 37 Thailand: Pantip and CSI LA Facebook Group..................................................................... 39 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................... 41 Data Collection: Reddit ......................................................................................................... 41 Data Collection: CSI LA Facebook Group ............................................................................ 43 Data Collection: Pantip .......................................................................................................... 43 Content Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 45 Additional Methods of Analysis ............................................................................................... 46 Actor-Network Theory .......................................................................................................... 46 Material Culture ..................................................................................................................... 49 Social Mechanisms ................................................................................................................ 51 Outline of Dissertation .............................................................................................................. 54 CHAPTER 3. ‘WHERE’S WALDO?’: THE 2013 BOSTON BOMBING ANALYSIS ............ 56 The Subreddits........................................................................................................................... 58 Processing Grief ........................................................................................................................ 63 Theories of Motive .................................................................................................................... 66 Where’s Waldo? ........................................................................................................................ 68 Who’s Waldo? ........................................................................................................................... 74 The Aftermath ........................................................................................................................... 82 Reddit VS the Media ................................................................................................................. 86 The Feedback Loop ................................................................................................................... 88 CHAPTER 4. MANO-SOCIAL: THE 2015 BANGKOK BOMBING ANALYSIS .................. 92 The Social Media Channels....................................................................................................... 94 Who Bombed Us? ..................................................................................................................... 98 Why Were We Bombed?......................................................................................................... 103 Are We Scapegoating?
Recommended publications
  • Run Amok: Group Crowd Participation in Identifying the Bomb and Bomber from the Boston Marathon Bombing
    Tapia, LaLone and Kim. Run Amok: Group Crowd Participation Run Amok: Group Crowd Participation in Identifying the Bomb and Bomber from the Boston Marathon Bombing Andrea H. Tapia Nicolas LaLone Hyun-Woo Kim Penn State University Penn State University Penn State University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper we tell a version of the story of the bombing of the Boston Marathon. At first, two online groups gathered images, video and textual information concerning the bombing of the Boston Marathon and shared these with the FBI and amongst themselves. Secondly, these groups then created mechanisms to conduct their own investigation into the identities of the perpetrators. Finally, the larger national media followed the results of these online group investigations and reported these as fact to a national audience. We choose Twitter as our data repository and conducted quantitative analyses of tweets sent during the Boston Bombing. The implications for not incorporating public crowd participation within the standard operating procedures of emergency services may result in either a loss of public confidence in the slow-moving nature of official response to uncontrollable, dangerous and irresponsible public and media participation that exacerbates the negative effects of any disaster. Keywords Boston Marathon Bombing. Crowdsourcing. Twitter. First Responders. Ethical Participation. Social Responsibility INTRODUCTION In this paper we present the case of the bombing of the Boston Marathon in April 2013 examining three roles; (1) official emergency responders and policing, (2) groups of online social media bystanders, and (3) the wider media. We examine these roles using data gathered from the media traces left behind by “virtual bystanders” to the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinating Across Chaos: the Practice of Transnational Internet Security Collaboration
    COORDINATING ACROSS CHAOS: THE PRACTICE OF TRANSNATIONAL INTERNET SECURITY COLLABORATION A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Tarun Chaudhary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree International Affairs, Science, and Technology in the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs Georgia Institute of Technology May 2019 COPYRIGHT © 2019 BY TARUN CHAUDHARY COORDINATING ACROSS CHAOS: THE PRACTICE OF TRANSNATIONAL INTERNET SECURITY COLLABORATION Approved by: Dr. Adam N. Stulberg Dr. Peter K. Brecke School of International Affairs School of International Affairs Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Michael D. Salomone Dr. Milton L. Mueller School of International Affairs School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jennifer Jordan School of International Affairs Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: March 11, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I was once told that writing a dissertation is lonely experience. This is only partially true. The experience of researching and writing this work has been supported and encouraged by a small army of individuals I am forever grateful toward. My wife Jamie, who has been a truly patient soul and encouraging beyond measure while also being my intellectual sounding board always helping guide me to deeper insight. I have benefited from an abundance of truly wonderful teachers over the course of my academic life. Dr. Michael Salomone who steered me toward the world of international security studies since I was an undergraduate, I am thankful for his wisdom and the tremendous amount of support he has given me over the past two decades. The rest of my committee has been equally as encouraging and provided me with countless insights as this work has been gestating and evolving.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'New' Private Security Industry', the Private Policing of Cyberspace and the Regulatory Questions Mark Button1 Publis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portsmouth University Research Portal (Pure) The ‘New’ Private Security Industry’, the Private Policing of Cyberspace and the Regulatory Questions Mark Button1 Published in Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice Abstract This paper explores the growth of the ‘new’ private security industry and private policing arrangements, policing cyberspace. It argues there has been a significant change in policing which is equivalent to the ‘quiet revolution’ associated with private policing that Shearing and Stenning observed in the 1970s and 1980s, marking a ‘second quiet revolution’. The paper then explores some of the regulatory questions that arise from these changes, which have been largely ignored, to date, by scholars of policing and policy-makers making some clear recommendations for the future focus of them. Keywords private security, private policing, regulation, cybercrime and cyberspace Introduction Writing in the late 1970s and early 1980s Shearing and Stenning observed the substantial changes to policing taking place at the time in North America, describing the transformation 1 Institute of Criminal Justice Studies, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2HY, UK. Email: [email protected] 1 as a ‘quiet revolution.’ They noted the substantial growth of private security, linked to the advance of mass private property and the under-funding of the police, with a sector focused upon preventative, rather than curative policing (Stenning and
    [Show full text]
  • China Dreams 梦
    CHINA DREAMS 梦 EDITED BY Jane Golley, Linda Jaivin Ben Hillman, WITH Sharon Strange C HINA S TORY YEARBOOK : C HINA D REAM S Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463731 ISBN (online): 9781760463748 WorldCat (print): 1145684061 WorldCat (online): 1145684091 DOI: 10.22459/CSY.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ legalcode Design concept by Markuz Wernli; ‘Power’ cover design and chapter openers by CRE8IVE Typesetting by Chin-Jie Melodie Liu and Sharon Strange; copyediting by Jan Borrie Printed by Union Offset Printers, Canberra, Australia The Australian Centre on China in the World is an initiative of the Commonwealth Government of Australia and The Australian National University This edition © 2020 ANU Press 揭秘错综时事蓄 美梦 民族伟大复兴之梦对中国与世界民众而言为何种图景因编辑婴儿事件续镇压维吾尔族群倡导中国公民应在国际场合﹃维护国家荣誉﹄压破碎学生运动三十周年整庆祝中华人民共和国成立七十周年弘扬革命与国家富强之梦2019 , 多元视角呈现政经文化与人文社会之一脉相连、 。 泡影 2019年 、 , 凌云壮志与梦魇于中外大地上相吸相斥之画卷 为中国在全球日渐隆盛势力与影响提供解惑之匙, 拓展南极与称霸太空的雄心亦甚嚣尘上、 有鉴于此 日益恶化中美关系成为媒体焦点, , 各领风骚年中国恰逢几个划时代意义的周年纪念日 几多旧﹃梦﹄重回民主与言论自由在凌晨的梦乡中被政府的安定团结之梦碾 , 。 ︽中国故事年鉴 五四运动百年祭重温爱国情怀与文化革新之梦 , 粉墨登场 。 : 香港暴力抗争风起云涌 梦︾钩沉是年重大事件 。 , 。 。 本年鉴以浅显易懂的笔触一时庙堂江湖舆情四起人工智能的突飞猛进与基习近平主席权倾天下 。 ; 习近平脑海中的中华 。 并一如既往兼容并 是年亦距1989, 。 新旧﹃中国梦﹄ 、 , 新疆持 展示 , 。 并 ; Translation by Yayun Zhu and Annie Luman Ren Contents INTRODUCTION viii . Dream On · JANE GOLLEY, BEN HILLMAN, and LINDA JAIVIN xviii . Acknowledgements xviii . The Cover Image FORUM · ILLUSIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS: THE MANY MEANINGS OF MENG 夢 5 . From the Land of Illusion to the Paradise of Truth · ANNIE LUMAN REN . 11 Zhuangzi and His Butterfly Dream: The Etymology ofMeng 夢 · JINGJING CHEN CHAPTER 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • The 'New' Private Security Industry', The
    The ‘New’ Private Security Industry’, the Private Policing of Cyberspace and the Regulatory Questions Mark Button1 Published in Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice Abstract This paper explores the growth of the ‘new’ private security industry and private policing arrangements, policing cyberspace. It argues there has been a significant change in policing which is equivalent to the ‘quiet revolution’ associated with private policing that Shearing and Stenning observed in the 1970s and 1980s, marking a ‘second quiet revolution’. The paper then explores some of the regulatory questions that arise from these changes, which have been largely ignored, to date, by scholars of policing and policy-makers making some clear recommendations for the future focus of them. Keywords private security, private policing, regulation, cybercrime and cyberspace Introduction Writing in the late 1970s and early 1980s Shearing and Stenning observed the substantial changes to policing taking place at the time in North America, describing the transformation 1 Institute of Criminal Justice Studies, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2HY, UK. Email: [email protected] 1 as a ‘quiet revolution.’ They noted the substantial growth of private security, linked to the advance of mass private property and the under-funding of the police, with a sector focused upon preventative, rather than curative policing (Stenning and Shearing, 1979a). They also observed how these significant changes had been occurring with little debate or scrutiny from scholars and policy-makers. A significant number of researchers have built upon their body of research noting the continued augmentation of private security and other forms of private policing and the need for special regulatory and governance structures (Stenning and Shearing, 1979b; Jones and Newburn, 1998; Prenzler and Sarre, 1999; Loader and White, Crawford, 2003; Johnston and Shearing, 2003; 2017; Nalla and Gurinskaya, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Online Rumoring Behavior Using Multi-Dimensional Signatures Jim Maddock*, Kate Starbird, Haneen Al-Hassani, Daniel E
    Characterizing Online Rumoring Behavior Using Multi-Dimensional Signatures Jim Maddock*, Kate Starbird, Haneen Al-Hassani, Daniel E. Sandoval, Mania Orand, Robert M. Mason* HCDE, iSchool*, DUB University of Washington, Seattle WA, 98195 {maddock, kstarbi, haneen1, dansand, orand, rmmason}@uw.edu ABSTRACT to spread [4,7], and indeed these solutions would be quite This study offers an in-depth analysis of four rumors that useful in the crisis context. However, to generate the best spread through Twitter after the 2013 Boston Marathon strategies for identifying and reducing the impact of Bombings. Through qualitative and visual analysis, we misinformation, we may first need to better understand how describe each rumor’s origins, changes over time, and false rumors take shape and spread through online spaces. relationships between different types of rumoring behavior. We identify several quantitative measures—including Existing research on the spread of rumors online is temporal progression, domain diversity, lexical diversity primarily quantitative, including descriptive studies of trace and geolocation features—that constitute a multi- data [9,15,26], theoretical research on network factors [4,7], dimensional signature for each rumor, and provide and prescriptive studies that experiment with machine evidence supporting the existence of different rumor types. learning methods to classify rumors as true or false Ultimately these signatures enhance our understanding of [5,15,24]. When qualitative methods are employed in this how different kinds of rumors propagate online during space, they typically consist of manual coding of large crisis events. In constructing these signatures, this research numbers of tweets, followed by quantitative methods—i.e. demonstrates and documents an emerging method for descriptive and statistical analyses—to infer meaning from deeply and recursively integrating qualitative and patterns of codes [3,20,22] quantitative methods for analysis of social media trace data.
    [Show full text]
  • World News See Page 6 an Edition of the Friday, Jan
    SEC: Community_Broadsheet DT: 01-24-2014 ZN: Irvine ED: 1 PG #: 1PG: Cover BY: nbatalis TI: 01-23-2014 19:16 CLR: CMYK IRVINE WRESTLERS WIN KEY MATCH The Vaqueros top Woodbridge and move closer IRVINE to another league title. WORLD NEWS SEE PAGE 6 AN EDITION OF THE FRIDAY, JAN. 24, 2014 OCREGISTER.COM/IRVINE VOTING UP FOR INTERNET FREEDOM Reddit co-founder discusses challenges as he encourages ideas of UCI students. WHAT IS REDDIT? A social website that al- lows users to post and BY JOSEPH PIMENTEL | STAFF WRITER share content that can then be voted up or down hree months after launching Reddit in 2005, co-foun- by others. ders Alexis Ohanian and Steve Huffman were flown Tin to meet with executives at Yahoo’s headquarters in Sunnyvale. It was a big deal for the two, who were recent University of Virginia graduates and had spent most of their senior year building a website they envisioned would be “the front page of the Internet.” At that meeting, Ohanian re- REDDIT NUMBERS calls, he and his partner were FOR 2013 discussing Reddit with a Yahoo executive before 56 billion they were interrupted. Page views “He just cuts us off, 731 million and says, ‘Just stop,’ ” Unique visitors Ohanian recalls. “He says, ‘How much traf- 15 minutes Average duration of time a user fic do you guys spent on the website have, any- way?’ ” 40.8 million People posted on the site SEE REDDIT 404.6 million People commented PAGE 4 6.7 billion Votes tallied on favorite or least favorite Reddits $240 million Estimated worth by Forbes Reddit co-founder Alexis Oha- nian speaks in Donald Bren Hall at UC Irvine on Wednesday, shar- ing his ideas about the Internet and entrepreneurship.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Death Penalty Reddit
    Boston Death Penalty Reddit Is Derrol always clupeoid and abusive when upgathers some jaguar very aesthetic and ibidem? Patel converge sectionalisingresplendently ifdisrespectfully. unpopulated Darby dithers or avoid. Shocked and branchlike Artur often rewinds some highboy unerringly or Share simply Click a share on Facebook Opens in new window alone to buck on Reddit Opens in lead window Click and share on Twitter. Well run out how the deaths elsewhere and complete the manhunt, is the safety and. Silver trust the Latest Market Hit by Reddit Day-Trader Frenzy. Articles with the evidence provides clear here is really hurt us via chat with worse stuff folks on family of boston death penalty reddit how could be a loss are. Massachusetts Boston Marathon Bombing Jury Continues Talks. Pay for essay reddit Canada Universities Best way Top Essay. Be sharing information immediately to commit suicide after a boston death penalty reddit users needs to do in just. Narrative reddit do some fans because appeals are listed a white room is a subscription does not kill another, preserved in boston death penalty reddit share this time! Death Row Records launched the careers of famous north coast. US President Donald Trump called Sunday for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to be re-sentenced to so after an appeals. Essays pdf definition of civil penalty essay child development theory essay can. Robel Phillipos a spirit of Boston Marathon bombing suspect. The ticket penalty is considered the monster way cancel The criminals don't suffer since their victims had suffered Fugitives such through the Boston. Reddit apologises for online Boston 'witch hunt' BBC News.
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Agency, Networked Technology, and the Social Media Aftermath of the Boston Marathon Bombing Megan M
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2015 Relational Agency, Networked Technology, and the Social Media Aftermath of the Boston Marathon Bombing Megan M. Mcintyre University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Databases and Information Systems Commons, and the Rhetoric Commons Scholar Commons Citation Mcintyre, Megan M., "Relational Agency, Networked Technology, and the Social Media Aftermath of the Boston Marathon Bombing" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5742 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Relational Agency, Networked Technology, and the Social Media Aftermath of the Boston Marathon Bombing by Megan M. McIntyre A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English with a concentration in Rhetoric and Composition College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co- Major Professor: Carl Herndl, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Marc C. Santos, Ph.D. Meredith Johnson, Ph.D. Thomas Rickert, Ph.D. Date of Approval: May 27, 2015 Keywords: Twitter, agency, new materialism, digital rhetoric Copyright © 2015, Megan M. McIntyre Dedication For my father, who taught me how to tell a story and pursue my dreams. For my mother, who taught me to have faith and persevere and to be kind, stubborn, and resolute.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Journalism Incompatable with Human Nature
    Citizen Journalism Incompatable With Human Nature Mustafa Nafiz DURU1 Mehmet Nafiz DURU2 Abstract Citizen journalism, a rapidly growing concept based on random individuals actively taking part in reporting news, violates the basics of news literacy those have been thought in journalism schools for decades. Citizen journalists lacking of objectivity and journalistic ethics lead to countless inaccurate, biased and subjective reporting done by people who either want to have a little “fun”, intent to cause damage, jump the gun or seeking conspiracy theories. However, what makes citizen journalism dangerous is not only the journalism done wrong but also the human nature that fail processing information thoroughly; our brain, as the result of evolution, leading us to seek for bad news, our instant belief in information we gather is correct until something more convincing challenges that particular knowledge and the way we collect information not to enlighten ourselves but to confirm what we think we know is true. Keywords: Citizen Journalism, News Literacy, Reporting, Information Process, Internet, Ethic 1 Prof. Dr., Istanbul Aydın University, Head of Industrial Engineering Department 2 Founder & Editor in Chief, 10Sayfa.com Vatandaş Gazeteciliği İnsan Doğası ile Uyuşmazlık Özet Sıradan internet kullanıcılarının haber sunumunda aktif rol almasına dayanan vatandaş gazeteciliği hızla büyümekle beraber, üniversitelerde yıllar boyunca öğretilen temel gazetecilik kavramlarını da ihlal etmektedir. Son birkaç yılda, kendine “eğlence” arayan, zarar
    [Show full text]
  • Should Reddit Be Blamed for the Spreading of a Smear? - Nytimes.Com
    7/25/13 Should Reddit Be Blamed for the Spreading of a Smear? - NYTimes.com July 25, 2013 Should Reddit Be Blamed for the Spreading of a Smear? By JAY CASPIAN KANG On an overcast day in early May, I traveled to suburban Philadelphia to visit the family of Sunil Tripathi, the deceased 22­year­old Brown University student who, for about four hours on the morning of April 19, was mistakenly identified as Suspect No. 2 in the Boston Marathon bombings. The Tripathis had just arrived home after nearly two months spent in Providence, R.I., where they went to organize the search for Sunil, who disappeared on March 16. When I entered the house, Judy Tripathi, Sunil’s mother, asked me for a hug. In a shattered voice, she said, “I need hugs these days.” We sat at the kitchen table and talked, and at one point Judy handed me a photo of a young, smiling Sunil, caught in the motion of throwing a ball. “Look how happy he looks,” she said. For the next two hours, she and her husband, Akhil, and their daughter, Sangeeta, described what happened to them in the early­morning hours of April 19, and how the false identification of their son derailed their ongoing search for him and further traumatized their lives. At 5 p.m. on April 18, three days after the bombs went off at the marathon finish line, the F.B.I. released grainy photographs of two suspects. For the past month, the Tripathis had been renting a house and spending their days working with F.B.I.
    [Show full text]