CHAPTER 7 GLOSSARY Actinide the 15 Chemical Elements with Atomic Numbers 89 to 103, Inclusively
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NOBELIUM Element Symbol: No Atomic Number: 102
NOBELIUM Element Symbol: No Atomic Number: 102 An initiative of IYC 2011 brought to you by the RACI KERRY LAMB www.raci.org.au NOBELIUM Element symbol: No Atomic number: 102 The credit for discovering Nobelium was disputed with 3 different research teams claiming the discovery. While the first claim dates back to 1957, it was not until 1992 that the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry credited the discovery to a research team from Dubna in Russia for work they did in 1966. The element was named Nobelium in 1957 by the first of its claimed discoverers (the Nobel Institute in Sweden). It was named after Alfred Nobel, a Swedish chemist who invented dynamite, held more than 350 patents and bequeathed his fortune to the establishment of the Nobel Prizes. Nobelium is a synthetic element and does not occur in nature and has no known uses other than in scientific research as only tiny amounts of the element have ever been produced. Nobelium is radioactive and most likely metallic. The appearance and properties of Nobelium are unknown as insufficient amounts of the element have been produced. Nobelium is made by the bombardment of curium (Cm) with carbon nuclei. Its most stable isotope, 259No, has a half-life of 58 minutes and decays to Fermium (255Fm) through alpha decay or to Mendelevium (259Md) through electron capture. Provided by the element sponsor Freehills Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys ARTISTS DESCRIPTION I wanted to depict Alfred Nobel, the namesake of Nobelium, as a resolute young man, wearing the Laurel wreath which is the symbol of victory. -
Sixth National Report for the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management
October 2017 United States of America Sixth National Report for the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management U.S. Department of Energy In Cooperation with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Department of State This page intentionally left blank. U.S. Sixth National Report-Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management ABSTRACT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The United States of America (U.S.) ratified the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management (Joint Convention) on April 9, 2003. The Joint Convention establishes an international peer review process among Contracting Parties and provides incentives for nations to take appropriate steps to bring their spent fuel and radioactive waste management activities into compliance with general safety standards and practices. The U.S. participated in Review Meetings of the Contracting Parties to the Joint Convention in November 2003, May 2006, May 2009, May 2012 and May 2015 in Vienna, Austria. This Sixth National Report, an update of the U.S. Fifth National Report prepared under the Joint Convention in September 2014, documents spent fuel and radioactive waste management safety in the U.S. under the terms of the Joint Convention. The U.S. Government prepared this report for review by the Contracting Parties. The U.S. complies with the terms of the Joint Convention. An extensive U.S. legal and regulatory structure ensures the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management. -
Development of a Solvent Extraction Process for Group Actinide Recovery from Used Nuclear Fuel
THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Development of a Solvent Extraction Process for Group Actinide Recovery from Used Nuclear Fuel EMMA H. K. ANEHEIM Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden, 2012 Development of a Solvent Extraction Process for Group Actinide Recovery from Used Nuclear Fuel EMMA H. K. ANEHEIM ISBN 978-91-7385-751-2 © EMMA H. K. ANEHEIM, 2012. Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska högskola Ny serie Nr 3432 ISSN 0346-718X Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Gothenburg Sweden Telephone + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: Radiotoxicity as a function of time for the once through fuel cycle (left) compared to one P&T cycle using the GANEX process (right) (efficiencies: partitioning from Table 5.5.4, transmutation: 99.9%). Calculations performed using RadTox [HOL12]. Chalmers Reproservice Gothenburg, Sweden 2012 Development of a Solvent Extraction Process for Group Actinide Recovery from Used Nuclear Fuel EMMA H. K. ANEHEIM Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Abstract When uranium is used as fuel in nuclear reactors it both undergoes neutron induced fission as well as neutron capture. Through successive neutron capture and beta decay transuranic elements such as neptunium, plutonium, americium and curium are produced in substantial amounts. These radioactive elements are mostly long-lived and contribute to a large portion of the long term radiotoxicity of the used nuclear fuel. This radiotoxicity is what makes it necessary to isolate the used fuel for more than 100,000 years in a final repository in order to avoid harm to the biosphere. -
DOE's Remote-Handled TRU Waste Characterization Program
DOE/WIPP-02-3214 REMOTE-HANDLED TRU WASTE CHARACTERIZATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Revision 0D (Subject to Approval) October 30, 2003 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office DOE/WIPP-02-3214 Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................5 1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................6 2.0 Overview of the RH TRU Waste Characterization Program...............................................7 2.1 RH TRU Waste Characterization Overview........................................................... 7 2.2 Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) and Quality Assurance Objectives (QAOs)....... 7 2.2.1 DQO for Defense Waste Determination..................................................................8 2.2.2 DQOs for Radioactive Properties ............................................................................8 2.2.2.1 TRU Waste Determination ................................................................................. 8 2.2.2.2 RH Waste Determination.................................................................................... 9 2.2.2.3 Activity Determination ....................................................................................... 9 2.2.3 DQOs for Physical and Chemical Properties...........................................................9 2.2.3.1 DQO for Residual Liquids............................................................................... -
Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
DOE/WIPP-02-3122 TRANSURANIC WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT Revision 6.2 Effective Date: May 30, 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office This document has been submitted as required to: Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (865) 576-8401 Additional information about this document may be obtained by calling 1-800-336-9477. Copies may be obtained by contacting the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22101 DOE/WIPP-02-3122 TRANSURANIC WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT Revision 6.2 Effective Date: May 30, 2008 Approved by: Signature on file Date: 05/27/08 Gary Scott for David C. Moody Carlsbad Field Office Manager Concurred by: Signature on file Date: 05/27/08 Donald C. Gadbury, Director, Office of the National TRU Program iii DOE/WIPP-02-3122 Revision 6.2 Effective Date: May 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 RESPONSIBILTIES............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 DOE Headquarters ................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 DOE Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) .......................................................... 2-1 2.3 DOE Field Elements ................................................................................. 2-2 2.4 TRU Waste -
The Actinide Research Quarterly Is Published Quarterly to Highlight Recent Achievements and Ongoing Programs of the Nuclear Materials Technology Division
1st quarter 2000 TheLos Actinide Alamos National Research Laboratory N u c l e a r M aQuarterly t e r i a l s R e s e a r c h a n d T e c h n o l o g y a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Organizers Issue an Invitation to In This Issue Plutonium Futures 1 —The Science Organizers Issue an Invitation to Plutonium Futures —The Science The second of a series of international con- have an exciting collection of some 180 invited ferences on plutonium will be held in Santa Fe, and contributed papers with topics ranging 2 NM, this summer, July 10–13. It follows the very broadly in materials science, transuranic 238Pu Aqueous highly successful 1997 conference, “Plutonium waste forms, nuclear fuels and isotopes, separa- Processing Line Will Futures - The Science,” which attracted over 300 tions, actinides in the environment, detection Provide New NMT participants representing 14 countries. The U.S. and analysis, actinide compounds and com- Capability participants, who made up about 70 percent of plexes, and condensed matter physics of ac- the total participants, came from Department of tinides. These papers, presented in separate 4 Energy national laboratories and a score of uni- oral and poster sessions, will give attendees a Editorial: versities and industries. As in 1997, the confer- chance to learn about current research outside Transactinium ence is sponsored by the Los Alamos National of their particular specialties and provide an Science Needs Laboratory in cooperation with the American opportunity for interdisciplinary discussions Educational Nuclear Society. -
Periodic Table 1 Periodic Table
Periodic table 1 Periodic table This article is about the table used in chemistry. For other uses, see Periodic table (disambiguation). The periodic table is a tabular arrangement of the chemical elements, organized on the basis of their atomic numbers (numbers of protons in the nucleus), electron configurations , and recurring chemical properties. Elements are presented in order of increasing atomic number, which is typically listed with the chemical symbol in each box. The standard form of the table consists of a grid of elements laid out in 18 columns and 7 Standard 18-column form of the periodic table. For the color legend, see section Layout, rows, with a double row of elements under the larger table. below that. The table can also be deconstructed into four rectangular blocks: the s-block to the left, the p-block to the right, the d-block in the middle, and the f-block below that. The rows of the table are called periods; the columns are called groups, with some of these having names such as halogens or noble gases. Since, by definition, a periodic table incorporates recurring trends, any such table can be used to derive relationships between the properties of the elements and predict the properties of new, yet to be discovered or synthesized, elements. As a result, a periodic table—whether in the standard form or some other variant—provides a useful framework for analyzing chemical behavior, and such tables are widely used in chemistry and other sciences. Although precursors exist, Dmitri Mendeleev is generally credited with the publication, in 1869, of the first widely recognized periodic table. -
Hobart Mendeleev 2-3-11.Pdf
Czar Nicholas II and Alexi at Tobolsk, Siberia in 1917 - Beinecke Library, Yale University Dr. David Hobart Los Alamos National Laboratory Academician Boris Myasoedov Secretary General Russian Academy of Sciences U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR-09-05702 U N C L A S S I F I E D National Laboratory From Modest Beginnings Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev was born on February 8th, 1834 in Verhnie Aremzyani near Tobolsk, Russian Empire From modest beginnings in a small village in Siberia an extraordinary Russian chemist conceived of a profound and revolutionary scientific contribution to modern science: the Periodic Table of the Elements. The Greek Periodic Table ~ 400 BC As with most profound discoveries a number of important developments and observations were made prior to that discovery Definition of an Element In 1661 Boyle criticized the experiments of “alchemists” - Chemistry is the science of the composition of substances - not merely an adjunct to the art of alchemy - Elements are the un-decomposable constituents of material bodies - Understanding the distinction between mixtures and compounds, he made progress in detecting their ingredients - which he termed analysis Robert Boyle 1627-1691 The Atomic Theory The Greek philosopher Democritus first proposed the atomic theory but centuries later John Dalton established the scientific foundation: - All atoms of a given element are identical - The atoms of different elements can be distinguished by their relative weights Democritus of Abdera John Dalton 460-370 BC 1766-1844 Early Knowledge and Discovery The elements gold, silver, copper, tin, Searching for the “Philosopher’s lead, mercury, and others were known Stone” German alchemist Henning from antiquity. -
Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives
Final Environmental Assessment for Actinide Chemistry and Repository Science Laboratory CHAPTER 2 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES The WIPP facility, in addition to serving its primary mission as a TRU waste disposal site, needs to perform a variety of actinide chemistry experiments to (1) support WIPP’s recertification efforts, (2) address scientific questions important to WIPP, (3) improve TRU waste characterization techniques, and (4) improve DOE’s understanding of how the waste interacts with the natural environment in order to better understand waste isolation performance. In the past, WIPP-related actinide chemistry experiments have taken place at DOE laboratory facilities at other DOE sites such as LANL. However, due to reductions in travel budgets and additional security requirements being imposed on DOE weapons laboratories, DOE believes it would be better able to maintain the budget, schedule, and quality of experiments conducted in support of the WIPP program if they were performed in Carlsbad. DOE is preparing this document to inform decision makers about the potential environmental impacts of the actinide chemistry experiments associated with the Proposed Action, one alternative laboratory location, and a no action alternative, each of which are described in more detail in this chapter. Under the Proposed Action, DOE would construct and operate the ACRSL facility adjacent to the CEMRC in Carlsbad. An alternative is to construct and operate a new actinide chemistry laboratory on the WIPP site. The No Action Alternative is to continue experimental activities in actinide chemistry at existing laboratory facilities at LANL. The descriptions of the design, construction, and operation of the proposed ACRSL facility were obtained from the proposal submitted by the CEMRC (2000). -
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE for Use with DOE M 435.1-1
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE for use with DOE M 435.1-1 Chapter IV Low-Level Waste Requirements (This page intentionally left blank.) DOE G 435.1-1 IV-1 7-09-99 IV. A. Definition of Low-Level Waste. Low-level radioactive waste is radioactive waste that is not high-level radioactive waste, spent nuclear fuel, transuranic waste, byproduct material (as defined in section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended), or naturally occurring radioactive material. Objective: The objective of this requirement is to provide the criteria for determining which DOE radioactive wastes are to be managed as low-level waste in accordance with DOE M 435.1-1, Chapter IV, Low-Level Waste Requirements. Discussion: DOE M 435.1-1, Section I.1.C., Radioactive Waste Management, requires that all DOE radioactive waste shall be managed as either high-level waste, transuranic waste, or low-level waste within one of the existing Office of Environmental Management radioactive waste management programs. To assist in determining whether a particular waste stream is low-level waste, see Figure I.1, Logic Diagram for Determining Radioactive Waste Type, which accompanies the guidance for the requirement. Management of wastes containing radioactivity that do not meet or are excluded from the definition of low-level waste above, (i.e., 11e.(2) byproduct material, residual radioactive material as defined in the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA), or naturally occurring radioactive material) should continue to be managed under the provisions of the UMTRCA or DOE 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment. -
Genius of the Periodic Table
GENIUS OF THE PERIODIC TABLE "Isn't it the work of a genius'. " exclaimed Academician V.I. Spitsyn, USSR, a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee when talking to an Agency audience in January. His listeners shared his enthusiasm. Academician Spitsyn was referring to the to the first formulation a hundred years ago by Professor Dmitry I. Mendeleyev of the Periodic Law of Elements. In conditions of enormous difficulty, considering the lack of data on atomic weights of elements, Mendeleyev created in less than two years work at St. Petersburg University, a system of chemical elements that is, in general, still being used. His law became a powerful instrument for further development of chemistry and physics. He was able immediately to correct the atomic weight numbers of some elements, including uranium, whose atomic weight he found to be double that given at the time. Two years later Mendeleyev went so far as to give a detailed description of physical or chemical properties of some elements which were as yet undiscovered. Time gave striking proof of his predictions and his periodic law. Mendeleyev published his conclusions in the first place by sending, early in March 186 9, a leaflet to many Russian and foreign scientists. It gave his system of elements based on their atomic weights and chemical resemblance. On the 18th March that year his paper on the subject was read at the meeting of the Russian Chemical Society, and two months later the Society's Journal published his article entitled "The correlation between properties of elements and their atomic weight". -
First Observation of Atomic Levels for the Element Fermium (Z ˆ 100)
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending VOLUME 90, NUMBER 16 25 APRIL 2003 First Observation of Atomic Levels for the Element Fermium (Z 100) M. Sewtz, H. Backe, A. Dretzke, G. Kube, W. Lauth, and P. Schwamb Institut fu¨r Kernphysik, Universita¨t Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany K. Eberhardt, C. Gru¨ning, P. Tho¨rle, and N. Trautmann Institut fu¨r Kernchemie, Universita¨t Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany P. Kunz, J. Lassen, and G. Passler Institut fu¨r Physik, Universita¨t Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany C. Z. Dong and S. Fritzsche Fachbereich Physik, Universita¨t Kassel, D-34132 Kassel, Germany R. G. Haire Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6375 (Received 25 October 2002; revised manuscript received 6 March 2003; published 25 April 2003) The atomic level structure of the element fermium was investigated for the first time using a sample of 2:7 1010 atoms of the isotope 255Fm with a half-life of 20.1 h. The atoms were evaporated from a filament and stored in the argon buffer gas of an optical cell. Atomic levels were sought by the method of resonance ionization spectroscopy using an excimer-dye-laser combination. Two atomic levels were found at wave numbers 25 099:8 0:2 and 25 111:8 0:2 cmÿ1. Partial transition rates to the 12 23 e 5f 7s H6 ground state have been determined from their saturation characteristics. Multiconfiguration 12 5 o Dirac-Fock calculations suggest that the leading orders of these levels could be the 5f 7s7p I6 and 12 5 o 5f 7s7p G5 terms.