DOCSLIB.ORG

Baytown Township Superfund Site, Lake Elmo, Minnesota

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baytown Township Superfund Site, Lake Elmo, Minnesota Office of Solid Waste and EPA-540-R-11-006 Emergency Response June 2011 (5102G) www.epa.gov/tio www.clu-in.org/optimization Remediation System Evaluation (RSE) Baytown Township Superfund Site Lake Elmo, Minnesota REMEDIATION SYSTEM EVALUATION BAYTOWN TOWNSHIP SUPERFUND SITE LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA Report of the Remediation System Evaluation Final Report June 30, 2011 Prepared by US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental and Munitions Center of Expertise NOTICE Work described herein was performed by the US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental and Munitions Center of Expertise (USACE CX) in Omaha, Nebraska for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Work conducted by the USACE CX, including preparation of this report, was performed under Work Assignment #58 of EPA contract EP-W-07-078. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. i PREFACE This report was prepared as part of a project conducted by the USEPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (OSRTI) in support of the "Action Plan for Ground Water Remedy Optimization" (OSWER 9283.1-25, August 25, 2004). The objective of this project is to conduct Remediation System Evaluations (RSEs) at selected pump and treat (P&T) systems that are jointly funded by USEPA and the associated State agency. The project contacts are as follows: Organization Key Contact Contact Information USEPA Office of Superfund Jennifer Hovis USEPA Headquarters – Potomac Yard Remediation and Technology Construction and 2777 Crystal Drive Innovation Post-Construction Arlington, VA 22202 (OSRTI) Branch [email protected] Phone: 703/603-8888 USEPA Region V Leah Evison USEPA Region 5 Remedial Project 77 West Jackson Boulevard Manager Chicago, Illinois 60604 [email protected] Phone: 800/621-8431 Minnesota Pollution Control Kurt Schroeder Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Agency (MPCA) State Lead 520 Lafayette Road North Hydrogeologist St. Paul, Minnesota 56155-4191 [email protected] Phone: 651/757-2703 Terracon Brett Staeden Terracon Project Engineer 3535 Hoffman Road East White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110-5376 [email protected] Phone: 651/770-1500 US Army Corps of Engineers Dave Becker US Army Corps of Engineers RSE Liason Environmental and Munitions Center of Expertise Omaha, Nebraska [email protected] Phone: 402-697-2655 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE ......................................................................................................................................................... i PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. iii ACRONYM LIST ......................................................................................................................................... v 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 TEAM COMPOSITION...................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 DOCUMENTS REVIEWED ................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 BASIC SITE INFORMATION AND SCOPE OF REVIEW....................................................................... 3 1.4.1 LOCATION ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 SITE HISTORY, POTENTIAL SOURCES, AND RSE SCOPE ................................................ 3 1.4.3 HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING/SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL ................................................ 4 1.4.4 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS ................................................................................................. 6 1.4.5 DESCRIPTION OF GROUND WATER PLUME .................................................................... 6 2.0 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 8 2.1 EXTRACTION SYSTEM ................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 TREATMENT SYSTEM..................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 MONITORING PROGRAM ................................................................................................................ 9 3.0 SYSTEM OBJECTIVES, PERFORMANCE, AND CLOSURE CRITERIA ................................. 11 3.1 CURRENT SYSTEM OBJECTIVES AND CLOSURE CRITERIA .......................................................... 11 3.2 TREATMENT PLANT OPERATION STANDARDS ............................................................................ 12 4.0 FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................................ 13 4.1 GENERAL FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 SUBSURFACE PERFORMANCE AND RESPONSE ............................................................................ 13 4.2.1 PLUME CAPTURE.......................................................................................................... 13 4.2.2 GROUND WATER CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATION TRENDS ..................................... 15 4.2.3 DATA GAPS .................................................................................................................. 17 4.3 COMPONENT PERFORMANCE ....................................................................................................... 17 4.3.1 EXTRACTION SYSTEM .................................................................................................. 17 4.3.2 AIR STRIPPER ................................................................................................................ 18 4.3.3 SOLIDS FILTRATION SYSTEM ........................................................................................ 19 4.3.4 GROUNDWATER INFILTRATION SYSTEM ...................................................................... 20 4.3.5 SYSTEM CONTROLS ..................................................................................................... 20 4.3.6 ISCO PILOT STUDY ........................................................................................................ 21 4.3.7 PRIVATE WELL SAMPLING AND GAC MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS ................................. 22 4.4 COMPONENTS OR PROCESSES THAT ACCOUNT FOR MAJORITY OF ANNUAL COSTS ................. 22 5.0 EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SYSTEM TO PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................. 24 5.1 GROUNDWATER ........................................................................................................................... 24 iii 5.2 SURFACE WATER ......................................................................................................................... 24 5.3 AIR ............................................................................................................................................ 25 5.4 SOIL ............................................................................................................................................ 25 5.5 WETLANDS AND SEDIMENTS ....................................................................................................... 25 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................. 26 6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS .................................................................... 26 6.1.1 IMPLEMENT ISCO WITHIN SOURCE AREA ...................................................................... 26 6.1.2 PHASED IMPLEMENTATION OF ISCO SOURCE AREA TREATMENT ................................. 29 6.1.3 CONSIDERATION OF IN-SITU BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT ................................................ 32 6.1.4 POTENTIAL LIFE CYCLE COST SAVINGS OFFERED BY SOURCE AREA TREATMENT ....... 34 6.1.5 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SOURCE AREA ASSESSMENT ........................... 36 6.1.6 PERFORMANCE-BASED CONTRACTING FOR SOURCE AREA TREATMENT ...................... 37 6.1.7 MORE RIGOROUS EVALUATION OF HYDRAULIC BARRIER CAPTURE INFLUENCE .......... 38 6.1.8 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MONITORING PROGRAM ....................................................... 39 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS TO REDUCE COSTS .................................................................................... 40 6.2.1 REDUCE BLOWER AIRFLOW RATE ................................................................................ 40 6.2.2 ADJUSTMENTS TO GAC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ....................................................... 41 6.2.3 NO NEED FOR CLASS I, DIVISION I MOTORS .................................................................. 42 6.2.4 OPTIMIZATION OF GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM...................................... 42 6.3 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TECHNICAL IMPROVEMENT ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Lake Elmo 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX
    City of Lake Elmo 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX CONTENTS: A. Background Report B. Glossary of Terms C. Jurisdictional Review & Comments D. Resolutions E. Meeting Minutes F. Capital Improvement Plan G. Sanitary System Ordinances & Agreements H. Water Supply Plan This page is intentionally left blank. APPENDIX A. Background Report (Prepared: April 25, 2017) City of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan 2040 This page is intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction, Context and History 1 Community Character 7 Demographics and Households 10 Housing 22 Economic Overview 33 Land Use and Growth Management 38 Natural Resources 44 Transportation 46 Parks and Open Space 49 Community Facilities 52 Living Healthy 54 Introduction, Context & History This background report is the first step in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan) development process, and it will be refined throughout the process as needed to ensure that it captures the current characteristics of the community. The intent of the following inventory and analysis is that will help facilitate the development of a Plan that is based in reality, is responsive to current and anticipated market trends, and respects the community’s vision for the future of Lake Elmo. The purpose of the background report is to provide a comprehensive ‘snapshot’ in time of the City of Lake Elmo today by providing a baseline of information, 1 data and analysis about the community. Coupling this information with local and regional trends will help inform and guide the planning process by establishing a foundation from which the Plan can be developed. The City of Lake Elmo is a community with diverse resources that offers residents and businesses an exceptional quality of life, and to maintain that quality and to help facilitate this planning effort, it is important to understand the City as it is currently.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019Annual Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp ANNUAL 2019 REPORT Greetings: While the year 2019 might seem an already distant time in the wake of 2020’s world-changing COVID-19 pandemic, it was a period of tremendous growth in the aviation industry. 0LQQHDSROLV6W3DXO,QWHUQDWLRQDO$LUSRUW 063 HQMR\HGDQRWKHUUHFRUG\HDUVXUSDVVLQJPLOOLRQSDVVHQJHUVIRUWKH¿UVWWLPH International travel reached new heights with new service to Dublin, Mexico City and Seoul. And nearly two dozen new restaurants joined the ranks of MSP’s award-winning concession program. The Metropolitan Airports Commission’s (MAC) reliever airport system also saw an increase in the number of aircraft operations and the number of aircraft based there. Work continued on a multi-year project to expand and modernize Terminal 1’s vintage ticketing and bag claim facilities, and a new 5,000-stall parking ramp took shape in preparation for its 2020 debut. The MAC also began planning and increasing investments in its reliever airports, helping ensure the Twin Cities will continue to enjoy not only the largest, but also we believe the best, airport system in the nation. We’re not alone in holding that opinion. In 2019, for the third consecutive year, Airports Council International named MSP the Best Airport in North America in its size category based on passenger surveys. In short, 2019 was a year of tremendous promise that illustrated the close connection between air transportation and a strong HFRQRP\+LVWRU\KDVVKRZQWKDWDYLDWLRQERWKGULYHVDQGEHQH¿WVIURPHFRQRPLFJURZWK±DQGLWZLOODJDLQZKHQWKHFXUUHQW crisis is behind us.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Elmo Airport Advisory Commission (LEAAC)
    Lake Elmo Airport Advisory Commission (LEAAC) MEETING AGENDA May 26, 2021 3 p.m. This meeting is being held via TEAMS* only Join via computer or tablet: Click here to join the meeting Join via phone by calling: 612-405-6798 Meeting ID 589785142# 1. Overview by Airport Manager -Information 2. Introductions -Information 3. Bylaws Approval -Action 4. Election Discussion -Information 5. Work Plan -Action 6. Mobile Sound Monitoring Study -Information 7. Aircraft Operations and Noise Complaints Summary -Information 8. Public Comment (3-min. per comment) -Information 9. Member Comment -Information 10. Set LEAAC meeting schedule -Action 11. Adjourn * For assistance with meeting accommodations or using TEAMS, please contact: Jennifer Lewis, MAC Community Relations Coordinator [email protected] or 612-486-2420 Phil Tiedeman, MAC Airport Manager, 3275 Manning Ave., Box 2, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Email: [email protected] Phone: 763-717-0001 DRAFT BYLAWS OF LAKE ELMO AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION (LEAAC) ARTICLE I The name of this organization shall be the Lake Elmo Airport Advisory Commission, hereinafter referred to as the "Commission." By appointing representatives to this Commission, the appointing authorities do hereby endorse the purpose and goals as identified in these bylaws and authorize and support the Commission as an advisory body to the respective appointing bodies. ARTICLE II PURPOSE AND GOALS GOAL: This Commission is formed to further the general welfare of the community and the Lake Elmo Airport, a public airport in Baytown Township, County of Washington, state of Minnesota, through minimizing or resolving problems created by the aircraft operations at the airport.
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET You May Have Heard
    MAC GA Final Four Community FACT SHEET You may have heard... The 2019 NCAA Final Four is coming to Minnesota. The event is expected to draw thousands of people to the area and the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is preparing its airport facilities to accommodate those traveling by air. Many event-goers traveling to and from the Twin Cities will use commercial airline services at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP); many others will use non-commercial aviation services, like those that operate at the MAC’s general aviation airports. Those airports include: • STP: St. Paul Downtown Airport in St. Paul • ANE: Anoka County-Blaine Airport in Blaine • FCM: Flying Cloud Airport in Eden Prairie • MIC: Crystal Airport in Crystal • LVN: Airlake Airport in Lakeville • 21D: Lake Elmo Airport in Lake Elmo The MAC is preparing to meet the increase in demand while ensuring a high level of service and being mindful of neighboring communities. What you can expect... • During the week leading up to the National Championship game and one day after (April 1-9, 2019), MAC expects to have more aircraft taking off and landing than usual at each of its airports. • We anticipate the highest volume of flights to occur from Wednesday, April 3rd through Tuesday, April 9th. • Federal law allows airplanes and helicopters to land and takeoff at any MAC airport any time of day or night. The MAC anticipates • Corporate jets and turboprop aircraft, like the ones arrivals will peak in pictured, will be used more than normal during the hours leading April 6 all hours of the day and night, including the early up to the Semifinal Saturday morning hours and later into the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DRAFT Lake Elmo Airport 2035 Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP)
    FINAL DRAFT Lake Elmo Airport 2035 Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) Released for Metropolitan Council Review May 06, 2016 Prepared jointly by the Airport Development & Environment Departments TABLE OF CONTENTS ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... i ES.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ i ES.2 AIRPORT ROLE ........................................................................................................ ii ES.3 FORECASTS .............................................................................................................iv ES.4 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS .....................................................................................vi ES.5 ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED FOR DEVELOPMENT ...............................................ix ES.6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................xv ES.7 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ................................................................................ xviii ES.8 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ...................................................................................... xxi ES.9 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS .................................................................... xxiv 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................... 1-1 1.1 OVERVIEW ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report to the Legislature
    2010 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PREPARED BY THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION AVIATION NOISE AND SATELLITE PROGRAMS OFFICE MARCH 2011 2010 Annual Report to the Legislature Metropolitan Airports Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.0 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION STRATEGIC PLAN ........................................ 5 2 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) .................................... 6 2.0 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 MSP AIRPORT FACILITIES .................................................................................................. 6 2.1.1 Airfield ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Terminal 1 - Lindbergh ................................................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Terminal 2 - Humphrey .................................................................................................. 8 2.1.4 Terminal Way-Finding Signage ...................................................................................... 9 2.1.5 Light Rail and Bus Transit ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Draft
    Chapter 9 Aviation Investment Direction and Plan Overview Aviation connects the Twin Cities region to the rest of the nation and the world beyond. Although federal law does not require that a region's long-range transportation plan include an aviation element, state law defines aviation as a metropolitan system and requires the Council to prepare an aviation system plan. Minnesota Statutes (473.145) directs the Council to prepare a metropolitan development guide that addresses “… the necessity for and location of airports…” More specifically, Minnesota Statutes 473.146, subd. 3.8 requires the Council to adopt a long-range comprehensive transportation policy Plan that includes “a long-range assessment of air transportation trends and factors that may affect airport development in the metropolitan area and policies and strategies that will ensure a comprehensive, coordinated, and timely investigation and evaluation of alternatives for airport development." The Twin Cities Regional Aviation System is a well developed aviation system that requires continued protection, maintenance, and enhancements to support the Twin Cities economy and transportation infrastructure. The Twin Cities region is served by one major airport with commercial air service − Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport − and eight seven reliever airports for general aviation, business and recreational users. Two seaplan bases Two seaplane bases A are are aalso partss of the system.. are two seaplane bases. and a turf runway airport. The airports are classified according to their role within the regional aviation system as a Major, Intermediate, Minor or Special Purpose facility. Most of the system airports are part of the National Plan of Integrated Airports (NPIAS), which makes them eligible for federal and state funding.
    [Show full text]
  • 2030 Twin Cities Aviation System Technical Report
    Twin Cities Aviation System Technical Report December 2009 Prepared for: Metropolitan Council Prepared by: With: KRAMER aerotek and Biko Associates “The preparation of this document was financed in part through a planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as approved under the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982. The contents of this report reflect the views of the Consultant, which is responsible for the fact and the accuracy of the data depicted herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of the report by the FAA does not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any development depicted therein, nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable in accordance with applicable public laws.” Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary Inventory.................................................................................................................................................. ES‐1 Aviation Industry Trends..........................................................................................................................ES‐3 Forecasts .................................................................................................................................................. ES‐4 Peer System Comparisons ....................................................................................................................... ES‐5 Airport Classification...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Servicing, Maintaining & Repairing
    13-Sep-21 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMMERCIAL OPERATORS LISTING OFFICE OF AERONAUTICS License Type - Aircraft Servicing, Maintaining & Repairing *Grouped by Associated City COMPANY NAME Aitkin Aviation LLC - Aitkin COMPANY NAME Adventure North Flying Service LLC - Aitkin CONTACT PERSON Adam Forsberg CONTACT PERSON Adam Forsberg ADDRESS 1190 Air Park Drive ADDRESS 1103 Airport Road CITY Aitkin, MN 56431 CITY Baudette, MN 56623 AIRPORT Aitkin Municipal - Steve Kurtz Field AIRPORT Aitkin Municipal Airport - Steve Kurtz Field ASSOCIATED CITY AITKIN ASSOCIATED CITY AITKIN TELEPHONE 218-927-4104 TELEPHONE 218-634-1923 EMAIL [email protected] EMAIL [email protected] WEB SITE www.aitkinaviation.com WEB SITE www.adventurenorthflyingservice.com COMPANY NAME Albert Lea Airport, Inc. COMPANY NAME Webers Aero Repair, Inc. CONTACT PERSON Jim Hanson CONTACT PERSON Kevin Sather ADDRESS 400 Airport Road ADDRESS 2606 Aga Drive, PO Box 264 CITY Albert Lea, MN 56007 CITY Alexandria, MN 56308 AIRPORT Albert Lea Municipal AIRPORT Alexandria Municipal - Chandler Field ASSOCIATED CITY ALBERT LEA ASSOCIATED CITY ALEXANDRIA TELEPHONE 507-373-0608 TELEPHONE 320-763-4066 EMAIL [email protected] EMAIL WEB SITE WEB SITE COMPANY NAME Austin Aeroflight, Inc. COMPANY NAME Adventure North Flying Service LLC - Baudett CONTACT PERSON Bruce W. Budahn CONTACT PERSON Adam Forsberg ADDRESS 710 - 21st Street NE ADDRESS 1103 Airport Road CITY Austin, MN 55912-4165 CITY Baudette, MN 56623 AIRPORT Austin Municipal AIRPORT Baudette International ASSOCIATED CITY AUSTIN ASSOCIATED CITY BAUDETTE TELEPHONE 507-433-1813 TELEPHONE 218-634-1923 EMAIL [email protected] EMAIL [email protected] WEB SITE www.austinaeroflight.com WEB SITE www.adventurenorthflyingservice.com COMPANY NAME Aitkin Aviation LLC - Baudette COMPANY NAME Bemidji Aviation Services, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Airports Commission: Glossary of Terms
    Metropolitan Airports Commission: Glossary of Terms In addition to the below glossary, the Federal Aviation Administration has a list of acronyms and abbreviations for various operations, lines of business, and programs available at https://www.faa.gov/jobs/abbreviations/. A-Weighted Decibels (dBA): A measure of noise levels adjusted relative to the frequencies most audible to the human ear. Above Ground Level (AGL): A height above the ground as opposed to above Mean Sea Level (MSL). Accelerate-Stop Distance: The runway length declared available and suitable for the acceleration and deceleration of an aircraft aborting a takeoff. Advisory Circular: External publications issued by the FAA consisting of non-regulatory material providing for recommendations relative to policy, guidance, and information relative to a specific aviation subject. Aircraft Approach Category (AAC): An alphabetic classification of aircraft based upon 1.3 times the stall speed in a landing configuration at their maximum certified landing weight. The categories are as follows: Category A: Approach speed less than 91 knots Category B: Approach speed 91 knots or more but less than 121 knots Category C: Approach speed 121 knots or more but less than 141 knots Category D: Approach speed 141 knots or more but less than 166 knots Category E: Approach speed 166 knots or more Airplane Design Group (ADG): A classification of aircraft based on wingspan and tail height. The groups are as follows: Group I: Wingspan up to but not including 49 feet or tail height up to but
    [Show full text]
  • Baytown Township Groundwater: Public Health Assessment
    Public Health Assessment Baytown Township Groundwater Contamination Site Washington County, Minnesota EPA Facility ID: MND982425209 September 14, 2004 Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Health Under Cooperative Agreement with the Agency For Toxic Substances And Disease Registry FOREWORD This document summarizes public health concerns at a hazardous waste site in Minnesota. It is based on a site evaluation conducted by the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). For a site evaluation a number of steps are necessary: ! Evaluating exposure: MDH scientists begin by reviewing available information about environmental conditions at the site. The first task is to find out how much contamination is present, where it is found on the site, and how people might be exposed to it. Usually, MDH does not collect its own environmental sampling data. We rely on information provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and other government agencies, private businesses, and the general public. ! Evaluating health effects: If there is evidence that people are being exposed—or could be exposed—to hazardous substances, MDH scientists will take steps to determine whether that exposure could be harmful to human health. The report focuses on public health; that is, the health impact on the community as a whole, and is based on existing scientific information. ! Developing recommendations: In the evaluation report, MDH outlines its conclusions regarding any potential health threat posed by a site, and offers recommendations for reducing or eliminating human exposure to contaminants. The role of MDH in dealing with hazardous waste sites is primarily advisory. For that reason, the evaluation report will typically recommend actions to be taken by other agencies—including EPA and MPCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Elmo Airport Zoning Ordinance
    POST HEARING DRAFT 03/10/20 Lake Elmo Airport Zoning Ordinance Adopted xx, xx, 20xx Adopted by the Lake Elmo Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board Contact Person: Lake Elmo Joint Airport Zoning Board c/o JAZB Secretary Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450 DRAFT 1 Table of Contents 2 3 SECTION I. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY ............................................................................ 1 4 SECTION II. TITLE AND SHORT TITLE ............................................................................... 2 5 SECTION III. DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION ............................................... 2 6 SECTION IV. AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTION ZONING ................................................................. 6 7 SECTION V. LAND USE SAFETY ZONING ............................................................................ 9 8 SECTION VII. NONCONFORMING USES ............................................................................. 10 9 SECTION VIII. AIRPORT ZONING PERMITS ......................................................................... 11 10 SECTION IX. VARIANCES ................................................................................................ 13 11 SECTION X. HAZARD MARKING AND LIGHTING ............................................................... 14 12 SECTION XI. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ........................................................................... 14 13 SECTION XII. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ............................................................................
    [Show full text]