Resolving wave effects on storm surges with an unstructured high resolution 2-way coupled surge-wave model for Australia

Ivica Janekovic, Yasha Hetzel, Charitha Pattiaratchi, E.M.S. Wijeratne, Aron Roland

School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering The UWA Oceans Institute The University of Extreme sea levels

Cardwell after Yasi (source: DSITIA) Extreme sea levels

 Essential for coastal planning

 A range of processes influence extreme water levels

 Previous work suggested the model underestimated extreme sea levels in some areas

 The present model attempts to improve these estimates through (Haigh et al. 2013 a,b) improved forcing, resolution, and coupling with a wave model Motivation

 Better prediction of around Australia

 Increased computational power (Pawsey) allows

 better resolutions, representation of the system

 better numerical models with complex dynamics

 coupling btw w-o-a models

 Unstructured formulation 3D – efficient, MPI scaling

 horizontal (triangle / quads)

 vertical s-z (LSC2- uneven number of levels) AUS model grid

Coastal ~100 m Simulations

)

1

-

s

m

(

d

e

e

p

s

d

n

i

w TROPICAL

x

a M GEORGE FEBRUARY 2011 APRIL 2007 HJRA maximum wind speed v15

v

e

l

)

o

S

c

o

( i

t

y

e

d (

m

u

t

i

t

s

a

-

1

L

)

Longitude (oE)

CYCLONE * Thevenard 0.9 EAST COAST 0.8 Port * Pirie ALBY APRIL 0.6

0.6 M Port Lincoln Port a x LOW

Adelaide 0.5 s * u * r Victor g 1978 e 0.4 Harbour

( * m

0.3 ) 0.2 JUNE 2016 1-4 July 2007 0.1

0 EXTRATROPICAL STORMS Models SCHISM (Semi-implicit Cross-scale Hydroscience Integrated System Model)  unstructured (triangles, quads, in vertical LSC2 scheme “s-z”)  semi-implicit integration, opposite CFL>0.6 (!)

• Wave-dependent wind stress • Wave momentum stress (wave setup)

WWM SCHISM wave hydrodynamic model model

• Sea level • Currents WWM III (Wind Wave spectral model, ~ WW3)  hybrid fractional splitting method, 3rd Ultimate Quickest Wind@10m when waves ~15m?  advanced source and dissipation formulations (Ardhuin), wave breaking (Battjes and Janssen,1978) Coupled Wave Effects

Effect on wind stress

 TC and 10m wind concept?  Classical stress using Cd  Charnock coef. is not constant, used wind-wave dependent α  Wave model can compute stress and U*

 Schism (SL, U, V)  2-way coupled @ 300s  WWM (WL, Wind stress, wave Sxx) Coupled Wave Effects

During TC Hs ~10-15m Wave energy --> sea level

Old way empirical relations (Hb 0.7- 1.3)

However breaking depends on many wave steepness, bottom slope ...

WWM <-> SCHISM Numerical experiments: a) Fully 2-way coupled case b) As (a) but WWM does not send Sxx, Sxy, Syy into SCHISM Cyclone Alby, April 1978

 Started as a category 4 cyclone that interacted with an approaching cold front with devastating results

 Flooding and erosion in SW

 ‘Worst case’ scenario

 Modeling challenges - lack of data & complex storm dynamics – extratropical transition (no longer a tropical cyclone)

Source: BOM Cyclone Alby, April 1978

 Alby accelerated to 80 km/h as it passed the SW of the state.

 Wind gusts of 150 km/h were recorded with little or no rain along the coast Strong, dry northerly winds  10 m waves reported offshore

JRA55 reanalysis winds Cyclone Alby, April 1978

Source: BOM Bunbury Wave-surge model setup

 Coupled & Uncoupled simulations

 100m-100km horizontal resolution

 61 vertical sigma-Z levels

 JRA55 Reanalysis atmospheric forcing (wind and pressure)

 Validation with gauge observations at Perth, Bunbury,

 Output – hourly water levels, currents, wave height, period Wind forcing JRA55

30-Mar-1978 06:00 Z (a) 02-Apr-1978 06:00 Z (b) 04 April 1978 12 Z

03-Apr-1978 06:00 Z (c) 04-Apr-1978 06:00 Z (d) 30

25

)

1

-

s

20

m

(

d

15 e

e

p

s

d

n

10 i

W

5

0

04-Apr-1978 12:00 Z (e) 04-Apr-1978 18:00 Z (f) Simulated waves & surge

Waves >10m matched well with ship reports Simulated waves & surge

Waves >10m matched well with ship reports Simulated waves & surge Wave contributions

1.2

1 Bunbury residual coupled 0.8 uncoupled

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

04/02 04/03 04/04 04/05 Surge difference Surge difference %

10-35% surge height difference due to waves Tropical cyclone Yasi

Dunk Island, QLD

Source: News Ltd. BEFORE AFTER

 One of the most intense and largest tropical cyclones to cross the coast in Australia

 Major damage (~$800 M) caused by inundation and 02 February 2011 erosion from extreme waves (>5m) and storm surge (up to 5.3 m!) Model forcing

 Weather models typically underestimate Simulated maximumHJRA maximum wind speed windv15 speed the intensity of tropical cyclones

v

e

l

) Cross sections of TC Yasi: o

S

c

o

( i

t

y

e

d (

m

u

t

i

t

s

a

-

1

L Wind Pressure )

Longitude (oE)

 Parametric wind models are used to simulate the vortex of tropical cyclones (e.g. Holland 2010)

 To force our surge-wave model we merged a parametric wind model with JRA55 model data Extreme waves

 Yasi waves > 12 m offshore and 6 m nearshore

 Simulated waves matched well with satellite observations

 Great Barrier Reef dissipated much of the wave energy

 Waves improved model accuracy Storm surge

Storm surge in Cardwell >5 m!

(source: DSITIA) Storm surge

Storm surge in Cardwell >5 m!

(source: DSITIA) Storm surge

Storm surge in Cardwell >5 m!

(source: DSITIA)

Wave setup

Surge Surge (m) Wave setup (m) Wave

Wave height

 Cross shelf depths determined contribution of wave setup Australia-wide simulation Australia-wide simulation

2011

TC Anthony, QLD (23,28-30 Jan) TC Bianca, WA (27-30 Jan) TC Yasi, QLD (2-4 Feb) Cold fronts, SA & Tas (1-4 Feb) Summary

 An advanced coupled surge-wave model has been set up for the entire Australian coastline and allows for estimation of wave setup over large areas

 Multiple test cases, shown only for Cyclone Alby (1978) in W.A. and Cyclone Yasi (2011) in Queensland

 15-35% of simulated surge heights during an extreme event were due to wave setup

 The amplitude of wave setup is closely linked with wave height and bathymetry

 Wave setup at the coast ranged between 6-10% of significant wave height measured at 10 m depth

 Accurate high resolution bathymetry is the major limiting factor for simulations of wave setup

 The capability to simulate waves and hydrodynamics over all Australia is made possible by supercomputer Thank you