Sexual Violence in Jacobean and Caroline Comedy Laughing Matters: Sexual Violence in Jacobean and Caroline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sexual Violence in Jacobean and Caroline Comedy Laughing Matters: Sexual Violence in Jacobean and Caroline SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN JACOBEAN AND CAROLINE COMEDY LAUGHING MATTERS: SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN JACOBEAN AND CAROLINE COMEDY BY ERIN JULIAN, M.A., B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy. McMaster University © Copyright by Erin Julian, September 2014 McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2014) Hamilton, Ontario (English and Cultural Studies TITLE: Laughing Matters: Sexual Violence in Jacobean and Caroline Comedy AUTHOR Erin Julian, M.A. (McMaster University), B.A. (Brock University) SUPERVISOR Professor H.M. Ostovich NUMBER OF PAGES vii, 292. ii Abstract This dissertation examines representations of sexual violence in Jacobean and Caroline comedy. While representations of rape in early modern tragedy have received considerable attention, criticism has largely overlooked the extent of sexual violence in early modern comedy – in part because comedy tends to represent sexual violence in ways that do not match up with recognisable rape scripts. This project argues, however, that, like rape, the sexual violences of comedy “humiliate and induce fear, constraining the activities and choices of victims” (Anderson and Doherty 21). The study particularly examines dramatic representations of whore shaming, rape hearings, and cuckoldry in order to discuss how sexual violence is encoded in comic tropes, the comedic genre, and early modern culture generally. This systematic sexual violence took a daily toll on the lives of early modern women, limiting their ability to give meaningful consent, to control their bodies and sexual expressions, and to make choices within marriage. But while comedy often invites its audience to laugh at sexually violated women, rendering the violence they experience acceptable, it can also invite us to see that violence as violence – thereby challenging the ethics of our laughter. iii Acknowledgements I have been incredibly fortunate in the varied sources of support I have received while working on this project. I am indebted to Drs Helen Ostovich, Melinda Gough, and Eugenia Zuroski Jenkins, who have provided me with encouragement and insight throughout my Master’s and Doctoral degrees. Helen has been an unfailingly generous supervisor. She has lent me her expertise on performance and early modern culture, helped me develop the ideas in this dissertation, and taught me to be a better reader and editor of my own work. She has also provided many opportunities to publish, attend conferences, and give lectures. I am, moreover, endlessly grateful to her for sharing her conversation, sense of humour, and love of Jonson (and for introducing me to James Shirley!). Melinda has consistently encouraged me to think incisively and asked the sorts of probing questions that open up one’s work in new and exciting ways. Additionally, she has always provided meticulous reading and commentary which has brought out the clarity in my writing. (She has never yet failed to correct my numerous subject-verb disagreements!) I am grateful, also, for the wit and warmth she brings to every conversation. Gena has always asked challenging and rewarding questions at my oral defenses (MA, comps, and PhD) that have not only led to lively conversations but which also promise to shape future iterations of this project. Additionally, her knowledge of late-seventeenth-century literature, drama, and criticism has provided an invaluably broad perspective on the ideas in this dissertation and on my conception of the early modern period as a whole. She also shared with me many enjoyable conversations about teaching, writing, and academic life generally while I was a TA in her course in my final year. I am indebted to my external examiner, Karen Bamford, whose book on sexual violence was one of the keystones of my dissertation. She was also a patient and friendly presence at my defense and posed questions which, along with her thoughtful and diligent comments during the revision process, will prove instrumental to the shaping of this project in future. I am grateful also to Aurelia Gatto, Antoinette Somo, and Ilona Forgo-Smith, who have always provided the information necessary to survive TAing and degree work (and who patiently endured my tardy email replies). I am grateful to the department of English and Cultural Studies at McMaster for supporting my doctoral work for the past five years with graduate funding, TA and RAships, and award nominations, and to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council for their financial support in the form of a Canada Graduate Scholarship; to the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges, and Universities and the Hamlin Family Fund of the Hamilton Community Foundation for their support in my final year with an Ontario Graduate Scholarship; and to the School of Graduate Studies and Mr Walter A. Buchanan for the Buchanan’s Bounty Book Trust Prize in my second year. I am thankful to my family and friends for creating a safe and supportive environment to work through at-times difficult material. My cohort colleagues (Jesse, Heather, Cassel, iv Mike, Kasim, Amanda, Vinh, Marquita and Matt) shared classes, meals, and conversations. I am particularly grateful to Matt Zantingh for numerous cathartic conversations over coffee; to Kasim Husain for excellent discussions of theatre and excursions to art galleries; to Jessica Dell for her kindness and humour and for teaching me much about teaching during the three years we TAed together; to Nicole Lamont for sharing her friendship (and her puppy) in the last three years; to Chantelle Thauvette, for countless walks, adventures, and conversations about early modern literature, academia, and Doctor Who; to Emily West, whose generosity in friendship and whose ability to speak out against gender-based violence I truly admire; to Brandon Kerfoot, who kept me laughing from afar and whose work ethic is truly inspiring; and finally, to Kari, who has welcomed me into her family and given me a second home for many years, and to whom I owe more than I can possibly express. Finally, I am grateful for Cynthia, Lady Jane Pawlet, and Lucy, who made the writing effort more difficult but also much more fun. v Table of Contents Title Page i Descriptive Note ii Abstract iii Acknowledgements iv Table of Contents vi Description of Academic Achievement vii Introduction: Sexual Violence in Early Modern Comedy 1 Chapter One. Shaming the Whore: Prostitution and Slander on the Early Modern Stage 39 Chapter Two. Traumatic Comedies: Rape Spectacles in Measure for Measure and Volpone 113 Chapter Three. Jonson and Coverture Law: Rewriting the Cuckold Tradition in Volpone and The Devil Is an Ass 194 Conclusion. “[G]ive me that lusty lad”: Ram Alley’s Challenge to Ethical Representation 254 Works Cited 269 vi Declaration of Academic Achievement The dissertation is entirely the student’s own research contribution. vii Ph.D. Thesis – E. Julian; McMaster University – English and Cultural Studies Introduction: Sexual Violence in Early Modern Comedy Struprum, Ravishment, and Chastity: Understanding the Rape Culture of Early Modern Patriarchy Early modern England was undeniably a patriarchy. This fact seems obvious, but its significance cannot be overstated when considering the sexual violence that proliferates in seventeenth-century drama. Patriarchal ideology supported and directed the development of the legal statutes and procedures that defined and processed matters relating to sexual violence and consent, as well as cultural attitudes to rape charges and verbal and physical sexual abuse. Patriarchal ideology and its inherent misogyny were also responsible for common perceptions of what qualities (like chastity) were most valuable for women to possess, which bodies were valuable and which were not, and the attendant belief that non-valuable (that is, lower-class, non-English, sexually promiscuous or otherwise unruly) bodies could be open to sexual abuse without recrimination.1 As my chapter on rape laws and rape hearings reveals, the ways that early modern law and culture understood and defined sexual violence are primarily driven by and representative of male concerns about sexual violence and were perhaps at odds with how women might have perceived sexually violent acts, how they might have defined sexual 1 Barbara Baines, in “Effacing Rape in Early Modern Representation” (1998), quotes Bracton – “the primary Renaissance authority on rape” (70) – in his summary of the degrees to which rapists were punished, noting that while all rapists are legally to receive some punishment, whether the victim “is married or a widow living a respectable life, a nun or a matron, a recognized concubine or a prostitute”; however, Bracton goes on to qualify that “a like punishment will not be imposed for each” (71). Baines suggests that this distinction is meant to indicate that some female bodies – particularly virgins – are more valuable than others. (Certainly, the qualification tempers the enthusiasm that Corinne Saunders has for Bracton’s “remarkable” defence of the prostitute in her own history of rape laws.) 1 Ph.D. Thesis – E. Julian; McMaster University – English and Cultural Studies violence, and the legal responses they may have desired or thought adequate. Certainly, the way that early modern law defined and handled rape falls far short of what contemporary feminists would consider adequate. As historical and critical work has shown, early modern understandings of sexual violence – when they actually paid attention to rape
Recommended publications
  • The English Poets
    THE E NG L I S H P O E T S S E LE CT I O N S WITH CR ITI CA L I NTRODUCTI ONS MATTHE W A R NOLD E‘DH ED BY ' Y WA R H P H R D . THO MA S UM , M A L I V O . I ' B EN J ONS QN to D R YD E N Mfihm m m Quirk MA CMI LLA N A ND co. 1 8 8 0 C O NT E NT S . m as BEN J ONSON (1 5734637) ‘ ' Echo s Lam ent of Narcissus (from Cynthia s Revels) V enetian Song (from V olpone) S ong (from Epicae ne) ' Charis Triumph (from Underwoods) Truth (from Hym enaei) ‘ ’ Th e Shepherds Holiday (from Pan 5 Anniversary) M Song before th e Entry cf th e asquers (from Th e Fortunate Isles) Lde to Himself (after th e failure of Th e New I nn) — To Ce a om Th e Fo e Song . li (fr r st) Epigram s To my m ere E nglish Censurer On Court- Worm To Fool or Knave n L c o n e of Be f O u y, C u t ss d ord Epitaph on Salathiel Pavy be E a on E za L . H pit ph li th . An Ode to Himself (from Underwoods) To th e Memory of my Beloved Master William Shakespeare (from th e F Fo o irst li ) . Epitaph on th e Coun tess of Pembroke (from Underwoods) Epitaph on Master Philip G ray (from Underw oo ds) Epode (from Th e Forest) To Heaven (from Th e Forest) WI LLI AM DRUMMOND or HAWTHORND EN (1 585—1 649) H e Editor Extracts from th e Poems S onnets S extai n Song To Chloris Sonn o ir W A e ande et t S .
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    206 Fletcherian Dramatic Achievement Bibliography Primary sources Apology for Actors Thomas Dekker, An Apology for Actors (1612), ed. Richard H. Per- kinson, New York 1941 Aristotle Poetics, tr. W. Hamilton Fyfe, The Loeb Classics Library, Cam- bridge, Mass., London 1927 St Augustine St Augustine, The Teacher, in Against the Academicians; and, The Teach- er, trans. Peter King, Indianapolis, Cambridge 1995 Bellenden The Chronicles of Scotland: Compiled by Hector Boece: Translated into Scots by John Bellenden, 1531, ed. R. W. Chambers and Edith C. Batho, vol. I, Edinburgh and London 1938 Bowers I-X The Dramatic Works in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon, gen. ed. Fredson Bowers, 10 vols, Cambridge UP 1966–1996 [Cicero] Ad Herennium, tr. Harry Caplan; The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass., London 1954 Demetrius and Enanthe MS John Fletcher, Demetrius and Enanthe, ed. Margaret McLaren Cook and F. P. Wilson, The Malone Society Reprints 1950 (1951) Dio Dio Cassius, Dio’s Roman History, tr. Earnest Cary, vol. vii, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass., London 1961 Faithful Friends The Faithful Friends, ed. G. R. Proudfoot and G. M. Pinciss, The Malone Society Reprints 1970 (1975) Henslowe’s Diary Henslowe’s Diary, ed. R. A. Foakes, 2nd edition, Cambridge UP 2002. Howard-Hill (1980) Sir John Van Olden Barnavelt: by John Fletcher and Philip Massinger, ed. T. H. Howard-Hill, The Malone Society Reprints 1979 (1980) Bonduca MS Bonduca: by John Fletcher, ed. W. W. Greg, The Malone Society Re- prints, 1951 Mann Thomas Mann, Doctor Faustus, tr. H. T. Lowe-Porter, Everyman’s Library, vol.80, 1992 Masque of Queens Ben Jonson, The Masque of Queens (1609), published in his Workes (1616): 945–964 Meres Francis Meres, Palladis Tamia (1598), Scholars’ Facsimiles & Re- prints, New York 1938 Metrical Boece (1858) The Buik of the Chroniclis of Scotland; or, A Metrical Version of the History of Hector Boece; By William Stewart (1535), ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voiceless Procne and the Absent Philomela in Aristophanes' Birds
    The Silence of the Shuttle: The Voiceless Procne and the Absent Philomela in Aristophanes’ Birds In the Birds, Aristophanes creates an odd, jarring sequel to Sophocles’ Tereus through the figures of Tereus and Procne: Procne and Tereus are living together among the birds as a happily reunited couple; their dead son Itys is only mentioned as a figure to be mourned; and the other events that made up the plot of Sophocles’ now fragmentary tragedy—Tereus’ rape of Procne’s sister Philomela, Procne’s subsequent murder of her own son—are not mentioned at all. Procne, furthermore, never speaks, and Philomela is completely absent, her name not even appearing in Aristophanes’ comedy. In this paper, I argue that, through Procne’s voicelessness and Philomela’s conspicuous absence, Aristophanes sets up Procne as a double for her sister, and this doubling is emblematic of the larger narrowing of women’s roles in the comic utopia of the Birds. Procne is also a double in one other, important respect: Although she is introduced as Tereus’ wife, the details given about her costuming indicate that she is costumed as a prostitute—an auletris, more specifically—and Tereus seems unconcerned with presenting her as an object of sexual fantasy to the other male birds. Thus, she occupies the roles of both a wife and a prostitute. This telescoping of female roles is part of the atmosphere of sexual freedom that Peisetairos and Euelpides hope for when they go to live among the birds; Euelpides hopes to live in a city where another man will scold him for not fondling his beautiful young son while leaving the gymnasium (Birds 137-142), and they find in Tereus a man who invites them to “play” (παίζωμεν, 660) with his beautiful and scantily clad wife.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennyson's Poems
    Tennyson’s Poems New Textual Parallels R. H. WINNICK To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. TENNYSON’S POEMS: NEW TEXTUAL PARALLELS Tennyson’s Poems: New Textual Parallels R. H. Winnick https://www.openbookpublishers.com Copyright © 2019 by R. H. Winnick This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work provided that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way which suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: R. H. Winnick, Tennyson’s Poems: New Textual Parallels. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2019. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0161 In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Tereus in Fragments: a Lost Play of Sophocles
    TEREUS IN FRAGMENTS: A LOST PLAY OF SOPHOCLES by Lisa Maurizio Lewiston ME 04240 [email protected] Tereus in Fragments is based on an ancient Greek myth about Tereus’ (male) violence and Philomela and Procne’s (female) revenge. It has been the subject of several modern dramas, most recently Joanna Laurens’ The Three Birds. Lisa Maurizio’s Tereus in Fragments: A Lost Play of Sophocles, however, differs from most modern adaptations of this myth in several respects. Her play more closely follows ancient tragic Greek conventions, especially Sophocles’ original, though now largely lost, tragedy Tereus. Philomela, for example, is a mute character in this play, as she seems to have been in Sophocles’ Tereus. In addition, Maurizio has translated and incorporated the few lines that survive from Sophocles’ play. More notably, Maurizio focuses less on Tereus’ violence (or male violence in general, the theme of many modern adaptations of this myth) and more on Procne’s longing for her sister and the fluidity of female identity. To this end, Maurizio has incorporated women’s poetry from around the world in her script, from Sappho’s ancient Greek lyrics to Forugh Farrokhzad’s modern Iranian verse. Copyrighted by Lisa Maurizio This script is available for performance and production on the condition that the author is acknowledged and notified. Changes to the script require the author’s permission. TEREUS IN FRAGMENTS: A LOST PLAY OF SOPHOCLES CHARACTERS Procne - young woman Tereus - man Philomela - mute young woman Nurse - old woman Itys - boy Servant - old man Chorus of Sirens - 3 bird-women when no mark appears, all three speak together, otherwise different voices are indicated by *, #, ^ ACT I Procne, an Athenian princess who resides in Thrace with her husband Tereus, desires to see her sister Philomela.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Procne, Philomela, and Tereus at First Seems to Lack the Kind of Links to Contemporary Roman Ideology and Spectacul
    CHAPTER 5 The story of Procne, Philomela, and Tereus at first seems to lack the kind of links to contemporary Roman ideology and spectacular praxis that formed the starting points for our reading of the Pentheus tale. Yet it is in part the deliberate turning aside of such recognizably Roman fea­ tures within the narrative that gives it its programmatic importance for understanding the dialogue Ovid creates between the visual experience of metamorphosis his text offers and the world of civic ritual and spec­ tacular performance. The tale's obviously tragic parallels, even as they confirm its status as a Greek, as opposed to Roman, story will draw our attention from the arena to the theater, another mode of spectacle that enmeshed the spectator in a complex fixing of the borders between real­ ity and representation. I begin by arguing that Ovid's treatment of eth­ nicity and gender in the episode recalls anxieties that recur specifically in discussions of the effects of theatrical performance and that, as we saw in the preceding chapter's treatment of the Pentheus episode, focusing these anxieties through the phenomenon of metamorphosis "textualizes" them, allowing his poem to comment on the theatrical experience and to reproduce it. One factor that accentuated the potential seams between what happened on a Roman stage and the real-world experience of its spectators was precisely that these foreign performances were so care­ fully integrated into the civic life of the Roman state. As the next stage in my argument, I try to demonstrate that Ovid creates a similar effect within his narrative by correlating a tragic view of the narrated events with other discursive frameworks: in particular, the rape of Philomela is read against the foundational historical episode of Lucretia and also em­ bedded within the Roman ritual calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abuse of Patriarchal Power in Rome: the Rape Narratives of Ovid’S Metamorphoses
    The Abuse of Patriarchal Power in Rome: The Rape Narratives of Ovid’s Metamorphoses A Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Classics By K. Tinkler Classics Department University of Canterbury 2018 Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Abstract……………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 CHAPTER ONE: Gender in Rome………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 A Woman’s Place in a Man’s World: Patriarchy in Rome…………………………………………………… 12 Lucretia’s Legacy: The Cultural Template of the Raped Woman……………………………………….. 18 The Intimacy of Rape: The Body of a Woman in Antiquity…………………………………………………. 22 CHAPTER TWO: Rape in the Metamorphoses…………………………………………………………………… 29 The Rape Stories of the Metamorphoses………………………………………………………………………….. 29 The Characteristics of Ovid’s Perpetrators………………………………………………………………………… 30 Gods and Non-Human Perpetrators………………………………………………………………………………….. 34 The Characteristics of Ovid’s Victims…………………………………………………………………………………. 40 The Rape of Philomela………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 44 The Male Gaze………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 48 CHAPTER THREE: The Aftermath of Rape…………………………………………………………………………. 55 The Non-Metamorphic Consequences………………………………………………………………………………. 55 The Psychological Effect on the Victim……………………………………………………………………………… 60 The Eternal Link between the Victim and the Rapist…………………………………………………………. 63 The Second Rape: The Goddesses’ Wrath………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Nightingale's Lament and Itys' Identity in Ovid's Metamorphoses
    The Nightingale’s Lament and Itys’ Identity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses A thesis submitted by Michal Hannah Sagal In partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in Classics Tufts University May 2016 Adviser: Professor Marie-Claire Beaulieu ii ABSTRACT The story of the nightingale has many versions, but these can be reduced to two plots from which the others grow. In the first, Aedon, married to Zethus, kills her son by accident. She intends to kill the oldest son of Niobe, who is married to the brother of Aedon’s husband. In the second version, Procne kills her son to avenge the rape of her sister, Philomela, at the hands of Procne’s own husband. The stories end in the same way: both mothers are transformed into a nightingale and lament their son Itys, singing his name eternally. In most versions of the story, Itys’ identity is defined by the nightingale’s lament. Ovid, however, suppresses the lament. The effect of this is to give Itys and his mother, Procne, identities that are separate from the nightingale’s lament, and to give Itys a voice of his own. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was over a year in the making, from seedling idea and initial research to the final product. After all this time, I owe thanks to quite a few people. First and foremost to Professor Marie-Claire Beaulieu, my adviser throughout this whole process. She patiently read and thoroughly commented on anything I sent to her for review, from snippet of an introduction to in-progress outline to full, final paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Stage Conventions of Realism1 a Defence of Mimetic Inconsistencies
    27 Chapter 1 Modern Stage Conventions of Realism1 A Defence of Mimetic Inconsistencies [Arnoldo.] ’tis no illusion. Mine eyes are not deceiv’d, all these are reall (The Custom of the Country 3.2.22–3) [There are] situations in Shakespeare where the unities are violently transgressed and which even the conventionless modern theatre cannot always rescue from absurdity. In Richard II, for example, the telescoped time-scheme of the sequence between Bolingbroke’s departure for exile and the report of his return to England fails markedly to satisfy our post-Ibsenite sense of probability. (Bradley 1992: 28–29) As we are all aware, the more realistic the stage gore, the less we believe in it, the more distracted we become by wondering ‘How did they do that?’ … Naturalists… find it wonderfully easy and gratify- ing to reveal contradictions, silly conventions, artifice of motive and timing and language. They find it less easy to explain why Shakespeare’s fictions convince, more than their own. (Taylor 1985: 54–55) This chapter proceeds from the observation that most modern acting is too lit- eral, too realistic to suit early modern dramatic writing. To have almost the same physical conditions as the Elizabethans is not enough; stage conditions are just the externals. What is also needed is to get closer to their acting style. The King’s Men performed on the proscenium at the Blackfriars, and presumably, produced the same plays with virtually the same acting as in the Globe; appropriate acting is not merely a question of the acting space. Before baroque visuality prevailed in the English theatre, audiences in general went to ‘heare’ a play, not to ‘see’ it.2 Performances were founded on language; acting in the modern sense was second- 1 An earlier version of this chapter was presented as a paper at the Scaena conference at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Notes Introduction 1. Ben Jonson, ‘Epitaph on S. P. a Child of Q. El. Chappel’, in Ben Jonson, ed. C. H. Herford, Percy Simpson and Evelyn Simpson, 11 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925–52), VIII (1947), p. 77, ll. 1–5. Further references are given in the text. 2. For example, Michael Shapiro, Children of the Revels: The Boy Companies of Shakespeare’s Time and their Plays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), p. 104; Glynne Wickham, Herbert Berry and William Ingram, eds, English Professional Theatre, 1530–1660 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 268. 3. See Claire Busse, ‘Pretty Fictions and Little Stories’, in Childhood and Children’s Books in Early Modern Europe, 1550–1800, ed. Andrea Immel and Michael Witmore (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 75–102 (p. 75). 4. See David Kathman, ‘How Old Were Shakespeare’s Boy Actors?’, Shakespeare Survey, 58 (2005), 220–46 (p. 223). 5. See Philippe Ariès, Centuries of Childhood (New York: Vintage, 1962), pp. 36–7. 6. For ease of reference I will generally refer to ‘the Children of the Queen’s Revels’, but I will use the title appropriate to a particular historical moment when discussing a specific event. 7. See Shapiro, Children of the Revels, p. 104; Shen Lin, “How Old were the Children of Paul’s?”, Theatre Notebook, 45 (1991), 121–31. 8. See Linda Austern, ‘Thomas Ravenscroft: Musical Chronicler of an Elizabethan Theatre Company’, Journal of American Musicological Society, 38 (1985), 238–63; W. Reavley Gair, ‘Chorister-Actors at Paul’s’, Notes and Queries, 25 (1978), 440–1; Lin, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Larson 1919 3424498.Pdf
    The Treatment of Royalty_ In The Plays of Beaumont and Fletcher • .l!lphild Larson A Thesis submitted ·to the Department of English and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the .University of ·Kansas in partial fulfillment of the Requirements !or a Master's Degree. Approved~ t.,-/J ~ . _Dept~ June 1919. TABLE OF.CONTENTS. Preface. I. Introduction. II. An Analysis of the Plays in Which Royalty Appears. III. Types of Royalty Treated by Beaumont and Fletcher. IV. Divine Right in Beaumont and .Fletcher's Plays. V:. Beaumont and Fletcher's Purpose in Treating Royalty. Conclusion. Chronology of Beaumont ·and Fletcher's Plays in which ,Royalty Appear.a. Bibliography. Index of Characters· and Plays. PBEFACE . The Treatment of Royalty in Beaumont and Fletcher, was suggested by Professor W.S':•Johnson as a subject for this . ) ~ thesis. I~ has not been my task to distinguish the part of each dramatist in regard to authorship. S.inoe the Duke i~ these plays is treated as a Sovereign ruler, he has been included in the study of royalty ·~as ;well as the King, Queen, Prince,. and Princess. I wish to extend my gratitude to Professor W.S.Johnson for his kind and helpful .criti_oi·sm in the preparation of this thesis, and also to Professor S.L.Whitoomb for his beneficial and.needful suggestions• A.• L. ' 1. INTRODUCTION Iri order to appreciate the sy.mpathies and interests of Beaumont and Fletcher, we need to have , a general knowledge· of the national life of England during their time. We also need to know something about the English drama of .this per- iod to understand why our dramatists favored the treatment of·.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovid's Song of Philomela
    Ovid’s Song of Philomela: “germanaeque suae carmen miserabile” (Meta. VI.582) The publication of R. J. Tarrant’s long awaited Oxford Classical Texts edition of Ovid’s Metamorphoses (2004) invited new attention to a text filled with questioned and questionable readings. In the myth of Tereus, Procne, and Philomela (VI.424-674), line 582 has elicited such controversy that Reeve even suggested the line might better be omitted. Yet one can argue that this line is meaningful for interpreting both the story and the epic in terms of Ovid’s own poetics, and that Tarrant’s redaction of the verse, “germanaeque suae carmen miserabile legit,” affirming the reading in Merkel’s 1865 Teubner edition, possesses the most Ovidian sensibility. Tarrant’s reading of “germanaeque” instead of “fortunaeque”, the more frequent choice (e.g. Anderson, Ovid’s Metamorphoses Books 6-10, 1972), coupled with his reading of “carmen” instead of the more frequent “fatum” (e.g. Goold’s revised Loeb edition, 1977), fits much more closely to the agenda of a poet notable for his allusive language, dramatic flair, and emphasis on the visual. Wheeler (A Discourse of Wonders, 1999) perceptively accepts and discusses carmen miserabile as evocative of Vergil (Georgics 4.514) and as an illustrative validation of his own theories on Ovid’s representation of ‘writing’ itself. But Wheeler also prefers the reading “fortunaeque,” as it supports his contention that Philomela’s text represents her tragic misfortune. But while the terrible suffering of Philomela may foreshadow the Orphic cycle of tragedies in Book X and allude to Vergil’s treatment of Orpheus and Eurydice in the Georgics, Ovid’s description of Philomela’s carmen miserabile is more evocative of Arachne than Orpheus.
    [Show full text]