Kings, Bastards, and Enthusiasts Touching for the Evil in Restoration England

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kings, Bastards, and Enthusiasts Touching for the Evil in Restoration England Kings, Bastards, and Enthusiasts Touching for the Evil in Restoration England By Christopher Andrews An honors thesis submitted to the History Department of Rutgers University Written under the supervision of Professor Alastair Bellany Rutgers University April 2012 Contents Acknowledgments 2 Introduction 3 Part One: 14 Valentine Greatrakes and Popular Attitudes towards Miraculous Healing Part Two: 62 John Browne’s “Adenochoiradelogia” and the Royal Touch Part Three: 132 The Duke of Monmouth and the Politicization of the Royal Touch Epilogue 180 Bibliography 197 1 Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the help and encouragement of a number of people. I am particularly indebted to Professor Alastair Bellany. This thesis would not exist without him, and his expertise, his generosity, and his ability to rapidly edit many, many pages were essential to the completion of this paper. Before I took his class, I had only the vaguest of knowledge about seventeenth century England and its history. But his passion for the subject was contagious, and he sparked in me a fascination with British history that I will carry for the rest of my life. For that, I am truly grateful. Thank you also to Professor Jennifer Jones, my second reader, who was willing to read this project on such short notice, and who made the defense process an enjoyable experience rather than a painful one. Professor Masschaele’s deadlines, helpful comments, and steadying advice were also invaluable in turning this project into a reality. The entire History Department deserves a great deal of praise for their thesis program, and I am honored and grateful that I was able to participate in it. 2 Introduction A crowd of several hundred had gathered outside the Banqueting House of Whitehall Palace. It was the morning of June 23, 1660. The building stood impressively against the sky, its white stones almost shining, its classical pilasters and pediments a stark contrast to the eclectic architecture that surrounded it. It was not the first time such a throng had been seen outside the building. Eleven years before, King Charles I had been marched onto a scaffold erected in front of the Banqueting House, and before a crowd of his own subjects, he was beheaded, initiating a decade of non-monarchical rule in England. The crowd that gathered now, however, had come to see his son, King Charles II. England’s experiment in republicanism had been short lived, and after the near political anarchy that followed Oliver Cromwell’s death in 1658, the monarchy was quickly restored, to widespread relief among the English populace. In fact, Charles had returned less than a month ago, in grand style, and Whitehall had again become a hive of activity as nobles poured in from all corners of the country to prove their loyalty, and commoners gathered to catch a glimpse of their new monarch. The people that had gathered this day were no mere idlers or sightseers, however. The group, a motley collection of men, women and children from across the British Isles, stood expectantly, as if waiting for something, their nervous energy palpable. A closer inspection, though, would reveal that their faces were not contorted with excitement, but pain—ulcerous and weeping wounds covered the necks and heads of many, some were blind, some clung to crutches or were carried by their family and friends. Thick storm banks set in as this wretched crowd stood patiently, and as if to confirm the English cliché, it soon began to rain. Most people retreated indoors to avoid the sudden onslaught, but our crowd 3 stood stubbornly in front of the Banqueting House, waiting, waiting for the appointment they so desperately desired.1 What drove these people to travel hundreds of miles across the country, to risk their fortunes and their lives in the treacherous maze of London, and to wait for hours in a downpour, all while afflicted with the most miserable diseases? It was a hope, a belief; a belief that had once exercised a powerful hold over the English imagination. These people had come to receive the touch of the king—the royal touch. For centuries, it was widely believed that the English monarch possessed a sacred gift, a healing power that allowed him to cure the disease known as scrofula or the ‘king’s evil’ by the touch of his hand alone. From its obscure origins in the twelfth century, the royal touch became perhaps the most famed of all the ceremonies of the English monarchy, the archetypal royal ritual. It was practiced universally by all the rulers of England for years, and enjoyed immense popularity throughout its history. Charles II alone touched nearly seven thousand of his subjects in 1660, and by the end of his twenty-four year reign, he had stroked around one hundred thousand people.2 However, despite this popularity, within thirty years of Charles’ death the royal rite of healing was totally abandoned by the English monarchy. Today, most people have never even heard of the royal touch or the English king’s supposed healing gift, and none would lend the belief any credence. Yet once it was one of the greatest symbols of English royal rule, both at home and abroad, and millions believed wholeheartedly in the wonder working power of the king. Why? What drove so many people to accept that their sovereign possessed a healing touch? And why did this belief die out so rapidly 1 Samuel Pepys attended the ceremony on June 23 and recorded it in his diary. Samuel Pepys, “June 23 1660”, Diaries; http://www.pepysdiary.com/archive/1660/06/. 2 John Browne, Adenochoiradelogia, (London: Printed for Tho. Newcomb for Sam. Lowndes, 1684), Book III 197- 207. 4 and completely? Though the origins of the rite lie deep within the Middle Ages, both its ceremonial peak and its precipitate decline occurred under the rule of the later Stuart monarchs, a period of incredible intellectual and social ferment in English history. The nature of the rite during the reign of Charles II and his successors sheds light, then, on the beliefs that both informed the royal touch and that led to its rejection. However, these beliefs did not develop in isolation, and the evolution of the rite through the years is essential to understanding its role at the turn of the eighteenth century. It is to this history that we must first turn. Scrofula or struma, known as the king’s evil in the seventeenth century, is a painful disease, debilitating and disfiguring. Today we know it is caused by tubercular infections of the cervical lymph nodes, but medical diagnosis in the 1600s was vague and imprecise, and the term was used to describe a wide range of maladies, from tumors to cancers to infected wounds to blindness. Its chief symptoms are large swellings that form in the neck and face, which, if left untreated, as they inevitably were in the seventeenth century, suppurate and fester into large, open, pus filled wounds. The mark of such a disease naturally evoked revulsion in many people, and the “Running Sores [that]… issued out much stinking matter” isolated the sufferers from the companionship and the help of their fellow man.3 Apart from offensive swellings, scrofula sometimes led to death. Though not on the level of the great killers like smallpox and plague, a steady stream of casualties from the disease are recorded in the London Bills of Mortality throughout the 1600s, and so the fear of death was added to the discomfort and disfigurement of the illness.4 Scrofula, however, has the frequent, and convenient, tendency to go into remission for long stretches of time, and so it is perhaps easy to see why this disease in particular became 3 Browne, Adenochoiradelogia, Book III, 170. 4 Keith Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in sixteenth and seventeenth century England (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), 192. 5 the sovereign remedy of the monarch. Still, we must always keep in the back of our minds the crowd that stood in front of the Banqueting House on that rainy morning, desperate in the truest sense of the word for any relief from the suffering they endured. The precise intellectual genesis of the royal touch is shrouded by both time and the impenetrable depths of the human psyche. However, we can be fairly certain when the touch began. The royal rite of healing probably arose in England around the twelfth century, during the reign of Henry I (r. 1100-1135), though was not formalized until the reign of his grandson Henry II, who ruled from 1154-1189. The ceremony was gradually expanded and refined throughout the years until it reached its ultimate ceremonial expression under the Stuarts.5 However, the English monarch was not the only ruler in Europe to touch for scrofula. The French too, practiced the rite as fervently as the English kings, and continued to do so for years after the end of the touch in England. The origins of the rite in France can be definitely dated to the reign of Philip I (r. 1059-1108), under whom the French cure first became institutionalized. However, in both the French and the English case, the origins of the rite were frequently traced back further, to two saintly and pious kings of the past. Saint Edward the Confessor and Robert the Pious, of England and France respectively, were widely recognized as the originators of the healing power in French and English accounts up until the modern era. During and immediately after their reigns, legends grew around both rulers of cures they supposedly wrought through their touch alone, and both Henry I and Philip I apparently appropriated these vague legends in their initial efforts at royal healing.6 It is notable that both of these mythical founders of the royal touch were famed for the religiosity, and became holy and saint like figures to latter generations.
Recommended publications
  • Samuel Johnson's Childhood Illnesses and the King's Evil
    SAMUEL JOHNSON'S CHILDHOOD ILLNESSES AND THE KING'S EVIL by LAWRENCE C. McHENRY, JR. AND RONALD MAC KEITH 'HERE is a brave boy,' proclaimed George Hector,* when he brought Samuel Johnson into the world. From this moment and throughout most of his childhood, young Sam was harassed by a variety of afflictions that troubled his daily existence, but did not prevent him from eventually becoming one of England's outstanding literary figures. Samuel Johnson's adult illnesses and the history of his childhood have been described by many writers, but no separate work is available on his childhood medical history. The purpose ofthis paper is to describe Johnson's childhood medical disorders and their consequences. The principal source of information on this period in Johnson's life is from an autobiographical sketch, An account of the life of Dr. Samuel Johnson from his birth to his eleventh year, written by himself. Johnson apparently called this his 'Annals' and his two principal biographers, Boswell and Hawkins, did not know of its existence. This was written when he was 55 years old and was 'among the mass of papers which were ordered to be committed to the flames a few days before his death.'** Johnson's 'Annals' gives a record of his early affections, but it contains a rather questionable medical implication that has been perpetuated as fact. This is that Johnson developed tuberculosis during the first few weeks of his life. We propose to point out that this is unlikely and to show that it is much more probable that he developed tuberculosis later, when he was about two years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Rois Thaumaturges
    Les Rois Tha uma turg es . Étud e su rle Cara ct Ère SURNATUREL At TRIBUE A LA PUISSANCE ROYALE Par ti cu li er eme nt en Fran ce et en Angl e - te rre . By Marc Bloch, Professeur a I’Universite de Strasbourg. En Depot: Librairie Istra, Maison d’Edition, Strasbourg, 15, rue des Juifs, Paris, 57, rue de Richelieu. Humphrey Milford: Oxford University Press, 1924. Professor Bloch has written a most exhaustive and erudite study of the “divinity that doth hedge a king.” As he states, the origins of the conception of mystic powers possessed by royal persons are lost in the obscurity attendant upon the beginnings of most human institutions. Certain it is that from the earliest periods down to a comparatively few centuries ago certain superhuman attributes were ascribed to those hereditary rulers who reigned by divine right. Because the supposed power of healing by the royal touch or other means figured among the origin of the tradition. He states that these, we must by no means allow ourselves to Henry i was most anxious to conciliate his think that the European or English kings whose English subjects. He married an English wife thaumaturgic properties are the special object and was anxious to attach his dynasty in every of study by Professor Bloch were considered possible way to that of the English kings before either by themselves or their subjects in the the Conquest. The most ancient narratives that light of mere sorcerers. Their mystical functions tell of the miraculous cures wrought by Edward were merely an appanage of their office, the the Confessor were written during the reign essential duties of which were to rule their of Henry i, and the official interpretation of the people, administer justice and conduct their cures brought about by the royal touch of affairs in war and peace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Cord
    THE GOLDEN CORD A SHORT BOOK ON THE SECULAR AND THE SACRED ' " ' ..I ~·/ I _,., ' '4 ~ 'V . \ . " ': ,., .:._ C HARLE S TALIAFERR O THE GOLDEN CORD THE GOLDEN CORD A SHORT BOOK ON THE SECULAR AND THE SACRED CHARLES TALIAFERRO University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Copyright © 2012 by the University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 www.undpress.nd.edu All Rights Reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Taliaferro, Charles. The golden cord : a short book on the secular and the sacred / Charles Taliaferro. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-268-04238-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-268-04238-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. God (Christianity) 2. Life—Religious aspects—Christianity. 3. Self—Religious aspects—Christianity. 4. Redemption—Christianity. 5. Cambridge Platonism. I. Title. BT103.T35 2012 230—dc23 2012037000 ∞ The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 Love in the Physical World 15 CHAPTER 2 Selves and Bodies 41 CHAPTER 3 Some Big Pictures 61 CHAPTER 4 Some Real Appearances 81 CHAPTER 5 Is God Mad, Bad, and Dangerous to Know? 107 CHAPTER 6 Redemption and Time 131 CHAPTER 7 Eternity in Time 145 CHAPTER 8 Glory and the Hallowing of Domestic Virtue 163 Notes 179 Index 197 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful for the patience, graciousness, support, and encour- agement of the University of Notre Dame Press’s senior editor, Charles Van Hof.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Man As Animal Religiosum in English Religious Writing C. 1650–C
    Accepted for publication in Church History for publication in September 2019. Title: Defining Man as Animal Religiosum in English Religious Writing c. 1650–c. 1700 Abstract: This article surveys the emergence and usage of the redefinition of man not as animal rationale (a rational animal) but as animal religiosum (a religious animal) by numerous English theologians between 1650 and 1700. Across the continuum of English protestant thought human nature was being re-described as unique due to its religious, not primarily its rational, capabilities. The article charts this appearance as a contribution to debates over man’s relationship with God; then its subsequent incorporation into the subsequent debate over the theological consequences of arguments in favor of animal rationality, as well as its uses in anti-atheist apologetics; and then the sudden disappearance of the definition of man as animal religiosum at the beginning of the eighteenth century. In doing so, the article hopes to make a useful contribution to our understanding of changing early modern understandings of human nature by reasserting the significance of theological debates within the context of seventeenth-century debate about the relationship between humans and beasts and by offering a more wide-ranging account of man as animal religiosum than the current focus on ‘Cambridge Platonism’ and ‘Latitudinarianism’ allows. Keywords: Animal rationality, reason, 17th c. England, Cambridge Platonism, Latitudinarianism. Contact Details: Dr R J W Mills Dept. of History, University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT United Kingdom [email protected] 1 Accepted for publication in Church History for publication in September 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sun King and the Merry Monarch
    The Sun King and the Merry 1678 Monarch Explores the religious backdrop to one of the largest threats to England's throne - the Popish Plot. Aggravated by the murder of the magistrate Sir Edmund Berry Godfrey, the Plot reflected religious beliefs and insecurities at the By Calum time. Sir Godfrey was my ancestor (of some 11 generations). A visit to his Johnson grave in Westminster Abbey in 2014 inspired me to explore his role in this religious turmoil which hit hard in 17th Century England... The Clergyman and the King of England Leaving for his morning stroll on the 13th of August 1678, Charles II, King of England and Defender of the Faith heard for the first time of a plot to kill him. This was far from unusual. Indeed, just months earlier, a woman in Newcastle had been subjected to a large investigation after stating, "the King deserves the curse of all good and faithful wives for his bad example”. And yet, when Mr Kirkby (his lab assistant) brought Dr Israel Tonge to him at 8 o’clock that evening, the king listened impatiently before handing the matter over to his first minister…. The Religious Pendulum: Change of Faith in England To truly examine the tumult about to hit England in the 17th Century, it is important that we look first at the Religious scene in Europe some 150 years earlier. In the previous century the Reformation began and Protestantism gathered momentum, fuelled by a desire to reduce the exuberance of the Church in Rome with its elaborate sculptures, paintings and stained-glass windows.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Magic and Modern Accessories: Developments in the Omamori Phenomenon
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-2015 Ancient Magic and Modern Accessories: Developments in the Omamori Phenomenon Eric Teixeira Mendes Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Asian History Commons, Buddhist Studies Commons, and the History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons Recommended Citation Mendes, Eric Teixeira, "Ancient Magic and Modern Accessories: Developments in the Omamori Phenomenon" (2015). Master's Theses. 626. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/626 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANCIENT MAGIC AND MODERN ACCESSORIES: DEVELOPMENTS IN THE OMAMORI PHENOMENON by Eric Teixeira Mendes A thesis submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Comparative Religion Western Michigan University August 2015 Thesis Committee: Stephen Covell, Ph.D., Chair LouAnn Wurst, Ph.D. Brian C. Wilson, Ph.D. ANCIENT MAGIC AND MODERN ACCESSORIES: DEVELOPMENTS IN THE OMAMORI PHENOMENON Eric Teixeira Mendes, M.A. Western Michigan University, 2015 This thesis offers an examination of modern Japanese amulets, called omamori, distributed by Buddhist temples and Shinto shrines throughout Japan. As amulets, these objects are meant to be carried by a person at all times in which they wish to receive the benefits that an omamori is said to offer. In modern times, in addition to being a religious object, these amulets have become accessories for cell-phones, bags, purses, and automobiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Slater V. Baker and Stapleton (C.B. 1767): Unpublished Monographs by Robert D. Miller
    SLATER V. BAKER AND STAPLETON (C.B. 1767): UNPUBLISHED MONOGRAPHS BY ROBERT D. MILLER ROBERT D. MILLER, J.D., M.S. HYG. HONORARY FELLOW MEDICAL HISTORY AND BIOETHICS DEPARTMENT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON PRINTED BY AUTHOR MADISON, WISCONSIN 2019 © ROBERT DESLE MILLER 2019 BOUND BY GRIMM BOOK BINDERY, MONONA, WI AUTHOR’S INTRODUCTION These unpublished monographs are being deposited in several libraries. They have their roots in my experience as a law student. I have been interested in the case of Slater v. Baker and Stapleton since I first learned of it in law school. I was privileged to be a member of the Yale School Class of 1974. I took an elective course with Dr. Jay Katz on the protection of human subjects and then served as a research assistant to Dr. Katz in the summers of 1973 and 1974. Dr. Katz’s course used his new book EXPERIMENTATION WITH HUMAN BEINGS (New York: Russell Sage Foundation 1972). On pages 526-527, there are excerpts from Slater v. Baker. I sought out and read Slater v. Baker. It seemed that there must be an interesting backstory to the case, but it was not accessible at that time. I then practiced health law for nearly forty years, representing hospitals and doctors, and writing six editions of a textbook on hospital law. I applied my interest in experimentation with human beings by serving on various Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) during that period. IRBs are federally required committees that review and approve experiments with humans at hospitals, universities and other institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 260 Paul Kléber Monod This Is an Ambitious Book. Monod's
    260 book reviews Paul Kléber Monod Solomon’s Secret Arts: The Occult in the Age of Enlightenment, New Haven and London: Yale University Press 2013. x + 430 pp. isbn 978-0-300-12358-6. This is an ambitious book. Monod’s subject is the occult, by which he means ‘a type of thinking expressed either in writing or in action, that allowed the boundary between the natural and the supernatural to be crossed by the ac- tions of human beings’ (p. 5). Although he cites the work of Antoine Faivre, Wouter Hanegraaff and others, readers of Aries will doubtless be interested to learn Monod’s reasoning for using the term occult in preference to West- ern esotericism. In short, while acknowledging the important contribution of the ‘esoteric approach’ he also highlights its perceived ‘shortcomings’, namely a tendency to regard relevant texts as ‘comprising a discrete and largely self- referential intellectual tradition, hermetically sealed so as to ward off the taint of other forms of thought, not to mention social trends and popular practices’. Moreover, ‘scholars of esoteric religion’ apparently ‘have a tendency to inter- pret whatever they are studying with the greatest seriousness, so that hucksters and charlatans turn into philosophers, and minor references in obscure eso- teric works take on labyrinthine significances’ (p. 10). In practice, what Monod understands here as the occult is largely restricted to alchemy, astrology and rit- ual magic; a maelstrom which, among other things, pulled in readers of Hermes Trismegistus, Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Paracelsus, Jacob Boehme and the Kabbalah, outwardly respectable scientists and anti-Trinitarians (sometimes one and the same); Philadelphians; French Prophets; Freemasons; students of Ancient Britain and the Druids; cunning folk; authors of popular Gothic novels; certain followers of Emmanuel Swedenborg; Neoplatonists; advocates of Ani- mal magnetism; and Judaized millenarians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jesuits and the Popish Plot
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1950 The Jesuits and the Popish Plot Robert Joseph Murphy Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Murphy, Robert Joseph, "The Jesuits and the Popish Plot" (1950). Master's Theses. 1177. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/1177 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1950 Robert Joseph Murphy THE JESUITS AND THE POPISH PLOT BY ROBERT J. MURPHY. S.d. A THESIS SUBMITTED II PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE or MAStER OF ARTS IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY JULY 1950 VI't A AUCTORIS Robert Joseph Murphy was born in Chicago, Illinois, April 15. 1923. He received his elementary education at St. Mel School. Ohicago, Ill.,. graduating in June, 1937 • Ho attended St. Mel High School tor one year and St. Ignatius High School. Chicago, Ill., grQduat1ng in June. 1941. In August, 1941, he entered the Jesuit Novitiate of the Sacred Heart, Millord, Ohio, remaining there until August 1945. 'that same month he entered West Baden College, West Baden Springs, Indiana, and transtered his studies in the Department of History to Loyola University, Ohicago, Ill. He received hi. Bachelor ot Arts degree in June, 1946, and began his graduate studies at Loyola in September 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Florence Newton's Trial for Witchcraft, Cork, 1661: Sir William Aston's Transcript'
    1 ‘Florence Newton’s trial for witchcraft, Cork, 1661: Sir William Aston’s transcript’, Royal Society, London, RB 1/37/5, fols 96r-102v. The Boyle Papers. Edited by Dr Andrew Sneddon, Ulster University. Keywords: witchcraft trial; Florence Newton; Youghal 1661; Ireland Introduction I Ireland avoided the ravages of later medieval, early modern, European witch-hunting that claimed around 50, 000 lives, the overall proportion of whom were women, around 80 percent. In the early modern period, Scotland executed 1500 people for witchcraft, England hanged 500, while Wales put five witches to death.1 Ireland hosted only four witchcraft trials under the dictates of the 1586 Irish Witchcraft Act, involving: Marion Fisher, 1655; Florence Newton, 1661; and the nine ‘Islandmagee Witches’, convicted respectively at the Lent and Summer Assizes held at Carrickfergus, Co. Antrim in 1711.2 The Boyle papers in the library of the Royal Society, London contain a transcript of witness testimonies given at Florence Newton’s trial for witchcraft at Cork Assizes in September 1661 and signed by 1 Julian Goodare, The European witch-hunt (London, 2016), pp 27, 267; Brian Levack, Witch-hunting in Scotland: law, politics and religion (London, 2008), pp 1-2; Richard Suggett, A history of magic and witchcraft in Wales (Stroud, 2008), p. 12. 2Andrew Sneddon, Witchcraft and magic in Ireland (Basingstoke, 2015), p. 71; ‘An Act Against Witchcraft and Sorcerie’, 28 Eliz. I, c. 2, [Ire.] (1586). The prosecution of Alice Kyteler and associates in Kilkenny in 1324 has recently been regarded as a medieval prototype of an early modern witch trial: Maeve Brigid Callan, The Templars, the witch, and the wild Irish: vengeance and heresy in medieval Ireland (Ithaca, 2015), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCKE STUDIES Vol
    LOCKE STUDIES Vol. 18 https://doi.org/10.5206/ls.2018.6177 | ISSN: 2561-925X Submitted: 27 NOVEMBER 2018 Published online: 8 DECEMBER 2018 For more information, see this article’s homepage. © 2018. D. N. DeLuna Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum] D. N. DELUNA (UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON) Abstract: A correction of an article originally published in vol 17 (2017). In 1675, the anonymous Letter to a Person of Quality was condemned in the House of Lords and ordered to be burned by the public hangman. A propagandistic work that has long been attributed to Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, and less certainly to his secretary John Locke, it traduced hard-line Anglican legislation considered in Parliament that year— namely the Test Bill, proposing that office-holders and MPs swear off political militancy and indeed any efforts to reform the Church and State. Careful examination of the text of the Letter, and that of one of its sources in the Reasons against the Bill for the Test, also circulated in 1675, reveals the presence of highly seditious passages of covert historical allegory. Hitherto un-noted by modern scholars, this allegory compared King Charles II to the weak and intermittently mad Henry VI, while agitating for armed revolt against a government made prey to popish and French captors. The discovery compels modification, through chronological revision and also re-assessment of the probability of Locke’s authorship of the Letter, of Richard Ashcraft’s picture of Shaftesbury and Locke as first-time revolutionaries for the cause of religious tolerance in the early 1680s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Body Royal Holloway, University of London 2-‐4 April
    The Royal Body Royal Holloway, University of London 2-4 April 2012 PROGRAMME Monday 2nd April 8.45-9.15: Registration and coffee 9.30-9.35: Introductions 9.35-10.45: Session 1 Plenary Lecture Philip Mansel [Chair: Maria Hayward, University of Southampton] Dressed to Rule: Dress and Monarchy from Louis XIV to Elizabeth II 10.45-11.10: Coffee 11.10-12.10: Session 2 Panel 2A: The physical body of queens: 17th and 18th century France and Sardinia [Chair: John MCCormaCk] Pascale Mormiche, l’Université de Cergy Pontoise PrinCesses and PreGnant Queens at the Court of Versailles in the seventeenth and eiGhteenth Centuries Federica Contu, University of Studies of Cagliari ReasoninG about the politiCal and the spiritual funCtion of the body. The case of Marie Clotilde of FranCe Queen of Sardinia. Panel 2B: The Effigial Body [Chair to be Confirmed] Lynsey McCulloch, Anglia Ruskin University The effiGial body: readinG a reliC of early modern monarchy Kosana Jovanovic, University of Rijeka, Croatia The Portable EffiGies Role in the Queens Funeral Ceremonies and Their ConneCtion with the KinG’s Two Bodies Theory. Panel 2C: Representing the Body: The case of Queen Victoria and King George V and VI [Chair to be Confirmed] Tracy Jane Anderson, University of Sussex ReGina Imperatrix: The royal and imperial bodies of Queen ViCtoria Ina Zweiniger-Bargielowska, University of Illinois (Chicago) Royal Death and LivinG Memorials: The Commemoration of George V and George VI Panel 2D: Memory and Commemoration: The Case of Henry VII [Chair to be Confimed] Christine Merie Fox, Royal Holloway, University of London Henry VII preparation for his memorial at Westminster Abbey Mark R.
    [Show full text]