Ebook Download a Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing

A UNIVERSE FROM NOTHING: WHY THERE IS SOMETHING RATHER THAN NOTHING PDF, EPUB, EBOOK

In other words: Not only we but everything in our whole universe is a product of some pollution. Although Krauss suggests that these rules or potentialities could also have spontaneously arisen. One of the few prominent scientists today to have actively crossed the chasm between science and popular culture, Krauss reveals that modern science is addressing the question of why there is something rather than nothing, with surprising and fascinating results. This brings up an obvious objection: pain and suffering seem contrary to play. Can one not still wonder legitimately why there is quantum vacuum energy and inflation and not nothing at all? Thus over trillions of years the universe will dissipate into an amorphous sea of particles, a fate that clearly disturbs the author. Krauss confessed that in the subtitle of the book "Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing", he didn't really mean what modern-day philosophers and theologians would understand by the term "nothing", because our knowledge and understanding of the universe and of nothing is advancing and what was considered nothing by previous philosophers such as Thomas Aquinas is not seen so by today's standards. Something came into ontological existence when apperception was born into the Cosmos. Krauss tells the scientific "story" of our Universe and answers the question, Why How there Is Something from Nothing using the latest in quantum mechanics and modern physics. Philosopher Brian Leftow has argued that the question cannot have a causal explanation as any cause must itself have a cause or a contingent explanation as the factors giving the contingency must pre-exist , and that if there is an answer it must be something that exists necessarily i. I'd be less than honest if I didn't admit that some of this went over my head, but then again, I haven't devoted my life to the study of physics and the cosmos. Quantum mechanics dictates that there is no such thing. There is some barely disguised disdain for string theory — which I share as well since it comes as force fitted, excessively complex and detached from reality to me. Rather than remaining perfectly smooth and continuous, space and time destabilize, churning and frothing into a foam of space-time bubbles. Jul 28, Shaun rated it really liked it Shelves: non- fiction , read-in Retrieved December 7, Bizarrely, it may not have had to get any. If the universe had no beginning, therefore there always was something — its non-existence is therefore impossible. Why there is something rather than nothing seems less fundamental to me, than asking why are we aware of the universe at all. Perhaps a better understanding of dark energy would lead to a different outlook. Community Reviews. I actually listened to the audio version of this book, narrated by Krauss. On the other hand, if you're open and secure in what you believe, don't mind a healthy dose of mind bending ideas, and are interested in learning more about the freaking awesomeness of the universe, then this somewhat simplified introduction is probably worth your time. It could be as flat as a table top. But for that we need another trick: cosmic inflation. From a scientific point of view, this book is along the same lines as The Grand Design by Stephen Hawking. However, what's reassuring is that Krauss is a leading physicist and that the same argument was used by other scientists such as Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow. Yet a cause may not always be necessary, even for the formation of the universe, which is beyond our knowledge; if there indeed was a starting point of the universe at all. He received undergraduate degrees in both Mathematics and Physics at Carleton University. At this point, making a universe looks almost easy. Metaphysics Epistemology Logic Ethics Aesthetics. It will also form a cross-cutting educational theme at ASU. Unfortunately, Krauss tries to pass this off as equivalent to the metaphysical question as to why their is something rather than nothing to be honest, it is difficult to tell if Krauss is being disengenuous here or simply sloppy in his thinking. All the way back to Aristotle and beyond, but I'm going to stop there, it gets different when you step back to Plato, and the Pre-Socratics, well just forget it , it's this basic idea that works to create his own speculation about creation he sidestepped the question in a way by saying the universe must be eternal since there could be no prime-mover , and following his logic it's one of those tools that most philosophy people carry around in their mental toolbox to help them call bullshit on arguments with weak premises. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Although existence may be grammatically predicated of nothing, it has no philosophical meaning. So what better thing could we do with our sliver of something than see what consciousness can do? Eschatological verification Language game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism. Krauss likes to take pot-shots at philosophers, too. The same goes for light: neither color nor sound exist without being perceived. Hidden categories: Official website different in Wikidata and Wikipedia. Philosophy portal Physics portal Religion portal. First, he challenges the question itself. So who needs God? Thus the reality of something coming out of nothing during the beginning of the universe or something going out of existence from something is real. A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing Writer

When theists say that the universe exists because of God, they are saying that the universe exists, because of some agent they know: that make those theists superior to us, simple miscreants, who do not happen to be acquainted with what created all. Many other thinkers, such as Bede Rundle, [27] have questioned whether nothing is an ontological possibility. I just feel it is Wrong, that is all, to explain things by saying that we wouldn't be here to talk about it if it were not so and that is the answer. We inhabit a universe we believe to be around fourteen billion years old. Faster than the speed of light? It was a book that I was sad to finish Inflation also gave cosmologists the measuring tool they needed to determine the underlying geometry of the universe. One of the few prominent scientists today to have actively crossed the chasm between science and popular culture, Krauss reveals that modern science is addressing the question of why there is something rather than nothing, with surprising and fascinating results. View all 49 comments. Krauss not only presents a sound and compelling case for the Big Bang Theory, but he also explains how something really can come from nothing which is really something, btw , a concept that makes my head hurt Share on WhatsApp. View all 17 comments. How can we, as reasoning and self-aware beings, not question how our universe came to be and why it exists at all? Don't try and argue against it as you will look the fool. That it attempts to also situate itself in the growing canon of popular books on atheism feels like a tacked- on marketing ploy. Would our universe bust, or would it ignore all predictions? I had never understood before reading his explanation, how the spatial scales of variability of the cosmic microwave background radiation proves that our universe is flat. He has been fascinated with the reasonableness of the Faith since his junior year in high school in the midth century for which the religion text was entitled, "Faith and Reason". He has investigated questions ranging from the nature of exploding stars to issues of the origin of a Prof. We would not be intellectually satisfied with saying that the pocket watch is just there. Thomas Aquinas, On Being and Essence , tr. He further adds that his purpose from writing the book is to share the marvellous advancements in science made recently and to spark debate about their philosophical and existential consequences which he certainly did - and I recommend reading them after the book. A love affair with science and for good reason. Download as PDF Printable version. But this book isn't really an atheist agenda, as it only answers the question of how a universe could come into existence from nothing, no energy, no trigger, no cause. This allowed us to understand that the vast majority of the weight in the universe comes not from the matter we know, but from another type of matter that is mostly scattered between galaxies which cannot be seen and which we know nothing about its nature. Want to Read saving…. Feb 10, Mohamed al-Jamri rated it really liked it Shelves: popular-science-recommendations. Though it was clear to me that the author was trying to explain the contradictory estimates of the geometry of the observable universe by measuring its curvature directly versus assessment of its mass density, the presentation and the pertinent illustrations for the closed, open and the so-called 'flat' universe left me baffled and made me re-read the relevant explanation in The Perception of Space The uses for gravitational lensing. All it represents is an unwillingness to recognize the simple fact that nature may be cleverer than philosophers or theologians. About Lawrence M. GOD is contingent on nothing. The creation of the universe from nothing or the possibility of a multiverse finds some discussion towards the end of the book. Sign up for our newsletter plus get 50 free theology eBooks in our digital library! This implies a kind of experimentation, or play, for the sake of seeing what happens. The Dip Just as I was bristling with all the new knowledge and information and thinking of the rave review this book is gonna get and about how knowledgeable I was going to be as I finish it, Krauss grinds the journey to a screeching halt as far as science is concerned. Dawkins is comparing the most enduringly profound scientific treatise in history to a pop-science book that recycles a bunch of stale ideas from physics and cosmology. A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing Reviews

Everything seems to exist for the sake of being perceived. We'll start here If the universe had not expanded so rapidly, we would expect the radiation to be patchier than it is. Mar 01, Bharath rated it really liked it. That generalization, the universe, is not an entity of which we actually experience the existence. Thorne The anser is no. Ancient History Encyclopedia. No mass-energy, forces, wave forms, or anything else you can think of. If they are right, our entire cosmos may have sprung out of nothing at all. It turns out this is also crucial for understanding how the cosmos came from nothing. Average rating 3. In the New York Times , philosopher of science and physicist David Albert said the book failed to live up to its title; he claimed Krauss dismissed concerns about what Albert calls his misuse of the term nothing , since if matter comes from relativistic quantum fields , the question becomes where did those fields come from, which Krauss does not discuss. Fuck them, I say. The idea is that, a fraction of a second after the Big Bang, the quantum-sized bubble of space expanded stupendously fast. View 1 comment. Our society really needs better fundamental science education. Share on Reddit. From a scientific point of view, this book is along the same lines as The Grand Design by Stephen Hawking. Even the most perfect vacuum is actually filled by a roiling cloud of particles and antiparticles, which flare into existence and almost instantaneously fade back into nothingness. Physics Cosmology. But for that we need another trick: cosmic inflation. Sign In See Subscription Options. Welcome back. Arguing that it is self-evident, unwavering, and unassailable is like arguing, as Darwin falsely did, when he made the suggestion that the origin of life was beyond the domain of science by building an analogy with the incorrect claim that matter cannot be created or destroyed. This is a question I ask as a scientist an non-believer, but it also gives an answer that happens to contradict most theological thought. Since our universe is made of mostly matter, rather than anti-matter, Krauss suggests that in the early universe there must have been some quantum effects that lead to matter being more than anti-matter, and that this can be as small as 1 in a billion and be enough to explain all the matter we see in the universe. I was fascinated to learn how controversial and uncertain the definition of "nothing" was. The three key principles of scientific ethos. Antipater refused to obey. A LOT. I listened to it as an audiobook that was read by the author himself. It won't be earthlings doing the observing because our sun will burn out long before then. First, there are ethical implications concerning how we treat other perceiving things, the imperative to minimize suffering. This site uses cookies to recognize users and allow us to analyse site usage. Share on pinterest Pinterest. Warner Wallace Podcast The book traces the progress we have made in uncovering the mysteries of the universe — and with each new discovery, the role of God diminishes. The dynamics and the nature of things are not as simple as they appear from Newtonian laws of physics. So, if you're not sure about the book, or want to sample a truncated version, that might be a place to start. This article needs attention from an expert in philosophy.

A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing Read Online

On the last type of nothing, the absence of even the laws of nature, Krauss says that while science doesn't have an answer to this currently, it might or might not have one in the future; A Theory of Everything. Perhaps I am also in the minority for not seeing the cold death of the universe as terrible though in the 90s when scientists were measuring the universe directly I did morbidly root for a big crunch If you want to become more literate regarding how the universe began, how it will end and what is cutting edge in physics today, I highly recommend this book. Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy. In his brilliant book A Universe from Nothing , Lawrence Krauss develops the idea of self-creating universes. This seemingly outlandish notion was put forward in the s by Alan Guth at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and refined by Andrei Linde , now at Stanford University. And is Nothing equivalent to empty space, or is it something different? Only the inhabitants of a universe can see and experience their universe, but God as an entity can see and experience all the universes This little passing interest of mine isn't like a fixation or anything - but if I find something interesting, I usually want to start at the beginning, or at least find out what the beginning was to give the history context. The answer is: Because God, as an act of love, chose to create. One of the few prominent scientists today to have actively crossed the chasm between science and popular culture, Krauss reveals that modern science is addressing the question of why there is something rather than nothing, with surprising and fascinating results. In this Total Simultaneity resides Total Consciousness. There must exist a being without this fatal flaw, who is the explanation of the existence of each entity within the scope of human experience because its nature is its existence. Books by Lawrence M. Einstein's theory of general relativity tells us that the space-time we live in could take three different forms. Hawking , and Kip S. All the way back to Aristotle and beyond, but I'm going to stop there, it gets different when you step back to Plato, and the Pre-Socratics, well just forget it , it's this basic idea that works to create his own speculation about creation he sidestepped the question in a way by saying the universe must be eternal since there could be no prime-mover , and following his logic it's one of those tools that most philosophy people carry around in their mental toolbox to help them call bullshit on arguments with weak premises. Not Richard Dawkins, who wrote the cool afterword! Would our universe bust, or would it ignore all predictions? Physicists have calculated that in a flat universe the energy of matter is exactly balanced by the energy of the gravity the mass creates. Well, maybe so, but I foresee a possibility that a version of string theory may end up providing the best possible model for dark energy and dark matter. Retrieved 11 February End of story. For every effect there is a cause, but what was there before the first cause? In the American Institute of Physics awarded Krauss the Andrew Gemant Award , given annually to "a person who has made significant contributions to the cultural, artistic, or humanistic dimensions of physics". Indeed, they will be receding faster than the speed of light, so detection will be impossible. This book didn't do much in that domain however, but it rather explained our recent understanding of the cosmos and how from "nothingness" though with quantum fluctuation which makes the whole idea of Krauss' "nothingness" problematic a whole universe can come into existence. It has properties: it can expand and contract, warp and bend. This absurd hyperbole says less about the merits of Krauss's derivative book than it does about the judgment-impairing intensity of Dawkins's hatred of religion. In all, I thoroughly enjoyed Krauss' narrative and his facetious nature in trying to relate this profound and convincing discussion to the reader interested in Science, or those who follow the developments and discoveries more closely. The repeated use of quantum physics which I understand only little about to answer this deep question might seem suspicious, especially in light of the many misleading uses by charlatans such as Deepak Chopra. Also, in philosophy, the topic question cannot even be asked. But there might not be an absolute answer to why it exists.

https://files8.webydo.com/9582877/UploadedFiles/13791E4C-CA19-9BD2-03C2-C0682FFC581C.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583063/UploadedFiles/F6A6A6D0-3C18-9B93-796B-41ADB2F316FE.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583707/UploadedFiles/DDD7CB65-F0F0-6636-6918-F9ACC30A1517.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9582857/UploadedFiles/D83E694D-8412-10CC-74FF-E46ED137ADAA.pdf https://cdn.starwebserver.se/shops/ronjajohanssonhk/files/nevernight-635.pdf https://cdn.starwebserver.se/shops/natalieakessonuc/files/urban-ecology-an-introduction-368.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9584214/UploadedFiles/C6B48C67-180D-590F-7ECC-31A3395BA572.pdf