A Brief History of the Ohio Geological Survey12

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Brief History of the Ohio Geological Survey12 Copyright © 1979 Ohio Acad. Sci. 0030-0950/79/0001-0003$2.00/0 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE OHIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY12 MICHAEL C. HANSEN and HORACE R. COLLINS, Ohio Division of Geological Survey, Fountain Square, Columbus, OH 43224 Abstract. Since its inception in 1837, the Ohio Geological Survey has been the principal source of geologic information in and about Ohio. These data, gathered during a 141-year period under the direction of ten state geologists, constitute more than 30,000 printed pages and numerous maps describing and illustrating Ohio's geology and mineral resources. This information has, perhaps more than any other factor, been responsible for the development within the state of important industries that rely upon mineral commodities derived from Ohio's bedrock and glacial sediments. The Ohio Division of Geological Survey is the oldest natural resources agency in the state. During the 19th century the Survey was responsible for investigation of the flora, fauna, soils, and agriculture of Ohio in addition to the primary function of geologic studies. Investigative activities of the Survey were sporadic in the 19th century; major periods of activity were 1837-1838, 1869-1874, and 1882-1893. Since 1900 the Survey has been maintained on a continuous basis, although funding and staff size have remained characteristically modest. In 1949 the Ohio Geological Sur- vey became one of the seven originally chartered divisions of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. OHIO J. SCI. 79(1): 3, 1979 The Ohio Geological Survey is the many unpublished reports, maps, and oldest legislatively authorized natural re- field observations. sources agency in the state and has served There have been four separate surveys as the principal source of geologic infor- or organizations: First organization, mation pertaining to Ohio since 1837. 1837-1838, William W. Mather, State The Survey has therefore been inextrica- Geologist; Second organization, 1869- bly linked to the development of geologi- 1888, John S. Newberry (1869-1882), and cal investigations in Ohio. During its Edward Orton, Sr. (1882-1888), State 141-year existence, funding for the Sur- Geologists; Third organization, 1888- vey has been characteristically modest 1900, Edward Orton, Sr., State Geologist; and, upon occasion, controversy and Fourth organization, 1900-present, Ed- criticism have plagued Survey progress ward Orton, Jr. (1900-1906), John A. and activities. In spite of these ob- Bownocker (1906-1928), Wilbur E. Stout stacles, the Ohio Geological Survey has (1928-1946), George W. White (1946- furnished the necessary geologic data base 1947), John H. Melvin (1947-1957), upon which the state's important mineral Ralph J. Bernhagen (1957-1968), and industries have developed and, at times, Horace R. Collins (1968-present), State has been the focal point for solution of Geologists (figure 1). Many individuals stratigraphic and other geologic problems have served the Ohio Geological Survey of regional, national, or worldwide sig- with distinction as full-time staff members nificance. These data constitute more or as unsalaried authors of important re- than 30,000 printed pages and numerous search studies. Indeed, a cursory perusal separate maps and charts, in addition to of authors of the many Survey reports yields a long list of prominent geologists. '•Manuscript received 29 November 1977 and in revised form 24 April 1978 (#77-88). The present paper is by no means an 2Part of a symposium on the History of Geol- exhaustive analysis of the history of the- ogy in Ohio, presented 2 April 1977 at the Ohio Ohio Geological Survey. Our treatment Historical Center. deals with administrative and organiza- M. C. HANSEN AND H. R. COLLINS Vol. 79 tional aspects of Survey history primarily Melvin (1950, 1952), Merrill (1906, 1920, during the 19th century and early 20th 1924), Orton (1894), Stoddard (1928), G. century. Sturgeon (1979) traces de- W. White (1976), and Whittlesey (1885) velopment of mineral industries and are of direct importance to Survey his- stratigraphic classification in the Upper tory. Merrill's (1920, pp. 387-427) work Paleozoic of Ohio in relation to the Sur- is the most complete summary of the vey. We have been forced to brevity Ohio Geological Survey through 1900. both by limitations of space and limita- Biographies of individuals associated with tions of time available for compilation. the Survey frequently furnish pertinent In addition, unpublished reference ma- information. Of particular interest are terials such as letters, manuscripts, photo- those of Mather (Hitchcock 1897, New- graphs, and other data are widely scat- vahner 1931), Whittlesey (A. Winchell tered and, apparently, rather incomplete, 1889), Hildreth (Waller 1944), Locke (N. necessitating a time-consuming and tedi- H. Winchell 1894; Waller, 1946), New- ous search before a comprehensive trea- berry (Stevenson 1893, Kemp 1893, tise of the history of the Ohio Geological Waller 1943), Orton, Sr. (Stevenson 1900; Survey can be compiled. I. C. White 1900, Swinnerton 1939), Almost nothing survives in the files of Orton, Jr. (Magruder et al 1932), Bow- the Survey from administrations prior to nocker (Stauffer 1929), and Stout (Bern- that of Wilbur Stout (1929-1946). These hagen 1961). missing documents, in Mo, probably do not survive in any repository; they most MATHER SURVEY (1837-1838) likely were disposed of because they were Geological investigations in Ohio prior not old enough to be of historical sig- to the establishment of a geological survey nificance but were too old to be of con- in 1837 were of a sometimes cursory and temporary value. Such pertinent his- generally localized nature, carried out by torical materials that we have located in individuals on a purely part-time basis at this continuing investigation include: S. their own expense. Predictably, the over- P. Hildreth Collection and E. B. Andrews all geological framework of Ohio was Papers, Marietta College Library, Mari- poorly understood, and private explora- etta, Ohio; Whittlesey Papers, Western tion of and investment in mineral re- Reserve Historical Society, Cleveland, sources was frequently shadowed by Ohio; Klippart Papers and Lapham Pa- trickery, deceit, and certainly speculation pers, The Ohio Historical Society, Co- brought about by this ignorance (Mather lumbus, Ohio; James Hall Papers, New 1838b, p. 6; Merrill 1920, p. 387-388). York State Library, Albany, New York. The beginning of the industrial revolu- Notably conspicuous by their absence tion and the demands of an increasing from this list are the Mather, Newberry, population in Ohio for mineral commodi- and Orton, Sr., papers. Should these col- ties, in particular salt, coal, iron ore, and lections be located, if extant, they would clay, prompted Governor Robert Lucas prove of much importance to the history to recommend the establishment of a of Ohio geology and particularly the his- geological survey of the state in his an- tory of the Ohio Geological Survey. nual message to the legislature in 1835 A rather large assemblage of publica- (Stoddard 1928, p. 108). Undoubtedly tions relates directly to the history of the Governor Lucas' motivation was, in part, Survey. An exhaustive list can be de- due to his desire to keep Ohio competitive rived from the Bibliography of Ohio with the surrounding states, many of Geology (Watkins 1953, Smyth 1963, which had established or were in the 1969, 1972). Much important informa- process of establishing geological surveys. tion is contained in the prefacing remarks It is obvious also from correspondence of of Annual Reports (Mather 1838a, 1838b; Increase A. Lapham (Lapham Papers, Orton 1890), Reports of Progress (New- Ohio Historical Society) that many Ohio berry 1871a, 1871b), and Volumes (New- scientists were strongly in favor of a berry 1873a, 1874, 1875, 1878, 1882; geological survey and conveyed their Orton, 1884, 1888, 1893; Orton, Jr., sentiments to political figures, including 1906a). Papers by Aumann (1953), the governor. The legislature, acting Ohio J. Sci. OHIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William W. Mather~1837-1838 John S. Newberry 1869-1882 Edward Orton, Sr,- 1882-1899 Edward Orton, Jr.~1899 1906 Wilber E, Stout 1928-1946 George W. White-1946-1947 John H. Melvin —1947-19S7 FIGURE 1. State Geologists of Ohio. M. C. HANSEN AND H. R. COLLINS Vol. /9 upon Governor Lucas' suggestion, passed letter to I. A. Lapham (Jan. 11, 1836, a resolution on March 14, 1836, estab- Laptham Papers) Hildreth responded: lishing a committee "to report to the "In answer to whom amongst our geolo- next legislature the best methods of ob- gists would be most competent, I answer taining a complete geological survey of without hesitation Mr. E. [Edward] the state, and an estimate of the probable Hitchcock of Massachusetts." Mather, cost of the same" (Hildreth 1836, p. 65). who was with the Natural History Sur- The committee appointed by the legis- vey of New York at the time of the ap- lature consisted of John L. Riddell, John pointment, was 33 years of age and Locke, Increase A. Lapham, and Samuel had little firsthand experience and P. Hildreth, chairman. Hildreth's report familiarity with the geology of Ohio. (1836) to the legislature represented a Perhaps Hildreth's (1836, p. 77) comment summary of the geological information in the committee report to the legislature, then known about Ohio. The reports of strongly recommending establishment of Riddell and Lapham (1837) were not in- a survey in Ohio, gives some insight on cluded with Hildreth's report but were
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 1. Natural History
    CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY —THE WILDERNESS THAT GREETED THE FIRST SETTLERS The land one sees today traveling through northern Ohio took gone. Thus, some 14,000 years ago as the last glacier receded millions of years to form. We can see evidence of tropical sea into the Lake Erie basin, the first Native Americans arrived and reefs on the Lake Erie Islands and deep ocean sediments here in began to utilize the natural resources that these natural processes the cliffs of the Black River. Ohio was just south of the equator had produced. at that time, some 350 million years ago, and over the millennia The natural history of Sheffield encompasses all those natural has migrated northward to its present position. Mountain features and processes of the environment that greeted the Native building to the east eventually raised the sea floor from under Americans, and later the pioneers, when they first arrived in the waves and erosion by streams, and later glacial ice, began Sheffield. To be sure, the landscape was a magnificent wilderness to sculpture the land. At the same time plants and animals were to the settlers, but it needed to be “tamed” in order to support evolving and began to populate the new land once the ice was the newcomers. Ice formation on the shale bluff of the Black River north of Garfield Bridge (2005). 1 BICENTENNIAL HISTORY OF SHEFFIELD TOPOGRAPHY Regional Physiography The topography of an area is the configuration of the land Physiography refers to the physical features or landforms of surface, including its relief [vertical differences in elevation of a region.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of Exploration Geochemical Data for the Mount Katmai Quadrangle and Adjacent Parts of the Afognak and Naknek Quadrangles, Alaska
    Interpretation of Exploration Geochemical Data for the Mount Katmai Quadrangle and Adjacent Parts of the Afognak and Naknek Quadrangles, Alaska By S.E. Church, J.R. Riehle, and R.J. Goldfarb U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2020 Descriptive and interpretive supporting data for the mineral resource assessn~entof this Alaska Mineral Resource Assessnzent Program (AMRAP) study area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For Sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-PublieatlonData Church, S.E. Interpretation of exploration geochemical data for the Mount Katmai quadrangle and adjacent parts of the Afognak and Nalrnek quadrangles, Alaska 1 by S.E. Church, J.R. Riehle, and R.J. Goldfarb. p. cm. - (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ;2020) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : 119.3 :2020 1. Mines and mineral resources-Alaska. 2. Mining gedogy- Alaska 3. Geochemical prospecting-Alaska I. Riehle, J.R. 11. Goldfarb, R.J. UI. Title. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2020 [TN24.A4] 557.3 5420 93-2012 [553'.09798] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................. Introduction......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Weathering, Erosion, and Susceptibility to Weathering Henri Robert George Kenneth Hack
    Weathering, erosion, and susceptibility to weathering Henri Robert George Kenneth Hack To cite this version: Henri Robert George Kenneth Hack. Weathering, erosion, and susceptibility to weathering. Kanji, Milton; He, Manchao; Ribeira e Sousa, Luis. Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering, Springer Inter- national Publishing, pp.291-333, 2020, 9783030294779. 10.1007/978-3-030-29477-9. hal-03096505 HAL Id: hal-03096505 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03096505 Submitted on 5 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Published in: Hack, H.R.G.K., 2020. Weathering, erosion and susceptibility to weathering. 1 In: Kanji, M., He, M., Ribeira E Sousa, L. (Eds), Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1 ed, Ch. 11. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland. ISBN: 9783030294779. DOI: 10.1007/978303029477-9_11. pp. 291-333. Weathering, erosion, and susceptibility to weathering H. Robert G.K. Hack Engineering Geology, ESA, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente Enschede, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] phone: +31624505442 Abstract: Soft grounds are often the result of weathering. Weathering is the chemical and physical change in time of ground under influence of atmosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere, biosphere, and nuclear radiation (temperature, rain, circulating groundwater, vegetation, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Devonian Formations in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio
    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Horace R. Collins, State Geologist and Di v ision Chief David K. Webb, Jr., Geologist and Assistant Chief Eleanor J. Hyle, Secretary Jean S. Brown, Geologist and Editor Pauline Smyth, Geologist Betty B. Baber, Geologist REGIONAL GEOLOGY SECTION SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY SECTION Richard A. Struble, Geologist and Section Head William J. Buschman, Jr., Geologist and Section Head Richard M. Delong, Geologist Michael J. Clifford, Geologist G. William Kalb, Geochemist Adriaan J anssens, Geologist Douglas L. Kohout, Geologis t Frederick B. Safford, Geologist David A. Stith, Geologist Jam es Wooten, Geologist Aide Joel D. Vormelker, Geologist Aide Barbara J. Adams, Clerk· Typist B. Margalene Crammer, Clerk PUBLICATIONS SECTION LAKE ERIE SECTION Harold J. Fl inc, Cartographer and Section Head Charles E. Herdendorf, Geologist and Sectwn Head James A. Brown, Cartographer Lawrence L. Braidech, Geologist Donald R. Camburn, Cartovapher Walter R. Lemke, Boat Captain Philip J. Celnar, Cartographer David B. Gruet, Geologist Aide Jean J. Miller, Photocopy Composer Jean R. Ludwig, Clerk- Typist STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 GEOLOGY SERVES OHIO CONTENTS Page Introduction . 1 Previous investigations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Study methods . 4 Detroit River Group . .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. 6 Sylvania Sandstone ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Brief History of the Michigan Geological Survey – Page 1 of 6 Understanding of the Michigan Basin
    MICHIGAN Geological Survey and also the first department of the State created by statute. Michigan Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 30028, 735 E. Hazel Street, The bill authorized and directed Governor Stevens T. Lansing, MI 48909. Mason, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint: A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE MICHIGAN A competent person whose duty it shall be to make an GEOLOGICAL SURVEY accurate and complete geological survey of this state, which shall be accompanied with proper maps and R. Thomas Segall, State Geologist diagrams, and furnish a full and scientific description of its rocks, soils and minerals, and of its botanical and geological productions . and provide specimens of the HISTORICAL SEQUENCE OF same . ORGANIZATIONAL NAME AND An appropriation of some $3,000 was recommended to carry out the above work during the first year, and on DIRECTORS: February 23, 1837, Governor Mason signed the bill into First Geological Survey law. Douglass Houghton, State Geologist, 1837-45 As a result of this legislation, Dr. Douglass Houghton, Second Geological Survey who had conceived and planned the survey, and Alexander Winchell, State Geologist 1859-62 persuaded individual members of the legislature to Michigan Geological and Biological Survey commit money and time to this undertaking, was Alexander Winchell, State Geologist, 1869-71 appointed Michigan's first State Geologist. The Carl Rominger, State Geologist, 1871-85 Michigan Geological Survey's early accomplishments Charles E. Wright, State Geologist, 1885-88 are inextricably linked with the work and personality of M. E. Wadsworth, State Geologist, 1888-93 Dr. Houghton.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Geological Survey Publications List
    NC Geological Survey Publications List Available at our Online Store - click on it for link updated October 11, 2016 by Medina PDF copies of out-of-print publications available ------ email [email protected] for more details Subject/ County/ Series Title Date Author Price Commodity Region Bulletin 01 Iron Ores of North Carolina 1893 Nitze, H.B.C. Iron State-wide OP The Building and Ornamental Stones in North Watson, T.L. and Bulletin 02 1906 Building stones State-wide OP Carolina Laney, F.B. Nitze, H.B.C. and Blue Ridge, Bulletin 03 Gold Deposits of North Carolina (REPRINT-1995) 1896 Gold OP Hanna, G.B. Piedmont Road Materials and Road Construction in North Holmes, J.A. and Bulletin 04 1893 Roads State-wide OP Carolina Cain, W. The Forests, Forest Lands, and Forest Products of Bulletin 05 1894 Ashe, W.W. Forests Coastal Plain OP Eastern North Carolina Pinchot, G. and Bulletin 06 Timber Trees and Forests of North Carolina 1897 Forests State-wide OP Ashe, W.W. Forest Fires: Their Destructive Work, Causes and Bulletin 07 1895 Ashe, W.W. Forests State-wide OP Prevention Swain, G.F., Bulletin 08 Papers on the Waterpower in North Carolina 1899 Holmes, J.A. and Water State-wide OP Myers, E.W. Blue Ridge, Bulletin 09 Monazite and Monazite Deposits in North Carolina 1895 Nitze, H.B.C. Monazite OP Piedmont Page 1 Subject/ County/ Series Title Date Author Price Commodity Region Gold Mining in North Carolina and Adjacent South Nitze, H.B.C. and Blue Ridge, Bulletin 10 1897 Gold OP Appalachian Regions Wilkens, H.A.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Curation and Analysis of Global Sedimentary Geochemical Data To
    10–13 Oct. GSA Connects 2021 VOL. 31, NO. 5 | M AY 2021 Curation and Analysis of Global Sedimentary Geochemical Data to Inform Earth History Curation and Analysis of Global Sedimentary Geochemical Data to Inform Earth History Akshay Mehra*, Dartmouth College, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA; C. Brenhin Keller, Dartmouth College, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA; Tianran Zhang, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA; Nicholas J. Tosca, Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK; Scott M. McLennan, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA; Erik Sperling, Dept. of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA; Una Farrell, Dept. of Geology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Jochen Brocks, Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; Donald Canfield, Nordic Center for Earth Evolution (NordCEE), University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Devon Cole, School of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA; Peter Crockford, Earth and Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel; Huan Cui, Equipe Géomicrobiologie, Université de Paris, Institut de Physique, Paris, France, and Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S, Canada; Tais W. Dahl, GLOBE Institute, University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark; Keith Dewing, Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary, Ontario T2L 2A7, Canada; Joseph F. Emmings, British Geological Survey, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK; Robert R. Gaines, Dept. of Geology, Pomona College, Claremont, California 91711, USA; Tim Gibson, Dept. of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA; Geoffrey J.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Tectonics Passport
    What is plate tectonics? The Earth is made up of four layers: inner core, outer core, mantle and crust (the outermost layer where we are!). The Earth’s crust is made up of oceanic crust and continental crust. The crust and uppermost part of the mantle are broken up into pieces called plates, which slowly move around on top of the rest of the mantle. The meeting points between the plates are called plate boundaries and there are three main types: Divergent boundaries (constructive) are where plates are moving away from each other. New crust is created between the two plates. Convergent boundaries (destructive) are where plates are moving towards each other. Old crust is either dragged down into the mantle at a subduction zone or pushed upwards to form mountain ranges. Transform boundaries (conservative) are where are plates are moving past each other. Can you find an example of each type of tectonic plate boundary on the map? Divergent boundary: Convergent boundary: Transform boundary: What do you notice about the location of most of the Earth’s volcanoes? P.1 Iceland Iceland lies on the Mid Atlantic Ridge, a divergent plate boundary where the North American Plate and the Eurasian Plate are moving away from each other. As the plates pull apart, molten rock or magma rises up and erupts as lava creating new ocean crust. Volcanic activity formed the island about 16 million years ago and volcanoes continue to form, erupt and shape Iceland’s landscape today. The island is covered with more than 100 volcanoes - some are extinct, but about 30 are currently active.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Ohio—The Precambrian
    No. 13 OHIOGeoFacts DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE GEOLOGY OF OHIO—THE PRECAMBRIAN Precambrian time (all of geologic time before the Cambrian Pe- million years ago a continent to the east collided with North America, riod) began when the Earth became a solid entity about 4.5 billion resulting in extensive crustal compression and development of a years ago and ended when the Cambrian Period began, about 570 mountain range that geologists call the Grenville Mountains. What million years ago. “Precambrian” is actually an informal term used is thought to be the zone of continental collision, known as a suture by geologists. This long period of time is divided formally into two zone, is located in eastern Ohio and is called the Coshocton Zone. eons—the Archeozoic (greater than 2.5 billion years ago) and the As these continents collided along a 3,000-mile-long line, stretch- Proterozoic (2.5 billion to 570 million years ago). Despite the immense ing perhaps from Sweden to Mexico, rocks were folded, twisted, span of time it represents, the Precambrian is the most poorly known metamorphosed, and thrust westward across part of the rift zone of the geologic subdivisions in Ohio, in part because Precambrian in western Ohio. This north-south-oriented, 30-mile-wide zone of rocks are nowhere exposed in the state. These primarily crystalline east-dipping, imbricated thrust slices is called the Grenville Front igneous and metamorphic rocks are deeply buried beneath younger Tectonic Zone and marks the westward limit of the Grenville Moun- Paleozoic sedimentary rocks at depths ranging from about 2,500 feet tains.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Division of Geological Survey Great Lakes Geologic Mapping Coalition Publications Updated March 2020
    Link to ODGS Publications Ohio Division of Geological Survey Great Lakes Geologic Mapping Coalition Publications Updated March 2020 2019 Aden, Douglas, 2019, Karst in the Lilley Formation, Peebles 7.5-minute quadrangle, Ohio, in Thorleifson, L. H., ed., Geologic Mapping Forum 2019 Abstracts: Minnesota Geological Survey Open-File Report 19-1, p. 4–5. Aden, D. J., 2019, Surficial geology of the Gnadenhutten quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Aden, D. J., 2019, Surficial geology of the New Philadelphia quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Aden, D. J., 2019, Surficial geology of the Tippecanoe quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Aden, D. J., 2019, Surficial geology of the Uhrichsville quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Aden, D. J., and Parrick, B. D., 2018, Karst of northern portions of the Peebles and Jaybird 7.5-minute quadrangles, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Open-File Report 2018-3, 40 p., 44 map tiles. Nash, T. A., 2019, Surficial geology of the Antrim quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Nash, T. A., 2019, Surficial geology of the Birmingham quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Throughout Its Hundred-Year History, the Illinois State Geological Survey
    Throughout its hundred-year history, the Illinois State Geological Survey has provided accurate, relevant and objective earth science information for the benefit of the state’s citizens and institution s. Revealing thePast, Discovering theFuture Story By Cheryl K. Nimz Photos By Joel M. Dexter Working from a field lab coal research uring a century of change, the geologist’s trained eye, some - station used from 1941 to 1945, geolo- some things remain the same. times by climbing a rock exposure, gists examined samples collected from Understanding Illinois geolo - striking a rock hammer against an rotary drill holes (above). Core samples gy has always required getting outcrop or quarry wall, or following from a recent coalbed methane drilling dirty, sunburnt, cold or wet. evidence along a stream bed. project near Olney were labeled and DRocks, soils and every earth material described by scientists. in between need to be examined by May 2005 Outdoor Illinois / 15 Geologists must sometimes use computer applications were needed Great Depression, wars and oil large rigs to drill far beneath the sur - to manage ever-increasing amounts embargos, to name a few—affected face, removing cores of earth materi - of data, assist interpretations and research directions. als for study, or even descend into share information. Also, the methods Finally, collaboration with other sinkholes, caves and mines. Then it Illinois State Geological Survey individuals and agencies has is back to the laboratory to examine (ISGS) geologists use, and the pro - become increasingly important. the materials, record their properties jects they work on, are refined and Many kinds of experts are needed to and interpret them.
    [Show full text]