DOCSLIB.ORG

Critical Species Lookbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Critical Species Lookbook Critical Species LookBook A compendium of California's threatened and endangered species for sustainable groundwater management August 2019 Critical Species Lookbook Cover Page Photo Credits Desert tortoise: ©California Department of Fish and Wildlife Amargosa vole: ©Don Preisler, University of California Davis Chinook salmon: ©Jeffrey Rich, The Nature Conservancy Bald eagle: ©Jack Mills, The Nature Conservancy August 2019 1 Critical Species Lookbook Recommended Citation Rohde MM, Seapy B, Rogers R, Castañeda X, editors. 2019. Critical Species LookBook: A compendium of California’s threatened and endangered species for sustainable groundwater management. The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, California. August 2019 2 Critical Species Lookbook Main Authors Xerónimo Castañeda Audubon Rick Rogers NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Melissa M. Rohde The Nature Conservancy Briana Seapy California Department of Fish and Wildlife Contributing Authors Scott Butterfield The Nature Conservancy Jennifer Carah The Nature Conservancy Laura Cockrell California Department of Fish and Wildlife Sarah Farnsworth University of California, Davis Sasha Gennet The Nature Conservancy Rene Gonzalez University of California, Davis Kelsey Haydon University of California, Davis Kassidy Heckman University of California, Davis Chi-Hai Kalita University of California, Davis Kirk Klausmeyer The Nature Conservancy Sophie Parker The Nature Conservancy Reviewers Daniel Applebee California Department of Fish and Wildlife Christina Babbitt Environmental Defense Fund Carie Battistone California Department of Fish and Wildlife Keith Babcock Dudek Laureen Barthman-Thompson California Department of Fish and Wildlife Dan Blankenship California Department of Fish and Wildlife Christian Braudrick Stillwater Sciences Shawnlei Breeding Audubon Nick Buckmaster California Department of Fish and Wildlife Stephanie Castle University of California, Davis Kendra Chan U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lena Chang U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Isaac Chellman California Department of Fish and Wildlife Deana Clifford California Department of Fish and Wildlife Neil Clipperton California Department of Fish and Wildlife Janene Colby California Department of Fish and Wildlife Courtney Conway University of Idaho Chris Dellith U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Paul Divine California Department of Fish and Wildlife Katherine Dlubac State Water Resources Control Board Ben Ewing California Department of Fish and Wildlife Danielle Fagre U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Kim Fitts BioConsultant Janet Foley University of California, Davis Joanna Gibson California Department of Fish and Wildlife August 2019 3 Critical Species Lookbook Michelle Gilroy California Department of Fish and Wildlife Greg Golet The Nature Conservancy Rick Golightly Humboldt State University Colleen Grant U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Marcia Grefsrud California Department of Fish and Wildlife Dave Hacker California Department of Fish and Wildlife Robert Hawkins California Department of Fish and Wildlife Rachel Henry U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tim Hovey California Department of Fish and Wildlife Jeanette K. Howard The Nature Conservancy Adam Hutchins California Department of Fish and Wildlife Andrea Jones Audubon Rebecca Jones California Department of Fish and Wildlife Terris Kasteen California Department of Fish and Wildlife Sharon Keeney California Department of Fish and Wildlife AJ Keith Stillwater Sciences Charles Land California Department of Fish and Wildlife Dave Lentz California Department of Fish and Wildlife Sally Liu The Nature Conservancy Jenny Marek U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Jacob Martin U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sandi Matsumoto The Nature Conservancy Robert McMorran U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Joe Medley Colibri Ecological Consulting Chad Mitcham U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Eric Morrissette U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service John O’Brien California Department of Fish and Wildlife Reagen O’Leary California Department of Fish and Wildlife Bruce Orr Stillwater Sciences Scott Osborn California Department of Fish and Wildlife Laura Patterson California Department of Fish and Wildlife Steve Parmenter California Department of Fish and Wildlife Heather Pert California Department of Fish and Wildlife Sierra Ryan Santa Cruz Mid-County GSA Mark Schwartz University of California, Davis Karen Sinclair U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Steven Slater California Department of Fish and Wildlife Bob Stafford California Department of Fish and Wildlife Thomas Stephenson California Department of Fish and Wildlife Chris Stermer California Department of Fish and Wildlife Khara Strum Audubon Vashti Supplee Audubon Natalie Stork State Water Resources Control Board Erin Tennant California Department of Fish and Wildlife Nathan Van Schmidt University of California, Santa Cruz Debra Shier San Diego Zoo William Somer California Department of Fish and Wildlife David Vigil California Department of Fish and Wildlife August 2019 4 Critical Species Lookbook Raphaela Ware U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Emily Wells U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Dou Yang U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Richard Zembal Orange County Water District August 2019 5 Critical Species Lookbook Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................................................. 9 Units of Measurement ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Objectives and Approach ........................................................................................................................................ 13 SGMA and the Environment .................................................................................................................................... 17 Species Selection ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 How to Use This Compendium Under SGMA .......................................................................................................... 22 Use and Limitations ................................................................................................................................................. 25 References ........................................................................................................................................................... 26 The LookBook ...................................................................................................................................................... 27 Amphibians & Reptiles ........................................................................................................................................ 28 A-1 | Alameda Whipsnake .................................................................................................................................. 29 A-2 | Arroyo Toad ............................................................................................................................................... 31 A-3 | Barefoot Gecko .......................................................................................................................................... 33 A-4 | Black Toad .................................................................................................................................................. 35 A-5 | Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard....................................................................................................................... 37 A-6 | California Red-Legged Frog ........................................................................................................................ 39 A-7 | California Tiger Salamander ....................................................................................................................... 41 A-8 | Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard .......................................................................................................... 43 A-9 | Desert Tortoise .......................................................................................................................................... 45 A-10 | Giant Garter Snake .................................................................................................................................. 47 A-11 | Kern Canyon Slender Salamander ........................................................................................................... 49 A-12 | San Francisco Garter Snake ..................................................................................................................... 51 A-13 | Santa Cruz Long-Toed Salamander .......................................................................................................... 53 A-14 | Sierra Nevada Yellow-Legged Frog .......................................................................................................... 55 A-15 | Southern Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog ................................................................................................. 57 A-16 | Southern Rubber Boa............................................................................................................................... 59 A-17 | Tehachapi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 118/Monday, June 20, 2016/Notices
    39944 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2016 / Notices information collection described in Type of Request: Extension. programs and projects that increase the Section A. Form Number: N/A. supply of affordable housing units, Description of the need for the prevent and reduce homelessness, A. Overview of Information Collection information and proposed use: improve data collection and reporting, Title of Information Collection: Application information is needed to and use coordinated neighborhood and OneCPD Technical Assistance Needs determine competition winners, i.e., the community development strategies to Assessment. technical assistance providers best able revitalize and strengthen their OMB Approval Number: 2506–0198. to develop efficient and effective communities. Number of Frequency of Responses Burden hour Annual burden Hourly cost Information collection respondents response per annum per response hours per response Annual cost Application .................... 52 1 52 100 5,200 $0 $0 Work Plans ................... 23 10 230 18 4,140 40 165,600 Reports ......................... 23 4 72 6 432 40 17,280 Recordkeeping ............. 23 12 276 6 1,656 40 66,240 Total ...................... ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 11,248 ........................ 249,120 B. Solicitation of Public Comment DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND or telephone (202) 708–2290. This is not URBAN DEVELOPMENT a toll-free number. Persons with hearing This notice is soliciting comments or speech impairments may access this [Docket No. FR–5910–N–10] from members of the public and affected number through TTY by calling the toll- parties concerning the collection of 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877– information described in Section A on Collection: Veterans Home 8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the California Desert
    MAMMALS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. Karen Boyer Buckingham Theodore A. Rado INTRODUCTION I ,+! The desert lands of southern California (Figure 1) support a rich variety of wildlife, of which mammals comprise an important element. Of the 19 living orders of mammals known in the world i- *- loday, nine are represented in the California desert15. Ninety-seven mammal species are known to t ':i he in this area. The southwestern United States has a larger number of mammal subspecies than my other continental area of comparable size (Hall 1981). This high degree of subspeciation, which f I;, ; leads to the development of new species, seems to be due to the great variation in topography, , , elevation, temperature, soils, and isolation caused by natural barriers. The order Rodentia may be k., 2:' , considered the most successful of the mammalian taxa in the desert; it is represented by 48 species Lc - occupying a wide variety of habitats. Bats comprise the second largest contingent of species. Of the 97 mammal species, 48 are found throughout the desert; the remaining 49 occur peripherally, with many restricted to the bordering mountain ranges or the Colorado River Valley. Four of the 97 I ?$ are non-native, having been introduced into the California desert. These are the Virginia opossum, ' >% Rocky Mountain mule deer, horse, and burro. Table 1 lists the desert mammals and their range 1 ;>?-axurrence as well as their current status of endangerment as determined by the U.S. fish and $' Wildlife Service (USWS 1989, 1990) and the California Department of Fish and Game (Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas)
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR BOREAL TOAD (BUFO BOREAS BOREAS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 MATT MCGEE AND DOUG KEINATH 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3023 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] drawing by Summers Scholl prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming March 2004 McGee and Keinath – Bufo boreas boreas March 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General ............................................................................................................................................8 Spring-Summer ...............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • EFFECTS of LATITUDE, SEASON, ELEVATION, and MICROHABITAT on FIELD BODY TEMPERATURES of NEOTROPICAL and TEMPERATE ZONE Salamandersl
    Ecology, 63(6), 1982, pp. 1657-1664 © 1982 by the Ecological Society of America EFFECTS OF LATITUDE, SEASON, ELEVATION, AND MICROHABITAT ON FIELD BODY TEMPERATURES OF NEOTROPICAL AND TEMPERATE ZONE SALAMANDERSl MARTIN E. FEDER Department ofAnatomy and Committee on Evolutionary Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 USA, and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA AND JAMES F. LYNCH Chesapeake Bay Center for Environmental Studies, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 28, Edgewater, Maryland 21037 USA, and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA Abstract. We analyzed field body temperatures of neotropical salamanders (Feder et al. 1982b) to examine existing generalizations about salamander thermal ecology, which have been based almost entirely upon data for temperate zone species. Our findings can be summarized as follows: 1) Behavioral thermoregulation in the field is evidently uncommon among the vast majority of tropical and temperate salamander species. Body temperatures of tropical salamanders closely parallel seasonal and altitudinal changes in the thermal environment. 2) Body temperatures of salamanders show a complex relationship with latitude. Temperate zone species experience lower minimum temperatures than neotropical salamanders, but there are no consistent latitudinal trends in maximum body temperatures. Tropical plethodontids and ambysto­ matids show similar rates of decline in mean body temperature with increasing elevation, but am­ bystomatid temperatures are significantly warmer than plethodontid temperatures at the same ele­ vation. 3) Variation in body temperature is greater seasonally for temperate salamanders than tropical salamanders. At a given time or locality, however, variation in field body temperature among members of a population is similar for tropical and temperate salamanders.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Biological Resources
    3.4 Biological Resources 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4.1 Introduction This section evaluates the potential for implementation of the Proposed Project to have impacts on biological resources, including sensitive plants, animals, and habitats. The Notice of Preparation (NOP) (Appendix A) identified the potential for impacts associated to candidate, sensitive, or special status species (as defined in Section 3.4.6 below), sensitive natural communities, jurisdictional waters of the United States, wildlife corridors or other significant migratory pathway, and a potential to conflict with local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources. Data used to prepare this section were taken from the Orange County General Plan, the City of Lake Forest General Plan, Lake Forest Municipal Code, field observations, and other sources, referenced within this section, for background information. Full bibliographic references are noted in Section 3.4.12 (References). No comments with respect to biological resources were received during the NOP comment period. The Proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and zone change for development of Sites 1 to 6 and creation of public facilities overlay on Site 7. 3.4.2 Environmental Setting Regional Characteristics The City of Lake Forest, with a population of approximately 77,700 as of January 2004, is an area of 16.6 square miles located in the heart of South Orange County and Saddleback Valley, between the coastal floodplain and the Santa Ana Mountains (see Figure 2-1, Regional Location). The western portion of the City is near sea level, while the northeastern portion reaches elevations of up to 1,500 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Teleostei: Cyprinidae), and Its Related Congeners in Sonora, Mexico
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87 (2016) 390–398 www.ib.unam.mx/revista/ Taxonomy and systematics Morphometric and meristic characterization of the endemic Desert chub Gila eremica (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), and its related congeners in Sonora, Mexico Caracterización morfométrica y merística de la carpa del desierto endémica Gila eremica (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) y sus congéneres relacionados en Sonora, México a b c Carlos A. Ballesteros-Córdova , Gorgonio Ruiz-Campos , Lloyd T. Findley , a a a,∗ José M. Grijalva-Chon , Luis E. Gutiérrez-Millán , Alejandro Varela-Romero a Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad de Sonora, Luis Donaldo Colosio s/n, entre Sahuaripa y Reforma, Col. Centro, 83000 Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico b Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, P.O. Box 233, 22800 Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico c Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C./Unidad Guaymas, Carretera al Varadero Nacional km 6.6, Col. Las Playitas, 85480 Guaymas, Sonora, Mexico Received 29 July 2015; accepted 24 November 2015 Available online 16 May 2016 Abstract The Desert chub, Gila eremica DeMarais, 1991 is a freshwater fish endemic to Northwest Mexico, being described from the Sonora, Matape and Yaqui River basins in Sonora, Mexico. The recent discovery of 2 isolated small populations from the known distribution for this taxon makes necessary an evaluation to determine their specific taxonomical identities (herein designated as G. cf. eremica). Thirty-three morphometric and 6 meristic characters were evaluated in 219 specimens of several populations of the genus Gila in Sonora, including all the known populations of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Conservation 228 (2018) 310–318
    Biological Conservation 228 (2018) 310–318 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Multi-scale effects of land cover and urbanization on the habitat suitability of an endangered toad T ⁎ Michael L. Tregliaa, , Adam C. Landonb,c,1, Robert N. Fisherd, Gerard Kyleb, Lee A. Fitzgeralda a Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collections, Applied Biodiversity Science Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2258, USA b Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Lab, Department of Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2261, USA c Water Management and Hydrological Science Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3408, USA d U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station, San Diego, CA, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Habitat degradation, entwined with land cover change, is a major driver of biodiversity loss. Effects of land cover Watersheds change on species can be direct (when habitat is converted to alternative land cover types) or indirect (when Structural equation model land outside of the species habitat is altered). Hydrologic and ecological connections between terrestrial and California aquatic systems are well understood, exemplifying how spatially disparate land cover conditions may influence Arroyo toad aquatic habitats, but are rarely examined. We sought to quantify relative effects of land cover at two different but Anaxyrus californicus interacting scales on habitat suitability for the endangered arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus). Based on an Anthropogenic development ff Riparian areas existing distribution model for the arroyo toad and available land cover data, we estimated e ects of land cover along streams and within entire watersheds on habitat suitability using structural equation modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B References
    Final Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix B, References July 2021 Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S ADOT Project No. 999 SW 0 M5180 01P I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS Appendix B, References 1 This page intentionally left blank. July 2021 Project No. M5180 01P / Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS Appendix B, References 1 ADEQ. 2002. Groundwater Protection in Arizona: An Assessment of Groundwater Quality and 2 the Effectiveness of Groundwater Programs A.R.S. §49-249. Arizona Department of 3 Environmental Quality. 4 ADEQ. 2008. Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Pinal Active Management Area: A 2005-2006 5 Baseline Study. Open File Report 08-01. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Water 6 Quality Division, Phoenix, Arizona. June 2008. 7 https://legacy.azdeq.gov/environ/water/assessment/download/pinal_ofr.pdf. 8 ADEQ. 2011. Arizona State Implementation Plan: Regional Haze Under Section 308 of the 9 Federal Regional Haze Rule. Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 10 Phoenix, Arizona. January 2011. https://www.resolutionmineeis.us/documents/adeq-sip- 11 regional-haze-2011. 12 ADEQ. 2013a. Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Upper Hassayampa Basin: A 2003-2009 13 Baseline Study. Open File Report 13-03, Phoenix: Water Quality Division. 14 https://legacy.azdeq.gov/environ/water/assessment/download/upper_hassayampa.pdf. 15 ADEQ. 2013b. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Fact Sheet: Construction 16 General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. Arizona 17 Department of Environmental Quality. June 3, 2013. 18 https://static.azdeq.gov/permits/azpdes/cgp_fact_sheet_2013.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets
    Mammal watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets Seldom visited by mammal watchers, Northern Mexico is a fascinating part of the world with a diverse mammal fauna. In addition to its many endemics, many North American species are easier to see here than in USA, while some tropical ones can be seen in unusual habitats. I travelled there a lot (having lived just across the border for a few years), but only managed to visit a small fraction of the number of places worth exploring. Many generations of mammologists from USA and Mexico have worked there, but the knowledge of local mammals is still a bit sketchy, and new discoveries will certainly be made. All information below is from my trips in 2003-2005. The main roads are better and less traffic-choked than in other parts of the country, but the distances are greater, so any traveler should be mindful of fuel (expensive) and highway tolls (sometimes ridiculously high). In theory, toll roads (carretera quota) should be paralleled by free roads (carretera libre), but this isn’t always the case. Free roads are often narrow, winding, and full of traffic, but sometimes they are good for night drives (toll roads never are). All guidebooks to Mexico I’ve ever seen insist that driving at night is so dangerous, you might as well just kill yourself in advance to avoid the horror. In my experience, driving at night is usually safer, because there is less traffic, you see the headlights of upcoming cars before making the turn, and other drivers blink their lights to warn you of livestock on the road ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Across Watersheds in the Klamath Mountains
    Diversity 2013, 5, 657-679; doi:10.3390/d5030657 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 1424-2818 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Article Genetic Diversity of Black Salamanders (Aneides flavipunctatus) across Watersheds in the Klamath Mountains Sean B. Reilly 1,*, Mitchell F. Mulks 2, Jason M. Reilly 3, W. Bryan Jennings 4, and David B. Wake 1 1 Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Bureau of Land Management, Medford Interagency Office, Medford, OR 97504, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Museu Nacional, Departamento de Vertebrados, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940-040, Brazil; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-510-642-3567; Fax: +1-510-643-8238. Received: 31 May 2013; in revised form: 2 August 2013 / Accepted: 8 August 2013 / Published: 29 August 2013 Abstract: Here we characterize the genetic structure of Black Salamanders (Aneides flavipunctatus) in the Klamath Mountains of northwestern California and southwestern Oregon using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. We hypothesized that the Sacramento, Smith, Klamath, and Rogue River watersheds would represent distinct genetic populations based on prior ecological results, which suggest that Black Salamanders avoid high elevations such as the ridges that separate watersheds. Our mitochondrial results revealed two major lineages, one in the Sacramento River watershed, and another containing the Klamath, Smith, and Rogue River watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Amargosa Vole
    Recovery Plan for the Amargosa Vole (Microtus californicus scirpensis) ( As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the ~ Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environ mental and cultural values of our national parks ~, and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energyand mineral resourcesand works toassure that ~‘ theirdevelopment is in the best interests ofall our people. ~4 The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people ~<‘ who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. AMARGOSA VOLE (Microtus cahfornicus scirpensis) RECOVERY PLAN September, 1997 7— U.S. Department ofthe Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Region One, Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Toad (Anaxyrus Californicus) Life History, Population Status, Population
    Arroyo Toad (Anaxyrus californicus) Life History, Population Status, Population Threats, and Habitat Assessment of Conditions at Fort Hunter Liggett, Monterey County, California A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Biology by Jacquelyn Petrasich Hancock December 2009 © 2009 Jacquelyn Petrasich Hancock ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Arroyo Toad (Anaxyrus californicus) Life History, Population Status, Population Threats, and Habitat Assessment of Conditions at Fort Hunter Liggett, Monterey County, California AUTHOR: Jacquelyn Petrasich Hancock DATE SUBMITTED: December 2009 COMMITTEE CHAIR: David Pilliod, PhD COMMITTEE MEMBER: Emily Taylor, PhD COMMITTEE MEMBER: Scott Steinmaus, PhD iii Abstract Arroyo Toad (Anaxyrus californicus) Life History, Population Status, Population Threats, and Habitat Assessment of Conditions at Fort Hunter Liggett, Monterey County, California Jacquelyn Petrasich Hancock The arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus) is a federally endangered species found on Fort Hunter Liggett, Monterey County, California. The species was discovered in 1996 and was determined to occupy 26.7 km of the San Antonio River from approximately 2.4 km northwest of the San Antonio Mission de Padua, to the river delta above the San Antonio Reservoir. The construction of the San Antonio Reservoir dam in 1963 isolated this northern population of arroyo toads. Through time, the Fort Hunter Liggett landscape has changed drastically. The land was heavily grazed by cattle until 1991, which considerably reduced vegetation in riparian areas. Military training following acquisition of the land in 1940 far exceeded current allowable training. Fire was used extensively to reduce unfavorable vegetation, and as a result, extreme tree loss occurred through the ranges.
    [Show full text]