ETHNICITY and NATIONALISM NIGERIA Before and After Colonial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ETHNICITY and NATIONALISM NIGERIA Before and After Colonial Ahmed Draia University – Adrar Faculty of Letters and Languages Department of English Letters and Language A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Master’s Degree in Literature and Civilization Presented by: Supervised by: Bodemaa Okbaoui Mr. Tahar Abbou Academic Year: 2015 – 2016 DEDICATION This work is dedicated with gratitude and love to my beloved parents, and to my eldest brother, who has always believed in my abilities. Acknowledgement Above all, thanks to God for providing me with material and mental capacity whereby I could conduct this research. Then I would like to thank Mr Tahar Abbou for allotting time to this work to be properly accomplished, and for his supervision throughout the academic year. I am also honoured to address special thanks to Dr Aziz Mostefaoui for his generosity by providing me with valuable sources and allowing me to keep using them until I have my work done. Finally, grateful thanks are presented to each one to whom this work owes some of its accomplishment, including teachers and students of the Department of English. Abstract The thesis of this dissertation is that the aspects of relations among the various ethnic groups in modern Nigeria thwart the resurgence of nationalism. Ethnic relations in Nigeria had been deteriorated by virtue of the subjection of the British colonial power to the region of present-day Nigeria, and on account of the introduction of new social and political systems into Nigerian societies. Thereafter, ethnicity and nationalism have become a focus of interest in Nigerian and in many African social and political studies, for they lay much emphasis on the legacies of colonialism in African societies. The aim of this study is to find out whether the ethnic composition impedes the unification of national interests. The work relies on some existing literature on Nigerian history to provide historical events that conclude Nigerians‟ abilities to integrate and possess common cultural identities. Hence, the work is an attempt to analyse the interrelation between ethnicity and nationalism in Nigeria from a historical standpoint. It concludes that ethnicity does not impede the acquisition of common cultural and national identity, for pre-colonial Nigerians showed the abilities of possessing common national identities notwithstanding ethnic diversity. The study also concludes that the advent of the British marked a watershed in the history of the country as it interrupted the normal formation of common identities. Key Words: ethnic relations, nationalism, colonial power, ethnicity, national identities. List of Maps Map 1 Nigeria Map 2 Major Cities and Ethnic Groups in Present-Day Nigeria Map 3 Nigeria Administrative Boundaries in 1960 List of Abbreviations AG: Action Group CDW: Colonial Development and Welfare LAAAPS Lagos Auxiliary of the Anti-Slavery and Aborigines Protection Society NCNC: National Council for Nigeria and the Cameroons NNA: Nigerian National Alliance NNDP: Nigerian National Democratic Party NPC: Northern People‟s Congress NYM: Nigerian Youth Movement UPGA: United Progressive Grand Alien Table of Content Dedication...…………………………………………………….……………………...…ii Acknowledgement …………………………………………………………………..…...iii Abstract………………………………………………………………….………….....…iv List of Maps…... ……… ……………………………………………………...………....v List of Abbreviations……………………..…………………………………….….…….vi Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………..........vii General Introduction……………...………………………………………………..……..1 Chapter One: Factors of Ethnic Relations and Ethnicity Formation in Pre-Colonial Nigeria Introduction…………………………………………………………….……...4 1.1. Hausa-Fulani Ethnicity…………………………………………….……...4 1.1.1 The Socio-Economic Factor……………………………….………5 1.1.2 The Cultural Factors…………………………………………….…7 1.1.2.1 The Myth of Common Origin……………………………...6 1.1.2.2 The Spread of Islam………………………………………..7 1.2. The Yoruba Ethnicity……………………………………………………...8 1.2.1. The Economic Factor……………………………………………..…8 1.2.2. The Cultural Factors……………………………………….…….…..9 1.2.2.1 The Linguistic Factor…………………….……………..…….9 1.2.2.2 The Myth of Oduduwa…………………..…………….……10 1.2.3. The Political Factor………………………………..………….…….11 1.2.4. Migration………………………………………..…………….…….11 1.2.5. Wars and Conflicts……………………………..…………….……..12 1.3. Igbo Ethnicity…………………………………………..……………….….13 1.3.1. The Socio-Economic Factor…………………………..…….…….….14 Conclusion…………………………………………………………….…...….....15 Chapter Two: Colonial Nigeria: The Advent of the British and the Rise of Nationalism 1851- 1960 Introduction…………………………………………………….…………..16 2.1. The Colonization Proces1851-1914…………………….....….………...16 2.1.1. The Establishment of the Southern Protectorate…...……..……..17 2.1.2. The Establishment of the Northern Protectorate……...……..…..18 2.1.3. The Amalgamation of Nigeria………………………...………..19 2.2. The Socio-Economic Changes……………….……………………..….21 2.3. The Rise of Nationalism in Nigeria…………………......………….…..23 2.3.1. Early Thoughts of Nationalism…………………...………….……25 2.3.2. Early Nigerian Nationalist Movements…………..……………….26 2.3.3. The Impact of the Second World War…………………...……….29 2.3.4. The External Influences on the British Policies………….…...…...30 2.3.5. The Political and the Nationalist Development…….………....…..31 2.3.6. Regional Conflicts and Political Independence….…….………….33 Conclusion………………………………………………….………………....36 Chapter Three: Challenges of Nation-Building in Post-Colonial Nigeria 1960-1970 Introduction………………………………….…………………………....37 3.1. Nation-Building………………………….……….…………...….…...37 3.1.1. State Creation………………………...……………….…………39 3.2. Challenges of Nation-Building……………...…………..……………41 3.2.1. Ethnic Resentments……………………...………………….……41 3.2.2. The Political Crises of the First Republic...…………….………...43 3.2.3. Ethnic Conflicts……………………….….…………….………...47 3.2.3.1. Nigerian Civil War 1967-1970………………………..…..49 Conclusion………………………………………………..……….……….…52 General Conclusion…………………………………………….………………...………...53 Works Cited………………………………………………….………………………….. ..55 Appendix General Introduction In times that predated colonialism, diverse communities inhabited the area known nowadays as Nigeria. These communities developed integrative mechanisms and common cultural traits which brought about the formation of homogenous groups labelled in modern terms „ethnic groups‟. They established systems and maintained relations that tended to link individuals with one another, and to establish culturally homogenous and economically complementary societies. However, this trend was interrupted by the advent of the British power to the area, introducing new economic and social systems and meanwhile raising awareness of cultural and ethnic diversity. Such awareness affected relations among ethnic groups, particularly when Nigeria gained its political independence in 1960. Once the British handed power to indigenous people, ethnic affiliation expressed itself explicitly in the politics of the country by virtue of suspicious and mistrustful relations the ethnic groups came to inherit from colonial powers. Thereafter, on account of the aspects of relations between ethnic groups, Nigerian nationalism could not be revived in post-colonial epoch. In this sense, ethnicity came to be defined as aspects of “relations among” ethnic groups, whereas nationalism is conceptualized as a common political interest among the ruling elite of a country. Thomas Hylland Eriksen argues that ethnicity is basically an aspect of relationship between communities, be it aspects of gain or aspects of loss, as he argues that these aspects of relations are functional in the formation of identities (17) Therefore, ethnic relations could be political and social as well as symbolic (Eriksen 17). On this standard, the first chapter of this work tackles the various factors of interconnection that led to the formation of the three dominant ethnic groups in Nigeria –the Hausa-Fulani, the Yoruba and the Igbo. The chapter illustrates how communities developed integrative and complementary mechanisms notwithstanding cultural differentiation. In fact, in the chapter it is argued that culture in pre-colonial Nigeria was developed by virtue of people‟s struggle to adopt their environments. Moreover, it is noteworthy to state that the formation of ethnic identities in Nigeria and elsewhere in Africa is not only a pre-colonial phenomenon. Anikpo states that ethnicity is a historical process that is developed by virtue of “historical transformations” which makes it an “enduring phenomenon” (21). Further, Anikpo notes that ethnicity exceeds the historical socio-economic and political factors that brought about its formation to become an identity (21). Therefore, ethnicity involves an attachment to formerly formed communities. Modern Nigeria is ethnically subdivided into three major ethnic groups which are Hausa-Fulani in the northern region, Igbo in the south-east, and Yoruba in the south-west (see map 2). These groups have inhabited the territory of Nigeria centuries before the advent of the British. Besides economic and social relations, these groups developed cultural features that reflected their ideals on unification. Thus, the myth of common origin that each of the Yoruba and the Hausa-Fulani peoples created had a symbolic meaning in strengthening relations among individuals. In addition, the spread of Islam beyond Hausa land also tended to unify the various states in the region so as to be ruled by a single dynasty. Furthermore, there were other manifestations of identities formation and ethnic relations such as migration, trade and even wars.
Recommended publications
  • Historical Facts
    HISTORICAL FACTS HOW GOO HAS LAGOS BEEN TO THE INDIGENES? Being a lecture presented by Habeeb Abiodun Sanni at the One any conference on political situation in Lagos State, organized by the committee of the Indigenous Association of Lagos State held at sycamore hotel, Ajara Badagry on Saturday 11, 2007. The Chairman of the organizing Committee, Hon, Justice S.O. Hunponu-Wasiu, Member of the committee, Your Royal Highness, leaders of the various indigenous Association of Lagos State here present, Indigenes of Lagos State, Members of the press, Ladies and gentlemen, all protocols duly observed. I am very delighted to be the guest speaker called upon by this body on the occasion of most competent person among the multitude of scholars devoted to teaching and researching on the whatever I discuss here today will not only be beneficial to all sundry, but could also serve as catalyst toward achieving the aims of the organizers’ dream of Lagos for the indigenes was akin to the basis upon which the United Muslim Party, separation of Lagos from the Western Region during the last decade of decolonization from Britain. The organizations such as F.R.A Williams, S.L. Akintola, and Chief Obafemi Awolowo, all of the Action Group, which preferred the retention of Lagos as part of the west. Supporting the position of the U.M.P, However, were Chief H.O Davies and Chief Odofin Akinyele. The latter founded the Lagos Regional Party, ostensibly to contest all local and general elections and use every means at their disposal to ensure that the separation of Lagos from the west was permanent and irrevocable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colonial Public Sphere in Nigeria, 1920-1943
    Stichproben. Wiener Zeitschrift für kritische Afrikastudien. No. 25/2013, Vol. 13, 29‐56. The Colonial Public Sphere in Nigeria, 1920‐1943 Katharina Oke Abstract The article turns to colonial and local imaginations of public criticism, public communication and public opinion in colonial Nigeria. Thereby, it focusses on the Lagosian English‐language press and colonial archival documents. The aim is to provide insight into the political terrain, to map power structures and contestations of colonial power directly related to colonial hegemony, the media, and the public sphere. The paper argues that both, the colonial state and local politicians engaged in debates about the form, substance and purpose of the public sphere. At stake was who was entitled to voice public criticism and how to alter and contest colonial rule. A colonial public sphere? Recent events, such as the so‐called “Arab Spring” in 2011 in North African countries and protests in Iran that followed the disputed re‐election of President Mahmud Ahmadinejad in 2009, have drawn attention to the public sphere. Located between the private realm and the sphere of public power, it is seemingly open to individuals and groups’ utterances and criticisms. Moreover, public criticism voiced in the public sphere has the potential to transform authority (Habermas 1990: 98; Koller 2010: 263). With regards to the above mentioned protests, scholars argue that increasing accessibility of communication technologies such as the internet and mobile phones facilitates participation in public communication, but that these media do not constitute a “new” public sphere with the power to oust presidents (Gladwell/Shirky 2011; Lynch 2012; Papacharissi 2002; Shirky 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Nigeria History of N I G.E Ria
    HISTORY OF NIGERIA HISTORY OF N I G.E RIA By A. C. BURNS," c.M.G. Deputy Chief Secretary to the Government of Nigeria LONDON GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD MUSEUM STREET FIRST I'UBLISBED IN 1929 A.U rights festm~e4 I'RINTED IN GREAT BRitAIN BY UNWIN BII.OTBERS LTD,, WOJUNG TO PETER PREFACE WHEN I first arrived in Nigeria, in 1912, Northern. and Southern Nigeria were still separate administra~ tions, with different traditions and distinct histories. Those Europeans who were interested in one Pro­ tectorate knew little of the other, and wasted no sympathy on their neighbours, while among the inhabitants of the country the .lack of a uniform sy2tem of government had accentuated the already existing differences of race, religion and culture. In no way was the difference between Northern and Southern Nigeria more marked than in the quality of their bibliographies. Several excellent books had been written on Northern Nigeria, and the history of the Protectorate was easily available to those who wished to study it. Of Southern Nigeria, on the other hand, there was not a single complete history, and information about the people of the country, and the early British administration on the Coast, was almost impossible to find. Still more impossible was it to obtain, in a single volume, a history of Nigeria as a whole, and the amalgamation of the Ist January, 1914, made a book of this sort more than ever necessary. Some years ago I began to collect the necessary materials for a history of Nigeria, but before this could be completed I was tran~ferred to the· Bahamas, where I languished for five years.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Past and Present Oba of Lagos. Lagos Dynasty Since 1600
    History of the past and present Oba of Lagos. Lagos dynasty since 1600 ASHIPA (1600-1630) Ashipa was regarded as the founder of dynasty of Lagos. He was the son Oba of Benin. He was acting as the leader of the people of Lagos but not as the king. He serves as the intermediary between the Oba of Benin and the people of Lagos (eko),he spent 27 years as the leader of eko ,and died in 1630 and his son Ado took over his responsibility. OBA ADO (1630-1669) Oba ado, the son of ashipa took over the leadership role played by his father in 1630 during his own reign, he was elevated to an Oba and was crown as the king of Lagos by the Oba of Benin. Oba ado became the first Oba of Lagos. Oba ado had three children,2 males and 1 female. They include (Gabaro, Akinsemoyin, and Erelu Kuti).Oba ado ruled for 39years. He joined his ancestor in 1669 and his first son Gabaro succeeded him. OBA GABARO (1669-1704) Oba Gabaro was installed in 1669 after his father death. During his reign, he moved the government to the island in particular isale eko where the present iga Idungran is today.he was the first Oba to erect a building in the palace, he also created the institution of chieftaincy and kingmakers.he had only one child during his lifetime called Eletu kekere.Oba Gabaro died in 1904 and his brother Akinsemoyin succeeded him. OBA AKINSEMOYIN (1704-1749) Oba Akinsemoyin started in own reign in 1704, it was during his reign that the Portuguese came to Lagos as slave dealers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology, Alliances and the Challenge of Sustainable Development in Nigeria – a Case Study of the United Progressive Grand Alliance
    Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa (Volume 19, No.4, 2017) ISSN: 1520-5509 Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, Pennsylvania IDEOLOGY, ALLIANCES AND THE CHALLENGE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA – A CASE STUDY OF THE UNITED PROGRESSIVE GRAND ALLIANCE Emmanuel Oladipo Ojo Department of General History, Institute of Humanities, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia ABSTRACT Since 1954, the Nigerian political scene has witnessed the formation and dissolution of several electoral and governing alliances; however, none was anchored on compatibility and glued by ideology. All, including the ruling All Progressives Congress (an alliance of four parties), were/are anchored on political expediencies and the unrestrained desire to seize power, sit on the structural frame and control the system of rewards. This article examines the prevailing political situation that led to the formation (in 1964) of the United Progressive Grand Alliance, UPGA by two erstwhile politically irreconcilable parties – the National Council of Nigerian Citizens (NCNC) and Action Group (AG). It posits that the formation of the alliance had no modicum of ideological underpinnings but was purely an outcome of the precarious political situation both parties found themselves. The article argues that one of the reasons for lack or absence of sustainable development in Nigeria is the fact that members of the political class convoke alliances for the purposes of winning elections and not to initiate and drive national development. It concludes that since an alliance whose members are ideologically estranged would almost always fatally fail; the UPGA did not only turn out to be a fatal failure; it arrested the political, social and economic development of the newly independent state and, alongside its inveterate rival, the Nigerian National Alliance (NNA), contributed immensely to the chain of events that sounded the death knell of Nigeria’s First Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Criticism and the Colonial State
    DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit The Colonial Public Sphere in Nigeria, 1920-1943 Verfasserin Mag. (FH) Katharina Oke angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag.phil.) Wien, 2013 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 390 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Diplomstudium Afrikanistik Betreuerin: Dr. Heike Ingeborg Schmidt, M.A. ii Acknowledgements I want to express my gratitude to Christina, Ernst, and Gerda, who generously supported my studies. I want to thank Prof Heike Schmidt for continuous encouragement and support. Thank you Andrea, Christin, Elisa, Franziska, Johanna, Julia, Karina, Silvia, and Thea for your patience and backing. Vida – thank you for last-minute support! Thank you Mathilda and Olusegun. iii iv Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Public Communication, Public Criticism, and the Public Sphere ........................................... 2 Sources and Methods..................................................................................................................... 5 Outline ............................................................................................................................................. 7 1 “The Old Order Changeth”? – Criticism and the Colonial State .......................... 9 1.1 Governing Public Communication ................................................................................ 9 1.2 The Newspapermen’s Duty .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • College of Humanities and Social Sciences
    KIU Journal of Humanities KIU Journal of Humanities College of Humanities and Social Sciences Kampala International University, Uganda. 1 KIU Journal of Humanities Copyright © 2018 College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kampala International University. All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study, or criticism or review, and only as permitted under the Copyright Art, this publication may only be produced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with prior written permission of the Copyright Holder. Published in March, 2018 ISSN: 2415-0843 (Print) ISSN: 2522-2821 (Online) Published by: College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda. 2 KIU Journal of Humanities KIU Journal of Humanities Copyright©2018 Kampala International University ISSN: 2415-0843; 3(1): 3–4 Editorial This issue of KIU Journal of Humanities touches on Development Administration, Civic and Political Education, Educational Administration, Judicial Administration, Social Psychology, Educational Psychology, Educational Administration, Educational Technology and Media Studies. The first part of the Journal addresses issues in Development Administration such as Sustainable Development, Fund Management, Political Economy and Foreign Direct Investments‘ Framework. It is argued in one of the papers that if the quality of Almajirai and Nomadic Education Programmes is to be enhanced, then there is need for a serious commitment on the part of the government to coordinate all aspects of this education. Formal and informal stakeholders need to be involved at every stage to ensure successful value education. Government alone must not be left to the running of these model schools, all the stakeholders must be involved so as to see the end of violence in our society and equal quality education for all for sustainable all – round development in Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Theophilus Owolabi Shobowale Benson and the Making of Modern Nigeria
    West Bohemian Historical Review XI | 2021 | 1 Theophilus Owolabi Shobowale Benson and the Making of Modern Nigeria Emmanuel Oladipo Ojo1 – Olusanya Faboyede2 This article highlights the contributions of Theophilus Owolabi Shobowale Benson to the making of Modern Nigeria. We argue that Benson joined hands with other nationalists to decolonise Nigeria and struggled for the establishment of a just, egal- itarian, constitutional and prosperous nation. We conclude that Benson, unlike the present crop of Nigerian politicians, did not play ethnic politics neither did he see politics as ‘pot of soup’ for exclusive personal consumption or a ladder for egocentric aggrandizement and enrichment. An ultraist per excellence with unquenchable passion for purposeful nation building and all-facet national development, Benson’s motto throughout his sojourn on Nigeria’s political scene, was “service to fatherland”. Data for the study was obtained from primary and documentary sources and subjected to internal and external criticisms as well as textual and contextual analysis. [Theophilus Owolabi Shobowale Benson; Nigeria; Politics; Nation Building; National Development; Ethnicity] Introduction Theophilus Owolabi Shobowale Benson, popularly known as TOS Benson, a prince from the Lasunwon Royal Family of Ikorodu, was one of the architects of modern Nigeria. A spirited nationalist, a pan-Nigerian na- tion builder, an inveterate antagonist of ethnic jingoism and a relentless crusader for the under-dog and the less privileged; TOS Benson made imperishable contributions to the growth and development of Nigerian politics and judiciary (law). This paper assesses the contribution of TOS Benson to the making of the Nigerian state right from September 1947 1 Department of General History, Institute of Humanities, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia; email: [email protected]; [email protected].
    [Show full text]