DOCSLIB.ORG

Section Annual Report for Medical Sociology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section Annual Report for Medical Sociology Section Annual Report for Medical Sociology This annual report covers the period of section activity from September 2017 to August 2018 and a fiscal year from January 2018 to December 2018. The report is typically completed by the immediate past chair of each section as it covers the period this person served as chair. However, it is often completed in consultation with other officers and it may be submitted by anyone on the section council. Sections that do not file an Annual Report will have their budget allocation withheld until a complete report is received. Please submit the report by November 15. Section Governance Provide details of your section’s governance activity during the period between September 2017 and August 2018. Business Meeting Copy and paste below (or attach separately) the agenda and approved meeting minutes from the section business meeting which include a count of members present and summary of decisions made at this meeting. The Medical Sociology section’s major activities for 2017-18 include the following: • Published four section newsletters (attached). • Selected recipients for six section awards: Louise Johnson Scholar, Howard B. Kaplan Memorial Award, Roberta G. Simmons Outstanding Dissertation Award, Donald W. Light Award for Applied or Public Practice of Sociology, Eliot Freidson Outstanding Publication Award, and Leo G. Reeder Award for Distinguished Contribution to Medical Sociology. • Established a section Google drive and migrated our policy and practice documents from a Dropbox folder onto the drive. All Council members reviewed and, as appropriate, revised their position descriptions. We established a process for recording awards nominations. • Pursuant to the 2017 Council meeting discussion, revised awards descriptions to require the nominators and nominees be section members. • Submitted a by-laws amendment to the ASA Committee on Sections which was approved and included on the 2018 election ballot. The amendment provides guidance on conflicts-of-interest. It was approved by section members. • Identified and approved a new newsletter editor. • The Chair (Jane McLeod) and Secretary-Treasurer (Danielle Bessett) worked with ASA Director of Finance (Les Briggs) to review the investment structure for the Donald Light Award for Applied or Public Practice of Medical Sociology and for other section accounts. • Organized six ASA sessions: o Race, Racism, and Health: Patterns and Processes) o The Politics of Health o Sociology of Medical Education o Sociological Research and the Reduction of Health Inequalities o Health, Health Care, and New Technologies 1 o Roundtables • Partnered with the section on Sex and Gender for a co-sponsored session on Gender, Health, and Medicine. • Planned and held the section awards ceremony, awards dinner, and section reception. • With Council assistance, section members organized a tour of the National Board of Medical Examiners. Twenty two section members attended. As appropriate, Council members consulted via email on these and other matters. We held our annual Business Meeting on Sunday, August 12, 2018 from 9:30-10:10am. The agenda for our meeting is attached (p.2 of our Appendix), and the 2018 Council minutes and Council reports referenced therein follow (on p.3 and pp.4-25, respectively). Council Meeting Copy and paste below (or attach separately) the agenda and approved meeting minutes of all Council Meetings conducted between August 2017 and September 2018. Minutes must include a list of council members present and a summary of decisions made. Minutes are not a transcript of proceedings but a listing of what discussions took place and official actions taken. The Medical Sociology Section Council met on Sunday, August 12, 2018 from 7-8:15am. 12 current Council members attended, along with 5 incoming Council members and 1 affiliated section member. The agenda for our meeting is attached (p.27), and the 2018 Business meeting minutes follow (p.28-30). The Previous Year Describe section activities during the period between September 2017 and August 2018. • Membership recruitment and retention – What efforts did the section make to retain members and reach out to new members? What were the results of the efforts? Our membership chair, Corinne Reczek, worked tirelessly through the year to recruit and retain section members. She distributed messages to the section listserv, encouraging members to recruit new members and to offer student memberships. She contacted former section members who had not renewed their memberships to encourage them to do so. As a result of her efforts, we have kept membership very near the 1,000-member mark. • Communications – How does the section communicate with its members? Did it begin using any new technologies or strategies? If so, were they effective? Include links to the section website, newsletters, and any other electronic media used. The section communicates with members primarily through the section listserv and our newsletter. We send weekly announcements to members through the listserv. We publish four newsletters each year. We attach copies of the 2017-18 newsletters to this report. 2 • Mentoring – What, if any, mentoring opportunities does the section offer to students, early career faculty, nonfaculty, etc.? The section does not offer a formal mentoring program. We are, nevertheless, a welcoming section that encourages participation and engagement across our full membership. We have two regular student Council members who participate in our Council meetings, prepare student- oriented features for the newsletter, and organize a meet-and-greet with the recipient of our distinguished contributions award (the Leo G. Reeder Award). Our nominations committee has a student member who participates fully in crafting the election slate. Each year, our nominations committee strives to achieve a slate that represents the full range of substantive, theoretical, and methodological interests in medical sociology, and that includes faculty at all ranks and members who hold nonacademic positions. • Programming – Provide an overview of the section’s programming at the annual meeting, scholarly/ professional development activities outside of the annual meeting, development of substantive resources, partnerships with other sections or groups, etc. The section offered eight sessions at the 2018 ASA meeting, including: Race, Racism, and Health: Patterns and Processes The Politics of Health Sociology of Medical Education (2 sessions) Sociological Research and the Reduction of Health Inequalities Health, Health Care, and New Technologies A co-sponsored session (with Sex and Gender) on Gender, Health, and Medicine Our section roundtables session. As noted, we also held our annual awards ceremony, awards dinner, and business meeting. The section offered three other events at the annual meeting that may be of interest to ASA. Section member Monica Cuddy organized a tour of the National Board of Medical Examiners which was held on Monday, August 13th. Council member Katrina Kimport organized a panel on sociology in practice settings that was offered as part of ASA’s symposium on sociological practice. Council member Tom Mackie participated in organizing a pre-conference on policy engagement, with special emphasis on health- related research. Plans for the Coming Year Describe section plans for the period between September 2018 and August 2019. These plans should align with the 2018 budget and proposed 2019 budget below. • Membership recruitment and retention – What efforts will the section make to retain members and reach out to new members? What are the goals of the efforts? 3 We will continue our usual efforts to recruit and retain members. For the past several years, we have sponsored a section book raffle to raise funds for our student awards. The raffle appears to have outlived its usefulness (we still sell many tickets and receive outstanding book contributions but fewer and fewer people want to take books home with them). We plan to suspend the book raffle and, in its place, develop a new fundraising strategy. The funds will go to our student awards. Although not directly a membership recruitment effort, offering a vibrant set of student awards increases the attraction of a section membership to students. Fundraising campaigns also have the potential to increase commitment to the section among current members. • Communications – How does the section plan to communicate with its members? Does the section plan on using any new technologies or strategies? If so, how? We will continue our practice of weekly listserv announcements and quarterly newsletters. In addition, our webmaster has created a “members update” page for our website that members can use to update each other about significant development in teaching, research, and service. • Mentoring – What efforts will the section make to mentor students, early career faculty, nonfaculty, etc.? We do not have current plans to expand specific mentoring activities. • Programming – Provide an overview of the section’s upcoming plans for programming at the annual meeting, scholarly/ professional development activities outside of the annual meeting, development of substantive resources, partnerships with other sections or groups, etc. In line with the theme of the conference (Engaging Social Justice for a Better World), the Medical Sociology section will offer a session entitled, “Health equity, social justice, and social movements.” In addition, we will host the second of two joint sessions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Article Pol J Public Health 2017;127(4): 176-181
    Review Article Pol J Public Health 2017;127(4): 176-181 Michał Skrzypek The social and clinical determinants of proportions between paternalism and partnership in therapeutic relationships in medicine Abstract The subject of the article are the contextual determinants of the formula of the therapeutic relationship in medicine with regard to the proportions between paternalism and partnership. The article was inspired by the results of two recent editions of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) “Health at a Glance” studies of 2015 and 2017; in their light, Poland ranks at the bottom of ratings concerning patient satisfaction with communication with doctors. According to these studies, the therapeutic relationship in medicine in Polish society appears to be petrified in the paternalist formula, not suffi- ciently taking into account the autonomy and agency of patients. Based on the analysis of the determinants of a broader tendency, described in Western studies, consisting in the wider development of partnership relationships between doctors and patients, the study will show individual barriers, social ones, including structural and institutional, as well as clinical barriers to implementa- tion in medical practice of the partnership model of therapeutic relationships in medicine, which assumes the active involvement of patients in clinical decision-making as well as in the processes of medical treatment. Keywords: physician-patient interaction, empowerment, socioeconomic status, social health inequalities, paternalism and partnership in medicine, medical sociology. DOI: 10.1515/pjph-2017-0038 INTRODUCTION and, as a result, Poland is placed at the bottom of the ranking of the level of patients’ satisfaction with communication with The article focuses on the problem of the determinants of doctors [5,6].
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Keith Andrew Wailoo July 2013 Mailing Address
    Keith Andrew Wailoo July 2013 Mailing Address: Department of History 136 Dickinson Hall Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544-1017 phone: (609) 258-4960 e-mail: [email protected] EMPLOYMENT July 2013-present Princeton University Vice Dean Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs July 2010-present Princeton University Townsend Martin Professor of History and Public Affairs Department of History Program in History of Science Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Center for Health and Wellbeing Sept 09-Jun 2010 Princeton University, Visiting Professor Center for African-American Studies Program in History of Science Center for Health and Wellbeing July 2006-June 2010 Rutgers, State University of New Jersey – New Brunswick Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of History Department of History Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research July 2006-Dec2010 Founding Director, Center for Race and Ethnicity, Rutgers University (An academic unit spanning all disciplines in School of Arts and Sciences, as well as professional schools and campuses, reporting to Vice-President for Academic Affairs) July 2006-Jun2010 P2 (Distinguished Professor), Rutgers University 2006-2007 Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences – Stanford, CA June 2001- Rutgers, State University of New Jersey – New Brunswick June 2006 P1 (Full Professor) Dept. of History/Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research July 1998- Harvard University – Cambridge, MA June 1999 Visiting Professor Dept. of the History of Science/Department of Afro-American Studies 1 July 1992- University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, NC June 2001 Asst. Prof (1992-1997); Assoc Prof (1997-1999); Prof (1999-2001) Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine Department of History, Arts and Sciences EDUCATION 1992 Ph.D., Department of History and Sociology of Science (M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Sociology Newsletter
    Volume 46, Issue 1 Page 1 Medical Sociology Newsletter VOLUME 46, ISSUE 1 FALL 2009 A Publication of the Medical Sociology Section of the ASA NOTES FROM THE NEW CHAIR By William R. Avison I am extremely honored to serve as Chair of the Medical Sociology Section of the ASA. The history of this section is rich with outstanding examples of classic research and important debates that have had implications not only for sociological thinking but also for the health and well-being of our fellow citizens. Last year’s celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Medical Sociology Section that was so ably organized by Janet Hankin provided us with Reminders: the opportunity to take stock of advances in our shared area of sociological interest. The extra issue of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior, entitled What Do We Know? Key • MSN Winter Deadline: Findings from 50 Years of Medical Sociology, will provide us with a valuable record of the January 8, 2010 contributions that medical sociology has made to science and to policy. st • 2010 ASA Annual Meeting As the Section enters its 51 year, there continue to be challenges both new and enduring. I have planned the 2010 program in Atlanta around these issues. The explosion of August 14-17, Atlanta, Georgia research in genomics, genetics, and the biosciences raises numerous research questions for • 2011 ASA Annual Meeting medical sociologists. It seems timely for us to debate the role of medical sociology in the August 13-16, Chicago, Illinois genomics revolution. In all likelihood, there are diverse views on this and I hope to organize a session that will highlight these different perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Recipients of Asa Awards
    APPENDIX 133 APPENDIX 11: RECIPIENTS OF ASA AWARDS MacIver Award 1956 E. Franklin Frazier, The Black Bourgeoisie (Free Press, 1957) 1957 no award given 1958 Reinhard Bendix, Work and Authority in Industry (Wiley, 1956) 1959 August B. Hollingshead and Frederick C. Redlich, Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study (Wiley, 1958) 1960 no award given 1961 Erving Goffman, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday, 1959) 1962 Seymour Martin Lipset, Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics (Doubleday, 1960) 1963 Wilbert E. Moore, The Conduct of the Corporation (Random House, 1962) 1964 Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, The Political Systems of Empires (Free Press of Glencoe, 1963) 1965 William J. Goode, World Revolution and Family Patterns (Glencoe, 1963) 1966 John Porter, The Vertical Mosaic: An Analysis of Social Class and Power in Canada (University of Toronto, 1965) 1967 Kai T. Erikson, Wayward Puritans (Wiley, 1966) 1968 Barrington Moore, Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Beacon, 1966) Sorokin Award 1968 Peter M. Blau, Otis Dudley Duncan, and Andrea Tyree, The American Occupational Structure (Wiley, 1967) 1969 William A. Gamson, Power and Discontent (Dorsey, 1968) 1970 Arthur L. Stinchcombe, Constructing Social Theories (Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1968) 1971 Robert W. Friedrichs, A Sociology of Sociology; and Harrison C. White, Chains of Opportunity: Systems Models of Mobility in Organization (Free Press, 1970) 1972 Eliot Freidson, Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge (Dodd, Mead, 1970) 1973 no award given 1974 Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic, 1973); and Christopher Jencks, Inequality (Basic, 1972) 1975 Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World System (Academic Press, 1974) 1976 Jeffrey Paige, Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World (Free Press, 1975); and Robert Bellah, The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial (Seabury Press, 1975) 1977 Kai T.
    [Show full text]
  • Boys in White: Um Clássico Da Pesquisa Qualitativa Completa Cinquenta Anos
    Boys in white: um clássico da pesquisa qualitativa completa cinquenta anos NUNES, Everardo Duarte; BARROS, Nelson Filice de. Boys in white: um clássico da pesquisa qualitativa completa cinquenta anos. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, v.21, n.4, out.-dez. 2014, p.1179-1196. Resumo O artigo analisa o livro Boys in white: student culture in medical school, de Boys in white: um clássico Howard S. Becker, Blanche Geer, Everett C. Hughes e Anselm Strauss, considerado da pesquisa qualitativa um dos modelos de pesquisa qualitativa em sociologia. A análise aborda as completa cinquenta anos trajetórias dos autores, do livro, da pesquisa qualitativa e dos estudantes de medicina, enfatizando sua importância Boys in white: a classic of nas origens da sociologia médica e da sociologia da educação médica. Na qualitative research turns 50 trajetória dos autores são apresentados aspectos biobibliográficos; na da pesquisa qualitativa, o modo como essa metodologia de investigação atravessa a construção do trabalho de campo; e na dos estudantes, sua forma de atravessar os primeiros anos da escola médica e construir sua própria “cultura do estudante”. Palavras-chave: Boys in white; estudante de medicina; pesquisa qualitativa; sociologia médica; sociologia da educação médica. Abstract This article analyzes Boys in white: student culture in medical school by Howard S. Becker, Blanche Geer, Everett C. Hughes and Anselm Strauss, considered a model of qualitative research in sociology. Everardo Duarte Nunes The analysis investigates the trajectories of the authors, the book, qualitative analysis, Professor, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas/ Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp). and the medical students, emphasizing Rua Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 their importance in the origins of medical 13083-887 – Campinas – SP – Brasil sociology and the sociology of medical [email protected] education.
    [Show full text]
  • Society and the Balance of Professional Dominance, and Patient Autonomy in Medical Care
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 69 Issue 4 Article 12 Fall 1994 Society and the Balance of Professional Dominance, and Patient Autonomy in Medical Care Bernice A. Pescosolido Indiana University-Bloomington Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Pescosolido, Bernice A. (1994) "Society and the Balance of Professional Dominance, and Patient Autonomy in Medical Care," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 69 : Iss. 4 , Article 12. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol69/iss4/12 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Society and the Balance of Professional Dominance and Patient Autonomy in Medical Care BERNICE A. PESCOSOLIDO" Through "Bioethics with a Human Face" Carl Schneider crafts a lens to view in sharp and clear focus the nature of the bioethics' debate, the central linchpin of patient autonomy in these discussions, and the limits encountered when intellectual debates confront empirical reality in the world of medical decision-making.' As the end point to his arguments, Professor Schneider asserts that social, institutions inevitably shape the nature of future medical decisions; the fascination lies in exploring how particular social institutions will influence their specific character.2 This ending point presents my starting point, for it raises a paradox. How could the same set of social institutions, or perhaps better said, the same socio-historical context, produce two paradigms-biomedicine and bioethics-that so clearly oppose one another? The simple answer is an historical one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of Medical Technology and Bureaucracy: Implications for Medical Care
    The Growth of Medical Technology and Bureaucracy: Implications for Medical Care DAVID MECHANIC Center for Medical Sociology and Health Services Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison Despite significant differences in ideology, values, and social organization, most Western developed countries—and probably most countries in the world—face common problems of financing, organizing, and providing health care services. As populations in­ creasingly demand medical care, there is growing concern among the governments of most nations to provide a minimal level of ser­ vice to all and to decrease obvious inequalities in care. To use avail­ able technology and knowledge efficiently and effectively, certain organizational options are most desirable. Thus, there is a general tendency throughout the world to link existing services to defined population groups, to develop new and more economic ways to provide primary services to the population without too great an emphasis on technological efforts, to integrate services increasingly fragmented by specialization or a more elaborate division of labor, and to seek ways to improve the output of the delivery system with fixed inputs. Although all of these concerns to some extent charac­ terize national planning in underdeveloped countries, they par­ ticularly describe tendencies among developed countries as they at­ tempt to control the enormous costs of available technologies. Throughout the world there is increasing movement away from medicine as a solitary entrepreneurial activity and more emphasis on the effective development of health delivery systems. Having discussed these trends elsewhere in detail (Mechanic, 1974, 1976), what I will do here is examine how changing technology and organization affect not only the provision of medical care, but also the underlying assumptions of practitioners and patients.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Origin of the Illness Experience
    Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 2014, Vol 21, No 3, 654–660 www.aaem.pl REVIEW ARTICLE The social origin of the illness experience – an outline of problems Michał Skrzypek1,2 1 Chair of Sociology of Ethnic Groups and Civil Society, Institute of Sociology, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland 2 Independent Medical Sociology Unit, Medical University in Lublin, Poland Skrzypek M. The social origin of the illness experience – an outline of problems. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014; 21(3): 654–660. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1120619 Abstract Introduction and objective. The main research objective is a study of social influences on the processes of experiencing illness in the sociological meaning of the term ‘illness experience’ focusing attention on the subjective activity inspired by being ill, taking into account interpretive (meaning-making) activity. The goal of the analysis is to specify ‘social actors’ jointly creating the phenomena of ‘illness’ and ‘being ill’, taking into consideration the evolution of the position of medical sociology on this issue. Brief description of the state of knowledge. The ways of experiencing illness in contemporary society, including processes of creating the meanings of the phenomena of ‘illness’ and ‘being ill’, are the outcome of not only the application of biomedical knowledge, but are also parallelly a sociocultural ‘construct’ in the sense that they are under the impact of social and cultural influences. In the sociology of illness experience it is pointed out that illness experience develops in connection with experiencing somatic discomfort, this process occurring in the context of influences of culture, society and socially accepted norms and values.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Law in the Professionalisation of Paramedicine
    The Role of Law in the Professionalisation of Paramedicine in Australia Ruth Townsend LLB LLM A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University © Copyright by Ruth Townsend December 2017 All Rights Reserved ii Statement of Originality I certify that the thesis entitled, ‘The Role of the Law in the Professionalisation of Paramedicine in Australia,’ submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Australian National University is my own original work. Where reference is made to the work of others, due acknowledgement is given. I also certify that the material in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree or diploma at any university. Name: Ruth Townsend Signature: Date: December 2017 iii Acknowledgements I would not have been able to even think about undertaking this project if it wasn’t for the encouragement and support of some very special people. Thank you to my mum for giving me the gift of reading that has led to a lifelong love of learning, fostered my creativity and imagination, and allowed me to feel a sense of success and self-confidence in my abilities. Thanks dad for instilling in my a sense of social justice that has sparked a passion to try and make the world a better place even if it is in just a very small way. Thank you to my supervisors, Professor Tom Faunce, Associate Professor Michael Eburn, with whom I have worked closely on paramedic law matters for many years, and panel member Dr Dominique Dalla Pozza who have all offered me enormous support and shared their very limited and precious time, and great wisdom and intelligence with me so generously.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Eliot Freidson: Progression and Constraints in the Biography of an Intellectual
    História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos ISSN: 0104-5970 [email protected] Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasil Pereira Neto, André Eliot Freidson: progression and constraints in the biography of an intellectual História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos, vol. 16, núm. 4, octubre-diciembre, 2009, pp. 941-960 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=386138046006 Como citar este artigo Número completo Sistema de Informação Científica Mais artigos Rede de Revistas Científicas da América Latina, Caribe , Espanha e Portugal Home da revista no Redalyc Projeto acadêmico sem fins lucrativos desenvolvido no âmbito da iniciativa Acesso Aberto Eliot Freidson PEREIRA NETO, André. Eliot Freidson: progression and constraints in the biography of an intellectual. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, v.16, n.4, out.-dez. 2009, p.941-960. Abstract Eliot Freidson (1923-2005) is considered one of the founders of the sociology of medicine. Both his critics and admirers in the sociological and medical fields recognize his work as an Eliot Freidson: progression international benchmark. This paper analyzes Freidson’s intellectual and constraints in the biography without concentrating on his ideas or their transformation over biography of an the course of time. The emphasis is on the personal constraints that marked intellectual* his intellectual career within a broader context, with the many different opportunities and choices. It Eliot Freidson: progressão e establishes the intersection between the singular trajectory of an condicionamentos na intellectual, and the structures, processes and events in which he was biografia de um intelectual immersed and which he changed by his actions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Professional Dominance Perspective, Revisited
    The Professional Dominance Perspective, Revisited FREDRIC D. WOLINSKY Texas A&M University e t us b e g i n w i t h t w o q u e s t i o n s , w h o n o w reads Talcott Parsons (1951)? Who now reads Eliot Freidson (1970a)? The answer to both questions, as evidenced in part by thisL special issue of the Milhank Quarterly, is anyone and everyone who desires to understand either the role of health and health care in American society, or the American health care delivery system itself. The field of medical sociology was originally planted in chapter 10 of Parsons’s The Social System, and Freidson’s Profession o f Medicine is the river that has nourished it. Although the winds of time have altered the topography of the field and the course of the water has some new bends, those original maps are still quite serviceable. Indeed, it can be (and has been) argued that most of the medical sociological work done over the past several decades fundamentally amounts to debating, modifying, and filling in (with finer brushstrokes) the details of those original maps (see Fox 1979; Wolinsky 1988). The purpose of this essay, then, is to revisit the professional dominance perspective yet again. To do this, I have somewhat arbitrarily organized the essay into three major sections. The first part provides a brief review of the professional dominance perspective as originally presented by Freidson (1970a). (Although it was the Profession o f Medicine for which Freidson received the American Sociological Association’s most prestigious Sorokin Award, elements of the theory are also contained in Professional Dominance {1970b].) The second section begins with a The Milbank Quarterly, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the American Sociological Association 1981–2004
    A History of the American Sociological Association 1981–2004 AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION Washington, DC Copyright © 2005 by the American Sociological Association. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information stor- age or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cite as: Rosich, Katherine J. 2005. A History of the American Sociological Association, 1981–2004. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. For information: American Sociological Association 1307 New York Avenue NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005-4701 (202) 383-9005 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.asanet.org Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2005931388 ISBN 0-912764-43-0 Offi cers of the Association (2005) President Troy Duster Vice-President Caroline Hodges Persell Secretary Franklin D. Wilson Executive Offi cer Sally T. Hillsman Contents Preface . .vii Acknowledgments . .x Abbreviations . .xii Introduction: Scope and Nature of Presentation . xv Chapter 1: The 1980s: Critical Challenges and New Resolve . 1 1. Introduction . 1 Background and Context . 1 ASA Priorities in the 1980s . 2 2. ASA Membership Trends and Fiscal Status . 3 Membership . 3 Budgets and Fiscal Policies . 5 3. The Executive Offi ce (EO) . 6 Transitions and Reorganization . 6 Application of New Information Technologies (IT) . 8 4. Governance: Constitution/Bylaws Changes and Council Policymaking . 9 The ASA Constitution and Bylaws . 9 Code of Ethics . 10 Amicus Briefs . 11 Awards Policy . 12 Member Resolutions . 12 5. Governance: Structural Changes . 13 ASA Sections . 13 Committee on Freedom of Research and Teaching (COFRAT) .
    [Show full text]