Evolutionary History of the Metazoa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolutionary History of the Metazoa If we make the time animals have Evolutionary History existed to be 1 day, humans have of the Metazoa been around for 61 seconds. Pushing back the origin of animals Mysteries of ancient animal life Oldest traces of animals: ~ 645 mya: 24- isopropylcholestane (2009) Goals: Consider the central questions Oldest animals sponges, ~650 mya about the origin of Metazoa. (Science Daily, 2010) Review modern evidence about time of origin, patterns of evolution, important processes. “ ” Outline for History of Life Meteorites bombard the planet 4.6-3.8 bya Making it inhabitable I. Cambrian Explosion Earth formed 4.5 bya 4.6 bya 1st evidence of life 4 bya II. What we knew 15 yrs ago Fossil b-g algae 3.6 bya III. More Recent Discoveries 3 bya 2.5 bya A. New Fossil Discoveries First cells 2.0 bya First multicelled algae 1.5 bya B. Molecular Dating with nucleus IV. Some explanations for deep divergence 1.0 bya Cambrian Period V. Why so many body plans in Cambrian? Precambrian, 4.6 bya 543-510 mya To 543 mya 600 mya 543 500 mya 400 Source Newsweek Biology’s “Big Bang”: The Cambrian Fauna (543-510 mya) In Burgess Shale alone, 15 of the 33 modern phyla are recognized n = 40,000 Astonishing array of And many Multicellular life. All More! Modern phyla present. Also 19 unique body forms of Unknown affinity Cambrian Explosion Cambrian deposits known since 1909 from >34 locations including the U.S.A., Russia, China, Canada Morris 1989 1 Summary: ~ 15 years ago ’ • Enigmatic Ediacaran assemblage (565 mya), many of Darwin s Dilemma which apparently never survived to the Cambrian • A 20 my gap in the fossil record before the Cambrian Why did the Cambrian Fauna present a challenge to the Darwinian view of Evolution? • Cambrian explosion of body plans Skeletized How did Darwin and his contemporary evolutionists fauna respond to this criticism? All Modern phyla present and many other types that did not survive. Why does Sukumaran argue that in evaluating the Cambrian explosion it is important to recognize that the difference between the concepts of diversity and disparity ? Artist’s rendition of Vendian assemblage Different Views on the Exact Nature as primitive multicelled animals (565 mya) of the Vendian assemblage: 1946: Martin Glaessner, an Australian paleontologist called them simple soft bodied animals related to jellyfish, corals, segmented worms 1983: German biologist Adolf Seilacher believed they were giant single celled organisms; their own kingdom of life; a failed experiment 1995: Gregory Retalack, Univ. of Oregon, argues they are ancient lichens (structural expts). 2008: Xiao and Laflamme….biota of protists, fungi, algae, and metazoa, but there is growing evidence that among the 100 or so disparate species there were also a few bilateria. Outline for “History of Life” A. Dating Techniques 1995: Groetzinger et. al . (Physical Chemistry) I. Cambrian Explosion II. What we knew 15 yrs ago Precise lead and zircon dating of Vendian-Cambrian boundaries III. More Recent Discoveries “bridges” the 20 my gap. A. New Fossil Discoveries Some Vendian species survive to the Cambrian; transitional rocks B. Molecular Dating between Vendian and Cambrian explosion bear traces of Ediacara IV. Some explanations for deep divergence metazoan life gaining momentum. Fauna V. Why so many body plans in Cambrian? 2 A. New Fossil Discoveries: Diploblasts Stromatoveris from early Cambrian Modern Comb Jelly Is strikingly similar to Pre-Cambrian Fronds A. New Fossil Discoveries Phosphatized remains 1997-98 Li et. al. & Xiao et al. Report finding multicellular sponges, and embryos of various phyla in 570 + 20 mya formation. Prof. Shuhai Xiao, Virginia Tech Univ. Review Trends in Ecology and Evolution Vol.24 No.1 The phylogenetic uncertainty of Ediacara organisms not Emphasis is restricted to classical Ediacara fossils that only limits their role in testing hypotheses about the tempo are soft bodied, macroscopic and morphologically diverse. of early animal evolution but also compromises our ability to interpret their ecology using modern analogs. Fortu- The Ediacara biota in space and time nately, ecological inferences can be independently made on Ediacara fossils are mostly restricted between 575 and the basis of trace fossils, functional morphology and taph- 541 Ma (Figure 1; Box 1). Discoid fossils from the onomy. In the past decade, investigation of trace fossils >635 Ma Twitya Formation in northwestern Canada associated with Ediacara body fossils has shed important [12] are similar to some simple forms in the Ediacara biota, light on the autecology of several Ediacara taxa, whereas but the absence of co-occurring complex forms and their recent advances in the paleoecology of Ediacara organisms significantly older age suggest that the Twitya discs are [9] are of close relevance to the evolutionary radiation in possibly simple forerunners rather than parts (e.g. hold- the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition. fasts) of complex Ediacara fossils. A few Cambrian fossils The Ediacaran–Cambrian transition marks a rapid are interpreted as Ediacara survivors or as phyletic des- change in taxonomic diversity, morphological disparity cendants [13,14], but with rare exceptions [14] the most and ecosystem complexity of early animals. Does the early iconic members of the Ediacara biota – the rangeomorphs Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on 24 August 2009 evolution of the Ediacara biota share similar patterns with and erniettomorphs (Box 2), for example – are unknown in the Cambrian radiation of animals? Only recently have the Cambrian. It has been proposed that the demise of the Earliest fossil record of animals G. E. Budd 1427 paleontologists begun to approach this question using Ediacara biota might be due to the closure of a unique quantitativeClosing methods and a growing databasethe of Ediacara 20taphonomic my window mediatedGap by microbial activities fossils [10,11]. [4,15], and that the Ediacara biota continued to strive after Ordovician (part) The Ediacara fauna bridges the evolution of Promising results from emerging research of the phylo- the Cambrian radiation but were simply not preserved. 490 genic affinities, ecological diversity and evolutionary pat- However, the scarcity of Ediacara fossils in exceptionally Upper terns of theXiao Ediacara biota promptand this review.Laflamme Thus, we preserved Cambrian 2008: biota such as the Burgess Shale [16] 500 Cambrian will begin with a brief description of the spatial–temporal points to a more likely scenario of extinction or at least Middle multicellular life leading to the Cambrian fauna distribution and bodyplan diversity of the Ediacara biota, ecological restriction [2]. 510 Burgess Shale Cambrian Review Trends in Ecology and Evolution Vol.24 No.1 followed by a“On review of recent the advances ineve the phylogenetic, of animalThe restricted temporal radiation..” distribution is in contrast with preservation paleoecological and evolutionary analyses of this biota. a wide spatial distribution of the Ediacara biota. Ediacara 520 8 Lower 530 Cambrian 4 1 6 540 7 3 550 560 5 E 570 Figure 2. The Ediacaran acanthomorphic acritarch Tanarium pluriprotensum from the Tanana Formation, in the Giles 1 580 D drillcore, Officer Basin, Australia; 100!. At least some Gaskiers glaciation Precambrian acanthomorphic acritarchs may be the eggs of 590 animals. Courtesy of S. Willman. Ediacaran interval formative only in the upper part of the Doushantuo Fm, it ranges 600 2 C down to very close to the base, and thus to 630 Myr ago 610 or so. The claim would be that the oldest animal fossils of the Doushantuo Fm, dating back to just after the 620 Nantuo glaciation (i.e. the Chinese glacial deposits normally correlated with the Marinoan) are of this age, 630 a time that predates the first Ediacaran fossils by some B Marinoan glaciation 60 Myr, as well as the more conservative molecular 640 clock estimates for the divergence of the bilaterians. Despite the obvious uncertainties, the most reason- 650 able interpretation of the data thus is that embryo- forming animals of some sort had evolved by just after 660 A Marinoan time, and that sponges and presumed other animals had started to emerge by 580 Myr ago at the Figure 1. Provisional time scale for events around the latest, and that the Ediacaran biotas are likely to be a Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. 1, range of large, acantho- little younger than the Doushantuo embryos. The morphic‘Ediacaran’acritarchs (a genus thatcontains metazoan- upshot of the new data is that considerably more like embryos is found from close to the bottom of their range just above the Marinoan glaciation rocks); 2, possible range of the convincing evidence exists in the fossil record for an Figure 1. Temporal distribution (bars) and stratigraphic occurrences (black dots) of representative Ediacara genera, plotted against timescale of Ediacaran Period and fossil origin of the animals considerably before the Cambrian localities or stratigraphic units. The three Ediacara assemblages (Box 1) are indicated by different shades of gray. The Marinoan and Gaskiers glaciations, as well as the age Doushantuo embryos and cnidarian-like fossils according to range of the Doushantuo biota, are also marked. Modified from Ref. [58] with permission from the AAAS. Barfod et al. (2002);3,possiblerangeofthesameaccordingto than it did 10 years ago (Budd & Jensen 2000), with an Condon et al. (2005) (which is correct is uncertain, but the inferred documented fossil origin of the entire clade Figure 2. Possible phylogenetic placement of bilateral Ediacara fossils (vendomorphs, parvancorinomorphs, Yorgia, Kimberella and Dickinsonia), tri-, tetra-, penta- and 32 former is favoured here); 4, the ‘Ediacaran’ biota; 5, trace being datable to just after 635 Myr ago—a significant octoradial forms, and rangeomorphs in the metazoan tree. The diverse array of morphological constructions exemplified by the Ediacara biota suggests a greater fossils; 6, Cloudina and Namacalathus;7,classicalsmallshell result (see figure 2 for summary). phylogenetic diversity than typically assumed.
Recommended publications
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history This timeline of natural history summarizes significant geological and Life timeline Ice Ages biological events from the formation of the 0 — Primates Quater nary Flowers ←Earliest apes Earth to the arrival of modern humans. P Birds h Mammals – Plants Dinosaurs Times are listed in millions of years, or Karo o a n ← Andean Tetrapoda megaanni (Ma). -50 0 — e Arthropods Molluscs r ←Cambrian explosion o ← Cryoge nian Ediacara biota – z ←Earliest animals o ←Earliest plants i Multicellular -1000 — c Contents life ←Sexual reproduction Dating of the Geologic record – P r The earliest Solar System -1500 — o t Precambrian Supereon – e r Eukaryotes Hadean Eon o -2000 — z o Archean Eon i Huron ian – c Eoarchean Era ←Oxygen crisis Paleoarchean Era -2500 — ←Atmospheric oxygen Mesoarchean Era – Photosynthesis Neoarchean Era Pong ola Proterozoic Eon -3000 — A r Paleoproterozoic Era c – h Siderian Period e a Rhyacian Period -3500 — n ←Earliest oxygen Orosirian Period Single-celled – life Statherian Period -4000 — ←Earliest life Mesoproterozoic Era H Calymmian Period a water – d e Ectasian Period a ←Earliest water Stenian Period -4500 — n ←Earth (−4540) (million years ago) Clickable Neoproterozoic Era ( Tonian Period Cryogenian Period Ediacaran Period Phanerozoic Eon Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period Ordovician Period Silurian Period Devonian Period Carboniferous Period Permian Period Mesozoic Era Triassic Period Jurassic Period Cretaceous Period Cenozoic Era Paleogene Period Neogene Period Quaternary Period Etymology of period names References See also External links Dating of the Geologic record The Geologic record is the strata (layers) of rock in the planet's crust and the science of geology is much concerned with the age and origin of all rocks to determine the history and formation of Earth and to understand the forces that have acted upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Chordates (Phylum Chordata)
    A short story Leathem Mehaffey, III, Fall 201993 The First Chordates (Phylum Chordata) • Chordates (our phylum) first appeared in the Cambrian, 525MYA. 94 Invertebrates, Chordates and Vertebrates • Invertebrates are all animals not chordates • Generally invertebrates, if they have hearts, have dorsal hearts; if they have a nervous system it is usually ventral. • All vertebrates are chordates, but not all chordates are vertebrates. • Chordates: • Dorsal notochord • Dorsal nerve chord • Ventral heart • Post-anal tail • Vertebrates: Amphioxus: archetypal chordate • Dorsal spinal column (articulated) and skeleton 95 Origin of the Chordates 96 Haikouichthys Myllokunmingia Note the rounded extension to Possibly the oldest the head bearing sensory vertebrate: showed gill organs bars and primitive vertebral elements Early and primitive agnathan vertebrates of the Early Cambrian (530MYA) Pikaia Note: these organisms were less Primitive chordate, than an inch long. similar to Amphioxus 97 The Cambrian/Ordovician Extinction • Somewhere around 488 million years ago something happened to cause a change in the fauna of the earth, heralding the beginning of the Ordovician Period. • Rather than one catastrophe, the late-Cambrian extinction seems to be a series of smaller extinction events. • Historically the change in fauna (mostly trilobites as the index species) was thought to be due to excessive warmth and low oxygen. • But some current findings point to an oxygen spike due perhaps to continental drift into the tropics, driving rapid speciation and consequent replacement of old with new organisms. 98 Welcome to the Ordovician YOU ARE HERE 99 The Ordovician Sea, 488 million years 100 ago The Ordovician Period lasted almost 45 million years, from 489 to 444 MYA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Paleontological Perspective of Vertebrate Origin
    http://www.paper.edu.cn Chinese Science Bulletin 2003 Vol. 48 No. 8 725-735 Cover: The earliest-known and most primitive vertebrates on the A paleontological perspective Earth---Myllokunmingia fengjiaoa , (upper) Zhongjianichthys rostratus of vertebrate origin ( middle ), Haikouichthys ercaicunensis (lower left and lower right). They were SHU Degan Early Life Institute & Department of Geology, Northwest products of the early Cambrian Explosion, University, Xi’an, 710069, China; School of Earth excavated from the famous Chengjiang Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, China Lagersttat, which was formed in the (e-mail:[email protected]) eastern Yunnan about 530 millions of years ago. These ancestral vertebrates not only Abstract The Early Cambrian Haikouichthys and Haikouella have been claimed to be related to contribute in an important developed primitive separate vertebral way to our understanding of vertebrate origin, but there have elements, but also possessed principal been heated debates about how exactly they are to be interpreted. New discoveries of numerous specimens of sensory organs, including a pair of large Haikouichthys not only confirm the identity of previously lateral eyes, nostril with nasal sacs, then described structures such as the dorsal and the ventral fins, and chevron-shaped myomeres, but also reveal many new had led to the transition from acraniates to important characteristics, including sensory organs of the head craniates (true vertebrates). The (e.g. large eyes), and a prominent notochord with differentiated vertebral elements. This “first fish” appears, discoveries of these “naked” agnathans however, to retain primitive reproductive features of have pushed the earliest record of acraniates, suggesting that it is a stem-group craniates.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Innovations
    Perspective Vertebrate innovations Sebastian M. Shimeld* and Peter W. H. Holland* School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AJ, United Kingdom Vertebrate innovations include neural crest cells and their derivatives, neurogenic placodes, an elaborate segmented brain, endoskeleton, and an increase in the number of genes in the genome. Comparative molecular and developmental data give new insights into the evolutionary origins of these characteristics and the complexity of the vertebrate body. ll chordates, at some stage in their life of both amphioxus (5) and ascidian (6) minded specifically disrupts an early mi- Acycle, possess a hollow neural tube embryos, although the expression pattern grating cell population that contributes to dorsal to a notochord, plus lateral muscle differs in detail between taxa. Lateral spinal ganglia, without affecting later- blocks. These characters unite tunicates (in- neural plate cells in amphioxus embryos migrating neural crest cells (13). Further- cluding ascidians), amphioxus, and verte- express members of the Msx (7), more, this mutant also affects Rohon- brates in the phylum Chordata. Compara- slug͞snail (8), and Distalless (9) gene Beard cells; these are not considered to be tive molecular and developmental analyses families whereas the latter gene is also neural crest derivatives but are a dorsal have refined this anatomical picture, sug- expressed in ectoderm adjacent to (and neural population of cells involved in gesting that the neural tube of the
    [Show full text]
  • Head and Backbone of the Early Cambrian
    _________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn letters to nature 12. Bokelmann, G. H. R. & Harjes, H.-P. Evidence for temporal variation of seismic velocity within the upper continental crust. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 23879–23894 (2000). 13. Ratdomopurbo, A. & Poupinet, G. Monitoring a temporal change of seismic velocity in a volcano: Application to the 1992 eruption of Mt. Merapi (Indonesia). Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 775–778 (1995). 14. Hill, D. P. et al. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake. Science 260, 1617–1623 (1993). 15. Brodsky, E., Karakostas, V. & Kanamori, H. A new observation of dynamically triggered regional seismicity: earthquakes in Greece following the August, 1999 Izmit, Turkey earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2741–2744 (2000). 16. Knopoff, L., Levshina, T., Keilis-Borok, V. I. & Mattoni, C. Increased long-range intermediate- magnitude earthquake activity prior to strong earthquakes in California. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 5779–5796 (1996). 17. Bowman, D. D. & King, G. G. C. P. Accelerating seismicity and stress accumulation before large earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4039–4042 (2001). 18. Price, E. & Sandwell, D. T. Small-scale deformations associated with the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake mapped by synthetic aperture radar interferometry. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 27001–27016 (1998). 19. Fialko, Y., Simons, M. & Agnew, D. The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral region of the 1999 Mw7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, southern California, from space geodetic observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 3063–3066 (2001). Figure 4 Model of velocity as a function of time owing to damage from the Landers 20. Kilb, D., Gomberg, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Lack of Support for Deuterostomia Prompts Reinterpretation of the First Bilateria. Authors and Affiliations Paschalia Kapli1, Pa
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.182915; this version posted July 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Lack of support for Deuterostomia prompts reinterpretation of the first Bilateria. 2 3 Authors and Affiliations 4 Paschalia Kapli1, Paschalis Natsidis1, Daniel J. Leite1, Maximilian Fursman1,&, Nadia Jeffrie1, 5 Imran A. Rahman2, Hervé Philippe3, Richard R. Copley4, Maximilian J. Telford1* 6 7 1. Centre for Life’s Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, 8 University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK 9 10 2. Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK 11 3. Station d’Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UMR CNRS 5321, Université Paul Sabatier, 12 09200 Moulis, France 13 4. Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Sorbonne 14 Université, CNRS, 06230 Villefranche-sur-mer, France 15 & Current Address: Geology and Palaeoenvironmental Research Department, Institute of 16 Geosciences, Goethe University Frankfurt - Riedberg Campus, Altenhöferallee 1, 60438 17 Frankfurt am Main 18 19 20 21 22 23 *Correspondence: [email protected]. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.182915; this version posted July 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/29/2021 09:36:32AM Via Free Access 318 Cotoras & Allende – Origin of Fin Developmental Program
    Contributions to Zoology, 84 (4) 317-328 (2015) Was the tail bud the ancestral centre where the fin developmental program evolved in chordates? Darko D. Cotoras1, 2, 3, Miguel L. Allende1 1 FONDAP Center for Genome Regulation, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile 2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 3 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: Archipterygium hypothesis, co-option, fin fold hypothesis, limb bud Abstract phologists proposed two explanations for the origin of the limbs/fins: The ‘Archipterygium Hypothesis’ and The structural origin of the vertebrates’ paired limbs is still an the ‘Fin Fold Hypothesis’ (both reviewed by Cole and unsolved problem. Historically, two hypotheses have been raised Currie, 2007). Later, it was suggested that the extremi- to explain the origin of vertebrate limbs: the Archipterygium ties were related with side folds in the Cambrian verte- Hypothesis and the Fin Fold Hypothesis. Current knowledge Myllokunmingia Haikouichthys provides support for both ideas. In the recent years, it has been brates and . This has also suggested that (1) all appendages correspond to body axis been rejected due to lack of evidence of a skeletal and duplications and (2) they are originated by the ventralization of muscular support, which are the distinctive features of the developmental program present in the median fins. The tail true limbs (Coates, 2003). bud is also a relevant structure in the attempt to understand the The oldest known paired fin-like appendages were origin of the vertebrates’ limbs. Due to their similarities in gene expression and general organization, both structures should be present in the jawless Thelodonta, however it is not studied more closely to understand their potential evolutionary obvious they had an endoskeletal support (Coates link.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 34 Vertebrates
    Chapter 34 Vertebrates Lecture Outline Overview: Half a Billion Years of Backbones • In the early Cambrian period, 540 million years ago, slender 3-cm-long animals swam in the oceans. • These animals lacked armor and appendages, but they left behind a remarkable legacy. • They were the ancestors of the vertebrates, one of the most successful groups of animals ever to swim, walk, slither, or fly. • Vertebrates derive their name from vertebrae, the series of bones that make up the vertebral column, or backbone. • For nearly 200 million years, vertebrates were restricted to the oceans, but about 360 million years ago, the evolution of limbs in one lineage of vertebrates set the stage for these vertebrates to colonize land. ○ On land, vertebrates diversified into amphibians, reptiles (including birds), and mammals. • There are about 52,000 species of vertebrates, far fewer than the 1 million insect species on Earth. • What vertebrates lack in species diversity, however, they make up for in disparity. ○ Plant-eating dinosaurs, at 40,000 kg, were the heaviest animals to walk on land. ○ The biggest animal that ever existed is the blue whale, at 100,000 kg. ○ A fish discovered in 2004 is only 8.4 mm long and has a mass roughly 100 billion times smaller than that of a blue whale. Concept 34.1 Chordates have a notochord and a dorsal, hollow nerve cord. • Vertebrates belong to one of the two major phyla in the Deuterostomia, the chordates. • Chordates are bilaterian animals belonging to the Deuterostomia clade. ○ Two phyla of invertebrate deuterostomes—the urochordates and the cephalochordates—are most closely related to the vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Vertebrates
    Vertebrates Chapter 34 • Objectives • List the derived traits for: chordates, craniates, vertebrates, gnathostomes, tetrapods, amniotes, birds, mammals, primates, humans • Explain what Haikouella and Myllokunmingia tell us about craniate evolution • Describe the trends in mineralized structures in early vertebrates • Describe and distinguish between Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes, noting the main traits of each group • Define and distinguish among gnathostomes, tetrapods, and amniotes 2 • Describe an amniotic egg and explain its significance in the evolution of reptiles and mammals • Explain why the reptile clade includes birds • Explain the significance of Archaeopteryx • Distinguish among monotreme, marsupial, and eutherian mammals • Define the term hominin • Describe the evolution of Homo sapiens from australopith ancestors, and clarify the order in which distinctive human traits arose • Explain the significance of the FOXP2 gene 3 1 Introduction • Half a Billion Years of Backbones – By the end of the Cambrian period, some 540 million years ago an astonishing variety of animals inhabited Earth’s oceans – One of these types of animals gave rise to vertebrates, one of the most successful groups of animals 4 • The animals called vertebrates get their name from vertebrae, the series of bones that make up the backbone • There are approximately 52,000 species of vertebrates which include the largest organisms ever to live on the Earth 6 2 Chordates have a notochord and a dorsal, hollow nerve cord • Vertebrates are a subphylum of the phylum
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of the Cretaceous Frog Beelzebufo from Madagascar and the Placement of Fossil Constraints Based on Temporal and Phylogenetic Evidence
    doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02164.x Phylogenetic relationships of the Cretaceous frog Beelzebufo from Madagascar and the placement of fossil constraints based on temporal and phylogenetic evidence S. RUANE* ,R.A.PYRONà & F. T. BURBRINK* *Department of Biology, The College of Staten Island, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA Department of Biology, The Graduate School and University Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA àDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA Keywords: Abstract Beelzebufo; The placement of fossil calibrations is ideally based on the phylogenetic Ceratophrys; analysis of extinct taxa. Another source of information is the temporal dating error; variance for a given clade implied by a particular constraint when combined divergence time estimation; with other, well-supported calibrations. For example, the frog Beelzebufo fossil calibration; ampinga from the Cretaceous of Madagascar has been hypothesized to be a Gondwanaland; crown-group member of the New World subfamily Ceratophryinae, which Madagascar. would support a Late Cretaceous connection with South America. However, phylogenetic analyses and molecular divergence time estimates based on other fossils do not support this placement. We derive a metric, Dt, to quantify temporal divergence among chronograms and find that errors resulting from mis-specified calibrations are localized when additional nodes throughout the tree are properly calibrated. The use of temporal information from molecular data can further assist in testing phylogenetic hypotheses regarding the placement of extinct taxa. Estimating the ages of clades by integrating fossil data supported constraints placed throughout the tree. Using and molecular phylogenies has become commonplace other calibrations, one can predict the age of the targeted and expands the range of evolutionary hypotheses that node for the uncertain fossil.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Origin of Vertebrate Body Plan: Insights from the Endoderm Using the Hourglass Model
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Veterinary & Animal Sciences Department Faculty Publication Series Veterinary & Animal Sciences 2020 On the origin of vertebrate body plan: Insights from the endoderm using the hourglass model Chunpeng He Tingyu Han Xin Liao Rui Guan J.-Y. Chen See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/vasci_faculty_pubs Authors Chunpeng He, Tingyu Han, Xin Liao, Rui Guan, J.-Y. Chen, Kimberly D. Tremblay, and Zuhong Lu Gene Expression Patterns 37 (2020) 119125 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Gene Expression Patterns journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gep On the origin of vertebrate body plan: Insights from the endoderm using the hourglass model Chunpeng He a,*,1, Tingyu Han a,1, Xin Liao b, Rui Guan a, J.-Y. Chen c,**, Kimberly D. Tremblay d,***, Zuhong Lu a,**** a State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China b Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Guangxi Mangrove Research Center, Guangxi Key Lab of Mangrove Conservation and Utilization, Beihai, 536000, China c Nanjing Institute of Paleontology and Geology, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China d Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 661 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The vertebrate body plan is thought to be derived during the early Cambrian from a worm-like chordate ancestor. Chordata While all three germ layers were clearly involved in this innovation, the role of the endoderm remains elusive. Vertebrata According to the hourglass model, the optimal window for investigating the evolution of vertebrate endoderm- Endoderm derived structures during cephalochordate development is from the Spemann’s organizer stage to the opening of Hourglass model the mouth (Stages 1–7, described herein).
    [Show full text]
  • Head and Backbone of the Early Cambrian Vertebrate Haikouichthys
    letters to nature 12. Bokelmann, G. H. R. & Harjes, H.-P. Evidence for temporal variation of seismic velocity within the upper continental crust. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 23879–23894 (2000). 13. Ratdomopurbo, A. & Poupinet, G. Monitoring a temporal change of seismic velocity in a volcano: Application to the 1992 eruption of Mt. Merapi (Indonesia). Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 775–778 (1995). 14. Hill, D. P. et al. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake. Science 260, 1617–1623 (1993). 15. Brodsky, E., Karakostas, V. & Kanamori, H. A new observation of dynamically triggered regional seismicity: earthquakes in Greece following the August, 1999 Izmit, Turkey earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2741–2744 (2000). 16. Knopoff, L., Levshina, T., Keilis-Borok, V. I. & Mattoni, C. Increased long-range intermediate- magnitude earthquake activity prior to strong earthquakes in California. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 5779–5796 (1996). 17. Bowman, D. D. & King, G. G. C. P. Accelerating seismicity and stress accumulation before large earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4039–4042 (2001). 18. Price, E. & Sandwell, D. T. Small-scale deformations associated with the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake mapped by synthetic aperture radar interferometry. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 27001–27016 (1998). 19. Fialko, Y., Simons, M. & Agnew, D. The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral region of the 1999 Mw7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, southern California, from space geodetic observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 3063–3066 (2001). Figure 4 Model of velocity as a function of time owing to damage from the Landers 20. Kilb, D., Gomberg, J. & Bodin, P.
    [Show full text]