BAYLOR UNIVERSITY Appointment of First Holder of J. Newton Rayzor Sr
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2016-07 SMV-Project-Enewsletter
SMV Project e-Newsletter 06 (July 2016) View this email in your browser SELF, MOTIVATION & VIRTUE PROJECT NEWS IN THIS ISSUE LEAD ARTICLE: Turning Points: Finding Experiential Forks in the Path to Wisdom and Virtues, by Howard Nusbaum, Ph.D. SPOTLIGHT: 2016 Self, Motivation & Virtue Conference MEET OUR RESEARCHERS: Featuring Dr. Warren Herold and Dr. Walter Sowden RECENT PUBLICATIONS & NEWS SMV LEADERSHIP TEAM ~ RECENT PUBS & PRESENTATIONS TURNING POINTS: FINDING EXPERIENTIAL FORKS IN THE PATH TO WISDOM AND VIRTUES By Howard Nusbaum, Ph.D. Dr. Nusbaum is the Director of the Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom, Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Chicago and a member of the Committee on Computational Neuroscience. He is also a Fellow of the Association for Psychological Science and the Psychonomic Society and has served as Associate Editor for the journal Brain and Language and the journal PLoS One, as well as serving on the editorial board of Heliyon. People often believe that, by adulthood, the psychology of the way they think, feel, believe, and act is set in stone–that an adult’s personality cannot really change. In part, this may be why people think that wisdom is something unattainable because they think you are either wise or you are not. Wisdom is not just what you know but the way in which you use what you know. However, research at the Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom (wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu) has focused on studying wisdom in the context of Aristotelian phronesis or practical wisdom: When faced with certain situations, is it possible to make a wiser decision, a decision that will increase human flourishing? If so, what can help someone make a wiser decision? Sir John Templeton said that wisdom cannot be taught. -
Arbeitsberichte 235 WHAT I COULDN't DO at HOME
WHAT I COULDN’T DO AT HOME CANDACE A. VOGLER Candace Vogler took her Bachelor’s degree at Mills College (1985) and earned her doctor- ate in Philosophy (1994) and her doctoral certification in English Literature and Cultural Studies (1992) at the University of Pittsburgh. She joined the Department of Philosophy at the University of Chicago in 1992, became an Associate Professor in 2000, and a Professor in 2007. From 2000 to 2007, she co-directed the Master of Arts Program for the University of Chicago Humanities Division. She is the author of John Stuart Mill’s Deliberative Land- scape (Routlege, 2001) and Reasonably Vicious (Harvard, 2002). She works in ethics, social and political philosophy, sexuality and gender studies, psychoanalysis, Marxism, and phi- losophy and literature. – Address: Department of Philosophy, The University of Chicago, 1010 E. 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. E-mail: [email protected] I have had two careers in the States since completing my doctoral work and joining the Philosophy faculty at the University of Chicago. I work in Anglophone analytic philoso- phy. I also work in literary theory and cultural studies. The structure of the North Amer- ican Anglophone academy is such that these careers are almost completely distinct. Ana- lytic philosophers do not normally read Lacan, say, or Marx, or Freud. Hegel and Heidegger are a bit of a stretch for them. And when analytic philosophers do read outside the boundaries of their chosen sub-disciplines, they read as though everyone of philosoph- ical interest was setting out to do analytic philosophy (it’s just that most of them do it very badly). -
Curriculum Vitae Candace A. Vogler Department of Philosophy the University of Chicago 1115 East 58Th Street Chicago, IL 60637
Curriculum Vitae Candace A. Vogler Department of Philosophy The University of Chicago 1115 East 58th Street Chicago, IL 60637 Academic Appointments David B. and Clara E. Stern Professor of Philosophy, University of Chicago Chair of Virtue Theory, Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues & Fellow, Royal Institute of Philosophy, May 2018-May 2021 Fulbright Distinguished Visiting Professor, University of Notre Dame Australia, August- September 2017 Chair, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2011-2014 Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2007-2010 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2000-2007 Co-Director, Masters of Arts Program in the Humanities, University of Chicago, 2000-2007 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 1994-2000 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 1992-1994 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of California, Los Angeles, 1992 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, 1991 Instructor, Department of Philosophy, Chatham College, 1989 Teaching Fellow, Department of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 1988-1990 Education University of Pittsburgh (1985-1992), Ph.D., Philosophy, 1994 Ph.D. certificate, Program for the Study of Culture, 1992 Mills College (1978-1981; 1984-1985), B.A. in Philosophy, Honors, 1985 Fellowships and Awards Fulbright Specialist World Learning Roster (2017-present) Distinguished Visiting Faculty, Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, University -
Towards an Aristotelian Theory of Care
The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2019 Towards an Aristotelian Theory of care: A comparison of Neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics with feminist ethics of care, and the fundaments of a virtue ethical theory of care Steven Steyl Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Philosophy Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Towards an Aristotelian Theory of Care A Comparison of Neo-Aristotelian Virtue Ethics with Feminist Ethics of Care, and the Fundaments of a Virtue Ethical Theory of Care Steven Steyl A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy and Theology at the University of Notre Dame Australia, July 2019 Declaration To the best of the candidate’s knowledge, this thesis contains no material previously published by another person, except where due acknowledgement has been made. This thesis is the candidate’s own work and contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any institution. Signature: Steven Steyl 25 July 2019 Abstract The intersection between virtue and care ethics is underexplored in contemporary moral philosophy. -
Recommended Text the Solar Calendar Part 3 of 3
POSTSCRIPT: THE PRACTICE OF ETHICS Delivered with slides almost exactly as written, March 12, 2009, at Case Western Reserve University. Nour, 2008. 266 POSTSCRIPT The point of this talk is not to school you in the practice of ethics, but to raise questions about the practice of eth- ics. There is a standard picture of the practice of ethics that goes like this: Ethical theory is done in a classroom. It is divided into nor- mative theory, meta-ethics, and descriptive ethics. Students learn to see how the ethics in their society and community works; they learn how to discover true ethical beliefs and sometimes discover them during class. Through meta-ethics, they understand what it is to have an ethical belief. Then — and here comes the practice part — they go out and practice ethics. In this picture, the domain of ethics is the domain of everyday life, and academic life has the role of provid- ing the theory of everyday life, in this case, the theory of ethics. The point, then, is to apply what you learn in the classroom. The school is the think-tank for your world. Of course, the expression “ethics” is equivocal, and can be a field of study, rather than the domain of what we should do and how we should live. In the first picture, we focused on a meaning of the word1 “ethics” that comes up when we speak of someone being ethical or unethical. When we do speak of someone being ethical, we mean that her ethics are solid: she is, for instance, a good per- son, does the right thing, and so on. -
The University of Chicago Freedom a Dissertation
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO FREEDOM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY BY PASCAL BRIXEL CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2020 © 2020 Pascal Brixel All rights reserved For my parents TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. v Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... viii Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter I. Is Freedom One or Many? ...................................................................................... 15 Chapter II. Kantianism, Moralism, and Psychologism ......................................................... 53 Chapter III. Freedom as Activity for Its Own Sake ............................................................... 94 Chapter IV. Coercion and Exploitation ................................................................................. 135 Chapter V. Toil .......................................................................................................................... 198 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... -
The Philosophy of Action in Live Performance Interaction Design: Aligning Flows of Intentionality
THE PHILOSOPHY OF ACTION IN LIVE PERFORMANCE INTERACTION DESIGN: ALIGNING FLOWS OF INTENTIONALITY by David J. Wright B.A. English and Theatre, Belhaven University, 2002 M.A. Philosophy of Religion and Ethics, BIOLA University, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by David J. Wright It was defended on May 11, 2015 and approved by Brett Ashley Crawford, Assistant Teaching Professor, Arts Management, Carnegie Mellon University Heinz School of Public Policy and Management Ryan McDermott, Assistant Professor, English & Theatre Arts Jennifer Waldron, Associate Professor, English & Theatre Arts Dissertation Advisor: Bruce McConachie, Professor, Theatre Arts ii Copyright © by David J. Wright 2015 iii THE PHILOSOPHY OF ACTION IN LIVE PERFORMANCE INTERACTION DESIGN: ALIGNING FLOWS OF INTENTIONALITY David J. Wright, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2015 In recent years, ubiquitous computing has altered traditional performance spaces. Arts organizations have notably tested various strategies to either accommodate or eliminate the persistent and disruptive “glowing screen” of smartphones. While theatre and performance artists and scholars correctly identify many problems created by this influx of new technology, this dissertation argues that the rise of ubiquitous computing presents immense potential for theatre and performance studies to begin solving the design problems faced by computer scientists and user experience designers. Theatre and performance scholars hold a crucial role in ubiquitous technology design for live performance, and we have key knowledge of action that user experience designers seek now more than ever. -
Philo News 12.Indd
“Virtue, Happiness, and The Meaning of Life” A project led by Jennifer A. Frey and Candace Vogler The John Templeton Foundation has generously granted a major, 2.1 million dollar research initiative, led by Jennifer A. Frey (University of South Carolina) and Candace Vogler (University of Chicago), titled “Virtue, Happiness, and The Meaning of Life”. This 28-month project, launched in August 2015 and set to conclude with a major international conference in October 2018, incorporates psychological, philosophical, and theological research focused on self-transcendence to advance understanding of the interrelations of virtue, happiness, and the meaning of life. The following is a brief description of the project’s theoretical framework, guiding questions, and ambitions by its principal investigators. Although interdisciplinary research into virtue and happiness has taken great strides forward in recent decades, there has been very little attention paid to the fact that virtue was traditionally conceived in terms of common goods. On the more traditional conception of virtue, human happiness is to be found within the context of a rich social life shared in common with others, a life in which the goods sought by individuals are those shared in common with others, and in which these goods are worked for and maintained together through the sound modes of social interaction that the cultivation of virtues makes possible. While philosophers (and virtue ethicists in particular) have been busy thinking of happiness in terms of personal benefi t, welfare,