Ticf Kkddv KERALA GAZETTE B[Nimcniambn {]Kn≤S∏Spøp∂Xv PUBLISHED by AUTHORITY

2017 HIvtSm_¿ 24 Xncph\¥]pcw, hmeyw 6 24th October 2017 \º¿ sNmΔ 1193 Xpemw 8 8th Thulam 1193 42 } Thiruvananthapuram, } Vol. VI No. 1939 Im¿ØnIw 2 Tuesday 2nd Karthika 1939

PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Skills Department And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Labour and Skills (A) necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; ORDERS Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred (1) by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of G.O. (Rt.) No. 1086/2017/LBR. 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby Thiruvananthapuram, 16th August 2017. direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour industrial dispute exists between (1) Regional Manager, Court will pass the award within a period of three Eureka Forbs Pvt. Ltd., Anmol Palani, Block No. C & D5, Leval IV, No. 88, G. N. Chetty Road, T. Nagar, months. Chennai-600 017, (2) The Branch Manager, Eureka Forbs ANNEXURE Pvt. Ltd., Twin Tower, 1st & 2nd Floor, Y. M. C. A. Cross Road, Behind I. D. B. I. Bank, Kozhikode-673 001 and “Whether the illegal termination of service of the workman of the above referred establishment Smt. Sareena, P. K., Customer Relationship Smt. Sareena, P. K. w/o Ujjal, Puthiyaveettil House, Representative by the management of Opp. Tagore Hall, R. C. Road, Kozhikode-32 in respect Eureka Forbs Pvt. Ltd., Kozhikode is justifiable ? of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; If not, what relief she is entitled to ?”

Gaz. No. 42/2017/DTP (Part I). 7 146 KERALA GAZETTE [PART I

(2) ANNEXURE

G.O. (Rt.) No. 1115/2017/LBR. “Whether the denial of Employment to Sri S. Sujith, Thiruvananthapuram, 19th August 2017. Driver, by the management of Lekshman Concretes, Kottiyam is justifiable? If not what Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an relief the worker is entitled to ?” industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director Sail-S.C.L. Kerala Limited, Registered (4) Office, Steel Nagar, P. B. No. 42, Kolathara P. O., Kozhikode-673 655 and the workman of the above G.O. (Rt.) No. 1202/2017/LBR. referred establishment represented the President Steel Thiruvananthapuram, 8th September 2017. Mill Workers Union (AITUC), Steel Complex Unit Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Committee, Kolathara P. O., Farok in respect of matters industrial dispute exists between the Managing Partner, mentioned in the annexure to this order; Kalyan Sarees, Kovilakathum Padam, Thrissur-680 022 And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is and the workman of the above referred establishment necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for represented by the General Secretary, Shop Employees adjudication; Association (AITUC) Mannadiar Line, Thrissur-680 001 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred order; by Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kozhikode. adjudication; The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred of three months. by Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of ANNEXURE 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for “Whether the denial of annual increment to adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Thrissur. The Sri P. V. Shahid (Token No. 1354) worker of Steel Complex, Kolathara, Kozhikode by the Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of management of Sail S. C. L. Kerala Limited, three months. Registered Office, Steel Nagar, P. B. No. 42, ANNEXURE Kolathara P. O., Kozhikode is justified or not? “Whether the denial of employment to If not what are remedies available to him?” (1) Smt. Rajani Dasan, (2) Smt. Devi Ravi, (3) (3) Smt. Beena Sojan, (4) Smt. Mayadevi, P., (5) Smt. Alphonsa Johnson, (6) Smt. Preethimol, P. V. G.O. (Rt.) No. 1178/2017/LBR. by the management of Kalyan Sarees, Thiruvananthapuram, 30th August 2017. Kovilakathum Padam, Thrissur-680 002 Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an is justifiable. If not, what relief they are entitled industrial dispute exists between Sri L. Sadhik Managing to get ?” Partner, Lekshman Concretes, Kottiyam, Kollam and the (5) workman of the above referred establishment represented by Sri T. Venugopal; General Secretary, Quilon District G.O. (Rt.) No. 1203/2017/LBR. Motor & Mechanical Workers Union (CITU), CITU Thiruvananthapuram, 8th September 2017. Bhavan, Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an annexure to this order; industrial dispute exists between (1) Sri V. S. Sunil kumar, And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Manager, Siva Glass Tech, Vellanikara necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for West, Madakkathara P. O., Thrissur-680 651, adjudication; (2) Sri P. Ramachandran, Partner, Siva Glass Tech, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Thekkedath Veedu, Nettisery P. O., Thrissur-680 657, by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of (3) Sri C. P. Jayasooryan, Partner, Siva Glass Tech, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby Chrikathu Veedu, Nettisery P. O., Thrissur-680 657 and direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for the workman of the above referred establishment adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour Sri Rijon s/o Vargese, Akkara House, Thaikattusery P. O., Court will pass the award within a period of three Thrissur-680 306 in respect of matters mentioned in the months. annexure to this order;

8 24th OCT. 2017] KERALA GAZETTE 147 And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is (7) necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for G.O. (Rt.) No. 1280/2017/LBR. adjudication; Thiruvananthapuram, 26th September 2017. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an by Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of industrial dispute exists between Smt. Sukumari Amma, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby Ayush Ayurveda Hospital, Parakkal, Muttil, Wayanad and direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for the workman of the above referred establishment adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Thrissur. The Sri Umesh, V. U., Vellankara House, Arinchermala P. O., Industrial Tribunal, will pass the award within a period of Kaippattukunnu, Panamaram in respect of matters three months. mentioned in the annexure to this order;

ANNEXURE And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Whether the denial of employment to Sri Rijon, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Glass Designer, by the management of Siva adjudication; Glass Tech, Vellanikara West P. O., Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Madakkathara, Pin-680 651 is justifiable ? by Section 10(1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of If not what relief he is entitled to get ? 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby (6) direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour G.O. (Rt.) No. 1204/2017/LBR. Court will pass the award within a period of three Thiruvananthapuram, 8th September 2017. months.

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an ANNEXURE industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Whether the termination of service of Aswani Hospital Ltd., Karunakaran Nambiar Road, Sri Umesh, V. U., Therapist, Ayush Ayurveda Thrissur-680 020 and the worker of the above referred Hospital, Parakkal, Muttil, Wayanad is establishment Smt. Latha, K. w/o Rajendrababu, justifiable or not ? If not what relief he is Mullazhipara Kizhakkethil House, Puthuruthi P. O., entitled to ? Thrissur-680 623 in respect of matters mentioned in the (8) annexure to this order;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is G.O. (Rt.) No. 1290/2017/LBR. necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Thiruvananthapuram, 28th September 2017. adjudication; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred industrial dispute exists between Sri Pannikodan Mohanan by Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of s/o Velayudhan, Mythra P. O., Arikode (via), Malappuram 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby District-673 639 (Abkari Contractor Group No. 1, direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Malappuram Range) and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Thrissur. The (1) K. K. Velu Nair, Secretary, Earanad Taluk Chethu Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of Thozhilali Union (CITU), Reg. No. 138/68, Manjeri P. O., three months. Malappuram District-676 121 (2) Smt. Saraswathi, C., ANNEXURE Chundathody House, Panthaloor, Kadambottu P. O., Manjeri (via), Malappuram District-676 121 in respect of Whether the denial of employment to Smt. K. Latha, matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; House Keeping Supervisor by the management of Aswani Hospital Ltd; Karunakaran Nambiar And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Road, Thrissur-680 020 is justifiable ? If not necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for what relief she is entitled to get ? adjudication;

9 148 KERALA GAZETTE [PART I

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred \nba hIp∏v by Section 10(1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of \nba (F-®v)- 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby hn⁄m-]\w direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for \º¿ 5851/F® v3/2017/\nb-aw. adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. Xncp-h-\-¥-]pcw, 2017 sk]v‰w-_¿ 18. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months. 1952-˛se t\m´-dokv BIv‰ns‚ (1952-˛se 53-˛-mw tI{μ BIv‰v) 3˛w 5˛w hIp-∏p-Ifpw 1956-˛se t\m´-dokv ANNEXURE N´-ß-fnse 8˛-mw N´-Øns‚ (4)-˛-mw D]-N-´hpw Iq´n-hm-bn® Whether non-payment of arrears of Salary, Bonus {]Imcw \¬I-s∏´ A[n-Im-c-ßƒ hn\n-tbm-Kn®v, and other allowances to Smt. Saraswathi, C., tIcf k¿°m¿, {io. sPbnwkv tPm¨, AUz-t°-‰v, Chundathody House, Panthaloor, \nc-s∏tXm´w, ]pXp-s∏-cn-bmcw ]n. H., sXmSp-]p-g, CSp°n Kadambottu P. O., Manjeri (via) by the Pn√-˛685 584 F∂-bmsf CSp°n dh\yq Pn√bn¬- Dƒs∏´ sXmSp-]pg Xmeq°v {]tZ-i-tØ°v 16˛9˛2017˛-mw employer, Sri Pannikkodan Mohanan XobXn apX¬ ho≠pw A©ph¿j-°m-e-b-f-hn-te°v s/o Velayudhan, Mithra P. O., Areacode (via), is t\m´-dn-bmbn (c-Pn-Ã¿ \º¿ 4/99/IDKY) CXn-\m¬ ]p\¿ justifiable or not ? If not, what are the reliefs \n-b-an-°p-∂p. she is entitled to ? Kh¿Æ-dpsS DØ-c-hn≥{]Im-cw, By order of the Governor,

SONIA WASHINGTON, _n. Pn. lco-{μ-\m-Yv, Deputy Secretary to Government. \nba sk{I-´-dn.