Alexei Lidov, Hierotopy. Spatial Icons and Image-Paradigms in Byzantine Culture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alexei Lidov, Hierotopy. Spatial Icons and Image-Paradigms in Byzantine Culture UDC 930.85(4–12) ISSN 0350–7653 SERBIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS INSTITUTE FOR BALKAN STUDIES BALCANICA XLII ANNUAL OF THE INSTITUTE FOR BALKAN STUDIES Editor DUŠAN T. BATAKOVIĆ Editorial Board FRANCIS CONTE (Paris), DJORDJE S. KOSTIĆ, LJUBOMIR MAKSIMOVIĆ, DANICA POPOVIĆ, GABRIELLA SCHUBERT (Jena), BILJANA SIKIMIĆ, ANTHONY-EMIL TACHIAOS (Thessaloniki), NIKOLA TASIĆ (Director of the Institute for Balkan Studies), SVETLANA M. TOLSTAJA (Moscow) BELGRADE 2011 REVIEWS Alexei Lidov, HIEROTOPY. SPATIAL ICONS AND IMAGE-PARADIGMS IN BYZANTINE CULTURE. Moscow 2009, pp. 351. (with an English summary, black-and-white and colour illustrations, a glossary, and an index) Reviewed by Danica Popović* For the Byzantinological and medi- Christian Church. Liturgy and Art (1994); evalist community, Alexei Lidov hardly The Miracle-Working Icon in Byzantium needs an introduction. An art historian and Old Rus’ (1996); The Ikonostasis. Ori- and theorist, the founder and director of gins – Evolution – Symbolism (2000); East- the Research Centre for Eastern Chris- ern Christian Relics (2003); Hierotopy. The tian Culture in Moscow (since 1991), a Creation of Sacred Space in Byzantium and corresponding member of the Russian Medieval Russia (2006); New Jerusalems: Academy of Arts (since 2007), Lidov is a The Translation of Sacred Spaces in Chris- prolific scholar widely published outside tian Culture (2006); Spatial Icons. Perform- Russia, and a captivating lecturer whose ativity in Byzantium and Medieval Russia presence at leading universities in Europe (2011). Apart from an undeniable schol- (Sorbonne, Oxford, Cambridge) and the arly breakthrough that they have made, USA (Princeton, Harvard, Columbia) the Moscow conferences have greatly unfailingly elicits great attention from contributed to a vigorous and productive the academic community. Over the last intellectual dialogue between different two decades Lidov has been an influential scholarly milieus such as Western Europe, presence in the field of medieval studies North America, Japan, Russia and other as the driving force and moving spirit of Slavic countries, Serbia included. ground-breaking projects, both in terms Serbia owes a particular debt of grati- of research topics and, especially, method- tude to Alexei Lidov. His energetic sup- ology. These projects, broadly devoted to port to the preservation of the heavily en- the foundations and key phenomena of dangered Serbian heritage in Kosovo and medieval visual culture, have been realized Metohija, immediately threatened in a through a series of international confer- period between the beginning of the 1999 ences held at regular intervals in Moscow war and the 2004 March Pogrom, will cer- since 1991. The research results have been tainly be remembered. Lidov considered published in extensive thematic volumes this commitment a matter of professional conceptually framed and edited by Lidov. and personal ethics, and stood up for his Their fresh and innovative quality is obvi- ous from their very titles: Jerusalem in Rus- sian Culture (1994 and 2005); The Eastern * Institute for Balkan Studies, Belgrade 218 Balcanica XLII values in his various capacities and on a nomenon as sacred space. In all that, Lidov, variety of occasions: he was active “on the rather than discarding the methods and re- ground”, as a UNESCO envoy, addressed sults of traditional disciplines such as the the general public through the media, took history of art, architecture or religion, ar- part in a number of Russian and interna- chaeology and many others, simply points tional conferences and forums. A lasting to their limitations or, more precisely, their achievement of his committed effort is inability to recognize all layers of meaning the lavishly illustrated, bilingual English/ present in some of the phenomena of visu- Russian book Kosovo. Orthodox Heritage al culture. Consequently, in his view, one of and Contemporary Catastrophe, published the major problems encountered in studies in Moscow in 2007. In addition to the focused on sacred space is the lack of ap- instructive preface on the cultural genocide propriate and precise terminology. committed in present times and “in the Hierotopy is both the central concept presence of authorities”, it contains a list and the broadest research framework of of the completely destroyed or damaged this book. The basic premises of the new Serbian heritage, and an exhaustive cata- method are expounded in the introduc- logue of all Orthodox Christian churches tory chapter, “Hierotopy: The creation in Kosovo and Metohija. of sacred spaces as a form of creativ- The book presented here holds a spe- ity and subject of cultural history” (pp. cial place in Alexei Lidov’s work. It assem- 11–38), and in the concluding study, bles ten studies published between 2001 “Images-paradigms as a new notion of and 2008, whose common denominator visual culture: A hierotopic approach to and core concern is hierotopy, the study of art history” (pp. 293–305). Lidov defines sacred space — its manifestations, forma- hierotopy both as the making of sacred tion mechanisms, functions and reception. spaces seen as a distinctive form of hu- So, hierotopy is the study of one of central man creativity and, at the same time, as a phenomena of medieval culture in gen- field of historical studies concerned with eral, and its visual aspect in particular. It discovering and analyzing some products should be noted right away that the book of that creativity. This particular kind is so much more than a mere collection of of creativity is deeply rooted in human articles brought together under one title. nature and constitutes a form of man’s Even the reader familiar with Lidov’s work knowledge of himself as a spiritual being, cannot help being at least a little surprised while the purposely created sacred places by its sophisticated conception and pro- are spaces intended for human commu- grammatic integrity. Namely, what we find nication with the transcendent. Pointing there is a theoretically well-grounded and, to the fact that sacred space has often been it deserves a special emphasis, factually an object of attention in human sciences corroborated explication of the author’s in recent times, but as a rule from narrow basic methodological premises, which have specialist perspectives, Lidov highlights crystallized over the past two decades. For the few “integrated” approaches in order this purpose, Lidov introduces several new to highlight the distinctiveness and func- concepts into scholarly discourse, as well tionality of the hierotopic method. This as a new pertinent vocabulary. It should be method, Lidov argues, cannot be reduced emphasized that these innovations are not to the concept of synthesis of the arts, an end unto themselves. On the contrary, very influential in art theory and prac- they result from a patient and steadfast tice in the age of modernism, including quest for a suitable method for interpreting such remarkably profound and original such an important and multilayered phe- achievements as that of Pavel Florensky, Reviews 219 who looked at the sacred space of an Or- — that the Byzantines saw as trustworthy thodox Christian church as a “synthesis confirmation of the divine presence. of the arts” and emphasized the essential Lidov further explicates his theoreti- “aesthetic” quality of all components of cal premises, outlined here only briefly, the liturgy. Lidov draws a clear distinc- using concrete examples. This aspect of tion between his own concept of hierotopy Lidov’s work demonstrates his vast erudi- and that of hierophany as conceived of by tion and knowledge of medieval culture, Mircea Eliade, his famous predecessor in both Eastern and Western Christian, as the study of the phenomenon of sacred- shown by the broad chronological and ness. While hierophany is the revelation geographical span that his considerations of the divine in a certain place or space, are based upon. Given the framework of which thereby assumes sacred qualities his concerns — sacredness and the sphere and becomes marked off from the pro- of the miraculous — it comes as no sur- fane, hierotopy is the form of human prise to see that miracle-working icons creativity which lastingly materializes the and relics, a widely popular research topic memory of a hierophany. over the last twenty years, are the focus of Lidov uses two more important con- his attention. cepts as helpful instrumenta studiorum. The concepts of hierotopy and spatial One of them is the spatial icon, which icons are particularly exhaustively elabo- he describes as an image endowed with rated in the chapter “Spatial icons: The iconic qualities and existing not only as miraculous performance of the Hodege- a flat plane but emanating into the space tria of Constantinople” (pp. 36–69). Based as a “vision”, bonding the image and the on the written sources, Lidov offers a new viewer together in an essential way. The interpretation of the well-known rite image functions in reality as a constantly known as the “Tuesday miracle”. Namely, changing and pulsating iconic space and every Tuesday, on the square in front of dynamic structure. It integrates a variety the monastery of Hodegon, the miracle- of elements: the rite and its participants, working double-sided icon of the Virgin the light, the scent, the sound. Lidov Hodegetria and the Crucifixion would makes the observation, as perceptive as it “fly” into the air, marking out a distinctive is accurate, that the concept of the Byzan- iconic space created as much by the icon tine spatial icon finds it typological analo- and elements such as the light, smells and gies in modern art forms such as per- sounds, as by the participants in the event. formances and multimedia installations. Lidov’s well-argued interpretation sug- The other concept used by Lidov is the gests that the ritual re-enacted the failed icon-paradigm, a sort of icon-idea, which, siege of Constantinople in 626, through although incorporating a wide range of the recurring iconic presence of the Vir- literary and symbolic associations, cannot gin, the city’s miracle-working protectress.
Recommended publications
  • Holy Mountains in the Hierotopy and Iconography of the Christian World Symposium to Be Held at the Russian Academy of Arts on September 13-15, 2017
    1 Holy Mountains in the Hierotopy and Iconography of the Christian World Symposium to be held at the Russian Academy of Arts on September 13-15, 2017 Dear Colleagues! The Russian Academy of Arts, the Institute for World Culture at Moscow State University, and the Research Centre for Eastern Christian Culture, would like to invite you to join an International Symposium which will be held in Moscow on 13-15 September 2017, dedicated this year to the subject of: Holy Mountains in the Hierotopy and Iconography of the Christian World The deadline for applications is 15 March 2017. The proceedings of the Symposium will be published in a separate volume containing the abstracts of papers given at the Symposium. If your topic is accepted, you should submit your abstract (no more than three pages in total) by 30 April 2017 in Russian or in English. The papers should also be presented in either of these languages. The project tackles the subject of Holy Mountains and the role of this phenomenon in the making of sacred spaces, mostly in the medieval tradition with a special focus on the Byzantine world. Nonetheless, other Christian and non-Christian phenomena will also be considered within their wide historical and geographical context. The symposium is clearly of a multi-and-interdisciplinary character, thus appealing to scholars with various research interests and academic backgrounds. The symposium shall explore not merely the specific territories and related artefacts, but the particular spatial imagery conceived in human minds and then embodied in sacred landscapes (like the famous Sacri Monti) 2 and various iconographic devices, as well as in some literary texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review—Alexei Lidov, Hierotopy: Spatial Icons and Images-Paradigms in Byzantine Culture
    Iowa State University From the SelectedWorks of Jelena Bogdanović 2010 Book Review—Alexei Lidov, Hierotopy: Spatial Icons and Images-Paradigms in Byzantine Culture. Jelena Bogdanović, East Carolina University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/jelena_bogdanovic/7/ 822 Byzantinische Zeitschrift Bd. 103/2, 2010: II. Abteilung 1 internal enemies, little is reported on the attitude of the local population during 2 his expedition which is extensively analyzed by A. Andresakis. 56 3 The last fifteen years of the Byzantine rule in Italy, ending in 1071, appear 4 confusing and incoherent in our sources and are briefly reported by the author 5 mainly through the eyes of the Byzantine sources (p. 444–451). 6 7 The book ends with an additional note by the author and coordinator of this 8 collective work, T. L ounghis , who reports on the reappearance of the 9 Byzantine forces in Italy to fight against the new conquerors, the Normans: 10 “Ep_letqo : g tekeuta_a bufamtim^ stqatiytij^ ap|peiqa stgm Itak_a ” (“Epi- 11 metro: the Last Byzantine Military Attempt in Italy”, p. 453–467)]. In 1154, in 12 the beginning of the reign of the Norman king of Sicily William I (1154–1166), 13 the Byzantine emperor Manuel I sent a Byzantine expedition by sea to Italy 14 under the generals Michael Palaeologus and Ioannes Dukas. A small Byzantine 15 army, in which a number of local soldiers had enlisted, temporarily conquered 16 Bari, Trani, Gionenezzo and Molfetto. This was the twilight of the Byzantines 17 attempt to dominate Italy. The most conspicuous characteristic of this 18 expedition, as Lounghis properly emphasizes, was the deterioration of the 19 once glorious Byzantine navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterotopic Assemblages Within Religious Structures: Ganesh Utsav and the Streets of Mumbai
    Open Cultural Studies 2019; 3: 96-106 Research Article Swapna Gopinath* Heterotopic Assemblages within Religious Structures: Ganesh Utsav and the Streets of Mumbai https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2019-0009 Received April 30, 2018; accepted January 4, 2019 Abstract: Indian urban public spaces have witnessed massive transformation post liberalization and globalization. In 2017, city spaces offer novel experiences and unravel new political dynamics in tune with the paradigm shifts in socio-political, economic and cultural domains. The city was shaped by the colonial and later modernizing forces, is being foregrounded in the postmodern, postcolonial discourses, and its public spaces therefore emerge as significant components in the social developments as witnessed in the new millennium. Ganesh Utsav in Mumbai is closely linked to India’s history of political struggle against British colonialism. There has been a phenomenal growth in its popularity and visibility, as a festival for ten days, encapsulating the whole city, transforming its identity as a financial capital of the country to a multiple layered carnival ground, with processions and festivities involving the majority of its population. Post globalization and neoliberalisation, the festival has transformed itself, assumed an identity uniquely political along with the rise of the right wing to power. My paper will be an attempt to critically evaluate this festival and the paraphernalia of sacredness that encapsulates the city space for ten days every year. While the spatial identity of religious practices is fascinating to observe, the ten-day festival of Ganesh Utsav builds a fabric of the sacred and profane across the city. The theoretical tool used in this study is Foucault’s heterotopias and Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of assemblage.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Number Symbolism in the Hierotopy of Orthodox Cathedrals
    European Journal of Science and Theology, February 2021, Vol.17, No.1, 125-137 _______________________________________________________________________ CHRISTIAN NUMBER SYMBOLISM IN THE HIEROTOPY OF ORTHODOX CATHEDRALS Assan Azimkhanovich Amangeldiyev*, Yesim Garifolla, Aigul Tursynbayeva and Aldanazarova Gulnar Baratovna L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Satpayev Str. 2, Nur-Sultan, 010008, Republic of Kazakhstan (Received 5 May 2020, revised 9 October 2020) Abstract The objective of this research is to carry out an analysis of the usage of Christian number symbolism in the course of the construction of the sacred space in Orthodox cathedrals. It has been found that creation of such spaces in Orthodox cathedrals was based on an ecclesiological idea, which was implemented in a multifaceted way with symbolic and meaningful amplifications due to the versatile figurativeness of the image of Jesus Christ and the Most Holy Mother of God. In general, Christianity has provided a rich cultural heritage, which is still having impact on the formation of the personality of each person and the spiritual life of society as a whole. Keywords: numbers, religion, faith, architecture 1. Introduction The defining feature of the medieval Christian mentality was a universal application of the symbolic laws of thought and compliance of all important phenomena from the perspective of the cult with speculative mathematical logic. The first ideas of the sacred properties of numbers go back to ancient times. The source of belief in the secret (true) meaning of numbers was an ancient (Ionic) alphabetic system, which appeared in Greece (Miletus) in the 5th century BC. It was the Milesian system that gained widespread use in the ancient world, especially during the Conquests of Alexander the Great and was borrowed by Egyptians, Persians, Phoenicians, Arabs and Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating the Sacred Space. Hierotopy As a New Field of Cultural History
    Creating the Sacred Space. Hierotopy as a new fi eld of cultural history Alexei Lidov Institute for World Culture, Lomonosov Moscow State University The Concept of Hierotopy The concept of Hierotopy was proposed by myself in 2001 and compre- hensively discussed for the fi rst time in 2004, at an International sympo- sium in Moscow1. It was a logical development of the extensive research program of the Research Centre for Eastern Christian Culture, which led to the organization of fi ve international Conferences and to the publica- tion of the related Conference proceedings2. The problematic of sacred space has been touched upon in all research projects, yet gradually from a supplementary subject it became a focus of studies. It is now clear that the development of Christian culture was conditioned by creation of numerous and diverse sacred spaces, where miracle-working icons and relics, iconographic programs and liturgical devices (such as iconostasis), as well as all possible “jerusalems” found their genuine sense. 1 See Lidov 2004, Lidov 2006. The present article, based on my paper at the conference in Padua 2012, is a new version of this topic. 2 Lidov 1994, Lidov 1996, Lidov 2000, Lidov 2003, Batalov – Lidov 2005. SSPAZIPAZI E PPERCORSIERCORSI SSACRI.indbACRI.indb 6611 112/02/20152/02/2015 11:41:1411:41:14 Alexei Lidov The Concept in the Making At that point the problem seemed unstudied and seemed to disappear be- hind innumerable descriptions of artifacts. The widespread term “sacred space” did not function well because of its too general nature, describing nearly the entire realm of the religious.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexei Lidov the Temple Veil As a Spatial Lcon Revealing an Image
    Originalveröffentlichung in: IKON 7 (2014), S. 97-108 Alexei Lidov The Temple Veil as a Spatial lcon Re vealing an Image-Paradigm of Medieval lconography and Hierotopy UDK: 75.046.3" 10/14" Alexei Lidov Moscow State University, Russia [email protected] The author argues that the imagery of the Sacred Veil separating the Holy from the Holy of Holies at the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem was a very powerful spatial icon which considerably influenced art and culture of the Byzantine world and the Latin West. The paper deals with new approaches to the history of art, and the crisis in traditional methodology which does not work in some cases. First of all, it concerns the concept of hierotopy (the creation of sacred spaces), recently proposed by the author of this paper and elaborated in several publications by the international group of scholars (www.hierotopy.ru ). These studies have revealed an important theoretical issue. In many cases the discussion of visual culture can not be reduced to a positivist description of artifacts, or to the analysis of theological notions. Some phenomena can be properly interpreted only on the level of "image-paradigms", which do not coincide with the illustrative pictures or ideological conceptions.This special notion seems a useful instrumentum studiorum, which helps to explain a layer of phenomena. That image-paradigm was not connected with the illustration of any specific text, though it was a part of a continuum of literary and symbolic meanings and associations. This type of imagery is quite distinct from what one could call an iconographic device.
    [Show full text]
  • Translations of the Sacred City Between Jerusalem and Rome
    136 De Blaauw Chapter 6 Translations of the Sacred City between Jerusalem and Rome Sible de Blaauw Several cities and individual churches in the Middle Ages were associated with the idea of representing or incorporating Jerusalem in one manner or another. This widely attested phenomenon occurred in a large range of variants, de- pending on the ‘type’ of Jerusalem represented and the way in which the rep- resentation was made concrete.1 In this contribution, I aim to discuss one of the earliest, and perhaps one of the most notable cases of ‘being’ Jerusalem outside Jerusalem. The church leaders of Rome may have had very specific rea- sons for appropriating the significance of the historical Jerusalem as the an- cient capital of the Roman Empire. Moreover, they may have utilized very specific instruments in order for this claim to materialize. It was rooted in the idea that Christian Rome had been founded directly from Jerusalem by the mission of the apostles Peter and Paul. Rome was, in the words of Jennifer O’Reilly: ‘the western extremity of their evangelizing mission from the biblical centre of the earth at Jerusalem and became the new centre from which their papal successors continued the apostolic mission to the ends of the earth’.2 The existence of the apostles’ tombs, reinforced by the recollections of numer- ous Christian martyrs, was the fundamental factor in making Rome into the new spiritual capital of the Christian world. This claim urged Christian Rome to establish new terms for its relationship with what qualified, perhaps, as ‘the ideological centre of the Christian empire’ in Jerusalem.3 It has been argued that the Roman Church did so by a literal transfer of the significance of earthly Jerusalem to Rome, and hence by making Jerusalem superfluous.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of the Body and Sacred Space in Late Antiquity and Byzantium
    Architecture Books Architecture 3-7-2018 Perceptions of the Body and Sacred Space in Late Antiquity and Byzantium Jelena Bogdanovic Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/arch_books Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, Architectural History and Criticism Commons, Byzantine and Modern Greek Commons, and the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Bogdanovic, Jelena, "Perceptions of the Body and Sacred Space in Late Antiquity and Byzantium" (2018). Architecture Books. 7. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/arch_books/7 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Architecture at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architecture Books by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Perceptions of the Body and Sacred Space in Late Antiquity and Byzantium Edited by Jelena Bogdanović Perceptions of the Body and Sacred Space in Late Antiquity and Byzantium seeks to reveal Christian understanding of the body and sacred space in the medieval Mediterranean. Case studies examine encounters with the holy through the perspective of the human body and sensory dimensions of sacred space, and discuss the dynamics of perception when experiencing what was constructed, represented, and understood as sacred. The comparative analysis investigates viewers’ recognitions of the sacred in specific locations or segments of space with an emphasis on the experiential and conceptual relationships between sacred spaces and human bodies. This volume thus reassesses the empowering aspects of space, time, and human agency in religious contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Dictionary of Christianity, Bibliography D. Patte, Editor, Vanderbilt University
    The Cambridge Dictionary of Christianity, Bibliography D. Patte, Editor, Vanderbilt University HIEROTOPY, THE CREATION OF CHRISTIAN SACRED SPACES. ALEXEI LIDOV M.Bacci. Lo spazio dell'anima. Vita di una chiesa medievale. Roma-Bari, 2005. S.Coleman, and J.Elsner. “The pilgrim's progress: art, architecture and ritual movement at Sinai.” In World Archaeology. Archaeology of Pilgrimage, 25/1 (1994), pp.73-89. John Crook. The Architectural Setting of the Cult of the Saints in the Early Christian West c.300-1200. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000. Slobodan Curcic. “Cave and Church. An Eastern Christian Hierotopical Synthesis.” In Hierotopy. The Creation of Sacred Spaces in Byzantium and Medieval Russia. Ed. A.Lidov. Moscow, 2006, pp.216-225. Allan Doig. Liturgy and Architecture from the Early Church to the Middle Ages. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. N. Isar. “The Vision and its ‘Exceedingly Blessed Beholder’: Of Desire and Participation in the Icon.” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 38 (2000), pp. 56-73. N.Isar. “Choros of Light: Vision of the Sacred in Paulus the Silentiary's poem Descriptio S. Sophiae,” in Byzantinische Forschungen, 28 (2004), pp. 215-242. N.Isar. “Chorography (Chôra, Chorós) — a Performative Paradigm of Creation of Sacred Space in Byzantium.” In Hierotopy. The Creation of Sacred Spaces in Byzantium and Medieval Russia. Ed. A.Lidov. Moscow, 2006, pp.59-80. New Jerusalems. The Translation of Sacred Spaces in Christian Culture. Material from the International Symposium. Ed. A.Lidov. Moscow, 2006. A.Lidov. “Heavenly Jerusalem: the Byzantine Approach.” In The Real and Ideal Jerusalem in Jewish, Christian and Islamic Art. Ed. B. Kuehnel. Jerusalem, 1998, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Image-Paradigm of Jerusalem in Christian Hierotopy
    THE IMAGE-PARADIGM OF JERUSALEM IN CHRISTIAN HIEROTOPY Andrew Simsky Research Center for Eastern Christian Culture, Moscow, Russia [email protected] Image-paradigms are non-pictorial mental images of the sacred. They are engendered in the viewer’s imagination by means of organized ensembles of iconic, symbolic and typological elements of sacred spaces and emerge from a manifold of interrelating associations. In this paper I elucidate this complex notion by studying the example of one image-paradigm of fundamental impor- tance, namely, the Holy City of Jerusalem, which appears to the religious imag- ination as the synthesis of an idealized historical city-relic and its celestial counterpart – the Heavenly Jerusalem. This Jerusalem is both the ‘navel’ of the world and a place of God’s immediate, living presence. The Church as a whole, as well as individual churches, are identified with Jerusalem, which reflects their primary function of serving as meeting places with God. While participat- ing in the liturgy and integrating into the liturgical space, the faithful feel them- selves to be in the midst of the Heavenly Jerusalem, a feeling which clearly cannot be reduced to or evoked by a simple two-dimensional picture. Gener- ally, pictures are unable fully to represent a sense of being somewhere. They help to create ambiences, but they cannot represent them. It takes more than a pictorial representation to transport oneself, in the mind’s eye, to another place. This is what is involved in the concept of the image-paradigm. The image-paradigm works by means of a ‘spatial icon’, that is, a thoughtfully ar- ranged spatial system of pointers, including architecture, an iconographic pro- gram, as well as the entire liturgical performance, including the very presence of the congregation absorbed in pious contemplation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1*Kamalova F.B., 2Ozkan A.R., 1Baitenova N.Zh., 1Kantarbaeva Zh.O
    IRSTI 21.41.63 1*Kamalova F.B., 2ozkan A.R., 1Baitenova N.Zh., 1Kantarbaeva Zh.o. 1Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan, Almaty 2Kastamonu University, Turkey, Kastamonu *e-mail: [email protected] THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE CONCEPTS OF «HOLY», «SACRED» The basic concepts widely used in religious phenomenology are – “holy”, “sacred”, “sacrum”. Reli- gious phenomenology of the concept of the sacred, the holy connects with things, space, time, in words and numbers, with human activities and social practice. The concepts of the sacred, the saint occupy an important place in religious phenomenology, as in modern science there is some discrepancy in the understanding and interpretation of the given concept. Today, these concepts are studied from the standpoint of various sciences, primarily from the standpoint of religious studies, theology, sociology, culturology, psychology, there are certain developments. But as part of the Kazakhstan study, this prob- lem has not been sufficiently studied and there are certain gaps. In connection with the current situation in the study of this issue, the identification of theoretical and methodological foundations relates to cur- rent problems in this area of research. The purpose of this article – along with such important concepts as “sacred”, “holy”, to explore and understand the “sacrum”, to show their relationship and features. The aim is also to distinguish their theological, religious study. According to the results of the research, their place and role in contemporary philosophical discourse are revealed. Key words: holy, sacred, sacrum, profane, numinous, hierophany, hierotopy. 1*Кaмaловa Ф.Б., 2Озкaн А.Р., 1Бaйтеновa Н.Ж., 1Қaнтaрбaевa Ж.О.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierotopy Between Art History and Religious Studies
    1 Hierotopy between Art History and Religious Studies Compendium of Abstracts 2 The Sacred Space as a Multimedia Phenomenon: Hierotopy between Art History and Religious Studies Alexei Lidov, Moscow, Russia The concept of hierotopy – a new academic field dealing with the creation of sacred spaces – was first conceived in the context of art history as a new way of seeing artistic phenomena, yet it spans various humanities, including the history of religion. Sacred spaces do not easily lend themselves to positivist methods of conventional anthropology, which are focused on material objects and actions. Having nevertheless a fundamental place in religious traditions (and in fact being seen by the faithful as a means of approaching the divine), they communicate powerful spiritual messages. At the same time, these special spaces are merely human creations. How are they made? How do they come to be infused with such a transcendental and ‘numinous’ atmosphere? How were the armies of workers and artists involved in hierotopic projects – such as Byzantine churches or sacred Japanese landscapes – guided by such a remarkable sense of unity? Could one speak of a ‘composer’ of a sacred space? What do religious ceremonies hold in common with multimedia installations of the modern age? Hierotopic study addresses precisely these sorts of questions. It studies the way architecture, image, light, scent and ritual each contribute to forming sacred spaces as single, united wholes. This paper presents an historical review of the field by focusing on the following highlights of past hierotopic research topics: the re-creation of the Holy Land, or the ‘New Jerusalem’, as a major trend of medieval Christian hierotopy; the performative nature of ‘spatial icons’ created by concerted action of various media; the dramaturgy of fire and light that resulted in spatial ‘icons of light’; and lastly, the recent reconceptualization of the spatial nature of icons and iconicity.
    [Show full text]