THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA LA SOCIETE ROYALE DU CANADA

ENERGY RESOURCES

October 15-16-17 octobre 1973

Sixth Symposium THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA LA SOCIETE ROYALE DU CANADA

SYMPOSIUM ON ENERGY RESOURCES

October 15-17, 1973

Organizing Committee G.C. Laurence, F.R.S.C. Chairman K.J. Laidler, F.R.S.C. Editor R.J. Uffen, F.R.S.C. J.H. Dales, F.R.S.C. A.D. Scott, F.R.S.C. M.C. Urquhart, F.R.S.C. Copies may be obtained from: The Royal Society of Canada 395 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0N4 Price: $7.00 (Postage included) The Royal Society of Canada

Guy Sylvestre

President, 1973-74 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements vi Editor's Foreword vi i SESSION I: ENERGY RESOURCES AND THEIR DEPENDENCE ON PRICE D.J. McLaren, F.R.S.C., Chairman tf.C. McCrossan The origin and geological environ- 3 ment of the mineral energy resources O.K. Mclvor & Potential oil resources and their 17 dependence on price and government share D.D. Lougheed Energy resources and their 45 dependence on price: natural gas V.L. Horte 's oil sands in the energy 55 supply picture (presented by 6.W. Govier G.A. Warne) G.D. Coates Relationship between coal price 71 levels and quantity of economically recoverable coal in Canada • R.E. Folinsbee, F.R.S.C Uranium and thorium: future energy 81 & A.P. Leech sources Discussion of Session I 99 SESSION II ENERGY MARKETS AND THEIR DEPENDENCE ON PRICE R6al Boucher, Chairman J.H. Dagher The longer term outlook for oil 115 R.R. Colpitts Energy markets and their dependence 133 on price: gas markets M.D. Lester & Large industrial users and the 149 J.T. Madill energy market D.C. Downing Hydrocarbons for petrochemicals 157 W..S. Wilson Energy and Canada's transportation 163 industry J. Pill Energy markets and urban development 171 Discussion of Session II 179 "IV

SESSION III: PROSPECTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE W.B. Lewis, F.R.S.C., Chainr.an Page W.B. Lewis, F.R.S.C. The nuclear energy industrial 189 complex and synthetic fuels \/ P.J. Mooradian, F.R.S.C. Fission, fusion and fuel economy 195 G.D. Garland, F.R.S.C. Geothermal energy: an undeveloped 217 Canadian resource? B.E. Conway, F.R.S.C. & Energy conversion: fuel cells and 235 A.K. Vijh electrolysis L. Boulet Electrical energy transmission 249 M.D. Armstrong & Prospects for urban transit 261 J.H. Morgan systems Discussion of Session III 269

SESSION IV: APPLICATIONS OF ECONOMICS TO QUESTIONS INVOLVING ENERGY A.D. Scott, F.R.S.C. , Chairman A.D. Scott, F.R.S.C. Economists and energy problems 275 J.E. Gander Canada and the world energy 279 situation J. Helliwell Estimating the national economic 291 effects of arctic energy development G.D. Quirin Energy: policy choices regarding 307 exploitation and export J.H. Dales* F.R.S.C. Rising energy prices and economic 331 structure Discussion of Session IV 337 SESSION• V: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

F.K. Hare, F.R.S.C., Chairman Page E.F. Roots Energy and the environment •• a 349 perspecti ve /O.G. Hurst, F.R.S.C. The safety of nuclear technology 357 A?&tS?8 G.C. Butler, F.R.S.C Health hazards from nuclear 377 sources E.B. Peterson The pipeline problem in review 389 I.E. Efford Energy: profits from reducing 401 demand A. Biswas Summing up 413 Discussion of Session V 419

SESSION VI; HUMANISTIC AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS R.J. Uffen, F.R.S.C., Chairman O.E. Th'ur Energy resources - manpower 429 considerations J.J. Deutsch, F.R.S.C. The effects of energy on life 437 styles Mrs. W.A. Brechin Energy in the home - the consumer, 443 participant or pawn? K.J. Duncan Problems: of native peoples 453 Donald MacDonald Energy: boon or bane? 459 Discussion of Session VI 463

EPILOGUE G.C. Laurence, F.R.S;C. On planning for sale and use of 467 energy Glossary 473 List of Speakers and Organizers 481 List of Registrants 485 Proceedings of Symposia 500 Royal Society of" Canada Symposia 501 vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Royal Society of Canada is gratefully appreciative of the very valuable contributions to the proceedings of the symposium by the chairmen of the sessions, invited speakers and others who participated in discussion, and of the encouragement it received from the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. In planning and organizing the symposium I was encouraged and helped by many whom I consulted. I am particularly grateful to Dr. K.J. Laidler for performing the large task of collecting a record of discussion and the papers and getting this volume published, and to Mr. E.H.p. Garneau for his careful attention to organization details. The success of the sessions is due mainly to the time-consuming efforts of their chairmen: Dr. D.J. McLaren, M. RSal Boucher, Dr. W.3. Lewis, Dr. A.D. Scott, Dr. P.K. Hare and Dr. R,J. Uffen.

G.C. Laurence Chairman

November, 1973. VI 1

EDITOR'S FOREWORL

At the meeting, the presentation cf a group of papers was followed by a discussion, which was usually at the enri of each session. A tape recording of the discussions was not made. Experience with previous symposia showed that even if a recording is made, speakers usually wish to rewrite their con- tributions. The record of the discussions that is found in the present publication is based entirely on written submissions, and includes accounts of what was said at the meeting and additional questions and comments that were not brought forward at the meeting. I have not tried to distinguish between these (since there was considerable overlap) but have merely arranged the material in what seems to be a logical order. I have tried to obtain answers to all of the questions that were put to the speakers, and in most cases was successful.

Prior to publication, the discussion sections were sent to all questioners and respondents, who have had the opportunity to make any changes or additions. In the end I believe that everyone has had full opportunity to present his point of view.

My task as Editor has been very considerably lightened by the help I have received from itiany persons, in particular the following: Dr, G.C. Laurence, the Symposium Chairman; Major E.H.P. Garneau, our Executive Secretary, and his staff for constant support and assistance; Miss Judy Yaworsky, of "The Agency," who did not confine her activities to public rela- tions but helped in many other ways; Dr. Anthony Scott and Dr. Arsit Biswas, for help with the editing of discussion sections; Mrs. Carol Fauteux, for excellent secretarial work; and Mrs. Alice Leech for her very careful proofreading.

K.J. Laidler November, 1973. SESSION I

ENERGY RESOURCES AND THEIR DEPENDENCE ON PRICE

Monday, 15 Octobers 1973, a.m.

Chairman D.J. MCLAREN, F.R.S.C. Director, Geological Survey of Canada f\»

Figure 1 - upper Devonian Paleogeography (after Nelson. S.J., 1970) THE ORIGIN AND GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE MINERAL ENERGY RESOURCES by R.G. McCROSSAN Institute of Sedimentary and Petroleum Geology, Calgary INTRODUCTION I have been asked to provide some background for the benefit of non-geologists on the way in which the energy mineral resources occur in nature. The mineral energy resources have at least two things in common with minor exceptions. They occur in sedimentary rocks, and all the economically exploitable concentrations of these materials are very unevenly distributed in the earth's cru«;t, as Premier Lougheed would be quick to point out. Oil, gas and coal have a number of other geological characteristics in common. I am going to talk about three types of commodities: petroleum (or oil and gas); coal; and uranium. Since economic deposits of all of these occur in sedimentary rocks, I would like by way of background to discuss the nature of sedimentary basins and their formation. SEDIMENTARY BASINS The earth's crust, as I am sure that you are all aware, is a dynamic thing in a constant state of motion with large and complex stress fields within it. At any instant of time the motions are not generally obvious except in the case of major earthquakes, but cumulated over geologic time the results of this activity are very large indeed. It is generally accepted by geologists today that large slabs of the earth's crust have moved horizontally over great distances with respect to one another. As a result the lighter partsof the crustal material or the continental masses have drifted apart leaving the ocean basins between them, or pushed against each other creating Targe compressional features near the interfaces in the form of major upwarps and downwarps. In other areas under tension as a result of lack of support, from beneath caused perhaps by such things as density changes in the mantle, and/or the pull-apart, collapse may occur. Thus there is on the continents and their bordering areas a surface of great relief which the forces of atmospheric weathering and gravity continually attempt to smooth by eroding rock' material off the high surfaces and depositing it in the bordering depositional basins. As well as horizontal movements of these major elements of the earth's crust, there seems to have been at various periods in the geologic past large vertical movements which have caused marine waters to invade or withdraw from large areas of the continent. Basins are filled with sediment brought in from the surrounding highlands by rivers in form of muds and sands. In addition large quantities of sediment are generated within the basins in the form of TOTAL BASIN FILL

Unmetemorphofcd Sedimentary Rocki

Figurt 2 - Total thickness uiMetamorphosed sedimentary rock In Canadian Basins (NcCrossan and Porter, 1973) salts precipitated by evaporation of sea water and through the agency of organisms which precipitate calcite. In addition to the deposits laid down in the marine environment, non-marine deposits are spreadfay the rivers on the surrounding Ipw-lying land surfaces. An example of a sedimentary regime can be seen in Figure 1 which shows the western Canada sedimentarv basin area as it would appear from the air during the late Devonian time, 350 million years ago. The chain of reefs, near the centre of the illustra- tion, including Redwater and Leduc can be seen cutting off the eastern portion of this basin from the open water-. At the same time as the reefs were grow- ing the basin was filling with muds, banking in from the eastern shore. Intermittent subsidence continued for almost 600 million years after the beginning of the Paleozoic in this general region resulting in a great wedge-shaped slab of sedimentary rocks covering the prairie regions of Canada and shown in Figure 2. It shows the thickness of all the unmetamor- phosed sediment of Canada having some petroleum potential. The thickest, regions shows in darker colors range to over 35,000 feet. You will notice the more central regions of the continent have a thinner sedimentary cover or the Precambrian shield is exposed indicating the more stable nature of that region which in turn explains the poorer quality sedimentary basins wtthin it. Moving away from the craton centre, the sedimentary masses thick- en and in some cases these form much better quality basins for petroleum. For various geological reasons, however, the various sedimentary masses have quite different potentials for petroleum occurrence. Organic matter incorporated in varying quantities in most sedi- mentary rocks, is of two main types: woody plant materials, made up of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen; and other organic material lower in oxygen con- tent and having it in less stable forms such as waxes, fats, proteins, etc. The former are derived from the land plants and the latter from marine animals and plants as well as certain parts of terrestrial plants. We shall now examine this organic material in more detail since it is involved direct- ly and indirectly in the formation of almost all of the economically important energy minerals. PETROLEUM Oil is derived from kerogen or sapropelic material in the sedi- mentary rocks; that is the organic material relatively rick in carbon and hydrogen and low in oxygen. This is the part of the organic complex lacking in the woody material or carbohydrates. It is made up of such things as the waxy coatings or cuticle of plants, resins, lipids or fats, and protein material. Only very small amounts of hydrocarbons are formed in the early stages of deposition, as may be seen in Figure3and it is not until the organic material is buried to at least a 1,000 metres that sufficiently elevated temperatures are attained to generate significant quantities of oil. The subsurface temperature varies from place to place, with variations in the rates of heat flow from the earth and with the insulating quality of the overlying blanket of sediment. This action produces a whole range of hydro- carbon compounds hot shown on the slide. Kith increasing depths of burial and heat these are progressively cracked to simpler compounds of lower Q molecular weight and" size until eventually at temperatures of 125 - 150 Centrigrade, methane is the only hydrocarbon left. At shallow depths small quantities of methane or dry gas are generated particularly from the woody CTs

HYDROCARBONS GENERATED OIL

BITUM.

ROCK

Typt a

FLAT BITUM 30

ROCK SO

K> Typ*b - e

BITUM ROCK

Figure 3 - Generation of Hydrocarbons with Increasing depth and temperature (after Sokolov et al., 1968) CydanM««6qeta) Figure 4 - Biodegradation it alkanes In Cretaceous oils (Deroo et al., 1973] remains of the terrestrial organic material through bacterial action and which accounts for many gas fields in eastern and southern Alberta. Hydrocarbons are formed in what are called source rocks which are very fine grained usually marine shales, formed from muds deposited in the deeper, quieter parts of a basin where the light organic particles come to rest with the finest grained sediment. As these fine-grained sediments pile up the water is squeezed out of them with increased load. The fluid moves from i,he source rock in the direction of the decreasing pressure gradient or towards the surface carrying the hydrocarbon compounds along with it. When the fluids pass into coarser grained rocks or reservoirs, they are sieved out effectively if the coarse rock is surrounded by a fine impermeable rock since the hydrocarbon molecules once coalesced cannot pass back again into the fine grained sealing rocks, even though the water molecules can. Exactly how this process operates is still not well understood. Once in the pores of reservoir rock the hydrocarbons,being less dense than the saline waters permeating the whole sedimentary mass* rise gravitationally to the top of the reservoir. Traps for hydrocarbons are formed when reservoirs with sealing rocks over them are deformed in structure by mechanical movements which may create folds in the bedded rocks. A closed container or trap can also be formed stratigraphically where a wedge of sand or a buried oyster bank, for example, or perhaps a coral reef, wedges out up the gentle regional dip towards the edge of the sedimentary basin. It must, of course, be closed off at its ends as well. Thus in order to form an accumulation of oil or gas we must have: 1. a fine-grained source rock sufficiently buried; 2. a coarse grained porous reservoir rock; 3. an impermeable sealing rock; 4. a trapping geometric configuration in the rocks; 5. last and often forgotten, but all important, timing - or the correct sequence of events. That is the trap must be in position to receive the oil when it moves. Oil has been forming since the beginning of marine life in the late Precambrian, but by far the bulk of the world's commercial deposits of hydrocarbon occur in young rocks; 29% Cenozoic in the last 74 million years, 57% in the Mesozoic from 200-75 million years and 8% Permian - 200-225 million years and less tnan 6% before that. Only a very small fraction of the total hydrocarbon generated in the source rock is caught and retained by traps as it escapes from ttte sedi- mentary basin. There is another rather special circumstance under which escaping nydrocarbons may come to rest before reaching the curface and that is the condition under which the heavy oils of Alberta formed and is illustrated in Fiqure 4. Along the updip edge of the Western Canada Sedi- mentary Basin invading surface waters have carried bacteria into the sub- surface through the very porous sa^ds of the Lower Cretaceous formations. These bacteria have literally eaten the alkanes or straight chain hydra- carbons out of the oils leaving a residual oil made up only of ring type compounds of much greater viscosity than a norma"1. oil from deeper in the basin. The type of evidence leaaihn to this hypothesis is shown in the chromatograms of a succession of oil samples ranging from a normal oil at HUUIH BAR - COASTAL BARRIER COMPLEX

Figure 5 - Cretaceous landscape with low lying alluvial plain containing coal swamps bordering ancient sea (Morris and Jansa, 1971)

Figure 6 - Thin section of coal from harbour seam in Nova Scotia showing various types of materials (courtesy of A.R. Cameron) Bellshill Lake to a sample from the Athabasca deposit. The normal alkanes and eventual! ypristane and phytane have been removed from the oil in a sys- tematic progression to the basin edge. It has been suggested by Jardine (1973) that this change in physical properties is sufficient to bring the oil to a halt in its movement out of the basin. I think that you can see then that the distribution of the various types of hydrocarbons in a sedi- mentary basin is quite orderly and to some extent predictable. And now I would like to show you that a similar pattern exists for coal as well. COAL Coal is formed from the other main type of organic material to be found in sedimentary rocks. It can be defined as a combustable rock which had its origin in the accumulation and partial decomposition of vegetation. The organic compounds such as cellulose, lignin, starches and sugars, to- gether with minor amounts of proteins, fats, oils, resins, waxes. The carbohydrates consist of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen and the resins, oils and other plant materials are made of carbon and hydrogen with little or no oxygen. As you will recall these latter types of compounds were the precursors for the oil and gas about which we just spoke but they may also form special types of coal. The proportions of these various materials are one of the main factors in determining the character of the coal formed from them. Lush forests grew under rather special conditions in the geologic past when large volumes of sediment from mountains bordering the ancient seas covering the central parts of the continent formed deltas with vast swampy plains between the sea and the land as shown in Fioure 5. The woody plant materials accumulating in the fresh and brackish waters of this environment formed thick organic layers which partially decomposed through bacterial action until the activity was arrested by a build up of the toxic decomposition products, pickeling the plant material in its own juices. Peat was thus formed just as it is today in many parts of the world. During this process a number of new organic compounds were formed and gases such as carbon dioxide, methane and hydrogen were given off to the atmosphere. As you will recall, it is methane formed by such a process from disseminated plant material that is found in the shallower parts of the sediirentary basin. The peat forming process involves asteady increase in the proportion of compounds rich in carbon. If the decomposition took place in a well oxygenated environment the end product would be only carbon dioxide and other gases. As you can see in Fioure 6, which is a thin slice taken from a coal sample from the Harbour seam in Nova Scotia, coal is by no means a homogeneous black material; rather it is made up of a variety of plant fragments. The dark grey (red in original) material is vitrinite and represents decayed bark and woody tissue impregnated by liquid decomposition products that was transformed into a harden&d gel during the peat formailisn. The light grey (yellow in original) material which happens to dominate in this particular specimen represents-the resins, spore and cuticle material, and is known as exinite and the black fragments are inertinite, probably formed through decay under conditions involving direct contact with the atmosphere, and without a liquid impregnation giving rise to a soft charcoal-like material. The banded nature of the coal with bright and dull ri e pt h The increase of rank of coal ft. m (decrease of volatile matter) IBJU 1

/

- 2000- •i -

7000- / 2200-

/

2400-

eooo- /

/ 1 2600- - / 9000- 2800-

/

3000- / - tooso- 10 20 30'i volatile matter d.a.f.

Figure 7 - Loss of volatHes with depth (Murchison et a!., 1968)

Figure 8 - Composition of coal ranks (Averitt, 1973^ 11 layers can be explained by the fluctuating conditions during the accumulation of the plant material. The peat is considerably reduced in volume by the extrusion of water and volatile compounds containing oxygen. The progressive enrichment in carbon continues and the peat gradually changes to a solid dark true humic coal. Figure 7 is a plot showing the loss of volatiles with increasing depth from a borehole in northwestern Germany. As successive layers of sedi- ment are added like oil, the peat is altered by being cooked and packed under greater and greater pressure to form the denser types of coals of increasing rank ranging from brown coals and lignites, such as are found in Saskatchewan, to sub-bituminous and bituminous, as occur in Alberta and eventually under conditions of extreme temperature and pressure anthracite. This change in types of coal is accompanied by marked differences in chemical and physical properties as is shown for the different ranks in Fiaure H. The black bars indicate the proportion of fixed carbon. It can also be seen that there is a continuous reduction in the proportion of volatile constituents in the coal with an accompanying decrease in the oxygen content to the point where in anthracite, the coal is made up of 95% carbon. These variations in composition and physical properties determine the use for each type. For instance, only certain types of coal having 20-30% volatiles are suitable for making high grade coke. It wasn't until about 300 million years ago that significant quantities of coal commenced to form when the land plants sudden- ly evolved. The carboniferous was one of the main periods of coal formation and the deposits of eastern North America were formed at that time. The other main period of coal formation in North America was in the upper Cretaceous 100 million years ago or so and was related to the period of major mountain building in the Cordillera which provided abundant terrestrial sediments bordering the Cretaceous seaway with extensive coal swamps. Thus it should be emphasized that the conditions suitable for coal formation are rather special and have occurred at only certain times in the geologic past in particular areas of the world with the result that the bulk of the 16.8 trillion tons of estimated world coal resources lie in Asia and North America. URANIUM You will recall that I stated at the beginning of this talk that all the energy minerals occurred in sedimentary rocks. That statement is almost true in that the major uranium deposits of the world also occur in sedimentary rocks in particular Precambrian conglomerates ?nd Mesozoic sandstones. It is not quite true in that the minerals of this element occur in a variety of other ways as hydrothermal deposits, pegmatites, disseminated in granites and so on, but these modes of occurrence are all of lesser importance. The origin of thiae sedimentary uranium occurrences is not well understood but it is probable that the uranium minerals occurring in the Precambrian conglomerates were detrital and formed fossil placer deposits which include other heavy minerals. The major deposits of South Africa are actually mined for their gold content with the uranium being a by-product. 12

Figure 9 - Log-normal distribution of reserves In Leduc reef pools. Alberta (HcCrossan, 1969)

100 CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY PLOT OF WESTERN CANADA 90- OIL AND GAS POOLS

BO-

70-

60-

30- TOTAL NUMSER OF OH FOOLS 1221 TOTAL NUMKK Of CAS POOLS 2472 20-

W

0 X) 20 30 40 50 60 70 CO 90 400 PERCENT or roots

F1»ur« 10 - Percent of ressrves of oil and gas froa MesUrn Canada vs. percent of pools 13

The most important Canadian deposits are also of this type. The deposits in sandstones of the western United States in which the uranium minerals either fill pores in the rock or replace rock-formTng minerals or carbonaceous material are throught to have been formed from the uranium leached from igneous rocks in surrounding areas. The dissolved uranial salts were transported in ground water in the hexavalent state and precipitated under reducing conditions in the tetravalent state. Again even for these minerals we find that the organic components of the rock are of importance in that they are one of the main agents that facilitate this redox reaction. I have not bothered to discuss thorium since it fs not yet an important, fuel. DISTRIBUTION Another characteristic common to all types of mineral deposits is the way in which they are distributed. For example, the concentration of uranium in the earth's crust is in the order of two parts per million and it is very ubiquitous. Anomalous concentrations of uranium are wide spread but mineable deposits are rare with average concentrations of ,1% and higher. Similarly, hydrocarbons are very common in sedimentary rocks but in trace amounts with on1y a very small fraction of the total sub- surface fluids being made up of hydrocarbon compounds. The processes about which we have spoken, however, have concentrated these fluids in anom lous quantities, but these concentrations are distributed in a most irregular manner. Many sedimentary basins of the world are totally Tacking In exploitable deposits, perhaps because they lack only one of the variables necessary for accumulate .n. Within a petroleum-prone basin the distribution of the oil and gas fields is also irregular with many fields clustered in certain areas of the basin where there was a confluence of the necessary conditions for accumulation. One can easily appreciate this irregularity by considering the very large pro- portion of the world's petroleum resources concentrated in a small area of the Middle East (15% of the world's hydrocarbon reserves in Ghawar and Bergan fields alone). Both oil and gas pools and mineral deposits display a size- frequency distribution that is approximately log-normal. Fiqure 9 shows the distribution of sizes of the Leduc reef pools of Western Canada. The middle graph is a log probability plot of these data with each dot representing an individual pool. With this type of distribution a very few pools contain the bulk of the hydrocarbon. For example, Redwater the largest pool in that particular distribution contains 817 minion barrels of oil recoverable and is by definition a giant and the only one in the set. That one pool contains 31% of all of the Leduc formation oil reserves which are distributed over 53 pools. The largest five pools in the upper tail of the distribution contain 75% of the 2.7 billion barrels of oil reserves in this system. That is 10% of the pools contain 75% of the oil. 90% of the oil lies within the top 9 or 17% of the pools. Figure TO shows the total oil and gas reserves of western Canada as a cumulative plot with percent of pools on the abscissa and percent of reserves on the ordinate, The graph shows very clearly that the last few percent of the pools contain a very large percentage of the total reserves. Finally it is worth noting that 65% 14

of the world's hydrocarbons occur in 1% of all fields; the 55 supergiants (McCulloh, 1973). When we consider that the largest pools or mineral deposits are often the easiest to find once the geological concept has been identified, it is not difficult to appreciate some of the economic and sociological pro- blems that have arisen in the past in exploiting the world's mineral resources. On a free market, the discovery of the elephants can seriously disrupt price structures and make exploration for and exploitation of smaller accumulations uneconomical. ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL While I anticipate that the other speakers on this program are going to deal with resource potential in some detail, I would like to try to clarify an important concept that still seems to be somewhat confused at least in the popular press; and that is the difference between reserves and resources. Reserves are already found and while the estimation of the quan- tities discovered may still be a rather inexact science, they are tangible and recoverable at a profit. Resources, or future petroleum potential, on the other hand, are working geological hypotheses; and not less valuable for that. They are as good as the background information upon which they are based. With a thorough understanding of the geology there is no reason to suppose that shrewd estimates of what lies ahead are not possible. Over the years the data collected throughout the world or. oil occurrence in the course of extensive exploration must form the largest body of scientific information ever accumulated about the earth's crust. Surely geologists should be capable of exploiting this information to tell us a good deal even in a quantitative sense about what remains to be discovered. To those who have decried these efforts, I say, make your criticism constructive and con- centrate on the merits of the geological arguments and not generalizations and emotional issues. CONCLUSIONS The sediment accumulating within depressions in the earth's crust contains within it small but important quantities of organic material. The two basic types of this material with burial and increasing temperature form coal and hydrocarbons respectively. When certain basic geological conditions necessary for the accumulation of mineral deposits or oil pools coincide a commercial accumulation may result. Only rarely are all the conditions optimum and when present can result in giants. The combined probabilities of these events results in a log-normal probability distribution. 15

REFERENCES Adams, P.J., 1960, Origin and Evolution of Coal, Geological Survey of Great Britain, 17 P. Averitt, Paul, 1973, Coal, jr[ United States Mineral Resources edited by Brobst, D. A. and Pratt, W.P.: U.S.G.S., Prof. Pap.820, P. 135 Deroo, G., Tissot, B., McCrossan, R.G., Der, F., 1973, Geochemistry of the Heavy Oils of Alberta, Paper presented at^Oil Sands of the Future Symposium, Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol., Calgary Jardine, 0., 1973, Oil Sands Occurrences of Western Canada, Paper given at Oil Sands Fuel of the Future, a symposium, Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol.s Calgary McCrossan, R. G., 1969, An Analysis of Size Frequency Distribution of Oil and Gas Reserves of Western Canada, Can. Jour. Earth Sc, V. 6, P. 201-211 McCrossan, R. G., and Porter, J.W., 1973, Geology and Petroleum Potential of Canadian Basins in: Future Petroleum Provinces of Canada, Can. Soc. Petrol. GeoL.TIem. 1 in press McCulloh, T. K., 1973, Oil and Gas Vn_ United States Mineral Resources, U.S. Geol. Surv., Prof. Pap. 820, P. 481 Murchison, Duncan and Westoll, T. Stanely, 1968, Coal and Coal Bearing Strata, P. 237, Oliver and Boyd, London. Nelson, S. J., 1970, Face of Time, Alberta Soc. Petrol. Geol., P. 104 Norris, D. K. and Jansa, L.F., 1971, Cascade and Crowsnest Coal Basins: Geol. Soc. Am., Rocky Mountain Section, Field Trip Guide Book.

Sokolov, V. A., Bujiiat-Zade, Z.A., Goedekian, A.A.s Dadashev, F.G., 1968, The Origin of Gases and Mud Volcanoes and the Regularities of Their Powerful Eruptions im Advances in Organic Geochemistry, Pergamon Press, Oxford, P. 477, 17

POTENTIAL OIL RESOURCES AND THF.IR DEPENDENCE ON PRICE AND GOVERNMENT SHARE

By D. K. McIVOR aid-D. D. LOUGHEED Imperial Oil Limited

In the early 1980's Canada will require additional supplies of domestic crude oil to meet its demand. Canada has significant potential crude oil resources; however, potential oil resources do not become reserves and appear in the consuming market until they are discovered and developed. This paper discusses Canada's potential oil resources and describes how their rate of development is dependent upon price, government share, markets and other factors. While the paper primarily discusses potential crude oil resources, the principles apply equally to the develop- ment of potential natural gas resources. The discussion which follows will start with a description of the methodology of assessing petroleum resource potential. Next the factors which influence the incentive and timing of the exploration and development of resources will be discussed. Then, using a simple mathematical model of a hypothetical frontier petroleum basin, the effect of some of these factors will be discussed in a quantitative fashion. Finally, the foregoing will be placed in the context of Canada's Future crude oil requirements. THE ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL OIL RESOURCES An analysis of the effect of various factors upon the exploration and development of potential crude oil resources requires first that we establish some appreciation of the producible oil potential. This is not easily accomplished, as evidenced by the wide variations among recently published estimates. The difficulty lies in the numerous highly uncertain fortors that control oil occurrence and the fact that knowledge of these factors varies widely from one area to another. Thus, to obtain a proper appreciation of the potential oil resources, one must accept the concept of dealing in ranges of potential reserves and understand that the confidence level or magnitude cf the range is proportional to the state of knowledge for any given area. The initial assessment in a new basin will of necessity be very crude. An estimate of the volume of sediments will be combined with an estimate of their richness, derived from the surficial knowledge of the sediments and comparison with known oil producing areas elsewhere in the world. As the exploration process proceeds through the geophysical survey and drilling stages, increasing amounts of "hard" data related to the 18

critical factors of reservoir rocks, source rocks, traps, and preservation from destructive events will allow progressively more intelligent and accurate assessments of the oil potential. A spectrum of assessments will be generated, varying from a wide range estimate for virgin basins to a relatively narrow range estimate for mature productive basins; and these will continually change as subsurface information and knowledge accumulates from geophysical surveys and drilling. For communication purposes, the probability concept is very use- ful when dealing with ranges and judgments. In this approach the range in estimated potential reserves is related to varying probabilities that specific amounts of potential reserves are present. This procedure carries with it the facility to sum numerous probability distributions of varying character to achieve a total probability distribution. In this way proba- bility distribution curves for all the various basins within Canada can be summed to provide a probability distribution for all of Canada. Since we use probabilities and know assessments are continually evolving, potential reserves estimates should be recognized as directional rather than factual. As such they can serve to direct policy and explora- tion intelligently but only by thorough exploration can one establish whether the assumptions and judgments are correct. In the context of these general comments it is our view that the estimates prepared by the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) and quoted in "Energy Policy for Canada - Phase I" (Reference 1) constitute a reasonable assessment of the potential undiscovered crude oil resources of Canada. However, all assessments tend to put some potential reserves everywhere, suggesting widespread oil occurrence rather than the very unevenly distributed occurrences found in nature. Thus they likely do not present the true picture of the risks and uncertainty involved in searching for oil. With these reservations, what does the GSC assessment tell us? Following are some of the highlights: - The mean probable potential for conventional crude oil resources for Canada is about 100 billion barrels. - Of this 16 billion barrels* have already been found, essentially all in the Western Provinces. - About four billion barrels of crude oil remain to be found in the Western Provinces and because it will likely occur in small pools, it will be difficult and costly to find. - About 80 billion barrels of Canada's undiscovered oil potential is located in frontier areas. *Includes natural gas liquids 19

- Of the frontier potential 63 billion barrels is located offshore, much of it in areas where the technology to explore and develop does not yet exist. In summary, Canada is estimated to have a relatively large undis- covered conventional crude oil potential, more than five times what has been found to date. Almost all of this lies in the remote frontier areas, many of them in very hostile environments. Finding and developing this potential will be difficult and costly and much of it may never be developed without the incentives of increased price, assurance of markets and a reasonable share of the reward between the public and the investor. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE INCENTIVE AND TIMING OF THE EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF RESOURCES The geological assessment procedure has established a mean undis- covered crude oil potential of about 84 billion barrels of oil; but, it must be emphasized this does not constitute a marketable resource until it is found, developed and provided an access to market. The incentive to do this is influenced by the geological risk, government share and stability of associated regulations, prices, markets, transportation costs, well productivity, etc. Since these factors are so pertinent to the ultimate materializa- tion of potential resources, this Section will discuss how each factor influences exploration/production incentive as background for the next Section which will present a numerical demonstration of their role. Oil Occurrence Risk One of the basic factors influencing exploration incentive is the high risk attached to finding significant quantities in any given area which in turn is due to the unequal distribution of oil and gas in the earth. Oil and gas occurrence statistics show that these commodities are extremely unequally distributed throughout the sedimentary basins of the world. A very few are extremely rich, more are modestly rich and the great majority are very lean or barren. Even within relatively rich basins, the oil and gas is usually concentrated in a very small portion of that basin. There are in the order of 500 sedimentary basins in the world, although the number is somewhat arbitrary since the separation between one basin and the next is often indefinite. Over half of the oil and g«s reserves discovered to date are contained in three of these 500 basins - the Persian Gulf, West Siberia, and Gulf of Mexico basins. A few score basins have significant reserves (more than 5 billion barrels, including gas converted to oil-equivalent). Reserves of more than local significance will probably never be discovered in most of the remainder. Reserves within a single basin are similarly uuequally distributed as can be documented by analyzing any mature exploration area. For example, Figure 1 illustrates !~ow the known oil reserves of Western Canada 20

WESTERN CANADA 800 CRUDE OIL POOLS RECOVERABLE RESERVES BILLIONS OF BARRELS 0.5 1.0 1.5 2,0 3 PEM6INA SWAN HILLS 3 REDWATER ^JUDY CREEK HILLS S. T&'Jiit BONNIE GLEN WIZARD LAKE THESE rav#fo&rt MITSUE POOLS COHTAIH ASffvaffa WEYBURN 50% + 11113 NIPISI OF AGGREGATE gWftl GOLDEN SPIKE RESERVES [M^IFENN ^.^'4^,'3 LEDUC - D3 SHHl BOUNDARY LAKE

i VIRGINIA HILLS CARSON CREEK _J STURGEON LAKE KEG RIVER 'B1 WILLESDEN GREEN AGGREGATE PROBABLE TURNER VALLEY ULTIMATE RESERVE KAYBOB - BHL 14 BILLION BARRELS WESTEROSE (EXCLUDES NATURAL GAS LEDUC - D2 LIQUIDS ) ACHESON - D3 KEG RIVER F 775 * POOLS < 100 MM BBLS.

FIGURE I 21 are distributed. More than half of all the discovered reserves are seen to be located in 15 pools, out of a total of 800. A similar picture results from an analysis of gas reserves. The reason for this extremely erratic distribution lies: in the complex interplay of geological events that must occur in order to provide an oil wr gas pool. The absence of just one of several critical factors precludes an accumulation. Looked at from this perspective, the many estimates of oil and gas potential within Canada's frontier basins may be misleading in that they generally imply significant reserves virtually everywhere and thus tend to minimize the risk involved in locating them. Canada's undiscovered hydrocarbon reserves will be distributed like those elsewhere - concentrated in a few basins, and further, in restricted parts of those basins. In this context it can be seen there is considerable risk in predicting even the presence of oil. Our confidence in the assessment estimate of 84 billion barrels of undiscovered oil in Canada must be based on the premise that the volumes and types of sediments within Canada are so vast that on the average it is reasonable to expect this amount of oil. In reality some basins will have more than the estimated potential and some will have none. Every explorer will have his own assessment of a basin and the realization that it will be unevenly distributed, both as to location and pool size, points out the risks as to the time that such resources will be available to the market and consequently the lengthy lead- times inherent in the oil exploration process. Government Share Government share of revenue has two effects: it reduces the potential reward and therefore the incentive to explore; and it lowers the cash flow available to the explorer for investment in explora- tion and development. Accordingly, if the government's share is high only the more highly assessed areas and those where exploration is less expensive are explored. We wish to discuss next a number of measures through which government share of revenue or its equivalent is obtained from the resource explorer, (i) Taxes The various levels of government receive revenue of different types from exploration/production activity: e.g. municipal taxes on property, plants and equipment; royalties, lease bonuses and rentals; licences and fees; and income tax. We intend to discuss only income tax here; however, in 1972 governments received $381 million from non-income te petroleum sources. Income tax for all corporations is calculated by applying a taxation rate to a taxable income. The taxation rate for petroleum exploration/development operations is about 50%. This compares to the current tax rate for manufacturing and processing of about 42%. Taxable incdme for the current year is obtained by deducting EXPLORATION/PRODUCTION COMPANY INVESTMENT & GROSS REVENUE PROFILE

GROSS REVENUE

t

-2 5 10 15 20 25 YR. NET CASH FLOW & BOOK PROFIT PROFILE

TOTAL GOVT REVENUE

NET CASH FLOW fron; production revenue a number of allowable expenses incurred during the taxation year or carried forward from the preceding years. Some examples are: - Losses - Capital cost allowance on expenditures for fixed capital assots such as field equipment, gas processing plants, etc. {The deduction rate, applied on a diminishing balance basis, varies from 5% to 30% per year depending upon nature of the asset.) - Exploration expenditures (geological and geophysical exploration surveys, exploration wells, land rental, applicable wages, salaries, etc.) - Production expenditures (development well drilling expendi- tures, fuel, applicable wages, salaries, etc.) The sum of these deductions when subtracted from production revenue after royalties yields net income before depletion. If there is not sufficient revenue in the current year to cover exploration and develop- ment expenditures, they may be carried forward to future years when such revenue does exist. The final step is the deduction of the depletion allowance from net income before depletion to obtain taxable income. An incentive in the form of depletion allowance has been available in Canada for extractive industries since a tax on corporate income was introduced in 1917. Initially the depletion allowance recognized the exhaustible nature of non-renewable natural resources. Subsequently it became recognized that this return of funds to the business promoted exploration to replace depleting resources ant to some degree compensated for risk. Tax legislation changes passed in 1971 changed the manner in which the.depletion allowance is calculated. The general result of the new legislation is to reduce the depletion allowance, thus increasing the government share. This is reflected by the change in effective income tax expressed as a percentage of net income before depletion. For example, prior to 1977 the effective income tax rate is always 33 1/3% of net income before depletion. After 1977, the effective tax rate will vary between 33 1/3% and 50% of net income before depletion, depending on the level of exploration. For any company with significant production income, the rate will be close to 50%. The income tax share of revenue over the life of petroleum ven- tures is very significant. Figure 2 has been prepared to illustrate a representative expenditure/revenue profile for a successful petroleum exploration/development company, in the Western Canada basin arid to depict the revenues accruing to governments and shareholders over time. 24

We have assumed that this company will spend $10 million over its investment phase, half on exploration and half on development. By Year 7 when initial production is achieved, the company will have accumulated almost $5 million of expenses which may be deducted from production revenue when calculating income taxes. Over the next 4 to 5 years, this backlog of prior expenses or losses is reduced to zero and income taxes become payable in Year 12. Revenues begin accruing to governments from the beginning. Industry-average data show that Provincial Governments would receive over 40% ($2 million) of this company's exploration outlays in the form of lease bonuses and land rentals. Royalty payments commence with production in Year 7 and rise rapidly as production rates increase. These two revenue sources have been added to income taxes to give the Total Government Revenue line shown. Typically, new exploration/development companies adopt the full- cost accounting method for shareholder reporting. All exploration/develop- ment expenses are capitalized and considered as assets, rather than booking them as charges in the years they are incurred. These capitalized expenses are then amortized (written off) against revenues over the life of producing properties. The net effect of this approach is that companies will report book profits to their shareholders well in advance of having recovered past expenses and being in a taxable position. Book profits ir the example of Figure 2 commence in Year 7, some 5 years ahead of having achieved a true break-even postion. Of course, over the life of the company the cumulative net cashflow and book profit are equal. It should be nov.ed that for each $1.00 of book profits, govern- ments will receive $1.18, indicating an effective share in excess of 50%. In other words, cumulative government revenue exceeds cumulative net cash flow and cumulative book profit. This example demonstrates the fallacy in judging the petroleum industry's contribution to the economy only in terms of income taxes over a limited time frame. Some critics refer to low apparent income tax rates without recognizing that most industry members are only now in the position of having largely recovered past exploration/development expenses and operating losses. In a notional sense, the shape and timing of the expendi- ture/revenur'taxation/book profit curves for the industry is similar to that for the single venture shown in the Exhibit. Thus, industry as a whole in Western Canada may be thought of as being situated at about Year 12, i.e., it is only now at a break-even position and becoming taxable. (ii) Royalties A royalty is a share of production of oil or gas retained by the lease owner who, with the exception of some freehold land in Southern Canada, is usually a government. It is not a tax. The royalty share must be given to the lessor free and clear of operating charges. It has commonly been 1/8 or 1/6, though governments have granted a reduction for wells producing below a specified rate. Recently Alberta and Saskatchewan have increased the oil royalty rate to 25% and British Columbia has increased theirs to 40%. This is in contrast to most 25 jurisdictions where royalty rate was constant for the term of the lease and any renewals if production ^tinues beyond the original term. On Federal land in Canada's high exploration cost frontier areas, to provide exploration incentive, the Government of Canada set a royalty rate of 5% for three years and 10% thereafter on the permit holders' initial lease selection. These rates are under review. (iii) Lease Pattern Selection Regulations After making a discovery on Federal and most Provincial lands the explorer is not allowed to retain all the acreage in his permit. He must surrender half to the Crown according to a kind of checkerboard pattern and this means the explorer loses the portion of his di uvery which underlies the surrendered lands. Thus the government obtains a share of the reserves which falls somewhere between zero and 50 per cent of the discovery depending upon pool size and the lease pattern selection regulations. The land retained by the explorer is termed primary acreage; that surrendered is called corridor acreage. Lease pattern selection regulations of this type are unique to Canada. Portions of permits in other world jurisdictions are also fre- quently relinquished to governments but not until reserves have been defined and not in a checkerboard pattern. Thus parts of discovered pools are not relinquished to government. In the case of Federal lands, Land Order 1-1961 permitted the original permit holder to reacquire the corridor acreage by accepting a higher royalty rate which varied from 20% on oil in the Mackenzie Delta, for example, to 50% on oil in the less remote southern Northwest Territories. The Land Order was rescinded in 1970 and government policy with respect to corridor acreage is currently under review. This has created uncertainty in industry planning at a time when major expenditure commitments have been made and new ones are pending. (iv) Bonus Payments to Governments for Land Acquisition There are two types of bonus transactions in the industry which relate to the exploration and development of oil and gas. The first relates to Provincial Crown reserve land which is offered for sale by requesting cash bonus bids. Future production from this land is, of course, sMll subject to a royalty. Since this type of land is near or adjacent to a known oil or gas field, the risk of failure is much lower than when the land was an unexplored permit. Accordingly, it will attract relatively high bids. The sale of Crown reserve land has been a lucrative source of revenue for the Western Provinces. For example, over the period 1947-1971 the Province of Alberta received $1.3 billion from sales of Crown reserve land. It should be recognized that the reserves which, under the lease selection regulations, revert to the Government represent a form of exploration disincentive, since the original finder took this loss into 26 POTENTIAL RESERVES ASSESSMENT FRONTIER OIL VENTURE 100

60

co LLJ or LLJ CO

60 \ co

\ cc

I 40 \ QQ IAN * 2.5 B LLION BBLS CO ce Q_ L \ \ 20 S

1

I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II I?. 13 POTENTIAL RESERVES - BILLION BBLS FIGURE 3 27 account in his economic assessment of the venture. The second type of cash bonus involves a competitive bidding procedure to obtain an exploration permit for unproven lands. The system has been used in the Provinces and has been proposed for the frontier areas. Its institution would result in a disincentive to exploration because it is an added exploration cost. In addition, it would not result in the generation 0* significant government revenue, because exploration permit acreage is high risk land. Price It is common in economics to find that higher commodity prices bring forth added supply and it is not surprising that this holds true for crude oil. For example, the Western Canada basin has potential undiscovered oil reserves of four billion barrels. This will likely be difficult and costly to find because it will be found in small accumulations; but, higher prices will provide an additional economic incentive for exploration and development of these reserves. The frontiers, as we have noted, are estimated to contain 80 billion barrels of Canada's undiscovered oil potential, of which 63 billion barrels is offshore. The remoteness and the hostile environment of these areas mean higher exploration, development and operating costs. Price can easily determine whether or not a given basin will be explored or whether pools of a given size or productivity can be economically developed. This will be addressed quantitatively in a later section. Another feature of the frontiers is their remoteness from the point of sale in the consuming market. The producer receives the market crude oil price less the transportation tariff between the wellhead and the market. Because remoteness from markets means higher transportation tariffs, exploration prospects must be better to offset the additional transportation expense. Market The assurance of markets is as important a component of explora- tion incentive as are good geological prospects and the expectation of adequate prices. A key feature of a favourable market outlook is the opportunity to produce reserves at economic rates. This means exporting supply that is surplus to domestic requirements. Energy Policy for Canada - Phase I has documented Canada's need for additional supply in the 1980's. To meet this requirement Canada should always have surplus domestic productive capacity to which it can turn as Western Canadian conventional crude oil productive capacity declines. The timing of exploration discoveries cannot be predicted, yet the realities of exploration economics dictate that the explorer must be able to market new supply as soon as it can be developed. Thus a market system which provides the opportunity to export surplus supply is a key factor in the conversion of potential resources to proven reserves. 28

POOL SIZE DISTRIBUTION FRONTIER OIL VENTURE 900

- 100

t/s 600 80

tif / - 60

300 40 5 J/ Uj 1 -— 20

0 C D E F G H POOLS FIGURE 4 29

ILLUSTRATION OF HOW OIL OCCURRENCE RISK, PRICES, COSTS, AND GOVERNMENT SHARE AFFECT THE EXPLORATION DECISION PROCESS In this Section, we will follow the thought processes and analyti- cal economic evaluation of a typical Industry explorer as he considers a new exploration venture. The example is hypothetical, but uses parameters evolved by Imperial in exploration planning and evaluation in Canada's frontiers. The example depicts exploration economics in an ice covered environment. An onshore frontier situation with lower per well exploration costs could have been used; however, the potential reserves assessment of the venture would also have been lower. The case chosen better depicts the economic decisions facing explorers in the offshore frontier areas where the bulk of Canada's potential oil is expected to lie. It is assumed the explorer is satisfied as to availability of markets and the price outlook. It is also assumed that a large block of prospective acreage is under permit to a single explorer, although this is not usually the case. Basic Description After land acquisition, primary seismic evaluation is conducted. This will define the number, size, and type of structures on the explorer's acreage. In the example, it has been assumed most of the major structures have been identified before the start of exploration drilling. Potential reserves are estimated from the size of the structures, a risk assessment as to the number that might contain oil, and reasonable assumptions for reservoir thickness, per cent of trap filled, and recovery factor. Potential reserves in the assumed oil-containing structures of the hypothetical venture have been expressed in terms of probability as shown on Figure 3, with ;he "mean" assessment for the amount of oil trapped in the structures being 2.5 billion barrels. Geological and geophysical reconnaissance and historical data from similar basins are combined with the mean assessment to construct a pool-size distribution curve (Figure 4). Note the explorer expects the five largest structures, Pools A through E, will contain about 90% of the potential mean reserves assessment. At this stage of exploration, it is not known whether the basin contains any oil, so the explorer defines the minimum diagnostic exploration program he believes will either find the first field or confirm, with reasonable certainty, the absence of commercial quantities of oil. It is assumed that the venture is in a hostile ice-covered offshore environment, and that a special drilling vessel is required. It has a fixed operating cost of $20 MM per year and variable costs of $4 MM per well, and can drill a maximum of two exploratory wells per year. It is estimated that 10 exploratory wells will be required to establish with certainty that the basin is devoid of economic hydrocarbon accumulations, and that the project should be abandoned. This "dry-hole 30

program" will require the expenditure of $140 MM over five years. However, since this exploration program is predicated upon find- ing a new field, the costs of additional follow-up exploratory drilling to adequately define the venture's potential must also be estimated. This "success case" is assumed to consist of the initial 10-well program, plus an additional 12 exploratory wells, with 8 of the 22 resulting in the discovery of new fields. In addition, 14 delineation wells will be required, for a total success cost of $480 MM, spread over 10 years. This represents an acquisition cost of 19<£ per barrel, compared to the long-term average acquisition cost of 40

POOL ECONOMICS- FRONTIER OIL VENTURE

PROFIT , 5 POOLS 334 LESS EXPLORATION COST (AFTERTAX) DRY HOLE PROGRAM... 53 SUCCESSFUL FOLLOW- UP PROGRAM _62_ 115 PROJECT PRESENT VALUE PROFIT AT 10% 2\g PROJECT DCF RETURN ... 14%

PROFIT (EXCLEXPL COST)

FIGURE 5 pool. Note that the ordinate is labelled "present value at 10%." This discount value is chosen because it represents the minimum rate of return most firms would wish to receive on a venture with a low risk. The pool for which the present value of the future income equals the present value of the costs (operating, development, income tax, royalty) is the reserve volume which just yields a DCF return of 10%. In this system, pool F approximately meets this criterion. Pools A, B, C, D,and E, which are larger than F, will yield returns greater than 10%, and thus are indicated to have a present value profit. The expected present value profit from th^ five largest pools (excluding any exploration costs) totals $334 MM, while the present value cost to the explorer of the $140 MM dry-hole program is $53 MM. Thus, the potential present value profit from this venture might be expected to support approximately six similar dry-hole programs and still yield a 10% DCF (334/53 is approximately equal to 6). This is referred to as the "success odds". The success-odds concept was devised as a means of incorporating risk in exploration economics. The principle on which it is based can be explained by the following analogy: In a game of chance there is a silver dollar hidden under one of six inverted cups. Since there is one chance in six of winning the silver dollar in one try, no more than 16 2/3<£ a turn should be risked in order to break even. In the long run, the correct cup should be overturned an average of once in every six tries. This principle applied to exploration recognizes that oil and gas will be found in only some of the ventures. Productive systems must bear the expense associated with unsuccessful exploration. Referring to Figure 5, in our example, the total present value exploration cost is $115 MM, including the successful follow-up program. Thus, the project present value profit amounts to $219 MM, which is equi- valent to a DCF return of 14%. Each explorer has some view as to what his DCF target should be, and some view of the probability of there being specific amounts of oil in the basin. How should the explorer view the DCF return and relate it to potential reserves in making his go/no go business decision? In practice, it is difficult to define what will likely be the explorer's lower limit for an acceptable DCF return. Note from Figure 5 that the DCF return is 14% if the explorer finds and develops 2.25 billion barrels (pools A, B, C, D, E). If he considers a 10% DCF return his minimum acceptable target, should he regard the 14% DCF return from this venture acceptable, considering he does not know there is any oil in the basin, and considering his successful 34 EFFECT OF VARIATIONS IN ASSUMPTIONS ON PROFIT

BASE CASE $I.OO/BBL PRICE INCREASE $I.OO/BBL. PRICE DECREASE —

(EXCL. EXPL COST)

FIGURE 6 35 ventures must bear the cost of the unsuccessful ventures? Even when the success odds are relatively favourable, he knows that the economic analysis and results imply a level of knowledge and precision which is not there. They are based on a fabric of "ifs": _If_ there are source beds, geologic structures, and seal beds; if the mean potential reserves and the pool distribution curve is as forecast; if he meets the timing forecast of discovery and development of pools A, B, C, etc.; if the crude oil price outlook is realized; if government royalty and taxes remain as assumed; if there is the market he anticipates; if there is a pipeline, if it is built when pool A is ready; and so on. The explorer's experience tells him if he aims at 15 to 20% DCF return for each exploration venture he should, over a number of years, obtain an average return level which should finance the inevitable future failures. At the same time the expected present value profit must provide success odds commensurate with the assessment of risk. Once the explorer is successful in finding his first economic-size pool in a new basin, he can lower his DCF return target because one of the tnajo^ uncertainties has now been removed — he knows there is oil (or gas) in commercial quantities in the basin. He will still plan a dry-hole program in seeking the second and subsequent pools, and will compare this present value cost, plus that of development and operation, against the present value of the revenue stream. Because there is still significant risk of variability in the pool size and fill, his DCF target must still be well above that for a relatively low-risk venture (10%). Effect of Price on Reserves Explored For and Developed We have seen how the explorer uses economic studies and financial criteria to guide his decisions as to whether or not to explore in a basin. These examples were based upon certain assumptions. One of these was price, and this was assumed to be $2.50 per barrel at the wellhead in 1973, escalating at 5% per year. Higher prices increase potential oil resources in two ways: First, they increase the DCF return of the project. For instance, a $1.00 per barrel price increase applied to the hypothetical system enhances the present value profit of the five largest pools by $320 MM (Figure 6 ) and increases the DCF return from 14% to 22%. The economics resulting from this higher price would probably be sufficient to bring about a commitment from an otherwise hesitant explorer. Second, they permit the development of pools which were uneconomic at lower prices. When the explorer finds oil (or gas) in a basin, he develops only those potential additional pools in the basin which meet his DCF return target. Thus, in the example, a 1973 price of $2.50 per barrel at the wellhead (escalating 5% per year) permits the finding and development only of pools A, B, C, D, and E. A 1973 wellhead price of $3.50 per barrel (also escalating 5%per year) would permit development of smaller-size pools 36 EFFECT OF VARIATIONS IN ASSUMPTIONS ON PROFIT 360 BASE CASE NO GOVERNMENT SHARE 320 1500 B/D/W PRODUCTIVITY

280

240

3? 2 200

160

120

80

40

c POOLS FIGURE 7 37 such as F and G, thus increasing the economic supply potential of the venture. Conversely, a price expectation which was $1.00 per barrel lower would completely eliminate any incentive for exploration and development of this venture since the projected DCF return would be only 8%. Effect of Government Share on Reserves Explored for and Pavel oped Just as crude price levels affect present value profit and hence reserves developed, the government share affects the sane factors. Figjre 7 shows a curve of present value profit on the basis of no government share. The difference between the upper two curves is the present value of the government's revenue from royalty and income tax. For the five pools, this exceeds the present value of the producer's profit by a factor of 1.5. It is apparent that by changing its share, it is within goverments1 power to significantly increase or decrease the producer's net cash flow or profit expectations, and accordingly, to affect the explorer's decision to enter the venture. Similarly, by maintaining long-term stability in regulations affecting its share the government can do much to enhance the exploration climate. Effect of Well Productivity on Economics Another key to the economic success of a venture is the productivity of the wells. In our example, it was assumed development wells would produce 3,000 barrels a day. If well productivity was only 1,500 barrels per day, twice the number of development wells would be required. The additional investment significantly reduces the present value profit (Figure 7) and the overall DCF return of the project is reduced from 14% to 11%, definitely too low a return to cover the risks involved. Frontier Crude Oil Reserves Availability as a Function of Price We have discussed the significant effects of price on the potential supply of oil from an exploration venture. We will now extend this concept of supply as a function of price to the frontier areas in total. In the case of the exploration venture, the incentive is provided by the economics of finding oil in pools of varying sizes. We would expect the average pool to be economic at the time of initial development. If this transpires, the bulk of the reserves in the basin would be market-available at about the same price. But the price at which reserves become market-available varies widely among basins. Because of differences in geographical location and hostility of environments eachbasin becomes a distinct economic entity with its own explorationy development and transportation costs. The market price required to bring out supply from these entities must be sufficient to offset transportation tariffs and provide the explorer with economic incentive for exploration and development. Thus, for any area, there is a reserves threshold below which the unit cost of transportation escalates very rapidly and is excessive in relation to any reasonable market price outlook. This is illustrated on Figure S. Point X is the reserve level at which there exists the required combination of market price and transporta- tion tariff providing economic incentive for exploration and development. 38

t \ \ \ \ \

RESERVES THRESHOLD REQUIRED TO SUPPORT A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

MARKET AVAILABLE RESERVES I CUMULATIVE) FIGURE 8 »WWIBWI»W«(i«W»0iasaMMM»H»«^^ ^Ti6[iHM^^

CRUDE GIL RESERVES AVAILABILITY AS A FUNCTION Of MARKET PRICE

10 20 30 40 50 60 MARKET AVAILABLE RESERVES - BILLION BBLS FIGURE 9 TIMING OF FRONTIER RESERVES AVAILABILITY

1980 1990 2000 2010 YEAR FIGURE 10 41

To the left of X, the effects of the escalating transportation tariffs are seen in terms of required market price. The plateau price will make the bulk of the reserves in the basin available. The remainder of the reserves in the smaller accumulations will require significantly higher prices to ensure their availability. Thus the price curve rises to the right. Figure 9, which shows how Canada's future frontier oil reserves depend upon price, was derived using this concept. With the GSC assessment of 1973 as a basis, the frontier basins were split into ten logistical areas. Price/market available reserves plots similar to Figure 8 were prepared for each area and cumulated versus price. The hachured area on Figure 9 encloses the resulting range of values. With the current market prices in the range of $4 to $5 per barrel, depending upon crude oil quality, this analysis indicates directionally that between 5 and 15 billion barrels of Canada's undiscovered potential may become available at current prices. An additional 25 billion barrels may become available with prices ranging to $8 per barrel (1973 dollars). The remainder will require higher prices. Even with the expectation of higher prices, there are significant technological problems to be solved before exploration and development of much of Canada's undiscovered crude oil potential will be feasible. Not knowing when this technology will be developed, it is hazardous to attempt to place this forecast of market-available reserves within the cont&xt of time. With this caveat, Figure 10 shows our estimate of the earliest time when frontier reserves could be placed on stream assuming no constraints. The various areas of differing costs have been broken out. with area A being the least costly and area I the most costly. To provide incentive for explorers to find and develop the latter increment, the lead time between the start of exploration and materializa- tion of these resources requires that the expectation of this higher price be apparent now. The plot suggests the technology for making most of Canada's potential reserves market-available could exist by 1995, but the other necessary ingredients for realization of this scenario are appropriate levels of price, market and government share. SUMMATION Let us briefly recap the major points we have presented: 1. Canada is estimated to have a relatively large undiscovered conventional crude oil potential about equal to five times that discovered to date. 2. Canada's undiscovered reserves will probably be concentrated in a few basins and in restricted parts of those basins. 42

3. This uneven distribution is the cause of the risk involved in assuming thac oil will be discovered wherever it is explored for and in predicting the time of discovery, 4. It is also the prime reason for the significant lead time between the start of exploration and the discovery of commercial quantities of crude oil. 5. Major components of Government's share are income tax, royalties, and the portion of a discovery it receives on surrendered land. 6. The explorer/producer's incentive to explore for and develop crude oil depends upon: - Geological prospectiveness and the risk of not finding oil in commercial quantities. - His expectation for the price of crude oil at the wel1 head. - His expectation of government share. - Ths expectation he will be able to market his crude oil, making a reasonable allowance for the time required to provide a transportation facility. - The discounted cash flow rate of return on his investment. - The development of the necessary technology.

DISCUSSION Using these points and the preceding material as background, there are a number of areas on which we believe additional comment is pertinent. It has been argued by some that the distribution of economic rent from crude oil and natural gas production is inequitable; i.e. that the explorer/producer's present value profit is too high, especially in the case of large pools. The explorer/producer's anticipated return should be viewed as the aggregate of successful and unsuccessful exploration with the discovery of both large and small pools, not simply as the result of finding a single large pool. Our analysis of the Canadian oil and gas exploration/ production industry reveals that it will earn only a 10 to 12% DCF return on all its investments in Western Canada. This estimate takes into account the production of remaining reserves at significantly higher prices. Of course, this is an average DCF return for all companies. Some have been \iery successful, but many have made a modest return, and 43

about the same number have yet to recover their costs. With respect to the fortunes of a very successful firm, it is interesting to note that even if one company had been fortunate enough to have acquired the reserves of the six best Alberta pools found in the early 1950's and then terminated exploration, it would have earned a DCF return of about 24%. It is inevitable that some explorer will find a large field on which he will realize a high DCF return. Indeed it is the expectation of individual companies that they will make a better than industry average rate of return that maintains their interest in high risk exploration. It is just as inevitable that the same explorer will have to support earlier or later exploration failures. The matter of exploration lead time has been mentioned several times- A concrete example is Imperial's exploration in the Beaufort Basin. Significant exploration expenditures began in 1964, and resulted in oil and gas discoveries in 1970-1972. However, production from the area cannot possibly begin before 1978, 14 years after significant expenditures commenced. As a final point, there is little governments can do to hasten the timing of discovery. On the other hand, governments' actions can easily create uncertainty with respect to vital factors such as share, markets and prices which could slow the pace of exploration. CONCLUSIONS 1. Canada has significant potential crude oil resources. 2. Potential oil resources will remain undiscovered unless the combination of geologic risk, government share, price, and timely market outlet can be perceived by the explorer to provide a potential reward commensurate with the money at risk. 3. The extremely uneven distribution of oil in the earth is such that a very few explorers will make substantial returns on investment while most will be less fortunate; yet it is the expectation of doing better than average that motivates explorers to risk large sums of money. 4. Canada will require significant crude oil supply additions in the future. This can be effectively realized by a continuation of Canada's competitive enterprise system; however, their timely development will require a clear understanding of the role of the basic factors of price, market, stability of regulations, and share of reward between the public and the investor. It is the purpose of this paper to aid in this clear understanding. REFERENCE 1. An Energy Policy for Canada - Phase I, Vols.l & 2, Information Canada, Ottawa, 1973. CANADA'S POTENTIAL ENERGY RESOURCES

POTENTIAL BARRELS Gil FUEL RESERVES • EQUIVALENT (billions)

Conventional Crude Oil 92 billion bbls. 92 Athabasca Oil Sands & Heavy Oil 331 billion bbls. 33. Natural Gas 765 trillion cu. ft. 126 Coal 120 billion tons 480 TOTAL OIL EQUIVALENT 1,029 billion bbls.

PROVED REMAlNrNG RESERVES PLUS ESIIMflTEO UNOISCOVER6I1 POTENTIAL SOURCE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CftNAOA 197] Fig. i

AMPLE FOSSIL FUELS TO MEET SHARE OF ENERGY MARKET TO YEAR 2050 PROJECTED POTENTIAL BSUIOIfS CANADIAN FOSSIL •US DEMAND FUEL CHI EQUIVALENT FOR ENERGY RESOURCES i.ooo-

800- NUCLEAR AN-D : OIL, 500 HYDRO GAS. POWER, OIL SANDS, / COAL 400

200 FOSSIL FUELS

•INIltmtOHHIMlNIOUMflltOMN AX IMHGV Fill(CT f ID! ,:.Vjfl!!A UI^!U'M*i1 III | VINES AMU niSOURClS OllrtWft 11/1 •PIKSI «*Il V PWIIVl 0 Hl'.tfllNIM, 1*1 US fl^niSt.ilvi HI (I KHINMM Mtsp'M .

Fig. 2 45

ENERGY RESOURCES AND THEIR DEPENDENCE ON PRICE: NATURAL HAS by V.L. HORTE Canadian Arctic Gas Studies Limited, Toronto

I think that most of vou here todav, like myself, would aqree that Canada is most fortunate in having amole potential resources of fossil fuels to meet its energy requirements until such time as these can he sunnlied by other forms of energy. We are more fortunate in this resnect than most industrial nations of the western world. Fortunate, however, onlv if we recognize the challenge of converting potential energy into available energv. We must take the necessary steps to ensure that adequate sunplies of energv are developed and made available in the riqht form, by the time they are needed, and at comoetitive costs. One form of energv we must continue to develop to meet near term needs is natural gas from domestic supplies, if we are to maintain our self- sufficiency in energy. About 85% of Canada's estimated ootential natural gas resources lie in the Arctic and offshore frontier reqions. It is to these potential supplies that Canada must look, by the end of this decade, if gas supply shortages are to be avoided. An initial sten in makinq these frontier gas supplies available for Canadian consumers will be the S5 billion Arctic Gas pipeline. Canada's potential fossil fuel resources -- oil, natural qas and coal -- amount to the equivalent of more than one trillion barrels of crude oil, as shown in Figure 1. The data here are taken from the extensive oolicv study completed earlier this year by the federal Department of Enerqv, Mines and Resources. We have converted the estimate of potential reserves made by the Geological Survey of Canada into equivalent barrels of oil on the basis that six mcf of gas are equal to one barrel of crude oil, and four barrels of crude oi1 are equal to one ton of coal. This potential resource base of one trillion barrels of oil is equivalent to more than three times Canada's estimated demand for fossil fuels during the 80-year period from 1970 to 2050, as inferred from the Enerqv, Mines and Resources' study. (Figure 2.) Certainly, a great portion of this energv potential supply will be available only at prices substantially greater than nresent energv costs. But based on projected trends of world demand/suDply relationships, the orospects for lower-priced alternative energv suoDlies are not encouraqinq. Demand for fossil fuels in Canada is expected, accordinq to the government study, to start declining by about 2020, and will be sharoly reduced by year 2050. By that time, electrical energy could account for 90? 46

TRILLIONS OF CUBIC FEU 120 DISCOVERED 10 AND POTENTIAL ° UNDISCOVERED GAS RESERVES POTENTIAL" OF WESTERN 8D CANADA 60 REMAINING RECOVERABLE NATURAL GAS 40 RESERVES AT DEC 31 72*

20 CUMULATIVE PRODUCTION TO73 Fig. 3 TRILLIONS CUBIC FEET SUPPLY 120-

i 100- i MISLEADING UNDISCOVERED POTENTIAL j COMPARISON 1 80- DEMAND OF CANADIAN TO 1987 GAS SUPPLY & 60- DEMAND REMAINING RECOVERABLE NATURAL GAS FORGANADfAN 40- RESERVES At DEC 31/72

20- CUMUL'ATivi PRODUCTION 1/ PROOUCTI.ON Fig. 4 of total enerqv needs. In turn, electrical enernv is then exoecteH to he qenerated almost entirely from nuclear reactors. It was this analvsis which led the government study to conclude that "Canada has more than enouah enercp/ resources available to rover her own use at least until the vear ^50." n.nd bevond this is the wide range of ootential new forms of enerqv -- nuclear fusion, solar, geothennal, and othei•« -- amon>] which nuclear fusion -^A solar enerqv can he looked unon as virtually unlimited and inexhaustible. We do not need to question the adequacv of our notential enerqv resources. The question we must ask is this: will our enerqv resources be developed and made available at a rate that keens pace witt the qrowth in demand and at a price competitive with world enerqv nrices? I do not intend to explore the supolv/demand outlook for oil, which will be discussed in deoth by others at this conference. However, there is one ooint that our studies at Arctic Pas clearly indicate. Neither in terms of price nor availability, can we exoect that petroleum sunnlies will provide a more attractive or realistic alternative to meeting present or anticipated demand for natural gas. Thus, development of adequate supplies of natural gas is most important if our total future enerqv needs are to he fully satisfied. Fiqure 3 shows that less than one-third of the ootential marketable reserves of natural qas which the ^eoloqical Survev of Canada estimates for western Canada still remain to be discovered. The ^eoloqical Survey of Canada study, issued earlier this vear in the qovernment's naner on energy policy, estimated 113 trillion cubic feet of potential reserves to exist in the four provinces of western Canada. Of this estimated notential, approximately 152 had been produced bv this year, and more than 51* represented remaining discovered reserves. I must mention that studies by mv own company indicate that the undiscovered potential qas reserves of western Canada are appreciably greater than that estimated by the Geoloqical Survpv nf Canada. We can conclude from Fiqure 3 that we have discovered and have committed to markets, in large part, the total western Canadian potential. I would add that it is also reasonable to exnact that the remaining notential will be more difficult to find, that the rate of discovery will decline, and the cost of finding will increase. The information shown in Figure 4 is of the tvoe which has led some of the academic economists in Canada to lean to erroneous conclusions as to the adequacy of our natural gas supply. It shows the volume of remaininq Droved plus potential qas reserves in western Canada to be appreciably qreater than the forecast of production demand during the next 15 years. The market studies by Arctic Gas suggest that less than 50 trillion cubic feet of production will be required during the next 15 vears, in order to meet presently authorized export volumes plus growinq domestic demand. However, the limiting factor in supply is not simnlv the volume of reserves, but the rate at which the reserves can be produced to meet specific daily and annual demands. I am sure that most of you are well aware of the fact that as qas is withdrawn from a reservoir, the pressure is reduced; as it reduces, the rate of production declines. Thus, while remaining reserves mav be large, the rate of delivery from those remaininq reserves is lessened and the time period for their recovery lengthened. Some 48

OELIVERABIUTY LIMITATIONS OF GAS PRODUCTION FROM WESTERN CANADA TRILLIONS OF CUBIC FEET 3-

2-

1973 1978 1983 1988 1992

PROJFCTfll VOLUMES ANNUAL WESTERN CANAOA GAS PRODUCTION SOURCE CANADIAN OHCTIC GASJ.1UDY 1IWIUD

Fig. 5

CANADiAN DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS WILL CONTINUE

OF CUBIC TO GROW FEET

1- AUTHORIZED EXPORTS

1973 1978 1982 1987

SOURC£ CANADIAN AHCTIf. GAS STUDY ilMIIt Fig. 6 49

SUPPLY SHORTAGE CANADA PRODUCTION

2 DEMAND RATE WILL EXCEED FORECAST GAS PRODUCTION 1 - FROM WESTERN CANADA THIS DECADE

1973 1973 1982 1987

SOURCE CANADIAN ARfllC G«S;.TlinV IIMIII Fig. 7

1MUMM WESTEBW SAWADA IS FEET ONLY GAS SUPPLY CANADIAN CONSUMERS

401

WESTERN FROVED REMAINING RECOVERABLE GAS RESERVES AS Of DEC 31/72 PLUS FOIEUtlAl UROISHOVEREO llfSt BVEi SOURCES: PROVED RESERVES . CAMAStlA* ?f THOLtUH «SiOCinTIDN CANADA fOTEBTWL HESEBVES... CEfllOBIUl SURVEY6F U0NSD4 1573 Fig. 8 50

sool TRILLIONS OF CUBIC FRONTIER REGIONS FEET ACCOUNT FOR 85% SQO OF CANADA'S POTENTIAL GAS SUPPLIES 400

200

WESTERN CANADA FRONTIER REGIONS

Fig. 9 51 diagrams will demonstrate this. Figure 5 portrays projected production of western Canada gas reserves during the 20-vear period 1973 to 1992. It is based upon assumptions as to the future rate of gas discovery in this region, and the deliverabilitv limitations on the resulting reserve suoply. It shows production increasing from a rate of nearly 2.6 trillion cubic feet this year to a peak of nearly 3.2 Tcf in 1979. Thereafter the rate declines gradually to a volume of 2.9 Tcf in 1992. I have mentioned that our studies suggest a greater potential gas supply in western Canada than the most recent estimates by the Geological Survey of Canada. This greater reserve potential is reflected in the production curve shown in Figure 5. If the Geological Survey of Canada's estimate of potential reserves were to be used, the rate of production decline would be more raoid than shown here. Projected demand for Canadian gas during the next 15 years is plotted in Figure 6, which shows the volume of exoorts to the United States declir' g as some of the presently authorized exoorts terminate during this period. But domestic demand for natural gas shows a steady growth. Total demand increases from a rate approaching 2.6 trillion cubic feet this year to about 3.6 Tcf in 1987. Figure 7 shows a combination of the projected market demand with the projected rates of gas production from western Canada. It shows that production falls short of meeting requirements within six years — in 1979. This short- fall is not very great in 1979, amounting to 1% of demand. But hv 1907, pro- jected western Canada production is about 15% short of indicated demand. Figure 8 shows that the four provinces of western Canada today comprise virtually the only available qas SUODIV to meet Canadian reguirements and our presently committed export volumes. As previously noted, this represents a presently discovered and remaining potential supply source, based on the Geological Survey of Canada estimates of some 95 trillion cubic feet. Fortunately, we have the frontier regions (Figure 9); and it is here that 85$ of Canada's potential gas resources are locatc-d, again based on the latest Geological Survey of Canada estimates. After allowing for production to date, the remaining indicated potential, based on Geological Survey of Canada estimates, amounts to some 775 trillion cubic feet. Of the frontier regions, the largest potential is indicated for the wide-spread eastcoast offshore area, with about 40^ of the indicated total. The northern mainland and Beaufort region is estimated by the Geological Survey of Canada to contain more than 100 tcf of potential gas reserves. What about prices? If natural gas is to look after its share of the energy market, it must be available at prices competitive with alternative forms of energy. Certainly it will cost more to get gas from our frontier areas than it has cost in the past from western Canada. However, there can be little doubt that costs associated with developing tha remaining and more difficult to find;potential in western Canada will be high. With respect to frontier sources, and in particular Delta gas, we are confident from our cost studies that we will be fully competitive with anticipated prices of alternative forms1 of energy. For example, based on projected world oil prices, we expect t;0i see Ibw-stilphyr content *^el oil selling by 1980 in Toronto at a price equivalent tpabe^toeen|^ and three times the present natural gas city gate price. Moreover, ft seems; highly unlikely tha+ we could develob adequate 52

domestic oil supplies at less than world nrices. When we look at other possible forms of energy -- such as coal gasifica- tion, nuclear energy or other new energy sources -- we must conclude that they will play an important role in our longer-term energy needs. But it is most improbable that these could be develoDed in time or on sufficient scale to ne attractive, realistic alternatives for our near term energy needs. Yhe largest supply of discovered reserves which could be available before 1980 to supplement western Canada will likely be those in the Mackenzie Delta-Beaufort area. In September, Arctic Gas reported estimates bv the consulting firms of <1.C. Sproule and Associates, and OeGolver and MacNauqhton. These firms independently estimated the potential reserves of the Mackenzie Delta, including the shallow water areas of the Beaufort Sea, to be aDoroximately 55 trillion cubic feet. They also concluded that further substantial but longer-term potential reserves exist in the Beaufort Sea area bevond the shallow water area. Of the 55 trillion cubic feet of potential reserves, the studies showed that aoproximatelv seven trillion cubic feet of gas can be exoected to be derived from fields discovered at that time. Considering the few wells drilled in the areas to date, the results are most encouraging. Our consultants estimated chat at the current rate of exploration drilling, substantial additional reserves will be established prior to the completion of the proposed Arctic Gas DiDeline. '!" mid-1973, the 27 firms oarticipating in Arctic Gas had spent in the order of $40 million to examine in detail the engineering, economic, environmental and northern reaional sociological aspects of the proposed piDeline. The pipeline will comprise more than 1,900 miles of 48-inch diameter pipeline, and more than 650 miles of 42-inch diameter oipeline. Of this, in the order of 200 miles would be in Alaska and the remainder in Canada. The proposed route extends from the gas suoplv areas, south through the Mackenzie Valley, and into Alberta to a noint northwest of Calgary at Caroline. Here it splits, with one 42-inch diameter leg extending southwest and the other 42-inch diameter leg extending southeast. Northern gas for Canadian markets east of Alberta will be picked un from Arctic Gas pipeline on the Alberta/Saskatchewan border near Empress bv TransCanada PiDeLines. In turn, TransCanada would move this gas across Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec. This would assure sustained construction exoansion on the TransCanada pipeline across the orairie provinces and Alberta for a long period. Even more importantly, it would ensure the continued use of existing pipeline facilities as gas suonlies from western Canada start to decline. In the far north, several alternative routes are still under consideration. They include two principal ontions from Prudhoe Bay across Alaska and the northern Yukon. One route lies east from Prudhoe Bay along the coastal plain, then south un the Mackenzie River Vallev. This route would cross the Alaska Wildlife Range. The major alternative follows the Alaska 'utility corridor" to skirt the Wildlife Range by crossing the Brooks Mountains in Alaska and the Richardson Mountains in the Yukon. This coastal route Is shorter, appreciably less costly, would traverse a greater area of potential gas supply, and, we are advised bv our consultants, would involve less ris' of environmental impact. 53

With installation of full compressor horsepower, the niDeline would be able to deliver in excess of four billion cubic feet of gas Der dav. Additional capacity can be installed as required, bv means of incremental looning with more large-diameter pipe. Throuqhout the areas of nermafrost, roughly north of 60 degrees latitude, the gas will be refrigerated at each compressor station to a temperature of about 25 degrees Fahrenheit, so that it will be close to the soil temoerature, and below freezing. This chilled gas concept will allow the pipeline to be fullv-buried along the entire length, and avoids the risk of any permanent damage to high ice-content permafrost. The right-of-way and compressor station sites will occuoy less than 40 sguare miles in the Yukon and Northwest Terriotries, out of an area in excess of 1.5 million sguare miles. Allowing for the regulators procedures, plus assembly and delivery of materials, it is unlikely that construction work could start prior to the winter of 1976-77. With careful olanning. it may be possible to build the northern end of the svstem as far as the Mackenzie Delta during two winter seasons, with the extension to the Alaskan North Slope during the following winter. This means that gas might start flowing from the Delta by nnd-1978, and from Alaska bv mid-1979, assuminn that there are no delays. Excessive delay could be detrimental to Canadian interests, because Canadians are likely to face shortages of natural gas by the end of this decade unless northern supplies are available. Yet Canadian demand, by itself, is not sufficient to pay the cost of a $5 billion pipeline. In order to provide northern gas to Canadian consumers bv the time that it will be needed and at the least possible cost, the pipeline must transport both Alaskan North Slope and Mackenzie Delta gas to both Canadian and U.S. consumers. As presently envisioned, about half of the design capacity of the pineline would be provided by gas from the Alaskan North Slope, and half from the Mackenzie Delta. To achieve maximum transportation economy, the pipeline nronosed bv Arctic Gas would reguire, within a very few years of start-UD, a market outlet i-\ e: :ess of four billion cubic feet per dav. This is more than Dresent total Canadian gas demand, and nearly 20 times the current annual demand growth. The possible loss of Alaskan gas is a real threat to the Arctic Droject. An extensive feasibility study of an alternative transportation route for the North Slope gas is already well underway bv Fl Paso Natural Company. The proposal envisions a pipeline from Prudhoe Bav to Alaska's Pacific coast where the gas would be liquefied for tanker shipment to California. The result of certification of that project would almost certainly be to delay the availability of Mackenzie Delta gas well beyond the time that will be reguired to meet the needs of Canadian consumers, and in our opinion could well prejudice development in the Delta area for many years. Arctic Has does not believe that the El Paso Project is the most economic or the most advantageous means for the United States to gain access to its North Slope gas reserves, But if the United Statas were to face lengthy delay in gaining access to its Alaskan gas by means of a pipeline across Canada, or were concerned about its futare security of SUDOIV, it could

p- 54

well turn to a trans-Alaskan delivery route We in Arctic 'iris do not believe that this will take ;>lace. because Canada and the U.S. in that event would both be losers. I have -aid that Canada is most fortunate in its uotential supplies of energy. Vie should not consider the challenges of develc;>inq this potential as a series of problems. They are really opportunities. I am confident that as a nation, we will seize these opportunities to maintain and enhance the national interest. 55

ALBERTA'S OIL SANDS IN THE ENERGY SUPPLY PICTURE by G.W. GOVIER* Energy Resources Conservation Board, Calgary

INTRODUCTION This paper describes the Alberta oil sands, discusses develop- ment work done and in progress, and makes some broad projections of how developments in the oil sands may occur over the next fifteen years. Even with some increase in conventional crude oil discoveries and with further gains through new and expanded recovery operations, the growth in Alberta's initial recoverable reserves of conventional crude oil is expected to be only some 200 to 300 million barrels per year over the next decade. With production expected to be in excess of 500 million barrels per year, at least in the early years, it seems inevitable that Alberta's remaining recoverable reserves of conventional crude oil will continue to decline from some 7 billion barrels today to about 3 billion barrels in 1985. Alberta's conventional crude oil production capacity will likely peak in the next few years at some 1.8 to 2.0 million barrels per day and then decline to some 1.2 million barrels per day by 1985. There is thus a clear need for the development of additional production capacity if Alberta is to maintain its position as a major oil production Province, and the present relation between Canadian crude oil production and consumption is to be preserved. Fortunately, Alberta does have the extensive oil sands deposits from which to provide supple- mentary production.

LOCATION AND RESERVES OF OIL SANDS Figure 1 shows the location and areal extent of the principal deposits of oil sands which extend over some 19,000 square miles of Alberta. The principal deposits are those of Athabasca, and Wabasca in north-eastern Alberta anrf in north-western Alberta. The Athabasca deposit is found entirely within the Wabiskaw- McMurray unit under an overburden of muskeg, glacial deposits and cretaceous sediments ranging from zero to 2,000 feet in thickness. The deposit has been extensively drilled and in a broad sense may be consi- dered reasonably well delineated. The areal extent of the deposit is indicated in Figure 2. The deposit covers 5 3/4 million acres, about 1/2 million of which is overlain by 150 feet or less of overburden. This latter area, crosshatched in Figure 2, is the area suitable for surface mining. Figures 3 and 3A are enlargements of the surface mineable area and show the distribution of core holes and the major leaseholders. Coring, * Paper presented by G.A. Warne. 56

ATHABASCA OIL SANDS PEACE RIVER OIL SANDS PEACE*. RIVER

WABASCA OIL SANDS COLD LAKE OIL SANDj

O

O CALGARY

FIGURE 1- LOCATION AND EXTENT OF MAJOR OIL SANDS DEPOSITS OF ALBERTA 57

R24 R20 R 4 WdM

T78

FIGURE 2 ATHABASCA OIL SANDS DEPOSIT AND SURFACE MINEABLE AREA 58

FIGURE 3° SURFACE MINEABLE AREA OF ATHABASCA DEPOSIT SHOWING CORE HOLE LOCATION 59

T.»9

AMERADA 90 I / HOME 30

\

T90

R.I3 FIGURE 3A SHOWING LEASE OUTLINES AND OWNERSHIP 60

logging and surface mining operations indicate much variability in the thickness and grade of the deposit and the erratic presence of lenses of dense hard material. Figure 4, which is a cress-section through parts cf the Great Canadian and the neighbouring Syncrude leases, illustrates the variability in the thickness and the quality of the sand. The Board made a detailed appraisal of the in-place reserves of crude bitumen in the Athabasca deposit in 1963. This was based upon core and log data obtained from over 1,600 wells. Some 1,200 additional wells have been drilled and logged or cored since 1963. These provide important detail in particular leases, especially in the areas of low overburden, but would not likely have a major effect upon the estimate of the overall in-place reserves. The Board's estimates of the in-place reserves of crude bitumen in the Athabasca deposit, unchanged from 1963, are 74 billion barrels in the 0-150 feet overburden range and 552 billion barrels in the 150 - 2,000 feet overburden range for a total of 626 billion barrels. These figures are based upon a 2 weight per cent saturation cut off. They represent the proved in-place reserves of crude bitumen. Over the past five years some 72 million barrels of synthetic crude oil has been produced by Great Canadian through mining and surface extraction operations. The Board believes that recovery of crude bitumen by surface mining methods to an overburden depth of about 150 feet, and for overburden to pay ratios of one or less, may now be considered proved. The limiting overburden thickness and the overburden to pay ratio reflect current prices, recovery economics and technology and what may reasonably be anticipated in the near future. Early this year the Board reviewed its 1963 study of the in- place reserves of the Athabasca deposit and, for the deposit in the 0-150 foot overburden range, made an appraisal of the quantity of crude bitumen which could be considered as proved recoverable and the amount of synthetic crude oil which it would yield. In this appraisal the Board assumed that only those sands containing 5 or more weight per cent crude bitumen, under less than 150 feet of overburden, and with an overburden to pay ratio of less than one, to be in the proved recoverable class. Appli- cation of these criteria and assuming a 90 per cent mining recovery leads to a recoverable reserve of 38 billion barrels of crude bitumen -- the amount now considered proved by mining methods. Great Canadian is now realizing a separation of crude bitumen and a conversion tr synthetic crude oil of 69 volume per cent; Syncrude anticipates a separation and conversion of 75 volume per cent. Using a conservative 70 volume per cent separation and conversion the 38 billion barrels of proved recoverable crude bitumen will yield 26,5 billion barrel: of synthetic crude oil. While the Board now considers only 38 billion barrels of the 552 billion barrels of in-place reserves of crude bitumen in the Athabasca deposit to be in the category proved by minir.g techniques, the Board is 61 optimistic that in situ methods will be developed to permit the recovery of a substantial part of the bitumen in the deep deposits. Even a 20 per cent bitumen recovery would lead to 110 billion barrels of crude bitumen which at a 70 per cent conversion would yield nearly 80 billion barrels of synthetic crude oil. The Board has made similar appraisals of the Cold I ke, Peace River and Wabasca deposits. These deposits contain in-place reserves of crude bitumen of 164 billion, 50 billion and 54 billion barrels respec- tively. At a 20 per cent bitumen recovery and a 70 per cent conversion the Cold Lake deposit would producf 20 bi"11 ion barrels and each of the other two deposits 7 billion barrels of synthetic crude oil, none of which may yet be classed as proved recoverable. A summary of the proved reserves of crude bitumen and synthetic crude oil is given in Figure 5. The figures which I have so far quoted are what the Board now considers to be the proved in-place reserves of bitumen, the proved recoverable reserves of bitumen and the proved recoverable reserves of synthetic crude oil. The ultimate reserves, i.e. the reserves that may ultimately be expected to be proved, may only be broadly estimated. The Board's judgment is that the ultimate in-place reserves of crude bitumen, at a 2 or 3 per cent cut off will be about 1,000 billion barrels; the ultimate recoverable reserves of crude bitumen at an average recovery of 33 per cent will be 330 billion barrels and the ultimate reserves of synthetic crude oil at 75 per cent volume conversion will be about 250 billion barrels.

PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT Experimental Projects Over the past several years some 20 experimental field tests or pilot schemes have been conducted in the oil sands deposits — mostly by major oil companies. At present two major tests and a number of minor tests are underway and one major test by Shell at Peace River which was suspended for a time is being resumed on an expanded basis. Amoco Canada Petroleum Company has been conducting field tests of its in situ recovery process since the late 1950's. Already having Invested about 9 million dollars in research on oil sands recovery methods, the company has announced plans to spend approximately 13 million dollars on further research into in situ recovery methods. Amoco is currently expanding its field program to obtain further design data relating to the application of underground combustion followed by waterflcoding. Imperial Oil Limited is continuing work it started at Cold Lake in 1964 on in situ recovery by steam injection. Imperial has drilled a further 23 shallow wells under the present program and is producing 1,500 barrels of crude bitumen per day. The company, in an application now before the Board, has applied for approval to add further facilities to boost the pilot plant rate to 4,000 barrels per day and to continue it for av

II-2S-N-K !6-i8-9Z-IO 10-20-92-10 I1-I4-92-I0IM

HUH 4 CIISI SKIM in

IEOENP FEED BITUMEN SATUtATIOH >IOV. PLANT FEED 1ITUMEN SATURATION < 'OV. KJECT MATERIA1 DEPOSIT OVERBURDEN AREAL CRUDE RECOVERABLE REMAINING RECOVERABLE DEPTH EXTENT BITUMEN CRUDE SYNTHETIC INTERVAL IN PLACE BITUMEN CRUDE OIL {FEET) (M ACRES) (MMSTB) (MMSTB) (MMSTB)

ATHABASCA 0-150 490 74,000 38,000 26,500 150-2000 5,260 551,900

COLD LAKE A 1000-2000 1,800 117,900 B 1000-2000 650 32,700 C 1000-2000 710 13,500

BUFFALO HEAD HiLLS 500-2500 159 900

PEACE RIVER 1000-2500 1,180 50,400

WABASCA A 250-2000 764 30,400

WABA5CA B 1OOO-2.5OO 1,000 23,400

TOTALS 12,013 895,100 38,000 26,500

FIGURE 5 - PROVED RESERVES OF CRUDE BITUMEN AND SYNTHETIC CRUDE OIL IN ALBERTA

oi 64

a further five years. Imperial has indicated that it is hopeful that in 5 or 10 years at the end of the test period it will have determined if a commercial operation using the technique is feasible in the Cold Lake deposit. The Shell in situ test in the Peace River oil sands deposit also involves the injection of steam and is being carried out on a 175,000 acre lease. If the results of the program warrant it, the company plans to undertake an expanded program involving 40 to 50 injection and pro- duction wells over a period of three years at a cost of some 15 million dollars. Should this program also prove successful, Shell would seek approval late in this decade for a commercial scheme of some 100,000 barrels per day capacity and similar in cost to an Athabasca surface mining scheme.

Commercial Development The first commercial plant in the oil sands was built by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, a company controlled by Sun Oil Company. It began production in 1967 and has gradually built up its production rate. In 1972 the rate averaged 51,000 barrels per day compared with its design capacity of 45,000 barrels per day and in 1973, despite a scheduled shut down for a major plant overhaul, this rate appears likely to be maintained. Great Canadian has applied to the Board for approval to increase the production rate to 65,000 barrels per day and that application is presently being considered. The process em\. jytd by Great Canadian involves removal of some 70 feet of overburden, mining, separation of the sand and bitumen, clean- up of the bitumen, and upgrading of it to sweet synthetic crude of 34° AP gravity. Giant bucket wheel excavators now supplemented by trucks and front-end loaders, are used to strip overburden and to mine the oil sands. Many problems were encountered in the early operation of the project but most of these problems have now been overcome. Great Canadian is mining some 80 per cent of the in-place bitumen in its lease; it separates 90 per cent of the crude bitumen contained in the mined sand; and effects a 65 weight or 78 volume per cent conversion of the recovered bitumen to synthetic crude oil. The overall result is a recovery, in the form of synthetic crude oil, of about 47 weight or 56 volume per cent of the bitumen in place. The Board considers these recoveries to be good for a first commercial operation. The synthetic crude oil from the project is of excellent quality and in high demand as a refinery feedstock. The price at Edmonton is now 4.20 dollars per barrel equivalent to about 3.95 dollars per barrel at the plant site. The capital cost of the Great Canadian project, including all on-site facilities but exclusive of road, bridge, pipe line and townsite development in Fort McMurray, was some 260 million dollars. The total represents a unit capital cost of $5,800 per daily barrel of original rated capacity of 45,000 barrels per day. The unit cost will decrease to 65 some $4,500 per daily barrel with the probable raising of the throughput to 65,000 barrels per day. The economics of the Great Canadian plant are still not good but with increasing crude oil prices and the probable raising of the production rate to the 65,000 barrels per day level the outlook for the plant is favourable. Syncrude Canada Ltd. is the operator for the team of Atlantic Richfield Canada Ltd., Imperial Oil Limited, Canada-Cities Service Ltd., and Gulf Oil Canada Ltd, and has approval for a second commercial oil sands development of 125,000 barrels per day capacity. This project is scheduled to commence production in late 1977. The production rate would increase gradually to 105,000 barrels per day of synthetic crude oil in 1980 and to 125,000 barrels per day by 1984. The project has been developed through a program of research work performed over some ten years and will also benefit from the experience of Great Canadian Oil Sands. Research and development expenditures have totalled about 30 million dollars. Syncrude plans to use large draglines rather than bucket wheel excavators for the overburden removal and mining operations provided the results of tests now in progress are satisfactory, but in other respects the operation will be generally similar to that of Great Canadian. A significant difference in the upgrading process wil7 be the use by Syncrude of fluid coking rather than delayed coking used by Great Canadian. Syncrude expects to mine about 87 per cent of the in-place bitumen in its mining area; to separate 91 per cent of the crude bitumen con- tained in the mined sand and to convert 71 weight or 82 volume per cent of the recovered bitumen to synthetic crude oil. The overall recovery of synthetic crude oil is expected to be 56 weight or 65 volume per cent of the in-place bitumen. If these recoveries are achieved they will repre- sent a significant improvement over those of the first plant. Earlier thi^ year Syncrude:applied to the Board for an amend- ment to the approval which it holds to permit certain technical changes in the process and fora delay in the authorized construction schedule. The Board's decision on this application was released on September 10, 1973, and approved by 1;he Alberta Government September 19. Syncrude and (the Government pf Alberta have had extensive dis- cussions and have recently largely reached agreement concerning royaltyc public participation, environmental controls, use of Wlbbrta materials, skilled labour and["professional services. Meanwhile, Syncrude has been proceeding towards the;start of major construction and a considerable number of senior staff have been hired for the program. Cost estimates for the program indicate";the capital cost including all on-site facilities but exclusive of road, pipe line and townsite development will be close to 900 million dollars. Even at the full capacity of 125,000 barrels per day this represents a unit capital cost of some $7,000 per daily barrel. 66

Considering inflation, this is quite comparable to the Great Canadian figure. Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited have submitted an application to the Board for a third commercial mining project. The hearing of this application began October 9 and will resume, following adjournment, on November 1. Shell proposes the production of 100,000 barrels per day of synthetic crude oil commencing in 1980 and reaching full scale in 1982. Shell would use drag lines for primary excavation, front-end loaders for rehandling and a rail system for haulage. It would follow Great Canadian and Syncrude in its use of the hot water extraction and froth separation processes. Shell proposes to upgrade the recovered bitumen by hydrotreating and hydrocracking. Present estimates indicate a capital cost of the Shell project of the same order as the Syncrude project. While I have commented favourably on the recoveries being obtained by Great Canadian and expected by Syncrude, I should not stop there. There are several respects in which future plants, benefiting from the experience of their predecessors and from new technology, should do better. I would suggest the following objectives: 1. The mining method should permit the mining of not less than 90 per cent of the oil sand containing over 5-6 per cent crude bitumen within the lease. 2. The extraction system should result in the recovery of not less than 95 per cent of the crude bitumen contained in the recovered sand. 3. The upgrading process should result in not less than a 75 weight per cent conversion of the recovered crude bitumen to synthetic crude oil. 4. The process should be self-sufficient in energy -- no natural gas should be required and electrical power interconnection should be for emergency purposes only. 5. Production of coke, char or heavy fuel oil in excess of site fuel requirements should be eliminated. 6. Sulphur recoveries from all sources should be in the range indicated in the Board's Sulphur Recovery Guidelines for Gas Processing Plants.

OUTLOOK FOR THE FUTURE Let me turf, low to trv_ ..tee of synthetic crude oil in the future. It is recognised that filoerta's conventional industry is approach- ing its capacity. Canada has good prospects for new conventional crude oil production, especially in the Mackenzie Delta, the Arctic Islands and off 67 the East Coast, and in time these will contribute to Canada's supply. Meanwhile, Canadian crude oil requirements continue to grow at 4 to 5 per cent per year and the gap between United States requirements and its in- digenous supplies widens at an alarming rate. Under these circumstances the amount and timing of the addition which the oil sands could make to Alberta's productive capacity is of great importance. The presently proved reserves are adequate to support 20 to 30 plants of 100 - 150,000 barrels per day capacity and producing 3 million barrels per day. Up to this rate reserves would not be limiting and no new technology would be required. What are limiting, however, are availability of capital, equipment manufacturing facilities, design and other professional services, construction labour and operating personnel. The magnitude of these factors is indicated by the approximate require- ments for a 100,000 barrel per day plant. Total Capital 800 million dollars Specialized Equipment 200 million dollars Design and Professional Services 800 man-years Construction Labour 5,000 man-years Operating Personnel 1,500 men Furthermore, substantial lead time from project conception to start of production is necessary — five or six years. Bearing in mind these very real limitations, my own judgment is that synthetic crude oil production will not much exceed 200,000 barrels per day in 1980 and that it could reach 800,000 barrels per day in 1985. Some conception of the manner in which additional synthetic crude oil production will be developed is given in Figure 6. The Board believes that perhaps four mining projects, including the Great Canadian, Syncrude and Shell schemes already announced, will be undertaken before the first in situ recovery operation. However, probably in the early 1980's a couple of in situ projects will be undertaken on a commercial basis. In all likelihood these will develop from the work underway and planned by Shell, Imperial and Amoco, the present leaders in development of in situ recovery techniques for the oil sands. If the two in situ oper- ations, not. now proved, did not develop, the probable maximum production by 19S5 would be in the order of 500,000 barrels per day, or perhaps a further mining project would raise the total to about 600,000 barrels per day. This brings us to Figure 7 and the outlook for Alberta's total liquid hydrocarbon production. The forecast of conventional crude oil production is based upon an intermediate rate of growth in conventional reserves. The figure shows conventional crude oil peaking at about 1.9 million barrels per day through 1977 to 1979, conventional crude oil plus natural gas liquids peaking at 2.3 million barrels per d?v4 with synthetic crude oil raising the p<2ak to 2.4 million barrels per day. The natural gas liquids, CO

1000

1967 '71 73 '75 '77 79 '81 '83 1985 YEAR FIGURE 6-ALBERTA SYNTHETIC CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION 2500

SYNTHETIC CRUDE OIL-

LU Q- 2000 r-r if * LU DC NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS CD //_/ o 1500

O 1000 CONVENTIONAL CRUDE OIL z" o H- 3 500 O O HISTORICAL FORECAST

60 65 70 75 80 85 YEAR FIGURE 7-ALBERTA LIQUID HYDROCARBONS PRODUCTION

en 70

shown on this figure as nearly constant in the range of 370,000 to 390,000 barrels per day, include some 180,000 - 190,000 barrels per day of propane and butane with the remainder (about equivalent) being pentanes plus. Synthetic crude oil production will slow the decline in total production over the period 1979 to 1982 and afterwards will reverse the decline to return productive capacity to 2.3 million barrels per day by 1985. Even without the two in situ developments, Alberta's total liquid hydrocarbon production will be maintained above 2 million barrels per day. We may conclude that synthetic crude oil is going to be important in the future of Alberta, Canada and the United States. It will be needed to offset the inevitable decline in our conventional production and to maintain and increase Alberta's total productive capacity. The extent of reserves proved to exist and proved to be recoverable will not limit development of mining projects. The prospects for commercial development of in situ projects are good although recovery by such means is not yet proved. The large requirements of money, equipment and man- power and the long lead time for oil sands projects makes early planning essential. It is reassuring to know that such planning is occurring both in industry and Government. 71

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COAL PRICE LEVELS AND QUANTITY OF ECONOMICALLY RECOVERABLE COAL IN CANADA

by

G. D. COATES Luscar Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta

If the contribution which Canada's large coal resource can make is to be properly taken into account in the determination of new energy policies, it is important to try to establish the relationship between coal prices and the magnitude of the nation's economically recoverable coal reserves. Unfortunately, so little of the necessary data is available that any conclusions can as yet be little more than tentative and speculative, but the matter is of sufficient importance at this time to warrant an attempt to establish the relationship. This paper constitutes such an attempt.

A definitive assessment would require reliable information about each of the following:

1. What is the nation's total coal resource? How much coal (by rank) exists in Canada; how does it occur and where?

2. How much of the total resource is mineable? To what extent will the mineable portion be increased by future technological improvements or decreased by future environmental restrictions?

3. What prices are necessary for recovery on an economic basis?

These questions are considered briefly below.

1. The Total Coal Resource. For these purposes, there is a need for not only reliable data, as to total in-place tonnages of each rank of coal but also information about the nature of the deposits, including:

- quality of the in-place coal - seam thickness and dip - seam partings - depth below surface - nature of overlying strata (i.e. composition of overburden, or roof conditions).

Such detail is at present unavailable, except in the case of some specific properties which account for only a small fraction of the 72

total resource. While estimates exist by rank of coal and province, these are based largely on data which are meager compared to the data required for mine planning and cost estimating, and include so little information regarding the nature of the deposits that economic assess- ment can be little more than speculative.

2. Mining Technology and Environmental Restraints. Technological consider- ations include the following:

(i) How much of the coal can be mined by surface methods? (ii) How much of the balance is recoverable by more costly underground mining methods, and what is the recoverable percentage? (iii) What will be the impact of further development of mining technology in future? As mining technology improves, reserves will move from the uneconomic to the economic category.

Without comprehensive information about the nature of the coal deposits no more than rough assumptions can be made about mineability; predic- tions about future mining technology can only be speculative.

Environmental and land-use restrictions have already placed certain deposits beyond reach for mining purposes; at this time, no one can predict with any certainty what the future balance will be between environmental considerations and economic benefits. Rightly or wrongly, it seems probable that the recovery of some known deposits of coal will not be permitted in future for environmental and conservation reasons.

3. Mining Economics. Full consideration of this factor would encompass all the costs of delivering to the ultimate consumer the energy derived from the coal, including:

(i) the cost of mining unprepared or run-of-mine coal; (ii) the cost of preparing the coal (i.e. crushing, screening and, where appropriate, cleaning it); (iii) the cost of transporting the coal or the energy derived from it.

Coal preparation can add heavily to costs, and in the Canadian context, the cost of transportation frequently exceeds the cost of mining. This paper, however, will not consider mere than the price of run-of- mine (i prepared) coal FOB mine.

The adverse effect which recent mine health and safety laws in the United States have had on underground productivity and on capital investment and hence on costs, and the increasing cost of reclamation in the course of surface mining make it clear that future trends along these lines should be taken into account in attempting to assess the future economics of coal mining, but that too is beyond the scope of this paper. 73

ESTIMATES OF THE MAGNITUDE OF THE CANADIAN COAL RESOURCE

In contrast to the production of only a few million tons of coal per year from Canadian mines at present (20 million in 1972), the nation's coal reserves are measured in the billions of tons. The most recent estimate1 by the Geological Survey of Canada (issued in 1970) indicated a total in-place coal resource in the three western provinces amounting to 118 billion tons with the eastern provinces^ contributing another 1.5 billion tons. Alberta's Energy Resources Conservation Board recently published a study^which estimated proved recoverable coal reserves remain- ing in that province °.Ione to be 8.7 billion tons. The following table summarizes the results of the two studies:

ERCB GSC Estimate of Geological Reserves proved remaining recoverable reserves in Measured Indicated Inferred Total Alberta Millions of Short Tons

Low & medium volatile bituminous B.C. 6,943 10,775 40,480 58,198 n.a. Alberta 982 19,620 7,367 27,969 3,220

High volatile bituminous •DR . OL*. 46 100 173 319 n.a. 6,278 3,044 9,322 226 Alberta

SubbAlbert ituminoua s 1,222 6,197 2,530 9,949 5,341

Lignite B.C. 340 300 300 940 n.a. Saskatchewan 292 7,024 4,698 12,014 n.a.

Totals B.C. 7,329 11,175 40,953 59,457 n.a. Alberta 2,204 32,095 12,940 47,240 8,787 Saskatchewan 292 7,024 4,698 12,014 n.a.

Western Provinces 9,824 50^296 58,591 118,711 n.a. 74

The fundamental difference between these two estimates should be emphasized. The GSC estimate is of the total resource, i.e. in-place geological reserves. The ERCB, on the other hand, has endeavoured to take a further step and estimate the proved recoverable tonnages remaining within the province. Neither presentation, however, provides the data needed to rpply more than rudimentary economic parameters.

It is also important to be aware of the exclusions from the GSC figures; these include:

(a) coal below 1,000 feet of cover in the plains region and below 2,500 feet in the mountains and foothills; the tonnages so excluded are unquestionably enormous, but have not been taken into consideration because Gf doubtful mir.-J. ility with present technology; with rese ^ ih it can be expected that such coal will increasingly become recoverable, but presumably at great cost by today's standards;

(b) seams less than 5 feet thick; in suitable circumstances, thinner seams than this can be economically mined; (c) known ,,oal deposits (mainly subbituminous and lignitin; in the Arctic:

(d) deposits such as G'rcundhog in B.C. which have until now been regarded as remote and of doubtful recoverability.

: ires e>-jude:

^a) deposits below 500 feet in the plains and below 2,000 feet in the mountains and foothills;

v!\ recovery, by surface mining methods, of seams more than 180 fet." below the surface;

'') reserves considered unrecoverable under current technology and present or anticipated future economic conditions (although 'future economic conditions' are undefined);

(d) for surface mining, deposits for which the ratio of overburden to coal exceeds 10:1 in the mountains and foothills and 15:1 in the plains;

(e) proved reserves contained in seams less than 4.5 feet thick. 75

Neither of the two studies can be regarded as the last word on the subject of coal reserves. Exploratory drilling continues and can be ex- pected to result in significant revisions to the estimates; and the under- lying parameters will need to be updated from time to time.

ECONOMIC FACTORS

In the absence of data which would permit a more detailed economic analysis, only the following six 'mining categories' are considered for purposes of this paper; the indicated prices assume:

- 1973 cost and price levels (for wages, materials and supplies, equipment, royalties, etc.); - run-of-mine coal, unprepared (except as noted), FOB mine; - production from relatively large, efficient mines operating consistently at close to rated capacity (e.g. in the case of surface operations, mines producing at least 1.0 million tons per year).

Mining Category I: surface mining of flat-lying seams on the plains to depths of, say, 120 *"?et and at a maximum ratio not exceeding about 15:1 (cubic yards of overburden to tons of recovered coal). Most of such coal should be economically recoverable at prices not exceeding 25c per million BTU.

Mining Category II: surface miring of flat-lying seams to depths in excess of 120 feet. This might involve bucket-wheel excavators where overburden conditions permit, or draglines with longer booms than those generally employed in the coal mining industry today, or pairs of draglines operating in tandem (with considerable costly rehandle of overburden). Required prices would generally be in excess of 25c per million BTU - say in the range of 25c to 35c per million BTU.

Mining Category III: surface mining of irregular and distorted seams in the foothills and mountains, by dragline or shovel/truck methods. Required prices would have to range even higher than for Cate~r"ry II.

Mining Category IV: underground mining, by conventional mining methods, of flat-lying seams at depths of less than 1,000 feet. The following table suggests that this would require prices not less than 45c per million BTU: 76

$/Ton (a) Labour at an average rate of $5.25/hr. including benefits: productivity of 15 tons per man shift 2.80 (b) Supplies & Power: $1.93 per ton (1970 estimate by NPC - see ref. 4) plus 25% subsequent escalation 2.41 (c) Taxes, insurance, royalties, lease rentals, administration, selling expenses, etc. .70 (d) ownership costs (depreciation of investment in both original and replacement facilities, depletion, interest and return on investment) 3.00 $ 8.91

Equivalent c/MM BTU Coal @ 10,000 BTU/lb. 45c Coal @ 8,000 BTU/lb. 55c Mining Category V: underground mining of flat-lying seams to depths in excess of 1,000 feet; until the mining technology is developed, the cost of recovery is unknown. Mining Category VI: underground mining in the foothills and mountains by conventional mining methods, at costs which vary over a wide range depend- ing upon the conditions involved. POSSIBLE ECONOMIC RESERVES: A SPECULATIVE ASSESSMENT The following is offered as no more than a speculative assessment of the order of magnitude of recoverable coal reserves which may ultimately be identified in the major coal areas of Canada. It is based on an exami- nation of published data concerning coal reserves, interpreted in the light of the findings of a corporate exploration programme over the past several years and detailed economic evaluation of a number of specific properties in the bituminous (both coking and non-coking), subbituminous and lignite fields of Western Canada. Nothing more precise than this seems warranted on the basis of the very limited available data about Canada's coal re- source in general, and in view of the uncertainties associated with attempt- ing to predict future technological and environmental factors.

1. Subbituminous Coal of Alberta Plains (a) Typical analysis of run-of-mine coal, as delivered: 7,200 to 8,500 BTU/lb. at 20% to 26% moisture and 6% Co 20% ash. 77

(b) Mining Category I (Surface Mining to i20 ft.): tonnages on the order of 4.0 billion tons may ultimately be proved. (c) Mining Category II (Surface Mining below 120 ft.): a further 4.0 billion tons should ultimately be found at this greater mining depth. (d) Mining Category IV (Conventional Underground Mining to 1,000 ft.): ultimate recoverable reserves in this category should exceed the indicated tonnages of surface-mineable coal. (e) Mining Category V (Underground Mining below 1,000 ft.): vast tonnages can be expected to occur below 1,000 feet of cover; recovery must, however, await the development of new mining techniques and there will not be much incentive to tackle this problem while such large tonnages remain which can be more readily recovered at a fraction of the cost of deep mining. Possible mining techniques include in-situ gasification.

2. Lignite of Southern Saskatchewan (a) Typical analysis of run-of-mine lignite as delivered: 5,800 to 7,400 BTU/lb. at 35% moisture and 5% to 7% ash. (b) Mining Category I (Surface Mining to 120 ft.): recoverable tonnages on the order of perhaps 2.0 billion tons may ultimately be proved. (c) Mining Category II (Surface Mining below 120 ft.): additional tonnages should ultimately be recovered below 120 feet, say on the order of 0.5 billion tons. (d) There are no prospects for underground mining of Saskatchewan lignite.

3. Non-Coking Bituminous Coal of the Alberta Foothills (a) Typical analysis of delivered coal: 10,000 to 13,000 BTU/lb. at 4% Jto 8% moisture and 10% to 20% ash. (b) Mining Category III (Surface Mining in Mountains and Foothills): it should ultimately be possible to identify perhaps 1.0 billion tons of such reserves. (c) Mining Category VI (Underground Mining in Mountains and Foothills): the potential recoverable reserves in this category should exceed the possible surface-mineable reserves. It is conceivable that recoverable tonnages on the order of, say, 3.0 billten tons may ultimately be identified.

4. Bituminous Coking Coal of Alberta and B.C. (Clean Coal) The existing coking-coal mine operators (both surface and underground mines) have contracts for the future delivery of approximately 125 million clean tons at prices ranging between about $11.00 and $14.00 per clean short ten FOB mine. It should not be expected that this total tonnage will be increased without higher average prices to 78

compensate for the greater costs which will be incurred in mining increasingly difficult deposits. If the present average price were to double, it is conceivable that on the order of 2.0 billion tons could be identified as economically recoverable by fairly conventional mining methods. Additional tonnages would become marketable at still higher mining costs and prices. This does not allow for the extensive deposits known to exist in steeply- dipping formations which may ultimately prove recoverable by hydraulic underground mining methods.

Other Coal Deposits in Canada

A more complete listing of Canadian coal deposits which are or may in future become economically recoverable would include the following:

(a) Bituminous coal deposits of Nova Scotia; the most recent estimate- indicates the following in-place geological reserves:

million short tons - measured 126 - indicated 466 - inferred 684

Nova Scotia mines accounted in 1972 for less than 1.5 million tons or about 7% of total Canadian production. However, the fact that the Crown corporation which accounts for most of this production reports mining losses in excess of $20.00 per ton casts doubt on the economic viability of recovering these deposits.

(b) Bituminous coal of New Brunswick: measured coal reserves are estimated2 to be only 10 million tons (no indicated or inferred reserves).

(c) Known deposits in the Canadian Arctic, mainly lignitic and subbituminous coal (no estimates available).

(d) Lignite deposit at Hat Creek, B.C.: approximately 600 million tons are thought to be recoverable.

(e) Lignite deposit at Onakawana, Ontario; approximately 240 million tons.2

CONCLUSIONS

Only a fraction of the nation's estimated total coal resource can be regarded as economically recoverable, now or in the future, even allow- ing for higher prices which would permit extraction under more costly 79

mining conditions than can be entertained today. The fraction economically recoverable is relatively high for the subbituminous coal and lignite of the Western Plains but, pending technological advances in the underground mining of steeply pitching and severely disturbed seams, the economically recoverable fraction of the bituminous coal of the western mountains must be regarded as very low.

A substantial increase in prevailing coal prices (FOB mine) will be necessary before large-scale recovery of subbituminous coal by conven- tional underground mining methods becomes economic. However, when that price rise does occur, it will result in an increase of several billions of tons in economically recoverable reserves.

It is regrettable that, at s time when the nation's energy policies are under review, so little of the data needed for meaningful economic analysis of Canada's coal resource are available. A joint Federal- Provincial drilling program now underway in Saskatchewan and the similar program under discussion for Alberta and B.C. should contribute much new information. It is hoped that a systematic approach like this can be extended, with the results to be reported in a form which will permit economic analysis.

The mining companies could also appropriately be encouraged to undertake more extensive exploration. At the moment, however, the quantity of proved reserves is so large in relation to the scale of production that the companies have little incentive to explore for coal (particularly underground deposits) which will obviously not be mined during this century.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The writer acknowledges with thanks the constructive comments offered by his Luscar colleagues. He is also indebted to Mr. M. H. Allan of the Saskatchewan Power Corporation and Messrs. J. J. Crabb and R. Crisafio of Crows Nest Industries Limited for their critical reading of the paper in draft form. 80

REFERENCES

1. B. A. Latour, and L. P, Chrismas. Preliminary Estimate of Measured Coal Resources Including Reassessment of radicated and Inferred Resources in Western Canada. GSC Paper 70-58, Geol. Sur. Can., 1970.

2. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. An Energy Policy for Canada. Ottawa 1973.

3. Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board. Reserves of Coal, Province of Alberta. ERCB - 73-31. December 31, 1972.

4. National Petroleum Council. U.S. Energy Outlook; Volume Two: Report of Coal Task Group. November, 1971.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. N. Berkowitz. On Meeting Energy Needs with Canadian Coal. Fuels Planning Conference, Toronto. Octot ::, 1972.

2. B. R. MacKay. Coal Reserves of Canada. Reprint of Chapter 1, Appendix A of Report of the Royal Commission on. Coal, 1946.

3. Proceedings: First Geological Conference on Western Canadian Coal. November, 1971. Research Council of Alberta. Information Series No. 60.

4. Statistics Canada. Coal Mines 1971. Cat. 26-206, annual, January, 1973.

5. Statistics Canada. Coal and Coke Statistics, monthly report. Cat. 45-002.

6. U.S. Bureau of Mines. Cost Analyses of Model Mines for Strip Mining of Coal in the United States (based on 1969 cost levels). (Washington) U.S. Department of Interior. IC 8535, 1972.

7. U.S. Bureau cf Mines. Coal Resources of the United States - January 1, 1967. (Washington) U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1275.

8. U.S. Bureau of Mines. Strippable Reserves of Bituminous Coal and Lignite in the United States. (Washington) Information Circular 8531, 1971.

9. L. P. Chrismas and M. K. McMullen. Coking Coal in Canada. Mineral Resources Branch, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa. Mineral Bulletin MR 135, 1973. 81

URANIUM AND THORIUM: FUTURE ENERGY SOURCES by R.E. FOLINSBEE, F.R.S.C, University of Alberta, and A. P. LEECH, Ottawa

Whose bread I eat, His song I sing.

Let us as authors acknowledge that we come from a province which has had a period of unprecedented growth through development of petroleum and natural gas resources, and from a city with a long association with the mining industry of northern Canada. This paper is an overview of the Canadian and world uranium and thorium supply - demand situation as seen by two interested geologists-at-iarge.

1000- - Beyond 2100, mankind's energy needs must be met 800-- by a combination of coal, nuclear power, and I 600- - solar energy - beyond 2300, by technologies that are not yet known to be possible, much less 400- - economical.'

200- - Overpopdar.cn ^/

T'ang PAPEH P8NTEO MONEY BOOK PIAYING IOOO voi CARDS ENCYCLOPEDIA

RELATIVE S^NDARD OF LIVING

800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1S00 2000 AD. -YEARS- Each advance of man from ihe primitive state has been accomplished by a break-through in energy utilization, from digging sticks, through flint and fire, to the use of metals, water,, domestic animals, agriculture and the pure energy minerals coal, oil, natural gas, and now uranium. Each of the energy revolutions has involved some reluctance about acceptance, a period of acceptance and expansion, an exhaustion of the energy push, and up to now, decline and fall of the empires. China's long history illustrates the inter-relationships between energy supply and the standard of living . 82

Canada has gone thr&jph an impressive 25-year period of growth in production of the energy minerals - oil, gas and uranium. The plateau has been reached in oil and gas production from the Western Canadian basin and the situation on the frontiers is an uncertain rme. Canadian coal faces transportation and environmental problems. Thus, we look directly or indirectly ro the nuclear fuels,, uranium, thorium, deuterium and hydrogen for future energy supplies.

90s

ESTIMATED GROWTH IN OEMAKD FOR UjO. t MIECTED MTAtS.1

Uranium production, under nuclear weapons impetus, soarsd to a peak in the late 50's and then like Icarus crashed,, as the weapons game went underground and supply contracts vanished. The slow revival of uranium as a peaceful energy source has collided head on with environmentalists and the no-growth ethic, but nuclear energy has advantages that suggest that its 5 year doubling rate will persist - a rate of change unprecedented in the history of mankind. The growth in demand for U3O3 has been sstimated to far surpass that for most ex our common metals . Uranium is portable. Nuclear fuels are small in bulk and easy to transport. The daily production of seven tons of U3O3 from Rabbit Lake, Saskatchewan could be transported to Germany as excess baggage on the Lufthansa flight out of Toronto. 83

How Electric Power Sources Compare^

1 pound of coal (It) produces 1.5 kilowatt hours

1 pound of oil (2$) produces 2.0 kilowatt hours

1 pound of gas (10$) produces 2.2 kilowatt hours

1 pound of natural uranium (^$20) produces 29,000.0 kilowatt hours

The energy released by the fissioning of just one gram of uranium235 or plutonium239 or uranium233 equals the heat of combustion of 2.7 metric tons of bituminous coa! or 13.4 barrels of crude oil 4.

The 4 million pounds annual production of U3O8 from Rabbit Lake, (costing $30 million), burnt in inefficient conventional reactors, will provide Germany with 116x10 kwh of electricity, now produced from about 70 million barrels of petroleum liquids (costing $300 million). Fully burnt in breeder reactors the some uranium has the energy equivalent of 24 billion barrels of oil, worth $100 billion. Once built, nuclear power plants produce 14 kwh of electricity from one cent's worth of fuel - an order of magnitude more cheaply than from any fossil fuel source, though capital costs are higher. Little wonder that Japan, West Germany, Britain and Spain have contracted with Canadian producers for over 65,000 torts of U3O3, one quarter of Canada's measured reserves.

In discussing the world's energy supply, Cheesman^ has suggested the use of a manageable energy measurement unit called a Q, defined as 10'° BTUs (one million trillion BTUs). Using this unit, he estimated the total recoverable world supply of energy at 282.1 Qs, 69 Qs to come from known low cost uranium ore reserves available at a price of $10 lb. or less, burnt in conventional reactors. Burnt in a fast breeder reactor, uranium resources would extend the world's uranium energy supply to 420,000 Qs. These would be sufficient to fuel the world into the 38th century even at the present 6% annual growth rate in energy use. Because of the fuel economy of the fast breeder, the uranium resource base will be immensely expanded.

Canada's energy reserves (known and measured) as estimated by the CNA may be converted to Qs and roughly compared with Cheesman's world resource (geological potential).

From now on, demand for uranium oxide will increase steadily and exponentially at a nearly 5 year doubling rate *'°. By 1985 annual requirements are estimated to exceed 100,000 tons of U3O8 while the cumulative grand total will he over 1,000,000 tons. 84

Energy Sources Energy Reserves Qs(1018BTUs) World Canadian Total Resources^ Reserves'*

Coal 170 1.064 Oil 13 0.004 Natural gas 10 0.043 s (enriched uranium) 69 2.215 Nuclear -v (fasf breeder ) (420,000)* Fusion deuterium (10 billion)* Oil shale and tar sands 20 1.015 Hydro 0.1 0.002 annual Geothermal, wind, tidal 0.1 282.1 Qs 4.3 Qs "Technology not presently available. WORLD URANIUM REQUIREMENTS & RESERVES

Thousand Requiremsnts Thru 1985 Reserves-$10/lbU3O8 % Tons U3O3 Tons U3O8 Canada 15 1.5 United States 330** 29 United States 474 47.5 So. + Southwest Africa 300 26 Japan 106 10.5 Canada 236 20 United Kingdom 92 9 France,Gabon, Niger 124 11 West Germany 65 6.5 Australia 92* 8 France 40 4 Others 68 6 W. Europe other 107 11 TOTAL 1150 100 Foreign other 101 10 *Recent W. Australian discoveries have TOTAL 1000 100 increase• • a^v • -^r «B v«^ d«^ thi• • • p sw fiaurw • £* ^^m evi* t« o^^ 150.00• ^^ ^^ g -^r •«*• 0•«*- tons *Gu!fl7 figures are 420,000 tons 85

These requirements, nearly half by the USA, can be met by known reserves exploitable at less than $10/lb U3O8 mined in the United States, Canada, South and Southwest Africa, Australia, France, Gabon and Niger'. By 1985, the price tag will probably be up to $15/lb# unless another Is to 2 million tons of low cost additional reserves are discovered and developed. °

Runnalls2 estimates that by 1975 growth in demand for U3O8 will out- strip the estimated production of present (or planned) mines, ana by 1980, even flat-out production will not satisfy the more than 300 hungry reactors presently operating, under L. construction, or on order. In 1972 8 alone, 56 nuclear power reactors with 2 a combined output of 54,640 MWe were ordered by countries of the western world; they will be operation- al by 1980, and in Gilchrist's : 40-- opinion , may face a fuei shortage - critical, naturally. so ° """^ •" """• On October 6, 1973 the USSR entered the western world uranium 20+ Jllllllllllllllllllli"1 market with a 700 ton sale of enriched uranium through the EEC to West German utilities. This recognition of uranium as a commodity by the USSR may foreshadow large future sales by this mineral rich nation. ^2 1972 1975 1980 YEAR- Canada's measured reserves of ANNUAL WESTERN WOOD U3Oj PRODUCTION VERSUS DEMAND. 1972-1980 uranium (and thorium), presently one- fifth of the world's reserves and falling as exploration moves elsewhere, are sufficient for our needs in any conceivable eventuality for the rest of this century, and our resource base (geological potential) is very large indeed, though unmeasured. Over 90% of the operational Canadian uranium industry is con- centrated in one small area of Ontario at Elliot Lake, where two major companies, Denison Mines and Rio Aigom, control most of the action and 20% of the world's low cost $5 - $10 uranium reserves '"/^ ^ . « 86

North South

\\\\V Legend

Diabase ETfl Espanola greywaclce

Bruce limestone

Bruce conglomerate

Misussagi quartzito

Arg.ll.te

Mem Ore Zone

Upper Ore Zone

Basement complex 0 100 200 DENISON MINES LIMITED GEOLOGICAL SECTION THROUGH Nol&No2 SHAFTS LOOKING EAST

At Denison, sprawled over 4700 acres, a 16 foot continuous bed of quartz-pebble con- glomerate averages 0.15% U3O8 per ton (3 lbs per ton) in channels of the ancient pre-Huronian surface of the Quirke Lake syncline '"' . Initial reserves were established as 300 x 10° lbs U3O8. As a dividend, these conglomerates contain 0.02 - 0.4% ThO2, most of which could be recovered cheaply along with the uranium and stockpiled for future use '^ . Denison, after Roman's 1971 brush with the federal government blocking a $100 million sale of control to a foreign corporation, is moving its uranium exploration effort out of Canada, to conduct prospecting and drilling operations in northern and western Australia and the Powder River Basin area of Wyoming. 87

NORTH

In Canada, the Agnew Lake con- glomerates are a vertical version of the PRE5ENT Elliot Lake conglomerates, with uranium and thorium content reversed: there are 3 ibs of thorium for every pound of uranium, which is present only as sub-ore grade at present prices . Exploration efforts continue for more uraniferous conglomerates in favourable areas of Canada.

Eliiof Lake Area In South Africa, another 20% of the world's uranium resources are found in placer channels along with gold washed SOUTH NORTH off an ancient Precambriar. terrain '^r'4. Since uranium is recovered as a by- product of gold mining, we might expect extra availability of South African uranium on world markets as a resuit of the recent surge in gold prices. As with the thorium at Elliot Lake, it would be cheaper in the long-run to recover and stockpile uranium now rather than retreat cemented tailings later.

Canada's crown corporation, Eldorado Nuclear Ltd., began success- w fully on Great Bear Lake and at the Beaverlodge (Goldfields) area of Agnew Lake Mines Ltd Saskatchewan, but despite this early start, lack of exploration funds and KBUGE25DO8P continued mining have reduced total reserves to only 2,803,200 tons con- taining .22% U3O8 at the end of 1972 9 (12 million lbs U3O8) .

RAND-BASIN Meanwhile, south of , MokS-a, a French government company, though unable to buy uranium directly

Kilfimtttrs from Canadian producers because of the \ w /'0 50 100 150 weapons clause, undertook an exploration \ .4 VKGM program in the Carswell dome area, an

Rand Basin showing locations of major drainage entry 88

Signif icant >S 500,000,000 >Si,ooopoopoo

diitricfs of United States & Canada

astrobleme produced by meteor impact. Here at Ciuff Lake, Mokta outlined a 45,000 ton orebody averaging 10% U3O8 ^° Although Mokta has spent $11 miilion on exploration in Canada since 1963, expenditures in the Carswell area were only $5 minion to find 9 million pounds of uranium that may be shipped to France, once the French finish their weapons testing. Meanwhile; Canadian restrictions on control by foreign companies have shifted Mokta's exploration interest to the USA, where uranium exploration costs average about $ l/lb l^Og discovered *'.

The major petroleum companies, Gulf Oil in particular, are becoming total energy companies. On the other side of the Athabasca sandstone basin at Rabbit Lake, Gulf Minerals, with minimal exploration expenditures, found a $500 million secondary enrichment of uranium in Precambrian sediments which will become a mine in 1975, milling 2000 tons per day from 0.35% ore, for a 20 year annual output of 4.5 million lbs l^Og, contracted in advance to partner Uranerz of West Germany 1°'*" .

South of the border, in the world's greatest energy consuming nation, the U.S.A., we see Canadian money developing uranium reserves for a protected market . Rio Algom, Kerr Addison and Noranda have discovered rich mines in the western States where one-third of the world's uranium reserves have been developed. This RQ

uranium was leached from volcanics, concentrated in ancient river chc.inels and reconcentrated by solution and reprecipitation.

WORLD URANIUM & THORIUM DEPOSITS & PRODUCERS (after GriKtth.1967)

Principal frodiKiri SiDtpouts oo ot Vffl O Uronjufn Dffpostf Q Thorium Depour

France and Australia share the last major chunk of reserve pie.

In addition to their efforts in Canada. French geologists went prospecting in other former colonies, Niger and Gabon, with the object of finding a few dozen 1500 ton U3O8 deposits at strippable depths. In Niger, sedimentary Jurassic and Carbonaceous uranium deposits lie !.n permeable channels where uranium, weathered from volcanic tuffs, was trapped by organic material in ancient stream beds.

The R<5«/est uranium discoveries have been made in Australia e where there was once only a smal! production facility at Mary Kathleen, a unique rare-earth" uranium orebody, and a high-grade deposit ar Rum Jungle in the Northern Territory. The inflated newspaper eslimates of reserves by Queensland Mines for the Nabarlek depositsjn an aboriginal reserve of tWe Northern Territory, deluded the Australian public along with Noranda, which ended up with Jim-Jim as a consolation prize,

potential.at Ranger, 140 million lbs. of U3O8 in^p shallow brebody^^ iJ;' high grade compared to the underground Canodian Elliot Lake deposits. 90

jiir. ji

URANIUM IN AUSTRALIA

Mill 300

Most recently. Western Mining, a gold mining company with an aiert staff, threatening INCO in the nickel industry, has come across a 100 million lbs uranium reserve in calcrete, a near surface ground water deposit at Yeelirie in Western Australia, next door to the fabulous iron mines . Asarco followed up with a similar deposit at Maitland Lake. So, beginning from one small producer, Australia has developed reserves comparable to those of Canada. The recent change in Australian government threatens to put a damper on down under and the wooily question of aboriginal rights has risen.

South America will probably be next on the list. As geologists, it seems incredible to us that major uranium ore deposits have not been found in outh America where there is no shortage of likely uranium sources, old shields with uranium in conglomerates or at unconformities and a great mountain mass shedding sediments and volcanics to the east, which should create Utah-Wyoming type roll deposits. It was as late as 1952 that Steidle, Dean of the School of Mineral Industries at Penn State, said in a mineral forecast for 2000 A. D., "No important sources (of uranium) are generally known within the confines of the United States"!20

So far, we have talked only of rich uranium deposits capable of producing at $5 - $10 per 1b U3O8. But as an energy mineral, uranium is competitive at much higher price levels. Doubling the price of U3O8 at the mine results in a negligible increase in the cost of power from a CANDU reactor at Pickering, Ontario, as 91

NON COMMUNIST WORLD CUMULATIVE UtANIUM KQU&EMENTS t4 TKROUOH 2000

wot ID — RKOURCES O

ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL (POTENTIAL)

$10-13

REASONABLY ASSURED < (RESERVESI ($10

1980 1990 2000 YEARS

U.S. URANIUM RESOURCES AT $ 10 TO $200+? PER LB U3O8

S200*? t 4000 4 S20C+ 1800-"

© $200- 200- • $200 8 $100 i

$50 9, 6-- 3 $30 510 2-- CONVENTIONAL SHALE SHAIE GRANITE »1ALE GRANITE SEAVATER 60-60ppm 2S-60ppm"K)-20ppm lO^Sppin 4-)0pp

opposed to the marked effect of Alberta's doubling of the gas price at wellhead on the economics of fueling the Hearne thermal station.

Moderate increases in the price of l^Og iead to vast increases in resources. At higher prices many different types of ores can be considered, niobium-uranium bearing carbonatites, granites, pegmatites and migmatites, uraniferous shaies and phosphorites, even sea water. Uranium and thorium recovery as by-products becomes economic.

The shelved Agnew Lake mine of Kerr Addison containing three pounds of thorium for ea~h pound of uranium could be opened and the thorium used as base load in efficient high-ramperature gas reactors. Gulf's experimental high-temperature reactor going on power at Ft. St. Vrain near Denver is the first of 8 contracted reactors of this type, destined to produce more than 7000 MWe", roughly equal to the Ontario CANDU program to 1983. The Gulf HTGR is said to be more efficient than present light water reactors, operating at 900°C with a 45% efficiency and only 1° thermal pollution. Gulf has arranged under license to supply the HTGR to German and French industrial groups and is negotiating internationally - tough competition for CANDU.

Even with the advent of tl e breeder reactor a critical decade for uranium supply will arrive in the 1990's; it will pose problems comparable to the petroleum crisis of the 70's. Uranium reserves not needed until the 1980's or 90's have little present worth. Prospecting for uranium should pick up after 1975 when companies, now spending scarce dollars on 'non-return' exploration, begin to generate larger cash flows from producing mines. Denison, with its mine and mills paid for years ago by defence contracts, would have been an attractive bargain for the CDC at the 1970 offering price of $100 million for O5% control, a deal blocked by the Canadian government.

Over the long term (21st century), the law of least effort will inevitably push the world energy system in the direction of a nuclear-hydrogen economy. Uranium as a fuel lies in the shadow of fusion; deuterium and hydrogen will certainly displace uranium, as coal was displaced by oil and natural gas. It is this long technological shadow, not any shortage of uranium prospects that inhibits commitments on the part of nations and energy companies towards uranium prospecting or acquisition of large utility fuel inventories. Japan and Germany, have-not nations in the energy field, have made the major commitments and are moving rapidly towards nuclear based economies2', along with Britain and the United States whose industrial might has long been based on cheap energy and the law of least effort.

From the standpoint of the law of least e '*ort let us compare the highly touted Syncrude Alberta oil sands project v/ith Gulf's Rabbit Lake uranium mine, located in comparable areas. 93

Syncrude Rabbit Lake

Capital cost $1000 million $50 million

Work force 1500 directly 210 commuting by air 8500 indirectly little indirect employment

Product and value 125,000 bl. oil day 15,000 Ib U3O8 $500,000 $150,000 day Reactors Energy equivalent 125,000 bl. oil Conventional 300,000 bl. oil CANDU 1,000,000 bl. oil Breeder 90,000,000 bl. oil

Profitability Nil High (capita! and tax generating prospects)

Environmental effects Heavy SO2 emission in a Removal of a local confined river valley. radiation hazard. Thermal pollution of . Creation of boom town subject to technological obsolescence. Unpredictable effects on an important wild-life delta.

In one year 200 men commuting into Rabbit Lnke would produce as much energy fuel, used in the breeder reactor, as 45,000 m ~ exhausting the mineable tar sands through labouring at 30 tar sand plants for a lifetime.

Within a two mile radius of this national library lie 200,000 tons of U3O8, roughly the equivalent of the measured Canadian reserves of uranium ore. About half of this might be recovered from the granites that underlie the city of Ottawa, mined to a depth of two miles; from the west's point of view perhaps not a wholly bad solution to the east's energy problems. Cost would be about $50 a pound of U3O8/ ten times costs with present ore grades.

There are many wilderness areas where such mining may even now be economically feasible. At Rossing in South West Africa Rio Tinto Zinc is said to have an immense orebody containing 1.4 pounds of uranium oxide per ton. Rio Tinto her. announced firm contracts to supply the UK Atomic Energy Commission with 7500 tons of U3O8 worth «*f?38 million between the years 1970 and 1980. It will operate an open pit mine that will employ about 700 European miners and 1000 Africans. 94

"I'll take that lamp, pal." Drawing by Donald Reilly; ©1973 The New Yorker Magazine, Inc. The Canadians1 search for honest uranium customers 9 5

Stories are rife.One quoted by Richard West22 ;s that a geologist first checked the site for uranhm -hen he read that an African chief in bygone days had seni his wives to Rossing to make them sterile - a story probably only the result of a fertile imagination. A preliminary isport published on the Rossing uranium deposit" suggests that it is an area injected by lens-like radioactive psgmatites that lend rhemseives to open pit mining and concentration. The area is said by the Rand Daily Mail of February 1970 to be five miles long and one mile wide. At an average grade of 1.4 !bs U3O8 a ton mineable to a depth of 300 feet the Rossing deposit would contain 3,000,000 tons of U3O8/ thrice the measured reserves of the world.

This brings us to a final point - the uranium mystique. Uranium hcs an odious association with the bombs crouched like trap-door spiders at the base of a thousand missile silos, or lying pupate in atomic submarine pods and the bays of bombers droning 24 hours a day across the vorld. During the 1940's we as Canadians participated, somewhat unknowingly, in the opening of Pandora's box. Source of the uranium and plutonium in the two deadly insects that stung Japan is shrouded in the veil of secrecy that still envelopes the Manhattan project. However, one of us, co-pilot on a Liberator bomber headed for reconnaissance over the immense reaches of the Pacific, rejoiced at the early end of the war. During the 1950's, though knowing the devastation wreaked at Hiroshima and Nagasaki we scrambled for contracts to supply uranium for the arsenals of the Western World. In the late sixties and seventies our policy seems to have been one of trying to close Pandora's box on its original troublesome contents, under the pressure of statements such as that by Richard West in "River of Tears" -

"This new process [of uranium enrichment] , as I have set out to show, is possible because of the big new supply of uranium from the Rossing mine. The British government and RTZ not only give moral support to South Africa's illegal rule in South West Africa but supply the racist regime with the means to make nuclear weapons. "

Pandora's box can never be closed, and it might be well to remember the rest of the Pandora legend. Although she was sent to punish mankind for discovering that primitive energy resource, fire, in the end Pandora closed the box on Hope. There is one faint hope for the world - that uranium, thorium and deuterium may produce the energy necessary to set the world free from the nightmare demands of lebensraum and co-prosperity spheres, and we should set ourselves to the giant task of unlocking this hope chest. An unclear energy future becomes nuclear by a single transposition.

Acknowledgments The literature search on which this paper was based was supported by the National Research Council of Canada. The authors are deeply grateful to R. M. Williams, H.B. Merlin and O. J. Runnalls of the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, to Wm. Gilchrist, Roger Blais and CF. Smith of Eldorado Nuclear, to 96

N.M. Ediger and L.T. Gregg of Gulf Oil, to A.F. Lowell of Rio Algom mines, to Denison Mines and to colleagues at the University of Alberta for pertinent information and advice 22-31 ^ Redrafting, mostly from EMR and USAEC sources wos by Frank Dimitrov and the paper was set up and lyped by Doreen Haugan of the Department of Geology.

REFERENCES

1. E. Cook, Technology Review, 74, No. 12, 16 (1972).

2. O.J.C. Runnclls, Can. Nuclear Assoc. Mtg., Paper No. 604, June (1973).

3. Nuclear power and environment in Canada, Can. Nuclear Assoc. (1971),

4. M.K. Hubbert, Bull. Can. Inst. Mining and Metallurgy, 1, July (1973).

5. W.J. Cheesman, Financial Times of Canada, July 9, 15 (1973).

6. R.D. Nininger, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Nuclear Fuel Resources and Requirements WASH-1243, 26 (1973).

7. J.W. Griffith, Mineral Report No. 12, Mineral Resources Division, Dept. Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, 52 (1967).

3. R.M. Williams, Can. Mining Journal, 94, Feb., p. 100 (1973).

9. W.M. Gilchrist, Eldorado Nuclear Ltd., 1972 Annual Report, 1, 3 (1972).

10. J.A. Robertson, Can. Inst. Mining and Metallurgy, Trans., LXX1I, 166 (1969).

11. Denison Mines Ltd., Uranium the Energy Mineral (1969).

12. S.M. Roscoe, inG.S.C. Paper 66-12, 11 pp (1966).

13. D.S. Robertson, Uranium Exploration Geology, in International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 267 (1970).

14. H.C.M. Whiteside, Uranium Exploration Geology, in International Atomic Energy Atency, Vienna, 49 (1970).

15. The Northern Miner, 59, No. 16, 1 (1973).

16. The Northern Miner, 59, No. 13, 1 (1973). 97

17. Gulf Oil Corporation Annual Report, 36 (1972).

18. G.C. Hardin, Future Energy Outlook, Colorado School of Mines Quarterly, 68, 163 (1973).

19. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Nuclear Fuel Supply, WASH-1242, 9 (1973).

20. E. Steidle, Mineral Forecast 2000 A.D. Penn. State College Bull, ?9, 119 (1952).

21. S. Matsune, Financial Post, Sept. 22, J-18 (1973).

22. R. West, River of Tears, Earth Island Limited, London, 72, 75 (1972).

23. J.W. von Backstrom, Uranium Exploration Geology, I.A.E.C., Vienna, 143, (1970).

24. L.T. Gregg, Capita! Requirements of the Canadian Nuclear Power Program, CNA'73-502, Can. Nuclear Assoc., June (1973).

25. H.B. Merlin, Can. Nuclear Assoc., 71 -CNA-301 (1971).

26. N.M. Ediger, Calgary Br., Can. Inst. Mining and Metallurgy, Jan. (1973).

27. W.M. Gilchrist, President's Address, Can. Nuclear Assoc., CNA'73-205 (1973).

28. Imperial Oil Review, 57^, No. 2, 16 (1973).

29. D. Lowry, G.W. Nicholson and Company Ltd., Analysis of Denison Mines Ltd., 7 pp., April (19c6).

30. A.F. Lowell, Rio Algom, Intra-company report on uranium (1973).

31. U.S. Energy Outlook, Nuclear Energy Availability, National Petroleum Council (1973).

32. New York Times Service as reported in Edmonton Journal, Oct. 6, 37 (1973); Thomas Land, Financial Post, C-7, Oct. 27 (1973). 9 9

DISCUSSTOw OF SESSION I

L/K. BEN HOGG (University of Winnipeg) : Ir. the papers in this session, the conventional units associated with each resource have been employed: oil- in barrels, gas in cubic feet, coat in tons, and I!^0g in tons; and various energy units. The equivalence in terms of energy is not obvious to me and I would hope that a simple unit common to all energy resources could be found. EDITOR: The reader is referred to the Glossary (P.473) for some help in this connection. DR. P.J. DYNE (Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment): To put the long-term potential of nuclear energy in perspective it is useful to express the energy content of our uranium in terms of equivalent barrels of oil. At this meeting Folinsbee and Leech told us that the single deposit at Elliott Lake contains 2 x 10^ tons of U-jOg. For an order of magnitude calculation we can take this as 2 x 10 tonnes of UO2. Irradiation in a CANDU reactor to 8000 Megawatt days/tonne releases 1.6 x 109 Megawatt days or 3.84 x 1013 kWh. Noting that 1 barrel of oil = 5.8 x 106 BTU or 1.7 x 103 kWh (106 BTU = 293 kWh) we find that the Elliott Lake deposit is equivalent to 3.84 x 1013/1.7 x 103 = 22 billion barrels of oil.

In other papers Mclvor and Lougheed estimate that 16 billion barrels of oil have so far been discovered in Canada, and Govier estimates that 27 billion barrels of synthetic crude could be recovered from the tarsands from near surface deposits. This one deposit of low-cost uranium ore is therefore equivalent in energy to our known petroleum resources and is comparable to the readily recoverable resource in the tarsands.

In addition, the spent fuel from a CANDU reactor contains pluton- ium whose energy equivalent is roughly equal to energy extracted from the original fuel. By processing and recycling the plutonium we could extract a further 20 billion barrels of oil-energy equivalent from this "waste" material.

The appeal of the energy resource argument for the breeder reactor is seen by noting that the energy content of the U-235 and U-238 (if it were possible to burn all the U-238) in the Elliott Lake deposit would be in the order of 2000 billion barrels TOO

of oil. This is of the same order as estimates of the total world oil resources and yet to be discovered (Hubbert, Scientific American, September 1971).

MR. JAMES C. BROWN (Shell Canada): Does the Geological Survey of Canada plan to publish a third estimate of Frontier oil potential in 1974 to follow up the 1972 and 1973 estimates published in the Energy, Mines and Resources green paper?

DR. McCRQSSAN: The Geological Survey of Canada will be involved in an on-going program to maintain estimates of the petroleum potential of Canada. This is being done through a departmental sub-committee with membership from various other branches as well as from the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs. In view of the con- tinuing changes in the data base, the estimates must be revised on a regular basis. I might add that even the already published estimates, because of the short time available in which to pre- pare them, were not able to take full advantage of even all the data available at that time, and further work is necessary to improve their quality on that basis alone. I am not in a position to say when the results of further studies will be published. This decision will be made by our senior management.

MR. BROWN:

In view of the uncertainties in these forecasts} is the Geological Survey of Canada making estimates of the amount and rate of exploration (sampling procedures) which is required before a firmer estimate of this potential is obtained? DR. McCROSSAN: Yes, we are mindful of exploration activities in any areas being evaluated, most particularly from the point of view of the degree to which various plays have been tested and the amount of effort needed to fully evaluate the possibilities of the various geologi- cal configurations within the basins. I think this would be what you referred to as sampling, We would look upon each play as being sub-population to the sampled. Perhaps we should consider the degree of exploration effort necessary to adequately sample a play in relation to our probability estimates of a certain quantity of hydrocarbon being present. I feel that we need further work in this area to improve our techniques before it can be considered statistically rigorous. 101

MR. JOSEPH YANCHULA (Consulting Petroleum Engineer, Calgary):

Dr. McCvossan's conclusion that "the distribution of the • • various types of hydrocarbons in a sedimentary basin is •''I quite orderly and to some extent -predictable" does not Si appear to be warranted. From the evidence in his own '; \ paper it could be more logically concluded that the dis- tribution is both unknown and completely unpredictable. : ' We do not even know how much oil was initially formed in a particular basin3 let alone trapped. In western : Canada approximately 95 percent of the oil is thought to be in the tarsands. How do we know it isn't only 90%? Even such a small error could mean that there • could be twice as much conventional oil left to be found as new expected by most geologists. The small ~ proportion of oil or gas in the Permian and older forma- tions can probably logically be explained by the small proportion of the wells which penetrate these deeper formatioKo. Stratigraphic traps are particularly difficult to locate and it is quite possible that an unusually large quantity of oil is located in these trapse particularly in the deeper, older inadequately explored formations. The Pembina field is the largest •• in Canada and happens to be a stratigraphic trap. If L: it had been in an older formation at a substantially ; greater depth it may not have been found. DR. McCROSSAN:

These questions are provocative and helpful in demanding clarifica- tion of statements that were, for lack of time, perhaps too simplistic. I must apologize for the length of the answer but the issues raised are complex and philosophical.

When I said that "the distribution of hydrocarbons in a sedimentary ~ bssin is quite orderly and to some extent predictable," I was referring specifically to the geochemical distribution. This phenomenon is particularly well displayed and is reasonably well documented in the structurally simple Western Canada sedimentary basin. It can be seen that the hydrocarbons grade as a result of . thermal maturation from immr.ture at shallow depth in the form of uncracked kerogen and methane derived from bacterial decomposition of organic material, to oils and gases at medium depths and more elevated temperatures which grade progressively to smaller and >i simpler hydrocarbon molecules with increasing depth and tempera- \ ture forming lighter oils with increasing proportions of higher molecular weight gases such as propane, butane, etc., to only f K gas with condensate and eventually to nothing but dry gas or l e methane in the deepest parts of the basin. In detail, this \ relationship is somewhat more complex in that it depends on other j' factors such as the ancient maximum depth of burial before -\. erosion of the surface to its present level, geologic age of the J deposits or the time which the hydrocarbon was subjected to a j 102

particular temperature, etc. In addition, the uppermost edge of a basin may contain a heavy oil belt such as occurs in Alberta formed by the bacterial degradation in the near surface zone of oil escaping from source rocks deeper in the basin. In many basins this shallower flange has been removed by subsequent erosion. With an understanding of the geological and geochemical history of a basin, one can predict the type of hydrocarbon that can be expected in certain parts of a basin :Lf_ it were generated from suitable source rocks and caught in suitable traps. Fairly early in exploration of a basin it is possible to determine whether suitable source rocks are present and to some extent whether suitable trapping configurations are likely tr be present. Thus when hydrocarbons are present in a basin they ar a arranged in an orderly sequence with respect to the basin geometry but that does not tell us whether or where within a particular slice of sedimentary volume commercial pools will be found. Orderly is not synonymous with uniformly.

In reality, we find many basins^ with little or no generating capability or others lacking suitable traps in place at the time of hydrocarbon migration when sedimentary loading was taking place. Within a petroleum-prone basin there are only certain places where conditions were optimum for accumulation. In principal, then, the occurrence of hydrocarbons is quite orderly in that they are distributed according to a relatively well understood set of conditions. These necessary conditions can only be established by drilling, and with an increasing information base one can be more and more certain in prediction.

If we knew absolutely nothing about a particular sedimentary basin Yanchula's observation that the distribution is both unknown and completely unpredictable would be correct. The continental rises aoout which we know very little are such a case, involving certain hypotheses which will not be tested for many years when the tech- nology becomes available. Yanchula's observation is not warranted for basins where a reasonable amount of exploration has taken place. In the case, for instance, of the continental shelves where a large amount of high quality marine seismic data is available a few wells can provide c:agnostic answers relatively early in an exploration program.

It is true to say that we do not know how much oil was originally generated in a basin but it is safe to say that it was vastly in excess of the amount trapped. If any amount of reasonable source rock was sufficiently buried in a basin the original supply is not nearly the problem that trapping the migrating fluid is.

The proportion of the oil in the oil sands compared to conven- tionally trapped oil in the Western Canada sedimentary basin is, not particularly relevant to the amount of oil remaining in the basin since the trapping conditions as explained above were probably totally different, with the heavy oil entrapment being much more efficient. The quant-'.ty of heavy oil is not likely to 103 yield much information on the conventionally trapped hydrocarbon other than to indicate that hydrocarbons were generated from source rocks in the basin.

There will, indeed, be additional oil and gas to be found in the Western Canada sedimentary basin and from what we know of that basin it will almost certainly be in stratigraphic traps. The Geological Survey of Canada estimated suggest on the basis of the known geology in the three Prairie Provinces that there are 4.0 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 34 trillion cubic feet of gas in addition to the proven reserves. This will be almost entirely xn smaller pools and harder to find than that already discovered. With what is known about the distribution of rock types or facies in the various formations of the Western Canada sedimentary basin and the very considerable deep well control it is quite unlikely, but not absolutely impossible, that a strati- graphic trap the size of Pembina might still remain undiscovered. In general, as noted in the paper, the younger or shallower rocks contain by far the bulk of the world•s hydrocarbons.

DR. W.R. TYSON (Energy, Mines and Resources): Mr. Molvor refers in his pappy to a figure of 75% of Canada 's oil potential as being located in offshore deposits; however, very little has been said this morning about exploitation of this resource. Would Mr. Mclvor care to comment on the prospects of develop- ment of offshore technology ?

MR. MeIVOR; To amplify our presentation, some 47 billion barrels of Canada's mean undiscovered crude oil potential resources in the Frontiers are expected to lie in deepwater and ice-covered areas where the technology to explore and develop is only just materializing or does not yet exist. We have confidence of this expertise being developed, given the proper investment climate. Imperial has been working for some years on various concepts to drill in such environments and we are now drilling Imraerk B-48, the first well in the Arctic offshore, from an artificial island constructed in the shallow water of Mackenzie Bay. Additionally, construction is underway on a second artificial island from which ve intend to drill ftdgo G-28. It is our belief that for shallow water locations in the Beaufort Sea, a*; least out to 10" water depth, the artificial island concept will satisfy the requirements of both exploration and production. For greater water depths, Imperial is conducting research into the feasibility of bottom- founded structures of steel and concrete design. Other companies are also conducting research into means by which to drill in ice- covered waters. 1. An Energy Policy for Canada, Phase 1, Volume II, Appendices, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources/ Information Canada, Ottawa,' p-i 32. 104

In the Arctic Islands offshore, basic data on physical parameters such as ice conditions are still being gathered; however, the air cushion drilling system is one concept that may offer a feasible apprcich. Off the Atlantic coast, in addition to the problems posed by floating sea ice and icebergs, much prospective acreage lies under water depths exceeding the drilling and production capability of existing technology. Research and development of sea-bottom production systems is well underway. Industry has demonstrated the capability elsewhere in the world to drill in 1,500 feet of water in the floating mode, and drillships are now in operation with rated capability to 3,000 feet. It is anticipated that drillship capability can be extended to 6,000 feet. Beyond this, however, the technological requirements are undefined. It is i.Tiportant to note that acreage on the East Coast is presently held out to 12,000 feet of water.

MR. J. YANCHULA: Mclvor and Lougheed state that 16 billion of the 20 billion barrels of recoverable oil thought to exist in the western provinces has already been found. If this is so3 then an intelligent •premier of a western province would find it in his interest to raise royalties to as high a level as possible to maximize the government take rather than try to provide incentives to explore for such a small proportion of oil, so difficult to find. MR. MeIVOR:

By the end of 1972 the western provinces had remaining proven crude oil reserves of 8 billion barrels (excluding natural gas liquids). Accordingly, the mean potential crude oil reserves remaining to be discovered of some 4 billion barrels represent 50% of the oil remaining to be produced, hardly a small propor- tion. However, we agree with Mr. Yanchula's deduction that raising royalties to a high level might effectively eliminate tht, incentive to search for this crude oil = We suspect too that such an action would also affect the exploration for natural gas for which in the western provinces there is a higher proportion remaining to be discovered than is the case for oil. Certainly a higher royalty would reduce the cash flow which the Industry would have to finance exploration and development programs and this, along with the repudiation of the royalty provisions in existing contracts required to increase royalty, would severely lower investor confidence. 105

MR. J. YANCHULA:

Regarding oil in the frontier areas, Mr. Mclvor and Mr. Lougheed state that only 5 to 15% can be sold at current price levels. The remainder will have to be sold at prices in excess of $8 per barrel. At that price level it would be economical to make oil out of coal. Why disturb the Arctic ecology and run the risk of polluting the oceans by offshore drilling if the oil is so expensive? If makes neither ecological nor economic sense to go after frontier oils and governments would be foolish to encourage such activity.

MR. MeIVOR;

We would first like to correct the statement attributed to us by Mr. Yanchula. We said our analysis indicated directionally that between 5 and 15 billion barrels of Canada's undiscovered crude oil potential may become available at current prices (which we took at $4-$5/barrel), and that an additional 25 billion barrels may become available at prices up to $8/barrel. We said the remainder would require prices above $8/barrel. We agree with Mr. Yanchula that whether or not crude oil is obtained from coal or from the frontiers will indeed be determined by whichever source is the most economic, including environmental protection costs. In'our view, there is much frontier crude oil made from coal, but we also believe Canada should be developing the tech- nology for all energy sources. Who can tell today with certainty which ones we will be successful in discovering and developing or precisely what the relative economics will be?

MR. J. YANCHULA; There is some possibility that the Arctic Ocean will become open water in 20 to 30 years. The thickness of Arctic ice has decreased from 43' 80 years ago to 6' to 8' today. Should the Arctic Ocean become open water, the cost of exploration, development and trans- portation of any oil found there would be greatly reduced. Risks of pollution would also be greatly reduced. The widely published theory that an ice-free Arctic Ocean would trigger another ice age has been thoroughly discredited. Periods of glaciations or ice ages are brought on by extraordinary solar activity.

MR. MeIVOR; Even if the hypothesis of open water in the Arctic Ocean by ths year 2000 is true, and we doubt that it is, can we wait 30 years to develop these potential resources? For example, the recent study, "An Energy Policy for Canada," suggests frontier crude oil supply will be required in the 1980's. 106

MR. YANCHULA: Mr. Horte has stated that it would cost 60 cents per Mcf to transport gas from the Arctic to the U.S. border. The wellhead price at the Mackenzie Delta in contracts signed by Imperial Oil was 32 cents per Mcf. This is a total of 92 cents per Mcf or roughly competitive with coal gasification or making gas from tarsands crude. Why not look to speeding up these alternatives if we start running short rather than saddle ourselves with a $6 billion outlay for a pipeline to a remote area?

Over half of the natural gas is currently used for industrial purposes. If a shortage should develop3 the largest industrial plants could be directed to use coal and the pollution problem could be eliminated by enforcing the installation of facilities to clean up flue gases. These are already in use in such cities as Hamilton.

The chief beneficiaries of the Mackenzie pipeline are the Americans because the Prudhoe Bay gas could be brought down somewhat cheaper than by liquifying it at an Alaska port. The corporations involved, mostly foreign, would also benefit, of course.

For Canadians, investment in a Mackenzie Valley gas pipeline would be economic lunacy. Only 400 permanent jobs would be created with the $6 billion investment compared to 400,000 jobs if put into secondary industry. There are multiplier factors involved but it is not too difficult to see where most jobs would be multi- plied with an investment of this magnitude.

If the Americans and the corporations wish to see the Mackenzie Valley gas pipeline built then they must offer the average Canadian, and particularly the northern Inuit and Indian people, a suitable quid pro quo. This, Mr. Horte and his associates have not even begun to consider. MR. HORTE: Mr. Yanchula makes the point that we should be speeding up developments with respect to coal gasification and making gas from tarsands crude because the cost of doing so would be about equal to the cost of Mackenzie Valley gas. However, I do not know what he bases this on.

To my knowledge there does not exist anywhere, at this time, a large-scale coal gasification plant in operation. While one or two are now being constructed in the United States, it will likely be some time before these are operating on a completely satisfactory basis. Furthermore, I expect the cost for such gas 107 will be in the order of $1.25 per Mcf. I think coal gasification will be attractive at some stage, but I fail to see why that possi- bility should deter us from developing now our hydrocarbon resources in the North. To the extent that the coal gasification is competi- tive, I am sure it will be developed.

With respect to manufactured gas from tarsands crude, it would seem to me that the more efficient way would be to leave this fuel in liquefied form and transport it to eastern Canada and burn it as liquefied fuel. This is a much more efficient way to transport BTU's. Certainly if you were to take tarsands crude and gasify it in eastern Canada, the cost would be far in excess of natural gas proposed from the Mackenzie Valley area. Burning it as liquefied fuel will probably be about the equivalent of the price of natural gas delivered from the Mackenzie Valley into eastern Canada. Further, in order to keep pace with the traditional markets for crude oil in Canada, we will need to be developing almost two tarsands plants a year by the end of this decade — a fairly sizable task in itself.

With respect to the direct-fired use of coal, I agree that more coal should be used for these purposes, and undoubtedly will, but again I do not see why this should cause us tc defer the develop- ment of our hydrocarbon resources in the North.

The only reason given by Mr. Yanchula for deferring the large investment in the pipeline facility is that the large investments will only create 400 permanent jobs. This ignores the thousands of jobs created in the manufacturing of the pipe, the compressor stations, etc., and in the construction and subsequent future expansion. But this is still only a small part of the permanent jobs created in the exploration, production, construction of gas plants and other facilities and service industries which have to support these facilities. For instance, all the pipelines in Canada employ only slightly over 3,000 people in their operations, but the oil and gas industry in western Canada depends upon these pipelines for transporting their product to market. In Alberta alone over 200,000 jobs are directly related to the oil and gas industry and this does not take into consideration the jobs created in the rest of Canada which supply annually about $500 million worth of equipment and supplies in supporting that industry.

Most important of all is the role that access to an ample and secure supply of natural gas at reasonable cost will play in facilitating the growth of production and employment in Canada. Recent events remind us of the hazard that an insufficiency of available and usable forms of energy could limit the growth of employment or even reduce employment in some circumstances.

Mr. Yanchula makes a statement that the chief beneficiaries of the Mackenzie pipeline are the Americans because the Prudhoe Bay gas could be brought down somewhat cheaper than by liquefying it at an Alaskan port. I do not quarrel with his statement that they 108

would benefit, but I wouU say that Canada would benefit even more in that this movement of a large volume of Prudhoe Bay gas, which coupled with Mackenzie Valley gas, makes it feasible for Canadians to obtain and develop their natural resources in the Delta area at a much lower cost than could otherwise be done. Certainly, dependent upon the Canadian market alone, the project would not appear to be viable any time in the near term when it will be required. Substantially larger reserves would have to be developed in the Delta and I expect you would see a deferment of exploration in this area if the project were dropped or postponed and, in the final analysis, we, as Canadians, would be the ones who would really suffer.

Mr. Yanchula's statement that we have not even begun to consider the northern Inuit and the Indian people reflects a lack of know- ledge of what is being done. I do not believe any project in this country has devoted more time, effort and money to this problem than we have. For example, we now have a training pro- gram involving 75 northern natives with on-the-job training aug- mented with technical skill training in order that they can develop the skills required. We hope to expand this program sub- stantially and to use these trainees to train other natives, not only in technical skills, but also in the supervisory and managerial areas. We have given full consideration to native concerns and are continuing to consult with the native organiza- tions in the North, as well as the individual native communities. We have discussed with them the routing of the pipeline, the location of our camps and other factors which could affect their community, their trapping areas or their lifestyles. While we are not involved in the land claims situation itself, we have been doing everything within our power to encourage both parties to get together and arrive at an equitable settlement.

We would be very pleased, if Mr. Yanchula is interested, »o meet with him and explain in greater detail what we are doing in the many arsas of his concern. DR. J.B. WARREN (TRiUMP, University of British Columbia) asked Mr. Horte for certain data regarding the effects of pipe diameters and was provided with the following: Economies of Scale Relative to Proposed Mackenzie Valley Gas Pipeline Index Index of Cost Throughput of Service Outside Capacity * per Mcf Diameter (Case A = 100) (Case A = 100) Case A 48 inches 100 100 Case B 36 inches 48 150 Case C 30 inches 31 200 * Throughput capacity is proportional to the inside diameter of the pipe raised to the power of 2§. 109

PR. WARREN then raised a further point:

J think it is understood that changing pipeline size from 48" to 36" makes an important oost difference of perhaps 50% but this is not the significant pointy which is the total gas to be moved; linked to it, what is the likely percentage of the gas flow coming from the two fields? Presumably an -stablished capacity of around 30 T cu. ft. is the basic assumption made for economic viability of such a live. If the present established capacities are 23 T at Prudhoe and 7 T (a less certain figure?) at the Delta then one might assume a flow rate in this i-ztio from the two fields, not the 50-50 division which your talk, I think, implied.

There is, of course, no reason why a pipeline should not be built for the U.S.-origin gas, assuming that suitable rental conditions can be established, and if no gas existed in the Delta this might well have been the situation. However, I would hope you would clarify this matter in your answer. MR. HORTE; With respect to ratio of volumes from Prudhoe and the Delta, the facts are that the rate of natural gas production from Prudhoe will be less than one would normally expect from reserves of 26 Tcf. We anticipate deliveries of 2.0 to 2.25 Bcf/day. This lower-than-normal delivery rate is because a major portion of the natural gas will be produced with and dependent upon oil production from the field. With respect to deliveries from the Delta area, one would expect a producing rate from these non- associated gas fields to be approximately 1 Bcf/day from reserves of 7.0 Tcf. This means the 50-50 proportion referred to assumes additional reserves being developed in the Delta. From our studies we fully expect these additional developments in the Delta to take place and be available by the time the project is com- pleted. The 48-inch diameter would still be the appropriate sizing even if initial volumes were 3.0 Bcf/day. If no gas existed in the Delta and only 2.0 Bcf/day were available from Prudhoe, the viability of the project would be seriously pre- judiced and the proposal to pipeline Alaska gas instead across Alaska, for liquefaction at a south-eastern Alaskan port and then move it by tanker to the California markets, would be greatly enhanced.

DR. WARREN: Ir. your talk you made the tacit assumption that to make a viable economic enterprise of the proposed gas pipeline to the Mackenzie Delta area, it is also necessary to transport American gas from the Prudhoe field and to feed both U.S. and Canadian gas to the no

Canadian market and the unlimited U.S. market.

On what basis is this assumption made? Is a Canadian pipeline feeding the Canadian market not a viable enterprise at present if the U.S. decides to ship Prudhoe gas directly to U.S.A.?

MR. HORTE: Pi Canadian pipeline from the Delta feeding the Canadian market only is not, at present, a viable scheme. The Canadian deficiencies forecast in the late seventies and eighties, while significant in terms of Canadian demands, are not large in terms of the volumes necessary to provide reasonable transportation economics. The deficiencies in Canadian demand grow at the rate of about 250 million/day annually and, unfortunately, demand cannot be saved up until it reaches large enough volumes to support a project of this magnitude. The market either is served by some alterna- tive form of domestic or imported energy or it goes short. The only near-term alternate would appear to be imported- energy which in a condition of world-wide shortage might be very difficult even if it were considered desirable. Shortages, of course, would have even more dire consequences for the Canadian economy.

An anonymous questioner asked Mr. Warne (who presented Dr. Govier's paper): Are there any other products in addition to crude oil which may be derived from the oil sands? MR. WARNE; There are a number of additional constitutents in the oil sands which may have commercial value. One of the principal such ccn- stitutents is vanadium and considerable work has been done, particularly by one of the major oil companies, to determine the economic feasibility of recovering this metal. This work has been encouraging and there is some basis for optimism that con- siderable amounts of the metal will be recovered from the sands.

Another significant product is sulphur. The bitumen contains up to about 5% by weight of sulphur and a major part of this is recovered. Unfortunately, there is presently a dearth of markets for sulphur and the price is too low to make shipment from .ithabasca economic. In these circumstances, the sulphur recovered is stockpiled pending an improvement in sulphur prices.

The same questioner also asked:

Should development of the oil sands be deferred until production from them is required for Canadian markets? Ill

MR. WARNE;

Canada imports substantial amounts of crude oil into Eastern Canada while exporting about equivalent quantitites from Western Canada to nearby areas of the United States. It is only in the last couple of years that such exports from Western Canada have slightly exceeded imports to Eastern Canada. Canada therefore has not been a significant net exporter of crude oil. In addition, production from Western Canada is approaching capacity and in the absence of major new discoveries will decline to perhaps as little as half the peak capacity by 1985. Projects initiated in the oil sands now, in addition to providing supplementary produc- tion capacity, will accelerate the development of the technology of such production thus ensuring that production will be available later when required.

DR. D.C. DOWNING (Gulf Oil Research Centre) of Mr. Coates: You identified a few billion tons of Canadian coal which you considered to be available fairly readily and 86 billion tons not available. What are the main diffi- culties and problems in extracting this latter quantity? MR. COATES;

The Geological Survey of Canada have estimated that in-place geo- logical reserve of low- and medium-volatile bituminous coal in the mountain regions of B.C. and Alberta to be 86 billion tons. Very little of this can be regarded as recoverable because of the following adverse characteristics of the deposits:

. severely disturbed geologically, with extensive folding, faulting, discontinuity, erosion, and irregularity of seam thickness; . much of the coal occurs in very steeply dipping forma- tions (dips of 70 degrees to 90 degrees are not uncommon); conventional underground mining methods cannot success- fully be applied to such conditions;

. much of the coal lies under deep cover, with weak roof conditions; . not all of the coal is of commercial quality; . much of the region presents access problems because of rugged topography and elevation; . some of the coal occurs in designated parks or wilderness areas in which mining has been banned. 113

SESSION II

ENERGY MARKETS AND THEIR DEPENDENCE ON PRICE

Monday, 15 October, 1973, p.m.

Chai rman REAL BOUCHER Directeur general de 1'energie Ministire des richesses naturelles Province de Quebec 114

TABLE I

World Energy Consumption Million Metric Tons of Coal Equivalent

Developed Developing Centrally World Countries Countries Planned Economies

1961 4,192 2,654 313 1,224

1962 4,418 2,794 337 1,286

1963 4,717 2,978 354 1,385

1964 4,978 3,126 371 1,481

1965 5,214 3,270 399 1,546

1966 5,507 3,438 427 1,642

1967 5,608 3,565 449 1,595

1968 6,019 3,797 489 1,733

1969 6,413 4,043 523 1,847

1970 6,843 4,300 569 1,974

% annual rate of growth 5.6% 5.5% 6.9% 5.5%

Source: World Energy Supplies 1961-1970 United Nations Statistical Papers Series J No. 15 ST/STAT/SER. J/15 table 1, page 7.

1. Excludes bunkers

In this table, conversion into coal equivalent is done on the basis of the heat energy that can be obtained from the fuels under ideal conditions. Thus hydroelectric power is equated to the coal that can generate an equal amount of heat. In some presentations, the coal required in a typical thermal station to generate the same amount of electricity is used as the equivalent of hydro or nuclear power. In the latter approach, hydro power has a coal equivalent some four and a half times higher than in the U.K. approach. 115

THE LONGER TEEM OUTLOOK FOR OIL

by

J.H. DAGHER

BP Canada Limited

WORLD ENERGY SUPPLY - DEMAND BALANCE

During the period 1961 to 1970 total world energy consumption was as in Table 1.

The developed countries with less than 307o of world population accounted for some 63% of total annual consumption throughout this period. North America, with some 6% of total world population accoanted for 357= of total consumption in 1961 and for 337o in 1970, that is a slight decrease in the share of total usage but still a disproportionately large share. On a per capita basis, the intensity of consumption in North America was even more pronounced . (Table 2).

The developing countries increased their consumption per capita at a higher than world average rate. However, mainly due to the impact of Japan, the developed countries as a whole increased their consumption per capita at an evan higher rate. The North American rate of increase in per capita energy usage was a healthy 3.6% per annum.

It is evident from the above that any forecast of future require- ments must be highly dependent on the underlying assumptions as to growth (or decline) rates in per capita consumption. Were all the world to consume energy at North American per capita rates, a sixfold increase in energy supplies would be needed. This is of course completely outside the realm of financial and technical feasibility over a short period of time. Never- theless the wide range of uncertainty surrounding future economic growth in developing countries greatly adds to the uncertainty of any forecast of energy demand.

The contribution of the various forms of primary energy to the total supply is shown in Tables 3 and 4.

The decline in the share of coals and the .pid increase in the shares of crude oil and natural gas to the total energy supply is a reflection of the relative competitiveness of the fuels (including the convenience aspect) . The developed countries accounted throughout for around 50% of coal production and the centrally planned economies for around 40%. These are the areas where the labour intensive aspect of coal production was having thestrongest impact on the relative competitiveness of this source of energy. 116

TABLE 2

Energy Consumption per capita Kilograms Coal Equivalent per capita

World Developed Developing Centrally North Countries Countries Planned Economies America

1961 1,387 4,029 231 1,220 8,068

1962 1,433 4,188 241 1,260 8,288

1963 1,499 4,408 247 1,334 8,628

1964 1,550 4,572 252 1,403 8,927

1965 1,592 4,728 264 1,442 9,219

1966 1,649 4,920 276 1,507 9,640

1967 1,648 5,052 282 1,442 9,881

1968 1,734 5,335 299 1,542 10,398

1969 1,811 5,620 311 1,618 10,824

1970 1,897 5,914 330 1,704 11,128

°L annual rate of growth 3.6% 4.3% 4.1% 3.5% 3.6%

Source: World Energy Supplies 1961-1970 United Nations Statistical Papers Series J No. 15 ST/STAT/SER.j/15 Table 1 page 7 and table 2 page 25.

1. North America also included in column 2, 117

It is also significant that well over half the natural gas was produced (and consumed) in the U.S. Over the decade, the consumption mix in the U.S. shows a relative tread away from solid fuels and even liquid fuels in favour of natural gas. At the beginning and the end of the period the contribution of the various forms of energy to U.S. primary energy consumption were as follows:

Per cent of total 1970 1961

Coal and Lignite 19.1% 23.2% Crude Petroleum 40.2% 41.6% Natural Gas 36.4% 31.6% Other 4.3% 3.6%

100.0% 100.0%

Source: U.S. Bureau of Mines

In particular, with its vast coal resources, the U.S. has not incraased its consumption of this fuel proportionately with the growth of other fuels. The position, of natural gas compared to the rest of the world is particularly noteworthy: the rapid increase in consumption has resulted in a decline in U.S. gas reserves from 21 years' supply in 1961 to 13 years in 1970 and less than 12 years currently,

THE ENERGY CRISIS

From the foregoing, it is obvious that any view on future world energy supply patterns must have at its core a view of future U.S. energy demand and supply patterns. In particular, the U.S. is generally depicted as having an energy crisis. Is there a U.S. energy crisis and if so, are its causes such that it is only a matter of time before it becomes manifest elsewhere in the ;world? Or is it a crisis brought about by circumstances particular to the U.S. which the U.S. can solve internally and thereby prevent its -spread? Most importantly is it a short term or a long term crisis? In order to answer these questions a historical retrospective is helpful. •

One of the tnost important economic characteristics of oil production is that;it is very expensive to discover but once discovered, generally relatively, cheap to produce (in terms of physical production costs that is .excluding royalties and taxes).

• This characteristic is reinforced in the subsequent downstrfesm operations that bring crude oil to the consumer .in a usable form. Average variable costs thus are appreciably smaller than average total costs. Economic theory says that.in the short term firms in a competitive industry 118

TABLE 3

World Energy Production Million Metric Tons Coal Equivalent

Total Coal and Crude Natural Hydro/Nuclear Lignite Petroleum Gas Electricity

1961 4,270 2,022 1,486 671 91 1962 4,511 2,077 1,612 732 97 1963 4,788 2,160 1,728 798 102 1964 5,081 2,238 1,867 869 107 1965 5,316 2,268 2,001 930 118 1966 5,621 2,310 2,172 1,012 128 1967 5,756 2,205 2,329 1,090 132 1968 6,140 2,274 2,542 1,186 138 1969 6,514 2,332 2,735 1,299 149 1970 7,001 2,409 3,004 1,431 157

% annual rate of growth 5.6% 2.0% 8.1% 8.8% 6.2%

Source: World Energy Supplies 1961-1970 United Nations Statistical Papers Series J No. 15 ST/STAT/SER.J/15 Table 1 page 6 and Table 2 page 25.

TABLE 4

World - Proportion of Primary Energy Supplied by various sources

Coal and Crude Petroleum Natural Hydro/Nuclear Total Lignite Per cent of total Gas Electricity

1961 100 47.4 34.8 15.7 2.1 1962 100 45.9 35.7 16.2 2.2 1963 100 45.1 36.1 16.7 2.1 1964 100 44.0 36.7 17.1 2.1 1965 100 42.7 32.6 17.5 2.2 1966 100 41.1 33.6 18.0 2.3 1967 100 38.3 40.5 18.9 2.3 1968 100 37.0 41.4 19.3 2.3 1969 100 35.8 42,0 19.9 2.3 1970 100 34.4 42.9 20.4 2.3 119

will remain in business for some time at less than equilibrium prices as long as price exceeds average variable costs . In the case of an oil deposit, the unspecified period of time could be equal *"o the time required to deplete the reservoir. That is, oil will continue . ••• produced, transported, refined and supplied to the consumer even A.._n prices are appreciably lower than the normal equilibrium price, that is the price which is equal to both the marginal cost and the average total cost. On the demand side, in the short term, demand is highly inelastic which means that very large variations in price are needed to place "surplus" oil. (It also means that large taxes can be levied without affecting volume too much). From the very early days of the industry, wide fluctuations in crude oil prices were a frequent phenomenon, more the rule than the exception. Reporting on price condition a hundred years ago in the Petrolia district of Southwestern Ontario the Canadian Monetary Times and Insurance ' ronicle stated "In 1862 oil was to be had for ten cents a barrel from the -lowing wells of Oil Springs and ... in 1865 it ran up to $10 per barrel...". The latter price is considerably higher than current prices in monetary value and much more so in real value.

Continuous and generally abortive attempts at stabilizing prices were made by Federal, State or Provincial Governments and by industry often with the blessing of and in close co-operation with Governments.

The first effective price stabilization system evolved in the U.S., during the Depression. The discovery of huge fields such as East Texas, Wilmington, Slaughter, Conroe West resulted in chaotic price conditions. Protectionism - in oil as well as other sectors of the economy - was prescribed as the antidote in those depression days. Accordingly, the 1930's saw the creation of a complex network of State and Federal regulations designed to achieve price stability by extending the definition of conserva- tion from its accepted physical engineering interpretation to economic conservation. These regulations were repeatedly tested in State and Federal courts and after a long period of trial and error, a system was put in place which effectively curtailed production to market demand. The desired aim of stable prices was eventually achieved but only at the cost of raising average crude oil prices to a level sufficient to make it economical for marginal stripper wells to remain in operation. A 36° gravity Oklahoma- Kansas crude oil which had tumbled from $3.50 per barrel in 1920 to $0.69 in 1932 was gradually raised back to the $1.20 - $1.50 range in the late 1930's. This trend was reinforced during the war by a policy of encouraging the drilling of marginal and stripper wells at the expense of wildcats. By

1. A.W. Stonier and D.C. Hague. A Textbook of Economic Theory. London, Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd., 1959 pages 134-136.

2. Canadian Monetary Times and Insurance Chronicle, Vol. 1, No.2, Aug. 29, 1867, p.3.

3. API Facts & Figures, 1959, p. 374. 120

1944, maximum efficient rates of production were being reached in most major producing States and for some months in 1945, were in fact exceeded. With the lifting of controls on demand at the end of the war, crude, oil prices rose to the $2.50 - $3.00 level in the late; 1940's. The protectionism of the 1930's gave way to a policy of encouraging imports of crude oil for the prevalent opinion was then that the U.S. was running out of crude oil. This liberal climate on crude oil imports gave rise in the early 1950's to an unprecedented rush by U.S. companies to explore in Canada, Venezuela, the Middle East. Their success was such that within a very short time U.S. crude oil imports caoie to represent a significant proportion of domestic production. (10% in 1954, 127= in 1955, 14% in 1957). U.S. domestic producers and royalty owners began to press for controls on imports which became embodied in the 1955 National Defence Amendment to the Trade Agree- ments Extension Act providing for limits to be placed on the imports of any strategic item which in the opinion of the President, upon advice from the Office of Defence Mobilization, was being imported to an extent which threatened to jeopardize national security. After attempting - unsuccessful- ly - to institute voluntary controls, in March 1959 the U.S. Administration instituted mandatory controls on crude oil and product imports.

Before pursuing the effect on the U.S. of this U.S. measure, its effect on the world scene was to create a large surplus of crude oil in Canada, Venezuela and the Middle East. Many U.S. companies having looked for and found oil with the intention of taking it into their U.S.refineries were then unable to do so. Naturally they chose to enter European and other markets rather than leave their oil in the ground. This led to severe price cutting on products which soon had to be followed by reductions in crude oil prices.

Reverting to the U.S. scene, broadly the import control system tied the offshore crude oil imports East of the Rockies to a level equal to 12.2% of anticipated production of domestic crude and natural gas liquids while West of the Rockies imports were allowed in volumes sufficient to bridge the gap between domestic supply and demand. Product imports, except for heavy fuel oils, were limited to historical levels.

How the quotas were allocated among various companies is irrelevant here. Suffice it to say that through most of the period it •esulted in a bonus of approximately $1.25 per barrel of import rights to the recipient, giving an indication of the price advantage of foreign crude oils relative to U.S. crude oils.

The system worked - with much 'ad hoc-ing'- throughout the 1960's and it worked essentially for one reason, namely that there was sufficient existing and new productive capacity to increase domestic production so that

1. U.S. Cabinet Task Force Report on Oil Import Control, February 1970. 121

the 12.2% import limit would not be binding. U.S. domestic crude oil and lease condensate production rose steadily till 1970 when it reached 9,637,000 barrels per day, but then in 1971 dropped to 9,463,000 barrels per day with a further slight drop to 9,451,000 barrels per day in 1972.* (These figures exclude of course Alaskan potential). Once it became clear that U.S. domestic production could not increase a-pace with demand, it was evident that the fixed import proportion could not bridge the supply/ demand gap. While it was obvious that a change in the U.S. control system was inevitable, there were no indications whatsoever or perhaps even worse, there were many conflicting indications as to the form the new system would take. A Cabinet Task Force was created on March 25, 1969 to conduct a comprehensive review of oil import restrictions. It submitted its report in February 1970 with the following general recommendations.^

"General plan. A majority of the Task Force recommends that the President proclaim in early 1970 a phased transition to a tariff system for controlling imports, to take initial effect no later than January 1, 1971, with the following principal features: (1) initial imposition of an increased tariff on non-preferred crude oil at a level $1.35 per barrel above existing tariffs; (2) phase-out of special quota privileges over a three-year transition period by means of a "tariff-free" quota; (3) deferment of decision on further tariff liberalization until January 1972, at which time the program managers may continue the process of liberalization if they are then persuaded on the basis of the best available evidence that indicated reserves in North American frontier areas will be sufficient to meet the aggregate 1980 production estimates set forth herein, or until January 1973 or January 1974 if the program managers are so persuaded by then; (4) a comprehensive review of the program no later than 1975, including an in-depth study of the post-1980 situation, to determine whether it then appears consistent with the national security to continue - or, if need be. arrest or reverse - the process of tariff liberalization."

Some key members of the Task Force dissented with the analysis and conclusions of the Report particularly with the recommended tariff approach to controls. No fundamental decisions were taken on the basis of the report, Shortly after, the National Petroleum Council, an officially established

1. Oil and Gas Journal July 30, 1973, pages 69-73. (Excludes N.G.L.)

2. U.S. Cabinet Task Force Report on Oil Import Control, February 1970, pages 136-137. 122

industry advisory board to the Secretary of the Interior was asked to under- take a comprehensive study of the U.S. energy outlook. They presented their report in December 1972. which recommended, among other things, the continuation of a mandatory import control programme. Meanwhile, equation of supply and demand continued to be achieved through temporary stop-gap measures such as allowing special imports of heating oils or allowing refiners to "borrow" against future quotas and special allocations.

The overall uncertainty as to the futurp direction of U.S. energy policy meant that the necessary investment was not forthcoming in U.?.. domestic refineries, in deep river ports, in offshore refineries (with some notable exceptions) in ships, in pipelines, in offshore producing capacity and generally in the whole massive structure that would eventually be needed to meet the rising demand. Several complicating factors added to the uncertainty and prevented the commitment or expenditure of the necessary monies while other unexpected factors added to the oil and gas supply stringency. Among these may be mentioned:

i) Ecological preoccupation which resulted in regulations and actions that prevented or considerably delayed the construction of refineries, nuclear and thermal power plants, pipelines, (Alaska being the prime case in point) deep river ports etc.

ii) Lag in the nuclear power plant construction program due to technological problems , delays in delivery of equipment - in addition to ecological delays.

iii) Unexpected surge in demand due to switches in power generation from coal to oil or gas, to the higher specific consumption of new cars, and to rapid economic expansion.

iv) Uncertainty as to new car emission control regulations - since altered or postponed on two major occasions - and which could have pre-empted a sizeable proportion of funds which would otherwise have been available to industry for expansion.

v) Turmoil in the international monetary scene which, among other things, was reflected in offshore crude oil prices.

vi) Mounting power or effectiveness of OPEC in securing higher per barrel revenues to member Governments and all the associated threats that were voiced and m some cases implemented (nationalization/expropriation) in the process.

1. National Petroleum Council's Committee on U.S. Energy Outlook Report, December 1972.

2. Id. page 320. 123

The debate was naturally broadened to all other forms of energy, with natural gas attracting particular attention regarding the desirability and efficacity of decontrolling prices, which in interstate commerce have been under FPC control since 1954. Many experts have attributed the spectacular rise in the share of natural gas in the total U.S. energy scene - and the resultant decline in U.S. proven reserves of natural gas - to underpricing imposed under FPC controls. In many major energy consuming centers the city gate price for natural gas was considerably lower than the equivalent btu price of hfiavy fuel oil. The same applies to Canada albeit to a lesser extent .

Meanwhile, and as a result of the foregoing, acute energy shortages began to be experienced in certain areas of the U.S.

Accordingly, President Nixon took two large measures. The first, an interim one taken on January 17, 1973, raised considerably the ceiling on 1973 crude oil and products import quotas and suspended import quotas on heating oils to April 30, 1973. The second, more far reaching was promulgated on April 18, 1973 in conjunction with a White House "Energy Message" to Congress.'- This virtually abandoned the old quota system and substituted instead a gradually rising fee on imports of crude oil and products above a predetermined level. It also introduced a strong incentive in favour of domestic refining relative to offshore refining. Other far reaching but longer term measures were also enunciated in the Energy Message.

The lifting of controls on crude oil and product imports found the U.S. and the world oil industry largely unprepared to cope with this un- expected and far reaching change. For the reasons previously mentioned, the refining capacity in the U.S. or elsewhere, the deep water ports, the ships and indeed the offshore crude oil productive capacity had not been built ready to be used when - and if - this unexpected radical change in U.S. policy was made, nor would it have been prudent to do so.

The ensuing rush by U.S. oil companies to mop up available crude oil, products available in world refineries and the ships to carry these has resulted in unprecedented high spot prices for crude oil, products and ships.

In October 1972, furnace fuel heating oils could be imported into the Worth American Eastern Seaboeidfrom Caribbean refineries at around 14c per gallon. In May 1973 c >oted prices for products at these export refineries and spot freight rates were anywhere from 25C to 28

Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. An Energy Policy for Canada - Phase 1, voluine 1, page 113. The White House, Message to Congress and Proclamation Modifying Proclama- tion 3279 Relating to Imports of Petroleum and Petroleum Products. Office of the White House Press Secretary April 18, 1973. U.S. Department of Interior "World Wide Crude Oil Prices - Second Report" Technical Report P3-6-72. June 1972. 124

barrel, thus more Chan doubling the cost of importing a barrel of Middle East crude into the U.S.

The effects, spread throughout the world. Cargo prices at Rotterdam over the span of six months changed as follows:-

January 1973 July 1973 $ per metric ton

Regular gasoline 42 99 Heating oil 36 63 Heavy fuel oil low sulphur 24 28 Heavy fuel oil high sulphur 16 18

Note the little change in heavy fuel oil prices which were exempt from import controls even before the lifting of import controls on all oils.

Canada reacted, first in February 1973 by controlling the export of indigenous crude oil after more than a decade when the aim had been to press the U.S. into allowing increasing quantities of Canadian crude oil exports, and then, in June 1973 by extending controls to the exportation of gasolines and heating oils whether derived from domestic or imported crudes.

THE LONGER TERM OUTLOOK FOR OIL

The worldwide rise in prices and the scramble for security of supplies to domestic markets have been interpreted as evidence of an energy crisis and, with less justification, of its enduring nature. It was precisely because products and crude oils could not be imported freely into the U.S. in 1972 that their prices and particularly freight costs were low a year ago and it is for the opposite reason that they are now high.

This is not to suggest that the rise in crude oil and product prices is entirely the result of this sudden - and in that sense temporary - tightness or that other sudden tight conditions will not again recur after the current one has been resolved. But the longer term outlook can only be taken after eliminating the transient effects of the current situation.

Having removed from today's picture, the abnormal elements (tightness of production facilities, of tankers capacity, of pipelines, of deep water facilities, of refining capacity, of storage tanks) brought about mainly by the sudden change in U.S. policy the resulting steady state picture is broadly as follows:

1. PLatt's Oilgram - dated July 27, 1973. 125

On January 1, 1971, total world proven recoverable crude oil reserves amounted to 552 billion barrels. In 1971, total world crude oil production amounted to 17,6 billion barrels so that existing known reserves were sufficient to provide 31.4 times the yearly demand. Were the demand for oil in the 1970's to grow at the same rate as it did in the 1960 's total world cumulative demand for oil during the decade of the 1970's would amount to some 238 billion barrels. Thus even if no oil at all is discovered, there are ample known reserves of conventional crude oil to meet the demand for the decade leaving at the end of it some 314 billion barrels, equal to eight years' supply of the thai current demand rate. But of course new oil will continue to be discovered. Over the last ten years or so, gross additions to world proven reserves of crude oil averaged some 35 billion barrels per year.

In fact, were the 1970's to repeat the performance of the 1960's as far as growth in demand (at 8.1% per annum) and of reserves additions 'at 35 billion barrels per annum) then more oil should be discovered in the decade than will be consumed.

However, were we to assume the continuation of recent growth rates, then early in the 1980's demand will begin to exceed historical rates of gross reserve additions. Of course such a situation is not tenable for long and either demand will have to fall short of purely geometrical growth or reserve additions will have to grow at a higher rate. More likely, both phenomena will occur to varying degrees induced partly by purely economic forces (interfuel competition, price elasticity of demand, of supply) but also, by deliberate Government policies: on the consuming countries' side by forced diversifications of energy sources, greater recourse to more abundant indigenous and therefore more secure, even if temporarily more expensive, sources of energy, and on the producing countries' side by anticipatory conservation.

On the demand side, the main factors that are expected to contri- bute to a reduction in the growth of oil consumption are:

1) Resurgence in the competitiveness of coal. As indicated in the table 4 in the 1960's the growth in crude oil and natural gas production

1. DeRolyer & MacNaughton Twentieth Century Petroleum Statistics, 1972 page 1

2. World crude oil production in the current decade has been 16.7 billion barrels in 1970, 17.6 billion barrels in 1971, 18.6 billion barrels in 1972 and is estimated at 20.4 billion barrels for 1973 giving a growth rate of 6.6% per annum in the 1970's so far. 126

considerably exceeded growth in energy demand. Part of this increase was at the expense of coal and a pure substitution - railroads, thermal generation, heating - and to that extent there is a once and for all component in oil's growth in the 1960's. Also, this substantial gain in oil's share of world energy supply was achieved under conditions of excess world crude oil productive capacity and the attendant pricing characteristics tc which reference has been made previously. The rise in crude oil costs that has been taking place since the fall of 1970 - after the steady decline of the 1960's - is gradually restoring coal's competitive position. In North America coal already has the largest share of thermal power generation followed by natural gas. If well- head prices of natural gas are allowed to rise, the substitution will be towards coal rather than oil, on the basis of current relative prices. A similar trend to coal may also be expected in Europe and Japan where oil accounts for a significant proportion of thermally generated electricity. In the synthetic gas market coal is also expected to be the preferred raw material on the basis of price and availability even if in the interim liquid feedstocks will likely be the main source of SNG.

2) Security of supplies and balance of payment considerations will also contribute to coal's resurgence. Unlike oil, coal is mainly found and produced in developed countries or in centrally planned economies. During the 1950's and the 1960's, many Governments, against the then current expectation of unlimited and steadily cheaper oil, had adopted policies designed to reduce or phase out domestic coal production. In the current changed circumstances a reversal of such policies is to be expected and is in fact taking place. In addition to direct assistance to coal a considerable measure of indirect and potentially more fruit- ful assistance is being given through more intensive research in coal gasification, liquefaction,transportation, desulphurization.

3) The foregoing applies also to nuclear energy. In Canada there is currently 2,000 megawatts electrical nuclear power capacity and a further 4,100 megawatts are under construction or committed. The energy study papers recently published by the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources foresee this growing to 15,000 megawatts by 1980, 30,000 megawatts by 1990 and by the year 2000 to about 100,000 megawatts. From its present position of supplying 0.571, of all electric power generated (and 2% of thermal power) nuclear energy is expected to account for-^"/,, of all electric power (and 63% of thermal power) by the year 2000. The extent to which electric power, generated mainly from non-oil sources can substitute for oil uses will vary from one sector to another. In the residential sector, where heating is by far the

1. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. An Energy Policy for Canada Phase 1 - Volume II page 299.

2. Id. page 292. 127

major end use for oil, the peak appears to have been reached in oil consumption. Future increases in residential energy consumption will be provided by gas and electricity. In the commercial and the industrial sectors, oil usage is expected to increase but at a much lower rate than total energy consumption. Over the next two or three decades only the transportation sector will derive most of its additional energy requirements from oil.

';) The rise of energy costs will result in an improved efficiency of energy utilisation. Here the scope of conservation is vast indeed. Over one third of the energy consumed in the developed countries is used in the process of converting primary fuels into other more convenient forms of energy and in the transportation of energy. A large proportion of the remainder, that is the energy delivered to consumers in the form they have chosen to buy it could be economized but it is difficult to apply the term waste to the whole of this proportion since it is largely a function of the subjective assessment of the researcher as to what is an adequate room temperature, which trip should be taken by car rather than by bus etc., whether a small foreign imported car should substitute for a large North American car etc. While the former, objective, set of sources of waste is largely under the control of engineers the latter is largely a matter of personal choice by millions of individuals. But personal preferences can be altered without coercion (unless taxation is a form of coercion?). For example, in the transportation sector, the energy requirements of various modes of transportation are as follows ^:-

BTU per passenger mile Intercity Passenger Traffic

Bus 1 ,090 Train 1 ,700 Car 4 ,250 Aircraft 9 ,700 Urban Passenger Traffic Bus 1 ,240 Gar 5 ,060

1. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. An Energy Policy for Canada Phase 1 - Volume II page 8.

2. Petroleum Press Service July 1973 page 258. 123

BTU per Ton Mile

Intercity Freight Traffic Pipeline 450 Waterway 540 Train 680 Truck 2,340 Aircraft 37,000

The main areas where significant reductions in energy usage can be achieved are:

i) In the residential/commercial field through better insulation of existing homes and buildings, higher insulation standards for new construction, minimum efficiency standards for appliances, furnaces, air conditioners, through smoothing of daily and seasonal cycle of demand, through education in conservation etc.

ii)In the transportation sector through improved mass transit, improved energy efficiency of automobiles, new freight hand1ing sys terns.

iii)In the industrial sector through greater use of recycling and secondary use of waste heat, smoothing of daily and seasonal cycle of demand, relocation of certain industrial activities on a national or even international scale. It has been estimated that U.S. crude oil consumption in 1990 could be reduced from a normal level of 27.5 million barrels per day to a level of 20 million barrels per day through the workings of the aforementioned conservation measures . The use of waste heat from power station and large industrial complexes, the generation of power from domestic waste and from agricultural waste are cases in point where a start has already been made.

Many of these savings or new form of energy generations are and will increasingly take place through the normal operation of the cost/benefit principle in a free economy thnt is, their contribution will very largely be determined by energy prices and cannot therefore be forecast a priori as purely engineering questions.

5) Working in the opposite direction, a greater demand for energy will result from the increased awareness for environmental protection. The standards which a society sets for itself regarding the quality of its environment have a significant effect on the energy it consumes both as to its quantity and as to its unit cost. This is far too large and complex a subject to be treated in any degree of detail. Only summary results need be mentioned:

1. Vogely Dr.W.A. ''Characteristics of the Denand for Oil and Gas" in International Inc., seminar on The Oil and Gas Shortage. 129

1) The Department of Energy, Mines and Resources has done a thorough analysis of the impact of environmental control measures on each of the major energy sources and has estimated the resulting cost increase at 5 to 7 per cent of total energy costs over the next decade. o it. The U.S. National Petroleum Council has estimated che additional costs at between 4 and 5% of total costs.

These cost estimates do not bring out other important aspects of environmental protection, namely their effect on the balance of payments and on security of supplies. To the extent that they result in a shift away from indigenous sources of energy both of these aspects are adversely affected by tighter environmental norms.

On the supply side, the main factov.3 that are expected to contribute to increasing the availability of hydrocarbon fuels are:

1) Revision and extension of proven reserves in existing production areas. Proven crude oil reserves are generally defined as the volumes that can be demonstrated by geological and engineering data to be recoverable with reasonable certainty under existing economic and operating condi- tions. As economic parameters change proven reserves may be enlarged through improved recovery techniques. The U.S. National Petroleum Ccuncil anticipates that average recovery efficiency will rise from 31% of oil-in-place in 1970 to 37% in 19S5, with new reservoirs achieving an efficiency of close to 50%. Also, the "proving" of reserves obeys a sort of law of supply-and-demand, whereby potential reserves are not "proven" in the rigorous sense, until the need for it arises.

2) New frontier areas like Canada's arctic regions, Siberia and offshore areas generally, are becoming economically attractive as exploration ventures with the rise in crude oil prices and with improvements in technology. The North Sea is a case in point. A recent report to the U.N. Committee on Peaceful Uses of the Sea Bed places the estimate of recoverable .tude oil in offshore areas

1. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. An Energy Policy for Canada Phase 1, Vol. I - Analysis page 27u.

2. National Petroleum Council Op. Cit page 53.

3. National Fetroleum Council Op. Cit page 310. 130

to 1,000 meter depth, at 2.3 trillion barrels (plus an equivalent amount of natural gas) which is some 4 times current remaining proven recoverable crude oil reserves.1 The report expects that techniques for well completion at these depths will have been developed by 1980 so that these potential reserves could come into production during the 1980's to an extent that will be determined primarily but not exclusively by prevailing and anticipated crude oil prices. For Canadian frontier areas, the response ol the supply of oil anJ gas to price has been analysed in great detail in the EMR energy papers. The analysis indicates that at a delivered cost of $6 (in 1972 $) per barrel a large exportable surplus of oil would be available (from existing reserves, frontier areas and synthetic Athabasca and heavy crude oil deposits) until the first uecade of the next centure.

3) Synthetic oil production from Tar Sands, Heavy Oil deposits, Shale Oils is rapidly nearing economic feasibility. Already, current crude oil prices support the economics of developing selected areas of the Athabasca Tar Sands. It is estimated that at $6 (in 1972$) per barrel, some 35 billion barrels of oil (three times current Canadian reserves) would be economically recoverable by open-pit mining techniques . If research now underway on in-situ recovery of Athabasca Tar and other boavy oils deposits is successful, substantial additional quantities of oil would be economically recoverable at the $5-$7 (in 1972$) per barrel price range. 3 A similar price level would also make it economical to produce some 54 billion barrels of synthetic crude from Colorado Shales .4 Vast deposits of heavy oils and shales are also known to exist in Venezuela, Brazil, China and other parts of the world.

4) Coal liquefaction is expected to become economically attractive at crude oil prices in the range of $5-$7 a barrel 5 , not a very large increase from the present $4 per barrel. When that stage is reached, the demand for crude oil will be further reduced by a more intensive upgrading of the barrel and vacating some of the current heating usages of oil. There are many technological problems to be resolved and possibilities to be exploited before a significant substitution of coal for oil is achieved but these are increasingly being explored with support of Government sponsored research.

1. Oil and Gas Journal July 30,1973 "Newsletter" pages 1, 2.

2. Dept. of Energy,Mines and Resources Op. Cit page 96.

3. Dept. of Energy.Mines and Resources Op. Cit Vol. II, pages 73-74.

4. Nat. Petrol. Council Op. Cit page 206.

5. Dept. of Energy, Mines and Resources Op. Cit Vol. I - Analysis page 69. 131

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The above enumeration of the factors that will eventually bring into equation the supply and demand for oil did not touch upon the problems that may arise in the process. Ex-post, of course, supply will have been equal to demand and at any given moment in time demand and supply match either in a stable equilibrium or otherwise (excess supply, unfilled excess demand, rationing etc.). The real questions therefore are how will rhat equation obtain, how it will unfold through time and how it will affect the other "equations" in the world's economies.

What greatly complicates any prognostications in this domain is that energy is often one of the major preoccupations of Governments, the subject of policies which create "large" options, the selection of one of which, rather than another, can have a widely different impact on the economy and the selection is not always entirely a matter of economic choice in the narrow sense.

This is abundantly illustrated by the various options for Canada considered in the recent EMR energy papers and which were explored with the CANDIDE econometric model. Depending on the political choice of on^ of the options or die other, GNF could grow over the remainder of the decade at anything between 4.6% per annum and 6.4% per annum in real tei-ms , inflation could range from 2.3 to 5.2% per annum, unemployment from an average of 2.7% to an average of 5.5%, disposable personal income (in 1961$) could grow at rates varying between 4.5% and 7.8/J..1 Admittedly this options' analysis is theoretical, designed precisely to bring out the consequences of each of the theoretical options so as to provide a basis for choice. Nevertheless, there is no clear cut indication, on the basis of these results, that the political choice will inevitably rest on one particular option. Added to which, each option has inherent uncertainties which only time will resolve.

The same wide variety of options exists on a world scale. There- fore while the natural and technological resources exist to enable the world community to progress gradually to the new energy era of more diversified and esoteric forms many forces may intervene to make the progression somewhat chaotic. Foremost among these are:

1) Financial limitations. In a recent forecast the Chase Manhattan Banic estimated that the oil industry (outside centrally planned economies) will need to invest a total of $1 million-million between now and 1985 in order to meet expected demand, of which, on the basis of recent historical trends, some $400 billion would have to be secured

1. Dept, of Energy, Mines and Resources Op. Cit Vol. II page 199. 132

from the capital markets of the world in competition with all other segments. This is largely a historical extrapolation and to that extent may not be a valid picture of the future but it is indicative of the magnitudes involved. It is noteworthy that all other energy alternatives to conventional oil and gas are characterized by often larger "unit project costs" and long lead times.

2) Investment choices of producing countries. An increasingly larger proportion of a higher priced crude oil is accruing to producing countries. Various investment opportunities will compete with investment in oil production according to the choices open to the recipient country. A diversion of energy funds into other avenues may therefore take place which may further add to the financial strains on the energy industries.

3) Political problems causing interruption of supplies, bilateral "every-man-for-himself" arrangements, scramble for resources, enforced cut-backs and over cautious anticipatory conservation on the part of producing countries, international trade; balance of payments and other world monetary problems.

4) Ecological delays and unexpected technological problems which may delay the coming on stream of alternative forms of energy.

All these are SJ many problems that may have to be surmounted over the next three or four decades on the inevitable and necessary path towards a new world energy balance where oil energy will play a still substantial role. 133

ENERGY MARKETS AND THEIR DEPENDENCE ON PRICE ; GAS MARKETS

by

ROLFE R. COLPITTS

Lalonde, Girouard, Letendre & Associates Consulting Engineers

PREFACE

s-or the last forty years, North America in general has enjoyed very low energy costs, as compared to many industrialized areas of the world.

Having now substantially committed our low cost energy resources, we face the prospect of increasing costs for a new supply, more in line with costs in Europe and Japan.

At the same time, a new consciousness of pollution hazards has arrived which will result in further increases in energy costs, but there is as yet no international solution to a global problem. The real results of the Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm are unknown as yet, since to be successful, a reduction of na- tionalistic feelings would be necessary. It is obvious that the United Nations is our only existing agency which could be equipped to handle the world-wide problem. Briefly, there are no prospects for a true energy shortage in Canada over the next 5 years. Events in the United States will certainly affect distribution and costs. There are energy supply problems after 1978. There is a shortage of energy which is environmentally acceptable. Natural gas has become valuable as a means of controlling air quality, and the "normal" * price of natural gas can be expected to rise

"Normal" means a situation of no major armed conflicts and no shutdown of supply by oil exporting nations. 134

NATURAL GAS RESERVES AND PRODUCTION 1963 - 1984

so ALBERTA

MARKETABLE RESERVES

30

30

10

0

MARKETABLE PRODUCTION

S3 64 69 66 67 66 60 70 7t 72 73 74 73 76 77 T8 79 80 81 82 83

YEAR SOURCES SEE REFERENCES

Fig. I 135 about Si/million Bills in much of Canada by mid-1973 over 1969, with further increases taking place due to wellhead increases. TransCanada PipeLines will run into deiiverability problems by 1978-79 in Alberta, making Fron- tier Natural Gas a necessity.

The situation in the United States could be of great help to a Canadian manufacturer in the next five years, with temporary plant shut- downs in the U.S.A. due to energy shortages.

Appendix "A" contains a list of industrial processes where a supply of gas is advantageous or essential. However, gas must be available at competitive prices to that in other countries for the processes to be used.

It should be noted that Canada is the only Western industrialized nation with an adequate "above ground" energy supply on a net basis in the period of 1973-78.

NATURAL GAS SUPPLY

The Alberta Utilities have 30 years supply guaranteed to them by the Energy Resources Conservation Board.

Government policy Important policy decisions on natural gas seemingly are made every ten years. Iii 1959, the National Energy Board was formed to hear the first export application.

In 1969, a hearing started on the export applications of six different organizations. These hearings concluded in April 1970. The decision determined that Consolidated Natural Gas would not be allowed to export from Canada. Consolidated helped to raise field prices overnight by 3i(£/mcf in Alberta. The average annual increase otherwise was 0.25

Facilities to supply eastern Canada In 1Q67, a new supply of natural gas was made available through the Great Project to Eastern Canada. To make this project viable, the distributors signed contracts covering their increased requirements for 5-7 years.

The so-called "Great Lakes Gas" was sold out in 1971, since the Great Lakes project was two years late in being completed.

It has been obvious for some time that another major construction job would be in full swing in 1972-73, even neglecting the recent negotia- tions with Ontario Hydro for very large quantities of natural gas. This project will also be 18 months late in getting underway because of court actions. 136

Rates Since TransCanada's planning for previous project was done under conditions of much lower interest rates, it was obvious that they would need a rate increase by 1972 if they were to get a new major project off the ground. Accordingly, a rate hearing started or. February 9, 1971, before the National Energy Board which lasted about two years. The distributors also need a rate increase^for the same reasons enumerated above. Arctic Supply The attached Fig.l indicates that TransCanada PipeLines will need deliveries from the Arctic starting in 1978-79, in order to keep supplying their present customers. Arctic wellhead prices start at 32

From 1954 to 1964, expenditures by the oil and exploration and producing industry were substantially above the revenue from the production of oil and gas in Canada every year. In 1965, there was a marked reduction in expenditures which, for the first time, boosted revenues to the indus- try above expenditures in Canada. This is not to say that the Canadian oil and gas producing industry actually dropped overall expenditures, since their expenditures in areas such as the North Sea increased markedly. The reduction in expenditures by the producing industry below the revenue line in Canada led to a reduction in the footage drilled from 1965 to 1971, and in fact the 1971 footage totalled 33% below the 1965 total. Drilling footages have since increased to the point where all the available drilling rigs in Western Canada are being used. Expenditures by the producing industry in Canada in the period 1965-1969, although lower than their revenues, were only marginally lower. Since 1969, revenues have increased much faster than expenditures and in 1973, it is expected that revenues will be 40% higher than expendi- tures. The National Energy Board figures most recently published indi- cated a deficiency in reserves. The decision of the National Energy Board resulting from the Dome hearing should indicate the current reserve life ratios. 137

It is to be hoped that the present greater drilling program will result in a substantial addition to reserves, otherwise T-ansCanada Pipe- Lines will run into field delivery problems before they can hope to obtain a new gas supply from new areas. Between 1973 and 1978, TransCanada PipeLines will still be almost completely dependent on Alberta as a source of gas and although the reserves are there, it is quite possible that the "delivery" may not be available. In addition to this factor, the Alberta Government is presently refusing to grant more export permits as one way of negotiating with the Eastern consumers. In theory, natural gas found in the vicinity of Sable Island can be exploited by pipeline when the reserve total reaches about 5 trillion cu.ft. It can be exploited through the process of liquefaction at a much lower reserve figure. Westcoast Transmission- Westcoast Transmission presently has adequate re- serves to meet their commitments (25-year life index), but are short on deliverability. Recently, they signed a contract with El Paso to export 450,000 mcf/day more natural gas. El Paso will provide exploration funds to prove up the additional reserves required. If the reserves are not forthcoming, the additional export will not be approved. Liquefied natural gas (Methane) The first ship designed to carry 300,000 bbl cargoes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) spot shipments commenced oper- ation in mid-1971. Up to the present, all such ships were designed for specific runs such as: Algeria to Le Havre Algeria to London Libya to Barcelona Libya to Spezia Alaska to Japan Borneo to Japan Initially, the ship will supply peak shaving gas to New England, since the New England distributors cannot obtain new gas supplies at any price from North American sources. In the meantime, El Paso is organizing a project to deliver LNG in large volumes on the East Coast of North America by 1976. Similar proj- ects could provide an opportunity for a "clean" fuel supply in the area East of Montreal. However, the overall cost of the gas after storage and regasifi- cation will be $1.00/mcf or more. The Federal Power Commission in a landmark decision recently ruled that new gas supply projects must be self-supporting, with new 138

customers paying for the new gas, etc.. Ttrs will effectively stop devel- opment, if allowed to stand, thus playing invo the hands of those who ad- vocate zero-growth. NATURAL GAS DEMAND AND PRICING There are two areas in Ontario where the demand for natural gas is almost unlimited. They are: The Windsor area and the Golden Horseshoe area, principally because of environmental rules. In Ontario, the sulphur limits really stem from a ground level concentration limit which prohibits high sulphur oiels from being used in areas which are thickly populated and highly industrialized. It is recognized that there are other consid- erations as regards basic cement manufacturing plants. The Task Force established by the Government of Ontario to look into future energy demand has indicated that the use of natural gas will increase 40% from 1970 to 1980 and the percentage of the total energy mar- ket will also increase. Residual fuel oil with sulphur contents in the range from 1% to 2% has been in long supply, and at a low price, mainly due to the fact that the New York and Boston areas have environmental rules, giving a max- imum of .37% sulphur. These restrictions had to be lifted in February '73 for 45 days, in order to keep the two cities from running out of fuel, and as expected, President Nixon's energy message pointed the way to a partial relaxation of the extremely restrictive environmental rules in favor of employment. However, under present conditions, and assuming that Alberta is able to foist its gas pricing ideas off on the industry, it is obvious that TransCanada PipeLines may lose the industrial boiler fuel load within roughly 300 miles of Montreal. This will lead to a low utilization factor on the system east of Toronto to any grea\. extent because of the storage possibilities in Southwestern Ontario. During the fall of 1972, the Natural Resources Department of the Province of Quebec published a study of the objectives of a suitable energy policy for Quebec.

The following p.ages show two tables reprints from 'i.es Objectifs d'Une Poiitique Quebecoise de VEnergie" which indicates that Quebec would like to see gas consumption doubled in the period from 1975 to 1985, with the overall percentage of the total energy market rising from 4% in 1970 to 8% in 1980. The main reasons behind this effort is to create a competitive atmosphere and to provide gas service in areas which need industrial devel- opment. "LES OBJECTIFS D'UNE POLITIQUE QUEBECOISE DE L'ENERGIE" TABLEAU 12 Repartition de la consommation de gas nature! par secteur - 1963 - 1970

Domestique Industrie! Commercial Total Mi.p.c. % Mi.p.c. % Mi .p.c. % Mi .p.c. %

1963 7,455 27.1 17,675 64.3 2,358 8.6 27 ,488 100 1964 8,708 26.2 22,125 66.5 2,418 7.3 33 ,251 100 1965 9,753 31.2 18,768 59.9 2,793 8.9 33 ,314 100 1966 9,980 30.6 14,452 54.7 3,174 9.7 32 ,606 100 1967 10,141 28.7 20,265 57.2 4,977 14 .1 35 ,383 100 968 11,398 25.7 27,283 61.6 5,605 12 .7 44 ,286 100 1969 13,153 25.8 31,405 61.5 6,466 12 .7 51 ,024 100 1970 14,625 28.6 29,295 57.4 7,134 14 .0 51 ,054 100

Mi s million o

"LES OBJECTIFS D'UNE POLITIQUE QUEBECOISE DE L'ENERGIE TABLEAU 18 - Pr§visions de consommation d'gnergie au Canada et au QuSbec (1975-1985)

12 CANADA QUEBEC En 10 BTU "1*75 1980 1980 1975 1980 19o5

Charbon, coke et gax manufacture1 838.6 1186.6 1344.8 35.8 31.2 28.3 Petrole 3595.5 4471.4 5477.7 1164.6 1445.0 1787.8 Gaz natural 1573.0 2033.0 2581.0 83.6 118.9 165.8 Hydro-e'lectricite' 612.5 656.7 743.8 277.6 344.6 406.4 NuclSaire 183.0 406.0 948.0 18.7 18.7 74.8 Gaz de petrole liquefie 78.0 95.0 112.0 15.4 19.7 24.0 Consommation totale 6880.6 8848.7 11207.3 1595.2 1978.1 2487.1

Source: Energy Demand Forecast Canada (1970-1985) preparee par Home Oil Company Canada • 141

TransCanada PipeLines transportation system During 1972, a hearing was held to establish new rates for TransCanada PipeLines. It should be noted that TransCanada PipeLines did not simply ask for a rate increase, but at the beginning of 1972 submitted an application to the National Energy Board calling for the scrapping of all existing contracts with their customers & substitution of new contracts and asked for the approval of a new rate sys- tem which had no relation whatsoever to their previous rate system.

After TransCanada PipeLines made their submission to the National Energy Board, which also called for automatic tracking of increased costs and would in the future almost automatically eliminate National Energy Board control over TransCanada PipeLines, a hearing started before the Energy Board of Alberta on natural gas pricing at wellhead.

The Canadian Petroleum Association sponsored a research study by the Stanford Research Institute which went a long way to indicating markets and purported to show that wellhead prices could increase up to 20

This study of course neglects any existing contract relations between producers and TransCanada Pipelines, and obviously did not concern itself with how one gets the Federal Power Commission to agree to an arbi- trary price increase at the border for gas under an existing contract.

It is understood that TransCanada PipeLines offered to substan- tially increase their wellhead prices as contracts come up for redetermi- nation, but the Alberta Governement has indicated that this is not accept- able.

Of serious concern to Canadian exporting industries who do not currently need an increase in gas supply is the fact that all TransCanada PipeLines rate increases after June 1, 1973 increase are created by the desire to transport increasing quantities of gas.

NEW MARKET AREAS

Advantages of natural gas distribution The availability of natural gas is an aid to industrial development.

The availability of natural gas assists in the quality control of the environment.

Mere availability of natural gas tends toward economical fuel prices, particularly in areas removed from water transportation.

Although the foregoing is a statement of fact, at the same time natural gas must be made available at a substantially lower price than propane, butane, or liquid methane in a given area for gas distribution to be practical. It must also be proven that natural gas can compete with other fuels. 142

While the foregoing is true, natural gas distribution cannot be used by much of Canadian industry at any price. Manufacturing plants which create consumer products can be insulated by import duties, and other means to some extent from international competition. However, because of our small population, other industries must export from world scale size plants to live. Energy must thus be competi- tive with other such plants in the world. The main problem areas are adequately covered in the recent Energy white paper published by the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources in Ottawa. One example only is used herein. An ammonia plant in Canada must compete with world scale plants on the Gulf Coast with fixed gas prices, while facing a desire by Alberta for doubled wellhead prices. Markets East of Montreal in Quebec The increased use cf natural gas offers several advantages to the economy of Quebec and the following are a few of the principal items: a) Since natural gas is the cleanest fossil fuel known, it provides an easy out in a quest for air quality. b) The mere availability of natural gas has historically led to petroleum product prices 02

The most complete survey was made by Ford, Bacon & Davis Inc. in 1954. 143

Trois-Rivieres load center, including Shawnig>n, Grand'Were: 20,000 mcf/day Victoriaville, Plessisville and Thetford Mines, from Drummondville: 20,000 mcf/day Drummondville and St. Hyacinthe: 6,000 mcf/day BScancour Industrial Park, assumed at: 16,000 Pipeline from Sable Island TransCanada Pipelines Limited has considered alternative routes for a rvHurai gas transmission line in the event that sufficient natural gas reserves are discovered on the Continental Shelf of Nova Scotia. The money for natural gas exploration off Nova Scotia is being made available partly by the two major U.S.A. natural gas transmission com- panies that supply New England. It is obvious that pressure will be applied at high levels to have any natural gas transmission from the Sable Island area run to Portland for connection to the systems of Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. and Algon- quin Transmission Company, with TransCanada PipeLines being supplied by dis- placement at Niagara. On the follovnnq oaqe is a conv of two nans taken from "Les Objectifs d'une Politique Qugbecoise de 1'Energie" which reflects the thinking of the Natural Resources Department of Quebec Government. 144

RESEAU (proiete) OE GAZ NATUREL AU QUEBEC, FIN 1976

FIGURE 2 145

APPENDIX "A" sse:s whare gas has physical advantages over other fuels:

A. Ferrous Metal 1. Anneali ng 9. Cutting 2. Hardeni ng If). Flame Hardening 3. Drawing n. Scarfing 4. Bending 12. Sintering 5. Bright annealing 13. Tinning 6. Carburizing 14. Atmosphere Generation 7. Carbon restoration 15. Hot Blast Air Heating 8. Normalizing for Cupola Non-Ferrous Metals 1. Galvanizing 2. Linotype & Monotype Melting 3. Crucible & Ladle Heating 4. Reclaiming Baking & Drying 1. Burn-off Ovens 2, Enamel Baking 3. Laundry Drying 4. Paper Drying 5. Feed and Crop Drying 6. Lithographing Food Processing 1. Bread Baking 9. Meat Cooking 2. Breakfast Food 10. Meat Smoking 3. Candy Cooking il. Peanut Roasting 4. Banana Ripening 12. Nut Frying 5. Cookie Baking 13. Potato Chip Cooking 6. Doughnut Frying 14. Pretzel Baking 7. Macaroni Drying 15. Hog Singeing 8. Cake Baking 16. Dehydrati ng 146

E. Ceramic Products 1. Glass Blowing 2. Porcelain Baking 3. Vitreous Enameling F. Miscellaneous

1. Asphalt Melting 2. Block Testing Engines 3. Gas Engine Operation 4. Varnish Cooking 5. Spray Drying 6. Smoke Abatement 7. Make-up air Heating 8. Grain Drying 9. Pilots for Pulverized Coal Boilers G. Petrochemicals

Natural gas and LPG used as feedstocks principally for: 1. Ammonia 2. Hydrogen 3. Methanol 4. Carbon Black 5. Many other uses 147

APPENDIX "B"

REFERENCES 1. International Petroleum Encyclopedia, 1972, by the Petroleum Publishing Company. 2. Various issues of Oilweek. 3. Various issues of the Oil and Gas Journal. 4. Various issues of Canadian Petroleum. 5. Reserves of Crude Oil, Gas, Natural Gas Liquids and Sulphur, Province of Alberta, December 31, 1971, by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. 6. BP Statistical Review of the World Oil Industry, by the British Petroleum Company Limited. 7. Various issues of A.G.A. Monthly, 8. Conservation in Alberta, 1972, by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. 9. 1971 Statistical Year Book, by the Canadian Petroleum Association. 10. Fuels Planning Conference, Sponsored by Modern Power & Engineering in co-operation with George Brown College of Applied Arts & Technology. 11. Energy in Ontario, The Outlook and Policy Implications, Volume II, by the Advisory Committee on Energy. 12. 1972 Annual Report, The National Energy Board. 13. Les Objectifs d'Une Politique Qjet :oise de l'Energie. 149

LARCH INDUSTRIAL USERS AND TH1. LiNhRPY MAI'.Kf.T

by M.D. LESTER AND J.T. MADILL

Aluminum Company of Canada, Montreal

INTRODUCTION We are sure that most of the papers at this Symposium were prepared at the last possible moment, for fear that some government, somewhere in the world9 would make an announcement or declare a policy which might do violence to the carcfully- constructed reasoning of the author's thesis. Those of us who are in the business of attempting to manage or plan any activity which depends on the availability and price of energy have been living through some hectic years, and the end is nowhere in sight.

That is not to say, of course, that we must simply be carried by the tide of events and await for some kind of stabi- lity or equilibrium to be re-established. Quite the opposite. Events are made by men, and it is all the more imperative these days that we try to bring some logic and good sense to the subject and that we try to devise counter-measures or strategies which will offset,, or at least minimize, the horrendous effects of a runaway situation.

This paper is one small attempt to focus on one sector of energy use in one country, but it would be useful to first touch on what we feel might be a scenario for the coming changes in the energy story. A SCENARIO OF ENERGY TRENDS

From the world-wide standpoint, the so-called energy crisis is really more a crisis of oil and gas. More particularly, it is a realization that, at present trends, the finite supply of oil and gas is going to run out, not centuries from now but decades from now. While the day of reckoning can, and probably will9 be postponed by some new finds, by some synthetic produc- tions by substitutions, and by more efficient utilization, the time delay thus gained will be relatively trivial.

How will society react to the gradual disappearance of a resource we have come to depend on so heavily? A time-table along the following lines suggests itself: 150

1973 to 1980 - Oil and gas prices continue to rise faster than "normal" escalation. This stimulates development of oil shale, tar sands, coal liquefaction and gasification. - At some high price, say, $1.00 to $1.50 per million BTU's, demand and supply reach equilibrium. - Electricity demand remains buoyant, as coal, hydro and nuclear generation keep power costs relatively stable. 1980 to 1990 - Oil and gas tend to be used only in applications where substitution has not yet proved feasible. )lery few new oil or gas-fired power stations are built, except for special purposes such as gas turbine peaking plants or in isolated locations that cannot support economically-sized nuclear plants. - Coal production continues to increase, but escalation of mining and transport costs start to make it less competitive than non-fossil electricity for power generation. - Many of the remaining feasible hydro sites are developed, including those in Quebec and British Columbia. - Nuclear power proliferates, and the breeder reactor undergoes intensive development work and demonstration testing. 1990 to 2000 - Electricity accounts for more than half of the total world-wide energy consumption. - Most electricity is now being generated by old conventional nuclear reactors and new breeder reactors. Coal- fired power is still being produced where the logistics are favourable. The remaining massive hydro schemes of West Africa, South America, and the U.S.S.R. are developed. - Petroleum, natural gas and synthetic hydro- carbons now considered primarily as either chemical feedstock or special-purpose materials, rather than bulk fuels. After 2000 - Electricity becomes increasingly predominant as man's principal energy source, with transportation based on electric motors and batteries rather than diesel and gasoline engi nes. - Hydrocarbons used principally for feedstock, lubrication and aircraft fuel. - Concern mounts over the radiation and thermal pollution effects from the enormous number of nuclear power stations. Reports indicate that the finite supply of uranium and thorium will run out not in centuries but in decades. 151

- The fusion reactor is perfected and plants located in the oceans provide power and hydrogen for eons to come,

THE PENETRATION OF ELECTRICITY

Whether or not the above timing is correct, the inescapable facts are that (a) we are moving toward an all- electric society; (b) the growing demand for electricity will be met by non-fossil fuel sources; and (c) fossil fuels will increase in price, reflecting their value as chemicals and special-purpose, non-replaceable materials.

The actual price levels involved in these trends are difficult to forecast and, in any case, will always be subicct to wide variations due to location and national policies. But let us say that, in 1985, oil and gas laid down at industrial load centers around the world will be worth about $1.50 per million BTU's. (This is equivalent to about $10 per barrel of oil or $1.50 per Mcf of gas.) Electricity might, by then, have stabilized at around 10 mills per kwh generated by nuclear additions. At these comparative prices, oil and gas could compete with electricity only in direct heating applications and, even here, such a utilization of hydrocarbons might be discouraged, in order to conserve and stretch out the fuel resource inventory. Environmental considerations will also serve to discourage burning fuels and to encourage non-combusticu production of electricity.

In Canada, the situation is rather unique and rather more favourable than elsewhere. first, we are blessed with extensive hydroelectric resources which today account for three- quarters of our electricity and one-quarter of our total energy demand. This, together with new hydro developments nov.< being planned^ form a substantial base of low-cost power - one which becomes eyen more attractive with age as facilities are written down well within their useful life. Second, our uranium deposits guarantee that we will be able to move easily into the forthcoming nuclear era, particularly in view of the recent success of our CANDU design which does not require expensive uranium enrichment. Third, we have enough coal, oil and gas resources to remain self-sufficient for a considerable period. This, in turn, leads to a number of options as to how we handle our fuels. Do we husband them carefully to last as long as possible? Do we exploit the present and future world market situation by selling as much as possible as fast as possible? Or do we steer a middle course by a two-tier system which brings some export profits to Canada and, at the same time, insulates us to some extent against high world prices? L)o we encourage the establishment of fuel-based industry at or near our oil9 gas and coal deposits? And how do we take advantage of our inherently lower electricity costs? Do we export power 152

as such or do we prefer to "package" it within our borders and sell it in the form of refined metals or enriched uranium? Whatever the final resolution of these auestions, we believe that Canada will undergo the same evolution as the rest of the world, i.e., higher fuel prices and a shift to non-fossil electricity where possible. The principal difference, and it is an important one, will be a generally lower price structure here than in most other nations.

Let's now turn to the subject at hand:- How will Canadian industry fare in this new scheme o? things?

THE IMPORTANCE OF ENERGY TO CANADIAN INDUSTRY

? To say that energy costs do not exceed 10 o of the cost of doing business for most industries in Canada, which happens to be true, conceals the wide range of impacts that are actually involved. To the banking industry or to the insurance business, higher heating and lighting costs are nothing more than a minor nuisance. But for ethylene or ammonia producers, where energy sources account for three- quarters of production cost, the problem is quite different. If any general observations can be made on the importance of energy to Canadian industry,, and in this we concur with the findings of the recent Federal publication, "An Energy Policv for Canada", they are that:-

1. Higher energy costs could place some industries in a very difficult position, and special protection may be needed for an interim period. 2, Higher energy costs would not be significant for most indus- tries, except where their products may be competing with alter- native materials whose costs are not increasing at the same rate as energy costs.

Let us take a closer look at four major Canadian industries in which energy costs play a key role. Pulp and Paper accounts for almost one fourth of industrial energy consumption in Canada and energy, in turn, represents about 12% of the cost of production. This consists of botli the direct use of fuel and electricity and the indirect use by way of the energy required to produce the chlorine and caustic involved in papermaking. There could be some additional switching to electricity for steam-raising. Our competitive position will not be affected by a world-wide increase in energy costs so long as Canada maintains its present differential advantage, particularly in electricity. The industry's domestic and export market is more likely to be influenced by such factors as increased recycling of paper and development of synthetic paper. 153

Chemicals are notably affected by the cost of the fossil fuel resources which are the raw materials of this industry. They represent over 20% of production cost, on the average, and considerably more in some cases. Where natural gas is the feedstock, our competitive position vis-a-vis the United State, is quite sensitive to the relative prices of this commodity in, say, Ontario and the Gulf Coast. Rising prices of Canadian gas over the near term may be offset by similar tendencies in the U.S.A., but there could be certain timing problems involved because of existing long-term contracts. Oil-based feedstock costs will not increase disproportionately in Canada, and electricity prices, as noted previously, should retain a competi- tive advantage. Perhaps the principal problem in this industry, wherever located, will be the loss of markets to alternative materials if cost increases are passed through.

Iron and Steel output includes about a 15$ expenditure on energv out of each do'llar of production. Heating fuels and metallurgi- cal coal account for the bulk of this item, although some increase in the use of electric furnaces is expected. The principal feature here is that, while Canada is more than self- sufficient in metallurgical coal, its steel mills import their requirements from the U.S.A. (mainly from mines owned by the Canadian mills). At the same time, Western Canadian coal is exported to Japan, and at a growing rate. There is no reason to believe that the logistics of this situation will not remain favourable.

Non-ferrous metals are closely identified with energy. The Canadian aluminum industry alone generates and consumes about 10% of all the electricity in the nation, plus a considerable amount of fossil fuel. The availability of abundant, low-cost power was and is instrumental in Canada's development as a leading world producer of the major non-ferrous metals. In the case of aluminum this factor was sufficient to offst. the absence of the raw material and to compensate for the logistical difficulties involved. If and when electricity costs equalize around the world, at whatever level, Canada would lose some of its competitive edge. However, a large portion of the electri- city supply in Canada to this industry is based on low-cost facilities, relatively free from future inflation, and a consi- derable amount of additional generation could be made available befoTe this advantage would diminish. For this reason, we would expect to see continued growth of this sector in Canadat at a time when expansion elsewhere is becoming difficult.

ADAPTATION BY INDUSTRY Industry in the developed nations of the vorld accounts for about one quarter of man's energy requirements, and this ratio is expected to persist. To what extent can or will the industrial sector participate in the over-all shift to primary 154

electricity? To answer this we need to look at the various applications to which industrial energy is put.

1. To drive motors, pumps, fans, vehicles, etc. Much of this is already electric-powered and the trend will grow,

2. To raise steam. This is now accomplished by means of all the fossil fuels and primary electricity. We expect coal to play an increasing role here and, in the longer term, a more pronounced move to electricity or perhaps direct use of nuclear heat. 3. To dry or melt materials and to heat spaces. This is a relatively efficient utilization of fossil fuels and will be supplanted by electricity or nuclear heat only over the longer term or in special economic circumstances. 4. To cool spaces. Already largely electric, but more emphasis will be placed on efficiency and insulation.

5. To provide light. Already electric. 6. Direct electrolytic use. Already electric and, by defini- tion, remains so. 7. Direct use of fuels as feedstock. By definition, no substi- tution is possible. The emphasis here will be on the use of relatively abundant coal as the basic raw material and on recycling.

The conclusion to be drawn is that the trend to greater electrification by the industrial sector will not be as pro- nounced as in the transport and residential sectors. Recent forecasts for Canada indicate that, while industry uses more than half of the nation's electricity today, the proportion will drop to about one third in 25 years.

SUMMARY

1. The finite supply of petroleum and natural gas and the fact that no substitutes are yet available for certain applications will lead to higher world prices for these resources.

2. The higher prices will stimulate additional supplies by means of oil sands, oil shales, coal gasification and liquefaction, and frontier drilling.

3. The new equilibrium price will be sufficiently high to cause a world-wide shift to electricity, mostly based on nuclear generation, at costs not markedly different from today's power costs. This will be particularly true in the transport and residential sectors, since the industrial sector is either already highly electrified or uses energy resources as feedstock, 155

4. The entire Canadian economy, including the industry sector, will continue tj benefit from a relatively lower energy cost structure, based on self-sufficiency in fossil fuels and uranium and on favourable hydroelectric resources.

5« For most Canadian industries, energy is a relatively small component of production costs. There are a few important exceptions but, in most cases, any energy cost increases will likely be matched by similar or greater increases to foreign competitors. Some industries could be in difficulty for an interim period and may require special action to ensure their survival. 157

HYDROCARBONS FOR TTROCHE'UCALS

hv

O.C.

Gulf Oil Canada Research Centre (now with Gulf Oil Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa., U.S.A.

M, le President, je veux exprimer mes remerciements a la Societe fovale tiu Canada, qui a oosse"de la vision de orevoir , il v a quelques mois, la maturation de ces nrobiemes d'energie et d'orqaniser ce colloque a une con.joncture si convenable. C'est un grand Dlaisir de presenter queique remarques a votre invitation, et ^'espere qu'elles contribueront a quelque chose en exDOsant les details de la situation. When we look at the petrochemical sector as distinct from the total energy picture, some important differences appear. For one thinn, vou probably know already that chemicals from petroleum have been distinguished in recent years by relatively rapid growth. You mav not know that they are also distinguished, especially in the last six or seven years, by an ability to lose remarkably large sums of money for many manufacturers. I hope vou will not be bored if I spend a few minutes on these and some other distinctive •Features of the petrochemical industry. 1. Rapid Growth Volumes of overall petrochemical use in North America seem to be growing, in the long-term trend, at a rate around B% per year. This is con- siderably faster than total energv demand, for which a growth factor commonly assumed is a little over 4%. However, before vou get too alarmed, remember that chemicals are products whose usage, though large, is measured in pounds, not barrels. Right now, in Canada, it is a good estimate that sliqhtlv over ?.5"' of liquid hydrocarbons being produced, and somethinq under ?,"'• of natural qas, are being used as petrochemical feedstocks. Even if this chemical stream were to grow until 1985 at 8" per year, with hydrocarbon production qrowinq at half that rate, the percentage of total hydrocarbons qoinq into petrochemicals in 1985 would only be a little over 4°'. It could constitute a much larger percentage, of course, of certain selected hydrocarbon cuts. At the moment, for example, a shortage of naphtha seems to be developing, due to demands for gasoline and for synthetic natural gas. There is one possible development which could raise the oercentaqe of hydrocarbons going to chemicals. This is, large-scale conversion of natural gas to methanol in order to get it out of remote production areas. I will come back to this later. 158

2• Large and Expensive Individual Plants The trend to large-scale plants was verv marked in the last 10 years. Commercial ethvlene plants in 1960, for example, were as small as 100 million pounds per vear. Now a new plant would be ten times that size. 'In ammonia plant of 120 tons per day used to be considered large. Now the economic size is 1,000 to 1,500 tons. I hardlv need to dwell on the difficulties which these changes of scale impose on a country like Canada, where a small population is spread over long distances, and where there exist various barriers to large-scale exports. 3. Importance of International Movements In most cases, basic petrochemical plants are in competition with similar plants around the world, unless their homeland adopts deliberately a policy of self-containment, a thing which Canada has not done. In the absence of man-made regulation, the main natural restrictions to movement are transportation costs plus the fact that certain products are difficult to shin — for example hydrogen, or acetylene, or ethvlene, 4. Price Competition Petrochemicals in the last ten years have been terrifically competitive in price. While the costs of almost everythina else have . .en aoing uo, selling prices of basic Petrochemicals not onlv fell, thev fell dramatically. For example, between the late 1%0's and early 1970's, in the United States: Ethylene fell from R(t ner pound to under 3t Vinyl chloride fell from around °it to &.?5t Phenol fell from 17v financial institutions. Be that as it mav, this coalescence took place in 1S9

France, Italy, the Netherlands, Great Britain and elsewhere at about the same time. Let me just show the situation of France as an examnle.

Significant French Petrochemical Manufacturers 1960 - six 1973 - two

Kuhlmann Pechinev-Hqine-Kuhlmann Pechinev Rh6ne-Pou1enc Progil

Rhone-Poulenc St. Gobain Ugi ne Now have a look at what has happened in Canada, which has a nonuiation about two-fifths that of France. Significant Canadian Petrochemical Manufacturers

1960 - twelve 1Q73 - fifteen Chemceli Badische C-I-L Chemceil Comi nco C-I-L Dow Cominco

Du Pont Oow Ethyl Ou Pont Goodrich Ethvl Gulf-Shawinigan Goodrich Monsanto Gulf-Shawiniqan Polysar Hercules Shell Imperial Union Carbide M&nsanto Polvsar Shell ^ Union Carhide

- II- - 160

!n addition to all twelve who were active in I960, three mora organizations have entered the fie id.

6. Sensitivity to Feedstock Costs

Because of the highly competitive and international structure of the industry, not only the Drofitability but the very viability of Canadian netrochemical operations is verv sensitive to raw material and fuel costs. This is narticularly so since many oetrochemical processes have hiqh fuel and newer usage. A refinery tvDicallv burns about H% of the hydrocarbons charged to run its ODerations. In an olefin plant the figure could he 30%. Whatever the absolute levels of raw material and fuel costs are, thev have to be competitive with those elsewhere.

7. "1objmy_ Unlike the energy structure as a whole, the oetrochemical industry is mobile. If conditions are not favourable in one place, new plants will be loc^teo in another orovince» another country, maybe even another continent. It is interesting to see this concern in a recent paper by Mr. William Trammel!. f^r. Trammell is an astute observer in a large international engineering company. In the April 30, 1973 issue of Chemical Engineering he savs, sneaking of mobility from the United States' viewDoint: "In the longer term, chemical-industrial economics and logistics will force serious consideration of locating new facilities overseas (including Canada) near low-cost gas resources." Although he is speaking specifically here of gas, vou may be sure that the same could be said of hydrocarbon liguids.

Now, I would like to go on to say a few words about three individual 1.1 asses, of basic petrochemicals. 1. Synthesis Gas Products These are all made through a synthesis gas containing various oro- oortions of carbon monoxide and hydrogen.

Hvdrogen: CO + nH? + H.,0 + (n+l)H, \\ ? Ammonia- 1.5H<, +

CO + 2H2 CH3OH

Oxo Process: R-CH=CH? + (plus aldehydes, isomers)

Svntftesis «?as H usually ma&' today bv steam reforming of natural o other Itqht hvdrocarbons, but it Mr? also be made fro:* i ii. So f; _ raw materials cost is concerned, the cheapest place to make \t will he <,.>e point 161 of feedstock production or importation, as the case nay be. In tM<; reqard, the large-scale conversion of remote Arctic gas to methanol, near the wells, mav become a serious alternate to moving out the qas itself. Theoretical lv 16 pounds of methane, the chief constituent of natural qas, can be converted to 32 pounds of methane! which still retains 82% of the heatinq value of the original methane. In practice the fiqure would be lower than R2W because of vield losses and fuel needs in the conversion olant. Methanol is a stable non-corrosive liquid, boiling well above ambient temoeratures and freezinq at -144°F. Furthermore, it can be burned directly as fuel. There are even Dromising developments toward a fuel cell which could convert it directlv to electricity. Its use as a netrochenrical is limited, mainly for oroduction of formaldehvde. So even though technically we call it a chemical, the large-scale conversion of natural gas to methanol would be reallv a conversion of one fuel to another.

2. 0Tefins These are mainly ethylene, oropvlene, butanes and butadiene verv important basic materials all. As feedstocks for these methane, the main constituent of natural gas, cannot be used. But the heavier hydrocarbons in natural gas -- ethane, propane, butane being the main ones -- can. You can also crack naphtha, or even heavier materials un into the furnace oil range. In Japan there is even a prototype unit cracking crude oil directly, without any preliminary refining. If natural qas liquids are used, the cheapest place to produce olefins is undoubtedly near where the natural qas liquids are separated. That means the gathering areas for natural gas nipelines. Dropane and butane are largelv removed from natural gas before it enters the pipeline. Ethane does not have to be taken out of the nineline gas but, of course its alternative value, for fuel, will be higher at the end of the line than at the beginning. If a liquid like naphtha or distillate is the olefin feedstock, the place where it will be available most cheaniv will be the refinery where it is produced. Locating an olefin nlant near a refinery also permits optimization of Diping, tankage, shipping facilities, nossiblv utilities and other expensive off-site items. There is also the noint that when naDhtha or middle distillate is cracked, large quantities of hydrocarbon fuels are produced as ccoroducts. Canadian natural gas, as marieted today, contains -erv substantial quantities of ethane. Technology i> -'r^'able for removinn ,:nvthinq un to W% of the ethane content, although i *.s rise as you nass 50% recovery. At the present moment, Canada.. natu,. ,;s production is runninq rnuqhlv at the rate of 3 billion cubic feet ner dav, of which 5.9% bv volume has been estimated as an average ethane content. Recovery of half of that ">ould give 2.5 billion pounds ner year of petrochemical feedstock -- anoroximatplv enouqh to supply two world size ethylene plants. Actuallv, the ethane being recovered in Canada today is about 90 million pounds, less than ?.% of the total in natural gas being Droduced. As .nany of you know, there are oroDosals now in the project stage to utilize this valuable feedstock component. 3. Aromatic Chemicals Benzene, toluene, xylenes and cumene are the main orimarv products and all are normally Droduced at a refinery sice, since they are extracted or derived from refinery streams by relative!v simnle nrocesses. If th£ 162

refinery is integrated with an olefin plant, aromatics from the refinerv and from the olefin plant can be recovered together. Summarizing, with some thoughts about the future of the petro- chemical industry in Canada, reminds one a bit of the disDutes over nonula- tion Droblems. There seem to be two alarming and ODoosite viewpoints -- one that there may be so many people on the earth that we aDnroach standing room only5 and the other that there mav be no neoole at all. In the Canadian petrochemical situation, we might either eat up all the available hydrocarbons as feedstocks, or eat up none. To be truthful, I do not think reallv that the first situation is likely. Over the next twentv vears, nearly all ethane and a large quantity of natural gas liquids may be needed for oetrochemicals, and there will almost certainly be problems in supDlving sufficient naphtha. But overall, petrochemical demands are not likely to intrude seriously into the total volume of hydrocarbon supplies.

A much more real danger is that the Canadian petrochemical industry might wither away to a shadow, as the result of competitive pressures which is is not structured to meet. The extreme case would be one recommended quite seriously a few years ago at a meeting of chemists in Toronto. The speaker was a consuHant for a large financial institution to the south of us. His view was that a simple solution existed to Canada's petrochemical problems; namely, shut down the Dlants in Canada and imoort whatever was needed. I am haDpy to see that there are recent signs of progress toward more constructive solutions. In one region of petrochemical manufacture in central Canada, a series of suoolv agreements has led to at least some rationalization of manufacturing activities. In another region a concerted effort is being made to reach economic scale in several basic oetrochemicals. Personally, and here I speak only for myself, I wonder whether these are only beginnings. Speaking as a technical man and not as a legal expert, I wonder whether the real answer, if we are to attain a viable status in petrochemicals, includes central ooeration in each area of at least services and utilities. Mavbe each economic area should have a single operating company, probably with multiole ownershiD. It will be interesting, and it will be a real test of Canadian ingenuity, to see how the present efforts develoo. 163

ENERGY AND CANADA'S TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY by

W.S. WILSON Canadian Pacific Ltd., Montreal The transportation industry is confronted with energy supply problems as both a very large consumer and a major factor in the chain necessary to produce and market fuels. Changes in the price and availability of energy have already altered our industry and I am sure there is much more to come.

Looking first at transportation's role as a consumer of energy, the most striking fact is that 99%, or more, of the fuel used is products of oil. This almost total dependence upon a fuel, which is faced with supply disruptions, rapidly rising prices, political manoeuvering and, in the long term, eventual exhaustion of reserves, is indeed troubling. In total, the transportation sector consumes slightly more than 1/4 of all our energy. Over half of this energy is gasoline for autos. Trucks and buses account for about 20% of the consumption, followed by the relatively small consumptions of the air, rail, pipeline and marine modes.

Large differences exist in the efficiency with which the various transportation modes use energy. Fiqure 1 shows how Prof. Richard Rice ol Carnegie-Mellon University compares the relative efficiency of pipelines, marine transportation, train, trucks, and aircraft. These are generalizations and it can be appre- ciated that there are large differences within each mode. For example a 40-car freight train requires many times more fuel per ton mile than a 100 car freight train. Overriding this, however, it can be seen that pipelines, marine, and rail transportation are much more efficient than trucks and aircraft in the consumption of fuel.

In the past, the commercial transportation industry has accepted and lived with these large differences in effi- ciency. Fuel costs were stable and in many cases not an impor- tant or controlling factor in the cost of service provided. I don't expect this to continue and already rising fuel costs are a serious concern within the trucking and airline industries in particular. Figure 2 shows how freight transportation requirements are now provided. Surprisingly, the majority of intercity movements are now supplied by the most energy efficient modes: pipelines, rail, and marine. Ir, terms of ton miles, less than 10% of freight is carried by trucks ajid aircraft, 164

RELATIVE FUEL EFFICIENCY OF TRANSPORTATION

LARGE PIPELINE L INLAND BARGE TOM L 100.000-TOM SUPERTANKER L 1GQ-CAR FREIGHT TRAIN L QQ-CAR FBEIGH7 TRAIN 1 I TURBOPROP AIR FREIGHTER Q LARGE CARGO JET (747) • QO-TOH TRUCK

I- I 100 200 300 100 500 600 700 800 900 1000

TON MILES OF CARGO PER GALLON

PHOF. RICHARD RICE. CARNEGIE-HE LLON UNIVERSITY Fig. 1

TOTAL INTERCITY DOMESTIC FREIGHT

(250 BILLION TON MILES - 1967)

RAIL 37*

OIL PIPELINES 182

GAS PIPELINES 72

TRUCK AND OTHER 91 Fig.2 165

our least fuel efficient modes. Despite this small percen- tage of the total freight business carried by these modes, they are very intensive users of fuel.

Faced with rising fuel costs some shift from the less efficient to the efficient energy using modes seems certain to occur. Rail's competitive advantage with the intercity trucking industry for example will grow and certain shippers will be attracted by price.

As noted earlier there are large differences in energy efficiency within each mode. Large trucks„ trains, and planes are more fuel-efficient than small ones and fuel costs will be an important factor in the further introduction of these larger units. I would not look for dramatic changes in our transportation systems but rather the evolution of a more efficient mix of transportation facilities to serve Canada's industry.

The extreme dependence on oil is promoting study of other energy sources for transportation. With the excep- tion of the nuclear ship, most of this work involves the application of electric power to transport. A completely practical electric car, unhappily, still eludes its developers and does not appear to figure in resolving our current fuel shortages• Electrically driven trains and pipeline pumping stations are, in contrast, a very practical matter and are now commonplace in some parts of the world.

The electrically driven pipeline pumping station has been widely adopted in Canada for over 15 years. Electri- cally driven gas line compressor stations have been less common, but have been adopted in parts of Eastern Canada. The electric drive, in addition to favourable energy costs, also offers the pipelines significant savings in operating and maintenance manpower and permits a degree of automatic operation not possible with oil or gas fired units.

Canadian Pacific and other railways in North America have been giving increasingly serious consideration to the electrification of high traffic density rail lines. Since 1971, diesel oil prices to the railways of Canada have risen nearly 40%. This rise is a strong motivation for electrification studies but not the only reason- Electric traction has been common for a long time in Japan and Europe and offers higher speeds, better performance on grades, and simplified (and therefore more economic) maintenance compared to the diesel. Recent innovations in electric locomotive design and lower cost means of bringing the power to the tracks add to the attractiveness of the idea. 166

DOMESTIC ENERGY FREIGHT

(8t BILLION TON MILES - 1967)

OIL PIPELINES 55X

GAS PIPELINES 261

TRUCK WATER « 21 Fig-3

Fig. 4 167

There appears to be a marginal improvement in the overall energy oliiciency of the electric locomotive over that of the diesel. In other words, when a gallon of fuel burnt in a ciiea&l is compared to that same gallon of fuel burnt .•'n =i never plant and then transmitted to an oloctrie- locomotive, the electric system delivers slightly more effec- tive horsepower to pull the train. While this is encouraging, the really important aspect is that the electrical energy could be generated from the same oil or, alternatively, any other fossil fuel, nuclear, or hydro resource. Our conviction is that while all these energy costs will likely increase, the oil to which we are now captive for rail opera- tions will likely rise more rapidly than the whole mix of energy sources. Electric power production, fortunately, has the flexibility to shift to the optimum sources of energy as our electrical systems expand. It also appears much more practical to deal with potential pollution problems at a limited number cf large generating stations rather than to control emissions on each individual locomotive. In Ohio the Muskinguiti Railroad is now operating and in the U.S. southwest the Black Mesa and Lake Powell Railroad is under construction. These are the first modern electrified railroads in North America and don't be surprised if the idea spreads from these beginnings.

While the flexibility to electrify does exist in the railway and pipeline industry, unfortunately, there appears to be no such scope for reducing the oil consumption of autos and trucks. While the social objectives of the new emission rules can't really be questioned they are reducing the gasoline efficiency of the auto by a further 30% to 40%. Increased costs and shortages will almost certainly lead to lower horsepower cars and more measures to reduce speed limits as have already been instituted in parts of the U.S. as a fuel conservation measure. I am sure Dr. Soberman will talk about urban traffic congestion and, hope- fully, will give us some alternative for that large share of auto usage which occurs within our metropolitan an-as.

Turning now to transportation's role as a mover of energy, Canada is richly endowed with energy resources and the transportation of these resources to market is a major industry. Figure 3 indicates the relative importance of the various modes in moving energy to market. Unfortunately, the story is incomplete as it ignores the very important transfers of energy by wire - frankly because statistics on this traffic are hard to find and almost impossible to present on a comparable basis. The domination of oil and gas pipelines in these other movements is however obvious. 168

Tne really remarkable thing is that 25 years ago the pipeline mours scarcely figured at all in national transportation and today they not only dominate in the energy traffic but represent 25% of all intercity freight ton miles generated.

Me ;' interesting and challenging ideas are being considered for the further development of our energy trans- portation f aa\ "! i tJer .

The generation of electric power at coal mines and long distance power transmission using either A.C. or D.C. techniques to replace the physical movement of coal to consumption centered generation plants.

Coal gasification and shipment oy pipej. r^. Deliveries of foreign oil and gas by large crude carriers (V.L.C.C.'s) and liquified natural gas ships and the companion deep water porL and domestic delivery facilities

Slurry pipelines delivering coal in either water or oil mediums. Further refinements in the unit train concept for large scale coal movements. At this time the issue which has attracted the most attention is the development of Arctic oil and gas resources aad a further large expansion of our pipeli^ ^- stem. Much st'-iy has already been di" ^ct^1 ^o ^luat^.g v • vious Arctic pipeline routes. As Picture '• s ows, t; e Maci' r/.ii Valley Pipeline Group has st.di'J ?.. >il Une i the Western Arctic, 'vhile CriLc'.an Arctic ^as S^uriy Lti1 and ..he Polar Gas Group have stu 'ei gas lims ser-'ii-} fcist-rn a Eastern Arctic reserves.

Other rnoc.es of Irving frosc /c.-ources are also receiv- ing serious consi^ei jtj'-n. \ ^mi-cry • t" Transport sponsored study is now reviewiu* th^ tn<5"ibnit>s of a railway providing access to +hfe W^^^err rcti;. others have considered ships and air . c, net .-.!". i •"„-*corsid..u'-. :• l^gf, c so been given to conve thesr fu' Is to lerf j_'j\ty in the Arctic and transpor'.my to marjv ^t "< ^.a -jise. ' t will no doubt learn a great deal from th ir >:c. npcia--. i,e work but, in my view, the pipelines seem !o oil'r ' :a TOS: economic means of solving the specific probleir of br nging this oil and gas to market.

While gas .>nd oil prices are rising rapidly, it is well to remeir.b' - at even at $6/barrel for oil and $1/M.C.F, for gas we are st"11 sealing with a low value commodity 169

worth no more than $50/ton. A highly efficient mode of transport must then be offered if the oil or gas is to be moved at all. Pipelines have historically offered this kind of efficiency and thus account for the largest share of all such movements on land.

A further point is that the most apparent energy resource in the Canadian Arctic is natural gas. While it is possible to liquify this gas and move it by ship, plane, or train, this concept is only now receiving limited commercial acceptance. L.N.G. is created at the exceedingly low tempera- ture of minus 258 F. A liquification plant is then a costly and sophisticated piece of equipment to achieve these low temperatures while the vessels to store and ship the L.N.G. are gigantic and costly "thermos" bottles. Compared to the simplicity of pumping gas through a pipe, the complications of liquification and maintaining cargoes at their low tempera- tures are a serious hinderance to considering any other transportation mode for gas.

Much the largest amount of research money has now been spent on studying the pipeline alternatives. In total this research work will soon have cost more than $50 million. The innovations to deal with Arctic problems, advanced route selection, design and other results of these expenditures mean a pipeline could be installed sooner than any other system. For example, the concept of pumping refri- gerated gas to preserve the integrity of permafrost soils has now been thoroughly proven and demonstrated. Metallurgical advances have made it possible to plan for higher pressure and therefore much more efficient pipe systems. In contrast, an immense development budget would be required before a prototype aircraft gas freighter could get off the ground. A ship's hull, capable of reaching most of these areas year round, is neither in existence nor under construction anywhere in the world and, further, would take millions of dollars and some time to build and test.

The selection of transportation systems for the Arctic will be a decision of lasting importance for the region and Canada. It is proper that all aspects receive a thorough review prior to making that decision. We should, however, not fall in love with studies for the sake of avoiding decisions on the question, or ignore the very fundamental and, in my view, governing advantages of the pipeline mode in the specific applications involved. 171

ENERGY MARKETS AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

by J. PILL Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Plan Review, Toronto

INTRODUCTION This paper attempts to assess the impact that the impending changes in our energy market will have on urban development in Canada, especially in a large city such as Toronto. There has been some speculation that the "energy crisis" will drastically change our way of life. It will be argued here that the urban characteristics that are currently most visible in shaping our cities -- land prices, transportation congestion, job opportunities, socioeconomic factors -- will continue to be important to the year 2000, and the energy situation per se probably will not have an overriding influence, although it will increase in importance. Energy will cost more, and it will come in different forms, but most people will still be able to obtain enough energy to live basically as we do now. We shall first present the energy projections to the year 2000 which will constitute our basic assumptions. Next, we shall briefly introduce the basic elements of urban land-use/transportation planning, and discuss some of the planning issues. The technological implications of the year 2000 energy projections on land-use and on transportation will then be examined, with some inferences concerning the impacts of the technological changes on urban form. Finally, a few tentative conclusions will be drawn regarding the overall relationship of the energy market to future urban issues. CANADIAN ENERGY TRENDS 1 2 We shall accept the recent federal and Ontario middle-of-the- road projections as a baseline, and present some of their conclusions as our starting assumptions. These projections involve reasonable premises but are subject to large variation depending on population growth, economic growth, and world politics. For instance, the federal estimates for population in the year 2000 range from 29 to 38 million. Given these qualifications, the following projections are presented: (i) Canada's energy requirements in 2000 will be four times those of 1970. (ii) Canada will be able to meet all of her energy needs to 2000 from indigenous sources. (iii) Increasing prices for energy commodities will tend to moderate demand growth rates in the long run, without government inter- vention, (iv) In 1990, crude oil prices will be more than double today's prices. 172

(v) The cost of natural gas will double or triple by 1990. (vi) Cost of electricity will continue to increase to 1980, but will tend to level off as technological advances are implemented, 2 Some specific projections are available for Ontario. Energy consumed for residential and commercial heating is expected to decline from about 20 percent of total provincial energy use to around 1J percent. The transportation sector accounted for about 17 percent of total energy consumption in Ontario in 1970, and this will rise slightly to 19 percent by 1990. Fuel consumption by motor vehicles accounted for four-fiftns of the 1970 transportation energy use; this could well decline by 2000. Industrial consumption of energy will increase slightly as a percentage of the total between 1970 and 1990, from 30 to 34 percent. Ontario Energy 2 Demand Transportation Residential 8. Industrial Total Commercial 1015 ETU 1970 16,8 26.6 29.8 2.35 1990 19.3 21.1 34.2 5.7 THE URBAN SYSTEM In urban planning, three interacting physical elements determine the urban pattern: land-use, transportation, and sewer and water services. For purposes of this discussion, we shall assume that in Ontario the provision of sewer and water services will be independent of energy cost to the year 2000. Land-use can be divided into three main categories: industrial, commercial and residential. There is a well-developed state of the art in land-use planning3, but a detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this paper. Within the context of overall development trends based on the economic base, land availability, demographic factors, and the level of transportation service, it is quite possible that energy cost could influence the design and location of buildings. This will be considered. The effects of the energy market on urban transportation might cause some concern because of the visibility of the recent American problems with gasoline supply. Gasoline purchases currently account for about one fourth of the cost of operating the average Canadian auto1, and with a doubling or tripling of gasoline prices within the next two decades, the concern might'be justified. In public transit, energy cost is a much lower percentage of total cost, constituting for example about 7 percent of the Toronto Transit Commission's expenditures in 1972.4 A large number of factors affect land-use and transportation in the city, and energy cost is currently not one of the major ones. We shall examine the direct effects of an energy cost increase, and try to assess the importance of these effects relative to other influences. 173

LAND-USE AND ENERGY COST There are two ways in which energy cost could have a direct effect on urban land-use. First, if transmission and transport of energy are expensive, decisions on location could be affected. Second, as heating costs become more significant, they could influence the design and form of buildings. There is little reason to believe that the cost of transporting energy will increase as quickly as cost of the energy itself. Wellhead prices for gas and oil will rise more rapidly than construction costs for pipelines and tankers. Electrical transmission losses will be a more or less constant percentage of total generated power, so as the price of electricity rises so will the cost of transmission, at almost the same rate. Therefore, electrical industries might tend to locate closer to the power source, e.g. a nuclear plant, other factors being equal. This might have some effect on urban industrial expansion by the year 2000. The avail- ability of labour, markets for the product, transportation, raw materials, and land will continue to be important. The specific location of a plant within an urban area will be determined more by land cost and access than by energy transmission costs. Overall, industrial location decisions will be made as they are now, with energy transport costs becoming slightly more important. Increased heating cosls could influence urban form in the long run. Multiple-unit buildings are cheeper to heat than single family houses because of their lower surface-area/volume ratios; this will tend to drive up the ownership cost of the latter, reinforcing trends caused by high land costs. The government might at some time impose minimum insulation standards; "electrical standards" could reduce energy consumption per build- ing by 3C percent compared to current standards.1 However, this woi/d require careful study to be certain that the discounted value of enenj•/ saved is greater than increased construction costs. In Ontario, use ot natural gas and electricity will increase substantially by 1990-, and depending on price structure, will be used more for heating than they are presently. By_2000, the cost of electricity should be cheaper than either gas or oil^>2>5, so in the long run a changeover to electric heating can be anticipated. The uS3 of "district heating" might prolong the use of oil and gas. Aside fror-; a greater concern for heating costs and some reinforcement of the trend to multiple-unit dwellings, it seems that these technical changes will not cause any major reorientation of urban trends. ENERGY AND URBAN TRANSPORTATION The gasoline shortages in the United States during the summer of 1973 portend a basic change in our use of energy for urban transpor- tation. The cost of a gallon of gasoline will at least double in Canada by the year 19901, and automobiles will be quite different from what they are now. As these technological and economic changes might seem to have a potential for changing our life-styles drastically, we shall examine them in detail. 174

Automobi1es The automobile has already undergone significant changes in North America during the past five years to meet government standards for exhaust emissions and safety. The net result for the consumer has been a reduction in performance and efficiency and an increase in cost. The 1976 emission standards for the United States will entail losses of about 20 percent in both power and gasoline mileage relative to an uncontrolled engine , Canada's standards will be somewhat less stringent, but not much.

The impending increases in gasoline prices will result in further changes in automobile design in the United States. There is a conflict in design objectives: to reduce energy consumption one must reduce weight and increase efficiency, while the current safety and emission standards increase weight and reduce efficiency. Trade-offs will be necessary. The most straightforward means of increasing gasoline mileage is to reduce the weight of the car: a 5,000 pound auto consumes twice as much fuel as a 2,000 pound one, and its mileage is reduced by another 25 percent by power steering, power brakes and air conditioning^. There are already signs of change: in Los Angeles, the vanguard of the American automotive culture, Pintos now outsell large Fords, no doubt largely due to well-publicized problems with gasoline supply?. Even Cadillac has a compact car in the works. A number of proposals have been made in the U.S. Congress to apply purchase taxes on automobiles based on gasoline mileage^. The technical and political factors thus point to an inevitable trend to smaller cars.

The Canadian automobile and petroleum industries are controlled by American firms, so it is unlikely that Canadian automobiles can differ significantly from American ones for very long. Thus there will be a parallel switch to smaller cars in Canada. There will also be a series of technical changes in the motive power, in which both energy and environ- mental criteria will play a part. Automobile engines will go through three (probably overlapping) stages by the year 2000: (i) refinements on the conventional internal combustion engine; (ii) new engine types powered by hydrocarbons; (iii) electric power. It is difficult to predict when the changes in power source will occur:

What is in the future [for the U.sT^ ? Through 1985 motor vehicles with internal combustion motors using petroleum fuel and travelling on widened and extended highways To predict beyond 193b would be to enter the tla-eshold of speculation^1. We shall now describe some of the technological and economic factors, and then enter the threshold of speculation.

The conventional internal combustion engine is operating close to its limit in emission reduction; to meet the 1976 United States standards it will probably require catalytic exhaust converters. It appears likely that these standards will be eased somewhat with regard to nitrous oxides, but this will not greatly simplify the technical problems. Better technical solutions are on the horizon, and as these are developed, the automobile engine as we know it will be phased out, perhaps by 1980^. 175

There are a number of possible successors8»10_ The rotary or Wankel engine is already in use; its production costs are comparable to a conventional engine, it uses a little more fuel (10-20%), and although its overall emissions are higher it is easier to clear, its exhaust vrth a catalytic converter because of lower nitrous oxide levels. The stratified charge engine shows a great daal of promise. It uses a modified Otto cycT? with stayed combustion: a rich fuel mixture is first introduced into the cylinder and ignited, and this rich mixture in turn ignites a much leaner mixture which could not burn evenly with conventional spark ignition. Honda, Texaco, Ford and Fiat, among others, are working on this concept8. Honda claims to have met the 1976 U.S. standards with relatively low fuel con- sumption and few driveability problems. The Diesel engine also shows some promise due to its low emission levels, and eventually the Stirling engine, which uses eternal combustion, could become a candidate if extremely low emission levels are required. Jhe efficiencies, costb, and emission levels of these engines are as follows1^: Stratified Conventional Rotary Charge Diesel Stirling

Fuel Cons.: Ib/hp hr .35 5 ,35 .35 45 Cost: $/hp 4 4' 5' 6' 12* Emission: 100 100 25 20 5 At present, gasoline costs about 1.6 cents per vehicle-mile for a 4,400 pound car travelling 35 miles per hour, while electrical power would cost about 2.25 cents per mile^. With the projections indicating that gasoline will continue increasing in price tnrough the year 2000 while the cost of electricity will leva! off in about 1980*>s it seems that electrical automobiles are almost inevitable in the long run. What proportion they will constitute by 2000 is difficult to predict. In summary, two basic technical changes will occur in the Canadian automobile: a reduction in size and weight, and different forms of propulsion. The fuel cost, and therefore the marginal cost of a trip, will increase as a proportion of the total cost per mile for owning and operating a car. The cost per mile might increase from 13 to 20 cents, and the cost of fuel from 25 to 50 percent of total cost. If the initial cost of the car is kept fairly stable by trading off increased power-plant cost against smaller size, the overall cost increase is acceptable. Overall, the situation might approximate that in Europe, where gasoline prices are currently about $1.50 per gallon and increasing. Cars are smaller, but there is no shortage of traffic congestion. Transit Public transit is more efficient than the automobile in its use of energy9; Mode BTU/passenger-mi 1e Bicycle 200 Walking 300 Transit 3,700 Auto 7,900 "176

iransit vehicles also preface much less pollution per passenger-mile than automobiles*!. Therefore, from an energy standpoint, transit is more desir- able than the automobile. In Ontario, it is stated government policy that transit is to be encouraged relative to cars in cities, and funds for transit have been increased. Technical innovations are on the horizon, such as the magnetic-levitation Intermediate Capacity Transit System to be built in Ontario cities. However, the diesel bus is likely to remain the mainstay of transit, and due to its low emissions of pollutants relative to the auto- mobile, especially on a passenger-mile basis, it will require fewer modifi- cations than the latter over the next decade. The bus will also be less affected by fuel price increases, since fuel costs are a relatively small part of total operating expenses. Diesel buses will probably outlive gasoline-powered automobiles as a transportation mode. Use of electric power will increase in transit, but it is unlikely that transit will be totally electrified by the year 2000. Overall, transit will be less affected by the changes in the cost of energy than the automobile. Modal split Modal split is the term used by transportation planners for the division of trips between transit and auto. The auto currently accounts for the bulk of passenger-miles in Canadian cities and for the majority of trips. In Metropolitan Toronto it is estimated that autos accounted for about six billion passenger miles in 1969. while transit accounted for about 1.5 billion, a ratio of four to one^. For certain kinds of trips, transit is much more important: over 70 percent of people working in downtown Toronto arrive by subway or streetcar. However, for most urban travel, the auto is more popular than transit, and the reasons are fairly obvious: it offers great advantages in time saving, is more flexible, and is relatively private. It costs more, but the perceived marginal cost of each trip is often comparable to the transit fare*. It has been shown here that certain changes will occur as a result of increased energy costs: housing type might be slightly affected, automobiles will be smaller, slower, end more expensive, ar.d transit costs will increase less than autc costs. Wh3t effect will this have on modal solit? All these changes — nigher residential densities, higher auto cost, lower transit cost -- will tend to encourage transit relative to auto, reinforcing trends already evident in Toronto, for instance. T!>e critical issue is, of course, the extent of this shift: will Canadian cities be deserted of cars? There is little reason to believe so, because evidence indicates that the decision in choosing between transit and auto for urban trips is influenced more by time saving than by reasonable variations in cost, and the auto will still offer considerable time savings for most urban trips outside the central business district in the year 2000. Tne cars will be smaller and lighter, their engines will

* I/i o/erall terms, the cost of the urban auto/road system is about 8 cents per person-mile compared with 5^ cents for the transit system12. Increased ,, energy prices will affect construction and manufacturing costs for both fl modes,, ts well as operating costs. Only the latter have been considered 1 here. 177

cost more, they will cost more to run: but despite improved and expanded transit service, they will still provide most of their present advantages relative to transit. If income levels continue to rise, there will not be any sharp reduction in auto ownership per capita except perhaps in very high density residential areas with high levels of transit service. All of this is speculative, but logic indicates that an increase in energy cost will have a relatively minor effect by itself toward encouraging the use of transit. Explicit policies designed to discourage auto use, for instance higher parking rates, road user charges, and higher fuel taxes, combined with improvements in transit service, will have'more effect on modal split than increased energy costs. Even with a major shift to transit, however, urban growth rates projected to 2000 indicate that auto congestion will still be serious."!3,14 CONCLUSIONS We have shown that the future energy situation in Canada will have three direct effects on urban land-use and transportation: (i) housing mix and design will be somewhat influenced by increased heating costs; (ii) public transit will be less affected than the automobile by increased energy cost; (iii) automobiles will be smaller, somewhat more expensive, and will use a different engine type. The basic effect of these changes will be to encourage the expansion of transit. However, the auto will continue to enjoy most of its relative advantage in speed and flexibility, and will continue to be the major mode for urban travel in Canada, although transit usage will increase. Auto congestion will continue to be a problem. It is possible that by the year 2000 communication will start to be a substitute for travel,'- but, this is pure speculation. Overall, the effect of increased energy cost will be only ona of many factors affecting urban development, and not the major one. Urban planning should take into account the energy situation, but must continue to be mainly concerned with the basic characteristics of transportation and land-use. It is especially important that energy policies should be developed on an overall system basis, and not at the urban level. We have begged what is perhaps the most important question of all: even though we can pay for it, can we afford to squander energy? The urban planner may speculate on this, but he cannot decide. REFERENCES 1. Ministry of Energy, Mines and Resources, An Energy Policy for Canada - Phase I (Ottawa: Information Canada, 1973) 2. Ontario Advisory Committee on Energy, Energy in Ontario, The Outlook and Policy Implications (Toronto: 1973) 178

3. F. Stuart Chapin, Urban Land Use Planning (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 19651 4. Toronto Transit Commission, Annual Report, 1972 5. M. Earl Campbell, "The Energy Outlook for Transportation in the United States", Traffic Quarterly, XXVII, 2 (April 1973) pp. 183-210 6. Fortune, June 1973, pp. 118-123 7. Road and Track, October 1973 8. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 7 (August 1973) pp. 688-689 9. Enc Hirst, "Energy-Intensiveness of Transportation", Transportation Engineering Journal of the ASCE, Vol. 99, No. TE 1 (February 1973) pp. 111-122 10. William Savery, "Future Energy Sources for Transportation", Traffic Quarterly, XXVI, 4 (October 1972), pp. 485-500 11. Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Plan Review, Report No. 18, Strengths and Weaknesses of Public Transport (March, 1973) 12. Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Plan Review, Report No. 12, Transportation Finance, Part 2 13. N. H. Lithwick, Urban Canada: Problems and Prospects (Ottawa: CMHC, 1970) 14. J. W. MacNeill, Environmental Management (Ottawa: Information Canada, 1971) 15. R. C. Harkness, "Communications Substitutes for Intra-Urban Travel", Transportation Journal of the ASCE, Vol. 98, No. TE 3 (August 1972) pp. 585-598 179

DISCUSSION OF SESSION II

A question was addressed to M. Real Boucher, the Sessional Chair- man, by Mr.P.L. FOURNIER {National Energy Board): Given the rapidly rising price of oil on the inter- national market, and given the probability that the OPEC countries will restrict production growth and possibly use oil as a political weapon against the West, can you comment on the stated -preference of the Government of the Province of Quebec to continue to rely on offshore oil, as opposed to domestic oil, which should be a more secure and price-stable source of oil (in particular its opposition to the extension of Interprovincial Pipe Line)?

M. BOUCHER: The Province of Quebec still intends to rely partly on offshore oil as opposed to domestic oil since its long-term demands cannot be met by the short-term Albertan reserves (12 to 14 years) and also because offshore oil as an alternative source will provide an adequate form of competition which, in the end, is the most effective way of controlling prices.

PROF. H. McQUEEN (Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Sir George Williams Univ., Montreal) to Dr. Dagher:

WJtat optionc, are open to the United States if ina-eac i.>: ..• numbers of Arab nations cut off the export* of oil to that country? Please comment from the short- tc-rm a ?..•.;' long-term points of view. DR. DAGHER: In the short term, the possibilities open to the United States depend on what availability in the world pattern of supply is feasible within newly imposed constraints, what savings in energv consumption can be achieved and what substitutions between energy fcrms (for example, coal for oil) can be implemented.

In the longer term, substitution of other forms of energy becomes much more feasible and therefore significant. MR. E•E. ROBERTSON (The Biomass Energy Institute Inc., Winnipeg) to Dr. Dagher: Do you foresee any significant impact on Canadian energy industries from the proposed §10 billion 5-year crash energy research and development program 180

ernbracinc all forms of renewable opposed to non- vens'CiL! ic resources?

DR. DAGHER: There is, of course, always an element of uncertainty in the results that can be derived from any research program. However, certainly over the next decade and probably also over the next two or three decades, the demand for Cr-ada's hydrocarbon resources is not likely to be significantly affected by the results of such research. So I do not foresee any adverse impact from this research and development on Canadian energy industries and possibly a beneficial impact from, for example, coal gasification/liquefaction, transportation research.

DR. R.E. FOLINSBEE (Dept. of Geology, University of Alberta) to Mr. Lester: What is the long-term ALCAN security of an electricity source like Kitimat? Please comment on this in the light of the policies of Premier Barrett and of electricity shortages fcr a growing population.

MR. LESTER: It is not logical to suggest that the B.C. Government would consider measures ivhich would endanger the viability of one of the province's most important industries, one which provides employment for several thousand people and supports a large industrial community not only of aluminum production but also pulp and paper. Moreover, since 1966, the Kemano-Kitimat complex has been the principal power supply source for a large section of northwestern British Columbia, providing electricity to this isolated portion of the B.C. Hydro system much more economically than otherwise possible.

DR. W.B. LEWIS to Mr. Lester:

./ suggest thai your M the United Makes. The uorLl hae, no nnai of brnrdvr reuc tons for it:; nuclear pouev. Nuclear energy r'i:al- costi.) arc still falling gveally lolthoul breeders. MR. LESTER:

Whether nuclear costs are actually falling today seems rather conjectural, but I would certainly c:gree, and so stated in the paper, that nuclear power costs would tend to at least level out at a plateau below alternative energy costs for many applications. I would also agree that breeder reactors are not required to achieve this happy economic result since, in any case, nuclear fuel costs are but a small part of the total nuclear power cost. However, and with all due respect to 181

Dr. Lewis' long and logical espousal of the CANDU natural uranium reactor, most of the nuclear power world seems convinced, rightly or wrongly, that a true breeder reactor will be necessary to stretch out the economically available supply of U-235. Having regard to development work in Britain and in France, and to the forthcoming $5 billion effort by the U.S.A., it would appear that we are going to get breeder reactors whether we need them or not.

PROF. H. MCQUEEN (Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Sir George Williams Univ., Montreal) to Mr. Lester: What plans should the aluminum industries have for con- servation of energy through the increased use of recycling of aluminum? This would make electricity available for other purposes. MR. LESTER:

Recycling has always played a prominent role in the aluminum industry, and secondary aluminum, so-called, already accounts for about one-quarter of total metal supply. Only 5% as much energy is required to recycle aluminum as to reduce new metal from its ore. In the face of mounting energy problems, the industry has been accelerating its efforts in this direction.

DR. A.D. SCOTT (Dept. of Economics, Univ. of B.C.) to Mr. Lester: You mentioned that one result of the rising energy prices would be a loss of markets by those industries that are energy-intensive to other products that are not energy-intensive. Which Canadian industries arc likely to lose out in this way?

MR. LESTER: T. don't believe we should exaggerate this possibility inasmuch as the competitiveness of most industries depends more on logistical market factors than on energy. However, if energy costs rise dramatically more than the price level of all commodities in general, such industries as synthetic fibers (competing with natural fibers) and metals (where they compete with wood and plastics) could lose ground. Canadian industry, taken as a whole-, would only lose out if Canadian energy cost increases were to out- strip those elsewhere but, as we noted, this is not likely to be the case.

MR. C.R. RIOPEL (Acres Consulting Services, Vancouver) to Mr. Lester

If Arab countries cut off oil supplies to the U.S.^ can we expect Venezuela and other non-Arab UP3C countries to move to fill the gap? If so3 do you think that this coulri cause the break-up of OPEC as now constituted? What vnuid be the effects on oil prices if OPEC breaks up? 182

MR. LESTER: If Arab oil supplies to the U.S.A. were cut off entirely and remained cut off, and I believe this to be highly unlikely, the 5% to 10% shortfall that would immediately occur in the U.S.A. total oil demand could conceivably be met by increased production elsewhere, particularly Iran. However, in the longer run, I would expect that the problem would be met by an even greater accelera- tion in the development of alternatives and substitutes, ^oubined with some rationing. As to the ultimate fate of OPEC, and the effect its possible demise would have on oil prices, such a pre- diction requires more courage than I can muster.

MR. G.D. COATES (Luscar Ltd., Edmonton) of Dr. Downing: Could Alberta's proposed natural gas rebate ("two-price") system actually stimulate the development of an expanded petrochemical industry in that Province?

DR. DOWNING: It might. The tremendous growth of the U.S. petrochemical industry on the Gulf Coast was certainly due in large measure to a government action — that is, regulations holding down the price of natural gas in interstate commerce. The effect was to hold down the price of natural gas higher components too. MR. W. DUNNINGTON (Du Pont of Canada, Montreal) to Dr. Downing: A. Are the following assumptions correct? (I) Liquids from taruands rhould cost less than liquid a from coal

(ii) United States coal is closer to Canadian markets than is Canadian coal (Hi) The United States will develop, at great expense, technology for making liquids from coal b. Would you agree that Canada should not do much work on liquids from coal? DR. DOWNING:

A. (i) Yes, usually. Less treatment needed, but more material needs to be moved. New coal technology might chancye the picture. (ii) True east of Great Lakes, (iii) I certainly expect so. B. At this time, I agree. The picture may change as Alberta oil production declines. 183

MR. W.M. CAMPBELL (Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.) to Dr. Downing:

What factors are missing in Canada that prevent the amalgamation of chemical companies3 as happened in France and elsewhere? DR. DOWNING:

Any political driving force; in fact with present combines laws, these are obstacles.

PROF. H. McQUEEN (Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Sir George Williams University, Montreal) to Dr. Downing:

What will be the effect of the oil export tax on the price of Canadian petrochemicals relative to that in the United States? DR. DOWNING:

It is too early to say. You would expect it to make petrochemical feedstocks relatively cheaper in Canada.

DR. Wm. VEDDER (General Electric Co., Schenectady, N.Y.) to Dr. Downing:

(i) Do you believe that a "methanol economy" might be possible : (ii ' Woul-l you discuss the economics of gas liquefaction v?i-u*.: conversion of gas to mcthanol (•Hi) At what distance between the source of gas end the consumer does methanol become more attractive'-

(iv) Is methanol a more desirable fuel? (v) Can methanol be made from coal via the gas phase or direct, lit': DR. DOWNING: This area is under intense discussion and development and con- clusions are not yet clear. Liquefaction is probably cheaper today than conversion to -methanol. Methanol is a perfectly good fuel. To make it from coal you would gasify the coal first-

DR. BEN HOGG (Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg) to Dr. Pill:

With a email population and a large land aveas except for Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver,, why arc we in Canada concerned with anti-pollution devices in our cars? Is there any legislative deadline (as in the U.S.A.) on auto anti-pollution devices in Canada? 184

Is it not rrure realistic in Canada to conoentr'ate on industrial anti-pollution devices?

DR. PILL: We are concerned with anti-pollution devices in Canada for the same reasons that the United States and Europe are concerned: air pollution in the cities. Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver suffer from it less than perhaps the most striking examples south of the border, such as Los Angeles. However, the need is there in Canadian cities, and it is simply a question of the degree of control. The 197 3 Canadian standards, as set by the Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations, led to a 70% reduction of exhaiist emissions on a new car. It can be argued (see Bus and Truck Transport, April 1973, pp. 19-37 for a comprehensive pre- sentation of the case) that not much more reduction in emissions is required. The 1976 United States standards (originally their 1975 standards) are very stringent, and in July 1973, the Minister of Transport and the Minister of the Environment announced that Canada's standards for 1975 would be less strict. The net result is that Canadian cars will have to have about the same modifica- tions to carburetion and ignition as the 1976 U.S. cars, but will not require the catalytic converters of the latter.

1 feel that cars sold in "clean air" areas should be allowed to continue with the 1973 standards, but this presents numerous logistic and manufacturing problems. As for industrial anti- pollution devices: of course, but not at the expense of control of automotive pollution. In many of the smaller on3-industry cities, industrial pollution Jiay be the most serious, and should receive priority. But I think both sources should receive attention.

DR. D.G. STEPHENSON (National Research Council) to Dr. Pill:

Would you please comment on the possibility of IJ in Lria L Heating having a significant impact on the way urban areas a^e developed,

DR. PILL: Research has indicated that District Heating, which as I under- stand it is the use of a central heat-generating plant using hydrocarbon fuel, offers an increase in efficiency on an area- wide basis. It would seem to be most useful in high-density developments, although it apparently works also in medium-density. The basic question with regard to its viability is: can it continue to offer -fficient savings to make hydrocarbon fuels competitive with eit ricity as the prices of the former rise? With use of oil or natural gas it is highly unlikely, but with coal there is certainly some promise. If it is viable, District Heating probably would not have a major impact on urban form: it would be just another utility. If it offers sizable savings, a District Heating plant might increase land prices in its 185 service area. More research and pilot projects are certainly indicated in this field. DR. I.E. EFFORD (Science Council of Canada) to Dr. Pill:

lour comparison of auto and rapid transit energy use differed from published accounts which suggest a ratio of 10:1 rather than 2:1 (Healey, 1971). Why is this? DR. PILL: The figures in my paper are from Hirst's article, as cited in reference number 9. Such a calculation is dependent on a number of factors: load factor, subway/streetcar/diesel bus mix, and line-haul versus feeder service. The figures cited for energy- use in transit are probably high, and they would be lower for Canada than for the U.S. In any case, there is no doubt that transit is more energy-efficient than the auto.

DR. EFFORD to Dr. Pill: Did you include the energy costs of road com? iruction and maintenance in your estimates of the cs^r's energy, consumption? Furthermores there is the difference between the energy used in the actual manufacture of the cars and buses or trams which would bias the figures more heavily in favour of bus and transit system:-. Was this done? DR. PILL:

Neither of the factors you introduce was considered in the paper. Perhaps they should have been, but the point of view taken was that of the consumer, and the issue was the degree of impact of increased energy cost on his travel behaviour. The cost of con- struction and manufacture in energy terms are germane to decisions by government and industry, although, of course, they will affect the consumer in the long-run. In the decisions on government policy between roads and transit, it is likely that factors other than energy will carry most of the weight. In Ontario, for instance, there is a provincial government policy encnuraginq transit which is not based to any great extent on energy considerations.

On a more substantive note, Richard K. Pefley, in a paper entitled, "Reducing Energy Demands," presented at the Conference on Transportation Horizons: Rebuilding Urban Environments at Berkeley on September 24, 1973, stated that transit construction involving subways is more energy-intensive than road construction. 187

SESSION III

PROSPECTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE

Tuesday, 16 October. 1973, a.m.

Chairman W.B. LEWIS, F.R.S.C. Deep River, Ontario 139

THE NUCLEAR ENERGY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX AND SYNTHETIC FUELS

by

W.B. LEWIS, F.R.S.C.

Although concern about coal resources was oiscussed in the last century conflicting views were commonly expressed up to 1950. In fact, the first broad and serious study bringing together forecasts of population and the use of coal, oil and natural gas was made by Palmer Putman only 20 years ago in 1953 for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and published as "Energy in the Future" by Van Nostrand. It was clear that the world's fossil fuel resources were being used up much faster than they were being formed. In fact the market operation depended on exploration and new discoveries, while knowing there ir.ust be a limit. For a long time estimates of prospects, or discovered reserves kept increasing. But now human nature indulges in some gloating over the coming prospect of a general shortage and high prices. l.'ithin the last 20 years ne have come to realize that no such prospect faces nuclear fuel. It is even nonsense to say, as some have, that man's enjoyment of cheap energy has now passed forever. It is not even correct to argue that breeder reactors or nuclear fusion will be necessary to get down to such a low cost. bnderstandinr this is basic to understanding the topic of this session namely the "Prospects of Technological Change". If we direct our attention and actions oroperly the prospect is to have energy costing say 3 mi 11/kWh, or $l/MBtu in 1972 dollar values in effectively inexhaus- tible amount as long as we allow technology to develop. Of course if we stop or lose our heads mankind is likely to perish. Even 3 rnill/kWh may be an unnecessarily high price, the exact figure depends on how much foresight we can bring to bear on our actions. If we keep scrambling to discover and bring to market oil from remote and difficult sites not only the price but the real cost would go higher. So too if we continue to build and operate nuclear power stations as we do now, even those like the successful Pickering. 190

Although the first general study on the basic idea of the nuclear energy industrial complex was publish- ed to the world 5 years ago, there seems to be little effort in the western world towards the needed foresight and technological change to put the idea into practice. The essential key is to plan and build both nuclear reactors or generating stations and also segregated nuclear fuel processing and management plants on appropri- ately related sites each on a sufficient scale such as 100 million kilowatts, in one interacting complex. Probably it is first necessary to educate the political, finance, business and technical worlds to understand the basic principle of economics that J.K. Galbraith calls the paradox of savings The supply of Capital and the supply of savings are aspects of the same thing. To quote Galbraith (1967) The Mew Industrial State p. 45 "Here is the paradox of savings: the steps which insure that they will be used serve also to increase their supply. The more effectively they are offset by investment the higher will be the income and the more savings there will be. 'Most communities in the past were limited in their progress by the savings they could extract from their meager product to invest in better methods of production. The same is true of poor nations today. The rich nations must also have savings to expand. But what is called economic progress here depends less on the supply of savings than on the effectiveness with which employment of a more than ample supply is insured. Not a shortage of savings but a recession resulting from the failure to use all available savings is the specter that haunts all policy makers. For investment to exceed savings, at least in peacetime, is thought exceptional. This tendency of savings and thus of capital to abundance, abundant use notwithstanding, is a matter of penetrating historical and social con- sequence . . ." The expansion and even the maintenance of the fossil fuel industry demands a continuing supply of capital or savings, because a locally finite resource is being used up; so mines have to be extended or now sites discovered. New pipelines, railways, etc. to link the source to the market are also needed. For nuclear power;, fuelling costs can be much lower but the need for capital is much the same 191

to build generating stations and to transmit and distribute the power. The prospect of technological change arises because the unit cost of energy from fossil fuels must, in general, rise despite some advances in technology such as unit trains, slurry pipelines, and increases of size of fossil fuel fired electric generating stations. On the other hand the unit cost of nuclear energy can fall a very long way. But, even if it stayed constant, at some point the cost of fossil energy would rise above it and make it profitable to introduce a technological change, in particular producing synthetic liquid or gaseous hydrocarbon fuel to carry on serving the market. The basic idea is not new and I may quote from Palmer Putnams 1953 book page 166 under the heading "Synthetic Fluid Fuels" "The mounting preference for fluid fuels has been described. In 1953 in the United States they are carrying about 57 per cent of the load. By 1960, if the preferences continue to be met, the proportion may be 67 per cent; and by 1975, 75 per cent. 'Rising costs of the discovery and refining of crude petroleum, and decreasing costs of synthetic fluid fuels in pilot-plant quantities, have brought the two within sight of each other economically. More important: synthetics give promise of using less steel, per barrel-day of production, than the petroleum industry uses." As I have indicated the study in 1966-68 of the Nuclear Energy Agro-industrial complex carried forward that basic idea indicating that as the cost of nuclear energy comes to be reduced it would progressively initiate technological change in several major industries and finally could fvlly substitute synthetic fluid hydrocarbon fuels for the petroleum products. At the present time the downward trend of the cost of nuclear power has been temporarily halted at a point where it is just competitive with fossil fuel generated electricity. In this use and circumstance it is locked in with two current economic facts the high interest rate on borrowed capital and the escalation of costs associated with both high interest rates and 192

devaluation of currencies. Electric utilities financed in this way cannot promise anything but a rise in the cost of power. We should note, however, that not all electric utilities are necessarily financed in this way, and low interest rates such as at one time available for example to the Tennessee Valley Authority make a very large difference to any prospect. Moreover the savings that have to be applied as capital way be directed to be derived otherwise. Governments with powers to tax, may in other words compel savings from other activities or even from the utilities themselves. What governments cio with money lies firmly in the political field where differing views can be held passionately. To introduce a rational element, it is necessary to point out the prospects of technological change as well as the prospects of technical conservatism. The unit cost of electricity, the cost per kilowatt-hour from nuclear energy will fall as the industrial complexes formed by generating stations and fuel reprocessing plants are increased in capacity. If large capacities such as 100 million kilowatts are planned for, the initial costs are necessarily high but not beyond the range of savings that can be attained in highly industrialised countries. Canada presented the advantages of adopting a thorium fuel cycle on a large scale with its CANDU reactors at the 4th United Nations Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy two years ago. From what has been said above it is clear that the actual cost depends on the scale adopted and also on the interest rate applicable. The following table relates costs of energy to those of synthetic fuels excluding delivery costs and costs of the carboniferous source whether carbon or limestone. In other words the table shows the cost contributions from the energy conversion. 193

CONTRIBUTION OF ENERGY COST TO COST OF SYNTHETIC FUEL ASSUMED COST OF ELECTRIC ENERGY INCLUDING ELECTROLYTIC CELLS 2.5 mill/kWh 5.0 mill/kWh ASSUMED ENERGY FOR PRODUCING 2000 STD 240 kWh 270 kWh 240 kWh 270 kWh CU. FT. HYDROGEN COSTING 604 67.5

FR0M .METHANE 497.5 120.6 135.7 241.2 271.4 LIME- {ETHANE 505.9 118.6 133.4 237.2 266.8 STONE (OCTANE 507.6 118.2 133.0 236.4 266.0 AS 10.000

FORECAST WORLD ELECTRICAL CAPACITY OF NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS ,-63% I (raclutting fftiml 2.000 •52%

1.000 '27%

Kj&r. UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR COMMITTED AS OF JUNE 1973 • 13% 200

100 8% NUCLEAR — COMMISSIONED ELECTRICAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION INSTALLED & COMMITTED CAPACITY -- FORECAST GW 20 2.2% OF TOTAl ELECTRICAL CAPACITY

1 6IGAWATT " 10° KILOWATTS All Promdinp IAEAJ1971 - STI TUB/361 • I SPii'U. PJP" SM IK?

I960 1965 1970 1975 I9B0 1985 1990 1995 2000 YEAR

FIGURE 1 — Forecast of world electrical capacity of nuclear power stations. 195

FISSION, FUSION AND FUEL ECONOMY by A.J. MOOPADIAN. F.R.S.C. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River

INTRODUCTION

Nature has given man abundant resources of Uranium235, U238, Thorium, and the ability to produce electricity. With these basic ingredients, the future of mankind and the options which he chooses to exercise will not be limited by the supply of energy. Even with a world population of 15 to 20 billion people and energy requirements twice that of the current North American standards, there is no apparent barrier to supplying mankind with sufficient energy into the foreseeable future.1*2 This is no scientist's dream. With current technology at the commercial stage cf development, and the elasticity of uranium supply with price, man's fuel supply is secure for hundreds of years. Evolutionary developments of today's concepts, based on proven scientific principles and credible technology, expands the security of energy supply to thousands of years. For those who are concerned about a future beyond this, there is always the hope for fusion.

Given these resources, we have a plethora of options. The Geneva Conference of August 1955 opened the book on the peacetime application of nuclear energy for all who cared to read and participate. Since that time many concepts have failed to meet the test of practicality and fallen by the wayside. A few have been developed to commercial status and have started a technical revolution in central electricity generating power stations. Others are in an advanced state of development and are at the threshold of a test of viability. Still others are awaiting a test of scientific feasibility. The purpose of this paper is to review the current status of nuclear power stations, examine the factors which are apt to influence future develop- ments and examine impending developments in the light of these factors.

Figure 1 shows the nuclear capacity now installed, that committed, and forecasts for future stations. As of June 30 of this year, 262,974 MHe of nuclear capacity was in opera- tion, under construction or on order throughout 26 countries.3 All of this capacity is based on the fission process. It helps to put this number in context by remembering that it requires about 50,000 MWe to service the whole of Canada with electric power.

There are but three general types of reactors which have achieved commercial status in the western world, By that 196

HEAVY WATER STEAM STEAM MODERATO R GENERATOR r=Z- STEAM

WATER MODERATOR «. •r TUBES- & COOLANT REACTOR

PUMP WATER BOILING WATER REACTOR HEAVY WATER REACTOR (LIGHT WATER)

STEAM STEAM GRAPHITE GENERATOR MODERATOR WATER MODERATOR & COOLANT

STEAM GENERATOR

WATER PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTOR BLOWER (LI1HT WATER) GAS COOLED REACTOR

FIGURE 2 — Nuclear power concepts at commercial stage of development. 197

I mean that they are purchased By ut'Tlftfes on a strictly com- mercial basis with sufficient confidence that the grid is dependent on them for poorer supply. They are characterized in the trade as light water reactors, ga: cooled reactors and heavy water reactors [see Fig. 2). All have the follow.ng features in common: (1) They use uranium as a primary fuel. (2) They are classified as "thermal" reactors, i.e. a moderator is required to slow down the fission neutrons which emerge at 2 MeV to thermal energies. (3) They produce electricity by generating steam to drive a conventional turbo-generator unit. (4) All breed plutonium by the reaction of spare neutrons on the fertile material U238. LIGHT MATER REACTORS The U.S. light water reactors were an early arrival on the commercial scene. The submarine reactor program gave a highly pertinent base for the entire reactor system. The exist- ence of large enrichment facilities in the United States com- bined with a dependence on thermal generation stations, were important factors in getting these reactors quickly off the mark. Because of this early commercial entry and the estab- lishment of a large U.S. market, the vast majority of commercial reactors which have been committed throughout the world are based on this concept. Probably the most important character- istic of the light water reactors is that they require enriched uranium as a fuel. Natural uranium, which contains only 0.7% of the fissile isotope U235 cannot be made to react in such an environment. Typically, commercial plants of this type use uranium which is enriched to levels of about 2.2 to 3.5% U235. Since enriched uranium is rather expensive, the economic optimum drives the designer to use as high a power density as possible to alleviate the inventory cost. The use of light water for a moderator dictates that the fuel be rather closely packed in order to avoid excessive loss of neutrons by capture in light hydrogen. This then drives the designer to the pressure vessel concepc. The pressure vessels used in light water reactors are no mean achievement. A typical 600 MW PWR unit requires a pres- sure vessel with diameter 4 m, length 1? to 13 m and wall 27 cm thick.

The BWR pressure vessels tend to be larger but since they operate at lower pressure, the wall thickness can be some- what rejuced. The Millstone I vessel, for example, is 5.7 m in internal diameter, 19.6 m long, with a wall thickness of 14.5 cm. The combination of enriched fuel operating in a pres- sure vessel makes it extremely difficult, if not impDssible, to 198

fuel the reactor while at power. All such reactors are based on off-load refuelling. Refuell>.g schedules vary but generally speaking require a shutdown of 3 to 4 weeks duration at inter- vals of 12 to 16 months. GAS COOLED REACTORS The second cla3~ of commercial reactor, championed by the U.K., is characterized by the use of graphite as a moderator and carbon dioxide as a coolant. The first generation stations were called the Magnox stations5 and they deliver almost all nuclear power now feeding the U.K. grids. Graphite is not as efficient a moderator as water, and therefore a larger volume is required to slow down the neutrons. The use of carbon dioxide has both a positive and a negative aspect. High quality heat can be extracted from the core, e.g. the Wylfa station has an outlet coolant temperature of 402°C as compared with about 300°C for the water-cooled reactors. However, gas is not nearly as good a heat transfer medium as water, and hence the designer must cope with handling large volumes of gas in both reactor and boiler. This, in turn, leads to higher capital costs. The Magnox stations use natural uranium metal clad in a magnesium alloy (hence the name Magnox). These first-generation gas- cooled stations have been reliable performers and for several years held the record for total power generated.

A second generation of gas-cooled reactor has now been committed in the U.K.; the so-called Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor (AGR).6 it, too, is graphite-moderated and cooled by carbon dioxide. However, to allow the fuel to operate at higher temp- e-atures, stainless steel clad uranium dioxide is used as a fuel. This, in turn, has required the use of enrichment. The reactor is still very large by PWR standards (20 m I.D. x 17.8 m high). Indeed, the pressure vessel problem could have proved to be intractable had it not been for the ingenious application of the pre-stressed concrete principle. There has been some difficulty in commissioning the first of these AGR stations and therefore little operating experience has been accumulated. All of the commercial gas-cooled reactors are designed for on-powar fuel ting. The large pressure vessel and the spreading out of the fuel by the graphite moderator makes this an easier task than in the case of the Light Water Reactors. Although the gas reactors were the earliest commercial stations in operation, very few have been committed in countries other than the two major sponsoring countries, France and Great Britain. Tndeed, the utilities of both countries are busy looking at alternatives for the next generation of stations. 199

HEAVY WATER REACTORS The most important event on the commercial scene since nuclear power was first introduced is the dramatic success of the 2000 HWe Pickering power station.7 Pickering is important, not because it is a Canadian achievement, but rather for the world at large, it removes all practical and commercial barriers to the full exploitation of the heavy water moderated concept. Pickering is a member of the CANDU family of reactors, the so- called PHW variant (for P_ressurized tteavy W_ater cooled). Heavy water is the most efficient moderating medium which nature has to offer. It has captured the imagination of reactor designers the world over8 since the inception of the atomic era. Its overwhelming merit is that it allows very efficient utilization of fission neutrons. As a result, fuel cycles can be conceived which will not only allow the use of natural uranium, as in Pickering, but also those which .an greatly extend the resources of nuclear fuels available for economic exploitation. Canada is the logical champion of this concept. During the last war she had been assigned the task of producing Plutonium from heavy-water moderated reactors. NRX and subse- quently NRU were built principally for this purpose. The tech- nological roots date back to 1945. However, it is a long step from recognition of potential to the proof cf commercial viability. The trick has been to prove practicality without the loss of potential. In this regard the choice of natural uranium for fuel has been a key factor in disciplining the program to make best use of the neutrons which the use of heavy water saves.'0 Several impor- tant achievements have been required: (1) The development of a reliable fuel assembly containing a minimum of parasitic material capable of being mass pro- duced at low cost and achieving burnups in the order of 10,000 HWd/tonne U.H (2) The development of a pressure tube of low neutron capture cross section and long life under irradiation.!2 (3) The development of a reliable on-power fuelling machine capable of making and breaking high pressure seals several times a day. (4) The development of reliable heat transport and moderator systems which minimize the inventory of heavy water am) its potential for leakage and loss. (5) The development of engineering, manufacturing and construc- tion skills that allow the entire system to be competitive in today's commercial environment. 200

TABLE 1 FISSILE INVENTORIES FOR TYPICAL COMMERCIAL REACTORS (600 MWe] Reactor Type Fuel Type U2 35 Inventory U235 Inventory tonne worth* CANDU-PHW Natural 0.61 $1 .73 X 106 Light Water PWR Enriched 1 .26 $12.4 X 10e BWR Enriched 1 .82 $17.9 X 106 Gas Cooled Magnox Natural 4.30 $12.5 X 106 AGR Enriched 2.43 $17.7 X 106 *Fabrication Cost Excluded Based on $8.00/lb U308 Separative Work Cost $38.50/kgU

TABLE 2 COMMERCIAL REACTORS AS PLUTONIUM BREEDERS Reactor Type Grams of Plutonium in Spent Fuel per Gram of U235 Consumed CANDU-PHW 0.57 Light Water PWR 0.28 BWR 0.31 Gas Cooled Maanox 0.34 "AGR 0.23 201

Table 1 graphically illustrates how successfully neutron efficiency has been conserved in the CANDU-PHW (the Pickering type reactor). The core fissile inventory is between a factor of 2 to 7 lower than that required by any of the other commercial concepts. The neutron efficiency of the system is such that natural uranium fed in at a concentration of 0.71% jj235 emerges in the spent fuel at a concentration of 0.18% U23S; a value lower than the tails assay from diffusion enrichment plants. In short, the enriched reactors waste more of nature's U235 before the fuel enters the core than Pickering does after the fuel has been used. The fuelling cost for Pickering is between 0.7 and .88 mills/kWhe, 50% to 100% lower than its competitors; and this without any claimed credit for the plutonium values in the spent fuel. Yet another illustration of the neutron efficiency of the CANDU-PHW is given in Table 2. Plutonium is as good a fissile material as U23S. Hence its production can be consid- ered a replacement for the consumption of U235. FACTORS WHICH WILL AFFECT THE COURSE OF DEVELOPMENTS OVER THE NEXT 20 YEARS Ca) Worldwide (Canada is no exception) the anticipated doubling time of electrical capacity is about ten years.'3 For a number of economic, strategic, environmental and political reasons, nuclear capacity is expected to double faster than this. Grids now accepting 500 MWe units will in twenty years take 2000 MWe units. Already several commercial units have been committed at about 1200 MWe. (b) Canada is uniquely gifted with an abundant supply of cold cooling water. This is not generally true for the rest of the world. Power plants will probably migrate to the sea shores and systems capable of operating efficiently with warmer sink temperatures will become more attractive. (c) Until the advent of nuclear power, the only fissile isotope available to man was U23S. Since, as I indicated earlier, all commercial reactors breed plutonium, a major new resource of fissile material will become available tsee Table 3). Its.optimum use will command a great deal of attention. (d) The inventory of uranium accessible to man is very large. It is estimated^-that 2 x 1Q12 tonne is available within a aile of the earth's surface and 4 x 109 tonne in the oceans. The earth's inventory occurs in a continuum of concentrations and so the supply will be determined by price. At 1973 prices (about $6.S0/lb U308), the uranium supply industry is not overly stimulated to develop proven reserves. 202

TABLE 3 14

WESTERN WORLD PRODUCTION OF PU

Year Tonne/Year

1972 3 1980 60 1985 200 203

It is reasonable to expect that prices will rise as fore- casts are converted to firm orders. It is worth noting that even with present day Pickering technology, the price of uranium could rise to $100/1b U308 before the fuelling cost would match that of a coal-fired station in Ontario using low sulphur coal. At these levels one could seriously contemplate sea water extraction.16 (e) The question of enrichment supply and cost is extremely important. All enrichment plants now operating in the U.S., the U.K., France and the Soviet, were built for military programs and their costing is somewhat confused. As yet, no uranium enrichment plant has been built on a fully com- mercial basis. It has been disturbing to utilities that the price for separative work has increased from $28.70/SWt" in February 1971 to $38.50/SWU effective August 14, 1973 with a built-in provision for a 1% increase every six months beginning January 1974. By 1980, at the latest, new enrich- ment capacity will have to be in production. In August of this year the USAEC released a study!? of thp cost of enrichment from a new diffusion plant unconfused by military financing. The study indicated that a separative work unit would cost $51.08 to $64.91 depending on whether the plant was publicly or privately f .ianced. The same study indi- cated that the new centrifuge technology would result in a significant saving and could produce a separative work unit at $38.17 to $51.44 under comparable financing conditions. However, it will probably require 10 more years before suf- ; ficient confidence is generated in the new technology to I warrant the commitment of 1 to 1% billion dollars needed to I build the required capacity. i (f) The introduction of a new concept of nuclear power plant I has a great deal of momenturr to overcome. The investments i are large. Single decisions seldom commit less than ! $300,000,000, and must be made at correspondingly high con- i fidence levels. The development of a national nuclear I infrastructure Is itself a time-consuming and costly propo- | sition and tends to be oriented to a specific reactor type. I It is highly improbable that new concepts will sweep aside | those now firmly established. If proven of sufficient I worth, they will be introduced in conservative and orderly 1 fashion. S OPTIONS OF COMMERCIAL SIGNIFICANCE WHICH CAN DEVELOP I OVER THE NEXT TWENTY YEARS g. -.—.— ••, i.. ,..n.i. ..i- n. . MM,.i.,i ,,.„,.. .,, .1, , i S Light Water Reactors - Light water reactors are not apt to change | significantly over this period of time. They have already gone I through two or three generations of improvements and are rather high on the learning curve. However, their momentum ensures that many more will be committed over this period. As uranium ro o

STEAM TO TURBINE STEAM TO TURBINE. STEAM TO TURBINE STEAM DRUM^ REACTOR STEAM PRESSURE STEAM STEAM/WATER MIXTURE | TUBES GENERATOR FUEL- FUEL FUEl

HEAVY WATER MODERATOR HEAVY WATER WATER FROM HEAVY WATER PUMP WATER FROM MODERATOR CONDENSES MODERATOR CONDENSER WATER fROM PHW CONDENSER BLW OCR IPressurisod Hoavy Water) {Boiling Light Water) (Organic Cooled Reactor)

FIGURE 3 — Variants of the CANDU concept in an advanced state of technological development. 205 and separative work costs increase, the light water reactors will become less and less attractive. Already a good deal of work is being done on developing the recycling of plutonium to partly offset the cost of enriched uranium. Over this period there will be a growing incentive for utilities to explore alternative options less sensitive to uranium supply and enrich- ment uncertainties. Gas-cooled Reactors - The next major step on the horizon is the high temperature gas-cooled reactor under development in the U.S.. the U.K. and Germany. The concept is based on the excel- lent work which was done on the Dragon project. It is a sig- nificant departure from the AGR. Helium replaces carbon dioxide as coolant and gas outlet temperatures in excess of 700°C are being considered. The fuel will be based on the Dragon coated particle development. At the moment, the U.K. program is in a state of indecision and the most important hard development is the commissioning of the Fort St. Vrain plant in the U.S. This is a 330 MWe demonstration plant which is expected to come on line later this year. Despite the high temperature of th- cool- ant, power will be generated through a conventional steam cycle. The reactor type is of interest because it offers the prospect of utilising U233 bred from thorium. The potential for high thermal to electric efficiency will be attractive to utilities needing inland stations short of cooling water. The development of reliable high performance gas turbines would allow future generations of these reactors to operate on a highly efficient closed cycle. The technological problems are not insignificant. At such high temperatures most reactions allowed by thermo- dynamics are apt to take place quickly.

Heavy Hater Reactors - One can conceive of CANDU reactors which are cooled by everything from heavy water, as in Pickering, to high temperature gas. However, only three variants are in a sufficiently advanced state of development that they could be considered as serious candidates for commercial application within the next 20 years. These are shewn schematically in Fig. 3. (a) A CANDU PHW - The Pickering and Bruce designs do not exhaust the development potential of this variant. There is sig- nificant scope for development of a higher power output per channel by the development of stronger zirconium alloys for pressure tubes and alternative fuels. One of the most interesting prospects on the horizon is the possibility of using uranium silicide as a fuel to replace uranium dioxide. Such a fuel is now in an advanced state of development in our laboratories and promises to offer the power plant designers a significant improvement in power output from a given physical size of core. It also holds promise of giving even lower fuelling costs than now obtained with conventional uranium dioxide fuel. There is also a known 206

prospect of recycling plutonium back into such systems at the price of complicating the present simple, once through, fuelling cycle. (b) CANDU BLWs - The BLW variant is characterized by the use of boiling light water as a coolant. A 250 MWe prototype station (Gentilly I) based on this principle has been com- missioned at Trots Rivi&res. Note that it operates on a direct cycle. It promises a significant reduction in the capital cost, but does so by encroaching on the fuel economy of the system. The introduction of this concept would be favoured by continuing good experience with Gentilly I, com- bined with a continuing increase in interest rates. Since the principal asset of the system is that it offers potential for capital cost reductions, it is a logical system in which to consider the recycle of plutonium. A study is underway to determine the prospects for such a concept. (c) CANDU OCR - This variant of the system uses a low vapour- pressure oil as coolant. Its merit is that heat can be extracted from the core at 400°C at significantly lower pressures than obtains for water-cooled reactors. It there- fore offers the possibility of a significant improvement in thermal to electric efficiency (between 35 and 40% net station efficiency). Although the organic coolant concept has been demonstrated by the excellent operating record of the 40 MW WR-1 test reactor at the Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, it has yet to be tested in a system which produces electric power. It is technologically one of the most promising of the CANDU variants. Nevertheless, a decision was taken this year to tidy up the loose ends and put the technology on the shelf rather than proceed with a prototype reactor. The reason for this decision was to avoid the risk of spreading out the Canadian effort too thinly at a time when the heavy-water cooled reactors were just establishing a commercial position. However, it is entirely conceivable that within the next 20 years interest in this concept will be revived, possibly coupled with the use of a thorium fuel cycle as suggested by Dr. Lewis.18,19 The reason that the thorium fuel cycle and the organic cooled concept go hand in hand is that the U233 which is bred from thorium does not suffer the same loss in reactivity as does U235 and plutonium with the increase of neutron temperature that results from a higher temperature coolant. THE FISSION BREEDING OPTIONS Thorium and U239 are both abundant fertile materials. They can be converted to fissile resources by the addition of a neutron to each, atom to produce U233 and plutonium respectively. 207

A figure of merit in any consideration of fertile to fissile breeding is "n" (the ratio of neutrons emitted to neutrons absorbed of the fissile atom produced). In theory, any reaction for which n = 2 can breed as much fuel as is consumed (i.e. would have a breeding ratio = 1). However, in any prac- tical system, neutrons are lost by leakage and parasitic capture. A more realistic threshold for a breeding ratio of 1 is n = 2.2. The basic criteria for evaluating a system with regard to its breeding ratio are presented in Fig. 4. Note that the value of n is critically dependent on both the nature of the target atom and on the energy of the neutron responsible for f i r <; i o n . Clearly, efficient breeding is most favoured either by a system in which the fission neutron spectrum is reduced to very low energies by a good moderator or alternatively by one in which the energy of the neutrons is kept very high by the rig- orous exclusion of moderating materials. These observations have led to the two major classifications of fission concepts; the "thermal reactors" in which a premium is placed on the efficiency with which the fission spectrum can be moderated to thermal velocities and the "fast reactors" in which the designer wishes to maintain the fission neutrons at fast velocities. It is also apparent from Figure 4 that the best breed- ing cycle for thermal reactors would be based on U233 from Th, while that for fast reactors would be based on Pu from U238. Fast reactor concepts have as long a history as that of thermal reactors. Clementine, a U.S. fast reactor experiment was commissioned in 1946 and EBR-1, a fast reactor, produced the first electric power (200 kWe) back in 1951. However, the development of a practical and viable system has proved to be a much tougher problem than was the case for thermal reactors. Attracted by the possibility of extending their fuel resources, the U.S., the USSR, the U.K., France, Germany and Japan all have major programs in the field. All of these countries will be accumulating large inventories of plutonium from their thermal reactors with which to start their commercial fast reactor programs. Many variants of the concept are possible.20 Fuel in both metallic and ceramic form has been considered. Gas, steam and a variety of liquid metals have been studied. Although there remain champions of alternative systems, there is now a surprising consensus that the earliest route to commercial fast reactors is the liquid sodium cooled, ceramic fuelled variant - the so called LMFBR for Liquid Metal cooled f_ast Breeder Reactor 208

NEUTRONS EMITTED NEUTRONS ABSORBED 3~ P(J239 • 233 EFFECTIVE BREEDING THRESHOLD

2 235 s*r

1 1000 FAST REACTOR SPECTRUM 100 „ FISSION RELATIVE «.-' SPECTRUM NEUTRON FLUX 10

THERMAL REACTOR SPECTRUM

10"2 10'' 10° 10 10z 103 IO+ 10s I06 107 NEUTRON ENERGY (

FIGURE 4 — The basis of breeding.

(Dr. C.H. Millar, private communication) 209

TABLE 4 TYPICAL CORE POWER DENSITIES FOR VARIOUS REACTOR TYPES Reactor Types Power Density Reference kWt/£ Thermal Reactors CANDU-PHW 11 .2 Gentilly 2 PWR 93 Burlington BUR 50 Brown's Ferry AGR 2.4 Dungeness B Magnox 0.9 Wylfa Fast Reactors U.S. ^580 Commercial Reactor Studies France 460 Phenix U.K. 366 PFR Soviet 480 BN-350 210

TABLE 5 21 RESOURCES UTILISATION BY THERMAL & FAST REACTORS

Running Net Consumptions g/ekW-yr Technology Fuel Cycle Reactor Type U Pu Th (or U233) Magnox 270 -0.54 - AGR 147 -0.17 Pu Export LWR 171 -0.29 - Late 1970s CANDU 110 -0.41

LWR 114 - Pu Recycle CANDU 60 1980s Fast Breeder FB 1 -0.23 - 1970s Th/U233 LWR 65 - 2 HWR 8 2 Late 1970s Th/U 23 HTGR 115 -0.20 5.5 211

At the moment, the only unit of prototype size which has been commissioned belongs to the Soviet Union (BN-350). The U.K. and French units are expected to come on line soon. The U.S. expects to spend $6 billion to bring their program to commercial fruition with a target date in the mid 1980s. The optimists are hopeful that the commercial date will be 1985. Pessimists claim the turn of the century and few would argue with 1995. Why this long? The LMFBR represents a convulsive change in technology from the thermal reactors. Liquid sodium at 500°C fs not the easiest material to handle and keep clean. In the interests of both fuel economy and capital cost the power density of the core is very much higher than that of thermal reactors (see Table 4). It is sobering to reflect that a right cylinder 1 metre deep by 2h metres in diameter is required to deliver 3000 MWt - enough to power Winnipeg! The preservation of good geometry in the core is a matter of both technical and economic concern. The fast neutron flux is 100 times higher than in thermal reactors. Every atom of material in the core is knocked out- of place once every few days. This coupled with high temperature.tends to make materials creep and swell. To achieve the required fuel economy, 8 to 10% of the fuel must be burned "up on each pass. Thj-s raises prob- lems of geometric ste-bility which must be resolved, in tiie fuel design. j,' 1 _r ~ It is a challenging but worthwhile task. None can argue reasonably that we should not find the way to make best use of our plutonium, However, it is difficult to believe that the Fast Reactor will gain acceptance simply OP the grounds of resource extension. In Table 5 we see that the. CAN.DU reactor, with only evolutionary developments and requiring/only modest < expansion of^pur national effort, can greatly extend, existing resources v^and,tfHS without closing: any options Jor t:he fast reactor. ' .^ . ^ • . ';. •' ''"',_, . J ' In the isost sensible of all sensible worlds, we wijl; develop our heavy water reactors w Burn thorium and pur fast reactors to burn uranium, Either alone is si/ffi'c.i ent to /see; man through for-at leasf thousand!* of years. , i; C FUSION i

. Ever sin^e msh discovered'that the source ofs the sun"s energy <"esulted •from the, fusion of hydrogen, he has drecffit of using the limitless supplies of hydrogen in water to generate his other energy heeds. The'objective of fusion research .is, to identify the conditions under which, this can* be done and:^to-dis- cover how to produce such conditions at will- v 0

I 212

In theory, many reactions can be considered. All require a very demanding set of criteria. However, there are but two likely candidates, they are -> He3 + n + 3 MeV f i \ n J. n v" ' "IU-T + H + 4 MeV (2) D + T - He" + n + 17.6 MeV The first of these is known to require conditions at least in orders of magnitude more difficult to achieve than the second. The only reaction receiving serious attention as a possible fusion power source is that of D upon T (deuterium upon tritium). Enough is now known to define the criteria of scientific feasi- bility which must be met in order that as much energy is pro- duced as is consumed in the process. A typical set of conditions which would meet these criteria is the achievement of a concen- tration of tritium-deuterium plasma of about 10llf particles/cm3 at a temperature of 108 degrees K and a confinement time of one second. Alternatively, higher densities can reduce the time required for a sufficient reaction to take place. Two general approaches have been considered which I would like to review very briefly. The first of these is known as the magnetic confinement concept and has been the subject of intensive attention since the time of the Second Geneva Confer- ence in 1958. The basic idea is that charged particles interact with a magnetic field and since the plasma is a mass of highly charged particles, it should be possible to contain them in a magnetic bottle. The development of superconductors has opened the door to the very high magnetic field strengths needed. It is now credible that magnetic fields can be produced of suffic- ient intensity (^100 kilogauss) to effectively contain a plasma by applying a pressure of over 400 atmospheres.22 The essence of the problem has been how to design such a magnetic bott'ie to avoid leakage of plasma through inherent instabi1ities.23 The state of the art is probably best represented by the current conser-us of optimism developing around the Tokamak (_a device first conceived in the USSR). At the moment each of the criteria described earlier has been achieved independently. To meet them simultaneously is expected to require at least one more generation of plasma devices. To this end, the USAEC is considering the commitment of a large $100M device, targetted for completion around 1982.24 The European fusion community is also considering the construc- tion of a large Tokanuk device.25 Assuming that the above experiments do indeed prove scientific feasibility, the application of the concept to power generation raises a number of formidable problems before a com- mercially viable source of fusion energy will be possible. 213

There have been some conceptual studies of what would be required to produce a power generating device of practical interest based on the Tokamak principle. These indicate that the reactor will need to be of rather large volume (about 1,000 cubic metres). In it, a magnetic field will have to be produced of 100 kiloqauss by a superconducting magnet. Such, a device would burn in the order of 1 kg of tritium per day which will have to be produced by the system itself. To close the fuel cycle, the tritium will have to be produced in a blanket of lithium bombarded by the high energy neutrons emitted from the plasma. The containment system will have to be designed to withstand intensive radiation damage while being cooled with the tritium breeding blanket of liquid lithium. Like sodium, liquid lithium is quite aggressive and one would have to be assured that it does not transport the materials of construction. Outside of all this will be the superconducting magnet operating near absolute zero. Production of the strong magnetic fields will pose some formidable problems associated with the circu- lation of conducting coolants and in the structure of the magnet itself. Perhaps enough has been said to support the view held by most proponents of fusion power that it is unlikely to achieve commercial status 'mtil the year 2000.

At the Seventh International Quantum Electronics Conference in Montreal in May 1972, an alternative to the mag- netic confinement system was disclosed by the U.S.27 This, too, is based on the deuterium-tritium reaction. The essence of the scheme is that laser light is impinged on a small pellet con- taining deuterium and tritium with the deposition of sufficient energy to ablate the outer skin so quickly that an implosion of the pels^ts takes place to produce densities 10,000 times higher than normal. The fusion reaction ignites and burns from the inside out in about 10"11 seconds (about the time for light to travel 1/8"). The release of energy is therefore in the nature of a small hydrogen bomb explosion. A series of such explosions can produce a cyclic flow of energy. The idea excites interest because it gets around the need for the large expensive magnets associated with the magnetic containment technique. The implosion approach is receiving a great deal of attention . Just as last year might be designated the year of the Tokamak, this year might be called the year of the laser. There is as yet no feasibility demonstration for this approach. Several laboratories expect to attempt such a demonstration over the next 3 to 4 years. One should not minimize the problem of converting such a scheme to practical application. While large magnets are not required, one has still to cope with the problem of producing large, reliable high energy lasers, appropriate methods of delivering the energy uniformly, feeding the fuel and extracting the products of the explosion with high reliability and at low cost. 214

In summary, the state of the art is that scientific feasibility of a fusion device appropriate to power generation has yet to be demonstrated, but is receiving a great deal of attention. It is credible that the question of scientific feasibility will be resolved within the next ten years. If the answer is yes, the development of a practical power producing device must be considered at least as long a road as that of developing fission power plants. There is a popular misconception that fusion could give mankind all of the benefits of nuclear power with none of the legacies of radioactivity. Both routes which I have des- cribed will generate about 4 times as many neutrons per unit energy than does a fission reactor. It is inconceivable that such a flux will not generate a significant radioactive inven- tory. Indeed, it may well transpire that the first practical application of fusion will be as a neutron generator to feed a fission system.28

CONCLUSION The development of the CANDU family of reactors coupled with oiir large resources of uranium and thorium, assures Canada of economic and abundant electric power into the foreseeable future. For the rest of the world, the heavy water option is now a competitive source of power and a viable alternative for those who had previously been dependent on the prospects for fast breeders and fusion a? long-term energy sources. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to Dr. C.R. Hoffmann, Dr. C.H. Millar and Mr. E. Critoph for the assembly of the material on which most of the presentation is based. 215 REFERENCES

1. LEWIS, W.B. Nuclear energy and the quality of life. IAEA Bull. Vol. 14, No. 4, pp 2-14, IAEA, Vienna 1972. 2. WEINBERG, A. & HAMMOND, R.P. Global effects of increased use of energy. Proc. 4th U.N. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 1971. Vol. 1, p.171. Paper P.033. 3. World list of nuclear power plants. Nuclear News, Vol. 16, No. 11 , Sept. 1973, pp. 53-62. 4. DAVIS, W.K. et al. United States light water reactors. Proc. 4th U.N. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 1971. Paper P.034. 5. VAUGHAN, R.D. & Anderson, E. The Bradweil power station. Proc. 2nd U.N. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 1958. Vol. 3, p. 450, paper P-263. 6. MOORE, R.V. A Review of Experience with Gas Cooled Reactors. "Atom", No. 147, Jan. 1969, pp 6-22. 7. McCONNELL, L.G. Construction and operating experience with thermal power reactors in Canada. Amer. Nucl. Soc, Washington, Nov. 12-17, 1972. TGD-1. 8. Heavy-water power reactors. Proc. Symp. Vienna. Sept. 1967. IAEA, Vienna 1968. 9. EGGLESTON, W. Canada's Nuclear Story. Toronto, Clarke Irwin, 1965. 10. MOORADIAN, A.J., Canadian nuclear fuel - challenges met and pending. Twelfth AECL Symp. on Atomic Power. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., publication No. AECL-3067. 11. MOORADIAN, A.J., Economic fuel for CANDU. Trans. 6th World Power Conf. Melbourne 1962. Vol. 4, pp. 1378-1408. (AECL- 1647). 12. Ross-Ross, P.A. Fuel channel development for Canada's power reactors. Eng. J. (Montreal), 1970, Vol. 53, No. 10, p.13 (AECL-3126). 13. United Nations. World energy requirements and resources in the year 2000. Proc. 4th U.N. Conf. Peaceful Uses Atomic Energy, Geneva, 1971. Vol. 1, p. 303, paper P-420. 216

14. RIPPON, S.E. Plutonium - problems and possibilities. Nucl. Eng. Int. Vol. 17, pp 85-92. Feb. 1972. 15. LEWIS, W.B. How much of the rocks and the oceans for power? Exploiting the uranium-thorium fission cycle. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, publication AECL-1916, 1964. 16. KEEN, N.J. et at. Extraction of uranium and other inorganic materials frrm sea water. Proc. Conf. Technology of the Sea, Harwell, 1967. UKAEA publica- tion. AERE-R-5500, Vol. 2. p.387. 17. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy hearings, Aug. 1973. Reported in: Nucleonics Week, 6 August 1973, p.2. 18. LEWIS, W.B. et at. Large-scale nuclear energy from the thorium cycle. Proc. 4th L). N. f"onf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva 1971. Paper P-157. 19. LEWIS, W.B. The super-converter or valubreeder: a near-breeder uranium thorium nuclear fuel cycle. Atomic. Energy of Canada Limited, publication AECL-3081 , 1968. 20. Proceedings of the Conference on Safety, Fuels and Core Design in Large Fast Power Reactors. Oct. 11-14, 1965. Argonne National Laboratory, publication ANL-7120. 21. OECD-ENEA. Power Reactor Characteristics. 1st Report, Paris, 1966. pp. 44-45. 22. ROSE, D.J., Science Vn_, 797, May 1971. 23. POST, R.F., Physics Today 26^ 30, April 1973. 24. Nucleonics Week, 1_4, 1, 26 July 1973. 25. Nucleonics Week, J_4, 6, 9 August 1973. 26. USAEC Report WASH-1239, February 1973. 27. .<(JCKOLLS, J., WOOD, L., THIESSEN, A. & ZIMMERMANN, G. Nature 2J3£, 139, 1972

28. LJOSKY, L.M., Proceedings of the BNES Conference on Nuclear F-.ion Reactors, Culham", 1969, p. 41. 217

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; AN UNDEVELOPED CANADIAN RESOURCE?

by

G_D. GARLAND

University of Toronto

INTRODUCTION

That the earth itself is a reservoir of thermal energy has been recogni2ed for centuries. The increase in temperature with depth, observed in mines and boreholes, is evidence of an internal heat source, from which heat is escaping to the earth's surface. Most of this heat is believed to be produced by radioactive elements in the outer part of the earth, but a portion may represent residual original heat. However, while the total rate of energy loss is very large: 3.2 x 10^ megawatts, much greater than the rate of energy expended in earthquakes, the density of the thermal flux is, except in unusual regions, very small. Through more than 99% of the earth's surface, the heat flux is of the order of 1 microcalorje per cnr sec, far too small to be of use to man. It is only in the remaining 1% of the area that unusual conditions combine to give a much higher flux. These areas of higher density of geothermal energy have been utilized for many years in Iceland and Italy, and in more recent times in New Zealand, the United States, and other countries. There has rot yet been a commercial development of geo- thermal sources in Canada, except, of course, for medicinal hot-water baths.

The purpose of this paper is to assess the possible importance of geothermal sources upon the Canadian energy situation. Even if geothermal energy is not utilized in this country for some years, the extension of developments in the western United States and Mexico will change the conti- nental energy balance, with implications for this country. In order to show the natural conditions that are required to r.oduce a geothermal field, and the installations that are involved in harnessing it, brief descriptions of fields in Italy, New Zealand and Iceland will be given and che possibility of similar conditions existing in Canada will be discussed. A description will also be given of a newly-proposed process, which involves the artificial circulation of water into areas that are not natural geothermal fields.

EXAMPLES OF GEOTHERMAL AREAS

Larderello, Italy Natural steara wells were known in this area, south of Volterra, at least as early as the eighteenth century. In 1777 the wells were developed for their boric acid content, and borax was extracted. The first use of the thermal energy came in 1904, when a steam-driven generator producing 40 h.p. was installed. Today, about 160 wells are drilled into the field, to a maximum depth of 1600 m., and these produce steam at the rate of almost 3,000,000 kg. per hour (Burgassi 1964). A most important feature of the Larderello field is that the steam is dry, many wells producing superheated steam at temperatures of the order of 200°C. The steam is used to drive the turbines of generators, producing electric power at the rate of 380,000 kw. Fig. 1. Developed geothermal areas of the world (crosses) in relation to plate boundaries and hot spots (circles). 219

Geologically, the area is one generally associated with young volcanism, although volcanic rocks are not exposed in the immediate vicinity of Larderello. The field itself is located on a upfaulted block within a sedimentary basin. This basin contains a thick sequ nee of permeable anhy- drite overlain by an impermeable clay, and it is believed that this combina- tion ia ul great importance in determining the nature ot the field.

Wairakei, New Zealand The Wairakei field is located within a zone of active volcanoes, which extends for 300 km. across North Island. (Healy, 1964). Development of the field began in 1950, and about 100 wells have now been drilled. Electric power is in production at the rate of about 150,000 kw., to be increased eventually to 250,000 kw.

Geologically, the field is located on a local upfaulted block within an area of subsidence. The aquifer is a pumice breccia, capped by a relatively impervious mudstone, which is itself overlain by young volcanic rocks. One deep well has passed through the aquifer into underlying young volcanic rock, which is believed to be related to the source of heat.

The most striking difference between the Larderello and Wairakei fields is that while the former produces superheated, dry steam, the Wairakei wells produce fluids of varying thermal quality, ranging from hot water to saturated steam. This property is believed to be related to the lateral extent of the porous reservoir rock, which, in the case of the Wairakei field, allows cold ground water to mix with the steam in various proportions.

Iceland Iceland is ar. island formed entirely of volcanic rock, lying on the axis of the mid-Atlantic Ridge. Hot water springs and natural outlets of steam have been known for many years, and have been utilized for domestic- heating for decades. Application of geothermal energy for power production began with the design of a 15,000 kw, generating station in the Hengill area near Reykjavik.

Heat sources in Iceland are divided into low temperature and high temperature types (Bodvarsson 1964). Low temperature sources are character- istically hot-water springs, producing water at a temperature of 100°C, and often arranged in linear patterns, suggestive of structural control alon^, faults. High temperature sources, which produce steam, are restricted Lo the neo-volcanic zone of most recent volcanic activity. There is evidence, from the isotopic content of the water, that it is of surface origin, rather than juvenile water released in the volcanic process. In this regard, the fields are similar to others, and a reservoir, capable of permitting fluid circulation, must be present. As sedimentary rocks are not present, the reservoir porosity must be provided by fractures in the volcanic rocks.

Bodvarsson has estimated the total potential of the Icelandic thermal areas at 300 megawatts. The present utilization of geothermal energy for heating is equivalent to 60,000 tons of coal per year.

Descriptions of other geothennal areas of the world may be found in Ruiz Elizondo (1964) and McNitt (1965). 220

QC i

FUMAROLE

\ VAPOUR INFLOW OF GROUND WATER

LEVEL OF VAPORIZATION I

WATEP CONVECTION CALLS

HOT ROCK

2. A vapour-dominated geothermal system (after White etal) 221

PHYSICS OF GEOTHERMAL AREAS

The above examples have shown some common features, which are typical of all geothermal areas: proximity to geologically young volcanism, transport of heat to the surface by hot water or steam produced from surface water, the presence of a porous aquifer to permit the circulation of the water and to provide the reservoir.

The global distribution of regions of young volcanism is now rather well understood in terms of plate tectonics (Fig.l). Most volcanic areas occur near the boundaries of the rigid plates, into which the outer part of the earth appears to be divided. Very often, these regions are also areas of high seismic activity. Plate motion is believed to be controlled by some system of convection in the mantle of the earth, the currents rising and spreading under oceanic ridges, and drawing the plates down under subduction zones. Recently, however, it has been proposed (Wilson and Burke 1972) that the convection system is complicated by the presence of plumes, which carry heat and material to the surface, and whose relation to a general convection system is not yet understood. Plumes may be recognized by the outpouring of unusual volumes of volcanic rock, as in the case of Iceland, a plume on a ridge, or Hawaii, the result of a plume beneath the interior of a single plate. Potential geothertnal areas are therefore to be expected either near plate boundaries, or in conjunction with plumes beneath the 4 it' ..iors of plates.

The surface expression of these areas varies greatly in intensity, from springs of moderately hot water, to outpourings of steam. White et al (1971) have discussed the mechanics of geothermal reservoirs with the aim of clarifying the distinction between vapour-dominated (i.e. steam) and fluid dominated fields. Figure 2 shows their model of a vapour-dominated system. Heat is carried upward from hot rock by a water convection system. Closer to the surface, the reduction in pressure permits water to boil. This depth forms the lower margin of the main body of the reservoir. In the main reser- voir, steam and water coexist. Closer to the surface, steam condenses and heat is carried by both water and steam. Steam may escape to the surface along major channels. If the supply of surfa-.e or ground water is too great, the large vapour-dominated region of the reservoir may not develop. The difference in type of field is therefore determined by the effectiveness of the cap rock, and the extent of porosity in the reservoir. In fields such as Larderello, and also the Geysers, California, the inflow of water relative to the heat supply is controlled, so that steam predominates.

An alternative representation of a geothermal reservoir is by means of a "pipe model", in which the cross-sectional areas and velocities are indicated. Figure 3, adapted from Elder (1965) shows such a model for Wairakei. A notable feature is the range of times involved in the recharge and recirculation systems. While the figures shown represent estimates only, there is evidence from isotopic studies on the time required for water to circulate (Hulston 1964). Measurements on Wairakei water show that 92% of the water from the field is meteoric, and the tritium content of this water is so low that the time it has spent in the earth must be considerably lOkltij*"-1 2 days— >»% , C RECBCULATIOM / IOOO r / (^" 100 km2 \ / V

26.000 yr

420 cal/gm

RECHARGE

~-

MOT ROCK

Fig. 3. Pipe model representation of circulation in a geothermal system (after Elder). 223

greater than one half-life of tritium (125 years). The total volume output of the Wairakei field would be provided by only 5% of the present annual rainfall in the catchment area of the field.

EXPLORATION AND PROVING

While the distribution of young volcanic rocks gives a broad guide to the regions in which to explore for geothermal fields, it is necessary to have methods to localize the search. Fortunately, a number of the methods of geophysical prospecting are immediately adaptable, since the reservoirs are nothing more than regions of anomalous physical properties. Measurements of the electrical conductivity of the crustal rocks, which can be made from the earth's surface, from a powerful exploration tool. The conductivity of rocks increases with temperature, so that the elevated temperature of a geo- thermal area can be detected directly. Early experiments were conducted in Iceland (Bodvarsson 1964), and electrical methods of exploration are now widely employed. In some regions,, there is a correlation between minor seismic activity and geothermal areas. The monitoring of seismic noise by networks of portable seismographs T. ill, in those cases, indicate the most promising locations. In the United States about $50 million per year are currently spent on the geophysical search for geothermal areas.

However, as in the search for oil and minerals, the location of a geothermal anomaly does not mean that a commercial resource is present. It is necessary to evaluate the total rate of output of hea* ,'om the area, and also to consider the thermal quality of the fluids (temi :.~iture of water, and energy content per unit mass, or enthalpy, of the steam). Within the bounds of a potential field, heat is discharged by conduction through the soil, by convection from water surfaces, in steam from steam vents (fumaroles), in hot water from springs, and by seepage to streams. Methods have been developed, particularly in New Zealand (Dawson 1964) for assessing the importance of each of these, using only shallow augur holes. The poten- tial of a new area may be estimated before more expensive drilling is under- taken.

THE HABNESSING AND ECONOMICS OF GEOTHEKMAL POWER

Electrical production at the major fields is by means of steam- driven turbines. In the case of a dry-steam field such as Larderello, the design of suitable generators is relatively straightforward. The more common situation is that typified by Wairakei (Armstead 1964), where different wells in the field produce steam at different pressures and of different degrees of saturation, or simply hot water. In these cases, the generating plant must be carefully designed to optimize the utilization of the different fluids. At Wairakei, hot water is only used if, when its pressure is reduced to an intermediate level, it boils ("flashes") to produce steam. The plant (Fig. 4) has been designed to handle natural steam at two pressures, or the steam produced by flashing.

In considering the economics of geothermal power generation, a number of factors, not encountered in other systems, must be considered. 2 24

I P LINE L P LINE

HOT WATER FROM WELLS

CONDENSERS HIGH PRESSURE STEAM FROM WELLS

INTERMEDIATE

STEAM FROM WELLS

fs

TURBINE REDUCING VALVE

Fig. 4. Utilization of fluids of differing thermal quality, in New Zealand (after Armstead) . 225

These include the estimated lifetimes of the field, and of individual wells, the deterioration of the fluid-handling system by dissolved substances, the cost of disposal of waste hot water, and the possible income to be derived by separation of valuable dissolved substances.

Geotfcermal fields, like all exploitable sources of resources, must have finite lifetimes, but because all known fields are still in production, there is very little evidence on the time,scale. There is evidence, from Maori legends (Healy 1962) that no gross changes in temperature have occured at Wairakei in one thousand years, and the geological evidence would support the existence of hydrotherinal activity there for the past million years. Much more serious is the finite lifetime of individual wells, since the drilling of new wells constitutes, a recurring charge' in the. exploitation cf a given field. Decrease in the, productivity of a *ell is believed to result from a decrease in the porosity, of the surrounding rocks, provoked by the deposition of dissolved substances in the pores. The experience at Larderello (Chierici 1964) has been that the flow of a well decreases as an inverse power of time; for the average well, the "production is reduced to 10% of the initial value in 20 years. Taking this rate of decrease, and estimating the cost of re-drilling, C'hierici gave the c.o'sts of geothermal power production in Italy as follows (30 megawatt geothermal plant; 300 megawatt fuelled plant; 1960 prices).

Geothermal Fuelled Electrical Installation per kw $130. - $150. $110. - $120. Operation per kwh. 0.12 - 0.13 C 0.06 - 0.07 C Fuel or steam " ' 0.08 - 0.09 c 0.50 - 0.55 e

While initial installation and operation costs are higher, the freedom from fuel costs makes the geothermal operation very attractive, in this case. Similar figures are available for the Geysers area in California, where the installation this year will reach 412 raw, (two-thirds of the requirements of San Francisco) and thereby surpass Larderello. Installation costs a-*-° quoted as $110/kw, and total operation, including steam, as 0.35

It will; be seen that the experience of those countries advanced in rlie use of geothennal power shows thai: installations in the range o£ 60 -220 megawatts are effective and efficient. The required production rate of steam or hot water to provide the energy for this is indeed impressive. For example, the experience at Larderello shows that 9 kg. of steam are utilized to produce 1 kwh of electrical energy. The required production rate for a 100 w, installation is thus 1 x 10" kg. per hour of steam equivalent to 24000 tons per day. For a field producing hot water (at 200°C) instead of steam, approximately three times as much water would be requireu, because of its lower enthalpy. 226

HOT ROCK Y ^

BOUNDARY OF CRACK

5. Proposed artificial recharge system. 227

The output mentioned for the Larderello plants corresponds to an overall efficiency of about 16%, in terms of the energy content of the steam. It is interesting to note that this is just about one half of the efficiency of an ideal engine operating between the input and exhaust temperatures of 250°C and 80°C respectively.

To date, the disposal of waste hot water has probably not been a major factor of expense, but with increasing consciousness of the problems of thermal pollution, it could well be a factor in the future. Obviously, large volumes of hot water, often heavily chargad with dissolved substances, cannot be discharged into fish-bearing streams. Geothermal plants are, of course, free of other forms of pollution.

A PROPOSED SYSTEM USING ARTIFICIAL RECHARGE

It is evident from the descriptions of natural geothermal areas that special, and fortuitous, combinations of circumstances are required: a source of heat near the earth's surface, and the correct combination of porosity and impervious cap rock to provide a reservoir. The utilization of geothermal energy would be much more widespread if the earth's heat could be extracted from other regions, where these conditions do not all exist. For example, there are numerous areas in western North America, where the outflow of heat is greater than the worldwide average, presumably because of recent igneous activity, but the reservoir conditions do not exist. A recent proposal (Robinson et al 1971) is based on the idea of producing an artifi- cial reservoir system in such areas. Imagine a large-diameter (40 cm.) hole bored into a region of relatively hot rock, at a depth of perhaps 5 km, (Fig. 5). The average geothermal gradient is about 30°C per km., but in regions where the heat flow is twice normal, temperatures of the order of 300°C would be reached at this depth. Water at high pressure (1500 psi) is forced into this hole, to produce, according to preliminary experiments, a thin, circular crack lying in a vertical plane. A second large-diameter hole is drilled to reach the crack at a higher level, and water is circulated between the deep and shallower hole. Calculations show that heat could be extracted at the rate of approximately 90 megawatts for 20 years, before cooling of the rock rendered the source inefficient. However, during this time cooling of the rock could well produce subsidiary fractures, which would increase the area of contact between water and rock, actually rendering the system more efficient with time. Energy could be extracted at the rate of 90 megawatts by the circulation of 2 million gallons of water per day, assum- ing an input temperature of 50°C and an output temperature of 250°C. Once circulation is begun, it is expected to continue, requiring only the pressure resulting from the different densities of hot and cole columns. The hot water would return to the surface at a pressure above atmospheric and could be flashed to produce steam.

The possibility of achieving such an artificial recharge system depends principally on two critical factors: the development of economic systems for the drilling of deep, large-diameter holes, and the effectiveness of the pressure-induced cracking process. There is hope for the first, in 228

STEAM 68% GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM

ELECTRIC POWER in mt~

Fig.S. Use of natural steam to provide total energy requirements for a community (after Robinson et al). 229

the form of a nuclear-powered electric melting drill. While the second problem has been studied on the laboratory scale it appears impossible to be certain of the outcome in the real earth before deep holes are drilled, and the technique tried. Further theoretical studies (Harlow and Pracht 1972) support the validity of the assumptions, in particular the importance cf secondary thermal fracturing of the rock.

If the system is feasible, Robinson et al propose that the hot water be flashed, to produce steam for a generator of 10 megawatts (Fig. 6). The remaining water could be used for domestic heating, and possibly even to power vehicles driven by steam - turbine engines. (The flow of hot water shown in Fig. 6 for Transport is that required to power 10,000 vehicles for 30 miles per day). The complete installation, from the two wells, could provide the energy requirements for a community cf 10.000 people.

THE PROSPECTS IN CANADA

The experience from other countries shows that active geothermal areas are invariably associated with geologically recent volcanism. As we have noted, the latter activity is usually related to plate boundaries, or to intra-plate plumes. In Canada, young volcanism is characteristic of the western Cordillera, near the western limit of the Americas plate (Fig. 1). Isolated plumes have not yet been recognized in this country. Before turning to the Canadian possibilities in detail, let us note again that future geo- thermal developments along the western margin of the Americas plate, are almost certain to have an impact on the continental energy resource picture, and there an indirect effect on the Canadian situation.

In the Canadian Cordillera the volcanism has been discussed by Souther (1970). Of great significance to possible sources of geothermal energy is his recognition of belts of Quaternary (i.e. younger than approxi- mately one million years) volcanoes (Fig. 7). Host of i;hese volcanoes are small cinder cones, whose active life was apparently short. The youth of some of them is remarkable. A flow and cone at Aiyansh, B.C. west of Hazetton, has been dated at 220 £ 130 years, while Mt. Edziza, southeast of Telegraph Creek, is known to have erupted at least three times in the past 1800 years. The structure in the vicinity of Mt. Edziza suggests that a situation favourable to a geothermal field may exist, with faults and frac- tures providing the porosity. According to Souther, the region is one which was first subject to compressive stresses, producing thrust faults. A change in the stress system led to a condition of tension, permitting the formation of a downfaulted block, on which the volcanic cone is situated.

Measurements of heat flow in the Canadian Cordillera are in progress, by the Earth Physics Branch, Department of Energy Mines and Resources. Jessop and Judge (1971) have reported the relatively high value of 1.86 x lO-Gcal/cm^sec fc anticton in southern British Columbia. The extension of heat flow meas aents into the neo-volcanic zones will be most important. Even if natural •thermal fields are not located, the outlining of regions of high heat flow .pproximately 2 x 10"6 cal/cm2sec or greater) will indicate the possible locations of Zuture artificial-recharge instal- 2 30

7. Location of Tertiary and younger volcanic rocks in

British Columbia (after Souther). The positions of Aiyansh (1) and Mi. Edziza (Z) are indicated. 231 lations, if that technique becomes a reality. More detailed geophysical investigations of other types, including electrical conductivity and micro earthquake studies also appear to be calle' for in the neo-volcanic belts. It is known that the western Cordillera is a general region of high electrical conductivity (Ganer, Auld, Dragert and Camfisld 1971), but the detailed mapping of the conductivity in the vicinity of the young volcanoes will require many more measurements.

The occurrence of hot springs is, of course, evidence of some source of geothermal energy. Harrison Hot Springs, and the springs near Terrace, both occur clos£ to the neo-volcanic belts, and would appear worthy of detailed study. In contrast, the hot springs of the Rocky Mountains (Warren 1927, Pickering 1954) hold little promise for geothermal energy production. The water temperature is low: on the average, about 115°F, and there is no nearby source of volcanic heat. The explanation given by Warren for the Banff springs appears correct, that surface water circulates to depth, along fractures, in a region of normal geothermal gradient. If this is the case, there is no possibility of obtaining steam, or water sufficiently hot to flash to steam.

Throughout most of the remainder of Canada, evidence of geothermal sources, and of high heat flow (Jessop 1968) is lacking, Geothermal possibili- ties appear limited to British Columbia and the Yukon. As has been shown, steam fields certainly can produce electrical power at competitive costs to other types of generation, and hot water fields, if of sufficient thermal quality,probably can. The method compares favourably, in its impact on the environment, with either large hydro-electric installations, and with plants using fossil fuels. Furthermore, the seismicity of the western Cordillera may well argue against hydro-electric dams in certain areas. The search for geothermal fields would therefore appear to be well worthwhile, although, until the development of the artificial recharge system, the necessity of proving substantial flows of thermal fluids, as discussed above must always be kept in mind. 232

References Armstead, H. Christopher H., 1964, Geothermal power development at Wairakei, New Zealand, U.N. Conference on New Sources of Energy, 3_> 274-282.

Bodvarsson, Gunnar, 1964, Physical characteristics of natural heat resources in Iceland. U.N. Conference on New Sources of Energy 2_, 82-89.

Bodvarsson, Gunnar and Johannes ZoBga, 1964, Production and distribution of natural heat for domestic and industrial heating in Iceland. U. N. Conference on New Sources of Energy 3_> 449-455.

Burgassi, Renato, 1964, Prospecting of geochermal fields and exploration necessary for their adequate exploration, performed in various regions of Italy. U.N. Conference on New Sources of Energy, 2_, 117-133.

Caner, B., D.R. Auld, H. Dragert and P.A. Camfield, 1971, Geomagnetic depth sounding and crustal structure in western Canada. Journ. Geophys. Res. 2i, 7181-7201.

Chierici, Averardo, 1964, Planning of a geothermal power plant; technical and econond.c principles. U.N. Conference on New Sources of Energy, 2, 299-311.

Dawson, G.B., 1964 The nature and assessment of heat flow from hydrothermal areas. N,Z. Journ. of Geol. and Geophys. I. 155-171.

Elder, John W. 1965, Physical processes in geothermal areas. In Terrestrial Heat Flow (William H.K. Lee, Editor). American Geophysical Union, Monograph 8.

Harlow, Francis H. and William E. Pracht, 1972, A theoretical study of geo- thermal energy extraction. Journ. Geophys. Res. 77- "038-7048.

Healy, J., 1962, Structure and volcanism in the Taupo volcanic zone, New Zealand. Amer. Geoph. Un. Monograph 6, ed. G.A. Macdonald and H. Kuno, 151-157.

Healy, J., 1964, Geology and geothermal energy in the Taupo volcanic zone, New Zealand. U.N. Conference on New Sources of Energy .2, 250-256.

Hulston, J.R., 1964, Isotope geology in the hydrothermal areas of New Zealand, U.N. Conference on New Sources of Energy, 2_, 259-262.

Jessop, A.M., 1968, Three measurements of heat flow in eastern Canada. Can. J. Earth Sciences 5_, 61-68.

Jessop, Alan M. and Alan S. Judge, 1971, Five measurements of heat flow in southern Canada. Can. J. Earth Sciences J5, 711-716.

McNitt, James R.f 1965, Review of geothermal resources. In Terrestrial Heat Flow (William H.K. Lee, Editor). American Geophysical Union, Monograph 8. 233

Pickering, B.J., 1954, Principal hot springs of the southern Rocky Mountains of Canada. Alberta Society of Petroleum Geologists, Guidebook, Fourth Annual Field Conference.

Robinson, E.S., J.C. Rowley, R.M. Potter, D.E. Armstrong, B.B. Mclnteer, R.L. Mills, M.CO Smith, 1971, A preliminary study of the nuclear subterrene, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Report LA - 4547. Ruiz Elizondo, Je'sus, 1964, Prospection of geothermal fields and investiga- tions necessary to evaluate their capacity. U.N. Conference on New Sources of Energy 2^ 3-23.

Souther, J.G., 1970, Volcanism and its relationship to recent crustal move- ments in the Canadian Cordillera. Can. J. Earth Sciences, I, CO C£ O

Warren, P.S., 1927, Banff Area, Alberta. Geol. Surv. Can. Memoir 133.

White, D.E., L.J.P. Muffler and A.H. Truesdell, 1971, Vapor-dominated hydrothermal systems compared with hot-water systems, Economic Geology, 66, 75-97.

Wilson, J.T. and Burke ,Kevin,1972, Two types of mountain building. Nature,232, 448-449. 235

ENERGY CONVERSION: FUEL CELLS AND ELECTROLYSIS

by

B. E. CONWAY, F. X.S.C .

Chemistry Department, University of Ottawa

and

A. K. VIJH

Hydro-Quebec Research Institute, Varennes

Fuel cells allow the possibility of direct conversion to electricity of the energy potentially available from the combus- tion of a fuel without involvement of mechanical systems with moving parts, e.g. turbines or dynamos. Essentially a fuel-cell is a type of battery in which the electrical energy generating materials are the fuel, on the one hand, and air or oxygen on the other and the electrochemical reactions in the "battery" are made to occur at two electrodes.

The first electrochemical energy conversion from fuel sub- stances and air or oxygen was realized by Sir William Grove (1839) after the discovery of electrolysis (of water) itself by Nichol- son and Carlisle. Grove not only succeeded in establishing (184?) a "gas battery" with hydrogen and oxygen but recognized that other substances could be similarly used, e.g. chlorine and carbon mon- oxide. Later, Haber and Moser developed a fuel cell employing carbon monoxide and oxygen in a high temperature system consist- ing of two Pt film electrodes formed on each side of air-heated glass tubes acting as a solid (super-cooled fluid) electrolyte.

Various modifications of fuel cell systems were developed but were relatively ineffective until the work of Bacon com- menced in 1932 and culminated in 1959 with a 5 kW hydr ogc-n/oxy RI-II power source which was the predecessor of the Pratt and Whitney systems for the Apollo series of spacecraft. The Bacon system employs relatively cheap electrode materials (nickel) and a strong potassium hydroxide electrolyte operating at elevated but not inconveniently high temperatures.

2. Advantages of Fuel Cell Systems

The principal advantages of fuel cell systems over conven- tional energy conversion processes are (a) the directness of the

A more technical version of this paper is available on request from the authors. 236

energy conversion operation: fuel and oxidant (air) are fed in on a continuous basis and electric power is immediately available without involvement of reciprocating or rotating (turbine) com- ponents (secondary pumping and heat exchange systems may require such auxiliary machinery). (b) In distinction to batteries which "run-down" due to consumption of the electrode materials from which they are made, a fuel cell will operate, in principle, continuously so long as fuel and air are supplied. (c) The con- version of the energy available from oxidation of the fuel can, in principle, be made with 100% efficiency in a fuel-cell while thermal conversion systems e.g. power stations generating elec- tricity by combustion of coal or oil, have a theoretical maximum efficiency of 40 to 50Z, and practically of 30-35%.

3. Energy Conversion Efficiency

The question of efficiency must be discussed in more detail for it is one of the principal factors that make fuel-cell systems attractive in relation to thermal energy conversion processes.

Any combustion process, e.g. of coal, oil or hydrogen^is a chemical reaction in which there are rearrangements amongst the nuclei of the atoms of the molecules concerned and a redistribu- tion of the electrons between the reactant molecules. Associated with such chemical reactions is a certain maximum available amount of energy that can be obtained from a given fixed quantity of the substance, the fuel. This maximum available energy is called the free energy. When a combustion reaction (oxidation of the fuel substance by oxygen in air) occurs in a thermal energy conversion process, e.g. in a power station, this maximum or free energy of the combustion process is never obtained. This is be- cause the heat generated by the combustion, which is available for raising steam, is usually less than the maximum available energy because some fraction of the latter is dissipated in other ways which cannot be avoided for fundamental theoretical reasons. The efficiency with which the heat evolved in a combustion re- action can be utilized is determined by the temperature at which this heat is generated in relation to the temperature of the surroundings. Thus, in thermal energy conversion only a part of the total available energy is available at a certain relatively low efficiency of 40-50%.

In a fuel-cell, however, the rearrangements of electrons in the combustion reaction referred to above can be controlled in a special way by allowing oxidation of the fuel substance, e.g. H2 to occur at a metal electrode surface by release of electrons into the metal, and corresponding reduction of the air or oxygen at a second metal electrode with consumption of the electrons released by the electrode process involving the fuel molecule.

By this mtuns, a voltage, as in a battery, is set up between the two metal electrodes and the electrons flow round a circuit thus directly generating an electric current,again as with a 237

Electrons Electrons

motor (work ptrformed) 1 ANODE C-ve POLE) -Voltege V^. CATHODE <+ve POLE) Sr

I Reaction Reaction

2H2-*4H*+(W O2 gas supply supply

Elecfrotyts Electrolyte t Separator

PRINCIPLE CF THE FUEL CELL USING HYDROGEN and OXYGEN

+ Net re@eti@n is 2H2-^ 4H +4e

with 02+4H*"+4«—^

that is 2H24-O2—-*- 2HgO, Q "combustion"

Fig.l Schematic representation oi a fuel ceil in which hydrogen and oxygen are combined ^Secfrochemi- Gtijly tci formi water. 238

battery. (See Figure 1) In this type of process, the reactions which go on at the electrodes are equivalent to a combustion process since we can write the fuel electrode reaction chemically, e.g, for hydrogen, as H -»• 2 H+ + 2e (in the metal of one electrode) (1) and the reaction involving air or oxygen at the other electrode as 2e (in the metal of the second electrode)+ 2 H + — 0 -*• K,0(2) The 2 electrons flow from one electrode to the other round the external circuit in which electrical power can be utilized. At the same time, hydrogen.j and oxygen are converted to water in the chemical reaction ^2 + "f °2 —*"H2° in tne ceH ant* this process is thus equivalent chemically and in the amount of energy it gene- rates to combustion of hydrogen in oxygen.

In the fuel cell, however, this process, equivalent to com- bustion, can occur, in principle, with conversion of all the maximum available energy to useful electrical work or power. Its efficiency can therefore be 100%. The electrical energy genera- ted from a fuel cell thus arises from all the maximum energy available in the combustion reaction and not just from the heat with some low efficiency.

In practice, however, some slowness of the reactions which occur at the electrodes arises and thus diminishes the voltage generated by the cell to values below the maximum theoretically expected value. This effect increases the greater is the current taken from the cell. It is called "polarization" of the cell and is an important practical factor which lowers actual operating efficiencies to values lower than the ideal figure of 100%. Much research h ^ been carried out to minimize these so-called polari- zation effects.

Similar electrochemical reactions equivalent to combustions can be carried out with other fuel substances such as piipane and methyl alcohol, but side reactions and other difficulties make the use of such fuels at present less desirable than hyd rogen.

4. Practical Aspects

The development of H2/O2 fuel-cell systems has reached a high degree of sophistication with correspondingly impressive levels of performance, 1000 A.ft"2 being a readily attainable current density. However, the cost per kW still renders such systems economically uncompetitive at present with more conven- tional energy conversion systems. High performance systems have been developed both along the lines of the Bacon type fuel-cell 239

(Pratt and Whitney) and with electrode structures for lower tem- perature operations ba^ed on Pt/Teflon matrices (American Cyan- amid Co.), for acid solutions.

Attempts at developing satisfactory fuel-cells which are able to run directly on carbon-containing fuels, e.g. hydro- carbons (especially propane), methanol, etc., have not been re- warded with success comparable with that attained with hydrogen/ oxygen cells. The use of a liquid fuel, such as methanol, is especially attractive but the electrochemical oxidation of this substance becomes inefficient after extended periods of time of operation of methanol-type fuel cells. For petroleum fuels, direct high temperature fuel-cells have been developed and operate, for example, on natural gas with a molten carbonate electrolyte. They offer attractive possibilities with regard to efficiency and high currents but the inconvenience of operating at 1GOG°C or more is a severe disadvantage and materials stabi- lity problems arise. Nevertheless, this type of system and the reformer type, have been seriously considered by Utility Com- panies for local electric generation purposes, e.g. in houses (see below).

These difficulties with carbonaceous type fuels have led to the development of hybrid fuel-cells in which the petroleum type fuel is made to undergo a so-called "catalytic reforming" re- action with water vapor to produce H2 which can then be electrc- chemically oxidized with high efficiency in a H2/02 fuel cell. In the hydrogen conversion ("reforming") reaction , other factors leading to inefficiency are involved, especially the fact that reforming is a reaction itself requiring energy. The hybrid fuel-cell with a catalytic reformer seems to be the favored system at the present time (see below). The require- ment for automatic fuel metering and an elevated temperature for the reforming catalysts have led to complex systems engineering problems with corresponding escalation of price per• kW and in- efficiency due to the power requirements of the auxiliary systems.

5. Fuel Cells; Current Status and Future Prospects Before examining the current position and future .possibili- ties of the use of fuel cells, it is pertinent to inquire into the factors that make these devices attractive, Ideally,:" a source of power having the following qualities is desirable:

- No atmospheric pollution; - No thermal pollution of rivers and lakes; - Noise-free operation; - No moving parts, so that high reliability ire performance is realized; y - High energy conversion efficiency for fossil or synthetic (e.g. H2) fuels; - No aesthetic damage as e.g., is caused by overhead t r ansmis s ion lines aiid-lar ge: generating afeajtions . 240

It is noteworthy that fuel cells fulfil all of the above requirements of an ideal power source. However, their wide- spread use is limited by their present level of technological development, especially with regard to costs of fabrication and catalyst materials (noble metals). In order to explore this point in more detail, it is useful to formulate some questions and pruvide pertinent answers, as follows: (1) Is reliable fuel cell technology available today? Can fuel cells of proven performance be purchased for a variety of day-to-day uses? Several companies have developed and tested reliable fuel cell systems. Recently, the most notable effort is that of the TARGET (Team to Advance Research for Gas Energy Transformation) programme undertaken by the Pratt and Whitney Company (U.S.A.) in cooperation with over thirty gas and electric utility com- panies. This programme was commenced in 1967 with a mandate to produce a commercial, economically competitive fuel-cell for terrestrial uses. Around May 1971, this programme employed nearly 1000 research and development personnel (1) and there are indications that the level of this effort has increased consider- ably with time. The group has developed experimental fuel cells of commercial potential, and the latest* version is the 12.5 kW power plant called "Powercel" PC11. Several modules of these cells have been successfully tested over a number of months in private homes, restaurants, stores, offices, apartment buildings and in utility sub-stations. A modular version containing six of these power plants (total 75 kW) is also being tested in the utility network by Hydro-Quebec. The results are distinctly en- couraging although, as is inevitable in a newly engineered system, a number of deficiencies in the construction and design have been discovered including substantial decline of efficiency on trials. The answer to the first question formulated above is therefore that reliable but, expensive, fuel cell technology i_s_ indeed available. Also, it has recently been disclosed that these power plants are now ready to be produced on an assembly- line basis, although in limited quantities, so that in the near future it will be possible to purchase a fuel-cell unit as easily as a lead-acid battery (2) but with substantially greater expense per k watt.

(2) Are large-scale systems likely to be viable and available?

This point may be answered by referring to the fact that the Pratt and Whitney Co. is already offering to the electric, utilities a programme for developing huge power plants based on fuel cells. It is indicated that systems can be provided by 1977 for 26-MW power stations based on their so-called FCG-1

ft A more advanced "Powercel" (FC16) is currently in production. 241 fuel ceil. it is expected that the cost of the installed (1977) FCG-1 power plant will be $185. per kW with an overall efficiency of 38%; this is to be contrasted with the 1970 PC-11 system for which the cost of the installed fuel cell was $2000. per kW and the overall efficiency about 30%. It should be added that the present (1973-1974) cost of the installed power plant is around $40C. per kW with an efficiency of around 30% and a life expec- tancy of 2-3 years.

(3) Are fuel cells economically competitive today?

This question may best- be considered in relation to some economic estimates given in Table I.

Table I Cost and Projected Costs of Energy Generated by Pratt and Whitney PC-11 "Powercel" Units

Single Fuel-Cell Module Cost 1970 1975 1980 1970 1975 1980

£/kwh 59 17 14 18 8

These figures have been taken from an internal report (3) of Hydro-Quebec and are based on the data provided by Pratt and Whitney (PW) about two years ago. Although recent, more pre- cise data on the "Powercel" PC-11 unit is not available (owing to proprietary considerations of PW), an approximate discussion of the current economic situation in terms of the data in Table I is not out of place here. It is clear that for ordinary terrestrial uses, the present cost of energy generated by pre- sent fuel-cell systems is prohibitively high and will remain so for several years. However, the situation regarding the applica- tion of these fuel-cells for ppecialized terrestrial uses is quite different. Some of these immediate, (i.e., in the time period e_a.- 1974-1979) economically competitive terrestrial uses of PW fuel cells are as follow?:

(i) Power for Isolated Communities

In isolated communities of low population density and at large distances from the transmission lines, fuel-cells become, 242

on a comparative basis, economically more attractive. This sit- uation obtains in several communities in the north of Quebec (3, 4) and undoubtedly exists for isolated communities elsewhere. An economic study shows (3,4) that in comparison with the alter- native (i.e. the present) mode of power generation for these communities, namely, by diesel-operated small power stations, installations using PC-11 should be competitive in about half the isolated communities in Quebec by 1975.

By 1980, it is estimated that the PC-11 fuel-cell plants can economically provide power to all the non-connected networks in Quebec, except perhaps on the Magdalen Islands. Although some of these economic predictions are perhaps open to modification or debate, it is indicated (3,4) that in the near future (i.e. the 1974-79 period), it would be more profitable to provide electricity to some of the non-connected communities by fuel- cells rather than by diesel-engined generators. In fact, it has been estimated (3,4) that Hydro-Quebec can save upto $1 million/ year (after 1980) if it chooses PC-11 power plants over diesels for the new installations (as well as replacements) in the isolated communities of Quebec which are too distant to be con- nected to main transmission lines.

(ii) Power for Military and Naval Purposes

High reliability and noise-free performance of fuel cells makes them attractive for a number of present day specialized applications of a military and naval (submarine) nature.

(iii) Other Applications

For a variety of other terrestrial applications, fuel-cells, even with their high cost, can easily become economically com- petitive. These applications are mainly concerned with the use of fuel-cells as mobile or easily manipulated discrete power units in much the same way as some quite expensive high energy- density (e.g., silver-zinc) batteries are used. Some of these possible applications of fuel cells are determined by their long term reliability (several months to years) as power packs for isolated island cottages, hunting lodges, or for emergency/stand- by uses in hospitals, aircraft systems, buoys and boats, etc.

(4) Will fuel-cells be an economically-competitive, important source of terrestrial power generation before the year 2000?

Here we may attempt to explore the future (i.e., the next two decades or so) role, as opposed to the immediate (i.e., over the years 1974-79) potential of fuel-cells in the context of the energy conversion picture as a whole. More precisely, it is important to know the possibility of wide-spread commercial use 243 of fual cells within the next couple of decades. This question is best examined in relation to the following topics:

(i) Cost Reduction by High Volume Production

The cost predictions in Table I, even for 1980, are based on a limited market for fuel-cells. If fuel-cells were to be- come adopted extensively (for reasons to be given below) as power sources, either by individuals or by electric utilities building several mega-watt power stations based on large numbers of fuel cell modules, within the next decade or so, high volume automated production techniques will be needed as in the pre- sent lead-acid and nickel-cadmium battery industry. Such techniques will inevitably lead to cost reduction in the pro- duction of fuel cells and hence to a more competitive position. Since, however, conventional means of power generation are already highly automated in other ways, it is not reasonable to expect dramatic new savings in the future.

(ii) Cost Reduction by Improved Technology

The significant (modern) research and development effort in the field of fuel-cells is less than twenty years old. In com- parison with other technologies of comparable complexity and impact, this is not a very long period. In this sense, the field cannot be yet considered fully developed so that it can be predicted that significant new advances will be made in im- proving the activity and the stability of the fuel-cell catalysts within the next couple of decades. These advances, hopefully, will decrease the power losses and increase the active li e of fuel-cells, thus making them economically much more attractive.

(iii) Relation to the Hydrogen Economy (see section 6 below)

It has been pointed out (5) that the ultimate and universal fuel of the future will be hydrogen and that Society will shift from the use of fossil fuels to use of hydrogen. The primary source of energy in the next 100 years or so will be nuclear energy and it has been supposed, in some projections, that for a variety of reasons including environmental ones, these nuclear plants will be situated away from the centres of high population density and perhaps on floating platforms on the sea (5), or, in isolated coastal regions. It is estimated (5) that the most economic way to transmit this "electricity" to the population centres would be by means of hydrogen, produced by the electro- lysis of sea water. The most efficient and advanced technique for the conversion of this hydrogen to electricity is, of course, 244

the hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell such as the PC-11. It is clear, therefore, that with the advent of the "hydrogen economy", the market for fuel cells will receive a new impetus, thus leading to their improved economic position because of high volume pro- duction and improvement of the fuel-cell technology resulting from new demand for the device. It is also important to mention here that the era of the "hydrogen economy" would inevitably lead to the investment of funds in the improvement of the technology of the electrolysis process• Since the process of electrolysis of water is essen- tially the opposite of the processes taking place in fuel cells, the two technologies and the principles involved in them are very similar. Hence, the era of the "hytirogen economy" would lead not only to direct increase of investments in fuel-cell technology but indirect improvements will also result because of the increased research and development efforts on the electrolysis process itself.

(iv) Environmental Considerations From the point of view of maintaining a clean-air environ- ment, fuel cells, of course, are the ideal devices. With the mounting social and economic pressures against the alternative (generally, highly polluting) conventional forms of thermal power generation, fuel cells are bound to attain an economically and socially more attractive position in the future.

From the foregoing considerations, it appears certain that within the next two decades or so, the relative economic posi- tion of fuel-cells is bound to improve substantially because of combination of a variety of favourable factors. (6) The Hydrogen Economy and the Energy Conversion Question In recent years, it has been pointed out (5) that the in- creasing rate of utilization of fossil fuels, including the re- emergence of coal, will lead to significant atmospheric pollu- tion by C

Hydrogen would be produced electrolytically from either, atomic reactor electrical power or with improved photo-voltaic or photo-galvanic devices (see below). The costs of transporting . .... H2 over long distances become comparable and then competitive (6) with the costs of transmission line systems for electricity be- yond about 500 km according to recent analyses (5,6). The systems proposed are local fuel-cells for utilization of the 245

transported H2 or direct thermal conversion systems (less effi- cient). The transported electrolytic H2 is also envisaged as being directly employed in the metal ore reduction and chemical process industries.

Transduction of the potentially available free energy of combustion of H2 in local fuel-cell units is envisaged on a domestic level basis with the advantage of production of only very pure water as the product (no pollution by C02 or products of incomplete combustion of fossil fusls). Utilities are cur- rently investigating the economic and other aspects of the feasibility of domestic fuel-cell systems and a full-page color advertisement by a public utility corporation in the U.S. appeared some three years ago in Life Magazine illustrating the "fuel-cell powered home."

While the present trials and applications of fuel cells are strictly limited, this present situation must be viewed in the light of attitudes to other historically significant advances in technology, e.g. to the early locomotive, automobile or to the earliest atmospheric (vacuum) steam engines developed by New- comen and later by Watt and, more recently, t" the gas turbine in its early stages of development. In the further development of such systems, necessity and technological skills overcame difficulties associated with efficiency and expense to produce energy conversion systems ultimately viable from an economic and engineering standpoint.

In the case of fuel-cell energy conversion systems, we are on the threshold of impressive developments as evidenced by the extent and success of recent work at Pratt and Whitney. There is still a long way to go, however, to make fuel-cell systems competitive in cost and scale with other energy conversion systems. Much more basic electrochemical research is required to examine mechanistic aspects of electrocatalysis, especially with respect to reactivity of "intermediate" fuels such as methanol, the most attractive of solution-soluble liquid fuels. At present, in this country, chere are probably not more than ten actual workers (not groups!) conducting research in this area, an almost ludicrously low level of activity. A much en- larged activity and level of financial support is immediately required in research institutions, industry and universities if we are to make competitive advances in this challenging field.

7. Conversion of Solar Energy; the Ultimate Energy Source

(i) Energy farm concept The ultimate source of energy for human activities upon the Earth is the Sun. Indirectly, of course, the Sun has in the past provided all the fossil energy resources through the photosyn- thetic cycle, a process which still continues and can be utilized 246

at present in the "energy farm" concept by cultivation of fast growing combustible vegetation.

(ii) Photo-voltaic and photo-galvanic systems

For direct conversion of solar energy to, e.g. electricity, interest is currently centered on photo-voltaic systems based on silicon single-crystal cells. Until recently, 0.6 x 10^ $ per k watt has been the quoted price for such devices as employed on Skylab. Obviously, this is unrealistic for practical utilization of such devices but a recent breakthrough indicates that the above price may be substantially diminished by orders of magni- tude in the relatively near future.

Photo-galvanic cells, based on photo-electrochemical effects, require very much more investigation. Photo-galvanic effects have been known since the time of Becquerel but their utilization for energy conversion processes has been little investigated. Again, substantial Government support for research in this area is needed for investigation of systems that could be orders of magnitude cheaper per k waU than present silicon semi-conductor devices.

In considering solar energy conversion, it must be recalled than an area of 5 miles square receives sufficient incident solar radiation in sunny climates to provide power for a large city. If direct photo-voltaic or photo-galvanic systems could be developed, they would be pollutionless and impressively less damaging to the landscape and surroundings than present oil re- fineries and associated rail transportation and tanking facili- ties or pipelines.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. P. Stonehart (Pratt and Whitney Air- craft) for provision of information on recent developments in fuel-cell technology at PW and to Professor J. O'M. Bockris for sending us recently published and some, as yet, unpublished material on the "Hydrogen Economy" and related topics.

References

(1) Walx Street Journal, May 19, 1971.

(2) P. Stonehart (of Pratt and Whitney Research Laboratories, Hartford, Conn., U.S.A.), private communication.

(3) J.G. Charuk and P.J. Gaudette, "Competitive Possibilities of Fuel Cells at Hydro-Quebec", Hydro-Quebec Internal Report No. 606-000/144, March .1971. 247

(4) J. Benoit in "FORCES", No. 20 (1972), pp.3 (available from Hydro-Quebec, 75 Blvd. Dorchester West, Montreal 128).

(5) J.O'M. Bockris, Science, 176, 1323 (1972); idem "Electro chemistry of Cleaner Environments", Plenum Press (1972); D.P. Gregory, Scientific American, 228, 13 (1973).

(6) J.O'M. Bockris, Electrochemical Science as the Basis to a Non-polluting Future Technology, (in press, 1973/4). 249

ELECTRICAL ENERGY TRANSMISSION

by LIONEL BOULET Director, Institute of Research of Hydro-Quebec

Nous ailons discuter dans cette conference le transport de 1'energie electrique. Nous considererons les differentes methodes utilisees pour les lignes ae>iennes et les cables et essaierons de deduire les possi- bility de chacune en analysant les problemes associ£s. Nous etudierons en premier lieu les lignes de transport ae>iennes.

A. LIGNES AERIENNES Transmission of large blocks of energy on long distances is achieved most reliably and most economically by means of overhead trans- mission lines. For about a quarter of a century, the use of bundled con- ductors with 2, 3 or 4 sub-conductors has become solidly established for EHV transmission lines. The highest voltage level for a line operating in a network is presently 765 kV. However, focus is now on the evaluation of performance and the assessment of problems likely to be encountered in the extrapolation of existing EHV levels into the UHV range. Overhead trans- mission systems up to 1500 kV and even 2000 kV seem technically feasible and economics will be a deciding factor for its adoption. In a long term view, environmental constraints will force plants out farther from load centers leading to the problem of transmission of even larger blocks of energy than is now encountered. Interconnection of major high voltage networks is also seen as a likely application of UHV.

Les lignes de transport aeriennes a tres haute tension permet- tent de transporter une grande quantite

1. Isolation e^terne dans l!air. 2. Effet cosjronne sur les conducteurs. 3. Influence de la pollution et de la pluie sur le comportement des isolateurs haute tension. 250

4. Isolation interne des equipements a tres haute tension.

5. Problemes mecaniques. Une breve description des travaux de recherche dans chacun des domaines est donnee ci-dessous. 1. Isolation externe dans 1'air. Les distances d'isolation dans 1'air des lignes de transmission a tres haute tension dependent surtout de la tenue des dites lignes devant les surtensions de manoeuvre. Afin d'obtenir les informations necessaires pour la conception des lignes jusqu'a 1500 kV ca, des etudes des distances d'isolation necessaires sont effectuees sur un modele a grandeur reelie de la fenetre d'un pylSne, pour des Scartements diffeYents allant jusqu'a 8.75 m. Les distances d'isolation dans 1'air constituent le facteur predo- minant du coQt des lignes de transport d'Snergie et des postes de transfor- mation. Actuellement deux problemes sont impliques, 1'un concernant la distance phase-terre et 1'autre la distance entre les phases. Des etudes systSmatiques sont effectuees afin de determiner les distances necessaires en fonction de la tension du reseau. Ces etudes sont non seulement realisees pour chercher les distances d'isolation, mais aussi pour etudier le mecanis- me du claquage dans le cas de grands ecartements. Une connaissance detail lee de 1'amplitude et de la forme d'onde des surtensions de manoeuvre qui se produisent dans le rfiseau est n§cessaire pour le calcul des espaces d'isola- tion dans 1'air. 2. Effet couronne sur les condur..eurs. L'effet couronne est l'un des facteurs les plus importants dans le choix des dimensions des conducteurs pour une ligne de transport d'ener- gie a haute tension. L'effet couronne produit sur une ligne S haute tension cause les principaux phenomenes suivants:

- Pertes d'eYiergie - Perturbations electromagnetiques - Bruits audibles Les pertes par effet couronne ont une influence lggere sur le choix gconomique des conducteurs. Les deux autres phenomenes ont une in- fluence importante sur 1'environnement pr§s de la ligne. Pour les lignes de transmission a tres haute tension, les perturbations electromagnetiques (dans la gamme des'frequences de radio et de television) et les bruits audi- bles sont les facteurs qui decident du choix final des conducteurs. L'ensemble des nasses et de la ligne experimentale constitue un moyen tres efficace d'§valuer les caracteristiques de nombreux types de 251

conducteurs soumis a 1'effet couronne. Par exemple, u.ie sgrie d'essais a de"j§ ete compietge sur un grand nombre de faisceaux. de conducteurs dans les nasses, pour faciliter le choix preliminaire des conducteurs requis pour les lignes de 1100 kV considerees dans le projet de la Baie James. Le faisceau de conducteurs choisi sera soumis aux essais a long terme sur la ligne experimentale.

3. Influence de la pollution et de la pluie sur le comportement des isoiateurs haute tension. Le choix du nombre des isolateurs requis pour une ligne de transmission depend surtout du comportement des chaTnes d'isolateurs sous les conditions de contamination et de pluie. Z.J Influence de la contamination. Les etudes necessaires dans 1'etablissement d'une ligne s'ins- crivent dans une suite logique de realisations tendant a obtenir une meilleure isolation des lignes de transmission. La premiere etape consiste a determiner le niveau de contamina- tion rencontre sur un site particulier. L1 application de diffe"- rentes methodes de mesure (enregistrement du courant de fuite, mesure du dep6t de pollution sur les isolateurs, determination en laboratoire de la tension de contournement d'isolateurs pollu§s naturellement, etc.) doit faire 1'objet d'une premiere etude. L'etape suivante est Vame1ioration de Visolation des lignes eiectriques dans des zones contaminees. L'IREQ conduit actueile- ments en laboratoire et sous conditions natureiies, des essais tendant a determiner 1'efficacite des nombreux moyens existant, c'est-a-dire: recouvrements hydrophobioues (graisse, silicone), glagure semi-conductrice, forme d'isolateur modifiee, isolateurs en matigre synthetique (teflon, etc.). Le type d'essais effectu§s en laboratoire peut se faire sous un brouiliard propre ou sal in, seion une procedure normalised par la CEI, ou une procedure spgciale selon les buts vises.

3.2 Comportement des isolateurs sous la pluie. Des normes, datant de plusieurs dgcennies, d§crivent les condi- tions d'essais sous la pluie des isolateurs, pour les accrgditer. Con.sidgrant les futurs essais sous pluie des equipements a tr§s haute tension, il y a des difficulty pratiques pour obtenir les Tongues distances d'arrosage et simultanSment le taux de pr§cipita- tion spgcifie par les normes standards. Ceci nous a amenSs a dsvelopper un nouvel Squipement d'essai qui puisse produire des jets d'eau pulsatifs. II etait de surcroTt necessaire d'approfondir nos connaissances du mgcanisme de claquage sous pluie et nos efforts 252

convergent dans ce sens. 4. Isolation interne des equipements a tres haute tension. Par isolation interne, on comprend 1'isolation des appareils de grande puissance qui ne sont pas exposes aux conditions atmospheYiques. Comme exemples importants, citons entre autres, 1'isolation des enroule- ments des transformateurs et des cSbleb sous-terrains. Ce type d'isolation comprend une grande variete d'huiles, de papiers imprggnes d'huile, de re- sines synthetiques et de matieres plastiques ainsi que des gaz comprimgs et le vide. Dans le cas des transformateurs a haute tension, le systeme d'iso- lation papier-huile est predominant. Dans ce domaine de recherche, nous devons concentrer nos activites sur le comportement. diglectrique de 1'huile et du papier huile sous haute tension et tres haute tension, surtout pour les transformateurs de puissance. 5. Mechanical Problems. The adoption of bundled conductors introduced also some mecha- nical disadvantages with respect to the equivalent single conductor. Line fittings are more complicated, ice loading is relatively higher, and the dynamic behaviour of the bundle introduced another source of concern for the utilities: sub-conductor oscillations due to aerodynamic wake inter- action. The numerous studies and experiments being carried out around the world on the vibration of bundled conductors is a good indication of the preoccupation of the transmission line engineers for that problem. The possible use of bundles of 6 and 8 conductors for UHV transmission lines accentuates even more the necessity for more efforts in that field. 5.1 Bundled Conductor Dynamics. Several types of oscillations have already been identified on bundled conductors. The majority of the vibration phenomena encountered in overhead lines can be classified in one of the following three types: - conductor galloping (0.1-1 Hz) - aeolian vibration (10-100 Hz) - subspan oscillation (1-3 HZ) A lot of knowledge has been gained through the years on those vibration phenomena. Galloping usually occurs with winds in the range of 5.0 m/s to 25;

15 m/s and the first four natural modes of the span can be excited. The large motions of galloping can bring the phase conductors sufficiently close to each other to produce arcing between them and power interruptions. The lack of adequate means of controlling those vibrations imposes economic burdens as utilities have to pro- vide vertical and horizontal clearances well beyond what is necessa- ry for electrical purposes. Galloping is in most cases associated with ice formation on conductors. Wind on non-symmetrical cross sections causes an aero- dynamic lift component acting in the direction of motion. Bundled conductors appear to be more prone to galloping than single line. The severity of that type of oscillation is really closely related to weather conditions favoring passage of the temperature below and above 0° C in a high humidity area causing thin ice coat formation on the subconductors. Adequate methods of control such as prevention of icing, use of damping

5.2 Conductor I any - Static Loading A goncl understanding cf ice formation has b^er, gained in recent years. Cloud icing is now reckoned cts being the cause of the most important ice formation on conductors. It happens when a low cloud layer containing supercooled droplets is moving through ?. line. The droplets collide with the conductor? and freeze up. Depending on the wind velocity, the droplets size and the temperature, water droplets may have time to freeze completely before each impingement; it produces soft rime which has low density around 0.6 g/cnr5. When the rate of impingement is relatively high, water does not have time to freeze up completely resulting in a wet growth and a high density ice formation, 0.9 g/cm^, named glaze. Hard rime lies between those two cases and happens at the limit wher. water has just the time tc froeze up before the impingement of the fc'lowing drop- let. The ice is collected on the windward face of the object. As the actual diameter of the object that the wind sees increases with time, the ability of the object to attract the droplets continuous- ly diminishes and results in a decreasing collection efficiency. The rate of ice formation on large diameters is thus smaller than for a small diameter object. In areas where icing conditions are serious, the smaller the number of subconductors the less the icing load will be. Thi', factor can influence the decision on the choice of number of subconductors fer UHV transmission line. Despite this knowledge, it remains still difficult to evaluate precisely the actual ico loading likely to occur on a line because of the lack of information on the meteorological conditions where the lines are built.

8. UNDERGROUND POWER TRANSMISSION There are several major reasons why in the future an increasing amount of electrical energy will be transmitted via high power capacity cables. The rapid growth of urban population density, the doubling of power consusr~-tion with every decade, the rising land costs and the esthetic objec- tions to overhead transmission lines point clearly to an ever increasing importance of underground power transmission cables in the future power systems which are to supply urban areas. In most lsr^s .ities, not only is the price of land for the right of way of an overhead ..rdnsmission line expensive, but often due to urban congestion, it is simply not available. f'Jost present overhead transmission lines within urban areas owe their exis- tence firstly to economical considerations and, secondly, to technical com-iderations. For example, if one considers a transmission voltage of 340 «V, taen the underground lines may cost as much as 16 times that of the overhead lines of equivalent voltage rating. Furthermore, the typical 255

oil-paper insulated 345 kV cable would consume its own MVA ratinq in 42 km. If attempts were made to compensate the capacitative charging current of the cable so as to increase its useful power transmission length, the overall underground cable system cost would then be still further increased. Thus for the usual oil-paper cables operating at transmission voltages between 230 and 345 kV, the maximum underground runs do not on the average exceed 32 km. Evidently, due to this length limitation alone, underground power transmission must necessarily be confined to urban areas having large popu- lation densities. Omitting the underground cable cost considerations for the sake of argument, one could say that long distance underground trans- mission would be possible with the low capacitance dielectric systems of the type contemplated or used in compressed gas cables (C6C) or cryogenic cables. The development or perfection of such cables is however at least a decade away.

As rising urban population densities demand increasingly larger blocks of underground transmitted power, the present insulating systems of H.V. power cables are becoming subjected to increasingly greater perfor- mance requirements. In the not too distant past, any rise in the demand of electrical energy could be easily met by raising the transmission voltage and adjusting accordingly the insulation wall thickness of conventionally insulated oil-imprsgnated-paper cables. However, this universally accepted solution to the problem is now rapidly approaching a practical limit im- posed by the magnitude of the dielectric losses inherent with oil-kraft paper systems. This is well demonstrated in case of the largest underground system voltage in use today, namely, the 3f5 kV cable network in New York City» where the dielectric losses are of the order of 27 watts per circuit meter. The installed pipe-type cab'es have a total length of 13 km, are forced cooled and have a rating of aLout 480 MVA. It is now a conceded fact that even with adequate forced cooling techniques, the use of oil - impregnated-paper cables much beyond 500 kV is not economically attractive. Furthermore, even below 500 kV in cases where the expensive charging current compensating equipment is not used, the required power ratings necessarily limit the lengths of the oil-paper cables down to a few thousand feet.

With conventional oil-impregnated-paper cables rated at 500 kV operation under forced-cooled conditions, an MVA rating of 600 is readily achievable. A recent study, with more encouraging results indicates the possibility of MVA ratings as high as 2000. For voltages in excess of 500 kV, the dielectric losses may be maintained within an acceptable level by substituting the oil impregnated paper system with other synthetic polyifier and liquid insulating materials having low dielectric loss characteristics. At 500 kV, a synthetic solid-liquid insulation is expected to provide a load capacity of around 800 MVA, which could be increased to about 1100 MVA at 750 kV. Under optimum forced cooling conditions, the latter value could be possibly extended to 3000 MVA. 256

It is evident from the foregoing discussion that to meet the immediate increase in power requirements of large cities, it is most expe- dient to refrigerate or force-cool the oil-impregnated-paper cables already in service with the presently lower load capacity. Cables which are installed in trays or pipe-tunnels may be air cooled by means of air-fans, while the buried cables can be cooled by circulating cold water within pipes installed adjacent to the cables themselves. The power transmission capability uf an underground electric cable is limited by the maximum cable operating temperature. This tempera- ture is the direct result of heat generated in the cable and the surround- ings' capability in the dissipation of this heat. Irrespective of the method of cable installation, the surrounding soil has conventionally been relied upon for the conduction and dissipation of the heat energy. The soil's low thermal conductivity, however, and its variation with locale, weather conditions and moisture content of the soil generally impose severe limitations and necessitate a wide safety margin on the current rating of cables. Improvements in current rating have been achieved by the use of special back-fill materials having good thermal conductivity and moisture retentiveness. With these improvements, the soil's heat dissipation capa- bility has reached its practical limit while demands persist for greater cable ratings. Present developments reveal a trend towards forced cooling which can more than double the power transmission capability of underground cables. The circulation of water or oil either through pipes buried next to the cables or through a large diameter pipe containing the cables are some of the methods employed.. The fluid is cooled with air cooled heat exchangers uniformly spaced along the transmission line, or even refrigera- tion units. The major objection to such cooling processes is the substan- tial flow of fluid required to extract a useful quantity of heat and the extensive equipment and power machinery necessary to circulate and cool this flo».;. Other more novel ideas proposed for cable cooling include cooling by (evaporation, two-phase flow and evaporation-condensation prin- ciples. The principle of operation of the evaporative cooling system is based on the evaporation of water in the vicinity of the cables and the removal of the vapor either by a forced air flow, by natural flow, or by a suction pump thus effect.ng the dissipation of the generated heat. The change of phase in evaporation requires absorption of heat energy without a temperature change. When this occurs, much smaller temperature changes of the convecting fluid result than if no evaporation occurred. This im- plies '.hat fcr a given heat source strength, surface and fluid temperatures can be kept lower when evaporation is employed. All new cable installations should, however, in anticipation of the increasing load needs,be rated at higher voltages (345 or 500 kV) and special care should be taken to ensure a high thermal conductivity environ- 25/

merit to provide an effective heat sink under force-cooled conditions. The development of a reliable synthetic paper rablp for 750 kV operation ir still at least some three years away; preliminary results obtained with polyolifin papers in conjunction with polybutene impregnants have shown encouraging results. It should be mentioned that over the past few years, a considerable amount of effort has been put into extending the operating voltage levels of extruded cross-linked polyethylene cables. These cables have practically replaced oil-paper cables for distribution voltages up to 35 kV and have made significant in-roads into the 69 and 138 kV area. However, their extension into the 230 kV range and above appears at this time rather limited due to degradation and failure effects from corona dis- charges and treeing. Nevertheless, their extended use into the Eh'V domain would be most desirable because of their inherently lower dielectric losses and capacitance per unit length. The dissipation factor for polyethylene is of the order of 2 x 10~4 and the dielectric constant has a value of 2.2, a most significant improvement over oil-paper.

To meet the long term demand of increased power for large cities, one has to resort to rather unconventional cable designs. When power block transfers greater than 3000 MVA are involved, even the EHV synthetic laminar cable insulation system becomes quite inadequate. At this point, we essen- tially have a choice between gas pressurized and cryogenic cables. The gas pressurized cable design uses compressed SFc as insulation, with the con- ductor centered by means of epoxy spacers within a metallic pressure-tight tube. The cable, due to its gaseous dielectric, has extremely low dielectric losses and low capacitance per unit length. It would thus be suitable fo.* long distance underground power transmission were it not for the installa- tion problems, which arise due to the fact that the overall cable has to be constructed from short pieces of pipe. Contamination of the spacer sjrfaces during the installation process may seriously lower the breakdown strength of the cable. Most present installations of this type of cable involve short lengths (usually <1000 ft) at transmission voltages of 230 kV. In fact, the present compressed gas cables are mainly used for interconnection with SFg gas insulated substations and, in this respect, they may be re- garded as an extension of the bus-bar. Capacities of 800 MVA at 230 kV systems are common; lately, studies have indicated that the ultimate power capacities of CGC systems may be as high as 10,000 MVA. The ultimate limit in power transfer capability will be realized by the use of cryogenic cable systems. The cryogenic cables undergoing development can be devided into two basic types: namely, those in which the conductor operates in the superconducting mode (superconducting cables) and those in which the conductor operates in the reduced conductor resistance mode (cryo-resistive cables). In a recently developed prototype cryoresis- tive cable, spunbonded-polyethylene synthetic-paper tapes were used in conjunction with liquid nitrogen. Extremely low losses (tans - 10"°) were obtained and the resistance of the cable conductor was reduced by approxim- ately a factor of 500 from that at room temperature. With cryoresistive cables power ratings up to 5000 MVA are contemplated. Initially super- 258

conducting cables were believed to bo necessarily restricted to ir-e under dc conditions- howover, the development of the niobium-tin sloy ci.ti-Juctor wnich exhibited supercond'.rtir.g properties {n the rony;? -f >-'-in f to i-jf'K with negligible magnetic loss at 60 Hz, has changed the situation entirely. Considerable work is underway to develop a suitable cable insulating system to be operative under liquid helium temperatures. There appear to be three main alternatives available - i.e. a conductor suspended by spacers in a liquid helium dielectric, a conductor insulated with a liquid helium impreg- nated dielectric or a conductor refrigerated by liquid helium and held in place by spacers in a high vacuum medium. The latter arrangement has the advantage of using less helium but suffers from suriace breakdown problems along the dielectric spacer surfaces. The power capacity of superconducting cables is projected into the area of 10,000 to 25,000 MVA. Superconducting cables could be operated at relatively low voltages (approx. 50 kV) due to their high current density capabilities; furthermore, unlike the cryoresis- tive cable design which uses impregnated synthetic paper tapes, not. only would the dielectric losses be low but also the capacitance/unit length would be low due to the unity dielectric constant value in the case of cables using the spacer design. Thus, superconducting cables could be used for long distance transmission, provided there would be sufficient supply of liquid helium available. Superconducting cables would become economical only at the high power ratings, where the refrigeration costs have been estimated to amount to only 15% of the total system cost.

We have not said much thus far about dc underground cables. The reason for this is that at the present, dc cables are used only under very special circumstances. They are primarily used as interties between iso- lated power networks and for submarine crossings where longer distances are involved. Unless the present preference for ac systems will abate with time, the use of dc cables is not expected to increase significantly. Before closing my remarks, I would like to add a few words on the transport of energy by fluids. C. TRANSPORT OF ENERGY BY FLUIDS, PARTICULARLY HYDROGEN. The cost of providing an energy supply is strongly influenced by the cost of delivering or transmitting the energy fr->m its source to its point of use. Moocm technology leans toward electrical energy as a means of supplying our increasing energy needs and toward nuclear-electric power as an ultimate substitute fur fossil fuel. Electric power, however, is a most expensive energy form to transmit and deliver and cannot readily be stored. A synthetic chemical fuel could be storable and cheaper to transmit. When we consider the various synthetic chemical fuels that could be made from nuclear power, hydrogen appears as the cleanest and simplest candidate for an energy-distribution medium. Its combustion products are compatible with the atmosphere. Hydrogen could, in principle, be distributed as uni- versally a.s natural gas is today, using most of the same technology. But its use would present some new technological problems. It could do all of the jobs done by natural gas, and more. Its universal availability would 259

give rise to new technological opportunities. Hydrogen can be transmitted from the generating stations to the load centers in underground pipelines similar to those used for natural gas today. Many factors, such as cooling requirements and safety considerations force the optimum location of power stations to be very far from the load centers. Offshore locations are now seriously contemplated by sectors of the nuclear industry. Hydrogen is already routinely "pipelined" in many hundreds of refinery and chemical plant locations throughout the world at pressures up to 1200 psi, but for quite short distances. Pipelines carrying hydrogen over distances of up to 50 miles are in operation in the Houston, Texas, area. In the Ruhr area of Germany, a hydrogen delivery pipeline network extends for 130 miles. Much of this network has been in continuous opera- tion since 1940. Energy can be transported concurrently by liquid hydrogen and by cryogenic cable. This combination would permit delivering hydrogen where the demand need not be met directly by electric power while reserving electric power for direct use. The combination will drastically reduce, and in the dc case will virtually eliminate cryogenic cable refrigeration even for superconducting lines, since heat flow from a surface at liquid hydrogen temperature (20°K) to helium is negligible. The economics of such a scheme have been studied, and it is proposed by Los Alamos engineers to service a system connecting New Mexico and Los Angeles. The wide experience available for the handling, transport and storage of hydrogen is presented by Bart!it et al. en o

WUEUAH POWitl il

IHTOTOPOYWR IM FOR

1261 BATUMI ' GAS J_^ HOUSEHOIO AND' COMMEKIU. ICM

SSI

TR/UMnMTATIO« [ . I3J0

HTMUUW 3145

IKDUSTIIW1 1IZ7 1421 COAl 511 NET IMTORT

Exroax I EXTORT EWB&V SUOWN AS W° B.T.U.

Fig. 1 261

PROSPECTS FOR URBAN TRANSIT SYSTEMS

by

MALCOLM D. ARMSTRONG AND JOHN H. MORGAN

Transportation Development Agency (M.O.T.) Montreal

A brief examination of energy usage in Canada clearly shows just how significant a role transportation plays in the overall energy balance. Fig. 1 illustrates both the sources and end uses of energy on a nation-wide basis. Not only did transport account for 23.5% of the energy consumed in Canada in the year 1972, but it also accounted for 37.5% of the energy wasted. Any attempt to economize on energy con- sumption will have to reduce the overall amount of energy used by the transportation sector, and at the same time, convert the usage pattern to one where some of the exhaust heat energy could be recovered and utilized for other purposes. The latter point can be illustrated by the following example: if electricity wer the prime motive power for transportation, some arrangement could be made for the recuperation of waste heat at the power plant by using it for domestic and industrial heating applications. Under today's pricing conditions energy is a relatively cheap commodity and there is no particular incentive to develop methods of saving it.

The breakdown of energy consumed by the transportation sector is shown in Table 1. The private automobile is by far the largest consumer of fuel particularly when it is used in urban driving. It accounts for over one-third of the transportation energy consumed and if the fuel used in inter-city driving is added, the overall total is just short of 50% of the energy consumed. At the risk of belaboring the obvious, it should be pointed out that fuel usage or sqandering is by no means the automobile's sole or major sin. The pollution emitted by automobile exhausts is known to be a major contributor to urban air pollution. The distortions in land use resulting from the very wide- spread use of private automobiles not only in Los Angeles, but even in cities like Toronto, have been sufficiently well documented.

Fig. 2 shows the fuel usage in passenger-miles per U.S. gallon of various means of passenger transport. It is interesting to note that automobiies (taken in their broadest definition) span almost the entire range with the heavy limousine transporting only its driver at one end of the scale and a jammed micro-bus at the other extremity. The point here is that there is no justification for condemning the.automobile at all times. It would be difficult, indeed, to improve upon the family automobile when carrying two adults and 2.7 children on a trip to visit relatives be they 5 or 105 miles away. It would, howevers be very desirable to reduce the rather large number of people who drive their automobiles to work and leave them in "dead storage" throughout the working day and use them again to go home at night. ro ro

TABLE I FUEL USAGE IN TRANSPORTATION - CANADA - 1970

0/ Gasoline Diesel oil Heavy Fuel oil AVGAS & TOTAL fa GalsxlO6 GalsxlO5 GalsxlO6 Turbo Fuel GalsxlO6 GalsxlO6

Automobile - Urban 2,579.7 34 .5 - Intercity 1,101.8 '4 .7 - Total 3,690.5 3,690.5

True*c - Urban 734.3 164.1 12 .1 - Intercity 857.0 227.9 14 .3 - Total 1,591.3 392.0 1,983.3

Bus -• Urban 3.1 31.3 .5 • Intercity 3.0 16.1 .4 • Total 6.1 4T? 53.5

Rail - Passenger 61.4 .8 - Freight. 120.5 1 .6 - Package ?5o 5 3.4 - Total 44C.4 440.4

Marine - Domestic 93.9 200. C 3 .9 - Deep Sea 95.1 173.2 3 .6 - Total 189.0 '74.0 563.C

Air - Ai r Lines 730.5 9 .1 G.A. 38.9 .5 - Total 769.4 769.4 263

Number of passengers Obsolete systems S.S. "Queen Mary 1.600 1930V-16 -'Ian 2 1850 steam 'r ,iin 80 Double-deck urban bus 20 Current systems Cabin yacht 4 Helicopter 24 Automobile (urban us.) 1 Corporate je; 8 Modern cruise line '250 Pullman train 100

DC-8 jet 78 DC-6 .->•-..« 33 « -bo jet •3-747} 210 Tfc... 3 Ait. is (DC-10) 180 . "tciw Nto f'ltf' ' ge use) 2 **! .vste plane 3 U?va* bus (noon) 12 f».C.C. krcat car (noon) 36 • t-ifesteaaen "beetle" 2

tosi^t. Manchester train 400 T0-!cv*l commuter train 1.200 Highway bus 22 Motorcycle (2 h.p) 1 Volkswagen Microbus 7 Somt proposed systams: U.S. S.S.T. 150 250-m.p.h TACV 48 Tilt-wing VTOL 48 Urban menorsil (one car) 20 Net propulsion efficiency 80 160

Fig. 2 264

The next question that arises is: What can Technology do to bring about a significant decrease in the energy consumed by the trans- portation sector? Evolutionary developments in internal contusion engines will probably result in improvements in fuel consumption which will over- come the penalties resulting from the recently imposed pollution control devices, and thus continue the tendency toward overall improvement in fuel consumption. The increasing popularity of compact and sub-compact automobiles will also tend to reduce the per-vehicle rate of energy consumption. In terms of the total amount of fuel consumed, however, both of these tendencies towards fuel economy are very likely to be over- whelmed by the continuing increase in private vehicle registration. Fig. 2 also shows that the likelihood of achieving significant fuel economies from various new technologies is not great.

There is a role for innovation in urban transportation, however, and it lies much more in the soft and human areas. The only effective means of achieving overall energy economies is to provide within the public sector of both urban and inter-urban transportation systems sufficient incentive to persuade today's private automobile driver to make full use of public transportation systems. The sort of improvements likely to bring this about would cons.st of the following: "*. Higher block speeds between stations. 2. A demand-responsive arrangement for passenger pick-up.

3. A distribution system which will convey the passenger to .vithin reach of his place of work. 4. Sufficient frequency of service to minimize delays at either end of the journey. 5. Some modicum of comfort even when travelling at busy times of day. 6. A significant economy compared to travel by private auto- mobile (such economies could, of course, be enhanced by arranging rather high user charges for parking space or use of urban roads within urban perimeters).

What is needed is something resembling the door-to-door conve- nience of the private automobile without the energy and land use penalties whic'i automobile usage engenders.

The first series of innovations will be evolutionary changes in existing means of transport. In most of these cases the technological aspects of the changes are not important - it is the structure of the overall traffic system that is altered in order to make the public transportation mode more effective. The Mercedes Benz Electro-Bus for 255 example is an interesting departure from the conventional because it offers three distinct modes of operation:

1. It can use its engine to drive its wheels directly (this is the mode offering the greatest fuel economy but causing some degree of pollution and is therefore intended for use outside cities).

2. It can run electrically from storage batteries.

3. Ix can use the diesel engine to charge the batteries. Another idea is the exclusive bus lane which is in use in Toronto and Calgary as well as in several of the tunnels leading into New York City. Exclusive bus lanes are one method of giving buses preference over private vehicles at bottle-necks particularly in the rush hour (the message to the private automobile driver would become clear enough if he saw dozens of buses passing him while he is immobile). An interesting option provided by the exclusive bus lane is that buses can use a lane running in a direction opposite to the other traffic on one-way streets.

The town of Runcorn has adapted a system of elevated roadways used by buses only, in order to eliminate conflict with other forms of traffic and so speed the movement of people by public transportation. The GO system in Southern Ontario is providing, on a limited scale, a demand-responsive service in which a traveller telephones the bus dispatcher to arrange for a minibus to pick him up at his doorstep within a given time span and to deliver him to the nearest GO-train station. When returning home the process is reversed and the minibus transports travellers from the GO station to their homes. The system is designed to provide service to the traveller approximating the convenience of the private auto- mobile yet provided by the public utility. It is particularly effective in residential suburbs where traffic density does not warrant the mainte- nance of a scheduled bus service The Telebus system in Regina works on a similar basis. Both the GO and the Telebus service are due to be expanded in the near future.

The self-drive taxi was an idea tried out in Montpellier, France, where customer-operated taxis could be picked up and left anywhere within designated areas of the city. The purpose of the system was to reduce the number of automobiles parked in the city during the day. The car was electric to minimize pollution and was activated by a consumable token. North American manufacturers have also been experimenting with electric automobiles. It is also quite possible that, some sort of street-car will come back into use. The new street-cars will certainly be much more attractive and comfortable tuci theii predecessors. Although the engineering deve- lopment of the street-car in Europe has been continuing, the more signi- ficant innovations ar* not mechanical, instead they consist of such things 266

as the assignment of exclusive tracks to street-cars and giving them preference at intersections. Street-cars are being reconsidered in this part of the world because they can fill a useful role in the "intermediate" range between bus and subway systems. The Boeing Airplane Co. have developed the Boeing Tram which incorporates many of the features of the most up-to-date European designs. This is the first North American effort in street-car development in 20 years since the design and manufacture of them was abandoned in the early 1950's. For those who still remember the radial street-cars of Ontario, the use of street-cars in inter-urban travel is not exactly an innovation.

Automatic control will be a major feature of any new transpor- tation system. The purpose of this will be to ensure safety ev?n under very heavy traffic conditions, and it will also allow speed to be pre-sct, to ensure the most, economical consumption of energy along any route segment. The BART system, which recently opened in the San Francisco Oakland area, is an example of a rapid transit system with conventional traction but advanced controls.

In recent years, a great deal of interest has been generated in the use of linear induction motors (LIM) for high-speed ground transportation. The predominant advantages of LIMs are that the traction is completely inde- pendent of adhesion between wheels and rails, that the design is not affected by centrifugal force or motor diameter, that "rotor" heating is not a pro- blem when running4 and that the motor is both quiet and pollution free. LIM configurations now under development should show specific weights of about 1 lb./hp at high speed/high power conditions.

With the novel forms of propulsion and braking, wheels are no longer needed to provide traction for transportation systems; various schemes have been proposed for suspending vehicles above road beds. Magnetic levitation uses either the attraction or repulsion of magnets to provide suspension and guidance. The MBB system uses separate magnets for levi- tation and guidance both working in the attractive mode.

By contrast Kraus-Maffei uses magnetic repulsion to produce both levitation and guidance with the same magnets. The system illustrated here is the one that has been selected by the Ontario Government for demons- tration at the CNE in Toronto.

Both British and French firms have manufactured prototype systems using air cushions to provide "lift" and guidance for vehicles propelled by linear motors. Usually a gas turbine provides compressed air which is ducted into the space between the vehicle and the track and prevented from escaping sideways by a flexible skirt - similar to hovercraft.

From even the sketchy outline presented here it should be evident that there is no shortage of technological development ready to emerge on the public transportation scene. What is needed is an intensification of 267 the existing awareness of the need tc conserve energy and to develop more beneficial criteria for the use of urban and suburban land. This means that the users of private automobiles will somehow have to bear the entire cost associated with the consumption of non-renewable resources, and the pollu- tion and misallocation of land which they bring about. At the same time, however, innovation in both physical and human terms will have to be marshalled effectively in order to provide a meaningful alternative to the private automobile.

REFERENCES

Fig. 1 presentation is similar to one presented in the Scientific American of Sept. 1971. U.S. Data has been replaced by Canadian 1972 totals pro- rated on the basis of 1971 proportions.

Fig. 2 is re-drawn from Technology Review, Jan. 1972, Richard A. Rice - System Energy and Future Transportation. 269

DISCUSSION OF SESSION III

DR. E.F. ROOTS (Dept. of Energy, Mines and Resources):

I co not have a question, but in support of Dr. Garland's excellent presentation I would like to add a comment that may be of interest to you and the members of this Symposium.

Canada is indeed taking the first steps to investigate our geo- thermal energy resources, and to become familiar with the tech- nology that will be required to utilize them. The Earth Physics Branch of the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources has had for several years a Geothermal Studies Section, which is becoming increasingly concerned with practical uses and exploitation of geothermal energy in Canada; and as Dr. Garland mentioned, the Geological Survey of Canada has instituted a study of the char- acteristics of the hot springs and fumaroles in western Canada. One of the objectives of this study is to evaluate the potential utilisation of these thermal resources. Some commercial companies have recently expressed interest in investigating geothermal possibilities in Canada. There are many difficulties, not the least of which is the absence of a legal or regulatory framework for exploring, staking, or exploiting geothermal resources. In many ways we are at the position with regard to geothermal resources that we were in a century ago with regard to petroleum resources; we had to look for a place where the stuff was issuing from the ground or obviously present, then drill a hole more or less blindly and hope that it would come up by itself.

There is one development going on at the present time in which Canada is involved that may lead to significant progress in this area. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, through its Committee on Challenges to Modern Society (CCMS)rhas endorsed the study of geothermal energy as one of its applied research programs. Canada has expressed an interest in this study from its inception. An international task force has been set up, chaired by the U.S., with Canada as a member. That task force has just completed (5 October) a workshop series of technical meetings which included tours of U.S. and Mexican geothermal power facilities. Present at the workshop, in addition to the U.S. and Canada, were representatives of the Federal Republic of Germany, France, Iceland, Italy, Portugal and Turkey, with also participation from non-Nato countries Japan, Mexico, New Zealand and ECE. Canada was repre- sented by three technical people involved in geothermal and energy questions all from the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources:- a physicist, a geologist and an engineer.

The task force identified four programmes in the geothermal energy field as being suitable for international study under Lhe CCMS framework : 270

(a) Improved means of geothermal energy exchange

(b) Non-electrical uses of geothermal resources

(c) Small geothermal power plants

(d) Exploitation of hot dry rock Canada has expressed an interest in becoming formally associated with programs (a) and (d) of this list, and will keep a watching brief on the other two. These programmes are to be submitted to the NATO-CCMS Plenary Session in BrusseJs on October 23-24. This meeting will be attended by one of the Canadian delegates to the recent international geothermal workshop. At the meeting, Canada will stress the importance of developing better techniques for the exploration and the assessment of useful geothermal resources. This appears to be an area where international co-operation, and the pooling of knowledge and experience, will be particularly beneficial.

MR. B.A. TUCKER (Industry, Trade and Commerce) of Dr. W.B. Lewis:

Why has the overview of alternative energy sources made no mention of the potential of hydrogen?

DR. W.B. LEWIS:

The generation and uses of hydrogen were discussed in the first paper as well as in that on fuel cells and electrolysis,, where the reforming operation was included. Perhaps the main use suggested was in the hydrogenation of carboniferous minerals ranging from the tar sands, through coal to limestone.

Transmission of hydrogen by pipeline was not discussed but may prove important in industrial areas. For long distance trans- mission the competition with natural or synthetic gas is not clear. Up to 60 percent hydrogen nas been used even in gas distributed for home use.

DRS. B.E. CONWAY and A.K. VIJH (University of Ottawa and Hydro-Quebec)

In reply to Mr. Tucker's question, we would like to direct attention to the remarks made in our paper concerning the projected "hydrogen economy." In this concept, H2 would be generated electrolytically, for example, by an atomic power station, and transported over long distances by pipeline or cryogenically. Energy would be obtained from the H2 by fuel-cell oxidation or by thermal energy conversion from the heat of combusioii. Hydrogen transmission becomes competi- tive with transmission-line power distributior when long distances are considered. The possibilities have been considered in various papers on the "hydrogen economy." 27

It should be pointed out that hydrogen, used in ways discussed in our paper, does not constitute a new energy source. The hydrogen must, of course, be obtained, for example from natural gas,"by reforming of other hydrocarbons or by electrolysis of water, itself an energy-consuming process. Recently, hydrogen^has been considered as a direct fuel for internal combustion engines-"- and has obvious advantages over hydrocarbons on account of the absence of primary carbonaceous pollutants which arise when incomplete combustion of hydrocarbon fuels occurs in an engine. *

MR. G.D. CPATES (Luscar Ltd., Edmonton):

With improving transmission capability and efficiency, do you foresee that it will become practical to trans- port the coal energy of the West, eastward for dis- tances of l^bOO to 2,500 miles?

DR. W.B. LEWIS:

Transmission of energy by piping fuels such as hydrocarbons and coal slurries is both practical and economical. It seems, however, unlikely to be used except to link sources to refineries producing high-priced liquid fuel for mobile purposes and petro- chemicals. For generating electricity,nuclear energy will be a cheaper source if the transmission distance of the fuel exceeds about 700 miles. Low-cost coal available in the West would there- fore only be transmitted 1,50 0 to 2,500 miles in shortage emergencies or for special uses other than burning.

From economic considerations, electricity generated from coal would only be transmitted over such long distances for short periods when required to balance the supply demanded from an extensive electrical grid.

1. G.A. Karim, M. Rashidi and M. Taylor, J. Mech. Eng. Science, London, (1974) in press.

* For data on the energetics of hydrogen combustion, as compared with hydrocarbons, see Glossary, p. 479- Editor. SESSION IV

APPLICATIONS OF

ECONOMICS TO QUESTIONS INVOLVING ENERGY

Tuesday, 16 October, 1973, p.m.

C h a i rm a n A.D. SCOTT, F.R.S.C. Department of Economics University of British Columbia 27 5

ECONOMISTS AND ENERGY PROBLEMS

by

A.D. SCOTT, F.R.S.C. Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

1. Although it was my pleasant duty to serve as chairman for this afternoon session on the "application of economics to questions involving 1 energy '5 I must confess that there is no clear dividing line between the subjects of this session and those of the first three sessions in the symposium. The excellent program organized by Dr. Laurence is placed, mainly, on the same framework as would be chosen by most economists: supply, demand, and technology, all in relation to price and cost. Although most earlier papers were not delivered by economists, it is obvious to all of us that, when it conies to analysis and prediction of energy developments, the questions asked by economists and by non-economists are very much the same. 2. In the next few paragraphs, I wish to introduce the economists' papers by talking about the studies of economists and how they differ from the contributions of other energy specialists. Please note that I do not seek to claim any superiority for the economist's approach; only difference-- three differences, in fact. These are of course differences in degree, not in kind, for most pnergy specialists, even those concerned with the environ- ment, with pollution, or with Canadian nationalistic survival, have in recent years adopted a more comprehensive outlook, and so are tinged with the economist's approach. At the same time some economists have been persuaded to abandon some of their a priori sermonising and theorising and become familiar with the actual data and problems in the energy industries and markets. First, the point of view. For the most part, economic analysis does not lead to conclusions about the welfare of particular industries or sectors of the economy. Rather, there is a tendency to avoid the assumption that the protection or survival of a particular region or activity is an absolute imperative. This is a tendency only—a matter of degree. To the extent that it pervades economic analysis, it is often appropriate for general policy guidance, but unfortunately makes the economists' approach to general energy matters seem ambivalent or lacking in firmness of allegiance. This kind cf objectivity is not, in periods of crisis, always in demand. 276

Second, scope. Just as with its point of view, so with the scope of economic analysis of energy matters. It is rarely contented with the "partial" approach that allows the analyst to home in on vital energy problems by neglecting or assuming away many other influences; nor is it content to label them as "social factors" or "political factors" and treat them unsystematically or as exogenous to the approach. Thus, for example, in all the papers today, "costs" are not simply cash expenses, but the alternative value or net benefit that could be obtained elsewhere in the economy if certain energy invest- ments were forgone, modified or postponed. This definitiu.i of cost, it is true, is more often than not approximately measured by the cash outlays necessary to get things done. But the two ideas are sufficiently different that, in order to make his energy studies consistent with his analyses of other problems and sectors in the economic system as a whole, the economist must have recourse to the clumsier general- equilibrium concept of alternative opportunity costs rather than the more direct partial-equilibrium measure, using cash exoenses. Th"s is particularly true of the larger systems models of en^qy c

3. In the sense in which I have been distinguishing it, economics is applied to energy matters mostly behind the scenes, as it were, within large corporations, governments, boards and tribunals, in preparation for hearings or policy decisions. (One excellent exception to this back-room tendency is the recent E.M. & R. report Phase One, about which so much has already been said.) In all countries, however, an increasing number of academics and independent research institutes are applying their energies to energy, nearly all with an idea of making a useful contribution to policy decisions at various levels, rather than simply describing, explaining or predicting. The authors of the following four papers illustrate the three differences of emphasis that I have been outlining, (a) They all aspire to take a national, if not a cosmopolitan point of view, (b) They all go out of their way to be general, rather than partial in their treatment of values and costs, (c) Their methods, however, are not all the same, varying from an eclectic statistical approach through classical and geometrical economic theory to large-scale computer simulation of the economy as a whole. Subsequent reflection on audience reaction to these papers has suggested two further paragraphs be added to these remarks. First, the contributions of economists, even if uninformed, are likely to be increasingly valuable because of their specification of their point of view. In particular, the adaptability of economic research to alternative points of view avoids the waste and confusion that stems from analyses that turn out to be intentionally defensive of environmental aims, industry projects, resource conservation, or nationalistic goals. Second, the habit of economists of approaching each matter incrementally is of value in supplementing the more "radical" (literally: by the roots) evaluations frequently produced by other energy specialists and group-interest spokesmen. The sometimes-paralysing emphasis on "nicely-balanced-less-or-more" makes it possible in this application temperately to discuss policy changes about changes in amounts, timing, prices, taxes, profits, and even in modes of living, without necessarily threatening particular groups with the extreme disappointment of their expectations that would result from all-or-nothing adoption of particular energy aims. 278

The work of economists in energy applications, howeyer, is changing in form as it expands. These remarks stem only from early observations. It is to be hoped that the continuation of inter- disciplinary collaboration will both lead economists to be more specific in their references to the technology and institutions in the energy sectors, and lead engineers, scientists and environmentalists to adopt the policy-oriented points of view pioneered by economists. 279

CANADA AND THE WORLD ENERGY SITUATION by J. E. GANDER Economic Council of Canada, Ottawa This paper is concerned with Canada's position in the critical transition that is taking place in the world energy situation, especially regarding the evolving supply/demand conditions in the United States of America. THE FRAME OF REFERENCE To bring so vast a topic into focus requires a lim- iting frame of reference. For purposes of this presentation, the following propositions summarize the approach and the main thesis. (1) The time period, 1973-85, referred to here as "short- term", encompasses the immediate, relevant concerns. (2) The principal focus is on the rapidly changing oil and natural gas situation, especially regarding the United States. (3) The emerging situation reflects the impact of past and present resource allocations and mis-allocations, not any inherent shortage of world energy resources. (4) The origins of the present situation centre on econom- ic and political decisions rather than on basic questions of resource supply and demand. (5) Canada will remain a relatively insignificant source of supply of world energy resources through the years 1973 to 1935. (6) Canada can be self-sufficient in energy resources over that period of time. As a result, Canada is unique among major energy users and suppliers. It carries on extensive international trade in energy materials, but is not primarily concerned with the need to import or export energy resources. (7) Self-sufficiency in energy resources, however, does not insulate Canada from international and global, energy issues. It in. no way implies that an isola- tionist, narrow, parochial approach is correct policy. Simultaneous importing and exporting of energy 280

materials has been a practical way to serve Canada's broad geographical expanse, and might well continue to be so. Through most of the 1960's, Canada's exports and imports of energy materials were, in value terms, roughly in balance. An export surplus has re- cently emerged and could, under certain circumstances, increase rapidly. The future size and structure of Canada's international trade in energy materials will reflect the impact of many crucial decisions in the private and public sectors and in other countries.

Canada remains exposed in many ways to the impact of energy policies abroad and to international commerce in energy resources. The impact of the world energy situation on Canada can be regarded as of more fundamental importance than the im- pact of Canada's energy resources on other countries.

THREE RELEVANT TIME PERIODS

Three time horizons have relevance for this discus- sion -- the short-term future, from 1973 to 1985; a medium- term future, to perhaps the year 2000, and a longer-term future to, say, 2050. These time designations are stretched versions of the time frames customarily used for economic analysis. Typically, "short-term" is limited to about one-year in length; "medium-term", three to five years, and "long-term", possibly ten years. The designations used here are related to resource availability and disposition. They are designations of energy supply, demand and reserves.

The years from :iow to 1985 are regarded as short-term because, barring outright disruptions, the major patterns of energy supply and demand over that period of time are already in place. Important variations in these patterns can begin to emerge in the later years of that period and fundamental deci- sions will be made and actions taken during that period which will largely determine energy patterns throughout the subsequent ten or fifteen years. An effort could be made, and should be made, between now and 1985 to insert systematic, new patterns of supply and demand into the emerging Canadian energy picture.

These efforts will, of themselves, raise many diffi- cult policy issues and will point the way to the medium- and ] mger-term future. However, their impact will not alter in any fundamental way the supply and use of energy between now and 1985. For example, oil and natural gas currently represent about three-quarters of the supply of the primary energy re- sources used in the industrialized western world. Twenty years ago, in Canada, oil and natural gas represented only about 40 per cent, a smaller share than coal and wood which now are only about 10 per cent. Oil and natural gas are expected to decline in relative importance in the long-term future, particularly as nuclear power and, possibly, coal increase in importance. Even so, by 1985 oil and natural gas probably will continue to supply roughly two-thirds of the energy used in the western, industrial world, and probably a larger proportion than that in Canada. Under some circumstances, the global share of oil and natural gas might drop to, say, 60 per cent of the total by 1985. Under other circumstances, the share supplied by oil and natural gas might remain close to the present three-quarters. Either way, except under some calamitous scenario, the years to 1985 repre- sent too short, a time span to wrench the world away from a pre- dominantly petroleum-based energy system.

The "medium-term", to the year 2 000, and the longer- term, to the year 2050, offer greater scope for change in the relative importance of the various primary energy resources, and greater scope for change in efficiency in use and in the uses to which they are put.

For our purposes, the most significant features of these longer term changes are the decisions which will be made over the next five or ten years, by industry, by governments and by society as a whole on what patterns of supply and consumption are deliberately being introduced, how these are designed to alter current trends, and what impacts they will have in the long run. How much nuclear power? How much gasification of coal? What utilization of oil from tar sands, or of oil and gas from the Arctic and other frontier sources of supply?

For this paper, therefore, the principal time-frame is 1973 to 1985 and the principal energy resources discussed are oil and natural gas. One question frequently raised in the con- text of the short, medium and longer-term future is, "Do we fact- an energy crisis?"

AN ENERGY CRISIS? The word "crisis" could occupy us all day, but is not essential to our discussion. The position adopted here is that there need not be any energy crisis over the long-term as a re- sult of the depletion of resources. The life support system of this planet depends upon solar energy<, As long as that energy continues to emanate from the sun, in sufficient quantities, taken together with the energy now stored within the planet, we have potentially all the energy we require. However, the poten- tial adequacy of energy supply over the long-run in no way re- duces the need for action for the conservation of energy, 2 R°

re-cycling of materials and the reduction of inefficiencies and waste in conversion and use. These objectives, together with environmental and ecological objectives, are of prime impor- tance in their own right in the process of avoiding crises and improving life support systems.

The current energy position represents a grave prob- lem of resource allocation or of mis-allocation. This has evolved especially over the past five years, centred on the rapidly changing energy situation in the United States. The magnitude of the current transition in the supply and use of energy, the amount of the decision-making time that industry and governments throughout the world are devoting to energy matters, the degree of public concern over these matters, and the potential for sizeable disruptions might point to a crisis situation -- especially if international political disagreements concerning the supply and use of energy arise and become bit- terly entrenched.

The current, strained position in the world energy picture can be said to reflect the rapid shift that has occurred in the oil and natural gas situation in the United States. At the time of the Sr.ez crisis and the European coal problems in the late 1950's, the United States, supplemented by supplies from Venezuela and to a lesser extent from Canada, could allo- cate oil to western Europe to meet a short-term emergency situa- tion. The prospect throughout the 1970's and early 1980's is that, to an increasing extent, the United States must rely on imported supplies of oil. By 1980 or 1985, approximately one- half of U.S. oil requirements are likely to be imported, mostly from the Middle East.

The degree of dependence is not of itself unusual. Japan's oil supply is all imported, and western Europe's supply has been almost entirely imported up to now. The new factor is the magnitude, and the rapid growth in magnitude, of this additional U.S. demand, superimposed on the growing requirements of Japan and, possibly, of Europe. The magnitude of these re- quirements is so great relative to current levels of oil exports from the Middle East countries that it can become an entirely new dimension in international energy relationships.

Taken together with the anticipated increasing demand by Japan and the large quantities of Middle East oil likely to continue to be needed in western Europe, in spite of the North Sea discoveries, the swing-around in the U.S. oil and natural gas position creates potential short-term crisis situations in a number of ways. For example, in 1965 oiJ production within the United States was almost equal to that of the Persian Gulf countries. Since then,- production in both the United States and Venezuela has flattened out and is expected to begin to dip. By 1970, Persian Gulf production exceeded that of the United States by about two-thirds. By 1975, it might well be two and one-half times the production of the U.S. To cite but two factors, the transportation and the financial ramifications of this change are tremendous. The financial impact will be of substantial importance both in terms of the U.S. balance of payments and in terms of the command over resources and, hence, over economic activity which accrues to the Middle East oil-producing coun- tries ,

CANADA AND THE WORLD SITUATION

Against the above background, what is Canada's posi- tion in the world energy situation? As noted above, Canada is unique among the principal industrialized countries in carrying on extensive international trade in energy while being self- sufficient in energy resources. Most countries are either essentially exporters or importers of energy resources. Al- though Canada has developed a rapidly growing international trade in energy resources, throughout the 1960's the dollar values of the experts and imports were roughly in balance. Consequently, imports supply about 50 per cent of Canada's oil requirements. In the early years of the 1970's a significant surplus in the value of exports of energy materials has begun to emerge, primarily as a result of the exports of oil and natural gas. Given recent constraints imposed on the export of oil and natural gas from Canada, it seems reasonable to regard "self- sufficiency" as the principal characteristic.

Although a number of forms of energy enter into Canada's international trade, and the trade is carried on with a number of countries, the dominant trade is bilateral -- Canada and the United States. The dominant imports into Canada are coal, to serve both thermal and metallurgical uses in Ontario, and oil to serve the market east of the "Ottawa Valley line". The imported coal comes from the United States; the oil imported into Canada came for many years almost entirely from Venezuela but in recent years an increasing proportion has come from the Middle East countries and from Africa. The role of Venezuela as a source of off-shore supply for Canada can be expected to di- minish further as its productive capacity fails to keep pace with rapidly increasing U.S. demands. The dominant export is petroleum, including both crude oil and natural gas. Signifi- cant two-way trade also takes place in petrojeum products. Canada also has had in recent years a small but growing export surplus in electricity. 284

Over the next five or ten years, the export of oil and natural gas from Canada to the United States will surely be the dominant issue in Canada's energy trade. For years the United States has operated under a system of mandatory oil import controls. As that restrictive U.S. policy is removed, in the face of the rapidly growing reliance of the U.S. on imported oil and natural gas, Canada becomes very much a pre- ferred source of supply. However, Canada never has been a very significant source of supply of energy to the United States market and regardless of how generous our export policies might be, after due allowance for Canada's own requirements of oil and natural gas, we cannot increase that role by any apprecia- ble, relative amount in the coming years. At best, Canada might supply perhaps 5 per cent of U,3. oil requirements be- tween now and 1985. If new reserves, in economically accessi- ble areas, are not proven up in the near future, prudent provi- sion for Canada's own oil requirements could result in imports from Canada supplying even a smaller part of U.S. requirements.

If exports oi oil and natural gas from Canada to the United States were to continue to increase at the rates encoun- tered in 1971 and 1972, the volume of oil and natural gas ex- ports would very soon over-run available Canadian reserves after allowance is made for some reasonable reserve life expec- tancy to meet growing Canadian requirements. In other words, Canada's main concern over the coming decade will be to prove up additional reserves on a large-scale in economically acces- sible areas to meet its own petroleum requirements in the peri- od from 1985 to 2000. Arctic oil and gas might offer the req- uisite reserves, or the tar sands might do so, or some combina- tion of those sources plus discoveries in the traditional pe- troleum producing areas of western Canada, or in new areas such as the Atlantic off-shore.

If new discoveries are made on a large scale in re- mote areas of Canada, some increments to export might provide a practical, cost-reducing way to ensure delivery of oil and natural gas from the new sources of supply to the Canadian market. However, the scope for increased exports on that basis is unlikely to alter in any basic way the dependence of the United States on off-shore sources of supply. The same obser- vation concerning only a limited incremental role can also be made in respect of petroleum supplies from Alaska to the other states of the Union.

Recognition that most of the probable new energy re- serves can only be developed and brought to market at high cost by to-day's standards, combined with conservationist and envi- ronmental concerns and with fears of resource depletions have led to proposals that Canada should increase its own imports of oil by substantial amounts. This policy would de-emphasize Canada's self-sufficiency and make Canada more dependent on off- shore sources of supply- It would, in effect, tend to move the Ottawa Valley line farther west and put Canada in a trade deficit position in energy. However important the substantial existing imports of energy resources are as a means of effec- tively meeting Canada's continent-wide requirements, ami what- ever merits this policy might have through some transitional period, or as a means of providing incremental supplies, any substantial increase in reliance on imports of energy resources, particularly of off-shore petroleum, can hardly become the foundation stone on which to build Canada's energy policy in the emerging world setting.

Certain features of the emerging world setting have particular relevance to Canada's energy situation. This rele- vance is seen primarily through the critical changes in the U.S. energy position. Perhaps two features adequately illustrate the magnitude of that change.

There is no practical way for the United States to avoid an increasing reliance on imported supplies of oil from the Middle East, OPEC countries through the remainder of this decade. These countries hold nearly two-thirds of the non- communist proven oil reserves. Together with the African oil- producing countries, most of which are also members of OPEC, more than 80 per cent of total, non-communist reserves are ac- counted for. These reserves are readily accessible and produc- tion costs are relatively low. Even so, mainly as a result of government policies in the producing countries, prices to con- sumer countries are already experiencing sharp increases. In contrast, Canada and the United States hold only about 10 per cent of known, non-communist oil reserves. Not only will oil imports be needed in the United States on a rapidly increasing scale to meet the short-fall in U.S. oil supply, but also to meet the inability of natural gas supplies to increase by any appreciable amount. Imports of liquefied natural gas from re- mote off-shore sources such as Russia, Africa or even Alaska can do little to fill the natural gas gap. In short, the United States has moved from a position of independence in petroleum supply to a position of critical dependence on off-shore, Middle East supplies. Although the large, U.S. based oil com- panies will continue to be a dominant factor in world oil pro- duction and marketing, they will not operate from the same po- sition of power that existed only a few years ago. Their in- fluence on the disposition of world oil supplies will remain great, but governments in both the producing and consuming countries undoubtedly will exercise an ever-increasing role. 286

At the same time, an increasing number of co:'".t-;Co, of which Britain, the Netherlands and Norway are ecr-jcially significant, will move into a more independent position in respect both of the Middle East producing countries and the big multinational companies. This shift, however, will ease only marginally the pressures on the U.S.. position.

The changing energy position in the United States has a number of causes and many ramifications which will have international impacts. That these impacts will affect internal, domestic relations in Canada is already evident in the shifting positions of many provincial governments and in federal-provin- cial relations. Many of the impacts will work in the direction of rapidly rising costs to energy users throughout the world. In Canada, the appropriate and practical policy regarding a two- price, or a three-price, system for oil and natural gas is already arising as an important and a potentially divisive issue. Throughout the last two decades, increases in energy prices have been slight* in comparison to general price trends, but supply conditions, transportation, processing and environ- mental factors can be expected to result in rapidly rising prices, especially for oil and natural gas. This will provide an unchartered testing ground for price elasticities both of supply and demand. Consequential shifts in the supply of and demand for the various energy resources are difficult tc fore- cast but nevertheless will become a major policy question. Within Canada, as noted above, the declining ]ife expectancy of the proven oil and gas reserves, together with the rising prices, have already created inter-provincial tensions and tensions between the provincial and federal governments.

A FEW POLICY ISSUES FOR CANADA What energy policy issues emerge in Canada from the world energy situation? A few observations are used to illus- trate the far ranging impacts. (1) Rising world energy prices will encourage the discov- ery and development of more remote and costly oil and gas fields. They also make more practical the development of tar sands and the greater use of coal reserves, including the gasification and liquefaction of coal. Rising oil and gas

* The well-head price of Middle East oil declined through much of the 1960's and in the early years the activities of OPEC were primarily directed towards price stabilization and pro- duction control. 287

prices also will encourage the use of nuclear power, including further development of Canada's CANDU reactor and production of heavy water. Higher prices and the difficulties of finding new reserves of oil and gas might also encourage Biomass projects, to utilize waste materials and field and forest products.

(2) The growing demand for energy in Canada and abroad, even at the higher prices, indicates a need to embark actively on programs to increase available supplies of energy, both by exploration for new, proven reserves of oil and natural gas and by programs designed to test the commercial feasibility of greater use of tar sands and other energy materials. Because of the long lead times between the initial efforts and the de- livery of appreciable quantities of energy to users, these ac- tivities require immediate assessment and initiation where ap- propriate. Programs which are begun in 1973 are unlikely to provide appreciable quantities of energy before the early 1980's. In all instances, moreover, even where workable techno- logies are known, the programs require substantial research and development to improve the technologies of exploration, produc- tion, transportation and use. One difficulty, of course, is how to decide upon the allocation of capital, materials and skilled manpower resources among the competing possibilities.

(3) While Canada's own energy needs obviously are the principal determinants of an energy policy, and while no practi- cal level of exports from Canada can prevent serious problems of supply for the United States over the coming ten or fifteen years; an open, international energy stance appears to be called for. This will include those exports that are possible and the continuation o\. imports of coal and oil to the extent that these are available on commercially attractive terms. The international energy policies are likely to become, to an in- creasing extent, an integrated part of commercial policies more generally and of wide-ranging international relations between governments. In all of this activity, the role of governments is likely to increase substantially relative to the power of the large, integrated, multinational petroleum companies. The im- mediate, direct objectives and priorities of governments and companies are likely to diverge over a greater range.

(4) The pressure of rising world energy prices will create difficult questions concerning the extent to which these should be transmitted to the Canadian economy. The tensions created by different provincial views on pricing policies demonstrate one major difficulty in resolving the problem. In addition, the important structural impacts which would result from alternative energy pricing policies require careful assessment, as do the international responses to any pricing policy designed to es- tablish a special Canadian price advantage. In short, there is 288

no easy way to establish comprehensive, consistent and satis- factory pricing policies for all energy resources in all parts of Canada. (5) Many secondary effects will result from the changing world energy situation. Requirements for ocean transport and port facilities will increase substantially, in many parts of the world, as will pipeline and refinery capacity, nuclear power plants, electrical transmission lines, possibly coal and uranium mining activity, rail transport and coal gasification plants. Oil from the tar sands and perhaps oil and natural gas from Arctic locations can be expected to become increasingly important issues within Canada. The financial and employment impacts of the variety of energy-related projects will require careful assessment and planning, and a systematic implementa- tion.

In summary, Canada's impact on the world energy sit- uation will be far less significant over the coming decade than will the world situation on Canada. The critical impor- tance of a rapidly changing energy situation in the United States and throughout the world calls for attempts to evaluate alternatives comprehensively and systematically in ways which have not been done previously. Such assessments must try to allow for the fact that quantitative evaluations of supply and demand cannot capture all the implications of those alterna- tives. Furthermore, the widespread range of international and domestic economic activities will have superimposed on them far-reaching political and social responses, the nature of which will always be difficult to foresee.

For Canada, one certain feature of the evolving world energy situation is that a complacent view of Canada's self- sufficiency in energy resources will in no way express the extent of Canada's involvement and concern. Although less directly affected by the kind of pressures that are building up in the United States, Canada invariably will experience side effects from the *»wld energy situation which have the poten- tial to be among the most important foreseeable factors through the balance of the 1970's. 289

Selected Bibliography

1. International Petroleum Encyclopedia, 1972, 197 3; Petroleum Publishing Co., Tulsa, Oklahoma.

2. John McHale World Facts and Trends, the MacMillan Co., Toronto.

3. Long Range Planning, Journal of the Society of Long Range Planning, Vol. 6, No. 1, March, 197 3.

4. BP statistical review of the world oil industry, 1972, The British Petroleum Company Limited, London.

5. Outlook for Energy in the United States to 1985; The Chase Manhattan Bank, New York; June, 1972.

6. Financial Analysis of a Group of Petroleum Companies, 1972; The Chase Manhattan Bank, New York; August, 1973.

7. Energy and Power, Scientific American, September, 1971, Vol. 224, No. 3; New York.

8. James E. Akins, The Oil Crisis: This Time the Wolf is Bore; Foreign Affairs, April, 1973, Vol. 51, No. 3; New York. 9. Energy in the Next Decade and Its Implications for Ir.vest- ment; Scudder, Stevens and Clark,- September 11, 1972,- New York.

10. Report of the Secretary of the Department of Interior of the Advisory Committee on Energy, June 30, 1971; Department of the Interior, Washington.

11. Walter G. Dupree, Jr. and James A. West, United States Energy Through the Year 2000, U.S. Department of the Interior, December, 1972.

12. The U.S. Energy Problem, Vol. 1, Summary, November 1971; Inter-Technology Corporation, Virginia; Report to the National Science Foundation. 13. Energy Research Needs, A Report to the National Science Foundation prepared by Resources for the Future, Inc., and M.I.T. Environmental Laboratory; October, 1971. 14. Oil in the World Economy, Shell international Petroleum Company Limited; June, 1971. 15. Energy and Public Policy - 1972; The Conference Board Inc., New York. I1), The National Energy Dilemma, The Conference Board Inc., New i'ork, Vol. X No. 8, August, 1973, 17. Richard Bailey, Energy Policy - The National Dilemma; National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review; May, 1972.

18. P. R. Ociell, Europe's Oil; National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review, August, 1972.

19. Enough Energy - if...; Business Week, April 21, 1973.

20. An Energy Policy for Canada, Phase ] , \Zolumes I and II; Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, 197 3.

21. John L. Crabb, The Worlc' Has Plenty of Oil...or has it? GEOS, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Spring, 1973.

22. How the Arabs Plan to Spend Their Riches, The Economist, May 5, 1973; London. 23. Papers for an International Symposium on Petroleum Economy, March 12 and 13, 1973, Laval University.

24. w. E. Barratt, Energy Crisis — What Does It Mean to Canada? Presentation to Canadian Plant Engineering Conference, Montreal, May, 29, 1-73.

25. Oil Week, MacLean-Hunter Limited, Toronto; weekly issues.

26. Statistics Canada various publications on energy statistics. 29!

ESTIMATING THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF ARCTIC ENERGY DEVELOPMENT by JOHN HELLIVIELL Department of Economics, University of British Columbia

A number of faculty and students at the University of British Columbia have been studying the national economic ef- fects of various plans for developing Canada's arctic energy resources*. We have focussed our attention on the natural gas resources in the Mackenzie Delta because the first proposal to come forward from the industry.^is for a pipeline to move gas from the Mackenzie Delta, and from Prudhoe Bay in Alaska, to Canadian and United States siarkets. The project itself is very large, and deserves careful assessment in its own right. The significance of the project is greatly increased by the fact that it is the first, of a whole chain, each part of which de- pends on the first step. Whatever the rhetoric, the substance of energy policy is defined by the sequence of government res- ponses to changi.ng circumstances. The government's approach to the Mackenzie Valley pipeline proposal will influence strongly the procedures and results of subsequent decisions. The two types of economic study described in this paper by no means cover all the ground for economic analysis of major energy projects. The first type, described in the first half of the paper, is concerned with the economic impact of the construction and operation of an Arctic pipeline, and the related facilities for gas production in the M-ackenzie Delta. The sec- ond type of study bypasses the project's- 'short-term impact on income, employment, and .the balance of payments. Instead, we ask the broader question: Does tha project make better economic sense than any of the obvious alternatives? The most obvious alternatives involve deferred development of the Mackenzie Delta, consequently avoiding exports of Delta gas and-, possibly, trans- shipment, of Alaskan gas. By Simulation-methods, it is possible

* The study of macroeconomic impact originated with a group of fourth-year undergraduates! who presented the results to a U.B.C. extension course on Arctic energy. The latest version is now a chapter' in. a forthcoming book of papers flowing from the/Arctic energy course.* The study of costs and benefits is more recent, ant," will be-reported"'in detail in the final chapter2 of the same book. Earner reports on both types of study have already been' publ ished.3 ..-••••-•• 292

to test separately the various facets of proposed project to see what better alternatives are lurking unseen. No study is as broad as it should be. To keep our project to a manageable scale, we have skirted the problems of fitting natural gas into comprehensive forecast of Canadian energy supply and demand. Neither have we considered the relative advantages of pipeline, rail, dirigible, and so on, as means of transporting gas to southern markets, although such studies must at some time be done. Instead, we give top priority, as reported in the second half of the paper, to assessing the urgency of the matter. If, as the proponents argue, the proposed Mackenzie Valley pipeline is an opportunity that must be seized immediately, or else de- ferred at great cost, then the decision process must be trun- cated accordingly. But if, as we have tentatively concluded, there is no advantage in proceeding immediately, then the way is clear for a more comprehensive range of alternatives to be con- sidered before a final decision is made. ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION Economic impact studies using econometric models are becoming increasingly common for the evaluation of investment projects and government policies. The method is fairly straight- forward. First it is necessary to find or develop an economet- ric model whose equations depict the evolution of the economy in sufficient detail. Then the node! is used to derive a base or control solution as far into the future as derired, constrained only by the decreasing accuracy of the model's structure and in- formation, and the consequent weakening of the model-bui1der's nerve. The control solution for our economic impact experiments is a simulation of the quarterly model RDX2 running from 1973 to 1985. For the base solution, the 300-odd exogenous variables were classified into groups and given mutually consistent growth rates. These values, plus the historically estimated coeffic- ients and the 1972 initial conditions determine the paths to 1985 of the 260-odd endogenous variables cf the model. For the analysis reported in this paper, the model is supplemented by 80 new variables, 50-odd coefficientss and 64 equations outlining the construction and operation of a Mackenzie Valley pipeline, the production of gas in the Mackenzie Delta, and the distribution of costs and benefits among the various participating groups. The exogenous variables, the coefficients, and the structure of the equations are based on announced features of the pipeline proposal, (as reported by Gray4, and elsewhere), a variety of cost and demand information, and the tax, royalty, and tariff-setting procedures expected to apply to northern pipelines and gas production. The new equations comprise an ad- ditional sector of model. Links between the new sector and the • rest of the model are provided by inserting certain employments 293 expenditure, and financing variables of the new sector into the relevant parts of the main model. When all this preparation was complete, the model in- cluding the pipeline and gas production sector was started in 1973 and run through 1985, and the results compared with the control solution. What of the results, and of the economics be- hind them? During the construction phase, there are increases in activity and investment expenditure in other industries, and increases in imports of goods and capital, directly and indir- ectly due to the pipeline. The direct material, labour, and im- port requirements for the pipeline and the pattern of foreign and domestic financing for the project, are embodied in the in- formation read into the model. The model itself contributes the estimates of the indirect or induced effects of the project. The induced responses follow a cyclical pattern, because of the so-called 'accelerator principle1. When firms in other indus- tries face a rising demand due to the project, they increase their output and also their own demand for plant and machinery, to allow them to meet the higher level of demand at least cost. When the project is over, other industries find themselves with excess capacity, and cut their investment below what it would have been had the pipeline never been constructed. RDX2 has a very detailed dynamic structure that shows vigorous cyclical responses to a large investment project. In assessing the likely effects of pipeline construction, we have dampened these responses in two ways. The material demands for a large pipeline ought to be carefully enough planned that their timing and temporary nature would be well known to governments and suppliers alike. Recognizing the temporary nature of the demand, many suppliers would choose to produce beyond normal capacity rather than expand their plants. A substantial reaction of this sort was built into the model, thus lessening the induced boom-and-bust investment cycle. Policy makers, using RDX2 and other similar models, are already assessing different mixes of monetary and fiscal policies that could be used to smooth the trans- fer of real resources into and out of the project during the construction phase. The operations phase is a different matter, as the pipeline would be working for more than thirty years. Thus there is no point in trying to"shield the rest of the economy from the effects; the choice of this long-term project over others implies a willingness to substitute gas and pipeline service exports for other net exports in the balance of payments. Quite naturally, the balance of payments effects, and the exchange rate change re- quired to make room for the gas project, increase as gas exports increase. Most of our simulations have been done using the pro- ponents' plan to use one-half of :;he pipeline's 4 bcf/d through- put capacity to trans-ship Alaskan gas to Canada's southern bor~ ro in

Table 1 - Part A DIRECT TRADE AND CAPITAL ACCOUNT IMPACTS OF MACKENZIE PIPELINE AND GAS PRODUCTION 1975 - 1985 (in millions of current dollars)

Capital Account Balance of trade effects (XBALP&GS )** Inflows under various export assumpti ons

(New Issues — Case 0 Ca se 1 Case 2 Case 3 reti rements) 50% Prudhoe gas 50% Prudhoe 50% Prudhoe 100% Can- Year FBALP&G$ 50% Delta exports 25% Delta exports 50% Canad- adian Use ian Use 1975 597 -623 -623 -623 -679 1976 927 -641 -•641 -641 -697 1977 905 -507 -507 -507 -598 1978 857 -233 -265 -296 -427 1979 329 220 77 -65 -242 1980 -101 612 339 65 -264 1981 -222 766 445 125 -260 1982 -235 775 456 137 -248 1983 -136 706 389 72 -309 1984 -136 702 387 73 -304 1985 -136 738 406 74 -298

Notes: * The direct capital account inflows contain all foreign capital used for the pipe- line, plus interest-free loans from U.S. gas purchasers to Delta producers. To simplify compa rison, interest-free loans were kept at values compatible with case 1. Other for- eign capital for gas production is treated as an induced rather than a direct flow. Re- sults are trucated to millions of dollars. ** The direct trade account effects include pipeline tariff receipts,, gas export revenues based on prices in existing contracts for future sale, and foreign interest and '95

der, one-quarter to export Mackenzie Delta gas to the United States, and the remaining one-quarter to ship Delta gas to Can- adian markets. Part A of Table 1 shows the direct effects on the trade account (XBALP&G$) and capital account (FBALP&G) of pipeline and gas production under varying assumptions about the quantity of gas exported. During the construction phase, the direct trade account deficit (-XBALP&G$) is usually smaller than the capital account surplus, (FBALP&G) by an average of about $300 million per year. This assumes 51% of the equity and one-third of the long term debt to come from within Canada. The net direct balance of payments effects (XBALP&G$) + FBALP&G during the operations phase depend very much on how the pipeline is used. Four alternative series for XBALP&G$ are shown in part A of Table 1. Case 0 shows the biggest trade surplus, with all of the pipeline used to ship Alaskan and Can- adian gas to U.S. markets. Cases 1, 2, and 3 involve increasing concentration on Canadian use. In case 3 there are no export receipts at all, and XBALP&G$ is made up entirely of foreign interest and dividends on the pipeline, once construction is complete. The net balance of payments impact during the mid- 1980's ranges from a positive amount cf $600 million in case 0 to a negative amount of over $400 million in case 3. Using the RDX2 estimates of the effects of exchange rate changes on other trade flows, the required long-term changes in the price of for- eign exchange would be such as to raise the relative value of the Canadian dollar by less than 4% in case 0, and to lower it by less than 2%% in case 3. For case 1, the plan now likely to be proposed by the Gas Arctic consortium, the indicated increase in the value of the Canadian dollar is about \\% . In all like- lihood, the prices contemplated by existing export contracts for Delta gas, and used in the Table 1 calculations, are unrealist- ically low. Higher prices would increase the export surplus in cases 0 and 1. Part B of Table 1 reports a few of the results showing the direct plus indirect effects of pipeline construction and operation using the assumptions of case 1. The first two columns show the changes in the overall trade balance (XBAL$) and the total net balance of payments (UBAL). The simulations are done using a flexible exchange rate version of RDX2, so that changes in the balance of payments and in the price of foreign exchange are mutually determined. Subject to lags, positive values for UBAL lead to a lower PFX (a higher value for the Canadian dollar) while lower values for PFX eventually reduce UBAL, But in the shorter term, trade flows are influenced more by activity levels than by relative prices, so that the exchange rate does not move directly towards a new equilibrium level. The three right-hand columns of part B in Table 1 show the net effects on aggregate activity and employment. Because of ro to en

Table 1 - Part B DIRECT PLUS INDUCED EFFECTS OF MACKENZIE PIPELINE AND GAS PRODUCTION*** 1975 - 1985 (based on 50% Prudhoe , 25% DeltDel a exports; includes policy offsets) Trade balance Balance of Price of Business output Unemployment Total em- XBAL$ Payments f orei gn (excluding pipe- rate RNU ployment UBAL exchange line output) UGPP NE mill, of current PFX mi 11 ions of 1961 mi 11 ions $ $Can/$US $

1975 -916 -389 .005 635 241 .029 1976 -1067 -89 .008 1076 631 .075 1977 -907 339 -.001 685 479 .074 1978 -548 582 -.012 182 213 .041 1979 125 395 -.021 -886 923 -.017 1980 767 -35 -.010 -1276 1 012 -.061 1981 1072 -91 .006 -1021 .637 -.070 1982 638 -35 .000 -488 -.096 -.047 1983 -390 -273 -.017 -159 -.589 -.017 1984 -971 -586 -.022 -137 -.498 .002 1985 -840 -393 -.020 -573 -.060 -.005

Notes: ** Cont'd. ; dividends on pipeline financing Foreign interest and dividends on gas production are treated as induced flows. *** All these results are in the 'shock minus control' format. The base case sol ution values are subtracted from the model solutions including pipeline and gas prod- uction in order to obtain the numbers in the table. 297

its extreme capital intensity, the pipeline is treated as a sep- arate sector. Thus the constant-dollar business output series UGPP excludes value-added by pipeline operations, although it naturally does include, during the construction phase, all the components of the pipeline that are manufactured in Canada. The unemployment rate is down during construction, up after- wards, and then down again in the mid 1980's, relative to the control solution. Total employment is up during construction b' a maximum of 75 thousand jobs, about ten times the direct labour requirements for pipeline construction. The subsequent cyclical loss of jobs is almost as larges so that the average net employ- ment effect between 1975 and 1985 is about zero. The results for total employment do not match exactly with those for the unem- ployment rate. This is because there are induced changes (sub- ject to lags) in labour force participation and net migration - the total population is almost 100 thousand higher than control in 1979, and equally as much lower in 1983. Our numerical results are intended to demonstrate some of the economy's main adjustment mechanisms, and are not offered as forecasts. The particular numbers resulting are very depen- dent on the initial conditions and on the assumed policies. In a very real sense, the numbers could be anything we chose, de- pending on the extent to which offsetting policies are employed. But if policies can be so adjusted, how can the results be used to justify a project? Now, at last, we have reached the main point of this section of the paper - that from the national point of view, job creation as such cannot be the justification for a project, be- cause there are many fiscal and monetary policies that could in principle be used to generate the same jobs, on as permanent a basis as desired. If a project is worthwhile on other grounds, then macroeconomic impact simulations of the sort reported in this section can help in the design of policies to ease economic adjustment. To find out whether the Arctic pipeline scheme proposed by the Gas Arctic consortium makes economic sense, we need to compare it to other uses of our natural, human, and financial resources. This is the purpose of the rest of the paper. ESTIMATING COSTS AND BENEFITS In this section we ask whether the Gas Arctic proposal makes the best use of the gas reserves in the Mackenzie Delta. We assumes for the purpose of these calculations, that the econ- omy could digest such a project, and that the services of the pipeline would be priced so that all costs, including a return on capital, were fully covered without surplus. This is, of course, the intent of the NEB rules for regulating pipeline tariffs. I have doubts about the procedures actually used by the NEB, but am 298

assuming for the present that the goal is achieved - to have each user pay his share of the costs. Thus the pipeline builders and owners obtain no 'economic rents' - a term used to denote an ex- cess of revenues over all costs, including a normal return on capi tal. If there are any economic rents generated by the pipe- line, therefore, they accrue to the gas producers, to gas users, or to governments acting as resource owners or fiscal agents. We have developed equations for seven separate classes of rent 1. to Canadian governments from non-frontier produc- tion 2. to producing firms from non-frontier production 3. to Canadian governments from Mackenzie Delta prod- uction 4. to producing firms from Mackenzie Delta production 5. to Canadian gas users 6. to the U.S. producers and users of Prudhoe Bay gas shipped through Canada 7. to U.S. purchasers of Mackenzie Delta gas. The equations and all the supporting calculations are described in detail elsewhere^; the present description is of their use. Our principal use has been to calculate the total Canadian rents for the Gas Arctic proposal (case 1), and to com- pare them with the corresponding totals for two deferred alter- natives. Case 1 involves pipeline construction between 1975 and 1978, with 50% of throughput capacity used to trans-ship Prudhoe Bay gas, 25% used to export Delta gas, and 25% used to move Delta gas to Canadian markets. Case 2 involves a five year deferral, with the pipeline assumed to come on stream in 1983, tc be used one-half to trans-ship Prudhoe Bay gas and one-half to move Delta gas to Canadian markets. Case 3 involves a ten year def- erral, with the pipeline coming on stream in 1988 and used en- tirely to carry Delta gas to Canadian markets. The first step was to establish a base case against which to make comparisons. This was done on the assumption that the Mackenzie Delta gas did not exist, or was otherwise not available. The two alternatives to Delta gas are assumed to be gas from Canadian non-frontier regions (mainly in the so-called Western Sedimentary Basin) and all other natural gas or substi- tutes for it, assumed to be available in large enough quantity to establish PGAS, the value of natural gas delivered to central Canadian markets. We have used estimates of this price, and of the related demand for natural gas, from forecasts made by the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources5, and by the Ontario Advisory Committee on Energy6. For most of our calculations, we assumed that well-head prices for gas in the Mackenzie Delta and in non-frontier regions would be established by subtracting transport costs from the market value of gas. This means that there are no rents to gas users, and that such rents as there are appear at the well-head. To calculate the base case rents from non-frontier regions, we assumed that a further 50 tcf of non-frontier re- serves can be discovered at a real per-unit capital cost of ex- ploration, production, and processing that is less than, four times the average real costs for the 74 tcf of non-frontier dis- coveries proven up to the end of 1972. The assumed future rate for proving and connecting new reserves is 2 tcf per year to 1978, and 3.5 tcf per year thereafter. As shown in Appendix A, this pattern provides for Canada's projected domestic natural gas consumption until 1988, and all future gas exports covered by approved contracts, without exceeding established flow rates of production from proven reserves. The economic rents to govern- ments and producing firms are calculated by simulating the pipe- line and gas producing sector forward until 2011, and discount- ing the cumulated non-frontier rents back to present values expressed in terms of 1973 dollars. These base case non-frontier rents were then used as benchmarks against which alternatives involving Delta and non- frontier gas can be compared. The calculation of non-frontier rents is necessary for two reasons. On the one hand, the large throughput of the Mackenzie Delta pipeline means that there would inevitably be some excess capacity when it came on stream. On the other hand, if a Mackenzie Delta pipeline were built be- fore it was needed to meet Canadian requirements, there would be additional costs for that reason. We have allowed for these costs by giving Delta gas priority in Canadian markets. Thus, the costs of digesting a big increment to supply, or using high-cost Delta gas before it is needed, turn up as a lower present value of rents from non-frontier gas. For each of our three main cases, we have attempted to minimize the non-frontier costs by cutting the discovery rate to its minimum value of 2 tcf/year as soon as the Mackenzie pipeline comes on stream. Results for Three Main Cases Part A of Table 2 shows the present values of the total Canadian rents for cases 1, 2, and 3. The numbers for total Canadian rents in column 5 are obtained by adding the Canadian share of producers' rents (23% in the non-frontier areas, 25% in the Delta) to the rents of Canadian governments and gas users. Canadian rents are shown as a percentage of total rents in col- o

Table 2 NET RENTS DUE TO EXPLOITATION OF NORTHERN GAS (Present values of all future rents are reported in millions of 1973 dollars)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Impact on rents from Rents from Mackenzie Rents to CanadIan Total Rents Ca nadi an non-frontier producti o n Delta production and ga s user s to Ca nadi ans rents a s % pipeline of tota 1 rents To Canadian To Produc ing To Can- To Producing Governments Firms (23% adian Firms (2 5% Can- Canadian- Govern- adian-owned) owned ) ments

A. No regulation of gas prices; all rents accrue in wellhe&d prices Case 1 -113 -217 1502 1489 1711 34% Case 2 - 90 -135 1514 1570 1784 43% Case 3 - 28 - 86 1452 1547 1791 62% Includi ng effects of policy changes Delta royalties at 25% of wel1 head price (equal to non-frontier rate); gas prices regulated to be 10% lower (lOtf/mcf in 1978) than market value in central Canadian markets; plus matching export tax on Delta and non- frontier gas exported, and throughput tax of same size on Prudhoe Bay gas trans-shipped. Case 1 .- 94 -124 3113 456 461 3567 72% Case 2 50 - 56 2453 633 786 3435 83% Case 3 230 - 70 1405 716 601 2399 83% 301 umn 7. In the absence of price requlation that qives rise to user rents, the best measure of Canadian advantage may be the sum of columns 1 and 3, rather than column 5. The Canadian share of producers' rents, which makes up the difference, is by definition a return to shareholders in excess of what could be obtained elsewhere, and thus has little justification in terms of equity or efficiency. In principle, governments are the most effective collection agents for the resource rents, which can then be distributed (within the province? the region? the nation? the world community?) through tax cuts, transfers, or social ex- penditure. Whether one looks at rents collected by Canadian gov- ernments, or total rents accruing to Canadians, there are appar- ent economic gains from deferring the Mackenzie Valley pipeline for a decade. Since the differences between the cases are very small, it is perhaps more appropriate to say that there is no net economic gain from construction of a Mackenzie Valley pipe- line in this decade. It is possible to say that there would be Canadian rents flowing from the proposed project (although not under the existing export contract prices); but our numbers say that there are even greater rents avilable from deferred develop- ment. There is no trick to showing that a natural resource dev- elopment could produce some economic rents - if not, the status of the natural resources would be in question. Sensible resource policy requires not just that some rents are produced, but that no alternative with higher rents is thereby lost. Thus we must always make present choices with an eye to future options. How do our conclusions tie in with the reasons offered by the Gas Arctic consortium in support of their plan for con- struction in this decade? In simple terms, our results are 1. Canada is not likely to need Arctic gas for domes- tic consumption until the late 1980's. 2. Trans-shipment of Prudhoe Bay gas is not an es- sential part of a Mackenzie Valley pipeline, esp- ecially if the pipeline is deferred until needed for Canadian use. 3. Exports of Mackenzie Delta gas are not necessary to make an Arctic pipeline feasible, especially if the pipeline is deferred until needed for Canadian use. These conclusions are demonstrated by the cases in Table 2. Case 3 involves no exports of Delta gas, and no trans- shipment of Prudhoe Bay gasB yet it shows higher rents than Case 1. If this is sos why has the consortium argued (e.g. Gray'*) that a Mackenzie Valley pipeline will be needed by the end of the decade, and that Delta exports and Prudhoe Bay trans-shipment are 302

necessary to make the pipeline viable? To solve this puzzle, we must approach the issues from their point of view. We must ask whose interests are represented in the consortium and calculate the rents of cases 1, 2, and 3 in those terms. The consortium comprises mainly Delta and Prudhoe Bay producing firms, potential U.S. purchasers of gas from both sources, and Canadian firms with pipeline interests. We can approximate their total rent by adding Delta producers rents to the Prudhoe Bay trans-shipmant rents and the rents accruing to U.S. purchasers of Delta gas*. Our numbers are rough, as we are not confident of our guesses about the cost advantages of the Mackenzie Valley pipeline over other methods for transporting Prudhoe Bay gas, Nevertheless, the order of magnitude is striking: Present value of rents to existing consortium members in millions of 1973 dollars Case 1 - Gas Arctic proposal 3805 Case 2-5 year deferral; no exports 2878 Case 3-10 year deferral; no 1547 exports and no trans- shi pment The differences between these results and those re- ported at the top of Table 2 demonstrate quite dramatically that one's point of reference makes a great deal of difference when one assesses costs and benefits. The calculations above indicate that the consortium would be well advised to push ahead with their plans. The calculations in Table 2 focus on the Canadian interest as a whole, and suggest the opposite conclusion. Gov- ernments and their agencies hoping to safeguard the public in- terest ought to undertake further calculations from the national point of view, taking new information into account as it becomes ava i1able.

* Some rents of the last type arise in our calculations even when well-head prices are set so that central Canadian users get no rents. The reason is that it costs less to ship.gas from Alberta to Chicago than to Toronto, primarily because of the high costs of pipeline construction north of Lake Superior. 303

Results with Alternative Policies A detailed simulation model of the sort we have devel- oped provides a handy tool for assessing the effects of different policy options, and for testing the sensitivity of the conclu- sions to changes in key assumptions. We have done a variety of the latter type of test, and theanswers l suggest that our re- sult that deferral is costless from the Canadian point of view holds under a variety of assumptions about the value of gas, the relative values attached to present and future rents, and the costs of non-frontier supplies. If we are right, then there is no need to discover overnight the best fiscal terms for the eventual development. These problems could be more effectively handled with due deliberation and research as could the various environmental, technical, and social problems posed by vast Arctic pipeline projects. To give a taste of the sort of policy options that can be assessed, part B of Table 2 shows the results of a joint test of several measures intended to increase the Canadian share of rents from cases 1, 2, and 3. The policy package includes: 1. Royalties on Delta gas raised from their assumed 5% and 10% values to 25%, approximately equal to the new Alberta average. 2. City-gate prices of gas delivered to central Can- adian markets are regulated to be 10% below market value. This difference is lOi/mcf in 1978, and grows thereafter with PGAS. 3. Gas export prices are unchanged from those applic- able in part A of Table 2. This is accomplished by an export tax just equal in size to the subsidy to domestic gas users. 4. A throughput tax of the same magnitude is leyied on Prudhoe Bay gas trans-shipped, in order to ob- tain a Canadian share in tha calculated transpor- tation rents. The policy changes serve to double total Canadian rents in cases 1 and 2 and to increase them by one-third in case 3. There is also a shift of the Canadian share in favour of governments and gas users. The proportion of total rent cap- tured is not as high as it should be under good resource manage- ment, but the object of the present calculations is only to give some idea of changes in rents brought about by an easily under- stood package of policy changes. The results also show that cases 1 and 2 have some potential for being more advantageous than case 3. Note, however, that there is still no advantage of 304

case 1 over case 2, and hence no reason for building soon and exporting Delta gas. The rents in cases 1 and 2 are higher than those in case 3 only because of the throughput tax on Prudhoe Bay gas trans-shipped. All of the cases in part B of Table 2 are better, from the Canadian point of view, than vneir corres- ponding numbers in Part A. This is no surprise, as no one has suggested that the present Canadian fiscal system is efficient in capturing resource rents. CONCLUSION On the basis of presently available information, our research indicates that deferral of an Arctic gas pipeline for up to ten years would have no economic cost. On the contrary, deferral offers substantial economic gains if it would help our chances of getting higher royalties and other policies designed to increase the public's share of resource rents. Deferral would also permit better planning to ease the economic, social „ and environmental problems caused by massive Arctic developments. REFERENCES 1. John Helliwell, "Impact of a Mackenzie Pipeline on the National Economy", Chapter 8 in P.H. Pearse, ed. Arctic Gas: The Mackenzie Pipeline and Canadian Energy Policy"; McClelland and Stewart, forthcoming. 2. John Helliwell, Peter Pearse, Chris Sanderson,, and Anthony Scott, "Where Does Canada's National Interest Lie? - A Quantita- tive Appraisal". Chapter 10 in P.H. Pearse, ed., op.cit. 3. John Helliwell, "More on the National Economic Effects of Arctic Energy Developments"„ Appendix AA, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, House of Commons Standing Committee on National r Resources and Public Works, Issue No.22, June 5, 19739 pp.41-8 J. 4. Earle Gray, "Why Canada Needs the Arctic Gas Pipeline", Chapter 2 in P.H. Pearse, ed.5 op.cit. 5. Canada , Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, An Energy Policy for Canada: Phase 1, Ottawa, (1973) 2 volumes. 6. Ontario, Advisory Committee on Energy, Energy in Ontario: the Outlook and Policy Implications. To r o nto (1972)2 volume's. 305

Appendix A - REQUIRED PRODUCTION FROM CANADIAN GAS RESERVES Flows Required for Export and Domestic Consumption, and Available Non-Frontier Supplies, 1973-2021 (Billion cubic feet per day)

Year Requirements Domestic Total Requirements Minus Ftr Exports Requirements Requirements Non-Frontier Supplies (EXGASNF) (DEMAND) (DEMAND + (DEMAND + EXGASNF - EXGASNF) GASMAX)

1973 2.8 4.1 6.9 0 1974 2.8 4.4 7.2 0 1975 2.9 4.8 7.7 0 1976 2.9 5.2 8.1 0 1977 3.0 5.6 8.6 0 1978 3.0 6.0 9.0 0 1979 3.0 6.5 9.5 0 1980 3.0 7.0 10.0 0 1981 3.0 7.3 10.3 0 1982 2.7 7.6 10.3 0 1983 2.6 7.9 10.5 0 1984 2.6 8.2 i0.8 0 1985 2.5 8.5 11.C 0 1986 2.3 8.9 11.1 0 1987 1.0 9.2 VI. 1 0 1988 1.9 9.6 11.5 .4 1989 1.7 10.0 li , 7 .7 1990 .6 10.4 11.0 .3 1991 .4 10.7 11.1 l.S 1992 • 2 10.9 11.1 2.5 i 1993 .2 11.2 11.4 3.4 I 1994 .2 11.5 11.7 4.3 !i 1995 11.8 , ' 11.8 S.5 1996 12.1 12.1 6.4 1997 12.4 . 12.4 7.4 1998 12,7 12.7 8.3 jj' 13.0 13.0 9.0 I 2000 13,3 13-3 9.9 | 2001 13.6 13,6 11.9 2002 14.0 14.0 K'.O 1 2003 14.5 14.3 12.5 2004 14. 7 14.' ••• 13.1 I r s 200 15.0 15.0 14.0 2006 15.4 15.4 14.7 1 20O7 15.8 15.8 (increasing by 2.5% * * per year) 2021 22.4 22.4

Si For footnotes see following page, 306

Footnotes to Appendix A

Assuming no new export contracts beyond commitments in 1973. Flows derived from terms of existing, contracts. Extensions of some expiring contracts were assumed for our 5ira.1latir.ns of Cases 2 and 3. In Case 2 exports were maintained at 2.7 bcf/d from 1983 to 1989, and 1.8 bcf/d in 1990 and 1991, returning to the base numbers in 1992 In Case 3, exports were maintained at 2.3 bcf/d from 1987 to 1993, 1.8 bcf/d iri 1994, 1.2 bcf/d in 1995 and 1996, dropping to zero thereafter.

As forecast by the Advisory Committee on Energy, Energy in Ontario: The Outlook and Policy Implications, Toronto, 1973. Demand is estimated to grow at 8% per year until 1980, at 4% annually between 1980 and 1990, and at 2.5% per year thereafter.

GASMAX is the maximum available flow from non-frontier gas reserves, in bcf/d. Two important assumptions underlie the calculation of these maximum flows. First, all reserves discovered in Western Canada before 1970 were assumed to be exploited at an average initial rate of 1 million cf/i per 8 bcf of initial reserves, declining after 15 years by 15% per year for eight years and then producing at the resulting constant rate until 95% of the initial reserves aro produced. Post-'70 reserves are assumed to be produced at an initial rate of 1 million cf/d per 7.3 bcf of initial reserves for 14 years, thereafter declining at 15% per year for eight years and then producing at the resulting constant rate until, again, 95% of initial reserves are withdrawn. This higher rate reflects trends in recent export contracts, almost all of which have been based on such higher rates. Second, since our postulated production rates result in excess capacity in the past, it is assumed that reserves are not brought into production until required. Appendix A uses GASMAX for the base case, assuming a discovery rate of 2 tcf per year until the end of 1978, and 3.5 per year until 1989, by which tiiss the remaining reserves have been discovered. The GASMAX patterns for the other cases have lower values in the early years and higher values late-r. because of their delayed discovery patterns. 307

ENERGY: POLICY CHOICES REGARDING EXPLOITATION AND EXPORT

by G.D. QUIRIN Faculty of Management Studies University of Toronto

INTRODUCTION Canada has developed and potential reserves of fossil fuels, of coal, oil, natural gas and uranium, which have, because of their proximity to established markets, an economic significance greater than a casual comparison of our reserves with world totals might suggest. They are, however, not infinite, and will, if used, eventually be exhausted. How fast should we depletp them? Should we develop and exploit new discoveries, or should we put them "on the shelf", to be used on some more propitious occasion? Should we permit their export, or reserve them for Canadian customers only? Should international influences be allowed to affect the domestic price, or should the domestic user be shielded from external de- velopments, and possibly given a competitive advantage over his foreign competitors by such protection? These are the fundamental questions that have been asked, and asked again, in our continuing debate on energy policy, and to which answers are at least implicitly contained in whatever energy policy happens to be in effect at a given moment. To my mind, they are also the right questions; decisions to utilize or not to utilize these resources ought to be taken primarily on the basis of the answers to these questions, and not on the basis of the relative labour content of the resource industries, the uncompensated employment effects or balance of payments effects of their expansion, or some of the similar variables which have been introduced into the debate by some of the participants. Professor Helliwell and others have examined the "impact" of certain resource developments and concluded that under certain conditions these developments will improve the terms of trade, raise the value of the Canadian dollar, and lead to the substitution of low labour-content resource-based exports for existing exports having a relatively higher labour content and thence to higher unemployment. With the choice of sufficiently impressive jargon, this can be made to sound like a dire threat indeed. What it means in plain English is that these developments will enable us to maintain imports of those commodities which contribute to our present standard of living while using a smaller frac- tion of our labour force to produce the exports required to pay for them. The "surplus" labour can be used, if we have the will, to produce other commodities which will improve our standard of living. Far from being a cost of resource development, the labour they release is a measure of the potential benefit. If it is not used, ana the benefit is not realized, 308

as the consequence of a failure of fiscal or monetary policy, blame for the failure should be laid where it belongs and not on the events which created the opportunity. In answering the questions we have posed, the fundamental con- sideration is that the fossil fuels are non-renewable resources. New deposits may be in process of formation, but the rate at which they are being formed is so low, in relation to potential rr'?s of depletion, that it can be ignored. All natural resources may become non-renewable, if exploitation is pursued at rates which reduce populations below the levels required for reproduction. But the distinction between non-renewable resources, where use necessarily involves a depletion of the stock, and those which may be used in practical volumes without depleting the stock, is fundamental. Fossil fuels share the non-renewable characteristic with other minerals; concern has centered on them because continued use of energy is a necessary condition for the maintenance of any type of industrial economy. Substitution and recycling possibilities are more easily seen for other minerals than for fuels; for thermodynamic reasons, the latter do not exist. It is easy to inject emotion into the debate; as Tuzo Wilson has reminded us, life in a cold climate would be very unpleasant with drastically-reduced energy supplies. There has also been concern over the use of non-renewable resources at the global level, of which the well-known Club of Rome projection1^ that the world's resources will all be exhausted on October 18, 2053, if the world does not come to an end sooner for other reasons, is merely one example. We share these concerns. We recognize that no steady-state economy can exist, in the long run, in which resources are being consumed at a rate in excess of that at which they are being recycled or, in the case of energy sources, created. This means that mankind will ultimately become dependent on energy sources which are being continuously renewed, such as solar energy. But we are also aware that solar energy, and many of the other "ultimate" substitutes are exceedingly expensive- given cur- rent technology. While we wait for technological change to reduce their costs, it seems to us that the folly of using non-renewable energy sources which are cheaper in terms of existing technology has not been convincingly demonstrated. The wisdom of the miser has yet to gain uni- versal acceptance.

The concern raised by the Club of Rome projections is a legiti- mate one even if one can find a multitude of questionable assumptions in the projections. Most economists have tended to dismiss them, as if they had been adequately disposed of by such critics as John Maddox^' and Wilfred Beckerman4 who have argued that the market is a robust, self- regulating device that will prevent resource exhaustion long before it occures. We may indeed be sure that it will, but it is still relevant to ask whether the price of oil 50 years hence will he $7.00 per barrel or $700.00. The implications of the difference for :h(> quality of life in a cold country are indeed profound. The common mask's mistrust of the invisible hand is not misplaced; he knows it may put its thumb in his eye while going about its great work and that he won't see it coming if it 309 does. However, we are unable, today, to say very much about what energy prices will be forty years hence, though we are working on it. The problems to which this paper is addressed are those which we have suggested are fundamental. Should we exploit these resources now. and tor what purposes, and how fast should we use up the stock available? This is the classic problem of conservation as it applies to such re- sources. It has been looked at before by a number of economists; major contributions have been made by Tony Scott^ and Scott Gordon^ . The traditional unit of analysis has been the individual ore body or other mineral deposit, the usual viewpoint that of the profit-maximizing firm operating such a deposit. Our treatment differs from most of the earlier literature in that explicit social welfare functions are introduced, and in the attention given to problems of resource development in an open economy.

ASSUMPTIONS In constructing the analytical model we have assumed that society has a limited quantity of a resource, measured in homogeneous output units. Demand functions and cost functions are known for each period j out to a planning horizon T, (j = 1, 2 ...T), but may differ in each period. The commodity is produced under conditions of increasing marginal cost, while demand is assumed to vary inversely with price, and to become zero at a price k which is taken to represent the price at which all the functions of the commodity are taken over by substitutes. We also assume an absence of external economies *nd diseconomies. Control over the quantity produced and consumed is assumed to be exercised by a central planning authority through prices, fixed for each period, which determine the quantity consumed and the cost of producing it. Output is met at minimum cost in each period, and we assume the planning authority may require producers to meet demand generated by a given price, providing costs are covered. This need not be taken as implying an advo- cacy, on our part, of centralized planning, but such advocates abound and we thought it would be useful to see how a central planning agency, interested in maximizing social welfare, would behave. We consider also the case of decentralized planning, making more direct use of markets, and the extent to which it will produce results ir. conformity with the optimum centrally-planned solutions. Formally, we have set up the problem as one of maximizing certain objective functions, defined as social welfare functions, subject to con- straints, the most important of which, and the one which sets our problem apart from the general optimum pricing problem, in the requirement that total production, over the planning horizon be not greater than the amount of the resource available. It is an inequality, because there may be reasons why the entire resource will not be consumed. Prices and quanti- ties are also constrained to be non-negative, for the usual reasons. We also require, where it is not implicit in the objective function, that aggregate sales receipts cover total costs in each period; in *he absence^ of externalities there is no particular reason to subsidize consumption of the commodity. Markets are cleared in each period. 310

SOCIAL WELFARE FUNCTIONS

By e social welfare function we merely mean a function expressing how the quantities of different commodities and income made available to ^H •p-Fr.^no^- momKarc n-f tho rnmmum'tu srp tn hp i nrlpvprl anri arlrlpri tin tn niv/P a measure of aggregate social welfare (Cf. Bergson 5 , Arrow ' ). In a partial equilibrium setting, where there are no externalities and where all other prices and incomes are fixed, we may derive a form of the social wel- fare function in which the only arguments are the prices and quantities of the single commodity under consideration. Lower prices mean higher real income for consumers since they will have more left over after buying the commodity, but less real income for its producers. How should these arguments appear in the s.w.f. pertaining to this particular industry? What do we, as a society, want it to accomplish? One answer which is frequently given is that we want it to meet the "needs" of the consumers in the community at lowest cost. This version of "produc- tion for use and not for profit" is too ambiguous; need is relative not absolute, disappearing entirely above a certain price where substitutes are used in its stead, but becoming (perhaps embarrassingly) large as it approaches the status of a free good. However, the spirit of the proposal seems to be captured adequately by requiring that the commodity be priced in such a way that consumers derive the maximum benefit from its existence and availability, subject of course to the requirement that they cover pro- ducers' costs. The benefit they gain is of course the saving derived from being able to use the commodity instead of the more expensive substitute. This leads directly to the maximization of Marshallian consumers' surplus^ or Hicks' compensating variation 9 as an objective. We recognize the problems associated with the consumers' surplus concept; it is inexact and ambiguous. But so are a numher of other indices widely used in economics, including the concept of national income. Like the latter, the consumer's surplus concept is just too useful to stay dead, and it has crept back as a key concept in benefit cost analysis. For a discussion of its use, see Mishan 14 . In the single-period context, without constraints, maximizing con- sumer benefits leads to the imposition of a monopsony price. It may be a single price, imposed by the central planning authority, or a set of dis- criminatory prices may be imposed. If the former, output will be con- strained below the competitive level. With price discrimination, output may reach the competitive level, with marginal producers receiving the competitive price but others receiving less. Considerations of this kind appear to underly U.S. policy with respect to domestic natural gas prices, where discriminatory price controls are maintained and hold prices below market-clearing levels.

Maximization of consumer benefits is only one of several possible objectives of public policy in respect of commodity pricing. An obvious alternative is the maximization of producer benefits. These may be iden- tified with the excess of receipts over the economic costs of attaining a particular output level, i.e., with economic rents. They are maximized by a monopolistic pricing policy, which, like its monopsonistic counterpart, 311 may involve a single price or a set of discriminatory prices, and ir.ay in- volve restriction of output below the competitive level. Examples of this type of policy also appear to exist, and are perhaps exemplified by the pricing policies of the countries belonging to the Organization of Petro- leum Exporting Countries. Neither of these single-minded objectives seems to us to be appropriate, at least in Canadian context. We are a society of producers as well as of consumers, and neither interest should be ignored by the body politic. The most obvious social welfare function embracing both interests is one in which the maximand is the sum of consumers' surplus plus economic rents. This leads, in the closed economy unconstrained case, to the familiar requirement that prices equal marginal cost, i.e., to the competitive solution. There are, superficially, reasons why the consumer-oriented social welfare function might be preferred, on distributional grounds, to the maximization of joint benefits. Consumers are, by almost universal assumptions, "little people", while producers are corporations with "neither bodies to be burned nor souls to be damned", as admirably expressed by Lord Coke. This easy identification may be challenged; the principal bene- ficiaries of a cheap-fuels policy may be customers who use natural gas to heat their swimming pools or gasoline to drive Cadillacs. The bulk of energy resources in Canada belong to the Crown, and at least a portion of economic rents accrues to the Crown as landlord or through the tax system; given that the Crown's share in economic rents is adjustable upwards, the case for subsidizing customers in proportion to the amounts they consume is a perversion in a society with egalitarian pretentions. The joint bene- fit, maximization solution is efficient, since a move from a monopolistic (monopsonistic) solution to the competitive one will increase consumer (producer) benefits by an amount which will almost invariably be larger than the amount by which producer (consumer) benefits are reduced by such a move, and will never be less. This means that any adverse distributional consequences can be fully compensated by suitable taxes and subsidies with- out eliminating the net gain. SOCIAL WELFARE NOW AND IN THE FUTURE The essence of the conservation problem is a balancing of present benefits and costs against future benefits and costs. We have therefore, to consider not merely the sum of consumers' surplus and economic rents in the single period context within which they were discussed above, but. the sum of such benefits in each of an indefinite number of future periods. Benefits and costs in different periods are not directly commensurable. This problem is handled by reducing all to a common present value basis by discounting at a rate r_, where r_ is defined as the social rate of discount. Some conservationists, particularly those emerging from back- grounds in the natural sciences, object to the discounting process, arguing that it results in a deliberate understatement of future benefits, reflects myopic time preference, etc. Perhaps a word of justification is in order. 0 A Period 1 Period 2 Combined

Construction of Discounted Demand Curves CO

-p. py. of Price

MCL

Consumption-/ ^Production Consumption = Product! on, Period i Period 1 both periods Combined Fig. 2 Derivation of Individuol Period Production and Consumption Schedules 315

We mast conserve all resources and not just the one we are interested in at the moment; capital is productive, and instead of one shoe this year we can have 1+r shoes next year, because of its productivity. If we do not discount the benefits from future goods, which reflect this general rela- tionship, and which are, because of it, easier to come by than current goods, we fall into the opposite trap of underestimating the benefits de- rived from the latter. While it is true that non-renewable resources may well become scarcer through time, other commodities have not and will not, as productivity in general increases in the normal course of economic growth. We cannot deal here with the selection of an appropriate discount rate; reference may be had to recent work by Baumol3 and Arrow 2 . THE USE AND LIMITATIONS OF DISCOUNTED COST AND DEMAND CURVES Intertemporal relations are of the essence in the consideration of conservation problems. Handling them satisfactorily requires fairly complicated analytical techniques. In this paper, for expositional pur- poses, the analysis is presented using discounted cost and demand curves. The intertemporal link is provided by the constraint on total volume pro- duced. Discounted cost and demand curves are derived from the corres- ponding single period curves applicable to a future period t periods from now by multiplying the price variable by a factor l/(l+r)t, where r is the applicable social rate of discount. The resulting transformed curves are expressed in terms of equivalent price units, ilel, present day dollars, and may be aggregated over price to yield a multi-period curve, as is illus- trated in Figure 1. The use of such curves is discussed in more detail by Scott^8 and by the Lutzes10 . It is possible to work back from the inter- section of multiperiod cost and demand curves to derive period-by-period production and consumption plans as illustrated in Figure 2. The usefulness of the technique is largely pedagogical, enabling the presentation of intertemporal analyses in graphic form. The basic weakness is that when the single intersection of the multiperiod curves is used, markets are cleared only over the entire planning horizon implicit in the multiperiod curves. The period-by-period production schedules derived from the intersection may call for production in advance of demand, making no allowance for storage costs. Even worse, they may call for consumption now and production twenty years hence, which is an even more difficult trick. It has been adopted in this paper to simplify the presentation of certain basic ideas. The propositions which are advanced were obtained using somewhat more complex techniques, using a model which provides for period-by-period market clearing, and which is constrained to prevent some of the other economic absurdities possible using the purely geometric approach. Those seeking a more rigorous derivation of the results may be referred to the original papers by Professor Kalymon and myself lb» u- The price series derived from a single intersection of discounted multiperiod cost and demand curves is, invariably, a geometrically rising series in which prices rise at the rate (1+r). The result, frequently ob- tained in the literature, that the optimum price series for an exhaustible resource is such an increasing series appears to be the result of using 316 RV. of 4 Price

PV. of Prices

0 317 this analytical device, or of special assumptions regarding successive single period cost and demand functions; it does not hold in the most general case. One of the components of the price, however, is the user cost term to which we will refer below, does increase geometrically and ftiay eventually dominate the price series. EFFECT OF THE RESOURCE CONSTRAINT In the absence of external economies or diseconomies, we would normally identify the summed discounted marginal cost curves as the multi- period supply curve of the industry, and its intersection with the multi- period demand curve as determining appropriate output over the planning horizon, with the appropriate production and consumption schedules deter- mined by working back from this intersection to the respective MC and de- mand curves for the individual periods. However, we must also contend with the existence of a constraint on the ultimate quantity which may be produced. The constraint may be shown on our diagram as a vertical lire drawn at the maximum quantity available. Multi-period supply at a given supply price is the lesser of (a) the quantity determined from the multi-period MC curve, or (b) the maximum quantity available, Q. Two possibilities exist. The MC-demand intersection may lie to the left of the amount Q, as in Figure 3(a), indicating that the constraint is not effectively binding, at least within the planning horizon. Alter- natively the constraint Q may be effective, so that the operational supply curve is OAB as sketched in Figure 3 (b) . In this case, the maximum attainable value of the social welfare function is realized by producing amount OQ. The supply price which must be paid to induce this amount to be supplied is 0Ps. At this price, how- ever, the quantity which would be demanded over the planning horizon would be OR; period-by-period consumption must be rationed, either directly or by permitting price to rise to the market-clearing level OP

MCL

MC,

MC 319

The dissipation of user costs under various systems of tenure has received a great deal of attention in the economic literature on conserva- tion. Private operators will take user costs into their calculations only if their title conveys absolute ownership of the resource, uninterrupted until exhaustion. This condition is notoriously unfulfilled in many forms of mineral lease. Where title is contingent on withdrawal prior to a '.om- petitor, as in the rule-of-rapture situation first examined by Stocking20 operators are likely to behave as if user cos'L were negative. Concession arrangements where the property reverts to the grantor aftep a certain date are slightly less obnoxious, but give the operator no incentive to consider potential values after the expiry of the concession agreement. In both instances, intervention by an outside authority is likely to be necessary to discourage an excessive rate of production. Even where the tenure sys- tem is ideal, there may be problems created by differences between the operator's cost of capital and the social rate of discount. A number of devices have been used to enforce restricted output in tenure situations where dissipation of user costs, seems'likely; these and related devices intended to capture the economic rents generated thereby are beyond the scops of the present paper; A word or two is in, order regarding the case where the constraint is not binding, i..e.s the case shown in Figure 3 (a). Here, the available reserve'will not be utilized within the planning horizon. This will happen either because the reserve is so "large relative to demand that no genuine scarcity problem exists, or because low-priced substitutes are available and are used in preference to the scarce commodity. In either case, no user cost term enters the optimum price, awl no conservation problem exists. It should be noted that this may be an incorrect conclusion obtained by using an inappropriately short planning horizon; our analysis suggests that in practical cases, the difficulty may be avoided by cordjering arbi- trary extensions of the planning horizon, since beyond a certain point further extensions do not affect the solution values. THE CASE FOR POSTPONEMENT In all cases where the resource constraint is binding, the inclu- sioi of the user cost term in prices induces some degree of postponement in consumption. But what about complete postponement, delaying utilization of the resource until some future date? To'consider this problem, we examine a diagram in which the first period cost and demard curves appear along with the multi-period curves; in effect dividing the planning horizon into two periods, "now" and "later". The question may be rephrased: under what conditions will production or consumption take place later but

Consumer Benefits

id. 6 of Diversions in a 2 323 at price OP,. The amount BC is exported; of this amount AB represents in- creased proauction while CA is diverted from the domestic market. There is an increase of P^ E F Pc in producers' rents, and a decrease of P

While it pays to export, it. pays even better not to export too much. The only economically interesting case in which it does not pay to export is the case where the substitution possibilities available to the potential export market are such that there is no price above the domestic market-clearing price at which any exports may be sold. If these substi- tution possibilities are also available to domestic consumers, there is of course no reason why output should be carried to the market clearing level; it would pay to use the substitutes in the domestic market as well. The required restriction in export volumes and enforcement of a two-price system can be obtained, administratively, in a variety of ways. Perhaps the simplest is through the imposition of an export tax. Restric- tion of the export volumes permitted may also be effective if the mechanism chosen is effective. Ar, example of 5 mechanism 'which resLricLb exports but is ineffective, is the system which has been used to regulate natural gas exports from this country since the mid 1950's. In essence this system allocates export rights to a designated export agency; producers have the option of taking the price offered by the export agency (usually a pipeline company) or having no market at all; this system places effective monopsony power in the hands of the export agency and allows it to use the restric- tion on output to hold prices down, thus frustrating the presumed intent of the restriction. We have, of course, had an export tax in operation on crude oil since OctGber 1. The ultimate nature of the scheme is still (as of writing) undecided; and it is not yet possible to identify it as an application of the welfare-maximizing model discussed here. For one thing, there is un- certainty concerning what output is marginal and what marginal cost is relevant. Jf the marginal output is that from the Athabasca tar sands, and an exemption from the tax is necessary to permit economic exploitation of the latter, there would seem to be a possibility that what has been created is a two-price system in which the domestic price is monopsonistic. In terms of our model, this will encourage excessive current use and dissipate rents to current consumers. Neither of these objectives is consistent with optimizing behaviour. THE IMPORTING COUNTRY CASE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS We have, to this point, confined our examination to the national- istic interests of a country which has a present resource base sufficiently large to permit exports in addition to serving local markets. The optimum we have derived is a purely nationalistic optimum. Implicit in our treat- ment to this point is an assumption of uncoordinated behaviour on the part. of foreign buyers, against whom monopoly power is being exercised. While- such a world might suit us best, it is not the world which exists with re- spect to most energy commodities. We have many customers, but they are nearly all located in T country which has demonstrated a willingness to intervene in markets for nationalistic reasons. If we examine the optimum policy for a country which is a producer but is not self-sufficient, the logical maximand is the sum of its domestic producers' rents plus its domestic consumers' surpluses. Analysis of this case, which is not pursued in detail here, suggests that an optimum policy involves the imposition of en import tariff, or import controls, to exercise monopsony power against 326

U.S. Restrictions

Canadian Restrictions

7 327 foreign producers, plus some subsidization of domestic producers. All of these are features of the oil policy of our principal customer, and an analysis using plausible numerical values of the relevant variable suggests that in fact the tariff/import quota combinations which have been employed are not far from optimal^7 . The demand curve to which Canadian policy must respond is not the pure demand curve of the market place, but one which has been already manipulated by U.S. import policy; optimizing be- haviour with respect to it does not lead to an optimum optimorum but to a position that is, in effect, optimum retaliation to existing U.S. policy, our net benefits are smaller than they would be if a similar strategy were adopted in the absence of market intervention by the U.S. These cons 1 derations serve to indicate that we are not operating in a world made for the unfettered exercise of our potential monopoly power; we are operating in a world of bilateral monopoly where we may expect to find monopsony power actively exercised on behalf of our consumers. If we do aaopt a policy which discriminates against U.S. buyers, even if it is a purely retaliatory one, there is no reason to expect government interven- tion to stop at the end of round one. Such a policy will alter the terms of optimal intervention by the U.S., as they seek to retaliate against our rigging of the market, and the benefits we derive from our new policy will be reduced. We can examine the implications of the situation more fully using the Stackelberg bilateral monopoly model^9*? . In Figure 7, Canada's decision variable, the degree of restriction it imposes on exports, is shown along the x-axis; the extent to which the US. restricts imports is shown on the y-axis. The solid indifference curves measure the net bene- fits obtained by Canada under various combinations of Canadian and U.S. policies, the dotted indifference curves measure net benefits obtained by the U.S. Reaction curves for the two countries may be drawn, showing the optimum response for each country to a given policy of the other; these pass through points where the line corresponding to given value of the other's variable is tangent to the highest own indifference curve. These are shown as Rc and R,. in Figure 7, respectively. The arrows indicate the preferred direction of movement. From any arbitrary starting point A with- in the area bounded by Rc and Ru, a succession of attempts by the two par- ties to achieve an optimum response to the other's policy will lead in- exorably along 3 path like ABCDEF to the point G at which the two reaction curves intersect. This is a position in which substantial restriction is practised by both parties, and where the benefits obtained from trade are accordingly limited for both. Both would like to move down their reaction curves, but can be kept from doing so by their trading partner, if the latter is unwilling to be cooperative. The Edgeworth contract curve, defined by the mutual tangency of pairs of indifference curves, also appears on Figure 7, as PP'. This in- dicates the set of Pareto-optimal solutions; in movements along PP' one party can gain only at the expense of the other. Negotiated solutions 1 along PP or that segment between Xc and Xu represent improvements, rela- tive to the position G, which might be attained through negotiation; points to the right of X- are improvements over G from the Canadian point of view, points above Xu are preferable to G for the U.S. XCXU thus describes the range of feasible bargains, attainable not only from the starting point. G but from any other, since either player has a potential threat strategy which can push the initial position to G if it seems advisable to do so. There is no unique solution, though certain points have been suggested by Nash and others '5> 6 as more plausible than others. There is not even a guarantee that the final solution will lie on PP1 though there is no point off PP1 from which a movement to PP does not improve the position of at least one of the participants. This analysis suggests that, it will at some point be desirable to sit down with the U.S. and negotiate a degree of mutual restraint in respect of enerqy policy. The latter will be collaborative, though not necessarily "Continental" if that term means completely free trade in energy, as it has to many current exponents of continental ism. Our discussion of the bilateral relationships is to some extent oversimplified; the U.S. has a number of other suppliers so that it is, strictly speaking, incorrect to view the problem as a two-person game. It also has well defined positions about the types of discriminatory trade arrangements which are moral and immoral, so that the position is more com- plex than we have described it. We hope that it will be possible, in a few months time, to present a version of this analysis from which the more serious simplifications have been removed, where numerical estimates are available for the parameters, and which can be used to yield explicit solu- tions.

Aknowledgements: The author wishes to express his thanks to Professor Basil Kalymon, his co-author of two related papers^* ^7 ; and to the corporate sponsors of the Natural Resources Management Program, Faculty of Management Studies for financial support of the research on which this paper is based. 329

REFERENCES 1. K.J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., (New York» Wiley, 1963). 2. K.J. Arrow and R.C. Lind, "Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions", American Economic Review, vol. LX (June, 1970) pp. 364-378. 3. W.J. Baumol, "On the Social Rate of Discount", American Fconomic Review, vol. 58, (Sept. 1968), pp. 788-802. 4. W. Beckerman, "Economists, Scientists, and Environmental Catastrophe", Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 24, (Nov. 1972), pp. 327-344. 5. A. Bergson, "A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics", Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. LI, Feb. 1938. 6. R.B. Braithwaite, Theory of Games as a tool for the Moral Philosopher, (Cambridge, 1955). 7. W.J. Fellner, Competition Among the Few, (New York, 1949). 8. H.S. Gordon, "Economic Theory of a Common Property Resource: The Fishery", Journal of Political Economy, vol. 62, (1954), pp. 124-42. 9. J.R. Hicks, "The Generalized Theory of Consumer's Surplus", Review of Economic Studies, vol. XIII, (1945-6), pp. 68-74. 10. F.A. Lutz and V. Lutz, The Theory of Investment of the Firm, (Princeton, 1951). 11. J. Maddox, The Doomsday Syndrome, (London, 1972). 12. A. Marshall, Principles of Economics, 8th ed., (London, MacmilIan,1920) 13. D.H. Meadows, D.L. Meadows, J. Randers and W.W. Behrens, The Limits to Growth, (London, 1972). 14. E.J. Mishan, Cost-Benefit Analysis, (London, Unwin. 1971). 15. J.F. Nash, "Two-Person Cooperative Games", Econometrica, vol. 21 (1953), pp. 128-40. 16. G.D. Quirin and B.A. Kalymon, "Conservation and the Optimum Exploita- tion of Exhaustible Resources", Working Paper No. 73-03, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Toronto. 17. , "Optimum Energy Policies in an Importing Country", Working Paper No. 73- , idem. 18. A.D. Scott, Natural Resources: The Economics of Conservation, (Toronto, 1955T 330

19. H. von Stackeiberg, Marktform und Gleichgewicht, (Berlin, 1934),

20. G.W. Stocking, The Oil Industry and the Competitive System, A Study in Waste, (New York, 1923). 331

RISING ENERGY PRICES ANO ECONOMIC STRUCTURE bv

O.K. DALES, F.R.S.C. Department of Political Economy University of Toronto

I The storv of the Industrial Revolution is larqely a storv of energy, but the theme that energy equals industrialization has been too we!1 learned. Rising prices of enerqv and forecasts of future "shortages" have led to exaggerated fears for the future of machine industry in particular and for our "way of life" in general. While it is true by definition that, in the absence of technological change, an economy that uses non-renewable resources cannot achieve a "steady state" and must ultimately decline, this truism doesn't take us far. It no doubt serves the important social function of raising the ethical implications of the law of increasing entropy as it applies to the use of natural resources,' but it gives no clue about either the type or the timing of the social economic adjustments to be expected in a deteriorating resource situation. It is in understanding the adjustment process that economics can be helpful. The present discussion is limited to the probable effects of rising energy prices on economic trends over the next thirty or fortv years, that is to say, during a period when present energy technology is not expected to be changed in anv fundamental way, or before the advent of either fusion or solar power on a large scale. No attempt is made to quantify the discussion in other than purely impressionistic terms. For what it is worth, mv general impression is that the pace of change attributable to rising energy costs will be so slow as to be of little concern to the next couple of generations. As a threat to our way of life, declining energy reserves are in my opinion of distinctly secondary importance to increasing population, both in the world as a whole and in North America. Although these two threats are related, I shall not discuss the population problem in this paper; in order to isolate energy problems, indeed, I shall pretend that population growth is zero. The rationale for thus downgrading the energy "crisis" aoart from the impressive adaptability of the human soecies, is what economists call substitutability. Particularly in a highly developed economy, there are scores of ways of doing things, as well as thousands of things to do, and the presence of many alternatives — much substitutability -- makes for slow, undramatic change, much as complexity makes for relatively tough and stable ecosystems. For present purposes, we may think of four broad classes of substitutability: The substitution of one energy material for another; the use of energy-saving methods of producing goods and services; substitution against energy-intensive goods and services in typical consumption patterns; and alterations in the spatial patterning of production and consumption. Substitutions resulting from a worsening energv situation, reflected in rising orices of energv, will not, of course, prevent a fall in the standard of living: but they will minimize the fall for any given reduction in resource availability. And the Doint remains that the more numerous the possible substitutions, the smaller is likely to be the decline in well-being associated with each substitution, and the smoother and slower the adjustment to a given change in circumstances. For a variety of reasons it is all but impossible to measure the effects on well-being of the resource reallocations occasioned bv substitution processes. During the cycle of growth that started 2f)D years ago the contribution of efficient organization to economic welfare seems to have been swamDed by the favourable effects of resource discoveries, inrroroved technology, and population growth.^ But the growth cycle may now have reached its Deak. The orosoect is for dwindling resources per caoita and continued population growth to have negative effects on the standard of living; in such a setting efficient resource allocation is bound to gain in significance as a determinant of economic welfare. We may still, of course, hone for improved technology, -Jt if we are wise, we shall also make sure that the substitution mechanisms are kept in good repair so that the adverse effects of declining natural resources and increasing population may be mitigated to the greatest possible extent. Economic no!icy that seeks to hide the need for adjustments, or to slow down the rate of adjustment, is a Dolicy we can ill afford during a period of slow and uncertain economic growth. II

If we cannot measure the magnitude of substitution effects, we can at least, be sure of their direction, and it is time now to illustrate the sorts of effects that we should expect to flow from declining energv availa- bilities. As • ^s noted above, different energy materials mav be substituted for one another, although the economic oracticability of doing so varies greatly depending both on the energv sources in guestion and the uses to which they are Dut. The possibilities of substitution are well known and need only brief mention. It seems most unlikely that there will be major changes in the pattern of energy production and use; electricity will remain the preferred form of nower for driving machinery in both the factory and the home, petroleum the preferred oower source for transportation, and some combination of petroleum and coal the preferred fuel for both processes heating and space-heating.3 More uranium and less fossil fuel will be used to oroduce electricitv, and coal mav well be increasingly substituted for oil or gas in heating markets, but as yet there seems little orosoect for the economic use of the bv-nroduct heat involved in the production of atomic oower. Within the energv sector, the m st visible effect of rising nrices of petroleum and natural gas mav be an increasing extraction of fluid hydro- carbons from tar sands, oil shale and ~oal. Attemots by governments to Dre- vent Drice rises for enerqv will, to the extent they are successful, delav investment in these substitute sources and save the consumer from higher orices at the exoense of exoosing him to shortages in physical supplies and various forms of governmental or corporate rationing schemes. 333

While the qeneral Djvttern_ of enerqv use mav not change verv much, enerqy Prices that rise relative to other prices will make for a reduced consumption of enerqv relative to the consumDtion of other qoods and services. It is here that our iqnorance of maqnitude, as ODposed to direction, is most frustratinq, since vve have verv little idea as to how stronq the effect will be, and therefore no wav of qauqing whether it will dominate other develoo- ments that mav tend to increase enerqy use. Nevertheless, there will be an i ~entive to reduce the consumDtion of enerqv throuqhout the economy. Within industry, the effect on production n£thods_ is not likely to be noticeable, and in the main will probably take the form of not extendinq machine methods and automation so far or so raoidly as s been the case in the recent oast. The effect on whjrt industry nroduces will larqelv depend on consumer reactions to higher enerqv prices, and her^i the chanqe in behaviour, though no doubt slow, should be more pronounced. As heating costs rise, well insulated houses and attached houses may sell more readily than rambling ranch bunqalows. As the operatinq cost of home appliances rises people will adjust bv buying fewer anpliances, demandinq more efficient appliances, and usinq them more sparingly. Me mav even see a return to the habit of turning out liqhts when they are not in use! Passenger automobiles should evolve in the direction of smaller and more efficient vehicles. Home freezers and air-conditionina equipment mav become less common. Recreational activities, which at the moment anpear to be rather energv-intensive, may well become less mechanized. Rut civiliza- tion will hardly be threatened by such modifications in our wav of life!

Ill

The transportation market calls for snecial comment because the moving of both goods and people uses immense amounts of petroleum,the enerqv source that is likely to rise most ir. orice in the foreseeable future. We should expect continuing adjustments desiqned to economize on transnort services. Thy demand for transport services arises from the soatial separation of production and consumption activities. While a society of self- sufficient families would require no transportation industry, differential nroductive capacities of both men and land ensure a kev role for transporta- tion in all actual societies. Cheap transportation unleashes the nreat potential of the division of labour among men and reqions; and the relatively imall proportion of national income originating in the transnort sector of developed economies, even of countries like Canada with huge areas of relatively unproductive, and therefore liqhtlv settled, land, indicates the great contribution cheap transnort has made to national wealth. In the nast, falling transport costs seem to have had a larqe "leverage" effect on soatial oatterninq of both people and production. Larqe reductions in interregional transport costs in the last half of the nineteenth century associated with the railwav were accompanied by growing interregional specialization of production. Dui'nq the nast half centurv, falling intraregion:;! transport costs associated -;ith truck and automobile transport have been associated with a tendency to separate living and shopping areas from workinq areas within 334

urban areas (urban <=nraw1), and \ ith a tendency for industries and firms to uisDerse themselves more widely within regions, that is, to display greater soecialization among bites. In brief, cheapening transport encouraged greater locational socialization, and therefore increased movement of goods, among regions and among sites within a region; an increased daily movement or neople within and between urban areas for business purposes; and, of course, increased travel for recreational purposes both within and between reqions. Increasing transoort costs will create incentives first to check, and then to reverse, these trends, although again the change is likely to be slow and undramatic. Perhaos the most noticeable effect will again be in consumer behaviour. There should be some observable tendency for people to move closer to their olace of work in order to reduce comnuting costs, and also, perhaps, to utilize recreation areas closer to home. The process probably implies a check to urban sprawl around the largest cities, and the growth of more medium-sized cities providing essentially a full range of economic services for their populations. Assuming that there are economies of scale in shipping goods, and that the railway is still the cheapest way of moving most goods on a ton-mile basis, onp should expect some growth of railway freight at the expense of interurban trucking. The growth of medium-sized cities, each with a range of manufacturing production and utilizing rail transport for interurban shipments, would preserve something like the present degree of decentralizational of industry within regions and prevent a return to the dominant regional metro- polises that characterized the late nineteenth century. As for the specialization of production among regions, little change is to be anticipated in the foreseeable future, in my opinion. The net advantages of having my wheat grown in Saskatchewan rather than Ontario seem to me to be very much greater than having my television set produced in Kitchener rather than Toronto, or my living in a house ip Port Credit rather than an apartment in central Toronto; I shall therefore make my adjustments to rising transport costs i-n the reverse order. Despite the consistent perversity of governments, which are forever trying to make the Arctic bloom, turn depressed areas into thriving metropolises, and arrange the world so that people never have to move from the place where they — all potential voters -- are born, I feel sure that individuals' interests will win out against the self-interest of politicians and their bureaucracies. I have been speaking of the effects of rising energy costs on the costs of moving general freight, and of transporting people. What of the costs of moving energy itself? Should we expect a reduction in the movement of energy and energy materials, and a consequent movement of production and peoole to regions with the largest remaining energy resources? I think not. In the recent past the costs of interregional shipment of energy have been areatly reduced by pipeline transport f«r fluid hydrocarbons and by the advent of nuclear electrical plants; the latter technology is indeed so recent that the adjustments it will occasion have only begun to be worked out. We thus have a backlog, as it were, of technological change that maucs for increased interregional mobility of energy, and increased mobility 335 makes for an increased, not a decreased, interregional division of labour so far as the energy costs of producing goods and services are concerned. Premier Lougheed's hopes of attracting manufacturing industry from Ontario and Premier Davis1 fear that he will be able to do so, seem to me both to be groundless. The power of either provinces or national states to create two- price systems for crude oil, I think, will prove to be small when pitted against the tendency of technology to lower the costs of transporting crude oil and the even stronger tendency for oroduction to be located in regions where total, not merely energy, costs of production are lowest. As I have argued elsewhere, in an era when the cost of moving food rises relative to the cost of moving energy, production and people will be attracted to diversified agricultural regions rather than to coal or oil fields.^ IV In summary, rising energy costs are bound to make >is a 1 "ttle poorer in terms of our consumption of goods and services, though this check to our affluence promises to be small by comparison with the adverse effects of growing population and rising food costs on per capita real incomes. TMs nverall effect will be the net result of a myriad of small adjustments in con- sumption and production arrangements. In general, it seems that there are more opportunities for "small-sacrifice" substitutions in our consumption patterns than in production methods. A check to mechanization of the home is likely to precede a check to mechanization in production. The effect of higher energy costs on transport costs must surely reduce the currently high amount of recreational travel demanded by consumers, and probably also the amount of expense-account travel by business. We may attend f=wer conferences in the future! In addition, some reduction of commuting expenses may be exnected as people locate closer to their jobs, and freight costs may be reduced by changes in int.raregional locational patterns or consuming and production activities that permit a substitution of rail for road transport. On the other hand, interregional freight movements in Canada are now handled mainly by the raii- wavs and probably will continue to be. Moreover, given the great benefits of the interregional division of labour, little change is to be expected in this aspect of our economic structure. Were we to be forced back to a siqnificantly qreater degree of regional self-sufficiencv, either by increased energy costs, or more probably by misguided governmental policies designed to save us from the effects of increased energy costs, the probable decline in our standard of living could no longer be viewed with equanimity.

Various aspects of this subject are dealt with in Herman E. Daly (ed.) Toward a Steady State Economy. (San Francisco, 1973) Denison, E.F. The Sources of Economic firowth in the United States. (Committee for Economic Development, 1962). The structure of Denison's analysis involves assigning major weight to 'advances in knowledge" and zero weight to resource discoveries. But see the papers by W. Wilson and M.D. Lester and O.T. Madill in this volume. See Dales, J.H. Hydroelectricitv and Industrial nevelooment: Quebec 1898-1940. (Harvard, 1957), Chapter 8. 337

DISCUSSION OF SESSION IV

Since the questions and discussion relating to these papers over- lapped one another to a considerable extent, they have been re- grouped according to individual topics.

A variety of quest! ons were raised with re ferenee t c> Mr. Gander 's paper. Some of them suggested tliat in his time frame, Mr. Gander was unduly pessimistic about future technological innovations; nuclear power, tar- sands and methanol were mentioned. Mr. E.E. Roberts on (Biomass Energy Institute_, Winnipeg) argued that solar energy and "biomass energy" were very significant.

MR. GANDER:

I set out three time frames: 1973-1985, 1973-2000, 1973-2050, but confined most of my remarks to the shortest of these. Between now and 1985, we cannot wrench ourselves away from the predominant role of oil and natural gas. Within the longer time frames, new technologies can come into play and we have the potential to avoid a shortage of energy as far out as you care to look. In my paper, I specifically mention tarsands, nuclear, biomass, and solar con- version, but none of these will alter energy supplies fundamentally prior to 1985, my first time frame.

Several questioners resisted Mr. Gander ' s predict i,on of an energy trade balance with the U.S. It was suggested that the United States is too large for Canada to be able to hold back its exports and that Canada's potential, including the tarsands, is large enough to resolve the United States energy crisis.

MR. GANDER:

Within the critical time-frame 197 3-19 85, our proven reserves of conventional oil and natural gas are not large relative to Canada's own expanding needs, nor will we be able to extract substantial quantities of oil from the tar sands within that period. Hence, any export surplus of oil and natural gas is not likely to be larger than what we are now exporting unless very substantial new reserves are proven. In spite of some opinions to the contrary, we can control oil and natural gas exports and are doing so. The United States obviously recognizes that we will look after Canada's needs first. In any event, no conceivable volume of oil and natural gas exports from Canada can relieve to any appreciable extent the predicted U.S. dependence on imported oil. 338

Our most urgent tasks are to prove up additional reserves and work on improved technologies, especially of in_ situ methods, to recover the oil locked in the tarsands. We should also consider the electrification of some rail lines and some automotive travel. Obviously, programs should be implemented to reduce energy waste and loss . Some members of the audience queried Mr. Gander's implicit and explicit -price forecasts. Prof. T.L. Powrie (Dept. of Economics} Univ. of Alberta) asked if Mr. Gander would comment on the possibility that the OPEC oil-price- structure may crumble} and on the resulting risk that large projects to produce high-cost domestic oil may be premature. Another speaker, believing that relative oil prices would continue to rises asked whether it was possible for Canada to attempt to establish a lower price structure. MR. GANDER:

Professor M.A. Adelman, of M.I.T., a renowned petroleum authority, has suggested that the OPEC price structure could weaken as the Arab countries vied with each other to increase production and their own revenues. On the other hand, James E. Akins, formerly Director of the Office of Fuels and Energy in the U.S. Department of State and recently appointed U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, startled many people a year or so ago when he predicted that the price of oil would rise to $5.00 a barrel before 19 80. The most startling thing about that forecast is that $5.00 a barrel pro- bably will be reached before the end of 1973. I personally come down on the side that believes that the OPEC and, hence, world price can stay up and could increase further, at least through the next few years.

Canada could implement a two-price stru^cure for oil and natural gas — or even a multi-price structure. The ways that could be done and the various probable impacts could occupy the full two- day seminar. I will make only four observations concerning it.

(1) Canada is not a low-cost oil producer, and costs will increase substantially as we move either into frontier areas or tarsands. Hence, the cost advantages we can gain from a two-price system are likely to be small unless some element of subsidy is also present. On the other hand, an increase in energy prices in Canada and abroad is not a major calamity. We might learn to be more efficient and careful in its use,

(2) If contract prices or the pricing policies of oil companies result in export prices for Canadian oil and natural gas that are below realizable returns based on world prices, or laiJ own costs from other sources in that market area, an export tax or some other means of recouping the difference may well be justified. However, even that it not a clear-cut option. There are other possibilities, though few so easy, direct and tangible. 339

(3) As a starting position, I think that we should maintain a close linkage to world market prices and international commerce even though we may be very limited in the amounts of oil and natural gas we will have available for export. We are likely to want to continue to import sizeable quantities of oil, and regional differentials within Canada will reflect world prices in that regard at least.

The relevant "world prices" are the laid-down costs of oil and natural gas in the particular market area in which the comparison is being made. That, and the possible use of an export tax, or something like it, under appropriate conditions, may be first steps to a pricing policy on the demand side. Any further reduction in price to Canadian users should be expressed as an identifiable subsidy (direct or indirect), and not in some complex, and soon confusing, multi-price structure. An important remaining question, of course, is who bears the cost of the subsidy and for whose benefit.

(4) Any price, or change in price or in pricing policy, has a host of ramifications on the supply side — returns to companies and to governments, incentives to explore and transport oil and natural gas, and so on. All that can be said here about them is that they are likely to be more important, and have more far- reaching effects than the impact of increasing prices has on the demand side.

Questions were raised concerning the two parts of Professor Helliwell's paper. With respect to both the whole ex&rcise and the economic impact results in Part I3 Mr. Helliwell was asked whether some of hie results did not reflect the characteristics of the RDX2 model more than those of pipeline construction. Would there not be some advantage in using the CANDIDE model, to make his results more easily comparable with those prepared by the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources?

PROF. HELLIWELL:

The results in Part A of Table 1, and in Table 2, do not depend at all on the characteristics of the RDX2 model, as they are obtained from the independent simulation of the pipeline, gas production, and rent equations. Part B of Table 1 shows the direct plus induced effects of pipeline construction and opera- tion, gas production, and a package of offsetting monetary and fiscal policies. These results do reflect the structure of RDX2. The chief advantages of using RDX2 for such experiments lie in its closely specified dynamic structure, detailed links between financial conditions and expenditure, and precise treatment of a wide range of monetary and fiscal policies. Results from other models provide helpful cross-checks, at a cost of extra analysis of differences in assumptions and methods. 340

Others in the audience queried the assumption of the. Helliwell model regarding the rates of discovery., development and exhaustion of Alberta and northern reserves. Mr. Melvcr (Imperial Oil) among others doubted that SO T cu. ft. would be available from Alberta in the near future. Other questioners argued, that such implied constant or increasing discovery rates were not possible. It was also argued that improved reserves ir. the Delta were much smaller than Prof. Helliwell implied.

PROF. HELLIWELL: The amount of additional non-frontier reserves available at less than the cost of developing and transporting Delta gas determines the time when an Arctic pipeline need be built. The excess well- head capacity of the end-'72 proven reserves is estimated to pro- vide for Canadian demand and existing export contracts until 1978. (The ability to expand substantially the rate of production from existing reserves is documented, among other places, in Appendix Table 3 of the B.C. Energy Commission, "Report on ... the Natural Gas Industry ..." and in 1972 Report of the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board.) In and after 1978, demand growth must be met from reserves developed in and after 1973. The ability to defer a Mackenzie Valley pipeline for several years does not depend on as much as 50 tcf of new reserves being avail- able in non-frontier areas. Even with domestic demand growing at 8% per year until 1980 and 4% thereafter, new reserves of 20 tcf would cover demand until 19 83; and 40 tcf would suffice until 19 87. It is important to obtain more information about the amount and cost of non-frontier gas not yet classed as "proven reserves." Nevertheless, differences of view about the likely amount should not be allowed to obscure the conclusion that the amount will almost surely be enough to permit a deferral of five years or more in the proposed pipeline.

Turning to the question of gas reserves in the Delta, Mr. Horte's paper reported for the first time the fact that proven reserves in the Delta are only 7 tcf, only one-quarter of the amount required to fill one-half of a 48" pipeline. Our calculations, as well as those of the Gas Arctic consortium, have been based on the assumption that at least 50 tcf would be available in the Delta at moderate production cost. Unsuccessful exploration raises the cost: and lowers the expected rents from Delta gas. To the extent that further exploration can be postponed, this would alter the results in favour of postponement. Reduced esti- mates of potential reserves ought to alter the results in favour of trans-shipment of Prudhoe gas (if there were thought to be a potential of less than 50 tcf in the Canadian Arctic) and against further exports of gas. 341

Professor Helliwell was also asked about the division of the vents as predicted in his three cases. Professor Quirin pointed out that the Consortium's project (Case I) actually produced the largest rents3 although these were assumed not to accrue to Canadians. Another questioner asked why Professor Helliwell did not stress Part B of his final table which showed superiority for Case I.

PROF. HELLIWELL:

U.S. rents are larger in Case 1 for two main reasons, both related to transportation costs. On the one hand, gas can be more cheaply shipped to Chicago than by the all-Canadian route to Toronto. Thus the wellhead.prices set to give no rents to Toronto gas users give rents , whose present value is about $600 million, to U.S. mid-west users. On the other hand we have assumed, consistent with the limited information available, that the Mackenzie Valley route for Alaskan gas is substantially cheaper than the alternative involving liquification and tanker shipment from Valdez. The present value of these rents is about 1500 million 19 73 dollars. As shown in Part B of Table 2, the construction of a pipeline in time to trans-ship Delta gas,and including some gas for export can produce more economic rents for Canadians, than would an all-Canadian line, if export taxes and throughput taxes are used to obtain a substantial Canadian share in the transportation rents otherwise accruing solely to U.S. shippers and purchasers. It should be noted that the idea of a throughput tax has been strongly opposed by the Gas Arctic consortium, perhaps in the belief that the amount of transportation rents is so small that the project would be jeopardized by any Canadian attempts to obtain a substantial share. In the absence of such sharing, however, there is little or no economic reason for Canadians to build a Mackenzie pipeline before it is needed for Canadian use.

A final group of questions to Professor Helliwell queried other procedures and assumptions. Would not pipeline costs be higher if delayed 10 years? Would, not future gas prices fall in harmony with a possible crumble of the OPEC oil-price-structure3 or because of the advent of nuclear power or a methanol economy? Was not Professor Helliwell neglecting or ignoring the $100 million already spent in the Delta?

PROF. HELLIWELL: Pipeline costs would indeed be higher. We have assumed that the cost of pipeline construction would rise at the general rate of inflation, with technical progress in construction techniques offsetting wage rates that rise faster than the general price level. 342

Our pattern of gas shows increasing relative value until 2000, with declining value thereafter as new technologies come into their own. The Mid-East situation has caused oil prices to rise faster than we envisaged, and are now almost up to the level corresponding to our 1978 city-gate natural ias price of $1.00 Mcf. These events do not alter our view of the likely value of natural gas in the year 2000, so if our 1978 value soon appears too low, we would probably assume a slower rate of price increase between 1978 and 2000. All of these matters need more careful study than we have given them.

We have assumed that exploration expenditures totalling $110 million would be required to prove reserves of 25 tcf in the Delta. It is too early to tell whether this is consistent with expenditures to date, although if it should continue to cost $100 million to discover 7 tcf, the rents available on Delta production would be much smaller than we have calculated, and early development correspondingly less advantageous. In calcula- ting the consequences of deferral, we carried forward the 1973 and 1974 exploration expenditures, including a return on capital, until production eventually took place. This procedure leads to a slight understatement of the advantages of deferral, as cost/benefit analysis should let bygones be bygones. If the participants would be more forthcoming about their past, and expected costs, we could improve the likely accuracy of our calculations in several respects.

Questions we're directed bo Prof. Quirin about the absence from his model of real-world conditions. This absence suggested to the questioners that the conclusions about conservation and export should be modified,

Dr. Irene Spry (Dept. of Economies, U. of Ottawa), for example, asked whether Dr. Quirin's calculations •included such "externalities" as effects on the environ- ment _, the native peoples} and the prevalence of uncer- tainty and risk..

PROF. QUIRIN;

While the model is abstract, and deliberately so as it seeks to derive general conclusions applicable under a wide diversity of conditions, I don't believe that it is irrelevant to considera- tion of current policy choices. For example, it has been suggested that we simply "lock up" northern oil and gas discoveries until some unspecified future date. The analysis suggests that, since there are no major cost reductions in prospect, and since existing aiternacives are already being used, it would be econo- mically wasteful to defer exploitation of these resources beyond the time at which they can be profitably incorporated into the North American energy supply. It has also been widely propo.-cid that exports be forbidden completely, or restricted to amounts in excess of those which Canadians are willing to buy at an 343 arbitrarily set price below the world market; such a proposal appears implicitly to underly the federal government's oil policy, or at least this week's version of the latter. The model suggests that it always pays to export, providing a higher price can be obtained in an export market than in the domestic, even if the entire volume to be exported has to be diverted from potential domestic consumers willing to pay the lower price. This seems to me to indicate that while the present federal policy might be justified as a short-run expedient, by way of giving consumers time to alter their consuming habits to the prospect of higher prices, it has little or less than nothing to recommend it as a longer-term policy. These seem to me to be eminently practical conclusions which follow from the model.

With respect to Dr. Spry's questions, I don't for the moment suggest that environmental costs be neglected in the^se decisions. Any development that takes place in the North will be subject to a far more detailed scrutiny, so far as environmental effects are concerned, than any similar project in our history, if not the world's. We can never be absolutely certain there will be unfavourable environmental effects, for absolute certainty is unknown to science. If environmental costs are "internalized" by appropriate controls, as they snould be, the analysis holds without alteration. I am as concerned as anyone for the welfare of native peoples; and any costs imposed on them by resource development should be charged against the project producing then-. It seems to me, however, th£-t it would be mistaken at least in terms of assessing the desirability of any current project, to saddle it with the full costs of overcoming 106 years of neglect, indifference and worse at the hands of the federal government.

It is true that the model does not explicitly consider risk; it could be argued that quantities and prices aic implicitly in expected value terms and that the use of a discount factor which incorporates a risk premium is all that is needed, but I am hesitant to make the suggestion and equally hesitant to pro- pose an alternative, given the generally unsatisfactory state of economic theory with respect to decisions under uncertainty.

Other questioner's suggested the need for a "pvudencc" factor, and others asked Prof. Quirin about hi a ccriac^i of the responsiveness of the U.S. price to Canadian supplies. Mr. R.S. Rungta (National Energy Board), for example, suggested that Prof. Quirin's export/demand curve should he horizontal.

PROF. QUIRIN: With respect to prudence, I suppose the prudent answer would be that it would be prudent to make a provision for prudence. But prudence cuts two ways, and in a world of rapid economic change, prudence may well call for the sale of inventories of possibly obsolescent products while there is still a market for them. 344

While everyone is worried, right now, about the risk of future shortages of oil, no one seems to take any account of the risk of a future glut, resulting either from major unexpected discoveries, a major depression, or the emergence of a lower cost competing energy source, all of which are distinct possibilities. One of the classic economic studies in this area by one of the leading economists of all time was W.S. Jevons' The Coal Question (which fell into precisely this trap and failed to see that the major problem of the British coal industry through most of the 20th century would be a shrinking market share and recurrent n ^ibour force redundancies.

A'j to the more specific question, while Canadian crude has been a larger factor in the U.S. market than that of any Middle East supplier, or indeed of the entire Middle East, I don't think it has played a major price-determining role. But this does not mean that the export demand curve is, or ever was, horizontal. Historically, Canadian crude penetrated the upper midwest markets of Wisconsin and Minnesota first, along with the Puget Sound area. Other markets were penetrated only as reductions in the Edmonton basing-point price relative to prices of competing crudes made the laid-down cost of Canadian crude competitive in the Detroit- Toledo, and subsequently in the Chicago-Wood River markets. If we raised our price sufficiently we would lose some of these markets, if we dropped it, and had the necessary crude supplies and pipeline delivery capacity, we would pick up additional markets, This, to me, suggests that the effective demand curve, based on a given Edmonton price plus the current export tax, is downward sloping, though that fact may have been obscurred by recent upward shifts.

On another aspect, Mrs. Spry suggested that "user cost" should be given full weight and that rent should not be considered to be squandered or "dissipated" when it accrues to the owner of the natural asset, the public or the Crown, perhaps in a form that allows reduced general taxation.

PROF. QUIRIN:

I would agree completely that user cost would not be dissipated if it were collected by the Crown and used to reduce general taxation. The point made in the paper is that if it is not collected, or some other constraint on current consumption pro- vided by an alternative device such as rationing, we will consume too much of the resource at an excessive rate and have too little left for the future. "Passing on" this component of economic rent in the form of a lower consumer price is thus inefficient. While there may be cases in which inefficient resource allocation may be justified if important distributional benefits are realized, the paper suggests that no such case can be made for cheap energy. Not only is energy consumption more or less proportional to income, but a large portion of it reaches the consumer market through 345 public utilities either directly as in the case of natural gas, or after conversion to electricity. Since the utilities have been fairly free run to practice price discrimination, at least as the economist defines that term, it seems likely that holding prices below artificially low will benefit chiefly those customers having applications with a high price elasticity of demand, for example, heating swimming pools, running second cars, and that these are more likely to be found in the higher income segments of society. It will benefit the low-income consumer too, but there are many other ways in which society could greater extend benefits in this direction at lower cost, and I would prefer to see them used.

PROF. J.B. WARREN (TRIUMF) addressed the following general question to all of the speakers:

Based on the painful prognostications oj oil r

But one might ask the economists:

(a) Is it not a fact that 50% to 60% of our present energy requirements are for transportable energy sources which could never use electrons flowing down wires? (and no one has suggested an economic way of bottling electrons!)

(b) Even over a 20-year period is it likely to be possible to change this figure significantly -- for example^ by electrification of railroads -- in view of the capital required to make such changes? (c) In view of the huge investment in the distribution of liquid fuel and in the highly convenient technology of liquid energy sources -- high energy content per unit volume -- would not the economic considerations favour production of a relatively cheap liquid fuel, such as methanol or even heptane from coal\3 water and hydrogen, as a solution? 346

id) Ignoring the huge tax structure erected on gasoline arid petroleum products ^ would the panel make a guess as to what would be a reasonable economic price of production of gasoline in 1985. Is a figure available for the production price of "synthetic petroleum" alkanes made in Germany by the Fischer-Tropsch process during the war period?

(e) If such a liquid fuel solution economically seems desirable, how and where in the Canadian scene, would we get the mixed discipline group together for the design and construction of a pilot-plant?

PROF. HELLIWELL:

With respect to the interesting series of questions raised by J.B. Warren, I have little to contribute. I share his belief that some basic shifts in energy mix will take place only over several decades, and I share his fear that the proposed alterna- tives will be too narrowly defined by existing patterns of commercial, technical, and academic specialization. 347

SESSION V

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

Wednesday, 17 October, 1973, a.m.

Chairman F.K. HARE* F.R.S.C. Department of Geography -University of Toronto ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT - A PERSPECTIVE by E.F. ROOTS Department of Energy, Mine? and Resources

A LONG-STANDING PROBLEM WITH NEW DIMENSIONS No reasonable person needs to be convinced of the benefits that an ample supply of highly-developed energy confers upon modern society. In Canada, perhaps more than in most countries, people in all walks of life are aware, on a day-to- day basis, of the vital role that energy plays in determining their comfort, their way of life, and in a very real scr^e their physical survival; and we are aware that our continued prosperity is inescapably dependent on a continued supply of energy in forms and amounts suitable for our individual ?nd collective needs. For Canadians, energy has until now been plentiful and relatively cheap, and our use of it has been determined by price and convenience alone. Our concerns about future supplies and uses have fccussed almost exclusively m local or national availability and costs. Energy, in any of its various forms, has been a means to an end, rarely of any intrinsic value in itself. It is provided through commodities, like coal or or facilities, like power stations or kitchen stoves, whose available quantity and price have been determined in the market place. The value of energy has been established purely by the relationship between the direct perceived benefits from its use and the apparent economic cost of its supply. The consequences, other than the immediate economic consequences, of producing and using energy hav. not appeared to be important in the development of our civilization or in the attitudes of society until the last few years. Of course, we have always been aware that the release or conversion of energy leads to waste products, and that the use of energy h?s effects on ourselves and our surroundings other than the prime purposes of providing heat, light, and power. Our earliest forefathers, living in caves, must have learned to place the family fire at the mouth of the cave in such a way that the smoke would not get into their eyes. With each advance or increase of energy use we have had to make allowances for soir nuisance effect or adverse effect on the environment. But as long as Man's total use of energy was small in relation to the flow of energy through the natural environment in the region, the effects on the environment of human use of energy could cause only local and temporary disturbances of environmental processor -- such as filling a cave full of smoke or scaring off the other wild animals who also wished to live there. The environmental and social effects of energy use may be either deleterious or beneficial in human terms, and the end result may be quite different than that most obvious at any given time. You have all heard of the theory that the layer of subcutaneous fat which men lack but which gives women their rounded and graceful forms was evolved because chauvinistic males always crowded closest to the fires in the chilly days during the waning of the Pleistocene ice sheets, forcing women to the cold perimeters safe from the clouts of their brutish menfolk and where they could attend to their children away from the smoke. If we wish to go along with this fancy we can at least conclude that the men did this, not in ord<-r to improve the species but because they selfishly wanted TO warm themselves at the fire. But the excluded females became better insulated, physiologically tougher, and more attractive in the process. And the end result of this environmental impact of energy use -- for the purpose of our story> anyway -- has been a boon to mankind ever since. In more recent times, we are all aware of energy- environment relationships and their biological or social con- sequences. Nearly every man in this room, when a small boy, had to empty ashes from the stove or furnace -- or else he showed his management ability by getting someone else to do the chore for him. What to do with the ashes -was a minor domestic or municipal problem. Grandmother used them to make soap, and also for garden fertilizer, but by Mother's day we became more organized and more efficient, and so ashes became v/orthless rather th *.n useful, and we paid taxes to have them hauled away and discarded. Somewhere here there was a lesson. Then came technological change. Me stopped shovelling coal in the house, and turned a' thermostat instead. Our city air became cleaner. Now housewives really had a chance to have lily-white sheets on the washing line and they demanded detergents that would make them so, spurning grandmother's soap from ashes and contributing to whole chains of pollution problems. And little boys no longer had chores to do like emptying ashes; they no longer had a responsibility through which the family depended upon them for its well-being. They were freer to enjoy themselves, or so it seemed, but they grew to become dependents rather than con- tributors. These little steps helped an all-too-common transition from a "family" into a group comprising "wage-earners plus dependents". Along this process there are a whole series of energy- environment-social lessons within the personal experience of each one of us.

There are all sorts of other examples that form part 151 of everyone's background as we face, in 1973, the encmy-cnvi ron- ment questions of the future. The very core of modern industrial civilization and progress is its use of energy to provide the goods and materials, the machinery and mobility, that enabled us, through the Industrial Revolution, to apply human knowledge for the material betterment of man. The muscle and heart of our industrial strength, upon which we are completely dependent for our advance in standard of living over pre-industrial societies, are our coal mines and steel mills. But how many of us, beneficiaries of the'energy society,, the coal-mi ne-and-steel-mil 1 society, live by choice at or near coal mines or steel mills? There is really no reason why we should expect to do so, any more than we need to eat our steak in an abbatoir to be reminded that meat comes from cows; but that does not excuse the destroyed or depressing environment of most of these very vital places. We must keep these relationships in mind as we attempt to assess the magnitude and seriousness of the effects on the environment of the present and likely future production and use of energy, and the feasibility or hopelessness of maintaining acceptable environ- mental quality in the future. •Among the many arguments and discussions that have been put forth in the last decade concerning energy issues and energy problems there has been one theme almost constantly present and about which all protagonists seem to agree. This theme is that the use of large amounts of energy by man has undesired effects on the environment, overwhelm!" ng the ability of natural environ- mental1 processes to absorb or neutralize those effects. The developers and those who would oppose development, the optimists, the doomsday criers, the apologists and the "trade-off boys" may have different approaches, objectives and conclusions concerning our present or future use of energy; but they tend to be united in stating that our present use of energy has impaired or threatens to impair the long-term quality and productivity of the environment, and that it will continue to do so in increasingly serious ways unless we take drastic <;teps to prevent such damage, or alter our pattern and scale of energy use. Our problem, then, is not to document the details of how energy activities affect the environment and how such effects could be prevented or reduced - althbugh this is vitally necessary if we are going to do anything realistic about the problem-, but to place these effects, and the cost and feasibility of their remedies, in the proper perspective with the needs for energy and the benefits to be gained from its use. We must also try to judge the environmental effects and costs of energy use against the environmental effects and costs of not csing the energy and of altering our ways of life accordingly. In our desire to cure the disease, are we likely to be killed by the medicine? 3b 2

THE NATURE OF THE EFFECTS ON THE ENVIROHHFNT The use of energy by man for industrial or social purposes is in every case an acceleration or concentration of processes that take place in Nature without man's intervention. The natural environment, and indeed man himself and all forms of life, is a product of these same and other energy processes which have proceeded at a gradually evolved rate and scale of energy exchange. The acceleration by man of selected energy processes within this.complex is bound to have an intimate relation to, and a direct effect on, the physical and biological functions of the environment; in most cases the balance of functions will be upset, and the effect on the environment disruptive. The magnitude and duration of the effects are directly related to the degree of concentration and acceleration of man-induced energy processes compared with those in nature.

The environment may be altered as a result of present- day and foreseeable energy activities in two basic ways: (1) Substances may be introduced into or deleted from the environment which through their changed concentration or composition, or both, interfere with normal environmental or biological processes. We group most of these effects under the general term of pollution, but in this category there may be also other effects, such as the introduction of "undesired non-pollutants" like water vapour, the fixation of free atmospheric oxygen into compounds, or the production of genetic aberrations; (2) The physical condition of land, water, the atmosphere or living matter may be altered so as to decrease their productivity, suitability, or mutual compatibility. In this category are included land disturbance, water evaporation, waste heat emission, radioactivation, noise, ionization and electric discharge, etc.

These disturbances, in various combinations, are an inevitable consequence of the production and transportation of energy materials, and the conversion, transmission and utilization of developed energy. We can group their effects for convenience into the ways in which they impact our familiar environment, e.g.: (a) Emissions into the atmosphere^- This is the modern version of smoke in the family cave, and in today's context is primarily the result of combustion of fossil fuels. The principal undesired emissions are familiar to everyone: particulate matter, sulphur oxides, nitrogen Oxides, hydro- carbons, and various metallic compounds. The particulate matter and the oxides are the emissions that become most conspicuously objectionable and cause the most immediate damage when they exceed a certain point; they are the ones, like smoke in our forefathers' eyes, .that we tend to react strongly to and want to do something about. Most governconIs have passed Clean Air Acts, or their equivalent, before they have enacted legislation controlling water pollution or land disturbance. The effects of the less conspicuous components of atmospheric emissions - the hydrocarbons and metallic compounds that may be cercinogenous, toxic, or have deleterious synergystic combinations - are varied, ranging from clearly damaging to potentially beneficia1 at certain concentrations, but i'n many cases the effects are unknown. It appears that we are learning enough, however, to make a reasons')"-"1 guess that the rapid oxidation, in a couple of centuries, of a significant proportion of the hydrocarbons accumulated over 300 million years will have a real and not merely a local or apparent effect on planetary chemistry and biochemistry. (b) Discharge into and Use of Hater: It does not take a dedicated environmentalist to tell the difference between clean water and dirty water. All mankind, and indeed nearly all mammals of any species, require for their very existence water of a fairly high degree of purity, usually on a daily basis. A supply of clean water is an instinctive requirement for each of us, and a sine qua non of every human settlement. And yet, a hallmark of civilization is that the streams in heavily populated civilized areas are unfit to drink. The oceans, covering three-quarters of the planet, have always been considered too mighty to be tamed except around the edges; but man !ias at last succeeded in proving that he is Lord of the Earth by making them dirty, too, nearly everywhere. Energy activities, as such, make a relatively minor direct contribution to the pollution of streams and lakes, but it is the high-energy industries and energy-intensive agriculture that provide most of the chemical and organic pollution with which we must deal today and in the near future. On the oceans,. energy activities must take most of the blame directly. Oil products and chemicals from petroleum transportation and refining are the dominant pollutants now found on the surface of almost all parts of every ocean. These come from myriad sources all over the globe, from marine operations themselves (tankers, offshore wells and collection lines, ports) from the discharge of oil-pclluted streams, and possibly most important of all, by precipitation from the polluted atmosphere. The amount of such pollution is undoubtedly^ increasing, on a world-wide basis. What we don't know are its effects on the marine ecosystem., except in a few obvious cases mostly concerning birds a.id inshore or shoreline fauna; nor do we know the persistence of many of the components of the pollutants and their path through ocean organisms. We do know enough to have cause for worry that continuation or increase of ocean pollution may sericusly distort the 354 marine web of life and that any real damage may be irreversible or irreparable at least within the period of human concerns; and to have reason to watch very closely whether v,e are causing physical or biochenical changes, small in themselves, that will influence the ocean's ability to regulate the atmospheric composition and the heat balance of the planet. We know enough to realize that these changes may happen subtly and invidiously, and that they may be well advanced before we are really sure they are happening; also that although we may have caused the changes, after a certain point we may be powerless to stop them.

(c) Land disturbance:- Man is a terrestrial animal. He makes his permanent home on land and makes his modern living from the solid earth except for a minor but nonetheless important contribution from fishing, where he still practices his ancient hunting economy. All his important mineral and energy resources are won from the land, including to a small | but increasing degree the solid land beneath the seas. The ' growth of industrialized high-energy society has made man individually more mobile, but has increasingly fixed his works and his wealth to specific places on land: - to cities, factories, highways, harbours, specialized farms and developed mines. One environmental effect of increased energy use has thus been to commit specific areas of land to specific immediate or long-term human uses that preclude their utilization for other purposes. This has been perhaps the most drastic and fundamental environmental impact of increased energy use to the present tiire, but we have taken it largely for granted and have adjusted to it by considering land itself not as a public utility, as it is in low-energy societies, but as a marketable commodity with a negotiable commercial value. We are now beginning to doubt the wisdom of ignoring the value of land as a public utility.

If you may feel that it is just the needs of people, and not specifically the use of energy, that has so altered our terrestrial environment, I would ask you to take a plane ride across the United States and then across India. There are many times more people per square mile in India than there are in the United States, and they have been living there in large numbers for at least three thousand years, compared to about one hundred years for large numbers of people across the United States. But which landscape shows most dramatically and unequivocably the effect of man's activities, mile after mile after mile? I would then ask you to Tonder the situation regarding wild elephants and wild tigers in India, anu wild bison and wild cougars in the United States. It is not the presence of people that has caused the difference in the effect on the terrestrial environment. The difference is in th ir use of energy. 355

When the per capita'and total energy -use -was small, the effects on the land itself were mostly minor and local, and easily reconciled as a necessary price to pay for the benefits gained from the use of the energy. After all, one couldn't expect to mine coal without digging a hole and leaving a dirty scar on the landscape. No coal pit, no power. In a simpler society, trade-offs were easier to justify, and for most people, the disagreeable environmental effects could be pushed out of sight or down the river. As the numbers of people and use of energy have increased, and as the various actions of individuals and communities and their relationships with the land become more interdependent and complex, however, it has become increasingly apparent that energy activities often have an effect on the land itself or its productivity or suitability for human use and enjoyment that is very difficult to relate to the past, present or future benefits from the energy obtained. These are problems of land use, land values, and amenity change; and they range from concrete problems of how to restore forest productivity in a mined-out area or where to store radioactive materials, to intangible but very real problems like changes in the future recreational potential of a flooded valley or the potn"tial loss in market value of a residential property near a noisy highway or an electric transmission line. Such problems are mostly local or sub-regional in nature, and they do not, at least in 1973 a portend dire consequences for the human rac^5 but they are among the most intractible of all environmental effects to eliminate or reduce because in large part they are due to the simple presence of the energy resource or facility itself. In a practical way, land use problems are perhaps the most difficult of all to deal with, because they strike directly at the roots of our traditional concepts of ownership and the rights and freedoms of individuals. CONTROL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. In the last decade, since the actual and potential disadvantages of deterioration of environmental quality resulting from energy use and associated activities became inescapably apparent, efforts have been expended in all developed countries to find ways of halting the deterioration and of restoring or maintaining environmental quality while still enjoying the benefits of a high-energy society. There are two approaches to doing this. One is to use less energy, and the other is to use energy with less effect on the environment. Neither course by itself would achieve the desired ends, if we wish to maintain a continually expanding industrial society. For long-term prosperity, which would mean achievement and continued maintenance of acceptable 356

environmental quality, it will be necessary to employ a practical mix of both approaches. But a short consideration of the state of affairs in .Canada and her sister high-energy countries in 1973 makes it clear that it would be impractical , and actually undesirable to halt the growth of energy use in the immediate future, no matter what the environmental benefits. In fact it would be impossible to maintain society as we know it in Canada and reduce our energy -onsumption so low that environ- mental .. qua! i ty was preserved while still using present energy practices. On the other hand, it is clear that a very great deal can be done to eliminate or reduce environmental impacts while still making available, and using, the energy needed by a vigorous society. This is the only approach that promises practical results before the problem gets much worse, and therefore much more attention, research, planning and legislation has been directed toward controlling the undesired environmental impacts of energy production end use than toward moderating the accelerating demand for energy. Some promising progress has been made toward maintaining environmental qualify while providing energy in the amounts requested. These efforts are, of course, far short of total success, and on balance the quality of the environment in most urban areas continues to deteriorate, and it rray possibly be doing so for the planet as a whole. What are the chances for total success? Is it possible to have a maintained and even an enhanced high-quality environment as the population and industrial activity expand until some stable level is reached many decades hence? Or is it possible only to fight some sort of delaying action, holding back the worst environmental degradations while the general level of its quality slowly sinks but we learn to live with it as a price for the expansion and activities of the human race, until some final perturbation makes our planetary home uninhabitable? How desperate is the situation? Can we play it by ear and stay on top, increasing our efforts as and when necessary to maintain control, or must, we go all out now or very soon befcre it is too la is? There are, as yet., no clear answers to these questions. To look at them in a clear-headed fashion, we need to ask four other vital questions. These are: 1. Do we know just what it is about specific energy activities that affect the environment, and in what ways the environment is being or is likely to be altered? 2. What is the technical possibility of avoiding, controlling, or counteracting the undesired effects? 3. Is it practical and economically feasible to prevent, control, or counteract adverse environmental effects on a large enough scale and with sufficient success to have reasonable assurance that an acceptable environmental quality can be maintained while the anticipated future demands for energy are met? 4. Are people, as individuals or businesses, or collectively as governments, sufficiently concerned about future environ- mental quality, aware of the problems, and sufficiently determined to do something about it to modify their present practices and pay the price to achieve long-term prosperity? The first three of these questions have been the subject of much research and development, innumerable conferences and a burgeoning stream of recommendations to regulatory and legislative bodies. Many governments have organized departments, commissions or institutions just to deal v/i th these questions - I need enly refer you to the activities of the Department of Environment and the Departrran.t of Energy, Mines and Resources of the federal government, or to the Energy and Environment Committee of Ontario and its counterparts in several other provinces' >^»3. International bodies such as the United Nations Environmental Program, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and .Development, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and indeed nearly every organization that concerns itself with what the Club of Rome calls "the predicament of mankind" has an organized study, evaluation or research program to tackle the problem of whether we can consume our energy and keep our environment at the same time. The subject is a current preoccupation of universities and scientific institutions everywhere, and libraries are becoming filled with technical material and sincere books on scientific and engineering aspects of the problem, analyses of policies and possibilities, and strategies for the future . The answers to the first three questions can only be given realistically through studies in detail which probe nearly every aspect of our environment and our industrial activities; but for purposes of argument and knowing that there are hundreds of contrary exceptions, I will hazard the following simple answers for 1973: ^• Do we understand how energy activities affect the environment? Answer: For the gross pollutants and physical changes and the way they affect on a short-term basis man or tho~>e elements of the environment that man presently thinks important, - yes, at least well enough to measure the effect and see what has to be avoided or undone. For the long-term effects from impacts too slight to cause immediate c'iar.yu.- no. For the lesser and more subtle pollutants and physical changes, we have answers in detail only for the few impacts, like cadmium emissions or radioactivity, that have short-term visible effects; and for these we know mainly only tne direct effect on humans, with little firm information on the effect on the rest of the environment. For most of the remainder we know very little., but enough to have grounds to suspect that it would be unwise to assume that minor constituents 3 58

and impacts are of no importance. 2 • y hat is the j_e_chnica1 possibility of avo.iding, controlling, o Y~ success fu \~) y counteracting known un d e_s ired effects on the environ- ment of energy activities? Answer: Very good. This is the question upon which most practical research is expended and most discussion centred. There are very many unsolved problems, some of which threaten to be intractible for some time - disposal of high-level radioactive wastes, complete removal of nitrogen oxides from air, elimination of noise, for example -, but with a few exceptions our technology seems to be up to or ahead of our scientific knowledge in this area. It seems that if we can understand what is happening to our environment we can usually devise a way to prevent or overcome the damage.

3. Is it practice! and economically feasible to prevent or control the undesired environmental effects of energy activities on a sufficiently large scale and with sufficient thoroughness that acceptable environmental quality will be maintained while ample energy, is provided for Canadians for the indefinite future? Answer: yes. It is of course one thing to avoid or control pollution in a laboratory or to rehabilitate the landscape of a demonstration mine, but quite another to achieve the same result on a production and country-wide basis, ton after ton, mile after mile, everywhere and all of the time, without going bankrupt or losing control. There are. many difficult problems - an economical l?rge scale method of scrubbing sulphur dioxide is elusive, as is an acceptable means of disposing vast amounts of low-temperature waste heat-, but all of our studies of the subject to date indicate that by proper environmental assessment and design, and by operating procedures or techniques that are known or may be reasonably expected to be developed in the near future, it will be possible to produce and use theanount of energy likely to be demanded in Canada during the next couple of generations, and still hold the undesired impacts on the environment at a level lower than they are today. This will of course take money, and it will add to the cost of energy. It will add to the complexity and reduce the convenience of energy-dependent activities. It will handicap some polluting fuels as energy sources and place greater demands on clean premium fuels which are in limited supply. It will require strict land-use practices and site allocation decisions, limiting freedom of enterprise. And it will require increasing regulation of individual activities in both urban, rural, and wilderness areas. All of these things will add to the net cost of energy. But as has been pointed out many times, the net cost of energy inr^lre^dy hi?h' U Js Just the market price that is low. To an arket ri thP rHrlrS I CV '/ ™ P 'ce of energy will have to cover the direc. costs of environmental protection from energy activities. 359

From the best estimates we can make these "environmental" costs will not be likely to add more than ten per cent, and in most cases less, to the market price of energy in the next couple of decades. Furthermore, if the price of energy increases markedly in the near future for other reasons, as seems likely, the costs of environmental protection will probably not increase in proportion, so the "environmental increment" may in fact decline. At any rate, on the basis of present information it appears that adequate protection of the environment during large-scale production and use of energy is possible without serious disruption of the economy. The fourth question:- Do we, as individuals and 9S a nation, really want to maintain a hiqh-quality environment for the future, and are we willing to do what i:. required to ensure ihet environmental quality is maintained?- is the nub of the whole energy-environment issue. Unlike many questions involving public purpose and decisions, this is not a question plagued by apathy or lack of information and attention. Everyone is aware that something undesirable is happening to his environment. Each of us. is beginning to pay for these changes through taxes, new car prices, medical bills and detergent sales. A good proportion of the daily news, much of the dialogue between a politician and his constituents, and a favourite preoccupation of youth and of activist societies, is on this theme. It is almost impossible to be indifferent to the energy-environment issue. Although there are large areas of ignorance, and many distorted ideas in circulation, a very large number of people in all walks of life do have a fairly realistic view of the basic problems of energy requirements and use, and of the environments and of the general nature of the trade-off between the two. And yet it is not at all clear that we will be able to take concerted action with sufficient purpose and vigour to maintain the quality of our environment. A general public and political realization of the problem; expressed concern about it; knowledge that in the main it is soluble at reasonable cost. Why then is there concern that it might not be solved? Consideration of this question would lead us outside the energy-environment issue. Our whole business and social tradition and economic momentum, in myriad ways is going to make it hard to change today's practices for an intangibly better environment tomorrow, no matter how clear the future benefits may seem. The blunt fact is that under any of the social or economic systems in the developed world today, it is just not economically or politically profitable to spend money now to benefit our grandchildren, or to enhance environ- mental quality for the good of everyone else. We can afford to do this as a luxury or as a moral duty when we are comfortable; but when the wind blows cold, each of us, as did our forefathers in the Pleistocene period, crowds himself up to the fire to get warm now. 360

Historical examples where a community or a society has deliberately changed its current practices to achieve a future goal are conspicuously lacking, except when the society is stressed by an outside threat, as in time of war. Whether or ;iot environmental degradation will provide sufficient outside stress remains to be seen. In the meantime, most of us will go on u;ing more and more electricity while sincerely opposing another power station in our vicinity. Many other species of animals, such as foxes, cats'and bees, are much better than any of the primates in keeping their homes clean and their immediate surroundings unpolluted and productive. Many successive generations of foxes rear families in the same den in the rocks without changing the surroundings or accumulating visible waste; while chimpanzees, confirmed exponents of planned obsolescence make a complete new nest for each individual every night. Wild cats go to considerable lengths to avoid leaving conspicuous signs or depleting the food supply near lairs that they may occupy for years; in contrast, when a family of baboons moves into a grove of fig trees they often spoil more fruit than they eat, and may make such a mess that by preference they soon move off to a fresh grove. In despoiling our own immediate surroundings, we of the human species show behaviour consistent with our zoological order. THE LONG-TERM OUTLOOK There remain to be considered the longer-term environmental consequences of energy use. Assuming that environmental quality can be maintained over the next few decades, at least in those characteristics which we recognize as important to human prosperity and enjoyment, what is the long-term outlook? The answer to rhis question is inextricably tied up with the future activities cf man as a species on the planet:- S his population and its distribution, his food supply, his use of I resources and his social organization. All of these things will | naturally depend ultimately upon the productivity and suitability of | the local and planetary environment. But it appears that, to an ever 1 increasing degree, human population, food supply and available I resources will be dependent on the energy available. If the 1 production and use of energy itself has a significant effect on f environmental productivity, therr* is already in place an important | feedback mechanism from human activities that can determine the j possible fates of mankind. We have already closed off some options. f The environment is integrated. We cannot affect land, or water, or ai*- without affecting the other components, and we cannot manipu- late non-living matter without affecting the living scheme of things, or vice versa. It is not realistic to forecast any aspect of environmental change in isolation; but for purposes of illustration we might speculate on some of the ways in which tne environment of the future may be affected by continued intensive use of energy. The nrst of these is man's collective compulsion, the heady but risky game of re-arranging the accessible planet. ..a,l1Pn- Mar' in developed countries now eats potatoes f>™ thltlJ °f- PetroJeum^ 5or.to produce modern crops the natural energy from the sun is supplemented with energy from fossil fuels, for cultivation, 361 manufacture and application of fertilizers, etc., all of which "improve11 on the productivity of the present natural environment by borrowing the stored results of past environmental processes. This process will probably continue, at least while mankind continues his present general course of population expansion and concentrated food production. At the same time the demand for food will intensify practices of monoculture, of dedicating areas of land to single-purpose crops of plant or animal species which could ,not survive except by the application of increasing amounts of man-applied energy. The increasing densities of population will further intensify the differences between industrial, agrarian, and recreational land, and these will only be maintained in an increasingly inteyrated regional or national community by the organized use of incre-asing amounts of energy.

Therefore it seems safe to speculate that one of the mo si conspicuous and perhaps the most important long-.erm environ- mental consequence of increasing use of energy by mankind will be the organization of those areas of Earth that are useful to man into.regions dedicated for special human purposes, and the forced •maintenance of this -organization, against the full range of natural environmental processes, by the application of more and more fossil or nuclear energy. The land areas of the earth will obviously be"the first to be so organized; but control and "improvement" of the oceans cannot be far behind, and we are already toying with the atmosphere. At present, given our current problems and entrenched instinctive behaviour as a species, there seems little alternative but to start along this course; but it is clear that the farther we go along the path of engineering cur own evolution5 the greater the risk of a miscalculation.

Petroleum compoui ds and pro ducts of combustion in the ocean. Oil on the surface of thn ocean, 'in its simple form, is an immediate and mediurn-term problem. The situation regarding the control of large- scale or persistent oil releases, and the clean-up of critical restricted polluted waters will likely be solved, one way or the other, in the next decade or two. Either we will have the situation under control, in its gross form at least, or the pollution will have reached such a state that our pattern of marine operations, fishing and international oil commerce, will have to be drastically changed. If the surface oil film gets much worse we may indeed have cause for concern about the ability of the oceans to regulate the oxygen balance of the atmosphere.

But what of the longer-term effects, even if we succeed in stopping the present rate of pillution? Vie can assume in any event, that the amount of petroleum transported on the oceans will diminisn after two or three decades. What then? Crude petroleum, and their oxidized products (after combustion) contain many compounds foreign to present living organisms. Some of these have a purely mechanical effect that interferes with biological processes; others are known to be toxic; for most we don't know th> effect. Where these go in the marine food chain is at present known only in very fragmentary fashion. All these new compounds have been introduced so suddenly that organisms 362

have had no chance to adapt to them in an, evol utionary way. Surface oceanic waters eventually mix with deeper waters, which may have a "residence time" of many centuries before re- appearing, and so the compounds will eventually be spread throughout all the oceans. The dilution of pollutants will of course be extreme, but some evidence leads to a disturbing concern that it may not be the concentration, but the widespread dispersion, of potent trace compounds which determine their overall biological impact-. In the back of the minds of many marine scientists is the nagging worry that we may even now be poisoning the ocean in ways that we cannot recognize. Persistent products in the atmosphere. Air pollution as normally understood comprises mainly those emissions that are found near the surface of the earth and which 'or the most part return to or react with the surface within a short period. But energy activities also produce products which remain aloft for long periods. Some of these fi id their way into the stratosphere (or are injected there directly by aircraft and rockets), where they may have very long residence times. Other materials, like carbon dioxide and silicate dust, tend to accumulate at middle levels, and seem to segregate gradually into bands or zones in selected latitudes and levels. The effect of these additions may be mechanical, by changing the reflectivity or absorption characteristics of the atmospnere: electrical, by changing ionization constants or providing nucleii for condensation; chemical, by reacting with gaseous ions and other particulate matter-, or biological, by upsetting the atmospheric microbiological system. The magnitude and importance of these effects over a long period are not known. Evidence is accumulating on the change and distribution of carbon dioxide and its effect on the diffusion cf long-wave radiation, on the effect of particulate matter in increasing atmospheric reflectivity, on the increase of stratospheric cloudiness in areas frequented by high-altitude jet aircraft, and other atmospheric changes apparently caused by human action. At this stage of our knowledge, a change in the thermal condition of the earth's surface appears to be the most likely g environmental consequence of continued energy production and use . Whether, and how soon, the change will be sufficient to affect biological productivity and human prosperity is at this stage pure speculation, but the first effects may well be an intensification of the surface temperature differences between low and high latitudes. Many present studies suggest that the short-term instab.il i-y of the climate is increasing in high latitudes, and that it is the perturbations of climate, not the long-term trends, that may initiate such dramatic events as continental glaciation or catastrophic droughts . The possibility of onset of widespread glacier advance „ in North America within the next century or so cannot be discounted . Whether or not man's uso of energy may affect this possibility merits careful watching. Waste heat. All systems presently used by man to produce or convert 363 energy on a large scale, and all systems likely to be in widespread use during the next several decades, emit .or lose more energy as waste than that used for.useful purposes. ' Almost all of this wasted energy goes to heat water or air, which is then dispersed to the environnent. The discharged heat cannot just go away. It must raise the temperature of something, or speed or retard a phase ch-nge' or a chemical reaction, or alter a biological process. T;IUS every time that man uses energy for his own purposes, he affects the environment.

The magnitude of this discharged WdSte heat, on a local basis, is considerable. On a winter's day Canadian cities release to the atmosphere considerably more heat than they receive from the sun; and the heat released from power plants in industrialized areas is becoming a significant proportion of the total j^eat fluctuation even in large water bodies like Lake Ontario . However, on a regional, nacional, or planetary basis the heat discharge from energy activities is almost negligible - far less than one per cent - compared with the energy received from the sun. Thus, while waste heat discharge may have early and long-lasting local or sub-regional effects on aquatic systems and on local climates, the change in planetary heat balance would appear to be small for at least the next century, even with anticipated increases in energy use. The worry is that the planetary heat balance itself may be delicate, and man-made local perturbations may have a triggering effect on the dynamic equilibrium with consequences far greater than those caused by the increased local heat alone. Careful study is well warranted, for it is just possible that by the time we have started to rock the climatic boat, it may be too late to stop it and we are not sure which way it will qo. Geological history is full of evidence that when a "climatic accident" occur?, the most highly organized biological species are among the most likely casualties.

Radioactive materials. Of all the products of energy production end use that effect the environment and the future of life on earth, radioactive materials are the most-dramatic and, to some, the most alarming. Certainly they affect all forms of organic life; many of the products are conspicuously damaging or lethal above certain concentrations; they remain in the life cycle system; and they may be dangerous for thousands of years. Most frightening of all to many, perhaps, is the fact that at the present state of knowledge of physics we do not see any practical means of taking apart unwanted radioactive matter and making it into harmless non- radioactive substances. At the same time that developed countries sverywhere are forecasting a great increase in nuclear power generation, we are expressing concern about what to do with accumulated dangerous wastes.

It behooves us to be careful and cautious. And there U no more careful, cautious, highly reaulated and safeguarded modern activity than the nuclear power industry. As a result, the immediate and middle-range problems of protection, storage, and 364

disposal of radioactive materials are well in hand, and it can safely be stated that except perhaps for a few lucky hydroelectric plants on largo waterfalls, nuclear power.generation is the safest and environmentally most acceptable large scale means of electric power generation in use today. But what of the longer-range outlook? The release of radioactive matter into the environment is bound to increase from a variety of industrial activities as well as from energy production - to say nothing of what may happen during, war and military events aimed at preserving peace. Fossil fuel plants and smelters disperse measurably large quantities of radioactive material -- at present more than that from nuclear power stations. All of these, at present, produce a radiation level much less than that received from the sun. But every quantum of radioactive energy, from whatever source, if absorbed into living matter on earth can be expected ultimately to affect the behaviour and future of some organism. Much depends on the future trends of development of nuclear power around the world, and how widely the enriched fuel reactors, with high-level radioactive wastes, come into use. Canada has not taken this route, and so we do not at present have a radioactive waste disposal problem anything like as severe as those countries which use enriched fuel. But we are inhabitants of the same planet, and although we may not have the sanv. problem, we share the dangers and risks with all mankind. No other activity of man demonstrates as conclusively as his release of radii-activity the inescapable fact that we all share Only One Earth. It may be that after our species has disappeared, after continental glaciations have come and gone, after marine inundations have rolled in and retreated, and our proud civilization has been reduced to a rusty film entombed between two rock strata, the signature of mankind and his ingenuity which will be left for future intelligent beings to ponder will be little pockets of radioactive materials, placed in the most surprising and geologically most unlikely situations, CONCLUSIONS Some general thoughts on the relationship of energy and the environment are thus: 1. Man's gradually improving ability to capture more and more solar anergy and release it at will - from the discovery of fire to domestication of plants and animals to fossil fuels to nuclear power - has allowed him to live increasingly independent, from the constraints of the natural environment, and to carry out activities which differ in rate and degree, but not in kind, from the processes in nature.. With each deviation from natural processes, he has had to spend more energy to maintain his desired imbalance from nature. 365

2. The most profound effect on the natura-1 environment of the use of energy by mankind has'been the comnii tment of specialized areas o* the terrestrial surface of the earth to specific human uses, with the consequent displacement or destruction of other species, and the subsequent dislocation or modification of natural ecosystems. This process is likely to continue, and to require more and more energy for its 'iaintenance. 3. The present use of energy has caused significant changes in air and water quality and in the character of the landscape, in local and regional areas, which have lowered the productivity of the environment and its suitability for human use and enjoyment. Almost all of these changes can be prevented without necessarily curtailing energy production and use. 4. Despite the fact that very great changes in the environmental impact of energy activities will have to be made in the next three decades if acceptable environmental quality and productivity is to be maintained while energy production and consumption grows to "three or four tines its present levels, the main problems of environmental management are not technical but are related to the attitudes of society and to the establishment of a system in which it will be economically and politically profitable to improve present and future environmental quality for the common good. 5. The price of unchecked environmental degradation from energy activities will be economic dislocation, human suffering, reduced regional and possibly world-wide productivity, and disintegration of important parts of the ecosystem. 6. Despite the prospects of avoiding or controlling most of the known short-term undesired environmental effects of energy use, there are many subtle effects whose long-term or synergystic consequences are unknown. The possibility that man may through accelerating energy activities make his planet uninhabitable despite successful control of certain aspects of environmental quality cannot lightly be discounted. 7. In short: Can we have ample energy and a high quality environment for the next generation? -- Yes. Can we afford to maintain environmental quality while using energy in the amounts desired? -- Yes. Can we afford not to? -- No, if we wish to remain prosperous. Do we really want to make the effort to maintain environmental quality, knowing the consequences of not doing so? -- Not sure. 366

Will we be able to preserve environmental quality and planetary productivity indefinitely while continually increasing our use of energy and high- energy methods of land use? -- Probably not, but there is still a little time. REFERENCES An Energy Policy for Canada, Phase One; Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Canada, Two. vols. 639 pp (1973) Biswas, Asit K., Energy and the Environment; Department of the Environment, Canada, Planning and Finance Paper No. 1, 71 pp (1973). Impact of Energy Use on the Environment of Ontario; Ontario Advisory Committee on Energy, 318 pp (1973). S.L. Kwee and J.S.R. Mullender, Growing Against Ourselves= The Energy-Environment Tangle ">• Lexington Books, 252 pp (1972). H.T. Odum, Environment. Power and Society; Wiley- Interscience Books, 331 pp (1971). W.H. Matthews, W.H. Kellogg, and G.D. Robinson, Man's Impact on the Climate; MIT Press, 415 pp (".972). G. Weller, ed., Climate of the Arctic, proceedings of 24th Alaskan Science Conference, 1973; in press. H. Flohn, Background of a geophysical model of the initiation of the next glaciation; in Weller, Climate of the Arctic, in press. H.G. Acres Ltd., Thermal Impacts to the Great Lakes 1968-2000; Report of a study undertaken for the Department of the Environment (1970). 367

THE SAFETY OF NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY

by

D. G. HURST, F. R. S. C.

Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa

INTRODUCTION

For the purposes of this talk, I interpret "nuclear technology" as meaning the technology of nuclear power. The keywords of the title are "safety", "nuclear" and "technology". If we leave out "nuclear" we have "The Safety of Technology", a topic that could have been discussed for the last million years. When our ancestors began to pound rocks together to provide themselves with tools and weapons, no doubt many of them lost the sight of an eye to errant chips of flint, or when they first began to use fire to warm themselves in their caves many of them suffocated or were poisoned by carbon monoxide. It would, therefore, have been quite appropriate during their eolithic symposia (Symposium is a Greek word meaning a drinking party) for them to talk about matters relating to the safety of their technology. Throughout the long history of technology studies on safety have usually been matters of hindsight. As technology went into use people suffered, and as a result, modifications wore made to reduce the hazard.

The birth of nuclear technology was unlike that of other technologies, for it was preceded by the awesome spectacle of the atomic bomb. It is interesting to specu- late whether safety would have been so carefully considered if the development had followed the usual route, growing slowly from simple procedures to major industries. In this respect, the bomb may have had a salutary effect inducing an attitude which puts economics secondary to safety thus per- mitting a soundly based philosophy of safety to emerge and to be put into practice. Although the dangers from a nuclear power station do not conceivably resemble the blast effects of the bomb, which are responsible for its destructive power, the radioactive materials produced in the nuclear reactor pose a very serious hazard unless contained. 368

Nuclear technology is almost if not quite unique in that its safety is safety by foresight. At the time of writing, there has been no known death or injury to the general public due to the nuclear aspects of civil nuclear power programs. Yet should just one case have occurred be- fore I give this paper public outcry might well make my task difficult. Contrast this with the situation in other branches of technology. During the week in which I was invited to give this paper 40 workmen were killed cleaning out a storage tank for fossil fuel, and about a dozen resi- dents of apartments or houses were killed in an explosion in the mid-West, almost certainly due to fossil fuel. These were not even nine-day wonders.

Although the mechanical effects of the bomb may cause unnecessary concern about nuclear power, the intangible or insidious properties of nuclear radiation enhance the valid worries of the public which is presented with a danger it does not fully understand. Yet radiation is only one among many other dangerous commodities. The mercury the hatters of London used in the last century to prepare beaver pelts was no less damaging than excessive radiation. The quaint figure of the mad hatter in Alice in Wonderland blunts our sensitivities to the suffering caused through the lack of understanding of the properties of mercury. The ready detect- ability of radiation and radioactive materials to some extent makes their control for safety easier than with many other dangerous commodities.

I shall limit myself mainly to the safety of nuclear power plants, but there are other aspects of nuclear safety, for example, ensuring when dealing with highly enriched material that a chain-reaction is not established inadvertently or when dealing with radioisotopes that safe procedures are followed. I have spoken of the foresight of nuclear safety, and I have been able to do this because of the restriction to nuclear power. The horrible fate of the early radium dial painters is well known. Those of you familiar with the early days of X-rays will also recall that there were among the radiologists and patients a nmriber of cases of serious radiation damage. These provided the quantitative basis for safety limits already established when the era of nuclear energy opened. 369

LEGISLATION AND OTHER BACKGROUND

The Canadian nuclear power program developed through a series of decisions made at the appropriate politi- cal levels. The mechanism for the development and control of the program derives from the Atomic Energy Control Act of 1946 and as subsequently amended. In the early post-war years the program was administered by the Atomic Energy Control Board. By 1954 the regulatory aspects were separated from the promotional aspects which are now the responsibility pf Atomic Energy of Canada Limited. This separation leaves the Atomic Energy Control Board free of any conflict of interest with its regulatory functions. in carrying out these functions the Board receives cooperation and assistance from a number of federal, provincial and municipal bodies, in particular from the Radiation Protection Bureau of Health and Welfare Canada and from the provincial departments concerned wj.th health, industrial safety, and other matters.

The Board's technical staff includes eleven engineers whose primary responsibility is with nuclear reactor safety. All have had previous experience in the nuclear p^v^r program and several have nad first hand experience in reactor operation.

The Board exercises control of atomic energy activities mainly through licences. Each application for a licence is considered from the point of view of safety. The extent and form of the consideration depends, of course, on the particular activity which is to be licensed. The topic of this symposium is "energy" and so I will confine myself to those licensing activities which have to do with the produc- tion of energy and more specifically to the licensing of power reactors.

REACTOR LICENSING

Before a start is made on the construction of a power reactor, a Construction Licence roust be obtained from the Board. We find it convenient to begin with Site Approval, which is not a formal licensing process but a preliminary step when the applicant indicates in a "Site Evaluation 370

Report" the general outline of the reactor to be built and seeks the opinion of the Board as to the acceptability of the proposed site. It gives an opportunity for the Board's advisers and the Board's staff to note any uaior items which ndqht be stumbling blocks, and to draw these co the attention oi the designer so that the site can be altered or the basic design modified. Throughout the licensing process, the Board puts much weight on advice from the Reacv.or Safety Advisory Committee, a committee composed of experts in reactor design, reactor operation, radioactivity, radiation effects, properties of materials, etc., together with expert representatives of various federal and provincial depart- ments as appropriate to the particular location. This com- mittee in association with the Board's staff follows the project from site approval through the construction and operating licensing and subsequently reviews the operation of the reactor. Before the applicant can obtain a Construc- tion Licence, he must submit a "Preliminary Safety Report" to the Board. This report contains detailed technical infor- mation on the reactor and auxiiliary equipment, information pertaining to the site, such as movements of water, water usaqe, the meteorological conditions, geology, etc. The report must also contain analyses of possible accidents. Following the receipt of the Safety Report, the staff and committee review the information and hold several meetings with the applicant. If it is satisfied with the proposal, •the committee will recommend to the Board the granting of a Construction Licence.

During the several years of construction, the com- mittee meets a number of times with the applicant. The staff is in almost continuous contact with the design and construc- tion as it proceeds. During this period the Safety Report is updated and expanded. When construction nears an end, the owner applies for an Operating Licence. He is then required to supply detailed information on the staffing arrangements and the operating procedures for the station. After the plant is in operation, a.n Annual Report is required and the committee meets with the owner at least once a year to review the operation. One or more Board officers are in residence from the middle stages of construction through the first few years of operation. Later an officer designated for the project maintains surveillance by frequent, visits. 37]

Much of the information on plant operation is provided by the operator, but some independent checking is done. In particular the environs of Canadian reactors are monitored for excess radioactivity and radiation by govern- ment bodies. The results are published regularly by Health and Welfare Canada and show very low levels of radioactivity and no clear-cut increase over background radiation.

RADIATION LIMITS

The Atomic Energy Control Regulations specify limits for public radiation exposure and are based on the recommendations of the International Commission on Radio- logical Protection, I, and perhaps through me, the Board, have been attacked for not proposing to lower the licence limits below these in the Regulations, particularly in view of proposals in the United States to lower some limits by a factor of 100. I believe that it is preferable to base our licence on the legal limits which have international endorse- ment but to expect that the operation will not approach these limits. I am not quite sure what we would do if the Pickering licence specified say 2% of our current limit and this was exceeded. Would we shut Pickering down? To do so would seem ridiculous since the current.limit is based on the recommendations of an internationally recognised body of experts. But if we did not, what would be the. point of the licence limit?

There appears to be a wiC^-spread misunderstanding that the U.S. had, some time ago, imposed a general 1% limit. Two years ago they announced a proposed rule-making to limit emissions xrom light water plants to 1% of the previous limits. This was followed by some weeks of hearings, thousands of pages of testimony, reviews, etc. On 29 June of this year an interim guide representing a design objec- tive of 1% for exposure from iodine was published, partly through the initiative and cooperation of Canadian utilities and designers we arrived earlier this year at a design and operating target of 1% for ail emissions from new station3 in Canada. 372

ACCIDENT ANALYSES

Despite the extreme care taken in design, construc- tion, and operation of nuclear-powered generating stations, it is customary to postulate that accidents may occur and to analyse the possible course and result of each accident to check the safety aspects or to reveal new features required. The prime consideration in the safety analysis is the amount of radioactivity which might escape from the plant in the event of a major accident. During the safety assessment when conceivable accidents are being analysed, it musi. be shown that there are provisions to retain the radioactive fission products in the plant so that the radiation on the boundary of the plant is within acceptable limits for accident conditions.

There are three major barriers to the release of fission products. These are the fuel sheath, the piping, etc., of the primary coolant system, and. the reactor contain- ment. The worst accident is usually considered to start with a sudden major failure of a large pipe in the coolant system, an event that many engineers consider practically inconceiv- able in view of the care taken in construction and inspection of such piping. Then some other safety system must also be assumed to have failed, for example, perhaps a shutdown system does not operate, or the containment building (whi'-h is supposed to be more or less a hermetic seal around the reactor) has inadvertently been left open. For the first case it must be shown that the containment will adequately prevent the release of activity, for the second that the fuel sheaths remain intact. The analysis proceeds on this basis through a whole matrix of accidents.

There has been public concern about both the normal routine emissions and the result of an accident. In recent years, although much of the concern in the United States has centered on the routine emissions, the well publicised controversy over emergency core cooling systems relates to the accidental situation. While I grant the importance of the routine emission control, this seems to me something that is well in hand and which can be improved 373

as required, providing the necessary money is spent, as exemplified by the new emission targets. In my view the Board and its advisers must continue to give mp.jor emphasis to preventing a serious accident.

WASTE MANAGEMENT

Another problem receiving much publicity is waste management. In spite of scare headlines, this is not in the same category cf hazard as a reactor accident, but we shall be passing on to our descendants the relatively small cost of perpetual care and the public should be informed. In Canada the problem is relatively easy because we do not as yet chemically process the fuel. Consequently, the fission product activity remains embedded in a ceramic matrix (the uranium oxide of the fuel elements) which is sheathed in zircaloy, a metal highly resistant to corrosion. When we join the ranks of countries which process spent fuel, we shall, like them, have released the activity into chemi- cal solutions, and we shall have to re-incarcerate it into a secure containment. If the activity could be buried in some deep hole, perhaps a salt mine, and subsequently ignored, the problem of perpetual care would be solved. However, our present policy is tc require storage of radio- active waste in a manner permitting retrieval. Whether the retrievability is to allow correction of any leakage, to anticipate chemical processing in a decade or so, or to permit our descendants to carry the waste with them as they flee the glaciers "of the next ice age, need not be decided at this time.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

I have outlined the mechanism by which a nuclear plant is reviewed before licensing and during subsequent operation under the licence. A more detailed account was given at the 1972 Annual Conference of the Canadian Nuclear Association.-^ The effectiveness of control depends a great de;_l on the detailed way in which it is applied and not only on the philosophy behind it. We are fortunate that the owners and operators have several incentives for safety. 374

Like us, they wish to avoid harm to the public, but in addition they face economic penalties from any accident. Moreover, the operators at the plant have personal reasons for wishing to keep the plant operating safely.

Although there are economic incentives for safety, these are not as obvious as the costs. It is essential for this reason as well as others that there be an independent body like the Board, investigating and approving the steps taken to avoid accidents, but free from the day-to-day pressure to minimize production costs.

Some of our requirements are regarded as a little extreme by the more hardheaded engineers. It would be a bad sign if such were not the case. We must, however, avoid taking too extreme a staad, as this could be self-defeating. We must, for example, avoid frustrating the operator by unrealistic operating requirements for he might furtively circumvent them to the detriment of safety. I believe the situation between the regulatory bodies and the operators in Canada lias been a healthy one. The regulatory bodies have imposed rather severe requirements and have insisted on investigating all phases j/hich they considered important,. On the other hand, I hope, and I believe, they have retained the confidence of the owners and operators to the extent tnat there has been a very satisfactory degree of cooperation.

The safety of nuclear technology, like that of any technology, is a complex matter. There is no simple panacea nor is there a simple watchword in which the whole philosophy can be summed up. people in the nuclear safety field think that they have developed a rather special approach. Typically, the applicant will be asked "What happens if such and such ar. item fails?". When he has explained the measures that he has taken to prevent that failure being a catastrophe, he may well be asked "And what happens if those measures fail?". This is a relatively novel approach. I recall, some years ago, on my way to a meeting of the American Nuclear Society, being in an aircraft with several members of that Society. When the stewardess appeared and went through the ritual with the oxygen mask, saying "Should 375

there be need the flap will open and the masks will drop down in front of you.", one of the nuclear engineers follow- ing his usual routine asked "And what happens if the flap doesn't, open?". Of course, she had no answer and merely repeated her routine announcement. That would not get by in a nuclear plant assessment. One other facet of the complex picture of safety may be illustrated by the tragedy of the Titanic. The Titanic was heralded as the safest liner ever built, but on its maiden voyage it struck an iceberg and sank. The cause was probably sloppy operation induced by undue faith in the designers' claims. This has an important lesson for us and for our licensees.

TRENDS

As the nuclear power industry matures one can see new trends in the regulatory approach. Increasing use of codes will relieve the highly qualified engineers of the regulatory body from a detailed concern with nuts and bolts. Some sections of the almost universally employed ASME codes are unsuitable for the CANDU system because of its distinc- tive features. Accordingly, special Canadian code sections are being developed under the aegis of the Canadian Nuclear Association. Quality assurance prograi>.d and in-service inspection are two related fields undergoing rapid growth.

Following a long period of accident-free experience, there may be a danger of complacency in Management and Operations. The former will question continued expenditure on safety measures which bear no obvious fruit, and the latter will wish to simplify procedures. I see scope for a fviture paper entitled "The Hazards of 7\ccident-Pree Tech- nology".

Returning to the present paper its title is mis- leading if it suggests some unique unchanging methodology of safety. The current of technology flows vigorously carving out new channels and taking new directions. The methods of control must evolve to meet the ever changing situation and will require decisions as to which changes are warranted and which represent a drift to less safe 376

conditions. When railways first went into operation each train was preceded by a man on horseback carrying a red flag of warning. The abolition of this requirement was no doubt justifiable but many new ones have had to be added in the intervening century and a half.

CONCLUSION

While we have been here this morning aircraft have been landing and taking off from the Ottawa airport. At any time, due to a malfunction or a pilot error, one of them could have come crashing through the walls of this room. The possibility is so remote that I doubt if you have been worrying about it. Nor have you, the public, stopped the use of aircraft because of such possibilities. It is a related kind of possibility that we study, and corresponding small magnitudes of probability that we strive for in seeking to maintain the safety of nuclear technology.

REFERENCE

1. D. G. Hur<5t and F. C. Boyd, Proceedings of the 1972 Annual Conference, Canadian Nuclear Association, June, 1972, Paper No. 72-CNA-1C0. 377

HEALTH HAZARDS FROM NUCLEAR SOURCES by G.C. BUTLER, F.R.S.C.

National Research Council of Canada, Otto ••••a

I should first of all define the subject matter of this paper a little more precisely—both parts of the title need this. What people are most concerned about and what will be discussed are the effects on human health of ionizing radiations.

The main areas of public interest and debate in this subject are:

a) the quantitative relations between releases of radionuclides and dose commitments to receptors (usually man);

b) the risks of late effects from a given dose of radiation; c) the levels of risk which are acceptable for the population of a country.

Ionizing radiations and radioactive substances are unique among environmental contaminants in that we can measure them down to much lower levels, and we know more about L.eir biological effects. This puts us on more solid ground for assessing risks and setting maximum permissible levels but it doesn't seem to reassure the worriers who simply have more facts and numbers to worry about. The thinking involved in assessing risks of harm to man from ionizing radiation and radioactive materials is highly developed and could be applied with profit to other forms of environmental contamination. While recognizing the inadequacies of the data and the resulting uncertainties it nevertheless shows a well balanced conservatism by using such practical concepts as:

- Dose commitment and harm commitment; - Food chains or food webs; - Reference Man; - Critical Group; - Linear non-threshold dose-effect relation.

These have been developed and used principally by two international organizations, the International Commission on Radiological Protection 378

Table 1

Estimates of somatic and genetic risks in a population of a million* persons attributable to continual exposure at a rate of 100 mrem per year

SOMATIC RISKS

Malignancy Deaths/year

Leukaemia 2.6

All other cancers 6.1 - 41.7**

Total 9-45

GENETIC RISKS

Disease Effect to Effect at classification first generation equilibrium

Dominant diseases 30 - 300 150 -- 1500

Chromosomal and 0-9 6 -- 60 recessive Anomalies 3 - 300 30 -- 3000 (expressed post- congenital stage)

Total 36 - 600 180 -- 4500

"in the case of genetic risk, the incidence per million live births is implied.

;'To obtain the number of cancer cases per year, BEIR suggests multiplying the values for "All other cancers" by 2 to correct for non-fatal cancers. 379

(ICRP) and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR).

The best recognized effects of ionizing radiations on human health may be subdivided into: a) Acute effects,

the immediate results of short-term exposure to high levels of radiation (hundreds of rads, say) leading to tissue damage, temporary or permanent incapacity, or death. b) Delayed effects,

i) Effects on the exposed persons manifested by malignancies including leukemia and cancers.

ii) Effects on the progeny of the exposed persons. These include teratogenic and genetic effects that may range from the most trivia 1 to the most serious, including permanent disability or premature death.

At the levels of environmental contamination which can arise from peaceful useful uses of atomic energy we need consider only the delayed effects.

The risk estimates for malignancies, derived by UNSCEAR, come from almost 30 years of observation of two groups of people exposed to man-made radiations: the atomic bomb survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki investigated by the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission and patients irradiated with X-rays for the treatment of a spinal disease, ankylosing spondylitis.

Table 1 summarizes the risk estimates available today for damage resulting from continuous irradiation of a population. Since these are based on a number of conservative assumptions, they are maximum estimates.

The routes of exposure from the point of atmospheric release into the environment to man are illustrated in the following example;

r Inhalation i Input -* Atmosphere — Earth's surface — Diet —• Tissue — Dose External irradiation 380

Table 2

Summary (if Estimates nf Annual Whole-Kudy Mose Rates in fhp I'niled Stales (1970)

Average Hose Rate* Annual IVmtn-Rems (mrem/yrJ (in millions)

Environmental Nntural 102 2O.!U Global Fallout 4 0.K2 Nuclear F'ower o.oon 0.0007

Subtotal lOfi 21.7H

Medical Diapn»istic 14.H Rndinpharmm*futii*al> 0.2

Suhtntnl

Occupational O.lli Miscellnnenus 11.5

IM'J

•Note: The numbers shown are averntre values only. Forgiven segments of the population, dose rates considerably greater than these may beexperienct'il. "•Bused nn the iibdoniinnl dose. 381

These have been extensively studied and reported upon by UNSCEAR to provide estimates of doses to world populations resulting from nuclear bomb testing and more recently from nuclear reactors. The radionuclides transported to man through food chains which give the greatest radiation doses are strontium, caesium and iodine.

Examples of how these concepts and procedures can be used to calculate dose commitments for releases from nuclear power plants are to be found in the 1972 report of UNSCEAR2. Two examples of calculations are illustrative: downstream from the reactor the yearly doses from radioactive caesium in fish are 10~° rad/year per g/day of fish consumed for the Indian Point reactor in the U. S. A. ; the corresponding figure is 10~4 for fish from thfi lake at the Trawsfynnyd reactor in the U. K.

To put these and other similar estimates into perspective, Table 2 presents a summary of all the doses to which the population of the U. S. A. was exposed in 1970.

The doses in this table which are attributed to nuclear power are quite small and will increase in the future in direct proportion to the installed capacity of nuclear power. Thus it is difficult to know what doses or dose commitments to use in calculating the risks of human ill-health or death resulting from the development of nuclear power. One set of doses to use would be the dose limits recommended or suggested by ICRP; these are '.

- 0.5 rem per year for individuals in the population;

- 5 rem in 30 years, i.e., 167 mrem/year to protect the population at large against genetic defects.

Another set of doses to use would be the AEC proposed guides for design objectives and limitations on operations applicable to light-water-cooled reactors, viz.:

- 10 mrem as the integrated dose over a year's time, at any point on the site boundary, from noble gas emissions;

- 5 mrem as the maximum calculated dose over a year's time as the result of discharge of liquid wastes;

- 5 mrem as the maximum annual dose to any organ as a result of discharge of long-lived activities (defined for half-life 8 days or more).

Since these are for only one source of irradiation of the population they are perhaps too low so let us take the dose limits suggested by ICRP, about 30 times the AEC values for individuals in the population. The risks to 382

Table 3

Calculations of risks for populations (based on the risk estimates of Table 1)

1CRP Dose Limits: Individuals: 500 mrem/yr Populations: 167 mrem/yr

INDIVIDUALS 500 mrem/yr

Somatic: 20* x 5 - 100 deaths per yr/10

Genetic effects to first generation based on a birth rate (Canada) of 0.017/yr: 148*x 0.017 x 5 = 13 cases per yr/10

TOTAL 113 cases per yr/10

= 1 x 10~ -3 Lifetime risk - 6x10 -3 Corrected for protraction and change: 1x10

POPULATIONS 167 mrem/yr

Somatic: 3 0 deaths per yr/10

Genetic effects at equilibrium (10 generations), Canadian birth rate 0.017/yr: 900* x 0. 017 x 1. 7 = Z6 cases per yr/10

TOTAL 56 cases per yr/10

= 6 x 1O~5

Lifetime risk = 3.6 x 10"3

Corrected for protraction: 1 x 10~3

*Geometric mean of the range in Table 1. 383

Table 4

Calculation of risks for workers (based on BEIR report)

Somatic (BEIR, Table, p. 170)

600* deaths annually from 5 rem per year to 10 people

Lifetime risk = ~,— = 2. 7 x 10

Genetic (BEIR, Table 4, p. 57)

160* dominant diseases to the first generation in a population of 10b from 5 rem/generation

160 x 40 -2 Risk per generation - ;— = 0. 64 x 10 106

-2 . \ Total lifetime risk = 3 x 10

This can be divided by 3 for protraction and 5 for statistics of workers' irradiation yielding: -3 Corrected lifetime risk -2x10

^Geometric means of ranges presented. 384

Table 5

TABLE I.' LIFETIME RISK OF DEA fH (PERCENTAGE) IN SELECTED OCCUPATIONS

Occupation U.K. U.S.

Trawler fishing 5[2J

Aircraft crews (civilian) 7[3] -

Coal mining 2[4]

Pottery (pneumoconiosis) 2[4] -

Construction 5[4] -

All manufacturing O.3C4]

All industries - its]

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission -

Including mining and quarrying

>^3^ 38 5

Table 6

TABLE III. AVERAGE LIFETIME RISK OF DEATH FOR SELECTED CAUSES

Cause of death Risk as a percent

Car accident 0.2

Rail accident < 0.01

Air accident 0.02

Use of oral contraceptive 0.06 CO CO

Table 7 Radiation doses aid risks

Dose rate or Associated Other risks of ce > dose commitment risks working or living (probability per lifetime) Escape to receptor: Biological shielding information environmental on dose-effects transport

M. P. Doses Workers 5 rem/yr 3x13 x 10"0 3 4x10 manufacturing Public (individuals) 0.5 rem/yr -•*, -4 -3 1x10 10 - 2 x 10 Population 5 rem/generation J 387 populations from exposure to the doses, using the risk estimates of Table 1, are presented in Table 3. Corresponding calculations for workers are presented in Table 4.

Some risks of conventional occupations and ordincry life are presented in Tables 5 and 6 . These seem to be acceptable since we do nothing to eliminate them.

A summary of the subject matter of this paper, including comparisons of risk estimates, is given in Table 7.

REFERENCES

1. H. C. Rothschild. A Criteria Digest on Radioactivity in the Environment. Report prepared for the Subcommittee on Physical Energy Phenomena of the NRCC Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality (in preparation).

2. United Nations. General Assembly. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (A/8725: G. A. Official records, 27th Session, Supplement No. 25) (1972).

3. The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. Report of the Advisory Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations (BEIR). National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (1972).

4. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, adopted September 17, 1965. ICRP Publication 9, Pergamon Press (1966).

5. F.D. Sowby. Some risks of modern life. In Environmental Aspects of Nuclear Power Stations, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 919-924(1971). 389

THE PIPELINE PROBLEM IN REVIEW by EVERETT B. PETERSON Northern Pipeline Study, Environment Canada, Edmonton

INTRODUCTION We are in the midst of a search for better ways of "technology assessment"1 in which the objective is to define and evaluate the interactions between new technological developments and society and the environment. A current Canadian example of technology assessment is the pipeline-related social science and natural science studies that have been conducted in the Mackenzie Valley and northern Yukon from 1971 to the present. It, was logical, then, that the organizers of this symposium on energy resources should select the "pipeline problem" as one element of a session on environmental considerations. Proposals to construct one r ^ore pipelines from the north bring into focus several subjects that are not so much "pipeline problems" as they are problems of defining scientific work objectives that will be of use to those who must decide whether these proposals for technological developments are acceptable. This paper will not discuss specific "problems" that a northern pipeline might pose for the environment because that vast subject is dealt with in various reports by proponents of the project2, by Government3 and by third-party review groups'*. Instead, current pipeline-related studies will be used as a source of examples to analyse the strengths and limitations of the development-related approach to scientific field studies. These examples could just as well have been drawn from other likely technological developments such as strip- mining or reservoir creation.

Most of the northern pipeline studies of the past three years have been sponsored either by prospective applicants for construction of a gas or oil pipeline or by the Government of Canada. In industry's case, the broad purposes of the environmental studies were: to determine what environmental losses or benefits would result from the proposed project and what threats to engineering facilities were posed by the natural environment; to apply environmental data to the development of better project routing and project design, and; to meet guidelines laid down by Government on a number of ecological concerns. In the case of Government, the broad purpose of the studies that were accelerated in 1971 was to ensure that Government was in possession of adequate information on the northern environment to be able to assess applications for a gas or oil pipeline in the Mackenzie Valley and northern Yukon and to reach decisions that would balance possible inter- ference with the environment against possible economic and social benefits. 39G

These broad objectives on the part of both industry and government resulted in a series of pipeline-related environmental studies thats without question, have exceeded in magnitude any previous project-related field studies in advance of an application for approval. Although the results of these studies are just now becoming available in published form, reaction to this unprecedented marriage of industrial engineering and environmental sciences has ranged from hints that it is nothing more than a liaison of convenience to suggestions that the problems are all solved because of these advance studies or because "good engineering and environmental protection are synonymous"5. As usual, a positijn somewhere in the middle is probably a more accurate assessment.

Because the northern pipeline studies are an example of the kind of environmental field research that industry and governments most readily support financially today, it is the purpose of this paper to briefly examine this development-related approach to environmental research in terms of its advantages, its limitations, and its ability to produce results that are scientifically sound, legally defensible and sociologically important. The theme of this paper is that this project-related approach is a very practical way for decision-makers to obtain technical data and opinions of scientists on the expected primary influences of a proposed project but that it only partially meets the expectations that today's public has for the prediction of secondary or tertiary environmental side-effects. Emphasis is given to the distinction between prediction (measurement and interpretation before the project) and assessment (measurement and interpretation after the project) of environmental influences resulting from large industr al projects. Because our predictive abilities are so dependent upon actual assessments of case histories, the main recommendation of this paper is that any large public works or industrial project should have, as an integral part, the establishment of ecological reserves to serve as experimental control areas for the actual assessment of the project's side-effects.

ADVANTAGES OF THE PROJECT-RELATED APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Large projects such as proposed northern pipelines present two distinctly different questions as far as application of ecological criteria is concerned. First is the broad question of whether, on environmental grounds, the project should proceed; second, if the project does proceed, are questions of how ecological information can be applied to avoid problem areas during construction, how to design a project that will lessen environmental side-effects, how to ensure the safety of man-made structures, and how to stipulate protective measures for the long-term management of renewable resources. For either the primary "Go or no go" question or the secondary "How to do it better" questions, it is evident that a project- related orientation for environmental field studies is a very practical way to obtain technical data and opinions pertinent to the proposed project. 391

While the 1ong-term mapping and data-collection programs of Government agencioo routinely assemble background information useful in assessment of project proposals, the temporary placement of these field programs into a project-related framework has the advantage of helping to set priorities where there are choices of geographic area to be covered by the sampling or mapping program. On a more local scale, it is also true that a project-related program will allow a particular sampling point - let us say a gauging station on a tributary of the Mackenzie River - to be located in such a way that it gives information for geographic areas of concern to the proposed project, for example a specific rive.1 crossing, but also provides data needed for the agency's own long-term program. If sampling stations from a wide variety of disciplines or agencies are located according to the agency's own criteria, and outside of the guidelines of a proposed project that may have data needs for very specific points on the map, then there is less chance that the selected sampling sites will be located to provide information both for the long-term network needs and for the specific proposed project. In some cases, however, physical or biologica'i criteria determine where sampling points must be located regardless of the location suggested by the proposed project.

Another important advantage of the development-related approach to research funding is that it provides an alternative to the traditional approach of obtaining fairly general knowledge. For projects such as a northern pipeline you do need specific information based upon local investigation and, in fact, one of the problems in delineating the distribution of ground-ice is that it is often difficult or very expensive to get specific enough in a sampling program because alternations from a frozen to an unfrozen state or from high ice-content soil to low ice-content soil may occur at intervals of a few feet. No matter how comprehensive the available ecological information, it is of little practical use if it is not incorporated into design criteria, construction plans and operational procedures of the proposed project. The chances for engineering and environmental planning to go hand in hand are increased if the environmental investigations are organized and planned around a specific proposed project. The chance of blending engineering and ecological technology will normal!} be greater for the proponent of a project than it is for the regulator of a project because, in the early phases at least, the proponent will possess the most detailed information on engineering features.

LIMITATIONS OF THE PRQJECT-RELATuD APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Scientists repeatedly stress that until the long-term variations of ecosystem functions are known, we can only guess about the environmental influences of large projects. After several years of study related to proposed northern pipelines, the Environment Protection Board reminds us that direct or primary effects on an environmental system can often be predicted but secondary and tertiary effects are obscure, often subtle, and for the most part, impossible to predict. Yet, these effects are as important. a<: are the more visible effects6. 392

It would have been appropriate to insert an example from the northern pipeline studies to indicate what scientists mean when they refer to secondary or tertiary effects, but there are no documented examples yet because a gas or oil pipeline does not now exist in the Mackenzie Valley and northern Yukon. To give a real-life example one must turn to some other industrial event for which such effects have been observed. While this paper was being prepared, the national TV news gave an example of what we are talking about here. The first news item was an analysis of the high price of beef in North America, with the observation that the August price of Canadian beef was tied to supplies being released to market in the United States and that its price there was influenced by the willingness of Japanese consumers to pay up to $14 per pound for beef. The second news item showed the normal Japanese protein source - fish - being mixed with cement for sidewalks because the mercury content of the fish mads them unfit for human consumption. In this sequence of events environmental contamination by Japanese industries led to trouble at the fish market7 which, in turn, influenced the price that we paid for beef this summer and autumn. This is an example of a tertiary or higher order side-effect of Japanese industry upon environment and society and there are two lessons in it. First, the complexity of this example indicates that even if we assemble our research efforts around a project-related approach there are serious limitations to our predictive capabilities for such subtle effects because someone writing an environmental impact prediction for Japanese industries that discharge mercury would surely not have included comments on the price of North Am- erican beef. Second, although newspapers like to carry articles on "Our costly cleanup"8 the cost of net cleaning up is rarely documented, yet the Japanese case of mercury contamination, by eliminating a vital source of protein from the marketplace, is costing many people something every week.

Those who must make decisions on the environments'! acceptability of proposals such as northern pipelines want to know which of the predicted primary effects are most significant in terms of duration and magnitude and which are most likely to be reversible through remedial measures. These kinds of information are obtainable only from actual assessment of existing similar projects or from simulation experiments and this poses very demanding requirements both for timing and duration of project-related studies. The time-scale problem in ecological studies is we^l publicized by the pleas of ecologists for more time to carry out necessary data collection. Surprisingly, we often overlook the fact that the time required to explore and prove up a major oil and gas field in the north is probably not very different from the time required to obtain environmental data on tne behavior of rivers and ice, population changes of wildlife species, responses to surface disturbance, or recovery rates of various ecosystems; in both cases a decade seems to be a reasonable minimum time requirement. In the example of northern oil and gas development, environmental considerations have entered the picture in an important way only as we approach the time of commitment for transportation of the resource. The weakness of placing a considerable environmental research effort on only the later phases of a proposed development needs no elaboration. Research planning organizations and conferences such as this one should devote considerable effort to initiation of environmental data collection in geographic areas that will be 393 the focus of the phases of energy development that are expected to be dominant 10 and 20 years from now. This would mean, of course, that fewer dollars and scientists would be available for assignment to the shorter-term project-related problems that are upon us now. Other limitations to the project-related approach centre around features of the environment itself. It has been argued that it is the functions of ecosystems that determine the value of the natural environment9; these functions included concepts such as 'resiliency', 'stability1, 'edge effects', 'transfer mechanisms' and 'sinks'. Research into freshwater ecosystems under the International Biological Program has demonstrated that to describe the stabilizing functions of an ecological system there is no substitute for experimentation under known or controlled stresses9. This kind of experimentation simply cannot be undertaken in project-related studies that, of necessity, are normally limited to three or less years in duration. Such experiments can be initiated during project-related field studies but the secondary and tertiary effects can be predicted only from a knowledge of the actu&l functional processes. This point is made here not to repeat the well-known generalization that everything is inter-related in ecosystems; the point rather is to indicate that we have not yet reached the point of sophistication in our ecological studies to allow someone to say to a developer "You cannot do that" because of some chain of events that will make his proposed action detrimental to something that is some distance removed in functional terms. It is here that a scientist must, be on very sure ground if he is to present a scientifically sound and legally defensible argument. This level of sophistication will not be obtained from project-related studies alone; it requires as well the experimentation that is possible only in research institutions that have a long-term mandate for research into basic mechanisms of ecosystem functions.

A diversion is in order at this point to give examples of practical application of two functional features of ecosystems. In simplified ecological terms, a 'sink' may be viewed as a place of accumulation of materials that are normally cycling through ecosystems - phosphorus in lakes is a well-publicized example. A recent U.S. court case that dealt with a stream channelization project in North Carolina10 resulted in a decision that the environmental impact statement failed to consider the cumulative impact of such relatively small undertakings on the regional environment. This is an example of an argument that could not be scientifically advanced without some knowledge of 'sinks' in the ecological sense of the word. As a second example, 'edge effects' could be important if one has to decide whether a particular area is better to preserve or better to be disturbed by some proposed development. One would be required, presumably, to place some "value" upon the area proposed for non-development. The normal tendency would be to estimate value on the basis of size with the assumption that a large ecosystem would have a greater value than a small ecosystem. But this relationship is not necessarily true because external relations are functions of the edge of a system rather than the total volume or total area9. These examples are important because such concepts find application in the post-1970 style of Federal environmental legislation that has been developing in Canada, with emphasis on the regulatory approach. This approach puts the primary responsibility upon the Government to inform 394

itself on a broad range of technical subjects, to prescribe tolerable limits for various things discharged to the environment and to carry out surveillance to ensure that standards and objectives are met11. Clearly, while project-related studies such as the northern pipeline investigations can assist regulatory authorities in their statutory responsibilities, the long-term execution of these responsibilities depends upon environmental studies and monitoring that extends beyond the normal life span of project-related field work.

The project-related approach to environmental studies has, by definition, the effect of focussing the researchers attention upon events that may occur if the project should proceed. For example, the northern pipeline studies quite logically generated several projects to test the effects of oil upon northern land or freshwater ecosystems. By focussing on potential oil spills as an object of study, research fell inco the category that Hare has identified as "short-term corrections of technological errors"12. This is a natural tendency in project-related work, with the result that somebody else has to worry about the other approach to environmental studies that deals with long-term design and management of the environment. Staying with the oil-spill example, the latter approach would analyse the causes of pipeline rupture, would note that by some sets of statistics about 40% of liquid pipeline ruptures are attributed to external corrosion13, and would then design research to test hypotheses that external corrosion of pipelines is influenced by bedrock or soil chemistry, by groundwater chemistry, by soil microbiology, or perhaps by soil microclimate. Then, if relationships were established between regional variations in incidence of pipeline rupture and variations in some proven causative factor, it might be possible to specify certain landscapes that should be either avoided by pipelines or that would require extra corrosion-resistant treatments of buried pipe. Clearly, this latter experimental approach does not fit with the terms of reference for project-related studies that are carried out in advance of an application, yet this approach is an important element of long-term environmental management.

Similar to this oil-spill example are project-related studies on water resources. Such studies must of necessity focus on objectives of immediate interest to those who must assess an application for the proposed project3 but they tell us little about long-term management questions such as 'Which bodies of water could be zoned for which uses?1 'Can small, landlocked, pothole lakes be used to receive wastes?' 'Are there small lakes that are virtually "dead" in a biological sense which could be intensively used for waste disposal and then filled?' or 'What precautions are needed for areas of predictably high use such as the alluvium in terraces along perennial rivers in the north where the best probable supplies of year-round good quality gronndwater are expected to occur?'ll*. Finally, a practical limitation to the effectiveness of project-related studies is their dependence upon background knowledge gained by many years of basic study by universities and Government research establishments. Because the drawing of research scientists into project-related studies is a recent phenomenon, one can assume that in the past a larger portion of this manpower resource was devoted to general 395 advancement of our knowledge about the natural environment. If there is a trend for an increasing proportion of research and survey expertise to be allocated to projects related to development proposals - and there is no evidence presented here that there is such a trend - then in the long-run the consultants and the applied ecologists who devote themselves to the project-related studies will find their traditional sources of basic data, the long-lived research institutes, progressively less helpful. Maintenance of a balance between long-term academic investigations and application of that knowledge to specific projects seems essential. OUTPUT FROM THE PROJECT-RELATED APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

From the relative lengths of the two preceding sections in this paper, the reader might conclude that the limitations exceed the advantages for project-related environmental studies. That is not necessarily the case, and the main point to be observed is that there are certain things that such studies can do well and other things that, from a scientific point of view, are better left to other avenues of investigation. If we recall the earlier summary of the original broad objectives of the pipeline-related advance studies, both for industry and for Government, the organization of various study groups around the proposal for a specific large project seems to be the most efficient and practical way of satisfying those objectives. This approach is well suir.ed for rapid assembly of technical data and opinions on the predicted primary environmental influences of the proposed project. However, the public expectation for prediction of influences of large projects includes secondary and tertiary effects. For reasons outlined in the preceding section, organization of research and surveys around specific development proposals tends to focus attention on questions directly related to the acceptability of the project and away from research objectives related to longer-term environmental management. This means that for those who must decide whether or not a large proposed project is to proceed, the best source of applicable information is from the project-related studies done in advance of application; for those who must try to predict secondary effects or who must direct their attention to broader aspects of environmental management there are other assessment techniques that are better than the prediative techniques that now dominate project-related environmental studies. One possible avenue to encourage such assessments is recommended in the closing section of this report. One is led to stress the distinction between the predictive approach based on measurements and interpretation in advance of project start-up and the assessment approach in which actual effects are measured and interpreted. In the long run, the latter approach is the more important one because the documentation of case histories not only gives results that are scientifically sound but it also improves our prediction capabilities for future large-scale industrial projects. In general, environmental studies will also become more important sociologically if they can reach a level of sophistication that includes secondary or higher-order effects that 396

are based on actual measurements of case histories. One possible approach to this goal is outlined next.

ECOLOGICAL RESERVES AS EXPERIMENTAL CONTROLS FOR LARGE PROJECTS

The theoretical basis for concern about development-related environmental changes is that such changes may be of such magnitude or speed to exceed the adaptive capabilities of populations in ecosystems that are the product of several thousands of years of natural selection. The history of ecological studies in North America is that such man-made changes are frequently not observed until it is too late to do much about it. For this reason, one of the most critical needs of environmental management is an ability to predict the influences of human activities15. As public pressures have forced ecologists to make their science an applied one, there has come an uncomfortable realization of how poorly we understand the functioning of undisturbed ecosystems and, because ecologists have traditionally favored undisturbed areas for study, it goes without saying that we understand even less about functions in disturbed ecosystems. It is this intensified realization of the absolute need for environmental yardsticks,against which conditions on disturbed areas can be assessed, that has led professional ecologists to be strong advocates for preservation of ecological reserves that will serve as the yardsticks of the future. Unfortunately, this need for ecological reserves is not widely appreciated because advocacy for such reserves is usually indiscriminately grouped with demands for wilderness preservation, parks development, or moratoria on development. Under specific circumstances, the latter demands upon land or upon land-use policies can be important in their own right; wilderness, parks or areas declared for a moratorium on development all possess the feature of beir'.j more or less incompatible with large resource development projects. In contrast, ecological reserves may require only a central core - the long-tf^m experimental eontrol area - that needs to be out-of-bounds for land-use practices that would disturb the surface. The rest of the reserve could be used to measure the actual effects of local environmental alterations from power plants, highways, pipelines, or other rights-of-way. This concept of setting aside areas in which actual environmental impact will be assessed during the life of a project, instead of just trying to predict environmental influences in advance of the project, leads to the suggestion that there be a requirement for the establishment of ecological reserves a3 an integral part of any large public works or industrial project15. The idea is that these reserves would be specifically set aside as experimental controls for the project, and the costs of monitoring should be considered as a project expense. In the long run, our ability to predict environmental influences of major new projects, such as northern pipelines, would be improved if there was deliberate establishment of such aieas on which true environmental impact assessments were carried out over a number of years. Historically, the ecological literature suggests another reason why the application of ecological principles to land-use practices could advance if this suggestion were put into practice. For example, Peterken's analysis of 141 published ecological works16 shows that only a small portion of ecological research projects include research in which the experimenter deliberately modifies 397 the ecosystem to observe the consequences. Notable exceptions are the oil-spill studies on land at Norman Wells, in a stream of the northern Yukon and in a lake of the Mackenzie Delta as part of the Environmental-Social Program of the Government of Canada3, and the Devon Island Project of the International Biological Program which included manipulative studies on removal of surface vegetation, driving tracked vehicles over vegetation, and fuel spills on vegetation17. We do not yet have a North American text on the ecology of disturbance and natural recovery in natural communities, but there is good reason to expect that manipulative ecological research will become more common because restorative ecology will be an increasingly important objective as more major developments are laid upon the land. Ecological reserves that would be tied to major development projects have an important role here because disturbances created by the project in or adjacent to the reserve could reduce the need for deliberate experimental disturbance. A practical way of building this suggested approach into an ecological reserves system is to recognize, as Britain does, that there may be a number of different classes of ecological reserve. For example, although Britain does have certain reserves that are examples of relatively undisturbed habitats and are set aside solely to preserve the fauna and flora, there are others that are thought of and managed primarily as public open spaces but are also important refuges for fauna and flora that survive there despite the disturbance18. Ecotypes that have evolved on disturbed lands possess high tolerances to conditions on these particular sites and in the case of some grasses this adaptation to a particular habitat may occur in as little as 50 years19. In Britain, this ecological principle is applied to the point that ecotype selection and seed production directly on the site to be reclaimed is considered to be as important as surface treatments. Thus, in a world of increasing disturbance to the land surface, ecotypes adapted to disturbances may themselves take on added value as important gene pools of the future. The establishment of ecological reserves for long-term study and preservation of these gene pools, for actual assessment of responses to disturbance, and for documentation of recovery rates, is strongly recommended as a step to improve our abilities to predict environmental side-effects of large industrial projects.

Finally, how can the problems of extrenolating research results from one study area to another or extrapolating project's documented side-effects to another proposed project be ass.^ted by a system of ecological reserves? This is an especially important question in the north which gives the impression of great similarity over a broad geographic area with the result that arctic or subarctic resource developers may possess an unjustified sense of security in broad geographic extrapolation of test results. Biologists know that assemblages of species depend very much upon local variations in landform, microclimate, distribution of near-surface groundwater, history of lightning fires, other disturbances, and availability of colonizing populations. It is these local variations that give a complex mosaic pattern to what is otherwise a broad bioclimatic zone. It is also these local variations that make isolines on a map and regional averages (such as average peat thickness or average depth of active layer) quite meaningless. The authors and users of environmental impact assessments will 398

come to appreciate the full significance of these local variations if there is a widespread and continuous documentation of the side-effects of various projects where thay traverse experimental zones within geographically dispersed ecological reserves. If the network of ecological reserves follows the International Biological Program guidelines for regional representation of major ecosystems, the documentation of specific disturbances in a series of reserves spread over a broad geographic range will tell us much more than we now know about the limits of extrapolation of development-environment interactions.

REFERENCES

1. Benn, T. 1973. Technology assessment and political power. New Scientist 58:487-430.

2. Mackenzie Valley Pipe Line Research Ltd. 1972. Arctic pipeline feasibility study 1972. 3. Government of Canada. 1972. Report on research under the Environmental- Social Program, Northern Pipelines. Report 72-2, Environmental - Social Committee, Task Force on Northern Oil Development. 109 p. 4. Environment Protection Board. 1973. Towards an environmental impact assessment of the portion of the Mackenzie gas pipeline from Alaska to Alberta. Interim Report No. 3. 94 p.

5. Hill, R.M. 1971. The arctic environment and petroleum pipelines. The Musk-Ox 9:35-41. 6. Environment Protection Board. 1973. Interdisciplinary studies. Gas Pipeline Newsletter (September). 2 p. 7. Anonymous. 1973. Trouble at the fish market. New Scientist 59:210. 8. Chant, D.A. 1973. Our costly cleanup. Financial Post, 3 March, 13. 9. Ecological Research Ltd. 1972. Parameters for ecosystem evaluation. Unpublished report prepared for Environment Canada. 76 p. 10. Carter, L.J. 1973. Environmental Law (II): A strategic weapon against degradation? Science 179:1350. 11. Morley, G.C. 1972. Federal environmental legislation: A surey. Unpublished report, prepared for Environment Canada. 18 , . 12. Hare, F.K. 1970. How should we treat environment? Science 157:352-355. 13. Original not seen, quoted in Environment Canada unpublished report from Oil Pollution Research Newsletter, March 1972. 399

14. Greenwood, J.K. and R.S. Murphy. 197c, Factors affecting water management on the north slope of Alaska. Report No. I.W.R. 19, Institute of Water Resources, University of Alaska. 42 p.

15. Jenkins, R.E. and WUB. Bedford. 1973. The use of natural areas to establish environmental baselines. Biological Conservation 5:168-174. 16. Peterken, G.F. 1968. International selection of areas for reserves. Biological Conservation 1:55-61. 17. Bliss, L.C. (Ed.) 1972. Devon Island I.B.P. Project, High Arctic Ecosystem Project Report 1970 and 1971. Department of Botany, University of Alberta. 369 p. 18. Nicholson, E.M. 1957. Britain's nature reserves. Country Life Ltd-. London. 19. Bradshaw, A.D., T.S. McNeilly and R.P.G. Gregory. 1965. Industrialization, evolution and the development of heavy metal tolerance in plants, p. 327-343. IN: Ecology and the industrial society. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York. 401

ENERGY: PROFITS FROM REDUCING DEMAND by IAN E. EFFORD Science Adviser, Science Council of Cana' INTRODUCTION Today in Canada we are involved in a continuing dis- cussion about energy needs and supplies. Those people, whose responsibility it is to look after supplies for the future, are working hard to discover ways to ensure that production meets ever increasing demands. No one, however, is seriously considering curbing these demands. In fact, the Government's recent Green Paper on energy policy (Ministry of Energy, Mines and Resources, 1973) does not appear to consider the idea of reducing the demand as a viable alternative. It does state, however, that: "Although adequate energy is essential to a high quality of life5 increase in the use of energy will not necessarily lead to improvement in the quality of life." My contention is that one of the newly emerging "concepts of a desirable life style" is a growing awareness of the environmental, social and economic prices we shall have to pay for the unbridled consumption of energy in all its forms, as well as the realization of the economic benefits to be gained by using our energy resources more efficiently. In this paper I shall discuss these benefits and some of the hindrances to their materialization.

During the last century, an ample supply of low cost energy has been one of the main ingredients in the increasing material wealth of the Canadian people. If present trends continue our use of energy which is increasing much faster than the growth in our population, will, by the year 2000, be three times the present per capita consumption. As we become an increasingly leisured society, the public is becoming concerned about the environmental impact of energy - new valleys flooded behind hydro-dams, new transmission lines and strip mines in the countryside, air pollution in our cities, etc. Furthermore, energy production involves enormous financial investments for dams or pipelines, etc, and it is obvious that these investments involve economic costs, such as increased interest rates or capital tied up which might otherwise be used for projects with different social values. It is clear that the use of energy, in all its forms, has costs as well as benefits. Only now, are we beginning to question whether we ought to set a higher value on the resources we are using so freely.

The views expressed here are those of the author, not of the Science Council. 402

THE PRESENT PHILOSOPHY The Government's Gre^n Paper on energy sets the stagt for public debate of the alternatives available to the nation. It makes clear by its emphasis, that in the opinion of the Ministry, the debate should be on how to supply the national energy needs for the next twenty or thirty years, not on whether the present trends should be modified. Yet the latter is the critical question facing Canada today. We are obviously energy rich, and with careful husbanding, we should be able to satisfy our needs in a variety of ways, so that in general, an energy policy on alternatives is not a pressing issue, although there are obvious political pressures at this time. What is a pressing issue and what will determine the type of nation we are preparing for the future is an energy policy which concerns itself with a choice between an unbridled increase or a gradual, planned transi- tion to a fixed energy economy. There is no right or wrong energy policy, but one can be devised, just as monetary policy can be devised, to control the growth and development of our country. An energy policy is simply a reflection of the political philosophy of the govern- ment in power. At the present time, the bases of this philosophy are shifting as public values change, and the prime problem is how to strike a balance between the advantages and disadvantages of using our energy resources in such a way as to be acceptable to the majority of Canadians. In my view the balance expressed in the Green Paper does not reflect the present values of Canadians, so much as the values of a few years ago. The Daner fails to discuss tie Government's overall philosophy, as opposed to its specific ideas on energy, so that the reader is forced to guess the Government's objectives for the new energy policy. One point does come through loud and clear, however, and that is a general desire for a continuous and secure supply of inexpensive energy, A low price for energy in the past has encouraged wasteful use and thus pushed the growth in the per capita demand up year after year. Thus is it important to ask why we should be concerned if the cost of energy in Canada increases with the cost of energy on the world market? Two separate arguments are developed in the Green Paper. The first is that during the seventies we must provide a :.jt of low cost energy because the presence of energy v.!ll create jobs. The second argument is that in order to main- tain a good balance of payment position we must keep our costs of energy - and thereby of production - down so that our goods can compete in the export market-place. The assumptions behind both arguments can be questioned. It has been assumed, without question, that an increase in the use of energy means a higher G.N.P. and that a higher G.N.P. means more jobs. Therefore, Canadians have accepted the environ- 403 mental costs in order to ensure stable employment for themselves and their children. The clear relationship found between energy and jobs in the underdeveloped countries does not follow necessarily in a country such as Canada. With more and more of our employment occurring in the service industry field, the role of energy in creating jobs decreases. Furthermore, high levels of energy use are associated with automated industries and a drop in employees per unit of production. The increased use of energy is at the expense of employment (Hannon, 1973). I believe that we are technically capable of increasing employment, and product- ivity if it is considered necessary, without resorting to an even greater input of energy. One way this will come about is if the cost of energy reflects both the production and transmission costs as well as the social and environmental externalities that have been excluded up to the present time. For example, an increase in the cost of gasoline will result in a shift in the market-place to smaller cars resulting in increased efficiency of our energy use for transportation, road costs and for car manufacture. I can find no detailed analysis of the relationship between employment and energy in Canada. Certainly, such an analysis should be done before we develop any firm plans for new national energy policies which advocate unlimited supplies of inexpensive energy in order to create more jobs. The second assumption concerns our export competitive- ness. Energy cost is likely to affect our competitive position only if other countries are isolating themselves from world prices by using low-cost energy, or alternatively their govern- ments are subsidizing the cost of energy. Both alternatives seem unlikely in the long term, and, as pressure on world energy supplies continues to develop and as prices rise, it is the country that develops the greatest efficiency of conversion of its energy resources that will gain the most from its exports, not the one that has kept the price of its energy artificially low. Except in a few industries such as smelting, energy usually contributes only 1-2% of the cost of products, so that even with a doubling or more in price it would not be a very important issue in terms of overall cost. It should be noted that the Green Paper discusses another aspect of the relationship between energy and employment. It suggests the development of some of our large sources of energy in the seventies, not to supply our needs, but to create a bulge in the employment market during a period when the number of Canadians seeking employment is expected to be high. This attitude reflects a misuse of our energy resources. We should not be trying to solve the complex problem of unemployment by using short-tarm tactics such as the exploitation of our energy resources. Would reducing immigration or the hours of employment not be more appropriate? For example, when one considers the projected employment of 100,000 man-years for the Mackenzie gas pipeline, against the annual immigration figure of about 150,000, 404

it is clear that a change in our immigration policy would have the greater effect upon our employment problem. In 1970, we had 147,000 immigrants of which 77,723 were seeking employment. This means that the need for about 800,000 man-years of employment during the seventies was created by that single year's intake. A 12% reduction in immigration that year would have removed the need for the equivalent of the total employment created by con- struction of the Mackenzie pipeline. My argument here is simplified by ignoring the demand for goods created by the immigrants themselves and the fact that the immigrants and the pipeline workers may not be in the same job market. It is presented solely to illustrate that there may be more direct ways of tackling the employment problem other than by the use of major energy projects; in fact energy may be more of a "red herring"than a solution.

ECONOMIC BENEFITS In my remarks so far, I have attempted to question the generally accepted theme that an unlimited supply of low cost energy is essential to the well-being of the country. This idea is being questioned extensively in the United States at this time, where supply is net keeping up with demand, and they have deter- mined that a considerable reduction in their demand is possible. Canada should not wait for a time of shortage, but should examine much more carefully the benefits of changing the demand. One such benefit is the financial savings that can be made. The total cost of energy to Canadians is enormous. Let me live you three sets of figures to illustrate these costs. The primary product- ion value for all energy produced in 1972 was about $5 billion. Although some of this energy was exported, there were some balanc- ing imports, so that we are not too far off when we say that Canadians spend annually at least $10 billion on energy bills. Looking at another aspect of energy, the Green Paper suggested that we would be investing between $42 and $68 billion in energy development during the balance of this decade, again some ir order to develop energy for export, but nevertheless an outlay by Canadians for energy development in Canada. Finally, I am told that the Federal Department of Public Works now spends $34.2 million a year on energy to run its buildings, by the year 2000, this is estimated to rise to $1 billion. My reason for giving these figures is no-t -so much to impress you with their magnitude but to impress upon you the profitability of reducing our energy needs. Even a reduction of as little as five per cent would result in very large economic benefits to the country. These benefits could be in the form of reduced cost of producing goods, so that prices on the internal or external market could be cut, or alternatively, profits from production could be raised. Increased efficiency within the government itself would give benefits that could come "n the form of reduced taxes or re- distribution of the money to areas of national concern. 405

Let me illustrate my point by taking a specific example concerning electrical energy in British Columbia which I have presented elsewhere in more detail (Efford, 1972a). The pro- jected annual per capita increase in electrical energy for British Columbia is 4.5% (Fig. 1). If this annual increase could be reduced to 3.0%, it would mean that by 1990 only 9,000 rather than 13,000 MW would have to be generated. I estimate that the savings in capital requirements would be about $1.6 billion, plus simple interest at 6% per annum for about ten years. By my rough estimation on this one aspect of energy alone, the people of British Columbia would save nearly $2.8 billion in twenty years. An amount of money, equal to twice the present annual budget of the province, would be released into the economy instead of being committed to paying electricity bills. You may claim that this is a small amount considering our present national expenditures but remember, I chose as my example a decrease of less than 1.5% in our annual consumption. What if it had been more? This saving would not result from reducing the amount of electricity now used by each person. Nor am I suggesting we stop increasing our use, for the time being, as this increase reflects in part the efforts being made to improve the living standards of the many underprivileged members of our society. What I am proposing is that we reduce the future rate of per capita increase, Remember also, that we would not need to build one of the large dams proposed, and thus there would be environmental benefits as well. This example, compounded for all forms of energy and over all provinces, illustrates the benefits that would accrue to the nation with a strong government policy concerned with more efficient use of natural resources. INCREASED EFFICIENCY If we accept the general principle that considerable benefits mi«jht be obtained from increased efficiency in use, we then ask: "How do we go about it?" There is an extensive amount of literature developing around the subject of energy conserva- tion (e.g., Biswas, 1973; Biswas and Cook, 1972; Office of Emergency Preparedness, 1972; Hirst and Moyers, 1973; Lincoln, 1973; Efford, 1972b, Berg, 1973a and b). The ideas and sugges- tions now being expressed cover all areas of energy use, from increased efficiency in primary conversion to changes in our use of the car and changes in the light fixtures in our homes. I shall take two general examples from building construction and industry to illustrate my point. Our climate is such that heating and cooling are a major expense for owners of houses and commercial buildings, and together with lighting, constitute an important use of energy in Canada. It is quite clear that we could realize very consider- able savings in both money and energy consumption by relatively slight design changes. 406

FIGURE 1 PROJECTED GROWTH IN PER CAPITA ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA

104.5% 100%

4.5% annual addition

1973 1974

COMPOUNDED TO THE YEAR 2000, THIS MEANS PER CAPITA ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION WILL BE 374.5% OF 1970 USE 407

In the case of house construction, the amount of wall and roof insulation used at present is insufficient to gain the greatest savings in energy or dollars, under most Canadian climatic conditions. New standards are being prepared presently as part of a revision of the CMHC Code of Residential Construction. These will probably recommend increasing the thickness of walls to 6" and doubling the insulation. The CMHC Code directly affects about 5Q°4 of all new housing in Canada, but it has sufficient "spillover" effect that over the next 35 to 40 years, we should see a gradual change to adequate insulation in all our single family dwellings. These insulation improvements will have a considerable impact on our residential energy demand, averaging about 20%, and on our home fuel bills. No doubt improvements in technology or major design changes could increase these savings even further. The introduction of central district heating in new towns and communities would be a major advance which might well halve the total fuel consumption necessary to heat and cool residential property (Brown, 1972). Canada, because of its very cold climate, should incline toward this type of development. At the moment, many other countries are ahead of us in this area of efficient use of energy. Some have whole communities based on district heating, generated for its own sake or as a by-product of the generation of electricity. What is needed at present is government support for the design of total district heating for a new community, as an example to Canadians of the benefits and problems. Only when we have a working example will the idea get off the ground in this country. It is particularly important to our northern communities that we encourage the overall design of energy production and efficient utilization, especially where heat recovery from garbage disposal facilities can be included. Although the prospects for improvements in energy efficiency within single family housing appear bright, in the case of commercial buildings, where more energy is used but more could be saved, the application of known technology is less advanced. Payment to the architect, and through him the consult- ing engineer, as a percentage of the cost of the building, creates little incentive to carry out studies and to design the whole building as an integrated energy package even though the savings in running costs to the owner may be many times any increase in fees or additional capital costs that might be encountered. Thus, the system today does not encourage the application of our present technology to foster the efficient use of energy, let alone the development of new approaches. Furthermore, it appears to be easy for ownars to write off high energy costs resulting from inefficiency through normal operating expenditures or to pass the costs on to tenants in escalation clauses in leases. Nevertheless, there are signs that the overall design of energy systems for large office and residential buildings is» 408

beginning to move into a new phase in Canada. Both the Federal Department of Public Works in Ottawa and Consumer's Gas Co. in Toronto have been working jointly for some time on computer programmes that allow testing of various control patterns for energy systems within these large buildings, and for testing alternative types of systems for heating, lighting and cooling to obtain the most efficient combination. This new tool is available to consultant engineers throughout Canada for use in building design. Consumer's Gas offers the use of this programme at cost, charging only for computer time, plus the royalty paid to the originator of the programme in the U.S. At the moment these facilities are not widely used in government, or in the business or public spheres. Attempts are being made to expand a small consulting group within Public Works, which would increase the government's competence in these areas, and spread its use in the government's buildings throughout the country. There is also a growing interest in the non-governmental sector, partly brought on, no doubt, by the increased costs of fuel. Expansion is being aided by workshops developed by both organizations, but lack of understanding of the increased efficiency that can be obtained and of the overall economic benefits, may hinder its development. The overall economic benefits can be illustrated by an example of a university building in Ontario in which Consumer Gas has cal- culated that a different control pattern for the building would save 72% of the present heating costs, 26% of the cooling costs and 27% of the lighting costs. When the total energy cost for a 1,000,000 square foot commercial building is about $450,000 a year, ,he case for switching to designs based on long-term main- tenance costs rather than for low initial construction costs become apparent especially when the future costs of energy are likely to rise rapidly. It appears that in many of our more modern buildings an integrated control of the energy package could give a saving of about 15%. For government buildings in Ottawa alone this would save more than one million dollars a year. Savings of these magnitudes in commercial buildings involve balancing the heat input and output systems with the heat generated from the lighting. In one or two well-designed buildings today, the whole of the heating system comes from the lights and other heat sources within the building which are distributed by heat pumps or other heat reclamation methods. Additional heat from auxiliary heaters is only added when the outside temperatures drop to very low levels, e.g., -5°F for Commerce Court in Toronto.

Unfortunately, the advantages to be gained in the winter are counteracted by the excess heat the lightsadd to the building in summer. One of the central problems preventing the most efficient use of energy in these modern buildings is the high light levels. For one of the largest buildings in Ottawa, the air-conditioners are cooling the building at all external temper- atures above 40°F. Over the last few years the accepted light levels for commercial buildings, schools, etc., based on recom- mendations of the Illuminating Engineering Society in the U.S.S 409 have been gradually increasing. For example, the recommended levels in schools has risen from 25 fc in 1950 to over 70 fc today, whereas the recommended level in the U.K. is only 10-30 fc (Hopkinson, 1963). In Canada, new offices are running from 90-120 fc, unless the engineer has tried specifically to design a building with lower light levels. It is Dredicted that these figures will reach 250 fc hy the yea^r 2000. The real question is why are these higher and higher levels established. Are they based on physiological or psychological needs or are they in fact cosmetic? As far as I can find out, there is no justification for the present high light levels, and that careful design of buildings to give, say 50 fc for most areas of work, and even less in non-use areas, would not only adequately light the building, but would reduce the initial cost of fixtures, the cost of electricity for the lights and the cooling costs in summer. It might increase the heating bill slightly in the dead of winter, but not enough to counteract the very considerable savings in both money and energy in summer. The point I have been trying to make by examining this topic in some detail is that by applying present knowledge and technology we can reduce our energy consumption considerably and save money. This type of example can be applied right across the board for energy uses. Let me just touch on another area of energy use to strengthen my argument. Industry in the United States is ahead of Canada con- cerning the profits to be made from increased efficiency in the use of all forms of energy. This is particularly true in some of the larger plastics and chemical industries where, as long as 12 years ago, some companies had set up internal management teams to examine the efficiency with which energy is used within the various plants. Union Carbide, for example, has been able to reduce its needs for fuel, excluding plant feedstock and steam, by 8.2% last year, and expects the reduction to be greater this year. The total saving in 1972 for this company was $6.15 million, a significant saving for even the largest company. The increase in efficiency has been mainly from heat recovery from waste products, which were previously flared, and the use of heat from exothermic reactions to replace heat previously supplied to pro- cessing units from outside the plant. This company is also encouraging the efficient use of electricity within its office buildings, not because it will make a significant dent in the company's energy bill, but because it will help to attune the employees to the new concern for efficient use of energy through- out the plant. Some of these energy management groups have begun to sell their expertise outside their own company on a consulting basis. Thus the ideas of efficiency are spreading to smaller companies. Carolina Power and Light Co. has joined with the largest of these management teams, DuPont, to help its customers 410

FIGURE 2

2.0 H

1.6 H

c

CO '= 1.2 CT CD "to O O

N, 0.8 H N.Z. It. Fr. «Sw.

0.4 H •©U.K. U.S. 9 • • Canada 9 « 9 a

9 9

i ! 2 4 6 8 10 Energy Consumption per capita (103 kg coal equivalent) 411 reduce their electric power consumption, and they guarantee to cut 10% off the consumption for any company that buys $500,000 of electricity a year. They go even further in that the utility's engineers are learning the techniques applied by DuPont, so that the uti'ity can itself help smaller customers become efficient, even if those same customers cannot afford to call in a manage- ment team as a consultant. This particular utility is carrying the idea of conservation to all levels of its customers, including the householders. They have developed a detailed analytical approach for their employees (Carolina Power and Light Co, 1973) which expects them to spot check customers' use of all forms of energy and advise them on wastage within their systems. One interesting point is that the utility expects that the main area of savings for their customers will be in fossil fuel use, an area outside the utility's direct business interests. The Canadian picture is certainly one of awakening consciousness in the area of energy conservation in industry, The Canadian subsidiaries of DuPont and Union Carbide are just beginning to develop energy management teams, and some of the utilities are beginning to think about conservation programmes, although in some cases they are still on the "growth for growth's sake" kick. When we have potential savings of 8% or more, our industries should be encouraged to pay much greater attention to this aspect of their manufacturing processes, if only as a way of increasing profits. The recently aborted attempt of the Province of Ontario to impose an energy tax was a step in the right direc- tion, as an increase in the cost of energy would force people to examine their demand very carefully.

CONCLUSIONS My role has been to point out that Canada is ».ot seri- ously considering dampening its energy demands nor taking full advantage o* the benefits to be gained by emphasizing the effi- cient use of energy. Because we are energy rich, we have shown considerable disregard for costs associated with growth in our use of energy and for the advantages to be obtained from increased efficiency. Canada, in fact, ranks 42nd out of 49 among indus- trial nations in converting energy to G.N.P. (Fig. 2 from Efford, 1973). One of the major problems facing us today is that scient- ific and technological knowledge is not being used to its maximum advantage to solve human problems. It is up to us as a nation to remove the barriers to the application of our present knowledge. Industry can develop increased efficiency in the use of energy for purely business reasons, but in the public areas, like house design, transportation, etc., where no one is responsible for balancing the costs and benefits to society, Governments must take the lead in the area of energy conservation. The Government will also have to play a leading role in funding studies of the problem but more importantly, in developing ways to aid the transfer of prasent knowledge to the people. This will come about only when 412

the government believes that an orderly transfer to a fixed energy economy is reasonable, practical and profitable for the long-term well-being of the entire nation. BIBLIOGRAPHY Berg, C.A., 1973a, "Energy Conservation Through Effective Utilization", Science 181;128-138, Berg, C.A., 1973b, "Energy Conservation Through Effective Utilization", U.S. Dept. of Commerce NBSIR 73-102:1-45. Biswas, A.K. (in press), "Energy and the Environment",, Environment Canada, Ottawa. Biswas, A.K. and Cook B., 1972, "Beneficial Uses of Thermal Discharges: Problems and Perspectives", Environment Canada, Ottawa. Brown, W.G., 1972, "District Heating for Canadian Towns and Cities", National Research Council of Canada NRCC 12459. Carolina Power and Light Company, 1973, Emphasis '73 Conservation, Raleigh. Efford, I.E., 1972a, Energy Policy Paper given to Sierra Club, Vancouver, 17 October 1972. Efford, I.E., 1972b, "Energy Addiction: A Social Disease", 206-219 in Energy and the Environment, H.R. MacMillan Lectures. F.d. I.E. Efford and B.M. Smith, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Efford, I.E.. 1973, "Power, Price and Society", Manitoba Institute of Continuing Education Conference on Environmental Law, Winnipeg. Hannon, B., 1973, Options for Energy Conservation, Center for Advanced Computation, University of Illinois, ocum<_:nt 79:1-21. Hirst, E. and Moyers, J.C., 1973, "Efficiency of Energy Use in the United States", Science 179:1299-1304. Hopkinson, R.G., 1963, Architectural Physics? Lighting, D.S.I.R. H.M. Stationery Office, London. Lincoln, G.A. , 1973, "Energy Conservation", Science 180:155-162;

Ministry of Energy, Mines and Resourcess 1973, "An Energy Policy for Canada" Vol. I and II, Ottawa. Office of Emergency Preparedness, 1972, "The Potential for Energy Conservation", A Staff Study, Washington, D.C. 413

SUMMING UP

by'

ASIT K. BISWAS

epartment of Environment, Ottawa

The five papers presented at the environmental session and the ensuing discussions remind me of a remark made by James Branch Cabell: "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds; and the pessimist fears that this is true." The scene for this session was admirably set by Dr. Roots with a discussion of the problems and perspectives in the energy-environment area. He pointed out that energy has until now been plentiful and relatively .cheap and its use has been primarily determined by price and convenience. As our energy requirements have gone up, so have the undesired effects of energy development on the environment - so much so that the natural environmental processes can no longer assimilate or neutralize these effects. Our present rate of use of energy has impaired or threatens to impair the long-term quality and productivity of the environment, and the problem is bound to become more serious in the future unless we consider appropriate preventive steps. Thus, it is necessary to determine the ways and means by which these adverse effects can be minimized, and also to place these effects, and the cost and feasibility of their remedies, in the proper perspective with the needs for energy and the benefits to be gained from its use. Dr. Roots suggests that the environment can be altered in two basic ways: interference of the normal environmental c- biological processes by introduction or deletion of substances and alteration of the physical condition of land, water, atmosphere or living matter to decrease their productivity, suitability or mutual compatibility. The question then logically arises as to what can be done to prevent environmental deterioration. Two alternatives are. suggested: one is to use less energy (Dr. Efford discusses this point in greater detail later), and the other is to use energy with less effect on the environment. Dr. Roots suggests that a cursory examination of the current, state of affairs in Canada will indicate that it would be impractical, in fact undesirable,- to "halt the growth of energy use in the immediate future, no matter what the environmental benefits." However, he quickly points out that a "very great deal can be done to eliminate or reduce environmental impacts while still making available, and us.ing, tne energy needed by a vigorous society." On a long-term basis, human population, food supply and available resources will be increasingly more dependent on the energy available. In the field of nuclear power, Ir. Roots suggests that we should be careful and cautious. He asserts that "except perhaps for a few lucky hydroelectric plants on large waterfalls, nuclear power generation is the safest and environmentally most acceptable large scale means of electric 414

power generation in use today. A similar thought is echoed by Dr. Hurs . After a brief review of the reactor licensing process, Dr. Hurst discusses the two major problems associated with nuclear reactors: the possibility of accidents and waste management. In the area of accidents, most of the discussion, quite correctly, is en the loss-cf-coolant accident, which is claimed to be an "event that many engineers consider practically inconceivable in view of the care taken in construction and inspection of such piping." This, however, is a debatable point. Dr. Hurst mentions the case of the U.S. reactors. After claiming for years that the emergency system will effectively cool the core under any conceivable accident, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission tested the system on a small mock-up reactor in Idaho. In six out of six trials, the system failed, and almost no water reached the core (Biswas, 1973a). Admittedly, the Canadian emergency cooling system is quite a bit different than the American one, but the type of problems encountered are somewhat similar. This includes the great difficulty of forecasting behaviour in this area of complex technology where pertinent experimentation is always difficult and may sometimes be impossible. This is why it is heartening to note Dr. Hurst's strong recommendation that AECB and its advisers must continue to give major emphasis to preventing a serious accident.

In the area of waste management, Dr. Hurst suggests that it is "not in the same category of hazard as a reactor accident," but we shall be "passing on to our descendents the relatively small cost of perpetual care". This is a point worth discussing. One of the waste products, Plutonium, is the deadliest substance known to man, and it appears that inhalation of a millionth of a gram is sufficient to cause lung cancer. Thus, in my view, there are two major problems involved. Firstly, the question of the cost of waste disposal, a waste that has to be completely isolated from the biosphere for at least 200,000 years (Biswas, 1973b). The costs of these types of hazards are difficult, if not impossible, to quantify under the format of benefit-cost analysis, and, consequently, the benefits may look more real since they could be quantified much more easily. In addition, the underlying premise of benefit-cost analysis necessitates that the redistributional effects of the action, for whatsoever reason, be inconsequential. Thus, when we consider hazards that may affect the society for 200,000 years, the equity question can neither be neglected as incon- sequential nor evaluated on any theoretical or empirical grounds (Biswas and Coomber, 1973). Secondly, we are making a social commitment with an implicit assurance that from now to perpetuity our social institutions will r-tain sufficient stability to guarantee thi continued existence of a cadre that will continually take care of these highly radioactive wastes. A glimpse at the man's past history of only the last 3,000 years will indicate that this may very well turn out to be an impossible assumption. We know of no government, democratic of otherwise, whose life was more than an instant by comparison to the half-life of plutonium.

Dr. Butler in his concise paper suggests that the effects of ion- izing radiations on human health may be subdivided into two categories: acute or delayed effects. Acute effects are the immediate results of 415 short-term exposure to high levels of radiation leading to tissue damage, temporary or permanent incapacity or death. Delayed effects can be of two types: development of malignancies including leukemia and cancers on exposed persons or teratogenic and genetic effects on the progeny of exposed persons. The balance of the paper shows the somatic and genetic risks due to different exposure rates and also a comparison of lifetime risk of death in selected occupations and for selected causes. In his paper on pipeline problems, Dr. Peterson suggests that the direct or primary effects of large projects on environmental systems can be predicted, but secondary and tertiary effects are somewhat obscure, and hence very difficult if not impossible to predict. Yet the secondary effects could be as important as the primary ones. The ecologists need time to obtain necessary data on the behaviour or rivers, ice, population dynamics, responses to surface disturbances or recovery rates of various ecosystems. Hence, it is not unreasonable to expect that the ecological studies in the north would require a similar time period that is necessary to explore and prove major oil and gas reserves: a decade seems to be a reasonable minimum time requirement for both cases. Dr. Peterson distinguished between predictive approach, which is based on measurements and interpretation prior to the project start-up and assessment approach in which actual effects are measured and interpreted. In the long run, the assessment approach will be more important because documentation of case histories not only gives results that are accurate but it also improves our prediction capabilities due to feed-back effects. Since ecologists have traditionally favoured undisturbed ecosystems for investigations, our knowledge and understanding of disturbed ecosystem is somewhat primitive and leaves much to be desired. In addition, there is the problem of extrapolation from one study area to another. This is especially important in the north which gives the impression of great similarity over a broad geographic area which could result in unjustified optimism. Dr. Efford, in the last paper of the session, makes a strong case for energy conservation. He suggests that the use of energy, in all its forms, has costs as well as benefits. He questions some usually accepted norms such as increase in the use of energy means a higher GNP which, in turn, means more jobs, and suggests that we are now technically capable of increasing employment and productivity without resorting to an even greater input of energy. If we can increase our efficiency of energy utilization, our overall energy requirements will be less. Thus, if we can reduce the projected annual per capita increase in B.C. from 4.5 to 3 percent, it means that only 9,000 MW has to be generated by 1990 rather than 13,000. This, Dr. Efford asserts, means a saving of nearly $2.8 billion in principal and interest - an amount that is nearly twice the current provincial budget. 416

Several examples are given as to how energy can be conserved. Better insulation of our homes could reduce the residential energy requirements by an average of 20%. Introduction of central district heating in new towns might well halve the total fuel consumption. The lighting standards of our office buildings have been continually increasing. This effects our energy requirements in two ways: firstly in terms of providing excess lighting and secondly to remove the excess heat generated by the light. Much of this high intensity lighting seems unnecessary. Dr. Efford concludes with a plea for more efficient use of energy by both the public and government agencies. This concludes a brief summary of the session, but I was also asked by our distinguished Chairman, Dr. Hare, to point out some of the major environmental concerns we did not discuss in this session. These, in my opinion, are the following. 1. Development and utilization of energy contribute different types of emissions to the atmosphere: oxides of carbon, nitrogen, sulphur, hydro- carbons and heat. The synergistic effects of all these emissions are not well understood. However, there is some empirical evidence to suggest that these may be effecting the world climate. If so, its effects on food production and energy consumption have to be carefully evaluated. The consequences for such an inadvertent climatic changes are so horrendous that the Royal Society of Canada should consider a possible future seminar on this subject. 2. Exploration and transportation of oil includes the hazard of oil pollution - both on land and oceans. It was estimated that nearly 2.2 million metric tons of oil entered the world oceans in 1969, and this figure is expected to increase to 4 million metric tons by 1980 (Biswas, 1973b). Transportation of natural gas and oil, by pipeline from the Arctic, across the permafrost areas to the population and load centres in the south, needs careful investigation. 3. At most stages of energy development and utilization, we create the problem of noise. Probably the worst offenders are the motor vehicles in the urban built-up areas. We just cannot allow the noise level to go on increasing ad infinitum. 417

4. Landscape estnetics is another factor that merits serious consideration. It includes the effects on the landscape due to strip mining, solid wastes disposal, transportation of oil and gas by pipelines, powerpiant siting and transmission of power. As our energy requirements increase, so wil1 the total infringements on our landscape. 5. We need better techniques to evaluate the social and environmental costs of anergy production and consumption so that the consumers pay the right cost for energy. Irreparable damage to the"environment, whether to human health from radioactive waste products, or to aquatic organisms from thermal discharges, or to the atmosphere from gaseous and particulate emissions, or to the beauty of a canyon and countryside by a hydro dam, or to the permafrost from oil and gas transmission, cannot be analysed by the fine tuning of marginalism. Neither can our current techniques be successfully used where benefits are short-run and quantifiable while the costs are long-run and mostly unknown and unquantifiable. This is one area that needs immediate intensive research efforts. S. Finally, I would like to play the devil's advocate with regard to nuclear power. The question I would like to pose is whether the society should strike the Faustian bargain with atomic scientists and engineers. If we do, we will impose a burden of monitoring and sophisticated management, including the highest levels of quality control, of a dangerous waste product continuously and indefinitely, essentially forever. The penalty of not doing this could possibly be unparallelled disaster. This is a moral problem of great profundity, and needs much more discussion than it has received so far in Canada. REFERENCES 1. A.K. Biswas, 1973a, Energy, Chapter in Human Ecology, Edited by F. Sargent, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. 2. A.K. Biswas, 1973b, Energy and the Environment, Planning and Finance Service, Department of Environment, Ottawa. 418

3. A.K. Biswas, and N.H. Coomber, Evaluation of Environmental Intangibles, Genera Press, Bronxvilie, New York. 419

DISCUSSION OF SESSION V

MR. NICK PI TOMASO (Murphy Oil, Montreal):

Papers have been presented by all coneerned segments of tnS question on energy, from energy industry representatives through to environmentalists, consumers, economists, etc. While it is unanimously agreed that energy is a problem in the not too distant future, the degree of crisis and steps which should be taken to resolve energy difficulties are far from mutually shared by the groups concerned.

Since it is a rather reasonable assumption that energy problems must be solved to the satisfaction of all concerned, is it not possible to establish a permanent committee composed of representatives of industry, environmentalism, government, consumers, which could co-ordinate progress in the area of energy development in a participative manner, rather than having such groups going their separate ways -- often in opposite directions? Energy development requires co-ordination. A group much as this could report to what I hope will be regularly planned symposia like the present one.

While papers are of informative value, we much move need a direction acceptable to all concerned with energy. I am not sure we are leaving this gathering with an awareness of action which must be taken, whether it be for 1978, 1988 or 1998, and at what price for that matter. DR. E.F. ROOTS: Although Mr. Di Tomaso's suggestion has merit in that the public and government would benefit from the existence of an identified group or committee that would be able to co-ordinate progress in energy, it would appear that because of the very complexity of the role that energy plays in society, it would be impossible for any single group to speak for all sides of the energy question for any length of time. There is an understandable desire to simplify energy questions, to demand that Canada have a single and consistent energy policy, or, as the questioner stated, to "assume that energy problems must be solved to the satisfaction of all concerned." But in reality, there never will be a single solution to energy problems nor a single energy policy that will be satisfactory to all- The recent report issued by the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, "An Energy Policy for Canada, Phase One, Analysis" 420

attempts to point out the complexity of the issues and a need for a dynamic, continuously evolving national response to energy questions. Therefore, while we should welcome any reasonable mechanism to promote dialogue between the various segments of society and the various authorities, industries and consumers involved in energy questions — and that means each one of us —, and while there is much more that can be done to co-ordinate the action taken on energy issues, it is doubtful if a single national bupei -cOiimii LLet: un energy, no matter how it were set. up or given authority, would remain satisfactory to many of us for very long.

There is no reason why concerned groups or societies cannot set up standing committees on energy questions and then bring their opinions or suggestions before the authorities. Some organizations have done so. Some government agencies have appointed non- government committees to advise them on energy questions. To be effective, they must concentrate on issues that are sufficiently specific to justify an identifiable expertise in the committee;- a good example is the Advisory Committee on Northern Pipeline Financing. If one wishes to have a broadly-based committee to comment on the full range of energy issues, such a committee must, to be effective, have a short life so that it can maintain momentum and enthusiasm; an example is the Energy Task Force of the Man and Resources Conference. We should also bear in mind that to an increasing degree, energy policy is made in the public ballot box, and is thus representative of the collective wishes of each of us as individuals.

It would appear that, much as we would all like to go away from this symposium with a clear idea of the action that must be taken for 1978 or 1998, it w;'.ll not be possible to do so. Even a national super-committee on energy would not help for long, for there is no single or simple answer to our national or regional energy problems. What we all have to do is be aware of the complexity of the problems, try to keep a realistic view of the options open to us, and use every reasonable means to ensure that our concerns are heard and that opportunitias for progress are grasped. To do this we need, not a single super-committee to which we can leave the job, but a wide range of mechanisms that involve each of us and which give proper expression to the legitimate competing interests of various sectors of society.

MR. DON LAHEY (Algonquin College, Physics Dept.) of Dr. Roots:

Could you elaborate on the effects of discharge of heat on the environment. Since the ultimate degradation of all energy used is to heat, and our energy consumptions are doubling every decade, how many doubling periods can we undergo without severe climatic dislocations! Recently Maurice Strong suggested that the melting of the Atlantic ice cap has already begun. Could you comment on this. 421

DR. ROOTS:

The most honest answer to this question is that we simply do not know how much additional heat could be released to the lower atmosphere, surface waters, or land surface before there would be severe climatic dislocations. On the surface of it, even making a generous estimate of man's production of energy in the next century, we will be producing energy on a scale that is insignificant, on a planetary basis, if compared with the energy received from the sun and released through geothermal heat, which is then exchanged and re-distributed through atmospheric, oceanic, and geological movements and inorganic and organic chemical processes. Estimates vary, but I do not know of any that propose that man's use of energy is even a millionth of the energy processes of the planet except over an exceedingly short period, as in atomic explosions. However, as you suggest, the doubling processes if continued can soon erase a miHion-to-one differential. You may remember an estimate in Scientific American a couple of years ago, which showed that if the present doubling rate for electrical power consumption in the U.S. were maintained, the heat release in the U.S. would in 99 years equal the heat received from the sun by the U.S. land surface on a 24-hour basis. These numbers appeared to be of the right order of magnitude.

We know too little about the effect on the climate of local or planetary perturbations of heat to answer your question. There is no question but that quite severe climatic changes, for example continental glaciation or spread of deserts, appear to be associated with changes in atmospheric circulation patterns that are in part at least associated with quite small changes in regional mean temperatures. But cause and effect relationships are very complex, and we must beware of jumping to conclusions about the effect of local or even regional heat release. We must also bear in mind that geological and archaeoclimatological evidence seems to show that world temperatures along the air- water-land interface have been remarkably constant for hundreds of millions of years, despite apparently wide changes in the ratio of land area to sea, the chemical composition of oceans and atmosphere, the albedo of the land and the vigour of oceanic heat transfer. So on the one hand we have a climatic system that appears very sensitive to temperature changes, and on the other hand evidence of remarkable long-term temperature stability despite considerable changes in planetary morphology and surface composition.

There are two ways in which our use of energy can change the heat balance of the planet. One is by releasing stored solar energy, either the energy of past solar radiation, through oxidation of fossil fuels, or the energy of past solar fusion processes, through conversion of nuclear energy to sensible heat. The other is through production of by-products like carbon dioxide or particulate matter in the atmosphere or changes in the pattern of vegetation including planktonic vegetation, that will alter 422

the intensity and spectrum of radiation received on the surface of the earth, or alter the earth's capacity to absorb or re- distribute the received energy. For what it may be worth, I sus- pect that the second of these two ways will prove to be more noticeable within our lifetimes; although there is no doubt that, if we keep on increasing our use of energy, the first effect will in time dominate.

Regardinq the second part of the question, I believe Mr. Strong was referring to the Antarctic ice-cap. The present size of the Antarctic ice-cap is determined by a number of factors:- distribution and temperature of precipitation, height and stability of sea-level, geothermal heat, re-arrangement of snow load by wind, pattern of solar radiation, and intensity and temperature of ocean currents which affect the presence of pack ice —, not all of which are related to climate. Although there is some evidence that the Antarctic ice-cap has been in the recent geological past rather larger than today, there is little to suggest that any reduction of size was due to melting occasioned by a warmer Antarctic climate. In fact there is some reason to suspect that one of the first effects of a warming of the Antarctic climate would be an increase of snowfall and a growth of the ice-cap.

If the questioner was referring to the extent of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, rather than the Antarctic, I think that it can be said with fair confidence that we do not know just how the arctic sea ice as a whole has changed in the last centuries or decades, 01 how its variations are related to climate changes. The variations in local areas have undoubtedly been very great. Only recently have we begun to gather reliable quantitative data on the extent, thickness, and physical characteristics of sea ice in either the northern or southern hemisphere. Several research programs are under way to attempt to determine the relationship of weat) ar, climate, and oceanographic factors to the extent and behaviour of sea ice.

DR. IRENE M. SPRY (Dept. of Economics, Univ. of Ottawa) of Dr. G.C. Butler:

Is there not a crucial difference between such risks as injury in car accidents and the genetic risks inherent in radiation which may build up for several generations? A purely quantitative comparison does not seem to give a sound basis for judgment. DR. BUTLER:

What you are really asking is, "Would one rather be injured or killed by a motor accident or by ionizing radiation?" To me a period of illness or a death from one cause is much like another, 423

DR. IRENE M. SPRY of Dr. Butler:

Can we yet judge genetic risks accurately? Has there been sufficient time since Hiroshima and Nagasaki to allow their full impact to be grasped? Should not a wide margin be allowed for uncertainty?

Have the risks from radiation been under-estimated in the past? How can we be sure that we are not under-estimating them still, especially genetic risks?

DR. BUTLER;

The estimates of genetic risks are very uncertain, a fact reflected by the wide range in the numerical estimates of Table 1. The estimates are based on animal experiments and cytogenetic observations on other populations as well as those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Much more research needs to be done to reduce the calculated range. In my opinion, the assumptions underlying the calculations are conservative and great effort has been expended to avoid underestimating the risks.

DR. IRENE M. SPRY of Dr. Butler: Is not the disposal of radio-active waste likely to involve high risks or very high costs to ensure safety? PP.. BUTLER: The current methods of waste disposal give minute doses of radia- tion to members of the public. The costs of achieving this have been included in the costs of nuclear power and I assume that other speakers have showi1 these costs to be acceptable.

PROF. R.E. FOLINSBEE (Dept. of Geology, U. of Alberta) of Dr. Butler: Would you comment upon the scientific validity of press reports regarding significant increases in the number of stillbirths in areas contiguous to atomic power plants?

DR. BUTLER: Epidemiologists and statisticians with whom I have discussed these reports tell me that the basic assumptions and methods of calcula- tion used in these estimates are unsound. While it is impossible to say that there is no increase of stillbirths around reactors, the calculated incidence of these is very much less than that given in the reports referred to by Professor Folinsbee. 424 DR. J.B. WARREN (TRIUMF, Univ. of B.C.) to Dr. C.C. Butler:

What fraction of the total genetic changes in man are esti- mated to be caused by the natural radiation background? Fret; urn ably th.e-.-s total spontaneous genetic changes are the necessary ingredient in the development of mankind. DR. BUTLER; This is not known for certain but my crude calculations indicate from 1 to 5 percent.

DR. BUTLER was also asked about the cumulative effects of radiation. What effects would radiation have on persons working in the vicinity of nuclear sources, if we consider cumulative effects? DR. BUTLER;

In my Table 1 the risk estimates were presented as the final equilibrium rate established after constant irradiation of the population with 100 mrem per year. These are therefore estimates of the cumulative effects.

MR. JOS. YANCHULA (Consulting Petroleum Engineer, Calgary) of Dr. D.G. Hurst:

Would you agree that for adequate safety,nuclear reactors should be installed underground? Even Mr. Edward Teller, the "Father" of the U.S. H-Bomb, has recommended this. He is not a man to be unduly apprehensive about nuclear power plants because he keeps insisting that in order to be militarily secure, the U.S. must be capable of destroying civilization much more efficiently than the U.S.S.R. DR. HURST:

The answer is clearly "No!", because we license above-ground reactors. I understand the reason for proposing underground installations is to provide a firm pressure envelope around the equipment. The containment building around CANDU reactors is designed to stand the pressures generated by an accident, for example, a primary system rupture. The containment building is, therefore, in a sense an artificial equivalent of an underground cavern.

DR. D.G-. HURST was asked the following question:

Safety surveillance of nuclear reactors will require in-service inspection and' analysis. Will the gathering and supply of data be entrusted to the operator and if 425

so how will the validity of the data be checked'' What is being done to automate supply of data to reduce exposure to data-collecting personnel?

DR. HURST: The gathering of data is done by non-destructive testing inspectors who may come from contractors, from the Provincial inspection authority, or from the operating staff. 1 have no worry about the validity of the data because, as I mentioned during the talk, I believe the relationship with the operators is quite healthy. In addition, they are fully aware that if we caught them in falsification of data or misrepresentation our whole mode of sur- veillance might change and life would become much more complicated for them and for us.

As to the reduction of exposure, this is a very important question. The device that does the in-service inspection of pressure tubes is an elaborate apparatus that measures wall thickness, surface quality, etc., and data are recorded remotely. In the inspection of boilers, tubing, etc., it is desirable to reduce exposures and efforts are always made in this direction. Moreover, we should not expose inspectors unless their efforts are necessary to enhance public safety.

PROFESSOR H. McQUEEN (Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Sir George Williams Univ. , Mo^Treal) and MR. BRIAN KELLY (Pollution Probe, Univ. of Toronto) asked DR. E.B. PETERSON : about the availability and accessibility of information on northern pipeline studies. Mr. Kelly also wanted to know if ways have been found to keep ecological damages within acceptable levels.

DR. PETERSON: Reports prepared for the Government of Canada under the Environ- mental-Social Program, Northern Pipelines, are all going to be published. Many of these are in press now and several are al- ready published. If you walk past the Information Canada office on Slater Street you will notice "_wo of these reports — one dealing with earthquake risk and one dealing with vegetation- landform-permafrost relations — displayed in the window right now. One of the problems is that it simply takes time to get technical reports published. So on your question of availability it is just a matter of publication time for various reports. Two thousand copies of each report are being published so their accessibility should be satisfactory after publication; before publication there is no generally suitable way to make information uniformly accessible to all interested parties, although some material, especially maps, have been placed on open file before formal publication. 426

As for pipeline information from the studies by industry, the best assurance of accessibility is that material filed with the National Energy Board in support of a pipeline application becomes available to the public before any hearings are held. I think that we can assume that the material filed in support of a northern pipeline application will include the kinds of reports and information that you asked about. On the question of whether ways had been found to keep ecological damages to acceptable levels if a northern pipeline were approved for construction, I can only say that the various reports do identify problem areas, areas that are thought to be more sensi- tive environmentally, and areas in which no particular problems are visualized. But to repeat what was said in the paper pre- sented here, these are predictions in advance of any actual pipe- line construction or operation. From these predictions it is going to be up to the various decision-makers, including the public, to decide if the expected environmental side-effects are "acceptable." The people who did the field studies in advance of a pipeline application cannot by themselves decide what is "acceptable" so in that sense I cannot answer your question. The one thing that can be done, etnd should be done, though, is to measure the actual side-effects if northern pipelines are built. If this is done with some contemporary projects, we will have better information to help decide which future projects are environmentally "acceptable" and which are not. 427

SESSION VI

HUMANISTIC AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Wednesday, 17 October, 1973, P.M.

Chai riiian R.J. UFFEN, F.R.S.C. Dean \pf Applied Science Queers*s University 429

ENERGY RESOURCES - MANPOWER CONSIDERATIONS

by OTTO E. THUR Department of Finance, Ottawa

The structure of economic acitivity in Canada has long been characterized by a strongly developed energy sector. The diversity of resources in this country has always made it possible to meet our energy needs, at first with wood and coal, to which electricity, and particularly hydro-electricity was later added, and finally, after wood ceased to be used as an energy com- modity and coal consumption declined markedly, with natural gas, crude petro- leum and, on a fairly modest scale up to now, uranium. This succession over time in the utilization of specific energy sources demonstrates to what extent this country should consider itself fortunate: all the forms of energy which have come into use' as a result of technological progress have been discovered within our borders. Consequently Canada has been able to avoid, at least from this point of view, a high degree of dependency on foreign countries. As S. Kuznets has shown, the life cycle of various commodities and notably the development cycle of the various primary sources of energy may be adequately represented by a series of logistic curves, each exhibiting an initial phase of acceleration, a point of inflexion and then a phase of deceleration, and each starting out asymptotically from a lower limit and tending asymptotically towards an upper limit. None ox. t' _se logistic curves, each corresponding to a primary source of energy, is missing in Canada. With the exception of the superpowers such as the United States and the Soviet Union, no other developed country has enjoyed as favourable an evolution as Canada.

Even though all primary sources of energy have been found in Canada, it must be noted that Canada could never have been considered, nGr could it be at present, as a country highly specialized in energy production on an international scale. Canada has never been and if- not now an important net exporter of energy. It is not therefore a country with any particular orien- tation towards energy, considering that on the whole we do little more than meet our own needs. In fact, up to now, what we have exported from one part of the country has been balanced by imports into other parts of the country. Thus the energy sector does not occupy any disporportionate role in the structure of our economic activity.

The role of energy in the Canadian economy can be measured either in terms of its contribution to the gross national product or in terms of employ- ment - with quite different results.

If we consider the principal economic activities directly linked with energy - specifically the production of crude petroleum and natural gas, their transportation by pipeline, the refining of the crude, petroleum and distribution of gas; all of the activities involved in •'he generation, trans- portation and distribution of electricity; and lastly, coal extraction - the CO o

Table 1

Energy Industries, 1971

Wages and Average Fixed Purchases Sales Value Industries Employment Salaries Earnings Capital of Materials $ Added "umber $ thousand $ Formation and Services million $ $ million $ million million

Crude petroleum 15,896 175,432 11,036 688 76 1,852 1 ,775 and natural gas

Oil pipe line 2f184 25,230 11,552 111 35 248 213 transport

Petroleum refineries 14,956 168,307 11,253 225 1,680 2,083 408

Gas utilities (transport and 15,941 135,873 8,523 543 288 888 600 distribution)

Electric power 50,626 497,825 9,8 3.3 1,250 680(1) 2,080(1) l,400(1) utilities

Coal mines 8,069 64,790 8,030 20 51 155 104

TOTAL (2) 107,672 1 ,067,457 9,914 2,837 2,810 7,311 4,500

(1) Excludes inter-company sales and purchases of electricity.

(2) Total excludes retail outlets and other final distribution channels. Uranium mining and refining also excluded. 431

value added by all these activities together comes to about 4.5 billion in current dollars for 1971, compared to a gross national product of 94 billion dollars in the same year, or 4.8 per cent. At first glance, this 4.8 per cent share would seem to be comparatively modest. It would be wrong, however, to underestimate the importance of the sector: it makes up nearly a twentieth of our total national production. All things considered, there are not many sectors of activity in our economy which match or exceed that proportion.

In somewhat different terms, we can point out that the value of sales in the energy sector, as defined above, is equal to 7,3 billion dollars for 1971 (this value of sales is simply the value added by the sector plus the value of goods and services purchased from other sectors). The value of sales in the energy sector accounts for more than a quarter of all shipments from the manufacturing industry in Ontario, and over half of the corresponding shipments in Quebec in the same year. This is certainly not a negligible sector - far from it.

When we come to the heart of our topic, manpower considerations in the energy sector, the picture changes considerably. Taking exactly the same activities as before, Statistics Canada' s annual census of industries shows that they employed 107,672 people, out of a working population of 8,079,000. This is 1.33 per cent of total employment. The gap between the energy sector's share of total production, 4.8 per cent, and its share of total employment, 1.33 per cent, is a striking indication that the production function of the energy sector is of a special nature. It is a production function requiring a great deal of capital and relatively little manpower. The creation of one job calls for the investment of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, depending on the particular energy industry. The high capital-intensity, the considerable amount of investment needed to create a few hundrr '. new jobs, gives rise to certain questions concerning the overall energy develop- ment situation. These questions are sufficiently well-known to make it un- necessary to go over them again, (Table 1)

The fact that the energy sector is a capital-intensive sector has economic consequences for the manpower working in it. Firstly, whenever capital invested per employee is high, the slope of the labour demand curve in that industrial sector is very steep. The economic importance of the slope of the curve is as follows: in such activities it is not easy to increase the number of people employed, but it is not easy to cut down on them either. Thus, though the sector may not create a lot of new jobs, those that it does create are remarkably stable compared to jobs which might be created in other sectors. Moreover, when the required investment is great, the demand for the output of this industry must also be extremely stable. It would be irrational to invest such large amounts without reasonable assurance that the existing production facilities can be operated at close to full capacity. The sector will not therefore be vulnerable to wide fluctuations in demand, and this in turn favours job stability. Finally, when investment per employee is high, workers accept a great deal of responsibility in operating expensive equipment. This is what economists call high productivity labour. Let us remember that high productivity has little to do with physical effort, the arduous nature of the work, or the work ethic; it is due either to special training or to a high degree of responsibility, and often to both at the same time. In the energy production sector it is above all due to responsibility for costly CO

Table 2 Average Weekly Earnings, 1972

Sector Dollars Sector Dollars

Crude petroleum and 226.36 Manufacturing 156.12 natural gas Non-durable goods 144.68 Oil pipe line transport n. a . Durable goods 168.09 Petroleum refineries 221.61 Construction 210.17 Gas utilities 179.14 Industrial composite 149.21 Electric power utilities 208.98

Coal mines 165.60 433 equipment. This means that the sector pays fairly high wages,

A few facts would probably be more convincing in this regard than a discussion of principles. We will limit ourselves to a few wage comparisons for the year 1972, the last one for which total figures are available. (Table 2)

Industrial composite weekly earnings in Canada in 1972 were $149.21. The average in the manufacturing industry reached $156.12 - $144.68 in non- durable goods and $168.09 in durable goods manufacturing. In contrast, average weekly earnings were $226.36 in crude petroleum and natural gas produc- tion, $221.61 in petroleum refining, $208.98 in electrical services and $179.14 in gas transportation and distribution. Only coal mining showed average weekly earnings of $165.60, slightly below earnings in the durable goods industries. Coal mining is also the least capital intensive activity in the energy production sector. Average weekly earnings in the energy sector, weighted according to the number of employees in each activity, come to about $205, or 31 per cent more than the weighted average for the manufacturing industry. The difference between average earnings in crude petroleum and natural gas production and in the manufacturing industry is 45 per cent, while the difference in the case of coal extraction is only 6 per cent.

Only one of the main production activities surpasses in average earnings the whole of the energy sector, and that is construction. In the construction industry, average weekly wages and salaries were $210 in 1972, as against $205 in the energy sector. In any case, the average income which energy production can assure appears to be relatively high. However, since the number of people employed is comparatively small, total wages and salaries paid out only account for 15 per cent of the value of sales for the sector and only 24 per cent of the value added. Within the economy as a whole, salaries and wages paid out by energy industries make up 2.0 per cent of total salaries and wages. As the sector's share in total employment is only 1.3 per cent, while its share of total wages and salaries is 2 per cent, it is obvious that this is a sector paying relatively high wages.

The economic impact of a sector of activity cannot be measured just by its direct contribution to national output, by the total employment it provides nor by the wages and salaries it pays out. This gives only a general picture and does not take into account the induced effects of the sector. In our approach, we will limit our study of induced effects to those two which can be considered as direct extensions of the activity of the energy sector. These are, firstly, fixed capital formation expenditures of the sector and secondly, purchases of materials and services by the sector from other sectors.

Since the energy sector is systematically experiencing a rapid growth in demand, it must also invest quite heavily to equip itself with a production capacity sufficient to meet this demand. Energy industries annually invest sums equal to 35 to 40 per cent of the value of their sales, or, in absolute terms, from 2.8 to 2.9 billion dollars in recent years. Such a level of investment gives this sector alone 25 to 30 per cent of all private investment of a productive nature - that is, excluding housing. Two conclusions may be drawn from these figures, one general and one bearing directly on our topic. 434

The first conclusion is that this provides a perspective for the interpretation of the individual energy projects of which we hear so much these days. In fact, when figures of 4, 6, 8 billion are mentioned in connection with projects in preparation, we are struck by their colossal dimensions. But these projects are necessarily spread out over a period of several years, and their net impact is therefore somewhat diluted. Since, in addition, such projects simply replace others which have been completed, their economic effect is that much more attenuated. A project of six billion dollars, for example, strikes us as out of the ordinary. However, six billion spread out over four years is 1.5 billion per year. As this 1.5 billion replaces some other capital expenditures which are part of the about 2.8 billion annual investment, the net economic effect can easily go well below a billion dollars a year.

This does not mean that such large investment projects would not produce economic Instability. They inevitably do so. However, this insta- bility is generally less than we fear. Neither does it mean that there is no need to make an effort to program large projects as carefully as possible, for this may eventually reduce instability.

The second conclusion is directly applicable to our topic: investments which are made year after year provide employment for even nore people than those who work directly in the energy industry. In the mining industry, and much of our primary energy is of mineral origin,a high percenta- ge of the capital expenditures goes into construction. Large-scale hydro- electric projects also, by their very nature, consist mainly of investment in construction. The share of labour in these construction-type investment expenditures is relatively large. Moreover, an important volume of labour goes into the manufacturing of equipment to be installed through these investments. In simpler terms, it is perhaps no exaggeration to say that half of the capital expenditures consist of salaries and wages paid to labour. At the average wage levels prevailing in the industries involved in these projects, the number of people employed who owe their job largely to invest- ment in the energy sector may be estimated at 140,000 to 150,000. Certainly part of this employment benefits other countries, to the degree that capital expenditures contain imported goods. However, as construction work is of considerable importance in these projects and as construction expenses have a low import content, the only significant leakage is from equipment. Even taking this leakage into account, it is nonetheless true that 1.4 to 1.5 per cent of total employment in the country is linked to capital expenditures in the energy sector.

Besides capital expenditures, each sector of production purchases great quantities of goods and services from other sectors. By means of this reciprocal purchasing many jobs are created, and this should not be forgotten in an evaluation of tho overall effect on employment generated by a given sector. In the case of energy industries this should be done with great care in order to avoid counting jobs twice.

This difficulty is due to the heterogenous nature of the energy sector. On one hand we have activities concerned with primary energy such as crude petroleum, natural gas and coal. But in the same sector we find transformation activities such as petroleum refineries and also generation 435

of electricity where the primary source is other than water. As a result the total of purchases of goods and services from other sectors, a t. im of over 2.8 billion dollars in 1971, cannot be used as it stands. Purchases >. r primary energy by refineries and by producers of electricity from domes.?c producers of primary energy must be subtracted from this total, because the employment created by these purchases has already been counted as part of the employment generated by the production of primary energy. Then purchases of primary energy from abroad must be subtracted. These are of considerable importance in the case of petroleum refineries because all of the eastern part of the country is supplied with imported crude petroleum.

Of total purchases of goods and services from other sectors, only about one third, the amount of purchases other than of domestic or imported primary energy can be counted. The 900 million dollars, approximately, which remain still represent some 40,000 to 45,000 jobs, which means that 0.5 per cent of total employment is generated by purchases by the energy sector.

If we add up all the jobs directly or indirectly generated by the energy industries we have, in percentage terms, 1.3 per cent directly in the energy industries, 1.5 per cent provided by the sector's capital expenditures and finally 0,5 per cent from purchases of goods and services, for a total of 3.3 per cent, which is still a relatively modest percentage.

We will no doubt be criticized for not including in our employment figures those related to the retail sale of gasoline, and so on. This omission can only be explained by the statistical difficulties encountered in trying to derive more or less exact figures, especially when employment in service stations must be divided between mechanics and those selling gasoline. In any case, whatever the method of calculation proposed, it would be difficult to come up with figures above 3.5 or 4 per cent of total employment. But the energy sector has a major contribution to make to the Canadian economy, even though it does not lead to high employment figures.

A great variety of sectors of activity must be present to make up an economy. Basically, considerable concern must be shown for each sector, as one, or two, or four per cent of employment represent large absolute numbers which cannot be ignored. It is not easy to find stable and well-paid employment, nor is it very easy, even in principle, to develop alternatives founded on a reasonably secure domestic and international demand. It is hard to create an economy which can ensure close to full employment; it is even harder, and no less important, to try to create efficient employment. When one sector of economic activitiy can do it, we should recognize this fact and be glad of it.

In this presentation we emphasized one specific topic, the contri- bution of the energy sector to the country's total employment. It is not the only topic, nor necessarily the most important which could or should be treated under the general heading of reflections on the relationships between energy and labour. We have given it particular attention only because of its current interest. 436

From a more long-term and basic point of view, the problem is to gain an understanding of the effects which energy could have on the labour of man. This calls for an interpretation of technological progress itself.

Technological progress as it has developed in the last 150 years has doubtless had a profound effect on labour, notably by considerably lightening the burden and the physical difficulty of work. The phenomenon of physical deterioration due to work is much less widespread now than 50, 100 or 150 years ago. The physical effort required in work has in many cases become so marginal that the whole industry is growing up and prospering before our eyes whose aim is to give physical exercise to people who get too little of it in.their so-called "active life". Technical progress is basically an evolution towards the liberation of man from the constraints of need. From this point of view, more has probably been done in the last few decades than in previous centuries.

Technological progress is a phenomenon linked to the abundant use of energy. If, some day, we were to run out of energy, all the wonderful machinery which man first dreamed of and then created would grind to a halt.Energy is a necessary condition for the minimization of the physical effort required in working. By providing us with power and in many forms, energy is essential to what we nowadays call "quality of life".

We agree that the use of energy may give rise to abuses. But this in no way means that the use of energy has only negative consequences. All things considered, the positive effects are doubtless much greater than the negative ones. 437

THE EFFECTS OF ENERGY ON LIFE STYLES by JOHN J. DEUTSCH, F.R.S.C. Principal, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario

Any discussion of the effect of energy on life styles must cover a great deal of ground. Mr. Frank McGee, the narrator on the recent N.B.C. three-hour documentary on the energy crisis, said "It's a profound question. It asks us to examine who we are, what life is all about, and what man's purpose is." The debate about energy problems has reached such a high level of intensity, precisely because it touches upon many of mankind's most immediate concerns ~ the rate of economic progress, everyday comforts, the exercise of political and sovereign power, and the quality of life in all its implications. , Throughout history the availability and use of various forms of energy have played a large part in the development of our civilization and man's style of living. In the earliest times, man's use ofjwind, water, and beasts of burden made possible the growth of agriculture, the sedentary life, inter-regional trade and the spread of political empires. However, these particular forms of energy placed strict limits on man's possibilities for many centuries. Watt's steam engine and the coming of mechanical power in the 18th century marked the beginning of a revolutionary transformation in western civilization and way of life. The rapid and widespread application of mechanical power was an essential feature of the industrial revolution -- it made possible large-scale specialized production of consumer goods in central factories, it fostered a rapid increase in population and promoted the urbanization of society. It brought also a revolution in life styles, in the qualities of life and in social st.uctures — the "dark satanic mills," the new middle class and the urban poor, new pools of wealth and rising material standards of life for many, new interdependence and rapidly expanding trade on a World-wide basis. The application of mechanical power to land and water transportation by means of the railway and the steamship, greatly accelerated the spread of Western European civilization and settlement to vast areas around thu world — in North and South America, in Australasia and parts of Africa. New supplies of food and raw materials from these areas made possible a rapid growth in population and in the urbanization of society. It oromoted the spread of the industrial revolution of society. It promoted the spread of the industrial revolution from Great Britain to all of Western Europe and America. The harnessing of mechanical energy in factory production, and in transporta- tion and conuni cation played a key role in the far-reaching transformation of the conditions of life, as mi 11 ions of peasants moved from the countryside to the crowded industrial cities of the 19th century. 438

In the 20th century, man's use of energy acquired an entirely new dimension as a result of the scientific and technological revolution which has dominated our lives during this most recent period. The vast new technical possibilities unlaashed immensely useful and versatile kinds and sources of energy in the form of electricity and petroleum products. Over the oast five or six decades these new forms and sources of energy have been raDidlv expansible and cheap. In these circumstances of cheapness and high elasticity of supply, the use of energy in our modern industrial society has grown at an exoonential rate, and in most recent times at an exponential rate substantially greater than the relatively high rate of increase in population. Cheapness, versatility, and a rapidly evolving technology have placed energy in its modern forms into a highly pervasive role. The enormous increase in the mobility of man and his works by means of the motor car, the airplane, and electronic communications, has made possible an ever greater centralization of man's institutions, his organizations and his places of living, nt every level, local, regional, and world-wide. The concentration of population and the persistent growth o* centrally directed large-scale enterprises have become outstanding phenomena of our times. The high material affluence of our standard of life rests to a significant degree, on the increasing access to natural resources and to the growth in processing and synthesizing of materials made possible by cheap and plentiful energy. The application of convenient forms of energy in household applicances and for domestic heating, lighting, and cleaning has transformed household drudgery and personal service and has added many millions of persons to the industrial and commercial labour force. All these developments are characteristic of our modern style of life; mobility, instant communication_, centralization, material affluence, freedom from household drudgery, and increased leisure. Abundant energy and the so-called "good life" have become synonymous. However, as we have approached the apex of these developments we have become keenly aware that something has gone wrong. We have proceeded as if abundance and cheapness of energy and the quality of life can be taken for granted and can go on forever. Now we find that these things are conflicting and in certain respects ire incompatible with one another. With amazing suddenness we are confronted with far-reaching problems and dilemmas. Over the past several decades, advanced Western industrial societies hava doubled their use of total energy every 17 years and of electricity every 10 years. The primary sources of this energy have been almost entirely fossil fuels, in particular oil and gas, which are finite in supply. In these circumstances such great acceleration in use is incompatible with sustained cheapness and sustained continuity of supply. Scarcities appear quickly and the remaining large reserves are found in fewer and fewer places. Marginal corts of exploitation rise steeply and those in possession of the remaining reserves are in a position to raise prices sharply and to control supplies. This is the scenario which we now observe. At the same time the high rate of acceleration in the use of cheap fossil fuels is coming into growing conflict with the quality of life on two 439 fronts simultaneously. Firstly, the centralization and high urbanization made possible by the large-scale and increasing use of mechanical energy in transportation, communication and style of living has resulted in the increasing discomforts of crowding, congestion, imnersonalization, and alienation from monolithic institutions. Secondly, the treatment of air, water and ambient space as free goods for the purposes of dumping wastes from the massive use of fossil fuels, has resulted in the degradation of man's environment in his crowded habitat and has created a conflicting set of values in our economic and social arrangements. Air, water and ambient space are finite, and ever more strictly so, in our centralized urban way of life. There is an inherently contradictory relationship here which cannot be sus- tained. The costs of preserving healthy air, water, and space must somehow be included in the cost of using energy if we are to achieve a sensible balance in our priorities and values. This will require adequate and appropriate adjustments in pricing and costing in our productive system and suitable reforms in our political and social arrangements. The difficulty associated with the achievement of these adjustments and reforms is the other scenario which we now observe. I have tried to suggest why it is that we have reached a stage in the use of energy in our affluent technological culture where we face highly complex problems. Now it is not a matter of some tinkering with regulations and controls which have eyolved out of the past, but of dealing with some quite basic economic, social and political issues. It is because of this that we now witness so much drama and noise in the energy debate. Speaking very broadly, we have a choice from among two types of approach. Both of them involve some quite fundamental decisions about the kind of life style we wish to develop in the future. We could try to follow a course which is designed to maintain, as far as possible, present life styles and present rates of economic growth, at least for this and perhaps the next generation. Clearly, this would involve the continued availability of an exponentially increasing supply of energy. How could this be accomplished in present circumstances? It would entail a set of policies in the large industrial economies of the West which would call for: 1. A rapid depletion of the remaining known reserves of gas and oil over the next ten to fifteen years; 2. The immediate large-scale development of the remaining major deposits of fossil fuels, particularly coal and the tar sands; 3. The accelerated exploitation of high-cost resources of oil and gas under the ocean and in frontier areas by means of substantially higher prices and larger incentives, and 4. The rapid expansion of nuclear power facilities. These projects would have to be pursued with sufficient means to satisfy the vastly increased demand for energy until near the end of the century when fusion power and perhaps the direct harnessing of solar energy could be brought into play on a large scale. Such a course of action would entail 440

extremely heavy commitments for capital and research expenditures and would call for carefully articulated long-range plans. This option, designed to support continued high rates of growth, would carry with it costs and risks which could have substantial effects on the conditions of life in the future. Sharply increased prices for energy, which could not be avoided, would tend to have a regressive impact on the distribution of income. The rapidly rising load of pollution resulting from the massive use of fossil fuels over the next several decades would cause a continuing notable deterioration in man's environment. Our knowledge and technological ability to cooe with such volumes of fossil fuel pollutants or with the environmental consequences of a vast expansion of coalmining remain woefully inadequate, or the costs would be so enormously high as to be impractical for some time to come. Consequently, the realistic trade-off between growth and the quality of the environment would tend to be unfavourable to the latter. We are already witnessing this, in a striking fashion, in some parts of the world. Finally, this particular high growth option would inevitably entail increased political risks in the immediate future. The bargaining and strategic power of those who control the rapidly depleting reserves of fossil fuels would be greatly enhanced. The adjustments and confrontations involved in the settlement of these matters inevitably entail shifts in national power and large risks and dangers in both the economic and political spheres.

In brief, the high growth option, involving the rapid "use-up" of remaining reserves of fossil fuels, would pursue a style of life dedicated to rising material affluence, accompanied by growing risks of social distortions and political instability.

The second basic option involves a course of policy designed to modify styles of life which would slow down substantially the exponential rate of increase in the use of energy and reduce the dependence on fossil fuels. This option would call for an immediate re-ranking of certain priorities and social values. These changes would be much more basic than mere ad hoc reactions to sudden scarcities or than expedient solutions to imminent crises. They would involve a social outlook and an emphasis in our way of doing things which would Dlace a distinctly higher priority on the conservation of energy and a lower oriority on the assumption of easy abundance, than is the case at the present time. These changes would involve, also, a new emphasis on developing wavs of achieving a higher efficiency in the use of energy rather than the more traditional pre- occupation with efficiency in the extraction of energy from finite sources.

Changes such as these, in priorities and outlook, would call for specific policies and programmes which are designed: 1. To shift incentives in the direction of better insulation and other ways of energy conservation in the heating of homes and buildings, and away from the almost single-minded emphasis on the cheapness of fuels;

2. To re-direct public subsidies and public planning so as to promote a change in the ways of moving of both men and goods awav from individualized modes to modes of mass transport; 44 i

3. To create greater incentives for the recycling of used materials and wastes in order to reduce dependence on the extraction of materials from lower and lower grade ores involving an increasingly larger consumption of energy; 4. To develop consumer attitudes, by means of education and fiscal incentives, which would place a higher value on durability and maintenance relative to novelty and frequent replacement; 5. To encourage land-use and industrial planning with a view to the conservation and more efficient use of heat and other forms of energy in industrial processes, and 6. To step up R Si D expenditures which are directed to the development of more lasting and cleaner sources of energy, that is, safer and more efficient nuclear power, fusion and solar radiation.

Policies and programmes designed to being about changes tn priorities and values along these lines would clearly have a significant effect on styles of life. They w ^ ' affect the way we build our homes and structures, the way we move and travel, and the way we make and use our material goods. They would influence the design of our communities and the location of our plac«s of work. They would affect the way we use and conserve our natural resources. In general, these altered priorities would promote a life style which has a longer perspective on the future and which is more conscious of the social implications of finite resources both in the ground and in the air. There is little doubt that both events and necessities will push our affluent Western societies in the direction of the second of the two options I have described, It is largely a question of timing and method. If the timing is too slow, the social and political costs, in terms of the quality of life and instability, will be higher than they would need to be. In the matter of method, choices have to be made regarding the extent to which the market system and the costing and pricing mechanism will be used to achieve new priorities and to balance demands and possibilities, or, the extent to which reliance will be placed on detailed regulations and centralized government controls. The nature of the compromise between these choices will have sub- stantial social and political consequences. I will end with a summation from Levn's Mtsmford's, The Pentagon of Power. "What law of nature has singled out the increased application of energy as the law of organic existence? The answer is: No such law exists. In the complex inter-actions that made life possible on earth, energy in all its forms is of course an indispensable component, but not the sole factor. - - - - Too mien energy is as fatal to life as too little; hence the regulation of energy input and output, not its unlimited expansion, is in fact one of the main laws of li^

Mumford, Lewis. The Pentagon of Power. (Harcourt Brace, N.Y.), n. 403. 44 3

ENERGY IN THE HOME - THE CONSUMER, PARTICIPANT OR PAWN?

by M. BRECHIN Consumers' Association of Canada

Consumers are the unheard voice in the energy debate. Lulled into complacency by the terms of reference of the National Energy Board, which requires decisions to be made in the "public interest" , by the inaccessibility of tne Energy Board and by the lack of information available to them, consumers have moved into a pattern of conspicuous consumption of energy, both directly and indirectly through the products we buy and use. We have been encouraged by advertising, by production methods, by the development of new technology, to use more and more energy. We are lulled into a sense of security by predictions made by political leaders and industrial experts of vast, untapped resources waiting under Canadian soil to make easier the everyday lives of our children and grand- children.

The title assigned to me, perhaps inadvertently, shows the position of the consumer in the energy debate today - "Energy in the Home" - as if the consumer interest were restricted to the four walls which sb i.t?v the family from the cold of our Canadian winters and cor: • -a in air-conditioned comfort from the heat and humidity _•"" . siur iers in its southern latitudes! I have tc^^n the liberty of adding a sub-title, The Consumer, Participant or Pawn? Our Association considers that, not only has the consumer been, in the past, an oft-victimized pawn in the national energy game, but that this manipulation must end. We consider that: full access to information to allow a reasoned input to the decision-making process is a vital necessity if Canada is to resmue once more its progress towards economic nationhood and capture for its citizens a full and rightful share of its national wealth. We are convinced that the consumer must be supplied with information and must be encouraged to become a participant, informed, knowledgeable and powerful, if our national intercjts ^nd thus our own individual interests are to be served.

No one is more awar3 than the Consumers' Association of Canada that consumers will not solve all the problems where experts have failed. However, because the decisions to be made involve hard choices which will affect our lives as consumers as well as the national welfare, our Association is convinced 444

that the consumer himself must have an input in deciding what the trade-off will be. Some of you may not be familiar with the organization which I represent or of the role which it has played over the past 26 years. CAC is the only nationally organized consumer organization in Canada. It is unique among world consumer associations in being a grass-roots, people organization, which at the same time directs the publication of a product testing and informational magazine. We operate upon our membership budget and a small grant from the consumers of Canada, received through the Department of Consumer and Corporate Affairs. This is used to support the administration of person-to-person consumer information and assistance programs, supplied by our volunteers across Canada.

CAC is an outgrowth of the Women's Bureau of the Wartime Prices and Trade Board. During the second world war thousands of Canadian women, individually and through the voluntary associations to which they belonged, were recruited to assist the war effort by monitoring rationing and price controls and by providing information and advice on economic issues. The war ended, women in Canada, having perceived the value of and the need for organization to assist the consumer in the marketplace, having experienced involvement in economic affairs, were loath to lose this advantage and saw in organization the solution to the lack of consumer power. In September, 1947 the major women's organizations in Canada met and formed the Canadian Association of Consumers. In 1961 the Association incorporated and reversed its name to put the consumer first. We became the Consumers' Association of Canada and,in a sort of reverse women's lib, extended our membership tc men. Our product testing program was begun and continues to expand. Reported in our magazines, the CANADIAN CONSUMER and le CONSOMMATEUR CANADIEN, CAC's message reaches our 120,000 members bi-monthly and is available also on newsstands across Canada.

If I am to follow my assigned title, the first and most obvious area is the use of energy for heating, cooling, and cooking in our homes. During my generation* Canadians have moved from major dependence upon wood and coal to oil, gas and electricity. Our society has made the switch from coal, aided uy the many distasteful aspects of dependence upon our "black gold" - inefficient usage, militant unions, lacerated land- scapes and increasing air pollution. Europeans are following our lead. To reverse the trend would be well-nigh impossible. But, if the "embarrassing riches"s to which oil industry spokesmen referred only a year ago, continue to prove as illusory as is indicated today, we may well be forced into conversion of our coal reserves to synthetic gas and oil. Even utilization of Alberta's tar sands or Arctic gas and oil will result in energy at a cost much greater than we experience today. 445

Why then are we, as consumers, being encouraged to use ever greater amounts of a scarce and increasingly limited resource? Why encotrage an addiction which will create traumatic withdrawal symptoms? Certainly one of the reasons for unthinking acceptance has been the ease of use of the three major sources of energy available to us today. Our lives are easier than those of our parents, to the point that we now spend millions of dollars encouraging active sports, to develop the stamina which Grandpa developed by chopping wood and hauling out the ashes. As humans, of course we will do things the easy way, especially if it is also the cheapest way, unless we are informed that there are hidden costs to be considered. Yet industry still spends advertising dollars telling us to "live better electrically", urging us to heat water and our homes with electricity; wasteful uses of electrical power which could be more efficiently served directly by gas and oil. Massive office and industrial complexes are designed so the lights beam night and day. In the province of Ontario alone electrical energy needs are increasing by 7% per year. Yet one million dollars is spent annually in direct advertising to encourage the use of electric home and water heating. In addition, costly incentive schemes promote the construction of all electric homes and low cost, uniform payments for electric space heating encourage its use. Moreover as with other industries, economies of scale which might justify such incentive payment structures begin to disappear after an optimum size is reached. We might well ask whether competition for customers between different forms of energy really is in the public interest today.

The prediction of Mr. George Gathercole, chairman of Ontario Hydro, that the wholesale cost of power will increase by 50% by 1977 is already apparent in the electric bills received from our municipalities. If advertising is needed at this time, surely it is advertising designed to limit consumption, to assist the consumer in making optimum use of a scarce and increasingly costly resource.

The environmental crisis in the U.S. has reminded us in a most distressing fashion of the predictions of the Club of Rome. It has also resulted in increased gas and oil prices to the Canadian consumer. This is a direct cost which we can feel and protest even if we cannot fully understand the cause. But in other ways the Canadian consumer 5 s locked indirectly into a wasteful usage of energy over whicn he has no control. Where energy use is concerned he is very truly a blindfolded consumer.

CAC has urged that industry make available to consumers, at the point of purchase, information on the cost of operation of appliances offered in today'1? marketplace. Self- cleaning versus regular ovens, self-defrosting versus automatic de-frost refrigerators and even, as proven by the energy consumption tests which Consumers Union has begun, different 446

makes of the same appliance vary in their consumption of power. At today's prices, consumers may be willing to pay the increased cost for the convenience offered; at tomorrow's projected figures, the story may be different. But at least the consumer has the right to know of the difference. Industry has been slow to respond to consumer requests for information and CAC is cooperating with government agencies in the development of a simple, standardized fact tag, which would make all relevant purchase information available to the consumer at the time of sale. Included must be the amount of energy required for operation.

One of the most important concessions offered to encourage an industry to locate in a given area is low cost energy. Of these concessions the consumer has little knowledge or control. One which has recently come to consumers' attention is the attempt by Quebec Hydro to increase its rate to householders by 22% over the next three years to assist in financing the James Bay Project. Were consumers consulted in this move? A large percentage of power developed by this project is designed for export to the United States and the industrial user will face an increase of only 1% in his bill.

Agriculture consumes enormous quantities of energy. In order to achieve increases in productivity, agriculture has moved from a labour-intensive to a capital-intensive industry. Machines have replaced people on the farms and these machines are prodigeous users of energy. So when we as consumers buy a pound of tomatoes or a broiler chicken, we are buying energy; energy used, in heating greenhouses, in transporting products, in heating the land, in heating and lighting the wholesale and retail establishments which handle the products; all uses of energy over which we have no control and of which we have little knowledge. Agriculture and the food industry are by far the largest uters of fossil energy. Up to 8 BTUs of energy are used to produce one pound of food. With food costs soaring„ increased energy costs will accelerate trends over which the consumer has no control.

Packaging - a subject hot.ly debated for many years by corsumers who see in its undue proliferation unnecessary cost represents still another use of energy i^gardir' jviiich the consumer is blindfolded. Plastics products, direct users of petroleum, are replacing pulp and paperboard; non-returnable containers are forced on the consumer as retailers fail to stock returnable types. Representatives of the plastics industry contend that more energy is used in the manufacture of pulp than in plastic products; but few studies are available on the use of energy throughout the whole process from raw material to ultimate disposal.

A recent study on milk packaging in Ontario by the Solid Waste Task Force proved conclusively that, although the 447 plastic pouch was less costly than the plasticized cardboard container, the cheapest container on the market at present, based both upon energy use and on the generation of solid waste was the returnable plastic bottle. Energy costs for the delivery of three thousand quarts of milk were ten times greater for the plastic pouch than for the returnable jug.

Disposal of excessive packaging uses energy whether we burn or bury. Incinerator or bulldozer alike gulp greedily of our energy reserves, again at a cost unknown to the consumer.

And what of transportation? In suburbia two-cars-in- every-garage has replaced the chicken-in-every-pot goal of a simpler era and they are reinforced by lawnniowers, snowblowers, outboard motors and countless other forms of energy users. To operate these gas-gobbling monsters we build concrete ribbons across our arable land while our urban mass transport systems languish from neglect. Could we not better utilize our resources by free transit services on the demand schedule? Is this stimulus of available power, which has fashioned our mass consumption society, a healthy one? Is the stimulus to rapid growth, to rapid exportation of our resources in the interests of consumers today? Ironically the root reason for the growth of the consumer movement seems to be an unconscious revulsion against the mass consumption society, a society which judges success by the acquisition of "things" and has created social unrest and growing alienation with the loss of ability to control or even influence our own destiny.

I have attempted to illustrate areas where, in his personal life, the consumer is a direct participant or an unthinking pawn in the use of energy. Many distinguished speakers in this seminar have given you reasoned and scholarly assessments of questions of economics, environment and independence as they are affected by energy use. As a consumer, I can add nothing to their assessment; but the three major energy projects now being considered and the growing trend toward the use of nuclear power for the generation of electricity will have direct and immediate impact on the consumer and from this consumer perspective I should like to comment briefly upon them.

Both the Churchill Falls and the James Bay project exhibit to consumer eyes some alarming inconsistencies. They will be built by very few men, many of them imported specialists; they will use massive amounts of energy and capital, not to generate power to build Canadian secondary industry, to eliminate the spectre of unemployment or lower the cost of living to Canadians', but primarily to fuel our power hungry American neighbours. 448

Both will displace and ruin the lives of thousands of native peoples, the consumers of the north; people who have struggled against incredible odds to maintain a stable, although to our eyes, frugal existence. Yet this existence, in which hunting and fishing plays a major role, even if replaced with job opportunities, could result in a serious lowering of health and nutritional standards among the affected native consumers. In the report of a task force headed by McGill Professor Richard Salisbury, it is reported that "any reduction of the supply of bush foods would clearly have an effect on the economy cf the local people, especially in the terms of the quality of the diet. The replacement of a high quality meat diet by a diet of low quality, store-bought carbohydrates is a phenomenon that has been repeated throughout the Third World as a reaction to urbanization and has seriously lowered health and nutritional standards". The report concludes: "Existing levels of cash earnings and transfer payments are tolerable while costs of food can be kept at a minimum and diets kept at a high quality through hunting. Once subsistence hunting is let go, the northern people are involved in a downward spiral of dependency, with wages in the north never catching up with the built-in inflation of prices in the area."

In neither project has the status of title to the land nor the value of aboriginal rights been resolved. But most importantly from a consumer viewpoint, not even the most rudimentary cost benefit analysis has been attempted. Let us not feel that consumers put total faith in economics; the science so aptly described by Edward Copleston, who in opposing the founding of the first professorship at Oxford, one hundred and fifty years ago, called economics "a science so prone to usurp the rest".

Long exposure to the fragmentary nature of economic studies, which traditionally :• nore social, esthetic, moral and even political considerations and give vastly greater weight to short then to long term values, has given consumers a healthy disrespect for economic pronouncements. In both northern developments, lacking an over-whelmingly favourable economic judgement, how can we affjrd to ride rough-shod over the clearly visible societal costs which they entail?

Of all the changes introduced by man, nuclear fission is potentially the most dangerous. Yet the danger to humanity created by the so-called peaceful users of nuclear energy is seldom mentioned. As Dr. David Cass-Beggs of the British Columbia Power and Energy Authority noted in a speech to the Canadian Electrical Manufacturers Association, the decision to move towards nuclear power stations is being decided upon purely economic grounds with n^ discussion, no input allowed 449

from the corsumer. Many questions occur to the consumer, questions of disposal, questions of safeguards. These questions must be answered and the full cost weighed before we continue expanding exponentially in our usage of electricity down the pathway to another crisis.

Canada is in the midst of a seemingly uncontrolled inflationary cycle. Interest rates to consumers for essential purchases of homes and major improvements are rising. Food, shelter and clothing purchases outpace even the growth in interest rates. In August the increase in wage rates fell below the increase in the cost of living for the first time. What of the unemployed consumer or those on fixed incomes, the elderly, the ill, the disabled? Despite sporadic, uncoordinated, ad hoc programs to assist them this segment of our society grows and each day grows further behind the rest.

Today we face in Canada three major schemes which will compete for scarce finances, money which is not available in Canada but must be borrowed from external sources. What will be the impact of this massive influx of foreign capital on an already unmanageable inflation? Almost certainly it will further devalue our purchasing power as consumers. It will make our goods less competitive in world markets, thus adding to the problem of unemployment and increasing the pressures on those least able to cope with them, Or will we opt for major financing within the country itself, syphoning off the already inadequate assistance to the less fortunate to finance projects such as the Mackenzie Valley pipeline?

Many facts have been brought forward regarding this highly .ontroversial project, with little agreement among erpervs. However, it seems clear that we face a continuance of a c price system in order to prevent domestic costs of pntrgi' ^rom soaring out of control. For the moment, CAC bej-i^rf^s that this can be in the interest of the consumer of oil. 'xhe present market for oil cannot be considered to operate normally. The price and supply of oil are heavily influenced by often swiftly changing political, nationalistic or other forces which are in many cases random. In addition the oil industry can affect significantly the movements of price and supply through the employment of strategies largely dependent upon the monopolistic position of many of the firms in the industry. Under these conditions there is no assurance that the workings of market forces can in any way protect either the long or short run interest of consumers, and an artifically imposed two- price system may be a valid mechanism to protect consumers against non-economic forces which influence this supply and price of oil.

How can we, as Canadians, be assured that the benefits from projects such as the Mackenzie Valley pipeline will 450

actually benefit Canadians? It would appear at the moment chat trie bo;-._Zitc will fall to the international petroleum giants, who now own almost all leases and exploration rights in the Canadian Arctic. It is to their advantage to exploit these resources now, but to fully benefit the Canadian consumer, should not development be paced to our needs? Why should Canadian consumers pay the vast social costs of building a pipeline which will be used primarily for exports? Ninety-five percent of the pipeline capacity, it is suggested, will be used for the transportation of oil to the U.S. market and construction of the pipeline will resul; In a doubling of domestic gas prices before 1980. Do we K-ed to do a fundamental re-think - to distinguish clearly between primary goods which man wins from nature and secondary goods which are produced from them, or of the even.more fundamental distinction between renewable and non-renewaJx •'. sources and to determine how our energy reserves should be msbanded and used to return the greatest good, not to private profits, but to the society to which the resources belong?

Frighteningly, the decision to build the pipeline can be taken by the National Energy Board alone, never coming to Parliament or to a forum of the people. Consumers have little reason to feel confident that the decisions of the Board will be made with the long range interests of Canadians, rather than the profits of the eneray moguls, PC J..1- ;>ir primary cons ideration.

What i 'v- Dui- the ripel.lne, irreparably damage the en~ ironment, destroy th : native people, fuel the fires of infl^ion to th' poinv. wier • s -:ial :. 1 'ances are set back by a generation and ;he:> f^id that ou. 'J reserves are r.tere speculation? ks cons me-.s, we .a . "^member that i.". February 197J, the National Latrgy bo^r-i siixf estimated production rates on the ba.-is. c-f Ui.fcres:ery ?';niand rather than upon proven reserves. Tc coi...«umerj=. ^.iis i-.-presents a frightening case of putt' •-f th oar-s L=>for;; v'.ie hcrse.

In c" I ^i>rcn o •: the uir• ^r initiatives under discussion, the poJ.ent \e.j t:\rc-a- to secondary industry in Canada and the utca des*- action of the lifestyles and welfare of consumers ir_ the .or .: is o. ^ious. The additional costs that will fall upon all consumers who purchase energy is clear. Less obvious, but equal.y real, is the threat to the fabric of Canadian socief-;; the penalty that will be paid by all of us but will bear rr. > -t heavily upon the low income consumer. The report of th SeMate Coinmittee on Poverty, born out by more recent stud'.ef. ;=hows that the income disparity in Canada continues to • .icrease despite all present programs. Were these programs to Lo reduced or planned initiatives shelved because of a shortage of currency caused by the massive cost of these projects, the effect, combined with concurrent runaway inflation ?ad high unemployment, would be a total disaster for 451

consumers in Canada.

This is the hard choice we face, the seldom discussed skeleton in the energy debate. As consumers, we can accept that in the future we must pay increasing prices for energy for our direct needs. But before we are forced to bear alone the societal as well as the environmental costs of such massive projects, the Canadian consumer must be made aware of all the factors involved, must have the opportunity to make an input to the decision making, must be assured that the decisions taken are in the best interests of consumers in Canada. We can no longer afford to be seduced by the easy life into accepting that what is good for Imperial Oil is good for Canadians. When it comes to energy, consumers can and must get out of the home, cease to be mere pawns and, armed with facts, become participants in the decision-making arena. 453

PROBLEMS OF NATIVE PEOPLES

by

vENNETH J. DUNCAN

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Guelph

There live in the whole of Canada some 16,000 Eskimos and some 270,000 Indians who together make up not more than \.5% of the total Canadian population. Of these, most of the Eskimos and about 10,000 Indians live in the Yukon and North West Territories, an area constituting not much iess than half of the total Canadian land mass. Perhaps another 40,000 live in the sparsely populated northern reaches of 3ritish Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Labrador so that at the most, The number of native people likely to be directly affected by the development of various energy sources in the North - that large and rather vague territory to which we look with such hope -will be some 70,000 people, a number not much larger than the population of the city of Guelph. It is with the plight of these peoples, that this short paper is concerned.

Demonstrably, human beings can adjust +o very diverse physical environments. Their modes of adaptation - and they are uniquely human - arc socio-culturaI systems. The contents to such systems will vary as the total physical and social environment? vary and change as those environments change. Every socio-culturai system has four subsystems, the technological, consisting of the information, techniques and tools whereby man exploits his physical environment, the symbolic, the means whereby men communicate among themselves and transmit to their young the content of the total system, the social which comprehends all the ways men interact with each other to manoge their environ- ment and the ideological which comprehends the beliefs men have about the nature of reality, of morality and of obligation i.e. their basic belief- systems.

These subsystems are intimately linked - a point Karl Marx made much of. They rationalize and support each other and in many ways makeseroe only with reference to each other. Indeed each socio-culturaI system requires to be understood in its own terms, because that is the only way if can be understood. Thus in Classical Eskimo society, one can explain such diverse things as the absence of any political system, the frequency of murder, the much remarked upon wife-lending, the sexual division of labour, infanticide, hospitality and food sharina, basic religious bei iefs the many different words for snow, the lone hunter and his peculiar weapons as parts of the overall adaptive system.

We in urban-industrial societies have tended to emphasise the importance of technology simply because ours is so complex and so demanding of our time and energy and to underestimate the impor tance of the other sub- systems in our own socio-culturaI adaptations - at least until our children begin to question the work ethic, to argue that we have too much technology, to demand that we stop destroying the physical environment, to argue that bigger may not be better and that pre-maritaI,i(conti nence hardly makes sense 454

in a sociary where no one has to get with child.

Socio-culturaI systems are never completely static although rate^ of change may vary considerable. There are many reasons for change to occur. There may for example be a change in some aspect of the physical environment which forces an adjustment. The users of the system may innovate either by invention or borrowing from other systems; or change may be forced upon one society by the more powerful members of another.

Whatever the source of change, the modification of one subsystem ordinarily will have consequences in the other subsystems until an adjustment is reached - if an adjustmen+ is reached. When a socio-cultura' system is forced TO change, the end result rray range from complete catastrophe to complete success witn many stages along the way. Historically we know that some societies have totally dis- aopeared that some survive as dependent or client systems and that others again have undergone vast changes yet remained viable or become more dynamic.

To come now to Canadian Native peoples what has been their experience with the invading or occupying western culture? It is important to look at it, no matter how briefly, since it has a bearing upon both the present and the future. All in all, the experiences of the numerous native socio- cultural systems were not happy ones. A variety of disease orgar'sms brought from Europe constituted modification to the physical environment and in the estimate of some people killed more natives than all the Indian wars com- bined. Yet many societies whose weapons technologies were unable to meet the challenge of better-armed Europeans were completely wiped out as e.g. the Beothuk of Newfoundland and the Eskimo of Southern Labrador. The Indian populations of the Maritime Provinces were nearly eradicated and their socio- cultural systems destroyed. The woodlands hunters of Oitario and Quebec and the hoe-culture peoples such as Hurons, Mohawks, Oneidas etc. became trapper^ and middle men in the developing fur-trade and in doinr so became very dependent upon the products of European technology without being able to adopt the technology itself. When the fur-trade passed them by, the remnants which survived the bloody inter-tribal wars settled down to lives of increas- ing dependence on reserves, in situations where their traditional socio- cultural systems were no longer viable and the modifications brought by the fur-trade no longer produced pay-offs.

Wnere the soil was usable, some turned to agriculture with initial success. However, even that technology became diversified ar.u complex and the Indian farmer proved less and less able to adapt to the changes. Today, most reserves in Eastern Canada shelter the remnants of socio-culturaI systems which have ceased to be viable and whose numbers depend largely on casual labour off the reserve and a very high level of welfare payments to sustain them. Thfat might be called client systems encapsulated in the larger society, in it but not of it. The loss of the traditional techno Igies and the inadequate adaptation to western technology has in many insrances been ar-ompanied by changes in the other subsystems. On many reserves the nativo language is no longer spoken by ti,e young, the traditional, usually matriarchal family structure is moribund and the ideological sub- system is half forgotten. It coulc* fairly be said these people have the 455 worst of both worlds.

Experience in the prairies and in British Columbia was not any happier. White hunters between 186b and i885 destroyed the great buffalo herds which had supported plains Indians cultures and in bo doing destroyed their technological adaptations to their prairie environment. The change was so oudderi and catastrophic that many of the native peoples thought it was supernatural punishment for their sinful lives. Forced onto reserves some have tried cattle raising, a few farming, but again their socio-cuItural systems really failed to meet the challenge posed by the invading western culture. Companion changes which will not be detailed here have taken place in the other subsystems of plains cultures and their long range prospect for survival does not look promising.

In the sam. way the great socio-cuItural system of the Pacific Coast Haida, Bella Coola, Kwakiutl etc., in contact with the encroaching western culture have undergone far-reaching modifications in their efforts to adapt to it. Their technologies have been radically modified, significant parts of their social structures eliminated, their ideologies discredited and their symbol systems in part displaced. Generally speaking it was where bearers of the western socio-cuItural system physically invaded and took over native territories or were in constant contact that the changes in native socio- cu I tural systems were most profound. Some simply disappeared, others changed very greatly but with rare exceptions such as the Caugnawaga their success was minimal and most are now hybrid client systems which might very well disappear even if sustained efforts were made to preserve their remnants.

If was on the Northern fringe,in territory that white men had little incentive to occupy in numbers that the western socio-cuItural system had a reduced but none-the-less still important pact. The hunting and collecting Indians of the interior and the primarily coastal Eskimos, also hunters and collectors, modified their technologies t<. the extent of trapping fur to trade for food, clothing and supplies. They adoD+ed and adapted western tools and weapons but sti Ii retain many of the salient features of their own socio- cu I tural systems although with increased contact the rate of loss of nalive cultural elements appears to be accelerating. Even these groups are becom- ing steadily more dependent upon outposts of the Western cultu.e and some now show considerable dependency and increasing demoralization as reflected in high rates of petty crime usually associated with drunkenness.

This brief survey makes several things evident. No native socio- cultural system remains intact. All have undergone adaptive change. A very few have made radical and apparently viable adaptations but ir, the areas of permanent white occupation most that survive are moriband and will probably in time disappear. It is an Inescapable fact that in the south all of the terrible costs of change were borne and to a large extent are still being borne by the native peoples. They have been deprived of their lands with inadequate or no compensation. The reserve system effectively prevents their integration into the general society although it can probably not now be ended without uproar on all sides; and in some complex and subtle way they appear to have been denied access to the benefits of urban industrial society. 456

It is evident that tne native peoples of the Northern area so long protected by distance, climate and an attitude of benign neglect are now threatened by an acceleration of the process of occupation which, if we can ignore rhe few years of the Klondike goldrush, began hardly more than thirty years ago. This coming occupation of the North is closely tied to the quest for new sources of energy to supply a world whose thirst for oil and electricity seems unquenchab.e and growing. Hydro-electric developments on the Peace and on the Nelsonhave already occurred with recognizable consequences for the ecology and the native peoples. The James Bay power development in Quebec will profoundly affect the ecology of a vast area, displace some 6,000 native peoples and perhaps destroy Their always precarious livelihoods. The search for oil and natural gas will take more and more people into the north and cannot help Dut bring intimate contact of a ki.id that has not before existed between white and native populations in taose areac, ana it must be accepted that in an energy-hungry world this invasion of me north is inescapable. The need for energy is massive and no conceivable break-through in the technology of energy production can be effective in time to prevent its occurring. Nor can we attempt by some kind of segregation to protect the native peoples from it for both they and we would oppose that solution.

There is, of course, considerable vidence that native peoples in the North are fearful of and hostile toward this incursion into territories they have long regarded as their own. Their fear is understandable. Their hold on survival as individuals and as socio-cultaral groups is fragile and they know it. Overwhelmingly they exist by trapping augmented by welfare and while they can easily believe that radical environmental change could destroy their only source of cash income, aside from government payments they are not equipped by experience or education to comprehend the potential benefits that could accrue. Consider for a moment the situation of these few thousands of people. They are culturally diverse; many cannot speak with each other if they do meet because of linguistic differences and many do not speak either French or English. They are thinly spread over a vast territory, few have any occupational skills beyond trapping and lack the cultural condition- ing to work day in day out at unskilled labour. Setting aside Eskimo syllables they are mostly illiterate. They do not have the numbers, the organization or the economic power to carry any political weight whatever. Realistically they cannot hope to stop the coming occupation of the North, though they may through the courts occasion some delay and at the same time they are unemployable except in the most menial and transient tasks.

It must be emphasised that the native people want the benefits of western culture as they see them which means essentially the material things. They are as anxious for convenience foods, ready made clothing, radios, decent housing, snow mobiles etc. as anyone in the south. Nor should we make much of some presumed identity between the native people and nature. They are no fonder of isolation, lack of services, bad communications, I oca! scarcities than the rest of us and they are just as uncomfortable in drafty shacks or crowded tents. The company of other humans in tolerable surroundings pulls them out of the bush or off the tundra as fast as it pulled rural Canadians off the farm and into the cities.

What should be done then and what can be done? Surely even the most hardened are prepared to admit that the psychological social and economic 457 costs of what I be I ieve to be an inevitable transition must not be borne by the native people. Whatever long run gains might accrue to them and +hese, judging by what happened in the south could prove ephemeral - the short run gains (and th"1 middle run gains too if there exists such a term) are not likely to be theirs. It appears only just that those who reap the benefits should bear the costs, i.e. the Canadian taxpayer or the private ffrm or bo+n. What, in realistic terms, can be done? There is of course no complete solution. To begin with there is not much point in giving each person a few square miles of land. Aside from possible mineral deposits or oil and gas such a settlement would ordinarily be worth nothing as a source of livelihood. Lump sum cash settlement of claims, especially if the sums involved were realistically large, would invite exploitation of the unsophisticated recipients or alternatively the intervention of a benevolent government who would hold the money in trust for the individual or hand with all the usual results that provision of the Indian Act has had in ths past. The best solution - it is fer from perfect - would appear to be to pay to each adult out of royalties collected frr the use of the resource by private enterprise or from general tax revenues, some reasonable annual income which would be only to anticipate something that is evidently In store for the whole of Canadian Society anyway. This would accelerate a process, already under way, of concentration of the native peoples in the larger settlements where for the first time children wot-'ld be available for education and training on a continuing basis, yet not removed from the family. This might of course lead in time to the disappearance of native soclo-cultural systems. For if wnat was said earlier is true the non-technological subsystems might be so incompatible with western technology that they could not persist in conjunc- tion with it. That does not in my view matter at all. Systems which no longer perform hav& only antiquarian value. If we, from some kind of anthropological romanticism thought t.9y ought to be preserved then surely we should pay the costs of that enterprise too. it is true that there might be a bit of idleness, a little debauchery, some drunkenness in tl._ adult generation but one finds that anywhere and they, in any case, are among the costs that those who initially bear them seem quite willing to accept. The financial cost of such a scheme would not, by today's standards, be very great: perhaps a hundred million dollars per year. With some prospect of ensuring productive and responsible generations to people in the north it is surely both our direct interest and our moral obligation to accept it. 459

ENERGY - BOON OR BANE? by DONALD MACDONALD President, Canadian Labour Congress, Ottawa

Canadian workers, together with members of their families, comprising over 70 per cent of our population, are also consumer-, and citizens. They would agree that we have benefited enormously iro. the availability of considerable energy resources. Life in Canada as we know it now would not be possible without these assets. Indeed, in a country which is characterized by a cold climate, long distances and a highly industrialized economic structure, the availability of energy must surely rank as one of the main preconditions for the operation of a stable social and political order. In a less broad way, the interests of Canadians have been well served by our ability to extract resources since the latter have provided a relatively large number of employment opportunities over the years through direct, indirect and induced employment. Furthermore, the energy industries have contributed to the material well-being of workers through wages and salaries which are competitive with other sectors of the economy. However, the extraction and refinement of Canada's rich reserves have not been accomplished without cost. To this day the memories of many are scarred by the remembrance of lost lives in the horrendous disasters encountered in the coal rnines and others have suffered grievously from the ravages of disease contracted from the depths of the earth. In the goods producing sector, costs =tre also now becoming mere and more evident. While efficient energy conversion ha; allowed many of our workers to escape from the dreadful drudgery of heavy physical work, a new kind of drudgery has arisen to replace this. One has only to contemplate the plight of the assembly line worker whose working hours are geared to the tempo of the never ending production line to appreciate how little real change has taken place. Finally, it is becoming increasingly clear that a high level of energy use produces pollutants which our planet cannot continue to absorb indefinitely and every effort must be made to protect the environment from damage. While it is not possible to produce a precise balance sheet on the costs and benefits of our reliance on energy, Canadians, nevertheless, have gained more than they have lost. It is doubtful that 460

there are many people here today who would not accept that the current level of social and economic well-being of Canadians has very much depended upon our ability to extract and market our energy resources. To concentrate on an accounting of past actions is useful to a point but a far more important question is where do we go from here? Whether energy in the Canadian context is ultimately to be judged a boon or bane depends upon the choices which we make now and it is about these I wish to talk. The main point which should be noted, very explicitly, is that it is essential to recognize that most sources of energy are not inexhaustible and care must be taken in how these scarce resources are used. In relation i.o other nations, however, Canada enjoys a comparative advantage in these materials and it would be the height of folly to ignore this. So that all Canadians may benefit from this several things must be done. The first is to make certain that Canada's own requirements are fully assessed in the medium and long-term and that no energy should be exported which is not surplus to these requirements. In this respect a great deal of vigilance must be observed by our regulatory authorities since they will come under increasing pressure from the oil and gas lobbies whose interests do not necessarily correspond with the public interest. Furthermore, estimates of future requirements may have to be revised due to the present uncertainties in the attitudes of the main oil producing states. Having determined exportable surpluses Canada should then adopt the stance that it will have to begin to process much more of the raw products before exports take place. With unemployment in this country currently at a level of 5.5 per cent it need hardly be repeated that here will be an excellent opportunity to produce badly needed jobs. As we begin to process more of our raw products we must also work toward the removal of export tariffs and non-tariff barriers against Canadian manufactures. Paralleling the effort to upgrade our raw materials further exploration must begin, particularly in the Arctic. The primary vehicle for this effort should be a publicly owned corporation which recognizes that natural resources belong to all of the people of Canada and not just to a few multinational corporations. The success of this corporation will depend upon the level of funding provided for new exploration and research activity. These funds should be derived from greater taxation of all companies engaged in the energy industry. The day of give-away taxation policies and niggardly royalty payments must be ended. Of fundamental importance in the coming debate on the role of the energy sector in Canadian life will be the issue of foreign ownership. Many of the energy related industries are controlled and operated by vertically-integrated foreign-based multinational corporations and it is 461 a question of tremendous significance whether further growth in foreign control can be allowed to continue. The creation of a publicly owned corporation would go some way toward providing an answer to this important question, but many more problems would remain. We would not? for example, wish to see foreign capital diverted from Canada unless it can be clearly shown that adequate domestic sources are available. On the other hand, it would not be desirable to allow continued growth in foreign control without evidence that Canadians will significantly benefit from these investments. To damonstrate "significant benefit" will require sound judgment on the part of those in positions of authority, and hopefully, the current debate on Bill C132, the Foreign Investment Review Act, will provide meaningful answers. The terms of reference for the proposed Foreign Investment Review Agency, if appropriately applied, are sufficiently broad to help cope with the problem of ascertaining "significant benefit". Briefly, new investment will not be allowed unless the following factors are taken into account: 1. the effect of the proposed investment on the level and nature of economic activity in Canada, including employment; 2. the degree and significance of participation by Canadians in the business enterprise and in any industry or industries in Canada of which it forms a part; 3. the effect of the proposed investment on productivity, industrial efficiency, technological development, product innovation and product variety in Canada; 4. the effect of the proposed investment on competition within any industry or industries in Canada; and, 5. the compatibility of the investment with national industrial and economic policies, including those enunciated by the provinces. The importance of these factors in assessing "significant benefit" is clear. However, as the Bill currently reads, the Agency's assessments and recommendations to the Minister responsible will not be made public. This kind of secrecy will deny Canadians the right to know how foreign investment decisions are made, and will place the Cabinet in the untenable position of being suspect, rightly or wrongly, on political grounds. In all of the foregoing I am making the assumption that as a nation we will have the judgment to see to it that the further development of our energy sector will not be achit/od at a cost to the environment or to the rights of individuals within our society. With regard to the environment, we must insist that careful studies be undertaken of the 462

impact of energy development before new projects are started. The rights cf our native peoples must also be considered and full compensation should be given to those who would be affected in any future developments. It is only in this way that we can be certain that the benefits accruing to Canadians from energy enterprises will truly outweigh the costs. The current and projected demand for energy supplies could be a major source of benefit providing that we make the right choices on which resources are going to be developed, who is going to do the developing and in what manner. In this regard, however, we should caution those who place too great an importance upon the energy sector as a major source of long-term dynamism in our economy. The reason for this caution is that Canada is not as abundantly endowed with energy resources as has been commonly thought. Phase I of the Analysis section in "An Energy Policy for Canada" by the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, states that while "Canada is fortunate to be self-sufficient in terms of energy production capability at a time when other industrialized countries have serious concerns over adequate and secure energy supplies", nevertheless, "our reserves are such that after meeting our own needs we can only expect to play a relatively minor role in meeting total United States energy requirements and an insignificant role in terms of world requirements." Therefore, anything but the most prudent set of extraction policies may well be against the public interest. When consideration is given to the energy sector in the context of our total industrial structure we should also bear in mind the problem of reconciling the interests of individual provinces in relation to each other and in relation to the country as a whole. I need only cite the Alberta Government's differences in this regard with the Canadian Government and the Government of Ontario. Furthermore, the actions of the federal government which seem to be directed toward a national industrial strategy based substantially on secondary manufacturing, may increasingly come into conflict with policies of the main energy producing provinces. Under these conditions, it is up to the federal government to bring about a greater degree of cooperation and coordination so that we will have a National Energy Policy geared to serving the interests of all Canadians wherever they may live. Canada today stands at e. historic crossroad in its attitude towards energy. Decisions which we take in the near future will have long ranging effects. I hope that we can now begin a reasoned debate on the role of energy in our lives and that in the ultimate accounting of history our decisions will be seen as a boon to Canadians as well as to the rest of humanity. The humanistic concerns of the labour movement will be an important factor in the trade-offs which must be made. 463

DISCUSSION OF SESSION VI

Mr. T.W. Chapman (Canada Life) of Dr. Thur:

Oil companies and some other analysts have calculated what is called an "employment multiplier" which pur- ports to show that the oil industry is in fact a very large direct and indirect employer of labour and that a considerable amount of employment in other industries is indirectly attributable to th.e oil and gas industry in the economy. How does this device fit into your analysis, and do you agree with, this conclusion?

DR. THUR: My answer to this question will probably be somewhat disappointing. In fact, I am not a firm believer in the useful nature of such an analysis. During these last years, we tended to overplay the importance of sectoral multiplier effects. Such an analysis, if generalized ir. a comprehensive way, would not do much more than prove the validity of a relatively trivial truth in economics, that "everything depends on everything," or that expenditures made by one group are incomes for another group; these in turn would become a new series of expenditures, ancf so forth. There is no doubt that the petroleum industry, by paying wages and salaries, buying intermediate products and investing in capital goods, triggers considerable multiplier effects. However, we may state as well that part of the petroleum activity is justified in economic terms by the existence of the automobile industry, and could be considered as a consequence, or as a multiplier effect of that industry. That is why I prefer to stop the analysis with direct income and employment effects.

If we decided to look for multiplier effects, we should take into account multiplier effects of ether possible expenditure patterns as well. If ws did so, we could expect some surprising conclusions. For example, we could prove that the most rational thing to be done would be to spend more for supplementary civil servants, and, if possible, to pay each of them rather poorly: we will have a very high multiplier effect out of this expenditure, because our supplementary civil servants will spend their incomes mainly on consumer goods and services, and housing, all of them with com- paratively low-impact content, and will save marginally only since they are paid poorly. Thus, leakages ars reduced to a minimum, multiplier effects pushed up to their maximum, and the end result is maximum grow\.h of G.N.P. 464

Several questions were addressed to Dr. Deutsck, who unfortunately was not available after the meeting to provide written replies; however} we reproduce the questions: MR. R.J.W. DOUGLAS (Ooological Survey of Canada): Mould 'icu comment on the feasibility and desirability of establishing planned communities based on new industrial plants at the sites of new nuclear power stations in order to attempt to reverse the trend towards greater expansion and congestion of our present urban centres. MR. J•A.R. BROTHERS (E.B. Eddy Company):

During this Symposium and elsewhere there is a marked reluctance to deal with the possibility of limiting growth. Although some attention earlier today was given to limiting cionsumption and Gross National Product, no one has touched on the basic driving force of "over-population" growth. Do you believe that this is a relevant issue? If yest why has it almost been systematically avoided?

PROF. V. IRETON (Dept. of Mechanical Engineerings U. of N.B.); The notions of "standard of living" and "quality of life" are fundamental to many current concerns. Would you please disGuss what you have decided that these notions mean. There have be

MR. M.A. MURRAY (C.N.R.):

"lou call for policies to promote the use of mass transport rather than individualized modes and similar measures. Does this not imply a change from an individual-dominant free society to an institution- restrictive society? Is this desirable from a social and individual point of view? Would higher prices fop energy not provide sufficient incentive for conservation and sufficient rationing effect?

PROF. T.W. JOHNSTON (INRS-Energie, Varennes, Que.) of Mrs. Brechin: Our public energy policy appears now to be determined by an adversary system^ dominated by producer-s and local governments with most of the effective infighting 465

taking place behind closed doors -- public hearings being for display purposes. In view of this, how can any of the reductions in gi'owth rates, as you have advocated, be realized in practice (say by a factor of 10)? If the present policy system cannot do thiss how should it be changed? MRS. BRECH1N:

Since most of the regulatory bodies use a process of evidence and cross-examination- they perpetuate the adversary stance in public hearings. Because of their structure, there is little opportunity for the individual, or for even the poorly-funded group to be heard. Hence from long association — and lack of exposure to other viewpoints — the regulatory body normally adopts the position of the regulated.

There are a few signs that some of these bodies, prompted no doubt by hearing at long last the rumblings of discontent, are beginning to look for a means of obtaining other input. The mechanisms could be changed fairly readily by providing for smaller, less formal hearings in widely scattered centres, to allow access to the citizen; and by amending the laws which govern the right to appear so as to screen out frivolous intervenors but to admit the citizen who has no legal training and is often inarticulate — perhaps even providing assistance to him in starting his case. Although verification of statements should be sought by the regulators, cross-examination by skilled lawyers for the applicant, devastating to the average citizen, should not be allowed,

But most important of all would be a requirement that information — accurate and complete — be readily available to individuals and citizens' groups. Thousands cf studies are undertaken at the tax- payer's expense, to which he is denied access — access which is necessary in order to make an informed decision in the face of con- flicting claims and potential trade-offs. It it perhaps possible to sum up by saying that the citizen must be allowed full access to information so that he can make an informed judgement, and that there must be available a convenient forum at which he can make his views known. 467

EPILOGUE

ON PLANNING FOR SALE AND USE OF ENERGY

by

GEORGE C. LAURENCE, !•". R . S . C .

POSTPONING SCARCITY

In this last paper of the Svmposium, I want tu stress a very important aspect of the use of our energy resources: the great difficulty, cost and time required to develop and expand a new energy industry to replace the use of gas and oil before our easily accessible reserves are close to exhaustion. Obviously, if this is not accomplished in time in sufficient quantity, severe hardship will result from want of heat, light, food and and the crippling of industries.

It seems probable now that deposits in mainland regions near the mouth of the Mackenzie River can extend the gas suDply to southern Canada by a decade or more, depending on growth in demand, if conserved for that ouroose. Surface mining of the Athabaska tar sands can provide for the growing Canadian demand probably for a third of a century, Discoveries in southern Canada and off the Atlantic coast will add more, but the hope that they will be very large has been fading as exploration continues.

As these sources are depleted, the sunD'iy of the natural hydrocarbon fuels will become more difficult and more costlv. ft will not be easy or cheap to bring gas or oil from the ice-bound Arctic islands or to exDloit the deeper deposits of tar sands. We shall want energy from other sources in enormous supply at costs that are not prohibitive.

Canada will need to be as self-reliant as possible in providing for future energy requirements. We cannot expect long-lasting SUDPIV from Venezuela, and certainly not from the United States. In trade with the Middle East we will be at a great disadvantage in competing with Dowerful and wealthy states for these materials that are so important for national security and industrial vitality.

The possibilities of avoiding privation and Drohibitive costs when the supply of gas from the northern mainland and of oil from the upper layers of tar sands begins to fail depend on progress in science and technology, expansion of new energy industries and huge capital investments. They are decreased by the extra depletion of reserves of the natural fuels by export.

DEPENDENCE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Many who are not scientists believe that progress in science and technology will soon provide abundance of low-cost energy by new methods, and hence there is no need for concern about depletion of natural resources. Few, if any, of those who know the relevant science and technology well share that optimism. 468

The fusion of hydrogen is at least 40 years behind the fission or uranium, as a commercial source of energy. There is no doubt that wind, tide, sunshine, heat from the ground will continue to be used to a limited extent. However, the most promising and easiest approach to a new source of energy for use in cars and planes is a new artificial fuel or electrical storage. It should not be forgotten that it will take many years to pass through the successive stages of research, pilot plant development, tooling for product.on5 plant construction, fault correcting and expanding the new industry to the scale required to meet the large demand. As we have heard, artificial fuels may be made partly from less desirable fossil fuels, as in the production of hydrocarbons from coal and hydrogen by chemical process. However, about two-thirds of the energy must come from another source; for example, to produce hydrogen that will be com- bined with coal. Electricity from nuclear power stations will be the most suitable energy for that purpose. Very much research and development may be required to produce a satisfactory fuel. Electric storage batteries are a possible alternative for propelling cars and planes, but they will need to be much lighter and less bulky than those familiar today. Their invention will depend on quite basic research in physical chemistry and much ingenuity in design. The Chemical Institute of Canada has urged the Federal Government to suoport research on new fuels and other energy sources. The Canadian Association of Physicists and the Secretariat of the Science Council have also emphasized the imoortance of research on energy sou ces. These are important recommendations on questions of science policy, but the views of scientists on questions of policy are heard only faintly by governments. Parliamentary committees seem to regard details of organization and administrative procedure as the substance of science policy. REQUIRED GROWTH OF NEW ENERGY INDUSTRY Until the nature of the new artificial fuel or storage batteries for cars and planes is more clearly foreseen, only a very rough estimate can be made of the electricity that will be required for making the fuel or charging the batteHes. It is unlikely to be much less than 0.12 kilowatt year for each barrel of oil replaced, a;)d less than 0.021 kilowatt year for each thousand cubic feet of gas. The same very approximate conversion factors may be assumed for other uses of electricity in place of oil and gas, such as space heating. For example, if Canadian demand for gas and oil, and their equivalent in future substitutes, grows at 5.5% oer annum (which might keep it approxi- mately proportional to the real gross national product) its total in 34 years will be equivalent to 120 trillion cubic feet of gas and 63 billion barrels of oil. These amounts are close to some recent estimates of the readily accessible reserves. The rate of consumption at the end of the 34 years would be equivalent, on the basis of the above conversion factors, to about 640,000 megawatts. That is about 16 times the total capability of all power stations in Canada tod&y. 469

To provide nuclear power capability of this huge amount in 34 years would require nuclear power capability increasing from 16,000 MW in the first vear at about 12% per year, in addition to that required for the growing demand for electricity for other purposes. Installed nuclear capability in North America has been increasing during the last 20 years at more than 60" per vear. It should be possible to maintain the 12% rate mentioned above ">n Canada as long as the necessary capital can be provided. However, the annual capital expenditure would climb in a few years to prohibitive levels. The problem is less formidable if the growth in the energy demand is limited to 3.5% per annum. The same oil and gas could last for 43 yea^s, at the end of which the rate of consumption would be equivalent to 440,000 MW. This output could be reached in the 43 years by nuclear capability increasing at 7.5% per annum, starting from l£,10Q MW in the first year. There apoears to be no insurmountable difficulty in supply of essential materials, personnel and manufacturing competence. ECONOMIC RESTRAINT ON GROWTH OF A NEW ENERGY INDUSTRY To increase nuclear energy production at an average rate of 7.5? per annum to overtake an oil and gas demand growing at the slower rate of 3.5» per annum in 43 years would require a total capital expenditure in 1961 dollars of $220 billion, assuming $500 (1961) per kilowatt capability. It would absorb about 8% of the gross fixed capital formation during that long period. Since construction would not start until the techno! :v of the new fuel had been developed, the expenditure would have to be cons.derably greater during the remaining years. That is, heavy competition for other capital demands, but the consequent changes in the relative production of other industries would probably not be as disastrous as an energy famine. Conclusions in speculative discussion of this kind depend on many assumptions. Nevertheless, by any credible assumptions, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that replacement of oil and gas by nuclear power will be so costly and take so long that we cannot export a large part of our oil and gas resources without severe penalty. To do so would cause an interval either of severe privation, or of uncertain dependence on foreign sources of supply, where, in trading position, we will be much weaker than the great powers with whom we would have to compete. THE MACKENZIE VALLEY GAS PIPE LINE These comments are directly relevant to discussion of a pipe line to bring natural gas from the mouth of the Mackenzie River. To avoid great difficulty and scarcity in the transition from use of natural gas and oil to electricity from nuclear energy, Canada will need most of the gas that the region can supply. Because the rate at which the proposed pipe will deliver Canadian gas to southern markets might be limited to about 750 billion cubic feet per year the exploitation of the gas should commence early, even if it displaces some of southern output. Otherwise, the gas from southern wells would be 470

exhausted first which would result in too early a reduction in the rate of supply to market. The risk that a pipe to deliver only Canadian gas to Canadian consumers would never be built has been exaggerated. The attractiveness of the investment depends on present worth of future costs and of future income which will rise more quickly. If the industry does not believe that prices will rise enough to pay the higher costs of using a pipe only large enough for Canadian supply from the Mackenzie Delta, they should also have concern about the costs of bringing gas from remote Arctic Islands> even with the larger pipe. In any case, the proDOsed pipe would be much too small to Drovide for Canadian needs if gas from southern wells is exploited first. THE NEED FOR CONTINUING ECONOMIC STUDY The economic effects of expenditure on pipe lines is discussed in the recent report on energy resource'of the Department of Energy, Mines & Resources. The manner in which it makes use of Statistics Canada's "Candide" model of the Canadian economy for the purpose raises some questions which they will probably clarify in future studies. Meanwhile the "rapid reader" may be misled if he fails to note its warning that its use of Candide was to illustrate how it can be applied and not to reach a final conclusion. The first objection to the use of Candide in the report is that it treats the investment as if it were a completely independent source and there were no displacement of capital from other use that made it possible. In that respect it greatly exaggerates the increase in gross national product. It will not be possible to correct this fault entirely satisfactorily until Candide is further developed to recognize more fully the effects of the international balance of payments. Another objection is that it limits the study to an 8-year interval. Hence it does not show most of the benefit from the sale of gas that the pipe will bring to market. In that respect it underrates the net increase in gross national product. Moreover, it biases the comparison of pipes built at different times in favour of the earliest. It is not suggested that Candide should not be used in the study of the economic effects of the great changes that will occur in the use of our energy resources. It is practically impossible to deal with such a complex problem without such a model. Candide should become a very powerful analytical instrument for other economic studies also, and Statistics Canada should be encouraged to continue 1n developing and improving it and to keep it up-to-date. At the same time, the Department of Energy, Mines & Resources, in collaboration with other agencies and departments, should continue to expand and improve its study of energy resources, using the Candide model with the help of Statistics Canada. I stress this because governments, having demonstrated their alertness to act when need arises, tend sometimes to neglect what they have started when public interest turns to new issues and problems. 471

In the past, we have thought of fossil fuels and of nuclear energv as separate subjects, each with its own problems. If we are to Dlan a smooth transition from one to the other, we must consider them together, in a single economic theory. I believe that the Candide model, suitably extended, is ideal for that purpose. By extension, the model can be used in the economic studv i.f the introduction of new sources of energy to replace the natural fuels, adjusting the parameters from time to time as new information of resources, costs and prices permits. In that way it can be a great aid in planning and scheduling effort in exploration, research and development, construction of pipe lines, fuel plants, power plants, transmission lines and other facilities, and in elucidating the questions discussed in this Daper. SUMMARY

1. If consumption of fluid fossil fuels continues to grow at the present rate, and export is not severely restricted, it will probably not be possible to develop new energy sources on the large scale necessary to avoid great hardship from scarcity of energy supply.

2. Study by federal government departments and agencies of the use of Canada's energy resources, using "Candide," should be continued and improved to assist in planning the crderly transition to new sources of energv.

3. Research and development related to new fuels and other energy sources should be very strongly supoorted.

1. An Energy Policy for Canada, Phase I. Information Canada, 1973. 473

GLOSSARY*

PREFIXES mi 11 i (m) = one thousandth 10-3 kilo (k) one thousand= 103 mi cro one millionth 10-6 mega (M) one million = 10^ z nano one billionth 10-9 giga (G) one billion 10^ I! 12 tera (T) one trillion= 10

DEFINED EQUIVALENTS

LENGTH

1 inch = 2.54 centimeters (cm) (exactly by definition) 1 kilometer (km) = 0.621371 mile (slightly less than 5/8 = 0.625)

AREA

1 square mile = 2.589988 square kilometers (km2) 1 hectare = 104 square meters (m2) = 2.471054 acres = 1.076391 x 105 square feet

VOLUMF

1 Canadian (Imperial) gallon = 1.20094 U.S. gallon = 0.00454605 cubic meter (m3) 1 U. S. gallon = 231 cubic inches = 0.00378541m3 1 molar volume (0°C and 760 mm pressure) = 0.0224136m3 (0°C,760 mm) TIME 1 day = 86400 seconds 5 1 year = 365.2422 days • 8765.8 hours = 5.259485xl0 7minutes = 3.1556910x10' seconds

MASS

1 pound (avoirdupois) = 453.59237 grams (g) 1 kilogram (kg) = 2.2046226 pounds (avoirdupois) 1 short ton = 2000 pounds (avoirdupois) 1 long (or gross) ton = 2240 pounds (avoirdupois) 1 metric ton (tonne) = 1000 kilograms = 2204.6226 pounds (avoi rdupois)

The Editor is most grateful to Dr. W. B. Lewis, F.R.S.C, for collecting much of the information included in this G1 o s s a ry. 474

HEAT AND ENERG.Y

1 calorie (cal) = 4.184 Joules (J) 1 Jcule = 1 watt sec. 1 British thermal unit (Btu) = 1055.06 Joules 252.165 calories 1 million Btu (M Btu) = 293.072 kilowatt hours (thermal) AWh(t)J 105 Btu = 1 therm 1013 Btu = 1 Q = 1.221133x10'° megawatt days 1 megawatt day = 81.89114 M Btu FREQUENCY 1 hert? = 1 cycle per sec. GAS VOLUMES The standard cubic foot (s.c.f. or std ft3) is measured at 760 mm and 15°C. 1 ft3 = 28316.85 cm3 = 0.02831685 m3 The molar volume is defined at 760 mm and the ice point = (0°C = 273.15 K) The Kelvin is 1/273.16 of the thermodynamic temperature of the triple point of water = 0.01°C.

760mm Hg = 760 Torr = 1 Atm = 1.01325xl06 dyne/cm2

Nat. Bur. Stds. (1963) give

Gas constant R = 8.31432x107 erj(g mole)'1 deg

Hence molar volume V = S^fl^i3'15 = 22413"59

Hence 1 s.c.f. = 2f^f^ x|J|^| = 1.19761 mole 1 kcal = 4.184 k Joule = 4184/3600 = 1.162222 U h. = 1.162222/0.293072 = 3.965654 Btu. 1 kcal/mole = 3.965654x1.19761 = 4.74931 Btu/s.c.f. COMBUSTION ENERGY PETROLEUM CRUDE Conventionally 1 barrel (bbl) Petroleum crude

= 42 U.S. galS£0.135 tonne = 34.97 Imp. gal. yields 5.8 million Btu (M Btu). Its density is about 0.85 g/cm^; thus 42 U.S. gal = 0.15899 m3 » 0.13514 tonne. 475

Hence energy yield = 42.9 M Btu/tonne* HARD COAL High quality hard coal yields 13500 Btu/lb • 27 M Btu/short ton = 29.76 M Btu/tonne Hence ratio Petroleum crude/Hard coal = 1.44. Since production statistics are extensively collected and quoted from the United Nations Statistical Yearbooks it should be noted that from 1964 onwards the tables enter "millions of tons of coal equivalent" derived using a factor 1.3 to convert metric tons (tonnes) of petroleum crude to metric tons of coal equivalent. This factor appears anomalously low. NATURAL GAS The combustion of 1000 cubic feet of natural gas produces about 106 Btu = 1 M Btu

ENERGY OF NUCLEAR FISSION The fission of 1 gram of U-235 produces 0.94 megawatt day (thermal) «s 77.0 M Btu In 1 kg of uranium in natural uranium there is 7.1 g of U-235. Of this, five-sixth is fissionable by thermal neutrons Isotope separation leaves 0.2 to 0.3% U-235 in tails; i.e. of 1 kg. of uranium, 2 to 3 g of U-235 may be lost in the separation.

•Palmer Putnam in "Energy in the Future" (Van Nostrand, 1953), quotes the range 39 to 49.4 M Btu/tonne 476

EQUIVALENT PRICES mill/kWh iriill/kWh */MBtu $/bbl */gal US

80 4.64 11.408 13.2675 2.730 6.8243 50 2.90 6.905 8.2922 1.70607 4. 2652 30 1 .74 4.143 4.9753 1 .0236 2. 5591 20 1.16 2.762 3.3169 0.68243 1 ,706. 1 10 0.58 1 .381 1.6584 0.34121 0.,8530

17.2414 1 .0 2.381 2.8594 0.5883 1,.47075 7.2414 0.42 1 .0 1 .201 0.24709 0 .61771 6.03 0.34973 0.83268 1 .0 0.30574 0 .51436 29.3 1 .700 4.0472 4,8604 1.0 2 .5 11 .723 0.67993 1.61887 1 .9442 0.4 1.0

Calculated on the basis of 40% efficiency in converting heat to electrical energy. 477

SOLAR ENERGY The usual unit is the Langley = 1 cal/cm^

Solar constant = energy falling on 1 sq. cm at normal incidence outside the earth's atmosphere, at the mean distance of the earth from the sun = 2.0^2% cal/min = 2 Langley/min = 0.0333 Langley/sec (1 calorie - 4.184 Joule = 4.184 watt sec) Solar constant = 0.13947 Wc.tt/cm2 = 1.3947 kW/m2 Insolation = solar radiation reaching the earth's surface at any given time and place. Time of day, season of year, latitude, and cloud cover have major effect on insolation. Net insolation = solar radiation received less that reflected (Fraction reflected = Albedo)

Net radiation = Net insolation less Net infrared radiation

Some typical values for Canada

Langleys per year

algary Winnipeg Coppermi ne Latitude 49°11' 51°6' 49054' 67°49'

Insolation 101,857 121 ,052 119,982 79,843 Net Insolation 87,146 84,562 85,578 50,827 Net Infrared -44,223 -52,090 -48,152 -36,641 Net Radiation 42,922 32,472 37,426 14,185 Comment High Latitude 478

Vermi1 ion Twi11ingate Toronto Medicine Hat

Latitute 53°2T 49041 ' 43°41 • 5001 • Insolation 118,715 95,972 126,060 129,087 Net Insolation 83,982 74,173 89,298 92,994 Net Infrared -48,543 -39,936 -50,513 -54,466 Net Radiation 35,439 34,237 38,785 38,528 Comment Cloud & Fog _ '.ittle cloud

35,000 Langleys per year are equivalent to 46.4 watts per sq. meter : 46.4 watt-hours per sq. meter per hour = 158 Btu per sq. meter per hour 479

CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMIC DATA

Fuel Combustion Reaction Energy Release in kca 1 for mole of fuel Gibbs Enthaipy free energy Hydrogen iquid) 68.32 56.69 57.80 54.64

Methane CH4-£202 C02^2H20(vapor) 191.76 191.4

Ethane 2 -—4>2C02-^3H20( vapor) 341.26 344.64

Octane CgH18^||i 0^ _^,8C02-§-9H20(vapor) 1222.78 1241.7

These figures are relevant to questions, raised at the Symposium, regarding the use of hydrogen as a fuel. The oxidation of two moles of hydrogen, M2, generates much less energy than when this amount of hydrogen is combined in methane, CH^; this is due to the large energy release in the formation of carbon dioxide, COp. A similar conclusion applies to the higher hydrocarbons such as ethane and octane.

RELATION OF CAPITAL TO UNIT ENERGY COSTS ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION COSTS If A = annual fixed percentage charge rate U = utilization factor (fraction of time at full power) C = capital cost „($) per installed kilowatt Contribution of capital to Unit energy cost (u.e.c) = CA/8.766 U m1l!*/kWh

(a) For example, if C = $100/kw, and if U = 0.8; A-'= 7 percent

then u.e.c. = 7000/7012.8 5» 1 m$/kWh

(b) if A = 14%; U = 0.8

then u.e.c.^2 mill/kWh per $ 100/kW

* 1 mill = 1 milli dollar = lm$; 10 mill "- 1 cent 480

OIL AND TAR SANDS INSTALLATION COSTS

1 barrel/day = 5.8 MBtu/day = u99.8 «: 1700 kWh(t)/day = 70.826 kW(t) For capital cost of $1000/(bM/d) or $1000/70.826= $14.1193/ kW(t): (a) For $5000/(bbl/day) = $70.6/kW(t)

For generating electricity at efficiency e contributes u.e.c. = 70.6A/876.6e = 0.08053 A/e mil1/kWh(e) e.g. e = 0.4, A = 14, u.e.c. = 2.819 mill/kWh(e) (b) For $5000/(bbl/day)

at A = 14 contributes 700000 _ _- _. /MO. 365.2422x5.8 " 33'04 c/MBtu 481

LIST OF SPEAKERS AND ORGANIZERS ARMSTRONG, Malcolm D., Chairman, Transportation Development, Agency, Canada Dept. of Transport, 2085 Union -9th Floor, Montreal 111, Que. BISWAS, Dr. A., Chief, Ecological Systems Branch, Planning & Finance Services, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0A3 BOUCHER, Real, Directeur G€ne"ral de 1'Energie, Gouvernement du Quebec, 1600 Bd. I1Entente, Quebec, Que. BOULET, Dr. Lionel, Directeur, Institut de Recherches, Hydro- Quebec, Varennes, Que. BRECHIN, Mrs. W.A., President, Consumer Assoc. of Canada, 100 Gloucester Ave.f Ottawa, Ont. K2P 0A4 BUTLER, Dr. G.C. , F.R.S.C., Director of Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0R6 COATES, George D., Vice-President, Administration, Luscar Ltd., 6th Floor, Royal Bank Bldg. , Edmonton, Alta. T5J 1X3 COLPITTS, R.F., Lalonde, Girouard, Lentendre & Assoc., 8790 Ave. du Pare, Montreal, Qu§. CONWAY, Dr. B.E., F.R.S.C., Chemistry Dept., University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. KIN 6N5 DAGHER, Dr. J.H., General Manager, Corporate Planning, B.P. Canada Ltd., 1245 Sherbrooke St. W., Montreal, Que. DALES, Dr. J. , F.R.S.C, Dept. of Political Economy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. M5S 1A1 DEUTSCH, Dr. John J., F.R.S.C.f Principal, Queen's University, Kings ton , Ont. DOWNING, Dr. D.C., "Technical Coordinator-Synthetic 7uels, Gulf Oil Corporation, Pittsburg, PA., U.S.A. 15230 DUNCAN, Dr. Ken, Head of the Dept. of Sociology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont. EFFORD, Dr. Ian, Science Council of Canada, Kent-Albert Bldg., 150 Kent St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5P4 FOLINSBEE, Prof. R.E., F.R.S.C., Dept. of Geology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. T6G 2E1 GANDER, J.E., Economic Council of Canada, 333 River Rd., Ottawa, Ont. K1L 8B9 GARLAND, Dr. G.D., F.R.S.C., Dept. of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. M5S 1A1 GOVIER, Dr. G.W., Chairman, Energy Resources Conservation Board, 603-6th Ave. S.W., Calgary, Alta. T2P 0T4 (Paper read by G.A. Warne) HARE, Dr. F.K., F.R.S.C., Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1 HELLIWELL, Dr. John, Dept. of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. 482

HORTE, V.L., President, Canadian Arctic Gas Studies Ltd., P.O. Box 139, Commerce Court Postal Station, Toronto, Ont. HURST, D.G., F.R.S.C, President, Atomic Energy Control Board, P.O. Box 1046, Ottawa, Ont. LAIDLER, Dr. K.J., F.R.S.C., Prof., Dept. of Chemistry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. KIN 6N5 LAURENCE, Dr. G.C., F.R.S.C., P.O. Box 335, Deep River, Ont. KOJ IPO LEECH, Mrs. Alice, 420 Hinton Ave. S., Otcawa, Ont. K1Y 1B3 LESTER, M.D., Aluminum Co. of Canada Ltd., 1 Place Ville Marie, P.O. Box 6090, Montreal, Que. LEWIS, Dr. W.B., F.R.S.C., (Retired), Box 189, 13 Bsach Ave., Deep River, Ont. KOJ IPO LOUGHEED, D.D., Vice-President and General Manager, Producing Division and Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Ltd., Ill St. Clair Ave. W., Toronto, Ont. M4V IN8 MACDONALD. The Kon. D.S., Minister of Energy, Mines & Resources, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KLA 0E4 MACDONALD, Donald, President, Canadian Labour Congress, 100 Argyle St., Ottawa, Ont. K2P 1B6 MADILL, J.T., Aluminum Co. of Canada Ltd., 1 Place Ville Marie, P.O. Box 6090, Montreal, Que. MCCROSSAN, Dr. R.G., Head, Energy Subdivision, Institute of Sedimentary and Petroleum Geology, 33rd St. N.W., Calgary, Alta. MCLAREN, Dr. D.J., F.R.S.C., Director, Geological Survey Branch, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 601 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0E8 MCIVOR, D.K., Senior Vice-President & Director, Producing Division & Exploration Manager, Imperial Oil Ltd., 111 St. Clair Ave. W., Toronto, Ont. M4V IN8 MORGAN, John H., Transportation Development Agency/ 2085 Union Ave., Montreal 111, Que. MOORADIAN, A.J., F.R.S.C., Vice-President, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ont. KOJ 1J0 PETERSON, E.B., Project Manager, Northern Pipeline Study, Northern Forest Research Centre, Environment Canada, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alta. T6H 3S6 PILL, J., Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Review, Rm 202, Old City Hall, Toronto 10, Ont. QUIRIN, Dr. G.D., Faculty of Management Studies , University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St. W., Toronto, Ont. M5S 1V4 ROOTS, Dr. E.F., Planning & Evaluation Sector, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 SCOTT, Prof. A.D., F.R.S.C., Dept. of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, B.C. SYLVESTRE, Guy, F.R.S.C., President, The Royal Society of Canada, 395 Wellington St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0N4 483

THOR, Dr. Otto, Asst. Deputy Minister, Economic Planning, Dept. of Finance, Place Bell Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0G5 UFFEN, Dr. R.J., F.R.S.C., Dean of Applied Science, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. URQUHART, M.C., F.R.S.C, Prof. & Head, Dept. of Economics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. VIJH, Dr. Ashok, Institute of Research, Hydro-Quebec, Varennes, Que. WARNE, G.A., Technical Asst. to the Chairman, Energy Resources Conservation Board, 603-6th Ave. S.W., Calgary, Alta. T2P 0T4 WILSON, W., Director of Energy Studies, Canadian Pacific Rail- way Ltd., Windsor Station, Montreal 10]. Que. 485

LIST OF REGISTRANTS

ALBERY, Allan, C.R., President, Albery, Pullerits, Dickson & Assoc, 29 Gervais Dr., Don Mills, Ont. M3C 1Y9 AMYOT, Prof. Laurent, Directeur, Institut de Genie Nucleaire, Ecole polytechnique dc Montreal, 2500 Marie Guyard, Montreal, Que. ANDREWS, R.W., Polysar Ltd., Vidal Street, Sarnia, Ont. ANSTEE, John, Manager, Isotope Production Division, Commercial Products, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., P.O. Box 6300, Postal Station J, Ottawa, Ont. K2A 3W3 ARMSTRONG, Miss D.J. , Policy Analysis Group, External Aff.iirs Dept., 125 Sussex Dr., Ottawa, Ont. K1A OG2 ARMSTRONG, Graham T., Northern Program Planning Division, Dept. of Indian Affairs & Northern Development, Resources Section, Rm 923C, 400 Laurier Ave. W., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0H4 AVEDIAN, Diran; MBA Student, 455 W. Sherbrooke, Apt. 403, Montreal 111, Que. H3A IB7 BABBAGE, George, Surveys & Mapping Branch, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 615 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA OE9 BALLANTYNE, E.A., Resource Program Division, Dept. of Finance, Place-Bell Canada, Ottawa, Ont. KlA OG5 BARCHARD, L. Everett, Petroleum Consultant, Suite 1005, 1260 McGregor Ave., Montreal 109, Que. BARRE, Kenneth de la, Director, Montreal Office, Arctic Institute of North America, 34 5 8 Redpath St., Montreal 109, Que. BARRINGTON, John, Union Gas Ltd., 50 Keil Dr., Chatham, Ont. N7M 3G8 BARTHOLOMEW, Dr. G.A. , F.R.S.C, Director, Physics Division, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River, Ont. K0J 1J0 BAXTER, Lloyd W., Oil Analyst, Cochran Murray Ltd., 18 King St. E., Toronto, Out. M5C 1E1 BEATTIE, J.R., Economic & Financial Consultant, 252 Buena Vista Rd., Ottawa, Ont. KIM OV7 BELANGER, Guy, 515 ouest, rue Ste-Catherine, Suite 215, Montreal "110, Que. BELEC, Marilyn, National Film Board of Canada, c/o Production Research Office, P.O. Box 6100, Montreal 101, Que. 486

BENAVIDES, Dr. Federico, Economic Counsellor, Embassy of Venezuela, 151 Slater St., Suite 801, Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5H3 BENTHAM, J.M., Vice-President, Purchases & Stores, Canadian Pacific Railways, Rm 23, 'B' Floor, Windsor Station, Montreal 101, Que. BERLINGUET, Louis, F.R.S.C., Vice-president a la Recherche, University du Quebec, 2875 Bd. Laurier, Quebec 10, Que. GlV 2M4 BLANCHARD, J. Ewart, Nova Scotia Research Foundation, P.O. Box 790, 100 Fenwick St., Dartmouth, N.S. BOLULLO, Louis, Advisor, Economic Research Directorate, Hydro- Quebec, 75 ouest, Bd. Dorchester, Montreal, Que. BOOTH', Harry, President, Alberta & Southern Gas Co. Ltd., 3rd Floor, Alberta & Southern Bldg., 240 Fourth Ave., S.W., Calgary Alta. T2P OH5 BORDEN, Robert L., Special Advisor, Energy and Minerals, Dept. of Industry, Trade & Commerce, Rm 2064, Tower 'B1, Place de Ville, 112 Kent St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA OH5 BOSTOCK, Hugh S., F.R.S.C, 2150 Westbourne Ave., Ottawa, Ont. K2A 1N5 BOUCHARD, Jean, Economiste, Regie de I1Slectricite du Quebec, 2100 Drummond, Montreal, Que. BRADLEY, Victor G., Ministry of State for Science & Technology, Rm 600, Victoria Bldg., 140 Wellington St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 1A1 BREGHA, Francois, Etudiant, Universite de York, 16 Heathbridge Park, Toronto, Ont. M4G 2Y6 BROE, Kenneth L., Canadian General Electric, 1010 Beaver Hall Hill, Montreal, Que. BROTHERS, James A.R., Manager, Corporate Marketing Research, E.B. Eddy Co., Head Office, P.O. Box 600, Hull, Que. J8X 3Y7 BROWN, J.C., , nning Advisor, Corporate Planning Dept., S)-tall Canada Ltd., Box 400 Terminal "A1, Toronto, Ont. BRUNEAU, Dr. A.A., Dean, Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St-John's, Nfld. BRUNELLE, Dr. Paul, Faculty of Applied Science, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que. BUCHHOLZ, Jim E.W., Chief, Research Division, Engineering Branch, National Energy Board, 473 Albert St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA OE5 BULLYMORE, Gordon W., Superintendent-Edmonton Area, The Alberta Gas Trunk Ltd., 11th Floor, Petroleum Plaza, 9945-108th St., Edmonton, Alta T5K 1H1 487

BUSSIERE, Michel, Diracteur du Bureau de Planification, Ministe're des Richesses Naturelles, Chambre 237, 1620 Bd. de I1Entente, Quebec, Que. BURKE, CD., Dept. of Development, Province of Nova Scotia, P.O. Eox 519, Halifax, N.S. BUYERS, Dr. W.J.L., Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chaxk River, Ont. KOJ 1J0

CAMPBELL, Dr. F.A., F.R.S.C., Vice-President, (Academic), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. T2N 1N4 CAMPBELL, W.M., Special Advisor to Vice-President, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Sheridan Park, Ont. CARIN, Barry, Senior Policy Analyst, Treasury Board Secretariat- Place Bell Canada, 160 Elgin St., 20th Fioor, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0R5 CARMICHAEL, Hugh, F.R.S.C., 9 Beach Ave., Deep River, Ont. CASEY, Dr. A.G., Defence Research Board, 125 Elgin St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0Z3 CHAPMAN, J.D., Dept. of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, B.C. CHAPMAN, Dr. J.H., F.R.S.C., 1368 Morley Blvd., Ottawa, Ont. K2C 1R5 CHAPMAN, Dr. T.W., Securities Analyst, Canada Life, 300 University Ave., Toronto, Ont. M5G 1R8 CHOUDHARY, Bijoy, Chisholm & Co. Ltd., 11 Adelaide St. W., Toronto, Ont. M5H 1M9 CHARBONNIER, Dr. Raymond Pierre, Science Council of Canada, 150 Kent St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5P4 CHURCH, J.W. President, Conestoga College of Applied Arts & Technology, 299 Don Valley Dr., Kitchener, Ont. CLARKSON, Stuart W., Chairman, Ontario Energy Board, 4 32 Mowat Block, Queen's Park, Toronto, Ont. M7A 1Y7 CLOUTIER, Bernard, President, Soquip, 3340 de la Perade, Ste-Foy, Que. G1X 2N7 CLOUTIER, Dr. Roland, Doyen, Faculte des Sciences, Universite de Moncton, Moncton, N.B. COAKER, Gerald, Staff Analyst, Corporate Planning Dept., Shell Canada Ltd., Box 44 Terminal 'A', Toronto, Oi.t. CO&TES, Dr. D.F., F.R.S.C., Mines Branch, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 555 Booth St.f Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0G1 COCHRAN, D.R., Ontario Energy Board, Rm SE-432 Mowat Block, 900 Bay St., Queen's Park, Toronto, Ont. M7A 1Y7 CONNELL, Gordon A., Co-ordinator, Economic Planning, Gulf Oil Canada Ltd., P.O. Box 130, 707-7th Ave. S.W., Calgary, Alta. T2P 022 488

COOK, W.H., F.R.S.C., International Bilogical Programme, National Research Council of Canada, 201 Maple Lane, Rockcliffe Park, Ottawa, Ont. KIM 1G9 CORDELL, Arthur J., Science Advisor, Science Council of Canada, 150 Kent St., Rm 721, Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5P4 COTTREAU, J.D., Public Relations-Eastern Canada, Gulf Oil Canada Ltd., 1 Place Ville Marie, Montreal 113, Que. CROMBIE, Marg, Student, Faculty of Environmental Studies, Scott Library, York University, 5th Floor, 4700 Keele, Downsview, Ont. M3J IP3 CURZON, F.L., Physics Dept., University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, B.C. CUTHILL, J. Ian, Manager, Exploration Dept., The Consumers' Gas Co., 19 Toronto St., Toronto, Ont. M5C 2E8 DALY, Conor J., Ministry of Transport, Government of Canada, 26 Nepean St., Apt. 101, Ottawa, Ont. K20 0B1 DAVID, Vincent, Agent de Recherche, Bureau de Planification & DeVeloppement du Quebec, 779 Place Philippe, No. 5, Ste-Foy, Quebec 10, Qu£. DAVIES, E.L., Orenda Ltd., Box 6001, Toronto International Airport, Toronto, Ont. DAVIS, G.A., Manager, Economics Dept., Shell Canada Ltd., Calgary, Alta. DAW, G.G., Asst. Science Advisor, Ministry of State for Science & Technology, Rm 600, Victoria Bldg., 140 Wellington St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5A2 DEEKS, Brian B., Project Manager, Business Development, Canada Wire S Cable, 147 Laird Dr., Toronto, Ont. M4G 3W1 DELISLE, Prof. Jules, Dept. of Applied Science, Electrical Engineering, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que. DERY, Jacques, President, Consultant Engineer, Jacques Dery & Assoc., 615 ouest, rue Dorchester, Montreal 101, Qu6. DESJARDINS, Michel, Institut Nationale de la Recherche, INRS- Petrole, 555 Bd. Henri IV, C.P. 7500, Ste-Foy, QuSbec 10, Que. 'iCENZO, Colin D., Director of Undergraduate Studies, Faculty of Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Di TOMASO, Nick, Vice-President & Director, Murphy Oil Co. Ltd., 6600 Cote des Neiges Rd., Montreal, Que. DOBUSH, Peter, Partner, Dobush, Stewart, Longpre, Marchand, Goudreau Architects, 9th Floor, 506 St. Catherine E., Montreal, Que. DOUGLAS, Robert, Geological Survey of Canada, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E8 489

DRAPER, William, The Federation of Ontario Nationalists, 1262 Don Mills Rd., Don Mills, Ont. M3B 2W7 DUBE, Georges, General Counsel, Ashland Oil Canada Ltd., 19th Floor, 400 University Ave., Toronto, Ont. M5G 1S5 DUFFET, Walter E., Vice-President, The Conference Board in Canada, Suite 1800, 333 River Rd., Ottawa, Ont. K1L 8B9 DUGGAL, A.N., Senior Econometrician, Operations Research Branch, Econometrics Division, National Energy Board, 473 Albert St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E5 DUMOULIN, Jean, Economist, Economic Development Division. Dept. of Finance, 26th Floor N. , Place Bell Canada, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0G5 DUNNINGTON, William, Development Manager-Du Pont of Canada Ltd., P.O. Box 660, Montreal 101, Que. DURAMD, Denis, Economist, Intergovenmental Affairs Dept., Complexe 'H1, ler etage, Quebec, Que. DURANT, William C., Canadian General Electric Co. Ltd., 175 Richmond Rd., Ottawa, Ont. K1Z 6W1 DYNE, Dr. P.J., Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Pinawa, Man. EASTWOOD, T. Alex, Chemistry & Materials Division, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ont. K0J 1J0 ELLIOTT, Howard H., Jr., Senior Engineering Economist, Insti- tute of Gas Technology, 3424 South State St., Chicago, 111., U.S.A. 60016 ETKIN, Bernard, F.R.S.C., Faculty of Applied Science & .Engineering, University of Toronto, Rm 170, Galbraith Bldg., Toronto, Ont. M5S 1A4 FARMER, Jacques, Vice-President, Planning, Gaz Metropolitain Inc., P.O. Box 6111, Montreal 101, Qu£. FARRUGIA, Michael A., Supervisor of Energy Studies, Dept. of Research, Canadian Pacific Ltd., Windsor Station, Montreal 101, Que. FIELD, J. Gordon, Senior Investment Analyst, A.E. Ames & Co. Ltd., 320 Bay St., Toronto, Ont. M5H 2P7 FIELDING, Mrs. Laura, Inland Water Branch, Environmental Management Service, Dept. of the Environment, Place Vincent Massey, Hull, Que. FIESEL, Clifford L., President & General Manager, Magnorth Petroleum Ltd., 730-407, 8th Ave., S.W., Calgary, Alta. T2P 1C3 FINN, Dr. D.B., F.R.S.C, Retired International Civil Servant, Castello, Sterpeto Di Assisi, Perugia, Italy. FITZGERALD, John G., Asst. Deputy Minister of Energy, Government of Newfoundland, Eastern Canada Savings & Loans Bldg., Empire Ave., St. John's, Nfld. 490

FLYNN, Henry, Ministry of State for Science & Technology, Lord Elgin Plaza, 66 Elgin St., Rm 902, Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5K6 FOUPNIER, Peter L., Chief, Analysis & International Division, National Energy Board, 473 Albert St., Ottawa, Ont. KIR 5B3 FRENCH, John D., Dept. of Development, Province of Nova Scotia, Bank of Montreal Bldg. George St., Halifax, N.S. FURLONG, D.B., Canadian Petroleum; Assa. Suite 400, 130 Albert St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5G2 GENITEAU, Alain, Economiste, Regie de 1"Electricite du Quebec, Montreal, Que. GIBSON, Bob, Student, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. GILCHRIST, W.M., President, Eldorado Nuclear Ltd., Suite 800, 151 Slater St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5H3 GLYDE, Dr. Henry R., Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ont. K0J 1J0 GOBLE, Erik, President, Kintla Exploration Ltd., No 7-8540- 109 St., Edmonton, Alta. T5B 0A1 GRAHAM, H.P., Ministry Executive, Planning Office, Ministry of Transoort, 28th Floor, Place de Ville, Tower "c"1, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0N5 GRIFFITHS, Dr. Geo M., Prof, of Physics, Ministry of State for Science & Technology, 207 Queen St., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 1A1 GRIMLEY, Dr. S.S., Industrial Programs Office, National Reseai.>_h Council of Canada, Administration Bldg. , Bldg. 58, Montreal Rd. , Ottewa, Ont. K0A 0R6 GWILYM, R.D., Student, Environmental Studies, York University, 9437 Keele St.. R.R.I, Maple, Ont. HAINES, Peter J., Special Advisor, Energy, Canadian Inter- national Development Agency, 122 Bank St., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0G4 HAMEL, Roger B., President, Produits P^troliers Champlain Lte., Suite 1300, Tour de la Bourse, Montreal 115, Que. HAMILTON, J.F. Investment Analyst, Excelsior Life, 15 Toronto St., Toronto, Ont. M5C 2E8 HAMILTON, William, Asst. Executive Secretary, Canadian Federation of Agriculture, 111 Sparks St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5B5 HANEY, William L., Director, Radio & Electrical Engineering Division, National Research Council of Canada, Montreal Rd., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0R8 HANNA, G.C., F.R.S.C., Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River„ Ont. HANNAM, Peter, Ontario Federation ot Agriculture, R.R.2, Guelph, Ont. HARPER, W.A., Energy Publications & Information Services, Energy Division Section, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 491

HARRISON. R.J.H., Faculty of Law, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. HART, Dr. John, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ont. P7B 5E1 HARVEY, Dave, A.I. McFarlan Co., Inc., 6 Bar Le Due, Lorraine, Que. HEMMING, D.R., Ministry of Transport, 100 Bronson Ave., Suite 1107, Ottawa, Ont. KIR 6G8 HENDERSON, Dr.. J.E., F.R.S.C, Geological Survey of Canada, (Retired), 395 Hamilton Ave. S., Ottawa, Ont. K1Y 1C9 HENDERSON, Dr. John, F.R.S.C., 1373 Orillia, Ottawa, Ont. K1H 7N6 HENEIN, J.C., Canada Centre for Remote Sensing, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 2464 Sheffield Rd., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 HERVIEU, Philippe, Energy Branch, Dept. of Natural Resources, Government of Quebec, 1600 Bd. de I1Entente, Quebec, Que. HISCOCKS, Dr. R.D., National Research Council of Canada, Administration Bldg., M.58, Montreal Rd., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0R6 HOFER, Richard M., President, R.M. Hofer & Assoc. Ltd., 77 Metcalfe St., Ottawa, Ont. K1H 5L6 HOFFMAN, R.B., Director, Structural Analysis & Productivity Research, Statistics Canada, Rm 1168, General Purpose Bldg., Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, Ont. HOGG, Dr. Ben, F.R.S.C., Vice-President, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, Man. R3B 2E9 HOhTZEAS, Prof. S., Dept. of Chemistry & Physics, University of Saskatchewan, Regina Campus, Regina, Sask. S4S 0A2 HOPPER, W.H., Director, Energy Policy Coordination & Review, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, On.. KlA 0E4 HOWARD, John S., Power Generation Planning Division, Electrical Engineering Branch, National Energy Board, 473 Albert St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E5 HUNTER, W. Stewart, Ontario Hydro, 620 University Ave., Toronto, Ont. M5G 1X6 IGLESIAS, Stewart, Special Asst., Secretary of State, 66 Slater St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5H1 IGNATIEFF, Alex, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, (Retired), 125 Reid Ave., Ottawa, Ont. KlY 4K5 IRETON, Verne, Asst. Prof., Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B. IRVING, «:r. E. , F.R.S.C., Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 324 Billings Ave., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 5L3 JACKSON, Barrie John, Head Radioactivity Measurement, Commercial Products, Isotope Prod. Div., Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., P.O. Box 6500, Ottawa, Ont. 492

JOHNSON, Prof. Arthur C, Dept. of Physics, Faculty of Science, York University, 4700 Keele St., Downsview 463, Ont. JOHNSON, D.L., Coordinator, Program Planning, Corporate Planning Dept., Shell Canada Ltd., Box 400 Terminal 'A', Toronto, Ont. MST^ 1E1 JOHNSON, Prof. Keith E. , Chemistry Dept., University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Sask. S4S 0A2 JOHNSON, Prof. T. Wyatt, Universite du Quebec, INRS-Energie, C.P. 1020 Varennes, Que. J0L 2P0 JONES, Daniel G.. Senior Economist, Commonwealth of Virginia, 1010 Mcdison Bldg., 109 Governor St., Richmond, Virginia. U.S.A. 23831 JUCHYMENKO, Alex, Market Planning Engineer, Ontario Hydro, 620 University Ave., Toronto, Ont. M5G 1X6 KAPNER, Mark, Public Technology, Inc., Rm 305, 1140 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. U.S.A. 20036 KEAST, F.H., Ontario Research Foundation, Sheridan Park, Mississauga, Ont. L5K 1B3 KELLY, Brian, Researcher, Pollution Probe, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. M5S 1A1 KERR, S. Aubrey, Senior Oil & Gas Advisor, Jones, Howard & Co. Ltd., 249 St. James St. W., Montreal, Que. KERWIN, Prof. Larkin, F.R.S.C., Universite Laval, Qu§bec, Que. G1K 7P4 KOHLER, Larry R., School of Advanced International Studies, John Hopkins University, 1930 Columbia Pike No. 4, Arlington, Virginia. U.S.A. 22204 KOOP, Jacob, Defence Research Board, Dept. of National Defence, 12th Floor, North Tower, 101 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0Z3 KOZLOWSKI, H., Dept, of Chemistry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. KUBLER, Dr. Bernard, Institut Nationale des Recherche Scientifi- ques, INRS-Petrole, 555 Bd. Henri IV, C.P. 7500, Ste-Foy, Quebec 10, Qu€. LACHOWSKY, Bohdan, Geography Dept., Queen's University, 141 King St. E., Kingston, Ont. K7L 2Z9 LAFKAS, Constantine, Queen's University, 141 King St. E., Kingston, Ont. K7L 2Z9 LAFRANCE, Rolland, Editor, GEOS Magazine, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources,- 538 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 LAFRANCE, Rolland,

LANDRY, R.E., Manager, Public Relations Dept., Imperial Oil Ltd,, 4th Floor, 111 St. Clair Ave. W., Toronto, Ont. M5W 1K3 LAPOINTE, Miss Renaude, Senator, The Senate, Em 47 5-S, Parliament Bldg., Ottawa, Ont. LARSON, Vernon C, Imperial Oil Ltd., Ill St. Clair Ave. W., Toronto, Ont. M5W 1K3 LAST, C.J., Chairman, The Petroleum Society of CIM, 525 Calgary House, 550-6th Ave. S.W., Calgary, Alta. T2P 0R8 LEE, Dr. G.F. , Capilano College, N. Vancouver, 2055 Purcell Way, N. Vancouver, B.C. LEVINE, Richard, 800 Dorchester W., Suite 1515, Montreal, Que. LOVE, Brigadier .H.W., The Arctic Institute of North America, 1 Suite 2222, Tower "A , Place de Ville: Ottawa, Ont. KlR 5A3 LEACH, H. Derrick, Consulting Resources Ltd., 20 Victoria St., Toronto, Ont. M5C 1Y1 LOEVINSOHN, H.T., Consulting Economist, 5636 Jellicoe Ave., Montreal, Que. H4W 1Z6 LORENTIU, A., Brinco Ltd., Westmount Square, Montreal 216, Que. LUNARDINI, Prof. Virgil J., Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. KIN 6N5. MAASIAND, Dr. D.E.L., Science Council of Canada, 150 Kent St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5P4 MACDONALD, Robert, Asst. Prof., Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, 4700 Keele St., Downs view, tOnt. MACMILLAN, Jack A., Director of Planning, Sun Oil Co. Ltd., 56 Wellesley St. W., Toronto, Ont. M5S2S4 -• . ' MAGEE, William G., Baker, Weeks of Canada Ltd., Toronto-Dominion Centre, P=O. Box 136> Toronto, Ont. M5K 1H2 ' ' ••.•'. MAGN&N, Bernard, C.P. Kail, Windsor Station^ Rra "332, Peel St., -Mcntr'eal, Que.' . MAJOR, C.R., Guardian Capital Group Ltd-...Mutual1 Funds Manage- ment Corporation," Suit^ 500, 48 Yon^e St., Toronto, Ont. M5E 1G6 MANDERS, Paul M. , Economist, Dept. of Finance, 26th Floor N. , • Place Bell Canada, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0G5 MARCOUX, A.idre, Sous-Ministre Adjoint, Minist§re des Richesses Naturellas, Chambre 21"5 A, 1620 66, de 1 • Entente, Quebec, Qu^. '"' . . MARKEY, Stephcr- ?., Executive Consu.ttanfea^J.td., 151 Slater St. , Suite 205, Ottawa,-,, Ont. KIP 5H3 MARTEL, Prof. Jacques G. , INRS-EnergieV C.P. 1020 Varennes, Que. JOS 2P0 MATTINSON, Dr. C.R., Senior Staff Economist, Economics ' Shell Canada Ltd..,. Calgary>• Alta. 494

MAYES, R.J., Brinco Ltd., 1 Westmount Square, Montreal 216, Que. MCCALL, Martin H., The Consumers' Gas Co... 19 Toronto St., Toronto, Ont. M5C 2E8 MCCOLM, Dr. George T., Ministry of State for Science & Techno- logy, (MOSST) , 99 Acacia Ave., Ottawa, Ont. KIM 0P8 MCDOUGALL, Ian, Faculty of Law, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. MCGILL, Peter, Science Council of Canada, 150 Kent St., 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5P4 MCINTYRE, G.F., Ontario Hydro, 88 Old Sheppard Ave., North York, Ont. MCKAY, J.C., Asst. Director, Research & Development Division, The Steel Co. of Canada Ltd., Hamilton, Ont. MCKINNON, I.N., Consolidated Natural Gas Ltd., 1300 Elveden House, 717-7th Ave. S.W., Calgary, Alta. T2P 0Z3 MCLEAN, D.D., Supervisor, Petroleum Resources, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 880 Bay St., Toronto, Ont. M5S 12.8 MCLEOD, R.R., Administration, Oil & Gas, Oil & Mineral Division, Dept. of Indian Affairs & Northern Development, 400 Laurier Ave. W., Ottawa, Ont. KIR 5C4 MCMULLEN, Michael K., Mineral Economist, Mineral Development Sector, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, Rm D216 No. 8 Temporary Bldg., Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0E4 MCQUEEN, Prof. Hugh, Mechanical Engineering, Sir George Williams University, Montreal 107, Que. MERCIER, Pierre, Brault, Guy, Ch.aput Inc., 612 rue St. Jacques, Montreal, Que. MERLIN, H.B., Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0E4 MILLAR. Dr; Charles H., Director, Advanced Projects & Reactor, Physics Division, Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ont. MILLAR, Miss Susan, Student, Carleton University, 514 Bay St., Apt. C, Ottawa, Ont. KlR 6B3 MILLEN, Steven, Director of Energy Resources, Government of Newfoundland, Empire Ave., St. John's, Nfld. MILTON, Dr. J.C.D., F.R.S.C., Nuclear Physics, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ont.,K0J 1J0 MISENER, Prof. A.D., F.R.S.C., Institute of Environmental Science & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. MITCHELL, E.R., Canadian Combustion Research Laboratory, Mines Branch,. Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 555 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 MITCHELL, Miss Susan, Canadian Arctic Resources Committee, 53 Queen St., Rm 21, Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5C5 MOONEY, W.J., Canada Cities Service Ltd., Box 2727, 1100 Calgary House, 550-6th Ave. S.W., Calgary, Alta. T2P 2M7 495

MOORE, Jean-Guy, Ingenieur-Conseil PStrolier, La Societe de development de la Baie James, 800 E., Maisonneuve Bd., Montreal 132, Que. MORRISON, Prof. R.W. , Physics Dept., Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont. K1S 5B6 MURPHY, Dr. Lawrence, Gulf Oil Canada Ltd., 800 Bay St., Toronto, Ont. M5S 1Y7 MURRAY, Michael A., Asat. Research Economist, Research & Development Dept., Canadian National Railways, P.O. Box 8100, Montreal 101, Que. NORMAN, D.H.J., Advisor, Operational Econometric Models, Long Range Planning Branch, Dept. of Finance, 24th Floor, Place Bell Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0G5 NORTH, Prof. F.K., Dept. of Geology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont. K1S 5B6 OOSTENBRINK, W.L., Supervisor, Economics Analysis, Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., P.O. Box 800, Calgary, Alta. T2P 2J7 OSLER, Sanford, Researcher, Pollution Probe, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. M5S 1A1 PEAKE, Tom A., Walwyn, Stodgell & Co. Ltd., 110 Yonge St., 14th Floor, Toronto, Ont. M5C 1T4 PELLAND, Michel, Animateur & Reporter, Radio-Canada, 4606 rue Coolbrook, Montreal, Que. PHILLIPS, James A., Texaco Canada Ltd., 130 Albert St., Suite 2002, Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5G4 PLANTE, Jacques, Production & Exploration Manager, Soquip, 3340 de la Perade, Ste-Foy, QuS. GlX 2N7 PICHE, Bernard, M.B.A., Etudiant, 3465 Hutchison, App. 905, Montreal, Qu§. POIRIER, Michel, Head, Physics Dept., Algonquin College, 200 Lees Ave., Ottawa, Ont. K1S 5B8 POKRUPA, Z.P., Consultant Economist, Shell Canada Ltd., Box 400 Terminal 'A', Toronto, Ont. M5W 1E1 POWELL, Russell C., Professional Engineer, Public Affairs Dept. Imperial Oil Canada Ltd., 1111 Talka Court, Mississauga, Ont. POWRIE, Prof. Tom, Dept. of Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. T 6G 2H4 PREST, Dr. V.K. , F.R.S.C., Geological Survey of Canada, Rm 373, 601 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0E8 PURCELL, Dr. Richard, Policy Branch, Ministry of State for Urban Affairs, 355 River Rd., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0P£ PAWLIN, J., Nuclear Products Dept., Canadian General Electric, Peterborough, Ont. QUON, Prof. Donald, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. T6G 2H4 496

RANDLE, J.A., Chief Engineer, Generation Planning & Hydrology Dept., Montreal Engineering Co. Ltd., Box 777, Place Bonaventure, Montreal 114, Que. RATH, Dr. Ulrich, CIMM, P. Geol., 1139 C Meadowlands Dr., Ottawa, Ont. K2E 6J5 REDHEAD, Dr. P.A., F.R.S.C., Division of Physics, National Research Council of Canada, Montreal Rd., Ottawa, Ont. K1A OSl RIOPEL, C.R., Acres Consulting Services Ltd., 505-5bb Burrard St., Vancouver 1, B.C. ROBERTSON, E.E., The Biomass Energy Institute Inc., P.O. Box 129 Postal Station 'C, Winnipeg, Man. R3M 3S7 ROBINSON, James, Dept. of Man-Environment Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont. N2L 3Gl ROBSON, Prof. John M. , F.R.S.C, Physics Dept., McGili Univer- sity, Box 6070, Montreal 101, Que. ROGERS, Prof. J.S., Dept. of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. ROGERS, Prof. J.T., Faculty of Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont. K1S 5B6 (and 13 Students) ROSS, D.W., Vice-President, Acres Consulting Services Ltd., 555 Burrard St., Vancouver 1, B.C. ROTH, Dr. Horst, Brinco Ltd., 1 Westmount Square, Montreal 216, Que. ROTHSCHILD, Dr. Henri Charles, National Research Council of Canada, Rm 3100, 100 Sussex Dr., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0R6 ROWLAND, Gerald C, Executive Asst. to Director, Conservation Council of Ontario, 6th Floor, 45 Charles St. E., Toronto, Ont. M4Y 1S2 RYAN, Prof. James 2., Dept. of Chemical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. T6G 2H4 SAMEL, Morris, Securities Dept., Bank of Canada, 234 Wellington St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5A3 SASSANO, Prof. Paul, Dept. of Geology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. T6G 2H4 SCHNEIDER, Dr. W.G., F.R.S.C., President, National Research Council of Canada, Montreal Rd., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0R6 SCHWARZ, Matthias, Energy Development Sector, Dept. of Energy, Mines i& Resources, 5 88 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. SCOTT, Mrs. Edna, iublic Affairs Advisor, Imperial Oil of Canada Ltd., 30 Metcalfe St., Suite 602, Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5L3 SCRUTON, G.H., Director of Studies, The Shawinigan Engineering Co. Ltd., 620 Dorchester Blvd. W., Montreal, Que. SENTANCE, Lawrence C., Executive Director, Assoc. of Profession- al Engineers of Ontario, 236 Avenue Rd., Toronto, Ont. M5R 2J5 SHARP, Dennis A., Walwyn, Stodgell & Co. Ltd., 110 Yonge St., 14th Floor, Toronto, Ont. M5C 1T4 49?

SHAW, _. DeWolf, Oils Analyst, Research Dept., Wood Gundy Ltd., Royal Trust Tower, Box 274 Toronto-Dominion Centre, Toronto, Ont. SIGVALDASON, Dr. Oskar T., Head, Applied Mechanics Dept., Acres Consulting Services Ltd., 5259 Dorchester Rd., Niagara Falls, Ont. L2E 6N8 SIMPSON, Robert A., Head, Mineral Fuel Section. Mineral & Metals Division, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0E4 SMITH, Dr. Charles H., F.R.S.C., Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 SMITH, Dr. E.E.N., Chief Geologist, Eldorado Nuclear Ltd., Rm 800, 151 Slater St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5H3 SMITH, Jim B., Group Manager of Intergrated Financial Planning. Ontario Hydro, 620 University Ave., C-1820 Toronto, Ont. M5G 1X6 SMITHERS, D. Gordon, Bureau of Competition, Government of Canada, Place du Portage, Hull, Que. SPICE, E.B., Canadian Bechtel Ltd., 7 King St. E., Toronto, Ont. M5C 1A2 STEPHENSON, Dr. D.G., Division Bldg. Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0R6 SPRY, Mrs. Irene M., University of Ottawa, 446 Cloverdale Rd., Ottawa, Ont. KIM 0Y6 STEVENS, Dr. William, General Chemistry Branch, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltdr., Chalk River Nuclear Laboratory, Chalk River, Ont. KOJ 1J0 STEWART, Prof. A.T. , F.R.S.C., Dept. of Phyr.ics, Queen's University, Stirling Hall, Kingston, Ont. STEWART, Dr. Ian A., Senior Economic Advisor, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, Rm 321, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 STEWART, Robert C, Public Service Commission, 3,75 Sanford Ave., Ottawa, Ont. K2C 0G1 STRANGE, Dr. Don, Policy Analyst, Treasury Board Secretariate, Place Bell Canada, 160 Elgin St., 20th Floor, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0R5 STRAUB, Miss Alice K., U.S. Embassy, 100 Wellington St., Ottawa, Ont- KIP 5A1

TAYLOR, A., Vice-President, Surveyer, Nenninger & Chenevert Inc., 1550 Blvd. de Maisonneuve W., Montreal, Que. H3G 1N2 TAYLOR, Gordon, Director, Resource Programs Division, Dept. of Finance, 160 Elgin St., 26th Floor, Place Bell Canada, Ottawa, Ont. K2P 2C4 THAUVETTE, Miss Suzelle, Asst. Executive, Canadian Federation of Agriculture, 111 Sparks St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5B5 TOLMIE, u. Ross, flerridge, Toimie, Gray, Coyne & Blair, 116 Albert St., Ottawa, Ont. KIP 5G4 498

TOOMBS, Ralph B., Senior Advisor, Oil & Gas (Canada), Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, Rm 403, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0E4 TUCKER, Brian A., Chief, Technological Forecasting Planning & Evaluation Branch, Office of Science & Technology, Dept. of Industry, Trade & Commerce, 112 Kent St., Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ont. K1A OH5 TUNNICLIFFE, P.R., Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ont. KOJ IPO TURENNE, Gaston, Director of Projects, Hydro-Quebec, 75 Dorchester Blvd. W. , 12th Floor, Montreal 101, Que. TUSCHAK, Dr. T.S., Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 TYSON, Dr. W.R., Physics & Metals Division, Mines Branch, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 56 8 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 THOMAS, Vernon, National Energy Board, 473 Albert St., Trebla Bldg., Ottawa, Ont. KIR 5B3 URSEL, F.G.V., Manager Electric System, Saskatchewan Power Corporation, Head Office, Victoria Ave. & Hamilton St., Regina, Sask. UVIRA, Dr. Jaromir Lev., The Steel Co. of Canada Ltd., Stelco Tower, 24th Floor, Hamilton, Ont.

VAN CLEAVE, A.B., F.R.S.C., Dean of Graduate Studies & Research, University of Saskatchewan, Regina Campus, Regina, Sask. VEDDER, Dr. Willem, General Electric Resource & Development Centre, P.O. Box 8, Schenectady, N.Y. U.S.A. 12345 VLADYKOV, Dr. Vadim D. , F.R.S.C, Prof, of Biology, University of Ottawa, 30 Somerset St. E., Ottawa, Ont. KIN 6N5 WADE. E.J., Mineral Resource Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources, Rm 1611, Whitney Block, Queen's Park, Toronto, Ont. M7A 1W3 WALLACE, I.W., Senior Field Sales Engineer, Tubular Products, The Steel Co. of Canada Ltd., General Office, Stelco Tower, Hamilton, Ont. WARD, Arthur C, F.R.S.C., Atomic Energy Commission Ltd.," Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ont. KOJ 1J0 WARREN, Dr. J.B., F.R.S.C., Director, TRIUMF, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. WHIDDEN, G.W., Trans-Canada Pipelines Ltd., P.O. Box 54, Commerce Court, Toronto, Ont. M5L 1C2 WHITE, Walter E. , The Juliana/ -Kpt. 704, 100" Bronson Ave., Ottawa, Ont. KIR 6G8 499

WHITHAM, Dr. Kenneth, F.R.S.C., Chief Seismology Division, Earth Physics Branch, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 WILLIAMS, R.M., Mineral Division Sector, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, No. 8 Temporary Bldg., Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 WILSON, Prof. G. Peter. Asst= Director, Atlantic Industrial Research, Voluntary Planning of N.S. Institute, P.O. Box 1000, Halifax, N.S. WOOD, Frank N., Province of Nova Scotia, Dept. of Development, P.O. Box 519, Halifax, N.S. WRANGHAM, Brian, Capital Communications Ltd., 151 Slater St., Suite 600, Ottawa, Ont. Kl? 5H3 WRIGHT, Mrs. T.C., Energy Division Section, Dept. of Energy, Mines & Resources, 588 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont. KlA 0E4 WYNNE-Edwards, Dr. H.R., F.R.S.C., Prof. & Head, Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, B.C. Y.iNCHULA, Joseph, Consulting Petroleum Engineer, 8 Windermere Rd., Calgary, Alta. ZEDERAYKO, E.I3., Dominion Securities, Harris Partners, 231 Lake Moraine Place, Calgary, Alta. ZIEMAN, W.E., Coordinator, Special Projects, Imperial Oil Ltd., Ill St. Clair Ave. W., Toronto, Ont. M5W IK 3 ZUPANCIC, Victor, Minerals Market Analyst, Rio Algom Mines Ltd., 120 Adelaide St. W., Toronto, Ont. 500

PROCEEDINGS OF SYMPOSIA COMPTES RENDUS DES COLLOQUES

These brochures, consisting Ces brochures retmissent les of papers presented at communications qui sont symposia, held from time to presenters aux colloques que time by the Society, are pub- la Socigte organise de temps lished, in most cases, as en temps; 3i!x fins d'en reduire simply as possible to keep cost le coQt et d'en assurer to a minimum and to ensure 1'actualite , elles paraissent3 rapid publication. The con- la plupart du temps, sous tents in all cases are pre- une forme aussi simple que sented in English or French, possible, en anglais ou en depending on the language of frangais, selon la langue the speaker. They are sold utilisee par le conferencier. by the Secretariat of the On peut se les procurer au Soci ety. Secretariat de la Societe.

1. F. Kenneth Hare, ed., The Tundra - La Tundra. (1970} $2.00

2. J.E. Watkin, ed., Mercury in Man's Environment - Le mercure dans 1'environnement humain. (1971) $3.00 3. W.C. Brown, ed., Communications into the Home - Les communications au foyer. (1972) $3.00 4. J.T. Wilson, ed., Futures Canada - L'avenir du Canada. (1972) $2.00 5. E. Whalley, S.J. Jones, L.W. Gold, ed., Physics and Chemistry of Ice. (1973) $30.00 6. K.J. La idler, ed., Energy Resources. (1973) $7.00 501

ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA SYMPOSIA

A symposium on "Nicolaus Copernicus," organized by Dr. T.J. Biachut, F.R.S.C, was held in Ottawa on November 28 1973, and a report will be issued as early as possible. In addition, the Society is planning the following symposia, and reports will be issued in due course:

Title Date Place Waste, Recycling and the 22-24 April , 1974 Ottawa Envi ronment

Perspectives in Spectroscopy 4-7 September, 1974 Mont Tremblant (in honour of Dr. Herzberg's 70th birthday)

North American Indians and 19-20 October, 1974 Quebec Eskimos

Glacial Till 17-18 Febr^ry, 1975 Ottawa

Problems of the Atlantic March, 1975 Undeci ded Provinces

Preserving the Canadian October, 1975 Ottawa Heritage