DOCSLIB.ORG

Practical 2-2020.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Practical 2-2020.Indd PRACTICAL WAR TAX RESISTANCE #2 To File or Not to File an Income Tax Return his publication is one of a series of “practicals” that offer ideas, tips, and information for individu- Tals who want to cut off their financial support for the U.S. war machine or are currently practicing war tax resistance. The full list of the “Practical Series” appears at the end of the text along with other resources and can also be found under the “Resources” tab at nwtrcc.org. For reasons of conscience, many people believe that they should resist military spending by refusing to pay federal income taxes. People who are considering war tax resis- tance typically ask, “What should I do when it’s time to file my income tax return?” Many refusers decide not to file returns at all. This pamphlet explores the risks, the benefits, and other consequences for war tax refusers who do file annual tax returns, and for those who do not. PHILOSOPHICAL REASONS Includes: FOR FILING OR NOT FILING Apart from practical personal benefits or risks (see be- Motivations low), many people make a decision on the filing question and based upon ethical, religious, or political beliefs about arguments war tax refusal. Risks and Philosophical arguments for filing returns include: consequences • The idea of equitable taxation for social needs is Practical sound in itself; therefore, we should cooperate with the underlying taxation system while openly benefits resisting only the appropriation of taxes for war. Strategizing • The moral basis of conscientious war tax refusal relies upon open disobedience and acceptance Real-life of consequences. We should resist taxes openly stories and not evade them or conceal our income in any manner. (Although some nonfilers are public about their refusal to file.) 1 • The moral and political impact of conscientious tax refusal comes from informing the IRS and our politi- cal representatives about our protest and the reasons for it. If we refuse taxes without informing the IRS, there will be no political impact, because we will not be clearly distinguishable from millions of others who evade taxes for personal benefit. • The act of political protest within the system is more significant than preventing tax collection itself. If col- lection occurs, it is forced; the resister has not volun- teered money for war Arguments for not filing include: • Because of the domination of militarism, the U.S. tax system is so perverse and distorted that it does not serve a positive social purpose. If we wish to con- tribute to the needs of society, we can do that more effectively by taxing ourselves and contributing to the unmet needs that we see, instead of cooperating with We can have the federal taxation system in any manner. more political • The federal government and the IRS are morally illegiti- and social mate. We have no obligation to cooperate with them or to accept the penalties and harassment that they impact by impose on tax refusers. talking openly • The political impact of filing protest returns is negligi- about our ble. IRS employees are unlikely to pay attention to the tax refusal to protest part; because of their vested interests they are among the people least likely to be influenced by our friends and ideas. We can refuse taxes openly without reporting co-workers... ourselves to the IRS. We can have more political and social impact by talking openly about our tax refusal and with the to friends and co-workers who are more likely to be general public influenced by us, and we can communicate openly with through the general public through leaflets, public education, and letters to periodicals. leaflets, public • Preventing assessment and collection is more signifi- education, cant than tax protest alone, because when we prevent and letters to collection, we are able to use thousands of dollars of uncollected taxes to directly finance political, educa- periodicals. tional, and social causes that meet the true needs of society. If we allow, or assist in, our own assessment and collection we have fewer resources left to devote to the common good. 2 PRACTICAL BENEFITS AND DRAWBACKS Along with philosophical considerations, there are a variety of practical factors to consider in making the filing or not filing decision. There are Those who file income tax returns as required by law pro- a variety vide a lot of information that can help the IRS in collecting of practical the tax. They disclose the amount and the source of their in- come. They disclose the location of assets, such as savings or factors to stocks, which produce income. When they sign an income tax consider in return, showing tax due but not paid, they are also consenting making the to the assessment of the tax. This is an important step in the collection process, because without an “assessment,” volun- filing or tary or involuntary, there can be no collection. Signing a tax not filing return showing tax due is a “self-assessment” that allows the decision. IRS to proceed directly to the collection process. If you do not file your own income tax return, the IRS must file a return in your name, mail you a copy, allow you to ap- peal, and make a final assessment of tax due before they can demand payment and begin the collection process. These steps are time consuming, and each delay may decrease the likelihood that the IRS will ever get to the stage of active col- lection efforts. Delaying assessment and collection efforts has both benefits and drawbacks. The main benefit is that the IRS may never assess or collect the tax at all. The main drawback is that delayed assessment will result in large civil penalties, interest accumulation, and an extended statute of limitations. There are separate penalties for delinquency, negligence, fail- ure to pay estimated tax, late payment, and so forth. The civil penalty for failure to file is independent of, and ten times greater than, the penalty for late payment. When the penalties and interest are added on they often double or triple the total amount claimed by the IRS when they finally get around to processing their claim. To be hit suddenly with assessments for tax liabilities piled up for several years, plus added penalties and interest, can be very intimidating for anyone who feels vulnerable to IRS collection tactics. Until the tax is paid or collected, interest continues to accrue and is compounded daily. Also, when the IRS files for you, they may assert excessive claims, either be- cause they make errors in estimating your income or because they do not allow for exemptions, deductions or credits that you would claim if filing for yourself. Getting the IRS to cor- rect such errors can be complicated and difficult. 3 In addition, if a return is filed, the IRS has only three years to If a return assess (or confirm) the tax due, which is usually done quickly. For a nonfiler, however, there is no “statute of limitations” is filed, the for assessment. The IRS has ten years to collect after an as- IRS has sessment has been made. Also, while some tax resisters have only three been able to defeat collection by declaring bankruptcy, taxes for which no return was filed cannot be “discharged” in bank- years to ruptcy court. (There are many caveats to bankruptcy filings assess the and taxes; if you are seriously considering bankruptcy to re- tax due. For lease tax debt, research it thoroughly.) a nonfiler, For some decades it seemed that not filing a tax return signifi- however, cantly decreased the likelihood that the resisted taxes would be collected. Many nonfilers never heard from the IRS; those there is no who received notices often found there was no effective fol- “statute of low-up, assessment, or attempts to collect. This picture began limitations” to change in the late 1980s when the IRS developed the capa- bility to file skeleton returns automatically, using information for provided by employers and other income payers on annual assessment. W-2 and 1099 reports. The IRS’s ability to assess taxes and penalties against those who do not file has improved and become more efficient in the last couple decades. Still, there are many longtime nonfilers who have had no interaction with the IRS; as far as IRS collection goes, it is always safe to say that some get noticed and some do not. Nonfilers are encouraged to fill out a tax form (current and past years are available at irs.gov) each year and set it aside. If the IRS gets in touch or circumstances change, it can be helpful to have income information for each year readily avail- able rather than having to reconstruct it or accept the IRS’s calculations, which tend to overestimate income. The practical benefits of nonfiling are strong for those who The practical are self-employed or who earn income that is not reported to the IRS on the W-2 or 1099 forms that all income payers are benefits of supposed to file. However, this approach is also not as simple nonfiling are as it used to be. The IRS has instituted reporting require- strong for ments for a much wider range of financial transactions and has tightened the definition of independent contractors. Still, those who as the IRS relies more heavily on computerized and automat- are self- ed processes, their ability to assess taxes against unreported income will probably remain low. employed or who earn It should be noted that self-employment has practical benefits income for those who choose to file. It is more involved, though not impossible, for the IRS to levy the payments to independent that is not contractors, and this can be an obstacle to collection.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radical Environmentalism: the New Civil Disobedience?
    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 6 Issue 1 Fall/Winter 2007 Article 35 November 2007 Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience? Cesar Cuauhtemoc Garcia Hernandez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Hernandez, Cesar Cuauhtemoc Garcia (2007) "Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience?," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1 , Article 35. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol6/iss1/35 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 289 Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience? César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández1 God said, “I have given you every seed-bearing plant which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree that bears fruit with seed. It will be for your food. To every wild animal, to every bird of the sky, to everything that creeps along the ground, to everything that has the breath of life, I give every green plant for food.” So it was. God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. Book of Genesis2 We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlaw Or American Patriot?
    4/13/2007 3:02 PM ****Draft Copy*** Not to be copied or circulated without permission of the author. Outlaw or American Patriot? Francis X. Kroncke 387 Pelham Boulevard The Cottage St. Paul, MN 55104-5251 [email protected] 651-895-0607 ©2007 4/13/2007 3:02 PM Foreword......................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 6 My life on trial ............................................................................................................................ 6 Chapter 1: The Raid...................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2: Key trial profiles ......................................................................................................... 43 The Minnesota 8 ....................................................................................................................... 48 Attorney and Defendant: Me .................................................................................................... 53 Witness: Gordy Nielsen, Vietnam veteran................................................................................ 59 Two Judges ............................................................................................................................... 65 The Twelve Jurors....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Obedience in a Nuclear Age (1988)
    CHRISTIAN OBEDIENCE IN A NUCLEAR AGE A Policy Statement Adopted By The 200th General Assembly (1988) Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) CHRISTIAN OBEDIENCE IN A NUCLEAR AGE A POLICY STATEMENT ADOPTED BY THE 200TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY (1988) PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (U.S.A.) THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (U.S.A.) LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY Copyright © 1988 The Office of the General Assembly, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, photocopying, recording, or otherwise (brief quotations used in magazine or newspaper reviews excepted), without the prior permission of the publisher. Additional copies available at $1.00 each from Presbyterian Distribution Services (specify PDS order #OGA-88-101). Call PDS Toll Free: 1-800- 524-2612. In New Jersey: 1-201-641-2528. Copies of the background papers and appendixes for this statement are available at $2.00 each from the same source (specify PDS order /TOGA- 88-102). The background papers and appendixes were not reviewed or considered by the General Assembly. The 200th General Assembly (1988) adopted the following policy statement and recommendations, as amended. The statement originated in actions of the 195th General Assembly (1983), the 197th General Assembly (1985), and the 199th General As- sembly (1987), in response to overtures from a number of presbyteries. An initial study document prepared by the Advisory Council on Church and Society, along with an extensive body of responses to the study paper, were referred to a task force jointly chaired by the Reverend Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Taxes, War and Mennonites, 1940-1993
    SILENCE AND COURAGE: INCOME TAXES, WAR AND MENNONITES ...............................1940–1993 by Titus Peachey MCC Occasional Paper, No. 18 August 1993 MCC Occasional Papers are a publication of Mennonite Central Committee (MCC). This series features manuscripts by MCC volunteers and staff on topics related to MCC programs and concerns. The papers do not necessarily reflect official MCC policy. ...............................CONTENTS 1. Income Taxes, War, and Mennonites.......................................................................4 a review of U.S. and Canadian income tax history, and Mennonite responses to it. 2. Reflections on War Taxes......................................................................................18 personal reflections on war taxes from MCC workers in North America and around the world. 3. Resource List.........................................................................................................43 a list of additional resources on war taxes for further study. About the Author: Titus Peachey lives in Lancaster, PA, and serves with his wife Linda as Co-coordinator of Peace and Justice Ministries for Mennonite Central Committee’s U.S. program. They are the authors of Seeking Peace, a collection of stories about Mennonites around the world struggling to live their beliefs in peace. In 1986, Titus and Linda conducted research on defense industries in Lancaster County, PA, and published their findings in a paper titled, “World Peace Begins in Lancaster”. From 1981–1985, they worked as directors of MCC’s relief and development program in Laos, where they witnessed the long-term impact of the U.S. bombing campaign during the Indochina War. ...............................FOREWORD “Until the late 1960’s, taxes were raised mainly to fight wars.” Understanding Taxes, 1983, US Dept of Treasury, IRS Publication 21. “Any thoughtful reader searching for a rationale to explain the extraordinary vitality of the income tax can easily find it in one word: war.” The Golden Egg, Gerald Carson, Houghton Mifflin Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships and War Tax Resistance
    PRACTICAL WAR TAX RESISTANCE #8 Relationships and War Tax Resistance his publication is one of a series of “practicals” that offer ideas, tips, and information for individuals who Twant to cut off their financial support for the U.S. war machine or are currently practicing war tax resistance. Other Includes: pamphlets in this series discuss how to control income tax Handling withholding, choosing low income/simple living, self employ- ment, and whether or not to file an income tax return. The full Finances list of the “Practical Series” appears at the end of this text or Filing and under the Resources button at nwtrcc.org. Not Filing Conscientiously opposing war through tax refusal is a stand that takes courage and has risks. Many, if not most, war tax “Mixed resisters (WTRs) deal with concerns about practicing war tax Marriages” resistance while married or in a relationship. Sometimes When One WTRs are in “mixed” relationships, where their partner does is a WTR not resist. Sometimes two WTRs find each other and share and One this common ground. And still other WTRs leave relationships is Not because of the stress caused by their war tax resistance. These are some of the many questions that crop up for WTRs Tips for the from around the country: In love and resistance does one fol- Long Haul low one’s heart or conscience? Are they mutually exclusive? At some point does one or the other win out? What practicali- Easing Out ties need to be considered vis-à-vis one’s partner when taking of Resistance the leap of withholding payment of taxes or committing to a partner if already practicing war tax resistance? How does Raising this differ according to state, age or work status? Children in a WTR Some grappled with finding answers to these questions years Household ago.
    [Show full text]