Marxism Today Is Essential Reading for Everyone Involved in Political and Democratic Questions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marxism Today Is Essential Reading for Everyone Involved in Political and Democratic Questions Marxism Today is essential reading for everyone involved in political and democratic questions. Where else could you get such thoughtful and informa- tive pieces? Happy birthday - warmest congratulations. Lang mae yer lum reek. Gordon McLennan (General Secretary, Communist Party) Reading Marxism Today gives me a bit of mental space in a crowded world. As a woman, however, I would prefer that it enabled me to take space. Inez McCormack (trade union official) For most of its 30 year life, Marxism Today has served with honour the development of marxist-leninist theory; we are sure it will return to its I get Marxism Today. I read it. I wel- historical role again in the future. comed the new format and MT quite Tony Chater (editor, Morning Star) frequently figures in my work and in my social discourse, although I wish it were less London-centred. MT has not yet Happy made itself necessary as a journal but it's on the way. Trevor Griffiths (playwright) Birthday I always read Marxism Today. I don't always agree with it but I think it is a stylish, well-written and beautifully produced magazine. It makes a unique To Us and important contribution to debates' on the Left. In particular, it has made an important intervention in the debate Marxism Today is 30 this month. around the relationship between race, Despite approaching early middle sex and class. I wish it another age, we still seem to be growing - and successful 30 years. far from settling down, we seem to be Diane Abbott (Labour MP) Having foreseen the Steel-Owen di- causing more bother and raising vorce in Marxism Today last March, I more eyebrows than ever before. We am delighted to pay my respects on your 30th birthday. For a bourgeois magazine asked an unscientifically selected to include the views of a simple work- group of readers what Marxism ing-class lad like myself proves what a grand job you're doing. I wonder if Marxism Today has been vital in Today means to them Harry Pollitt reads the wine column. moving the issue of democracy and the Derek Jameson (broadcaster) future of socialism to the centre of political debate in Britain. Ken Livingstone (Labour MP) Marxism Today means I have a grip on the world. I never bullshit without a copy under my arm. Pat Kane (musician, Hue and Cry) Marxism Today is to me like an extreme- ly bright, cheerful little rodent, with bright-rimmed glasses and a bow tie, leaping off a sinking ship. Michael Ignatieff (writer) To me Marxism Today means a con- troversial and very readable journal, one that produces controversy by speaking uncomfortable truths, saying Marxism Today is always worth reading things the Left does not always want to even when it's wrong. hear. However, it must beware of a Clare Short (Labour MP) growing tendency to produce con- troversy for its own sake. I feel that it I'm extremely glad that the Marx has reached a critical juncture; a point brothers' memory is being kept alive where it must be careful not to alienate since their films were among my its readership while maintaining its favourites. Was it Karl who sang? valuable, and necessary, cutting edge. Muriel Grey (broadcaster) David Blunkett (Labour MP) 32 MARXISM TODAY OCTOBER 1987 Marxism Today is to marxism what Eddie Shah is to Today. Ann Pettitfor (Labour activist) You've still got your complement of petty-marxists who spin their beliefs out with all the finesse of single issue fanatics everywhere. Nevertheless you do have some writers who are not ideological about their ideologies. If there was a second coming, I'm sure He would write for you. John McVicar (journalist) It makes me think. George Bolton (president, Scottish NUM) I try to apply my political ideas and I hate being caught on the spot! I get feelings to everything I do - I read most of my political education from Marxism Today because it does the conversations with friends and musi- same. We don't always agree but I cians. When I do see Marxism Today, enjoy it more when we think different- it's a good read. ly than when we think alike. Sarah Jane Morris (musician) Jill Tweedie (writer) I enjoy quarrelling with Marxism To- Marxism Today has been something day. In the average article my 'yes-but's almost entirely new on the Left: always usually start around paragraph three. I open-minded, striving to be fair to its like its intellectual honesty. It rarely opponents, usually jargon-free, and takes refuge in 'scapegoating' or in often a pleasure to read. It is thus in- knee-jerk rhetoric of the 'Thatcher's escapably a symptom of the decline of vicious attacks on' variety. I think its socialism. title is misleading. I see very little Ferdinand Mount (journalist, The Spec- which is classically marxist in its analy- tator) sis, which is presumably why so many marxists hate it. Socialism For The Thinking Yuppie may not be a snappy title but would undoubtedly be a more accurate one. Ann Leslie (journalist, Daily Mail) The great thing about Marxism Today, and especially Martin Jacques, was the courage in taking on established and often fossilised thinking on the Left at a time when to challenge that thinking was regarded as divisive and heretical. Marxism Today opened up, for anyone on the Left prepared to think, major areas of policy and of culture which had been dust-covered for too long and made the job of others like myself much easier. John Lloyd (editor, New Statesman) As a musician I find Marxism Today useful. It takes cultural politics seriously and has become a major force on the Left. Simon Booth (musician, Working Week) Marxism Today has long provided a significant forum for discussions about socialism and we now need to extend the dialogue to include all those who are on the Left. Tony Benn (Labour MP) Best wishes to Marxism Today for Marxism Today is an early warning many tomorrows. system for the movement. You don't Neil Kinnock (leader of the Labour always agree with what it says, but you Party) cannot disregard it. Why does Marxism Today keep asking Tom Sawyer (deputy general secretary, It is very useful to have the credo of the questions like this? If you must know NUPE) greatest ideological influence of the I've just given myself an advance 20th century expressed in such a read- birthday present and taken out a sub to Oh, that's heavy ... I never read it. I able and regular manner. MT. I can't bear to be without it. don't know anything about it. Melvyn Bragg (broadcaster) Joan Ruddock (Labour MP) Paul Smith (fashion designer) 33 MARXISM TODAY OCTOBER 1987.
Recommended publications
  • A Socialist Schism
    A Socialist Schism: British socialists' reaction to the downfall of Milošević by Andrew Michael William Cragg Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Marsha Siefert Second Reader: Professor Vladimir Petrović CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 Copyright notice Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection i Abstract This work charts the contemporary history of the socialist press in Britain, investigating its coverage of world events in the aftermath of the fall of state socialism. In order to do this, two case studies are considered: firstly, the seventy-eight day NATO bombing campaign over the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1999, and secondly, the overthrow of Slobodan Milošević in October of 2000. The British socialist press analysis is focused on the Morning Star, the only English-language socialist daily newspaper in the world, and the multiple publications affiliated to minor British socialist parties such as the Socialist Workers’ Party and the Communist Party of Great Britain (Provisional Central Committee). The thesis outlines a broad history of the British socialist movement and its media, before moving on to consider the case studies in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Far Left from 1956
    The British far left from 1956 EDITED BY EVAN SMITH AND MATTHEW WORLEY Against the grain MANCHESTER 1824 Manchester University Press This content downloaded from 154.59.124.115 on Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:26:06 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms This content downloaded from 154.59.124.115 on Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:26:06 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Against the grain The British far left from 1956 Edited by Evan Smith and Matthew Worley Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed in the United States exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan This content downloaded from 154.59.124.115 on Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:26:06 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Copyright © Manchester University Press 2014 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors, and no chapter may be reproduced wholly or in part without the express permission in writing of both author and publisher. Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk Distributed in the United States exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA Distributed in Canada exclusively by UBC Press, University of British Columbia, 2029 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 978 07190 9590 0 hardback First published 2014 The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for any external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Militancy, Reform and the 1970S: a Review of Recent Contributions to CPGB Historiography
    FJHP Volume 23 (2006) Industrial Militancy, Reform and the 1970s: A Review of Recent Contributions to CPGB Historiography Evan Smith Flinders University The historiography of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) has grown rapidly since its demise in 1991 and has created much debate for a Party seen as only of marginal interest during its actual existence. Since 1991, there have been four single volume histories of the Party, alongside the completion of the ‘official’ history published by Lawrence & Wishart and several other specialist studies, adding to a number of works that existed before the Party’s collapse. In recent years, much of the debate on Communist Party historiography has centred on the Party and its relationship with the Soviet Union. This is an important area of research and debate as throughout the period from the Party’s inception in 1920 to the dissolution of the Communist International (Comintern) in 1943 (and even beyond), the shadow of the Soviet Union stood over the CPGB. However an area that has been overlooked in comparison with the Party in the inter-war era is the transitional period when the CPGB went from being an influential part of the trade union movement to a Party that had been wrought by internal divisions, declining membership and a lowering industrial support base as well as threatened, alongside the entire left, by the election of Margaret Thatcher in 1979. This period of CPGB history, roughly from 1973 to 1979, was heavily influenced by the rise of Gramscism and Eurocommunism, in which a significant portion of the Party openly advocated reforms and a shift away from an emphasis of industrial militancy.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Flying the Red Flag? Communists in the National
    1 ‘FLYING THE RED FLAG? COMMUNISTS IN THE NATIONAL UNION OF MINEWORKERS, 1945-1985’. SHERYL BERNADETTE BUCKLEY Ph.D. Thesis 2015. 2 ‘Flying the Red Flag? Communists in the National Union of Mineworkers, 1945-1985’. Volumes: I Sheryl Bernadette Buckley Submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford School of Arts and Media 2015 3 Contents I Communism and Coal pp.12- 38 1.0 The end p.12 1.1 Being British Communists p.13 1.2 The industrial strategy p.15 1.3 The Labour Party p.20 1.4 Building British Bolsheviks p.23 1.5 Perceptions of the strategy and party responses p.27 1.6 Perceptions of strength p.29 1.7 The CP and the NUM p.31 1.8 Self-identification p.37 II Literature Review pp.38- 61 2.0 Studying the CP and the NUM p.38 2.1 Why communist history? p.37 2.2 Ownership of the communist past p.40 2.3 Transparency p.41 2.4 Debates p.42 2.5 The CP and the Soviet Union p.44 2.6 The Cold War and industrial politics p.44 2.7 The link between King Street and coalfield Communists p.46 2.8 Proving the link: evidence p.48 2.9 Horner and the party p.49 2.1.0 Post-nationalisation changes? p.51 2.1.1 Unofficial strikes p.52 2.1.2 Official strikes p.53 2.1.3 Agitators or instigators? p.54 2.1.4 Wage militancy and surplus labour p.55 2.1.5 Economism and politicisation p.56 2.1.6 Scargillism p.58 2.1.7 Main research objectives and originality p.61 III Sources and Methods pp.62-71 3.0 The Historical Method p.62 3.1 Sources p.62 3.2 Labour History and Study Centre, Manchester p.63 3.3 Working
    [Show full text]
  • Finsbury Communist, No. 363, April 1995
    • • w... •:.f. .. , I ' ' . I' . ~ :.' . ..) ' J ' .. ~· " .,,'-··~'"' ·,. ~ ' i' :, . ..,,, b''• ·. ' '.' :;<~:,:~:-·· ·: ..·· ;t t:'-rls-··.· ury ··· COmmvnist · · · · ·AN ANTI_: REVISIONIST JOURNAL ~ . .' J2B!!!Q~-~ElQ~§-·.QQ~N! In March, shares in National Power & PowerGen were -put on·· t.he .,. market. Millions" 61., s-peculators rushed to buy them. They were qer.tain 'of' . a quick profit frC~m selling them later on. So they: tho~ht; No S:>C)ner had the s-peculators .. boUght til-e shares, however, than Professor Stephen Littlechild, the electricity regulator, announce4 that electricity prices shoUld come down •. ,Luw.er electricity ·prices mean lower electricity pr~fits and lower share prices. The speculators' hopes were da:shed, even th(\ugh they sti-ll made slight nominal profits. ··. ~ . The :following letter appeared in the Morning Star on March 17'th:..;. ··::r "So ·. there is a choice. Windfall profits · for share speculators and fat cat. s~ -Or lower. -prices for electricity consumers. I know which I vreter. · Eec'~~se of aLl the redundancies~ BT, gas. water and electricity · production costs have all gone down sharply. It is abo~t time lower costs led to lower -prices. • R!.. :• , , .\ ~· ' I ·~ .~: ,,. Pens:L~oners' ·organisations, ~n parti6ular, should bring pressure ·to .'· •:·bear···on ·regulatdrs like Prbfessor Littlechild . If the regulators don't regulate pri-ces downwards, they should be replaced." The price cf pro·d.uction is~ ·: appro3ciJ:mately, equal to t}:].e c_ost. 'of production' 'plus an average. pr.ofi t •.~ ~owever 1 . the · privatised utili ties, and big firms generally, have· been having 1t both way~. They. have: been making workers redundant . !3.11 .ovel=:-:-'the place, thereby1 ·red'tl.ci~ · .
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth International a JOURNAL of INTERNATIONAL MARXISM PUBLISHED by the INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE of the FOURTH INTERNATIONAL Volume 13 No
    Fourth International A JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARXISM PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL Volume 13 No. 1 Price: $4.00 Summer 1986 HOW THE WORKERS REVOLUTIONARY PARTY BETRAYED TROTSKYISM 1973 -1985 Statement of the International Committee of the Fourth International Fourth A JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARXISM VOLUME 13 NUMBER 1 SUMMER 1986 International EDITORIAL BOARD: David North, editor Peter Schwarz Chris Talbot Nick Beams Keerthi Balasuriya Editorial 3 HOW THE WORKERS REVOLUTIONARY PARTY BETRAYED TROTSKYISM 1973- 1985 Statement of the International Committee of the Fourth International PART ONE From Trotskyism to Opportunism 1. Why the WRP Collapsed 7 2. Internationalism and the Fight for Trotskyism in Britain 10 3. Conflict with the OCI 16 4. The Founding of the Workers Revolutionary Party 19 5. The Expulsion of Alan Thornett 21 6.1975: The Year of the Great Shift 26 7. The Labour Government in Crisis 30 8. The Trial of the "Observer" Lawsuit 33 9. The Fourth Congress of March 1979 34 10. The Election Campaign 35 11. The Degeneration of the Party Regime 37 12. The Right-Centrist Leaven of Ultra-Left Downsliding 38 13. 1981: The WRP Embraces the Popular Front 39 14. All Power to the GLC! 41 15. The WRP Attacks the Trade Unions 42 16. Towards the Party of Law and Order 43 PART TWO The Permanent Revolution Betrayed 17. The WRP Abandons the Proletariat of the Backward Countries 45 18. The Evolution of WRP Policy in the Middle East 46 19. Perspectives of the Fourth Congress of the WRP (March 1979) 47 20.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 New Times, New Politics History and Memory During the Final Years Of
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in British Politics 6:4 (2011), pp. 453-78. The definitive publisher-authenticated version (doi:10.1057/bp.2011.24) is available online at: http://www.palgrave- journals.com/bp/journal/v6/n4/full/bp201124a.html New Times, New Politics History and memory during the final years of the CPGB Dr Emily Robinson, University of Nottingham Abstract This article examines the relationship between collective memory, historical interpretation and political identity. It focuses on the dissolution of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) and particularly on the effects of the collapse of the USSR on both the identity of its members, as constructed through collective narrative memory, and on Marxist interpretations of history. The CPGB provides a powerful example of the interplay between history, memory and political identity. Marxism is particularly closely connected with the discipline of academic history: its political analysis being explicitly based on a theory of historical development. Moreover, the small size and intense commitment of the CPGB meant that it developed an unusually strong mnemonic culture. The divisions within both the party itself and the wider Marxist community, which stretched from 1956 right through until 1991, were often framed around questions of historical interpretation. The events of 1989-91 created an historical and mnemonic crisis for CPGB members who struggled to reconcile their past identities with their present situation. Unlike the outward-facing revisionism of other political parties, this was an intensely personal affair.
    [Show full text]
  • New Times, New Politics: History and Memory During the Final Years of the CPGB
    New times, new politics: history and memory during the final years of the CPGB Article (Unspecified) Robinson, Emily (2011) New times, new politics: history and memory during the final years of the CPGB. British Politics, 6. pp. 453-478. ISSN 1746-918X This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/48327/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in British Politics 6:4 (2011), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Joan Bellamy Jon Bloomfield Communist Party of Chile Editorial
    MarxismTbday 'heoretical and Discussion Journal of the Communist Party June 1975 30 pence Editorial Comments Joan Bellamy Imperialism and Some Problems of the Third World Jon Bloomfield A Caricature of Marxism Communist Party Manifesto: To the Party and People of Chile of Chile John Chambers Discussion: Norman Lucas ThePRODUCED Communis BYt Part UNZ.ORGy and Developments in British Culture ELECTRONICA Cry fo REPRODUCTIONr Clarity PROHIBITED MarxismTbday Theoretical and Discussion Journal of the Communist Party Volume 19, Number 6 Editorial Correspondence James Klugmann, 16 King Street, Editor James Klugmann WC2E8HY Editorial Board Advertisements Doris Allison, above address Irene Brennan/Gabriel Carritt/Tony Chater Jack Cohen/Maurice Cornforth/Maurice Dobb Orders and Subscriptions John Foster/John Gollan/Arnold Kettle Usual Agents or Central Books Ltd., John Mahon/Betty Matthews/Allan Morton 37 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8PS Bert Pearce/Mike Seifert/George Wake Nick Wright Subscription Rates £4.00 per annum CONTENTS Editorial Comments 161 Joan Bellamy Imperialism and Some Problems of the Third World 168 Review Article: Jon Bloomfield A Caricature of Marxism 178 Document: Communist Party of Chile Manifesto: To the Party and People of Chile .. 181 Discussion Contributions: John Chambers The Communist Party and Developments in British Culture 190 Norman Lucas A Cry for Clarity 192 The front cover was designed by Pa iCook. The picture is from a Mayakovsky poster (see Editorial Comment on "Mayakovsky's Windows")- SERIES ON 'MARXISM AND THE
    [Show full text]