DOCSLIB.ORG

Non-Controlling Interests Accounting Under Ind AS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Non-Controlling Interests Accounting Under Ind AS 1 Non-controlling interests accounting under Ind AS Introduction The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) changed the term ‘minority interest’ to ‘Non-Controlling Interest’ (NCI) in 2008 in the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The change in terminology reflects the fact that an owner of a minority interest in an entity might control that entity and, conversely, that the owners of a majority interest in an entity might not control the entity. Therefore, NCI is This article aims to a more accurate description than minority interest of the interest of those – Provide an overview of the accounting of owners who do not have a controlling interest in an entity. non-controlling interests under Ind AS. Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) are converged with IFRS and therefore, Ind AS 110, Consolidated Financial Statements defines NCI as equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Ind AS 110 requires a parent to present NCI in the Consolidated Financial Statements (CFS) within equity, separately from the equity of the owners of the parent. For example, if a parent owns 80 percent of a subsidiary directly and the remaining 20 percent is owned by a third party, then in the parent’s CFS the 20 percent interest held by the third party is presented as NCI in that subsidiary (within equity). This is because existence of NCI in the net assets of a subsidiary does not give rise to a present obligation, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow of economic benefits from the group. It represents equity i.e. residual interest in the assets of the entity after deducting all its liabilities. On the other hand, Accounting Standards (AS) use the term minority interest and not NCI. AS 21, Consolidated Financial Statements, defines minority interest as that part of the net results of operations and of the net assets of a subsidiary attributable to interests which are not owned, directly or indirectly through subsidiary(ies), by the parent. AS 21 prescribes that while preparing CFS a parent is required to identify and present minority interest separately from liabilities and the equity of the parent’s shareholders. Thus, under AS minority interest is not presented as part of equity. NCI can be categorised as: • Present ownership interests that entitle their holders to a proportionate share of the entity’s net assets in liquidation (ordinary NCI) • All other NCI (other NCI) e.g. equity components of convertible bonds or options under share-based arrangements, etc. © 2017 KPMG, an Indian Registered Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 2 Measurement of NCI and further losses are adjusted For example, the parent buys against the parent’s share, except shares from, or sells shares to, Ind AS 103, Business Combination where the minority has a binding NCI or the subsidiary issues new requires that for each business obligation to make good such shares or reacquires its shares. combination, where an acquirer losses. does not acquire 100 per cent of a As per Ind AS 110, transactions subsidiary, then the acquirer can • Potential voting rights and the that result in changes in elect on a transaction-by-transaction NCI proportion ownership interests while basis to measure ordinary NCI on As per the requirements of retaining control are accounted initial recognition either at: Ind AS 110, the determination for as transactions with equity holders in their capacity as • Fair value at the date of of control of an entity takes equity holders. As a result, no acquisition, which means that into account potential voting gain or loss on such changes goodwill, or the gain on a bargain rights that are substantive. is recognised in profit or loss; purchase, includes a portion However, Ind AS clarifies that instead, it is recognised in attributable to ordinary NCI; or NCI is generally based on current ownership interests because this equity. Also, no change in the • The holders’ proportionate corresponds to the economic carrying amounts of assets interest in the recognised amount interests of the parties. (including goodwill) or liabilities of the identifiable net assets of is recognised as a result of such the acquiree, which means that This includes in substance current transactions. goodwill, or the gain on a bargain ownership interest i.e. as a result The interests of the parent and purchase, relates only to the of a transaction that gives it NCI in the subsidiary are adjusted controlling interest acquired. access to the returns associated with an ownership interest. to reflect the relative change in This accounting policy choice relates In this case, the proportion their interests in the subsidiary’s only to the initial measurement of allocated to the parent and NCI is equity. As per Ind AS 110, any ordinary NCI. After initial recognition, determined by taking into account difference between the amount the option of measuring ordinary NCI the eventual exercise of those by which NCI are adjusted and at fair value is not available. potential voting rights and other the fair value of the consideration paid or received is recognised Measurement of other NCI derivatives that currently give the entity access to the returns directly in equity and attributed to The accounting policy choice associated with an ownership the owners of the parent. These available to ordinary NCI (as interest. principles also apply when a explained above) does not apply subsidiary issues new shares and to ‘other NCI’. Such instruments • Calculation of Earnings Per the ownership interests change are measured as prescribed by the Share (EPS) as a result. relevant Ind AS. For the purpose of calculating EPS • Non-reciprocal capital based on CFS, the entity would contribution: Practical application areas consider profit or loss attributable Sometimes an entity receives While preparing CFS, a parent may to the ordinary equity holders of amounts from shareholders in have to consider some practical the parent entity and if presented, the form of capital contributions, application areas while accounting profit or loss from continuing being either cash or other non- and presenting NCI. Some of the operations attributable to those monetary assets, which are significant areas are as follows: equity holders. non-reciprocal - i.e. no financial • Attribution of profit and losses The Ind AS Transition Facilitation or non-financial obligation exists. Group (ITFG) of the Institute As per Ind AS 110, an entity is This may happen, for example, of Chartered Accountants of required to attribute the profit or when an entity requires additional India (ICAI) in its recent bulletin, loss and each component of other financing or is in financial difficulty. Bulletin 111 also reiterated that comprehensive income to the Amounts might be received while calculating EPS, profit or owners of the parent and to the from all shareholders or only loss attributable to the parent NCI. Additionally, Ind AS requires certain shareholders. The non- entity refers to profit or loss of the an entity to allocate the losses reciprocal capital contributions consolidated entity after adjusting incurred by subsidiary between made by a parent to a non-wholly profit attributable to NCI. the parent and NCI even if it owned subsidiary should be allocated proportionately to NCI, results in a negative balance of • Sale/purchase of equity the NCI. Whereas under AS 21, if interest to/from NCI: After a i.e. they should be accounted the losses attributable to minority parent has obtained control of a for as transactions between interest in a subsidiary exceed the subsidiary, there may be a change shareholders, which have a direct minority interest in the equity of in its ownership interest in that impact on equity. the subsidiary, then such excess subsidiary without losing control. 1. Ind AS Transition Facilitation Group (ITFG) of ICAI issues Clarifications Bulletin 11 dated 1 August 2017 © 2017 KPMG, an Indian Registered Partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 3 For example: Company X makes attributable to NCI would not be and the NCI. If an impairment loss non-reciprocal capital contribution recognised in the parent’s CFS. attributable to a NCI relates to of 100 to its subsidiary, Y, in However, in this case, goodwill goodwill that is not recognised in which it holds a 75 per cent attributable to NCI is included in the parent’s CFS, that impairment interest. The NCI in Y makes no the recoverable amount of the is not recognised as a goodwill capital contribution. As per NCI related CGU or group of CGUs. impairment loss. In such cases, accounting an amount of INR25 only the impairment loss relating Hence, while conducting is allocated to NCI and INR75 is to the goodwill that is allocated impairment testing of goodwill, in allocated to parent equity directly to the parent is recognised as a this case, the carrying amount of in equity in the CFS of X. goodwill impairment loss. goodwill allocated to such a CGU • Impairment testing of cash- or group of CGUs is grossed up to Presentation in the financial generating units with goodwill include the unrecognised goodwill statements and NCI attributable to the NCI. This In the parent’s CFS, as mentioned Ind AS 36, Impairment of adjusted carrying amount is then above, NCI are presented within Assets requires an entity to compared with the recoverable equity, separately from the equity of test goodwill acquired in a amount of the unit to determine the owners of the parent. Therefore, business combination each year whether the CGU is impaired.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frs 102 Factsheet 6 Business Combinations
    FRS 102 FACTSHEET 6 BUSINESS COMBINATIONS Business combinations A business combination is defined as the bringing together of separate entities or businesses into one reporting entity and may be structured in a number of ways for legal, taxation or other reasons. It may involve the purchase by an entity of the equity of another entity, the purchase of all the net assets of another entity, the assumption of the net liabilities of another entity, or the purchase of some of the net assets of another entity that together form one or more businesses. Section 19 Business Combinations and Goodwill sets out the requirements for business combinations. This section also includes the requirements for group reconstructions, however, this is not covered in this factsheet. This factsheet has been prepared to provide a high level overview to entities applying FRS 102 that undertake a business combination for the first time covering the following: • An outline of the purchase method • The separation of intangible assets from goodwill • Illustrative disclosures This factsheet has been prepared by FRC staff and provides high level guidance to entities applying FRS 102 that undertake a business combination for the first time. It should not be relied upon as a definitive statement on the application of the standard nor is it a substitute for reading the detailed requirements of FRS 102. FRS 102 Factsheet 6 1 December 2018 The Purchase Method Key FRS 102 references The purchase method is the required accounting treatment for the vast majority of business 19.6, 19.7 combinations1 and involves the following steps: 1) Identify an acquirer This is the entity which obtains control of other combining entities or businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity;
    MICHAEL MORTELL Senior Managing Director Digital Media; Mergers & Acquisitions; Private Equity; Restructuring; Strategy 485 Lexington Avenue, 10th Michael Mortell is a Senior Managing Director at Ankura Capital Advisors, Floor New York, NY 10017 based in New York. Mike has extensive experience advising entrepreneurs +1.212.818.1555 Main and companies on mergers, acquisitions, strategic and business planning, +1.646.291.8597 Direct restructuring, and capital raising alternatives. Over a career in investment banking and consulting, he has cultivated expertise in the digital media and [email protected] private equity industries and developed strong relationships within them. Mike has a proven record of identifying young, high-potential companies, and providing the strategical and tactical counsel that supports growth EDUCATION objectives and positions them for future success. He also has advised MBA, University or Chicago owners/shareholders of established companies on strategic growth and Booth School of Business liquidity options. In addition to his work in digital media, he has significant BS, Finance Fairfield University experience in the e-commerce, software, retail, specialty manufacturing, and business services sectors. Prior to joining Ankura, Mike was a senior advisor at GP Bullhound, a CERTIFICATIONS boutique investment bank that acquired AdMedia Partners, the M&A FINRA Series 24, 7, 79 and 63 advisory firm where he served as a managing director. He previously ran the Private Equity Financing Group of Prudential Securities and worked for Zolfo, Cooper and Company where he was a consultant to troubled companies and their creditors. Mike also co-founded and managed Grandwood Capital LLC, an investment bank and advisory firm focused on middle-market companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Issues to Consider for Large Block Minority Shareholder Redemptions Jeffrey S
    Shareholder Forensic Analysis Insights Valuation Issues to Consider for Large Block Minority Shareholder Redemptions Jeffrey S. Burns and Nathan P. Novak The purpose of this discussion is to identify certain issues to consider when performing a valuation analysis for the purpose of a closely held company shareholder redemption. Specifically, the focus of this discussion is on certain qualitative and quantitative factors that commonly arise when a closely held company is going through the process of redeeming or buying out an ownership interest of a significantly large but noncontrolling shareholder. Several considerations that are unique to large block noncontrolling shareholder redemptions are discussed below. Additionally, an example is provided to illustrate how certain of the issues can occur and can be handled in a hypothetical, but realistic, situation. NTRODUCTION such as if a shareholder claims he or she is being I oppressed by the company and a court orders that A shareholder redemption, as that term is used company to redeem the oppressed shareholder’s throughout this discussion, occurs when a share- shares. holder (or otherwise owner) of a company sells his or her shares back to the company. The shares may This discussion focuses on the valuation issues be retired or may be distributed among the remain- that arise during a litigious shareholder redemp- ing shareholders. tion, such as the issues related to the dissociation of an owner. Further, there are certain issues that Ultimately, the result is the same either way: are unique to the redemption of a noncontrolling 1. There will be one less shareholder. shareholder that holds a significantly large block of the company stock.
    [Show full text]
  • FR Y-9C, FR Y-9LP, FR Y-9SP, FR Y-9CS and FR Y-9ES; OMB No
    Supporting Statement for Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9C, FR Y-9LP, FR Y-9SP, FR Y-9CS and FR Y-9ES; OMB No. 7100-0128) Summary The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, under delegated authority from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), proposes to revise, without extension,1 the following mandatory reports for implementation in March and June 2009. (1) the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9C; OMB No. 7100-0128) and (2) the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9SP; OMB No. 7100-0128). This family of reports also contains the following mandatory reports, which are not being revised: (1) the Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Large Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9LP; OMB No. 7100-0128), (2) the Financial Statements for Employee Stock Ownership Plan Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9ES; OMB No. 7100-0128), and (3) the Supplement to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9CS; OMB No. 7100-0128). Pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, the Federal Reserve requires bank holding companies (BHCs) to provide standardized financial statements to fulfill the Federal Reserve’s statutory obligation to supervise these organizations. BHCs file the FR Y-9C and FR Y-9LP quarterly, the FR Y-9SP semiannually, the FR Y-9ES annually, and the FR Y-9CS on a schedule that is determined when the supplement is used. The Federal Reserve proposes the following revisions to the FR Y-9C effective March 31, 2009: (1) new data items and revisions to existing data items on trading assets and liabilities, (2) new data items associated with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 16 ESTIMATING EQUITY VALUE PER SHARE in Chapter 15, We Considered How Best to Estimate the Value of the Operating Assets of the Firm
    1 CHAPTER 16 ESTIMATING EQUITY VALUE PER SHARE In Chapter 15, we considered how best to estimate the value of the operating assets of the firm. To get from that value to the firm value, you have to consider cash, marketable securities and other non-operating assets held by a firm. In particular, you have to value holdings in other firms and deal with a variety of accounting techniques used to record such holdings. To get from firm value to equity value, you have to determine what should be subtracted out from firm value – i.e, the value of the non-equity claims in the firm. Once you have valued the equity in a firm, it may appear to be a relatively simple exercise to estimate the value per share. All it seems you need to do is divide the value of the equity by the number of shares outstanding. But, in the case of some firms, even this simple exercise can become complicated by the presence of management and employee options. In this chapter, we will measure the magnitude of this option overhang on valuation and then consider ways of incorporating the effect into the value per share. The Value of Non-operating Assets Firms have a number of assets on their books that can be categorized as non- operating assets. The first and obvious one is cash and near-cash investments – investments in riskless or very low-risk investments that most companies with large cash balances make. The second is investments in equities and bonds of other firms, sometimes for investment reasons and sometimes for strategic ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Demystifying Equity Financing
    Chapter 6 Demystifying Equity Financing by James Macon, Principal, Barbour Alliance L3C Above images used with the permission of Ben Waterman. 31 The Equity Model Equity is a representation of ownership in an enterprise allocated to individuals or other entities in the form of ownership units (or shares). Equity can be used as a financing tool by for-profit businesses in exchange for ownership (control) and an expected return to investors. Unlike many debt financing tools, equity typically does not require collateral, but is based on the potential for creation of value through the growth of the enterprise. Equity investors may not require ongoing interest payments, however, the future return expectations are higher than debt, ranging from 8% to more than 25% per year over the life of the investment. The primary considerations for any enterprise considering equity are 1) the level of ownership and thus control the founders are willing to relinquish in their enterprise; and 2) the ability to deliver the level of return expected by the equity investors. The two primary categories of equity are “common” shares (typically for founders and employees) and “preferred” shares Words of Caution: (typically for investors). Preferred shares include special features Farmers who seek outside capital through any process or “terms” to sweeten and protect the investment. Such features should consider carefully structuring the agreement to include liquidation preference (right to redeem their allocation of maintain management control. Farmers should also proceeds from a sale of the business before common shareholders), consider carefully limiting the capacity of investors to anti-dilution protection (protecting the value of preferred equity withdraw capital before the business can withstand a units at the expense of common shareholders should the value withdrawal of capital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Equity Capital for Reits: an Examination of Three Asset-Pricing Models
    MIT Center for Real Estate September, 2000 The Cost of Equity Capital for REITs: An Examination of Three Asset-Pricing Models David N. Connors Matthew L. Jackman Thesis, 2000 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000. This paper, in whole or in part, may not be cited, reproduced, or used in any other way without the written permission of the authors. Comments are welcome and should be directed to the attention of the authors. MIT Center for Real Estate, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building W31-310, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4307 (617-253-4373). THE COST OF EQUITY CAPITAL FOR REITS: AN EXAMINATION OF THREE ASSET-PRICING MODELS by David Neil Connors B.S. Finance, 1991 Bentley College and Matthew Laurence Jackman B.S.B.A. Finance, 1996 University of North Carolinaat Charlotte Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2000 © 2000 David N. Connors & Matthew L. Jackman. All Rights Reserved. The authors hereby grant to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic (\aopies of this thesis in whole or in part. Signature of Author: - T L- . v Department of Urban Studies and Planning August 1, 2000 Signature of Author: IN Department of Urban Studies and Planning August 1, 2000 Certified by: Blake Eagle Chairman, MIT Center for Real Estate Thesis Supervisor Certified by: / Jonathan Lewellen Professor of Finance, Sloan School of Management Thesis Supervisor
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking the Myths and Mysteries of Chapter 14
    Unpacking the Myths and Mysteries of Chapter 14 Christine Quigley ∙ Schiff Hardin LLP Nathan Brown ∙ Proskauer Rose LLP May 6, 2016 1. Code § 2701: The First of the Special Valuation Rules1 a. Generally, Code § 2701 applies any time an individual “transfers” an equity interest in a privately held entity to a “member of the transferor’s family,” if, immediately after such transfer, the transferor or one or more “applicable family members” holds an equity interest in the entity that is classified as an “applicable retained interest.”2 b. If Code § 2701 applies, the gift tax value of the transferred interest is determined under the so-called “subtraction method.”3 In its most simple form, the subtraction method determines the gift tax value of the transferred equity interest by subtracting the value of all equity interests in the entity held by the transferor (and applicable family members) immediately after the transfer from the aggregate value of all equity interests in the entity held by the transferor (and applicable family members) immediately before the transfer. c. If the retained equity interest is an applicable retained interest, its value for purposes of applying the subtraction method is zero (the “zero value rule”).4 The result of the zero value rule is that, for gift tax purposes, the transferor is treated as transferring not only the actual gifted interest, but all applicable retained interests as well. This can result is a significant, unexpected gift tax liability. d. Code § 2701 is riddled with defined terms that must be fully understood before one can properly determine whether Code § 2701 applies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Earning Per Share and Return on Equity on Stock Price
    SA ymTsuHltRifaeEcvetePIdMhreavirePwmjoA2ur0nCa2l Ti0n;t1hOe1fi(eF6ld)o:Ef1ph2Aa8rmR5a-cNy12I8N9 G PER SHARE AND RETURN ON EQUITY ON STOCK PRICE a JaDajeapnagrtBmaednrtuozfaAmcacnounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Siliwangi University of Tasikmalaya [email protected] ABSTRACT Research conducted to determine the effect of Earning Per Share and Return on Equity on Stock Prices, a survey on the Nikkei 225 Index of issuers in 2018 on the Japan Stock Exchange. the number of issuers in this study was 57 issuers. The data taken is the 2018 financial report data. Based on the results of data processing with the SPSS version 25 program shows that Earning Per Share and Return on Equity affect the Stock Price of 67.3% and partially Earning Per Share has a positive effect on Stock Prices. Furthermore, Return on Equity has a negative effect on Stock Prices. If compared to these two variables, EPS has the biggest and significant influence on stock prices, however, Return on Equity has a negative effect on stock prices Keywords: Earning Per Share, Return on Equity and Stock Price INTRODUCTION Investors will be sure that the investment can have a People who invest their money in business are interested positive impact on investors. Thus, eps is very important in the return the business is earning on that capital, for investors in measuring the success of management in therefore an important decision faced by management in managing a company. EPS can reflect the profits obtained relation to company operations is the decision on the use by the company in utilizing existing assets in the of financial resources as a source of financing for the company.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Expansion of New York State Real Estate Transfer Tax March 27, 2017
    CLIENT MEMORANDUM Proposed Expansion of New York State Real Estate Transfer Tax March 27, 2017 On January 23, Governor Cuomo introduced proposed legislation to the New York State Legislature implementing his 2017-2018 budget proposal. One proposal (contained in the Revenue Article VII Bill) would expand the New York State Real Estate Transfer Tax (“NY State RETT”) to apply to transfers of minority interests in certain entities holding New York State real property if the value of the real property is at least 50% of the value of all of the entity’s assets. If enacted, this would amount to a significant expansion of the tax. There is a separate New York City real estate transfer tax which is not implicated by the Governor’s proposal. See Part JJ (p. 206) of the proposed legislation and Part JJ (p. 39) of the official Memorandum of Support. On March 15, the New York State Assembly and New York State Senate each passed one-house budget resolutions and corresponding legislation. The Assembly’s version of the budget adopted the NY State RETT minority transfer legislative language proposed by Governor Cuomo without change. The Senate’s version removed the proposed changes to the NY State RETT entirely. The passage of the one-house budget resolutions marks the official start to the final negotiations over the state budget in advance of the new fiscal year, which begins April 1. Current Law. NY State RETT is generally imposed at a rate of 0.4 percent on transfers of interests in real property, including transfers of a “controlling interest” in an entity with an interest in New York real property (regardless of the relative value of the entity’s real estate assets).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Economic Value Added
    Understanding Economic Value Added By David Harper (Editor In Chief - Investopedia Advisor) http://www.investopedia.com/university/EVA/ Thanks very much for downloading the printable version of this tutorial. As always, we welcome any feedback or suggestions. http://www.investopedia.com/investopedia/contact.asp Table of Contents 1) Introduction 2) Economic Value Added: Overview 3) Calculating NOPAT 4) Calculating Invested Capital 5) Pulling It All Together: Calculating And Understanding Economic Value Added 6) What Does Economic Value Added Really Mean? 7) Conclusion Introduction From a commercial standpoint, Economic Value Added (EVA™) is the most successful performance metric used by companies and their consultants. Although much of its popularity is a result of able marketing and deployment by Stern Stewart, owner of the trademark, the metric is justified by financial theory and consistent with valuation principles, which are important to any investor's analysis of a company. To many, the EVA™ metric (also known as "economic profit") basks in a mystique of complexity. But this tutorial will show you that this complexity is only an illusion. In fact, the entire metric is a development of three simple ideas: cash is king; some expense dollars are really investments in "disguise"; and equity capital is expensive. To help you understand EVA™ and its components, we devote each chapter of this tutorial to exploring a different conceptual aspect of economic value added (EVA™) and demonstrating the associated calculations. Over the course of these chapters, we build an EVA™ calculation for the Walt Disney Co (DIS), a publicly traded company, using recent financial statements. And, at the end of this study of EVA™, we compare it to other performance metrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Financial Statements
    332 Accounting Standard (AS) 21 Consolidated Financial Statements Contents OBJECTIVE SCOPE Paragraphs 1-4 DEFINITIONS 5-6 PRESENTATION OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 7-8 SCOPE OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 9-12 CONSOLIDATION PROCEDURES 13-27 ACCOUNTING FOR INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES IN A PARENT’S SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 28 DISCLOSURE 29 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS 30 Consolidated Financial Statements 307 Accounting Standard (AS) 21 Consolidated Financial Statements1 (This Accounting Standard includes paragraphs set in bold italic type and plain type, which have equal authority. Paragraphs in bold italic type indicate the main principles. This Accounting Standard should be read in the context of its objective and the General Instructions contained in part A of the Annexure to the Notification.) Objective The objective of this Standard is to lay down principles and procedures for preparation and presentation of consolidated financial statements. Consolidated financial statements are presented by a parent (also known as holding enterprise) to provide financial information about the economic activities of its group. These statements are intended to present financial information about a parent and its subsidiary(ies) as a single economic entity to show the economic resources controlled by the group, the obligations of the group and results the group achieves with its resources. Scope 1. This Standard should be applied in the preparation and presentation of consolidated financial statements for a group of enterprises under the control of a parent. 2. This Standard should also be applied in accounting for investments in subsidiaries in the separate financial statements of a parent. 3. In the preparation of consolidated financial statements, other Accounting Standards also apply in the same manner as they apply to the separate 1It is clarified that AS 21 is mandatory if an enterprise presents consolidated financial statements.
    [Show full text]