Dc0001910-Socialatlas08 [Application/Pdf]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2007/2008 Contents Foreword 2Heelands 81 Executive Summary 3 Hodge Lea 82 Introduction 5 Kents Hill 83 Floor Targets 5 Kingsmead 84 Milton Keynes summary of trends 6 Lathbury 85 Borough Profile 7-22 Lavendon 86 Estates & Settlements 23 Leadenhall 87 Overall estate rankings 24 Little Brickhill 88 Data definitions and methods 25-27 Loughton 89 Estate level indicators 28 Loughton Lodge 90 Summary of indicators for estates 29-30 Medbourne 91 Estate summary of trends 31-32 Middleton/Milton Keynes Village 92 Astwood 33 Monkston 93 Bancroft 34 Monkston Park 94 Bancroft Park 35 Moulsoe 95 Beanhill 36 Neath Hill 96 Blakelands 37 Netherfield 97 Blue Bridge 38 New Bradwell 98 Bolbeck Park 39 Newport Pagnell 99 Bow Brickhill 40 Newton Blossomville 100 Bradville 41 North Crawley 101 Bradwell 42 Oakhill 102 Bradwell Common 43 Old Farm Park 103 Brickfields 44 Old Wolverton 104 Broughton & Atterbury 45 Oldbrook 105 Browns Wood 46 Olney 106 Caldecotte 47 Oxley Park 107 Calverton 48 Peartree Bridge 108 Campbell Park 49 Pennyland 109 Castlethorpe 50 Ravenstone 110 Central Bletchley 51 Shenley Brook End 111 Central Milton Keynes 52 Shenley Church End 112 Chicheley 53 Shenley Lodge 113 Clifton Reynes 54 Sherington 114 Coffee Hall 55 Simpson 115 Cold Brayfield 56 Springfield 116 Conniburrow 57 Stacey Bushes 117 Crownhill 58 Stantonbury 118 Denbigh East 59 Stoke Goldington 119 Downhead Park 60 Stony Stratford 120 Downs Barn 61 Tattenhoe 121 Eaglestone 62 Tinkers Bridge 122 Emberton 63 Two Mile Ash 123 Emerson Valley 64 Tyringham & Filgrave 124 Far Bletchley 65 Walnut Tree 125 Fenny Stratford 66 Walton Park 126 Fishermead 67 Warrington 127 Fullers Slade 68 Water Eaton 128 Furzton 69 Wavendon 129 Galley Hill 70 Wavendon Gate 130 Gayhurst 71 West Bletchley 131 Giffard Park 72 Westcroft 132 Granby 73 Weston Underwood 133 Grange Farm 74 Willen 134 Great Holm 75 Willen Park 135 Great Linford 76 Woburn Sands 136 Greenleys 77 Wolverton 137 Hanslope 78 Woolstone 138 Hardmead 79 Woughton Park 139 Haversham/Little Linford 80 Woughton-on-the-Green 140 1 Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2007/2008 Foreword Foreword from Dr D. Gray, Deputy Director of Public Health Neighbourhoods are complicated places and no two are the same, in looks, feel or atmosphere. It is difficult to catch the true character of an area in numbers, but there are some indicators that can at least start to paint a picture. Now in its seventh year, the Social Atlas collates and monitors a wide range of these social and economic indicators to provide a broad brush picture for each estate and settlement in the borough. This annual snap-shot of the situation in terms of education, income, community safety and health and disability can start to help us understand better the rich tapestry of different communities that exist in Milton Keynes. The information in this Social Atlas will be of interest and use to every agency and organisation that works with communities in Milton Keynes, as well as to the communities themselves. I trust you will find the 2008 Social Atlas of Milton Keynes a useful resource and tool. Dr Diane Gray Deputy Director of Public Health Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust/Milton Keynes Council In case of queries about the data, contact either: Lesley Potter Paul Edwards Milton Keynes Intelligence Milton Keynes Intelligence Spatial Planning Division Spatial Planning Division Milton Keynes Council Milton Keynes Council PO Box 112, Civic Offices PO Box 112, Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes, MK9 3HQ Central Milton Keynes, MK9 3HQ 01908 252269 01908 254257 [email protected] [email protected] 2 Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2007/2008 Executive Summary Milton Keynes as a whole is relatively affluent and most people enjoy a good quality of life but significant numbers of residents experience disadvantage in one or more categories. In the Social Atlas these are divided into indicators around income; children & education; older people; community factors and health & disability. • Income On average 197 out of 1,000 population in Milton Keynes get housing or council tax benefit, a means tested benefit. The highest rate is 561 out of 1,000 in Beanhill. • Children & Education There are seven indicators in this category covering a diverse range of topics affecting children. They include family referrals to Children’s Social Care where the data could not be updated from last year. Numbers of children getting free school meals is a traditional indicator of disadvantage that shows a large variation across estates. The average is 11% of pupils with the highest, 40%, in Granby. As educational attainment has a strong association with future disadvantage, the remaining 3 indicators focus on this. To try to estimate the proportion of young people not going into higher education we look at the proportion of 18-24 year olds not getting student awards. The average across Milton Keynes is 86% but the highest can be found in Netherfield where 98% of young people are not in receipt of student awards. The remaining indicators look at educational attainment in schools. Firstly, the proportion attaining below level 4 in Key Stage 2 English. Milton Keynes average is 235 per 1,000 pupils, with great variation across estates. The English average is 200 per 1,000. Performance has improved since introduction of the tests. In 1997, nationally 37% of pupils were failing to reach level 4, and 41% of pupils in Milton Keynes. The second of these indicators assesses the proportion of pupils gaining less than 5 GCSEs at grade A*-C, for the first time including Mathematics and English. The Milton Keynes average is 610 per 1,000 pupils, the highest is 1,000 in 5 estates. The English average is 532 per 1,000 pupils. • Older People On average 78 out of 1,000 pensioners are clients of Older People’s Services. • Community Factors Community factors include those affecting how people feel about their home environment. There are several different factors in this category including domestic fires; categories of recorded crime; tenure; neighbour complaints and a measure of community involvement. Domestic fires have been found to correlate strongly with disadvantage. Looking over a rolling 5-year period, on average there were 10 fires per 1,000 dwellings in Milton Keynes from 2002 to 2007. The highest was 70 per 1,000 dwellings in Granby. Crime data has been included for violent crime, burglaries and criminal damage. The highest rates of both violent crime and criminal damage occur in Central Milton Keynes because of the high visitor population. Considering neighbour complaints to Environmental Health: on average there were 18 complaints per 1,000 dwellings, the highest rate was in Peartree Bridge with 57 complaints per 1,000. • Health & Disability There are 6 health and disability indicators listed in the grid profiles, although only 4 of these are used in the calculation of the overall rankings. Teenage conceptions: on average there were 52 conceptions per 1,000 girls aged 15 to 19. The numbers are small so a 2-year average time period is considered. Disabled concessionary fares and clients of disabled services are included as pointers towards areas where the population has a greater need for support. Some of the variations in these factors are explained by the dominant style of dwelling in the estate, for example more bungalows. The final 3 indicators focus on hospital activity. The emergency admission rate was 96 per 1,000 population per year. Granby has the highest rate of 244 per 1,000. Non- emergency hospital admissions were included for information; this indicator was not included in the overall rankings. Visits to accident and emergency were also included in the estate profiles for the first time this year. 3 Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2007/2008 Introduction The purpose of this series of documents is to enable people working towards Social Inclusion to identify: • the most significant social inclusion issues • geographic concentrations of need • the relative severity of social exclusion compared with other areas and the national picture • a snapshot position • geographic areas and issues where development of services and initiatives might be focused • measure change and to prompt discussion on possible causes of inequality and suggestions for actions to achieve im- provement. The data used are primarily locally collected data, intended to highlight areas with a high need for public services. Earlier work included developing a framework to structure information gathering, along the lines of those used by the government in “Opportunity for All” and by bodies such as the Joseph Rowntree Trust. The framework has the following categories: • income • children • young adults • adults aged 25 to retirement • older people • community factors • health and disability The indicators included this year are directly comparable, with the only difference being the inability to get family referals data due to a change in computer systems. This should be resolved by next year. The ideals restricting choices for indicators are that: • they should be capable of being collected at ward and/or below ward level • they should be commonly available across all local authorities • they should allow for national comparisons • they should have an acknowledged relationship with disadvantage. Useful developments since the first document have been: 1. The setting up of the Office for National Statistics website for the Neighbourhood Statistics Service. Extensive amounts of data, from the 2001 census and other administrative data sources, are available at local level at no cost. The site can be found at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/neighbourhood-statistics.asp 2. The development and updating of the Index of Multiple Deprivation, a multi-dimensional indicator available to lower-super output area level, published in 2000, 2004 and 2007.