Dc0001910-Socialatlas08 [Application/Pdf]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dc0001910-Socialatlas08 [Application/Pdf] Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2007/2008 Contents Foreword 2Heelands 81 Executive Summary 3 Hodge Lea 82 Introduction 5 Kents Hill 83 Floor Targets 5 Kingsmead 84 Milton Keynes summary of trends 6 Lathbury 85 Borough Profile 7-22 Lavendon 86 Estates & Settlements 23 Leadenhall 87 Overall estate rankings 24 Little Brickhill 88 Data definitions and methods 25-27 Loughton 89 Estate level indicators 28 Loughton Lodge 90 Summary of indicators for estates 29-30 Medbourne 91 Estate summary of trends 31-32 Middleton/Milton Keynes Village 92 Astwood 33 Monkston 93 Bancroft 34 Monkston Park 94 Bancroft Park 35 Moulsoe 95 Beanhill 36 Neath Hill 96 Blakelands 37 Netherfield 97 Blue Bridge 38 New Bradwell 98 Bolbeck Park 39 Newport Pagnell 99 Bow Brickhill 40 Newton Blossomville 100 Bradville 41 North Crawley 101 Bradwell 42 Oakhill 102 Bradwell Common 43 Old Farm Park 103 Brickfields 44 Old Wolverton 104 Broughton & Atterbury 45 Oldbrook 105 Browns Wood 46 Olney 106 Caldecotte 47 Oxley Park 107 Calverton 48 Peartree Bridge 108 Campbell Park 49 Pennyland 109 Castlethorpe 50 Ravenstone 110 Central Bletchley 51 Shenley Brook End 111 Central Milton Keynes 52 Shenley Church End 112 Chicheley 53 Shenley Lodge 113 Clifton Reynes 54 Sherington 114 Coffee Hall 55 Simpson 115 Cold Brayfield 56 Springfield 116 Conniburrow 57 Stacey Bushes 117 Crownhill 58 Stantonbury 118 Denbigh East 59 Stoke Goldington 119 Downhead Park 60 Stony Stratford 120 Downs Barn 61 Tattenhoe 121 Eaglestone 62 Tinkers Bridge 122 Emberton 63 Two Mile Ash 123 Emerson Valley 64 Tyringham & Filgrave 124 Far Bletchley 65 Walnut Tree 125 Fenny Stratford 66 Walton Park 126 Fishermead 67 Warrington 127 Fullers Slade 68 Water Eaton 128 Furzton 69 Wavendon 129 Galley Hill 70 Wavendon Gate 130 Gayhurst 71 West Bletchley 131 Giffard Park 72 Westcroft 132 Granby 73 Weston Underwood 133 Grange Farm 74 Willen 134 Great Holm 75 Willen Park 135 Great Linford 76 Woburn Sands 136 Greenleys 77 Wolverton 137 Hanslope 78 Woolstone 138 Hardmead 79 Woughton Park 139 Haversham/Little Linford 80 Woughton-on-the-Green 140 1 Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2007/2008 Foreword Foreword from Dr D. Gray, Deputy Director of Public Health Neighbourhoods are complicated places and no two are the same, in looks, feel or atmosphere. It is difficult to catch the true character of an area in numbers, but there are some indicators that can at least start to paint a picture. Now in its seventh year, the Social Atlas collates and monitors a wide range of these social and economic indicators to provide a broad brush picture for each estate and settlement in the borough. This annual snap-shot of the situation in terms of education, income, community safety and health and disability can start to help us understand better the rich tapestry of different communities that exist in Milton Keynes. The information in this Social Atlas will be of interest and use to every agency and organisation that works with communities in Milton Keynes, as well as to the communities themselves. I trust you will find the 2008 Social Atlas of Milton Keynes a useful resource and tool. Dr Diane Gray Deputy Director of Public Health Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust/Milton Keynes Council In case of queries about the data, contact either: Lesley Potter Paul Edwards Milton Keynes Intelligence Milton Keynes Intelligence Spatial Planning Division Spatial Planning Division Milton Keynes Council Milton Keynes Council PO Box 112, Civic Offices PO Box 112, Civic Offices 1 Saxon Gate East 1 Saxon Gate East Central Milton Keynes, MK9 3HQ Central Milton Keynes, MK9 3HQ 01908 252269 01908 254257 [email protected] [email protected] 2 Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2007/2008 Executive Summary Milton Keynes as a whole is relatively affluent and most people enjoy a good quality of life but significant numbers of residents experience disadvantage in one or more categories. In the Social Atlas these are divided into indicators around income; children & education; older people; community factors and health & disability. • Income On average 197 out of 1,000 population in Milton Keynes get housing or council tax benefit, a means tested benefit. The highest rate is 561 out of 1,000 in Beanhill. • Children & Education There are seven indicators in this category covering a diverse range of topics affecting children. They include family referrals to Children’s Social Care where the data could not be updated from last year. Numbers of children getting free school meals is a traditional indicator of disadvantage that shows a large variation across estates. The average is 11% of pupils with the highest, 40%, in Granby. As educational attainment has a strong association with future disadvantage, the remaining 3 indicators focus on this. To try to estimate the proportion of young people not going into higher education we look at the proportion of 18-24 year olds not getting student awards. The average across Milton Keynes is 86% but the highest can be found in Netherfield where 98% of young people are not in receipt of student awards. The remaining indicators look at educational attainment in schools. Firstly, the proportion attaining below level 4 in Key Stage 2 English. Milton Keynes average is 235 per 1,000 pupils, with great variation across estates. The English average is 200 per 1,000. Performance has improved since introduction of the tests. In 1997, nationally 37% of pupils were failing to reach level 4, and 41% of pupils in Milton Keynes. The second of these indicators assesses the proportion of pupils gaining less than 5 GCSEs at grade A*-C, for the first time including Mathematics and English. The Milton Keynes average is 610 per 1,000 pupils, the highest is 1,000 in 5 estates. The English average is 532 per 1,000 pupils. • Older People On average 78 out of 1,000 pensioners are clients of Older People’s Services. • Community Factors Community factors include those affecting how people feel about their home environment. There are several different factors in this category including domestic fires; categories of recorded crime; tenure; neighbour complaints and a measure of community involvement. Domestic fires have been found to correlate strongly with disadvantage. Looking over a rolling 5-year period, on average there were 10 fires per 1,000 dwellings in Milton Keynes from 2002 to 2007. The highest was 70 per 1,000 dwellings in Granby. Crime data has been included for violent crime, burglaries and criminal damage. The highest rates of both violent crime and criminal damage occur in Central Milton Keynes because of the high visitor population. Considering neighbour complaints to Environmental Health: on average there were 18 complaints per 1,000 dwellings, the highest rate was in Peartree Bridge with 57 complaints per 1,000. • Health & Disability There are 6 health and disability indicators listed in the grid profiles, although only 4 of these are used in the calculation of the overall rankings. Teenage conceptions: on average there were 52 conceptions per 1,000 girls aged 15 to 19. The numbers are small so a 2-year average time period is considered. Disabled concessionary fares and clients of disabled services are included as pointers towards areas where the population has a greater need for support. Some of the variations in these factors are explained by the dominant style of dwelling in the estate, for example more bungalows. The final 3 indicators focus on hospital activity. The emergency admission rate was 96 per 1,000 population per year. Granby has the highest rate of 244 per 1,000. Non- emergency hospital admissions were included for information; this indicator was not included in the overall rankings. Visits to accident and emergency were also included in the estate profiles for the first time this year. 3 Social Atlas for Milton Keynes 2007/2008 Introduction The purpose of this series of documents is to enable people working towards Social Inclusion to identify: • the most significant social inclusion issues • geographic concentrations of need • the relative severity of social exclusion compared with other areas and the national picture • a snapshot position • geographic areas and issues where development of services and initiatives might be focused • measure change and to prompt discussion on possible causes of inequality and suggestions for actions to achieve im- provement. The data used are primarily locally collected data, intended to highlight areas with a high need for public services. Earlier work included developing a framework to structure information gathering, along the lines of those used by the government in “Opportunity for All” and by bodies such as the Joseph Rowntree Trust. The framework has the following categories: • income • children • young adults • adults aged 25 to retirement • older people • community factors • health and disability The indicators included this year are directly comparable, with the only difference being the inability to get family referals data due to a change in computer systems. This should be resolved by next year. The ideals restricting choices for indicators are that: • they should be capable of being collected at ward and/or below ward level • they should be commonly available across all local authorities • they should allow for national comparisons • they should have an acknowledged relationship with disadvantage. Useful developments since the first document have been: 1. The setting up of the Office for National Statistics website for the Neighbourhood Statistics Service. Extensive amounts of data, from the 2001 census and other administrative data sources, are available at local level at no cost. The site can be found at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/neighbourhood-statistics.asp 2. The development and updating of the Index of Multiple Deprivation, a multi-dimensional indicator available to lower-super output area level, published in 2000, 2004 and 2007.
Recommended publications
  • Site Allocations Plan: Emerging Preferred Options, October 2015
    Development Plans Site Allocations Plan Emerging Preferred Options Consultation October 2015 www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning-policy Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 What is the purpose of this consultation? 4 3 Site Allocations Plan so far 5 4 Land supply requirement 6 5 The sites 8 6 The assessment process 11 7 Determining preferred options 14 8 Sustainability Appraisal and other evidence 16 Appendix A - List of sites and maps 17 Appendix B - Revised assessment framework 69 Appendix C - Employment Land Study site rankings 75 Appendix D - Surgery capacity 77 Appendix E - Site assessment summary and rankings 79 Options, referred P Emerging Plan: Allocations Site | Council 2015 Keynes Milton October 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 All Local Planning Authorities have a duty to allocate sufficient land to enable homes to be built to satisfy local housing need. Milton Keynes Council established in its Core Strategy a target of delivering 28,000 homes in the period from 2010 to 2026; an average of 1,750 homes per year. This target is split 26,240 in the urban area and 1,760 across the rural rest of the Borough. 1.2 There is a need to ensure that there is choice and flexibility in land supply across the Borough. This will help maintain completion rates and enable the Council to demonstrate it has a five year supply of land, which is a strict government requirement. Problems with this can arise because, despite there being enough land available, it is not being built out quickly enough to meet the Core Strategy’s annual housing targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Research & Intelligence
    Legend Borough Boundary Parish Wards PARISH PARISH WARD Parish boundary Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP CENTRAL BLETCHLEY Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP MANOR NORTH Parish Wards Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP EATON SOUTH Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP FENNY STRATFORD Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP NEWTON LEYS Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP MANOR SOUTH Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP EATON NORTH Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP QUEENSWAY AND DENBIGH WEST Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP GRANBY Bradwell CP BRADWELL Bradwell CP BRADWELL COMMON Bradwell CP HEELANDS Campbell Park CP WOOLSTONE Campbell Park CP SPRINGFIELD Campbell Park CP WILLEN AND NEWLANDS Campbell Park CP OLDBROOK Campbell Park CP FISHERMEAD Great Linford CP NEATH HILL Great Linford CP REDHOUSE PARK Great Linford CP GREAT LINFORD Great Linford CP WILLEN PARK Great Linford CP DOWNS BARN Great Linford CP CONNIBURROW Great Linford CP DOWNHEAD PARK Great Linford CP GIFFARD PARK AND BLAKELANDS Great Linford CP BOLBECK PARK AND PENNYLAND Newport Pagnell CP NEWPORT PAGNELL NORTH Newport Pagnell CP NEWPORT PAGNELL SOUTH Shenley Brook End CP FURZTON SOUTH Shenley Brook End CP EMERSON VALLEY SOUTH Shenley Brook End CP SHENLEY LODGE Shenley Brook End CP SHENLEY BROOK END Shenley Brook End CP TATTENHOE Shenley Brook End CP FURZTON NORTH Shenley Brook End CP EMERSON VALLEY NORTH Shenley Brook End CP KINGSMEAD Shenley Brook End CP WESTCROFT Shenley Church End CP CROWNHILL Shenley Church End CP GRANGE FARM AND HAZELEY Shenley Church End CP SHENLEY CHURCH END Shenley Church
    [Show full text]
  • MK Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development
    October 2016 Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas FINAL Landscape Sensitivity Study to Residential Development in the Borough of Milton Keynes and Adjoining Areas 1 St John’s Square Final Report London, EC1M 4DH T: +44 (0)207 253 2929 Prepared by Gillespies LLP F: +44 (0)207 253 3900 October 2016 www.gillespies.co.uk Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Identification of Development Model and Landscape Attributes 8 4 Susceptibility Criteria 8 5 Assessment of Landscape Sensitivity to Residential Development 10 6 Landscape Assessments 11 INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction 1.1.1 Milton Keynes Council (MKC) is currently developing 1.1.3 The main aims of this study are; a new Local Plan. Planning to meet housing need will be a key part of Plan:MK. This is to comply with the requirement in the To assess the sensitivity of the 30 landscape areas around National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Paragraph 14) that Milton Keynes, Newport Pagnell, Woburn Sands and Olney to residential development Local Plans should met objectively-assessed needs unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably To identify where particular land areas may have greater or outweigh the benefits, or that specific policies in the NPPF indicate less capacity for residential development that development should be restricted. In assessing potential site options, the NPPF states that ‘allocations of land for development should prefer land of less environmental value’ (Paragraph 17). The Local Plan should bring forward allocations which are consistent with these various requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do YOU Think?
    Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Consultation December 2020 What do YOU think? Contents Letter from the Steering Group Page 1 What You Told Us Page 3 Policy Intents Page 7 Design and Energy Efficiency Page 8 Non-designated Heritage Assets Page 9 Important Views Page 10 Designated Local Green Spaces Page 13 Green and Blue Infrastructure Network Page 14 Footpaths and Bridleways Page 16 Cycleways Page 18 Community Facilities Page 19 Traffic Page 20 Economy, Employment and Agriculture Page 20 Site Assessment Page 21 Questionnaire – insert Photo credit: Thank you to Laura Boddington who supplied most of the photographs. Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group and Haversham-cum-Little-Linford Parish Council have been working for a considerable time to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan for the Parish. We have been assisted in this by Oneill Homer, a leading consultancy who have assisted Parish and Town Councils around the country to produce well over 100 Neighbourhood Plans, including several in Milton Keynes. The cost of this consultancy work has been paid for by a government grant. What is a Neighbourhood Plan? A document that sets out planning policies for the neighbourhood area – planning policies are used to decide whether to approve planning applications. Written by the local community, the people who know and love the area, rather than the Local Planning Authority. A powerful tool to ensure the community gets the right types of development, in the right place. What is this document for? We had hoped to hold a public meeting / exhibition to discuss the significant work undertaken so far and find out YOUR views of our policy intents and the potential development sites offered by landowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Bus Routes
    A B C D E F G H J K X60 to Aylesbury X5 to Buckingham and Oxford 33 33A to Northampton M 37 to Olney 1 N and Buckingham M o rt o h Q t a ueen o m E r p l w ea HAVERSHAM t no d o r oa a n R ©P1ndar S ©P1ndar y tr ee on R t rt o ve a ol d X60 W 1 A ©P1ndar 1 5 d ©P1ndar oa Stony Stratford R am sh 6 X60 er av H 33A 37 33 ©P1ndar POETS ©P1ndar Stratford Roa d ©P1ndar Wolverton Road ©P1ndar OLD ESTATE LATHBURY ©P1ndar Slated Row ©P1ndar WOLVERTON H ©P1ndar 6 School ©P1ndar i g 2 ©P1ndar h W S Wolverton o t X60 r r ©P1ndar e Rail Station d ©P1ndar e s w to Olney and t Str Urban Bus Routes 21 at 6 WOLVERTON ford 5 7 33 33A o Lavendon ©P1ndar 4 4 R r L oa t MILL 6 d h o 310 ©P1ndar 37 to Astwood ©P1ndar NEWPORT n A d d a o ©P1ndar v o n en The ©P1ndar ue PAGNELL R R ©P1ndar n d Radcliffe April 2021 Westb o Wolverton ©P1ndar u r t y School ©P1ndar p ©P1ndar L m ad t a a o e n R ©P1ndar h n ©P1ndar t e ©P1ndar e o ©P1ndar X5 r r gt t o in S er WOLVERTON N h X6 r ©P1ndar S o ©P1ndar 2 ©P1ndar 2 A s 2 d 2 5 37 n ©P1ndar 4 i ©P1ndar 37 21 W STONY Wolverton ©P1ndar ©P1ndar Church Street 5 Newport Pagnell STRATFORD 7 OAKRIDGE Market Hill 33 ©P1ndar ©P1ndar Ne PARK ©P1ndar ©P1ndar 4 5 6 7 wport ©P1ndar R REDHOUSE ©P1ndar S o ©P1ndar 1 2 21 37 C10 l A NEW ad a ©P1ndar r e PARK ©P1ndar R d d 33 33A 310 ©P1ndar n o v erto ad ©P1ndar lv e w i ©P1ndar o V 7 W ©P1ndar BRADWELL ©P1ndar r ad 6 ©P1ndar ©P1ndar Ro 4 L e Wolverton ©P1ndar a GREENLEYS l D 33A ©P1ndar l CALVERTON n l ©P1ndar L l 21 ©P1ndar e a 21 e ©P1ndar H ©P1ndar i n ©P1ndar gh Street X60 n 33
    [Show full text]
  • Unrestricted Total Restricted Total Total 1St Emerson & Furzton Guides
    Unrestricted Restricted Total Total Total 1st Emerson & Furzton Guides 50 50 1st Emerson & Furzton Guides 120 120 1st Emerson & Furzton Guides 48 48 1st Shenley Brook End Brownies 50 50 1st Shenley Brook End Brownies 7 7 1st Shenley Brook End Brownies 65 65 1st Shenley Brook End Rainbows 70 70 1st Shenley Brook End Rainbows 60 60 1st Whitehouses Rainbows 300 300 2nd Loughton Guides 200 200 326 Hanslope After School Club 180 0 180 5th Newport Pagnell Brownies 48 48 5th Newport Pagnell Scout Group 1,496 1,496 Acornfields Community Interactions CIC 1,000 1,000 Age UK Milton Keynes 1,500 1,500 Age UK Milton Keynes 41,016 41,016 Age UK Milton Keynes 25,000 25,000 Age UK Milton Keynes 50 50 Akota British Bangladeshi Community in MK 1,000 1,000 Arabian School of Gymnastics 182 1,818 2,000 Arta & Heritage Alliance MK 4,800 4,800 Arts Gateway MK 2,000 2,000 Arts Gateway MK 520 520 Aspects Trust 1,100 1,100 Awake to Know Africa 1,000 1,000 Baba Zorawa Lunch Club 1,500 1,500 Beanhill Action Group 962 962 Bletchley Old Peoples' Welfare Committee 1,070 1,070 Bletchley Town Cricket Club 1,000 1,000 British Blind Sport 715 715 British Red Cross Society 874 874 Broughton Cycling Group 197 197 Broughton & Brooklands Community Connectors 300 300 Broughton Cycling Group 1,968 1,968 BucksVision MK 50 50 BucksVision MK 150 150 Camphill MK Communities 922 922 Care Services (MK) CIC 5,000 5,000 Carers Trust Thames 330 330 Carers Trust Thames 75 75 Chicheley Village Hall 5,000 5,000 Child Bereavement UK 500 1,000 1,500 Child Bereavement UK 2,000 18,000 20,000
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice
    PUBLIC NOTICE THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MILTON KEYNES (WOLVERTON ROAD, NEWPORT PAGNELL) (TEMPORARY CLOSURE) ORDER 2021 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Council of the Borough of Milton Keynes has on 8th June 2021 made the above Order under Section 14(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. The effect of the above-named Order will be to temporarily prohibit vehicles from entering, waiting or proceeding along Wolverton Road, Newport Pagnell (at the M1 bridge) between Little Linford Lane roundabout and Giffard Park Roundabout. in order to enable Highways England to carry out the following essential works as part of the ‘M1 T3 smart motorway’ project: (1) Installation of temporary protection above the road, (2) Installation of environmental barrier panels to the bridge parapets, (3) Removal of the temporary protection above the road and in the interest of public safety. The affected length of road will be closed between the hours of 9:30am and 4:30pm every day (Monday to Friday) between 14th June 2021 and 9th July 2021. The road will be re-opened to the public during the hours of 4:30pm and 9:30am (Monday – Friday) and fully opened at weekends. Alternative routes (whilst Wolverton Road is closed): Motorists: The alternative route will be via Brickhill Street (V10), Monks Way (H3) and Marsh End Road (Vice Versa). Pedestrians: Access for pedestrians will be maintained throughout the closure via a Banksman on site For information on any affected bus service please visit the Council website at: https://www.milton- keynes.gov.uk/highways-and-transport-hub/bus-and-taxi/bus-service-disruptions-and-diversions.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Milton Keynes in Buckinghamshire
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Milton Keynes in Buckinghamshire Report to the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions August 2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2001 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 255 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 33 APPENDIX A Final Recommendations for Milton Keynes: Detailed Mapping 35 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for the new town of Milton Keynes and Bletchley is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND? The Local Government Commission for England is an independent body set up by Parliament. Our task is to review and make recommendations to the Government on whether there should be changes to local authorities’ electoral arrangements. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire
    Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire Archaeological Watching Brief for The Parks Trust CA Project: 660924 Site Code: GLM17 CA Report: 17554 HER Ref: EMK1317 October 2017 Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire Archaeological Watching Brief CA Project: 660924 Site Code: GLM17 HER Ref: EMK1317 CA Report: 17554 Document Control Grid Revision Date Author Checked by Status Reasons for Approved revision by A 6/9/17 SB and AKM JN Draft Internal review B 10/10/17 AKM PB Draft Internal review MLC This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology © Cotswold Archaeology Great Linford Manor Park, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire: Archaeological Watching Brief CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................ 4 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................... 5 4. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 6 5. RESULTS (FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • MK Cycling Map a Map of the Redways and Other Cycle Routes in Milton Keynes
    MK Cycling Map A map of the Redways and other cycle routes in Milton Keynes www.getcyclingmk.org Stony Stratford A B C Little D Riv E Linford er Great O Nature Haversham Dovecote use Reserve Ouse Valley Park Spinney Qu e W en The H Grand Union Canal a A5 Serpentine te i E r g le L h a se Haversham a n u S Riv t O ne o er Grea Village School t r r e S e tr Burnt t e et Covert Sherington Little M Russell Linford 1 Stony Stratford Street Ouse Valley Park Park L Library i School St Mary and St Giles t t Lakelane l Ousebank C of E Junior School Co e lt L Spinney WOLVERTON s H i ol n m f MILL Road o Old W r Wolverton Ro olv Manor d ad Strat Tr ert ford Road on L ad i R Farm a Lathbury o n oad n R Slated Row i e n t t y Ouse Valley Park to STONY e School g R n e i o r r t Stantonbury STRATFORD a OLD WOLVERTON Haversham e L d h o S Lake y S n r Lake a d o W o n WOLVERTON MILL W d n Portfields e Lathbury a s e lea EAST W s R S s o E Primary School t House s tr R oa at e b C n fo r o hi u e r u ch n e d c rd ele o d The R r O rt u o y swo y H e Q ad n r y il t Radcliffe t l lv R h 1 a i n Lan 1 e v e e Ca School Wolverton A r er P r G Gr v L e eat e v Wyvern Ou a i n R M se Bury Field l A u k il d School l L e e i H din i l y gt a t s f le on A t al WOLVERTON MILL l o n e e G ve C Wolverton L r h G u a L a d venu Queen Eleanor rc i A SOUTH r h Library n n S C Primary School e A tr R Blackhorse fo e H1 at M y ee d - le t iv n r a y sb e Stanton REDHOUSE d o a u r Bradwell o Lake g d R r V6 G i a L ew y The r n Newport n n o g o e Low Park PARK a
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Proposals for the Future Boundaries of Bletchley
    The Review Officer (Milton Keynes) Layden House 76-86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG 12 October 2012. Sent by e mail to [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam, Alternative proposals for the future Boundaries of Bletchley. We write to you as chair and vice chair of We st Bletchley parish council. We are writing in a personal capacity as the parish council was not able to discuss the boundaries. We are concerned that the proposals agreed by Milton Keynes Council will undermine the long term viability and cohesion of the Bletchley area and the two parish councils that serve the area. We note that Bletchley & F enny Town Council has taken a v iew that it wants to see its boundaries respected in any war ding proposal. We share that view and believe that both Bletchley parish council areas should be retained with no par ish wards divided off. We are aware that what the B&F town council seek cannot be secured within paris h boundaries. Both its objective and our approach can be secured within the two parish boundaries. Aims We would like to see ward boundaries that: . Respect the existing collective boundaries of the two parish councils . Keep communities together whilst achieving electoral parity. Retain long standing community relationships . Address the linking of areas that are a long way apart. 1 Our objections to the Council proposals. Milton Key nes Counc il agreed it s submission on the 9 October. Their pro posals from Milton Keynes Council remove a ke y area within West Bletchley, the Scot s estate.
    [Show full text]