Some Notes About the Outline and Bibliography That Follow 1. The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some Notes About the Outline and Bibliography That Follow 1. The Some notes about the outline and bibliography that follow 1. The outline is a journey through monastic history from its beginnings up to and inclusive of the 19th century. The outline has been broken up into what seems to be reasonable portions. 2. The bibliography that follows each portion of the outline generally records books/articles which would be most helpful to the portion of the outline listed above. The bibliography does not pretend to be exhaustive. Further, some books listed in one section may be helpful in other sections of the outline though the book’s title may not be recorded a second time. 3. The outline in its entirety would take about a year to complete provided that one met with the novice every weekday for an hour. Perhaps a rough schedule could look like the following: Part I: Background for the Rise of Christian Monasticism may take three weeks provided that one emphasized the scriptural roots and the figure and teaching of Origen. Part II: Pre-Benedictine Monasticsm may take five to six weeks. One would need to emphasize Egyptian monasticism, St. Basil, Evagrius of Pontus, St. Augustine, St. Jerome, and John Cassian while taking less time on Palestian and Syrian monasticism. Part III: The Life and Rule of St. Benedict of Nursia may take three weeks. Part IV: Section 1 may take three weeks emphasizing the Celtic form of monasticism as well as the missionaries whose work set the stage for the medieval world. Part IV: Section 2 may take three weeks emphasizing Charlemagne and his associates made to the spread of the RB. Part IV: Section 3 may take two weeks with its study of Cluny. Part IV: Section 4 may take two weeks with its study of the Cistercian order. Part IV: Section 5 may take a week. Part IV: Section 6 may take at least three weeks with its study of the Protestant Reformation and the beginnings of new congregations. Part IV: Section 7 may take four weeks to complete with a study of the Enlightenment, a study of what seems to be death of the monastic life, its revival, and the monastic life’s entry to America. All of the above would add up to 30 weeks. If one completed the outline in 30 weeks, then that would reflect serious study and effort. Not every novitiate, or novice master, or novice is built for such endurance. I would advise that one takes what one can from the outline and adapt it to one’s needs and inclinations. Outline for an Introduction to the Tradition of Monastic Spirituality Introduction 1. The meaning of the terms a. Introduction b. Tradition c. Spirituality 2. Monasticism as a Universal Phenomenon a. Marginality, the basic sociological factor of Monasticism b. Non-Christian and Christian monasticism 1. Non-Christian monasticism: the Facts, the Structures, the Motivations 2. Christian Monasticism a. Motives influenced by other cultures or religions b. Specifically Christian motives Part I: Background for the Rise of Christian monasticism A. Monastic currents outside of Judaeo-Christian Revelation 1. Far Eastern Religions (especially Hinduism and Buddhism) 2. The Greco-Roman World a. The Pythagoreans b. The Cynics c. The Stoics d. Neo-Platonism 3. Persian Influences B. Monastic currents in Judaism 1. The Essenes and Qumran 2. The Therapeuts C. Scriptural Roots of Monasticism 1. The Old Testament 2. The New Testament D. Pre-Monastic Christian Asceticism 1. Virginity and Ascetics in the 1st centuries 2. Martyrdom 3. Origen’s Ascetical-Mystical teaching 4. Rigorist and Unorthodox tendencies E. The immediate origins of Christian monasticism Some suggested resources: Piefer, Claude. “Reclaiming the Monastic Tradition.” American Benedictine Review 42:2 (June 1991): 202-211. Bouyer, Louis, Introduction to Spirituality, Translated by Mary Ryan Perkins. New York: Desclee, 1961, chaps. one and two. Endress, Richard. “The Monastery as a Liminal Community.” American Benedictine Review, 26:2 (June 1975): 142-153. “Neo-Pythagoreanism”, H.S. Long, New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2nd ed., 2003. “Essenes”, John J. Collins, Anchor Bible Dictionary, vol.2, 1992, 619-626. Fitzmyer, Joseph. Responses to One Hundred One questions on the Dead Sea Scrolls. New York: Paulist Press, 1992. Desprez, Vincent. “Jewish Ascetical Groups at the time of Christ: Qumran and the Therapeuts,” American Benedictine Review 41:3 (September 1990): 291-311. Piefer, Claude. “The Biblical Foundations of Monasticism.” Cistercian Studies 1 (1966): 7-31. “Virginity” Ignace de la Potterie, Dictionary of Biblical Theology, ed. Xavier Leon-Dufour, Seabury Press, 1973, pp. 635-637. Ramsey, Boniface. Beginning to Read the Fathers. New York: Paulist Press, 1985, pp. 136-148. Clark, Elizabeth A. Women in the Early Church. Message of the Church Fathers. Wilmington, Del.: Michael Glazier, 1983, pp. 15-25. Brown, Peter. The Body and Society. Lectures on the History of Religions. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988, pp. 418-423. Becker, Ernest. The Denial of Death, New York: Free Press / London: Collier-Macmillan, 1973, pp. 163-165. Kardong, Terrence. “John Cassian’s Teaching on Perfect Chastity”, American Benedictine Review 30 (1979) pgs. 249-263. Russell, Kenneth. “Cassian on a Delicate Subject”, Cistercian Studies 27 (1992) pgs. 1-12. Bouyer, Louis. The Spirituality of the New Testament and the Fathers, Translated by Mary Perkins Ryan. New York: Desclee Press, 1960, pp. 190-210. “Origen” Henri Crouzel, New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2nd ed., 2003, Crouzel, Henri. Origen: The Life and Thought of the First Great Theologian, Translated by A.S. Worrall, San Francisco, Calif.: Harper and Row, 1989, pgs. 87-149. von Balthasar, Hans. Origen, Spirit and Fire: A Thematic Anthology of his Writings, Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1984, pgs. 183-314. Danielou, Jean, Origen, Translated by Walter Mitchell. New York: Sheed & Ward, 1955, pp. 293-309. PART II: Pre-Benedictine Christian Monasticism Introduction: Types of Monastic literature and major monastic themes Section 1: Monasticism in Egypt A. The Anchorites and Semi-anchorites 1. An overview 2. St. Athanasius, Herald and Theologian of the Incipient Monasticism 3. Antony: Father and Model of Monks 4. The anchoritic and semi-anchoritic way of life 5. The Apophthegmata Patrum 6. The Historia Monachorum in Aegypto; The Historia Lausiaca 7. Aspects of desert spirituality B. Pachomian Cenobitism 1. Introductory Material a. Chronological tables b. Genealogical table of Pachomius’ Lives c. The Geography of Pachomius’ monasteries 2. The life and deeds of Pachomius a. Summary of Principal Facts and dates b. The Biographies of Pachomius c. Pachomius: The man and his deeds 3. The Rule of Pachomius a. Precepts b. Precepts and Institutes c. Precepts and Judgments d. Precepts and Laws 4. The Institutions of the Pachomian Koinonia a. The normative texts: The Rules b. The development and extent of observances c. Activities of the Koinonia d. Scripture in the life of the Koinonia 5. Pachomian spirituality a. The Community Ideal b. Life under the Rule c. Leadership and Responsibility d. The ascetic goal Some suggested resources: Ramsey, Boniface. Beginning to Read the Fathers. New York: Paulist Press, 1985, pp. 161-163. Chitty, Derwas. The Desert a City. Oxford: Blackwell, 1966, pp. 2-6. Desprez, Vincent. “Saint Anthony and the Beginnings of Anchoritism,” American Benedictine Review 43:1 (March 1992) pgs. 66-81. McGuire, Brian. Friendship and Community: The Monastic Experience 350-1250. Cistercian Studies. Cistercian Publications: Kalamazoo, MI, 1988, pgs. pp.7-12. Robert E. Gregg’s Introduction to his translation of The Life of Anthony and the Letter to Marcellinus, The Classics of Western Spiritulity. New York: Paulist Press, 1980, pgs. 6-10. Bouyer, Louis. The Spirituality of the New Testament and the Fathers, Translated by Mary Ryan Perkins. New York: Desclee Press, 1960, pgs. 311-313. “The Desert Fathers, Antony and Pachomius” by Philip Rousseau in The Study of Spirituality (ed. Jones, Wainwright, Yarnold), New York: Oxford University Press, 1986, pgs. 125-128. Brown, Peter. The Making of Late Antiquity. The Carl Newell Jackson Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978, pgs. 89-91. Harmless, William. Desert Christian: An Introduction to the literature of Early Monasticism. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. Dunn, Marilyn. The Emergence of Monasticism: from the Desert Fathers to the Early Middle Ages. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2003. Ward, Benedicta. The Desert Christian: The Sayings of the Desert Fathers (The Alphabetical Collection). New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1975, pgs. xvi-xxv. Stewart, Columba. The World of the Desert Fathers: Stories and Sayings form the Anonymous Series of the Apophthegmata Patrum. Oxford: SLG Press, 1986. Ward, Benedicta. The Wisdom of the Desert Fathers: the Apophthegmata Patrum (the Anonymous Series). Oxford: SLG Pres, 1975. Donahue, Cecil. “The ‘Agape’ of the Hermits of Scete,” Studia Monastica 1 (1959) 97-114. Leloir, Louis. “The Message of the Desert Fathers: Then and Now,” American Benedictine Review 40:3 (September 1989) pgs. 221-249. Louf, Andre. “Spiritual Fatherhood in the Literature of the Desert,” in Abba: Guide to Wholeness and Holiness East and West, Cistercian Studies. ed. John R. Somerfeldt. Cistercian Publications: Kalamazoo, MI, 1982, pgs. 37-63. Stewart, Columba. “The Portrayal of Women in the Sayings and Stories of the Desert,” Vox Benedictina 2 (1985) 5-23. Taft, Robert. “Praise in the Desert: The Coptic Monastic Office Yesterday and Today,” Worship 56 (1982) 513- 536. Brown, Peter. The Body and Society, Lectures on the History of Religions. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988, pgs. 217-239. Veilleux, Armand. “Monasticism and Gnosis in Egypt,” in The Roots of Egyptian Christianity, Studies in Antiquity and Christianity, ed. B.A. Pearson and J.E. Goehring. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1986, pgs.273-277. Veilleux, Armand. Paochomian Koinoinia, Cistercian Studies. Cistercian Publications: Kalamazoo, MI, 1980- 1981. Desprez, Vincent. “Pacomian Cenobitism: I & II,” American Benedictine Review 43:3 & 43:4 (September 1992 & December 1992), pgs.
Recommended publications
  • Anselm of Canterbury
    Anselm of Canterbury From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For entities named after Saint Anselm, see Saint Anselm's. Anselm of Canterbury Archbishop of Canterbury Province Canterbury Diocese Diocese of Canterbury See Archbishop of Canterbury Appointed 1093 Reign ended 21 April 1109 Predecessor Lanfranc Successor Ralph d'Escures Other posts Abbot of Bec Orders Consecration 4 December 1093 Personal details Birth name Anselmo d'Aosta c. 1033 Born Aosta, Kingdom of Burgundy 21 April 1109 (aged 75) Died Canterbury, Kent, England Buried Canterbury Cathedral Denomination Roman Catholic Gundulf de Candia Parents Ermenberga of Geneva Sainthood Feast day 21 April Portrayed with a ship, representing Attributes the spiritual independence of the Church. Anselm of Canterbury (Aosta c. 1033 – Canterbury 21 April 1109), also called of Aosta for his birthplace, and of Bec for his home monastery, was a Benedictine monk, a philosopher, and a prelate of the Church who held the office of Archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 to 1109. Called the founder of scholasticism, he is famous as the originator of the ontological argument for the existence of God. Born into the House of Candia, he entered the Benedictine order at the Abbey of Bec at the age of 27, where he became abbot in 1079. He became Archbishop of Canterbury under William II of England, and was exiled from England from 1097 to 1100, and again from 1105 to 1107 under Henry I of England as a result of the investiture controversy, the most significant conflict between Church and state in Medieval Europe. Anselm was proclaimed a Doctor of the Church in 1720 by a Papal Bull of Pope Clement XI.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerology and Moral Alchemy in Philippe De Mézières’ Work
    A RELIGION IN ITS TIME: NUMEROLOGY AND MORAL ALCHEMY IN PHILIPPE DE MÉZIÈRES’ WORK Joël Blanchard In his cell at the Celestines’ monastery, the Vieil Pélerin [The Old Pilgrim], also known as Ardant Désir [Burning Desire], has a dream. A lady of light, Divine Providence, attended by her ladies-in-waiting, appears to him to announce to him nothing less than the necessary reform of Christianity and of the kingdom of France. The wall that men have erected through their sins between themselves and God must be brought down. The biblical parable of the talents urges that those men who have the ability, and first among them the Vieil Pélerin, make the most of these talents on behalf of the renascence of the kingdom of God and in the service of the kingdom of France. Thus will one be able to help France’s new sovereign, the “blanc faucon aux bec et aux pattes dorés” [the golden-billed and golden-legged white falcon], Charles VI, in his mission. Yet, prior to everything, an inquiry has to be carried out and an inventory made in every part of the Christian world, so the necessary remedies could be determined. Only then will the “belle monnoie de la sainte arquemie” [the beautiful coinage of holy alchemy], moral alchemy being meant here, be able to circulate in the whole world and the philosopher’s stone be discovered.1 Le songe du vieil pelerin is as much an initiatory tale as a work deal- ing with politics (and political morality), history and geography, which plunges us right into the tragic end of the Middle Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition of Henri-Xavier Arquillière, L'augustinisme Politique: Essai
    1 Translation by Catherine J. Bright and Courtney M. Booker, of Henri-Xavier Arquillière, L’Augustinisme politique: Essai sur la formation des théories politiques du Moyen-Age, second ed. (Paris: Vrin, 1955), 19–50. PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION The study that I present in these pages is by no means a general statement of Saint Augustine’s political doctrine. That has been done many times.1 The goal of my research is more limited. All medievalists have been struck by the profound intermingling of the Church and the State, which forms one of the characteristic traits of medieval civilization. How did this intimate relationship operate? How was the old Roman idea of the State absorbed by the increasing influence of the Christian idea, to the point that it led to the theory of the two swords in the twelfth century? That is the question. I have named this progressive, irregular movement political Augustinism, for want of a better term.2 I endeavored to define its formation and to mark some of its stages with precision. If by doing so I was able to open some avenues of research, in which I have directed several of my students, then I will have fully achieved my goal. I sought to observe the lives of certain ideas—to catch, in a way, their distortion in the minds of those that were simpler than the protagonists who inspired them, and to establish how these ideas came to transform major institutions, such as the monarchy. 1 See in particular the recent work of Gustave Combès, La doctrine politique de saint Augustin, Paris, 1927 (482 p.).
    [Show full text]
  • Discipline: the Narrow Road
    DISCIPLINE: THE NARROW ROAD KENNETH C. HEIN 1WOWAYS Much of the world sees life as a struggle between good and evil, with humanity caught in the cross fire. Individual human beings or even whole cultures have to choose sides: to follow the way of darkness or the way of light; to take the narrow road or the broad road, to choose blessing or curse, to follow the way to Paradise or the way to Gehenna, etc. Our Christian heritage takes us to our roots in Judaism, where the "two-ways theory" was widely understood and accepted. When Jesus of Nazareth spoke of "the narrow road" and "the broad road," his message drew upon traditional imagery and needed no modem-day exegesis before its hearers could grasp its meaning and be moved by the message. While we can understand the same message with relative ease in our day, we can still benefit from a brief look at the tra- dition that our Lord found available two thousand years ago.' In Jesus' immediate culture, those who spoke of an afterlife readily used various images to talk about life after death and how one might achieve everlasting life. The experience of seeing a great city after passing through a narrow gate in its walls was easily joined to the imagery of one's passing through difficulties and the observance of the Torah to everlasting life. Another image that was often used spoke of a road that is smooth in the beginning, but ends in thorns; while another way has thorns at the beginning, but then becomes smooth at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • ASPECTS of Tile MONASTIC PATRONAGE of Tile ENGLISH
    ASPECTS OF TIlE MONASTIC PATRONAGE OF TIlE ENGLISH AND FRENCH ROYAL HOUSES, c. 1130-1270 by Elizabeth M. Hallani VC i% % Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in History presented at the University of London. 1976. / •1 ii SUMMARY This study takes as its theme the relationship of the English and French kings and the religious orders, £.1130-1270, Patronage in general is a field relatively neglected in the rich literature on the monastic life, and royal patronage has never before been traced over a broad period for both France and England. The chief concern here is with royal favour shown towards the various orders of monks and friars, in the foundations and donations made by the kings. This is put in the context of monastic patronage set in a wider field, and of the charters and pensions which are part of its formaL expression. The monastic foundations and the general pattern of royal donations to different orders are discussed in some detail in the core of the work; the material is divided roughly according to the reigns of the kings. Evidence from chronicles and the physical remains of buildings is drawn upon as well as collections of charters and royal financial documents. The personalities and attitudes of the monarchs towards the religious hierarchy, the way in which monastic patronage reflects their political interests, and the contrasts between English and French patterns of patronage are all analysed, and the development of the royal monastic mausoleum in Western Europe is discussed as a special case of monastic patronage. A comparison is attempted of royal and non-royal foundations based on a statistical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of Protection for Children and Other Vulnerable Persons
    Program of Protection for Children and Other Vulnerable Persons Conception Abbey February 28, 2017 2nd Edition OFFICE OF THE ABBOT April 22, 2020 Dear friends of Conception Abbey, As Christians living under the monastic Rule of Saint Benedict, the monks of Conception Abbey strongly condemn any abuse of persons — children, young persons, or adults — no matter where it occurs. Every person deserves to be treated with respect and dignity, and Conception Abbey is com- mitted to protecting every person served by the works and ministries of the Abbey. In common with other institutions of Consecrated Life, the monks of Conception Abbey are com- mitted to providing a safe and protective environment for children, young people and adults. We always strive to ensure such an environment. We share the anguish and sadness expressed by many over instances of sexual abuse of minors perpetrated by diocesan priests, religious priests, and reli- gious brothers and sisters. We know that those who have experienced the betrayal of sexual abuse have been deeply wounded, and the scars may last forever. We know that many in the Church who have looked to clergy and religious as servant leaders of the gospel have also experienced a great sense of loss and betrayal. Trust and confidence can be restored only over time, and with deliberate attention on the part of all to healing the pain while assuring a safe and healthy environment for those who work, serve, minister and worship in the Church. All members of the monastic community of Conception Abbey, as well as all employees, volunteers and seminarians, are required to adhere to the Abbey’s Program of Protection for Children and Oth- er Vulnerable Persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report on Religious Life
    Catholic News Agency and women who Year-long MAJOR ORDERS TYPES OF RELIGIOUS ORDERS dedicate their lives celebrations AND THEIR CHARISMS to prayer, service The Roman Catholic Church recognizes different types of religious orders: and devotion. Year of Marriage, A religious order or congregation is Many also live as Nov. 2014- distinguished by a charism, or particular • Monastic: Monks or nuns live and work in a monastery; the largest monastic order, part of a commu- Dec. 2015 grace granted by God to the institute’s which dates back to the 6th century, is the Benedictines. nity that follows a founder or the institute itself. Here • Mendicant: Friars or nuns who live from alms and actively participate in apostolic work; specific religious Year of Faith, are just a few religious orders and the Dominicans and Franciscans are two of the most well-known mendicant orders. rule. They can Year of Prayer, congregations with their charisms: • Canons Regular: Priests living in a community and active in a particular parish. include both Oct. 2012- • Clerks Regular: Priests who are also religious men with vows and who actively clergy and laity. Nov. 2013 Order/ participate in apostolic work. Most make public Congregation: Charism: vows of poverty, Year for Priests, obedience and June 2009- Dominicans Preaching and chastity. Priests June 2010 teaching who are religious Benedictines Liturgical are different from Year of St. Paul, prayer and diocesan priests, June 2008- monasticism who do not take June 2009 Missionaries Serving God vows. of Charity among the Religious congregations differ from reli- “poorest of the gious orders mainly in terms of the vows poor” that are taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Fables of King Arthur
    MIRATOR 9:1 (2008) 19 Fables of King Arthur Aelred of Rievaulx and Secular Pastimes Jaakko Tahkokallio Introduction This article sets out to contextualise the famous Arthurian anecdote found in the Speculum Caritatis by Aelred of Rievaulx (c. 1110–1167) on two different levels. Firstly, I shall offer an analysis of the immediate textual context of this controversial passage, by which I wish to demonstrate that it is best interpreted as a reference to orally circulated stories, not to the Latin history of Geoffrey of Monmouth, as has often been argued. Secondly, I explore the ways in which Aelred speaks of storytelling and other secular pastimes elsewhere in his works, since I understand that his more general views on these topics provide important contextual information for the interpretation of the Arthurian anecdote. Doing this, I wish to emphasise how the anecdote is related to communication with monks who were probably strongly associated with lay aristocratic culture, and how, in consequence, the passage is all the more likely to refer to forms of vernacular storytelling pertaining to the settings of secular life. Furthermore, I shall address the issue of how Aelred, contrasting monastic and secular ways of life, invoked the views of St. Augustine on pagan theatre, entertainers, and poetry. I shall briefly examine the relationship between the ideas of these two writers, and argue that Aelred used St. Augustine's ideas not only because they were topoi of a literary tradition in which he was writing, but because he found them useful in his analysis of contemporaneous cultural phenomena, even though these were certainly very different from those St.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile Aelred of Rievaulx
    KNOWING & DOING A Teaching Quarterly for Discipleship of Heart and Mind This article originally appeared in the Fall 2007 issue of Knowing & Doing. C.S. LEWIS INSTITUTE PROFILES IN FAITH Aelred of Rievaulx (1110-1167) Friend and Counselor by James M. Houston Senior Fellow, C.S. Lewis Institute Founder of Regent College, Professor of Spiritual Theology (retired), and Lecturer at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford University elred of Rievaulx was born at Hexham, No, no, I beg; no, my sons, do not strip your father of an area considered remote in today’s the vesture of suffering. I am quite all right, I am not England, but a rich cultural center of hurt, I am not upset; this son of mine who threw me Northumbria in his day. Neither Eng- into the fire, has cleansed, not destroyed me. He is my AA lish nor Scottish in its independence, its son, but he is ill. I am indeed not sound of body, but he frontier character enabled Aelred’s family to exert in his sickness has made me sound in soul, for blessed ecclesial influence over both countries as devout and are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the sons godly priests. With such moral exemplars, it is under- of God’. And then taking his head in his hands, the standable that priestly celibacy, enforced elsewhere most blessed man kisses him, blesses and embraces by the Gregorian Reform, was so slow in entering him, and gently sought to soothe his senseless anger into their realm of influence; it must have seemed against himself, just as though he felt no pain from unnecessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Abelard, See Peter Accountability, See Charters, Individual, Seals Adelaide
    INDEX Abelard, see Peter Arras, Bishop of, see Lambert Accountability, see Charters, Individual, Ars dictaminis, 209, 212, 235, see Aurea Seals Gemma, Konrad of Mure Adelaide of Maurienne, queen of Augustine, bishop of Hippo, 143, 163, France, 92 175, 194, 240, 243 Adele of Champagne, queen of France, Doctrine of image, 177, 178, 179, 180, xvi, 93, pl. XVII 181, 186, 193 Administration, 43 Sign Theory, 3, 5, 63, 106, 121–123, Aimery le Viaudre of Issy, xiv, pl. XI 124, 125, 126, 127, 147, 163, 177 Alan, duke of Brittany, xv, pl. XII Authentication, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 156, Alan of Lille, 183, 184, 187, 190, 191 202, 204 Alaric II, king of the Visigoths, 76 Authenticity, 4, 12, 15–16, 27, 31, 32, 34, Alberic of Reims, 118, 119, 124, 158 35, 37, 38, 83, 98, 109, 131, 157, 201, Alienor of Braines, xi, xiv, pl. I, VIII, see 203, 205, 255 Robert of Braines Aurea Gemma, 209, 235, 236 Amiens, Authenticum, 38 Bishops of, 50, 51, 52, 90, 95, 99, 106, Authority, 31, 32–33, 38, 43, 50, 53, 54, 119, 132; see Guy, Thierry 55, 57, 60, 75, 88, 89, 109, 110, 120, Chancellors of, 119 131, 135, 137, 139, 156, 157, 199, 201, City, 249 203, 205, 221, 246, 255 Anaclet II, Pope and anti-Pope, 211, Episcopal, 96, 98, 101, 107, 141 213, 214, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 223, Royal, 75, 76, 81, 88, 89, 93, 94 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229 Anjou, 21, 23 Baldwin of Canterbury, see Baldwin of Counts of, see Fulk Rechin, Geoffrey Ford Anne of Kiev, queen of France, xii, Baldwin, count of Flanders, 91 pl.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Auguste Martin Collection
    University of Dayton eCommons Guides to Archival and Special Collections University Libraries 7-2014 Guide to the Auguste Martin collection Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/finding_aid eCommons Citation "Guide to the Auguste Martin collection" (2014). Guides to Archival and Special Collections. 72. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/finding_aid/72 This Finding Aid is brought to you for free and open access by the University Libraries at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Guides to Archival and Special Collections by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Guide to the Auguste Martin collection, circa 1850 to 1966 ML.028 Finding aid prepared by Jillian Slater This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit August 06, 2014 Describing Archives: A Content Standard The Marian Library/International Marian Research Institute 300 College Park Dayton, Ohio, 45469-1390 937-229-4214 Guide to the Auguste Martin collection, circa 1850 to 1966 ML.028 Table of Contents Summary Information ............................................................................................................................. 3 Scope and Contents....................................................................................................................................... 4 Arrangement...................................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Rene Matthew Kollar. Permanent Address: Saint Vincent Archabbey, 300 Fraser Purchase Road, Latrobe, PA 15650. E-Mail: [email protected] Phone: 724-805-2343. Fax: 724-805-2812. Date of Birth: June 21, 1947. Place of Birth: Hastings, PA. Secondary Education: Saint Vincent Prep School, Latrobe, PA 15650, 1965. Collegiate Institutions Attended Dates Degree Date of Degree Saint Vincent College 1965-70 B. A. 1970 Saint Vincent Seminary 1970-73 M. Div. 1973 Institute of Historical Research, University of London 1978-80 University of Maryland, College Park 1972-81 M. A. 1975 Ph. D. 1981 Major: English History, Ecclesiastical History, Modern Ireland. Minor: Modern European History. Rene M. Kollar Page 2 Professional Experience: Teaching Assistant, University of Maryland, 1974-75. Lecturer, History Department Saint Vincent College, 1976. Instructor, History Department, Saint Vincent College, 1981. Assistant Professor, History Department, Saint Vincent College, 1982. Adjunct Professor, Church History, Saint Vincent Seminary, 1982. Member, Liberal Arts Program, Saint Vincent College, 1981-86. Campus Ministry, Saint Vincent College, 1982-86. Director, Liberal Arts Program, Saint Vincent College, 1983-84. Associate Professor, History Department, Saint Vincent College, 1985. Honorary Research Fellow King’s College University of London, 1987-88. Graduate Research Seminar (With Dr. J. Champ) “Christianity, Politics, and Modern Society, Department of Christian Doctrine and History, King’s College, University of London, 1987-88. Rene M. Kollar Page 3 Guest Lecturer in Modern Church History, Department of Christian Doctrine and History, King’s College, University of London, 1988. Tutor in Ecclesiastical History, Ealing Abbey, London, 1989-90. Associate Editor, The American Benedictine Review, 1990-94.
    [Show full text]