DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Statement the West Midlands Rail Freight Interchange Order 201X Regulation 5 (2) (Q) Quod - July 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Statement the West Midlands Rail Freight Interchange Order 201X Regulation 5 (2) (Q) Quod - July 2018 Document 7.1A Planning Statement The West Midlands Rail Freight Interchange Order 201X Regulation 5 (2) (q) Quod - July 2018 Four Ashes Ltd The West Midlands Rail Freight Interchange Order 201X Planning Statement Document Ref 7.1A July 2018 Quod West Midlands Interchange | Planning Statement i Document Ref 7.1A Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. vi 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Document ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 The Applicant ................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 The Site ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Project Background ...................................................................................................... 3 1.5 National Policy Context ................................................................................................ 3 1.6 The Proposed Development ......................................................................................... 4 1.7 Approach to Consultation ............................................................................................. 5 1.8 Structure of this Planning Statement ............................................................................ 6 2. MAIN FEATURES OF THE SITE ........................................................................... 8 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Site location .................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Site Description and Context ...................................................................................... 10 2.4 Planning Policy Designations ..................................................................................... 14 2.5 Planning History ......................................................................................................... 16 3. SCHEME DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 20 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 20 3.2 The search for a SRFI site .......................................................................................... 20 3.3 Feasibility Work and Early Stages .............................................................................. 20 3.4 Mission Statement and Vision .................................................................................... 23 3.5 Description of Development ....................................................................................... 24 3.6 Design Overview and Scheme Development ............................................................. 32 3.7 Operational Matters .................................................................................................... 42 4. IDENTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS .................. 49 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 49 4.2 Legal and Policy Context ............................................................................................ 49 4.3 Planning Considerations ............................................................................................. 62 4.4 Summary ....................................................................................................................63 West Midlands Interchange | Planning Statement ii Document Ref 7.1A 5. NEED, SCALE, LOCATION AND ALTERNATIVE SITES ................................... 65 5.1 National Need ............................................................................................................. 65 5.2 National and Regional Policy ...................................................................................... 69 5.3 Market Demand .......................................................................................................... 82 5.4 Scale of Development ................................................................................................87 5.5 Site Selection and Alternative Site Assessment ......................................................... 90 6. GREEN BELT ..................................................................................................... 100 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 100 6.2 SRFI Development in the Green Belt ....................................................................... 101 6.3 The West Midlands Green Belt ................................................................................. 102 6.4 Impacts on the Green Belt ........................................................................................112 6.5 Very Special Circumstances ..................................................................................... 116 7. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ............................................................................. 120 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 120 7.2 Minerals ....................................................................................................................120 7.3 Agriculture and Soils ................................................................................................. 125 8. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACTS .............................................................. 129 8.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 129 8.2 Landscape and Green Infrastructure Strategy ......................................................... 129 8.3 Artificial Light ............................................................................................................ 140 9. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................... 145 9.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 145 9.2 Biodiversity and Ecological Conservation ................................................................. 145 9.3 Veteran Trees ........................................................................................................... 152 9.4 Drainage and Flood risk ........................................................................................... 155 10. TRANSPORT NETWORKS ................................................................................ 158 10.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 158 10.2 Rail Freight ............................................................................................................... 158 10.3 Highways ..................................................................................................................169 11. CARBON ............................................................................................................ 177 11.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 177 11.2 Legislation and Planning Policy ................................................................................ 177 11.3 Freight Carbon Review and Rail Freight Strategy .................................................... 179 West Midlands Interchange | Planning Statement iii Document Ref 7.1A 11.4 Operational Rail-Based Examples ............................................................................ 181 11.5 Carbon Saving Benefits of WMI ............................................................................... 185 11.6 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 186 12. AIR QUALITY ..................................................................................................... 188 12.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 188 12.2 Policy ........................................................................................................................ 188 12.3 Assessment .............................................................................................................. 190 12.4 Mitigation .................................................................................................................. 193 12.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 193 13. NOISE AND VIBRATION ................................................................................... 195 13.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 195 13.2 Policy ........................................................................................................................ 195 13.3 Assessment .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards 2010: Closedown Report
    TOWARDS 2010: CLOSEDOWN REPORT Towards 2010: Closedown Report September 2010 1 TOWARDS 2010: CLOSEDOWN REPORT Target 1: Substantially increase the number of new jobs by increasing the number of companies investing in Kent and the number of businesses starting up or expanding AND Target 2: Concentrate on the regeneration of Kent’s deprived areas and support business growth in these areas, seeking maximum funding from Government and the EU to support the necessary infrastructure, including roads, utilities, telecoms and other services Lead Cabinet Member: Lead Managing Director: Lead Officers: Kevin Lynes David Cockburn Theresa Bruton/Mike Bodkin Target 1 Status: Good progress Target 2 Status: Complete List the partners with whom we are working to deliver this target: Locate in Kent, Kent district and borough councils, local regeneration partnerships, area partnerships, South East England Development Agency (SEEDA), Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG), and Department for Transport (DfT), Homes and Communities Agency (HCA), Kent Foundation, Kent Economic Board, Business Support Kent. Additionally, we work with key stakeholders from other private, public and voluntary sectors on specific projects. Outcomes delivered: These two Towards 2010 targets (1 and 2) are reported together as they are interlinked. Delivery of both of these targets must be seen against the background of the current global recession which makes it far more difficult to achieve all of the outcomes we are striving for. However, much has been achieved: Publish KCC’s Regeneration Framework - KCC's Regeneration Framework has been adopted and one of its key priorities is to support business. The Regeneration Framework has also led to the development of a number of other strategies including the Spatial Vision, Digital Strategy, Housing Strategy and ‘Growth without Gridlock’, all to be completed during 2010/11.
    [Show full text]
  • Pb Proof Final (Issued) 211014.Docx
    ARDSTONE UK REGIONAL OFFICE FUND VSH NOMINEE 1 LIMITED AND VSH NOMINEE 2 LIMITED PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF PAUL BURLEY IN RELATION TO AN APPLICATION BY CENTRO FOR THE MIDLAND METRO (BIRMINGHAM CITY CENTRE EXTENSION LAND ACQUISITION AND VARIATION) ORDER OCTOBER 2014 OP/P1.1/OBJ11 VICTORIA SQUARE HOUSE PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF PAUL BURLEY BA(Hons) MPhil MRTPI CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 Qualifications and Experience 1 2.0 Introduction 2 3.0 Context – The Birmingham City Centre Extension 5 4.0 The Property, the Surrounding Area & Nearby Developments 17 5.0 Current Policy and Strategy 29 6.0 Analysis of the CSQ 47 7.0 Conclusions 56 8.0 Declaration 59 APPENDICES 1 Listed Building List Description for Victoria Square House 2 Birmingham City Council Cabinet Report (21 October 2013) 3 Centro’s ‘Bite Sized Chunks Initiative’ Report (1999) 4 Chapter 4 (Planning Policy) of the Environmental Statement for the 2005 Order 5 1993 UDP – Adopted UDP Written Statement and Proposals Map Extracts (1993) 6 1993 UDP – Extracts from Inspector’s Report (1992) 7 2005 UDP Alterations – First Deposit Written Statement and Proposals Map Extracts (2001) 8 2005 UDP Alterations – Second Deposit Changes (2002) 9 Visit Birmingham News Release (15 November 2014) – Visitors to Christmas Market 10 Listed Building List Description for Council House etc 11 Listed Building List Description for Town Hall 12 Mailbox News Release (29 November 2013) – Mailbox Developments 13 HCA Employment Densities Guide 2nd edition (2010) 14 Chapter 8 of the Environmental Statement for Paradise Circus
    [Show full text]
  • Black Country and Southern Staffordshire Regional Logistics Site Study
    Black Country and southern Staffordshire - Regional Logistics Site Study Black Country and southern Staffordshire Regional Logistics Site Study Final Report April 2013 UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND Prepared for: Wolverhampton City Council, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council, Walsall Council, Staffordshire County Council, South Staffordshire District Council, CENTRO, Cannock Chase District Council, Stafford Borough Council, Lichfield District Council and Tamworth Borough Council Black Country and southern Staffordshire - Regional Logistics Site Study Rev Date Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 September First Draft Mark Phillips Alan Houghton 2012 Principal Head of Planning Planning and and Regeneration Regeneration Consultant 2 October Second draft Anita Longworth 2012 Principal Planner 3 December Third draft Jerry Thorne 2012 Rail Specialist 4 April 2013 Fourth draft Eleanor Deeley CBRE Bob Perkins Associate Economics Paul Roberts Principal Traffic Engineer Byron Song /Simon Tomlinson The Logistics Business Ltd 4th Floor, Bridgewater House, Whitworth Street, Manchester. M1 6LT E Mail: [email protected] i Black Country and southern Staffordshire - Regional Logistics Site Study Limitations URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Black Country and southern Staffordshire local authorities (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • M6 Junction 10A to 13 Smart Motorway
    Post Opening Project Evaluation M6 Junction 10a – 13 Smart Motorway One Year After August 2017 Notice Although this report was commissioned by Highways England, the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Highways England. While Highways England has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, Highways England does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. Post Opening Project Evaluation M6 J10a-13 Smart Motorway: One Year After Study Foreword Highways England’s motorways are some of the safest in the world. Our road network carries a third of road traffic and we have seen demand grow by a quarter since 2000 with continued growth forecast. One reason for the introduction is smart motorways is because there are more vehicles on the road. By making use of the full width of the road, smart motorways add that extra capacity to carry more vehicles and ease congestion. They have evolved from Controlled Motorways (with variable speed limits) to Dynamic Hard Shoulder Running (opening the hard shoulder as a running lane to traffic at busy periods) to All Lane Running (permanently removing the hard shoulder and converting it into a running lane). Compared to a traditional motorway widening they deliver: • Increased capacity at significantly less cost than traditional motorway widening. • New technology and variable speed limits to improve traffic flow. • Less congestion and more reliable journeys for customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Monday Volume 690 8 March 2021 No. 185 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 8 March 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 501 8 MARCH 2021 502 Dr Coffey: My hon. Friend should be aware that we House of Commons have account managers working in all parts of the country to take up this scheme. In particular, we continue Monday 8 March 2021 to work with a wide range of organisations closely connected to SMEs, including chambers of commerce and the Federation of Small Businesses, to get the The House met at half-past Two o’clock message out there and make it straightforward to apply. We should recognise that, due to eligibility criteria, not all direct applications may be successful, and the support PRAYERS of a gateway is likely to be beneficial. We are also enabling applications through the gateway plus model, [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] which will particularly help sole traders, and we will continue to advertise that. Virtual participation in proceedings continued (Order, 4 June and 30 December 2020). Peter Gibson [V]: I thank my right hon. Friend for her [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] answer. I welcome the removal of the 30-person threshold, which will help even the smallest firm in my constituency. Since the launch of the kickstart scheme, our phenomenal Oral Answers to Questions Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen has been facilitating SMEs to access it, and he has helped 350 young people sign up.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plans
    Network Rail Strategic Business Plan Update Control Period 4 April 2008 C o n t en ts Executive summary 1 1 Introduction 16 2 The demand for rail 18 3 The industry strategy 19 4 Network Rail’s policies and strategies 26 5 Efficiency and input prices 36 6 Our plan for CP4 49 7 Expenditure and financing 87 8 Outputs 91 Appendices 103 Network Rail April 2008 Strategic Business Plan update 1 Exe Executive summary next control period. ORR noted that the SBP was c utive summar a considerable improvement on earlier plans and In October 2007 Network Rail published its that Network Rail had made good progress in a Strategic Business Plan (SBP) for Control Period number of areas. It also expressed concern that y 4 (CP4) which runs from April 2009 to March some parts of the plan were not robust and these 2014. This document provides an update and generally coincided with the areas which had further justification for elements of the SBP. been highlighted in our SBP as requiring further work. Of greater concern, however, ORR said The Strategic Business Plan that it believed Network Rail had significantly The SBP was published against a background of under-estimated the scope for it to improve strong growth, improving safety and sustained efficiency in the next control period. improvements across the whole industry. This presented a unique opportunity for continuing We welcome the fact that ORR seems to agree improvement in services for the benefit of with much of our plan and we believe that this passengers and freight users, our industry reflects progress made by the industry as a partners, taxpayers, the economy and the whole.
    [Show full text]
  • In the River Teme, 2015
    Spawning Success and Population Structure of Shad (Alosa spp.) in the River Teme, 2015: with supplementary note on Sea Lamprey spawning NE Ref: ECM 7017 © Natural England Final Report January 2016 PROJECT MANAGER: ADRIAN C. PINDER REPORT AUTHORs: ADRIAN C. PINDER DEMETRA ANDREOU EMILIE HARDOUIN SALMA SANA PHILLIPA GILLINGHAM CATHERINE GUTMANN ROBERTS Bournemouth University Natural England School of Applied Sciences Foundry House Fern Barrow 3 Millsands PooleQuality Management Riverside Exchange Dorset Sheffield BH12 5BB S3 8NH TEL: 01202 962574 www.bournemouth.ac.uk i Title: Spawning success and population structure of shad (Alosa spp.) in the River Teme, 2015: with notes on sea lamprey spawning. Client: Natural England Ref: BUG2718 This document has been issued and amended as follows: VERSION DATE DESCRIPTION CHECKED APPROVED BY LEAD BY AUTHOR 0.1 27/10/15 Draft for client approval ACP 0.2 24/11/15 Revision for approval ACP 0.3 05/01/2016 Final report ACP Suggested citation: Pinder, A.C. et al., (2016) Spawning success and population structure of shad (Alosa spp.) in the River Teme, 2015: with supplementary notes on sea lamprey spawning. BUG Report to Natural England. 49pp. Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Bournemouth University for the sole use of the client for the intended purpose as agreed between the parties, and is subject to the terms and conditions agreed between the parties. The report may not be relied upon by any other party, without Bournemouth University’s agreement in writing. Any third party seeking to rely on the report without permission does so at their own risk.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHWAYS HERITAGE WALKS Malvern – Putting a Spring in Your Step Walk Length: Either Approx 3.5 Or 5.25 Miles
    HIGHWAYS HERITAGE WALKS Malvern – putting a spring in your step Walk Length: either approx 3.5 or 5.25 miles. Grade: roadside; suitable for mobility-impaired. Start: Link Top car-park, Newtown Road, Malvern Link: , off A449 Worcester Road. Grid Reference: SO 774 471. Postcode: WR14 1NZ. Public transport: Bus No. 44, Worcester – Ledbury. Railway Station: Malvern Link Description Malvern is situated in the scenic Worcestershire countryside beloved of the composer Edward Elgar. Popular in Victorian times for its therapeutic spa waters and numbering Florence Nightingale amongst its patients, the town retains a quiet charm with many fascinating roadside heritage features, including milestones and estate boundary markers. Route Instructions From the Malvern Link top car-park, cross Worcester Road to the side entrance of Holy Trinity Churchyard. Climb the steps to emerge on North Malvern Road. Turn left and cross the road to view the replacement Stocks and Whipping Post, behind a wire fence. The originals were used to punish local miscreants. 1 The Animal Pound was used to house strayed animals until their owners paid a fine to reclaim them. Continue up the road past the National School, Girls and Infant School on your right, to the Clock Tower. 2 The Church, schools and tower were financed by Charles Morris, a wealthy “Proprietor of Houses, of Portman Square, London” who used to spend 1. Stocks and Whipping Post, with spout. the summer months in Malvern with his sister from the 1830s. He was a generous benefactor of the poor and set up a number of spouts for fresh water.
    [Show full text]
  • Define for Bloor Homes Penkridge
    Penkridge North Landscape & Visual Appraisal December 2019 1 Introduction PURPOSE OF THE REPORT railway line, close to the south-western corner of the site, and a small on the south and east bank of the River Penk and it is also bisected by cluster of houses is located on the A449 to the immediate north. the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal. As a settlement, Penkridge This is a high-level landscape and visual appraisal for a development Dunston Business Village, a small standalone complex of employment has generally grown southwards, with the settlement contained to opportunity on land to the north of Penkridge. Its conclusions have units, is also located along the A449, approximately 2.5 kilometres the east by the M6 and to the west by the railway line. Beyond the informed the evolution of the masterplan proposals that were further north. M6 to the east lies Cannock Chase, approximately 4 kilometres from originally set out in the Greater Penkridge Vision Document, previously Penkridge. The site gently slopes from a high point of around 87.5m AOD on submitted to South Staffordshire Council in November 2018. the northern boundary to around 81m AOD alongside Stafford Road The traditional centre lies approximately a kilometre to the south of the and then falls again towards the River Penk at around 75m-80m AOD. site and is mainly focussed around Stafford Road and Market Street. It THE SITE Beyond the site the land continues to rise to the north around Honey contains a wide range of local services and facilities, including three Pots woodland (100m-105 AOD) and to the east towards Cannock local convenience shops, a library, community centre and medical The site is located to the north of Penkridge and covers approximately Chase (at around 155m-160m AOD).
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire Place C/O Wedgwood Building Tipping Street Stafford ST16 2DH Telephone: (01785) 276643 Email: James.Chadwick@Staff
    Staffordshire Place c/o Wedgwood Building Tipping Street Stafford ST16 2DH Telephone: (01785) 276643 Email: [email protected] Please ask for: James Chadwick 29 August 2017 Dear Sir/Madam WEST MIDLANDS INTERCHANGE – STAGE 2 CONSULTATION Thank you for consulting Staffordshire County Council on your Stage 2 public consultation for the proposed Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI) at Four Ashes. In July 2016 we responded to your Stage 1 consultation and set out the broad parameters and issues we felt would need to be considered as the proposal evolved. Whilst we have been in discussions with you in certain specific technical areas some of the information and documents we are seeing for the first time, indeed this is the first time we have seen the full application detail packaged together. It is acknowledged that the documents provided at this stage are working drafts and our comments below are provided on that basis. Before moving into detailed comments on the technical documentation we note that the newsletter accompanying the consultation makes reference to a Community Fund. However, this then does not feature in the technical documents or the draft Order. We acknowledge that the provision of a community fund is a voluntary offer and that such funds have no weight in the planning balance. As such the decision maker in this respect will have no regard to the provision of a community fund in determining the application. However, this point is not made clear in the consultation documents nor is it evident what mechanism by which the fund will be secured.
    [Show full text]
  • Land North of Penkridge Stafford Road Penkridge South Staffordshire
    Andrew Johnson: Chief Planning Officer - Planning Committee 17/07/2018 17/01022/OUT Bloor Homes Ltd PENKRIDGE Councillor J Chapman Land North Of Penkridge Stafford Road Penkridge South Staffordshire Development of up to 200 dwellings (Use Class C3) together with an access roundabout on Stafford Road, public open space, landscaping and associated infrastructure. 1. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING HISTORY 1.1 Site Description 1.1.1 This application site is located off Stafford Road/A449, Penkridge. The site measures approximately 9.78ha and is a grassed field sub divided by hedgerows. It is situated towards the north western end of Penkridge, north of a residential estate and south of an open field/hedgerow boundaries. 1.1.2 The field is an irregular shape and is bound along the Stafford Road/A449 by a mixture of hedges, trees and an access gate. Through the southern part of the site runs an existing public footpath (Penkridge 31) that connects to the A449. The site is generally level and its surrounding landscape is broadly undulating in nature. 1.1.3 To the west is located the railway line and to the east the A449 and open fields. The application site is separated from the majority of these dwellings by buffer planting; however the most southern part of the site is separated by a larger gap due to land ownership. 1.1.4 The residential properties are accessed via Goods Station Lane, Nursery Drive, Cooke Close and Grocott Close. 1.2 No Planning History 1.3 Pre-applications have taken place 2. APPLICATION DETAILS 2.1 Proposal 2.1.1 Outline planning permission is sought for the development of an open countryside site for residential development for up to 200 dwellings (Use Class C3) together with an access roundabout on Stafford Road, public open space, landscaping and associated infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 0.99
    Thursday Volume 663 25 July 2019 No. 337 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 25 July 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1415 25 JULY 2019 1416 Patrick Grady (Glasgow North) (SNP): The Minister House of Commons might be toasting the new Prime Minister, but I do wonder how much hot air is being generated and what contribution that will make to the net emissions target. Thursday 25 July 2019 The Scottish Government have committed to net zero by 2045, rather than the UK Government’s 2050 target. The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Is the UK not willing to match that level of ambition? PRAYERS Mr Goodwill: When it comes to hot air, pots and kettles spring to mind. I look forward to working with the Scottish [MR SPEAKER ] in the Chair Administration to achieve the target. This is not a party political issue. Every single part of this House wants to take action on climate change, and it is vital that we do Oral Answers to Questions so to deliver a cleaner and greener planet in the future. Colin Clark (Gordon) (Con): This is perfect weather ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS for barbecues and enjoying Scottish beef. Does the Minister agree that the beef industry is doing its bit to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from burping cows? The Secretary of State was asked— Climate Change Adaptation Mr Goodwill: Methane is a very potent greenhouse gas, but it is interesting to note that, unlike carbon 1.
    [Show full text]