DOCSLIB.ORG

Mode of Carcinogenic Action for Cacodylic Acid (Dimethylarsinic Acid, DMAV) and Recommendations for Dose Response Extrapolation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mode of Carcinogenic Action for Cacodylic Acid (Dimethylarsinic Acid, DMAV) and Recommendations for Dose Response Extrapolation Science Issue Paper: Mode of Carcinogenic Action for Cacodylic Acid (Dimethylarsinic Acid, DMAV) and Recommendations for Dose Response Extrapolation July 26, 2005 Prepared by: Health Effects Division Office of Pesticide Programs US Environmental Protection Agency DMA MOA Page 1 of 201 DISCLAIMER This document is a preliminary draft: It has not been formally released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and should not at this stage be construed to represent Agency policy, and should not be interpreted as intent to regulate. It is being circulated for comment on its technical accuracy. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. DMA MOA Page 2 of 201 PREFACE By August 2006, under the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs must review the safety of all existing pesticide tolerances (the legal limit set on the maximum amount of pesticides that may remain in or on foods). As part of this tolerance reassessment process, the risk assessment on cacodylic acid is being updated. For ease of discussion, cacodylic acid will be referred to as DMAV (dimethylarsinic acid). Cacodylic acid and its sodium salt (sodium cacodylate) are organic arsenical nonselective contact herbicides which defoliate or dessicate a wide variety of plant species. Cacodylic acid and its sodium salt are used in combination, primarily as cotton defoliants, but also for weed control around non-bearing citrus, lawn renovation and edging, and weed control around buildings, sidewalks and driveways, and along utility lines. The only agricultural uses of cacodylic acid are on cotton and non-bearing citrus (i.e. applied when the citrus trees are not bearing their fruit). There are residential exposures to homeowners and children (e.g. toddlers) from the use of cacodylic acid on ornamentals, during lawn renovation and weed control, and around buildings and walkways. Much of this document will focus on and highlight issues related to the cancer hazard assessment of DMAV. EPA will also be developing a risk assessment for exposures to monomethylarsinic acid (MMAV). It is important to note that following pesticide applications of MMAV to citrus and/or cotton plants, residues measured in the fruit and plants are predominately DMA. Thus, whether DMAV or MMAV are used as herbicides, the general population is principally exposed to DMAV in foods. As part of the reassessment of cacodylic acid, new studies on the metabolism and the animal cancer mode of action were evaluated. These studies are the focus of this special issue paper. A complete health risk assessment developed by OPP includes: hazard identification, dose response assessment, exposure assessment and risk characterization. The current paper focuses only on the carcinogenic mode of action in animals and whether the rat tumor data should be used to estimate human potential risk and if so how does the mode of action understanding informs the dose response extrapolation for cancer risk assessment. A complete hazard characterization including non-cancer endpoints unrelated to the cancer process, exposure assessment, and risk characterization are not included here. Thus, this paper does not represent a complete assessment for evaluating the potential health impacts (for both noncancer and cancer endpoints). These remaining components will be included in EPA’s health risk assessment of cacodylic acid expected to be available to the public in late 2005. The Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) has provided its analysis and prespective on cacodylic acid’s carcinogenic mode of action (Section 3), its relevance to humans (Section 4) and dose response extrapolation approaches for estimating carcinogenic risk (Sections 5 and 6). The SAB should also refer to additional discussion on the mode of carcinogenic action for DMAV in Appendix E. It should be noted that the parts of Appendix E that refer to the OPP document on cacodyic acid were based on an earlier draft of the OPP paper. Given the issues raised regarding the metabolism and mode of carcinogenic action for arsenicals, OPP is at a point in its assessment of cacodylic acid where external peer review by the Science Advisory Board (SAB) would DMA MOA Page 3 of 201 facilitate further development and refinement of OPP’s health assessment document. The aim of the SAB review is to obtain advice and comment on whether the conclusions drawn in OPP’s analysis of metabolism and cancer mode of action are consistent with the current science. This external scientific peer review is viewed as a significant and critical step as OPP proceeds to develop a sound and scientifically credible health risk assessment on cacodylic acid. OPP intends to use the SAB’s comments, as well as public comments that are received to further refine this preliminary cancer hazard and dose response analysis. DMA MOA Page 4 of 201 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background ........................................................................................................... 9 2. Data for Evaluating Potential Cancer Risk to DMAV......................................... 12 2.A. Introduction ................................................................................................. 12 2.B. Available Cancer Studies in Humans and Animals.................................. 14 2.B.1. Inorganic Arsenic .................................................................................. 14 2.B.2. Monomethylarsonic Acid (MMAV)......................................................... 14 2.B.3. Dimethylarsonic Acid (DMAV) ............................................................... 15 2.B.4. Trimethanearsinic oxide (TMAO).......................................................... 15 2.C. Toxicokinetics and Metabolism ................................................................. 15 2.C.1. Metabolism Scheme .............................................................................. 16 2.C.2. In vivo Metabolism Studies................................................................... 18 2.C.3. In vitro Studies....................................................................................... 28 2.D. Toxicodynamic Considerations ................................................................. 29 2.D.1. In vivo Toxicities Associated With Arsenical Compounds ................ 29 2.D.2. Relative Toxicity of Various Arsenical Compounds In vitro .............. 30 2.D.3. Complicated Mixtures of Metabolites................................................... 33 2.E. Weight of the evidence and Summary: Data for evaluating potential cancer risk to DMAV .................................................................................... 34 3. Mode of Action Analysis for DMAV .................................................................... 36 3.A. Summary of Carcinogenic Effects............................................................. 36 3.A.1. Epidemiologic Studies .......................................................................... 36 3.A.2. Laboratory Animal Cancer Bioassay Studies ..................................... 37 3.B. Summary Description of Postulated Mode of Carcinogenic Action in Rats .............................................................................................................. 40 3.B.1. Identification of Key Events.................................................................. 41 3.B.2. Dose-Response Concordance of Key Events with Tumor Response49 2.B.3. Temporal Association ........................................................................... 52 3.B.4. Genotoxicity ........................................................................................... 52 3.B.5. Initiation and Promotion Studies.......................................................... 59 3.B.6. Strength, Consistency, and Specificity of Association of Tumor Response with Key Events ................................................................... 59 3.B.7. Biological Plausibility and Coherence................................................. 62 3.B.8. Other Modes of Carcinogenic Action................................................... 62 3.B.9. Uncertainties and Limitations............................................................... 63 3.B.10. Mode of Action Conclusions ................................................................ 64 4. Human Relevance ............................................................................................... 67 4.A. Human Relevance of Bladder Cancer Produced in Rodents By Xenobiotics: Generic Considerations ....................................................... 67 4.B. Human Relevance of Bladder Cancer Produced in Rats by DMA........... 68 4.C. Relevance of Bladder Cancer to Sensitive Human Subpopulations or Lifestages .................................................................................................... 71 5. Dose-response assessment............................................................................... 72 5.A. Introduction ................................................................................................. 72 5.B. Biologically-Based Dose Response Modeling.......................................... 72 5.C. Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.................................. 73 5.D. Empirical Modeling ..................................................................................... 74 DMA MOA Page 5 of 201 5.D.1. Introduction...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity of Herbicides to Newly Emerged Honey Bees,1.2.3
    PUKOr.SED BV THE ACr.ICl'.LT RESEARCH SIRViCE. U. S. DEPA:;T.rfEH OF AGRICULTURE FOR OFFICIAL US* Reprinted from the Environmental Entomology Volume 1, Number 1, pp. 102-104, February 1972 Toxicity of Herbicides to Newly Emerged Honey Bees,1.2.3 HOWARD L. MORTON,' JOSEPH O. MOFFETT," and ROBERT H. MACDONALD" Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Tucson, Arizona 85719 :, ■ ABSTRACT . We fed herbicides to newly emerged worker Apis mellifera L. in 60% sucrose syrup at concentrations of 0, 10, 100, and ] 000 parts per million by weight. The following herbicides were relatively nontoxic to honey bees at all concentra tions: 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, silvcx, 2,4-DB, dicamba, 2,3,6-TBA, chloramben, picloram, Ethrel®, 2-chIoroethylphosphonic acid, EPTC, and dalapon. The following were extremely toxic at 100 and 1000 ppmw concentrations: paraquat, MAA, MSMA, DSMA, hexaflurate, and cacodylic acid. Two compounds, bromoxynil and endothall, were very toxic only at 1000 parts per million by weight (ppmw) concentration. Paraquat, MAA, and cacodylic acid were moderately toxic at 10 ppmw. No sig nificant differences were noted in the toxicity of purified and commercially formulated herbicides. Studies conducted at this laboratory (MolTctt Materials and Methods et al. 1972) and elsewhere (Palmer-Jones 1950, Ten grams (approximately 100 individuals) of 1964; King 1961") indicate that toxicily of herbi newly emerged honey bees were placed in 2x6x6- cides to honey bees, Apis mellijera L., depends upon in. screened cages. All honey bees were less than the chemical, the formulation, and the carrier used 24 hr old at the time they were placed in the with the herbicide.
    [Show full text]
  • Speciation of Volatile Arsenic at Geothermal Features in Yellowstone National Park
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70 (2006) 2480–2491 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Speciation of volatile arsenic at geothermal features in Yellowstone National Park Britta Planer-Friedrich a,*, Corinne Lehr b,c,Jo¨rg Matschullat d, Broder J. Merkel a, Darrell Kirk Nordstrom e, Mark W. Sandstrom f a Technische Universita¨t Bergakademie Freiberg, Department of Geology, 09599 Freiberg, Germany b Montana State University, Thermal Biology Institute Bozeman, MT 59717, USA c California Polytechnic State University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA d Technische Universita¨t Bergakademie Freiberg, Department of Mineralogy, 09599 Freiberg, Germany e US Geological Survey, 3215 Marine St, Boulder, CO 80303, USA f US Geological Survey, National Water Quality Laboratory, Denver, CO 80225-004, USA Received 2 September 2005; accepted in revised form 7 February 2006 Abstract Geothermal features in the Yellowstone National Park contain up to several milligram per liter of aqueous arsenic. Part of this arsenic is volatilized and released into the atmosphere. Total volatile arsenic concentrations of 0.5–200 mg/m3 at the surface of the hot springs were found to exceed the previously assumed nanogram per cubic meter range of background concentrations by orders of magnitude. Speciation of the volatile arsenic was performed using solid-phase micro-extraction fibers with analysis by GC–MS. The arsenic species most frequently identified in the samples is (CH3)2AsCl, followed by (CH3)3As, (CH3)2AsSCH3, and CH3AsCl2 in decreasing order of frequency. This report contains the first documented occurrence of chloro- and thioarsines in a natural environment. Toxicity, mobility, and degradation products are unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenasen®, Arsenic Trioxide, 10Mg in 10Ml, Injection
    Phenasen®, Arsenic Trioxide, 10mg In 10ml, Injection Phebra Pty Ltd Chemwatch Hazard Alert Code: 4 Chemwatch: 23-0970 Issue Date: 10/07/2017 Version No: 6.1.1.1 Print Date: 02/03/2018 Safety Data Sheet according to WHS and ADG requirements S.GHS.AUS.EN SECTION 1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING Product Identifier Product name Phenasen®, Arsenic Trioxide, 10mg In 10ml, Injection Synonyms Not Available Other means of identification Not Available Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Phenasen injection is for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia where treatment with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline chemotherapy has Relevant identified uses failed or where the patient has relapsed. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Registered company name Phebra Address 19 Orion Road Lane Cove West NSW 2066 Australia Telephone +61 2 9420 9199|1800 720 020 Fax +61 2 9420 9177 Website www.phebra.com Email [email protected] Emergency telephone number Association / Organisation Not Available Emergency telephone numbers +61 401 264 004 Other emergency telephone N/A numbers SECTION 2 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Classification of the substance or mixture Poisons Schedule S4 Classification [1] Acute Toxicity (Oral) Category 4, Acute Toxicity (Inhalation) Category 4, Carcinogenicity Category 1A Legend: 1. Classified by Chemwatch; 2. Classification drawn from HSIS ; 3. Classification drawn from EC Directive 1272/2008 - Annex VI Label elements Hazard pictogram(s) SIGNAL WORD DANGER Hazard statement(s) H302 Harmful if swallowed. H332 Harmful if inhaled. H350 May cause cancer. Precautionary statement(s) Prevention P201 Obtain special instructions before use.
    [Show full text]
  • Cacodylic Acid), in F344/Ducrj Rats After Pretreatment with Five Carcinogens1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 55, 1271-1276, March 15, 1995] Cancer Induction by an Organic Arsenic Compound, Dimethylarsinic Acid (Cacodylic Acid), in F344/DuCrj Rats after Pretreatment with Five Carcinogens1 Shinji Vaniamolo,2 Yoshitsugu Konishi, Tsutomu Matsuda, Takashi Murai, Masa-Aki Shibata, Isao Matsui-Yuasa,3 Shuzo Otani, Koichi Kuroda, Ginji Endo, and Shoji Fukushima First Department of Pathology ¡S. Y., Ts. M., Ta. M.. M-A. S.. S. F.1, Second Department of Biochemistry //. M-Y., S. O.j, and Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health /K K., G. E.I, Osaka City University Medical School, 1-4-54 Asahi-machi, Aheno-ku, Osaka 545, and Osaka Cit\ Institute of Public Health and Environmental Sciences, Osaka 543 IK. K.], Japan ABSTRACT Taiwan and Mexico are exposed to high amounts of As via the drinking water (5, 8). Moreover, the wide population in the United Arsenic (As) is environmentally ubiquitous and an epidemiologically States may be supplied with water containing more than 50 ju.g/1As significant chemical related to certain human cancers. Dimethylarsinic (6). Industrial arsenicals are used for smelting, glass making, and the acid (cacodylic acid; DMA) is one of the major methylated metabolites of manufacture of semiconductors (3, 9). For more than half a century, ingested arsenicals in most mammals. To evaluate the effects of DMA on chemical carcinogenesis, we conducted a multiorgan bioassay in rats given various carcinogenic effects of As for humans have been documented, various doses of DMA. One-hundred twenty-four male F344/DuCrj rats mainly involving the skin and lung (7). In addition, recent epidemi- were divided randomly into 7 groups (20 rats each for groups 1-5; 12 rats ological studies have indicated that there are significant dose-response each for groups 6 and 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Alfa Laval Black and Grey List, Rev 14.Pdf 2021-02-17 1678 Kb
    Alfa Laval Group Black and Grey List M-0710-075E (Revision 14) Black and Grey list – Chemical substances which are subject to restrictions First edition date. 2007-10-29 Revision date 2021-02-10 1. Introduction The Alfa Laval Black and Grey List is divided into three different categories: Banned, Restricted and Substances of Concern. It provides information about restrictions on the use of Chemical substances in Alfa Laval Group’s production processes, materials and parts of our products as well as packaging. Unless stated otherwise, the restrictions on a substance in this list affect the use of the substance in pure form, mixtures and purchased articles. - Banned substances are substances which are prohibited1. - Restricted substances are prohibited in certain applications relevant to the Alfa Laval group. A restricted substance may be used if the application is unmistakably outside the scope of the legislation in question. - Substances of Concern are substances of which the use shall be monitored. This includes substances currently being evaluated for regulations applicable to the Banned or Restricted categories, or substances with legal demands for monitoring. Product owners shall be aware of the risks associated with the continued use of a Substance of Concern. 2. Legislation in the Black and Grey List Alfa Laval Group’s Black and Grey list is based on EU legislations and global agreements. The black and grey list does not correspond to national laws. For more information about chemical regulation please visit: • REACH Candidate list, Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) • REACH Authorisation list, SVHCs subject to authorization • Protocol on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) o Aarhus protocol o Stockholm convention • Euratom • IMO adopted 2015 GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVENTORY OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS” (MEPC 269 (68)) • The Hong Kong Convention • Conflict minerals: Dodd-Frank Act 1 Prohibited to use, or put on the market, regardless of application.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Completing Arsenic Biogeochemical Cycle: Microbial Volatilization of Arsines in Environment
    Journal of Environmental Sciences 26 (2014) 371–381 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of Environmental Sciences www.jesc.ac.cn A review on completing arsenic biogeochemical cycle: Microbial volatilization of arsines in environment Peipei Wang1, Guoxin Sun1, Yan Jia1, Andrew A Meharg2, Yongguan Zhu1,3,∗ 1. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China 2. Institute for Global Food Security, Queen’s University Belfast, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5AG, UK 3. Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China article info abstract Article history: Arsenic (As) is ubiquitous in the environment in the carcinogenic inorganic forms, posing risks to Received 06 March 2013 human health in many parts of the world. Many microorganisms have evolved a series of mechanisms revised 23 May 2013 to cope with inorganic arsenic in their growth media such as transforming As compounds into accepted 08 August 2013 volatile derivatives. Bio-volatilization of As has been suggested to play an important role in global As biogeochemical cycling, and can also be explored as a potential method for arsenic bioremediation. Keywords: This review aims to provide an overview of the quality and quantity of As volatilization by fungi, arsenic bacteria, microalga and protozoans. Arsenic bio-volatilization is influenced by both biotic and abiotic methylation factors that can be manipulated/elucidated for the purpose of As bioremediation. Since As bio- microorganism volatilization is a resurgent topic for both biogeochemistry and environmental health, our review volatilization serves as a concept paper for future research directions.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Lists
    United States Office of Solid Waste EPA 550-B-10-001 Environmental Protection and Emergency Response May 2010 Agency www.epa.gov/emergencies LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right- To-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act • EPCRA Section 302 Extremely Hazardous Substances • CERCLA Hazardous Substances • EPCRA Section 313 Toxic Chemicals • CAA 112(r) Regulated Chemicals For Accidental Release Prevention Office of Emergency Management This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction................................................................................................................................................ i List of Lists – Conslidated List of Chemicals (by CAS #) Subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act ................................................. 1 Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Consolidated List ..................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Radionuclides Listed Under CERCLA .......................................................................... B-1 Appendix C: RCRA Waste Streams and Unlisted Hazardous Wastes................................................ C-1 This page intentionally left blank. LIST OF LISTS Consolidated List of Chemicals
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Arsenical Herbicide Residues in Plant Tissues1 R
    Determination of Arsenical Herbicide Residues in Plant Tissues1 R. M. SACHS,~ J. L. MICEIAEL,~ I?. U. ANAS.TASIA,J and W. A. WELL+ Abstract. Paper chromatographic separation of hydroxydi- the toxicity of which may be greater than the parent methylarsine oxide (cacodylic acid), monosodium methane- arsenical (i 1). Comparativk phy?otoxicity studies in our arsonate (MSMA), sodium arsenate, and sodium arsenite was laboratories of foliar and root applications of hydroxy- achieved with the aid of four solvent systems. Aqueous ex- dimethylarsine oxide (cacodylic acid), monosodium meth- tracts of plant tissues removed essentially all the arscnicals anearsonate (MSMA), sodium arsenate, and sodium arse- applied, but mechanoiic fractionation was required before the nite revealed that cacodylic acid was the most potent extracts could be analyzed by paper chromntographic pro- of the four when all were foliarly-applied, whereas cedures. A standard nitric-sulfuric acid digestion procedure sodium arsenite was by far the most phytotoxic when all was employed for arsenic analyses, but great care was taken were root-applied (11). Hence, the need for an examina- LO avoid sulfuric-acid-induced charring by first adding rela- tion of problems of relative absorption, transport, and Lively large amounts of nitric acid to drive off chlorides present. metabolism was indicated. New methods of analysis were Depending upon the amount of chloride present, substantial developed and others modified to investigate these prob- losses of arsenic as arsine chlorides were observed if the samples lems. The methods are described in this paper. Studies charred. Five minutes in fuming sulfuric acid to completely of comparative phytotoxicity, absorption, and metab- break the carbon-arsenic bonds was another critical require- olism will appear separately (11).
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides and Toxic Substances
    Revised Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid August 10, 2006 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM Date: August 10, 2006 Subject: Revised “Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid” Document From: Lance Wormell, Chemical Review Manager Reregistration Branch 2 Special Review and Reregistration Division To: Organic Arsenical Herbicides Docket (EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201) EPA originally published the “Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid” (EPA 738-R-06-021) in the electronic docket on August 9, 2006. EPA has since identified and corrected a typographical error on page 22. The cancer slope factor for inorganic arsenic used to calculate the exposure level in drinking water was incorrectly listed as 3.67 x 10-3 (mg/kg/day)-1. The value has since been corrected to 3.67 (mg/kg/day)-1. The typographical change in the document does not alter EPA’s calculations or conclusions and the current document should be used in place of the previous version. United States Office of Prevention, Pesticides EPA 738-R-06-021 Environmental Protection And Toxic Substances July 2006 Agency (7508P) _________________________________________________________________ Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid List B Case Nos. 2395, 2080 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cacodylic Acid, Sodium Salt
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Cacodylic Acid, Sodium Salt Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Cacodylic Acid, Sodium Salt Code : 12488 Other means of : Arsinic acid, As,As-dimethyl-, sodium salt (1:1); Arsinic acid, dimethyl-, sodium salt; identification Sodium cacodylate; Sodium dimethylasenate; Arsine oxide, dimethylhydroxy-, sodium salt Supplier/Manufacturer : 3420 Central Expressway, Santa Clara CA 95051 3420 Central Expressway, Santa Clara CA 95051 In case of emergency : Chemtrec: 1 800 424 9300 Outside USA & Canada: +1 703 527 3887 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : ACUTE TOXICITY (oral) - Category 3 substance or mixture ACUTE TOXICITY (inhalation) - Category 3 CARCINOGENICITY - Category 1A GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Danger Hazard statements : Toxic if swallowed or if inhaled. May cause cancer. Precautionary statements Prevention : Obtain special instructions before use. Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood. Use personal protective equipment as required. Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area. Avoid breathing dust. Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. Wash hands thoroughly after handling. Response : IF exposed or concerned: Get medical attention. IF INHALED: Remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. Call a POISON CENTER or physician. IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or physician. Rinse mouth. Storage : Store locked up. Disposal : Dispose of contents and container in accordance with all local, regional, national and international regulations. Hazards not otherwise : None known. classified Section 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Safety of the Herbicides 2, 4-D and 2, 4
    Forestry Commission ARCHIVE © Crown copyright 1977 First published 1977 ISBN 0 11 710149 4 THE SAFETY OF THE HERBICIDES 2,4-D AND 2,4,5-T D. J. TURNER, B.Sc., Ph. D. Agricultural Research Council Weed Research Organization LONDON: HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE CONTENTS 4 INTRODUCTION 5 The historical background 5 2.4-D and 2,4,5-T as herbicides 5 2.4-D and 2,4,5-T as defoliants 7 The side effects of the defoliation programme 9 The present situation 9 Civil uses of defoliants 10 THE PROPERTIES, MANUFACTURE, MODE OF ACTION AND 10 USES OF 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T Chemical and physical properties 10 The manufacture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T 14 Formulation ingredients 14 The mode of action of the herbicides 14 The choice of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T formulations 16 The practical use of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T for woody plant control 18 Overall foliage sprays Dormant shoot sprays Basal bark sprays Cut-bark and cut-stump treatments 19 THE EFFECTS OF 2,4-D AND 2,4,5-T ON DOMESTIC LIVESTOCK 20 AND ON MAN Acute effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on animals 21 Chronic (subacute) effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on animals 22 The effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on humans 22 2.4-D and 2,4,5-T in animal products 23 2.4-D and 2,4,5-T residues in crops and fruit 23 Indirect effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on farm livestock 24 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) 24 Teratogenic effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T 26 THE EFFECTS OF 2,4-D AND 2,4,5-T ON OTHER LAND ORGANISMS 27 AND THE PERSISTENCE OF THESE COMPOUNDS IN TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS The effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on higher plants 28
    [Show full text]