Just How Big Is Lake Superior?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Just How Big Is Lake Superior? lakesuperior.com http://www.lakesuperior.com/the-lake/lake-superior/how-big-is-lake-superior/ Just How Big is Lake Superior? Steve Colman, now retired from the University of Minnesota Duluth's Large Lakes Observatory, uses this comparison with the U.S. East Coast to explain the size of the Big Lake. Raising Lake Superior's level by a single inch requires 551 billion gallons of water, but even that enormous sum is a mere drop in the Big Lake bucket. It's the world's largest freshwater lake by surface area – 31,700 square miles (82,100 square kilometres), or roughly the size of Maine – and holds 10 percent of the world's surface fresh water. (By volume, it's the third largest, behind Lake Baikal in Siberia and Lake Tanganyika in eastern Africa.) Lake Superior's 3 quadrillion gallons are enough to cover both North and South America under a foot of water. Here's another (preposterous) way to think about it: Downing half a gallon of water daily, it would take you 16.4 trillion years to drink Lake Superior. Or the entire world population of 7 billion people, each person drinking half a gallon per day, could together polish off Lake Superior in 2,348 years. The Big Lake holds as much water as all of the other Great Lakes combined plus three more Lake Eries. To reach its deepest point, you'd need to descend 1,276 feet – about the distance of a ride down from the top floor of Chicago's 108-story Willis Tower. Lake Superior is so large and so deep that its retention time – about how long an average drop of water remains in the Lake – is 191 years. For Lake Michigan it's 99 years, Huron 22, Ontario 6 and Erie just 2.6 years. No wonder ours is called Superior. Expand Lake Superior has as much water as the rest of the Great Lakes combined – plus three more Lake Eries. More facts Length: 350 miles (560 kilometres) Width: 160 miles (260 kilometres) Volume: 3 quadrillion gallons, or 2,900 cubic miles (12,100 cubic kilometres) Shoreline: 1,826 miles (2,938 kilometres) Average depth: 483 feet (147 metres) Maximum depth: 1,276 feet (389 metres) by Phil Bencomo Print.
Recommended publications
  • The Lake Michigan Natural Division Characteristics
    The Lake Michigan Natural Division Characteristics Lake Michigan is a dynamic deepwater oligotrophic ecosystem that supports a diverse mix of native and non-native species. Although the watershed, wetlands, and tributaries that drain into the open waters are comprised of a wide variety of habitat types critical to supporting its diverse biological community this section will focus on the open water component of this system. Watershed, wetland, and tributaries issues will be addressed in the Northeastern Morainal Natural Division section. Species diversity, as well as their abundance and distribution, are influenced by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors that define a variety of open water habitat types. Key abiotic factors are depth, temperature, currents, and substrate. Biotic activities, such as increased water clarity associated with zebra mussel filtering activity, also are critical components. Nearshore areas support a diverse fish fauna in which yellow perch, rockbass and smallmouth bass are the more commonly found species in Illinois waters. Largemouth bass, rockbass, and yellow perch are commonly found within boat harbors. A predator-prey complex consisting of five salmonid species and primarily alewives populate the pelagic zone while bloater chubs, sculpin species, and burbot populate the deepwater benthic zone. Challenges Invasive species, substrate loss, and changes in current flow patterns are factors that affect open water habitat. Construction of revetments, groins, and landfills has significantly altered the Illinois shoreline resulting in an immeasurable loss of spawning and nursery habitat. Sea lampreys and alewives were significant factors leading to the demise of lake trout and other native species by the early 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Site of the Month: Why Is Sebago Lake So Deep?
    Why is Sebago Lake so deep? Maine Geological Survey Maine Geologic Facts and Localities February, 1999 Why is Sebago Lake so deep? 43° 51‘ 13.36“ N, 70° 33‘ 43.98“ W Text by Robert A. Johnston Maine Geological Survey, Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry 1 Why is Sebago Lake so deep? Maine Geological Survey Introduction Modern geophysical equipment allows geologists to investigate previously unmapped environments, including ocean and lake floors. Recent geophysical research studied the types, composition, areal extent, and thickness of sediments on the bottom of Sebago Lake in southwestern Maine. Geologists used side- scan sonar and seismic reflection profiling to map the bottom of the lake. Approximately 58 percent of the lake bottom was imaged with side-scan sonar and over 60 miles of seismic reflection profiles were collected. This web site will discuss the findings of the seismic reflection profiling. Maine Geological Survey, Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry 2 Why is Sebago Lake so deep? Maine Geological Survey Physiographic setting Sebago Lake, although second in surface area to Moosehead Lake, is Maine's deepest lake. With a water depth of 316 feet, its deepest part is 49 feet below sea level! Sebago Lake is located in southwestern Maine 20 miles northwest of Portland and 50 miles southeast of the White Mountains. It lies along the transition between the Central Highlands and the Coastal Lowlands physiographic regions of New England (Figure 1). The abrupt change in landscape can be seen in panoramic views from several vantage points near Sebago Lake. Denny, 1982 Denny, Maine Geological Survey From From Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • AN OVERVIEW of the GEOLOGY of the GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J
    AN OVERVIEW OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J. Bornhorst 2016 This document may be cited as: Bornhorst, T. J., 2016, An overview of the geology of the Great Lakes basin: A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Web Publication 1, 8p. This is version 1 of A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum Web Publication 1 which was only internally reviewed for technical accuracy. The Great Lakes Basin The Great Lakes basin, as defined by watersheds that drain into the Great Lakes (Figure 1), includes about 85 % of North America’s and 20 % of the world’s surface fresh water, a total of about 5,500 cubic miles (23,000 cubic km) of water (1). The basin covers about 94,000 square miles (240,000 square km) including about 10 % of the U.S. population and 30 % of the Canadian population (1). Lake Michigan is the only Great Lake entirely within the United States. The State of Michigan lies at the heart of the Great Lakes basin. Together the Great Lakes are the single largest surface fresh water body on Earth and have an important physical and cultural role in North America. Figure 1: The Great Lakes states and Canadian Provinces and the Great Lakes watershed (brown) (after 1). 1 Precambrian Bedrock Geology The bedrock geology of the Great Lakes basin can be subdivided into rocks of Precambrian and Phanerozoic (Figure 2). The Precambrian of the Great Lakes basin is the result of three major episodes with each followed by a long period of erosion (2, 3). Figure 2: Generalized Precambrian bedrock geologic map of the Great Lakes basin.
    [Show full text]
  • GLRI Fact Sheet
    WISCONSIN PROJECTS FOR 2010-2011 Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Federal funds support critical restoration and protection work on Wisconsinʼs Great Lakes Wisconsinʼs agencies and Priorities for the Great Lakes. GLRI funds will help Wisconsin address Great Lakes Drainage Basins in Wisconsin organizations received almost $30 these priorities on Lake Michigan and Lake Superior million in grants for the first year of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative – a Lake Superior. federal basin-wide effort to restore and Economic Benefits of Restoration protect the Great Lakes. Restoring the Great Lakes will bring great benefits to our state. Work done A Vital Economic Asset under the GLRI will create jobs, The Great Lakes have had profound stimulate economic development, and Lake effects on our environment, culture, Michigan improve freshwater resources and ! and quality of life. They have fueled shoreline communities. A study our economic growth in the past and – conducted by the Brookings Institution if properly restored and protected – will Map Scale: found that fully implementing the 1 inch = 39.46 miles help us revitalize our economy in the regional collaboration strategy will future. generate $80-$100 billion in short and Lake Superior and Lake Michigan are affected by the actions of people throughout their watersheds. Lake Lake Michigan and Lake Superior long term benefits, including: Superior’s watershed drains 1,975,902 acres and provide: • $6.5-$11.8 billion in benefits supports 123,000 people. Lake Michigan’s watershed from tourism, fishing and drains 9,105,558 acres and supports 2,352,417 • Sport fishing opportunities for people. more than 250,000 anglers, recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Management AFRICAN GREAT LAKES
    AFRICAN GREAT LAKES CONFERENCE 2nd – 5th MAY 2017, ENTEBBE, UGANDA Dynamics of Fish Stocks of Commercial Importance in Lake Victoria, East Africa: Implications for Management Robert Kayanda, Anton Taabu-Munyaho, Dismas Mbabazi, Hillary Mrosso, and Chrisphine Nyamweya INTRODUCTION • Lake Victoria with a surface area of 68,800 sqkm is the world’s second largest freshwater body • It supports one of the world’s most productive inland fisheries with the estimated total fish landings from the lake for the period of 2011 to 2014 have been about 1 million tons with a beach value increasing from about US$ 550 Million in 2011 to about US$ 840 million in 2014. • It supports about 220,000 fishers (Frame Survey 2016) • The fish stocks of Lake Victoria have changed dramatically since the introduction of Nile perch Lates niloticus during the late 1950s and early 1960s Fishery Haplochromines The Original Fish Fauna Brycinus sp Protopterus Rastrineobola Mormyrus spp Barbus spp Bagrus docmac Labeo Schilbe intermedius Oreochromis variabilis Clarias gariepinus Mormyrus spp Synodontis victoriae Oreochromis leucostictus INTRODUCTION Currently, the fisheries is dominated by four major commercial important species, these are; •Nile perch •Dagaa •Nile tilapia •Haplochromis Apart from Nile tilapia only estimated through trawl and catch surveys, the other 3 are estimated through trawl, acoustics, and catch INTRODUCTION This paper summarizes current knowledge of the status of the fish stocks and reviews the need for species specific management plans for the major commercial important fish species of Lake Victoria (Nile perch, Nile tilapia, dagaa and haplochromines). Methods • Fisheries dependent – Frame surveys – Catch assessment surveys • Fisheries independent – Acoustic – Bottom trawl Biomass and relative abundance • Total biomass from the surveys 3500 remained fairly stable over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes/Big Rivers Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment Report for Fiscal Year 2004 March 2003 Region 3 - Great Lakes/Big Rivers Partnerships and Accountability Aquatic Habitat Conservation and Management Workforce Management Aquatic Species Conservation and Aquatic Invasive Species Management Cooperation with Native Public Use Leadership in Science Americans and Technology To view monthly issues of “Fish Lines”, see our Regional website at: (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Fisheries/) 2 Fisheries Accomplishment Report - FY2004 Great Lakes - Big Rivers Region Message from the Assistant Regional Director for Fisheries The Fisheries Program in Region 3 (Great Lakes – Big Rivers) is committed to the conservation of our diverse aquatic resources and the maintenance of healthy, sustainable populations of fish that can be enjoyed by millions of recreational anglers. To that end, we are working with the States, Tribes, other Federal agencies and our many partners in the private sector to identify, prioritize and focus our efforts in a manner that is most complementary to their efforts, consistent with the mission of our agency, and within the funding resources available. At the very heart of our efforts is the desire to be transparent and accountable and, to that end, we present this Region 3 Annual Fisheries Accomplishment Report for Fiscal Year 2004. This report captures our commitments from the Region 3 Fisheries Program Operational Plan, Fiscal Years 2004 & 2005. This document cannot possibly capture the myriad of activities that are carried out by any one station in any one year, by all of the dedicated employees in the Fisheries Program, but, hopefully, it provides a clear indication of where our energy is focused.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of the Holocene Humid Period in the Central Sahara and Thar Deserts: Societal Collapses Or New Opportunities? Andrea Zerboni1, S
    60 SCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS: CLIMATE CHANGE AND CULTURAL EVOLUTION doi: 10.22498/pages.24.2.60 The end of the Holocene Humid Period in the central Sahara and Thar deserts: societal collapses or new opportunities? Andrea Zerboni1, S. biagetti2,3,4, c. Lancelotti2,3 and M. Madella2,3,5 The end of the Holocene Humid Period heavily impacted on human societies, prompting the development of new forms of social complexity and strategies for food security. Yearly climatic oscillations played a role in enhancing the resilience of past societies. The Holocene Humid Period or Holocene settlements (Haryana, India), show a general changes in settlement pattern, rather than full- climatic Optimum (ca. 12–5 ka bP), in its local, trend towards desertification and higher fledged abandonment. monsoon-tuned variants of the African Humid evapotranspiration between 5.8 and 4.2 ka bP, Period (DeMenocal et al. 2000; Gasse 2000) followed by an abrupt increase in δ18O values In the SW Fazzan, the transition from the Late and the period of strong Asian southwest (or and relative abundance of carbonates, indic- Pastoral (5-3.5 ka bP) to the Final Pastoral summer) monsoon (Dixit et al. 2014), is one ative of a sudden decrease in Indian summer (3.5-2.7 ka bP) marks the ultimate adaptation of the best-studied climatic phases of the monsoon precipitations (Dixit et al. 2014). to hyperarid conditions and, later, the rise Holocene. Yet the ensuing trend towards arid- of the Garamantian kingdom (2.7-1.5 ka bP; ity, the surface processes shaping the pres- Aridification and cultural processes Mori et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Lake Nature Area
    Rice Lake Nature Area Location: 4120 Bassett Creek Drive Nature Area Size: 9.23 Acres Description The Rice Lake Nature Area is located along the north side of Bassett Creek Drive. The nature area is within a residential neighborhood, although the woods and wetland provide more seclusion than expected for a small urban nature area. Access to the park is through a pedestrian bridge crossing of Bassett Creek, which flows from west to east. In this reach, Bassett Creek is within an incised channel and some bank erosion is present. The creek is bordered by mixed hardwood floodplain forest and hardwood swamp. Reed canary grass is present where there is sufficient clearing, but the understory can be sparse due to heavy shading. Tree removal would likely generate a flush of reed canary grass Rice Lake Nature Area can be accessed by walking an aggregate path, and a boardwalk leading to a floating dock. South Rice Pond, sometimes referred to as Rice Lake, is a shallow basin, with a wide emergent marsh fringe. Small, shallow ponds and lakes like South Rice, are somewhat unique, as they are successionally proceeding from deeper open water to wetland. That natural process can be observed from the Rice Lake Nature Area, by observing the existing habitat and surrounding areas. The Rice Lake Nature Area provides a unique opportunity to provide an unobstructed view of South Rice Pond. Because the park is dominated by wetland, access is limited to a raised trail and boardwalk. Forest and Woodlands The southern portion of the Rice Lake Nature Area is composed of a mixture of floodplain forest and hardwood swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010
    Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010 Nipigon Bay is in the most northerly area of Lake Superior. The Area of Concern takes in a large portion of Nipigon Bay and the Nipigon River, the largest tributary to Lake Superior, and the communities of Red Rock and Nipigon. There are Ontario Power Generation dams on the Nipigon River for the generation of hydroelectricity. The area supports a variety of wetlands and bird populations, including one of four known pelican colonies in Ontario. The watershed forests on both sides of the Nipigon River have been allocated for forest harvesting. Environmental concerns in the Nipigon Bay Area of Concern are related to water level and flow fluctuations in Lake Nipigon and the Nipigon River from the generation of hydroelectricity. These fluctuations affect stream bank stability, sediment load and fish and wildlife habitat. Other concerns include the accumulation of wood fibre, bark and other organic material from past log drives, and effluent discharges from a linerboard mill (which closed in 2006) and the municipal sewage treatment plants in Nipigon and Red Rock. PARTNERSHIPS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Nipigon Bay was designated an Area of Concern in 1987 under the Canada–United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Areas of Concern are sites on the Great Lakes system where environmental quality is significantly degraded and beneficial uses are impaired. Currently, there are 9 such designated areas on the Canadian side of the Great Lakes, 25 in the United States, and 5 that are shared by both countries. In each Area of Concern, government, community and industry partners are undertaking a coordinated effort to restore environmental quality and beneficial uses through a remedial action plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Per___1. Based on the Evidence, I Believe That the Lake
    Sample: Scientific Argument NAME _________________ Per___________ 1. Based on the evidence, I believe that the lake _evaporated___. I believe this due to the evidence on card B, C and D 2. On Card B it states, “In the region where the lake is found, planetary geologists have not yet observed any summer temperatures low enough to freeze methane” This is important because This evidence refutes that the lake froze. If the temperature did not get low enough to freeze, it could not have frozen. The only other option would be that the lake evaporated 2. On Card D it states, “Summer days have more hours of sunlight. Therefore, more energy is transferred to the lake in summer than any other season. This is important because If energy is transferred into the lake, this will cause the temperature of the lake to rise. If the temperature rises, there will be more kinetic energy causing the molecules to move faster. With enough energy, evaporation can occur. With more sunlight in summer, there are more hours for the energy to enter into the lake than any other season. 2. On Card C it states, “Summer started in 2002, the lake was there in 2007, there was no lake in 2009, fall started in 2010. Seasons on Titan are just over 7 years long. This is important because Titan is cold, even in the summer, because it’s so far away from the Sun. Even though it’s cold, it is a very long summer. Summer started in 2002 and the lake was there in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Roadmap to Fishing Lake Superior: Have a Super Time!
    Roadmap to Fishing Lake Superior: Have a Super Time! Want to fish Lake Superior, but aren’t sure when or where to go? This roadmap is a starting point to provide you with information on many fishing sites and times of the year when great opportunities exist. Please note this is not an exhaustive list. Eagle HarborCopper Harbor Traverse Bay Ontonagon Keweenaw Bay Black River Harbor Grand Marais Marquette Au Train-Shelter Bay St. Marys River Munising Black River Au Train- Ontonagon Eagle Harbor Copper Harbor Traverse Bay Keweenaw Bay Marquette Munising Grand Marais St. Marys River Port Harbor Shelter Bay brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, brown trout, lake trout, lake whitefish, round coho, lake trout, lake whitefish, lake trout, lake whitefish, round coho, lake whitefish, n burbot, coho, cisco, walleye, yellow perch Feb - March whitefish, siscowet, smelt, splake, round whitefish, siscowet, smelt, whitefish, splake, steelhead, pike, yellow perch smelt, steelhead steelhead, yellow perch splake, steelhead, yellow perch yellow perch brown trout, Chinook, coho, lake brown trout, Chinook, coho, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, Chinook, cisco, coho, lake brown trout, Chinook, brown trout, Chinook, cisco, coho, Chinook, trout, lake whitefish, Chinook, coho, lake trout, coho, lake trout, round trout, lake whitefish, n pike, coho, lake trout, lake siscowet lake trout, lake whitefish, siscowet, coho, lake round whitefish, April - May lake trout, siscowet, whitefish, siscowet, smelt, sm bass,
    [Show full text]