DOCSLIB.ORG

11453900 Lake Berryessa Near Winters, CA Sacramento River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11453900 Lake Berryessa Near Winters, CA Sacramento River Basin Water-Data Report 2008 11453900 Lake Berryessa near Winters, CA Sacramento River Basin LOCATION.--Lat 38°3048, long 122°0613 referenced to North American Datum of 1927, in SE ¼ NW ¼ sec.29, T.8 N., R.2 W., Napa County, CA, Hydrologic Unit 18020117, near center of Monticello Dam on Putah Creek, and 7.4 mi west of Winters. DRAINAGE AREA.--566 mi². SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--January 1957 to current year. REVISED RECORDS.--WSP 1735: 1958-60. WSP 1931: Drainage area. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is NGVD of 1929 (levels by U.S. Bureau of Reclamation). COOPERATION.--Records provided by U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Total evaporation provided by U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, not reviewed by U.S. Geological Survey. REMARKS.--Reservoir is formed by concrete arch-gravity dam completed November 1956. Usable capacity, 1,592,000 acre-ft, between elevations 253.25 ft, invert of outlet valves, and 440 ft, crest of glory-hole spillway. Dead storage, 10,340 acre-ft. Water is released down Putah Creek and is diverted into Putah South Canal (station 11454210) for irrigation of about 46,000 acres in the lower Sacramento Valley. Total diverted during current year was 214,400 acre-ft. Releases for irrigation began in May 1959. Records, including extremes, show total contents at 2400 hours. See schematic diagram of lower Sacramento River Basin available from the California Water Science Center. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum contents, 1,733,500 acre-ft, Mar. 2, 1983, elevation, 446.67 ft; minimum since irrigation pool first filled, 422,130 acre-ft, Dec. 1, 1992, elevation, 361.73 ft. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Maximum contents, 1,404,300 acre-ft, Mar. 13, 15, 16, elevation, 429.46 ft; minimum, 1,151,000 acre-ft, Sept. 30, elevation, 415.02 ft. Capacity table (elevation, in feet, and contents, in acre-feet) (Based on survey by U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in 1956) Elevation Contents Elevation Contents Elevation Contents 360 404,550 390 765,730 420 1,236,000 370 511,760 400 911,200 430 1,414,200 380 632,360 410 1,068,100 450 1,799,900 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Report 2008 11453900 Lake Berryessa near Winters, CA—Continued RESERVOIR STORAGE, ACRE FEET WATER YEAR OCTOBER 2007 TO SEPTEMBER 2008 DAILY OBSERVATION AT 2400 HOURS Day Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 1,242,700 1,231,100 1,222,000 1,219,900 1,340,200 1,400,600 1,395,900 1,364,000 1,324,200 1,277,300 1,227,200 1,182,000 2 1,241,900 1,231,000 1,221,800 1,219,900 1,346,900 1,401,400 1,395,300 1,363,100 1,322,700 1,275,500 1,225,600 1,180,600 3 1,241,300 1,230,800 1,221,800 1,219,700 1,357,800 1,401,900 1,394,600 1,362,000 1,321,300 1,274,300 1,223,900 1,179,200 4 1,240,100 1,230,400 1,222,300 1,253,800 1,361,100 1,402,500 1,394,100 1,361,100 1,319,500 1,272,400 1,222,500 1,178,200 5 1,239,800 1,230,100 1,221,300 1,260,700 1,363,400 1,402,800 1,393,300 1,360,700 1,318,300 1,271,000 1,220,800 1,177,200 6 1,238,200 1,229,900 1,221,500 1,265,200 1,364,200 1,403,000 1,391,700 1,359,300 1,316,700 1,269,600 1,219,200 1,175,900 7 1,237,700 1,229,600 1,222,700 1,265,200 1,366,200 1,403,000 1,390,100 1,358,000 1,314,900 1,268,300 1,217,800 1,174,800 8 1,236,700 1,229,600 1,221,500 1,269,000 1,366,900 1,403,400 1,389,700 1,357,500 1,314,000 1,266,600 1,216,300 1,173,800 9 1,236,000 1,229,100 1,221,500 1,269,200 1,367,400 1,403,800 1,389,000 1,355,900 1,313,000 1,264,800 1,214,600 1,172,300 10 1,236,100 1,229,200 1,220,900 1,271,300 1,369,000 1,403,900 1,387,700 1,354,400 1,310,600 1,263,500 1,213,200 1,171,100 11 1,235,400 1,229,700 1,220,400 1,271,500 1,369,000 1,403,900 1,386,600 1,353,700 1,308,700 1,261,700 1,211,800 1,169,900 12 1,235,800 1,228,900 1,220,300 1,272,700 1,368,300 1,404,100 1,385,700 1,353,200 1,307,300 1,260,000 1,210,500 1,169,100 13 1,235,400 1,229,200 1,219,700 1,272,500 1,369,000 1,404,300 1,385,700 1,351,600 1,306,000 1,258,000 1,209,100 1,167,600 14 1,234,900 1,228,700 1,219,700 1,273,600 1,369,800 1,403,900 1,377,700 1,350,300 1,304,400 1,256,800 1,207,900 1,166,500 15 1,235,100 1,228,400 1,219,600 1,273,600 1,369,800 1,404,300 1,382,100 1,348,700 1,302,800 1,254,900 1,206,200 1,165,700 16 1,235,100 1,228,700 1,219,600 1,273,400 1,370,100 1,404,300 1,381,000 1,347,800 1,301,300 1,253,300 1,204,600 1,164,000 17 1,234,400 1,228,000 1,219,700 1,272,500 1,370,500 1,404,100 1,379,700 1,346,500 1,299,700 1,251,800 1,203,100 1,162,700 18 1,234,800 1,228,000 1,219,900 1,273,100 1,370,300 1,404,100 1,378,400 1,345,100 1,297,900 1,249,800 1,201,500 1,162,200 19 1,234,600 1,227,700 1,220,400 1,273,200 1,371,200 1,403,800 1,377,200 1,343,600 1,296,300 1,248,600 1,200,200 1,160,800 20 1,234,200 1,227,300 1,221,800 1,273,200 1,371,000 1,403,900 1,375,700 1,342,200 1,294,700 1,246,600 1,199,000 1,160,100 21 1,233,400 1,227,000 1,221,600 1,273,400 1,371,600 1,403,600 1,375,200 1,340,200 1,293,100 1,244,600 1,197,500 1,159,000 22 1,233,200 1,226,500 1,221,300 1,274,700 1,371,600 1,403,600 1,373,600 1,338,300 1,291,500 1,243,300 1,196,300 1,158,300 23 1,233,400 1,225,900 1,221,600 1,273,800 1,372,500 1,402,500 1,372,300 1,337,000 1,289,900 1,241,900 1,194,900 1,157,400 24 1,233,000 1,226,100 1,221,300 1,273,600 1,389,200 1,402,100 1,371,400 1,335,800 1,288,200 1,240,100 1,193,700 1,155,900 25 1,232,900 1,225,600 1,221,500 1,287,300 1,394,400 1,402,100 1,370,300 1,334,200 1,286,800 1,238,600 1,192,200 1,155,100 26 1,232,700 1,225,400 1,221,500 1,310,300 1,396,300 1,400,600 1,369,600 1,332,900 1,285,400 1,236,700 1,191,300 1,154,200 27 1,231,600 1,225,400 1,220,600 1,319,400 1,398,300 1,399,900 1,368,500 1,331,300 1,283,800 1,235,100 1,189,400 1,153,400 28 1,232,300 1,224,600 1,220,400 1,324,300 1,399,200 1,399,000 1,367,600 1,329,700 1,282,000 1,233,400 1,188,200 1,152,200 29 1,231,300 1,223,400 1,220,900 1,326,500 1,400,300 1,398,300 1,366,300 1,328,400 1,280,400 1,231,600 1,186,900 1,151,700 30 1,231,500 1,222,800 1,220,900 1,329,000 --- 1,397,500 1,364,900 1,326,700 1,278,900 1,230,300 1,185,300 1,151,000 31 1,231,300 --- 1,219,700 1,334,500 --- 1,396,600 --- 1,325,800 --- 1,228,700 1,183,500 --- Max 1,242,700 1,231,100 1,222,700 1,334,500 1,400,300 1,404,300 1,395,900 1,364,000 1,324,200 1,277,300 1,227,200 1,182,000 Min 1,231,300 1,222,800 1,219,600 1,219,700 1,340,200 1,396,600 1,364,900 1,325,800 1,278,900 1,228,700 1,183,500 1,151,000 Elevation, in feet, at end of month 419.73 419.24 419.06 425.60 429.24 429.04 427.29 425.11 422.46 419.58 416.94 415.02 Change in contents, in acre-feet -12,000 -8,500 -3,100 +114,800 +65,800 -3,700 -31,700 -39,100 -46,900 -50,200 -45,200 -32,500 Total evaporation, in acre-feet 3,529 1,880 1,755 829 1,585 4,092 5,939 8,097 9,239 9,640 9,654 6,859 Calendar Year 2007 Water Year 2008 Change in contents, in acre-feet -216,000 -92,300 — 2 — Water-Data Report 2008 11453900 Lake Berryessa near Winters, CA—Continued 1,450,000 1,400,000 1,350,000 1,300,000 1,250,000 OBSERVATION AT 2400 HOURS RESERVOIR STORAGE, ACRE FEET, RESERVOIR STORAGE, ACRE 1,200,000 1,150,000 O N D J F M A M J J A S 2007 2008 — 3 — .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enhancing Environmental Flows of Putah Creek for Chinook Salmon Reproductive Requirements
    Enhancing environmental flows of Putah Creek for Chinook salmon reproductive requirements Written by: Chan, Brian; Jasper, Chris Reynolds; Stott, Haley Kathryn UC Davis, California ESM 122, Water Science and Management, Section: A02 Abstract: Putah creek, like many of California’s rivers and streams, is highly altered by anthropogenic actions and historically supported large populations of resident and anadromous native fish species. Now its ecosystem dynamics have changed drastically with the Monticello dam, the Solano diversion canal and the leveeing of its banks. Over time the creek has found a balance of habitats for native and non-native fish species that is mainly dictated by species-preferred temperature tolerances (Keirman et. al. 2012). Cooler temperatures and faster flows upstream from Davis prove to be ideal habitats for native species, in particular, the federally endangered Chinook salmon, which is the most widely distributed and most numerous run occurring in the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and their tributaries. As water moves downstream, it becomes shallower and warmer, resulting in ideal conditions for non-native species (Winters, 2005). This report analyzes the environmental flows released into putah creek and how much salmon preferred breeding habitat is available from this flow regime based on temperature. Introduction: Figure 1: Teale GIS Solutions Group (1999), US Census Bureau (2002), USGS (1993) [within Winters, 2005] The Putah Creek watershed is an important aspect in the natural, social, and economic livelihoods of the people of Yolo and Solano counties. The Putah Creek watershed begins at the highest point in Lake County, Cobb Mountain, and flows down to the Central Valley where it empties into the Yolo Bypass at near sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Putah Creek Watershed Watershed Assessment and Water Quality Monitoring Proposal June 28, 2004
    Napa County Putah Creek Watershed Watershed Assessment and Water Quality Monitoring Proposal June 28, 2004 Lower Chiles Valley, Napa County Putah Creek Drainage Prepared By: Phillip Blake, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Napa Sandy Elles & Jennifer Kopp, Napa County Farm Bureau Dave Whitmer, Napa County Agricultural Commissioner Bob Zlomke, Napa Co. Resource Conservation District Napa County Putah Creek Watershed Group Steering Committee: Sally Kimsey Jim Frisinger Tucker Catlin Robert Craig Jack Todeschini Don Clark Advisor: Diane Dillon, Supervisor, Dist. 4 1 2 Introduction In July, 2003, the Napa County Farm Bureau organized an informational meeting of landowners and farm agency representatives, to discuss local ramifications for the removal of agricultural waste discharge waivers in the Putah Creek watershed. Following this initial exploration of information known about Irrigated Lands Waivers, the NC Farm Bureau invited farmers in the Napa County Putah Creek area to join a coalition and apply for a group waiver. The group would organize to share best management practices and conduct water quality monitoring. Since that initial meeting, representatives from Napa County Farm Bureau, USDA Natural Resouces Conservation Service, (NRCS) Napa County Resource Conservation District, (NCRCD), UC Cooperative Extension, and the Napa County Agricultural Commissioner have further studied the issue and determined that irrigated lands in the area are primarily drip-irrigated wine grape vineyards. These farm operations typically employ minimal use of chemical inputs and utilize farm cultural practices that present a very limited potential to impact downstream waters with pollutants of concern. Water quality issues have been extensively discussed and addressed through various processes, including 2 different county watershed task forces and several technical advisory bodies, since 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Calfornia Water Districts & Water Supply Sources
    WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM? Quincy Corning k F k N F , M R , r R e er th th a a Magalia e Fe F FEATHER RIVER NORTH FORK Shasta Lake STATE WATER PROJECT Chico Orland Paradise k F S , FEATHER RIVER MIDDLE FORK R r STATE WATER PROJECT e Sacramento River th a e F Tehama-Colusa Canal Durham Folsom Lake LAKE OROVILLE American River N Yuba R STATE WATER PROJECT San Joaquin R. Contra Costa Canal JACKSON MEADOW RES. New Melones Lake LAKE PILLSBURY Yuba Co. W.A. Marin M.W.D. Willows Old River Stanislaus R North Marin W.D. Oroville Sonoma Co. W.A. NEW BULLARDS BAR RES. Ukiah P.U. Yuba Co. W.A. Madera Canal Delta-Mendota Canal Millerton Lake Fort Bragg Palermo YUBA CO. W.A Kern River Yuba River San Luis Reservoir Jackson Meadows and Willits New Bullards Bar Reservoirs LAKE SPAULDING k Placer Co. W.A. F MIDDLE FORK YUBA RIVER TRUCKEE-DONNER P.U.D E Gridley Nevada I.D. , Nevada I.D. Groundwater Friant-Kern Canal R n ia ss u R Central Valley R ba Project Yu Nevada City LAKE MENDOCINO FEATHER RIVER BEAR RIVER Marin M.W.D. TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL STATE WATER PROJECT YUBA RIVER Nevada I.D. Fk The Central Valley Project has been founded by the U.S. Bureau of North Marin W.D. CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT , N Yuba Co. W.A. Grass Valley n R Reclamation in 1935 to manage the water of the Sacramento and Sonoma Co. W.A. ica mer Ukiah P.U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biological Resources Section Provides Background Information
    4.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Biological resources section provides background information on sensitive biological resources within Napa County, the regulations and programs that provide for their protection, and an assessment of the potential impacts to biological resources of implementing the Napa County General Plan Update. This section is based upon information presented in the Biological Resources Chapter of the Napa County Baseline Data Report (Napa County, BDR 2005). Additional information on the topics presented herein can be found in these documents. Both documents are incorporated into this section by reference. This section addresses biological resources other than fisheries which are separately addressed in Section 4.6. 4.5.1 SETTING REGIONAL SETTING The Napa County is located in the Coast Ranges Geomorphic Province. This province is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean and on the east by the Great Valley geomorphic province. A dominant characteristic of the Coast Ranges Province is the general northwest- southeast orientation of its valleys and ridgelines. In Napa County, located in the eastern, central section of the province, this trend consists of a series of long, linear, major and lesser valleys, separated by steep, rugged ridge and hill systems of moderate relief that have been deeply incised by their drainage systems. The County is located within the California Floristic Province, the portion of the state west of the Sierra Crest that is known to be particularly rich in endemic plant species (Hickman 1993, Stein et al. 2000). LOCAL SETTING The County’s highest topographic feature is Mount St. Helena, which is located in the northwest corner of the County and whose peak elevation is 4,343 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano Project History
    Solano Project Zachary Redmond Bureau of Reclamation 2000 Table Of Contents The Solano Project.............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Prehistoric Setting .................................................3 Historic Setting ...................................................5 Project Authorization.....................................................8 Construction History ....................................................10 Post-Construction History................................................17 Settlement of the Project .................................................21 Uses of Project Water ...................................................22 Conclusion............................................................24 About the Author .............................................................24 Bibliography ................................................................25 Archival Collections ....................................................25 Government Documents .................................................25 Articles...............................................................25 Books ................................................................25 Web Sites.............................................................26 Index ......................................................................27 1 The Solano Project The Solano Project is a water
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Home: a Recreational Day Use and Interpretive Trail at Putah Creek Exploring Home: a Recreational Day Use and Interpretive Trail for Putah Creek
    Exploring Home: A Recreational Day Use and Interpretive Trail at Putah Creek Exploring Home: A Recreational Day Use and Interpretive Trail for Putah Creek Sage Millar Senior Project June 2008 University of California, Davis Department of Environmental Sciences Landscape Architecture Program A Senior Project Presented to the Faculty of the Landscape Architecture program University of California,Davis in fulfillment of the Requirement Exploring Home: for the Degree of A Recreational Day Use and Interpretive Bachelors of Science of Landscape Architecture Trail for Putah Creek Rob Thayer, Senior Project Advisor Presented by: Patsy Owens, Senior Project Advisor Sage Millar at University of California, Davis Steve McNeil, Committee Member on the Thirteenth day of June, 2008 This senior project consists of background research and site analysis as well as a final site plan for a recreational day use area and interpretive trail on Putah Creek. This document contains the background research, site analysis, and program develop- Abstract ment I completed before designing the final site plan. The site is 10 miles west of Winters on Hwy 128 at the base of Monticello Dam where Cold Creek enters Putah Creek. The site is in the Pu- tah Creek Wildlife area and is approximately 25 acres. Because of it’s location near the trailhead into Stebbins Reserve, and Putah and Cold Creeks, the site provides and excellent opportunity to create an educational and interpretive experience for visitors to the area. Hiking trails, informational kiosks and signage will highlight the history and various natural processes that are occur- ring on and around the site. A small interpretive center or outdoor teaching area will enhance the experience of visitors, and also provide an outdoor classroom for gatherings such as field trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigated Negative Declaration Putah Creek Energy Farm Use Permit Parcel 030-200-016
    Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Putah Creek Energy Farm Use Permit Parcel 030-200-016 Zone File # 2019-006 Lead Agency Yolo County Department of Community Services Planning Division 292 West Beamer Street Woodland, CA, 95695-2598 Technical assistance provided by September 2019 Yolo County Department of Community Services CONTENTS Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................... 1 CEQA 1 Yolo County ........................................................................................................................................... 1 3. Environmental Checklist Form ..................................................................................................... 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ......................................................................................... 5 Environmental Determination .............................................................................................................. 5 4. Detailed Project Description ........................................................................................................ 6 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 Project Objectives ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Putah Creek Corridor Connecting the Pieces
    Putah Creek Corridor Connecting the Pieces Putah Creek Corridor Connecting the Pieces Accepted and Approved by A Senior Project Presented to the Faculty of the Landscape Architecture Program University of California, Davis Steve Greco, Faculty Committee Member in Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Bachelors of Science in Landscape Architecture Tara Hanlon, Committee Member Rich Marovich, Committee Member Presented by: Claire Napawan, Senior Project Faculty Advisor Kathryn Salfen at University of California, Davis on the Tenth Day of June, 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my senior project committee members for their tremendous help. They all provided me with their knowledge, time and encouragement. THANK YOU! Claire Napawan Steve Greco Rich Marovich Tara Hanlon In addition to my senior project committee members, I would like to thank my parents for all their help not only during this project but for helping through everything! i Abstract This project focuses on Putah Creek as it runs from Lake Berryessa to the Yolo Wildlife Area. It examines the corridor as both a wildlife corridor and as a local trail corridor. With many existing patches of wildlife reserves located along Putah creek, the restoration of riparian forest along the channel will provide full connectivity and functionality to the corridor. On the social scale Putah Creek runs between Winters and Davis. Connecting the existing trails of the UC Davis Riparian Reserve and Winters Putah Creek Nature Park will establish a local trail corridor. This project also examines the need of the design of the trails at Win- ter’s Putah Creek Nature Park to Preserve linear corridors and creating multi-use trails that can allow wildlife movement across the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Plan
    Calistoga Bicycle Plan Prepared for City of Calistoga Prepared for Napa County Transportation & Planning Agency Acknowledgments Project Team City Staff Napa County Transportation & Planning Agency Richard Spitler, City Manager Eliot Hurwitz, Program Manager Dan Takasugi, Public Works Director Paul Price, Executive Director Ken MacNab, Planning and Building Renée Kulick, Administrative Assistant Manager Erik Lundquist, Senior Planner Consultant Team Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. City Council Steve Weinberger, PE, PTOE, Principal Mary Jo Yung, PE, PTOE, Traffic Engineer Jack Gingles, Mayor Allan Tilton, PE, Traffic Engineer Michael Dunsford, Vice Mayor Josh Abrams, Transportation Planner Chris Canning Angela McCoy, Editing/Formatting Gary Kraus Dalene J. Whitlock, PE, PTOE, Report Review Karen Slusser Questa Engineering Corporation Jeffery Peters, Principal Planning Commission Margaret Henderson, ASLA, Principal Aaron Fulton, GIS Specialist Jeff Manfredi, Chairperson Shaun O’Bryan, GIS Specialist Paul Coates, Vice Chairperson Nicholas Kite Carol Bush Project Steering Committee Walter Kusener Michael Costanzo, Executive Director Napa County Bicycle Coalition/ Napa County Bicycle Advisory Committee Randy Davis, Director, Parks and Recreation City of American Canyon Jean Hasser, Principal Planner (Retired) City of Napa Greg Desmond, Senior Planner City of St. Helena Rick Marshall, Deputy Director, Public Works County of Napa Calistoga Bicycle Plan Table of Contents Page Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood and Tsunami Annex
    Solano County Emergency Operations Plan Flood and Tsunami Annex Updated January 2017 Solano County Office of Emergency Services 530 Clay Street Fairfield, CA 94533 707.784.1600 Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Quick Reaction Guide ................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Policy .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 2. Authorities and References .............................................................................................. 3 2.1 Federal........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 California .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Solano County ............................................................................................................................ 3 Section 3. Assumptions and Considerations .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Updates Around the Creek
    Volume 15, No. 2, Fall 2004 We envision Putah Creek as a thriving corridor of native riparian and aquatic ecosystems connecting the Coast Ranges to the Sacramento River and the Delta. We envision a Putah Creek watershed community of people who value their creek and are committed to its stewardship. Updates Around the Creek Lower Putah Creek Coordinating Committee: Grants and Dams Rich Marovich CALFED Grant On April 6, the State Water Resources Control Board announced an award to the LPCCC of $992,236 from the Prop 50 CALFED Watershed Program to continue the PCC Adopt-A-Reach Project (volun- teer activism), continue the Putah Creek Above: The Spring Cleanup gathered Discovery Corridor Project (public edu- this recliner, among other things. cation opportunities on public lands), de- Right: Tom Cahill speaks to a good velop bioindicators of restoration success crowd during the June field trip. (UC Davis studies), update the PCC guide to Putah Creek, and update the Watershed Putah Creek Council: Restoration, Cleanup, and Education Management Action Plan. Dawn Lindstrom Putah Creek Council Website Coast and Creek Cleanup for the past 6 Wildlife Conservation Board Gets a Facelift! years and has been the lead organization Grant If you have not had the opportunity to for Yolo County for the past two years. On August 12, the WCB approved $1,207 take a look at the redesigned Putah Creek On September 18, 2004, volunteers along million for implementation projects in the Council website, you will be surprised at Putah Creek went to sites at Yolo Housing Lower Putah Creek Watershed, including the wealth of knowledge you will find.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Sanitary Survey
    LAKE BERRYESSA 2018 WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY Final Report October 2018 Prepared for Napa County Flood Control Water Conservation District and Solano County Water Agency Lake Berryessa 2018 Watershed Sanitary Survey FINAL REPORT October 2018 Technical Committee: Napa County Flood Control Water Conservation District Annamaria Martinez Phillip Miller Solano County Water Agency Justin Pascual Prepared By: Leslie Palencia, Palencia Consulting Engineers PREPARED BY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number Section 1 – Introduction Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1-1 Objectives of the Update .............................................................................................. 1-1 Constituents and Potential Contaminating Activities Covered in the Current Update ... 1-2 Report Organization ..................................................................................................... 1-3 Section 2 – Watershed and Water Supply Systems Background .................................................................................................................. 2-1 Watershed Description ................................................................................................. 2-2 Land Use ........................................................................................................... 2-2 Precipitation ....................................................................................................... 2-2 Water Treatment Plants ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]