DOCSLIB.ORG

Letter from Constantine Roussos to Steve Crocker Et

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Letter from Constantine Roussos to Steve Crocker Et July 1st, 2014 VIA EMAIL ([email protected], [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; and [email protected]) Economist Intelligence Unit Dr. Steve Crocker, Chairman of the ICANN Board; Fadi Chehadé, ICANN President & CEO; Susana Bennett, ICANN COO; Akram Attallah, ICANN President of Generic Domains Division; Christine Willett, ICANN Vice-President of gTLD Operations; Cherine Chalaby, ICANN Chair of the New gTLD Committee; Heather Dryden, ICANN Chair of Government Advisory Committee; Cyrus Namazi, ICANN Vice-President of DNS Engagement; Chris LaHatte, ICANN Ombudsmann; and John Jeffrey, ICANN General Counsel Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 12025 E Waterfront Dr, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094 Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) 20 Cabot Square, London, E14 4QW, United Kingdom Re: DotMusic and other Relevant, Non-Negligible Opposition to .music LLC’s Community Application (ID: 1-959-510461) based on Discrimination and Lack of Enhanced Safeguards Dear Economist Intelligence Unit, Dr. Crocker, the ICANN Board, GAC Chair, Ombudsman, and General Counsel to ICANN: Please accept this collective letter of opposition submitted by a diverse segment of the global music community and public (the “Opposition”), including the following: 1 https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails:downloadapplication/1659?t:ac=1659 1. DotMusic (A .music community initiative includes support from Music Community Member Organizations (MCMOs) constituting a majority of the global music community.2 DotMusic and our community members are not identified in the .music LLC application (See Appendix A) but have a strong association with the .music string). 2. “Relevant opposition by many groups of non-negligible size” (Appendix B) and “relevant opposition by many groups of negligible size” (See Appendix C) strongly associated with the .music string (These community members are not identified in the .music LLC application but also have a strong association with the .music string). 3. Comments by a significant number of individuals from the general public (See Appendix D) (The public comment number should be considered non-negligible if it is compared to the average number of public comments ICANN receives for an average public comment period from the general public). The Opposition is submitted in accordance with Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines which require that “to be taken into account as relevant opposition, such objections or comments must be of a reasoned nature. Sources of opposition that are clearly spurious, unsubstantiated, made for a purpose incompatible with competition objectives, or filed for the purpose of obstruction will not be considered relevant.”3 There are four (4) .music LLC policies that are “incompatible with competition objectives” and have substantial opposition of reasoned nature. In fact these points were brought up to ICANN in many correspondence letters (See Appendix E), re-consideration requests,4 and under the Community Objection filed against .music LLC (See Appendix F) for community objection parts, the additional submission that shows objector(s) as non-negligible and relevant, and response to .music LLC). DotMusic has also filed a Legal Rights Objection against .music LLC. DotMusic will be materially harmed by .music LLC’s exclusive access application (including an anti-competitive eligibility requirement to restrict registrations to only global music community members belonging to organizations formed before 2007). DotMusic has valid trademarks for its .MUSIC™ brand in over 40 countries and territories (in classes relating to domain name registrations) and will be harmed if it is excluded from participation in the string. The .music LLC application states that .music LLC intends to operate under a “sole registrar model” which, if delegated to .music LLC would block DotMusic entirely from participating as a 2 http://music.us/supporters.htm 3 http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/cpe/guidelines-27sep13-en.pdf 4 https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-2012-02-25-en registrar. Also all of DotMusic’s supporting organizations (constituting an overlapping majority of the music community) would be excluded from the string because they are not part of .music LLC’s defined community. In contrast, .music LLC’s organizations (whose overlapping music community members nearly all of which are represented or have memberships with DotMusic’s Music Community Member Organizations) are included in DotMusic’s community definition. DotMusic’s community definition is broad and encompasses .music LLCs organizations because of the symbiotic and overlapping structure of the music sector i.e. the community. It is also important to reiterate the advice of the Government Advisory Committee (GAC) to ICANN in its most recent GAC London Communique about addressing exclusionary policies concerning “discrimination in restricted TLDs.”5 This would include the discriminatory policies contained in .music LLC’s application. Additionally we oppose three (3) other .music LLC policies: 1) The lack of naming enhanced safeguards to protect intellectual property; 2) the lack of a dedicated music-focused content and use policy that should be aligned with the articulated purpose of the string; and 3) registration policies that contain loopholes that provide the registry the right to have all the registration policies (after evaluation and grading by the Economist Intelligence Unit) “modified and amended” after Community Priority Evaluation or delegation. These policy issues, lack of clarirty, and loopholescompromise transparency and accountability to the global music community, the global public interest and the ICANN process. With full disclosure and transparency, we would like to inform ICANN, the EIU, the public and the global music community that we have reached out to .music LLC in numerous occasions to resolve our differences, and address the concerns presented by .music LLC’s Application. We attempted to form an equal and fair partnership that would represent all music constituents without discrimination and serve the global music community, including joint letters of support. Under the “Remedies Requested” section of the Community Objection, it was communicated (to both the International Chamber of Commerce and .music LLC) that the Community Objection would be withdrawn “if an amicable multi-stakeholder community-based partnership by both parties is made representing the interests of the entire community.” (See Appendix F, Pg. 14) .music LLC rejected any proposal to work together under an equal and fair partnership and rejected any proposal to work together, including submitting a joint letter of support to ICANN. .music LLC’s Application, misappropriates the CPE AGB language and leaves the global music community divided between members of organizations that were formed before 2007 and 5 GAC Advice to the Board, https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/GAC%20London%20Communique%20FINAL%20.pdf?version =1&modificationDate=1403767077808&api=v2 Pg.3, IV, 2 a, I members of organizations that were formed after 2007. Under the terms of their Application music community members eligible for .music registration will be beholden to pre-2007 organizations and be locked to these pre-2007 organizations without any alternative choice of switching membership to a post-2007 organization. This policy thwarts consumer choice, forward-looking innovation and competition. This policy might also lead to pre-2007 organizations to engage in price increases and gouging since existing members would be “locked in.” A proper investigation must be conducted by ICANN and the EIU in regards to the misrepresentation of .music LLC’s eligibility policies which raise potential anti-trust considerations. The .music LLC community-based .music application was intended to serve a “higher purpose” than the commercial .music applications submitted by Google, Amazon and or those submitted by other portfolio applicants such as Donuts, Famous Four, Radix or Minds & Machines (See .music Applicant Comparison Matrix in Appendix G). The .music LLC Application has circumvented GAC Advice by declining to file a change request to remove exclusionary language from its Application and continues to discriminate against a substantial percentage of legitimate music constituents. This highlights that .music LLC is substantially over-reaching beyond the community. The objective of a community-based application is to serve a “higher purpose” and meet the needs of their corresponding community as stated by Christine Willett, ICANN’s Vice-President of Operations: “[A] community-based application was intended to serve as a higher purpose… it’s a broader purpose than just a commercial purpose.”6 6 The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jun/26/battle-dot-eco-domain-name-internet-green-groups, 26 June 2014 .music LLC’s Registration Policies are “incompatible with competition objectives” and have anti-trust implications 1) Eligibility Criteria: Music Community Member Organizations formed after 2007 are excluded from accreditation to offer .music domain to their legitimate music members. According to .music LLC’s Application, eligibility to offer .music registrations to community members is restricted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Boxing Clever
    NOVEMBER 05 2018 sandboxMUSIC MARKETING FOR THE DIGITAL ERA ISSUE 215 ’BOXING CLEVER SANDBOX SUMMIT SPECIAL ISSUE Event photography: Vitalij Sidorovic Music Ally would like to thank all of the Sandbox Summit sponsors in association with Official lanyard sponsor Support sponsor Networking/drinks provided by #MarketMusicBetter ast Wednesday (31st October), Music Ally held our latest Sandbox Summit conference in London. While we were Ltweeting from the event, you may have wondered why we hadn’t published any reports from the sessions on our site and ’BOXING CLEVER in our bulletin. Why not? Because we were trying something different: Music Ally’s Sandbox Summit conference in London, IN preparing our writeups for this special-edition sandbox report. From the YouTube Music keynote to panels about manager/ ASSOCIATION WITH LINKFIRE, explored music marketing label relations, new technology and in-house ad-buying, taking in Fortnite and esports, Ed Sheeran, Snapchat campaigns and topics, as well as some related areas, with a lineup marketing to older fans along the way, we’ve broken down the key views, stats and debates from our one-day event. We hope drawn from the sharp end of these trends. you enjoy the results. :) 6 | sandbox | ISSUE 215 | 05.11.2018 TALES OF THE ’TUBE Community tabs, premieres and curation channels cited as key tools for artists on YouTube in 2018 ensions between YouTube and the music industry remain at raised Tlevels following the recent European Parliament vote to approve Article 13 of the proposed new Copyright Directive, with YouTube’s CEO Susan Wojcicki and (the day after Sandbox Summit) music chief Lyor Cohen both publicly criticising the legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Openness in the Music Business– How Record Labels and Artists May Profit from Reducing Control
    Table of Contents TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Dr. Theo Schöller-Stiftungslehrstuhl für Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement Openness in the music business– How record labels and artists may profit from reducing control Johannes L. Wechsler Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. I. Welpe Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. J. Henkel 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. F. v. Wangenheim Die Dissertation wurde am 09.12.2010 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften am 11.05.2011 angenommen. i Table of Contents Table of Contents DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. V LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................................................IX ABSTRACT..............................................................................................................................................XI 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AP1 Companies Affiliates
    AP1 COMPANIES & AFFILIATES 100% RECORDS BIG MUSIC CONNOISSEUR 130701 LTD INTERNATIONAL COLLECTIONS 3 BEAT LABEL BLAIRHILL MEDIA LTD (FIRST NIGHT RECORDS) MANAGEMENT LTD BLIX STREET RECORDS COOKING VINYL LTD A&G PRODUCTIONS LTD (TOON COOL RECORDS) LTD BLUEPRINT RECORDING CR2 RECORDS ABSOLUTE MARKETING CORP CREATION RECORDS INTERNATIONAL LTD BOROUGH MUSIC LTD CREOLE RECORDS ABSOLUTE MARKETING BRAVOUR LTD CUMBANCHA LTD & DISTRIBUTION LTD BREAKBEAT KAOS CURB RECORDS LTD ACE RECORDS LTD BROWNSWOOD D RECORDS LTD (BEAT GOES PUBLIC, BIG RECORDINGS DE ANGELIS RECORDS BEAT, BLUE HORIZON, BUZZIN FLY RECORDS LTD BLUESVILLE, BOPLICITY, CARLTON VIDEO DEAGOSTINI CHISWICK, CONTEMPARY, DEATH IN VEGAS FANTASY, GALAXY, CEEDEE MAIL T/A GLOBESTYLE, JAZZLAND, ANGEL AIR RECS DECLAN COLGAN KENT, MILESTONE, NEW JAZZ, CENTURY MEDIA MUSIC ORIGINAL BLUES, BLUES (PONEGYRIC, DGM) CLASSICS, PABLO, PRESTIGE, CHAMPION RECORDS DEEPER SUBSTANCE (CHEEKY MUSIC, BADBOY, RIVERSIDE, SOUTHBOUND, RECORDS LTD SPECIALTY, STAX) MADHOUSE ) ADA GLOBAL LTD CHANDOS RECORDS DEFECTED RECORDS LTD ADVENTURE RECORDS LTD (2 FOR 1 BEAR ESSENTIALS, (ITH, FLUENTIAL) AIM LTD T/A INDEPENDENTS BRASS, CHACONNE, DELPHIAN RECORDS LTD DAY RECORDINGS COLLECT, FLYBACK, DELTA LEISURE GROPU PLC AIR MUSIC AND MEDIA HISTORIC, SACD) DEMON MUSIC GROUP AIR RECORDINGS LTD CHANNEL FOUR LTD ALBERT PRODUCTIONS TELEVISON (IMP RECORDS) ALL AROUND THE CHAPTER ONE DEUX-ELLES WORLD PRODUCTIONS RECORDS LTD DHARMA RECORDS LTD LTD CHEMIKAL- DISTINCTIVE RECORDS AMG LTD UNDERGROUND LTD (BETTER THE DEVIL) RECORDS DISKY COMMUNICATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Legal and Illegal Digital Music Distribution Christian Syvertsen
    Master thesis The dynamics of legal and illegal digital music distribution Christian Syvertsen 1 Preface This paper was written as a Master thesis in Informatics for Christian Syvertsen at the University of Oslo. The Master studies were started spring 2005, and the thesis is to be delivered November 2007. This Master thesis has been realized at the department of Information Systems at the Institute of Informatics at the University of Oslo, with great assistance and advice by supervisors Jennifer Blechar and Ole Hanseth. November 2007 University of Oslo, Department of Informatics Page 2 of 86 Master thesis The dynamics of legal and illegal digital music distribution Christian Syvertsen 2 Abstract In this thesis I give an overview and background of the current digital music landscape, analyse it through Actor Network Theory and see the complexity of the network as making it difficult to break down into less holistic parts. Every part of the network influences the other. As illegal downloads of illegally copyrighted music only increases, it seems apparent that the record industry have taken a wrong strategy. Copyright laws have been tightened, DRM systems have been applied and lawsuits have been made, but it seems that it has no decreasing effect on the illegal downloads. I believe what the record companies must to is to put more efforts into making a better legal music download service, that actually can offer a better product than the P2P networks, because then increasing numbers of users will prefer that legal alternative. But for something like this to be achieved, there is a long way to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding Platforms: Ecosystem and Evolution Full Text Available At
    Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000061 Crowdfunding Platforms: Ecosystem and Evolution Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000061 Other titles in Foundations and Trends® in Marketing Entertainment Marketing Natasha Zhang Foutz ISBN: 978-1-68083-332-4 The Cultural Meaning of Brands Carlos J. Torelli, Maria A. Rodas and Jennifer L. Stoner ISBN: 978-1-68083-286-0 Ethnography for Marketing and Consumer Research Alladi Venkatesh, David Crockett, Samantha Cross and Steven Chen ISBN: 978-1-68083-234-1 The Information-Economics Perspective on Brand Equity Tulin Erdem and Joffre Swait ISBN: 978-1-68083-168-9 Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000061 Crowdfunding Platforms: Ecosystem and Evolution Yee Heng Tan Tokyo International University Japan [email protected] Srinivas K. Reddy Singapore Management University Singapore [email protected] Boston — Delft Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000061 Foundations and Trends® in Marketing Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 United States Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is Y. H. Tan and S. K. Reddy. Crowdfunding Platforms: Ecosystem and Evolution. Foundations and Trends® in Marketing, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 53–172, 2020. ISBN: 978-1-68083-699-8 © 2020 Y. H. Tan and S. K. Reddy All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Digital Group Plc (“7Digital”, “The Group” Or “The Company”)
    26 September 2017 7digital Group plc (“7digital”, “the Group” or “the Company”) Interim results for the half year ended 30 June 2017 7digital Group plc (AIM: 7DIG), the global leader in end-to-end digital music solutions, today announces its interim results for the half year ended 30 June 2017 (“H1”). Highlights Strong sales momentum into the second half of the year - Total revenues up 17% on a pre currency movement basis and 9% on adjusted basis to £5.9m (H1 2016: £5.4m) - Licensing revenues up 33% to £4.0m (H1 2016: £3.0m) - MRR up 38% to £3.2m (H1 2016: £2.3m) - LBITDA reduced by 36% to £1.7m (H1 2016: £2.6m) Benefits from the acquisition of 24-7 Entertainment (“24-7”), effective from 1 June 2017, starting to come through with additional revenue of £530k in June as a result of the acquisition MediaMarktSaturn (“MMS”), Europe’s biggest electronics and entertainment retailer, becomes the Company’s largest shareholder following the acquisition of 24-7 Entertainment Contracts signed with MMS as part of the transaction with a value of £18.0m over three years Total combined value of other one/two year contracts signed in the period of £4.0m. These included contracts with all three major record labels, the re-launch of TriPlay's eMusic service in the US and a renewed contract with musical.ly across additional territories, with revenue to be recognised over the next year More than 65% of H2 licensing revenues (£7.5m out of £11.3m) already contracted or committed £2.9m raised through a placing and open offer in March 2017 which allowed
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Crowdfunding : Entrepreneurs’ and Platforms’ Strategies Jordana Viotto Da Cruz
    The Economics of Crowdfunding : Entrepreneurs’ and Platforms’ Strategies Jordana Viotto da Cruz To cite this version: Jordana Viotto da Cruz. The Economics of Crowdfunding : Entrepreneurs’ and Platforms’ Strategies. Sociology. Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2017. English. NNT : 2017USPCD030. tel-01899518 HAL Id: tel-01899518 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01899518 Submitted on 19 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| UNIVERSITE PARIS 13 U.F.R. DE SCIENCES ÉCONOMIQUES ÉCOLE DOCTORALE : ERASME NO 493 THÈSE Pour obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Université Paris 13 Discipline : Sciences Économiques Présentée et soutenue publiquement par Jordana VIOTTO DA CRUZ Le 13 novembre 2017 « The Economics of Crowdfunding: Entrepreneurs’ and Platforms’ Strategies » Directeurs de thèse Marc BOURREAU, Télécom ParisTech François MOREAU, Université Paris 13 Jury Thierry PÉNARD, Professeur, Université Rennes 1 Président Paul BELLEFLAMME, Professeur, Aix-Marseille Université Rapporteur Jörg CLAUSSEN, Professeur, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Rapporteur Françoise BENHAMOU, Professeur, Université Paris 13 Examinateur Marc BOURREAU, Professeur, Télécom ParisTech Directeur de thèse François MOREAU, Professeur, Université Paris 13 Directeur de thèse UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13 U.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Název 1 99Funken 2 Abundance Investment 3 Angelsden
    # Název 1 99funken 2 Abundance Investment 3 Angelsden 4 Apontoque 5 Appsplit 6 Barnraiser 7 Bidra.no 8 Bloom venture catalyst 9 Bnktothefuture 10 Booomerang.dk 11 Boosted 12 Buzzbnk 13 Catapooolt 14 Charidy 15 Circleup 16 Citizinvestor 17 CoAssets 18 Companisto 19 Crowdcube 20 CrowdCulture 21 Crowdfunder 22 Crowdfunder.co.uk 23 Crowdsupply 24 Cruzu 25 DemoHour 26 DigVentures 27 Donorschoose 28 Econeers 29 Eppela 30 Equitise 31 Everfund 32 Experiment 33 Exporo 34 Flzing v 35 Fondeadora 36 Fundit 37 Fundrazr 38 Gemeinschaftscrowd 39 Goteo 40 GreenVesting.com 41 Greenxmoney 42 Hit Hit 43 Housers 44 Idea.me 45 Indiegogo 46 Innovestment 47 Invesdor.com 48 JD crowdfunding 49 Jewcer 50 Karolina Fund 51 Katalyzator 52 Ketto 53 Kickstarter 54 KissKissBankBank 55 Kreativcisobe 56 Labolsasocial 57 Lanzanos 58 Lignum Capital 59 Marmelada 60 Massivemov 61 Mesenaatti.me 62 Monaco funding 63 Musicraiser 64 MyMicroInvest 65 Nakopni me 66 Namlebee 67 Octopousse 68 Oneplanetcrowd International B.V. 69 Penězdroj 70 Phundee 71 PledgeCents 72 Pledgeme 73 Pledgemusic 74 Pozible 75 PPL 76 Projeggt 77 Rockethub 78 Seed&Spark 79 Seedmatch 80 Seedrs 81 Snowballeffect 82 Spacehive 83 Spiele offensive 84 Start51 85 Startlab 86 Startme 87 Startnext 88 Startovac 89 Startsomegood 90 Syndicate Room 91 TheHotStart 92 Thundafund 93 Tubestart 94 Ulule 95 Venturate 96 Verkami 97 Vision bakery 98 Wemakeit 99 Wishberry 100 Zoomal Legenda: *Sociální média Vysvětlení zkratek pro sociální média F - Facebook T - Twitter Lin - LinkedIn G+ - Google plus YouT - YouTube Insta - Instagram
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property Law in Cyberspace
    Intellectual Property Law in Cyberspace Second Edition CHAPTER 7 UNIQUE ONLINE TRADEMARK ISSUES Howard S. Hogan Stephen W. Feingold Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton Washington, D.C. New York, NY CHAPTER 8 DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION, MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION Howard S. Hogan Stephen W. Feingold Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton Washington, D.C. New York, NY Intellectual Property Law in Cyberspace Second Edition G. Peter Albert, Jr. and American Intellectual Property Law Association CHAPTER 7 UNIQUE ONLINE TRADEMARK ISSUES CHAPTER 8 DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION, MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION American Intellectual Property Law Association A Arlington, VA Reprinted with permission For more information contact: bna.com/bnabooks or call 1-800-960-1220 Copyright © 2011 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Albert, G. Peter, 1964– Intellectual property law in cyberspace / G. Peter Albert, Jr. -- 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-57018-753-7 (alk. paper) 1. Industrial property--United States. 2. Computer networks--Law and legislation--United States. 3. Internet 4. Copyright and electronic data processing--United States. I. Title. KF3095.A77 2011 346.7304’8--dc23 2011040494 All rights reserved. Photocopying any portion of this publication is strictly prohibited unless express written authorization is first obtained from BNA Books, 1231 25th St., NW, Washington, DC 20037, bna.com/bnabooks. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by BNA Books for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided that $1.00 per page is paid directly to CCC, 222 Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA 01923, copyright.com, Telephone: 978-750-8400, Fax: 978-646-8600.
    [Show full text]
  • Girişimciler Için Yeni Nesil Bir Finansman Modeli “Kitle Fonlamasi - Crowdfunding”: Dünya Ve Türkiye Uygulamalari Üzerine Bir Inceleme Ve Model Önerisi
    T.C. BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ İŞLETME ANABİLİM DALI İŞLETME DOKTORA PROGRAMI GİRİŞİMCİLER İÇİN YENİ NESİL BİR FİNANSMAN MODELİ “KİTLE FONLAMASI - CROWDFUNDING”: DÜNYA VE TÜRKİYE UYGULAMALARI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME VE MODEL ÖNERİSİ DOKTORA TEZİ HAZIRLAYAN ASLI VURAL TEZ DANIŞMANI DOÇ. DR. DENİZ UMUT DOĞAN ANKARA- 2019 TEŞEKKÜR Beni her konuda daima destekleyen, cesaretlendiren, güçlü olmayı öğreten, mücadeleden, öğrenmekten ve kendimi geliĢtirmekten vazgeçmemeyi ilke edindiren, sevgili babama ve rahmetli anneme, Sevgisini ve desteğini daima hissettiğim değerli eĢime, Tezimin her aĢamasında bana tecrübesi ve bilgi birikimiyle yol gösteren, ilgi ve desteğini esirgemeyen tez danıĢmanım Doç. Dr. Deniz Umut DOĞAN’a, Çok değerli görüĢleri ve yönlendirmeleri için Prof. Dr. Nalan AKDOĞAN’a, ÇalıĢma dönemimde destek ve yardımını benden hiç esirgemeyen Çiğdem GÖKÇE’ye ve sevgili dostlarıma, En içten duygularımla teĢekkür ederim. I ÖZET GiriĢimcilerin en önemli problemi finansal kaynaklara ulaĢmalarında yaĢadıkları zorluklardır. GiriĢimciler finansal sorunlarını çözmek için geleneksel finansman yöntemlerinden ve Risk Sermayesi, GiriĢim Sermayesi, Bireysel Katılım Sermayesi, Mikrofinansman gibi alternatif finansman modellerinden yararlanmaktadır. Günümüzde giriĢimcilerin gereksinim duydukları sermayeye ulaĢmak için kullandıkları yeni finansal yöntemlerden biri Kitle Fonlaması modelidir. ÇalıĢmada giriĢimcilik, giriĢim finansmanı ve Kitle Fonlaması modeli konusunda literatür taraması yapılarak ilgili kavramlara değinilmiĢtir. Dünya’da
    [Show full text]
  • Song of the Year
    General Field Page 1 of 15 Category 3 - Song Of The Year 015. AMAZING 031. AYO TECHNOLOGY Category 3 Seal, songwriter (Seal) N. Hills, Curtis Jackson, Timothy Song Of The Year 016. AMBITIONS Mosley & Justin Timberlake, A Songwriter(s) Award. A song is eligible if it was Rudy Roopchan, songwriter songwriters (50 Cent Featuring Justin first released or if it first achieved prominence (Sunchasers) Timberlake & Timbaland) during the Eligibility Year. (Artist names appear in parentheses.) Singles or Tracks only. 017. AMERICAN ANTHEM 032. BABY Angie Stone & Charles Tatum, 001. THE ACTRESS Gene Scheer, songwriter (Norah Jones) songwriters; Curtis Mayfield & K. Tiffany Petrossi, songwriter (Tiffany 018. AMNESIA Norton, songwriters (Angie Stone Petrossi) Brian Lapin, Mozella & Shelly Peiken, Featuring Betty Wright) 002. AFTER HOURS songwriters (Mozella) Dennis Bell, Julia Garrison, Kim 019. AND THE RAIN 033. BACK IN JUNE José Promis, songwriter (José Promis) Outerbridge & Victor Sanchez, Buck Aaron Thomas & Gary Wayne songwriters (Infinite Embrace Zaiontz, songwriters (Jokers Wild 034. BACK IN YOUR HEAD Featuring Casey Benjamin) Band) Sara Quin & Tegan Quin, songwriters (Tegan And Sara) 003. AFTER YOU 020. ANDUHYAUN Dick Wagner, songwriter (Wensday) Jimmy Lee Young, songwriter (Jimmy 035. BARTENDER Akon Thiam & T-Pain, songwriters 004. AGAIN & AGAIN Lee Young) (T-Pain Featuring Akon) Inara George & Greg Kurstin, 021. ANGEL songwriters (The Bird And The Bee) Chris Cartier, songwriter (Chris 036. BE GOOD OR BE GONE Fionn Regan, songwriter (Fionn 005. AIN'T NO TIME Cartier) Regan) Grace Potter, songwriter (Grace Potter 022. ANGEL & The Nocturnals) Chaka Khan & James Q. Wright, 037. BE GOOD TO ME Kara DioGuardi, Niclas Molinder & 006.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIA NON JUDICIAL Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi E
    INDIA NON JUDICIAL Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi e-Stamp Certificate No. IN-DL60960205740197L Certificate Issued Date 11-Sep-2013 04:14 PM Account Reference IMPACC (IV)/ dl839203/ DELHI/ DL-DLH Unique Doc. Reference SUBIN-DLDL83920320383381180966L Purchased by SANJAY KUMAR SINGH ARBITRATOR Description of Document Article 12 Award Property Description NA Consideration Price (Rs.) 0 (Zero) First Party SANJAY KUMAR SINGH ARBITRATOR Second Party Not Applicable Stamp Duty Paid By SANJAY KUMAR SINGH ARBITRATOR Stamp Duty Amount(Rs.) 100 (One Hundred only) BEFORE SHRI SANJAY KUMAR SINGH ARBITRATOR IN DOMAIN NAME DISUPTE RESOLUTION POLICY (INDRP) IN RE: MICROSOFT CORPORATION ONE MICROSOFT WAY REDMOND WA 98052-6399. USA COMPLAINANT Versus PIYUSH SOMANI, ESDS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED B-24 & B-25, NICE INDUSTRIAL AREA. SATPUR MIDC. NASHIK-422 007 INDIA RESPONDENT Disputed Domain Name: <micorsoft.co.in> The complainant has filed the present Complaint for decision in accordance with the IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution policy (the police), and the INDRP Rules of procedure (the Rules) of the IN Registry 1. The parties are: The Complainant in this administrative proceeding is MICROSOFT CORPORATION ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WA 98052-6399. USA The Complainant's contact details are: Address ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WA 98052-6399. USA The Complainant's authorized representative in this administrative proceeding is: A) Name: Pravin Anand Address: Anand and Anand. First Channel, plot No 17A, Sector 16A, Film City, Noida Telephone: 91-120- 4059300. Fax: 91-120-4243056. E-mail: [email protected] B) Name: Nischal Anand Address: Anand and Anand. First Channel, plot No 17A Sector 16A, Film City, Noida, India Telephone 91-120-4059300 Fax: 91-120-4243056 E-mail nischal@anandandanana com.
    [Show full text]