Report of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People General Assembly A/70/35 Official Records Seventieth Session Supplement No. 35 Report of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People United Nations New York, 2015 Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. ISSN 0255-2035 A/70/35 [6 October 2015] Contents Chapter Page Letter of transmittal ............................................................. 4 I. Introduction ................................................................... 5 II. Mandate of the Committee ....................................................... 8 III. Organization of work ............................................................ 9 A. Membership and officers ..................................................... 9 B. Participation in the work of the Committee ...................................... 9 IV. Review of the situation relating to the question of Palestine ............................ 10 V. Action taken by the Committee ................................................... 19 A. Action taken in accordance with General Assembly resolution 69/20 ................ 19 B. Action taken by the Committee and the Division for Palestinian Rights in accordance with General Assembly resolutions 69/20 and 69/21 .............................. 19 VI. Action taken by the Department of Public Information in accordance with General Assembly resolution 69/22 ................................................................ 23 VII. Conclusions and recommendations of the Committee ................................. 24 15-17236 3/32 A/70/35 Letter of transmittal [6 October 2015] Mr. Secretary-General, I have the honour to enclose herewith the report of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People for submission to the General Assembly in accordance with paragraph 2 of its resolution 69/20 of 25 November 2014. The report covers the period from 7 October 2014 to 6 October 2015. (Signed) Fodé Seck Chair of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People His Excellency Mr. Ban Ki-moon Secretary-General of the United Nations New York 4/32 15-17236 A/70/35 Chapter I Introduction 1. Among the developments that marked the reporting period were the efforts by the United Nations and the international community to support the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip following the Israeli military operations in the summer of 2014, which caused widespread destruction and physical and human devastation; the submission by the State of Palestine of documents to accede to a number of international treaties and conventions, including the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; the Israeli parliamentary elections on 17 March and the subsequent formation of a right-wing Government under Benjamin Netanyahu; the further deterioration of the security situation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including the rise of settler violence and terror against Palestinian civilians; and endeavours for stronger involvement of the wider international community in the peace negotiations. 2. More than one year after the war on Gaza in the summer of 2014, the situation in the Gaza Strip remains very grave. Palestinian and international efforts to address the humanitarian situation and rebuild the lives, homes and livelihoods of the tens of thousands of people affected by the violence have been slow to proceed owing to the blockade and severe restrictions on the import of materials into Gaza imposed by Israel, the occupying Power, and also to unfulfilled donor pledges. As at August 2015, not a single one of the destroyed homes in Gaza had been rebuilt, and over 100,000 Palestinians are still homeless, forced to shelter in temporary housing with other families or in the ruins of their homes. 3. Israeli occupying forces continued to carry out frequent military raids and incursions in the West Bank, resulting in the killing and injuring of Palestinians, including children. Thousands of Palestinians, including women and children, were arrested during the reporting period, in addition to over 5,000 Palestinians who remain in Israeli jails and detention centres, many in administrative detention. Unarmed Palestinian civilians continued to be subjected to excessive force by Israeli forces during demonstrations against the prolonged occupation of their land. Israel continued to expand its illegal settlements in the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, and approved plans to build thousands more new settlement units. Eleven years after the 2004 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice was rendered, the construction of the separation wall and its associated regime continue, fragmenting the Palestinian land and communities, obstructing movement and access, further isolating East Jerusalem and severely harming the socioeconomic conditions of the Palestinian people. During the reporting period, the situation in occupied East Jerusalem remained alarming, with increased numbers of incursions by extremist Israelis into the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound and acts of incitement and provocation, as well as continued land confiscations, excavations near holy sites, house demolitions, revocations of residency permits and evictions of Palestinian residents. 4. Palestinian State-building and institution-building efforts continued, yet were undermined by restrictions and obstacles imposed by Israel on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which continued to prevent the free movement of persons and goods, economic activity and sustained development and growth. After the State of Palestine deposited instruments of accession to a number of international treaties and conventions, including the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on 15-17236 5/32 A/70/35 1 January 2015, to which it acceded the following week, Israel withheld the tax revenue that it collects on behalf of the Palestinian people pursuant to the 1994 Paris Protocol on Economic Relations, deepening the financial crisis of the Government of the State of Palestine, and did not release it until after the Israeli elections, following intense international pressure. On 25 June, the State of Palestine submitted a file to the International Criminal Court detailing possible war crimes in Gaza and settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. 5. Following the suspension of bilateral and United States-mediated peace talks by Israel in April 2014 and the subsequent war on Gaza in July and August 2014, Member States and regional organizations embarked upon efforts to mobilize broader, more substantive international support to the peace process. These include proposals for the Security Council to shoulder its responsibilities and redouble efforts to enforce its resolutions on the question of Palestine, as well as enlisting the support of regional stakeholders and organizations in order to break the deadlock and cycle of violence and help to foster an environment that is conducive to peace. During the reporting period, Saint Lucia, Sweden and the Holy See officially recognized the State of Palestine, and a number of European parliaments passed non-binding resolutions calling upon their Governments to do so. 6. During the reporting period, the activities of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People and its Bureau continued to draw the international community’s attention to the issues of immediate urgency, such as the dire humanitarian situation and the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip, the international efforts to revitalize negotiations and the need to address ongoing Israeli settlement activities in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, with the objective of mobilizing wide support for the Palestinian people’s inalienable right s, including the right to self-determination and independence, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, international law and the provisions and calls made in numerous relevant United Nations resolutions. The Committee monitored the situation and the political developments on the ground, implemented its programme of international meetings and conferences and held consultations with representatives of Governments, national parliaments and interparliamentary organizations, as well as civil society. The Committee continued to reaffirm and promote the United Nations position that a just and permanent settlement of the question of Palestine could be reached only by ending the Israeli occupation that began in 1967, achieving the full independence of the State of Palestine on the basis of the pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital and reaching a just and agreed solution to the issue of Palestine refugees on the basis of General Assembly resolution 194 (III). 7. Until the end of 2014, the Committee continued its series of events within the framework of the International Year of Solidarity with the Palestinian People. An international meeting of parliamentarians organized by the Committee at United Nations Headquarters in November focused on their role in ensuring respect for international law. An international conference organized by the Committee in Seville, Spain, in December was aimed at better understanding the role of local governments and civil society organizations in the struggle for the realization of Palestinian rights. A seminar on assistance to the Palestinian people held in Vienna in March 2015 focused on key aspects
Recommended publications
  • Israel's Treatment of Palestinian Prisoners
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT POLICY BRIEFING Violating international legal obligations: Israel's treatment of Palestinian prisoners Abstract Nearly five thousand Palestinians are held by Israel in a 'parallel' justice system reserved for those accused of offenses against the state. Instead of entering the Palestinian legal system, these prisoners are tried by Israel's military courts and often held in Israel, in conditions that violate international humanitarian and human rights conventions. Children and elected officials are among them, subject to ill-treatment — including prolonged solitary confinement, abuse and a lack of due process— by Israeli military authorities. A number of prisoners have gone on hunger strike and increasing numbers of protestors have demonstrated to demand that Israel guarantee basic prisoners' rights and end its deplorable prison conditions and indefinite detention without charges or fair trial. One prisoner has been on strike for more than 200 days; he and a number of others are in critical condition and require urgent medial treatment. While the United Nations and other international bodies have condemned Israel's systematic ill-treatment of Palestinian prisoners as a blatant violation of international law, the situation has only recently attracted widespread international calls for action. The European Union has expressed its concern, but action is now required. DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2013_95 March 2013 PE 491.484 EN Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This Policy Briefing is an initiative of the Policy Department, DG EXPO AUTHORS: Nasser ISHAQ under supervision of Pekka HAKALA Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department WIB 06 M 071 rue Wiertz 60 B-1047 Brussels Editorial Assistants: Agnieszka PUNZET and Delphine FUMEY CONTACT: Feedback of all kinds is welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoners of Injustice: Report of the National Lawyers Guild Delegation to Palestine | 1 NLG Delegation at the Wall with Stop the Wall Founder, Jamal Juma
    PRISONERS OF INJUSTICE Report of the National Lawyers Guild Delegation to Palestine May 2014 Published November 2014 by the National Lawyers Guild. The National Lawyers Guild was formed in 1937 as the nation’s first racially integrated bar association to advocate for the protection of constitutional, human and civil rights. National Lawyers Guild 132 Nassau Street, Rm. 922 New York, NY 10038 Web: nlg.org National Lawyers Guild International Committee Web: nlginternational.org Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 CHARGE OF THE DELEGATION 3 FINDINGS 5 LEGAL-INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 8 ADMINISTRATIVE DETENTION 9 HUNGER STRIKERS 12 TARGETING OF YOUTH 15 DETENTION OF LAWYERS 18 PLEA BARGAINS 19 COORDINATION WITH THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY 20 THE MO’ATAZ AL-WASHAHA CASE 21 NOTHING HERE IS NEWS TO THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT 23 PARALLELS WITH U.S. MASS INCARCERATION/’WAR ON 25 TERROR’ POLICIES AND PRACTICES U.S. AND ISRAELI MASS INCARCERATION: CRIMINALIZE, 26 CONTROL, DISEMPOWER CONCLUSION 29 DELEGATE BIOGRAPHIES 30 BIBLIOGRAPHY 32 Dedication There have been many harrowing developments since our May 2014 prisoners’ rights delegation to Palestine. In the months following our delegation, Israel showed the world just how brutal a military occupation can be by heavily restricting movement throughout the West Bank; arresting hundreds of Palestinians and placing many of them in indefinite administrative detention; and instigating a vicious, ultraviolent bombardment of the Gaza Strip, killing thousands of Palestinians, most of whom were civil- ian men, women and children. The goal of our delegation was to meet with, and learn from, as many of the Palestinian political lead- ers, community organizers, and activists who are most involved in prisoners’ rights issues in Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography and Politics: Maps of “Palestine” As a Means to Instill Fundamentally Negative Messages Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies (C.S.S) Special Information Bulletin November 2003 Geography and Politics: Maps of “Palestine” as a means to instill fundamentally negative messages regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict The maps of “Palestine” distributed by the Palestinian Authority and other PA elements are an important and tangible method of instilling fundamentally negative messages relating to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. These include ignoring the existence of the State of Israel, and denying the bond between the Jewish people and the Holyland; the obligation to fulfill the Palestinian “right of return”; the continuation of the “armed struggle” for the “liberation” of all of “Palestine”, and perpetuating hatred of the State of Israel. Hence, significant changes in the maps of “Palestine” would be an important indicator of a real willingness by the Palestinians to recognize the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state and to arrive at a negotiated settlement based on the existence of two states, Israel and Palestine, as envisaged by President George W. Bush in the Road Map. The map features “Palestine” as distinctly Arab-Islamic, an integral part of the Arab world, and situated next to Syria, Egypt and Lebanon. Israel is not mentioned. (Source: “Natioal Education” 2 nd grade textbook, page 16, 2001-2002). Abstract The aim of this document is to sum up the findings regarding maps of “Palestine” (and the Middle East) circulated in the Palestinian areas by the PA and its institutions, and by other organizations (including research institutions, charities, political figures, and terrorist organizations such as Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad).
    [Show full text]
  • International Treaties Signed by the State of Palestine
    INTERNATIONAL TREATIES SIGNED BY THE STATE OF PALESTINE Area Name of Treaty and Date of its Adoption Entry into force 1. Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading 2 May 2014 Treatment or Punishment (CAT), 10 December 1984 2. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against 2 May 2014 Women (CEDAW), 18 December 1979. 3. Convention on the Political Rights of Women, 31 March 1953 2 April 2015 4. Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989. 2 May 2014 Human 5. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 13 December 2 May 2014 Rights 2006. 6. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 16 Decem- 2 July 2014 ber 1966. 7. International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Dis- 2 May 2014 crimination, 7 March 1966. 8. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2 July 2014 (ICESCR), 16 December 1966. 9. Optional Protocol to the Convention of the Rights of the Child on the 7 May 2014 Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict, 25 May 2000 10. Hague Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on - Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907 11. Geneva Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the 2 April 2014 Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 12 August 1949 12. Geneva Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of 2 April 2014 Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, 12 August 1949 Interna- 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Kazakhstan
    Deposited on 26 November 2020 Republic of Kazakhstan Status of List of Reservations and Notifications This document contains the consolidated list of reservations and notifications made by Republic of Kazakhstan upon deposit of the instrument of ratification pursuant to Articles 28(5) and 29(1) of the Convention, and subsequent to that deposit. 1 Deposited on 26 November 2020 Article 2 – Interpretation of Terms Notification - Agreements Covered by the Convention Pursuant to Article 2(1)(a)(ii) of the Convention, Republic of Kazakhstan wishes the following agreements to be covered by the Convention: Other Original/ Date of Date of Title Contracting Amending Entry into Signature Jurisdiction Instrument Force 1 Конвенция между Правительством Республики Армения и Правительством Республики Казахстан об избежании двойного Armenia Original 06-11-2006 19-01-2011 налогообложения и предотвращении уклонения от налогообложения в отношении налогов на доходы и на имущество 2 Convention between the Republic of Austria and the Republic of Austria Original 10-09-2004 01-03-2006 Kazakhstan with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital 3 Конвенция между Original 16-09-1996 07-05-1997 Правительством Республики Азербайджан и Правительством Казахстанской Республики об избежании двойного Azerbaijan Amending налогообложения и 03-04-2017 27-04-20181 Instrument (a) предотвращении уклонения от налогообложения в отношении налогов на доходы и на имущество 4 Соглашение между Original 11-04-1997 13-12-1997 Правительством Республики Казахстан и Правительством Республики
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Authority Textbooks: the Attitude to Jews, Israel and Peace (Update, June 2018)
    המרכז למורשת המודיעין (מל"מ) הממררככזז להמומירדשע ת להמומדוידעייןע יןו ל(טמרלו"רמ ) מרכז המידע למודיעין ולטרור Palestinian Authority textbooks: the attitude to Jews, Israel and peace (Update, June 2018) July 22, 2018 Overview Right: Representing the Western Wall (al-Buraq Wall1) as sacred exclusively to Muslims: "...the al-Buraq Wall is part of the western wall of al-Aqsa mosque and right to it belongs exclusively to Muslims" (from the fifth grade textbook Islamic Education, part 1 (2017), page 54).2 Left: Demonizing Israel and accusing it of excavating under the Temple Mount to topple the mosques (Social studies textbook for the seventh grade, part 1 (2017), page 64). This report updates the previous study about how Jews, Israel and peace appear in Palestinian Authority (PA) textbooks.3 The study was conducted by Dr. Arnon Groiss and commissioned by the Center for Near East Policy Research, directed by David Bedein. The previous study was based on 150 textbooks dealing with various subjects, most of which were printed in the PA between 2013 and 2017. In 2016 the PA began a project for the new publication of the textbooks in use in its schools, which necessitated an update. When the textbooks for the first to tenth grades had been updated and printed, a further study was done by Dr. Groiss and the results appear below. The current study covers 118 textbooks, 1Al-Buraq was the name of the animal which, according to Muslim tradition, carried Muhammad during his night flight from Mecca to Jerusalem, from which he rose to heaven.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 6 September 2011
    United Nations A/AC.183/SR.332 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 September 2011 Original: English Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People Summary record of the 332nd meeting Held at Headquarters, New York, on Tuesday, 19 April 2011, at 3 p.m. Chair: Mr. Diallo ..................................................... (Senegal) Contents Adoption of the agenda Update on developments since the previous meeting of the Committee The situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and developments in the political process Report of the Chair on the United Nations Latin American and Caribbean Meeting in Support of Israeli-Palestinian Peace and the United Nations Meeting of Civil Society in Support of Israeli-Palestinian Peace, Montevideo, 29 to 31 March 2011 United Nations Seminar on Mobilizing Assistance to the Palestinian People, Helsinki, 28 and 29 April 2011 Accreditation of civil society organizations to the Committee This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be submitted in one of the working languages. They should be set forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within one week of the date of this document to the Chief, Official Records Editing Section, room DC2-750, 2 United Nations Plaza. Any corrections to the record of this meeting and of other meetings will be issued in a corrigendum. 11-30418 (E) *1130418* A/AC.183/SR.332 The meeting was called to order at 3.20 p.m. Government had approved the construction of 500 houses in the West Bank. Adoption of the agenda The situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A HRC WG 6 34 KAZ 2 Kazakhstan Annex E
    Tables for UN Compilation on Kazakhstan I. Scope of international obligations1 A. International human rights treaties2 Status during previous cycle Action after review Not ratified/not accepted Ratification, accession or ICERD (1998) CRPD (2015) ICCPR -OP 2 succession ICESCR (2006) ICRMW/* ICCPR (2006) CEDAW (1998) CAT (1998) OP-CAT (2008) CRC (1994) OP-CRC-AC (2003) OP-CRC-SC (2001) CRPD (signature, 2008) ICPPED (2009) Complaints procedures, ICERD, art. 14 (2008) OP-ICESCR (signature, inquiries and 2010) OP-ICESCR (signature, urgent action3 2010) ICCPR, art. 41 ICCPR-OP 1 (2009) OP-CRC-IC OP-CEDAW, art. 8 (2001) ICRMW CAT, arts. 20 (1998), 21 OP-CRPD (signature, 2008) and 22 (2008) ICPPED, arts. 31 and 32 OP-CRPD (signature, 2008) Reservations and / or declarations Status during previous cycle Action after review Current Status ICCPR -OP 1 (Declaration, ICCPR -OP 1 (Declaration, art. 1, 2009) art. 1) OP-CAT (Declaration, art. OP-CAT (Declaration, art. 24.1, 2010) 24.1) OP-CRC-AC (Declaration, OP-CRC-AC (Declaration, art.3.2, minimum age of art.3.2, minimum age of recruitment at 19 years recruitment at 19 years) 2003) B. Other main relevant international instruments Status during previous cycle Action after review Not ratified Ratification, accession or Convention on the Convention against Rome Statute of the succession Prevention and Punishment Discrimination in Education International Criminal Court of the Crime of Genocide (2016) Conventions on stateless persons4 ILO Conventions Nos. 169 and 1895 Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and Additional Protocols thereto6 Conventions on refugees7 Palermo Protocol8 ILO fundamental Conventions9 II.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/20/32 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/20/32 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 May 2012 Original: English Human Rights Council Twentieth session Agenda item 7 Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Richard Falk* Summary In the present report, while noting the continuing non-cooperation of Israel, the Special Rapporteur underscores the widespread and abusive use of administrative detention procedures by Israel. He calls attention to hunger strikes by Palestinian prisoners in protest against administrative detention. Amid escalating violence by Israel in Gaza, the Special Rapporteur examines Israel’s policy and practice of targeted killings. * Late submission. GE.12-13656 A/HRC/20/32 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1–6 3 II. Administrative detention and hunger strikes ........................................................... 7–15 5 III. Extrajudicial executions in Gaza by Israel .............................................................. 16–23 9 IV. Settlement expansion............................................................................................... 24–32 12 A. Settlement outposts ......................................................................................... 25–29 12 B. Settler violence ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ICRC Statement -- Status of the Protocols Additional
    United Nations General Assembly 73rd Session Sixth Committee General debate on the Status of the Protocols additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and relating to the protection of victims of armed conflicts [Agenda item 83, to be considered in October 2018] Statement by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) October 2018 Mr / Madam Chair, On the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the Additional Protocols of 1977, the ICRC took several steps to promote the universalization and implementation of these instruments. Its initiatives included the publication of a policy paper on the impact and practical relevance of the Additional Protocols, raising the question of accession in its dialogue with States, and highlighting the relevance of these instruments through national and regional events. Among other steps taken, the ICRC wrote to States not yet party to the Additional Protocols encouraging them to adhere to these instruments. We reiterate our call to States that have not yet done so, to ratify the Additional Protocols and other key instruments of IHL. At the time of writing, 174 States are party to Additional Protocol I and 168 States are party to Additional Protocol II. Since our last intervention, Burkina Faso and Madagascar became States number 73 and 74 to ratify Additional Protocol III. In April 2018, Palestine made a declaration pursuant to Article 90 of Additional Protocol I making it the 77th State to accept the competence of the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission. We welcome the fact that the number of States party to this and other key instruments of IHL has continued to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • United Arab Republic 1 United Arab Republic
    United Arab Republic 1 United Arab Republic ةدحتملا ةيبرعلا ةيروهمجلا Al-Gumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-Muttahidah Al-Jumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-MuttahidahUnited Arab Republic ← → 1958–1961 ← (1971) → ← → Flag Coat of arms Anthem Oh My Weapon[1] Capital Cairo Language(s) Arabic [2] Religion Secular (1958–1962) Islam (1962–1971) Government Confederation President - 1958–1970 Gamal Abdel Nasser United Arab Republic 2 Historical era Cold War - Established February 22, 1958 - Secession of Syria September 28, 1961 - Renamed to Egypt 1971 Area - 1961 1166049 km2 (450214 sq mi) Population - 1961 est. 32203000 Density 27.6 /km2 (71.5 /sq mi) Currency United Arab Republic pound Calling code +20 Al-Gumhuriyah al-Arabiyahةدحتملا ةيبرعلا ةيروهمجلا :The United Arab Republic (Arabic al-Muttahidah/Al-Jumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-Muttahidah), often abbreviated as the U.A.R., was a sovereign union between Egypt and Syria. The union began in 1958 and existed until 1961, when Syria seceded from the union. Egypt continued to be known officially as the "United Arab Republic" until 1971. The President was Gamal Abdel Nasser. During most of its existence (1958–1961) it was a member of the United Arab States, a confederation with North Yemen. The UAR adopted a flag based on the Arab Liberation Flag of the Egyptian Revolution of 1952, but with two stars to represent the two parts. This continues to be the flag of Syria. In 1963, Iraq adopted a flag that was similar but with three stars, representing the hope that Iraq would join the UAR. The current flags of Egypt, Sudan, and Yemen are also based on Arab Liberation Flag of horizontal red, white, and black bands.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Research Paper
    TOPICS IN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT REFUGEES: CITIZNESHIP AND DISPLACEMENT IN THE MIDDLE EAST INTD 497 FINAL RESEARCH PAPER Submitted by: Sara Awad – 260552571 Submitted to: Prof Diana Allan th Submitted on: December 7 2015 Today, 6 million Palestinian refugees live in different countries around the world. At a micro-level, Egypt hosts over 120,000 Palestinian refugees (0.1% of the population) in different cities like Alexandria, Cairo, and Al-Arish (UNHCR, 2014). While the majority arrived after the Nakba (1948) and the 1967 war, more recent refugees arrived from Gaza following major Israeli raids. Although Egypt’s responsibility as a host state is to ensure Palestinian refugees a decent life, assistance efforts have not been consistent over time. Since the 1940s, the Egyptian government has been refusing to have any permanent refugee camps fearing that Palestinians would stay permanently. As a result, unlike Lebanon and Jordan, Palestinians in Egypt live within the Egyptian community in the urban setting (Abed, 2009). Additionally, although UNRWA is the official assistance and protection provider to Palestinian refugees, Egypt does not fall under its scope of operations. Palestinian refugees report directly to UNHCR whose efforts have been either insufficient or curtailed by government’s constraints. Due to a void of international and local protection, Palestinian refugees have been vulnerable vis-à-vis government’s laws which have been fluctuating according to the preferences of the regime in power. While Nasser’s regime equated Palestinian refugees to Egyptian nationals and allowed them to enjoy different rights, subsequent regimes retracted these rights and increased their alienation and financial burdens.
    [Show full text]