DOCSLIB.ORG

Applications of Canonical Metrics on Berkovich Spaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Applications of Canonical Metrics on Berkovich Spaces by Matthew Stevenson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mathematics) in The University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Mattias Jonsson, Chair Professor Ratindranath Akhoury Postdoctoral Assistant Professor Eric Canton Professor Mircea Mustat, ˘a Professor Karen Smith Matthew Stevenson [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0314-6518 c Matthew Stevenson 2019 All Rights Reserved To my family and teachers ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor Mattias Jonsson for his support and encouragement over the past five years. This thesis is immeasurably stronger because of his influence and suggestions, and it would not have been possible without his guidance. While teaching me the techniques at the core of this work, acting as a sounding board for my ideas, and being the voice of reason in the hills above Bogot´a,you have been an incredible mentor and it has been an absolute pleasure working with you. In addition, I would like to thank the members of my committee: Mircea Mustat, ˘a, Karen Smith, Ratindranath Akhoury, and Eric Canton. I have benefited greatly from classes and mathematical discussions with each of you, and you have been invaluable resources to me during my time at Michigan. Part of this thesis is based on joint work with Mirko Mauri and Enrica Mazzon. I am grateful for our fruitful collaboration. I have learned so much from both of you, and our work together was an exceptionally enjoyable and rewarding experience. Furthermore, this thesis benefitted greatly from conversations with Bhargav Bhatt, S´ebastienBoucksom, Antoine Ducros, Charles Favre, Kiran Kedlaya, Johannes Nicaise, J´er^omePoineau, Daniele Turchetti, Martin Ulirsch, Veronika Wanner, and Tony Yue Yu. Special thanks are due to Thibaud Lemanissier for our collaboration on hybrid analytifications, and to Michael Temkin for patiently explaining aspects of his work on canonical metrics. iii Throughout my time at Michigan, I benefited greatly from mathematical discus- sions with my fellow graduate students including (but not limited to) Harold Blum, Brandon Carter, Rankeya Datta, Yajnaseni Dutta, Jake Levinson, Devlin Mallory, Takumi Murayama, Ashwath Rabindranath, Emanuel Reinecke, and Harry Richman. Particular thanks are due to Takumi, Emanuel, and Enrica, as well as to Mathilde Gerbelli-Gauthier and Olivier Martin, all of whom had a profound impact on my mathematical career. Last but not least, I am thankful to have family, friends, and loved ones who supported and encouraged me throughout this process. I am especially grateful to Samantha for her constant support during the writing of this thesis. This dissertation is based upon work partially supported by NSF grants DMS- 1266207 and DMS-1600011, and ERC Starting Grant MOTZETA (project 306610). iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: iii LIST OF FIGURES :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: vii ABSTRACT ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: viii CHAPTER I. Introduction .......................................1 1.1 Temkin's canonical metric and weight functions................4 1.2 Dual complexes and essential skeletons.....................6 1.2.1 Skeletons over a discretely-valued field................8 1.2.2 Skeletons over a trivially-valued field.................9 1.2.3 The closure of Kontsevich{Soibelman skeletons........... 12 1.3 A non-Archimedean Ohsawa{Takegoshi extension theorem.......... 14 1.3.1 A regularization theorem........................ 16 1.4 New evidence for the geometric P = W conjecture............... 19 II. Preliminaries ....................................... 23 2.1 Conventions.................................... 23 2.2 Berkovich analytifications............................. 24 2.3 Analytic generic fibres............................... 26 2.4 i-analytifications................................. 29 2.5 Models....................................... 29 2.6 Monomial and quasi-monomial points...................... 30 2.7 Gauss extensions.................................. 35 2.8 Logarithmic geometry............................... 36 2.9 Polyhedral complexes............................... 38 III. Canonical metrics on sheaves of differentials ................... 40 3.1 Metrics on non-Archimedean line bundles.................... 40 3.1.1 Definition of a metric on a line bundle................ 40 3.1.2 Metrics on analytifications of line bundles.............. 41 3.2 Weight metrics................................... 43 3.2.1 The weight metric over a discretely-valued field........... 44 3.2.2 The weight metric over a trivially-valued field............ 47 3.2.3 Alternative expressions for the weight function........... 48 3.3 Temkin's metrization of pluricanonical sheaves................. 50 3.3.1 Seminorms on modules of K¨ahlerdifferentials............ 51 v 3.3.2 Temkin's metric............................. 53 3.3.3 Temkin's metric on divisorial points................. 55 3.4 Comparison theorems with Temkin's metric.................. 59 3.4.1 Temkin's comparison theorem with the weight metric........ 59 3.4.2 Divisorial points under Gauss extensions............... 66 3.4.3 Proof of TheoremA.......................... 72 IV. Essential skeletons of pairs .............................. 75 4.1 Skeletons over a discretely-valued field..................... 75 4.2 Skeletons over a trivially-valued field...................... 77 4.2.1 The faces of the skeleton of a log-regular scheme........... 77 4.2.2 The skeleton of a log-regular scheme.................. 80 4.2.3 The retraction to the skeleton..................... 81 4.2.4 Functoriality of the skeleton....................... 84 4.2.5 Comparison with the dual complex.................. 84 4.2.6 The skeleton of a product....................... 86 4.2.7 The Kontsevich{Soibelman and essential skeletons......... 89 4.2.8 Comparison of the trivially-valued and discretely-valued settings. 92 4.3 Closure of the skeleton of a log-regular pair................... 98 4.3.1 The decomposition of the closure of the skeleton.......... 100 4.3.2 The case of the toric varieties..................... 103 4.3.3 The closure of a Kontsevich{Soibelman skeleton........... 106 V. A non-Archimedean Ohsawa{Takegoshi extension theorem ......... 114 5.1 The structure of the Berkovich unit disc.................... 114 5.1.1 The Berkovich unit disc........................ 114 5.1.2 Temkin's metric on the Berkovich unit disc............. 119 5.1.3 Metric structure on the Berkovich unit disc............. 120 5.1.4 Quasisubharmonic functions on the Berkovich unit disc....... 121 5.2 An Ohsawa{Takegoshi-type extension theorem................. 124 5.2.1 Proof of Theorem 5.2.0.1........................ 126 5.3 A non-Archimedean Demailly approximation.................. 136 5.3.1 Construction of the non-Archimedean Demailly approximation.. 138 5.3.2 A regularization theorem........................ 143 5.3.3 Non-Archimedean multiplier ideals.................. 145 VI. On the geometric P=W conjecture ......................... 150 6.1 The geometric P = W conjecture......................... 150 6.2 Dual boundary complex of GLn-character varieties of a genus one surface.. 153 6.2.1 Dlt modifications and dual complexes................. 153 6.2.2 Hilbert scheme of n points of a toric surface............. 155 6.2.3 A proof of Theorem 6.2.0.1 for n = 2.................. 157 6.2.4 The essential skeleton of a logCY pair................ 158 6.2.5 Proof of Theorem 6.2.0.1........................ 163 6.2.6 An alternative proof of Theorem 6.2.0.1................ 165 6.3 Dual boundary complex of SLn-character varieties of a genus one surface.. 170 6.3.1 An alternative proof of Theorem 6.3.0.1............... 173 6.4 Local computations on the Tate curve...................... 176 BIBLIOGRAPHY :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 182 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1 A commutative diagram describing the model associated to the Gauss extension.. 68 3.2 A comparison between the constructions of [BHJ17] and x3.4.2............ 72 4.1 An illustration of Proposition 4.2.8.3 for a Tate elliptic curve............. 97 4.2 A comparison of the decomposition of the extended fan and the closure of the skeleton for a model of P2................................. 106 4.3 An example illustrating that the inclusion of Proposition 4.3.3.1 may be strict... 112 5.1 The Berkovich unit disc over an algebraically closed, spherically complete field, with the radius function shown on the vertical axis................... 116 5.2 A possible configuration for Γ';n in Lemma 5.2.1.5................... 132 vii ABSTRACT This thesis examines the nature of Temkin's canonical metrics on the sheaves of differentials of Berkovich spaces, and discusses 3 applications thereof. First, we show a comparison theorem between Temkin's metric on the i-analytification of a smooth variety over a trivially-valued field of characteristic zero, and a weight metric defined in terms of log discrepancies. This result is the trivially-valued counterpart to a comparison theorem of Temkin between his metric and the weight metric of Mustat, ˘a{Nicaisein the discretely-valued setting. These weight metrics are used to define an essential skeleton of a pair over a trivially-valued field; this is done following the approach of Brown{Mazzon in the discretely-valued case, and we show a compatibility result between the essential skele-
Recommended publications
  • The Arakelov-Zhang Pairing and Julia Sets

    The Arakelov-Zhang Pairing and Julia Sets

    THE ARAKELOV-ZHANG PAIRING AND JULIA SETS ANDREW BRIDY AND MATT LARSON Abstract. The Arakelov-Zhang pairing h ; φi is a measure of the \dynamical distance" between two rational maps and φ defined over a number field K. It is defined in terms of local integrals on Berkovich space at each completion of K. We obtain a simple expression for the important case of the pairing with a power map, written in terms of integrals over Julia sets. Under certain disjointness conditions on Julia sets, our expression simplifies to a single canonical height term; in general, this term is a lower bound. As applications of our method, we give bounds on the difference between the canonical height hφ and the standard Weil height h, and we prove a rigidity statement about polynomials that satisfy a strong form of good reduction. 1. Introduction Let K be a number field with fixed algebraic closure K. For z 2 P1(K), we use h(z) to denote the standard logarithmic Weil height of z and hφ(z) to denote the Call-Silverman canonical height of z with respect to φ 2 K(x). We recall background on these heights in Section 2. Let ; φ : P1 ! P1 be rational maps defined over K (equivalently, rational functions in K(x)) each of degree ≥ 2. In [21] (see also [23]), Petsche, Szpiro, and Tucker introduced the Arakelov-Zhang pairing h ; φi, a symmetric, non-negative, real-valued pairing on the space of rational maps. In Section 2, we present their definition of the pairing as a sum of integrals over Berkovich space at each place of K.
  • Berkovich Analytification

    Berkovich Analytification

    Berkovich analytification Wouter Zomervrucht, November 10, 2016 1. Berkovich spaces Throughout, k is a non-archimedean field. −1 −1 Let’s recall some definitions. An affinoid algebra A is a quotient of kfr1 T1,..., rn Tng for some r1,..., rn > 0. Its Berkovich spectrum is the topological space bounded multiplicative (equivalence classes of) bounded X = M(A) = = . seminorms on A maps from A to a valuation field A domain D ⊆ X is a closed subset that admits a bounded homomorphism A ! AD universal for the property that M(AD) !M(A) has image inside D. For such D one has D = M(AD). The map A ! AD is flat. Domains form systems of neighborhoods at each point of X. In other words, domains behave exactly like the standard opens D( f ) ⊆ Spec A do for schemes. A subset Z ⊆ X is special if it is a finite union of domains. If Z = D1 [ ... [ Dn is such a = presentation, then we write AZ ker ∏i ADi ⇒ ∏i,j ADi\Dj . Define OX(U) = lim AZ. Z ⊆ U special Now (X, OX) is a locally ringed space, satisfying OX(X) = A. Remark 1.1. The functor M : faffinoid algebrasg ! flocally ringed spacesg is faithful, but not full. This problem, together with the lack of localizations, warrants the somewhat involved definition below. A quasi-affinoid space is a locally ringed space U equipped with the data of an affinoid algebra A and an open immersion U ,!M(A).A morphism of quasi-affinoid spaces f : (U, A) ! (V, B) is a map of locally ringed spaces such that for all domains D ⊆ U, E ⊆ V with f (D) ⊆ E the restriction f : D ! E is affinoid, i.e.
  • Weight Functions on Non-Archimedean Analytic Spaces and the Kontsevich–Soibelman Skeleton

    Weight Functions on Non-Archimedean Analytic Spaces and the Kontsevich–Soibelman Skeleton

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Spiral - Imperial College Digital Repository Algebraic Geometry 2 (3) (2015) 365{404 doi:10.14231/AG-2015-016 Weight functions on non-Archimedean analytic spaces and the Kontsevich{Soibelman skeleton Mircea Mustat¸˘aand Johannes Nicaise Abstract We associate a weight function to pairs (X; !) consisting of a smooth and proper va- riety X over a complete discretely valued field and a pluricanonical form ! on X. This weight function is a real-valued function on the non-Archimedean analytification of X. It is piecewise affine on the skeleton of any regular model with strict normal crossings of X, and strictly ascending as one moves away from the skeleton. We apply these properties to the study of the Kontsevich{Soibelman skeleton of (X; !), and we prove that this skeleton is connected when X has geometric genus one and ! is a canonical form on X. This result can be viewed as an analog of the Shokurov{Koll´ar connectedness theorem in birational geometry. 1. Introduction 1.1 Skeleta of non-Archimedean spaces An important property of Berkovich spaces over non-Archimedean fields is that, in many geo- metric situations, they can be contracted onto some subspace with piecewise affine structure, a so- called skeleton. These skeleta are usually constructed by choosing appropriate formal models for the space, associating a simplicial complex to the reduction of the formal model and embedding its geometric realization into the Berkovich space. For instance, if C is a smooth projective curve of genus at least two over an algebraically closed non-Archimedean field, then it has a canonical skeleton, which is homeomorphic to the dual graph of the special fiber of its stable model [Ber90, x 4].
  • Grothendieck Duality and Q-Gorenstein Morphisms 101

    Grothendieck Duality and Q-Gorenstein Morphisms 101

    GROTHENDIECK DUALITY AND Q-GORENSTEIN MORPHISMS YONGNAM LEE AND NOBORU NAKAYAMA Abstract. The notions of Q-Gorenstein scheme and of Q-Gorenstein mor- phism are introduced for locally Noetherian schemes by dualizing complexes and (relative) canonical sheaves. These cover all the previously known notions of Q-Gorenstein algebraic variety and of Q-Gorenstein deformation satisfying Koll´ar condition, over a field. By studies on relative S2-condition and base change properties, valuable results are proved for Q-Gorenstein morphisms, which include infinitesimal criterion, valuative criterion, Q-Gorenstein refine- ment, and so forth. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Serre’s Sk-condition 9 3. Relative S2-condition and flatness 24 4. Grothendieck duality 41 5. Relative canonical sheaves 63 6. Q-Gorenstein schemes 72 7. Q-Gorenstein morphisms 82 Appendix A. Some basic properties in scheme theory 105 References 108 1. Introduction arXiv:1612.01690v1 [math.AG] 6 Dec 2016 The notion of Q-Gorenstein variety is important for the minimal model theory of algebraic varieties in characteristic zero: A normal algebraic variety X defined over a field of any characteristic is said to be Q-Gorenstein if rKX is Cartier for some positive integer r, where KX stands for the canonical divisor of X. In some papers, X is additionally required to be Cohen–Macaulay. Reid used this notion essentially to define the canonical singularity in [48, Def. (1.1)], and he named the notion “Q- Gorenstein” in [49, (0.12.e)], where the Cohen–Macaulay condition is required. The notion without the Cohen–Macaulay condition appears in [24] for example.
  • Definable Sets of Berkovich Curves

    Definable Sets of Berkovich Curves

    DEFINABLE SETS OF BERKOVICH CURVES PABLO CUBIDES KOVACSICS AND JER´ OME^ POINEAU Abstract. In this article, we functorially associate definable sets to k-analytic curves, and definable maps to analytic morphisms between them, for a large class of k-analytic curves. Given a k-analytic curve X, our association allows us to have definable versions of several usual notions of Berkovich analytic geometry such as the branch emanating from a point and the residue curve at a point of type 2. We also characterize the definable subsets of the definable counterpart of X and show that they satisfy a bijective relation with the radial subsets of X. As an application, we recover (and slightly extend) results of Temkin concerning the radiality of the set of points with a given prescribed multiplicity with respect to a morphism of k-analytic curves. In the case of the analytification of an algebraic curve, our construction can also be seen as an explicit version of Hrushovski and Loeser's theorem on iso-definability of curves. However, our approach can also be applied to strictly k-affinoid curves and arbitrary morphisms between them, which are currently not in the scope of their setting. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 2 3. Local and global structure of curves 12 4. Definable analytic curves and morphisms 23 5. Definable subsets of B 30 6. Definable subsets of curves 35 7. Radiality and definability 39 8. Comparison with Hrushovski-Loeser's spaces 48 References 52 1. Introduction Let (k; j·j) be a complete rank 1 non-archimedean algebraically closed non-trivially valued field.
  • Analytification and Tropicalization Over Non-Archimedean Fields

    Analytification and Tropicalization Over Non-Archimedean Fields

    ANALYTIFICATION AND TROPICALIZATION OVER NON-ARCHIMEDEAN FIELDS ANNETTE WERNER Abstract: In this paper, we provide an overview of recent progress on the interplay between tropical geometry and non-archimedean analytic geometry in the sense of Berkovich. After briefly discussing results by Baker, Payne and Rabinoff [BPR11] [BPR13] in the case of curves, we explain a result from [CHW14] comparing the tropical Grassmannian of planes to the analytic Grassmannian. We also give an overview of most of the results in [GRW14], where a general higher-dimensional theory is developed. In particular, we explain the construction of generalized skeleta in [GRW14] which are polyhedral substructures of Berkovich spaces lending themselves to comparison with tropicalizations. We discuss the slope formula for the valuation of rational functions and explain two results on the com- parison between polyhedral substructures of Berkovich spaces and tropicalizations. 2010 MSC: 14G22, 14T05 1. Introduction Tropical varieties are polyhedral images of varieties over non-archimedean fields. They are obtained by applying the valuation map to a set of toric coordinates. From the very beginning, analytic geometry was present in the systematic study of tropical varieties, e.g. in [EKL06] where rigid analytic varieties are used. The theory of Berkovich spaces which leads to spaces with nicer topological properties than rigid varieties is even better suited to study tropicalizations. A result of Payne [Pay09] states that the Berkovich space associated to an algebraic variety is homeomorphic to the inverse limit of all tropicalizations in toric varieties. However, individual tropicalizations may fail to capture topological features of an analytic space. arXiv:1506.04846v1 [math.AG] 16 Jun 2015 The present paper is an overview of recent results on the relationship between analytic spaces and tropicalizations.
  • Frobenius Categories, Gorenstein Algebras and Rational Surface Singularities

    Frobenius Categories, Gorenstein Algebras and Rational Surface Singularities

    FROBENIUS CATEGORIES, GORENSTEIN ALGEBRAS AND RATIONAL SURFACE SINGULARITIES OSAMU IYAMA, MARTIN KALCK, MICHAEL WEMYSS, AND DONG YANG Dedicated to Ragnar-Olaf Buchweitz on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Abstract. We give sufficient conditions for a Frobenius category to be equivalent to the category of Gorenstein projective modules over an Iwanaga–Gorenstein ring. We then apply this result to the Frobenius category of special Cohen–Macaulay modules over a rational surface singularity, where we show that the associated stable cate- gory is triangle equivalent to the singularity category of a certain discrepant partial resolution of the given rational singularity. In particular, this produces uncountably many Iwanaga–Gorenstein rings of finite GP type. We also apply our method to representation theory, obtaining Auslander–Solberg and Kong type results. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. A Morita type theorem for Frobenius categories 3 2.1. Frobenius categories as categories of Gorenstein projective modules 3 2.2. Alternative Approach 6 2.3. A result of Auslander–Solberg 7 3. Frobenius structures on special Cohen–Macaulay modules 7 4. Relationship to partial resolutions of rational surface singularities 10 4.1. Gorenstein schemes and Iwanaga–Gorenstein rings 10 4.2. Tilting bundles on partial resolutions 11 4.3. Iwanaga–Gorenstein rings from surfaces 13 4.4. Construction of Iwanaga–Gorenstein rings 15 5. Relationship to relative singularity categories 18 6. Examples 20 6.1. Iwanaga–Gorenstein rings of finite GP type 20 6.2. Frobenius structures on module categories 22 6.3. Frobenius categories arising from preprojective algebras 23 References 24 1. Introduction This paper is motivated by the study of certain triangulated categories associated to rational surface singularities, first constructed in [IW2].
  • Berkovich Spaces and Tubular Descent

    Berkovich Spaces and Tubular Descent

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Advances in Mathematics 234 (2013) 217–238 www.elsevier.com/locate/aim Berkovich spaces and tubular descent Oren Ben-Bassata,∗, Michael Temkinb a Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, United Kingdom b Department of Mathematics, Hebrew University, Israel Received 9 February 2012; accepted 1 October 2012 Communicated by Tony Pantev Abstract We consider an algebraic variety X together with the choice of a subvariety Z. We show that any coherent sheaf on X can be constructed out of a coherent sheaf on the formal neighborhood of Z, a coherent sheaf on the complement of Z, and an isomorphism between certain representative images of these two sheaves in the category of coherent sheaves on a Berkovich analytic space W which we define. ⃝c 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Tubular descent; Berkovich analytic spaces 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to study how a coherent sheaf F on a k-scheme of finite type X can be reconstructed from its restrictions to an open subvariety U and the complement Z D X − U, or informally speaking, how F can be glued from FU and FZ . Clearly, FU and FZ do not determine F, so one should suggest a richer descent datum which does determine F but uses as little as possible information beyond the pair .FU ; FZ /. Note that at the very least one should know the restrictions of F onto all closed subschemes whose reduction is Z, or equivalently one should know the formal completion FbZ of F along Z. Furthermore, even the knowledge of FbZ and FU is insufficient, so we will introduce an intermediate geometric space W that will play the role of the “intersection” of X D bX Z and ∗ Corresponding author.
  • Homotopy Theory for Rigid Analytic Varieties

    Homotopy Theory for Rigid Analytic Varieties

    Helene Sigloch Homotopy Theory for Rigid Analytic Varieties Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik und Physik der Albert-Ludwigs-Universitat¨ Freiburg im Breisgau Marz¨ 2016 Dekan der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik und Physik: Prof. Dr. Dietmar Kr¨oner Erster Referent: Dr. Matthias Wendt Zweiter Referent: Prof. Dr. Joseph Ayoub Datum der Promotion: 25. Mai 2016 Contents Introduction 3 1 Rigid Analytic Varieties 11 1.1 Definitions . 12 1.2 Formal models and reduction . 20 1.3 Flatness, smoothness and ´etaleness . 23 2 Vector Bundles over Rigid Analytic Varieties 27 2.1 A word on topologies . 28 2.2 Serre{Swan for rigid analytic quasi-Stein varieties . 30 2.3 Line bundles . 37 2.4 Divisors . 38 3 Homotopy Invariance of Vector Bundles 41 3.1 Serre's problem and the Bass{Quillen conjecture . 41 3.2 Homotopy invariance . 42 3.3 Counterexamples . 44 3.4 Local Homotopy Invariance . 48 3.5 The case of line bundles . 56 3.5.1 B1-invariance of Pic . 57 1 3.5.2 Arig-invariance of Pic . 59 4 Homotopy Theory for Rigid Varieties 65 4.1 Model categories and homotopy theory . 65 4.2 Sites and completely decomposable structures . 70 4.3 Homotopy theories for rigid analytic varieties . 71 4.3.1 Relation to Ayoub's theory . 75 4.3.2 A trip to the zoo . 76 5 Classification of Vector Bundles 79 5.1 Classification of vector bundles: The classical results . 79 5.2 H-principles and homotopy sheaves . 82 5.3 The h-principle in A1-homotopy theory . 86 5.4 Classifying spaces .
  • PATCHING OVER BERKOVICH CURVES and QUADRATIC FORMS Vlerë Mehmeti

    PATCHING OVER BERKOVICH CURVES and QUADRATIC FORMS Vlerë Mehmeti

    PATCHING OVER BERKOVICH CURVES AND QUADRATIC FORMS Vlerë Mehmeti To cite this version: Vlerë Mehmeti. PATCHING OVER BERKOVICH CURVES AND QUADRATIC FORMS. Compo- sitio Mathematica, Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 2019. hal-02437192 HAL Id: hal-02437192 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02437192 Submitted on 13 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PATCHING OVER BERKOVICH CURVES AND QUADRATIC FORMS VLERE¨ MEHMETI Abstract. We extend field patching to the setting of Berkovich analytic geometry and use it to prove a local-global principle over function fields of analytic curves with respect to completions. In the context of quadratic forms, we combine it with sufficient conditions for local isotropy over a Berkovich curve to obtain applications on the u-invariant. The patching method we adapt was introduced by Harbater and Hartmann in [18], and further developed by these two authors and Krashen in [19]. The results presented in this paper generalize those of [19] on the local-global principle and quadratic forms. Resum´ e.´ Recollement sur les courbes de Berkovich et formes quadratiques. Nous ´etendonsla technique de recollement sur les corps au cadre de la g´eom´etrieana- lytique de Berkovich pour d´emontrer un principe local-global sur les corps de fonctions de courbes analytiques par rapport `acertains de leurs compl´et´es.Dans le contexte des formes quadratiques, nous le combinons avec des conditions suffisantes d'isotropie locale sur une courbe de Berkovich pour obtenir des applications au u-invariant.
  • Topics in Algebraic Geometry I. Berkovich Spaces

    Topics in Algebraic Geometry I. Berkovich Spaces

    Math 731: Topics in Algebraic Geometry I Berkovich Spaces Mattias Jonsson∗ Fall 2016 Course Description Berkovich spaces are analogues of complex manifolds that appear when replacing complex numbers by the elements of a general valued field, e.g. p-adic numbers or formal Laurent series. They were introduced in the late 1980s by Vladimir Berkovich as a more honestly geometric alternative to the rigid spaces earlier conceived by Tate. In recent years, Berkovich spaces have seen a large and growing range of applications to complex analysis, tropical geometry, complex and arithmetic dynamics, the local Langlands program, Arakelov geometry, . The first part of the course will be devoted to the basic theory of Berkovich spaces (affinoids, gluing, analytifications). In the second part, we will discuss various applications or specialized topics, partly depending on the interest of the audience. Contents 1 September 6 5 1.1 Introduction..............................................5 1.2 Valued fields.............................................5 1.3 What is a space?...........................................7 1.4 The Berkovich affine space (as a topological space)........................7 1.4.1 The Berkovich affine line..................................8 2 September 8 9 2.1 Banach rings [Ber90, 1.1]......................................9 2.1.1 Seminormed groupsx .....................................9 2.1.2 Seminormed rings...................................... 10 2.1.3 Spectral radius and uniformization............................. 11 2.1.4 Seminormed modules..................................... 12 2.1.5 Complete tensor products.................................. 12 2.2 The spectrum [Ber90, 1.2]..................................... 12 x 3 September 13 14 3.1 The spectrum (continued) [Ber90, 1.2]............................... 14 3.2 Complex Banach algebras [Jon16, App.x G]............................. 15 3.3 The Gelfand transform [Ber90, pp.
  • Non-Pfaffian Subcanonical Subschemes of Codimension 3

    Non-Pfaffian Subcanonical Subschemes of Codimension 3

    ENRIQUES SURFACES AND OTHER NON-PFAFFIAN SUBCANONICAL SUBSCHEMES OF CODIMENSION 3 DAVID EISENBUD, SORIN POPESCU, AND CHARLES WALTER Abstract. We give examples of subcanonical subvarieties of codimen- sion 3 in projective n-space which are not Pfaffian, i.e. defined by the ideal sheaf of submaximal Pfaffians of an alternating map of vector bun- dles. This gives a negative answer to a question asked by Okonek [29]. Walter [36] had previously shown that a very large majority of sub- canonical subschemes of codimension 3 in Pn are Pfaffian, but he left open the question whether the exceptional non-Pfaffian cases actually occur. We give non-Pfaffian examples of the principal types allowed by his theorem, including (Enriques) surfaces in P5 in characteristic 2 and 7 a smooth 4-fold in PC. These examples are based on our previous work [14] showing that any strongly subcanonical subscheme of codimension 3 of a Noetherian scheme can be realized as a locus of degenerate intersection of a pair of Lagrangian (maximal isotropic) subbundles of a twisted orthogonal bundle. There are many relations between the vector bundles E on a nonsingular algebraic variety X and the subvarieties Z X. For example, a globalized form of the Hilbert-Burch theorem allows⊂ one to realize any codimension 2 locally Cohen-Macaulay subvariety as a degeneracy locus of a map of vector bundles. In addition the Serre construction gives a realization of any subcanonical codimension 2 subvariety Z X as the zero locus of a section of a rank 2 vector bundle on X. ⊂ The situation in codimension 3 is more complicated.