DOCSLIB.ORG

Expanding Access in High-Quality Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Research: BMJ Open Respiratory Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Expanding Access in High-Quality Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Research: BMJ Open Respiratory Research Editorial BMJ Open Resp Res: first published as 10.1136/bmjresp-2013-000003 on 3 October 2013. Downloaded from Expanding access in high-quality respiratory and critical care medicine research: BMJ Open Respiratory Research Stephen J Chapman,1 Matt P Wise2 To cite: Chapman SJ, We are delighted to introduce BMJ Open rather than its perceived potential impact. We Wise MP. Expanding access Respiratory Research, an online peer-reviewed are interested in publishing all research study in high-quality respiratory and critical care medicine open access respiratory medicine journal pub- types, including small or specialist studies, BMJ research: BMJ Open Resp lished by the in partnership with the important negative results, and replication Res 2013;1:e000003. British Thoracic Society. The journal is dedicated studies, with the aim of adding to the overall doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2013- to rapid publication of high-quality research body of knowledge available in the public 000003 from all areas of respiratory medicine, includ- domain. We envisage that readers and the ing respiratory science and critical care. wider respiratory research community will Publication bias and a preoccupation with determine the impact of published research Accepted 13 August 2013 journal impact factor mean that currently avail- articles on an individual basis, and in order to able research findings in respiratory medicine encourage this we will provide article-level arelikelytorepresentonlythe‘tip of the metrics including counts of views and citations. iceberg’, with many more preliminary, The journal will maximise visibility of authors’ small-scale or negative studies remaining research by ensuring free online access to a copyright. unavailable to the research community. Open global audience using the well-established bmj. access journals have their proponents12and com host site. As the journal becomes estab- detractors34; however, it is a priority that all well- lished we aim to gain listing in the PubMed conducted research on respiratory medicine is database and ISI Current Contents (Web of made freely available in order to portray a repre- Science) and indexed by Scopus and Google sentative picture of the research landscape. BMJ Scholar. Accompanying editorials will be pro- Open Respiratory Research aims to meet this gap, vided to aid interpretation of selected articles without compromising on integrity or standards of particular interest, and exceptional articles http://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/ of peer review. A central aim of the journal will be press-released. therefore is to combine the benefits of open We plan an interactive journal experience access with a commitment to maintaining scien- and hope to provoke scientificdebateand tific rigour through the process of stringent encourage interaction, with the opportunity for peer-review. In this way the journal will maintain readers to comment on published research. We high standards of publication and uphold the look forward to reading your research submis- scientific reputations of the BMJ and the British sions and welcome your feedback on all aspects Thoracic Society, while allowing freely available of BMJ Open Respiratory Research. 1Consultant and Senior unrestricted and immediate online access to Competing interests None. Lecturer in Respiratory research globally, with the article copyright on October 2, 2021 by guest. Protected Medicine, Oxford University Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally Hospitals and Oxford retained by the author. peer reviewed. BMJ Open Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, All articles published in Open Access This final article is available for use under the UK Research will have been approved following terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 2Consultant Adult Critical external peer review by at least two expert 3.0 Licence; see http://journals.bmj.com/site/bmjopenrespres Care, University Hospital of reviewers selected by our international editor- Wales, and National Institute ial board. We aim for a rapid peer review for Social Care and Health fi REFERENCES Research (NISCHR) service, with the majority of rst decisions 1. Smith KA. The frontiers publishing paradigm. Front Academic Health Science available within 30 days of submission. Immunol 2012;3:1. Collaboration (AHSC) Clinical Publication of accepted articles will be con- 2. Wolpert AJ. For the sake of inquiry and knowledge– Research Fellow, UK the inevitability of open access. N Engl J Med tinuous, with research published online as 2013;368:785–7. soon as the article is ready. 3. Frank M. Open but not free—publishing in the 21st Correspondence to century. N Engl J Med 2013;368:787–9. [email protected], The emphasis of the peer review will be the 4. Haug C. The downside of open-access publishing. [email protected] scientific and ethical validity of research, N Engl J Med 2013;368:791–3. Chapman SJ, Wise MP. BMJ Open Resp Res 2013;1:e000003. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2013-000003 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scientific Publications in Respiratory Journals from Chinese
    Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004201 on 28 February 2014. Downloaded from Scientific publications in respiratory journals from Chinese authors in various parts of North Asia: a 10-year survey of literature Bo Ye,1 Ting-Ting Du,1 Ting Xie,2 Jun-Tao Ji,1 Zhao-Hong Zheng,1 Zhuan Liao,1 Liang-Hao Hu,1 Zhao-Shen Li1 To cite: Ye B, Du T-T, Xie T, ABSTRACT et al Strengths and limitations of this study . Scientific publications in Objectives: Respiratory disease remains one of the respiratory journals from leading causes of morbidity and mortality in China. Chinese authors in various A few journals covered resources beyond respiratory However, little is known about the research status of parts of North Asia: a 10-year even selected from the respiratory system of Science — survey of literature. BMJ Open respirology in three major regions of China Mainland Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). Besides, some 2014;4:e004201. doi:10.1136/ (ML), Hong Kong (HK) and Taiwan (TW). A 10-year related journals not shown in SCIE were not col- bmjopen-2013-004201 survey of literature was conducted to compare the lected. Some respiratory medicine research articles three regions’ outputs in the research of respirology. were published in general journals, rather than in the ▸ Prepublication history for Design: A bibliometric study. specialized ones. Searching by the author’s address this paper is available online. Setting: China. (China, HK or TW) led to another problem that the To view these files please Participants and outcome measures: A literature articles which addressed other cities or provinces visit the journal online search in PubMed database, updated as of September were not included.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Therapeutic Applications: a Systematic Review Alessandro G
    Fois et al. Respiratory Research (2018) 19:51 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0754-7 REVIEW Open Access Evaluation of oxidative stress biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and therapeutic applications: a systematic review Alessandro G. Fois1,2*†, Panagiotis Paliogiannis3†, Salvatore Sotgia3, Arduino A. Mangoni4, Elisabetta Zinellu2, Pietro Pirina1,2, Ciriaco Carru3 and Angelo Zinellu3 Abstract Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a fatal lung disease of unknown origin, is characterized by chronic and progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia which progressively impairs lung function. Oxidative stress is one of the main pathogenic pathways in IPF. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the type of markers of oxidative stress identified in different biological specimens and the effects of antioxidant therapies in patients with IPF. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of publications listed in electronic databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar) from inception to October 2017. Two investigators independently reviewed all identified articles to determine eligibility. Results: After a substantial proportion of the initially identified articles (n = 554) was excluded because they were duplicates, abstracts, irrelevant, or did not meet the selection criteria, we identified 30 studies. In each study, we critically appraised the type, site (systemic vs. local, e.g. breath, sputum, expired breath condensate, epithelial lining fluid, bronchoalveolar lavage, and lung tissue specimens), and method used for measuring the identified oxidative stress biomarkers. Furthermore, the current knowledge on antioxidant therapies in IPF was summarized. Conclusions: A number of markers of oxidative stress, with individual advantages and limitations, have been described in patients with IPF.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ambition of the European Respiratory Journal: Chapter 4
    EDITORIAL | THE AMBITION OF THE ERJ The ambition of the European Respiratory Journal: chapter 4 Marc Humbert1, Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan2, Elin L. Reeves3, Matthew G. Broadhead3 and Neil J. Bullen3 Affiliations: 1Service de Pneumologie, University Paris-Sud, Inserm U999, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. 2Service de Physiologie, Paris Descartes University EA 2511, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 3European Respiratory Society Publications Office, Sheffield, UK. Correspondence: Marc Humbert, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. E-mail: [email protected] @ERSpublications The ERJ: publishing and contextualising the best in respiratory research and practice http://ow.ly/V1Gsd Already we are more than half-way through the current 5-year editorial cycle of the European Respiratory Journal (ERJ), and as we begin 2016 we again open our first issue of the new year with our annual round up and look to the future. Traditionally, the ERJ has been founded on exceptionally strong research content, attracting the most important, cutting-edge and novel original material from all over the world, and delivering this content to all corners of the globe; in 2015 alone we will have published 200 original research articles encompassing the full spectrum of respiratory diseases. However, we also increasingly seek to provide context to this material and enhance it as much as possible for our readers with editorial comment and discussion through correspondence. We are proud to see that the Agora section continues to develop, both augmenting our research content with short reports and also framing it with thought-provoking and perceptive correspondence, and hopefully bringing our readers to this notional meeting place so that they can participate in the discussion themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • BMJ Open Respiratory Research: 1 Year On
    Downloaded from http://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/ on October 4, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com Editorial BMJ Open Respiratory Research: 1 year on Matt P Wise,1 Stephen J Chapman2 To cite: Wise MP, BMJ Open Respiratory Research is now entering its satisfied with the publishing process and how BMJ Open Chapman SJ. second year as an open access journal. Our the journal is taking shape. We are delighted Respiratory Research: 1 year on. BMJ Open Resp aim when the journal was launched was to that the contents are now listed on PubMed, Res 2015;2:e000077. facilitate the rapid publication of high-quality andwehopethiswillincreasetheattractiveness doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2014- research from all areas of respiratory medicine for potential authors as well as increase visibility 000077 including respiratory science and critical care.1 of the journal’s content. Although much is As an open access periodical, we have the rightly made of the advantages of open access opportunity to limit publication bias by pub- publishing in terms of unrestricted ease of Received 29 December 2014 lishing studies that other journals may not access to the medical and scientific community, Accepted 2 January 2015 favour due to a perceived lack of importance an additional positive consequence is the wide- or impact. Our aspiration has been to focus on spread accessibility of medical research to well-conducted studies that acknowledge and patients. Indeed, the journal’smostdown- discuss potential limitations when they exist. loaded article to date is a qualitative study of Unfortunately, too many small-scale, prelimin- caregivers’ experiences of idiopathic pulmon- ary, negative, repeat or observational studies, ary fibrosis,2 an insightful article that has been which could usefully contribute to the promoted in part by patient foundations, and research landscape, fail to reach publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Acceptance Time in Respiratory Research: Room for Improvement?
    AGORA | RESEARCH LETTER Paper acceptance time in respiratory research: room for improvement? To the Editor: We recently submitted a paper to a top five respiratory journal in terms of average citations per article. The paper was swiftly sent for peer review. A month later, the review was in, and the paper was now “awaiting associate editor decision”. After another 6 weeks, and at the time of writing this letter, the paper is still with the handling editor. Like us, many authors have probably at this stage speculated when it would be reasonable to contact the editorial office and enquire about the status. A recent study carried out for Nature showed that the median time between submission and acceptance of a paper for 4375 different journals was approximately 100 days [1, 2]. The study was based on an analysis of all papers in PubMed for which these data were listed from 1965 to 2015 and included more than 6 million observations of acceptance and publication time. Somewhat surprisingly, the acceptance time has remained fairly constant for more than 30 years and may in fact underestimate the actual time, as not all journals choose to deposit these data. Moreover, some journals use the re-submission date rather than the date for initial submission as the “start date”, which may also bias the results. Based on this large dataset at hand, available on GitHub [2], it is possible to analyse acceptance time for most respiratory journals. If the analysis is restricted to those respiratory journals with more than three citations per paper over 2 years, of which there are 22 journals [3], 18820 papers are found with reported acceptance times.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual General Meeting
    ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING The ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of the British Thoracic Society will be held on Wednesday 2nd December 2020 at 4:30PM virtually on Zoom. Please register in advance via Zoom: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_FREtv- O6SYeHAq-FBBfXNw It would be fair to say that the BTS Strategic Plan highlighted in the 2019 AGM papers and Annual Report and aligned to the 4 UK Nations’ Health Plans, took a step back in 2020 due to the unprecedented challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic placed upon the global population and global healthcare. Specifically, this presented both the British public and our healthcare systems with huge challenges at all levels. Respiratory medicine, BTS and its members have stepped up to this task with impressive innovation, dedication, hard graft and positivity. BTS is, and has been, one of the premier sources of guidance on the management of COVID-19 with a dedicated website hosting BTS guidance, as well as information from government sources across the four nations and allied specialist societies. The webpages have been, and continue to be, viewed hundreds of thousands of times. We are all aware that we are not out of the fire by any stretch and the prospect of managing “endemic” acute COVID-19, COVID-19 follow up including “Post COVID-19 Syndrome” together with seasonal “Winter pressures” allied to our “usual” population of patients with respiratory disease is going to remain challenging. As with the general population, this has not been without a physical and emotional cost, with many of our members being infected and suffering stress, anxiety and potential burnout.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Authors
    1 Aims and Scope ................................................................. 1 Post-Acceptance ................................................................ 5 Article Type Specifications ................................................. 2 Publication Charges ........................................................... 6 Preparation of Articles ........................................................ 4 Editorial Policies ................................................................. 7 How to Submit .................................................................... 5 Further information ............................................................. 9 AIMS AND SCOPE Aims and Scope Audience npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, The journal is relevant to a wide international online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing multidisciplinary audience, including primary, secondary and high-quality research in all areas of the primary care tertiary care respiratory specialists, respiratory management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic physiotherapists, dieticians and nurses. Contributions come diseases. Papers published by the journal represent from clinicians and academics working within any sector that important advances of significance to specialists within the affects the primary care management of respiratory and fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are respiratory-related allergic diseases in primary and particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the
    [Show full text]