COMMITTEE
AGENDA
TO Community & Social Services Committe e DATE December 10, 2013 LOCATION Council Chambers , Guelph City Hall, 1 Carden Street TIME 5:00 p.m. ______ DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES- November 13, 2013 open meeting minutes PRESENTATIONS (Items with no accompanying report) a) A Place to Call Home, A 10 year Housing & Homeless Plan for Guelph Wellington – Eden Grodzinski b) Best Practices in Volunteer Screening Program Update – Tania Framst, Executive Director of the Volunteer Centre CONSENT AGENDA The following resolutions have been prepared to facilitate the Committee’s consideration of the various matters and are suggested for consideration. If the Committee wishes to address a specific report in isolation of the Consent Agenda, please identify the item. The item will be extracted and dealt with separately. The balance of the Community & Social Services Committee Consent Agenda will be approved in one resolution. TO BE ITEM CITY DELEGATIONS EXTRACTED PRESENTATION CSS 2013.34 • Jennifer Popkey √ Accessibility Advisory Bergen and Brad Committee Annual Report Howcroft members of the Accessibility Advisory Committee CSS 20 13. 35 • Andy Behnan, √ Guelph Sports Hall of Fame Chair Annual Report • Larry Townsend, Co Chair
Page 1 of 2 CITY OF GUELPH COMMITTEE AGENDA
CSS 2013. 36 • Greg Pinks, Chair √ Cultural Advisory Committee Annual Report CSS 201 3.37 • Bill Gurney, √ Guelph Skatepark: Preferred Newline Design, Location and Budget Skateparks Estimate Recommendations CSS 2013.3 8 • Auburn LaRose, √ Report Card Coalition – Youth Wellington Charter Endorsement Dufferin Guelph Public Health Resolution to adopt the balance of the Community & Social Services Committee Consent Agenda.
ITEMS EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Once extracted items are identified, they will be dealt with in the following order: 1) delegations (may include presentations) 2) staff presentations only 3) all others. CLOSED MEETING THAT the Community & Social Services Committee now hold a meeting that is closed to the public with respect to: CSS-C-2013.3 Citizen Appointments to Various Committees S. 239 (2) (b) of the Municipal Act – personal matters about identifiable individuals STAFF UPDATES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURN NEXT MEETING: February 11, 2014
Page 2 of 2 CITY OF GUELPH COMMITTEE AGENDA
Minutes of the Community and Social Services Committee Held in the Council Chambers, Guelph City Hall on Wednesday November 13, 2013 at 5:00 p.m.
Attendance
Members: Chair Dennis Councillor Laidlaw Councillor Van Hellemond
Absent: Mayor Farbridge Councillor Burcher
Councillors: Councillor Bell Councillor Findlay Councillor Guthrie Councillor Hofland
Staff: Mr. D. Thomson, Executive Director, Community & Social Services Mr. D. McCaughan, Executive Director Operations, Transit & Emergency Services Ms. B. Powell, General Manager, Community Engagement & Social Services Mr. B. Labelle, City Clerk Ms. J. Sweeney, Council Committee Coordinator
Call to Order (5:00 p.m.)
Chair Dennis called the meeting to order.
Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were no disclosures.
Confirmation of Minutes
1. Moved by Councillor Van Hellemond Seconded by Councillor Laidlaw
That the open meeting minutes of the Community and Social Services Committee held on October 8, 2013 be confirmed as recorded.
VOTING IN FAVOUR: Councillors Dennis, Laidlaw and Van Hellemond (3) VOTING AGAINST: (0) CARRIED
Page 1
November 13, 2013 Community and Social Services Committee
Presentation
Ms. Judith Carson, President of the Guelph Wellington Seniors Association, outlined the accomplishments and activities of the Association during the past year. She played a video showing the various activities available to seniors at the Evergreen Seniors Centre.
Consent Agenda
The following items were extracted:
CSS-2013.30 Guelph Community Sports Lease and Agreement
CSS-2013.32 Affordable Bus Pass Fourth Quarter Report and Program Sustainability Recommendations
CSS-2013.33 Parks Horticulture Operations – 2013 Budget Reduction Impact
Balance of Consent Items
2. Moved by Councillor Laidlaw Seconded by Councillor Van Hellemond
That the balance of the Community and Social Services Committee November 13, 2013 Consent Agenda, as identified below, be adopted:
CSS-2013.31 Older Adult Strategy First Year Corporate Action Plan
1. That the first year corporate action plan of the Older Adult Strategy, which outlines timelines and resource requirements, be approved.
2. That staff be directed to report back on subsequent implementation plans.
VOTING IN FAVOUR: Councillors Dennis, Laidlaw and Van Hellemond (3) VOTING AGAINST: (0) CARRIED
Extracted Consent Items
CSS-2013.30 Guelph Community Sports Lease and Agreement
Mr. David Tack, Chair of Guelph Soccer was present and provided a brief history on the operation of the facility. He requested that the City support the continuation of the loan guarantee.
3. Moved by Councillor Van Hellemond Seconded by Councillor Laidlaw
That the following amendments to conditions related to the extension of the Guelph Community Sports loan ratified by Council on September 9, 2013 with respect to Report #CAO-C-1304 be approved:
Page 2
November 13, 2013 Community and Social Services Committee
1. That Guelph Soccer Club Incorporated (Guelph Soccer) not be added to the existing bank loan agreement as an additional party responsible for payment; and,
2. That the following additional conditions be appended: a) That Guelph Soccer publically release audited financial statements along with the Guelph Community Sports audited financial statements as part of the Guelph Community Sports annual report to Council, b) That Guelph Soccer convert the loan advancements of $379,100 made in 2006 to fund the original capital investment to Guelph Community Sports into a non-repayable grant which will be reflected in the audited statements, c) That Guelph Soccer and Guelph Community Sports work with City staff to explore opportunities to partner and operate recreational programming for our community and include the analysis as part of the Guelph Community Sports business plan.
VOTING IN FAVOUR: Councillors Dennis, Laidlaw and Van Hellemond (3) VOTING AGAINST: (0) CARRIED
CSS-23013.32 Affordable Bus Pass Fourth Quarter Report and Program Sustainability Recommendations
Mr. Derrick Thomson, Executive Director Community & Social Services, introduced the report and advised that additional financial breakdown will be provided for the budget discussion.
4. Moved by Councillor Van Hellemond Seconded by Councillor Laidlaw
1. That the Affordable Bus Pass Pilot Program become a permanent Corporate program.
2. That the Affordable Bus Pass Program be effective on January 1, 2014 to align with the Corporate budget cycle.
VOTING IN FAVOUR: Councillors Dennis, Laidlaw and Van Hellemond (3) VOTING AGAINST: (0) CARRIED
CSS-2013.33 Horticulture Operations – 2013 Budget Reduction Impact
Mr. Murray Cameron, General Manager Parks & Recreation provided clarification on the impact of the 2013 budget reduction.
Councillor Dennis vacated the Chair and Councillor Laidlaw took the Chair.
5. Moved by Councillor Dennis Seconded by Councillor Van Hellemond
1. That the November 13, 2013 report entitled “Parks Horticulture Operations – 2013 Budget Reduction Impact” be received for information.
Page 3
November 13, 2013 Community and Social Services Committee
VOTING IN FAVOUR: Councillors Dennis, Laidlaw and Van Hellemond (3) VOTING AGAINST: (0) CARRIED
6. Moved by Councillor Dennis Seconded by Councillor Van Hellemond
2. That the $50,000 reduction to the 2013 parks operating budget relating to parks horticulture, be referred to the 2014 budget process.
VOTING IN FAVOUR: Councillors Dennis, Laidlaw and Van Hellemond (3) VOTING AGAINST: (0) CARRIED
Councillor Dennis resumed the Chair.
Staff Updates and Announcements
Mr. Derrick Thomson, Executive Director, Community & Social Services provided updates on the following: a) Local Immigration Partnership Project funder, Citizenship & Immigration Canada will be extending contribution funding until 2016, and invited the City’s LIP Project Manager to a conference in Edmonton to share the City’s success b) Elevator Project, formerly the Innovation Fund, a mechanism in the Community Investment Strategy, has created a new process for social innovation and funding of such projects.
Adjournment (6:00 p.m.)
7. Moved by Councillor Laidlaw Seconded by Councillor Van Hellemond
That the meeting be adjourned. CARRIED
______City Clerk
Page 4
A Place to Call Home A 10 -year HHP for Guelph Wellington
Prepared for the City of Guelph Community & Social Services Committee By Eden Grodzinski, JPMC Services Inc. December 2013 Purpose
10-year Housing and Homelessness Plan (HHP) for Guelph Wellington required by the Province Strategy has been developed in accordance with the Housing Services Act, 2011 and the Ontario Housing Policy Statement, 2011 Methodology
1. Need and Demand Study (County) 2. Research and Consultations: 210 individuals consulted through public meetings, interviews, focus groups Individuals with lived experiences, community service providers, volunteers, landlords and developers, government representatives (both staff and elected officials) Literature review of best practices Resulted in Discussion Paper (Feb. 2013) Methodology
3. Strategy Development Discussion paper’s vision and themes subjected to validation survey – 272 responses 3 focus groups to test goals/actions – municipal planners, County finance, and Community Reference Group Final strategy based on cumulative responses, and takes into consideration renewal of IAH & HPS (housing 1 st emphasis) Reviewed by MMAH Vision
“Everyone in Guelph Wellington can find and maintain an appropriate, safe and affordable place to call home.” Goals
1. To help low-income households close the gap between their incomes and housing expenses
2. To provide a range of supports to assist people at risk of homelessness to remain housed Goals
3. To offer a comprehensive range of supportive housing options for residents with complex needs due to aging, disabilities, mental health issues and addictions
4. To increase the supply and mix of affordable housing options for low- to moderate-income households Goals
5. To reduce the length of time and number of people that experience homelessness
6. To promote practices that make the housing and homelessness support system more accessible and welcoming Goals
7. To preserve the existing social and affordable rental housing stock
7. To seize opportunities to turn research knowledge into action Next Steps
Submit approved HHP to the Province prior to January 1, 2014
Early 2014, share and promote the approved HHP in the community Best Practices in Volunteer Screening Program Update
Community and Social Services Special Presentation December 10 th , 2013 The challenge
• Community benefit organizations have used Police Records Checks (PRC) as a primary screening and risk management tool for volunteers.
• This past practice generated a situation wherein the volume of requests for free PRCs was becoming financially unsustainable
• The challenge was to find a way to defray costs associated with volunteer police records checks while supporting our community to affordably recruit and retain volunteers and to protect our most vulnerable citizens. An Innovative Solution
The Best Practices in Volunteer Screening Program was an opportunity to create a better community through volunteerism by supporting the best fit between volunteer, position and community benefit organization, while ensuring the safety of our community’s most vulnerable Supports the City’s Priorities
Community Investment Strategy Fosters Community Wellbeing Is mutually beneficial Is unique Protects public interests in the short and long-term Strategic Priorities Organizational Excellence Innovation in Local Governance City Building How it works
• The City of Guelph has a Community Benefit Agreement with the Volunteer Centre to create and manage the Best Practices in Volunteer Screening Program • The Volunteer Centre has an Memorandum of Understanding with the Guelph Police Service that describes how we support our unique roles related to this program • Community Benefit Organizations will complete an application online • Organizations meeting the program’s eligibility criteria, will be given authorization numbers for positions deemed eligible for free PRC. Volunteer Centre
• Demonstrated leadership in volunteer screening and Police Records Check • Have expertise in all of the volunteer screening tools available to ensure that Police Records Checks are used appropriately • Connects citizens of Guelph with meaningful opportunities to become engaged in their communities and with the community benefits sector through volunteerism Current Participation
• The program formally launched in June 2013; with the Guelph Police Service introducing fees for PRC for volunteers (for those choosing not to participate in the program) on September 1st
• As of the end of October, 40 organizations participated, representing 200 volunteer positions
• In August the Volunteer Centre hosted an open house; in September 2 workshops on the topic of volunteer screening best practices were held Lessons Learned
• Many organizations do not have a screening process that they use with their volunteers
• Many organizations do not have a volunteer screening policy or procedure
• Many organizations do not have written position descriptions on which to assess risk
• Many organizations require their volunteers to obtain PRC for positions of relatively low risk Moving Forward
• Provide more advocacy locally on the appropriate use of PRC, their value and limitations
• Provide more education and training on screening and volunteer risk assessment
• Provide greater consultation on the development of policies and volunteer position descriptions “As organizations improve their screening practices, the result will be more satisfied volunteers who are able to maximize their community contributions in a way that ensures every ones safety” Questions?
For more information, contact the Volunteer Centre
COMMUNITY & SOCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE CONSENT AGENDA
December 10, 2013
Members of the Community & Social Services Committee.
SUMMARY OF REPORTS:
The following resolutions have been prepared to facilitate the Committee’s consideration of the various matters and are suggested for consideration. If the Committee wishes to address a specific report in isolation of the Consent Agenda, please identify the item. The item will be extracted and dealt with immediately. The balance of the Community & Social Services Consent Agenda will be approved in one resolution.
A Reports from Administrative Staff
REPORT DIRECTION
CSS -2013.34 ACCESSIBILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL Receive REPORT
1. That the December 10, 2013 report entitled “Accessibility Advisory Committee Annual Report” be received for information.
CSS -201 3. 35 GUELPH SPORTS HALL OF FAME ANNUAL Receive REPORT
1. That the December 10, 2013 report entitled” Guelph Sports Hall of Fame Annual Report” be received for information.
CSS -201 3.36 CULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL Receive REPORT
1. That the December 10, 2013 report entitled “Cultural Advisory Committee Annual Report” be received for information.
CSS-2013.37 GUELPH SKATEPARK: PREFERRED DESIGN, Approve LOCATION AND BUDGET ESTIMATE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. That the final design, location and high level budget estimate of the proposed permanent Skatepark Facility be approved.
CSS-2013.38 REPORT CARD COALITION – YOUTH CHARTER Approve ENDORSEMENT
1. That the City of Guelph endorse the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights as a document that identifies values and principles that are upheld by the City of Guelph.
2. That the City of Guelph adopt the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights as a document that will guide the City’s policy decisions and key activities as they relate to youth.
attach.
Accessibility Advisory Committee Annual Report
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 People with disabilities represent a significant and growing part of our population. •1.5 million Ontarians have disabilities •13.5% of the population. •Estimated that 20% of the population will have disabilities in two decades. •In the City of Guelph that represents over 20,000 people.
Powerpoint Templates Page 2 AODA Legislated Requirements Main Focus During 2013: Provided Input to the Corporation’s: • Accessibility Policy; and •Multi-Year Accessibility Plan AAC Consultations: •Design of Public Spaces •Co-hosted a public meeting that engaged the public on the: • Design of bus stops and shelters •Determine the proportion of on- demand taxicabs Powerpoint Templates Page 3 Completed Tasks During 2013
• Provided comment on the Province’s Municipal AAC Handbook • Attending a networking/education forum hosted by the Province • Commented on several site plan applications • As a result recommended changes to the Parking Bylaw
AAC members contributed almost 550 hours of work during 2013
Powerpoint Templates Page 4 Looking Forward
Goal of an Accessible Community by 2025; Next Steps:
• Advise staff on potential barriers to implementing the Multi-Year Accessibility Plan • Strengthen relationship with Transit • Advise on accessible opportunities for the: • Downtown Guelph Streetscape Manual and Built Form Standards; and • St. Georges Square Plan
Powerpoint Templates Page 5 STAFF REPORT TO Community and Social Services Committee
SERVICE AREA Community and Social Services Community Engagement and Social Services: Accessibility Services
DATE December 10, 2013
SUBJECT Accessibility Advisory Committee Annual Report
REPORT NUMBER CSS-CESS-1355
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PURPOSE OF REPORT To submit the 2013 annual report of the Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC).
KEY FINDINGS In accordance with the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (Chapter 32, Statutes of Ontario, 2001), the Accessibility Advisory Committee was established in 2001 with a mandate to advise and assist the organization in promoting and facilitating a barrier-free Guelph for citizens of all abilities (universal accessibility), including persons with disabilities. This aim shall be achieved through the review of municipal policies, programs and services and the identification, removal and prevention of barriers faced by persons with disabilities.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS None
ACTION REQUIRED That the report be received for information.
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the December 10, 2013 report entitled “Accessibility Advisory Committee Annual Report” be received for information.
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, (Chapter 32, Statutes of Ontario, 2001), the AAC advises and assists the Corporation of the City of Guelph:
PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT in promoting and facilitating a barrier-free Guelph for citizens of all abilities (universal accessibility), including persons with disabilities. This aim shall be achieved through the review of municipal policies, programs and services and the identification, removal and prevention of barriers faced by person with disabilities. The AAC has the following mandated tasks:
1. To participate in the annual development and/or refinement of “the organization’s” Accessibility Plan(s) which are intended to improve the quality of life for all Guelphites, including persons with disabilities; 2. To advise “the organization” on the implementation, and effectiveness of the City’s annual Accessibility Plan to ensure that it addresses the identification, removal and prevention of barriers to persons with disabilities in “the organization’s” by-laws, and all policies, programs, practices and services; 3. To select and review the site plans and drawings for new developments, described in section 41 of The Planning Act; 4. To review and monitor existing and proposed procurement policies of “the organization” for the purpose of providing advice with respect to the accessibility for persons with disabilities to the goods or services being procured; 5. To review access for persons with a disability to buildings, structures and premises (or parts thereof) that the City purchases, constructs, significantly renovates, leases or funds for compliance with the 2012 Facility Accessibility Design Manual (FADM). 6. To review “the organization’s” policies and standards and advise “the organization” on issues and concerns (barriers) faced by persons with disabilities and the means by which the organizations may work towards the elimination of these barriers. In addition, the AAC undertakes the following: • Reviewing and advising “the organization” on universal transportation issues, their policies and standards, and how to enable barrier-free access for persons with disabilities; • Advising, consulting and reporting findings and recommendations to “the organization” on matters related to the status of persons with disabilities. The AAC shall be informed on matters of policy (municipal, provincial or federal government and CSA) affecting persons with disabilities and shall inform “the organization” about the impact of these policies; • Coordinating the immediate and ongoing dissemination of information in various formats to persons with disabilities, etc., and to the public at large regarding issues faced by persons with all types of disabilities and regarding the work undertaken by the AAC; and, • Supporting, encouraging and being an ongoing resource to “the organization,” individuals, agencies and the business community by education and building community awareness about measures (such as employment accommodations, business accessibility, etc.) for improving the
PAGE 2
STAFF REPORT quality of life for persons with disabilities, through the removal of physical barriers, incorporation of universal design standards and education to overcome attitudinal barriers to make Guelph an accessible, liveable city for all people.
REPORT
The Accessibility Advisory Committee has met five times since its last annual report in 2012. In addition to the regular meetings during 2013, committee members were involved in various sub committee meetings and have attended numerous community events and community engagement forums. In total, committee members have contributed 542 hours in 2013.
The AAC carried out the following significant tasks over the past year at the request of staff: • Commented on the Corporate Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and Policy • Committee members became familiar with new legislation released on January 1, 2013 under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) that focused on the Design of Public Spaces . While the AAC are still interpreting this regulation, they have been able to make recommendations to staff on potential barriers to watch for during planning and implementation • Co-hosted, with City staff, a public meeting in accordance with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act to engage citizens on the following Integrated Accessibility Standard Regulation (IASR) topics: o The development of accessible design criteria to be considered in the construction, renovation or replacement of bus stops and shelters. O. Reg. 191/11, s. 78 (1); and o Determine the proportion of on-demand accessible taxicabs required in the community. O. Reg. 191/11, s. 79 (1) • Participated in the Site Plan Approval Process by: o Reviewing site plans and recommending accessibility related changes o Identifying possible areas for improvement related to accessibility o Providing input to the accessible parking section for the City’s Parking Bylaw (in progress) o Providing input to an accessibility section in the Site Plan Review Guidelines • Recommended the location of potential accessible bus stop pads and surplus bus shelters at the request of staff • Members attended an Accessibility Advisory Committee Forum hosted by the Accessibility Directorate of Ontario in Burlington, Ontario • Provided comment on the Province’s Municipal Accessibility Advisory Committee Handbook
Looking forward, the Accessibility Advisory Committee will:
o Advise staff on potential barriers as the City implements the Multi-Year Accessibility Plan
PAGE 3
STAFF REPORT o Advise staff on the Downtown Guelph Streetscape Manual and Built Form Standards
CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN
Innovation in Local Government 2.3 Ensure accountability, transparency and engagement
City Building 3.1 Ensure a well designed, safe, inclusive, appealing and sustainable City 3.3 Strengthen citizen and stakeholder engagement and communications
DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTATION
Planning Services Guelph Transit Guelph Police Services
ATTACHMENTS
ATT-1 Accessibility Advisory Committee Annual Report
Report Author Leanne Warren Accessibility Services Coordinator
______Approved By Recommended By Barbara Powell Derrick Thomson General Manager, Community Executive Director, Engagement and Social Services Community and Social Services 519-822-1260 ext. 2675 519- 822-1260 ext. 2665 [email protected] [email protected]
PAGE 4
CSS-CESS-1355 ATT-1
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
TO Community and Social Services Committee
SERVICE AREA Community and Social Services Community Engagement and Social Services: Accessibility Services
DATE December 10, 2013
SUBJECT Accessibility Advisory Committee Annual Report
SUMMARY OF REPORT Annual work status report from City Council’s Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC)
KEY FINDINGS The AAC carried out the following significant tasks over the past year at the request of staff: • Commented on the Corporate Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and Policy • Committee members became familiar with new legislation released on January 1, 2013 under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) that focused on the Design of Public Spaces. While the AAC are still interpreting this regulation, they have been able to make recommendations to staff on potential barriers to watch for during planning and implementation • Co-hosted, in combined efforts with City staff, a public meeting in accordance with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act to engage citizens on the following Integrated Accessibility Standard Regulation (IASR) topics: o The development of accessible design criteria to be considered in the construction, renovation or replacement of bus stops and shelters. O. Reg. 191/11, s. 78 (1); and o Determine the proportion of on-demand accessible taxicabs required in the community. O. Reg. 191/11, s. 79 (1) • Participated in the Site Plan Approval Process by: o Reviewing site plans and recommending accessibility related changes o Identifying possible areas for improvement related to accessibility o Providing input to the accessible parking section for the City’s Parking Bylaw (in progress) o Providing input to an accessibility section in the Site Plan Review Guidelines • Recommended (Staff Requested): o The location of potential accessible bus stop pads and surplus bus shelters
PAGE 1
CSS-CESS-1355 ATT-1
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
Future Tasks: o Continue to advise staff on potential barriers as the City implements the Multi-Year Accessibility Plan o Continue to advise staff on the Downtown Guelph Streetscape Manual and Built Form Standards Activities: • Members attended an Accessibility Advisory Committee Forum hosted by the Accessibility Directorate of Ontario in Burlington, Ontario • Provided comment on the Provinces’ Municipal AAC Handbook
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There were minor budgetary costs for transportation to the Accessibility Directorate of Ontario forum in Burlington as the group carpooled.
BACKGROUND The Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) is a committee of Council as legislated through the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disability Act (AODA). The regulations under the AODA are based on the Ontario Human Rights Code and aim to proactively remove barriers for people with a disability making Ontario an accessible province by the year 2025. Barriers can range from physical, such as a doorknob that is hard for a person with limited upper body mobility and strength to operate, to the format of information, i.e. a document available in a format that a person using a screen reader will be able to access.
The members of the AAC readily advise the City and Council on the removal of barriers, and over the past months have been able to provide advice on potential barriers related to some projects that were still in the planning stage. This is the committee’s ideal approach.
Our abilities change throughout our lifespan and may change as we age. We may have temporary disabilities or permanent ones. We may all experience some form of disability sooner or later.
Disability comes in many forms. It may be: • Visible or hidden. It’s easy to see the person who uses a wheelchair or scooter. Other disabilities, such as hearing related disabilities may be hidden. • Severe or mild. Complete paralysis can affect every aspect of a person’s life. A minor speech impairment may have a lesser impact. • Singular or multiple. Diabetes can lead to blindness, loss of sensation in peripheral extremities, or even amputation.
PAGE 2
CSS-CESS-1355 ATT-1
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
• Chronic or intermittent. Someone with a learning disability will tend to process information at the same level every day. But a person with seizures may have one only once every few weeks, months or years.
To be selected for a position on the committee, AAC members must have a disability or be knowledgeable about disabilities. Members at the AAC table are able to share their lived-experience with disability and are often well connected in the community with others who have a disability through support groups, social opportunities and when they access services.
The AAC will support the Accessibility Services Coordinator to carry out a systematic review of City services, policies, procedures and practices to ensure compliance with the AODA and the Ontario Human Rights Code. The AAC’s willingness to share their accessibility related knowledge with City staff and committees provides the City with an invaluable resource – a resource with the expertise to look at matters through an “accessibility lens.”
REPORT
The City’s Accessibility Advisory Committee members have been quite active since October 2012 when they last reported their activities to Council. The highlights of their activities are as follows:
AODA Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and Corporate Accessibility Policy With their unique lens on accessibility, the AAC reviewed and commented on the Corporation’s draft Multi-Year Accessibility Plan. This Plan will serve as a guiding document as staff implements the AODA over the next several years.
The Plan is accompanied by a Corporate Accessibility Policy that is planned to replace both the City’s Barrier Free Policy from 2001 and the City’s first policy under the AODA, the Accessible Customer Service Policy 2010. By combining these documents, along with the newer legislated requirements, the City will provide thorough expectations to staff in one policy document.
The committee encourages the City to continue to strive beyond the minimum requirements of the AODA.
Design of Public Spaces Standard As of January 2013, the AODA IASR contains yet another standard. This new standard focuses on the Design of Public Spaces. It includes parks and trails, customer service areas, and accessible parking to name a few of the significant elements.
PAGE 3
CSS-CESS-1355 ATT-1
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
From an accessibility perspective this new standard has further supported the City’s direction to ensure that its City facilities are accessible. The City’s Facility Accessibility Design Manual (FADM) that Council approved as an accessible standard for all City facilities in 2005, was updated in 2012 to reflect the requirements of the Ontario Building Code, and is currently being updated to include the Design of Public Spaces requirements. Providing staff with the most current information on accessible building has given Guelph the opportunity to be a leader for accessible municipal facilities. While some Ontario municipalities are working to interpret this new standard, staff members in our municipality have already gained the necessary expertise to carry out their building projects in compliance with this legislation.
The AAC and City staff provided feedback to the province on the draft of this standard in 2012.
Co-hosted Public Meeting During November 2012 the AAC, Guelph Transit and Guelph Police Services hosted a public meeting during the first part of the AAC’s regular meeting. The topics discussed included engaging 19 citizens (including the AAC) on the following Integrated Accessibility Standard Regulation (IASR) topics: 1. The development of accessible design criteria to be considered in the construction, renovation or replacement of bus stops and shelters. O. Reg. 191/11, s. 78 (1); During the meeting Guelph Transit staff presented a standard for bus stops throughout the city that Engineering had recently developed. Attendees seemed to be accepting of the design and few comments were received. 2. Determine the proportion of on-demand accessible taxicabs required in the community. O. Reg. 191/11, s. 79 (1) Judith C. Sidlofsky Stoffman, B.A., M.L.S., LL.B., LL.M., Legal Counsel for Guelph Police Service, presented the current arrangement regarding accessible taxi cabs in Guelph.
Site Plans Reviewed • Participated in the Site Plan Approval Process by: o Reviewing site plans and recommending accessibility related changes o Identifying possible areas for improvement related to accessibility o Providing input to: The accessible parking section for the City’s Parking Bylaw (in progress) An accessibility section in the Site Plan Review Guidelines
As part of the Accessibility Services Coordinator systematic review, the AAC struck a sub-committee to assist in the review site plans. During their bi-weekly
PAGE 4
CSS-CESS-1355 ATT-1
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
meetings to review plans, it became apparent that the Accessible Parking Bylaw was in need of updating.
Shortly after the sub-committee identified this concern, the Design of Public Spaces standard was released which includes accessible parking minimum standards. This standard will be helpful in that it will provide some guidance on minimum guidelines.
The sub-committee recommended to the AAC that the sub-committee continue to review site plans and provide input through an accessibility lens.
Accessible Parking Bylaw Consulting on an Accessible Parking Bylaw is work that the AAC are looking forward to. The old bylaw is several years old, with outdated terminology and contains very little direction. The new Design of Public Spaces standard will provide a solid base for this work to build on.
Staff Requested Recommendation The AAC met with Transit to provide input on potential locations of accessible bus stops, pads and surplus bus shelters.
Future Tasks Multi-Year Accessibility Plan : The AAC will continue to be available to advise staff on potential barriers to implementing the Multi-Year Accessibility Plan. Several implementation plans will be develop over the next two years.
Strengthen Relationship with Transit : With the change in the General Manager position and the implementation of the new Supervisor of Mobility position, the AAC expect to identify re-occurring concerns with the Mobility system as well as provide insight to the impact of these concerns from the AAC’s perspective.
Downtown Guelph Streetscape Manual and Built Form Standards, and St George’s Square Plan : Staff members have invited the AAC to provide input into these plans at public and AAC meetings. Representatives from the AAC have attended the public meetings to date and have provided input from an accessibility perspective. The Committee members look forward to meeting with staff to identify accessible design opportunities in this exciting project.
PAGE 5
CSS-CESS-1355 ATT-1
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
AAC Activities Attended a Forum Several AAC members attended a full day forum hosted by the Accessibility Directorate of Ontario (ADO). The keynote speaker was from the Ontario Municipal Social Services Association who launched two guides: a Guide to Conducting Accessible Meetings and a Guide to Accessible Public Engagement.
Provided Comment on ADO Document The Guelph AAC was selected by the ADO to provide comments on the Province’s handbook designed to provide guidance to municipal AACs.
CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN
Innovation in Local Government 2.3 Ensure accountability, transparency and engagement
City Building 3.1 Ensure a well designed, safe, inclusive, appealing and sustainable City 3.3 Strengthen citizen and stakeholder engagement and communications
DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTATION Planning Services Guelph Transit Guelph Police Services
COMMUNICATIONS Minutes are posted on the City website (AAC Bi-Monthly Meeting Minutes December 2012 to August 2013 ) and available in alternate formats upon request
Report Author Leanne Warren Accessibility Services Coordinator
Approved By Brad Howcroft Accessibility Advisory Committee – Vice-Chair
PAGE 6
Guelph Sports Hall of Fame Report to Community and Social Services Committee December 10, 2013 MANDATE
Established in 1992 with sponsorship from the City of Guelph and the Kiwanis Club of Guelph Recognizes and honours achievements of Guelph individuals and teams who have attained prominence and distinction in any field of sport and those who have made a major contribution to the development and advancement of sports in Guelph The achievement of such individuals and teams are permanently recorded in a public display at the Sleeman Centre in downtown Guelph. GOVERNANCE
The Board consists of 9 members: 3 from the Kiwanis Club and 6 members at large plus a (non voting) City representative Andy Behnan just completed year one as Chair Carolyn Lee was added in 2013 as a new member As a result of a resignation, there is currently one vacancy on the Board The Committee met seven times during 2013 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Andy Behnan - Chair Larry Townsend - Vice Chair/Kiwanis Club Representative Rich Grau – Secretary/City Representative Wayne Mizen – Kiwanis Club Representative Michael MacIntyre – Kiwanis Club Representative Will Lenssen – Public Appointee Sandra Pitts – Public Appointee Andrew Maloney – Public Appointee Carolyn Lee – Public Appointee Vacant Position – To be appointed from the public SELECTION COMMITTEE
Larry Mellott – Chair Andy Behnan – Vice Chair Rich Grau – Secretary/City Representative Chuck Lindley Nick DiCarlo Marie Denham Ron Gumbley Shari Dorr Kiwanis Club Sports Celebrity Dinner
This was the 27 th Annual Kiwanis Sports Celebrity Dinner Master of Ceremonies - Paul Osborne Special guests included: • Eric Gillis • Victoria Moors • Henry Burris • Peter Dyakowski • Todd Hlushko • Pierre Pilote The dinner was attended by over 270 guests 2013 INDUCTEES
Athlete – Todd Hlushko Veteran Athlete – Lt-Col. John Steele Builder – Steve Redmond Official – Frank Cecchetto Team – 1939 Guelph Leaflets Bob Warden John Korkoran INDUCTEE RECOGNITION
Each inductee receives a replica plaque and Hall of Fame pin as mementos for their induction into the Hall.
Sketches by Robert Howson Narratives composed by Paul Osborne Printing by Moffitt Print Craft Framing by the Kloepfer Custom Picture Framing and Gallery All costs are covered by proceeds from the Kiwanis Club Sports Celebrity Dinner. OUTSTANDING STUDENT AMBASSADORS RECENT INITIATIVES
Relocation, aesthetic updating and improved signage for the Hall of Fame display Development of the Guelph Sports Hall of Fame website hosted at: guelph.ca/sportshalloffame • Inductees section will include photographs and narratives STAFF REPORT TO Community and Social Services Committee
SERVICE AREA Community and Social Services Culture and Tourism
DATE December 10, 2013
SUBJECT Guelph Sports Hall of Fame Annual Report
REPORT NUMBER CSS-CT-1350
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PURPOSE OF REPORT To submit an annual report for the Guelph Sports Hall of Fame.
KEY FINDINGS The Guelph Sports Hall of Fame Committee was established in 1993, and consists of six (6) at large members and three (3) Kiwanis Club members. Inductees are recognized at the annual Guelph Kiwanis Sports Celebrity Dinner which was hosted on October 23, 2013. This year’s inductees were:
• Athlete Todd Hlushko • Veteran Athlete Lt-Col John Steele • Official Frank Cecchetto • Builder Steve Redmond • Team 1939 Guelph Leaflets
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS None
ACTION REQUIRED That the report be received for information.
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the December 10, 2013 report entitled “Guelph Sports Hall of Fame Annual Report” be received for information.
BACKGROUND The Guelph Sports Hall of Fame Committee was established in 1993 with the first inductees being recognized later that year. The committee consists of six (6) at large members and three (3) Kiwanis Club members. The Kiwanis Club members
PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT are appointed to the committee. Inductees are recognized and presented with personal plaques at the annual Guelph Kiwanis Sports Celebrity Dinner which is typically hosted in the fall of each year. Larger commemorative plaques are placed on public display at the Sleeman Centre in an area designated for the Hall of Fame. Nominations are accepted at all times, with a cut-off date of January 31. Next year’s dinner will be held in June, and as such, the cut-off date for nominations was changed to October 31, 2013.
This past year, a web page hosted on the City’s website was launched. It can be found at guelph.ca/sportshalloffame. In the coming months, it will be updated to include narratives and pictures for all inductees.
REPORT
Objectives for the Guelph Sports Hall of Fame • To recognize and honour achievements of Guelph individuals and teams who have attained prominence and distinction in any field of sport, and those who have made a major contribution to the development and advancement of sports in Guelph • To permanently record and give public prominence to the achievement of such individuals and teams in a public display centre
Classification of Inductees • There are five (5) classes of induction into the Guelph Sports Hall of Fame – Athlete, Veteran Athlete, Official, Builder and Team
Eligibility for Election • Nominees who by outstanding achievement have attained prominence in any field of sport, or have made a major contribution to the development and advancement of sports in Guelph are eligible for election to the Guelph Sports Hall of Fame. • Athlete candidates must have concluded their careers as active players for a minimum of five (5) years before their election, except where – by reason of outstanding performance and skill upon request by the Selection Committee, made in advance – the Board of Governors may reduce such waiting period. • Builder and Team candidates can be active or inactive at selection time.
Recent Meetings The committee met seven times during 2013, in January, April, May, June, September, October and December. Subsequent meetings are usually scheduled on a bi-monthly basis, but have yet to be determined for 2014.
27th Annual Kiwanis Sports Celebrity Dinner This year’s dinner was held at the Italian Canadian Club on Wednesday October 23, 2013. The event was attended by in excess of 270 people. Special guests included:
PAGE 2
STAFF REPORT Eric Gillis – Two-time Olympian Eric Gillis formerly of Antigonish, Nova Scotia finished third in the Canadian 10 kilometre road race in Toronto recently. Gillis who now lives in Guelph, crossed the finish line first at the Canadian half marathon championship in Montreal and won the men’s race with a time of 1:05:56.
Todd Hlushko – Champion baseball and OHL player. He played for the Pro- Joys 1988 – 91 helping to win the Championship in 1989, and later played for the Guelph Royals winning the Championship in 1993. Todd played in the OHL for the Guelph Platers, Owen Sound Platers and the London Knights 1988 – 1990. He was drafted by the Washington Capitals and also played in the NHL for Philadelphia, Calgary and Pittsburgh. He played for the Canadian National Team from 1992 – 1994, winning silver at the ’94 Olympics and bronze at the ’95 World Hockey Championships in Stockholm.
Henry Burris – Presently the quarterback for the Hamilton Tiger-cats. In 2012, he started all 18 games during his first year with Hamilton, setting Ti- cat records for passing yards and completions while also setting the single- game passing completions record with 37, at Toronto on November 1, 2012. Henry has played for Calgary, Green Bay, Chicago and Saskatchewan.
Peter Dyakowski – Is an offensive lineman for the Hamilton Tiger-cats, and in 2012 was crowned Canada’s Smartest Person by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation after winning the televised special of the same name. He was selected in the second round by the Ti-cats in the 2006 CFL Canadian Draft. Peter has played 6 seasons with Hamilton.
Pierre Pilot – NHL All Star 8 times as well as 3 time recipient of the Norris trophy as the outstanding defenseman in 1963, ‘64 and ’65, and runner up in 1962, ’66 and ’67. He was Stanley Cup winner with the Chicago Blackhawks in 1961 and inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame in 1975.
Victoria Moors – A 16 year old gymnast that attends Bishop Macdonell High School in Guelph. She competed at the 2012 Olympics in London, England where the team finished fifth overall, higher than expected. In August, Moors was the first female gymnast to perform a double-twisting double layout in international competition during her floor exercise routine at the Pan American Senior Apparatus Championship. At the World Artistic Gymnastics Championships in October, she finished 10 th in the all-around. The double- twisting double layout skill on floor exercise is now called the "Moors" in the Code of Points.
This year’s inductees were: • Athlete Todd Hlushko • Veteran Athlete Lt-Col John Steele • Official Frank Cecchetto
PAGE 3
STAFF REPORT • Builder Steve Redmond • Team 1939 Guelph Leaflets
CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN
Innovation in Local Government 2.3 Ensure accountability, transparency and engagement
City Building 3.1 Ensure a well designed, safe, inclusive, appealing and sustainable City 3.3 Strengthen citizen and stakeholder engagement and communications
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The cost of plaques is covered by the Guelph Kiwanis Club. City of Guelph staff at the Sleeman Centre install the plaques and maintain the cleanliness of the display as part of their normal responsibilities.
DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTATION
Community and Social Services – Culture and Tourism
COMMUNICATIONS N/A
ATTACHMENTS N/A
Prepared By: Rich Grau Manager, Sleeman Centre
______Approved By Recommended By Colleen Clack Derrick Thomson General Manager Executive Director Culture and Tourism Community and Social Services 519-822-1260 x 2588 519-822-1260 x 2665 [email protected] [email protected]
PAGE 4
Cultural Advisory Committee
Report to Community and Social Services Committee December 10, 2013
1 Cultural Advisory Committee
Members – 2013 J. C. Blokhuis Lynn Broughton (to September 2013) Ronald East Reinhard Kypke Laurel McKellar Greg Pinks Anuradha Saxena Gillian Veitch (to September 2013) Sally Wismer 2 Cultural Advisory Committee
GOAL – To provide staff with a sounding board, subject- specific advice and expertise, and community voice during policy and program development .
Assisted with the Culture Map web portal testing Assisted with development of Public Art Donation process Assisted with development of Temporary Art Display application 3 Cultural Advisory Committee
GOAL – To provide staff with assistance with program delivery and provide the community with information about City projects/activities.
Assisted with the Culture Map web portal launch Assisted with the presentation of the 2013 Cultural Connections Conference
4 Cultural Advisory Committee
GOAL – To provide community with a link to City, information about City projects and activities, and an avenue for sharing concerns/needs.
Attended community events such Art on the Street, Nuit Blanche, Culture Days and RRC Season Launch Hosted a “community conversation” event for local cultural organizations 5 Cultural Advisory Committee
GOAL – To provide staff with subject-specific advice and expertise Through the Public Art Committee: Made recommendations on one proposed gift of public art Made recommendations on one temporary installation of art in public space Currently assisting with Photo courtesy of Musagetes – Photo by: Vanessa Tignanelli. commissioning process for the Civic Precinct Public Art project 6 Cultural Advisory Committee
Looking ahead
•Connecting with community members •Supporting policy and program development and implementation •Facilitating two-way communication
7 STAFF REPORT TO Community and Social Services Committee
SERVICE AREA Community and Social Services Culture and Tourism
DATE December 10, 2013
SUBJECT Cultural Advisory Committee Annual Report
REPORT NUMBER CSS-CT-1351
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PURPOSE OF REPORT To submit an annual report for the Cultural Advisory Committee.
KEY FINDINGS The Cultural Advisory Committee was established in 2011, with the mandate to give guidance and input to staff on arts and culture matters to further the City’s strategic goals.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS None
ACTION REQUIRED That the report be received for information.
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the December 10, 2013 report entitled “Cultural Advisory Committee Annual Report” be received for information.
BACKGROUND The mandate of the Cultural Advisory Committee (CAC) is to give guidance and input to staff on arts and culture matters to further the City’s strategic goals. The Committee’s goals and objectives are:
• To assist and advise staff on the development and review of policy relating to cultural development; • To assist staff on establishing priorities for cultural development and identify potential resources; • To provide input into the Culture & Tourism Department’s long-term strategic planning;
PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT • To help develop ongoing connections between community cultural groups, individuals, and the City in order to enhance and promote effective communication; • To assist staff in connecting with community businesses and organizations to develop new partner and sponsorship opportunities; • To champion the integration of arts and culture development plans into related City plans, such as the Official Plan and various master plans.
The Cultural Advisory Committee was established in 2011 following Council’s dissolution of the River Run Centre Board of Directors (CSS-ACE-1111). The dissolution of the Board of Directors and the establishment of the Advisory Committee reflects recommendations outlined in the City of Guelph’s Recreation, Parks and Culture Master Plan (2009) to develop a committee whose mandate would be to galvanize community actions and to provide a ‘more targeted approach’ to arts and cultural development.
REPORT
The Cultural Advisory Committee met five times in 2013. In addition to regular meetings, committee members took part in various subcommittee meetings and attended numerous community events. In total, committee members have contributed approximately 175 volunteer hours this year.
The Cultural Advisory Committee’s 2013 work plan focused on five goals:
• To provide staff with a sounding board, subject-specific advice and expertise, and community voice during policy and program development • To provide community with a link to City, information about City projects and activities, and an avenue for sharing concerns/needs • To provide staff with subject-specific advice and expertise • To provide staff with assistance with program delivery and provide the community with information about City projects/activities • To provide Council with information about community wants/needs, how recommendations from the cultural sector support City policies and plans, and to hear from champions
To achieve these goals, the committee’s activities in 2013 included: assisting with the final phase of the Guelph Cultural Mapping Project, including web portal testing, hosting the launch event, and assisting with the Cultural Connections Conference; assisting with the development of processes to facilitate donations of public art and temporary displays of artwork in public space; supporting City events such as Cultural Days; and hosting a “community conversation” event for local cultural organizations.
In addition, the Public Art Committee, a standing committee of the CAC, evaluated and accepted one public art donation (a statue of John McCrae scheduled for
PAGE 2
STAFF REPORT installation in 2015), and one application for the temporary display of art in public space ( Fluxus Garden , installed by the Musagetes Foundation in St. George’s Square for the month of September).
The Public Art Committee (PAC) has also been actively involved in the commissioning of artwork for the Civic Precinct. Committee members assisted with the development of documents for various stages of the competition, appointed a Public Art Selection Panel, and have been overseeing the art selection process.
Looking forward, the Advisory Committee has begun developing a work plan for 2014. Initiatives being considered include continued assistance with the implementation of the Public Art Policy (through the work of the PAC); hands-on assistance at City events such as Culture Days; and continued development of a communication strategy to improve the flow of information between the City and the cultural sector.
CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN
Innovation in Local Government 2.3 Ensure accountability, transparency and engagement
City Building 3.1 Ensure a well designed, safe, inclusive, appealing and sustainable City 3.3 Strengthen citizen and stakeholder engagement and communications
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS N/A
DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTATION N/A
COMMUNICATIONS N/A
ATTACHMENTS N/A
Prepared By: Reviewed By: Astero Kalogeropoulos Ella Pauls Arts & Culture Program Officer Manager, Cultural Development
PAGE 3
STAFF REPORT
______Approved By Recommended By Colleen Clack Derrick Thomson General Manager Executive Director Culture and Tourism Community and Social Services 519-822-1260 x 2588 519-822-1260 x 2665 [email protected] [email protected]
PAGE 4
Silvercreek Skatepark Gph,Guelph, ON
Committee Meeting Presentation |December 10, 2013 Site Analysis, Public Consultation & Conceppgt Design : Process Summar y
Step ( 1 ): Site Analysis – Fall, 2012 – February, 2013 • concluding with the Site Analysis Report February 14th, 2013
Step ( 2 ): Pu blic (You th) Desi gn Meeti ng #1 – February 27th, 2013 • three (3) 2-D preliminary Schematic Design approaches were presented to the youth community and a preferred approach was selected
Step ( 3 ): Public (Youth) Design Meeting #2 – March 27th, 2013 • the preliminary Conceptual Design was rendered in 3-D and presented to the youth community for additional comments and feedback
Step ( 4 ): Preliminary GRCA Submission – May, 2013 • ppyreliminary submission of Concep pgtual Design to the GRCA for comments
Step ( 5 ): Public Meeting– July 24th, 2013 • the Conceptual Design was presented to the general public for comments and feedback
Step ( 6 ): Final Concept Design – October, 2013 • the Final Concept Design was prepared to address all comments received to date
Step ( 7 ): Revised GRCA Submission – November, 2013 • revised submission of the Final Concept Design to the GRCA for approval
Silvercreek Park Skatepark Committee Meeting Presentation Site Analysis |Fall 2012
Public ( Youth ) Desigggn Meeting # 1 |February 27th 2013
If you could only have 5 perfect obstacles in the park, what would they be?
Bowl (11) mentions Stair Sets (10) mentions Half Pipe / Miniramp (9) mentions Ledges (8) mentions Ranked 1 Ranked 2 Ranked 3 Quarter Pipes (6) mentions Transition/Bowl 97 7 Snake Run (6) mentions Terrain Pyramid / Fun Box (6) mentions Obstacle/Park Terrain 5 12 6 Manual Pad (5) mentions Banks (5) mentions Real Street/Plaza 9410 Terrain Gaps (4) mentions Spines (4) mentions Please rate the GENERAL type of Hips (4) mentions Culture Sculpture (4) mentions terrain you prefer in order of Step-Up (3) mentions importance to you (1 to 3). Rollers / pu mp b umps (3) mentions Handrails (3) mentions Flow Bowl (2) mentions Wall Ride (2) mentions PlCiPool Coping (2) menti ons Bank to flat bar (1) mention Curbs (1) mention Please rate yypour preference in order of what Desi gn Directions most appeal to you (1 to 3). Ranked 1 Ranked 2 Ranked 3 Design Direction #1 7 6 6 Design Direction #2 964 Design Direction #3 388 Other Comments There was a great participation rate at the meeting and a substantial volume of feedback was collected – this is greatly appreciated by the design consulting team. The terrain preferences seem to be in favour of diversity and the inclusion of transition style elements (mostly “integrated” transition) is a must. Without the need to include parking in the immediate skatepark site plan area and with the utilities easement presenting a manageable constraint, there is more flexibility for potential area coverage. Workshop participants seem very interested in exploring a unique signature feature for the park inspired by a cultural reference to the community. Some early ideas include a reference to the old limestone architecture, the “Royal” City (i.e . rideable crown sculpture) and especially a reference to the environmentally conscious nature of the Guelph community (i.e. Speed River, “green” islands” healthy landscapes and also earth toned concrete to emphasize a “green and earthy” design aesthetic. Public ( Youth ) Desigggn Meeting # 2 |March 27th 2013
Public Meeting |July 24th 2013
GRCA Review & Approval |May 2013 - present
Final Conceppgtual Design |October 2013
Next Steps :
Secure GRCA Approval
• metinggy,pg, scheduled with City Staff, the skatepark consulting team, and the GRCA November 21st 2013 • revised submission to the GRCA November 28th 2013
Proceed with the Detailed Design Phase
• the skatepark consulting team have already proposed fees for the Detailed Design and Contract Administration phases (June 2012 proposal) • this scope of services has not been authorized by the City to proceed • the Cityyy may also want to p ursue a desig n-build contract to compppjlete the project
Monitor 2014 construction of the utility upgrades
Prepppare for Skatepark Construction in late 2014 or earl y 2015 STAFF REPORT TO Community and Social Services Committee
SERVICE AREA Community and Social Services Community Engagement and Social Services: Youth Services
DATE December 10, 2013
SUBJECT Guelph Skatepark: Preferred Design, Location and Budget Estimate Recommendations
REPORT NUMBER CSS-CESS-1353
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PURPOSE OF REPORT To provide the results of the community engagement and internal stakeholder input regarding the proposed permanent Skatepark preferred design and location. A high level budget estimate is also provided.
KEY FINDINGS On September 26, 2011, Guelph City Council directed staff to report back to the Community and Social Services Committee with the results of engagement with the public, relevant agencies and the skateboarding community on the primary site and design features of a permanent skatepark proposed for Silvercreek Park.
City staff contracted the services of van der Zalm + associates, for the purposes of site evaluation, stakeholder engagement and preliminary/final concept design services for proposed skatepark.
Site Evaluation conducted by van der Zalm + associates, City staff and external experts (environmental, geotechnical, Grand River Conservation Authority and Guelph Police Services) all concluded that Silvercreek Park was a suitable site to proceed with a community skatepark build.
Community Consultation, workshops and feedback have helped create a conceptual Skatepark Rendering that meets the needs of Guelph skateboard, BMX and scooter enthusiasts while maintaining a design aesthetic that complements Silvercreek Park’s existing landscape and usages.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Funds are currently identified within the 2014 and 2015 Capital Budget for Detailed design and construction.
PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT
ACTION REQUIRED That the conceptual design, location and preliminary budget estimate of the proposed permanent Skate park Facility be approved.
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the final design, location and high level budget estimate of the proposed permanent Skatepark Facility be approved.
BACKGROUND
In 2009, City Council directed staff to remove Guelph’s Deerpath Skateboard features and proceed with a study on the relocation of the Skateboard Park including a review of locations, site treatments, costs and timing. Council also approved the establishment of an advisory group of stakeholders and residents to assist staff with the relocation study.
An advisory committee met with staff seven times in 2010/2011 to look at possible new skateboard locations. Through this process the working group identified four preferred sites and staff completed an in depth analysis of these sites. Staff and stakeholder review of these sites included: ability to patrol/monitor site, proximity to major transit routes, proximity to existing amenities, distances from existing or proposed residential/commercial property, existing or potential parking/drop-off opportunities, and fit/complements to current use.
The staff and advisory group concluded that the Silvercreek Park site most closely matched the criteria necessary for a feasible site. On September 26, 2011 Council endorsed the recommendations of the Skatepark Advisory Group regarding the Silvercreek Park site and directed staff to report back on the results of consulting with the public including the skateboarding community, relevant agencies, and internal staff service areas on the preferred site and design features.
The Skatepark Advisory Group also recommended the City pursue a street plaza design for the Silvercreek Park site. There are no deep bowls in these designs but rather features that you might see in many urban settings. Trees and shrubs can be incorporated within the design and the concrete can be coloured to both match the surrounding environment and to discourage graffiti. Streetscape or plaza designs meet the needs of the greatest number of skateboarders while incorporating design aesthetics that complement existing community park landscapes. These designs move away from traditional grey concrete slabs (that non-users see as blemishes on existing parkscapes) and move towards a public space that is integrated with its surrounding environment and inviting to more than just skateboarders. Additionally, plaza designs are more cost effective than deep bowls and require far less site preparation which reduces time to build and cost.
PAGE 2
STAFF REPORT
REPORT
Introduction
On September 26, 2011 Guelph City Council endorsed the recommendations of the Skatepark Advisory Group regarding Silvercreek Park, and directed staff to report back on the results of consulting with the public, relevant agencies and the skateboarding community on the primary site and design features. The following report outlines the processes and results of community consultation, expert site review, study and survey and stakeholder input on the development of the Silvercreek Park Skateboard Site.
Process to Obtain Consultant
In May 2012, The City of Guelph issued a Request For Proposal For The Consulting Engineering Services For a Detailed Design and Construction Management of Silvercreek Park Skateboard Facility. Following submission reviews and ranking by City staff and Skateboard Advisory Group members, van der Zalm + associates supported by Newline Skateparks was awarded the contract.
Van der Zalm/Newline Skateparks are considered industry leaders with nearly 200 highly recognized projects and over a decade of concrete skatepark development experience. The firm’s design and construction expertise focuses on creating integrated skateboarding environments that respond to the needs of youth and the wider community.
Van der Zalm/Newline have built several skateparks throughout Ontario and have extensive experience building facilities in riverside and floodplain venues including design and build projects in Cambridge and Waterloo, Ontario (both builds within Grand River Conservation Authority jurisdiction). Van der Zalm/Newline’s initial work focused on Site Analysis and Conceptual Design & Costing Plans for Silvercreek Park Skatepark.
Site Assessment with Technical Experts
Van der Zalm + associates /Newline : Van der Zalm/Newline were able to identify an area of approx 20,000 sq ft within the North-West quadrant of Silvercreek Park that was free from significant constraints that would preclude the development of the skatepark and is a suitable site envelope for the development of Guelph’s Community Skatepark facility.
That said, there is an existing storm sewer line which passes directly underneath the proposed Skatepark facility, which may impact final design. Design options, such as minor design revisions and/or an engineered solution, are available to ensure the long-term viability of the pipe. Based on preliminary investigations by
PAGE 3
STAFF REPORT Van der Zalm/Newline, it is expected that any mitigating factors should not substantially affect either the facility or the funding envelope.
The site envelope is able to be developed with no impact on existing plantings or naturalized areas, with minimal excavation or disruption while maintaining an existing naturalized buffer between proposed site and the Speed River.
Skatepark facility design will consider all site constraints with respect to topography, hydrology, and existing vegetation utilizing responsible design practices. The design process will also identify the important site opportunities to create a compelling community facility design and an attractive, welcoming public space.
LVM Inc. Geotechnical Report : In August 2012, LVM was contracted to complete a geotechnical investigation of the Silvercreek Park Skateboard Facility envelope with particular assessment of subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site and recommendations pertaining to site preparation, concrete slab on grade design and stormwater infiltration potential.
LVM’s final report came back favourably, identifying no notable site restrictions related to soils or bedrock, nor constraints that would prevent a slab on grade concrete build. The report also indicates that the site is free of landfill or industrial debris, holds no significant storm water infiltration concerns (no need for additional under floor drainage required for build) and has a soil and bedrock profile suitable for skatepark build requirements.
MMM Group Scoped Environmental Impact Study : MMM has been contracted to complete a scoped Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the Silvercreek Skatepark site. Work is currently underway and will be completed by the second quarter of 2014.
A Scoped EIS and appended Arborist Report will be prepared for the Silvercreek Park Skateboard Facility. The Scoped EIS will document the findings of all field investigations, provide an assessment of Species at Risk habitat and Significant Wildlife Habitat potential, provide a detailed assessment of potential direct and indirect impacts to the Natural Heritage System features and functions, and provide recommendations regarding appropriate mitigation measures. The Arborist Report will clearly locate the tagged trees and data collected for each specimen and will provide specific tree preservation mitigation recommendations and requirements.
Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) : The proposed location of the Silvercreek Skatepark falls within GRCA jurisdiction and sits within the Speed River’s floodplain. Any construction within the floodway is regulated by a net zero cut/fill requirement, which is a prerequisite for GRCA permits.
PAGE 4
STAFF REPORT
The Grand River Conservation Authority is generally supportive of the skatepark build in Silvercreek Park, providing the cut/fill requirements can be met. To alleviate the fill requirements of the park, the design team is working in conjunction with the GRCA to define appropriate on-site and off-site solutions to maintain the floodplain’s net capacity.
Newline Skateparks has previously supported the Cities of Cambridge and Waterloo in achieving similar permitting from the GRCA for skatepark builds in each municipality, and is confident of similar results for the City of Guelph.
Internal Staff : Planning, Building, Engineering and Environment • Engineering and Waterworks have provided advisement pertaining to the York Trunk Sewer & Paisley-Clythe Feedermain project running parallel to the proposed Silvercreek Skatepark site. Sewer and feedermain project has no negative impacts on the proposed skatepark site, build or alignment. Opportunities exist to coordinate both projects and lessen park restoration expenditures through combined planning. • Environmental Planning has reviewed proposed Silvercreek Skatepark site alongside Official Plan Amendment 42, and indicated that the project fits within Plan guidelines. • Development Planning has supported the site selection and design review
Parks and Recreation • Parks and Open Space has supported the site selection and design review process
Community and Social Services • Accessibility Services has reviewed conceptual skatepark design renderings and has provided feedback regarding accessibility for prospective users and passive spectators. This feedback will be incorporated into the detailed construction drawings for the Silvercreek Skatepark.
Guelph Police Services : On May 8, 2013, Guelph Police Services completed a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Report on the proposed Silvercreek Skatepark Site, and reviewed skatepark concept drawings with City of Guelph staff. The following site feedback was provided.
Safety • The skate park would not be a lit facility so this would discourage night time use. • Gaining access to the facility was a concern with possible users walking across Wellington Street from Bristol Street Park and attempting to dodge
PAGE 5
STAFF REPORT traffic to get to the park. The addition of a user initiated crosswalk across Wellington Street would alleviate these concerns.
Accessibility • There is a bus stop on Edinburgh Road near the entrance to this portion of the park. Users can also drive into the park or be dropped off. • Parking may be a challenge as the proposed skatepark will eliminate two parking areas. This will cause an issue during the evenings when the volleyball leagues are playing, as parking is already a premium on those nights. Staff are currently looking at other parking solutions to mitigate this impact.
Visibility and Monitoring • The location of the facility is visible to traffic as it travels along Wellington Street. Vehicles will also be able to drive down into the park immediately beside the facility to monitor use. • There were also concerns that people would be able to use the skatepark for shelter, and hide between the skatepark and the river to engage in illegal and unwanted activities. This will not be the case as the highest point of the structure is only four feet high and will not offer a wall to hide behind. • Elevation from top edge of the walls will be gradually slopped away from the structure to eliminate any potential hiding spots. Noise • The location is well situated to dissipate any noise that may be generated from the users of the facility. • The lack of lighting will discourage night time use and reduce or eliminate any noise complaints resonating from the facilities. • The residents living on Bristol Street should not be affected by any noise from this location. The natural berm along the north side of Wellington Street and the vehicular traffic along Wellington Street should buffer and conceal any sound generated at the park and possibly heard by these residents. • The Speed River and the forested area of the Silvercreek Trails are along the south side. Residences are located south of the river, and trails are sheltered from the skatepark and should not be affected by any sound from the park. • The CPTED concerns identified by Guelph Police Services will be addressed through detailed design and site planning. Most of the items listed above are not expected to have significant design or budgetary impacts. However, the inclusion of a user-initiated crosswalk, a Kiss ‘n Ride option, and the provision for other parking solutions were not considered as part of the preliminary budget estimate.
Community Consultation results regarding Design and Location
On February 27 and March 27 of 2013, the City of Guelph and van der Zalm/Newline Skateparks hosted Community Skatepark Design Workshops. On July 24, 2013, City and van der Zalm/Newline staff also conducted a Community
PAGE 6
STAFF REPORT Information Session on the proposed Silvercreek Park site and how this location was chosen, reviewed the final skatepark design created through a collaborative design process, and outlined next steps.
Design Workshop #1 on February 27 was attended by 36 community members and provided the group with the opportunity to critique three distinctly different schematic designs (a “street only” design, a “bowl/flow” design and a hybrid “street plaza/bowl” design). Each design provided something different with regard to skatepark terrain priorities and also with regard to site planning (layout within the park). All of the designs presented received favourable feedback from the group with the hybrid “street plaza/bowl” design receiving the greatest number first choice votes. Additionally, workshop participants were able to state their preferred elements for their ideal park, discuss site opportunities and limitations, and guide the design team on elements required to create a unique “Guelph” skatepark. Some “Guelph” suggestions included a reference to the “Royal City” with crowns featured in the design, the possible inclusion of a poppy in a feature to represent Guelph’s connection to John McCrae, and the most noted request was the inclusion of plantings and trees in the design to reflect Guelph’s commitment to the environment (See ATT-1).
Design Workshop #2 on March 27 was attended by 28 community members and gave participants an opportunity to review an updated design featuring the information gathered in Workshop #1 and to provide additional feedback recommendations to the design team before the completion of the final “go forward” design. Participants were overwhelmingly enthusiastic with the design presented on March 27, and felt that comments and suggestions from Workshop #1 had been effectively incorporated into the design. Attendees also suggested minor design changes and asked specific questions about the design and included features (height of obstacles, type of rails, inclusion beginner areas, etc). The Skatepark Design Team committed to include Workshop #2 suggestions into the final design to be presented to City Council for final approval (See ATT-2).
Community Information Session on July 24 was attended by 14 community members, many residing in areas adjacent to the proposed skateboard park. Those in attendance were generally pleased with the skatepark design presented, and were satisfied with the site selection process and criteria. Most concerns from the group pertained to the safety of the participants arriving at the park (crossing Wellington Street or Edinburgh Road), the ability for parents to drop off participants at the site, and whether or not bus stops were close enough to the site (current transit stops are approximately 200 and 500 metres from the site).
Conceptual Design
In September of 2013, van der Zalm/Newline Skateparks provided City Staff with conceptual design renderings for the Silvercreek Skatepark. The park is approximately 15,000 sq ft in size, runs east to west along the Speed River and
PAGE 7
STAFF REPORT features a hybrid street and bowl design. The park incorporates two significant planters separating the street and bowl sections, and adds to the park’s existing “green scape”. The concept, park elements and layout were driven by the contributions of Guelph’s skateboard, BMX and scooter enthusiasts and features elements that complement the needs of beginners and experienced riders alike. Additionally, the park incorporates the best practices of skatepark design and layout regarding proximity to residential areas, a centralized location in the community, clear sightlines, visibility on foot and in a vehicle, a location that appeals to enthusiasts and passive viewers, and a design that complements existing park uses and landscapes (See ATT-3).
Budget Estimate
Silvercreek Skatepark design and build is estimated at $800,000 and is accounted for within Parks 2014 and 2015 Capital Budget Projections. The budget breakdown is as follows and is an order of magnitude estimate only, based on typical construction costs for skateparks of this type. Order of magnitude estimates for the proposed conceptual design are not yet available. The actual cost of time and construction may vary due to economic conditions, actual (verified) site conditions, and/or availability of material:
Project Manageme nt (site management, security/fencing, testing allowance) 10% Civil Works (earthworks, material import, drainage work) 30% Skatepark Elements (concrete, metal works, concrete detailing) 50% Remediation (landscaping, planting) 10%
Additional works, as outlined below, are required to inform the final design and develop the final construction budget. Indeed, whether or not some of the recommendations for the overall site plan can also be accommodated will be addressed. As outlined above, depending on the final permitting requirements for the GRCA, parking, FADM, and CPTED requirements, additional funding may be required and could be phased in appropriately.
Next Steps
1. Complete approval and permitting process with Grand River Conservation Authority – Q2 2014 . 2. Complete detailed construction drawings with Council approval of site and final concept designs – Q3 2014 .
PAGE 8
STAFF REPORT 3. Present detailed construction designs to Guelph’s River Systems Management Committee for review and site restoration/enhancement recommendations – Q3 2014 . 4. Completion of Scoped EIS for the Silvercreek site and incorporation of report recommendations into final design, site restoration and site enhancement planning – Q2 2014 . 5. Develop and issue Silvercreek Skatepark Build RFP through City of Guelph purchasing – Pending 2015 Capital Budget Approval . 6. Silvercreek Skatepark build – Pending 2015 Capital Budget Approval.
CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN Organizational Excellence 1.2 Develop collaborative work team and apply whole systems thinking to deliver creative solutions 1.3 Build robust systems, structures and frameworks aligned to strategy
Innovation in Local Government 2.2 Deliver Public Service better 2.3 Ensure accountability, transparency and engagement
City Building 3.1 Ensure a well designed, safe, inclusive, appealing and sustainable City 3.3 Strengthen citizen and stakeholder engagement and communications
DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTATION Community and Social Services • Parks and Recreation • Community Engagement • Accessibility Services
Planning, Building, Engineering and Environment • Engineering • Water Services • Environmental Planning • Landscape Planning
Corporate and Human Resources • Corporate Communications
COMMUNICATIONS Community and Social Services Planning, Building, Engineering and Environment Corporate and Human Resources
PAGE 9
STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENTS ATT-1 Schematic Skatepark Concept Drawings ATT-2 Refined Skatepark Design ATT-3 Final Skatepark Renderings
Report Author Adam Rutherford Youth Services Coordinator
______Approved By Recommended By Barbara Powell Derrick Thomson General Manager, Community Executive Director, Engagement and Social Services Community and Social Services 519-822-1260 ext. 2675 519- 822-1260 ext. 2665 [email protected] [email protected]
PAGE 10
CSS-CESS-1353 ATT-1 CSS-CESS-1353 ATT-1 CSS-CESS-1353 ATT-1 CSS-CESS-1353 ATT-2 CSS-CESS-1353 ATT-3 CSS-CESS-1353 ATT-3 CSS-CESS-1353 ATT-3 CSS-CESS-1353 ATT-3 Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights Results from the 2011/12 Youth Survey Top Five Health Issues Identified by Youth
1. Depression / Mental Health 2. Healthy Weights / Body Image 3. Healthy Relationships 4. Alcohol Use 5. Physical Activity Risk Taking Behaviours
12% 7% Smoking
Alcohol 49% 43%
Prescription Drugs 20% 28%
Thoughts of Self-Harm 14% 26%
13% 13% Thoughts of Suicide Protective Factors
1. More students in Guelph report feeling like they can make a difference in their community 2. More students in Dufferin report active transport to/from school 3. More families in Wellington County live below the Low Income Cut Off (LICO) 4. More students in Guelph report high levels of school engagement and school bonding The Making of the WDG Youth Charter of Rights
UN Rights of Youth the Child Engagement Endorsements 2007 2013
1989 WDG 2012 2013 Children’s June: Youth Charter of Charter of Rights Rights 1989: UN Rights of the Child
• The 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child builds on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), outlining children’s specific rights given their vulnerability and dependence • The Convention outlines that children have the right to: ▫ Protection ▫ Provision ▫ Participation 2007: WDG Children’s Charter of Rights 2012: Youth Engagement
• May & June: Youth Engagement Workshops • November & December 2012: Youth Consultations • January – April 2013: Report Card Design 2013: Youth Charter of Rights Charter Endorsements
• As with the Children’s Charter, we are asking local political councils, community organizations, and school boards to endorse the Youth Charter of Rights • Endorsing the Youth Charter signifies a commitment to act in accordance with the values and principles outlined in the charter Endorsement of the Youth Charter of Rights STAFF REPORT TO Community and Social Services Committee
SERVICE AREA Community and Social Services Community Engagement and Social Services : Youth Services
DATE December 10, 2013
SUBJECT Report Card Coalition – Youth Charter Endorsement
REPORT NUMBER CSS-CESS-1354
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PURPOSE OF REPORT To seek endorsement of the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights
KEY FINDINGS The Youth Charter of Rights was developed by a Youth Engagement Working Group of the Youth Report Card Coalition. This working group facilitated a series of workshops with youth from Wellington, Dufferin and Guelph and identified “youth friendly” updates to the 2006 Children’s Charter of Rights.
The endorsement of the Charter will reflect the intent to support and advocate for the rights of youth, and a recognition that the Corporation of the City of Guelph has a shared responsibility to support families and youth by putting their health and well-being first.
The statements contained within the Youth Charter of Rights correspond with recommendations and desired outcomes of the 2013 – 2018 Youth Strategy, and serve to strengthen the community’s commitment to and understanding of Guelph’s youth population.
On October 23, the Guelph Youth Council endorsed the Wellington-Dufferin- Guelph Youth Charter of Rights.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS None
ACTION REQUIRED That the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights be endorsed as a document that identifies values and principles that are upheld by the City of Guelph, and that the City of Guelph adopt the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights as a document that will guide the City’s policy decisions and key activities as they relate to youth.
PAGE 1
STAFF REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the City of Guelph endorse the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights as a document that identifies values and principles that are upheld by the City of Guelph
2. That the City of Guelph adopt the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights as a document that will guide the City’s policy decisions and key activities as they relate to youth.
BACKGROUND The purpose of the Report Card is to raise the profile of youth in our communities by examining and reporting on the state of their health, development, and overall well-being. The Well-Being of Youth Ages 14 to 18: A Report Card for Wellington- Dufferin-Guelph is a comprehensive review of the many factors that have an impact on our youth’s well-being: health, learning, and development. This Report Card focuses on youth ages 14 to 18 years and their families, who are living in Wellington County, Dufferin County, and the City of Guelph.
The Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph (WDG) Youth Charter of Rights is a document that outlines a vision to make Wellington, Dufferin, and Guelph better places for youth and families. It includes a series of statements that outline the responsibilities that our communities have for ensuring healthy development and bright futures for all of our youth.
In 2006, the Wellington Children’s Services Council and the Wellington-Dufferin- Guelph Coalition for Report Cards on the Wellbeing of Children led to the development of a Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Children’s Charter of Rights. This charter was made unique to our community and is based on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. There was an overwhelmingly positive response towards the Children’s Charter of Rights, with over 58 organizations in Wellington, Dufferin, and Guelph endorsing the Charter. These endorsements represent an organization’s commitment to act in accordance with the values and principles of the Charter.
With the success of the Children’s Charter of Rights, the Coalition decided that an important component of the work necessary to prepare a Report Card for Youth ages 14 to 18 was a Youth Charter of Rights
REPORT The Youth Charter of Rights was developed by a Youth Engagement Working Group of the Youth Report Card Coalition. This working group facilitated a series of workshops with youth from Wellington, Dufferin and Guelph and identified “youth friendly” updates to the 2006 Children’s Charter of Rights. Participants were asked to capture what they felt were important aspects of their personal wellbeing, as well
PAGE 2
STAFF REPORT as that of their peers and community. The underlying meaning, or “spirit”, of the Children’s Charter is reflected in the revised statements; however, the language and wording was changed to reflect youth specific input and endorsement. The participating youth felt that each statement would make all youth in our community proud.
The endorsement of the Charter will reflect the intent to support and advocate for the rights of youth, and a recognition that we have a duty to support families and youth by putting their health and wellbeing first. The community can use the Charter to guide and direct their commitment to youth health and development. Furthermore, youth may feel empowered to exercise their rights and protect the rights of their peers and other youth in the community.
Additionally, the Youth Charter of Rights and the work of the Youth Report Card Coalition is in harmony with the City of Guelph’s 2013 – 2018 Guelph Youth Strategy and the work of the Guelph Youth Council. All of the statements contained within the Youth Charter of Rights correspond directly to the recommendations and desired outcomes of the 2013 – 2018 Youth Strategy, and serve to strengthen the community’s commitment and understanding of Guelph’s youth population.
On October 23, the Guelph Youth Council endorsed the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights.
CORPORATE STRATEGIC PLAN City Building 3.1 Ensure a well designed, safe, inclusive, appealing and sustainable City 3.3 Strengthen citizen and stakeholder engagement and communications
DEPARTMENTAL CONSULTATION N/A
COMMUNICATIONS N/A
ATTACHMENTS ATT-1 Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Youth Charter of Rights
Report Author Adam Rutherford Youth Services Coordinator
PAGE 3
STAFF REPORT
______Approved By Recommended By Barbara Powell Derrick Thomson General Manager, Community Executive Director, Engagement and Social Services Community and Social Services 519-822-1260 ext. 2675 519- 822-1260 ext 2665 [email protected] [email protected]
PAGE 4
CSS-CESS-1354 ATT-1