DOCSLIB.ORG

Kew Bridge, Kew Bridge Road and Duke Road (Chiswick) Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kew Bridge, Kew Bridge Road and Duke Road (Chiswick) Consultation Proposals for Kew Bridge, Kew Bridge Road and Duke Road (Chiswick) Consultation report July 2019 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 4 Next steps ................................................................................................................ 4 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 8 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Potential outcomes ......................................................................................... 8 2.3 Consultation history ........................................................................................ 8 2.4 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 9 2.5 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 9 2.6 What we asked ............................................................................................... 9 2.7 Methods of responding ................................................................................. 10 2.8 Consultation materials and publicity ............................................................. 10 2.9 How we considered equalities in the consultation ........................................ 12 2.10 Analysis of consultation responses ........................................................... 13 3. About the respondents ...................................................................................... 14 3.1 Number of respondents ................................................................................ 14 3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation ........................................... 14 3.3 Methods of responding ................................................................................. 15 3.4 Respondents by postcodes and London Borough........................................ 16 3.5 Relationship between respondent and scheme area ................................... 20 3.6 Modes of transport ....................................................................................... 21 3.7 Quality of the consultation ............................................................................ 21 4 Summary of responses to open questions ........................................................ 22 4.1 Comments on our proposals for Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) ................................................................................. 22 4.2 Comments on our proposals for Duke Road and Duke’s Avenue junctions with Chiswick High Road ............................................................................................... 23 4.3 Summary of stakeholder responses ................................................................. 24 4.3.1 Politicians .................................................................................................. 24 2 4.3.2 Transport and road user groups................................................................ 31 4.3.3 Businesses and employers ....................................................................... 40 4.3.4 Local interest groups ................................................................................. 47 4.3.5 Schools ..................................................................................................... 55 5. Next steps ......................................................................................................... 56 Appendix A: Summary text of consultation proposals ............................................... 57 Appendix B: Consultation questions .......................................................................... 62 Appendix C: Consultation letters ............................................................................... 64 Appendix D: Consultation materials .......................................................................... 70 Appendix E: Stakeholders ......................................................................................... 84 Appendix F: Detailed analysis of comments .............................................................. 92 Detailed comments on our proposals for Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) ....................................................................... 93 Detailed comments on our proposals for Duke Road and Duke’s Avenue junctions with Chiswick High Road........................................................................................ 98 Comments on the quality of the consultation, the materials and the information provided ............................................................................................................... 106 3 Executive summary We consulted on our proposals for Cycle Superhighway 9 in autumn 2017. We published our analysis of the responses and our responses to the issues raised at tfl.gov.uk/cs9 The scheme is an important part of the Mayor’s Healthy Streets Approach, which aims to make London greener, healthier and more pleasant through encouraging walking, cycling and the use of public transport. The feedback we received was valuable in helping us to further improve the scheme. Overall, we are progressing our plans for the scheme as outlined in the January 2019 Response to Issues Raised report. In response to the feedback received, we carried out a further consultation on two parts of the route between 30 January and 26 February 2019: Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) Duke Road and Duke’s Avenue’s junction with Chiswick High Road The further consultation asked for feedback on the proposals in these two areas from residents, businesses, employers, transport users and other relevant stakeholders. We publicised the consultation using leaflets distributed across a wide area, targeted email campaigns and via news stories in regional and local media. This document explains the processes of the consultation, and provides an update on responses. We received 1,491 responses to the consultation. 38 of the responses were from stakeholder groups, which comprised politicians, transport and road user groups, businesses and employers, local interest groups and schools. We have summarised the issues raised by these stakeholders in Appendix E. There were 12 campaign style responses from owners of properties at Kew Bridge, 8 Kew Bridge Road, these were broadly based on the response from the Key Bridge Owners Association. These have been included in the overall responses. Many of the responses provided detailed feedback which we analysed in depth to ensure we understood views raised on the scheme. Next steps The feedback we received was valuable in helping us to further improve the scheme. We have produced a detailed Response to Issues Raised report available on our website tfl.gov.uk/kew-duke 4 1. About the proposals 1.1 Introduction We consulted on our proposals for Cycle Superhighway 9 in autumn 2017. The route is an important part of the Mayor’s Healthy Streets Approach, which aims to make London greener, healthier and more pleasant through encouraging walking, cycling and the use of public transport. We have published an analysis of the responses and our response to the issues raised here. The feedback we received was valuable in helping us to further improve the scheme. In response to feedback received through the consultation, we carried out a further consultation on two parts of the route: Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) Duke Road and Duke’s Avenue’s junction with Chiswick High Road 1.2 Purpose We wanted to hear views on the further proposals in these two areas. Other than the two sections identified for further consultation, we will be progressing our plans for the route as outlined in the Response to Issues Raised report. No further consultation was planned on the proposals for the route except for the two parts of the route above. We will carry out local engagement on the rest of our proposals later in the process. We are intending to proceed with our proposals subject to formal approvals. 1.3 Detailed description We published detailed proposals on our website at tfl.gov.uk/kew-duke. There, we provided an overview of the scheme, along with maps and a computer-generated image of the Kew Bridge junction showing how the junction would look if our proposals were implemented. Our survey asked for comments about our proposals in the two areas. The summary text of our consultation proposals is reproduced in Appendix A. The full consultation material (including section summaries, traffic impacts, maps and images) will remain available at tfl.gov.uk/kew-duke Kew Bridge and Kew Bridge Road (High Street Brentford to Wellesley Road) The main change we are proposing is to provide a segregated two-way cycle track on the south side of Kew Bridge Road and South Circular Road. Previously we proposed with-flow segregated cycle tracks and a bus lane on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sequential Assessment Department for Education
    SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION/BOWMER AND KIRKLAND LAND OFF HOSPITAL BRIDGE ROAD, TWICKENHAM, RICHMOND -UPON- THAMES LALA ND SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT On behalf of: Department for Education/Bowmer & Kirkland In respect of: Land off Hospital Bridge Road, Twickenham, Richmond-upon-Thames Date: October 2018 Reference: 3157LO Author: PD DPP Planning 66 Porchester Road London W2 6ET Tel: 0207 706 6290 E-mail [email protected] www.dppukltd.com CARDIFF LEEDS LONDON MANCHESTER NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE ESFA/Bowmer & Kirkland Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 4 2.0 QUANTITATIVE NEEDS ANALYSIS ....................................................... 5 3.0 POLICY CONTEXT .............................................................................11 4.0 SEQUENTIAL TEST METHODOLOGY .................................................17 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF SITES .....................................................................22 6.0 LAND OFF HOSPITAL BRIDGE ROAD ................................................55 7.0 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................57 Land at Hospital Bridge Road, Twickenham, Richmond-upon-Thames 3 ESFA/Bowmer & Kirkland 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This Sequential Assessment has been prepared on behalf of the Department for Education (DfE) and Bowmer & Kirkland, in support of a full planning application for a combined 5FE secondary school and sixth form, three court MUGA and associated sports facilities, together with creation of an area of Public Open Space at Land off Hospital Bridge Road, Twickenham, Richmond-upon- Thames (the ‘Site’). Background 1.2 Turing House School is a 5FE 11-18 secondary school and sixth form, which opened in 2015 with a founding year group (Year 7) on a temporary site on Queens Road, Teddington. The school also expanded onto a further temporary site at Clarendon School in Hampton in September 2018, and plans to remain on both of these temporary sites until September 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Nursing in British Mental Hospitals
    Downloaded by [New York University] at 12:59 29 November 2016 The Story of Nursing in British Mental Hospitals From their beginnings as the asylum attendants of the nineteenth century, mental health nurses have come a long way. This is the first comprehensive history of mental health nursing in Britain in over twenty years, and during this period the landscape has transformed as the large institutions have been replaced by services in the community. McCrae and Nolan examine how the role of mental health nursing has evolved in a social and professional context, brought to life by an abundance of anecdotal accounts. The nine chronologically ordered chapters follow the development from untrained attendants in the pauper lunatic asylums to the professionally qualified nurses of the twentieth century, and, finally, consider the rundown and closure of the mental hospitals from nurses’ perspectives. Throughout, the argument is made that while the training, organisation and environment of mental health nursing has changed, the aim has remained essentially the same: to nurture a therapeutic relationship with people in distress. McCrae and Nolan look forward as well as back, and highlight significant messages for the future of mental health care. For mental health nursing to be meaningfully directed, we must first understand the place from which this field has developed. This scholarly but accessible book is aimed at anyone with an interest in mental health or social history, and will also act as a useful resource for policy- makers, managers and mental health workers. Niall McCrae is a lecturer in mental health nursing at Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King’s College London.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain in Bloom Submisson
    HAM & PETERSHAM IN BLOOM 2018 HAM & PETERSHAM IN BLOOM 2018 CONTENTS Page 4-5 Map of Ham & Petersham 6 Ham and Petersham, recent achievements 7-8 The Bloom Campaign, Groups & Organisations within the Campaign 25 The schools 25 Leisure and recreational facilities 27 The Ham and Petersham Neighbourhood Plan 28 Ham and Petersham Calendar 28 Future Plans and strategy 29 Thanks and sponsors 2 3 Location key: 1. Ham Lands 2. Ham House 3. Ham Polo Ground 4. Walnut Tree Allotment 5. Ham Village Green 6. Library Garden 7. Grey Court School 8. South Avenue 9. Ham Common 10. Ham Gate House Garden 11. Parkleys 12. Ham Common Woods 13. Toad Ponds 14. Latchmere Brook 15. Petersham Meadows 16. Petersham Common Woods 17. The Cassel Hospital 18. Ham Parade 4 5 HAM & PETERSHAM Ham and Petersham is within the Borough of Richmond, bordered on the east by Richmond Park, to the west by the Thames, and to the south by the Royal Borough of Kingston. The village was recorded as Piterichesham in the 1086 Doomsday Book. Ham is not mentioned, but derives its name from the meaning of a meadowland in a river bend or Hamms. Large expanses of parkland and water meadows constrained the growth of Ham and Petersham, preserving their dis- tinctive rural character in the 19th century. The railways never reached these villages and therefore there was no rapid expansion during the Victorian period. The 20th Century brought a number of small housing estates, some houses built in the grounds of the larger properties, and development by Richmond Council of a few roads as part of the plan to reduce the housing list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Mental Science. (J
    THE COUNCIL AND OFFICERS, 1930-31. Officers. P r e s i d e n t .— T . SAXTY GOOD, O.B.E., M.A., M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. I F. R. P. TAYLOR, M.D. | E. BARTON WHITE, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. V i c e -P r e s i d e n t s .^ J. R. GILMOUR, M.B., F.R.C.P.E. NEIL T. KERR, M.B. I R. R. LEEPER, F.R.C.S.I. P r e s i d e n t -E l e c t .— R. R. LEEPER, F.R.C.S.I. E x -P r e s i d e n t .— NATHAN RAW, C.M.G., M.D., F.R.C.S.E., F.R.S.E. T r e a s u r e r .— JAMES CHAMBERS, M.A., M.D. G e n e r a l S e c r e t a r y .— R. WORTH, O.B.E., M.B. R e g i s t r a r .— DANIEL F. RAMBAUT, M.A., M.D. L i b r a r i a n .— J. R. WHITWELL, M.B. /South-Eastern.— J. NOEL SERGEANT, M.B. n South-Western.— s. E. m a r t i n , m .b . d i v i s i o n a l I Northern and Midtend— J. IVISON RUSSELL, M.B., secretaries Scottish.— W. M. BUCHANAN, M.B. [F.R.F.P.S. U rlsh— ROBERT THOMPSON, M.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Listed Buildings Register Planning
    Listed Buildings Register Planning 14 October 2019 Official# REFERENCE GRADE ADDRESS DESCRIPTION 83/00179/II Grade II Boundary Walls To Richmond Park Boundary Walls TQ 17 SE 4/12 TQ 27 SW 5/12 TQ 1971 27/12 83/00207/II Grade II North Lodge 2 Admiralty Road - Part Of National Physics Laboratory Teddington Middlesex TW11 0NN North Lodge to the National Physical Laboratory 73/00003/II Grade II North Bridge In Pleasure Grounds Ailsa Road Twickenham Middlesex Two bridges in the pleasure grounds parallel to Ailsa Road, St Margarat's area 73/00007/II Grade II Alma Cottage 5 Albert Road Teddington Middlesex TW11 0BD No 5 (Alma Cottage) 83/00250/II Grade II Amyand House 60 Amyand Park Road Twickenham Amyand House, 60 Amyand Park Road 99/00001/II Grade II 52 Amyand Park Road Twickenham Middlesex TW1 3HE Grove Cottage 74/00010/II Grade II 70 Barnes High Street Barnes London SW13 9LD No 70 Barnes High Street 83/00166/II Grade II 2 Branstone Road Richmond Surrey TW9 3LB 2 Branstone Road Richmond 68/00006/II Grade II 12-14 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey TW9 1HH 12-14 Brewers Lane (Victorian shopfront to No 12) 68/00033/II Grade II 11 And 13 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey 11 and 13 Brewres Lane (Victorian shop front ) 83/00018/II Grade II 16 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey TW9 1HH 16 Brewers Lane (Modernised Victorian shop window) 83/00019/II Grade II 8 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey TW9 1HH 8 Brewers Lane 83/00093/II Grade II The Britannia 5 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey TW9 1HH The Britannia (Modified Victorian pub front) 83/00106/II Grade II 2 - 6 Brewers
    [Show full text]
  • Download It As A
    Richmond History JOURNAL OF THE RICHMOND LOCAL HISTORY SOCIETY Numbers 1–39 (1981–2018): Contents, Author Index and Subject Index This listing combines, and makes available online, two publications previously available in print form – Journal Numbers 1 to X: Contents and Index, republished with corrections in October 2006, and Journal Numbers XI to XXV: Contents and Index, published in November 2004. This combined version has been extended to cover all issues of Richmond History up to No. 39 (2018) and it also now includes an author index. Journal numbers are in Arabic numerals and are shown in bold. Although we have taken care to check the accuracy of the index we are aware that there may be some inaccuracies, inconsistencies or omissions. We would welcome any corrections or additions – please email them to [email protected] List of Contents There were two issues in 1981, Richmond History's first year of publication. Since then it has been published annually. No. 1: 1981 The Richmond ‘Riverside Lands’ in the 17th Century James Green Vincent Van Gogh in Richmond and Petersham Stephen Pasmore The development of the top of Richmond Hill John Cloake Hesba Stretton (1832–1911), Novelist of Ham Common Silvia Greenwood Richmond Schools in the 18th and 19th centuries Bernard J. Bull No. 2: 1981 The Hoflands at Richmond Phyllis Bell The existing remains of Richmond Palace John Cloake The eccentric Vicar of Kew, the Revd Caleb Colton, 1780–1832 G. E. Cassidy Miscellania: (a) John Evelyn in 1678 (b) Wordsworth’s The Choir of Richmond Hill, 1820 Augustin Heckel and Richmond Hill Stephen Pasmore The topography of Heckel’s ‘View of Richmond Hill Highgate, 1744’ John Cloake Richmond in the 17th century – the Friars area James Green No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Landscape
    THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE The River Thames is London’s best known natural feature. It twists and turns through London, changing from a large freshwater river at Hampton into a saline estuary in the east. The river forms a continuous wildlife corridor stretching through London, between the countryside and the sea. The nature conservation importance of the linear features of the river channel, mudflats and banks cannot be separated from the land in the river corridor. The stretch between Hampton and Kew has the largest expanse of land designated with Site of Special Scientific Interest status in London. For centuries, people have been fascinated by the River Thames, and it FromTeddington Weir downstream the Thames continues to attract and inspire local residents and visitors from central London is tidal and abroad. Part of the great attraction of the river is the accessible experience of tranquil nature among the concrete and asphalt of the city - the flash of a kingfisher, the bright colour of a wildflower or a sudden cloud of butterflies have a special resonance in the urban setting. One of the main aims of the Strategy is to ensure the continued balance between wildlife conservation and public enjoyment. Over the centuries, the land and the river have been influenced by man’s activities. No habitat in London is truly natural which means that we have a particular responsibility to continue to manage the area in ways which conserve a mosaic of attractive habitats and to take special care of rarities. This section gives an overview of the variety of riverside habitats, providing broad guidelines for their management.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Consultation
    Version 3 26 June 2017 HAM AND PETERSHAM NEIGHBOURHOOD FORUM HAM AND PETERSHAM NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN RESPONSES TO THE PRE – SUBMISSION CONSULTATION Ref Name /Organisation Summary of response received Neighbourhood Forum Response No. Vision and Objectives 1. Richmond Clinical Neither agree or disagree with Vision Noted Commissioning Group (CCG). Responding on behalf of the RCCG, NHS England (NHSE), NHS London Healthy Urban Development Unit (HUDU) and NHS Property Services (NHS PS). 2. Richmond Housing Agree with the Vision Noted Partnership (RHP) 3. Richmond Housing Para 1.8.6 This makes no reference to housing new We have understood this comment to be about increasing Partnership (RHP) residents and families, only meeting the needs of existing the housing stock in the neighbourhood area rather than the residents. turnover of the existing stock. The Context section in the Housing chapter (3.2) sets out the constraints governing the scope for new development which are amplified in respect of individual sites in the Opportunities for Change chapter. Suggested revision; ‘The Neighbourhood Plan seeks to ensure that new housing meets the needs of current and future residents in the area 1 Version 3 26 June 2017 Ref Name /Organisation Summary of response received Neighbourhood Forum Response No. …’ 4. Ham Riverside Lands The Vision statement is bland and question the The Vision statement has been rephrased to give it a more Ltd (HRLL) description ‘semi-rural’ positive tone and explanatory paragraphs added. The phrase ‘semi-rural’ reflects the open space setting of the settlements which a distinctive feature of the character of the neighbourhood and figured prominently in views expressed in the consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Character Appraisal & Management Plan Conservation Areas
    LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES Character Appraisal & Management Plan Conservation Areas – Petersham no.6, Ham Common no.7, Ham House no.23 & Parkleys Estate no.67 These character appraisals and management plans were adopted by the council on 30th March 2007 following public consultation. HAM & PETERSHAM CONSERVATION AREA, CHARACTER APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 Contents Introduction INTRODUCTION 2 Conservation areas were introduced in the Civic Amenities Act 1967 and are defined as areas of SPECIAL INTEREST 4 “special architectural or historic interest, the character History and Development 4 or appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or Location and Setting 6 enhance”. Designation introduces a general control over the demolition of unlisted buildings and the felling CHARACTER APPRAISALS 11 or lopping of trees above a certain size. Petersham Conservation Area No.6 11 Ham Common Conservation Area No.7 16 It is a formal requirement that the ‘special interest’, Ham House Conservation Area No.23 20 which justifies designation, is defined by the local Ham Street Sub Area 20 planning authority through a detailed character Ham House Estate Sub Area 22 appraisal of each conservation area. The objective Parkleys Estate Conservation Area No.67 23 of a conservation area appraisal is to provide a clear and comprehensive analysis of the character and PROBLEMS AND PRESSURES 25 appearance of the conservation area, and assess the vulnerability of this character to unsympathetic MANAGEMENT PLANS 28 change. This provides a sound basis for development control decisions within these areas. It is also a requirement that a management plan is produced for each conservation area, which sets out proposals for the preservation and enhancement of the character and appearance of a conservation area, as identified during the character appraisal process.
    [Show full text]
  • Listed Buildings Register
    Listed Buildings Register Planning 30 April 2019 REFERENCE GRADE ADDRESS DESCRIPTION 83/00179/II Grade II Boundary Walls To Richmond Park Boundary Walls TQ 17 SE 4/12 TQ 27 SW 5/12 TQ 1971 27/12 83/00207/II Grade II North Lodge 2 Admiralty Road - Part Of National Physics Laboratory Teddington North Lodge to the National Physical Laboratory Middlesex TW11 0NN 73/00003/II Grade II North Bridge In Pleasure Grounds Ailsa Road Twickenham Middlesex Two bridges in the pleasure grounds parallel to Ailsa Road, St Margarat's area 73/00007/II Grade II Alma Cottage 5 Albert Road Teddington Middlesex TW11 0BD No 5 (Alma Cottage) 83/00250/II Grade II Amyand House 60 Amyand Park Road Twickenham Amyand House, 60 Amyand Park Road 99/00001/II Grade II 52 Amyand Park Road Twickenham Middlesex TW1 3HE Grove Cottage 74/00010/II Grade II 70 Barnes High Street Barnes London SW13 9LD No 70 Barnes High Street 83/00166/II Grade II 2 Branstone Road Richmond Surrey TW9 3LB 2 Branstone Road Richmond 68/00006/II Grade II 12-14 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey TW9 1HH 12-14 Brewers Lane (Victorian shopfront to No 12) 68/00033/II Grade II 11 And 13 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey 11 and 13 Brewres Lane (Victorian shop front ) 83/00018/II Grade II 16 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey TW9 1HH 16 Brewers Lane (Modernised Victorian shop window) 83/00019/II Grade II 8 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey TW9 1HH 8 Brewers Lane 83/00093/II Grade II The Britannia 5 Brewers Lane Richmond Surrey TW9 1HH The Britannia (Modified Victorian pub front) 83/00106/II Grade II 2 - 6 Brewers Lane Richmond
    [Show full text]
  • PEAT) Results 2010
    Patient Environment Action Team (PEAT) results 2010 Privacy and Organisation name Site name Environment Food dignity SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE PCT THORNBURY HOSPITAL 4 Good 5 Excellent 4 Good HAVERING PCT ST GEORGE'S HOSPITAL 3 Acceptable 4 Good 3 Acceptable KINGSTON PCT TOLWORTH HOSPITAL 5 Excellent 5 Excellent 5 Excellent BARNET PCT EDGWARE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 5 Excellent 5 Excellent 4 Good BARNET PCT FINCHLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 5 Excellent 5 Excellent 5 Excellent HILLINGDON PCT MOUNT VERNON HOSPITAL - NORTHWOOD & 4 Good 4 Good 4 Good PINNER COMMUNITY UNIT ENFIELD PCT ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL 4 Good 5 Excellent 4 Good BARKING AND DAGENHAM PCT GRAYS COURT 4 Good 3 Acceptable 4 Good TOWER HAMLETS PCT MILE END HOSPITAL 5 Excellent 5 Excellent 5 Excellent NEWHAM PCT EAST HAM CARE CENTRE 3 Acceptable 4 Good 5 Excellent HARINGEY TEACHING PCT ST. ANN'S HOSPITAL 4 Good 4 Good 5 Excellent HEREFORDSHIRE PCT LEOMINSTER COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 4 Good 4 Good 4 Good HEREFORDSHIRE PCT BROMYARD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 4 Good 5 Excellent 4 Good HEREFORDSHIRE PCT ROSS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 4 Good 4 Good 4 Good HEREFORDSHIRE PCT HILLSIDE CENTRE FOR INTERMEDIATE CARE 4 Good 5 Excellent 4 Good HEREFORDSHIRE PCT STONEBOW UNIT 4 Good 4 Good 4 Good MILTON KEYNES PCT CAMPBELL CENTRE 4 Good 4 Good 5 Excellent MILTON KEYNES PCT WARD 14 MKGH 4 Good 4 Good 4 Good MILTON KEYNES PCT WINDSOR INTERMEDIATE CARE 4 Good 4 Good 5 Excellent NEWCASTLE PCT NEWCASTLE GENERAL HOSPITAL 3 Acceptable 3 Acceptable 3 Acceptable PLYMOUTH TEACHING PCT MOUNT GOULD HOSPITAL 5 Excellent 5 Excellent 5 Excellent PLYMOUTH TEACHING PCT PLYMPTON HOSPITAL 5 Excellent 5 Excellent 5 Excellent PLYMOUTH TEACHING PCT LEE MILL 5 Excellent 4 Good 5 Excellent PLYMOUTH TEACHING PCT GLENBOURNE 5 Excellent 5 Excellent 5 Excellent PORTSMOUTH CITY TEACHING PCT ST.
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 Local Landscape Hampton Wick Reach
    98 Thames Landscape Strategy: The Local Landscape Landscape Character Reach No 5: HAMPTON WICK LANDSCAPE CHARACTER The Hampton Wick Reach curves from Kingston Railway Bridge to Teddington Lock. The reach is characterised by residential areas interspersed with recreation grounds and dominated by the Kingston Power Station and British Aerospace site. Yet despite these developments and recent apartment blocks, the reach remains remarkably green and well-tree’d. This leafy character should be enhanced by the recent demolition of the British Aerospace Works and the current removal of the redundant power station. Although the chimneys of the power station can be seen from miles around, huge plane trees and lombardy poplars reduce some of its impact on the river. Entering the reach from Kingston, the railway bridge and pumping station arches and the lines of trees beyond provide a distinct gateway, leading to the shaded waterside park. The smooth trunks of the plane trees and the high canopy above, create an arcade-like frame to the river. The cracked asphalt, stained concrete street lamps and broken khaki benches leave the place feeling a little uncared for, but the simple space is thronged with walkers and fishermen on the lower path and people just sitting and watching on the upper 5. HAMPTON benches. WICK The waterside park leads into the main part of Canbury Gardens, a much- valued and popular park. A riverside line of trees is backed by strips of shrubberies, a pub and a rowing club. Tennis courts, bowling greens and pavilions occupy the landward edge of the park, creating a dense complex of formal recreation facilities under the shadow of the power station.
    [Show full text]