Cercozoa) Table S1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cercozoa) Table S1 Fiore-Donno et al. 2019 . Community structure of soil protists (Cercozoa) Table S1. Environmental parameters from the study site as in Regan et al., (2014) used in our statistical analyses. Their seasonal variation is shown in Figure S2. Soil_mo Bulk_de Clay_perc Total Organi CN_rati C_microbial_ N_microbial_ Extractable_O Extractable_ Fungal_P Number_of_ Bacterial_16S_a Archaeal_16S_ Plant_litter_ Total_plant_ Roots pH NH + NO - PO 2- isture nsity ent _N c_C o 4 3 4 biomass biomass rganic_C Organic_N LFAs bacteria bundance abundance biomass biomass µg*g- % relative g/soil µg*g-1 µg*g-1 µg*g-1 µg*g-1 µg*g-1 soil µg*g-1 soil µg*g-1 soil µg*g-1 soil µg g-1 number of number of Unit % g cm-3 1 soil cells g-1 dw g 20cm2 g 20cm2 to silt core soil dw soil dw soil dw soil dw dw dw dw dw dw copies / g dw copies / g dw dw S003 63.20 0.83 16.47 2.37 6.13 0.63 6.47 10.19 13.56 24.13 88.46 1679.34 262.90 231.08 11.99 1.54 5.64E+10 3.96E+11 1.14E+09 4.98 11.28 S004 54.50 0.79 16.06 0.87 6.49 0.56 5.51 9.84 12.36 6.59 69.07 1464.90 213.15 212.85 18.09 1.62 2.30E+10 3.33E+11 1.94E+09 5.95 9.08 S005 56.70 0.75 18.23 3.00 6.55 0.65 6.49 10.00 12.06 29.20 85.71 1787.47 271.40 200.78 8.72 1.81 3.16E+10 4.06E+11 3.55E+09 2.95 8.70 S006 59.15 0.80 17.70 3.48 6.30 0.64 6.52 10.18 14.66 22.36 83.17 1672.75 251.27 199.55 9.04 1.83 3.13E+10 3.24E+11 2.48E+09 6.61 10.89 S007 61.24 0.77 18.10 1.22 6.52 0.68 6.89 10.20 15.13 7.09 75.90 1952.62 295.48 220.93 19.59 1.81 2.34E+10 4.24E+11 2.89E+09 3.85 8.78 S008 60.03 0.81 17.05 3.03 6.82 0.67 6.84 10.21 15.62 23.83 88.37 1874.11 293.56 220.85 10.17 1.65 2.45E+10 3.89E+11 2.22E+09 5.62 9.00 S009 61.99 0.87 16.95 1.29 6.36 0.66 6.66 10.14 16.51 22.11 72.30 1728.85 260.16 181.07 6.95 1.98 2.39E+10 2.12E+11 3.79E+09 4.72 10.38 S010 57.33 0.74 15.70 0.90 6.57 0.68 7.16 10.59 16.87 7.70 67.68 1910.61 281.67 205.27 13.90 2.02 1.82E+10 2.99E+11 2.80E+09 5.30 8.17 S013 59.13 0.54 14.61 1.54 6.76 0.69 7.07 10.19 18.32 15.21 85.41 1790.22 311.66 253.52 11.86 1.69 4.54E+10 4.61E+11 5.53E+09 2.25 4.39 S014 54.05 0.95 15.62 1.46 6.84 0.64 6.45 10.13 13.05 24.60 93.34 1653.95 264.78 213.66 5.67 1.60 5.42E+10 2.58E+11 2.19E+09 5.26 7.12 S015 58.75 0.98 14.67 1.62 6.56 0.63 6.32 10.11 15.91 17.61 88.30 1754.65 276.46 199.54 8.72 3.26 1.11E+10 2.43E+11 1.56E+09 7.29 9.93 S016 55.15 0.96 14.87 0.67 6.63 0.67 6.98 10.35 14.99 6.06 62.74 1755.28 257.57 212.57 16.38 2.17 3.07E+10 3.58E+11 3.49E+09 3.09 6.08 S017 56.93 0.98 14.77 1.31 6.63 0.65 6.70 10.27 19.49 24.64 67.28 1699.59 248.41 193.71 6.28 1.85 1.69E+10 3.62E+11 4.16E+07 9.20 12.17 S018 56.71 0.99 15.09 1.70 6.55 0.65 6.49 9.94 13.93 26.82 84.85 1752.26 276.27 174.50 4.30 1.42 1.90E+10 2.52E+11 5.75E+08 6.34 9.91 S019 60.13 0.92 16.08 1.53 6.52 0.64 6.45 10.00 29.10 11.61 79.12 1820.81 280.89 355.42 32.96 2.80 2.83E+10 3.67E+11 2.35E+09 3.29 8.90 S020 58.46 1.03 15.46 1.14 6.70 0.68 6.98 10.29 13.49 26.33 73.53 1636.69 248.00 179.65 4.27 1.59 1.09E+10 4.07E+11 1.76E+09 5.55 10.19 S021 55.72 0.97 16.20 1.08 6.51 0.67 6.69 10.03 15.48 15.15 63.55 1584.14 241.77 173.24 9.34 1.83 1.47E+10 3.78E+11 1.51E+09 5.12 7.96 S022 58.04 0.99 14.10 2.24 6.56 0.64 6.59 10.21 13.29 7.92 70.71 1605.58 246.04 191.18 13.96 1.79 3.80E+10 6.45E+11 2.15E+09 4.22 6.40 S037 57.95 0.87 12.58 2.14 7.02 0.67 6.78 10.13 17.43 7.25 101.64 1966.03 337.32 252.74 16.32 1.99 1.29E+10 5.30E+11 3.37E+09 2.46 3.47 S038 54.59 1.00 13.54 1.21 6.80 0.62 6.23 9.97 14.17 15.57 74.56 1674.44 245.30 191.04 6.94 1.65 1.57E+10 6.04E+11 2.17E+09 3.14 4.13 S039 55.12 0.80 12.23 2.91 6.57 0.68 6.91 10.11 28.69 67.66 128.05 1970.79 296.41 225.09 6.79 1.85 2.06E+10 2.81E+11 2.01E+09 2.10 3.43 S040 57.18 1.01 12.47 2.85 6.88 0.60 5.99 9.98 18.04 12.75 128.21 1814.46 278.28 237.06 16.62 2.36 2.93E+10 2.45E+11 1.76E+09 2.91 4.01 S041 57.45 1.04 15.05 1.98 6.75 0.66 6.55 10.00 12.12 20.79 87.29 1779.02 261.24 217.01 8.67 1.46 1.79E+10 3.02E+11 3.12E+09 3.86 6.20 S042 57.57 1.18 12.68 1.73 6.52 0.59 6.06 10.23 19.21 12.91 58.81 1456.60 215.44 187.22 9.43 1.39 1.61E+10 1.71E+11 1.68E+09 4.87 6.84 S043 57.98 1.03 13.29 1.18 6.81 0.65 6.47 9.93 15.85 6.34 73.10 1731.53 276.13 222.94 17.99 1.85 1.34E+10 6.77E+09 1.67E+09 4.39 6.15 S044 56.62 0.96 11.83 1.74 6.70 0.67 6.60 9.92 11.67 20.54 69.75 1602.51 226.28 169.39 5.51 1.60 1.59E+10 2.65E+11 6.29E+08 6.00 9.31 S045 57.19 1.03 12.32 1.20 6.58 0.66 6.79 10.29 17.37 19.80 83.94 1895.28 308.16 187.95 6.46 2.05 2.04E+10 3.19E+11 3.04E+09 0.80 2.70 S046 58.78 0.86 13.58 2.71 6.81 0.68 7.02 10.31 17.32 6.13 94.24 1761.92 296.48 259.85 18.11 1.75 1.19E+10 3.10E+11 1.56E+09 5.35 7.36 S049 55.00 0.99 15.13 4.07 6.55 0.57 5.74 10.06 14.41 4.74 57.87 1492.02 206.68 200.86 21.80 1.93 2.09E+10 2.79E+11 NA 4.97 8.73 S050 50.81 1.01 15.20 2.51 6.70 0.56 6.07 10.78 11.04 14.12 45.79 1343.29 191.38 141.72 3.57 1.23 1.15E+10 2.88E+11 1.70E+09 5.78 7.38 S063 26.15 0.75 16.47 2.53 6.21 0.64 6.51 10.17 7.41 7.95 59.22 1487.35 187.18 171.99 11.23 2.27 1.02E+10 1.42E+11 1.52E+09 2.14 14.20 S064 26.83 0.85 16.06 1.06 6.68 0.61 6.08 9.93 6.61 11.72 55.04 1362.62 179.87 115.91 3.65 1.54 7.37E+09 1.44E+11 2.92E+09 6.32 20.57 S065 26.77 0.91 18.23 1.43 6.53 0.63 6.31 9.96 5.07 9.69 72.74 1362.22 181.01 160.34 12.68 1.83 2.77E+09 1.54E+11 2.51E+09 2.66 7.31 S066 34.64 0.88 17.70 0.57 6.45 0.66 6.56 9.95 5.52 12.15 81.90 1714.88 252.90 165.02 14.35 3.24 8.04E+09 1.76E+11 2.76E+09 3.36 11.44 S067 29.43 0.84 18.10 0.66 6.65 0.64 6.47 10.12 6.74 14.44 62.78 1571.20 201.79 118.79 3.60 1.80 3.40E+09 1.72E+11 2.76E+09 4.68 12.62 S068 27.39 0.79 17.05 1.17 6.62 0.71 7.23 10.23 7.06 10.76 68.24 1554.34 222.01 152.72 9.78 3.60 5.08E+09 1.62E+11 3.02E+09 4.22 13.17 S069 29.73 0.76 16.95 2.32 6.46 0.67 6.66 9.97 5.30 7.99 76.48 1675.64 234.34 170.64 22.88 4.10 2.08E+09 1.77E+11 1.74E+09 2.42 12.91 S070 26.13 0.78 15.70 1.97 6.62 0.69 7.14 10.41 5.57 15.49 74.25 1898.60 226.91 156.48 8.10 2.04 3.81E+09 2.08E+11 3.13E+09 6.03 23.78 S073 26.40 0.89 14.61 1.49 6.74 0.58 5.86 10.09 5.77 11.59 61.77 1676.60 187.30 123.99 6.76 1.53 2.48E+09 1.58E+11 2.17E+09 2.88 7.68 S074 27.35 0.80 15.62 1.45 6.72 0.61 6.22 10.18 6.26 8.34 60.13 1468.12 206.80 156.43 10.50 2.18 2.82E+09 2.04E+11 2.42E+09 2.26 16.38 S075 29.64 0.92 14.67 0.74 6.50 0.64 6.47 10.09 5.37 7.80 73.10 1426.44 198.62 176.53 17.40 3.77 4.43E+09 1.40E+11 3.05E+09 1.39 9.88 S076 26.78 0.98 14.87 0.76 6.73 0.63 6.15 9.75 6.11 14.79 60.79 1386.20 182.36 115.04 4.18 1.38 2.37E+09 1.49E+11 3.19E+09 1.88 6.99 S077 29.24 0.87 14.77 0.88 6.58 0.61 5.96 9.83 5.68 10.31 57.39 1136.92 152.53 165.60 13.13 1.80 4.27E+09 1.63E+11 2.31E+09 4.71 10.10 S078 26.92 0.81 15.09 1.11 6.62 0.64 6.17 9.67 6.51 6.59 63.02 1640.88 242.95 168.23 13.00 2.51 5.70E+09 1.82E+11 2.58E+09 4.21 13.83 S079 25.58 0.86 16.08 1.59 6.51 0.56 5.65 10.15 6.20 2.16 46.04 1073.71 117.31 229.82 21.23 1.63 3.33E+09 1.05E+11 1.14E+09 9.67 27.61 S080 30.36 0.87 15.46 1.03 6.70 0.70 6.95 9.99 5.94 7.64 79.27 1613.10 239.07 161.18 19.98 2.73 2.20E+09 3.03E+11 2.32E+09 3.83 16.24 S081 27.34 0.81 16.20 1.64 6.70 0.67 6.86 10.17 5.98 8.81 51.90 1695.18 239.72 150.82 10.14 2.83 2.97E+09 2.22E+11 3.00E+09 3.83 14.72 S082 27.91 0.86 14.10 1.34 6.56 0.71 7.19 10.19 5.10 13.50 59.27 1591.73 204.17 121.09 5.44 1.88 2.90E+09 2.16E+11 3.23E+09 4.00 15.32 S097 30.08 0.74 12.58 1.60 6.83 0.67 6.58 9.90 4.30 18.72 71.90 1603.33 241.33 133.81 1.17 2.72 3.42E+09 2.13E+11 3.23E+09 2.67 8.50 S098 29.88 0.86 13.54 1.15 6.91 0.66 6.81 10.32 8.31 12.19 84.50 1416.28 212.51 181.19 9.48 2.33 1.75E+09 2.22E+11 3.14E+09 1.43 12.28 S099 26.48 0.83 12.23 1.46 6.99 0.67 7.39 11.07 7.76 9.04 92.35 1672.98 282.92 195.87 12.53 3.13 2.87E+09 1.33E+11 1.48E+09 0.96 8.26 S100 28.30 0.95 12.47 1.60 6.87 0.66 6.93 10.49 6.31 16.15 80.04 1535.31 222.92 144.25 5.19 2.37 2.86E+09 2.58E+11 3.55E+09 1.78 15.28 S101 27.86 0.71 15.05 1.07 6.58 0.64 6.37 9.88 6.13 9.09 67.19 1192.93 160.78 157.53 17.52 1.97 2.23E+09 2.30E+11 2.28E+09 3.70 12.44 S102 26.17 0.83 12.68 2.12 6.61 0.64 6.54 10.25 7.20 5.88 71.54 1682.17 206.23 200.22 17.82 3.43 2.95E+09 2.18E+11 3.76E+09 5.65 19.13 S103 27.21 0.86 13.29 1.05 6.79 0.72 7.41 10.25 4.26 16.91 73.18 1873.78 259.66 139.70 4.21 2.83 2.43E+09 2.45E+11 4.57E+09 3.34 16.16 S104 29.58 0.70 11.83 1.70 6.65 0.71 7.11 10.07 8.25 16.14 66.64 1461.45 236.95 148.38 7.25 2.54 3.02E+09 2.15E+11 4.01E+09 4.49 13.09 S105 30.72 0.84 12.32 1.96 6.67 0.64 6.51 10.11 6.81 11.86 68.04 1637.90 237.39 155.25 13.05 3.15 1.83E+09 1.96E+11 2.72E+09 2.33 12.97 S106 27.56 0.77 13.58 1.75 6.75 0.67 6.71 10.05 5.46 15.66 69.24 1645.76 220.36 113.77 3.39 3.09 2.09E+09 2.54E+11 4.97E+09 2.16 12.95 S109 27.13 0.84 15.13 1.25 6.76 0.59 6.09 10.30 8.03 11.54 54.94 1693.08 205.42 127.84 7.48 2.93 2.89E+09 2.44E+11 1.69E+09 6.44 15.81 S110 26.59 1.01 15.20 0.79 6.80 0.61 6.12 10.01 5.68 4.91 47.54 1081.53 169.12 141.45 14.09 1.80 1.83E+09 2.30E+11 4.55E+09 5.90 16.55 S123 41.89 0.92 16.47 0.72 6.72 0.69 6.88 9.95 11.79 8.78 71.47 1769.63 266.23 238.94 13.27 5.14 6.17E+09 1.44E+11 5.73E+08 3.50 19.24 S124 36.01 0.91 16.06 0.60 6.33 0.67 6.86 10.27 5.55 11.08 56.74 1626.52 226.86 145.74 10.32 3.86 5.75E+09 9.06E+10 1.99E+09 3.30 18.00 S126 36.30 0.81 17.70 0.38 6.86 0.60 5.98 10.04 7.95 7.32 47.77 1365.01 219.47 192.81 9.19 2.41 8.27E+09 7.73E+10 1.84E+09 3.60 14.20 S127 43.53 0.83 18.10 0.74 6.89 0.70 7.32 10.42 8.27 12.92 77.64 2093.15 332.62 173.46 6.98 3.11 3.22E+09 1.00E+10 1.84E+09 4.10 12.72 S128 41.26 0.80 17.05 0.61 6.78 0.65 6.54 10.02 8.20 9.65 57.00 1639.22 259.76 155.71 7.47 3.33 3.27E+09 3.78E+10 2.85E+08 3.40 17.30 S129 40.46 0.83
Recommended publications
  • Functional Traits and Spatio-Temporal Structure of a Major Group of Soil Protists (Rhizaria: Cercozoa) in a Temperate Grassland
    fmicb-10-01332 June 8, 2019 Time: 10:19 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 11 June 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01332 Functional Traits and Spatio-Temporal Structure of a Major Group of Soil Protists (Rhizaria: Cercozoa) in a Temperate Grassland Anna Maria Fiore-Donno1,2*, Tim Richter-Heitmann3, Florine Degrune4,5, Kenneth Dumack1,2, Kathleen M. Regan6, Sven Marhan7, Runa S. Boeddinghaus7, Matthias C. Rillig4,5, Michael W. Friedrich3, Ellen Kandeler7 and Michael Bonkowski1,2 1 Terrestrial Ecology Group, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 2 Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), Cologne, Germany, 3 Microbial Ecophysiology Group, Faculty of Biology/Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany, 4 Institute of Biology, Plant Ecology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 5 Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research, Berlin, Germany, 6 The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, United States, 7 Department of Soil Biology, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany Edited by: Soil protists are increasingly appreciated as essential components of soil foodwebs; Jaak Truu, University of Tartu, Estonia however, there is a dearth of information on the factors structuring their communities. Reviewed by: Here we investigate the importance of different biotic and abiotic factors as key Anne Winding, drivers of spatial and seasonal distribution of protistan communities. We conducted Aarhus University, Denmark 2 Ida Karlsson, an intensive survey of a 10 m grassland plot in Germany, focusing on a major group Swedish University of Agricultural of protists, the Cercozoa. From 177 soil samples, collected from April to November, Sciences, Sweden we obtained 694 Operational Taxonomy Units representing 6 million Illumina reads.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Genetic Diversity
    1.13 NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY Dennis P. Gordon National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6022, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The known genetic diversity represented by the New Zealand biota is reviewed and summarised, largely based on a recently published New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. All kingdoms and eukaryote phyla are covered, updated to refl ect the latest phylogenetic view of Eukaryota. The total known biota comprises a nominal 57 406 species (c. 48 640 described). Subtraction of the 4889 naturalised-alien species gives a biota of 52 517 native species. A minimum (the status of a number of the unnamed species is uncertain) of 27 380 (52%) of these species are endemic (cf. 26% for Fungi, 38% for all marine species, 46% for marine Animalia, 68% for all Animalia, 78% for vascular plants and 91% for terrestrial Animalia). In passing, examples are given both of the roles of the major taxa in providing ecosystem services and of the use of genetic resources in the New Zealand economy. Key words: Animalia, Chromista, freshwater, Fungi, genetic diversity, marine, New Zealand, Prokaryota, Protozoa, terrestrial. INTRODUCTION Article 10b of the CBD calls for signatories to ‘Adopt The original brief for this chapter was to review New Zealand’s measures relating to the use of biological resources [i.e. genetic genetic resources. The OECD defi nition of genetic resources resources] to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on biological is ‘genetic material of plants, animals or micro-organisms of diversity [e.g. genetic diversity]’ (my parentheses).
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Phytomyxid Infection on the Alien Seagrass Halophila Stipulacea In
    Research Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.14053 Rare phytomyxid infection on the alien seagrass Halophila stipulacea in the southeast Aegean Sea MARTIN VOHNÍK1,2, ONDŘEJ BOROVEC1,2, ELIF ÖZGÜR ÖZBEK3 and EMINE ŞÜKRAN OKUDAN ASLAN4 1 Department of Mycorrhizal Symbioses, Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, 25243 Czech Republic 2 Department of Plant Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, 12844 Czech Republic 3 Marine Biology Museum, Antalya Metropolitan Municipality, Antalya, Turkey 4 Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Fisheries, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Athanasios Athanasiadis Received: 31 May 2017; Accepted: 9 October 2017; Published on line: 8 December 2017 Abstract Phytomyxids (Phytomyxea) are obligate endosymbionts of many organisms such as algae, diatoms, oomycetes and higher plants including seagrasses. Despite their supposed significant roles in the marine ecosystem, our knowledge of their marine diversity and distribution as well as their life cycles is rather limited. Here we describe the anatomy and morphology of several developmental stages of a phytomyxid symbiosis recently discovered on the petioles of the alien seagrass Halophila stipulacea at a locality in the southeast Aegean Sea. Its earliest stage appeared as whitish spots already on the youngest leaves at the apex of the newly formed rhizomes. The infected host cells grew in volume being filled with plasmodia which resulted in the formation of characteristic macroscopic galls.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhizaria, Cercozoa)
    Protist, Vol. 166, 363–373, July 2015 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 May 2015 ORIGINAL PAPER Molecular Phylogeny of the Widely Distributed Marine Protists, Phaeodaria (Rhizaria, Cercozoa) a,1 a a b Yasuhide Nakamura , Ichiro Imai , Atsushi Yamaguchi , Akihiro Tuji , c d Fabrice Not , and Noritoshi Suzuki a Plankton Laboratory, Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Hokkaido 041–8611, Japan b Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba 305–0005, Japan c CNRS, UMR 7144 & Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Equipe EPPO - Evolution du Plancton et PaléoOcéans, Place Georges Teissier, 29682 Roscoff, France d Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980–8578, Japan Submitted January 1, 2015; Accepted May 19, 2015 Monitoring Editor: David Moreira Phaeodarians are a group of widely distributed marine cercozoans. These plankton organisms can exhibit a large biomass in the environment and are supposed to play an important role in marine ecosystems and in material cycles in the ocean. Accurate knowledge of phaeodarian classification is thus necessary to better understand marine biology, however, phylogenetic information on Phaeodaria is limited. The present study analyzed 18S rDNA sequences encompassing all existing phaeodarian orders, to clarify their phylogenetic relationships and improve their taxonomic classification. The mono- phyly of Phaeodaria was confirmed and strongly supported by phylogenetic analysis with a larger data set than in previous studies. The phaeodarian clade contained 11 subclades which generally did not correspond to the families and orders of the current classification system. Two families (Challengeri- idae and Aulosphaeridae) and two orders (Phaeogromida and Phaeocalpida) are possibly polyphyletic or paraphyletic, and consequently the classification needs to be revised at both the family and order levels by integrative taxonomy approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Massisteria Marina Larsen & Patterson 1990
    l MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 62: 11-19, 1990 1 Published April 5 l Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. l Massisteria marina Larsen & Patterson 1990, a widespread and abundant bacterivorous protist associated with marine detritus David J. patterson', Tom ~enchel~ ' Department of Zoology. University of Bristol. Bristol BS8 IUG. United Kingdom Marine Biological Laboratory, Strandpromenaden, DK-3000 Helsinger, Denmark ABSTRACT: An account is given of Massisteria marina Larsen & Patterson 1990, a small phagotrophic protist associated with sediment particles and with suspended detrital material in littoral and oceanic marine waters. It has been found at sites around the world. The organism has an irregular star-shaped body from which radiate thin pseudopodia with extrusomes. There are 2 inactive flagella. The organism is normally sedentary but, under adverse conditions, the arms are resorbed, the flagella become active, and the organism becomes a motile non-feeding flagellate. The ecological niche occupied by this organism and its phylogenetic affinities are discussed. INTRODUCTION (Patterson & Fenchel 1985, Fenchel & Patterson 1986, 1988, V~rs1988, Larsen & Patterson 1990). Here we Much of the carbon fixed in marine ecosystems is report on a protist, Massisteria marina ', that is specifi- degraded by microbial communities and it is held that cally associated with planktonic and benthic detritus protists, especially flagellates under 10 pm in size, and appears to be widespread and common. exercise one of the principal controlling influences over bacterial growth rates and numbers (Fenchel 1982, Azam et al. 1983, Ducklow 1983, Proctor & Fuhrman MATERIALS AND METHODS 1990). Detrital aggregates, whether benthic or in the water column, may support diverse and active microbial Cultures were established by dilution series from communities that include flagellates (Wiebe & Pomeroy water samples taken in the Limfjord (Denmark), and 1972, Caron et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Protistology Review of Diversity and Taxonomy of Cercomonads
    Protistology 3 (4), 201217 (2004) Protistology Review of diversity and taxonomy of cercomonads Alexander P. Myl’nikov 1 and Serguei A. Karpov 2 1 Institute for the Biology of Inland Waters, Borok, Yaroslavl district, Russia 2 Biological Faculty, Herzen Pedagogical State University, St. Petersburg, Russia Summary Cercomonads are very common heterotrophic flagellates in water and soil. Phylogenetically they are a key group of a protistan phylum Cercozoa. Morphological and taxonomical analysis of cercomonads reveals that the order Cercomonadida (Vickerman) Mylnikov, 1986 includes two families: Cercomonadidae Kent, 1880 (=Cercobodonidae Hollande, 1942) and Heteromitidae Kent, 1880 em. Mylnikov, 2000 (=Bodomorphidae Hollande, 1952), which differ in several characters: body shape, temporary/habitual pseudopodia, presence/absence of plasmodia stage and microtubular cone, type of extrusomes. The family Cercomonadidae includes Cercomonas Dujardin, 1841 and Helkesimastix Woodcock et Lapage, 1914. All species of Cercobodo are transferred to the genus Cercomonas. The family Heteromitidae includes Heteromita Dujardin, 1841 emend. Mylnikov et Karpov, Protaspis Skuja, 1939, Allantion Sandon, 1924, Sainouron Sandon, 1924, Cholamonas Flavin et al., 2000 and Katabia Karpov et al., 2003. The names Bodomorpha and Sciviamonas are regarded as junior synonyms of Heteromita. The genus Proleptomonas Woodcock, 1916 according to its morphology is not a cercomonad, and is not included in the order. The genus Massisteria Larsen and Patterson, 1988 is excluded from
    [Show full text]
  • Zoelucasa Sablensis N. Gen. Et N. Sp.(Cercozoa, Incertae Sedis), A
    Acta Protozool. (2012) 51: 113–117 http://www.eko.uj.edu.pl/ap ACTA doi: 10.4467/16890027AP.12.009.0513 PROTOZOOLOGICA Zoelucasa sablensis n. gen. et n. sp. (Cercozoa, Incertae Sedis), a New Scale-covered Flagellate from Marine Sandy Shores Kenneth H. NICHOLLS Summary. Zoelucasa sablensis n. gen et n. sp. is a small heterotrophic fl agellate housed within a pyriform lorica of relatively large imbri- cate, circular siliceous scales. It was found in near-shore benthic sand/seawater samples of both the Pacifi c and Atlantic Oceans (west and east coasts of Canada; salinity = 32–33 ppt). The median length and width of the lorica was 18 and 11 μm, respectively (n = 29). This taxon lacks chloroplasts and swims with a slow zig-zag motion controlled by a short (5–7 μm long), anteriorly-directed fl agellum and a longer trailing fl agellum, 15–20 μm in length. Its classifi cation within the phylum Cercozoa (most likely, Class Imbricatea) is tentative, as there are no known morphological homologues (discoidal, overlapping siliceous plate-scales forming a test or lorica enclosing a heterotrophic fl agellate). Further study of cultured and wild material, including a search for other possible non-fl agellate (e.g. amoeboid?) life history stages, TEM examination of cell sections, and rDNA sequencing will most certainly provide more opportunities for a justifi able classifi ca- tion, possibly including a new Order. Key words: Imbricatea (Silicofi losea), sand-dwelling protist, psammon, silica scales, fl agellate. INTRODUCTION samples collected from both the east and west coasts of Canada. Owing to its apparently unique morphology, it is described here as a new monospecifi c genus and Sand-welling marine protists include taxa repre- has been tentatively assigned to the class Imbricatea of senting a wide variety of forms and phylogenetic lines.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa
    Protist, Vol. 162, 545–570, October 2011 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 July 2011 PROTIST NEWS A Revised Classification of Naked Lobose Amoebae (Amoebozoa: Lobosa) Introduction together constitute the amoebozoan subphy- lum Lobosa, which never have cilia or flagella, Molecular evidence and an associated reevaluation whereas Variosea (as here revised) together with of morphology have recently considerably revised Mycetozoa and Archamoebea are now grouped our views on relationships among the higher-level as the subphylum Conosa, whose constituent groups of amoebae. First of all, establishing the lineages either have cilia or flagella or have lost phylum Amoebozoa grouped all lobose amoe- them secondarily (Cavalier-Smith 1998, 2009). boid protists, whether naked or testate, aerobic Figure 1 is a schematic tree showing amoebozoan or anaerobic, with the Mycetozoa and Archamoe- relationships deduced from both morphology and bea (Cavalier-Smith 1998), and separated them DNA sequences. from both the heterolobosean amoebae (Page and The first attempt to construct a congruent molec- Blanton 1985), now belonging in the phylum Per- ular and morphological system of Amoebozoa by colozoa - Cavalier-Smith and Nikolaev (2008), and Cavalier-Smith et al. (2004) was limited by the the filose amoebae that belong in other phyla lack of molecular data for many amoeboid taxa, (notably Cercozoa: Bass et al. 2009a; Howe et al. which were therefore classified solely on morpho- 2011). logical evidence. Smirnov et al. (2005) suggested The phylum Amoebozoa consists of naked and another system for naked lobose amoebae only; testate lobose amoebae (e.g. Amoeba, Vannella, this left taxa with no molecular data incertae sedis, Hartmannella, Acanthamoeba, Arcella, Difflugia), which limited its utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Glycolytic Reactions in the Mitochondrion?
    Broad Distribution of TPI-GAPDH Fusion Proteins among Eukaryotes: Evidence for Glycolytic Reactions in the Mitochondrion? Takuro Nakayama1, Ken-ichiro Ishida2, John M. Archibald1* 1 Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Integrated Microbial Biodiversity, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 2 Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan Abstract Glycolysis is a central metabolic pathway in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In eukaryotes, the textbook view is that glycolysis occurs in the cytosol. However, fusion proteins comprised of two glycolytic enzymes, triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), were found in members of the stramenopiles (diatoms and oomycetes) and shown to possess amino-terminal mitochondrial targeting signals. Here we show that mitochondrial TPI- GAPDH fusion protein genes are widely spread across the known diversity of stramenopiles, including non-photosynthetic species (Bicosoeca sp. and Blastocystis hominis). We also show that TPI-GAPDH fusion genes exist in three cercozoan taxa (Paulinella chromatophora, Thaumatomastix sp. and Mataza hastifera) and an apusozoan protist, Thecamonas trahens. Interestingly, subcellular localization predictions for other glycolytic enzymes in stramenopiles and a cercozoan show that a significant fraction of the glycolytic enzymes in these species have mitochondrial-targeted isoforms. These results suggest that part
    [Show full text]
  • Protist Phylogeny and the High-Level Classification of Protozoa
    Europ. J. Protistol. 39, 338–348 (2003) © Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/ejp Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK; E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 September 2003; 29 September 2003. Accepted: 29 September 2003 Protist large-scale phylogeny is briefly reviewed and a revised higher classification of the kingdom Pro- tozoa into 11 phyla presented. Complementary gene fusions reveal a fundamental bifurcation among eu- karyotes between two major clades: the ancestrally uniciliate (often unicentriolar) unikonts and the an- cestrally biciliate bikonts, which undergo ciliary transformation by converting a younger anterior cilium into a dissimilar older posterior cilium. Unikonts comprise the ancestrally unikont protozoan phylum Amoebozoa and the opisthokonts (kingdom Animalia, phylum Choanozoa, their sisters or ancestors; and kingdom Fungi). They share a derived triple-gene fusion, absent from bikonts. Bikonts contrastingly share a derived gene fusion between dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase and include plants and all other protists, comprising the protozoan infrakingdoms Rhizaria [phyla Cercozoa and Re- taria (Radiozoa, Foraminifera)] and Excavata (phyla Loukozoa, Metamonada, Euglenozoa, Percolozoa), plus the kingdom Plantae [Viridaeplantae, Rhodophyta (sisters); Glaucophyta], the chromalveolate clade, and the protozoan phylum Apusozoa (Thecomonadea, Diphylleida). Chromalveolates comprise kingdom Chromista (Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta) and the protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata [phyla Cilio- phora and Miozoa (= Protalveolata, Dinozoa, Apicomplexa)], which diverged from a common ancestor that enslaved a red alga and evolved novel plastid protein-targeting machinery via the host rough ER and the enslaved algal plasma membrane (periplastid membrane).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Assessment of Non-Cultured Aquatic Fungal Diversity from Differenthabitats in Mexico
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Valderrama, Brenda; Paredes-Valdez, Guadalupe; Rodríguez, Rocío; Romero-Guido, Cynthia; Martínez, Fernando; Martínez-Romero, Julio; Guerrero-Galván, Saúl; Mendoza- Herrera, Alberto; Folch-Mallol, Jorge Luis Assessment of non-cultured aquatic fungal diversity from differenthabitats in Mexico Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 87, núm. 1, marzo, 2016, pp. 18-28 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42546734003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87 (2016) 18–28 www.ib.unam.mx/revista/ Taxonomy and systematics Assessment of non-cultured aquatic fungal diversity from different habitats in Mexico Estimación de la diversidad de hongos acuáticos no-cultivables de diferentes hábitats en México a a b b Brenda Valderrama , Guadalupe Paredes-Valdez , Rocío Rodríguez , Cynthia Romero-Guido , b c d Fernando Martínez , Julio Martínez-Romero , Saúl Guerrero-Galván , e b,∗ Alberto Mendoza-Herrera , Jorge Luis Folch-Mallol a Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 2001, Col. Chamilpa, 62210 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico b Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Avenida Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa, 62209 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico c Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad s/n, Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasmodiophora Brassicae
    Bi et al. Phytopathology Research (2019) 1:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-019-0018-6 Phytopathology Research RESEARCH Open Access Comparative genomics reveals the unique evolutionary status of Plasmodiophora brassicae and the essential role of GPCR signaling pathways Kai Bi1,2, Tao Chen2, Zhangchao He1,2, Zhixiao Gao1,2, Ying Zhao1,2, Huiquan Liu3, Yanping Fu2, Jiatao Xie1,2, Jiasen Cheng1,2 and Daohong Jiang1,2* Abstract Plasmodiophora brassicae is an important biotrophic eukaryotic plant pathogen and a member of the rhizarian protists. This biotrophic pathogen causes clubroot in cruciferous plants via novel intracellular mechanisms that are markedly different from those of other biotrophic organisms. To date, genomes from six single spore isolates of P. brassicae have been sequenced. An accurate description of the evolutionary status of this biotrophic protist, however, remains lacking. Here, we determined the draft genome of the P. brassicae ZJ-1 strain. A total of 10,951 protein-coding genes were identified from a 24.1 Mb genome sequence. We applied a comparative genomics approach to prove the Rhizaria supergroup is an independent branch in the eukaryotic evolutionary tree. We also found that the GPCR signaling pathway, the versatile signal transduction to multiple intracellular signaling cascades in response to extracellular signals in eukaryotes, is significantly enriched in P. brassicae-expanded and P. brassicae-specific gene sets. Additionally, treatment with a GPCR inhibitor relieved the symptoms of clubroot and significantly suppressed the development of plasmodia. Our findings suggest that GPCR signal transduction pathways play important roles in the growth, development, and pathogenicity of P. brassicae.
    [Show full text]