BHP IRON ORE (GOLDSWORTHY) LIMITED
GOLDSWORTHY EXTENSION PROJECT PHASE II CONSULTATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
I nforinat (ciii ic
011609
622.341(941.3) DAM BHP Iron Ore CopyA 6z2,3c(qn) .- -
CONSULTATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Protection Authority invites people to make submissions on this proposal.
The Consultative Environmental Review (CER) for the proposed Goldsworthy Extension Project Phase II has been prepared in accordance with Western Australian Government procedures. The report will be available for public comment for four weeks from Monday 2 November 1992.
Comments from government agencies and from the public will assist the EPA to prepare an assessment report in which it will make recommendations to Government.
Following receipt of comments from government agencies and the public, the EPA will discuss the ideas raised with the proponent and may ask for further information. The EPA will then prepare its assessment report with recommendations to government, taking into account the issues raised by the public submissions.
Why write a submission? p A submission is a way to provide information, express your opinion and put forward your suggested course of action including any alternative approach. It is useful if you indicate any suggestions you have to improve the proposal. All submissions received will be acknowledged.
Developing a submission
You may agree or disagree with, or comment on, the general issues discussed in the CER or with specific proposals. It helps if you give reasons for your conclusions, supported by relevant data. You may make an important contribution by suggesting ways to make the proposal more environmentally acceptable.
When making comments on specific proposals in the CER:
clearly state your point of view; indicate the source of your information or argument if this is applicable; and 0 suggest recommendations, safeguards or alternatives. Points to keep in mind I By keeping the following points in mind, you will make it easier for your submission to be analysed.
Attempt to list points so that the issues raised are clear. A summary of your submission is helpfiij. Refer each point to the appropriate section, chapter or recommendation in the CER. If you discuss sections of the CER, keep them distinct and separate, so there is no confusion as to which section you are discussing.
Attach any factual information you wish to provide and give details of its source. Make sure that your information is accurate.
Please indicate whether your submission can be quoted, in full or in part, by the EPA in its assessment report.
Remember to include:
your name your address the date of your submission.
The closing date for submissions is:
Monday 30 November 1992.
Submissions should be addressed to:
The Chairman Environmental Protection Authority 8th Floor 'Westralia Square' 38 Mounts Bay Road PERTH WA 6000
Attention: Ms Jane Aberdeen GOLD SWORTHY EXTENSION PROJECT PHASE II CONSULTATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
prepared for BHP Iron Ore (Goldsworthy) Limited by Dames & Moore Pty Ltd
Job No. 06021-053-071 October 1992 EXECUTWE SUMMARY
BHP Iron Ore (Goldsworthy) Limited proposes to develop an open-cut iron ore mine at Yarrie, located approximately 200km east-southeast of Port Hedland, Western Australia. This development is necessary for the continuation of the Goldsworthy iron ore operations, given the near-exhaustion of high grade iron ore reserves at the current mines at Nimingarra and - Sunrise Hill.
The project involves the removal of overburden, open-cut mining of iron ore, primary crushing and loading of the ore into rail cars for transport to Finucane Island. A village is proposed to be built at Yarrie to house the workforce. Mining of the remnant Nimingarra and Sunrise Hill deposits is planned to continue on a periodic basis in order to fulfil some existing sales contracts.
The mining operation at Yarrie is planned to be carried out by a contractor. A construction workforce of about 200 people and an operational workforce of about 100 is anticipated. The contractor workforce will most likely operate on a long-distance commuting basis.
The Yarrie deposit contains a known reserve of approximately 35 million tonnes of ore in two parts: the relatively shallow Y3 area and the deeper Y2 area. Mining of ore in Y3 is scheduled to begin in December 1993, following a development phase of about 6 months' duration. The extraction rate of ore will be about 5 million tonnes per year.
Overburden from Y3 will be placed in a crescent-shaped gully on the southern side of the Yarrie plateau. Mining of Y2 will follow at a later stage. Once the Y3 pit is mined out, overburden from Y2 will be backiilled into the Y3 pit. At the completion of mining, the overburden will be shaped to blend with the existing landform and rehabilitated. The total quantity of overburden to be mined is about 100 million tonnes.
Water supplies for the mining operation and the accommodation village are planned to be supplied from bores drilled into the Yarrie plateau on the periphery of the pit area. Up to 1,000 klJday is expected to be required. This supply will be augmented, if necessary, by bores installed in the nearby Eel Creek aquifer.
The sourcing of water from the plateau is expected to substantially reduce the need for dewatering of the orebody, which would otherwise be required once mining on the lower benches of the Y2 pit reached the local water table level. If dewatering does prove to be necessary, it will be accomplished either by means of strategically-placed bores or by pumping from a sump in the base of the pit. The high-quality water produced from this dewatering will
be used, wherever possible, for mine-related purposes. If any excess water is produced, it will be discharged to a tributary of Eel Creek, via settling ponds if necessary to remove excess suspended sediments.
The crushed ore will be transported from the mine to Finucane Island by private railway. It is planned to extend the existing Goldsworthy rail line, which currently terminates at the Shay Gap crusher, to Yarrie. Culverts will be utilised along the rail route to minimise - interference with the natural surface drainage and consequent impacts on vegetation downslope of the railway line.
The flora and fauna of the project area are typical of the northern Pilbara. A notable feature is the presence of a large number of mounds just east of the mining area, many of them apparently active, belonging to the Pebble-mound Mouse. The area containing the mounds is outside the area to be disturbed by mining and will be specifically protected.
BHP has identified a number of possible impacts of the project on the environment. These are:
changes to landforms due to construction activities, the mine pit and overburden disposal; soil erosion; release of water produced by pit dewatering during the later stages of the project; drawdown of groundwater due to abstraction for water supply; possible seepage of saline water from the mined-out pit in the very long term; interruptions to surface water flows ('shadowing") by the railway line; loss of vegetation and fauna habitat; barrier effects of the railway line on fauna; noise and dust; and potential for release of hazardous materials (fuel and oils, etc.).
BHP has prepared an environmental management programme to avoid or manage these impacts. The overall aim of the environmental management programme will be to minimise impacts through a "minimum clearing" policy, minimum abstraction of groundwater, careful monitoring of impacts and comprehensive rehabilitation. BHP has developed rehabilitation procedures through its experience in the Pilbara region and will apply this experience to rehabilitation at Yarrie. The object of the rehabilitation programme will be to ensure that, at the end of the project, disturbed surfaces (with the exception of the mine pit) are returned to a stable condition with a flora and fauna that resemble the natural condition of the site.
BHP has held discussions with the Aboriginal custodians of the Yarrie area and with the pastoralists on whose leases the project area is located. Agreement has been reached between the company and the other parties on avoiding or mitigating any adverse effects of the proposal on their interests in the area.
The investigations undertaken for this CER have shown that the environmental impacts of the Yarrie project will be fairly minor and easily managed. BHP is committed to managing any impacts that cannot be avoided. (iv)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 THE PROPOSAL 1 1.2 THE PROPONENT 1 1.3 LOCATION AND TENURE 1 1.4 HISTORY OF THE PROPOSAL 2 1.5 EXISTING FACILITIES 3
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 2.1 INTRODUCTION 4 2.2 MINING 4 2.2.1 Construction 4 2.2.2 Mining Method 5 2.2.3 Mining Schedule 6 2.2.4 Pit Dewatering 7 a 2.3 OVERBURDEN MANAGEMENT 8 2.4 ORE PROCESSING 9 2.5 TRANSPORT OF PRODUCT 9 2.6 WATER SUPPLY 11 2.7 WORKFORCE AND ACCOMMODATION 12 2.7.1 Workforce 12 2.7.2 Accommodation 13 2.8 INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES 14 2.9 EXPLORATION POTENTIAL 17
3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 18 3.1 REGIONAL SETI'ING 18 3.2 GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY 18 3.3 TOPOGRAPHY 18 3.4 SOILS AND ERODIBILITY 19 3.5 HYDROLOGY 19 3.5.1 Regional Hydrology 19 3.5.2 Local Hydrology 20 3.5.3 Water Resources 21 (v)
3.6 CLIMATE 21 3.7 VEGETATION AND FLORA 23 3.8 FAUNA 24 3.8.1 Introduction 24 3.8.2 Habitats 24 3.8.3 Vertebrate Fauna 24 3.8.4 Rare Fauna 25 3.8.5 Feral Fauna 26 3.9 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE 26 3.10 EUROPEAN HERITAGE 27 3.11 EXISTING LAND USE 27 3.11.1 Pastoral Leases 27 3.11.2 Tourism and Sightseeing 27 fl 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 28 4.1 LANDFORMS 28 4.1.1 Construction Earthworks 28 4.1.2 Borrow Pits 28 4.1.3 Erosion 29 4.2 SURFACE HYDROLOGY 29 4.3 HYDROGEOLOGY 30 4.4 FLORA AND FAUNA 31 4.4.1 Impacts on Flora 32 4.4.2 Impacts on Fauna 32 4.4.3 Impact on Wetlands 34 4.5 NOISE AND DUST 34 4.6 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 35 4.7 WASTE PRODUCTS 35 4.8 FIRE 35
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PROGRAMME 36 5.1 LANDFORMS 36 5.1.1 Construction Earthworks 36 5.1.2 Borrow Pits 36 5.1.3 Erosion 36 1 1 (vi)
5.2 SURFACE HYDROLOGY 37 5.2.1 Pit Dewatering 37 5.2.2 Effects of Railway Line 38 5.3 HYDROGEOLOGY 38 5.3.1 Drawdown of Groundwater 38 5.3.2 Salinity Build-up in Y2 Pit 39 5.4 FLORA 39 5.4.1 Railway Line 39 5.4.2 Weeds 40 5.5 FAUNA 40 5.5.1 Railway Line and Road Kills 40 5.5.2 Pebble-mound Mouse 41 5.5.3 Other Fauna Protection Measures 42 5.6 NOISE AND DUST 42 5.6.1 Noise 42 5.6.2 Dust 42 5.7 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 43 5.8 OILY WASTES 43 5.9 OTHER WASTE PRODUCTS 44 5.10 FIRE 44 5.11 REHABILITATION 45 5.11.1 Aim of Rehabilitation 45 5.11.2 Post-Construction Rehabilitation 45 5.11.3 Rehabilitation of Overburden 45 5.11.4 Decommissioning 46 5.11.5 Monitoring of Rehabilitation 46
6.0 SOCIAL IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT 47 6.1 INTRODUCTION 47 6.2 VISUAL IMPACTS 48 6.2.1 Visibility 48 6.2.2 Impact on Scenic Values 48 6.3 ABORIGINAL INTERESTS 48 6.4 IMPACTS ON EXISTING LAND USES 49 6.4.1 Pastoral Leases 49
J (viii)
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title 3.1 Climatic Averages - Goldsworthy
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title 1.1 Location Map 1.2 Northern Pilbara Tenements 2.1 Project Area Layout 2.2 Ultimate Pit Design 2.3 Yarrie Pit Cross-section 3.1 Yarrie Geological Setting 3.2 Yarrie Ore Body: Typical Cross-sections 3.3 Eel Creek Aquifer 3.4 Yarrie Ore Body: Hydrogeology
LIST OF PLATES
Plate No. Title 1 Yarrie Mine Site 2 View of Project Area 3 View of Railway Route
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Title A EPA Guidelines for Preparation of the CER B Report of Vegetation Surveys C Report of Fauna Survey D BHP-Newman Guidelines and Objectives for Borrow Pit Development and Rehabilitation
The base map used in Figure 2.1 is Crown Copyright and is reproduced with the permission of the General Manager, Australian Surveying and Land Information Group, Department of Administrative Services, Canberra, ACT. GOLDS WORTHY EXTENSION PROJECT
CONSULTATWE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 THE PROPOSAL
BHP Iron Ore (Goldsworthy) Limited (referred to in this document as BHP) proposes to develop an open-cut iron ore mining operation at Yarrie, located approximately 200km east-southeast of Port Hedland, Western Australia. This proposal is subject to the Iron Ore (Goldsworthy-Nimingarra) Agreement Act 1972. The proposal was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), which set a formal assessment level of Consuitative Environmental Review (CER) for the project. This CER is submitted for public review and to assist Government to determine the environmental acceptability of the project. The EPA has provided guidelines for the preparation of the CER and these are attached in Appendix A.
1.2 THE PROPONENT
The Goldsworthy operations are owned by the Mount Goldsworthy Mining Associates Joint Venture. The Joint Venture partners are