DOCSLIB.ORG

Weather Forecasting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weather Forecasting Weather Forecasting Say Thanks to the Authors Click http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (No sign in required) To access a customizable version of this book, as well as other interactive content, visit www.ck12.org CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the FlexBook®, CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high-quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning, powered through the FlexBook Platform®. Copyright © 2013 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org The names “CK-12” and “CK12” and associated logos and the terms “FlexBook®” and “FlexBook Platform®” (collectively “CK-12 Marks”) are trademarks and service marks of CK-12 Foundation and are protected by federal, state, and international laws. Any form of reproduction of this book in any format or medium, in whole or in sections must include the referral attribution link http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (placed in a visible location) in addition to the following terms. Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution/Non- Commercial/Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Commons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. Complete terms can be found at http://www.ck12.org/terms. Printed: June 19, 2013 www.ck12.org Concept 1. Weather Forecasting CONCEPT 1 Weather Forecasting Lesson Objectives • State how meteorologists predict the weather. • Outline how technology and computers are used to forecast the weather. • Describe what weather maps show. Vocabulary • anemometer • barometer • hygrometer • meteorologist • rain gauge • snow gauge • thermometer • weather balloon • weather map • weather satellite • weather station • wind vane Introduction Did you ever have a picnic ruined by a surprise rainstorm? People often complain when the weather forecast is wrong. But in fact, weather forecasts today are much more accurate than they were just 20 years ago. Scientists who study and forecast the weather are called meteorologists. How do they predict the weather? Predicting the Weather Weather is very difficult to predict. That’s because it’s very complex and many factors are involved. Slight changes in even one factor can cause a big change in the weather. Still, certain “rules of thumb” generally apply. These “rules” help meteorologists forecast the weather. For example, low pressure is likely to bring stormy weather. So if a center of low pressure is moving your way, you can expect a storm. 1 www.ck12.org Technology and Computers Predicting the weather requires a lot of weather data. Technology is used to gather the data and computers are used to analyze the data. Using this information gives meteorologists the best chance of predicting the weather. Weather Instruments Weather instruments measure weather conditions. One of the most important conditions is air pressure, which is measured with a barometer. Figure 1.1 shows how a barometer works. There are also a number of other commonly used weather instruments (see Figure 1.2): •A thermometer measures temperature. • An anemometer measures wind speed. •A rain gauge measures the amount of rain. •A hygrometer measures humidity. •A wind vane shows wind direction. •A snow gauge measures the amount of snow. FIGURE 1.1 The greater the air pressure outside the tube, the higher the mercury rises inside the tube. Mercury can rise in the tube because there’s no air pressing down on it. Collecting Data Weather instruments collect data from all over the world at thousands of weather stations. Many are on land but some float in the oceans on buoys. You can see what a weather station looks like in Figure 1.3. There’s probably at least one weather station near you. Other weather devices are needed to collect weather data in the atmosphere. They include weather balloons, satellites, and radar. You can read about them in Figure 1.3. Weather stations contain many instruments for measuring weather conditions. The weather balloon in Figure 1.3 will rise into the atmosphere until it bursts. As it rises, it will gather weather data and send it to the surface. Many 2 www.ck12.org Concept 1. Weather Forecasting FIGURE 1.2 Some of the most commonly used weather instruments. (a) Thermome- ter: temperature, (b) Anemometer: wind speed, (c) Rain gauge: amount of rain, (d) Hygrometer: humidity, (e) Wind vane: wind direction, (f) Snow gauge: amount of snow. FIGURE 1.3 Weather stations collect data on land and sea. Weather balloons, satellites, and radar collect data in the atmosphere. 3 www.ck12.org weather satellites orbit Earth. They constantly collect and transmit weather data from high above the surface. A radar device sends out radio waves in all directions. The waves bounce off water in the atmosphere and then return to the sender. The radar data shows where precipitation is falling. It’s raining in the orange-shaded area shown above. Using Computers What do meteorologists do with all that weather data? They use it in weather models. The models analyze the data and predict the weather. The models require computers. That’s because so many measurements and calculations are involved. Weather Maps You may have seen weather maps like the one in Figure 1.4.A weather map shows weather conditions for a certain area. The map may show the actual weather on a given day or it may show the predicted weather for some time in the future. Some weather maps show many weather conditions. Others show a single condition. FIGURE 1.4 This weather map shows air pressure contours. Which state has the lowest air pressure shown on the map? Air Pressure Maps The weather map in Figure 1.4 shows air pressure. The lines on the map connect places that have the same air pressure. Air pressure is measured in a unit called the millibar. Isobars are the lines that connect the points with the same air pressure. The map also shows low- and high-pressure centers and fronts. Find the cold front on the map. This cold front is likely to move toward the northeast over the next couple of days. How could you use this information to predict what the weather will be on the East Coast? 4 www.ck12.org Concept 1. Weather Forecasting Other Weather Maps Instead of air pressure, weather maps may show other weather conditions. For example, a temperature map might show the high and low temperatures of major cities. The map may have isotherms, lines that connect places with the same temperature. Lesson Summary • Weather is very complex. This makes it hard to predict. Certain “rules” can help. For example, low pressure brings stormy weather. • Weather instruments measure weather factors. Weather stations collect data on Earth’s surface. Weather balloons, satellites, and radar collect data in the atmosphere. Computer models analyze the data and help predict the weather. • A weather map shows the weather for a certain area. It can show actual or predicted weather. It may show a single weather condition or more than one. Lesson Review Questions Recall 1. Why is weather difficult to predict? 2. List three weather instruments, and state what they measure. 3. What is the role of weather balloons and weather satellites? 4. What does a weather map show? 5. Define isobars and isotherms. Apply Concepts 6. What concepts explain how a barometer works? 7. In the weather map in Figure 1.4, where is the weather most likely to be clear and dry? How do you know? Think Critically 8. Explain how radar could be used to track an approaching thunderstorm. Points to Consider In this chapter you learned about weather. Weather is sometimes confused with climate. The two are related but not the same. • What is climate? • How does climate differ from weather? 5 www.ck12.org Opening image copyright Zastol‘skiy Victor Leonidovich, 2010. Used under license from Shutterstock.com. References 1. CK-12. CC-BY-NC-SA 2. (a) Brainless Christian, (b) Pearson Scott Foresman, (c) Dirtfoto, (d) Bidgee, (e) Stephen Aaron Rees, (f) CambridgeBayWeather. (a) http://www.shutterstock.com/results.mhtml#searchterm=48665401 (b) http://com mons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anemometer_(PSF).png (c) http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=51447 562 (d) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rain_recorded_in_a_rain_gauge.jpg(e)http://www.shutterstock .com/pic.mhtml?id=24166237 (f) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Snow_guage_graduate.JPG. (a) Im- age Copyright Brainless Christian, 2010 Used under license from Shutterstock.com; (b) Public domain; (c) Image Copyright Dirtfoto, 2010 Used under license from Shutterstock.com; (d) CC-SA-2.5; (e) Image Copyright Stephen Aaron Rees, 2010 Used under license from Shutterstock.com; (f) Public domain 3.. Weather station url:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/16/Weather_Station_USDA.jpg; we ather balloon url: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ballon_radiosonde_f.jpg; weather satelliteurl: ht tp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GOES_8_Spac0255.jpg;weatherradar url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:S turmfront_auf_Doppler-Radar-Schirm.jpg;. Weather station: public domain; weather balloon: public domain; weather satellite: public domain; weather radar: public domain 4.. http://www.dnr.sc.gov/climate/sco/Education/wxmap/wxmap.php. Public domain 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snow Nowcasting Using a Real-Time Correlation of Radar Reflectivity
    20 JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY VOLUME 42 Snow Nowcasting Using a Real-Time Correlation of Radar Re¯ectivity with Snow Gauge Accumulation ROY RASMUSSEN AND MICHAEL DIXON National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado STEVE VASILOFF National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma FRANK HAGE,SHELLY KNIGHT,J.VIVEKANANDAN, AND MEI XU National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado (Manuscript received 21 November 2001, in ®nal form 13 June 2002) ABSTRACT This paper describes and evaluates an algorithm for nowcasting snow water equivalent (SWE) at a point on the surface based on a real-time correlation of equivalent radar re¯ectivity (Ze) with snow gauge rate (S). It is shown from both theory and previous results that Ze±S relationships vary signi®cantly during a storm and from storm to storm, requiring a real-time correlation of Ze and S. A key element of the algorithm is taking into account snow drift and distance of the radar volume from the snow gauge. The algorithm was applied to a number of New York City snowstorms and was shown to have skill in nowcasting SWE out to at least 1 h when compared with persistence. The algorithm is currently being used in a real-time winter weather nowcasting system, called Weather Support to Deicing Decision Making (WSDDM), to improve decision making regarding the deicing of aircraft and runway clearing. The algorithm can also be used to provide a real-time Z±S relationship for Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) if a well-shielded snow gauge is available to measure real-time SWE rate and appropriate range corrections are made.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Snow Density Variations at Different Elevations
    Brian Miretzky 1 A Study on Snow Density Variations at Different Elevations and the Related Consequences; Especially to Forecasting. Brian J. Miretzky Senior Undergrad at the University of Wisconsin- Madison ABSTRACT With observations becoming more common and forecasting becoming more accurate snow density research has increased. These new observations can be correlated with current knowledge to develop reasons for snow density variations. Currently there is still no specific consensus on what are the important characteristics in snow density variations. There are many points of general agreement such as that temperature and relative humidity are key factors. How to incorporate these into snowfall prediction is the key. Once there is more substantiated knowledge, more accurate forecasts can be made. Finally, the last in the chain of events is that society can plan accordingly to this new data. Better prediction means less work, less time, and less money spent. This study attempts to determine if elevation is an important characteristic in snow density variations. It also looks at computer models and how snow density is used in conjunction with these models to make snowfall projections. The results seem to show elevation is not an important characteristic. The results also show that model accuracy is more important than snow density variations when using models to make snowfall projections. 1. Introduction volume of the sample. Snow densities are typically on an order of 70 to 150 kg The density of snow is a m-3, but can be lower or higher in some very important topic in winter weather. cases. This is because the density of snow The fact that snow densities can helps determine characteristics of a vary makes them one of the most given snowfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Hotplate Snow Gauge
    Evaluation of the Hotplate Snow Gauge http://aurora-program.org Aurora Project 2004-01 Final Report July 2005 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. Aurora Project 2004-01 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Evaluation of the Hotplate Snow Gauge July 2005 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jack Stickel, Bill Maloney, Curt Pape, Dennis Burkheimer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research and Education Iowa State University 11. Contract or Grant No. 2711 South Loop Drive, Suite 4700 Ames, IA 50010-8664 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Aurora Program Iowa State University 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 2711 South Loop Drive, Suite 4700 Ames, IA 50010-8664 15. Supplementary Notes Visit www.ctre.iastate.edu for color PDF files of this and other research reports. 16. Abstract Winter precipitation (e.g., snow, ice, freezing rain) is poorly measured by current National Weather Service (NWS), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and State Departments of Transportation (SDOT) automated weather observation systems. The lack of accurate winter precipitation measurements, particularly snow, negatively impacts the ability of winter maintenance personnel to conduct snow and ice control operations. The inability to accurately measure winter precipitation is an ongoing problem that is well recognized by the meteorological community as well as organizations and industries dependent on accurate quantitative precipitation information. The FAA recognized this limitation and its impact on the ability to conduct aircraft deicing operations, and began a research program in the 1990s to improve decision support for aircraft deicing.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Precipitation
    CHAPTER CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 6. MEASUREMENT OF PRECIPITATION ..................................... 186 6.1 General ................................................................... 186 6.1.1 Definitions ......................................................... 186 6.1.2 Units and scales ..................................................... 186 6.1.3 Meteorological and hydrological requirements .......................... 187 6.1.4 Measurement methods .............................................. 187 6.1.4.1 Instruments ................................................ 187 6.1.4.2 Reference gauges and intercomparisons ........................ 188 6.1.4.3 Documentation. 188 6.2 Siting and exposure ........................................................ 189 6.3 Non-recording precipitation gauges .......................................... 190 6.3.1 Ordinary gauges .................................................... 190 6.3.1.1 Instruments ................................................ 190 6.3.1.2 Operation. 192 6.3.1.3 Calibration and maintenance ................................. 192 6.3.2 Storage gauges ..................................................... 192 6.4 Precipitation gauge errors and corrections ..................................... 193 6.5 Recording precipitation gauges .............................................. 196 6.5.1 Weighing-recording gauge ........................................... 196 6.5.1.1 Instruments ................................................ 196 6.5.1.2 Errors and corrections. 197 6.5.1.3 Calibration
    [Show full text]
  • 260-2510 Standard Rain and Snow Gauge
    Precipitation 260-2510 Standard Rain and Snow Gauge The 260-2510 Standard Rain and Snow Gauge is a National Weather Service type all-aluminum rain gauge with a total capacity of 20" of rainfall. The gauge includes a funnel, measuring tube, overflow can and measuring stick with English and metric markings. The tripod support is sold separately. The upper portion of the funnel is cylindrical in shape and is turned to a fine edge. Rainwater falling into the funnel is delivered into a measuring tube. The cross- section area of the tube is one-tenth the cross-section area of the funnel. Therefore, when 1 inch of rain falls into the funnel, it fills the measuring tube to a depth of 10 inches. The scale on the measuring stick is expanded 10 times, and since the scale is graduated to hundredths of an inch, the correct rainfall depth of water in the tube is read directly to hundredths from the stick. The capacity of the measuring tube is 2" of rainfall. Any excess overflows into the outer chamber. The overflow water must be transferred to the empty measuring tube for direct measurement with the stick. In winter, the funnel and measuring tube are removed so that rain/sleet/snow/hail are collected by the outer chamber. The amount of precipitation is measured by melting the ice and then pouring the water into the measuring tube. 260-2510 Rain Gauge Features with 260-2510S Tripod National Weather Service Type Rain and Snow Gauge Total capacity 20 inches (500 mm) English / metric measuring stick included Optional tripod support stand Specifications
    [Show full text]
  • The Measurement Factors in Estimating Snowfall Derived from Snow Cover Surfaces Using Acoustic Snow Depth Sensors
    MARCH 2011 F I S C H E R 681 The Measurement Factors in Estimating Snowfall Derived from Snow Cover Surfaces Using Acoustic Snow Depth Sensors ALEXANDRE P. FISCHER Observing Systems and Engineering, Weather and Environmental Monitoring, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Manuscript received 8 October 2009, in final form 14 October 2010) ABSTRACT At three Canadian test locations during the cold seasons of 2006 and 2007/08, snowfall measurements are derived from changes in the total depth of snow on the ground using multiple Campbell Scientific, Inc., SR50 ultrasonic ranging sensors over very short (minute–hour) time scales. Data analysis reveals that, because of the interplay of numerous essential factors that influence snow cover levels, the measurements exhibit a strong dependence on the time interval between consecutive measurements used to generate the snowfall value. This finding brings into question the reasonable accuracy of snowfall measurements that are derived from the snow cover surface using automated methods over very short time scales. In this study, two math- ematical methods are developed to assist in quantifying the magnitude of the snowfall measurement error. From time-series analysis, the suggested characteristics of the snowdrift signal in the snow depth time series is shown by using measurements taken by FlowCapt Snowdrift acoustic sensors. Furthermore, the use of three collocated SR50s shows that repeated snow depth measurements represent three pairwise essentially dif- ferent time series. These results question the reasonable accuracy of snowfall measurements derived using only a single ultrasonic ranging sensor, especially in cases in which the snow cover is redistributed by the wind and in which snow depth spatial variability is prominent.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 10/05/21 07:26 AM UTC
    DECEMBER 2007 C H E R R Y E T A L . 1243 Development of the Pan-Arctic Snowfall Reconstruction: New Land-Based Solid Precipitation Estimates for 1940–99 J. E. CHERRY International Arctic Research Center, and Arctic Region Supercomputing Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska L.-B. TREMBLAY Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada M. STIEGLITZ School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia G. GONG Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York S. J. DÉRY Environmental Science and Engineering Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada (Manuscript received 24 April 2006, in final form 5 January 2007) ABSTRACT A new product, the Pan-Arctic Snowfall Reconstruction (PASR), is developed to address the problem of cold season precipitation gauge biases for the 1940–99 period. The method used to create the PASR is different from methods used in other large-scale precipitation data products and has not previously been employed for estimating pan-arctic snowfall. The NASA Interannual-to-Seasonal Prediction Project Catch- ment Land Surface Model is used to reconstruct solid precipitation from observed snow depth and surface air temperatures. The method is tested at four stations in the United States and Canada where results are examined in depth. Reconstructed snowfall at Dease Lake, British Columbia, and Barrow, Alaska, is higher than gauge observations. Reconstructed snowfall at Regina, Saskatchewan, and Minot, North Dakota, is lower than gauge observations, probably because snow is transported by wind out of the Prairie region and enters the hydrometeorological cycle elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Inconsistency in Precipitation Measurements Across Alaska and Yukon
    1 Inconsistency in Precipitation Measurements across Alaska and Yukon 2 Border 3 4 1 2 *1 3 5 Lucia Scaff , Daqing Yang , Yanping Li , Eva Mekis 6 7 8 [1] Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 3H5 9 [2] National Hydrology Research Center, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 3H5 10 [3] Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada. 11 12 13 * Correspondence to: 14 Dr. Yanping Li 15 Email: [email protected] 16 1 17 Abstract 18 This study quantifies the inconsistency in gauge precipitation observations across the border of Alaska 19 and Yukon. It analyses the precipitation measurements by the national standard gauges (NWS 8-in gauge 20 and Nipher gauge), and the bias-corrected data to account for wind effect on the gauge catch, wetting loss 21 and trace events. The bias corrections show a significant amount of errors in the gauge records due to the 22 windy and cold environment in the northern areas of Alaska and Yukon. Monthly corrections increase 23 solid precipitation by 136% in January, 20% for July at the Barter Island in Alaska, and about 31% for 24 January and 4% for July at the Yukon stations. Regression analyses of the monthly precipitation data 25 show a stronger correlation for the warm months (mainly rainfall) than for cold month (mainly snowfall) 26 between the station pairs, and small changes in the precipitation relationship due to the bias corrections. 27 Double mass curves also indicate changes in the cumulative precipitation over the study periods. This 28 change leads to a smaller and inverted precipitation gradient across the border, representing a significant 29 modification in the precipitation pattern over the northern region.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.6 an Algorithm Deriving Snowfall from an Ensemble of Sonic Ranging Snow Depth Sensors
    6.6 AN ALGORITHM DERIVING SNOWFALL FROM AN ENSEMBLE OF SONIC RANGING SNOW DEPTH SENSORS * Alexandre Fischer and Yves Durocher Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 1. INTRODUCTION Because of the desire to save money, The operating principle behind using as well as the need to take measurements in USDS is that they take snow on ground remote locations and difficult terrain, ultrasonic readings as a point-oriented distance to target snow depth ranging sensors (USDS) have measurement. The USDS chosen by traditionally been one of the most popular Environment Canada (EC) is the Campbell methods for taking automated snowfall (SF) Scientific Sonic Ranging Sensor (SR50; CSD measurements in lieu of manual observations. 2003). The SR50 consists of a These sensors have been used extensively transmitter/receiver which emits/receives a 50 with regards to avalanche forecasting kHz ultrasonic pulse. The time it takes for the (Ferguson et al. 1990), and for snow removal pulse to return to the receiver (after reflecting operations triggered by exceeding specified off a targeted surface) divided by two gives the snow-depth thresholds (Gray and Male 1981). distance to the target in metres. The more These sensors have also be used to quality snow there is on the ground beneath the control automatic recording gauge sensor, the less time it takes for the sound to measurements by providing additional details return the receiver. Subtracting this number on the type, amount, and timing of from a fixed reference point creates a “Snow precipitation (Goodison et al. 1988). on Ground” (SOG) measurement. The change While this technology is not the only in SOG levels over time gives, in theory, a SF in-situ method currently used to measure SF measurement.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Precipitation
    MEASURING PRECIPITATION Heavy rain event over the city of Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. (Image Copyright: David Jenkins). Introduction Precipitation has both direct and indirect effects to human well-being and economic activities. Too much or too little precipitation can have a significant effect on these factors. As a result, precipitation is measured at thousands of weather stations and other locations around the world. Standard Rain Gauge The most common instrument used for measuring rain and some times snow is the standard rain gauge. This meteorological instrument was developed around the beginning of the 20th century and it basically consists of a large funnel connected to a graduated measuring cylinder. Usually, the funnel and cylinder are housed in a larger container (Figure 1). To make measurements more accurate, the funnel cross-sectional area is often 10 times the size of the cylinder cross-sectional area. As a result, 1 mm of rainfall would magnify to 10 mm of water in the graduated measuring cylinder. Measurements from the standard rain gauge are normally made once or twice a day. Figure 1: Standard rain gauge. (Image Source: Wikimedia Commons, photo by Bidgee. This image is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license). Tipping Bucket Gauge The tipping bucket rain gauge consists of a large cylinder with funnel located at its top for collecting precipitation (Figure 2). Precipitation is channelled to an opening at the bottom of the funnel that causes the water collected to fall into one of two small joined buckets which are balanced in a seesaw fashion. Figure 2: Tipping bucket rain gauge.
    [Show full text]
  • A Relationship Between Reflectivity and Snow Rate for a High-Altitude
    JUNE 2012 W O L F E A N D S N I D E R 1111 A Relationship between Reflectivity and Snow Rate for a High-Altitude S-Band Radar JONATHAN P. WOLFE National Weather Service, Portland, Oregon JEFFERSON R. SNIDER Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming (Manuscript received 23 May 2011, in final form 29 December 2011) ABSTRACT An important application of radar reflectivity measurements is their interpretation as precipitation intensity. Empirical relationships exist for converting microwave backscatter retrieved from precipitation particles (rep- resented by an equivalent reflectivity factor Ze) to precipitation intensity. The reflectivity–snow-rate relationship b has the form Ze 5 aS ,whereS is a liquid-equivalent snow rate and a and b are fitted coefficients. Substantial uncertainty exists in radar-derived values of snow rate because the reflectivity and intensity associated with snow tend to be smaller than those for rain and because of snow-particle drift between radar and surface detection. Uncertainty in radar-derived snow rate is especially evident at the few available high-altitude sites for which a relationship between reflectivity and snow rate has been developed. Using a new type of precipitation sensor and a National Weather Service radar, this work investigates the Ze–S relationship at a high-altitude site (Cheyenne, Wyoming). The S measurements were made 25 km northwest of the radar on the eastern flank of the Rocky Mountains; vertical separation between the radarrangegateandthegroundwaslessthan700m.A meteorological feature of the snowstorms was northeasterly upslope flow of humid air at low levels. The Ze–S data pairs were fitted with b 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Polarimetric Relations for Snow Estimation—Radar Verification
    MAY 2020 B U K O V CICETAL. 991 Polarimetric Relations for Snow Estimation—Radar Verification PETAR BUKOVCIC ´ Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, and NOAA/OAR National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma Downloaded from http://journals.ametsoc.org/jamc/article-pdf/59/5/991/4957943/jamcd190140.pdf by NOAA Central Library user on 11 August 2020 ALEXANDER RYZHKOV Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma DUSAN ZRNIC´ National Severe Storms Laboratory, and School of Meteorology, and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma (Manuscript received 5 June 2019, in final form 25 February 2020) ABSTRACT In a 2018 paper by Bukovcic´ et al., polarimetric bivariate power-law relations for estimating snowfall a 5 a b 5 2 b2 rate S and ice water content (IWC), S(KDP, Z) gKDPZ and IWC(KDP, Z) g2KDPZ , were developed utilizing 2D video disdrometer snow measurements in Oklahoma. Herein, these disdrometer-based relations are generalized for the range of particle aspect ratios from 0.5 to 0.8 and the width of the canting angle distri- bution from 08 to 408 and are validated via analytical/theoretical derivations and simulations. In addition, a novel S(KDP, Zdr) polarimetric relation utilizing the ratio between specific differential phase KDP and differential 2 21 2 21 reflectivity Zdr, KDP/(1 Zdr ), is derived. Both KDP and (1 Zdr ) are proportionally affected by the ice particles’ aspect ratio and width of the canting angle distribution; therefore, the variables’ ratio tends to be almost invariant to the changes in these parameters.
    [Show full text]