DOCSLIB.ORG

Tahoe Valley Area Plan Initial Study/Initial Environmental Checklist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tahoe Valley Area Plan Initial Study/Initial Environmental Checklist Tahoe Valley Area Plan Initial Study/Initial Environmental Checklist March 16, 2015 INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATGED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST/FONSE Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................1 1.1 INITIAL STUDY/INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ......................................... 1 1.2 TIERING PROCESS .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION, SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES ..................... 5 1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES/PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................... 10 1.5 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................. 12 1.6 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ............................................................................................ 12 1.7 RELATIONSHIP TO LAND USE PLANS, POLICIES AND REGULATIONS ............. 12 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................... 19 2.1 AREA PLAN OVERVIEW ................................................................................................... 19 3.0 BASELINE .................................................................................................. 35 4.0 METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS .................................................... 37 5.0 COMMODITIES INVENTORY ..................................................................... 39 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND IMPACT ANALYSIS ..................... 41 6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ..................................... 43 6.2 CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION .......................................................... 44 6.3 TRPA ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY TRPA) ..... 45 6.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS...................................................... 46 6.4.1 CEQA................................................................................................................. 46 6.4.2 TRPA ................................................................................................................. 46 6.4.4 Aesthetics (CEQA), Scenic Resources/Community Design and Light and Glare (TRPA) ....................................................................................... 48 6.4.4 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................. 68 6.4.5 Air Quality .......................................................................................................... 71 6.4.6 Biological Resources (Stream Environment Zones, Wetlands, Wildlife and Vegetation) ................................................................................................................. 90 6.4.7 Cultural Resources (CEQA) and Archaeological/Historical (TRPA) ............... 109 6.4.8 Geology and Soils (CEQA) and Land (TRPA)................................................. 115 6.4.9 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................ 127 6.4.10 Hazards and Hazardous Materials (CEQA) and Risk of Upset and Human Health (TRPA) .......................................................................................................... 132 6.4.11 Hydrology and Water Quality ........................................................................ 145 6.4.12 Land Use and Planning ................................................................................. 164 6.4.13 Mineral Resources (CEQA) and Natural Resources (TRPA) ........................ 172 6.4.14 Noise.............................................................................................................. 174 6.4.15 Population and Housing ................................................................................ 186 6.4.16 Public Services .............................................................................................. 192 6.4.17 Recreation ..................................................................................................... 203 6.4.18 Transportation and Traffic (CEQA) and Traffic and Circulation (TRPA) ....... 208 6.4.19 Utilities and Service Systems (CEQA) and Energy and Utilities (TRPA) ...... 217 6.4.20 Mandatory Findings of Significance .............................................................. 227 MARCH 16, 2013 TAHOE VALLEY AREA PL AN P A G E I INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATGED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST/FONSE 6.5 CERTIFICATION [TRPA ONLY] ............................................................................... 236 6.6 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 237 MARCH 16, 2013 TAHOE VALLEY AREA PL AN P A G E II INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATGED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST/FONSE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INITIAL STUDY/INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST This Initial Study/Initial Environmental Checklist (IS/IEC) has been prepared to address the potential environmental effects of the Tahoe Valley Area Plan in South Lake Tahoe, California. An IS is a preliminary environmental analysis that is used by the lead agency as a basis for determining whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), or a Negative Declaration is required for a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. An IEC is a preliminary environmental analysis that is used for determining whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), a Mitigated Finding of No Significant Effect, or a Finding of Significant Effect (FONSE) is required for a project under TRPA guidelines. The IS and the IEC contain a project description, description of environmental setting, identification of environmental effects by checklist or other similar form, explanation of environmental effects, discussion of mitigation for significant environmental effects, evaluation of the project’s consistency with existing, applicable land use controls, and the name of persons who prepared the study. This IS/MND has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Cal. Pub. Res. Code §21000 et seq. The CEQA lead agency for this project is the City of South Lake Tahoe (City). This document also serves as an IEC/FONSE prepared pursuant to the requirements of Article VI of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) Rules of Procedure and Chapter 3 of TRPA’s Code of Ordinances. TRPA serves as lead agency pursuant to its own regulations. The Tahoe Valley Area Plan is being prepared by the City pursuant to Chapter 13 of the TRPA Code of Ordinances, which allows local governments to adopt conforming Area Plans that contain policies and development ordinances that are consistent with and further the goals and policies of the TRPA Regional Plan. Chapter 13 established a conformity process that: . Allows local governments to adopt an Area Plan that supersedes TRPA plans and ordinances if the plan is found to be in conformance with the Regional Plan; . Defines required content in an Area Plan that includes but is not limited to applicable policies, maps, ordinances and development and design standards; and . Defines which development activities will not have a substantial effect on the natural resources in the Region and allows TRPA to transfer limited development permitting authority to local governments. 1.2 TIERING PROCESS CEQA The CEQA concept of "tiering" refers to the evaluation of general environmental matters in a broad program-level EIR, with subsequent focused environmental documents for individual projects that implement the program. This environmental document incorporates by reference the discussions in the 2010 City General Plan EIR (the Program EIR) and concentrates on issues specific to the Tahoe Valley plan area. CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines encourage the use of tiered environmental documents to reduce delays and excessive paperwork in the environmental review process. This is accomplished in MARCH 16, 2015 TAHOE VALLEY AREA PL AN P A G E 1 INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATGED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST/FONSE tiered documents by eliminating repetitive analyses of issues that were adequately addressed in the Program EIR and by incorporating those analyses by reference. Section 15168(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines provides for simplifying the preparation of environmental documents on individual parts of the program by incorporating by reference analyses and discussions that apply to the program as a whole. Where an EIR has been prepared or certified for a program or plan, the environmental review for a later activity consistent with the program or plan should be limited to effects that were not analyzed as significant in the prior EIR or that are susceptible to substantial reduction or avoidance. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(d).) This Initial Study is tiered from the City of South Lake Tahoe 2010 General Plan EIR in accordance with Sections 15152 and 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines and Public Resources Code Section 21094. The 2010 General Plan EIR is a Program EIR that was prepared pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines. The 2011 General Plan (General Plan) is a comprehensive land use plan that guides physical development within the City of South Lake Tahoe through 2030. The 2010 General Plan EIR analyzes full
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tahoe-Sierra Frontal Fault Zone, Emerald Bay Area, Lake Tahoe, California: History, Displacements, and Rates
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE The Tahoe-Sierra frontal fault zone, Emerald Bay area, Lake Tahoe, California: History, displacements, and rates 1 2 1 3 4 4 GEOSPHERE, v. 15, no. 3 R.A. Schweickert , J.G. Moore , M.M. Lahren , W. Kortemeier , C. Kitts , and T. Adamek 1Department of Geological Sciences, MS 172, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA 2U.S. Geological Survey, MS 910, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02022.1 3Western Nevada College, 2201 West College Parkway, Carson City, Nevada 89703, USA 4Robotic Systems Laboratory, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, California 95053, USA 18 figures; 3 tables; 1 set of supplemental files CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] ABSTRACT zones along the eastern edge of the Sierra Nevada microplate. The Lake Tahoe basin (Figs. 1A and 1B), a complex half-graben, is part of the Walker Lane belt, CITATION: Schweickert, R.A., Moore, J.G., Lahren, M.M., Kortemeier, W., Kitts, C., and Adamek, T., 2019, The location and geometry of the boundary between the Sierra Nevada possibly an incipient plate boundary, and a region of dextral transtensional de- The Tahoe-Sierra frontal fault zone, Emerald Bay area, microplate and the transtensional Walker Lane belt of the Basin and Range formation between the internally unfaulted Sierra Nevada and the extensional Lake Tahoe, California: History, displacements, and Province in the Lake Tahoe area have been debated. Two options are that Basin and Range Province to the east. Numerous studies in the Walker Lane belt rates: Geosphere, v. 15, no. 3, p. 783–819, https://doi .org /10.1130 /GES02022.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Affected Environment
    Chapter 3 Affected Environment Chapter 3. Affected Environment This chapter provides environmental analyses relative to social, biological, and physical parameters of the project area. Components of this study include a setting discussion, impact analysis criteria, project effects and significance, and applicable mitigation measures. This chapter is organized as follows: • Section 3.1, Air Quality • Section 3.2, Cultural Resources • Section 3.3, Social Environment • Section 3.4, Hydrology and Flood Plains • Section 3.5, Hazardous Waste/Material • Section 3.6, Traffic • Section 3.7, Parking • Section 3.8, Land Use and Planning • Section 3.9, Noise • Section 3.10, Recreation • Section 3.11, Public Services and Utilities • Section 3.12, Geology and Soils • Section 3.13, Water Quality • Section 3.14, Growth Inducing Impacts • Section 3.15, Visual Resources • Section 3.16, Biological Resources. Kings Beach Commercial Core Improvement Project Final EA/EIR/EIS 3-1 Chapter 3 Affected Environment As part of the scoping and environmental analysis conducted for the project, the following environmental issues were considered but no adverse impacts were identified. Consequently, there is no further discussion regarding these issues in this document. • Agriculture—There is no land designated as agriculture in the project area. • Coastal Zones—The project area is not located in a Coastal Zone. • Energy—The proposed project would not involve changes to energy usage patterns or availability and would not have substantial energy impacts. • Farmlands/Timberlands—There are no designated Farmlands or Timberlands in the project area. • Paleontology—There are no known paleontological resources in the project area. • Minerals—There are no known mineral resources in the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies Related to Wilderness Primitive Areas, 1967-1969
    Studies Related to Wilderness Primitive Areas, 1967-1969 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1261 This volume was published as separate chapters A-G UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. OS 75-605185 CONTENTS [Letters designate the separately published chapters] (A) Mineral resources of the Desolation Valley primitive area of the Sierra Nevada, California, by F. C. W. Dodge and P. V. Fillo. (B) Mineral resources of the Ventana primitive area, Monterey County, California, by Robert C. Pearson, Philip T. Hayes, and Paul V. Fillo. (C) Mineral resources of the Uncompahgre primitive area, Colorado, by R. P. Fischer, R' G. Luedke, M. J. Sheridan, and R. G. Raabe. (D) Mineral resources of the Mission Mountains Primitive Area, Missoula and Lake Counties, Montana, "by Jack E. Harrison, Mitchell W. Reynolds, M. Dean Kleinkopf, and Eldon C. Pattee. (E) Mineral resources of the Blue Range primitive area, Greenlee County, Arizona, and Catron County, New Mexico, by James C. Ratte", E. R. Landis, David L. Gaskill, and R. G. Raabe, with a section on Aeromagnetic interpretation, by Gordon P. Eaton. (F) Mineral resources of the San Juan primitive area, Colorado, by T. A. Steven, L. J. Schmitt, Jr., M. J. Sheridan, and F. E. Williams, with a section on Iron resources in the Irving Formation, by Jacob E. Gair and Harry Klemic. (G) Mineral resources of the Emigrant Basin primitive area, California, by E. W. Tooker, H. T. Morris, and Paul V. Fillo, with a section on Geophysical studies, by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction and Emplacement of Cretaceous Plutons in the Crystal Range, Southwest of Lake Tahoe, California
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Summer 2017 Construction and Emplacement of Cretaceous Plutons in the Crystal Range, Southwest of Lake Tahoe, California Brad Buerer San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Buerer, Brad, "Construction and Emplacement of Cretaceous Plutons in the Crystal Range, Southwest of Lake Tahoe, California" (2017). Master's Theses. 4837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.eyj9-3w7m https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4837 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSTRUCTION AND EMPLACEMENT OF CRETACEOUS PLUTONS IN THE CRYSTAL RANGE, SOUTHWEST OF LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Geology San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Brad Buerer August 2017 © 2017 Brad Buerer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled CONSTRUCTION AND EMPLACEMENT OF CRETACEOUS PLUTONS IN THE CRYSTAL RANGE, SOUTHWEST OF LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA by Brad Buerer APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY August 2017 Dr. Robert Miller Department of Geology Dr. Jonathan Miller Department of Geology Dr. Dave Andersen Department of Geology ABSTRACT CONSTRUCTION AND EMPLACEMENT OF CRETACEOUS PLUTONS IN THE CRYSTAL RANGE, SOUTHWEST OF LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA by Brad Buerer Three Cretaceous plutons are investigated to determine their construction and emplacement histories, focusing on magmatic foliation patterns and contact relationships with each other and with the Jurassic metasedimentary host rocks of the Sailor Canyon Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Taylorsville Region, California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR 353 GEOLOGY OF THE TAYLORSVILLE REGION, CALIFORNIA BY J. S. DILLER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 t f CONTENTS. Page Introduction.............................................................. 7 Location and extent................................................... 7 Outline of geography and geology of region.............................. 7 Topography............................................................... 9 Relief. ............................................................... 9 Diamond Mountain block.......................................... 9 The escarpment. .............................................. 10 The plateau slope.............................................. 10 Valleys on southwest border.................................... 10 Genesee Valley............................................. 10 Indian Valley............................................. 10 Mountain Meadows........................................ 11 Jura Valley................................................ 11 Grizzly Mountain block........................................... 11 Crest line and escarpment..................................... 11 Southwest slope............................................... .12 Drainage.............................................................. 12 Descriptive geology........................................................ 13 General statement........'............................................... 13 Sedimentary rocks....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tahoe's Seven Summits
    Birds return to Lake Tahoe, page 4 Summer 2014 Drought offers TAHOE’S SEVEN SUMMITS good news, bad By Jeff Cowen news for Lake Tahoe In Depth By Jim Sloan The Lake may be this Region’s Tahoe In Depth most famous geographic feature, but it is Tahoe’s peaks that define our From the shoreline, a long-term landscapes and, at times, the course or severe drought seems to put of our lives. Daily, we glimpse them Lake Tahoe in dire straits. The water towering over our tedium, indelible recedes, streams dry up and the reminders of nature’s greatness and our shoreline beaches expand to expose own impermanence. Succumbing to a bathtub ring along the 72-mile their power, we climb them. shoreline. Some climbers are peak collectors, But from the water, things don’t “bagging” the major summits one by always look so bad. During a one. Others climb on a lark, impulsively drought, many of the pollutants joining friends and unprepared for the that affect Lake Tahoe’s clarity can’t Photo © Steve Dunleavy experience ahead. Regardless of our Pyramid Peak rises above the fog-choked Tahoe Basin. find their way to the Lake. Droughts paths, once we reach their summits, we slow down the rate of urban runoff, feel at once tiny and expansive, earth and rodents. Trees become shorter and neighborhoods. reducing erosion and the flow of fine and time stretching in all directions wider, until they disappear entirely. Our Climbers of even our most benign sediment and other water-clouding below us, the experience undeniably bodies change too.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current 1989 Informational Newsletter for Summer 2017 (June-August) American River Conservancy
    Over 24,800 acres protected since the Current 1989 Informational Newsletter for Summer 2017 (June-August) American River Conservancy Forest to Faucet: El Dorado County. All three forks of the American An Algorithm for Preserving Clean Water, Air, River and all sixteen reservoirs empty into Folsom and Food, Recreational Landscapes, Lake which provides high-quality, year-round water and Family Health. to Sacramento County. Given the high elevation and By Alan Ehrgott the large tracts of protected National lands in El Dora- do and Placer County (35% of land base), our water OK, I admit it. This title is a mouthful . but quality is excellent—so good, in fact, that many bever- stick with me here and it will all come together. First, I age companies and other businesses locate here simply want to remind ourselves what an algorithm is. An because of the water quality. algorithm is a methodical set But threats to this water quality are increasing. of steps that can be used to As our rural populations make calculations, resolve grow, non-point sources of problems, and reach decisions. pollution increasingly bring Algorithms can be used to oil, gasoline, herbicides, pesti- solve simple problems like cides and other chemicals into making a cup of coffee, or in our local streams and rivers. this case, a large, complex land The ARC conducts water use problem that affects mil- quality monitoring and a doz- lions of residents. en river clean-ups each year. Let’s take a familiar On more than one occasion I place — eastern Sacramento have picked up full plastic County, Placer, and El Dorado jugs of herbicide (Round-Up) counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sierra Nevada Fisher Conservation Assessment
    Southern Sierra Nevada Fisher Conservation Assessment Prepared By Wayne Spencer Sarah Sawyer Heather Romsos William Zielinski Rick Sweitzer Craig Thompson Kathryn Purcell Deana Clifford Lindsay Cline Hugh Safford Susan Britting Jody Tucker Prepared For The Fisher Interagency Leadership Team: Sierra Nevada Conservancy USDA Forest Service National Park Service US Fish and Wildlife Service California Department of Fish and Wildlife January 2015 Produced by the Conservation Biology Institute. CBI is a 501(c)3 tax-exempt organization that works collaboratively to conserve biological diversity in its natural state through applied research, education, planning, and community service. Recommended Citation: Spencer, W.D., S.C. Sawyer, H.L. Romsos, W.J. Zielinski, R.A. Sweitzer, C.M. Thompson, K.L. Purcell, D.L. Clifford, L. Cline, H.D. Safford, S.A. Britting, and J.M. Tucker. 2015. Southern Sierra Nevada fisher conservation assessment. Unpublished report produced by Conservation Biology Institute. Fisher Interagency Leadership Team: Barnie Gyant, USDA Forest Service Region 5 Cay Goude, US Fish and Wildlife Service David Graber, PhD National Park Service (retired) Kent Smith (retired) and Eric Loft, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Jim Branham, Sierra Nevada Conservancy Core Project Support Team: Diana Craig, USDA Forest Service Sarah Sawyer, PhD, USDA Forest Service Wayne Spencer, PhD, Conservation Biology Institute Mandy Vance, Sierra Nevada Conservancy Fisher Technical Team: Wayne Spencer, PhD (Chair), Conservation Biology Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Geosphere, Published Online on 26 June 2013 As Doi:10.1130/GES00877.1
    Geosphere, published online on 26 June 2013 as doi:10.1130/GES00877.1 Geosphere Paleoseismic history of the Fallen Leaf segment of the West Tahoe−Dollar Point fault reconstructed from slide deposits in the Lake Tahoe Basin, California-Nevada Jillian M. Maloney, Paula J. Noble, Neal W. Driscoll, Graham M. Kent, Shane B. Smith, Gretchen C. Schmauder, Jeffrey M. Babcock, Robert L. Baskin, Robert Karlin, Annie M. Kell, Gordon G. Seitz, Susan Zimmerman and John A. Kleppe Geosphere published online 26 June 2013; doi: 10.1130/GES00877.1 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geosphere Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 150. a History of California's Fish Hatcheries 1870Â
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 150 A History of California's Fish Hatcheries 1870–1960 BY EARL LEITRITZ 1970 1 DEDICATION This volume is dedicated to the late Captain G. H. Lambson, superintendent of the United States Bureau of Fisheries stations in California from 1899 to 1916, and Mount Shasta Hatchery and Klamath River stations from 1917 to 1931, who gave the author his first assignment at the Mount Shasta Hatchery on July 21, 1923. 2 3 ABSTRACT The purpose of this bulletin is to document the development of fish culture in California from 1870 through 1960. During this period, 170 hatcheries and egg collecting stations were constructed, and brief descriptions of many of these are given. Since only 25 installations were operating in 1960, the reasons for closing the other sites were de- termined when possible. Detailed descriptions of each of the major hatcheries operated in 1960 are presented. 4 PREFACE This bulletin was written to record under one cover the history of artificial fish propagation in California, some ac- tions of early fish commissions, a history of former-day fish hatcheries in California, and a brief résumé of existing fish hatcheries. In compiling this account the author has searched widely through early records and publications of the Fish and Game Commission and has drawn heavily on the materials submitted by the many contributors thereto. In addition, the author, an employee of the Department of Fish and Game for more than 36 years, has put into print some of the interesting events which occurred through the years of his employment.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of California's Fish Hatcheries 1870–1960
    6/13/2019 A History of California'S Fish Hatcheries 1870–1960 STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 150 A History of California'S Fish Hatcheries 1870–1960 BY EARL LEITRITZ Inland Fisheries Branch 1970 ― (2) ― DEDICATION This volume is dedicated to the late Captain G. H. Lambson, superintendent of the United States Bureau of Fisheries stations in California from 1899 to 1916, and Mount Shasta Hatchery and Klamath River stations from 1917 to 1931, who gave the author his first assignment at the Mount Shasta Hatchery on July 21, 1923. ― (3) ― ― (4) ― ABSTRACT The purpose of this bulletin is to document the development of fish culture in California from 1870 through 1960. During this period, 170 hatcheries and egg collecting stations were constructed, and brief descriptions of many of these are given. Since only 25 installations were operating in 1960, the reasons for closing the other sites were determined when possible. Detailed descriptions of each of the major hatcheries operated in 1960 are presented. ― (5) ― PREFACE This bulletin was written to record under one cover the history of artificial fish propagation in California, some actions of early fish commissions, a history of former-day fish hatcheries in California, and a brief résumé of existing fish hatcheries. In compiling this account the author has searched widely through early records and publications of the Fish and Game Commission and has drawn heavily on the materials submitted by the many contributors thereto. In addition, the author, an employee of the Department of Fish and Game for more than 36 years, has put into print some of the interesting events which occurred through the years of his employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Size on Talus Slopes Correlates with Fracture Spacing On
    1 Sediment size on talus slopes correlates with fracture spacing on 2 bedrock cliffs: Implications for predicting initial sediment size 3 distributions on hillslopes 4 Joseph P. Verdian1, Leonard S. Sklar1,2, Clifford S. Riebe3, Jeffrey R. Moore4 5 1Department of Earth and Climate Sciences, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, 94302, USA 6 2Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University, Montreal, H3G1M8, Canada 7 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, 82071, USA 8 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 84112, USA 9 10 Correspondence to: Leonard S. Sklar ([email protected]) 11 Abstract. The detachment of rock fragments from fractured bedrock on hillslopes creates sediment with an initial size 12 distribution that sets the upper limits on particle size for all subsequent stages in the evolution of sediment in landscapes. We 13 hypothesize that the initial size distribution should depend on the size distribution of latent sediment (i.e., fracture-bound 14 blocks in unweathered bedrock) and weathering of sediment both before and during detachment (e.g., disintegration along 15 crystal grain boundaries). However, the initial size distribution is difficult to measure, because the interface across which 16 sediment is produced is often shielded from view by overlying soil. Here we overcome this limitation by comparing fracture 17 spacings measured from exposed bedrock on cliff faces with particle size distributions in adjacent talus deposits at 15 talus- 18 cliff pairs spanning a wide range of climates and lithologies in California. Median fracture spacing and particle size vary by 19 more than tenfold and correlate strongly with lithology.
    [Show full text]