EEnnggiinneeeerriinngg 114455 SSeessssiioonn 22 SSiilliiccoonn VVaalllleeyy aanndd EEnnttrreepprreenneeuurrsshhiipp

Professor Randy Komisar Stanford University

Copyright © 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Stanford Technology Ventures Program (STVP). This document may be reproduced for educational purposes only.

1 AgendaAgenda 1. Stanford’s Office of Technology Licensing - Linda Chao 2. Admit and Waiting List - Eric Carr 3. Discussion of Stanford and - Randy Komisar 4. Key Technology Entrepreneurship Frameworks - Randy Komisar 5. Opportunity Analysis Project and Study Team Formation - Eric Carr

2 First, A Look at Stanford University

3 EarlyEarly Years:Years: FredFred TTermanerman aandnd HPHP

• Professor Terman brought Hewlett and Packard together at Stanford • In 1939, the two decided to “make a run for it ourselves” and founded HP at a now-famous garage in downtown Palo Alto

Source: John Hennessy 4 AnotherAnother GoldenGolden Age:Age: EarlyEarly 1980s1980s

• Many new technologies as radical innovations

• Emergence of John Hennessy as another Terman

• Very productive era ...

5 1990s:1990s: TheThe InternetInternet

• Two EE students in a trailer • Use of Yahoo on and off- campus explodes • Form independent company

Source: John Hennessy 6 2000s2000s

• Two students dissatisfied with Net search • They work furiously in their spare time to develop a better way • They form a company to exploit the opportunity others had left behind

7 StanfordStanford’’ss RoleRole inin SiliconSilicon ValleyValley

• Interaction with industry (via legacy just discussed) • Research funding and creativity • Silicon Valley as a nearby planting ground for ideas • Role of students as inventors, as disseminators, and as part of the workforce • Encouraging entrepreneurship …

8 MMoorree SSuucccceessss FFaaccttoorrss

• Talent pool and social networks • Loyalty to the technology with a unique openness • Highly skilled and motivated • Diverse (highly multicultural) • Many early adopters of new technology to quickly learn from • Services infrastructure with many suppliers for outsourcing • for both financing and team building • Entrepreneurial spirit • Role models that demonstrate both confidence and paranoia • OK to fail, learn from it, and then try again • Flat organizational structures • OK to talk/partner across company boundaries about common issues

9 QuestionsQuestions forfor DiscussionDiscussion

1. What could go right (and wrong) in Silicon Valley in the coming 10 years?

2. Where do you plan to live to start your career next year and why?

References for Stanford and Silicon Valley Content: President John Hennessy of Stanford University: James Gibbons of Stanford University; John Doerr of ; John Chambers of Cisco; Annalee Saxenian and Homa Bahrami of UC Berkeley

10 © 2003 Mark P. Rice, Babson

11 Key High-Technology Entrepreneurship Framework #1: Dorf and Byers Vision

Strategy

Execution

12 Vision:

Strategy:

Execution:

Reference: Dorf and Byers (Figure 8.4)

13 FFuunnddaammeennttaall QQuueessttiioonnss:: VViissiioonn

What do the founders wish to achieve with the business? What is our shared vision and goals? Where do we want to go and what business are we in?

Example: what business are they really in? •Yahoo … Internet Directory? •Palm … Organizers? • … Search?

14 Fundamental Questions: Strategy

Do we have the right strategy? Who is going to buy? What are we selling? Why are we better?

Fundamental Questions: Execution

Can we do it? What resources are needed? What is the blueprint for growth? Can we adapt?

Reference: Steven Brandt

15 Key High-Technology Entrepreneurship Framework #2: Sahlman’s Concept of Fit

Reference: Sahlman

16 Framework #3: Dynamics of the Start-Up Game (1) Founding: An entrepreneur begins with a vision and shares of stock in the new venture. Entrepreneur trades stock for Value has been ideas, money, and people successfully created.

(2) Seed Stage: (4) Exit Stage: •Venture capitalists provide A race against •IPO or M&A money in return for stock •Entrepreneur, investors, and •Employees join via friends & time to create employees can cash in stock associates in return for cash value and for money salary and stock options •A viable company has been •Ideas become intellectual reduce risk created or expanded property which represents the •Each entrepreneur continues initial value in the company to build the company, retires, or starts the game again

Further growth is delayed Company balances earning until milestones are (3) Growth Stage: cash, taking investment, and reached and risk of spending cash to create value failure is reduced More money, ideas, and people are obtained, but for much less stock than in the earlier stage due to lower risk

Reference: Start-Up by Jerry Kaplan FFrraammeewwoorrkk ##44:: KKoommiissaarr’’ss ““33 QQuueessttiioonnss EEvveerryy VVeennttuurree CCaappiittaalliisstt WWaannttss ttoo KKnnooww””

1. Big Market?

2. Winning Strategy?

3. Excellent Team?

Reference: Randy Komisar

18 Study Group and Project Team Formation (Eric Carr)

13 teams of 5 students each

19 Opportunity Analysis Project Overview (Eric Carr)

•Check out the OAP web site for more details + dates •Focus on Assessing an Idea to Opportunity •Not looking for a Used Car Sales pitch - Be Honest •Key Deliverables •Web Site + Interim Deliverables •Marketing Position Statement, Project Status Report, etc. •Presentation (15 minutes) •Term Paper (Executive Summary) •Check out Team tab for examples from last year •Good luck!

20