DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1807.03867V2 [Physics.Class-Ph] 21 Feb 2019 Eetrve)Adohrtertcladcalculational Paper and Theoretical Other for Advantages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1807.03867V2 [Physics.Class-Ph] 21 Feb 2019 Eetrve)Adohrtertcladcalculational Paper and Theoretical Other for Advantages Analytic formula for the Geometric Phase of an Asymmetric Top Nicholas A. Mecholsky∗ Vitreous State Laboratory The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064 (Dated: 1/21/2019) The motion of a handle spinning in space has an odd behavior. It seems to unexpectedly flip back and forth in a periodic manner as seen in a popular YouTube video.1 As an asymmetrical top, its motion is completely described by the Euler equations and the equations of motion have been known for more than a century. However, recent concepts of the geometric phase have allowed a new perspective on this classical problem. Here we explicitly use the equations of motion to find a closed form expression for total phase and hence the geometric phase of the force-free asymmetric top and explore some consequences of this formula with the particular example of the spinning handle for demonstration purposes. As one of the simplest dynamical systems, the asymmetric top should be a canonical example to explore the classical analog of Berry phase. PACS numbers: Keywords: geometric phase, Hannay angle, Berry phase, holonomy, Euler top, rigid body I. INTRODUCTION this is the asymmetric top in force-free motion in space. Some of the dynamic variables are periodic (like the an- gular momentum and angular velocity vectors). However The motion of spinning objects is ubiquitous. From a other variables (like the Euler angles) are not periodic. In seemingly mundane and classical motion, new myster- one cycle of the periodic variables, the system almost re- ies are still being debated and surprising features are turns to its original state except for the variables that are revealed.2–4 One important observation is the identifi- 5–7 not periodic. Typically this can be viewed as an angular cation of a Berry phase of rotating classical objects. difference from the initial state. This extra phase will be Geometric phases have become popular recently due to referred to as the ‘total phase’ in this paper. The total their applications to material properties (see Ref. (8) for phase is a combination of two parts. One is the dynamic a recent review) and other theoretical and calculational 9,10 part that depends on the time dynamics and the other is advantages. Examples have relied on Berry’s original 19 11 the geometric part, called the Hannay Angle, that is in- paper describing the quantum mechanical effect and dependent of time and hence ‘geometric’. Alternatively, relegating the classical version to the term ‘classical ana- we may consider a periodic system whose Hamiltonian is log’. The classical analog of Berry phase is the Han- forced to change slowly due to some external influence. nay angle and was developed in the mid 1980s by Han- 13,20 6,7 An example of this could be the Foucault pendulum. nay and others, inspired by Berry’s original work. The If the system is then returned to the original Hamilto- canonical example of the Hannay angle usually involves 12,13 nian, there is an extra phase due to this forcing. One Foucault’s pendulum. However, even in the force-free might call these two examples the ‘passive’ and ‘active’ spinning of a top, the Hannay angle is apparent, yet not cases. typically discussed in elementary treatments of the sub- In 1991, Richard Montgomery, and around the same ject. Evidently Jacobi was the first to write down the time, Mark Levi, published papers6,21 that derived a for- exact analytic expressions for the motion of the asym- mula for computing the total phase of rigid bodies metric top in the 19th century. In Landau and Lifshitz’s Mechanics,14 it was already appreciated that the motion 2ET ∆α = Ω, (1) of the top was not perfectly periodic in time. This was M − identified by Landau and Lifshitz when they stated “this where T is the period of the angular velocity vector in arXiv:1807.03867v2 [physics.class-ph] 21 Feb 2019 incommensurability has the result that the top does not space (here we compute it from Eq. (16)) and Ω is the at any time return to its original position.” (see Ref. (14), signed solid area swept out by the angular momentum 37, page 120) However, this observation was not inves- 2ET § vector. The dynamic part is the integrated an- tigated further in that text and the connection to the M Hannay angle was not included in their work which would 7 11 gle of the angular velocity projected onto the angular have predated the original work by Hannay and Berry. momentum vector. The geometric part is a fraction of Geometric phases (Hannay angles) are not typically a unit sphere swept out by the path of the angular mo- discussed in undergraduate courses. The basic features mentum vector in the body frame (using the right hand and calculations can be seen in several references.5,7,15–18 rule to assign a sign). The geometric phases of several real-world examples are Even though much work has been done in this area calculated in Ref. (15). As a simple example, consider a in the past few decades (see for example Ref. 22), the classical system that has periodic motion. An example of connection and explicit formula for the total phase of an 2 asymmetric top was never published. Part of the goal inertia is given by of this paper is to take the last step and cast the exact expressions for the motion of the asymmetric top in the 5 2 3 3 l2w + l1 framework of the total phase. A closed form expression a = (3a) for the total phase will be presented and explored. We use q 2p√l1 + l2 the example of the T-shaped handle (seen flipping around 5 2 2 2 2 4 3 2l1l2 (3l2w +2l2 +2w )+ l1w + l2 on the International Space Station in a recent YouTube b = (3b) 1 2 video ) to demonstrate some of these expressions, how- q p 2 (l1 + l2) ever the formulas are valid for a general asymmetric top. 1 5 p In some ways, this is the most elementary example of c = w, (3c) total phase available in classical physics. Even in this 2r3 simple system, a wide variety of questions and lines of shown superimposed in Fig. 1. Although this is correct investigation are possible. To that end, an exploration 1 and some observations of the formula are in order. for all l1, l2, and w, here we wish l1 large enough with respect to l2 (and w small enough) so that a>b>c. The paper begins by reviewing the dynamics of the It will turn out that the only important parameters asymmetric top. The angular velocity and Euler angles for the description of the body are those that determine are determined as functions of time. From these expres- the direction that the moment of inertia points in the sions, the total phase is determined directly and com- moment of inertia space (the polar and azimuthal angles pared to Montgomery’s formula. Finally, some observa- relative to the I1, I2, and I3 axes). Thus the absolute tions about the total phase are made and some conclu- magnitude of the vector of the eigenvalues of the mo- sions are discussed. ment of inertia is not important. We will find it useful to use a moment of inertia that is parameterized by two variables, b and c, the semi-axes of a solid ellipsoid. The third semi-axis of this ellipsoid is determined such that II. DYNAMICS AND TOTAL PHASE As an example for visualization, and without loss of generality, we may use a T-shaped handle to explore our dynamics such as the dynamics seen in the video.1 For any three physical moments of inertia there is a corre- sponding T-shaped handle and thus we are losing no gen- erality. Consider a handle of uniform density and unit mass with a cross piece of length l1, a shaft of length l2, and a square cross-sectional width of w (Fig. 1). The total moments of inertia can be computed using the parallel axis theorem with individual square prisms. This will give a moment of inertia tensor with diagonal elements 2 2 2 2 4 3 6l1l2w +2l1w + l2w (6l1 + w)+ l2 +4l1l2 I1 = 2 (2a) 12 (l1 + l2) 2 3 (l1 +2l2) w + l1 I2 = (2b) FIG. 1: Two equivalent rigid bodies. A T-shaped han- 12 (l1 + l2) dle (green) with l1 = 8, l2 = 4, and w = 1 and the I3 = equivalent solid ellipsoid that has the identical principal mo- 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 ments of inertia given by Eqs. (3), with semi-axes (a,b,c) = l1l2 l1 +5w +4l2 + l1 l1 + w + l2w (6l1 + w)+ l2 2 , (4.23281, 3.07318, 0.645497). The ellipsoid is shrunk by 1/4 12 (l1 + l2) for presentation. (2c) where the coordinate axes have been chosen to have a diagonal moment of inertia tensor. An ellipsoid (with 1 Otherwise a relabeling of a, b, and c is needed so that the mo- semi-axes lengths a, b, and c) with the same moment of ments of inertia are correctly ordered. 3 the moment of inertia vector (composed from the eigen- reference (determined by the principle moments of inertia values) has unit magnitude. The moment of inertia for I1 < I2 < I3 in a right handed coordinate system), the this particular choice is given by, initial angular velocity is given by 2 2 ω I1 = b + c (4a) 0 = (ω01,ω02,ω03). (9) 1 2 4 2 2 4 2 We will show below that the total phase will not depend I2 = b + 2 3b 2b c 3c + c (4b) 2 − − − − on the magnitude of ω0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mechanics 84 6.1 2D Particle in Cartesian Coordinates
    A Hostetler Handbook v 0.82 Contents Preface v 1 Newton's Laws1 1.1 Many Particles ................................. 2 1.2 Cartesian Coordinates............................. 3 1.3 Polar Coordinates ............................... 4 1.4 Cylindrical Coordinates ............................ 7 1.5 Air Resistance, Friction, and Buoyancy.................... 8 1.6 Charged Particle in a Magnetic Field..................... 17 1.7 Summary: Newton's Laws........................... 20 2 Momentum and Center of Mass 23 2.1 Rocket with no External Force ........................ 24 2.2 Multistage Rockets............................... 25 2.3 Rocket with External Force.......................... 25 2.4 Center of Mass................................. 26 2.5 Angular Momentum of a Single Particle................... 28 2.6 Angular Momentum of a System of Particles ................ 29 2.7 Angular Momentum of a Continuous Mass Distribution .......... 30 2.8 Summary: Momentum and Center of Mass ................. 34 3 Energy 36 3.1 General One-dimensional Systems ...................... 40 3.2 Atwood Machine................................ 43 3.3 Spherically Symmetric Central Forces .................... 44 3.4 The Energy of a System of Particles ..................... 45 3.5 Summary: Energy ............................... 47 4 Oscillations 49 4.1 Simple Harmonic Oscillators.......................... 49 4.2 Damped Harmonic Oscillators......................... 52 4.3 Driven Oscillators ............................... 57 4.4 Summary: Oscillations............................
    [Show full text]
  • GYRODYNAMICS Introduction to the Dynamics of Rigid Bodies
    2 GYRODYNAMICS Introduction to the dynamics of rigid bodies Introduction. Though Newton wrote on many topics—and may well have given thought to the odd behavior of tops—I am not aware that he committed any of that thought to writing. But by Euler was active in the field, and it has continued to bedevil the thought of mathematical physicists. “Extended rigid bodies” are classical abstractions—alien both to relativity and to quantum mechanics—which are revealed to our dynamical imaginations not so much by commonplace Nature as by, in Maxwell’s phrase, the “toys of Youth.” That such toys behave “strangely” is evident to the most casual observer, but the detailed theory of their behavior has become notorious for being elusive, surprising and difficult at every turn. Its formulation has required and inspired work of wonderful genius: it has taught us much of great worth, and clearly has much to teach us still. Early in my own education as a physicist I discovered that I could not understand—or, when I could understand, remained unpersuaded by—the “elementary explanations” of the behavior of tops & gyros which are abundant in the literature. So I fell into the habit of avoiding the field, waiting for the day when I could give to it the time and attention it obviously required and deserved. I became aware that my experience was far from atypical: according to Goldstein it was in fact a similar experience that motivated Klein & Sommerfeld to write their 4-volume classic, Theorie des Kreisels (–). In November I had occasion to consult my Classical Mechanics II students concerning what topic we should take up to finish out the term.
    [Show full text]
  • Accurate Simulation of Rigid Body Rotation and Extensions to Lie Groups
    Accurate Simulation of Rigid Body Rotation and Extensions to Lie Groups Sam Buss Dept. of Mathematics U.C. San Diego Visible Luncheon Gwyddor Cyfrifiador University of Swansea March 3, 2011 Topics: ◮ Algorithms for simulating rotating rigid bodies. ◮ All algorithms preserve angular momentum. ◮ Algorithms can be made energy preserving. ◮ Generalization to Lie group setting. Talk outline: 1. Rigid body rotations. 1st thru 4th order algorithms. Unexpected terms. 2. Generalization to Taylor series methods over Lie groups/Lie algebras. 3. Energy preservation based on Poinsot ellipsoid. 4. Numerical simulations and efficiency. 1 Part I: The simple rotating, rigid body I = Inertia matrix (tensor). ω L = Angular momentum. ω = Rotation axis & rate, L L = Iω (Euler’s equation) ω = I−1L ω˙ = I−1(L˙ ω Iω) − × ω¨ = ω ω˙ + I−1(L¨ ω˙ L 2ω L˙ + ω (ω L)) × − × − × × × ... ... ω = 2ω ω¨ ω (ω ω˙ ) + I−1[L 3ω L¨ 3ω˙ L˙ ω¨ L × − × × − × − × − × + ω˙ (ω L) + 2ω (ω˙ L) + 3ω (ω L˙ ) ω (ω (ω L))] × × × × × × − × × × Wobble: ω˙ = 0 even when no applied torque (L˙ = 0). 6 vL˙ = Rate of change of momentum = Applied Torque. 2 Framework for simulating rigid body motion We assume the rigid body has a known angular momentum, and the external torques are completely known. The orientation (and hence the angular velocity) is updated in discrete time steps, at times t0, t1, t2,.... Update Step: At a given time t , let h = ∆t = t t , and assume i i+1 − i orientation Ωi at time ti is known, and that momentum is known (at all times). Update step calculates a net rotation rate vector, ω¯, and sets Ωi+1 = Rhω¯ Ωi, where Rν performs a rotation around axis ν of angle ν .
    [Show full text]
  • Polhode Motion, Trapped Flux, and the GP-B Science Data Analysis
    July 8, 2009 • Stanford University HEPL Seminar Polhode Motion, Trapped Flux, and the GP-B Science Data Analysis Alex Silbergleit, John Conklin and the Polhode/Trapped Flux Mapping Task Team July 8, 2009 • Stanford University HEPL Seminar Outline 1. Gyro Polhode Motion, Trapped Flux, and GP-B Readout (4 charts) 2. Changing Polhode Period and Path: Energy Dissipation (4 charts) 3. Trapped Flux Mapping (TFM): Concept, Products, Importance (7 charts) 4. TFM: How It Is Done - 3 Levels of Analysis (11 charts) A. Polhode phase & angle B. Spin phase C. Magnetic potential 5. TFM: Results ( 9 charts) 6. Conclusion. Future Work (1 chart) 2 July 8, 2009 • Stanford University HEPL Seminar Outline 1. Gyro Polhode Motion, Trapped Flux, and GP-B Readout 2. Changing Polhode Period and Path: Energy Dissipation 3. Trapped Flux Mapping (TFM): Concept, Products, Importance 4. TFM: How It Is Done - 3 Levels of Analysis A. Polhode phase & angle B. Spin phase C. Magnetic potential 5. TFM: Results 6. Conclusion. Future Work 3 July 8, 2009 • Stanford University HEPL Seminar 1.1 Free Gyro Motion: Polhoding • Euler motion equations – In body-fixed frame: – With moments of inertia: – Asymmetry parameter: (Q=0 – symmetric rotor) • Euler solution: instant rotation axis precesses about rotor principal axis along the polhode path (angular velocity Ωp) • For GP-B gyros 4 July 8, 2009 • tanford UniversityS HEPL Seminar 1.2 Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Gyro Precession • Symmetric (II 1 = 2 , Q=0): γp= const (ω3=const, polhode path=circular cone), • =φp Ω p const = , motion
    [Show full text]
  • The Gravity Probe B Test of General Relativity
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience The Gravity Probe B test of general relativity This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. 2015 Class. Quantum Grav. 32 224001 (http://iopscience.iop.org/0264-9381/32/22/224001) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 162.247.72.27 This content was downloaded on 31/05/2016 at 09:49 Please note that terms and conditions apply. Classical and Quantum Gravity Class. Quantum Grav. 32 (2015) 224001 (29pp) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/22/224001 The Gravity Probe B test of general relativity C W F Everitt1, B Muhlfelder1, D B DeBra1, B W Parkinson1, J P Turneaure1, A S Silbergleit1, E B Acworth1, M Adams1, R Adler1, W J Bencze1, J E Berberian1, R J Bernier1, K A Bower1, R W Brumley1, S Buchman1, K Burns1, B Clarke1, J W Conklin1, M L Eglington1, G Green1, G Gutt1, D H Gwo1, G Hanuschak1,XHe1, M I Heifetz1, D N Hipkins1, T J Holmes1, R A Kahn1, G M Keiser1, J A Kozaczuk1, T Langenstein1,JLi1, J A Lipa1, J M Lockhart1, M Luo1, I Mandel1, F Marcelja1, J C Mester1, A Ndili1, Y Ohshima1, J Overduin1, M Salomon1, D I Santiago1, P Shestople1, V G Solomonik1, K Stahl1, M Taber1, R A Van Patten1, S Wang1, J R Wade1, P W Worden Jr1, N Bartel6, L Herman6, D E Lebach6, M Ratner6, R R Ransom6, I I Shapiro6, H Small6, B Stroozas6, R Geveden2, J H Goebel3, J Horack2, J Kolodziejczak2, A J Lyons2, J Olivier2, P Peters2, M Smith3, W Till2, L Wooten2, W Reeve4, M Anderson4, N R Bennett4,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 04 Rotational Motion
    Chapter 04 Rotational Motion P. J. Grandinetti Chem. 4300 P. J. Grandinetti Chapter 04: Rotational Motion Angular Momentum Angular momentum of particle with respect to origin, O, is given by l⃗ = ⃗r × p⃗ Rate of change of angular momentum is given z by cross product of ⃗r with applied force. p m dl⃗ dp⃗ = ⃗r × = ⃗r × F⃗ = ⃗휏 r dt dt O y Cross product is defined as applied torque, ⃗휏. x Unlike linear momentum, angular momentum depends on origin choice. P. J. Grandinetti Chapter 04: Rotational Motion Conservation of Angular Momentum Consider system of N Particles z m5 m 2 Rate of change of angular momentum is m3 ⃗ ∑N l⃗ ∑N ⃗ m1 dL d 훼 dp훼 = = ⃗r훼 × dt dt dt 훼=1 훼=1 y which becomes m4 x ⃗ ∑N dL ⃗ net = ⃗r훼 × F dt 훼 Total angular momentum is 훼=1 ∑N ∑N ⃗ ⃗ L = l훼 = ⃗r훼 × p⃗훼 훼=1 훼=1 P. J. Grandinetti Chapter 04: Rotational Motion Conservation of Angular Momentum ⃗ ∑N dL ⃗ net = ⃗r훼 × F dt 훼 훼=1 Taking an earlier expression for a system of particles from chapter 1 ∑N ⃗ net ⃗ ext ⃗ F훼 = F훼 + f훼훽 훽=1 훽≠훼 we obtain ⃗ ∑N ∑N ∑N dL ⃗ ext ⃗ = ⃗r훼 × F + ⃗r훼 × f훼훽 dt 훼 훼=1 훼=1 훽=1 훽≠훼 and then obtain 0 > ⃗ ∑N ∑N ∑N dL ⃗ ext ⃗ rd ⃗ ⃗ = ⃗r훼 × F + ⃗r훼 × f훼훽 double sum disappears from Newton’s 3 law (f = *f ) dt 훼 12 21 훼=1 훼=1 훽=1 훽≠훼 P.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Energy Dissipation on the Free Body Motions of Spacecraft
    . * , NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 4 Technical Report No. 32-860 Effects of Energy Dissipation on the Free Body Motions of Spacecraft Peter W. Likins N66 30123 (ACCESSION NUMBER1 (THRUI .I ' IPAdESI E/// INASh CR OR TMX ORADNUMBER1 \ . GPO PRICE $ I I 1 'I ' CFSTI PRICE(S) $ , < Hard c2py (HC) ?/ fs-i') l f e 7c Microfiche (MF) I / \ ff 653 July 65 JETI PROPULSION LABORATORY CALIFORNIAINSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASAD ENA. CALIFOR N I A July 1, 1966 _- NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Technical Report No. 32-860 Effects of Energy Dissipation on the Free Body Motions of Spacecraft Peter W. Likins Spacecraff Control Section JET PROPULSION LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA,CALIFORNIA July 1, 1966 i Copyright @ 1966 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Prepared Under Contract No. NAS 7-100 National Aeronautics & Space Administration JPL TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 32-860 CONTENTS 1. Introduction to the Problem ............... 1 II. Preliminary Considerations ............... 2 A . Definitions .................... 2 B . Rigid Body Rotational Motion and Stability ......... 3 C . Attitude Stability of Nonrigid Bodies ........... 3 D . The Space Environment ................ 4 111. Alternative Methods of Solution ............. 5 A . The Energy Sink Model Method ............. 5 B . The Discrete Parameter Model Method .......... 5 C . The Modal Model Method ............... 5 IV. The Energy Sink Model ................ 8 A . Poinsot Motion Modified for Energy Dissipation ....... 8 B . The Acceleration of a Particle Attached to a Free Rigid Body ... 13 C . Application to SYNCOM ...............15 D . Application to Explorer Z ............... 16 E . Applications with Structural Damping ........... 18 F . Applications with Annular Dampers ............20 G . Applications with Pendulum Dampers ...........20 H .
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Patch Potentials on the GP-B Performance
    Effects of Patch Potentials on the GP-B Performance Results and Lessons Learned Sasha Buchman, John Turneaure HEPL June 24 2009 & GP-B March 24 2009 Page 1 GP-B Performance 6606 Geodetic effect Roll averaged 1,000 to 2,500 marcs/yr MISALIGNMENT 1000 Apparent linear drift LINEAR DRIFTS about 500 marcs/yr Repeat events RESONANCE to 200 marcs 100 39.0 Frame dragging effect 10 marcsec/yr 1 1.00 Original GP-B requirement Drift rate (deg/hr) rate Drift 0.50 Tighter req. 1995 DESIGN 0.21 Single gyro expectation 0.12 4 Gyro expectation 0.1 0.08 Readout alone (4 gyros) 0.01 1 marcsec/yr = 3.2 × 10-11 deg/hr Page 2 Goals and Outline ¾ Identify and understand “anomalous effects” ¾ Identify single cause of effects if possible ¾ Establish physical base for data analysis ¾ Experimental Observations ¾ Ground Measurements ¾ Classification of Effects on GP-B ¾ Discussion of Effects ¾ Remaining Work ¾ Lessons Learned Page 3 The Relativity Mission Concept 1 GM α GI ⎡3R ⎤ dγ 3 Ω d ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ Ω =⎜γ +⎟ 2× 3()R v +⎜γ +1 +⎟ 2 3⎢ ⋅ω 2 ()e ⋅R − e ω⎥ = ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ 2c⎠ R ⎝ 4⎠c 2 R ⎣ R ⎦ γ 2⎝ Ω ⎠geodet ic γ , α - 1 Frame Dragging 1 dγ ⎛ marcs⎞ Geodetic Effect 2= 3. × − 104⎜ ⎟ Space-time curvature Rotating matter drags space-time γPage 4 ⎝ yr ⎠ de Sitter (1916) Pugh and Schiff (1959, 1960) Experimental Observations Coupling of rotor-fixed frame to the Gyro Suspension System (GSS) 3 Modulation at low spin ωSL and polhode ωP frequency in the ~ 1.5 Hz GSS band -7 1 ¾ ωSL=1.3 Hz mod.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Do All Torque-Free Systems Necessarily Exhibit Polhode Motion Or Is It a Special Case for Specific Geometries (E.G
    Ph610 Fall 2012 Students’ questions #6 1. 1. Do all torque-free systems necessarily exhibit Polhode motion or is it a special case for specific geometries (e.g. Poinsot's Ellipsoid)? 2. How good of an approximation is the classical precession without accounting for a variable precession and variable obliquity, the Earth being non-rigid and non-relativistic precession effects? 3. Is there a straight-forward way of identifying which convention is being used for Euler's angles? The convention seems to be switched between quantum and classical books. Do either fields use the x-convention that mathematicians use? 2. Questions 9/30 The notation for the tutorial of problem 6.1 confuses me. Your arrows above the I indicate a tensor but this is a scalar. It is the "moment of inertia about the axis of rotation" Goldstein p. 192. The moment of inertia tensor is the between the dot product. So in part a) when you ask for the rotational inertia tensor, it's confusing as to which I you want. I've tried to compare the terminology with Goldstein, Marion, and Taylor mechanics, as well as various websites. Rotational inertia tensor is not in common use, but I think you mean the moment of inertia tensor. For part c), or in general, I don't understand how include time. My tensor in part a) is supposed to be I(t) at t = 0, but seems identical to what I'd get for the I independent of time. I don't understand how to make it time dependent.
    [Show full text]
  • Inertial Properties Estimation of a Passive On-Orbit Object Using Polhode Analysis
    Inertial Properties Estimation of a Passive On-orbit Object Using Polhode Analysis The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Setterfield, Timothy P., David W. Miller, Alvar Saenz-Otero, Emilio Frazzoli, and John J. Leonard. “Inertial Properties Estimation of a Passive On-Orbit Object Using Polhode Analysis.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics (June 29, 2018): 1–18. As Published https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003394 Publisher American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/117602 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Inertial Properties Estimation of a Passive On-Orbit Object Using Polhode Analysis Timothy P. Setterfielda, David W. Millerb, and Alvar Saenz-Oteroc MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cambridge, MA Emilio Frazzolid ETH Zürich Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Zürich, Switzerland John J. Leonarde MIT Department of Mechanical and Ocean Engineering, Cambridge, MA Many objects in space are passive, with unknown inertial properties. If attempting to dock autonomously to an uncooperative object (one not equipped with working sensors or actuators), a motion model is required to predict the location of the desired docking location into the future. Additionally, for cooperative satellites that failed to deploy hardware, accurate knowledge of the object’s principal axes and inertia ratios may aid in diagnosing the problem. This paper develops algorithms for estimation of the analytical motion model, principal axes, and inertia ratios of a passive on-orbit object.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonhard Euler : Life, Work and Legacy
    Prelims-N52728.fm Page i Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:35 PM LEONHARD EULER: LIFE, WORK AND LEGACY Prelims-N52728.fm Page ii Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:35 PM STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS Volume 5 Cover art: “Leonhard Euler”, by Susan Petry, 2002, 26 by 33cm, cherry wood. After the 1753 portrait by Handmann. Photo by C. Edward Sandifer AMSTERDAM - BOSTON - HEIDELBERG - LONDON - NEW YORK - OXFORD - PARIS SAN DIEGO - SAN FRANCISCO - SINGAPORE - SYDNEY - TOKYO Prelims-N52728.fm Page iii Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:35 PM LEONHARD EULER: LIFE, WORK AND LEGACY Edited by Robert E. Bradley Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Adelphi University 1 South Avenue Garden City, NY 11530, USA C. Edward Sandifer Department of Mathematics Western Connecticut State University 181 White Street Danbury, CT 06810, USA Amsterdam - Boston - Heidelberg - London - New York - Oxford - Paris San Diego - San Francisco - Singapore - Sydney - Tokyo Prelims-N52728.fm Page iv Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:35 PM Elsevier Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK First edition 2007 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Rigid Body Motion
    Chapter 4 Rigid Body Motion In this chapter we develop the dynamics of a rigid body, one in which all interparticle distances are fixed by internal forces of constraint. This is, of course, an idealization which ignores elastic and plastic deformations to which any real body is susceptible, but it is an excellent approximation for many situations, and vastly simplifies the dynamics of the very large number of constituent particles of which any macroscopic body is made. In fact, it reduces the problem to one with six degrees of freedom. While the ensuing motion can still be quite complex, it is tractible. In the process we will be dealing with a configuration space which is a group, and is not a Euclidean space. Degrees of freedom which lie on a group manifold rather than Eu- clidean space arise often in applications in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, in addition to the classical problems we will consider such as gyroscopes and tops. 4.1 Configuration space for a rigid body A macroscopic body is made up of a very large number of atoms. Describing the motion of such a system without some simplifications is clearly impos- sible. Many objects of interest, however, are very well approximated by the assumption that the distances between the atoms in the body are fixed1, ~r ~r = c = constant. (4.1) | α − β| αβ 1In this chapter we will use Greek letters as subscripts to represent the different particles within the body, reserving Latin subscripts to represent the three spatial directions. 85 86 CHAPTER 4.
    [Show full text]