Birdseye View of the Ice-Age Floods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Birdseye View of the Ice-Age Floods AftermathAftermath ofof thethe IceIce--AgeAge Floods:Floods: AA Bird’sBird’s EyeEye ViewView Bruce Bjornstad Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Most Ice-Age floods came from repeated outbursts of glacial Lake Missoula. Downstream, the floods poured out over southeastern Washington, scouring out an interconnected network of channelways (i.e., the Channeled Scabland) over a hundred miles wide. Infrared Satellite Image of Washington State The Channeled Scabland is recognized from outer space where the floods completely removed the loose topsoil, eroding down into the underlying dark basalt bedrock. ChanneledChanneled ScablandScabland Landsat Image Land-Use Map of the Central Columbia Plateau N GC GC T-CC C-P T-CC C-P N Floodwaters descended across the Channeled Scabland via three interconnected routes: 1) the Cheney-Palouse (C-P), and 2) Telford-Crab Cr. (T-CC) scabland tracts, and 3) Grand Coulee (GC). During the largest Ice-Age floods all three routes were simultaneously filled with water from periodic outbursts from glacial Lake Missoula. CloserCloser ViewView ofof SouthSouth--CentralCentral ChanneledChanneled ScablandScabland North Be ezley HIlls . C GC a R P Q mbi FC uincy Colu Fr LC ench Bas man in LC ML CC Hills Sadd le Oth ello M Ba DC o sin unt P ains as Above B co as O in flood level EL SR C R Vertical Exaggeration = 4X Floodwaters naturally followed the path of least resistance. This included areas of lower elevation or more easily eroded sediment and rock. Higher elevations escaped the floods’ wrath. GC = Grand Coulee, LC = Lind Coulee, DC = Drumheller Channels, PC = Potholes Coulee, FC = Frenchman Coulee, LCCC = Lower Crab Creek Coulee, EL = Eagle Lakes, SR = Scooteney Reservoir, RC = Ringold Coulee, ML = Moses Lake, O = Othello Telford-Crab Creek Scabland Tract Cheney-Palouse Scabland Tract Over much of the Channeled Scabland the floods completely stripped away the topsoil, exposing and eroding into the underlying, Lower Grand Coulee dark, basalt bedrock. Scabland Palouse Hills Between scabland flood channels the gently rolling Palouse hills, composed of windlblown, fine sand and silt, were preserved in areas that lay above flood level. ScablandScabland FeaturesFeatures e v Mesa o o r G Mesa Butte Mesa Mesa Characteristic of the Channeled Scabland are potholes (arrows), also referred to as kolks, created by violent vortices during flooding. The swirling action created hydraulic lift, which was able to pluck out and transport huge blocks of fractured basalt. Other common scabland features include mesas, buttes, spill-over channels, and grooves. ChannelsChannels DrumhellerDrumheller Southeast Longitudinal ScablandScabland FeaturesFeatures atat Grooves Mesas, Buttes, Basins, and Channels Potholes (Kolks) StreamlinedStreamlined PalousePalouse HillsHills Streamlined Palouse Hills Scabland Scabland Streamlined Palouse hills mark areas where the floods failed to completely remove all the topsoil within flood channels. These “islands” of loose Palouse soil were eroded and molded into their present shape by the deep, rapidly moving Ice-Age floodwaters. Northeast Cheney-Palouse Scabland Tract Palouse R. e cours de rmer vi a Fo e R. Di Palouse shtucn alous Wa of P Falls ulee e Co ous Snake al R. P r Hwy. 261 me For AlteredAltered Unscoured Streamlined Palouse Soil d LandLand-- Floo (above flood red Palouse scou level) ks in Hills crac lt scapescape basa HU Ran HU Ranch ch Coulee Cataract Vertical Exaggeration = 4X Prior to Ice-Age flooding the Palouse Divide was higher and covered with a thick layer of Palouse soil. Also during this time the Palouse R. ran westward down Washtucna Coulee. With Ice-Age flooding, floodwaters smashed into the Palouse Divide. Because Washtucna Coulee could not handle all the water coming down the Cheney-Palouse tract, floodwaters had nowhere else to go but up and over the Palouse Divide. The floods quickly eroded down into the underlying bedrock where they encountered a number of pre-existing deep cracks (red lines). The floods preferentially eroded the weaker basalt along these cracks. Today the Palouse River and HU Ranch Coulee are entrenched along these subparallel cracks. North Diversion of the Palouse R. WC Cheney- For P mer alous of cou e N Palo rse Flood-scoured use Scabl R. WC and cracks in basalt Tract R P P a l o u s PD e Former course WC R . of Palouse R. DC SR PR C Pasco South P R C WA OR The area shown in the photos at left is represented by the rectangle above. Prior to flooding, the Palouse R. flowed southwestward down Washtucna Coulee. The Palouse R. took an abrupt right turn southward after floodwaters eventually cut a lower channel across the Palouse Divide, creating a shortcut to the Snake R. PR = Palouse R., PRC = Palouse River Canyon, SR = Snake R., WC = Washtucna Coulee, DC = Devils Canyon, PD = Palouse Divide Washtucna Coulee Above Devil’sDevil’s flood level DC CanyonCanyon Columbia Wa shtu Plateau Trail cna C oulee Kahlotus DC Entrance to RR Tunnel along Columbia Plateau Trail L. Monumental Dam Snake R. Vertical Exaggeration = 4X As with the Palouse R. Canyon (PRC) to the east, floodwaters moving down Washtucna Coulee (WC) overtopped another divide between WC and the Snake R, carving a new channel, called Devil’s Canyon (DC). The straightness of DC suggests it too developed in weaker rock along a fracture line in the basalt. Unlike the PRC, DC is dry, since the flow of water in WC and DC was cut off after the last Ice-Age floods. GiantGiant CurrentCurrent RipplesRipples H.P. Schwert photo two-lane road Channeled Scabland Snake River The huge scale of giant current ripples, up to several meters high and tens of meters apart, attests to the magnitude of the Ice-Age floods. North West Bar Giant Current ar B nt ce es Cr Ripples at h nc Be . West Bar a R ck bi bco lum Ba Co Vertical Exaggeration = 4X North South SteamboatSteamboat RockRock Northeast Above flood level r e p p GCR’s U d n ra G Banks e Lake le u o C Several sets of giant current ripples (GCR’s) are perched atop Steamboat Rock, in the upper Grand Coulee. These ripples lie 750 ft above Banks Lake, a direct indication of the floods depth at this location. Like the prow of a giant ship, the steep vertical face of Steamboat Rock points in the direction of the floods, a most hydro-dynamically stable form for this monolith. CataractCataract CanyonsCanyons Northeast North Visitor’s Center Dry Falls Frenchman Coulee Northeast Northeast Vertical Exaggeration = 4X Palouse Falls Potholes Coulee Cataract canyons are another flood feature characteristic of Ice-Age flooding. Shown here are four examples of cataract canyons within the Channeled Scabland. Similar features have been observed on Mars, leading scientists to believe huge floods have occurred on Mars as well. PotholesPotholes Coulee/QuincyCoulee/Quincy LakesLakes Northeast Q uin Above flood cy La level kes P B ot ab ho co le ck s C ou lee C olu mb B ia en Riv c er h Vertical Exaggeration = 4X Potholes Coulee is a pair of cataract canyons formed by floodwaters moving west out of the Quincy Basin. Floodwaters also moved down the Columbia River valley from the north, but probably at a lower elevation. CataractCataract ComplexComplex atat PotholesPotholes CouleeCoulee Above Flood Level Cataract P Plunge pool Flood bar P P P P P During flooding cataracts were like giant waterfalls; the floods eroded down to more-resistant layers of basalt. The force of falling water created huge plunge pools that undercut cataracts at their base. This allowed the vertical walls of cataracts to maintain themselves as they migrated upstream. Huge bars of gravel and sand, hundreds of feet deep and up to a mile long, formed downstream of the cataract complex. Northwest Above flood level Cataract cliffs Columbia R. Coulee s Pothole Lakes Quincy Quincy Lakes is in the foreground with Potholes Coulee and Colum and several hundred feet below. In stair cataract cliffs, first into Potholes Coulee, and then into the C -step fashion, floodwaters tumbledbia River over beyond olumbia River. BottleneckBottleneck atat WallulaWallula GapGap Wallula Gap All floodwaters were forced to pass through a single, narrow constriction at Wallula Gap. Elevation Map of Southeastern Washington N ChanneledChanneled WA ID ScablandScabland Lake Lewis Pasco WA Lake OR Condon Wallula Gap During larger floods the volume of water entering the Pasco Basin was greater than could pass through the narrow opening at Wallula Gap, so the water backed up to an elevation of 1200 ft, forming temporary Lake Lewis. Downstream, Lake Condon rose to a 1000-ft elevation behind another hydraulic constriction in the Columbia. R. Gorge. Lakes Lewis and Condon only lasted a few days, or as much time required for all the water to drain out to the Pacific Ocean. WallulaWallula GapGap East Above flood level 1200 ft 300 ft Two Sisters South Columbia R. During the largest floods, water levels in Wallula Gap were up to 900 ft higher than today. Below the high water mark (1200 ft) slopes were stripped clean of soil and scabland-like features, such as mesas, buttes, spill-over channels, and pinnacles (e.g., Two Sisters) are the predominant landforms. Chaotic Network of Spill-Over Channels at Wallula Gap Two Sisters Above flood level Water levels rose to ~1200 ft during the largest floods, the height to where we see flood-scoured spill-over channels. Above 1200 ft lie only smooth, soil-covered slopes, unaffected by the raging torrent below. All floodwaters were forced to pass through this single opening, which at its narrowest, was <3 mi. wide. Kennewick Northwest C olum bi a R ive r Yellepit Pond Northwest end of Wallula Gap as it appears today.
Recommended publications
  • Gills Coulee Creek, 2006 [PDF]
    Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Watershed Management Sediment TMDL for Gills Coulee Creek INTRODUCTION Gills Coulee Creek is a tributary stream to the La Crosse River, located in La Crosse County in west central Wisconsin. (Figure A-1) The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) placed the entire length of Gills Coulee Creek on the state’s 303(d) impaired waters list as low priority due to degraded habitat caused by excessive sedimentation. The Clean Water Act and US EPA regulations require that each state develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for waters on the Section 303(d) list. The purpose of this TMDL is to identify load allocations and management actions that will help restore the biological integrity of the stream. Waterbody TMDL Impaired Existing Codified Pollutant Impairment Priority WBIC Name ID Stream Miles Use Use Gills Coulee 0-1 Cold II Degraded 1652300 168 WWFF Sediment High Creek 1-5 Cold III Habitat Table 1. Gills Coulee use designations, pollutants, and impairments PROBLEM STATEMENT Due to excessive sedimentation, Gills Coulee Creek is currently not meeting applicable narrative water quality criterion as defined in NR 102.04 (1); Wisconsin Administrative Code: “To preserve and enhance the quality of waters, standards are established to govern water management decisions. Practices attributable to municipal, industrial, commercial, domestic, agricultural, land development, or other activities shall be controlled so that all waters including mixing zone and effluent channels meet the following conditions at all times and under all flow conditions: (a) Substances that will cause objectionable deposits on the shore or in the bed of a body of water, shall not be present in such amounts as to interfere with public rights in waters of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Northrup Canyon
    Northrup Canyon Why? Fine basalt, eagles in season Season: March to November; eagles, December through February Ease: Moderate. It’s about 1 ¾ miles to an old homestead, 3 ½ miles to Northrup Lake. Northrup Canyon is just across the road from Steamboat Rock, and the two together make for a great early or late season weekend. Northrup, however, is much less visited, so offers the solitude that Steamboat cannot. In season, it’s also a good spot for eagle viewing, for the head of the canyon is prime winter habitat for those birds. The trail starts as an old road, staying that way for almost 2 miles as it follows the creek up to an old homestead site. At that point the trail becomes more trail-like as it heads to the left around the old chicken house and continues the last 1 ½ miles to Northrup Lake. At its start, the trail passes what I’d term modern middens – piles of rusted out cans and other metal objects left from the time when Grand Coulee Dam was built. Shortly thereafter is one of my two favorite spots in the hike – a mile or more spent walking alongside basalt cliffs decorated, in places, with orange and yellow lichen. If you’re like me, about the time you quit gawking at them you realize that some of the columns in the basalt don’t look very upright and that, even worse, some have already fallen down and, even more worse, some have not quite finished falling and are just above the part of the trail you’re about to walk.
    [Show full text]
  • Hay Creek WSC Assessment.Pdf
    Gilliam County Hay Creek/Scott Canyon Watershed Assessment • i Hay Creek / Scott Canyon Watershed Assessment Prepared by the Gilliam County Natural Resources Department for the Hay Creek/Scott Canyon Working Group Principal Author: Sue Greer, Contract Watershed Assessment Staff with assistance from: Susie Anderson, Watershed Coordinator, Gilliam-East John Day Watershed Council George Meyers, SWCD Watershed Technical Specialist June, 2003 Gilliam County Hay Creek/Scott Canyon Watershed Assessment • ii Hay Creek & Scott Canyon Watershed Gilliam County, Oregon Scott Canyon Highway 19 N Highway 206 Hay Creek Watershed Scott Canyon Watershed Stream Flow County Roads State Highways Condon Gilliam County Hay Creek/Scott Canyon Watershed Assessment • iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION Goals and Objectives of Hay Creek / Scott Canyon Working Group. 1 Agencies & Jurisdictions. 2 Legislation and Management Plans . 4 CHAPTER 2 – WATERSHED OVERVIEW Watershed Description. 5 Ecoregions . 6 Land Ownership . 7 Land Use . 7 Noxious & Invasive Weeds . 8 Fish & Wildlife . 9 Population . 9 Climate & Precipitation . 9 Vegetation Zones . 11 Soils . 12 CHAPTER 3 – HISTORICAL CONDITIONS Historical Timeline. 16 Introduction . 17 Geology. 17 Climate . 18 Vegetation. 18 Native American Use. 19 Presence of Fish & Wildlife. 20 Natural Disturbance Patterns . 20 Settlement . 21 Livestock & Farming . 22 Roads & Rails. 23 City Water Supply. 23 CHAPTER 4 – CHANNEL HABITAT TYPES & CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY Introduction . 25 Methods . 25 Potential of Restoration basis CHTs. 26 CHT Description & Analysis . 27 Fish Barriers. 29 CHAPTER 5 – HYDROLOGY & WATER USE Introduction . 31 History . 31 Peak Stream Flows . 32 Water Rights . 32 Ground Water. 33 Road Density . 34 Gilliam County Hay Creek/Scott Canyon Watershed Assessment • iv CHAPTER 6 – SEDIMENT SOURCES Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
    RECONNAISSANCE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE LATE CENOZOIC SEDIMENTS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN, WASHINGTON by James G. Rigby and Kurt Othberg with contributions from Newell Campbell Larry Hanson Eugene Kiver Dale Stradling Gary Webster Open File Report 79-3 September 1979 State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington CONTENTS Introduction Objectives Study Area Regional Setting 1 Mapping Procedure 4 Sample Collection 8 Description of Map Units 8 Pre-Miocene Rocks 8 Columbia River Basalt, Yakima Basalt Subgroup 9 Ellensburg Formation 9 Gravels of the Ancestral Columbia River 13 Ringold Formation 15 Thorp Gravel 17 Gravel of Terrace Remnants 19 Tieton Andesite 23 Palouse Formation and Other Loess Deposits 23 Glacial Deposits 25 Catastrophic Flood Deposits 28 Background and previous work 30 Description and interpretation of flood deposits 35 Distinctive geomorphic features 38 Terraces and other features of undetermined origin 40 Post-Pleistocene Deposits 43 Landslide Deposits 44 Alluvium 45 Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Older Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Colluvium 46 Sand Dunes 46 Mirna Mounds and Other Periglacial(?) Patterned Ground 47 Structural Geology 48 Southwest Quadrant 48 Toppenish Ridge 49 Ah tanum Ridge 52 Horse Heaven Hills 52 East Selah Fault 53 Northern Saddle Mountains and Smyrna Bench 54 Selah Butte Area 57 Miscellaneous Areas 58 Northwest Quadrant 58 Kittitas Valley 58 Beebe Terrace Disturbance 59 Winesap Lineament 60 Northeast Quadrant 60 Southeast Quadrant 61 Recommendations 62 Stratigraphy 62 Structure 63 Summary 64 References Cited 66 Appendix A - Tephrochronology and identification of collected datable materials 82 Appendix B - Description of field mapping units 88 Northeast Quadrant 89 Northwest Quadrant 90 Southwest Quadrant 91 Southeast Quadrant 92 ii ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Basalts and Glacier Floods—Roadside Geology
    u 0 by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher - Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor FLOOD BASALTS AND GLACIER FLOODS: Roadside Geology of Parts of Walla Walla, Franklin, and Columbia Counties, Washington by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jennifer M. Belcher-Commissio11er of Public Lands Kaleeo Cottingham-Supervisor DMSION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Raymond Lasmanis-State Geologist J. Eric Schuster-Assistant State Geologist William S. Lingley, Jr.-Assistant State Geologist This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 3.24 Tax (WA residents only) ~ Total $ 3.50 Mail orders must be prepaid: please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Front Cover: Palouse Falls (56 m high) in the canyon of the Palouse River. Printed oo recycled paper Printed io the United States of America Contents 1 General geology of southeastern Washington 1 Magnetic polarity 2 Geologic time 2 Columbia River Basalt Group 2 Tectonic features 5 Quaternary sedimentation 6 Road log 7 Further reading 7 Acknowledgments 8 Part 1 - Walla Walla to Palouse Falls (69.0 miles) 21 Part 2 - Palouse Falls to Lower Monumental Dam (27.0 miles) 26 Part 3 - Lower Monumental Dam to Ice Harbor Dam (38.7 miles) 33 Part 4 - Ice Harbor Dam to Wallula Gap (26.7 mi les) 38 Part 5 - Wallula Gap to Walla Walla (42.0 miles) 44 References cited ILLUSTRATIONS I Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Columbia Basin Mollusk Species of Special Concern
    Deixis l-4 consultants INTERIOR COLUMl3lA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN cryptomasfix magnidenfata (Pilsbly, 1940), x7.5 FINAL REPORT Contract #43-OEOO-4-9112 Prepared for: INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT 112 East Poplar Street Walla Walla, WA 99362 TERRENCE J. FREST EDWARD J. JOHANNES January 15, 1995 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 ‘(206) 527-6764 INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN Terrence J. Frest & Edward J. Johannes Deixis Consultants 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 (206) 527-6764 January 15,1995 i Each shell, each crawling insect holds a rank important in the plan of Him who framed This scale of beings; holds a rank, which lost Would break the chain and leave behind a gap Which Nature’s self wcuid rue. -Stiiiingfieet, quoted in Tryon (1882) The fast word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant: “what good is it?” If the land mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not. if the biota in the course of eons has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first rule of intelligent tinkering. -Aido Leopold Put the information you have uncovered to beneficial use. -Anonymous: fortune cookie from China Garden restaurant, Seattle, WA in this “business first” society that we have developed (and that we maintain), the promulgators and pragmatic apologists who favor a “single crop” approach, to enable a continuous “harvest” from the natural system that we have decimated in the name of profits, jobs, etc., are fairfy easy to find.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington's Channeled Scabland
    t\D l'llrl,. \·· ~. r~rn1 ,uR\fEY Ut,l\n . .. ,Y:ltate" tit1Washington ALBEIT D. ROSEWNI, Governor Department of Conservation EARL COE, Dlnctor DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 45 WASHINGTON'S CHANNELED SCABLAND By J HARLEN BRETZ 9TAT• PIUHTIHO PLANT ~ OLYMPIA, WASH., 1"511 State of Washington ALBERT D. ROSELLINI, Governor Department of Conservation EARL COE, Director DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 45 WASHINGTON'S CHANNELED SCABLAND By .T HARLEN BRETZ l•or sate by Department or Conservation, Olympia, Washington. Price, 50 cents. FOREWORD Most travelers who have driven through eastern Washington have seen a geologic and scenic feature that is unique-nothing like it is to be found anywhere else in the world. This is the Channeled Scab­ land, a gigantic series of deeply cut channels in the erosion-resistant Columbia River basalt, the rock that covers most of the east-central and southeastern part of the state. Grand Coulee, with its spectac­ ular Dry Falls, is one of the most widely known features of this ex­ tensive set of dry channels. Many thousands of travelers must have wondered how this Chan­ neled Scabland came into being, and many geologists also have speculated as to its origin. Several geologists have published papers outlining their theories of the scabland's origin, but the geologist who has made the most thorough study of the problem and has ex­ amined the whole area and all the evidence having a bearing on the problem is Dr. J Harlen Bretz. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Exposure Winners Revealed!
    Winter weekend getaway in Leavenworth A Publication of Washington Trails Association | wta.org Northwest Exposure Winners Revealed! 10 Trails for This Winter State Parks Centennial 2013 Volunteer Vacations Jan+Feb 2013 Jan+Feb 2013 20 16 32 NW Weekend: Leavenworth » Eli Boschetto NW Explorer An alpine holiday is waiting for you on the east side of the Cascades. Snowshoe, ski, take in the annual Ice Fest Northwest Exposure celebration or just relax away from home. » p.20 Congratulations to the winners of WTA's 2012 Northwest Exposure photo contest. Images from across the state— Tales From the Trail » Craig Romano and a calendar for planning hikes too! » center Guidebook author Craig Romano shares insights and lessons learned from years of hiking experience. » p.24 Nordic Washington » Holly Weiler Hit the tracks this winter on Nordic skis. Destinations Epic Trails » Wonderland » Tami Asars across Washington will help you find your ideal escape at Info and tips to help you plan your own hiking adventure some of the best resorts and Sno-Parks. » p.16 on the classic round-the-mountain trail. » p.32 WTA at Work 2013 marks the 100th anniversary of Trail Work » Sarah Rich Washington's state park system. With Bridge-building in the Methow » p.10 more than 700 miles of hiking trails, Engineering Trails » Janice Van Cleve make a plan to visit one this year. » p.8 Turnpikes—what they are and how they're constructed » p.12 Advocacy » Jonathan Guzzo Budget concerns for 2013 » p.14 Youth on Trails » Krista Dooley Snowshoeing with kids » p.15 Trail Mix Gear Closet » Winter camping essentials » p.22 Nature Nook » Tami Asars Birds, beasts and blooms in the NW » p.25 Cape Disappointment, by Jeremy Horton 2 Washington Trails | Jan+Feb 2013 | wta.org Guest Contributors TAMI ASARS is a writer, photographer and career hiker.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Ordinance Leaf & Grass Blowing Into Storm Drains Lafayette
    Good & Bad • Stormwater GOOD: Only Rain in the Drain! The water drains to Ordinance the river. Leaf & Grass Blowing into Storm Drains Lafayette BAD: Grass and leaves blown into a storm drain interfere with drainage. Parish Dirt is also being allowed in our waterways. Potential Illicit Discharge Sources: Environmental Quality • Sanitary sewer wastewater. Regulatory Compliance 1515 E. University Ave. • Effluent from septic tanks. Lafayette, LA 70501 Phone: 337-291-8529 • Laundry wastewater. Fax: 337-291-5620 • Improper disposal of auto and household toxics. www.lafayettela.gov/stormwater • Industrial byproduct discharge. Illicit Discharge (including leaf blowing) Stormwater Ordinance Stormwater Runoff Illicit Discharge Please be advised that the Environmental Grass clippings and leaves blown or swept is defined by the EPA as: Quality Division of Lafayette Consolidated into storm drains or into the street harms Any discharge into a municipal separate Government has recently adopted an waterways and our river. Storm drains flow storm sewer that is not composed entirely of into coulees and into the Vermilion River. rainwater and is not authorized by permit. Illicit Discharge (including leaf blowing) Grass clippings in the river rob valuable Stormwater Ordinance oxygen from our Vermilion River. Chapter 34. ENVIRONMENT When leaf and grass clippings enter the Signs of Potential Illicit Discharge Article 5. STORMWATER storm drain, flooding can occur. Only rain must enter the storm drain. When anything • Heavy flow during dry weather. Division 4 Sec. 34-452 but rain goes down the storm drain, it can • Strong odor. It is now in effect and being enforced. You become a drainage problem. may access this ordinance online at Grass clippings left on the ground improve the • Colorful or discolored liquid.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 26 Trails in Grant County 2020
    and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 In Grant County, Washington TourGrantCounty.com TOP TRAILS Grant County has some of the most scenic and pristine vistas, hiking trails and outdoor 26 recreational opportunities in Washington State. and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units Grant County is known for its varied landscapes on a high desert plateau with coulees, lakes, in Grant County Washington reservoirs, sand dunes, canals, rivers, creeks, and other waterways. These diverse ecosystems Grant County Tourism Commission For Additional copies please contact: support a remarkable variety of fish and PO Box 37 Jerry T. Gingrich wildlife species that contribute to the economic, Ephrata, Washington 98837 Grant County Tourism Commission recreational and cultural life of the County. www.tourgrantcounty.com Grant County Courthouse PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98837 No part of this book may be reproduced in (509) 754-2011, Ext. 2931 any form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, without permission in For more information on writing from the Grant County Tourism Grant County accommodations Commission. www.tourgrantcounty.com © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Second printing, 10m Trails copy and photographs Book, map and cover design by: provided by: Denise Adam Graphic Design Cameron Smith, Lisa Laughlin, J. Kemble, Veradale, WA 99037 Shawn Cardwell, Mark Amara, (509) 891-0873 Emry Dinman, Harley Price, [email protected] Sebastian Moraga and Madison White Printed by: Rewriting and editing by: Mark Amara Pressworks 2717 N. Perry Street Watchable Wildlife copy and Spokane, Washington 99207 photographs provided by: (509) 462-7627 Washington Department of [email protected] Fish and Wildlife Photograph by Lisa Laughlin CONTENTS CONTENTS Grant County Trails and Hiking Grant County Watchable Wildlife Viewing Upper Grand Coulee Area 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Reply to Comments 1 We Would Like to Thank the Three Anonymous
    1 Reply to comments 2 We would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers and Marco Jorge for their comments. We are 3 particularly pleased that three of the four reviews thought it was an important paper that should be 4 published, and their constructive criticisms have really helped to improve it. We are disappointed that 5 reviewer #2 thinks that we cannot extract information and meaning from the geomorphological 6 signature of tunnel valleys. But we strongly disagree with this view and our argument is laid out below. 7 That they ignore a large body of literature spanning many disciplines that has shown the importance of 8 geomorphology for investigating landforms genesis we find rather perplexing. The reviewer comments 9 are in black and our replies and revisions in blue. 10 - Stephen Livingstone and Chris Clark 11 12 Short Comment by Marco Jorge 13 INTRODUCTION 14 L80-84 (statement of objective): Consider rephrasing sentence (perhaps revise whole paragraph). 15 Suggest to remove “To rectify this” (to correct this error), because it is about the lack of data rather 16 than error. Scale -> geographic scale; Pattern -> spatial arrangement; Rectify “. .mapping of the size, 17 shape, pattern and [spatial] distribution to better understand spatial properties. .” L84: “constitution” 18 -> Composition? 19 We have replaced “to rectify this” with “Based on previous studies and the availability of DEMs, we 20 are now able to undertake…” (as suggested by reviewer #3), changed “pattern” to “spatial 21 arrangement” and “constitutes” to “is”. 22 Reword the rationale for study area selection; e.g., that the landforms can be mapped from a DEM is 23 unrelated to the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • RCFB April 2021 Page 1 Agenda TUESDAY, April 27 OPENING and MANAGEMENT REPORTS 9:00 A.M
    REVISED 4/8/21 Proposed Agenda Recreation and Conservation Funding Board April 27, 2021 Online Meeting ATTENTION: Protecting the public, our partners, and our staff are of the utmost importance. Due to health concerns with the novel coronavirus this meeting will be held online. The public is encouraged to participate online and will be given opportunities to comment, as noted below. If you wish to participate online, please click the link below to register and follow the instructions in advance of the meeting. Technical support for the meeting will be provided by RCO’s board liaison who can be reached at [email protected]. Registration Link: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_JqkQAGCrRSOwbHLmg3a6oA Phone Option: (669)900-6833 - Webinar ID: 967 5491 2108 Location: RCO will also have a public meeting location for members of the public to listen via phone as required by the Open Public Meeting Act, unless this requirement is waived by gubernatorial executive order. In order to enter the building, the public must not exhibit symptoms of the COVID-19 and will be required to comply with current state law around personal protective equipment. RCO staff will meet the public in front of the main entrance to the natural resources building and escort them in. *Additionally, RCO will record this meeting and would be happy to assist you after the meeting to gain access to the information. Order of Presentation: In general, each agenda item will include a short staff presentation and followed by board discussion. The board only makes decisions following the public comment portion of the agenda decision item.
    [Show full text]