Infection Prevention and Control Guideline for Flexible

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Infection Prevention and Control Guideline for Flexible INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL GUIDELINE for Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Flexible Bronchoscopy To promote and protect the health of Canadians through leadership, partnership, innovation and action in public health. — Public Health Agency of Canada Infection Prevention and Control Guideline for Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Flexible Bronchoscopy is available on Internet at the following address: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre : Lignes directrices pour la prévention et le contrôle des infections transmises par les appareils souples d'endoscopie digestive et de bronchoscopie. This publication can be made available in alternative formats upon request. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010 Cat.: HP40-55/2010E-PDF ISBN: 978-1-100-17223-1 Table of Contents Introductory Statement.................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 8 PART I. PURPOSE .................................................................................................................... 11 PART II. TRANSMISSION OF INFECTION BY FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPY ....................... 12 1. Background........................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Spaulding Classification for Medical Devices.............................................................. 12 2. Overview............................................................................................................................... 12 3. Microbial Sources ................................................................................................................. 13 3.1. Endogenous................................................................................................................... 13 3.2. Exogenous..................................................................................................................... 14 4. Specific Microorganisms Transmitted or Shown to Contaminate Flexible Endoscopes...... 16 5. Occupational Infection Related to Endoscopy...................................................................... 19 6. Classic and Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease .................................................................... 20 7. Factors That Contribute to Survival of Microorganisms in Reprocessed Flexible Endoscopes ............................................................................................................................................... 21 7.1. Wet Storage................................................................................................................... 21 7.2. Biofilm Formation and Organic Debris ........................................................................ 22 7.3. Equipment Design Flaws.............................................................................................. 22 8. Errors in Reprocessing.......................................................................................................... 22 PART III. FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPES: STRUCTURE and FUNCTION ................................ 24 PART IV. ISSUES RELATED TO REPROCESSING FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPES............... 29 1. Reprocessing of Flexible Endoscopes and Accessories........................................................ 29 1.1. Pre-Cleaning ................................................................................................................. 35 1.2. Leak Test....................................................................................................................... 35 1.3. Manual Cleaning and Rinsing....................................................................................... 36 1.4. Disinfection and Sterilization ....................................................................................... 37 1.4.1. Selection of a High Level Disinfectant Product ....................................................... 38 1.4.2. Liquid Chemical Agents ........................................................................................... 38 1.4.3. Low Temperature Gas and Gas Plasma Sterilization ............................................... 39 1.4.4. Automated Endoscope Reprocessors (AERs)........................................................... 44 1.4.5. Reprocessing Endoscopic Accessories ..................................................................... 45 1.4.6. Valves and Water Bottles.......................................................................................... 47 2. Sheathed Endoscopes............................................................................................................ 47 3. Storage of Flexible Endoscopes............................................................................................ 47 4. Quality Management............................................................................................................. 48 4.1. Staff Training................................................................................................................ 49 4.2. Preventative Maintenance and Repair .......................................................................... 50 4.3. Monitoring Microbial Bioburden in Flexible Endoscope Channels............................. 50 5. Healthcare Worker Protection During Endoscopy/Bronchoscopy and During Equipment Reprocessing......................................................................................................................... 51 5.1. Hazards During Endoscopy .......................................................................................... 51 5.2. Hazards During Reprocessing....................................................................................... 51 5.3. Infection Prevention and Control Practices and Precautions........................................ 52 5.4. Occupational Health and Safety Considerations........................................................... 52 5.5. Environmental Controls................................................................................................ 53 6. Endoscopy Unit Design ........................................................................................................ 53 3 7. Surveillance and Outbreak Investigation and Management ................................................. 54 8. Investigation of a Reprocessing Problem ............................................................................. 54 PART V. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPROCESSING FLEXIBLE ENDOSCOPES...... 57 1. Administrative Recommendations........................................................................................ 57 1.1. Policies and Procedures................................................................................................ 57 2. Recommendations for Endoscopy and Endoscopy Decontamination Equipment................ 58 3. Recommendations for Reprocessing Endoscopes and Accessories...................................... 60 3.1. Preparing the Endoscope for Cleaning ......................................................................... 60 3.2. Leak Testing.................................................................................................................. 61 3.3. Manual Mechanical Cleaning in the Reprocessing Area.............................................. 61 3.4. Sterilization and High Level Disinfection .................................................................... 62 3.5. Recommendations for Accessories............................................................................... 64 3.6. Storage and Transport................................................................................................... 65 4. Recommendations for Endoscopy Unit Design.................................................................... 65 5. Recommendations for Quality Management ........................................................................ 66 5.1. Personnel Education and Training................................................................................ 66 5.2. Worker Health and Safety............................................................................................. 67 5.3. Reprocessing Program.................................................................................................. 68 6. Recommendations for Outbreak Investigation and Management......................................... 69 7. Recommendations for Classic and Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD and vCJD))... 70 APPENDIX A – PHAC IP&C Guideline Development Process ................................................. 72 APPENDIX B – Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................. 74 APPENDIX C – Spaulding Classification System ....................................................................... 77 APPENDIX D – Bioburden Test Method..................................................................................... 78 APPENDIX E – Sample Audit Checklist for Reprocessing of Medical Equipment/Devices...... 81 APPENDIX F – Sample Audit Tool for Reprocessing of Endoscopy Equipment/Devices......... 84 APPENDIX G – Verification of Training Stages for Endoscope Reprocessing .......................... 87 APPENDIX H – Guideline for Outbreak Investigation Related to Endoscopic Procedures........ 90 APPENDIX I – PHAC Guideline Rating
Recommended publications
  • Multisociety Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible GI Endoscopes
    Ò GIE SPECIAL ARTICLE Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes: 2016 update Prepared by: REPROCESSING GUIDELINE TASK FORCE Bret T. Petersen, MD, FASGE, Chair, Jonathan Cohen, MD, FASGE, Ralph David Hambrick, III, RN, Navtej Buttar, MD, David A. Greenwald, MD, FASGE, Jonathan M. Buscaglia, MD, FASGE, James Collins, RN, Glenn Eisen, MD, MPH, FASGE This article was reviewed and approved by the Governing Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). The beneficial role of GI endoscopy for the prevention, for reprocessing GI endoscopes.1,2 Since then, high-level diagnosis, and treatment of many digestive diseases and disinfectants, automated reprocessing machines, low- cancer is well established. Like many sophisticated medical temperature sterilization methods, endoscopes, and devices, the endoscope is a complex, reusable instrument endoscopic accessories have evolved.3-7 that requires meticulous cleaning and reprocessing in Additional outbreaks of infections related to suboptimal strict accordance with manufacturer and professional or- infection prevention practices during endoscopy,8,9 lapses ganization guidance before being used on subsequent in endoscope reprocessing, contamination or malfunction patients. To date, published episodes of pathogen transmis- of automated reprocessing machines, and transmission sion related to GI endoscopy using standard end-viewing during ERCP have been well publicized. A cluster of cases instruments have been associated with failure to follow es- of hepatitis C
    [Show full text]
  • Training Simulators for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current and Future Perspectives
    cancers Review Training Simulators for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current and Future Perspectives Martina Finocchiaro 1,2,3,*, Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia 4 , Albert Hernansanz 2 , Nicola Marino 5, Denise Amram 6, Alicia Casals 2 , Arianna Menciassi 1,3, Wojciech Marlicz 7,8, Gastone Ciuti 1,3,† and Anastasios Koulaouzidis 9,† 1 The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56025 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (G.C.) 2 Center of Research in Biomedical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] (A.H.); [email protected] (A.C.) 3 Department of Excellence in Robotics & AI, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy 4 Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; [email protected] 5 Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy; [email protected] 6 LIDER-Lab, DIRPOLIS Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56025 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 7 Department of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected] 8 The Centre for Digestive Diseases Endoklinika, 70-535 Szczecin, Poland 9 Department of Social Medicine & Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected] Citation: Finocchiaro, M.; * Correspondence: martina.fi[email protected] Cortegoso Valdivia, P.; † These senior authors equally contributed to this work. Hernansanz, A.; Marino, N.; Amram, D.; Casals, A.; Menciassi, A.; Simple Summary: Over the last decades, visual endoscopy has become a gold standard for the detec- Marlicz, W.; Ciuti, G.; Koulaouzidis, tion and treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the Pediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit: a Clinical Report by the Endoscopy and Procedures Committee
    SOCIETY PAPER Developing the Pediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit: A Clinical Report by the Endoscopy and Procedures Committee ÃHarpreet Pall, yDiana Lerner, zJulie Khlevner, §Carrie Reynolds, jjJacob Kurowski, ôDavid Troendle, #Elizabeth Utterson, ÃÃPamela M. Evans, yyzzHerbert Brill, §§Michael Wilsey, and jjjjôôDouglas S. Fishman ABSTRACT There is significant variability in the design and management of pediatric ndoscopy plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of endoscopy units. Although there is information on adult endoscopy units, E digestive disorders in childhood. Pediatric endoscopy has little guidance is available to the pediatric endoscopy practitioner. The grown exponentially since its early beginnings as fiber endoscopy purpose of this clinical report, prepared by the NASPGHAN Endoscopy and in the early 1970s (1). The location where these procedures are Procedures Committee, is to review the important considerations for setting performed has shifted over time. Many endoscopy programs started up an endoscopy unit for children. A systematic review of the literature was in procedure or treatment rooms, whereas some of the nascent undertaken in the preparation of this report regarding the design, manage- endoscopy units began in the operating room (OR). Gradually more ment, needed equipment, motility setup, billing and coding, and pediatric institutions and facilities have begun using more specialized ambu- specific topics. latory endoscopy units. The purpose of this NASPGHAN Clinical Report prepared Key Words: endoscopy unit, endoscopy, pediatrics by the NASPGHAN Endoscopy and Procedures Committee is to review the considerations in developing a pediatric gastrointestinal (JPGN 2016;63: 295–306) (GI) endoscopy unit. A systematic literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar was performed to identify abstracts and articles related to GI endoscopy and pediatrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoscopy Unit
    Part B – Health Facility Briefing & Design 80 Endoscopy Unit International Health Facility Guidelines Version 4 May 2014 Table of Contents 80 Endoscopy Unit ......................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Planning ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Design ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 4 Components of the Unit .......................................................................................................................... 10 5 Schedule of Accommodation – Endoscopy Unit ................................................................................. 11 6 Functional Relationship Diagram – Endoscopy Unit ........................................................................... 18 7 References and Further Reading ........................................................................................................... 19 International Health Facility Guidelines © TAHPI Part B: Version 4 2014 Page 2 Endoscopy Unit 80 Endoscopy Unit 1 Introduction Description The Endoscopy Unit is a dedicated unit for Endoscopy procedures, a minimally invasive surgical or
    [Show full text]
  • Endoscopy Unit
    HEALTH BUILDING NOTE 52 VOLUME 2 Accommodation for day care Endoscopy unit 1994 STATUS IN WALES APPLIES For queries on the status of this document contact [email protected] or telephone 029 2031 5512 Status Note amended March 2013 Health Building Note 52 Volume 2 Accommodation for day care Endoscopy unit London: HMSO © Crown copyright 1994 First published 1994 Applications for reproduction should be made to HMSO ISBN 0 11 321726 9 HMSO Standing order service Placing a standing order with HMSO BOOKS enables a customer to receive future titles in this series automatically as published. This saves the time, trouble and expense of placing individual orders and avoids the problem of knowing when to do so. For details please write to HMSO BOOKS (PC 13A/1), Publications Centre, PO Box 276, London SW8 5DT quoting reference 05.03.010. The standing order service also enables customers to receive automatically as published all material of their choice, which additionally saves extensive catalogue research. The scope and selectivity of the service has been extended by new techniques, and there are more than 3,500 classifications to choose from. A special leaflet describing the service in detail may be obtained on request. About this publication The Health Building Note series is Health Building Note 52 intended to give advice on the briefing Volume 2 and design implications of Departmental Volume 2 of HBN 52 focuses on a self- policy. contained, dedicated endoscopy unit for adults and children located in an acute These Notes are prepared in general hospital. consultation with representatives of the National Health Service and appropriate Accommodation is provided for: professional bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual-Continuum Design Approach for Intuitive and Low-Cost Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    1 Dual-Continuum Design Approach for Intuitive and Low-Cost Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Nicolo Garbin1, Long Wang1, James H. Chandler2, Keith L. Obstein3,1, Nabil Simaan1, Pietro Valdastri2,1 Abstract—Objective: This paper introduces a methodology ALC - antrum lesser curvature; to design intuitive, low-cost, and portable devices for visual BGC - body greater curvature; inspection of the upper gastrointestinal tract. BLC - body lesser curvature; Methods: The proposed approach mechanically couples a multi-backbone continuum structure, as the user interface, and a DAQ - data acquisition board; parallel bellows actuator, as the endoscopic tip. Analytical model- DCE - dual-continuum endoscope; ing techniques derived from continuum robotics were adopted to DOF - degree of freedom; describe the endoscopic tip motion from user input, accounting EGD - esophagogastroduodenoscopy; for variations in component size and pneumatic compressibility. EM - electromagnetic; The modeling framework was used to improve intuitiveness of user-to-task mapping. This was assessed against a 1:1 target, ER - emergency room; while ease-of-use was validated using landmark identification ET - endoscopic tip; tasks performed in a stomach simulator by one expert and FE - flexible endoscope; ten non-expert users; benchmarked against conventional flexible GEJ - gastroesophageal junction; endoscopy. Pre-clinical validation consisted of comparative trials GI - gastrointestinal; in in-vivo porcine and human cadaver models. Results: Target mapping was achieved with an average error GP - general practitioner; of 5◦ in bending angle. Simulated endoscopies were performed ICU - intensive care unit; by an expert user successfully, within a time comparable to LED - light emitting diode; conventional endoscopy (<1 minute difference). Non-experts MIS - minimally invasive surgery; using the proposed device achieved visualization of the stomach MP - mass production; in a shorter time (9s faster on average) than with a conventional endoscope.
    [Show full text]