Metro East Joint Development Assessment Panel Agenda

Meeting Date and Time: 1 March 2019, 10:00am Meeting Number: MEJDAP/189 Meeting Venue: City of Gosnells Council Chambers 2120 Albany Highway Gosnells

Attendance

DAP Members

Mr Ian Birch (Presiding Member) Ms Kym Petani (Deputy Presiding Member) Mr Peter McNab (Specialist Member) Cr Julie Brown (Local Government Member, City of Gosnells) Cr Ron Mitchell (Local Government Member, City of Gosnells)

Officers in attendance

Mr Luke Gibson (City of Gosnells)

Minute Secretary

Ms Caroline Clark (City of Gosnells) Ms Ferne Milne (City of Gosnells)

Applicants and Submitters

Mr Jarrod Ross (Taylor Burrell Barnett) Mr Brett Chivers (Linc Property)

Members of the Public / Media

Nil

1. Declaration of Opening

The Presiding Member declares the meeting open and acknowledges the past and present traditional owners and custodians of the land on which the meeting is being held.

2. Apologies

Nil

3. Members on Leave of Absence

Nil

Version: 2 Page 1

4. Noting of Minutes

Signed minutes of previous meetings are available on the DAP website.

5. Declarations of Due Consideration

Any member who is not familiar with the substance of any report or other information provided for consideration at the DAP meeting must declare that fact before the meeting considers the matter.

6. Disclosure of Interests

Nil

7. Deputations and Presentations

7.1 Mr Jarrod Ross (Taylor Burrell Barnett) and Mr Brett Chivers (Linc Property) presenting in support of the application at item 8.1. The presentation will request for modifications to conditions.

The City of Gosnells may be provided with the opportunity to respond to questions of the panel, as invited by the Presiding Member.

8. Form 1 – Responsible Authority Reports – DAP Applications

8.1 Property Location: Lot 2, 9500 and 9001 Grove Road and Lot 501 Edward Street, Kenwick Development Description: Transport Depot and Warehouse Applicant: Taylor Burrell Barnett Owner: MKSEA Pty Ltd Responsible Authority: City of Gosnells DAP File No: DAP/19/01560

9. Form 2 – Responsible Authority Reports – Amending or cancelling DAP development approval

Nil

10. Appeals to the State Administrative Tribunal

Current Applications LG Name Property Location Application Description City of 7 (Lot 10) Kelvin Road, Motor Vehicle Sales and Motor Vehicle Gosnells 1910 (Lot 6) and 1914 (Lot Repair 12) Albany Highway, Maddington City of Lot 3 Southern River Road, Stage 1 of a Commercial Precinct Gosnells Southern River including Fast Food Outlet, Convenience Store, Recreation - Private, Restaurant and Shops City of Lot 100 (3301) West Swan Proposed Roadhouse, Swan Road, Caversham Restaurant/Tavern and Tourist Facilities (short stay accommodation)

Version: 2 Page 2

Current Applications LG Name Property Location Application Description City of Lot 7 (24) Valencia Road, Expansion of Valencia Nursing Home Kalamunda Carmel with Additional Beds and Associated Facilities City of Lot 42 (116) Union Road, Demolition of Existing Dwelling and Kalamunda Carmel Ancillary Structures, Construction of (Tourism Development) including Short Term Accommodation Micro-distillery (Gin Brewery), Restaurant, Apiculture and Single Dwelling

11. General Business / Meeting Closure

In accordance with Section 7.3 of the DAP Standing Orders 2017 only the Presiding Member may publicly comment on the operations or determinations of a DAP and other DAP members should not be approached to make comment.

Version: 2 Page 3 Form 1 – Responsible Authority Report (Regulation 12)

Property Location: Lot 2, 9500 and 9001 Grove Road and Lot 501 Edward Street, Kenwick Development Description: Transport Depot and Warehouse DAP Name: Metro East JDAP Applicant: Taylor Burrell Barnett Owner: MKSEA Pty Ltd Value of Development: $4.95 million LG Reference: DA18/00304 Responsible Authority: City of Gosnells Authorising Officer: Luke Gibson, Manager Development Services DAP File No: DAP/19/01560 Report Due Date: 18 February 2019 Application Received Date: 19 December 2018 Application Process Days: 60 days Attachment(s): 1. Development Plans 2. Location Plan 3. Planning Control Area 4. MKSEA Precinct 3A Structure Plan 5. Subdivision Plan 6. Transport Impact Assessment 7. Schedule of Submissions

Officer Recommendation:

That the Metro East JDAP resolves to:

1. Approve DAP Application reference DAP/19/01560 and accompanying plans:

 Site Plan, Drawing No. DA-002(H), dated 23 January 2019;  Elevations, Drawing No. DA-200(B), dated 22 January 2019; and  Office Plan, Drawing No. DA-100(B), dated 23 January 2019;

in accordance with Clause 68 of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and the provisions of the City of Gosnells Town Planning Scheme No. 6, subject to the following conditions:

Conditions

1. Prior to applying for a Building Permit, arrangements being made to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells for the amalgamation of lots 2, 9500 and 9001 Grove Road and lot 501 Edward Street, Kenwick into one Certificate of Title. The amalgamation must be completed prior to occupation of the development.

2. Prior to applying for a Building Permit, a geotechnical report is to be submitted, detailing site conditions with respect to soil in accordance with AS 1547:2012 –

Page 1 on-site domestic wastewater management, groundwater and stormwater disposal, to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells.

3. The applicant shall submit a drainage design, prescribing a functional drainage system, including detailed engineering drawings, and necessary technical information to demonstrate functionality of the design. The design shall be in accordance with the relevant Urban Water Management Plan and is to be endorsed prior to the lodgement of a Building Permit application and thereafter implemented, to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells.

4. Prior to applying for a Building Permit, The applicant shall submit details (in the form of a prescribed Treatment of Sewage application) of an appropriate on site effluent disposal system.

Prior to the occupation of the development, the approved on site effluent disposal system must be installed to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells and maintained thereafter.

5. Prior to the occupation of the development, the proposed hardstand area is to be paved, sealed and drained to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells.

6. Prior to occupation or use of the development, vehicle parking, manoeuvring and circulation areas shall be designed, constructed, sealed, drained, line- marked and kerbed in accordance with:

(i) The approved plan(s); (ii) Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 2890.1:2004, Parking facilities, Part 1: Off-street car parking; (iii) Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 2890.6:2009, Parking facilities, Part 6: Off-street parking for people with disabilities; (iv) Australian Standard AS 1428.1-2009, Design for access and mobility, Part 1: General Requirements for access-New building work (by providing a link to the main entrance of the development by a continuous accessible path of travel) (v) Council’s engineering requirements and design guidelines.

The car parking is to be maintained to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells for the duration of the development.

7. All crossovers are to be located and constructed to the City of Gosnells specifications.

8. Prior to applying for a Building Permit, a Landscape Plan for the development site and the adjoining road verge(s) is to be submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells. The following details are to be included:

(i) Landscape treatments such as mulch areas, paving and bin collection areas. (ii) The location, species, quantity and pot size of proposed trees and shrubs.

Page 2 (iii) Areas to be irrigated. (iv) A 3m minimum clearance between the pipeline and any vegetation with a mature height greater than 0.5 metres must be maintained.

9. Prior to the occupation of the development, the landscaping and irrigation of the development site and the adjoining verges is to be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells.

10. Prior to occupation of the development, an application to construct or install an apparatus for the treatment and disposal of all industrial wastewater is to be submitted and approved by the City of Gosnells. The apparatus is to be installed prior to the occupation of the development and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the City of Gosnells.

11. Any easements necessary to facilitate maintenance access to drainage installations being provided at the owner’s cost.

12. Buildings, structures, roadway, pavement, pipeline, cable, fence, change in ground level, or any other improvement on or under the land, must not be constructed within the gas transmission pipeline easement, without the prior authorisation of APA. This includes both temporary and permanent improvements of the type detailed above. All construction workers on site must be made aware of this requirement.

13. Prior to the commencement of any works within the gas transmission pipeline easement, the proponent must enter a Third Party Works Authorisation within the pipeline licensee/operator (APT Parmelia Pty Ltd). Works within the easement must comply with any conditions attached to a third party works approval.

14. The ability of the pipeline operator to access the easement must be maintained at all times to facilitate prompt maintenance and repairs. This may be through interlocking padlocks so APA has keyed access as any time. APA field officers will undertake any necessary site induction to facilitate unaccompanied access.

15. The current ground level over the existing high pressure gas pipeline easement is not to be reduced and must be maintained to the satisfaction of the pipeline licensee/operator (APT Parmelia Pty Ltd).

16. No civil infrastructure providing for water, sewer, electric, telecommunications and other like services will be accepted within the gas pipeline easement, other than service crossings to the satisfaction of the pipeline licensee/operator (APT Parmelia Pty Ltd).

17. Stormwater runoff from constructed impervious surfaces (i.e. roof and hardstand generated by small rainfall events (i.e. the first 15mm of rainfall) must be retained and/or detained and treated onsite and will not be permitted to enter the waterways untreated.

18. Prior to any fill and/or topsoil being brought onto the site, the applicant shall ensure that all material is certified clean, uncontaminated, and free from rubble, weeds and disease and is geo-technically suitable for the proposed works.

Page 3 19. The light industrial warehouse shall be constructed using weather-proof material with impervious and chemically resistant flooring designed and graded to contain any spills, washdown water and contaminated stormwater.

20. The fuel bowser area shall be bunded and graded to contain any hydrocarbon spills.

21. All wastewater generated from the light manufacturing operations (warehouse/workshop areas), the washdown bay and fuel bowser area shall be disposed of at a licensed waste disposal facility.

22. In the event of a spill, all contaminated fluid shall drain towards an internal collection sump and be disposed of at a licensed waste disposal facility.

23. Storage of toxic or hazardous chemicals shall be within a containment compound on impervious and chemically resistant flooring.

24. All fire sprinkler/suppression system discharge shall be disposed of at a licenced waste disposal facility.

25. The on-site effluent disposal system shall include secondary treatment with nutrient removal capability.

26. The on-site effluent disposal system and its associated wastewater infiltration area shall have a minimum 100 metre horizontal separation from waterways and a minimum 1.2 – 1.5 metre vertical separation (depending on soil types) from the highest known level of groundwater.

27. The development shall be connected to the reticulated sewerage system within three (3) months of it becoming available to the subject lot and the on-site effluent system decommissioned.

Advice Notes

1. The stormwater management system should be designed to prevent mobilisation of sediment, nutrients and contaminants (i.e. hydrocarbon and other hazardous chemicals) from the site to the waterways. Stormwater from the proposed development should be managed in accordance with Department of Water and Environmental Regulation’s Stormwater Management Manual for Western Australia (2004-2007), Decision Process for Stormwater Management in Western Australia (2017) and water sensitive urban design principles. The proposed rainwater tank, sediment traps and bio-retention areas for stormwater management are supported, subject to the system being designed to manage the first 15mm of run off. It is recommended that trees and/or shrubs are incorporated in the bio-retention areas to improve their performance and reed/sedge survival rates. See Vegetation Guidelines for Stormwater Bio-filters in the South-West of Western Australia (Monash University, 2014) for more information.

It should be noted that a maximum stormwater runoff coefficient equivalent to pre-development levels and/or in accordance with an existing Urban Water Management Plan approved for the development area shall be applied to calculate the critical permissible site discharge (PSD) from the development. This PSD shall not be exceeded in all storm events up to the 1 in 20 year

Page 4 Average Recurrence Interval. All excess stormwater shall be detained and/or infiltrated on-site through suitable structural means.

2. The site is classified as a sewage sensitive environment as it is located within the Canning River catchment. In line with the Draft Government Sewerage Policy, on-site effluent systems in such locations are required to have secondary treatment systems with nutrient removal capability (i.e. ATUs that can discharge treated sewerage with phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations of less than 1mg/L and 10mg/L respectively). The Department of Health and Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions can provide a list of systems that are certified to achieve these nutrient discharge targets.

3. You are advised of the need to apply for a Building Permit from the City's Building Services Branch prior to the commencement of work. In this regard, your attention is drawn to the requirements of the Building Code of Australia and the Building Act 2011.

4. Your attention is drawn to the requirements for access to buildings for people with disabilities in accordance with the Building Code of Australia and AS1428.1. Detailed drawings are to be submitted with the Building Permit application identifying means of access from carparking areas to the entrance of the building and throughout the building, as required by AS1428.1.

5. An Occupancy Permit is to be applied for and issued by the Local Authority (Permit Authority) prior to occupation of the building or part thereof. For a new building, a Certificate of Construction Compliance (BA17) is to be provided with the application. For an existing building, a Certificate of Building Compliance (BA18) is to be provided with the application for it to be valid.

6. Your attention is drawn to requirements for sanitary conveniences to be provided in accordance with the Building Code of Australia, Table F2.3/2.4 and AS1428.1. For further details please contact the City’s Building Services Branch.

7. Due to the nature of foundation materials, footing and slab details and a site report from a structural engineer are required to be submitted with the Building Permit application.

8. The applicant is advised that this Development Approval does not constitute approval for any works within the road reserve abutting the subject land. The Local Government Act requires prior approval to be obtained from the City before any works carried out within the road reserve. It is the responsibility of the applicant to obtain the appropriate permits, with all applications to be made to the City of Gosnells.

9. For on-site wastewater disposal systems to be approved, a ‘site-and-soil evaluation’ in accordance with Australian Standard 1547 (AS/NZS 1547) is required. Approval is required for any on-site waste water treatment process with such proposals being in accordance with the DOH publications which may be referenced and downloaded from:

http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/N_R/Recycled-water

http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/U_Z/Water-legistions-and-guidelines

Page 5 10. An early works agreement from APA is required for any assessments/approvals that require greater than 3 days assessment or supervision. Lead in times for agreements can be up to 12 weeks. Please contact APA at [email protected] or 1800 103 452.

11. If you are planning on undertaking any physical works on property containing or proximate to a pipeline, or are seeking details on the physical location of a pipeline, please contact Dial Before You Dig on 1100, or APA directly on [email protected].

12. Your attention is drawn to the following to minimise the impact of development works:

(i) All development works must be carried out in accordance with Control of Noise Practices set out in section 6 of AS2436 1981. For further details please contact the Department of Water and Environment Regulation.

(ii) Development work shall only be permitted between 0700 hours and 1900 hours on any day which is not a Sunday or public holiday, without the written approval of the City.

(iii) Development work shall comply in all respects with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.

Details: outline of development application

Zoning MRS: Industrial TPS: General Industry Use Class: Transport Depot and Warehouse Strategy Policy: N/A Development Scheme: Town Planning Scheme No. 6 Lot Size: Lot 2 Grove Road – 1.12ha Lot 9001 Grove Road – 500m² Lot 9500 Grove Road - 2.61ha Lot 501 Edward Street – 3.25ha Total – 7.03ha Existing Land Use: Nil (vacant land)

The application involves the following:

 2,690m² of Warehouse space over two buildings connected by a breezeway, including incidental 85m² office/amenity area;  A 1,345m² workshop, 560m² breezeway and 335m² wash bay. The workshop and wash bay will have capacity for four trucks to be serviced, with an additional truck in the wash bay area;  400m² incidental main office;  95 truck and trailer parking bays and 115 car parking bays;  Hardstand area for the storage of containers;

Page 6  A bunded fuel bowser providing diesel and AdBlue dispending. The system will be comprised of two individual tanks (68,000L for diesel and 10,000L for AdBlue);  Associated landscaping, hardstand, drainage swales and fencing;  A maximum of 90 employees on site at any one time, with a maximum of 30 in each of the office and workshop/warehouse areas and a further 25-30 truck drivers employed on a casual basis;  Approximately 60 trucks will be accommodated per day;  Approximately 10 customers will attend the site per day;  The provision of 1,342m3 of stormwater storage capacity across the site; and  Access to the site will be via the future Intermodal Place, which has been constructed as part of an approved subdivision.

A copy of the development plans is contained as Attachment 1.

Background:

Site Description

The subject site comprises four properties with a combined land area of approximately 7.03ha. These properties form part of Precinct 3A of the Maddington Kenwick Strategic Employment Area (MKSEA), which encompasses 30 land parcels and approximately 89.3ha of land generally bound by Coldwell Road, Grove Road, Brook Road, Bickley Road, Roe Highway and the City of Kalamunda district boundary.

The site is located in the northern portion of Precinct 3A, and is generally bound by Welshpool Road East to the north and the railway freight line, the Parmelia gas pipeline and Woodlupine Brook Reserve to the west of the site. The site is located approximately 1km north and west of the Greater Brixton Street Wetlands and 700m west of Yule Brook. The site, as well as surrounding properties form part of the initial stage of the Precinct 3A industrial area.

A plan showing the location of the subject site is contained as Attachment 2. It must be noted that the Intermodal Place (being the 20m wide PTA access) has been provided approximately 50m to the south of the location identified on the Structure Plan.

Planning Framework

In August 2016, the WAPC, pursuant to section 122 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 (P & D Act), declared a Planning Control Area (No. 104) (PCA) over an area required for the future Kenwick Rail Freight Facility. The purpose of the PCA is to ensure that no development occurs within the designated area which might prejudice its future purpose. A portion of the subject site and proposed development falls within the PCA. A map showing the extent of PCA 104 is contained as Attachment 3.

The subject site is zoned ‘Industrial’ under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) and ‘General Industry’ under the City’s Town Planning Scheme No. 6 (TPS 6). A

Page 7 Special Control Area (SCA) exists over Precinct 3A to require a Structure Plan over the precinct, provide for the protection of environmental values and modify the land use permissibility of a Warehouse use (making it a “P” use rather than a “D” use).

In August 2017, the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) approved a Structure Plan over MKSEA Precinct 3A. A copy of the approved Structure Plan is contained as Attachment 4.

Previous Development Approvals

On 19 December 2017, the Metro East JDAP approved an application for a Warehouse on a portion of the subject site. The applicant has advised that this development application is not progressing.

The lot boundaries have since been realigned as a result of WAPC subdivision approval 156171. The proposed development is located on an area of land that is generally consistent with proposed Lot 1 of this plan of subdivision, which has yet to formally be created. Once titles are issued, the subject site which the proposed development is sited will become Lot 21 Intermodal Place, with an approximately lot area of 3.83ha.

A copy of the approved plan of subdivision is contained as Attachment 5.

Legislation and Policy:

Legislation

 Planning and Development Act 2005  Metropolitan Region Scheme  Town Planning Scheme No. 6  Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015

State Government Policies

 State Planning Policy 3.7 – Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (SPP 3.7)  Government Sewerage Policy – Perth Metropolitan Region  Development Control Policy 4.3 – Planning for High-Pressure Gas Pipelines (draft) (DC 4.3)

Local Policies

Nil.

Consultation:

Public Consultation

The application was not required to be advertised for public comment.

Consultation with other Agencies or Consultants

Page 8 The proposal was referred to the following agencies:

 APA Group (operator of the Parmelia Gas Pipeline);  The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER);  The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA);  The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA); and  The Department of Health (DoH).

The application was not referred to the Public Transport Authority (PTA) despite the site being adjacent the future Kenwick Rail Freight Facility, as the PTA was a signatory to the application. Comments from agencies are discussed throughout this report where relevant and a Schedule of Submissions is contained as Attachment 7.

Planning Assessment:

Planning Control Area 124

The western portion of the site is subject to a PCA declared under section 112 of the P & D Act. The purpose of the PCA is to protect land that may be required for the future Kenwick Rail Freight Facility and to ensure that no development occurs within the area which might prejudice its future purpose. All development applications within the PCA require WAPC approval in accordance with section 115 of the P & D Act.

It should be noted that section 130 of the P & D Act stipulates that the PCA provisions prevail over any region or local planning scheme. The Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage have previously advised that the effect of this provision is such that the JDAP cannot act in place of the WAPC in determining applications in a PCA.

Despite the application not including any development within the PCA, the current lot boundaries include land within the PCA and therefore separate approval will required from the WAPC, with the JDAP being responsible for considering the portion of the development which falls outside the PCA.

Metropolitan Region Scheme

The subject site is zoned Industrial under the MRS and the western boundary of the site abuts land reserved for Railways under the MRS. In accordance with Clause 29 of the MRS, applications proposing development on land abutting areas reserved under the MRS shall be forwarded to the WAPC for determination, unless delegated to another authority pursuant to section 16 of the P & D Act.

In this regard, the WAPC’s Delegation 2017/02 stipulates that applications for development abutting land reserved in the MRS shall be referred to the public authority responsible for that reserved land for comment and recommendation prior to being determined by the local government (or the JDAP acting in place of the local government). As the PTA is a signatory to the application, it has given its consent to the proposed development being approved.

Page 9 Town Planning Scheme No.6

Land Use Permissibility

The subject site is zoned General Industry under TPS 6. A Transport Depot is a “D” use within the General Industry zone, meaning that the use is not permitted unless the local government has exercised its discretion by granting planning approval. A Warehouse is a “P” use within the General Industry zone, meaning that it is permitted.

It should be noted that the office use is an incidental component of the predominant use of the site as a Transport Depot and Warehouse.

Car Parking

The following table details the TPS 6 parking provision for the site.

Use Class TPS 6 Car Parking TPS 6 Car Parking Car Parking Bays Standards Requirements Provided 2 Transport Depot 1 space for every 100m 4,435m² gross floor 115 bays, including one area (including space for the exclusive Warehouse gross floor area, or warehouse and use of people with (Both uses have incidental offices) disabilities. the same car requiring 45 bays. parking requirement) 1 space for every A total of 90 employees employee, whichever is the requiring 90 bays.

greater. Therefore, a total of 90 car parking bays are required.

As outlined above, the proposal complies with TPS 6 car parking requirements.

Setbacks and Landscaping

For development within industrial zones, Table 3B of TPS 6 stipulates a 15m primary street setback, including 3m of landscaping abutting the street. The subject proposal complies with those requirements.

Façades

For development within industrial zones, TPS 6 requires each façade of the building to be constructed of masonry, concrete or glass (or a combination of one or more of those materials or similar materials as approved by the Council). Where the bottom 2m is masonry, Council may approve the use of metal, timber or other panelling above the masonry base.

The façade of the office facing the street will be constructed of painted concrete panels and feature box eave and aluminium framed glazing to the street and the eastern and western elevations. The warehouse will be constructed of precast concrete panels in mid grey paint finish with Colorbond wall cladding above.

The façades of the proposed development comply with TPS 6.

Page 10 Water and Sewerage

The DoH has advised that the development is required to connect to scheme water and comply with the Government Sewerage Policy – Perth Metropolitan Region.

Whilst reticulated water is available, the subject site is not currently serviced by a reticulated sewer service, nor was the provision of reticulated sewer required as a condition of subdivision approval.

Clause 4.9.5 of TPS 6 stipulates:

"Where connection to a comprehensive reticulated sewerage system is not available, no development with on-site effluent disposal in excess of that of a single house or single residential equivalent, shall be approved unless the proposed development is in accordance with the provisions of the Government Sewerage Policy."

Given that connection to reticulated sewer is not available, the applicant will be required to have an Alternative Treatment Unit (ATU) approved by DoH and installed on-site, to support the development. The EPA has supported this approach, and a condition to this effect is recommended.

Notwithstanding the EPA’s advice, the DBCA has raised concerns with respect to the use of on-site waste treatment systems due to the proximity of the site to two tributaries of the Canning River, being Woodlupine and Yule Brooks. The DBCA has requested that reticulated sewerage be made available, and if it not available prior to development, that conditions relating to wastewater be imposed. Whilst those suggested conditions have been included in the recommendation, it is noted that similar conditions recommended by DBCA for a proposal for a Warehouse in the same precinct (DAP18/01489) were deleted by the JDAP on the basis the conditions were requirements of, and could be monitored by, other relevant State Government agencies, if and when required.

Environmental Requirements

The TPS 6 SCA provisions for MKSEA Precinct 3A require consideration of environmental values within and adjacent to the precinct as part of any development proposal.

In the case of the development application process, Clause 5.6.4 of TPS 6 stipulates:

“5.6.4 - To ensure the management of significant environment values within and adjacent to the Special Control Area, the following information is required to accompany subdivision and development applications:

5.6.4.1 - Detailed Vegetation, Wetland and/or Buffer Management Plans for wetland UFI 7635 and occurrences of Threatened Ecological Communities, Declared Rare and Priority Flora and retained areas of significant vegetation including Declared Rare and Priority Flora (where applicable), on advice from Department of Parks and Wildlife and to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.”

Page 11 In considering the above requirement, the following is relevant:

 Wetland UFI 7635 is located approximately 1.1km south of the subject site. Due to this locational separation, it is considered that this wetland is not a relevant environmental consideration for the proposed development as it is located well outside of the minimum 50m buffer requirement for the wetland.  There are no Threatened Ecological Communities or Declared Rare and Priority Flora within or in proximity to the subject site, with the nearest known occurrences being located approximately 1km south-east of the site, within or adjacent to the Greater Brixton Street Wetlands. As such, this does not form a relevant environmental consideration for the proposed development.  The site has been cleared as part of the previous subdivision works.  The EPA raised no objections to the proposal and noted that the site does not contain native vegetation and is not directly adjacent to areas with significant environmental values.

In light of the above, it is considered that the subject application does not warrant the preparation of any detailed vegetation, wetland and/or buffer management plans.

Traffic and Access

The subject application proposes vehicular access from the future extension of Intermodal Place, which will provide a connection to Welshpool Road East via Logistics Boulevard, in accordance with the MKSEA Precinct 3A Structure Plan.

The application proposes three crossovers to Intermodal Place; two for trucks (entry and exit) and one to access the main car parking area.

The largest vehicle to access the site is expected to be a 36.2m long A-Double, which requires a RAV 7 access capability. Intermodal Place and Logistics Boulevard (connecting to the Welshpool Road East/Hale Road intersection) have been constructed to RAV 7 standard.

A Transport Impact Assessment (TIA) has been submitted in support of the application, which is contained as Attachment 6. The purpose of the TIA was to assess the access and parking arrangements and potential traffic impacts the proposed development may have on the surrounding road network. The key points in this respect are as follows:

 The use will generate approximately 150 truck movements per day; and  The proposed development is estimated to generate 116 vehicle (truck and passenger) trips in the AM and PM periods, and maintaining a Level of Service of A (free-flowing operation). In summary, it is considered that the proposed development is able to be accommodated within the capacity of the proposed road network and will not present any site specific safety issues. For this reason, the proposal is considered acceptable from a traffic and access perspective.

The finalisation of the road and traffic infrastructure required to service the proposed development will be provided as part of the broader subdivision works. As such, it is not considered necessary to impose conditions to that effect, given the applicant is

Page 12 required to finalise the subdivision process in order to create the specific development lot.

Bushfire Hazard

The subject site and surrounding area have been identified as bushfire prone and the provisions of SPP 3.7 apply to all planning proposals in designated bushfire prone areas.

In accordance with the requirements of SPP 3.7, a Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) was prepared in support of the MKSEA Precinct 3A Structure Plan, which incorporates the subject site. The purpose of the BMP was to identify bushfire hazards within, and in the vicinity of, the Structure Plan area, and to ensure that the threat posed by any hazard is appropriate mitigated in accordance with the requirements of the WAPC’s Bushfire Protection Guidelines.

The applicant has provided a revised Bushfire Attack Level (BAL) assessment and rating for the subject site, demonstrating that the majority of the site will achieve a BAL Low rating. A small portion of the northwest of the development (including the wash down bay and a portion of the workshop) is within the BAL-12.5 rating. This is within the acceptable BAL-29 or less area and is therefore considered acceptable.

It should be noted that the construction standards of AS 3959-2009 – Construction of Buildings in Bushfire Prone Areas, do not apply to Class 4 to Class 9 buildings such as Warehouses, and as such, the applicant has to discretion to utilise the elements of AS 3959 in the construction of the building.

Parmelia Gas Pipeline

The Parmelia Gas Pipeline runs parallel to the western boundary of the subject site, following the alignment of the freight railway line, and is protected by a 15m wide easement which encompasses a portion of the subject site. To provide for the protection of people from unacceptable levels of risk presented by high-pressure gas pipelines, the WAPC’s draft DC 4.3 establishes requirements for planning proposals in the vicinity of high pressure gas pipelines.

DC 4.3 requires a Pipeline Risk Management Plan (PRMP) to be prepared and approved as part of any subdivision or development proposal. In this regard, the owner/operation of the Parmelia Gas Pipeline, APA Group, has raised no objections to the proposal subject to conditions relating to access and works over the easement.

Whilst it is acknowledged that, as a general principle, it is not reasonable to impose conditions that are subject to the satisfaction of a third party, the conditions requested by the APA Group have been included in the recommendation for the JDAP’s consideration.

Conclusion:

The proposal is supported, subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions.

Page 13 33493

APPROX. 40

GOSNELLS / KALAMUNDA / GOSNELLS BOUNDARY LINE BOUNDARY 16t Forklift accessible 16t Forklift 102 tonne hardstand 42 tonne hardstand Fully laden 40' container stacking (max. 4 high) (max. stacking 40' container Fully laden accessible Reach Stacker

SOFT PAVING AREA x x x x x CONCRETE SLAB - (RED ASPHALT) EXTENT OF CONTAINER RATED HEAVY DUTY HEAVY RATED OF CONTAINER EXTENT AREA - (CONCRETE) PAVING REACH STACKER ACCESSIBLE EXTENT OF PAVING AREA - (CONCRETE) HEAVY DUTY HEAVY DUTY EXTENT OF TRUCK PARKING PAVING AREA - (ASPHALT) HEAVY DUTY EXTENT OF STANDARD PAVING AREA - (CONCRETE) EXTENT OF FUTURE WAREHOUSE 1 EXTENT OF LIGHT DUTY PAVING AREA EXTENT OF CANTILEVER AWNING EXTENT OF 15m WIDE EASEMENT PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE EXTENT OF LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE / INDICATIVE POLE MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHT LOCATIONS FENCE TYPE FN-01 CITY OF KALAMUNDA OF CITY

LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE AREA CITY OF GOSNELLS OF CITY

20 18000 sqm. approx. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. spaces spaces 95 64 115 350 560 300 400 1,345 1,345 1,345 1,095 5,359 2,346 8,230 2,760 3,340 2,660 8,460 4,300 37,995 Based on MNG Survey Drawing No. 99923-046-A PCG94 COORDINATES E 65298.745 , N 257530.972

0 12000

12000 18000 2900

15000 77075

EASEMENT APPROX. 18000 ONLY TRAILER (Incl. Warehouse Office & (Incl. Warehouse (1 Level)

1 2 12000 1:400 @ A1 Scale: Total Light Duty Paving Area Total Warehouse Awning Area 15m wide Easement Area Total Car Parking Provided Total Truck / Trailer Parking Provided Amenities) Truck Parking Heavy Duty Paving Area Warehouse Warehouse Workshop Wash Bay Area Standard Heavy Duty Paving Area Container Rated Heavy Duty Paving Container Rated Heavy Duty (Incl. paving area under Breezeway) (85 no. Trucks & 10 no. Trailers Only) Breezeway Enclosure Equipment & Compressor Main Office Heavy Duty Reach Stacker Accessible Paving Area Future Warehouse 1 Concrete Slab Landscape/Drainage/Soft Paving Area SPACES TOTAL SITE AREA TOTAL TOTAL BUILDING AREA DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT

site TRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLY only

95 no. TRUCK / TRAILER PARKING (85 no. TRUCKS & 10 no. TRAILERS ONLY) features, anything

35000 55000

of dimensions, WORKSHOP / WAREHOUSE

detailed the

to via 2.4mW x 2.4mH RSD 14000 approximate

WASH BAY 3.5m x 15.3m EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE

B B as 3.5m x 3m COMPRESSOR features, ENCLOSURE accuracy

are

3500 B

or

23rd January 2019 given

verification is

FENCE TYPE FN-02 proposed 6000

AREA Date:

to BAY & 300 sqm. WASH

B B boundaries

feasibility FENCE TYPE FN-01 2 no. 50KL CONNECTIONS. UNDERGROUND TANKS FOR TRUCK WASH RINSE ONLY. RAINWATER / POTABLE

WAREHOUSE EXPANSION AREA 3,905 sqm. OUTLINE OF FUTURE and

subject

assurance 35000 20000 RSD RSD PIT

existing

4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H attributes, disclosed in this plan. shown on or All areas and survey by licensed surveyor. No x x NOTE: RSD RSD CENTRELINE OF EASEMENT 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 1805-121

19300 25000 APPROX. RSD RSD AREA 1,345 sqm. 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H WORKSHOP Project No: RSD RSD 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H B B 248235 APPROX. SITE 2.9m WIDE LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE AREA DA-002(H) (Linemarking only) COLUMN TO SUIT FUTURE EXPANSION AREA 85 sqm. 8 no. CAR PARKING SPACES & AMENITIES

B B col col WAREHOUSE OFFICE Drawing No: 139860 RSD RSD AREA 1,345 sqm. 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H (Incl. Warehouse Office & Amenities) B B

6000 WAREHOUSE 2 OVERALL WORKSHOP / WAREHOUSE

RSD RSD 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H B B Development Application 3 ROWS OF BARBED WIRE 3 ROWS OF 2100 HIGH BLACK PVC COATED 2100 HIGH MESH FENCE CHAINWIRE AREA 560 sqm. BREEZEWAY B B

RSD RSD TURNING 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H BAY Drawing Type: RSD

1800 4000W x 5000H B SCALE 1:100 TYPICAL SIDE & REAR

300 FENCE TYPE FN-02 BOUNDARY FENCE ELEVATION 2100 6000

TURNING COLUMN TO SUIT FUTURE EXPANSION

BAY (14m x 2.5m) col TWO PORT AUTOMATIC DIVERSION DRAIN col FB/DRAIN SWING GATE FN-01 3000 AREA 1,345 sqm. STRIP DRAIN MIN. INVERT LEVEL: 12.0m 50mm DIA. CLASS 9 PVC PRESSURE MAIN (MIN. 750mm COVER) WAREHOUSE 1 SCREEN FENCE TEMPORARY COLORBOND 1.8m HIGH

(14m x 2.5m)

TEMPORARY TRUCK PARKING AREA 1250 1250 13150 FB/DRAIN PROPOSED FUEL BOWSER LOCATION 2650

FENCE TYPE FN-02

1250 1250

ATU 52150 12800 (6m x 4.5m) (1 Level) MAIN OFFICE 2100 HIGH BLACK 2100 HIGH GARRISON FENCE MAIN 2650 OFFICE AREA 400 sqm. Site Plan PROPOSED TRANSPORT FACILITY Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

31250 30500 MAIN OFFICE 22650

2100 107 no. CAR PARKING SPACES 18500 SCALE 1:100 TYPICAL STREET FRONTAGE FENCE TYPE FN-01 FENCE & GATE ELEVATION SLIDING GATE FN-01 PROPOSED ESTATE SIGN CAR TRUCK ENTRY ENTRY / EXIT

EXIT 3m WIDE LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE AREA 3m WIDE LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE AREA SLIDING GATE FN-01 TRUCK FENCE TYPE FN-01 and way only may

INTERMODAL PLACE

AREA 5.3m x 5.9m TRANSFORMER PROPOSED ELEC.

Intergen and

any

areas

of

in

All

approximate copyright

Ltd.

altered to

are

permission Based on MNG Survey Drawing No. 99923-046-A PCG94 COORDINATES E 65117.261 , N 257329.119 Pty or

subject

used Based on MNG Survey Drawing No. 99923-046-A PCG94 COORDINATES E 65221.65 , N 257295.012 drawings

are

expressed on

Development copied, the

drawings

be

These without dimensions confirmation by survey. and are subject to i,QWHUJHQ3URSHUW\'HYHORSPHQW3W\/WG not Property i,QWHUJHQ3URSHUW\'HYHORSPHQW3W\/WG These drawings are subject to copyright and may not be copied, used or altered in any way GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID without the expressed permission of Intergen MC1 PC1 MC4 Property Development Pty Ltd. All areas and HORIZONTAL ALUMINIUM dimensions on drawings are approximate only SLATS SPACING OF APPROX. and are subject to confirmation by survey. 25% PERMEABILITY

BOX PC3 ALU GL

BREEZEWAY WASH BAY 9810 1800 CL 7500 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H APPROX. MAX. HEIGHT 4500 4000 CLEARANCE HEIGHT APPROX. WAREHOUSE 2700 GF

2100H CHAIN WIRE 01 EAST ELEVATION MESH ENCLOSURE TO PC4 RSD COMPRESSOR AREA -- SCALE 1:200

MC4 GRID GRID GRID RF GRID GRID GRID MC1 GRID GRID AW GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID GRID

PC4 PC3 GL

9810 WASH BAY BREEZEWAY

CL 1300 7000 6620 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H APPROX. MAX. HEIGHT APPROX. 4500 4000 3200 MIN. AWNING CLEAR CLEARANCE HEIGHT 2400 APPROX. WORKSHOP DADO GF

WASH BAY EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 02 WEST ELEVATION RSD PC2 -- SCALE 1:200

GRID GRID MC2 MC3 MC1 MC4 AW GRID MC2 MC3 MC1 BOX GL PC3 GRID EXTERNAL FINISHES LEGEND INDICATIVE LOCATION OF TENANT SIGNAGE FULL HEIGHT PRECAST CONCRETE WAREHOUSE PANELS IN PC1 INDICATIVE LOCATION OF MID GREY PAINT FINISH. TENANT SIGNAGE PRECAST CONCRETE WAREHOUSE DADO PANELS IN MID GREY PC2 PAINT FINISH.

3130 FULL HEIGHT PRECAST CONCRETE OFFICE PANELS IN LIGHT 3500 PC3 GREY PAINT FINISH. 9810 9810 9000 1800 7000 6620 CL PC4 FULL HEIGHT PRECAST CONCRETE OFFICE PANELS IN DARK APPROX. MAX. HEIGHT APPROX. MAX. HEIGHT

4500 GREY PAINT FINISH. 2400W 4000 MIN. AWNING CLEAR 2700 CLEARANCE HEIGHT APPROX. WORKSHOP 2400 x 2400H DADO GF WAREHOUSE METAL WALL CLADDING IN COLORBOND MC1 'SURFMIST' FINISH OR EQUIVALENT.

2100H CHAIN WIRE WASH BAY EQUIPMENT HORIZONTAL ALUMINIUM SLATS MESH ENCLOSURE TO WAREHOUSE METAL WALL CLADDING IN COLORBOND 03 NORTH ELEVATION ENCLOSURE 04 SOUTH ELEVATION PC4 WITH CLOSE SPACING OF ALU MC2 PC2 COMPRESSOR AREA APPROX. 5% PERMEABILITY 'COTTAGE GREEN' FINISH OR EQUIVALENT. -- SCALE 1:200 -- SCALE 1:200 WAREHOUSE METAL WALL CLADDING IN COLORBOND 'PALE MC3 EUCALYPT' FINISH OR EQUIVALENT.

WAREHOUSE METAL WALL CLADDING IN COLORBOND 'SHALE GRID GRID MC4 GREY' FINISH OR EQUIVALENT.

METAL ROLLER SHUTTER DOORS IN SELECTED POWDERCOAT EJ RSD ƒ522)3,7&+ FINISH TO MATCH COLORBOND 'MONUMENT' OR SIMILAR. STEEL FRAMED WAREHOUSE AWNING IN SELECTED PAINT 2500 AW FINISH.

STEEL FRAMED OFFICE CANOPY BOX-OUT IN COMPOSITE 9810 BOX PANEL CLADDING TO MATCH CLIENT'S CORPORATE COLOR 7720 7500 7000

APPROX. MAX. HEIGHT ALUMINIUM FRAMED GLAZING SUITE IN BLACK POWDERCOAT

APPROX. MAX. MID GL CLEARANCE HEIGHT CLEARANCE HEIGHT MATTE FINISH. APPROX. WAREHOUSE MIN. AWNING CLEAR 2400 TENANT DADO METAL WAREHOUSE ROOF SHEETING IN SELECTED SIGNAGE RF ZINCALUME FINISH WITH TRANSLUCENT ROOF SHEETING TO APPROX. 10% OF ROOF AREA. INDICATIVE WAREHOUSE SECTION 05 ALU ALUMINIUM SLATS OVER OUTDOOR AREA -- SCALE 1:200 5000

GRID GRID

NOTE: EJ ƒ522)3,7&+ x No assurance is given as to the features, attributes, feasibility or accuracy of anything shown on or disclosed in this plan.

9810 x All existing & proposed features, dimensions, areas and 7410

7000 boundaries are approximate only and subject to 6620

APPROX. MAX. HEIGHT verification via detailed site survey by licensed surveyor. POINT HEIGHT

07 ESTATE SIGNAGE ELEVATION APPROX. MAX. MID MIN. AWNING CLEAR CLEARANCE HEIGHT 2400 APPROX. WORKSHOP -- SCALE 1:75 DADO

06 INDICATIVE WORKSHOP SECTION -- SCALE 1:200

0 10 20 Elevations Drawing Type: Development Application Drawing No: DA-200(B) Project No: 1805-121 Date: 22nd January 2019 Scale: 1:200 @ A1 PROPOSED TRANSPORT FACILITY Lot 21 Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA i,QWHUJHQ3URSHUW\'HYHORSPHQW3W\/WG These drawings are subject to copyright and may not be copied, used or altered in any way without the expressed permission of Intergen Property Development Pty Ltd. All areas and dimensions on drawings are approximate only and are subject to confirmation by survey.

12800

CAR PARKING SPACES OPERABLE WALL

MEETING ROOM 1 / FUTURE OFFICE MEETING ROOM 2 (3.6m x 3.6m) (5.3m x 3.6m)

OFFICE 1 (3.6m x 3.6m)

MALE 4660 CHANGE & MALE SHOWER ACCESSIBLE / OFFICE 2 TOILET FEMALE OPERATIONS (3.4m x 3.6m) TOILET & OFFICE SHOWER LUNCH ROOM (2.6m x 6.1m) (5.1m x 4.6m)

15 no. LOCKERS WASH TROUGH BOLLARD WAREHOUSE 2 AREA OPEN PLAN OFFICE OFFICE 3 24 no. 1.8m x 0.7m Workstations (3.4m x 3.6m) BOLLARD 17300

02 WAREHOUSE OFFICE & AMENITIES PLAN SCALE 1:100 OFFICE 4

31250 (3.4m x 4.6m)

PRINT / UTILITIES AREA

OFFICE 5 (3.6m x 3.9m) COMMS FEMALE CLNRS/ ROOM TOILET STORE (2.2m x 3.2m)

ACCESSIBLE CORRIDOR 1 MALE TOILET & TOILET SHOWER LINE OF ENTRY CANOPY ABOVE BOARDROOM (3.6m x 5.9m) CORRIDOR 2

LUNCH ROOM (5.3m x 4.2m)

LINE OF ENTRY CANOPY ABOVE OUTDOOR AREA (8.0m x 3.8m)

EXTENT OF HORIZONTAL ALUMINIUM SLATS AROUND EXTENT OF SHADE SAIL OUTDOOR AREA PERIMETER OVER OUTDOOR AREA EXTENT OF FIXED CANOPY 1250 OVER OUTDOOR AREA

2650 2650

ATU (6m x 4.5m) 1250

01 MAIN OFFICE GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:100

0 5 10 Office Plan Drawing Type: Development Application Drawing No: DA-100(B) Project No: 1805-121 Date: 23rd January 2019 Scale: 1:100 @ A1 PROPOSED TRANSPORT FACILITY Lot 21 Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 12.40 12.60 12.60 12.60

BASE11.60 12.50 12.60

BASE12.20 12.60

12.55 BASE11.60 12.60 12.40

12.60

12.70 12.60 BASE11.80 12.65 12.85

12.60 12.60

12.60 12.50 12.70 12.90

BASE12.10 12.40

12.55

12.80 12.80 12.80 12.80 12.45 12.80

BASE12.00

21

12.60Cyclone Fence

12.40 12.60 13.20

13.20 12.60 12.70 12.80 12.80 12.75 12.40 12.80 12.60

12.60 12.40 13.13 12.80

BASE12.00

BASE12.10 12.40

12.80 12.60

13.02 12.80

12.80 12.40 12.80

11.63

12.50 12.75

12.90

12.60 12.60 12.30 12.90 12.60 LID=12.55 BASE12.10 BASE12.10 BASE12.10 12.60 12.60 12.60 12.21

SRCivil Consulting Pty. Ltd. SRCivil Consulting Pty Ltd 30 North Road BASSENDEAN WA 6054 Ph : (08) 9379 9481 or 0447 112 481 The City of Gosnells provides the information contained herein. The Council of the City of Gosnells shall not be liable for any loss or damage howsoever Date: 15/02/2019 Scale: 1:3000 caused as a result of reliance upon information contained in these documents. ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 106 122 801 232 28 59 105 111 51 24 99 70 108 233 27 EAST 4481 ￿￿￿￿ 256 ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 32 ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 104 234 26 CANNINGTON ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ 901 103 110 33 255 ￿￿￿￿￿￿ 807 45 C￿￿￿￿￿￿33845 235 102 806 25 101 2762 132 236 34 254 805 2 247 16 804 133 2 253 237 ￿￿ 131 ￿￿ 809 248 ￿￿ 462 ￿￿ 252 4483 200 810 134 238 239 240 ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ 801 130 249 250 ￿￿ ￿￿ 54 8 ￿￿ 135 251 ￿￿ 7 71 802 C￿￿￿￿￿￿44211 129 ￿￿ ￿￿ C￿￿￿￿￿￿38797 9 34 136 128 106 ￿￿ 100 193 ￿￿ 3299 114 127 194 ￿￿ C￿￿￿￿￿￿52083 107 137 195 196 ￿￿ 113 197 198 ￿￿ 500 126 227 199 ￿￿ ￿￿

37 501 112 115 125 ￿￿ 226 ￿￿ 1 109 ￿￿ 224 223 222 221 200 11 38 ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ 803 ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ 220 200 66 ￿￿ 116 ￿￿ 225 ￿￿ 124 ￿￿ 157 ￿￿ 201 163 ￿￿ 117 ￿￿ 6 67 ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ 123 ￿￿ 158 4225 2 726 716 ￿￿ 118 ￿￿ ￿￿ 219 202 WATTLE 41 ￿￿ 122 ￿￿ 217 717 ￿￿ ￿￿ 159 ￿￿ 39 ￿￿ 119 192 ￿￿ 218 203 718 ￿￿ 121 ￿￿ 160 ￿￿ 216 GROVE 40 709 ￿￿ 53 725 ￿￿ ￿￿ 191 ￿￿ 120 ￿￿ 180 161 ￿￿ 204 719 708 ￿￿ 190 ￿￿ 215 72 ￿￿ 162 720 707 189 179 205 5 724 706 181 163 214 721 188 178 705 213 206 908 722 182 177 164 302 907 723 704 187 186 212 207 906 703 183 176 165 905 701 73 185 211 208 828 702 64 22 1 101 88 184 175 166 209 C￿￿￿￿￿￿51823 102 111 2 167 210 301 103 ￿￿ 79 500 ￿￿ 109 173 12 ￿￿￿￿ 168 BECKENHAM 104 ￿￿ 501

￿￿ C￿￿￿￿￿￿51713 112 110 172

￿￿ 169 ￿￿ 171 " 829 ￿￿ 21 302 39 1 55 ￿￿ 38 300 ￿￿ ￿￿ 802 ￿￿ 54 ￿￿ C￿￿￿￿￿￿51713 6 ￿￿ ￿￿ 301 37 3 ￿￿ 53 ￿￿ ￿￿ 34 7 500 435 ￿￿ 56 ￿￿ 507 36 ￿￿ 4 56 16 ￿￿ 52 ￿￿ 801 ￿￿ 33 14 ￿￿ 57 ￿￿ 301 ￿￿ ￿￿ 5 ￿￿ 51 58 102 ￿￿ ￿￿ 12 ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ 40 8 .8 ￿￿ ￿￿ 50 ￿￿ 11 6 ￿￿ ￿￿ 59 28 ￿￿ 2 ￿￿ 9 4225 2 ￿￿ 49 60 29 10 17 ￿￿ 48 11 41 ￿￿ ￿￿ 13 ￿￿ 61 163 30 18 17 2 ￿￿

47 7 19 102 ￿￿ 62 ￿￿ 21 ￿￿ " 162 ￿￿ 46 ￿￿ 26 1 160 501 ￿￿ 6 20 22 15 ￿￿ 63 ￿￿ 161 25 ￿￿ 168 ￿￿ ￿￿ 45 ￿￿ 58 ￿￿ 3 64 ￿￿ " ￿￿

160 24 ￿￿ 16 0 8

44 ￿￿ 169 275 32 .7 " . " ￿￿ 159 " 9 43 ￿￿￿￿ 170 23 56 0 10 66 ￿￿ 158 274 ￿￿ 57 1 ￿￿ 171 59 ￿￿ 0 67 ￿￿ 273 ￿￿ 55 . ￿￿ 157 83 ￿￿ 3 ￿￿ 172 272 ￿￿ 54 27 71 7 " ￿￿ 156 277 ￿￿ ￿￿ 173 82 60 ￿￿ ￿￿ 155 271 278 53 28 " ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 9 1 81 61 ￿￿ 174 270 101 70 154 279 80 62 ￿￿ ￿￿ 52 20 269 70 2 153 176 ￿￿ 280 ￿￿ 79 71 63 ￿￿ ￿￿ 268 ￿￿ ￿￿ " 152 ￿￿ 281 78 51 5 ￿￿ 69 ￿￿ 177 ￿￿ 267 ￿￿ 64 6 8

￿￿ ￿￿ 72 ￿￿ .7

151 ￿￿ 282 77 "4 178 ￿￿ ￿￿ 50 266 2 "

150 ￿￿ 283 ￿￿ 76 65 52 .

179 ￿￿ 265 ￿￿ 67 3 " ￿￿ " 149 ￿￿ 284 ￿￿￿￿ 74 73 68 49 180 ￿￿ ￿￿ 75 66 ￿￿ 264 ￿￿ C￿￿￿￿￿￿36749 148 ￿￿ 285 ￿￿ 84 ￿￿ 7 181 ￿￿ 263 ￿￿ 207 .8 ￿￿ 4 4 286 85 8 ￿￿ 182 103 5 ￿￿ 262 3 ￿￿ 183 102 40 206 " ￿￿ 261 41 42 43 45 46 48 ￿￿ 101 86 ￿￿ 13 2 260 ￿￿ 289 39 ￿￿ 185 100 87 ￿￿ 259 290 32 31 ￿￿ 99 88 37 36 35 34 33 53 ￿￿ ￿￿ 186 258 2 C￿￿￿￿￿￿31946 ￿￿ 291 98 89 502 ￿￿ 257 ￿￿ 292 90 30 ￿￿ 97 ￿￿ 256 ￿￿ 1 91 104 110 29 5 ￿￿ 255 106 107 108 109 ￿￿ 294 95 ￿￿ 123 105 ￿￿ 254 ￿￿ ￿￿ 295 93 ￿￿ 111 28 ￿￿ ￿￿ 122 59 14 ￿￿ 296 448 94 ￿￿ ￿￿ 118 116 115 114 113 27 503 297 449 121 120 112 11 450 454 ￿￿ 26 ￿￿ 298 ￿￿ ￿￿ 3 455 ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 451 ￿￿ ￿￿

￿￿ 10 25 452 456 ￿￿ ￿￿ "

￿￿ ￿￿ 453 457 124 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 24 ￿￿ 12 13 ￿￿ 1 458 412 502 125 72 459 ￿￿ 126 135 413

134 ￿￿ 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 12 40

152 ￿￿ KENWICK 469 414 153 411 .6 151 154 415 1 3 501 150 C￿￿￿￿￿￿31946 410 2 155 159 160 161 162 163 136 416 372 467 460 149 156 157 158 2546 409 466 461 148 417 500 462 147 138 137 408 418

146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139

4 464 442 407 419 " 463 441 C￿￿￿￿￿￿31946 ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ " 41 2 443 440 2545 406 420 75

444 " .3 73 439 170 169 168 167 166 165 179 180 181 182 405 421 5 14 ￿￿ 445 171 0 69 ￿￿ 1 ￿￿ 446 404 422 68 ￿￿ 70 ￿￿￿￿ 447 173 174 175 176 177 178 184 183 403 423 " 67 ￿￿ 172 63 82 66 ￿￿ 424 83 ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 65 ￿￿ 84 ￿￿ 425 201 ￿￿ ￿￿ 312 313 314 315 316 317 193 191 310 311 2

C￿￿￿￿￿￿29973 185 426 "3

165 84 .9 186 " 181 C￿￿￿￿￿￿33154 427 166 187 323 321 320 319 318 182 202 2645 322 74 167 188 428 168 1 198 184 189 429 207 194 C￿￿￿￿￿￿33153 430 190 209 398 399 400 401 402 208 195 236 208 2644 431 C￿￿￿￿￿￿36749 Signed fo2r 0a9 nd on behalf of the 210 ￿￿ 196 3183 205 ￿￿ 192 235 432 Western Australia￿￿n Planning Commission 211 328 397 396 395 394 204 210 ￿￿ 197 211 ￿￿ 203 ￿￿ 219 234 329 433 202 212 199 233 1 ￿￿ 218 2008 213 ￿￿ 200 232 213 330 76 ￿￿ 217 C￿￿￿￿￿￿32276 __5_6_____￿￿______2_21______2_1_4____ 375 377 378 ￿￿ 216 231 331 376 57 ￿￿ 222 ￿￿ 215 230 332 ￿￿ 223 374 380 58 ￿￿ 229 333 371 2 224 59 An officer duly authorised by th2e28 Commission 373 22 55 225 334 370 pursuant to section 24 of the227 ￿￿ 372 226 ￿￿ ￿￿ 335 ￿￿ 23 ￿￿ C￿￿￿￿￿￿33140 ￿￿ Plann5i3ng and Develop￿￿ment Act 2005 ￿￿364 17 ￿￿ 220 ￿￿ 24 52 ￿￿ 337 ￿￿ 365 369 for that purp1o6se in t￿￿he presence of : ￿￿ 51 ￿￿ 338 ￿￿363 366 ￿￿ 101 25 " 15 ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ 50 ￿￿ 339 ￿￿ 362 367 ￿￿￿￿ 14 ￿￿ ￿￿ 26 8 ￿￿ 268 ￿￿ 361 368 ￿￿ 20 Brixton 49 ￿￿ 340 23 ￿￿ ￿￿ 267 354 360 ___2_2______3_4_1 _____ 44 ￿￿ 27 Street ￿￿ 19 266 237 355 359 Swamps 238 353 356 ￿￿ 28 85 Witness 265 45 ￿￿ 18 20 239 54 264 352 357 29 45 242 351 46 17 263 241 240 358 16 262 293 350 55 16 30 4 349 57 47 ____2_61____1______2_9_2______56 15 31 260 53 48 D￿￿ate 244 248 291 ￿￿ 259 247 C￿￿￿￿￿￿33152 52 49 32 ￿￿ 246 51 50 14 7 ￿￿ 258 245 249 301 289 33 ￿￿ ￿￿ 257 250 2 ￿￿

302 ￿￿ 13 ￿￿ ￿￿ 256 252 " 269 ￿￿ 254 253 C￿￿￿￿￿￿33140 3 12 34 ￿￿ ￿￿ 255 251 11 5 ￿￿ ______9 10 ￿￿ 270 ￿￿ 2 ￿￿ 2641 8 . ￿￿ 4 7 ￿￿ 271Approved - Minister for Planning 36 35 7 ￿￿ 38 37 6 ￿￿ 14 272 276 286 C ￿￿33140 5 41 40 39 ￿￿ 277 283284 285 ￿￿￿￿￿￿ 43 42

280 281 4227 2 275 278 279 2742 6 "￿￿4.2" 205 30 ______2_9_5_29_4______297 296 4488 6 299 298 ￿￿￿￿ 4895 Dat3e43 342 300 ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 345 344 ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

KENWICK FREIGHT RAIL FACILITY No: 124

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ N ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 0 60 120 180 240

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ metres ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ~ '

j g ~

!501 11

10

#

t:.:-.:.~ STRUCTURE PLAN BOUNDARY - GENERALINDUSTRY 0 INDICATIVE DRAINAGE BASIN LOCATION SUBJECT TO DETAILED DESIGN INDICATIVE DRAINAGE BASIN LOCATION TO BE 0 PROVIDED ON FUTURE PT A LAND GROVE ROAD ANO WELSHPOOL ROAD EAST: e THE FINAL CONFIGURATION AND DESIGN OF THIS INTERSECTION IS TO BE AGREED WITH MAIN ROADS WESTERN AUSTRALIA Cl) COLDWELL ROAD AND WELSHPOOL ROAD EAST: THE FINAL CONFIGURATION AND DESIGN OF THIS INTERSECTION 5 TO BE AGREED WITH MAIN ROADS WESTERN AUSTRALIA

PARMELIA GAS PIPELINE EASEMENT

PTA ACCESS === INDICATIVE ROAD REALIGNMENT ~ PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING/ REALIGNMENT

2008 c:::::si PLANNING CONTROL AREA 124

~ EXISTING CADASTRE / LOT NUMBER ~ PARMELIA GAS PIPELINE GENENIC SETBACK (45m)

~ PARMELIA GAS PIPELINE NOTIFICATION AREA (356m) * ROAD CLOSURE TO BE STAGED TO ENSURE CONTINUED ~ ACCESS TO EXISTING LOTS.

PLAN 1 I STRUCTURE PLAN 9••n111111ta s: 1:2,SOO@Al Maddington - Kenwick Strategic Employment Area - Precinct 3A d: 24 August 2017 A UNC PROPEITTY PROJECT p: 15/073/024P

LEGEND

E L D

A A

H O APPLICATION AREA (55.8ha) R

GROVE ROAD AREA TO BE REALIGNED

PORTIONS OF EDWARD STREET, COURTNEY PLACE AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS WAY TO BE REALIGNED W 1 13 E 2 LSHP PLANNING CONTROL AREA 124 13 OOL 0 26.3 84.3 . RO 2 1 31.8 A 1 D 106.3 14.91 EA 4 S 6 44. T EXISTING DWELLINGS, OUTBUILDINGS AND 3 4 7 1 34.4 5

6 . 1 74.8 1 2 2 9 2 . 2 1 OTHER STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED 1 4 5 6 0.9 2 12 13 7 5 . 3 1 2 . 2 6 1 . 2 7 6 9 3 3063m² DIMENSIONS AND CONFIGURATION OF . 6 5 4 1 . 1.0187ha 8 2 2 0 . 6 5 3017m² DRAINAGE RESERVE SUBJECT TO DETAILED 0 0 10 6 .9 . 5 14 11 8 . 12 7 12 DESIGN AND CITY OF GOSNELLS APPROVAL 7.9 3 3 4 9733m² 98 7.5 15 .5 .4 .5 6 * 4 4 1 4 . 3 0 . . 2 9 1 7 9 REFER TO DETAILED DRAWINGS SHOWING 8 4 15 2 13 5 5 . .

1 2 3 1 5 PROPOSED INTERSECTION WITH WELSHPOOL 4 1 1 5742m² 4 4 . . 1 8742m² 3 1 ROAD EAST 4 1 13 2 1. 41 73.9 6.3 24.7 1 3.8653ha 7 2.8 3 200 2 .3 18 12 3.6 1 COURTNEY PLACE (20m RES) .

7 2 17 9 1 . 1 134.7 0 . 4 3 6 7 1 1 1 2 4 16 7 9 . 4 .9 1 . 4629m² 7 13 6 8648m² 4 9

0 1 7 3 1 3 60 23 .4 .5 13 50 17 16 1 2 63 3 0 .5302 . 6400m² 5 ROAD 7 6 1 1 5 5 1 14 10 12 6 .9 . 0 4 2 4200m² . EXTENSION 1 7 4 2 12.6 6 3 T .3 13 BY PTA 32 4269m² 18 0 R 60 5 N 20. O 301 1 5 A 7 3 E D . 5167m² 1 1 4 2 7 M 3 9 6 ( 4 . 1 20 2 0 E 9 1 6 . 4.3 m 1.6. 5 S R 1 5 ES A ER E V 0 15 E) 5 85 19

1 E 5 3878m² 7 1 .68 . 2 6 0 N . 0 I 1 2 4 3 . 2 L . ) 7 7 0 8 6 E E 1 5 23 . 21 P 4 I V 6 P R 1.3910ha 7 20 84 402 E S 5 4.3808ha 2849m² 7 S E 1 1 1 . 1 R 4 0 A 1 5 22 501 . 1 G 24 m .5 7 0 6 5 22 3 4 2 .7 . 4 ( 1 A 0 2 1.3300ha I 3 83 L 4 1 .1 2 21 Y E 4 7 1 . 5 74 4 7 2 3 .4 1 A M 82 .3 2 E R A 1 29 W N 1 1 .3 I P 1 8 4 5 L 3378m² 0 H T 5 R 11 9 9 8 23 . 404 6 7 1 .9 O 0 9 N 6 2 5 G 6 A 1 1.3300ha 12 . E 5 I 82 500 30 D 24 M H 4 2 5 9 2720m² 2 7 N . 8 1 6152m² 3 0 6 . 8 9 4 1 L G 5 I 0 0 E I ( 5 L 31 2 .5 11 8102 0 A A O 9 m . 11 E 2856m² 4 7 3 R 8 3.9835ha 8 8 . 6 6 25 8 R 3 R 403 R 3 5 2 4 5 2 2 E - 9 S 3 6155m² . . 9 E 8 26 1 32 5 1 . D R 0 6 V 5 2 501 2042m² . 1 A 3 5 . 3264m² E 1 5 5 1 8 ) .3 O 0 3 6 8 1 4 3 3 1 36 8 5 5 . R 27 8 T 1 1 5 E 2 7 1.6883ha 2042m² 3 H 75 . 33 5 .3 V 5 10 . .3 5 8 3400m² 3 8 ) O 5 5 G 5 28 E I 1 1 8 0 1 R 8 5 6 V E 8 0 2021m² R .2 67 G 2 E R 5 .3 S 1 . 8 403 1 4 34 5 E . 4 F 1 6 R 3 1 14.1 7 9 1 . . 3400m² 4 5 2 0 m 8 1 0 5 6 65 1 .8 0 3 37 .8 ( 406 2 3 1

0 5 . 8 8 . 4 9 1.3518ha

6 1 . 35

4 9 5 1 11 5 1 10 1 39 3350m² 405 3.9309ha 5 1 4 8 5922m² 5 8 6 8 0 5 . . 2 3 5 1 5 1 . 1 2 1 . 1 5 38 0 . 7 3

8 8 4 . 40 2 2 0 5325m² 8 .2 5922m² .8 .8 3 3 5 68 7 9 D 2 . 5 52 . 2 . 8 7 86 6 0 1 A .8 1 2 1 3 1

0 1 3 0 1 O 41 R

.8 1 4 L 8 1 2 5922m² .8 L 5 3 3 3 5 E 2

.

2 W ( 1 3 1 D 66 13 0 L 0 1 O m 1 C 8 8 . . 0 R 3 1 1 5

0 5 E 1 11 408 10 S 53 3.8744ha E R

V 1 1 E

)

1

4

3

.

5 11 71 32 8.3 5

12 14 1 69 1 1 0

4

9

1

3

E 9 3 . D 3 4

. 11 8 W 6 10 S 1 407 T A 1 410 R .7 4.5802ha E R 8 E D EDWARD STREET LAND EXCHANGE T 0 1 To be closed following relocation north to new 20 metre road

0 1 40 .9 reserve. Subject to separate LAA 1997 Section 11 (2)(b) with 0 0 0 2 .8 1 0 8 1 Department of Lands & City of Gosnells (6907m²) 0 1

16 9.2 10

ORIGINAL LANDHOLDING PLAN

0 1 WE LSHP OOL RO 409 412 AD 6 E A 4 ST 2.4964ha 4 PAW 803 (2.3535ha)

5 . 75

0

3 72 7 8 2 RESERVE FOR 1.0915ha 1.0032ha 9 DRAINAGE 1.0036ha 10 G 11

0 R 200 1 6 12

0 O 411 1 9 2 4.2908ha 1.0217ha V 9 1.2869ha E C O R URT T NE N 5 Y O P E LA M C E 1.0235ha E A S A E 302

D

2 E 2.0010ha 4 3 Y .9 14 IN A L E 1.2437ha IP W P

501

301 H S A 3.2597ha G I G 2.2910ha

402 H

A I L 1.7396ha E E M G R 22 O A R

P O R

V

E 500 21

R

O 4.6764ha

A

404 D 12 1.2809ha 76 2.5133ha 414 102 501 11 401 1.0120ha 4.4898ha 1.2809ha

10 71 1.2809ha

403 406 9 1.0083ha 2 1.2809ha 2.4288ha 52 405 8 D 1.2809ha A O R

L 68 7 L 4 E 1.2809ha W D 1.5115ha L E 13 D O W C A R D 408 S T 1.4157ha R E 53 E T 5 71 1.5051ha

T 14

N

E

M

E

S A

E 410

2.5819ha

E 407

N

I

L

E

P

I P

72

S 70

A 40

G

2.0461ha

A

I

L

E

M

R A P 409

G

412 R 75 14 O 2.0360ha V 73 E

R

O

411 A

D

74

Revised Plan of Subdivision

Maddington - Kenwick Strategic Employment Area - Precinct 3A plan: designed: scale: Taylor Burrell Barnett Town Planning & Design N 15/073/179B JR 1:5,000@A3 Level 7, 160 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 date: checked: p: (08) 9226 4276 f: (08) 9322 7879 e: [email protected] 0 50 100m A LINC PROPERTY PROJECT 1/05/2018 JR © COPYRIGHT TAYLOR BURRELL BARNETT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT projection: drawn: MAY BE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC, MECHANICAL, PHOTOCOPYING, MICRO COPYING OR RECORDING WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM TAYLOR BURRELL BARNETT. PCG 94 NM ALL AREAS AND DIMENSIONS DISPLAYED ARE SUBJECT TO DETAIL SURVEY. Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Transport Impact Assessment

Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

CW937700

Prepared for Linc Property Pty Ltd 8 February 2019

8 February 2019 Cardno i Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Contact Information Document Information

Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd Prepared for Linc Property Pty Ltd Trading as Cardno Project Name Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal ABN 77 009 119 000 Place, Roe Highway

11 Harvest Terrace, West Perth WA, 6005 Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

File Reference CW93770-TR-RP-009-D- Lot_21_TIA.docx www.cardno.com Job Reference CW937700 Phone 08 9273 3888 Fax 08 9465 8664 Date 8 February 2019

Version Number E

Author(s):

Marc Dunford Effective Date 8/02/2019 Transport Planner/Economist

Approved By:

Ray Cook Date Approved 8/02/2019 Manager – Traffic & Transport Planning

Document History

Version Effective Date Description of Revision Prepared by Reviewed by

A 18th Dec 2018 Working Draft Marc Dunford Sam Laybutt B 19th Dec 2018 Final Report Marc Dunford Sam Laybutt C 20th Dec 2018 Final Report Marc Dunford Raymond Rachmat D 7th Jan 2019 Final Report Marc Dunford Scott Lambie E 8th Feb 2019 Minor text update Raymond Rachmat Sam Laybutt

© Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | ii Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 2 Existing Situation 2 2.1 Existing Site Context 2 2.2 Existing Road Network 6 2.3 Existing Intersections 8 2.4 Existing Site Traffic Generation and Land Uses 10 2.5 Existing Road Network Performance 10 2.6 Existing Restricted Access Vehicle (RAV) Network 10 2.7 Existing Pedestrian/Cycle Networks 11 2.8 Existing Public Transport Facilities 12 2.9 Crash Assessment 12 3 Development Proposal 13 3.1 Proposed Development 13 3.2 Access Arrangements 13 3.3 Swept Path Analysis 14 3.4 Car Parking Provision 15 3.5 Bicycle Parking Provision 15 4 Changes to Surrounding Transport Network 16 4.1 Road Network 16 4.2 Planned RAV 7 Network 17 4.3 Pedestrian/Cycle Facilities 17 4.4 Public Transport Facilities 18 5 Integration with Surrounding Area 19 5.1 Surrounding Attractors/Generators 19 5.2 Proposed Changes to Surrounding Land Uses 19 6 Analysis of Transport Network 20 6.1 Analysis Overview 20 6.2 Background Traffic 21 6.3 Development Traffic Generation 22 6.4 Development Traffic Distribution 22 6.5 Background Development Traffic 23 6.6 Assessment Scenario Summary 25 6.7 Intersection Performance 25 6.8 Car Park Layout 27 6.9 Pedestrian and Cycle Access/Amenity 27 6.10 Impact on Neighbouring Areas 27 7 Conclusions and Summary 28

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | iii Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Appendices

Appendix A SIte Plan Appendix B Swept Path Appendix C WAPC Checklist

Tables

Table 2-1 Existing mid-block traffic volumes (two-way) 10 Table 3-1 Car Parking Requirements 15 Table 3-2 Proposed land uses and parking bays 15 Table 6-1 Trip Generation Directional Distribution 22 Table 6-2 Adopted Trip Generation 22 Table 6-3 Scenario Summary 25 Table 6-4 Level of Service (LOS) Performance Criteria 25 Table 6-5 Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection – Scenario 1 2019 + Development 27 Table 6-6 Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection – Scenario 2 2029 + Development 27

Figures

Figure 2-1 Site Location within MKSEA Precinct 3 3 Figure 2-2 Site Location within City of Gosnells Scheme Zone Map 4 Figure 2-3 Close-up image of the Site 5 Figure 2-4 Existing road network 6 Figure 2-5 Existing Intermodal Place / Logistics Boulevard intersection 8 Figure 2-6 Existing Welshpool Road East / Coldwell Road intersection 8 Figure 2-7 Existing Coldwell Road / Logistics Boulevard intersection 9 Figure 2-8 Existing RAV Network 10 Figure 2-9 Existing pedestrian/cycling facilities 11 Figure 2-10 Existing bus routes 12 Figure 3-1 Access arrangements for the Site 13 Figure 3-2 36.2m A-Double Swept Path Entering Access C 14 Figure 3-3 36.2m A-Double Swept Path Exiting Access A 14 Figure 4-1 Road network changes 16 Figure 4-2 Planned RAV 7 Network 17 Figure 6-1 Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection 20 Figure 6-2 Background Traffic 2019 21 Figure 6-3 Background Traffic 2029 21 Figure 6-4 Adopted site traffic distributions 23

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | iv Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Figure 6-5 Background and Development Traffic – 2019 24 Figure 6-6 Background and Development Traffic – 2029 24 Figure 6-7 SIDRA layout for Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection 26

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | v Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

1 Introduction

1.1 Background Cardno has been commissioned by Linc Property Pty Ltd to conduct a Traffic Impact Assessment for a proposed development of a Transport Facility at Lot 21, Roe Highway Logistics Park (the ‘Site’) within the Maddington-Kenwick Strategic Employment Area (MKSEA). The total site area will be 38,345 m2 and will be developed as a transport depot with approximately 5,000m2 total building area, including warehouses, a workshop and an office. The remainder of the area will be paved area allowing access for the transport trucks visiting The Site. The development plan is enclosed in Appendix A This report has been prepared in accordance with the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) Transport Impact Assessment Guidelines Volume 4 – Individual Developments (2016) and the relevant checklist is included at Appendix C. This report will specifically focus on traffic access, circulation, and safety. Discussion regarding pedestrian, cycle and public transport considerations are also provided.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 1 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 2 Existing Situation

2.1 Existing Site Context The site is location within Precinct 3A (sub-area of Precinct 3) Structure Plan of the Maddington - Kenwick Strategic Employment Area (MKSEA). The proposed development site is located at future Lot 21, Roe Highway Logistics Park in Kenwick. The development is expected to be completed in 2019. The Site is located in an undeveloped area and is therefore currently bounded by vacant lots on all sides. The location of the Site is illustrated in Figure 2-1, Figure 2-2 shows the Site location within the City of Gosnells’ Local Planning Scheme Zone Map, and Figure 2-3 shows a close-up view of the Site. Grove Road to the east of the Site has recently been realigned so that it will join Welshpool Road East as opposed to terminating at the freight railway. Grove Road is due to be renamed Logistics Boulevard once developments are complete, and will be named as such throughout the report. The new intersection of Logistics Boulevard with Welshpool Road East is expected to be completed by 20th December 2018. A new road providing access to The Site, Intermodal Place, has recently been completed.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 2 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Figure 2-1 Site Location within MKSEA Precinct 3

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 3 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Figure 2-2 Site Location within City of Gosnells Scheme Zone Map

The Site

Source: City of Gosnells Local Planning Scheme No. 6

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 4 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Figure 2-3 Close-up image of the Site

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 5 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 2.2 Existing Road Network Figure 2-4 shows the layout and classification of the roads surrounding the Site. Road classifications are defined in the Main Roads Functional Hierarchy as follows: > Primary Distributors (light blue): Form the regional and inter-regional grid of MRWA traffic routes and carry large volumes of fast-moving traffic. Some are strategic freight routes, and all are National or State roads. They are managed by Main Roads. > Regional Distributors (red): Roads that are not Primary Distributors, but which link significant destinations and are designed for efficient movement of people and goods within and beyond regional areas. They are managed by Local Government. > District Distributor A (green): These carry traffic between industrial, commercial and residential areas and connect to Primary Distributors. These are likely to be truck routes and provide only limited access to adjoining property. They are managed by Local Government. > District Distributor B (dark blue): Perform a similar function to District Distributor A but with reduced capacity due to flow restrictions from access to and roadside parking alongside adjoining property. These are often older roads with traffic demand in excess of that originally intended. District Distributor A and B roads run between land-use cells and not through them, forming a grid that would ideally be around 1.5 kilometres apart. They are managed by Local Government. > Local Distributors (orange): Carry traffic within a cell and link District Distributors at the boundary to access roads. The route of the Local Distributor discourages through traffic so that the cell formed by the grid of District Distributors only carries traffic belonging to or serving the area. These roads should accommodate buses but discourage trucks. They are managed by Local government. > Access Roads (grey): Provide access to abutting properties with amenity, safety and aesthetic aspects having priority over the vehicle movement function. These roads are bicycle and pedestrian friendly. They are managed by Local government.

Figure 2-4 Existing road network

The Site

Source: Main Roads Mapping Information Centre 2018

The characteristics of the surrounding road network are discussed as follows:

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 6 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

> Welshpool Road East: Located north of the Site, Welshpool Road is divided carriageway road with two lanes in each direction. It is classified as a Primary Distributor according to the MRWA Metropolitan Functional Road Hierarchy (MFRH) with a posted speed limit of 70 km/h. > Roe Highway: Located to the west of the Site, Roe Highway is classified as Primary Distributor with a posted speed of 100 km/h. It forms a part of the RAV 7 network. > Logistics Boulevard (formerly Grove Road): This road is a two-way, single carriageway road providing access to existing adjacent properties. The road is classified as an Access Road according to the MRWA MFRH with posted speed of 50 km/h. > Intermodal Place: This road is a two-way single carriageway which provides access to The Site. The road is a dead-end and terminates at the Fremantle Railway Freight Line with a wide turning space. > Courtney Place: Courtney Place is situated approximately 250m east from the Site. The road is a two- way, single carriageway, cul-de-sac road and is classified as an Access Road. The road currently functions to serve the existing residential dwellings east of the Site. As part of the MKSEA Precinct 3A Structure Plan, Courtney Place is proposed to be extended and connect into the newly developed Logistics Boulevard. > Coldwell Road: This road is currently a two-way single carriageway road classified as a Distributor B according to the MRWA MFRH with posted speed of 60 km/h. Coldwell Road currently serves as the primary point of access into and out of the area. Along with Logistics Boulevard, it is designated as a MRWA RAV 2 and RAV 3 route.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 7 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 2.3 Existing Intersections > Intermodal Place / Logistics Boulevard is located South East of the Site. It is a three-way priority intersection.

Figure 2-5 Existing Intermodal Place / Logistics Boulevard intersection

Source: Nearmap November 2018

> Welshpool Road East / Coldwell Road is located approximately 900m East of The Site. It is a three-way priority intersection with a right turn pocket into Coldwell Road.

Figure 2-6 Existing Welshpool Road East / Coldwell Road intersection

Source: Nearmap November 2018

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 8 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

> Coldwell Road / Logistics Boulevard is located approximately 950m South of The Site. It is a three-way priority intersection.

Figure 2-7 Existing Coldwell Road / Logistics Boulevard intersection

Source: Nearmap November 2018

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 9 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 2.4 Existing Site Traffic Generation and Land Uses Currently the Site is vacant and there are no trips to/from the Site.

2.5 Existing Road Network Performance The existing two-way traffic volume of road in the vicinity of the Site is shown in Table 2-1. Logistics Boulevard and other roads internal to Precinct 3A are not yet open to traffic.

Table 2-1 Existing mid-block traffic volumes (two-way)

Average Two-way Weekday Traffic Volumes

Road Vehicles per AM Peak Hour Vehicles per PM Peak Hour

Welshpool Road East 2,616 2,885

Source: Main Roads Traffic Maps Data (2016/2017)

2.6 Existing Restricted Access Vehicle (RAV) Network Existing RAV network is shown below in Figure 2-8. Up to RAV 3 sized vehicle can access the Site.

Figure 2-8 Existing RAV Network

The Site

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 10 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 2.7 Existing Pedestrian/Cycle Networks The Site is currently not served by any pedestrian or cycling facility as it is currently vacant. Refer to Figure 2-9 for pedestrian and cycling facilities in the surrounding area. The nearest available cycling/pedestrian facility is a shared path located on the northern side of Welshpool Road East and the Roe Highway Principal Shared Path (PSP).

Figure 2-9 Existing pedestrian/cycling facilities

Source: Department of Transport Active Transport Map, October 2016

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 11 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 2.8 Existing Public Transport Facilities The Site is not currently served by any existing public transport services. The closest public transport routes are bus route 282 and 283 that run along Welshpool Road with the closest bus stop located on the southern side of Welshpool Road East approximately 500m north of the Site near Hale Road and Welshpool Road intersection. Refer to Figure 2-10 for the bus routes in the area surrounding the Site.

Figure 2-10 Existing bus routes

The Site

2.9 Crash Assessment Crash data for the five-year period between January 2013 and December 2017 for Logistics Boulevard, from Edward Street to end of road, were sought from the Main Roads (WA). The search shows that one minor crash occurred midblock between a car and a stationary object.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 12 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 3 Development Proposal

3.1 Proposed Development The proposed development is a transport depot facility located at the proposed Lot 21, Roe Highway Logistics Park within Precinct 3A (sub-area of Precinct 3) of the Maddington – Kenwick Strategic Employment Area (MKSEA). The proposed development consists of the following: > 2 warehouses of 1,345 sqm each > 1,345 sqm of workshop > 335 sqm wash bay area > 400 sqm main office > 115 car parking bays > 95 truck/trailer parking bays

3.2 Access Arrangements Access arrangements for the proposed development are shown in Figure 3-1, as follows: > Access A: exit for trucks in forward gear > Access B: entry and exit for cars in forward gear > Access C: entry for truck in forward gear

Figure 3-1 Access arrangements for the Site

A

B

C

The main entry into the site will be via Access C for heavy vehicles, Access A will be the exit for heavy vehicles. Cars will enter and exit through Access B. As informed by the future tenant, the largest vehicle to enter the site is expected to be a 36.2m A-Double sized truck.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 13 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 3.3 Swept Path Analysis As mentioned previously the largest vehicle to enter the Site is a 36.2m A-Double vehicle, therefore swept path analysis will be undertaken using the A-Double vehicle. The result of the swept path can be seen below in Figure 3-2 and Figure 3-3. Larger format of the drawing is attached in Appendix B. The results shows that the Site can accommodate the design vehicle.

Figure 3-2 36.2m A-Double Swept Path Entering Access C

Figure 3-3 36.2m A-Double Swept Path Exiting Access A

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 14 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 3.4 Car Parking Provision The car parking provision required to service the proposed warehouse and associated office has been calculated based on the City of Gosnells’ Local Planning Scheme No.6. The applicable land uses and their car parking requirements are set out in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2 shows these requirements applied to the Site.

Table 3-1 Car Parking Requirements

Use Car Parking Requirements

2 Transport Depot § 1 space per 100m gross floor area (GFA), OR § 1 space per every employee § Minimum 4 spaces

Table 3-2 Proposed land uses and parking bays No. Proposed Shortfall/ Land use Size Requirement Compliant Employees Car Bays Excess § 2 Warehouses: 2,690 m2 Transport 60 on-site § 1 Workshop: 1,345m2 60 bays 115 bays +55 bays Yes Depot employees § Office 400m2 Total 60 4,435m2 60 bays 115 bays +55 bays Yes employees

Based on the current plan, the parking provisions for the development are slightly above the requirements set out in Table 3A of the City of Gosnells’ Local Planning Scheme No.6, with an excess of 55 bays. There is ample parking provision and the Site is compliant with the local planning regulations with respect to car parking.

3.5 Bicycle Parking Provision The City of Gosnells’ Local Planning Scheme No. 6 does not have any requirements for bicycle parking facilities for this land use.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 15 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 4 Changes to Surrounding Transport Network

4.1 Road Network The following changes are proposed and underway: > Logistics Boulevard / Welshpool Road East / Hale Road intersection is slated to be completed on 20th December 2018. > Coldwell Road will be widened. > Logistics Boulevard, South of the recent realignment, will be widened. > A new road, Freight Road, will be constructed, running between Coldwell Road and Logistics Boulevard. The changes are highlighted in Figure 4-1 below.

Figure 4-1 Road network changes

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 16 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 4.2 Planned RAV 7 Network The following roads will be included in the RAV 7 network (see Figure 4-2): > Logistics Boulevard > Intermodal Place > Freight Road > Coldwell Road > Courtney Place (part of)

Figure 4-2 Planned RAV 7 Network

4.3 Pedestrian/Cycle Facilities As of October 2018, the City of Kalamunda Council adopted the Bicycle Plan 2017 which proposes cycling infrastructure to be built in the City of Kalamunda including areas surrounding the Site. Access to the Site from Forrestfield and Wattle Grove to the northwest via bicycle will be improved by the proposed new cycle routes and extensions to the existing PSP included in the Bicycle Plan. Changes to Welshpool Road East will improve the safety for cycling travelling along the road. Information from the Department of Transport indicates that in the long term, a cycling facility along the freight rail line may be provided, and may connect to the west of the Site.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 17 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 4.4 Public Transport Facilities According to the Precinct 3A Structure Plan Transport Assessment Report by Cardno, the Public Transport Authority (PTA) advised that there are no changes to the existing public transport services along Welshpool Road are likely to occur within the foreseeable future. Furthermore, PTA suggest that due to the relatively low employment density associated with industrial land use, along with the lack of connectivity between the eastern and western precincts within MKSEA, it is unlikely that PTA would justify the provision of a public transport service within MKSEA.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 18 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 5 Integration with Surrounding Area

5.1 Surrounding Attractors/Generators The Site is located within an industrial area that will be developed with similar land uses. No major trip attractors or generators will be located within close proximity to the site.

5.2 Proposed Changes to Surrounding Land Uses The Site is currently located on undeveloped semi-rural land that will be developed into industrial land uses, consistent with the MKSEA Structure Plan.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 19 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 6 Analysis of Transport Network

6.1 Analysis Overview

6.1.1 Critical Intersection SIDRA analysis was undertaken at the following intersection to estimate the impact of the development generated traffic on the surrounding transport network (also highlighted in Figure 6-1): > Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place

Figure 6-1 Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection

Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place

6.1.2 Assessment Years As identified in the ‘WAPC Transport Impact Assessment Guidelines Volume 4: Individual Developments’ dated August 2016, traffic conditions should be analysed for the year of assumed opening year and 10-year horizon after full development. Opening year of the Site is assumed to be 2019, by which point the intersection with Welshpool Road East should be completed as outlined in Section 4.1. It is also assumed that 10% of available lots in MKSEA Precinct 3 would already be occupied by tenants and operational. In 2029, 10-year horizon after full development, it is assumed that 100% of MKSEA Precinct 3 would be occupied and operational.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 20 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 6.2 Background Traffic Background traffic data was sourced from the AIMSUN microsimulation modelling included in the MKSEA Precinct 3 Transport Impact Assessment previously undertaken by Cardno, based on ROM (Regional Operations Model) outputs supplied by MRWA in September 2017. At 2019, the background traffic includes the estimated traffic flow that would be diverted to Logistics Boulevard from Coldwell Road as well as traffic generated from the 10% build out of MKSEA Precinct 3. At 2029, the background traffic includes traffic generated from the 100% build out of MKSEA Precinct 3. Figure 6-2 and Figure 6-3 shows the adopted background traffic volumes.

Figure 6-2 Background Traffic 2019

Logistics Boulevard

1 1 L 1 287 Intermodal Place 1 75 1 0 R R T L T 1 132 0 85

Logistics Boulevard

Figure 6-3 Background Traffic 2029

Logistics Boulevard

14 7 L 7 368 Intermodal Place 15 240 7 3 R R T L T 8 224 3 258

Logistics Boulevard

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 21 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 6.3 Development Traffic Generation The trip generation from and to the Site is developed based on information provided by the tenant. > Personnel: - 60 employees on site > Visitors: - 10-15 per day > Drivers: - Approximately 25-30 truck drivers arrive on-site per day > Trucks Movement: - 150 movements per day, evenly distributed between 6am and 6pm. For the purpose of robust assessment, employees and drivers are assumed travel by private vehicle and arrive within the same peak hour. It is assumed visitors do not arrive during the peak hours of the Site given that the Site peak hours are expected to be 6am-7am, therefore visitors are not included in the trip generation estimate at peak hours. Trip Generation Directionality is shown in Table 6-1. Summary of the total trip generated by the site is shown in Table 6-2.

Table 6-1 Trip Generation Directionality

Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily

In Out In Out In Out

Staff 100% 0% 0% 100% 50% 50%

Drivers 100% 0% 0% 100% 50% 50%

Trucks – 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Semis

Trucks – B- 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Doubles

Table 6-2 Adopted Trip Generation

Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily

In Out In Out In Out

Staff 60 0 0 60 60 60

Drivers 30 0 0 30 30 30

Visitors - - - - 15 15

Trucks – 10 10 10 10 120 120 Semis

Trucks – B- 3 3 3 3 30 30 Doubles

Total 103 13 13 103 255 255

6.4 Development Traffic Distribution The traffic distribution assumption is shown in Figure 6-4.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 22 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Figure 6-4 Adopted site traffic distributions

INBOUND Site

64% 66%

Legend 36% AM Distribution 34% PM Distribution

OUTBOUND Site

69% 65%

Legend 31%

AM Distribution 35% PM Distribution

6.5 Background and Development Traffic The background traffic adopted and shown Figure 6-2 and Figure 6-3 are trips generated for the entire MKSEA Precinct 3, therefore it also includes traffic generated by the proposed development. However, for the purpose of robust assessment, the trips generated by the proposed development have been added on top of the background traffic. The total background and development traffic for the assessment are shown in Figure 6-5 and Figure 6-6.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 23 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Figure 6-5 Background and Development Traffic – 2019

Logistics Boulevard

68 9 L 9 287 Intermodal Place 67 75 37 4 R R T L T 38 132 5 85

Logistics Boulevard

Figure 6-6 Background and Development Traffic – 2029

Logistics Boulevard

Intermodal Place 80 16 L 15 368 80 240 43 7 R R T L T 45 224 8 258

Logistics Boulevard

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 24 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 6.6 Assessment Scenario Summary A summary of scenarios to be applied to the analysis of the critical intersection are shown in Table 6-3.

Table 6-3 Scenario Summary

Year Background Traffic Development Traffic

Scenario 1 2019 Included, Included Opening year of Site 10% of MKSEA Precinct 3 is completed

Scenario 2 2029 Included, Included 10-year horizon 100% of MKSEA Precinct 3 is completed

Note: As the roads are not yet open to traffic, no analysis of the ‘Existing’ conditions has been undertaken for either 2018, 2019 or 2029.

6.7 Intersection Performance SIDRA results for each approach are presented below in the form of Degree of Saturday (DOS), Average Delay, Level of Service (LOS) and 95th Percentile Queue. These characteristics are defined as follows: > Degree of Saturation (DOS): is the ratio of the arrival traffic flow to the capacity of the approach during the same period. The theoretical intersection capacity is exceeded for an un-signalised intersection where DOS > 0.80; > 95% Queue: is the statistical estimate of the queue length up to or below which 95% of all observed queues would be expected; > Average Delay: is the average of all travel time delays for vehicles through the intersection. An un- signalised intersection can be considered to be operated at capacity where there average delay exceeds 40 seconds for any movement; and > Level of Service (LOS): is the qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream and the perception by motorists and/or passengers. The different levels of service can generally be described as shown in Table 6-4.

Table 6-4 Level of Service (LOS) Performance Criteria

LOS Description Signalised Un-signalised Intersection Intersection

A Free-flow operations (best condition) ≤10 sec ≤10 sec

B Reasonable free-flow operations 10-20 sec 10-15 sec

C At or near free-flow operations 20-35 sec 15-25 sec

D Decreasing free-flow levels 35-55 sec 5-35 sec

E Operations at capacity 55-80 sec 35-50 sec

F A breakdown in vehicular flow (worst condition) ≥80 sec ≥50 sec

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 25 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

6.7.2 Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place Intersection The following presents the results of the analysis of the Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection for Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. Figure 6-7 is a SIDRA layout representation of the intersection. Note that the second southbound lane on Logistics Boulevard has been excluded from the analysis as it becomes a dedicated left turn pocket into Freight Road.

Figure 6-7 SIDRA layout for Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection

The results from the SIDRA analysis for the Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 for the AM and PM peak hour periods and are summarised in Table 6-5 and Table 6-6 respectively.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 26 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Table 6-5 Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection – Scenario 1 2019 + Development Intersection Scenario 1 Scenario 1 Approach AM Peak PM Peak

95% 95% Delay Delay DOS LOS Queue DOS LOS Queue (s) (s) (m) (m)

Logistics Boulevard (South) L 0.099 5.7 LOS A 0 0.054 6.6 LOS A 0 T 0.099 0 LOS A 0 0.054 0 LOS A 0 Logistics Boulevard (North) T 0.091 0.5 LOS A 3.1 0.177 0 LOS A 0.9 R 0.091 6.3 LOS A 3.1 0.177 7.3 LOS A 0.9 Intermodal Place L 0.015 7.5 LOS A 0.7 0.094 6 LOS A 2.7 R 0.015 9.2 LOS A 0.7 0.094 7.7 LOS A 2.7

Table 6-6 Logistics Boulevard / Intermodal Place intersection – Scenario 2 2029 + Development Intersection Scenario 2 Scenario 2 Approach AM Peak PM Peak

95% 95% Delay Delay DOS LOS Queue DOS LOS Queue (s) (s) (m) (m)

Logistics Boulevard (South) L 0.156 5.7 LOS A 0 0.156 6.2 LOS A 0 T 0.156 0 LOS A 0 0.156 0 LOS A 0 Logistics Boulevard (North) T 0.201 0.5 LOS A 5.4 0.231 0.1 LOS A 1.8 R 0.201 6.9 LOS A 5.4 0.231 8.3 LOS A 1.8 Intermodal Place L 0.031 7.4 LOS A 1.1 0.142 6.8 LOS A 4 R 0.031 11.1 LOS B 1.1 0.142 10 LOS B 4

As indicated in Table 6-5 and Table 6-6, the intersection has sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic demand during the weekday AM and PM peak hour in the year 2019 and 2029.

6.8 Car Park Layout The car park sight line clearance at the access driveways, dimension of car parking bays, circulation roadways, and aisles have been checked against AS 2890.1 requirements for car park Class 1A and no non- compliances have been identified.

6.9 Pedestrian and Cycle Access/Amenity The pedestrian and cycling network is described in Section 2.6 of this Transport Impact Assessment. Employees will be able to utilise the 2.5m wide path network to access the Site from surrounding land uses, cycle networks and bus stops located on Welshpool Road East.

6.10 Impact on Neighbouring Areas It is expected that the Site will have minimal impact on the neighbouring area as it is an industrial development located within an industrial area. Traffic noise and vibration generated by the Site is expected to be minimal and at a similar level to other developments in the surrounding area.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 27 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA 7 Conclusions and Summary

This Transport Impact Assessment outlines the transport aspects of the proposed redevelopment focusing on traffic operations, access, and car parking. Discussion regarding pedestrian, cycle parking and public transport considerations are also provided. This assessment has been prepared in accordance with the WAPC Transport Impact Assessment Guidelines Volume 4: Individual Developments (2016) for lodgement with the development application. The following conclusions have been made in regards to the proposed development: > The proposed development consists of: - 2,690m2 warehouse - 1,345m2 workshop - 400m2 office - 115 parking bays - 95 truck trailer parking bays > It is estimated that the proposed development would generate 116 trips in the AM and PM peak. > Access to/from the Site will be via the newly developed Intermodal Place and the Welshpool Road East / Hale Road intersection which is expected to be completed 20th December 2018, prior to the development completion. > A SIDRA analysis of Intermodal Place and Logistics Boulevard intersection has been undertaken. The analysis was assessed for the year of opening (2019) and 10-years after full opening (2029). Based on the analysis results, the development will have no impact of note to the road network. No significant queue lengths or delays are expected at the intersection. > The proposed car parking provision of 115 bays satisfies the City of Gosnells requirements and will sufficiently cater on-site employees. The parking provision represents a surplus of 55 bays and as such will not negatively impact the amenity of the surrounding road network. > The nearest bus stop is located on Welshpool Road East, approximately 500m north of the Site near Hale Road and Welshpool Road intersection. This bus stop serves bus routes 282 and 283.

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 28 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

APPENDIX

SITE PLAN

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 29 33493

APPROX. 40

GOSNELLS / KALAMUNDA / GOSNELLS BOUNDARY LINE BOUNDARY 16t Forklift accessible 16t Forklift 102 tonne hardstand 42 tonne hardstand Fully laden 40' container stacking (max. 4 high) (max. stacking 40' container Fully laden accessible Reach Stacker

SOFT PAVING AREA x x x x x CONCRETE SLAB - (RED ASPHALT) EXTENT OF CONTAINER RATED HEAVY DUTY HEAVY RATED OF CONTAINER EXTENT AREA - (CONCRETE) PAVING REACH STACKER ACCESSIBLE EXTENT OF PAVING AREA - (CONCRETE) HEAVY DUTY HEAVY DUTY EXTENT OF TRUCK PARKING PAVING AREA - (ASPHALT) HEAVY DUTY EXTENT OF STANDARD PAVING AREA - (CONCRETE) EXTENT OF FUTURE WAREHOUSE 1 EXTENT OF LIGHT DUTY PAVING AREA EXTENT OF CANTILEVER AWNING EXTENT OF 15m WIDE EASEMENT PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE EXTENT OF LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE / INDICATIVE POLE MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHT LOCATIONS FENCE TYPE FN-01 CITY OF KALAMUNDA OF CITY

LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE AREA CITY OF GOSNELLS OF CITY

20 18000 sqm. approx. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. sqm. approx. spaces spaces 95 115 335 380 560 400 1,345 1,345 1,345 1,095 5,330 2,346 8,230 2,760 3,360 8,470 2,660 4,300 37,995

0 12000

12000 18000 2900 76075

15000 APPROX.

EASEMENT 18000 ONLY TRAILER (Incl. Warehouse Office & (Incl. Warehouse (1 Level)

1 2 12000 1:400 @ A1 Scale: Total Light Duty Paving Area Total Warehouse Awning Area 15m wide Easement Area Total Car Parking Provided Total Truck / Trailer Parking Provided Amenities) Truck Parking Heavy Duty Paving Area Warehouse Warehouse Workshop Wash Bay Area Standard Heavy Duty Paving Area Container Rated Heavy Duty Paving Container Rated Heavy Duty (Incl. paving area under Brezzeway) (85 no. Trucks & 10 no. Trailers Only) Breezeway Main Office Heavy Duty Reach Stacker Accessible Paving Area Future Warehouse 1 Concrete Slab Landscape/Drainage/Soft Paving Area SPACES TOTAL SITE AREA TOTAL BUILDING AREA DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT

TRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLYTRAILER ONLY 95 no. TRUCK / TRAILER PARKING (85 no. TRUCKS & 10 no. TRAILERS ONLY) TANKS 35000 2 no. 50KL UNDERGROUND 55000 WORKSHOP / WAREHOUSE COMPRESSOR PROPOSED LOCATION 13000 B B B 2500 21st December 2018 FENCE TYPE FN-02

6000 AREA BAY Date: 335 sqm. WASH B B FENCE TYPE FN-01 WAREHOUSE EXPANSION AREA 3,905 sqm. OUTLINE OF FUTURE

35000 20000 RSD RSD PIT 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H survey by licensed surveyor. attributes, feasibility or accuracy of anything or accuracy feasibility attributes, disclosed in this plan. shown on or dimensions, & proposed features, All existing only are approximate areas and boundaries site to verification via detailed and subject No assurance is given as to the features, given as to is No assurance x x NOTE: RSD RSD CENTRELINE OF EASEMENT 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H 1805-121

19300 25000 APPROX. RSD RSD AREA 1,345 sqm. 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H WORKSHOP Project No: RSD RSD 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H B B 248235 APPROX. SITE 2.9m WIDE LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE AREA DA-002(C) (Linemarking only) COLUMN TO SUIT FUTURE EXPANSION AREA 85 sqm. 8 no. CAR PARKING SPACES & AMENITIES

B B col col WAREHOUSE OFFICE Drawing No: 140860 RSD RSD AREA 1,345 sqm. 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H (Incl. Warehouse Office & Amenities) B B

6000 WAREHOUSE 2 OVERALL WORKSHOP / WAREHOUSE

RSD RSD 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H B B Development Application 3 ROWS OF BARBED WIRE 3 ROWS OF 2100 HIGH BLACK PVC COATED 2100 HIGH MESH FENCE CHAINWIRE AREA 560 sqm. BREEZEWAY B B

RSD RSD TURNING 4000W x 5000H 4000W x 5000H BAY Drawing Type: RSD

1800 4000W x 5000H B SCALE 1:100 TYPICAL SIDE & REAR

300 FENCE TYPE FN-02 BOUNDARY FENCE ELEVATION 2100 6000

TURNING COLUMN TO SUIT FUTURE EXPANSION

BAY col col FB/DRAIN SWING GATE FN-01 AREA 1,345 sqm. WAREHOUSE 1 SCREEN FENCE TEMPORARY COLORBOND 1.8m HIGH TEMPORARY TRUCK PARKING AREA FB/DRAIN PROPOSED FUEL BOWSER LOCATION FENCE TYPE FN-02 ATU 12800 (1 Level) MAIN OFFICE 2100 HIGH BLACK 2100 HIGH GARRISON FENCE MAIN OFFICE AREA 400 sqm. Site Plan PROPOSED TRANSPORT FACILITY Lot 1 Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

31250 MAIN OFFICE

2100 107 no. CAR PARKING SPACES 18500 SCALE 1:100 TYPICAL STREET FRONTAGE FENCE TYPE FN-01 FENCE & GATE ELEVATION SWING GATE FN-01 SWING GATE FN-01 PROPOSED ESTATE SIGN TRUCK ENTRY

EXIT 3m WIDE LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE AREA 3m WIDE LANDSCAPE / DRAINAGE AREA TRUCK CAR ENTRY / EXIT

FENCE TYPE FN-01 INTERMODAL PLACE AREA 5.3m x 5.9m TRANSFORMER PROPOSED ELEC. These drawings are subject to copyright and may to copyright are subject These drawings permission of Intergen without the expressed are approximate only dimensions on drawings confirmation by survey. and are subject to i,QWHUJHQ3URSHUW\'HYHORSPHQW3W\/WG not be copied, used or altered in any way not be copied, used Property Development Pty Ltd. All areas and Property Development Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

APPENDIX

SWEPT PATH

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 31 DESIGN VEHICLE: JAMES DRACUP BY : K TRANS WA Date Scale Size Perth Tel: 08 9273 3888 07.01.2019 A3 © Cardno Limited All Rights Reserved. LOT 21 ROE HIGHWAY LOGISTIC PARK KENWICK WA ® This document is produced by Cardno Limited solely for the 7 January 2019 2:15 PM benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the 36.2 A-DOUBLE SWEPT PATH terms of the retainer. Cardno Limited does not and shall not U:\Projects\CW937700_Linc_Property_Pty_Ltd_MKSEA_Transport_Asessment\5_Technical\Traffic\Graphics\CAD\_Phase 12 Lot 21 TIA\Swept Path\CW937700-TR-LOT SP.dwg assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any CW937700-TR-LOT 21 SP2 E third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document. Drawing Number Revision CAD File: DATE PLOTTED: Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

APPENDIX

WAPC CHECKLIST

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 33 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Comments / Item Provided Proposals

Summary

Introduction/Background

name of applicant and consultant Included in Section 1.1

development location and context Included in Section 2.1

brief description of development proposal Included in Section 1.1

key issues N/A

Background information Included in Section 1.1

Existing situation

existing site uses (if any) Included in Section 2.4

existing parking and demand (if N/A appropriate)

existing access arrangements N/A

existing site traffic Included in Section 2.4

surrounding land uses Included in Section 2.1

Included in Section 2.2, surrounding road network 2.6

Included in Section 2.2, traffic management on frontage roads 2.3

traffic flows on surrounding roads (usually am and pm peak hours) Included in Section 2.5

traffic flows at major intersections (usually am and pm peak hours) Included in Section 2.5

operation of surrounding intersections Included in Section 6.7

existing pedestrian/cycle networks Included in Section 2.7

existing public transport services surrounding the development Included in Section 2.8

Crash data Included in Section 2.9

Development proposal

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 34 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

regional context Included in Section 2.1

proposed land uses Included in Section 3.1

table of land uses and quantities Included in Section 3.1

access arrangements Included in Section 3.2

parking provision Included in Section 3.4

end of trip facilities Included in Section 3.5

any specific issues N/A

Included in Section 4.1, road network 4.2

intersection layouts and controls Included in Section 4.1

pedestrian/cycle networks and crossing facilities Included in Section 4.3

public transport services Included in Section 4.1

Integration with surrounding area

surrounding major attractors/generators Included in Section 5.1

committed developments and transport proposals Included in Section 3, 4

proposed changes to land uses within 1200 metres Included in Section 5.2

travel desire lines from development to these attractors/generators N/A

adequacy of existing transport networks Included in Section 6.7

deficiencies in existing transport networks N/A

remedial measures to address deficiencies N/A

Analysis of transport networks

assessment years Included in Section 6.1

time periods Included in Section 6.1

development generated traffic Included in Section 6.3

distribution of generated traffic Included in Section 6.4

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 35 Transport Impact Assessment Proposed Lot 21 Intermodal Place, Roe Highway Logistics Park, Kenwick WA

Included in Section 6.3, parking supply & demand 3.4

base and "with development" traffic flows Included in Section 6.5

Included in Section 3.3, analysis of development accesses 6.8

impact on surrounding roads Included in Section 6.7

impact on intersections Included in Section 6.7

impact on neighbouring areas Included in Section 6.10

traffic noise and vibration Included in Section 6.10

road safety Included in Section 2.9

public transport access Included in Section 2.8

pedestrian access / amenity Included in Section 6.9

cycle access / amenity Included in Section 6.9

Included in Section 2.6, analysis of pedestrian / cycle networks 6.9

safe walk/cycle to school (for residential and school site developments only) N/A

Traffic management plan (where appropriate) N/A

CW937700 | 8 February 2019 | 36 APT Parmelia Pty Ltd ACN 078 902 397 Eastpoint Plaza, Level 5 233 Adelaide Terrace, Perth WA 6000 P: +61 8 6189 4300 | F: +61 8 6189 4349 APA Group | apa.com.au

25th January 2019

APA Reference: 441978 Your Reference: N/A

City of Gosnells 2120 Albany Highway Gosnells WA EMAIL OUT: [email protected]

Dear David

RE: Proposed use and construction at 141 Grove Road and 64 Edward Street, Kenwick

Thank you for your referral request received on 15th January 2019 in relation to the proposed transport depot, warehouses and offices at 141 Grove Road & 64 Edward Street, Kenwick.

APA Group (APA) is Australia’s largest natural gas infrastructure business and has direct management and operational control over its assets and investments. APA’s gas transmission pipelines span across Australia, delivering approximately half of the nation’s gas usage. APA owns and operates over 15,000km’s of high pressure gas transmission pipelines across Australia. APA is the Pipeline Licensee for the Parmelia Gas Pipeline, which runs along the eastern boundary of the subject site.

APA’s Role As a Licensee under the Petroleum Pipelines Act 1969 (WA), APA is required to operate high pressure gas transmission pipelines (HPGTP) in a manner that minimises adverse environmental impacts and protects the public and property from health and safety risks. Once a HPGTP is in place, APA is required to constantly monitor both the pipeline easement and also a broader area within which we are required to consider land use changes and development and to assess what such changes means to the risk profile of the HPGTP.

APA has a number of responsibilities and duties to perform under a complex framework of legislation, standards and controls across Federal, State and Local Government landscapes. In particular, our HPGTPs are required to be operated in accordance with Australian Standard 2885 (Pipelines – Gas and Liquid Petroleum) (AS2885). In discharging our regulatory responsibilities, APA needs to continuously review what is happening around its assets, what land use changes are occurring and what development is taking place to ensure it remains in a positon to comply with applicable operational and safety standards and legislation whilst meeting its commercial obligations and imperatives.

Pipeline Risk Profile and the Measurement Length In managing HPGTP’s and considering land use changes, APA must focus on that area geographically defined by AS2885 as the Measurement Length (ML). The ML area is the heat radiation zone associated with a full-bore pipeline rupture. APA is mandated to consider community safety in the ML due to the high consequences of pipeline rupture to life, property and the economy.

APA Group comprises two registered investment schemes, Australian Pipeline Trust (ARSN 091 678 778) and APT Investment Trust (ARSN 115 585 441), the securities in which are stapled together. Australian Pipeline Limited (ACN 091 344 704) is the responsible entity of those trusts. The registered office is HSBC building, Level 19, 580 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000.

Page 1 of 3

The ML is determined by taking into account a number of factors including the design criteria of the pipe (driven by the environment within which it was designed for at the time of construction) and the Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure (MAOP) of the pipe. APA must consider any changes of land uses within the ML area to determine the effect of a new use on the risk profile of the pipeline.

For reference, the ML of the Parmelia Gas Pipeline 390 metres. Note that the ML is a radial dimension, and therefore applies to both sides of the pipe.

The proposed plastic processing plant would not warrant a Safety Management Study as it would not change the current T1 classification of the pipeline.

Comments On the basis of the information provided, APA does not object to the proposal subject to the following condition and advisory notes being included within any approval issued for the proposal:

Conditions:

1. No improvements within Easement Buildings, structures, roadway, pavement, pipeline, cable, fence, change in ground level, or any other improvement on or under the land, must not be constructed within the gas transmission pipeline easement, without the prior authorisation of APA. This includes both temporary and permanent improvements of the type detailed above. All construction workers on site must be made aware of this requirement.

2. Third Party Works Approval Prior to the commencement of any works within the gas transmission pipeline easement, the proponent must enter a Third Party Works Authorisation within the pipeline licensee/operator (APT Parmelia Pty Ltd). Works within the easement must comply with any conditions attached to a third party works approval.

3. Pipeline Operator Access The ability of the pipeline operator to access the easement must be maintained at all times to facilitate prompt maintenance and repairs. This may be through interlocking padlocks so APA has keyed access as any time. APA field officers will undertake any necessary site induction to facilitate unaccompanied access.

4. Landscape Plans Prior to the development commencing, landscape plans depicting any planned landscaping, including the planting of vegetation, species details, surface treatments, furniture structures or improvements on or immediately abutting the gas transmission pipeline easement must be submitted to and approved by the City of Gosnells. A three metre minimum clearance between the pipeline and any vegetation with a mature height greater than 0.5 metres must be maintained. The City of Gosnells will seek the view of the pipeline licensee / operator [APT Parmelia Pty Ltd] in this matter.

5. Ground Cover The current ground level over the existing high pressure gas pipeline easement is not to be reduced and must be maintained to the satisfaction of the pipeline licensee/operator (APT Parmelia Pty Ltd).

Page 2 of 3

6. Civil Works No civil infrastructure providing for water, sewer, electric, telecommunications and other like services will be accepted within the gas pipeline easement, other than service crossings to the satisfaction of the pipeline licensee/operator (APT Parmelia Pty Ltd).

Notes

 If you are planning on undertaking any physical works on property containing or proximate to a pipeline, or are seeking details on the physical location of a pipeline, please contact Dial Before You Dig on 1100, or APA directly on [email protected]

 An early works agreement from APA is required for any assessments/approvals that require greater than 3 days assessment or supervision. Lead in times for agreements can be up to 12 weeks. Please contact APA at [email protected] or 1800 103 452.

For any further enquiries in relation to this correspondence, please contact myself on (+61) 436 616 145 or APA’s Infrastructure, Planning & Protection team by email at [email protected]

Yours faithfully,

Zijad Bajrektarevic Urban Planner & Projects Approval Infrastructure Planning & Protection APA Group

Page 3 of 3

~ Government of Western Australia ~Department of Health

Your Ref: 210206 DA18/00304 Our Ref: F-AA-13967/05 EHB19/12 Enquiries: Vic Andrich 9388 4999

Mr Ian Cowie Chief Executive Officer City of Gosnells PO Box 662 GOSNELLS WA 6990

Attention: Donna Shaw, Acting Manager Development Services

Dear Mr Cowie

PLANNING APPLICATION - JDAP ASSESSMENT - TRANSPORT DEPOT,

WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE - LOTS 2, 9500 AND 9001 GROVE ROAD AND LOT 501 EDWARD STREET, KENWICK

Thank you for your letter of 10 January 2019 requesting comments from the Department of Health (DOH)on the above proposal. The DOH provides the following comment:

Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal The development is required to connect to scheme water and be in accordance with the

Government Sewerage Policy - Perth Metropolitan Region.

On-Site Wastewater Disposal Suitable provision for an adequate onsite effluent disposal area is to be accommodated in any planning approval. For on-site wastewater disposal systems to be approved, a 'site-and-soil evaluation' in accordance with Australian Standard 1547 (AS/NZS 1547) is required. Anyon-site waste water treatment process is to be in accordance with DOH publications which may be referenced and downloaded from: http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/N_R/Recycled-water http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/U_ZlWater-legislations-and-guidelines

Should you have queries or require further information please contact Vic Andrich on (08)93884999 or [email protected] Yours sincerely

j~~ COG SCAN I I RTN - 8 FEB Z019 Jim Dodds SET NO I ! LOCATION ,...J _.. !,...l .....- _ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIRECTORATE

5 February 2019

Environmental Health Directorate I Public and Aboriginal Health Division All correspondence to: PO Box 8172 Perth Business Centre Western Australia 6849 Grace Vaughan House 227 Stubbs Terrace Shenton Park WA 6008 Telephone (08)93884999 Fax (08)93884955 ABN 28 684 750 332 www.health.wa.gov.au Environmental Protection Authority

GOVERNMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Mr Ian Cowie Yourref: 210206 DA18/00304 Chief Executive Officer OurRef: DWERMA-000040 Enquiries: Teresa Bryant; 6364 6421 City of Gosnells Email: [email protected] PO Box 662 GOSNELLS WA 6990

ATTENTION: Donna Shaw

Dear Mr Cowie

JOINT DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PANEL APPLICATION - LOTS 2, 9500 AND 9001 GROVE ROAD AND LOT 501 EDWARD STREET, KENWICK - TRANSPORT DEPOT, WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE

I refer to your letter dated 16 December 2018, seeking comment on the proposed development.

It is noted the site does not contain native vegetation and is not directly adjacent to areas with significant environmental values.

The management of water quality and quantity is important to protect nearby wetlands within the Maddington-Kenwick Strategic Employment Area. The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) expects water management planning will be consistent with the Local and Urban Water Management Strategies for Precinct 3A. The development of landscaped bio-retention swales is supported. Management and maintenance of the Alternative Treatment Unit and leach drain should be in accordance with the Department of Health regulations.

It is noted that Corymbia ficifolia (Red Flowering Gum) is proposed for landscaping. Whilst Red Flowering Gum are utilised by species of Black Cockatoo for feeding, Corymbia calophylla (Marri), if planted, will also provide future roosting and nesting opportunities. It is noted that Marri were present in the area prior to clearing. The EPA recommends that landscape planning include Marri trees.

The Atrium Level 4, 168 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000. Postal Address: Locked Bag 33, Cloisters Square Perth, Western Australia 6850.

Telephone: (08) 6364 7000 | Facsimile: (08) 6364 7001 | Email: [email protected] Should you have any queries or require further information, please contact Teresa Bryant on (08) 6364 6421.

Yours sincerely

Tom Hatton CHAIRMAN i ^February 2019

Page 2