DOCSLIB.ORG

Ncaa Batting Leaders

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ncaa Batting Leaders NCAA BATTING LEADERS Batting Avg. Slugging Pct. On base pct. 1. Arizona 95 .394 1. UCLA 10 .735 1. UCLA 10 .467 2. Arizona 96 .370 2. Florida 11 .580 2. Arizona 95 .463 3. UCLA 10 .368 3. Arizona St.11 .559 3. Arizona St. 11 .452 4. Washington 96 .351 4. Florida 14 .551 4. Arizona 96 .443 5. Arizona St. 11 .338 5. Arizona 95 .538 5. Florida 11 .433 Runs Scored Hits Runs Batted In 1. Florida 11 47 1. Arizona 10 57 1. Florida 11 45 UCLA 10 47 UCLA 10 57 2. UCLA 10 44 3. Florida St. 18 39 3. Arizona 07 55 3. Florida St. 18 37 4. Auburn 16 36 4. Florida 11 54 4. Auburn 16 34 Arizona 10 36 5. Florida St. 18 53 5. Arizona St. 11 32 Triples Doubles 1. Cal St. Fullerton 86 4 Home Runs 1. UCLA 10 15 Oklahoma 13 4 1. UCLA 10 14 2. Florida St.18 12 3. Oklahoma 12 3 Florida 11 14 3. Florida 14 10 4. 3 tied at 2 3. Florida St. 18 10 4. 4 tied at 8 4. Arizona St. 11 9 Total Plate Appearances 5. Auburn 16 8 Total Bases 1. Texas A&M 84 275 1. UCLA 10 114 2. Arizona 07 246 At Bats 2. Florida 11 101 3. California03 226 1. Texas A&M 84 251 3. Florida St. 18 95 4. Michigan 05 221 2. Arizona 07 214 4. Arizona 10 84 5. Florida 11 220 3. Michigan 05 200 5. 2 tied at 80 4. Florida St. 18 188 Hit By Pitch 5. 2 tield at 186 Walks 1. Florida 15 14 1. Florida 11 35 2. Alabama 12 9 Strikeouts 2. California 03 32 3. Alabama 09 8 1. Arizona 07 69 3. Arizona St. 11 28 Florida 14 8 2. Michigan 05 64 4. Tennesee 13 26 5. 2 tied at 7 3. Northwestern 06 59 5. 4 tied at 23 4. Texas A&M 84 58 Sac Flies 5. 3 tie at 56 Sac Bunts 1. Michigan 15 3 1. Arizona 91 13 Cal St. Northridge 94 3 Stolen Bases 2. UCLA 84 12 Nebraska 13 3 1. Florida St. 18 15 3. UCLA 88 11 Arizona 98 3 2. Florida 15 14 UCLA 85 11 5. 18 tied at 2 3. Arizona 06 10 5. 4 tied at 10 4. Alabama 09 9 Steal Attempts 5. 3 tied at 8 Caught Stealing 1. Florida St. 18 18 1. Arizona 92 6 2. Florida 15 14 Grounded in DP 2. Oklahoma 01 5 3. Oklahoma 16 11 1. Oklahoma 16 4 Adelphi 84 5 4. Arizona 06 10 2. 8 tie at 3 Northwestern 84 5 Florida St. 16 10 5. Cal Poly Pomona 84 4 NCAA Batting Leaders NCAA BATTING ANALYSIS LEADERS Avg vs. Left Avg vs. Right Pct Reach As Leadoff 1. Arizona 98 .800 1. Arizona 95 0.394 1. Florida 06 .571 2. UCLA 16 .714 2. UCLA 10 0.371 2. Alabama 09 .560 3. Arizona 97 .500 3. Arizona 96 0.370 3. Arizona 94 .520 Georgia 09 .500 4. UCLA 15 0.358 4. Auburn 15 .515 UCLA 17 .500 5. Iowa 97 0.357 5. Florida 15 .512 Avg w/ 2 Outs Avg w/ Bases Empty Avg w/Runners 1. Michigan 09 .455 1. Arizona 95 0.419 1. Michigan 09 .480 2. UCLA 92 .422 2. Washington 96 0.392 2. Fresno State 82 .462 3. Arizona State 11 .417 3. UCLA 00 0.390 3. Fresno State 98 .394 4. Arizona 95 .394 4. Florida 06 0.385 4. UConn 93 .389 5. Arizona 96 .390 5. Florida 14 0.379 5. UCLA 92 .377 Avg w/Bases Loaded Avg w/RBI Ops Pct Adv Runners 1. UCLA 91 1.000 1. Lousiana 03 1.000 1. Fresno State 82 .813 Fresno State 88 1.000 2. DePaul 00 0.500 2. Michigan 09 .607 Florida State 02 1.000 3. Baylor 14 0.474 3. Arizona 95 .597 Cal Poly Pomona 85 1.000 4. Arizona 96 0.447 4. UCLA 94 .595 UCLA 17 1.000 5. Michigan 09 0.429 5. UCLA 92 .589 Pinch Hitting Avg Pinch Hit at Bats Pinch Hits 1. Oregon 15 1.000 1. Nebraska 85 9 1. Florida 18 3 2. Michigan 98 1.000 2. Tennessee 05 8 Iowa 97 3 3. Cal St Northridge 94 1.000 Arizona State 08 8 3. 11 tied at.. 2 4. Fresno State 98 1.000 4. 3 tied at 7 5. Michigan 15 1.000 Runners left on base Runners Advanced 1. Florida 15 51 2-out RBI 1. Oklahoma 13 20 Arizona 10 51 1. Florida 11 22 Arizona 06 20 3. Arizona 07 50 2. Arizona State 11 18 Arizona State 11 20 4 California 03 49 3. UCLA 10 18 4. Arizona 91 19 Tennessee 07 49 4. Florida St. 18 17 Florida 15 19 Arizona 10 17 Fly Outs/Ground Outs Ground Outs 1. Michigan 09 5.40 Fly Outs 1. UCLA 91 78 2. Arizona 09 3.20 1. Texas A&M 87 61 2. UCLA 97 77 3. Arizona St. 18 2.71 2. UCLA 91 58 3. Fresno State 90 76 4. Kent State 90 2.43 Auburn 16 58 4. Texas A&M 83 70 5. Missouri 10 2.22 4. Oklahoma State 94 55 UCLA 93 70 5. Washington 09 53 Ground Outs/Fly Outs 1. Iowa 01 29.00 2. Fresno State 82 4.33 3. Michigan 98 4.29 4. UMass 98 4.20 5. Long Beach State 92 3.77 NCAA Batting Analysis Leaders NCAA BATTING PER-GAME LEADERS Hits Per Game Runs Scored Per Game Doubles Per Game 1. Washington 96 11.75 1. UCLA 10 9.40 1. UCLA 10 3.00 2. UCLA 10 11.40 2. Arizona 95 7.50 Alabama 16 3.00 3. UCLA 15 11.00 3. Washington 96 7.00 3. Florida 14 2.00 4. Arizona 95 10.25 UCLA 15 7.00 UCLA 04 2.00 5. Arizona 96 10.00 5. Arizona State 11 6.80 Oregon 12 2.00 Triples Per Game Homers Per Game RBIs Per Game 1. Oklahoma 13 .80 1. UCLA 10 2.80 1. UCLA 10 8.80 Cal St Fullerton 86 .80 2. Florida 11 2.00 2. Arizona 95 6.50 3. Oklahoma 12 .50 Florida 18 2.00 3. Florida 11 6.43 UCLA 06 .50 4. Arizona State 11 1.80 4. Arizona State 11 6.40 Florida State 90 .50 5. UCLA 18 1.50 5. UCLA 15 6.33 Stolen Bases Per Game Walks Per Game Strikeouts Per Game 1. Florida 15 2.33 1. Cal Poly Pomona 84 6.00 1. UCLA 02 1.00 2. Alabama 09 2.25 2. Florida 13 5.67 2. UCLA 92 1.40 3. Florida St. 18 2.14 3. Arizona State 11 5.60 3. UCLA 82 1.50 4. Arizona 96 2.00 4. California 03 5.33 Arizona 96 1.50 DePaul 07 2.00 5. Tennessee 10 5.25 Princeton 96 1.50 At Bats Per Game Plate Apperances Per Game 1. Cal Poly Pomona 84 60.50 1. Cal Poly Pomona 84 69.00 2. Oklahoma State 82 45.00 2. Oklahoma State 82 49.50 3. Texas A&M 84 41.83 3. Nebraska 13 48.50 4. Kansas 92 40.50 4. Texas A&M 84 45.83 Michigan 95 40.50 5. Florida 13 44.33 NCAA Batting Per-Game Leaders NCAA PITCHING LEADERS Earned Run Avg Opposing Bat Avg Innings Pitched 1. Fresno State 98 0.00 1. Cal St Fullerton 86 .067 1. Texas A&M 84 72.1 Arizona 94 0.00 2. UCLA 93 .073 2. Arizona 07 60.00 Adelphi 85 0.00 3 UCLA 89 .096 3. Michigan 05 55.00 Northwestern 86 0.00 4. California 02 .101 4. Texas A&M 83 54.00 Utah State 84 0.00 5. Nebraska 85 .107 5. UCLA 91 53.10 Batters Struck Out Batters SO Out Looking Wins 1. Arizona 07 76 1. Arizona 06 22 1. Florida St. 18 6 2. Tennessee 07 75 2. LSU 04 19 Arizona 07 6 3. Oklahoma 12 68 Arizona State 08 19 3. 22 tied at 5 5 4. Arizona 06 64 4. Washington 09 18 5. UCLA 84 63 5. Arizona 07 17 Runners Picked Off 1. Fresno State 91 3 Losses Saves 2. 6 tied at 2 1. Arizona 10 3 1. Oklahoma 17 3 Florida 11 3 2. Alabama 11 2 Hits Allowed Texas A&M 08 3 3. 23 tied at 1 1. Texas 98 5 4. 246 tied at 2 2. Louisiana Tech 85 6 Sac Flies Allowed 3. 3 tied at 7 Sac Bunts Allowed 1. UCLA 15 3 1. Cal St Fullerton 85 12 Washington 98 3 Walks Allowed Texas A&M 84 12 3. 18 tied at 2 1. Virginia Tech 08 0 3. Fresno State 88 9 Missouri 83 0 Long Beach State 91 9 Earned Runs Allowed 3. 9 tied at 1 Michigan 05 9 1. Utah State 84 0 Utah 85 0 Home Runs Allowed Runs Allowed Adelphi 85 0 1. Arizona 96 0 1. 6 tied at 1 Northwestern 86 0 Michigan 02 0 Arizona 94 0 Western Michigan 82 0 Doubles Allowed UCLA 89 0 1. Adelphi 88 0 Triples Allowed Louisiana 95 0 Long Beach State 93 0 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Los Angeles Super Regional • #2 Ucla Vs. #15 Georgia • May
    SoŌ ball Contact: James Ybiernas • Phone: (310) 206-8123 • FAX: (310) 825-8664 • E-mail: jamesy@athleƟ cs.ucla.edu • www.uclabruins.com 2008 UCLA Softball Schedule & Results LOS ANGELES SUPER REGIONAL • #2 UCLA VS. #15 GEORGIA • MAY 24-25 Rankings: USA Softball (3), NFCA (5) Overall: 48-7 Pac-10: 17-4 Saturday, May 24 2/8 Nevada 2 W, 10-1 (5) Game 1 • 5 p.m. • Georgia (V) vs. UCLA (H) • ESPN 2/8 #5 Oklahoma 2, A W, 6-1 2/9 Santa Clara 2 W, 27-1 (5) 2/9 UC Santa Barbara 2, A W, 7-5 (8) Sunday, May 25 2/10 #5 Oklahoma 2, A L, 0-7 Game 2 • 4 p.m. • UCLA (V) vs. Georgia (H) • ESPN2 2/15 vs. #22 Missouri 3 W, 4-0 Game 3 • 6 p.m. • Georgia vs. UCLA (if necessary) • ESPN2 2/15 vs. South Carolina 3 W, 6-2 2/16 vs. Illinois 3 L, 2-6 2/16 vs. Portland State 3 W, 7-4 Gametracker and live audio on UCLABruins.com 2/17 vs. Wisconsin 3 W, 4-1 2/22 vs. Massachusetts 4 W, 4-2 UCLA, GEORGIA FACE OFF IN SUPER REGIONALS Senior Anjelica Selden was named fi rst team All-Pac-10 2/22 vs. #18 Georgia 4 W, 5-2 2/23 vs. #10 Baylor 4 W, 6-1 The second-seeded UCLA softball team (48-7) hosts for the third time in her career and fi rst team All-Pacifi c 2/23 vs. #14 Hawai’i 4 W, 3-0 #15 Georgia (46-22) this weekend in Super Regionals Region for the second time.
    [Show full text]
  • HUSKERS HOST WORLD's Largest Tailgate THIS WEEKEND 2014 NEBRASKA SCHEDULE
    NEBRASKA SOFTBALL NEBRASKANO. 1 IN SOFTBALL ACADEMIC ALL-AMERICANS • NO. 13 IN NCAA TOURNAMENT WINS NO. 10 IN WORLD SERIES APPEARANCES • NO. 10 IN NCAA TOURNAMENT APPEARANCES SOFTBALL MEDIA RELATIONS CONTACT: MATT SMITH OFFICE PHONE: (402) 472-7780 CELL PHONE: (402) 770-5926 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEEK 11: 2014 NEBRASKA SCHEDULE (30-13) Date Opponent Time/Result vs. OHIO STATE Hotel Encanto Invitational (Las Cruces, N.M.) Dates: Fri., Sat. & Sun., April 18, 19 & 20 Feb. 7 vs. UTEP W, 7-0 First Pitches: 6 p.m, 1 p.m. & Noon Feb. 7 vs. No. 12 Florida State W, 4-3 Ohio State Buckeyes Location: Lincoln, Neb. Nebraska Cornhuskers Feb. 8 at New Mexico State W, 11-0 (5) Record: 20-20 Stadium: Bowlin Stadium Record: 30-13 Feb. 9 vs. No. 12 Florida State L, 1-5 Ranking: NR/NR Live Stats & Audio: Huskers.com Rankings: 19th/20th Hilton Houston Plaza Classic (Houston, Texas) Big Ten Record: 6-6 Live TV: None Big Ten Record: 8-4 Feb. 14 at Houston W, 4-1 Feb. 14 vs. Army W, 7-0 BTN.com (Friday & Saturday) Away Record: 2-7 Live Streaming: Home Record: 7-3 Feb. 15 vs. Stephen F. Austin L, 0-1 Feb. 15 vs. Sam Houston State W, 2-0 HUSKERS HOST WORLD’S LARGEST TAILGate THIS WEEKEND Feb. 16 vs. Sam Houston State W, 7-1 The 19th-ranked Nebraska softball team wraps up an eight-game homestand this weekend by Mary Nutter Collegiate Classic (Cathedral City, Calif.) welcoming the Ohio State Buckeyes to Bowlin Stadium for a three-game series on Friday, Saturday and Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Balls & Strikes
    A BALLS & STRIKES NEW -11 OPTION? This lineup just got more LEGIT. FPLG11 • LEGIT™ FASTPITCH -11 ONE-YEAR WARRANTY • APPROVED BY - ASA®, USSSA®, NSA, ISA, ISF and all other associations • LENGTH / WEIGHT - 28”/17oz, 29”/18oz, 30”/19oz, 31”/20oz, 32”/21oz, 33”/22oz ©Worth Sports, a subsidiary of Jarden Corporation (NYSE:JAH) 510 Maryville University Drive, Suite 110, St. Louis, MO 63141 • worthsports.com LEGIT POWER. LEGIT PERFORMANCE B BALLS & STRIKES MADE IN THE USA CREATE CUSTOM BATTING HELMETS YOUR TEAM. YOUR COLORS. YOUR STYLE. Now you can build your own custom softball batting helmets online and purchase them directly from schuttstore.com 1 BALLS & STRIKES OFFICIAL SPORTING GOODS RETAILER EVERYTHING SOFTBALL GET 5% BACK ON BATS, GLOVES, CLEATS & MORE WHEN YOU JOIN THE LEAGUE BY SPORTS AUTHORITY GET 5% BACK on all in-store merchandise when you earn 100 Points or more during a quarterly period. Sign up in store or online at sportsauthority.com/theleague SPORTSAUTHORITY.COM 2 BALLS & STRIKES THE LINEUP 5 Letter from the President Official Publication of ASA/USA Softball 8 Faces on the Field - Meet the athletes who play ASA June 2013 12 News and Notes Executive Director Contributors 16 ASA GOLD National Ron Radigonda Julie Bartel E.T. Colvin Editor Kevin Isaacson 17 USASoftball.com Steven Embree Staff Sgt. Mike Meares Design Codi Warren 20 Women's College World Series Recap Old Hat Creative 23 Softball Poem The Official Publication of 27 USA Softball Junior Women's National Team The Amateur Softball Association / USA Softball 32 Love of the Game Balls and Strikes Softball Magazine is published quarterly by the Amateur Softball Association 2801 N.E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-Softbl-Mg-Sec4.Pdf
    O P P O N E N T S PACIFIC-10 CONFERENCE The Pacifi c-10 Conference continues to uphold its tradition as the “Conference of Champions” ®, claiming an incredible 166 NCAA team titles PAC-10 CONFERENCE STAFF DIRECTORY over the past 19 years, including 11 in 2008-09, averaging nearly nine championships per academic year. Even more impressive has been the breadth of the Pac-10’s success, with championships coming in 26 different men’s and women’s sports. The Pac-10 has led the nation in NCAA 1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, CA 94597-8853 Championships in 43 of the last 49 years and fi nished second fi ve times. Phone: (925) 932-4411 • Fax: (925) 932-4601 Spanning nearly a century of outstanding athletics achievements, the Pac-10 has captured 380 NCAA titles (261 men’s, 119 women’s), far outdistancing the runner-up Big Ten Conference’s 222 titles. COMMISSIONER The Conference’s reputation is further proven in the annual Learfi eld Sports Directors’ Cup competition, the prestigious award that honors Larry Scott the best overall collegiate athletics programs in the country. STANFORD won its 15th-consecutive Directors’ Cup in 2008-09, continuing its ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER remarkable run. Eight of the top 25 Division I programs were Pac-10 member institutions: No. 1 STANFORD, No. 4 USC, No. 7 CALIFORNIA, No. ADMINISTRATION & WOMEN’S BASKETBALL ADMIN 11 WASHINGTON, No. 12 ARIZONA STATE, No. 16 UCLA, No. 22 OREGON and No. 24 ARIZONA. The Pac-10 landed three programs in the top-10, Christine Hoyles one more than the second-place ACC, Big Ten and SEC (2).
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Ucla Softball 2007 Ucla Softball
    DUUISIS NNIBHIBH EEXX EEXERXER SSII BBLALA AATT AACILCIL BIIRILRRUINIL EETUMT USMOFTBALL ZZZRILZRIL EEX RX ECORDSEELL IINN VVERE ANDR IILLAOREL LHAOISTORYRE 37 2006 UCLA SOFTBALL 2007 UCLA SOFTBALL 37 DUCLA’UUISIS NNIBHISB HA EEXLLX-T EEXERXIMEER SSIIOFTBALL BBLALA AATT AACILLCETTERWINNERSIL IIRILRIL EETUMTUM ZZZRILZRIL EEXX EELL IINN VVERER IILLAORELLAORE – A – – G – – P – Julie Adams, 1996 • 97 • 99 • 2000 Jenny Gardner, 1998 • 99 • 2000 Karla Parent, 1990 Michelle Aguillar, 1980 • 81 • 82 • 83 Lyndsey Gayer, 1998 Janice Parks, 1986 • 87 • 88 • 89 Joanne Alchin 1992 • 93 Keira Goerl, 2001 • 02 • 03 • 04 Danielle Petersen, 2005 • 06 Christie Ambrosi, 1996 • 97 • 99 Yvonne Gutierrez, 1989 • 90 • 91 • 92 Michelle Phillips, 1986 • 87 • 88 Nichole Anderson 1991 • 93 Missy Phillips, 1988 • 89 • 90 • 91 Karen Andrews, 1979 • 80 • 81 • 82 – H – Janet Pinneau, 1983 • 84 • 85 • 86 Sandra Arledge, 1986 • 87 Lisa Hankerd, 1985 • 86 • 87 • 88 Marianne Pond, 1980 Toria Auelua, 2000 • 01 • 02 • 03 Tanya Harding, 1995 Marcia Pontoni, 1976 • 77 • 78 • 79 Debbie Hauer, 1979 • 80 • 81 • 82 Julie Poulos, 1989 – B – Julie Henderson, 1985 • 86 Alleah Poulson, 1994 • 95 • 96 • 97 Nikki Barbieri, 1996 • 97 Tara Henry, 2004 • 05 • 06 Diane Batham, 1983 Ashley Herrera, 2004 • 05 • 06 Casey Hiraiwa, 1998 • 2000 • 01 • 02 – R – Kelly Beach, 1980 Erin Rahn, 1999 • 2000 • 01 • 02 Lori Holingsworth, 1975 • 76 Caitlin Benyi, 2003 • 04 • 05 • 06 Stephanie Ramos, 2001 • 02 • 03 • 04 Gina Holmstrom, 1984 • 85 • 86 • 87 Jane Beyler, 1975 • 76 • 77 Dot Richardson, 1981
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORING the BRAND IDENTITY CREATION of FEMALE ATHLETES: the CASE of JENNIE FINCH and CAT OSTERMAN a Dissertation by JAMI NICO
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Texas A&M Repository EXPLORING THE BRAND IDENTITY CREATION OF FEMALE ATHLETES: THE CASE OF JENNIE FINCH AND CAT OSTERMAN A Dissertation by JAMI NICOLE LOBPRIES Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Gregg Bennett Committee Members, George Cunningham Summer Odom Jon Welty-Peachy Head of Department, Richard Kreider August 2014 Major Subject: Kinesiology Copyright 2014 Jami Nicole Lobpries ABSTRACT In the context of human branding, athletes have become viable brands capable of providing empirical support for scholarly and industry endeavors. To add to our conceptual understanding of athlete branding and particularly in the context of female athletes, this qualitative case study investigated the brand identity creation and brand building strategies used by two female athletes, Jennie Finch and Cat Osterman, and their management teams to leverage their brand equity. Further, due to the gendered nature of sport, this case study assessed the perceived barriers female athletes face in the brand building process. Guided by brand identity theory and social role theory, interviews were conducted with Finch, Osterman, three female agents who manage female athletes’ brands, and four softball players from various levels of the softball community. Findings from this case study provide empirical support for using brand identity theory to assess the creation of an athlete’s brand identity and strategies for positioning, communicating, and leveraging the athlete’s brand. Themes shaping brand identity creation included identifying core values, brand personality, and brand associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Series Records
    SERIES RECORDS NCAA BATTING LEADERS Batting Avg. Slugging Pct. On base pct. 1. Arizona 95 .394 1. UCLA 10 .735 1. UCLA 10 .467 2. Arizona 96 .370 2. Florida 11 .580 2. Arizona 95 .463 3. UCLA 10 .368 3. UCLA 19 .574 3. Arizona St. 11 .452 4. Washington 96 .351 4. Arizona St.11 .559 4. Arizona 96 .443 5. Arizona St. 11 .338 5. Florida 14 .551 5. Florida 11 .433 Runs Scored Hits Runs Batted In 1. Florida 11 47 1. Arizona 10 57 1. Florida 11 45 UCLA 10 47 UCLA 10 57 2. UCLA 10 44 3. Florida St. 18 39 3. Arizona 07 55 3. Florida St. 18 37 4. UCLA 19 37 4. Florida 11 54 4. Auburn 16 34 5. Auburn 16 36 5. Florida St. 18 53 5. Arizona St. 11 32 Arizona 10 36 UCLA 19 32 Triples Doubles 1. Cal St. Fullerton 86 4 Home Runs 1. UCLA 10 15 Oklahoma 13 4 1. UCLA 10 14 2. Florida St.18 12 3. Oklahoma 12 3 Florida 11 14 3. Florida 14 10 4. 3 tied at 2 3. UCLA 19 12 4. 4 tied at 8 4. Florida St. 18 10 Total Plate Appearances 5. Arizona St. 11 9 Total Bases 1. Texas A&M 84 275 1. UCLA 10 114 2. Arizona 07 246 At Bats 2. Florida 11 101 3. California03 226 1. Texas A&M 84 251 3. Florida St. 18 95 4. Michigan 05 221 2. Arizona 07 214 4. UCLA 19 89 5.
    [Show full text]
  • SOFTBALL BYU Athletic Communications
    BYU Athletic Communications 30 Smith Fieldhouse • Provo, Utah • 84602 801-422-8999 • fax 801-422-0633 Softball Contact: Brent Johnson OFTBALL May 18-20, Week 13 S NCAA Regionals, Provo Regional BYU 2006 Schedule/Results Regionals in Provo Date Opponent Time/Results FEB 9 Southern Mississippi* W, 5-4 For the first time in its six-year softball history, BYU will host the NCAA post sea- Loyola Marymount* W, 2-1 FEB 10 Texas State* L, 4-6, 8 inn. son this weekend. The Cougars invite seeded Washington, Kansas and Hawai`i* W, 4-0 Southern Utah to the Provo Regional. FEB 11 Texas Arlington* W, 5-2 FEB 16 UC Davis# W, 11-0 , 5 inn. FEB 17 Notre Dame# L, 3-8 This season’s NCAA bid was the Cougars’ first at-large bid. “We are a good Purdue # W, 5-2 FEB 18 Cal St. Fullerton# W, 5-2 team and I thought we would get a NCAA bid,” BYU head coach Gordon Eakin Kansas# W, 2-1 FEB 23 Houston^ L, 0-4 said. “The nice surprise was being able to host.” FEB 24 Witchita State^ L, 3-6 Iowa State^ W, 4-1 Probable Starters FEB 25 Texas State^ W, 1-0 Rhode Island ^ Cancelled/Rain C- Cortney Nix or Emi Snow MAR 2 No. 14 Texas A&M$ L, 2-3 MAR 3 College of Charleston$ W, 2-1 1B- Ianeta Le`i No. 14 Texas A&M$ W, 8-0, 5 inn. MAR 4 Texas Southern$ W, 20-0, 5 inn. 2B- Tracee Hoch College of Charleston$ W, 5-4 3B- Ashlyn Russell MAR 9 Middle Tennessee State** W, 4-0 MAR 10 Miami (Ohio)** W, 10-0 SS- Jodi Norton or Andrea Ramirez Pacific** Cancelled/Rain LF- Monica Gonzales or Krystle Chamberlain MAR 11 Wisconsin** W, 7-6, 11 inn.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents General Information______1-2
    Text Table of Contents GENERAL INFORMATION _________________________ -2 Table of Contents _________________ 1 2006 Schedule ___________________ 2 HISTO Quick Facts _____________________ 2 RY SEASON PREVIEW _____________________________ 3-6 2006 Roster _____________________ 4 Season Preview ________________ 5-6 COACHING STAFF _____________________________ 7-0 N Coach Heather Tarr _______________ 8 Coach Geoff Hirai _______________ 10 C Coach Eve Gaw __________________ 9 Support Staff ___________________ 10 AA PLAYER PROFILES _____________________________-34 Seniors _____________________ 12-15 Newcomers _________________ 30-33 Juniors _____________________ 16-25 Class Photos ___________________ 34 O PP Sophomores ________________ 22-29 ONENTS 2005 REVIEW ______________________________ 35-42 Season Notes ________________ 36-37 Individual Statistics _____________ 39 Game-By-Game Results __________ 38 Pac-10 Statistics _____________ 40-42 2006 OPPONENTS ___________________________ 43-52 R Tournaments _________________ 44-45 Dawgs On Deck ________________ 49 E V Seniors Aimee Minor and Sarah Hyatt are expected to lead the Huskies at the Non-Conference Opponents _______ 46 UW Sponsors __________________ 49 IE plate. Last season, the pair combined for 32 home runs and 97 RBI. Pac-10 Opponents ____________ 47-49 All-Time Series Records _______ 50-52 W NCAA HISTORY _____________________________ 53-65 Husky Postseason Results _________ 54 1999 Box Scores _____________ 60-61 NCAA Records _________________ 55 2000 Box Scores _____________ 61-62 P 1994
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Ucla Results
    Duis nibh ex exer si bla at acil iril etum zzril ex el in ver illaore 2006 UCLA RESULTS 50-9 OVERALL • 15-5 PAC-10 (O’All: 24-4 Home, 11-3 Away, 15-2 Neutral; Pac-10: 8-3 Home, 7-2 Away) Game date Opposing team Score r-h-e r-h-e Inns Overall Pac-10 Pitcher of record Attend Time ~ Feb 09, 2006 vs Sacramento State W 22-3 22-14-2 3-4-3 5 1-0-0 0-0-0 DODD (W 1-0) 0 2:03 ~ Feb 09, 2006 vs Cal Poly W 13-0 13-15-1 0-1-2 5 2-0-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (W 1-0) 249 1:42 ~ Feb 10, 2006 vs UC Santa Barbara W 9-3 9-11-2 3-9-0 7 3-0-0 0-0-0 DODD (W 2-0) 0 2:30 ~ Feb 11, 2006 vs Massachusetts W 8-0 8-12-3 0-1-2 6 4-0-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (W 2-0) 650 1:55 ~ Feb 12, 2006 at San Diego State W 2-1 2-10-2 1-3-4 7 5-0-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (W 3-0) 876 2:07 Feb 15, 2006 at Long Beach State 0-1 L 0-5-2 1-1-0 7 5-1-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (L 3-1) 669 1:50 Feb 18, 2006 FRESNO STATE W 2-0 2-7-1 0-2-2 7 6-1-0 0-0-0 DODD (W 3-0) 494 1:46 Feb 19, 2006 FRESNO STATE W 1-0 1-6-2 0-3-0 (10) 7-1-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (W 4-1) 692 2:52 Feb 21, 2006 at UC Riverside W 2-0 2-3-1 0-7-1 7 8-1-0 0-0-0 DODD (W 4-0) 267 1:51 ! Feb 24, 2006 vs Ohio State W 4-1 4-5-0 1-1-1 7 9-1-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (W 5-1) 273 1:41 ! Feb 24, 2006 vs LSU W 3-1 3-2-0 1-4-1 7 10-1-0 0-0-0 DODD (W 5-0) 0 1:27 ! Feb 25, 2006 vs Kansas W 4-3 4-5-3 3-8-2 7 11-1-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (W 6-1) 523 1:52 ! Feb 25, 2006 vs Texas A&M W 5-0 5-8-1 0-2-1 7 12-1-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (W 7-1) 462 1:53 ! Feb 26, 2006 vs Oklahoma W 2-0 2-3-1 0-4-0 7 13-1-0 0-0-0 SELDEN (W 8-1) 863 1:43 # Mar 03, 2006 CAL POLY W 9-1 9-7-1 1-4-2 5 14-1-0 0-0-0 DODD (W 6-0) - 1:37 # Mar 03, 2006
    [Show full text]
  • HUSKY RECORDS • Individual & Team Records Individual & Team Records • HUSKY RECORDS Individual Records – Single Game Home Runs 9 Vs
    HUSKY RECORDS • Individual & Team Records Individual & Team Records • HUSKY RECORDS Individual Records – Single Game Home Runs 9 vs. UCR, 2/11/11 RBIs 24 vs. Stanford, 4/30/93 Team Pitching Records – Season $ – minimum 200 opportunities Runs 5, Michelle Church vs. Stanford, 3/22/93; Walks 14 vs. Mississippi State, 11/12/11 Grand Slams Ashley Charters vs. Penn State, 3/13/09 Stolen Bases 8 vs. Florida A&M, 2/18/07 & vs. UC Davis, Highest/Most Lowest/Fewest 2/19/12 Hits 6, Angie Marzetta vs. Stanford, 4/30/93 ERA 2.58–2012 0.73–2000 5, Kathy Fiske vs. Cal State-Northridge, 2/2/02; Doubles 3, Michelle Church vs. Stanford, 4/30/93; Complete Games 53–2009 24–1997 vs. Tenn.-Chattanooga, 2/16/02; Jenny Topping vs. South Florida, 2/18/00; Shutouts 33–2000 9–2008 vs. Arizona State, 4/4/04; Alicia Blake vs. Stanford, 4/2/06 Team Records – Season Saves 8–1997 1–(4 times) vs. Arizona State, 4/17/05; Triples 2, Jennifer Cline vs. Santa Clara, 3/21/93; Innings Pitched 478.2–2000 364.1–2005 vs. Nevada, 4/24/05 Highest/Most Lowest/Fewest Tami Storseth vs. Stanford, 3/22/93 Hits Allowed 460–2003 269–2009 4, Jenny Topping vs. Oklahoma State, 2/25/00; Batting Average .343–1996 .269–2006 Home Runs 3, Kristen Rivera vs. Purdue, 3/03/03; Taylor Smith Hits Allowed/7 innings 6.63–1993 4.31–2009 vs. Utah, 2/26/00; At Bats 1,985–1995 1,437–2005 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Auburn Softball 2019 Media Guide 15 All-Americans • 2 Sec Titles • 2015, 2016 Wcws
    AUBURN SOFTBALL 2019 MEDIA GUIDE 15 ALL-AMERICANS • 2 SEC TITLES • 2015, 2016 WCWS INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1-5 ALL-TIME SERIES RESULTS ............................................62-82 Gameday Experience and Jane B. Moore Field ....................................... 3-4 vs. A-C .............................................................................................. 62-64 2019 Schedule and Quick Facts .................................................................5 vs. C-G.............................................................................................. 65-67 MEET THE TEAM ...........................................................6-29 vs. G-M............................................................................................. 68-72 2019 Roster ..............................................................................................7 vs. M-S ..............................................................................................73-76 Head Coach Mickey Dean ..........................................................................8 vs. T-Z .............................................................................................. 77-79 Coaching Staff ..........................................................................................9 All-Time Final SEC Standings ............................................................. 80-82 Seniors ..............................................................................................10-14 POSTSEASON
    [Show full text]