DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents MARIN COUNTY LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2012 Update 0 Prepared By: MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 266 San Rafael, CA 94903 www.readymarin.org In partnership with: Marin County Fire Department Marin County Department of Public Works Marin County Community Development Agency TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Marin County Operational Area ............................................................................................................................... 2 Strategies .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Jurisdiction Vulnerability- Major And Minor Hazards ............................................................................................ 4 Earthquake - Major ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Fire - Major ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Flood - Major ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Other Hazards - Minor .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Section 1: Risk Assessment - Major ....................................................................................................................... 7 Earthquake ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Fire .......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Flood ....................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Other Hazards - Minor ............................................................................................................................................ 43 Section 2: Hazard Mitigation .................................................................................................................................. 49 Planning and Goals ................................................................................................................................................. 49 Earthquake ............................................................................................................................................................. 50 Fire .......................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Flood ....................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Agriculture .............................................................................................................................................................. 66 Terrorism ................................................................................................................................................................ 67 Tsunami .................................................................................................................................................................. 68 Landslides ............................................................................................................................................................... 69 Section 3: Planning Reference .............................................................................................................................. 71 Regional Planning ................................................................................................................................................... 71 MARIN COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA .................................................................................................................... 71 Workshops/Public Involvement ............................................................................................................................. 72 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan ...................................................................................................... 73 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Hazard Mitigation Plan is the product of an ongoing planning process undertaken by the County of Marin. The purpose is to meet the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA) - (Public Law 106-3900) and thereby maintain continued eligibility for certain Hazard Mitigation – or disaster loss reduction – programs from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), part of the Department of Homeland Security. The Interim Final Rule published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002 and October 1, 2002 established mitigation planning requirements for local governments. The Marin County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) describes strategies for sustaining and building on current mitigation activities to ensure the future safety of lives, preservation of property, and protection of the environment during times of disaster. State and Federal guidance also encourages mitigation planning to address man-made hazards including terrorism. This plan includes terrorism only broadly since mitigation for this hazard is addressed by other agencies operating at a higher level of security. Mitigation planning will improve the ability to recover after disaster. The LHMP is based on critical data with a focus on Hazard Identification, Vulnerability Analysis, and Mitigation Strategies, with a breakout of the major and minor hazards. The major hazards include significant risk detail. The minor hazards are less detailed, using a broader approach. 1 Marin County Operational Area Marin County is located on the central coast of California, north of the Golden Gate Bridge. It is part of the California Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA) Coastal Region. Marin County covers 521 square miles with a population of over 250,000 in eleven incorporated cities and towns and the county’s unincorporated area. Most of the population is located in the urban corridor located along the east-central part of the county, adjacent to Highway 101. Marin County plays a large part in the economy of the San Francisco Bay Area. Marin County is surrounded by water on three sides: the Pacific Ocean on the west, the San Pablo Bay on the east and the San Francisco Bay on the south. It is adjacent to Sonoma County on the north. Marin County is connected to its surrounding neighbors by bridges. The Golden Gate Bridge is to the south; the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge is to the east; State Highway 37 is to the north east (along the north part of San Pablo Bay across filled bay land); and Highway 101 is to the north (which narrows to a 4-lane uncontrolled road that transverses the Antonio Creek). One of the major problems Marin County faces during any emergency is the possibility of being isolated from the surrounding communities and any resources or help. Planning Process The process for updating the Marin County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) began in January 2012 and follows the FEMA prescribed methodology.. Various forums and meetings defined the scope of the work for the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to update the recorded history of losses from natural hazards, and to update the analysis of future risks posed to the county by these hazards. The risk assessment portion of the plan was defined and specific recommendations for actions to mitigate future disaster losses were identified (Section 2 – Hazard Mitigation). The update team consisted of four lead departments/agencies who were each responsible for outreach to their stakeholders, subject matter experts, and constituents, as well as the elements of the LHMP that were specific to their discipline. These leads were: Marin County Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services (OES), Marin County Fire Department, Marin County Department of Public Works, and the Marin County Community Development Agency. The members of the committees, county department heads, the Disaster and Citizens Corps Council, and the Board of Supervisors are asked to monitor the plan as it is amended, at least annually. Stakeholders will monitor progress on individual projects, will be solicited to provide periodic reports on project development, and will be instrumental in evaluating the goals and objectives for expected outcomes of mitigation projects. Local Planning Mechanisms This plan considers current Marin County planning mechanisms including existing capital improvement plans, zoning, building codes, agency forums, and comprehensive plans for purposes of mitigation projects and activities. Key components of major plans are integrated in 2 this LHMP. Marin Countywide Plan The Marin Countywide Plan 2007, developed by the Marin County Community Development Agency, is a long range general plan that includes a significant section on environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • Geology at Point Reyes National Seashore and Vicinity, California: a Guide to San Andreas Fault Zone and the Point Reyes Peninsula
    Geology at Point Reyes National Seashore and Vicinity, California: A Guide to San Andreas Fault Zone and the Point Reyes Peninsula Trip highlights: San Andreas Fault, San Gregorio Fault, Point Reyes, Olema Valley, Tomales Bay, Bolinas Lagoon, Drakes Bay, Salinian granitic rocks, Franciscan Complex, Tertiary sedimentary rocks, headlands, sea cliffs, beaches, coastal dunes, Kehoe Beach, Duxbury Reef, coastal prairie and maritime scrublands Point Reyes National Seashore is an ideal destination for field trips to examine the geology and natural history of the San Andreas Fault Zone and the North Coast of California. The San Andreas Fault Zone crosses the Point Reyes Peninsula between Bolinas Lagoon in the south and Tomales Bay in the north. The map below shows 13 selected field trip destinations where the bedrock, geologic structures, and landscape features can be examined. Geologic stops highlight the significance of the San Andreas and San Gregorio faults in the geologic history of the Point Reyes Peninsula. Historical information about the peninsula is also presented, including descriptions of the aftermath of the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. Figure 9-1. Map of the Point Reyes National Seashore area. Numbered stops include: 1) Visitor Center and Earthquake Trail, 2) Tomales Bay Trail, 3) Point Reyes Lighthouse, 4) Chimney Rock area, 5) Drakes Beach, 6) Tomales Bay State Park, 7) Kehoe Beach, 8) McClures Beach, 9) Mount Vision on Inverness Ridge, 10) Limantour Beach, 11) Olema Valley, 12) Palomarin Beach, 13) Duxbury Reef 14) Bolinas Lagoon/Stinson Beach area. Features include: Point Reyes (PR), Tomales Bay (TB), Drakes Estero (DE), Bolinas Lagoon (BL), Point Reyes Station (PRS), San Rafael (SR), and San Francisco (SF), Lucas Valley Road (LVR), and Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (SFDB).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the California's 2001 Wildfire
    RECOMMENDED CITATION FORMAT Blonksi, K.S., M.E. Morales, and T.J. Morales. 2002. Proceedings of the California’s 2001 Wildfire Conference: Ten Years After the East Bay Hills Fire; October 10-12, 2001; Oakland California. Technical Report 35.01.462. Richmond CA: University of California Forest Products Laboratory. Key words: East Bay Hill’s fire, fire modeling, fire analysis, community planning/permitting, fire behavior, vegetation management, fuels management, Hills Emergency Forum, incident perspectives, homeowners’ hazards, insurance Published by: University of California Agriculture & Natural Resources Forest Products Laboratory 1301 South 46th Street, Richmond, CA 94804 www.ucfpl.ucop.edu Edited by: Tony Morales and Maria Morales Safe Solutions Group P.O. 2463 Berkeley CA, 94702 510-486-1056 [email protected] Special thanks to: Miriam Aroner for comments & Ariel Power for technical suggestions. Proceedings of the California’s 2001 Wildfire Conference: 10 Years After the 1991 East Bay Hills Fire SPECIAL RECOGNITION GOES TO OUR SUPPORTERS FOR THEIR DONATION OF TIME, MONEY AND SERVICES Sponsors: Bureau of Land Management California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection California Fire Alliance Diablo Fire Safe Council East Bay Regional Park District Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region IX (FEMA) Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Hills Emergency Forum Insurance Services Offices Inc. (ISO) Jack London Square Merritt College Environmental Science Program North Tree Fire International Port of Oakland Safeco Insurance
    [Show full text]
  • THIRD BIENNIAL STATE of TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE, 1992 AGENDA October 24, 1992 9:00 AM to 4:40 PM 9:00 Registration 9:30 Welcom
    THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE, 1992 AGENDA October 24, 1992 9:00 AM to 4:40 PM 9:00 Registration 9:30 Welcome: John Grissim, Environmental Action Committee of West Marin 9:35 Keynote: Skip Schwartz, Audubon Canyon Ranch 9:50 Summation of First Two Conferences: Bruce Wyatt, U.C. Cooperative Extension Sea Grant Program 10:10 Current Issues Facing Tomales Bay: Richard Plant 10:30 State Government & Bay Protection: Senator Milton Marks 10:40 The Role of County Government and the Coastal Commission: Supervisor Gary Giacomini 10:50 My Front Yard: Clayton Lewis 11:00 Break: Refreshments 11:15 Water Quality Panel: Guest Moderator, Steve Eabry 12:35 Poetry: Dr. Michael Whitt 12:45 Lunch (provided) 1:45 Citizen Stewardship for Tomales Bay: Michael Herz, San Francisco Baykeeper 2:15 Research Panel: Guest Moderator, Jules Evens 3:35 Break: Refreshments 3:50 Tomales Bay Poetry/Song: Rhiannon 4:00 Herding Fleas: Steve Eabry, Coordinator Morro Bay Task Force 4:30 Concluding Remarks: Suzanne d'Coney, Conference Coordinator THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS A Summary of the Past Two Conferences: Bruce Wyatt…………………………..………. 10 Water Quality Panel: Moderator, Steve Eabry Suntan Lotion and Other Impacts Affecting Tomales Bay: Richard Plant…………. 12 Programs and Practices for the Protection of Tomales Bay: Richard H. Bennett Ph.D……………………………………………………. 16 California Department of Fish & Game: Activities and Plans: Mike Rugg……............…… 19 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Activities and Plans Dale Hopkins…………………………………………………………….….. 21 California Department of Health Services Preharvest Shellfish Sanitation Program Gregg W. Langlois………………………………………………………….. 24 National Marine Sanctuary Protection in the Area: Edward Ueber………………… 26 Marin- Sonoma Dairy Waste Committee: Joe Mendoza…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Point Reyes National Seashore Wildland Fire Resource Advisor Guide July 2007
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Point Reyes National Seashore, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 Point Reyes National Seashore during the 1995 Vision Fire Point Reyes National Seashore Wildland Fire Resource Advisor Guide July 2007 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose and Need for this Guide 1.2 Background 1.3 The Park Environment 1.4 Fire History 2 Vegetation Overview.......................................................................... 8 3 Sensitive Resources............................................................................ 10 3.1 Air Quality 3.2 Soil Resources 3.3 Water and Riparian Resources 3.4 Vegetation 3.5 Wildlife 3.6 Cultural Resources 3.7 Wilderness Values 3.8 Maps of Interest 4 Appendix 1: Vegetation Types............................................................ 19 5 Appendix 2: Rare Animal Species List............................................... 28 6 Appendix 3: Rare Plant Species List................................................... 30 7 Appendix 4: Cultural Resources List.................................................. 33 8 Appendix 5: Summary of Resource Protection Measures.................. 35 9 Appendix 6: MIT Guidelines.............................................................. 38 10 Appendix 7: References...................................................................... 48 PORE Resource Advisor Guide 2 of 50 1.0 Introduction This Resource Advisor (READ) guide is intended to be used
    [Show full text]
  • Easkoot Creek Restoration at Stinson Beach
    EEEnnnvvviiirrrooonnnmmmeeennntttaaalll AAAsssssseeessssssmmmeeennnttt EEEaaassskkkoooooottt CCCrrreeeeeekkk RRReeessstttooorrraaatttiiiooonnn aaattt SSStttiiinnnsssooonnn BBBeeeaaaccchhh UUU...SSS... DDDeeepppaaarrrtttmmmeeennnttt ooofff ttthhheee IIInnnttteeerrriiiooorrr NNNaaatttiiiooonnnaaalll PPPaaarrrkkk SSSeeerrrvvviiiccceee GGGooollldddeeennn GGGaaattteee NNNaaatttiiiooonnnaaalll RRReeecccrrreeeaaatttiiiooonnn AAArrreeeaaa DDDiiivvviiisssiiiooonnn ooofff NNNaaatttuuurrraaalll RRReeesssooouuurrrccceee MMMaaannnaaagggeeemmmeeennnttt aaannnddd SSSccciiieeennnccceee II Environmental Assessment Easkoot Creek Restoration at Stinson Beach 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Overview 1 1.2 Project Location 1 1.3 Purpose and Need 1 1.4 Issues and Concerns 2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 7 2.1 Project Study Area 7 2.2 Public Involvement 7 2.3 Scoping 8 2.4 Alternatives 8 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 18 3.1 Soils and Geology 18 3.2 Hydrology and Water Resources 18 3.3 Natural Resources 23 Wildlife 23 Vegetation 25 Special Status Resources 25 Wetland and Riparian Communities 30 Air Quality 31 3.4 Cultural Resources 31 3.5 Visitor Use and Experience 32 3.6 Socioeconomic Environment 33 Public Service and Utilities 33 Aesthetic and Visual Resources 33 Noise 33 Environmental Justice 34 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 35 Impact Evaluation Methodology 35 Cumulative Context 36 Impairment to Park Resources 36 No Action Alternative 37 Soils and Geology 37 Hydrology and Water Resources 37 Natural Resources 37 Cultural Resources 38 Visitor Use and Experience
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Wildfire on Drinking Water Utilities and Effective Practices for Wildfire Risk Reduction and Mitigation
    Report on the Effects of Wildfire on Drinking Water Utilities and Effective Practices for Wildfire Risk Reduction and Mitigation Report on the Effects of Wildfire on Drinking Water Utilities and Effective Practices for Wildfire Risk Reduction and Mitigation August 2013 Prepared by: Chi Ho Sham, Mary Ellen Tuccillo, and Jaime Rooke The Cadmus Group, Inc. 100 5th Ave., Suite 100 Waltham, MA 02451 Jointly Sponsored by: Water Research Foundation 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, CO 80235-3098 and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. Published by: [Insert WaterRF logo] DISCLAIMER This study was jointly funded by the Water Research Foundation (Foundation) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The Foundation and USEPA assume no responsibility for the content of the research study reported in this publication or for the opinions or statements of fact expressed in the report. The mention of trade names for commercial products does not represent or imply the approval or endorsement of either the Foundation or USEPA. This report is presented solely for informational purposes Copyright © 2013 by Water Research Foundation ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or otherwise utilized without permission. ISBN [inserted by the Foundation] Printed in the U.S.A. CONTENTS DISCLAIMER.............................................................................................................................. iv CONTENTS..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transient Channel Incision Along Bolinas Ridge, California: Evidence for Differential Rock Uplift Adjacent to the San Andreas Fa
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 112, F03S07, doi:10.1029/2006JF000559, 2007 Click Here for Full Article Transient channel incision along Bolinas Ridge, California: Evidence for differential rock uplift adjacent to the San Andreas fault Eric Kirby,1 Courtney Johnson,1 Kevin Furlong,1 and Arjun Heimsath2 Received 11 May 2006; revised 24 August 2006; accepted 16 October 2006; published 1 March 2007. [1] The rates and spatial distribution of active deformation provide critical constraints on the geodynamics of deforming lithosphere, yet such data are often difficult to acquire in eroding landscapes where poor preservation of geomorphic or stratigraphic markers hinders strain reconstruction. Recent advances in understanding of the relationship between bedrock channel profile form and erosion rate have led to their use as an index of rock uplift rate in steady state landscapes. Here we extend this analysis to landscapes experiencing a transient increase in erosion rate using an example from the Marin County region of northern California. We characterize channel and hillslope gradients in a series of small watersheds along a monolithologic portion of the Franciscan terrane in Marin County. Channel steepness indices vary strongly from north to south along the ridge and correspond with the progressive development of relief on threshold hillslopes along valley walls. These patterns argue that recent channel incision has engendered a transient adjustment of hillslope gradient, as incision outpaces soil production rates. These differences in landscape form and inferred incision rate are explained by differential rock uplift within the region east of the San Andreas fault. Relationships between channel gradient and incision rate suggest a threefold to fivefold difference in incision rate across the region and place a minimum bound on differential rock uplift rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomales Bay State Park General Plan Was Prepared by the Department of Parks and Recreation Northern Service Center and North Bay District Staff
    SCH #2003062074 Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor Mike Chrisman Secretary for Resources Ruth Coleman Director of Parks and Recreation State of California The Resources Agency Department of Parks and Recreation P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 February 2004 California Department of Parks and Recreation General Plan Inquiries The Tomales Bay State Park General Plan was prepared by the Department of Parks and Recreation Northern Service Center and North Bay District staff. For general information regarding this document, or to request additional copies, please contact: California Department of Parks and Recreation Northern Service Center One Capitol Mall, Suite 500 Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Tomales Bay State Park General Plan Team Copyright 2004 California State Parks This publication, including all of the text and photographs (excepting the cover photograph), is the intellectual property of the Department of Parks and Recreation and is protected by copyright. Cover photograph copyrighted and provided by Robert Campbell, Chamois Moon www.chamoismoon.com Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 10 Location and Park Areas..................................................................................................... 12 West Shore Park Areas ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rodeo Valley, Marin Headlands & Easkoot Creek, Stinson Beach
    Habitat Restoration Team 2019 April-June Schedule Volunteer Programs are every Sunday, 9:30 am-2:30 pm and every 2nd and 4th (and 5th) Tuesday, 10 am-2 pm. March 2019 March 17 (Sunday) –Easkoot Creek, Stinson Beach. Bring something to share for the pot luck. We’ll do some weeding to maintain restored stream side Steelhead habitat. Tour One Tam's great Cape-ivy control work and see amazing native plantings at the new septic site. Meet at the Stinson Beach central parking lot. Map Link March 24 (Sunday) – Presidio Stables & Fort Barry, Marin Headlands. Today we protect important endangered Mission blue butterfly habitat! We will pull broom in two sites to protect amazing habitat. Fantastic progress has been achieved by HRT in the last 25 years! Meet at the Gerbode Trailhead parking lot across from Presidio Stables. Map Link March 26 (Tuesday) – Upper TV, Tennessee Valley. The onset of spring brings abundant opportunities to help out with various ongoing projects in Tennessee Valley. Meet at TV parking lot. Map Link March 31 (Sunday) – Morning Sun to Gerbode Valley, Marin Headlands. Amazing wildflowers will reward us! We'll hike or caravan up the ridge and remove broom as we go to protect endangered butterfly habitat above Gerbode Valley. Meet at the commuter lot on the west side of highway 101 at Spencer Ave exit. Map Link April 2019 April 7 (Sunday) – Fairfax-Bolinas, Bolinas Ridge. Your help is needed to pull French broom and search for veldt grass as we continue to transform this 5 acre broom invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Stinson Beach Hydrologic Survey
    Stinson Beach County Water District Stinson Beach, California STINSON BEACH HYDROLOGIC SURVEY February 1998 Todd Engineers Questa Engineering 2200 Powell Street, Ste. 225 1220 Brickyard Cove Road, Ste 206 Emeryville, CA 94608 Pt. Richmond, CA 94807 510/595-2120 510/236-6114 Fax: 510/595-2112 Fax: 510/236-2423 http://www.toddengineers.com http://www.QuestaEC.com Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. ES-1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1 Background ........................................................................................................................1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................2 Scope ....................................................................................................................................2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................2 Acknowledgment .................................................................................................................3 Field Program ...................................................................................................................................4 Installation of Monitoring Wells ..........................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Point Reyes National Seashore
    Tomales Tomales ad a Ro Bluff talum Tomales-Pe T O Sand Lawsons Landing M Avalis Point 1 Beach PETALUMA A Bird Rock L E S W a l P k e O r T C o I r m N e a e le T k s Toms P Point Chile o Preston no Cr C d in eek hi a t Point le Ro T no ey ra GOLDEN GATE Vall il Hamlet NATIONAL Chileno Valley TULE Oyster Pen Ro ELK RECREATION AREA ad RESERVE W Boat launch HIT GUL E Antonio CH Hog Island Cr ee Historic Pierce k Point Ranch McClures Beach Pelican Point BOLINAS RIDGE Elephant Rock Tomales Beach aluma ilson Pet R W Hi GOLDEN GATE all- oa ll sh d R NATIONAL ar o RECREATION AREA M a Salmon C d re ek Marshall Beach Marshall Kehoe Beach TOMALES BAY High Tide Arroyo S P a Check tide tables before walking on i u e s r a beaches. Rising water can trap you c l against a cliff with no possibility of e Marconi Conference Center P L and Marconi State Historic Park escape. o R i n a t n c N R o h v o a Heavy Surf R to a o B d o The pounding surf and rip currents are a u lev treacherous, especially at McClures INVERNESSd RIDGE ard Hearts Desire Beach, Kehoe Beach, and Point Reyes Beach Beaches, North and South. Stay away from the water. TOMALES BAY TOMALES BAY d SAN ANDREAS FAULT ZONE a To Novato STATE STATE o R and 101 PARK PARK a m Abbotts lu Millerton Point a PACIFIC Lagoon t e -P s e rd y a e v R le t US COAST u in o o GUARD B P OCEAN e k a Mo Inverness r un D t V is is nc io ra n PRIVATE Sir F R GOLDEN GATE o a Mount Vision NATIONAL PROPERTY d 1282ft RECREATION AREA 391m N ic a s s le l i POINT REYES a ai o V m Tr al Oyster Farm Estero To y ley Point
    [Show full text]