SECCIÓN / RECHERCHES
FIG. 1 of the tapestry Les Dés sont jetés, 1st September 1965. Photo: Robert Cohen. FLC.
- 76 -
Levitt, C. (2020). Weaving Words: Le Corbusier and Jean Lurçat Between Tapestry and Poetry. LC. Revue de recherches sur Le Corbusier. Nº 02, 76-89. LC. REVUE DE RECHERCHES SUR LE CORBUSIER Nº 2 (09/2020)
WEAVING WORDS LE CORBUSIER AND JEAN LURÇAT BETWEEN TAPESTRY AND POETRY Caroline Levitt doi: 10.4995/lc.2020.13922
Abstract: Before his funeral service in the Cour Carrée of the Louvre on 1 September 1965, the body of Le Cor- Les Dés sont jetés which his woven works of 1948 onwards are intricately connected to his thinking across media. Jean Lurçat (1892- the imagery of the tapestries alongside the writings of the artists themselves, Paul Éluard and Stéphane Mallarmé reveal surprising connections. Keywords: Le Corbusier; Jean Lurçat; tapestry; poetry; Pierre Baudouin.
Résumé : Avant ses funérailles à la Cour Carrée du Louvre le 1er septembre 1965, le corps de Le Corbusier Les Dés sont jetés la place et l’importance de la tapisserie dans la carrière plus large de Le Corbusier en tant qu’architecte, artiste non seulement dans leur engagement avec la tapisse-rie comme forme de résistance et de révolution sur un l’imagerie des tapisseries aux cô-tés des écrits des artistes eux-mêmes de Paul Éluard et de Stéphane Mallarmé révèlent des connec-tions surprenantes. Mots-clé : Le Corbusier; Jean Lurçat; tapisserie; poésie; Pierre Baudouin.
Resumen: Antes de su funeral en el Cour Carrée del Louvre el 1 de septiembre de 1965, el cuerpo de Le Corbu- Les Dés sont jetés y la importancia del tapiz en la carrera más amplia de Le Corbusier como arquitecto, artista y poeta, y resalta las formas en que sus obras tejidas de 1948 en adelante están intrincadamente co-nectadas a su pensamiento a solo en su compromiso con el tapiz como una forma de resistencia y revolución a través de un modelo medieval, sino también en sus diferentes usos de la poesía en el sentido más amplio. Lecturas detalladas de las imágenes de los tapices junto con los escri-tos de los propios artistas, Paul Éluard y Stéphane Mallarmé revelan conexiones sorprendentes. Palabras clave: Corbusier; Jean Lurçat; tapiz; poesía; Pierre Baudouin.
- 77 -
e-ISSN (2660-7212) SECCIÓN / RECHERCHES
1. Trans. by AS Kline poetryintranslation. com/PITBR/French/ MallarmeUnCoupdeDes. php#anchor_Toc160699751 Consulted 17 June 2020. 2. [“I salute you from the severe threshold of the tomb”.] The eulogy is reprinted in André Malraux, Oraisons funèbres Translations are the author’s unless otherwise stated. 3. Christopher Green’s work on the artistic output of Le Corbusier remains foundational: Christopher Introduction: The Dice are Cast Green, “The Architect as Artist”, in Le Corbusier: Architect of the Century, ed. by Michael Raeburn someone / ambiguous / the immemorial ulterior demon / having / from non-existent regions / led / the old and Victoria Wilson (London: Arts Council man towards this ultimate meeting with probability / this / his childlike shade / caressed and smoothed and rendered / supple by the wave and shielded / from hard bone lost between the planks / born of a frolic / 110-130. Also Christopher the sea through the old man or the old man against the sea / making a vain attempt […] Green, Le Corbusier- Sculpture With and Against Stéphane Mallarmé, Un Coup de dés jamais n’abolira le hasard, 18971 ‘Architecture’ (Leeds: Leeds City Art Gallery/ The Henry 4. See in particular sea at Roquebrune-Cap-Martin. Before his funeral service in the Cour Carrée of the Louvre on 1 September, KLH Wells, Weaving Modernism: Post-War and a talking point for those who came to pay homage, hung a version of his tapestry Les Dés sont jetés Tapestry Between Paris and New York (New Haven Légion and London: Yale University d’honneur, funeral eulogy, proudly addressed the Swiss-born architect on behalf of his adopted nation, France, citing 5. From 1925-1941 words from Victor Hugo in his honour: “Je te salue au seuil sévère du tombeau!”2 To sum up the career of the Jean Lurçat lived in the architect of whitewashed concrete villas and stacked, modular housing units through the media of tapestry modernist home built for him by his brother in and canonical French poetry might initially seem an unexpected choice; however, as this article will demons- the Villa Seurat, Paris. In trate, it was extremely pertinent on both counts. As Malraux himself stated, the maxim of the “machine for li- 1945, he purchased a ving in” for which Le Corbusier was perhaps best known is only half the story, and the architect was “more medieval chateau in Saint- secretly” a poet. The animosity between Le Corbusier and André Lurçat should not go Le Corbusier’s long and varied career as an architect, artist and poet by now needs no introduction, and it has unacknowledged. been tempting to simply explain the tapestries as one more experiment in his multimedia synthesis of the arts 6. Romy Golan borrows - a collaborative venture akin to the wooden sculptures he produced with Joseph Savina, perhaps, or alter- Le Corbusier’s term natively a deeply personal form of expression, as in his paintings.3 Equally, they could be understood as a “Muralnomad” as a title natural return to the decorative arts tradition from which he emerged as a student in la Chaux-de-Fonds. and methodology, but her focus is mural painting; However they were also both part of and distinct from a much wider modernist revival of tapestry production. the tapestries she does examine are Le Corbusier’s has been considered elsewhere.4 for Chandigarh, which are smaller-scale serial pieces modern architecture; and yet remarkably little art historical attention has been devoted to him.5 with which this article is concerned. Romy Golan, Muralnomad: The Paradox medium for both Le Corbusier and Lurçat, and even the process of of Wall Painting, Europe design and manufacture, have been discussed to some degree, the complex imagery of Le Corbusier’s woven 1927-57 (New Haven and 6 London: Yale University works in particular has been sidelined.
- 78 -
Levitt, C. (2020). Weaving Words: Le Corbusier and Jean Lurçat Between Tapestry and Poetry. LC. Revue de recherches sur Le Corbusier. Nº 02, 76-89. LC. REVUE DE RECHERCHES SUR LE CORBUSIER Nº 2 (09/2020)
7. See Maureen Shanahan, “Tapis/Tapisserie: Marie Cuttoli, Fernand Léger and the Muralnomad”, Konsthistorisk tidskrift/ Journal of Art History, Marie Cuttoli: The Modern Thread from Miró to May Ray (Pennsylvania: Barnes FIG. 2 Le Corbusier, Tapissserie only publication devoted Marie Cuttoli, 1936. Tapestry in wool and silk, Atelier is a slim exhibition Picaud, Aubusson, 147 cm x catalogue: Baudouin: 175 cm. FLC. Tapisseries des peintres (Aubusson/ Fécamp: Musée Départemental de la intermediary with whom Le Corbusier worked from 1948, has been largely ignored.7 And whilst the Resistance imagery of Lurçat’s tapestries has been well-documented, their textuality - the material nature of including text 8. See Claire within the woven composition - has not been discussed.8 Politics, in other words, has been prioritised over O’Mahony, “Renaissance poetics. Poetry and the poetic were vital catalysts and outputs for both Le Corbusier and Lurçat, whether as and Resistance: Modern written or quoted text or as creative metaphor, and are therefore central to an understanding of their work. This French Tapestry and Collective Craft”, in The article seeks to read the tapestries of Le Corbusier and Lurçat in a new light and in relation to each other via Journal of Modern Craft, 9:3 their ideology, imagery and engagement with poetry in the broadest sense. 9. Tag Gronberg, in her analysis of the Pavillon, has Framing the Debate considered the rugs and a number of Serbian pots also on display to be evidence The 1925 Exposition des Arts Décoratifs provided an initial point of encounter for Lurçat, Le Corbusier and of Le Corbusier’s interest Cuttoli. Cuttoli’s Maison Myrbor fashion house showed knotted rugs based on designs by Lurçat, who had in “folklore” and a memory been developing his career as a tapestry designer since 1917 and who simultaneously had two geometric rugs of his Voyage d’Orient. Tag Gronberg, Designs on display in the Ambassade Française. At the edge of the same exhibition site stood Le Corbusier’s famous- on Modernity: Exhibiting ly ill-fated Pavillon de l’Esprit Nouveau, inside which Berber rugs (a jarring presence in the otherwise anti-dec- the City in 1920s Paris 9 Lurçat’s rugs (Manchester: Manchester sold quickly, opening the way for Cuttoli’s engagement with modern artists such as Fernand Léger and Georg- 133-137. es Braque in the workshops of Aubusson, whilst Le Corbusier’s Pavillon and the urban plans it represented provoked censure and distrust. 10. For a discussion of the 1930s, including the The Ma- bathers, see Green, “The rie Cuttoli Tapestry, it relates strongly in its subject matter to contemporaneous paintings by the architect, with Architect as Artist” and Genevieve Hendricks, “Touching the Body: Le Corbusier’s Figurative pinasse 10 The artistic Works”, in Le Corbusier: and symbolic imagery that Le Corbusier developed during his yearly holidays at the Bassin d’Arcachon from The Measures of Man, ed. 1926 to 1936, would be mined by him for the rest of his career. The integrated frame was a requirement of by Olivier Cinqualabre and Frédéric Migayrou (Zurich: Cuttoli in the works of all the artists she commissioned, intended to reference the French tapestry tradition and Verlag Scheidegger & reinforce the status of wall-hung tapestries as artworks. Here, however, Le Corbusier disrupts the clarity of the
- 79 -
e-ISSN (2660-7212) SECCIÓN / RECHERCHES
framing device, incorporating multiple frames at once as he often did in his paintings. That of the ‘picture with- in the picture’, perhaps conceived as a canvas on an easel, is the most prominent, in broken greys and beiges, grounds it. The shell, and the pinecone to the right, presented as trompe l’oeil with their naturalistic shadows, refer to Le Corbusier’s collection of objets à réaction poétique and the textured blocks of colour on which they 11. Flora Samuel has considered the motif of sit recall the painted display alcoves that Le Corbusier incorporated in his interiors. Within the central image, a frames in Le Corbusier’s red form evokes the picture frame window found on the roof terrace at the Villa Savoye, and anticipates architectural works in Le Corbusier’s many other architectural frames, such as the one that would reach into the sky at La Tourette, Le Corbusier in Detail possibly anchoring the thick black line behind as a displaced horizon line.11 Le Corbusier reinforces the falsity 101-122. of presenting tapestry as painting and instead insists on the varied ways in which his work might be under- stood or ‘framed’.12 12. Baudouin later insists on this point: “Le Corbusier tapissier n’est pas le même que Le Corbusier eventually found her approach to be too engaged with luxury materials and the elitism of painting. This article, peintre”. Pierre Baudouin, then, is concerned not with the Cuttoli experiment, but with the bringing together of Le Corbusier and Lurçat “Muralnomad”, in Le Corbusier lui-même, through their later works from the 1940s and 50s. They are linked initially by this narrative of rejecting luxury ed. by Jean Petit (Geneva: and engaging with tapestry as a form of resistance and revolution; it is there that we will begin. 240-241. 13. “The painting is Imagery and Ideology a signed object as much as it is a painted surface… the painted object becomes Looking closely at the imagery woven into the tapestries can tell us much about their production and ideology: a cultural object by means as with Le Corbusier’s buildings, the process and concept of creation is woven clearly into both the structure of the signature”. Jean and the surface appearance. In Le Corbusier’s Trois femmes sur fond blanc Baudrillard, For a Critique of - the Political Economy of the Sign busier. The other hand, open with the palm showing, points to the monogram of the Atelier Picaud, Aubusson, the tapestry workshop in which the piece was made. The signature, the hands and the workshop symbol speak to the relationship between the individual; mass-produced objects-types; and the ancient craft of ta- 14. See Simon Richards, Le Corbusier and the pestry-making. The signature here is a copy, woven in by the weavers. Alongside the workshop symbol, it is Concept of Self (New Haven evidence of the collaborative nature of tapestry design and production as much as of authorship or individual and London: Yale University have it, of the tapestry’s status as an art object, but not of the artist’s presence.13 The juxtaposition of the si- Marie-Jeanne Dumont, “The Open Hand: From Political gnature with the hand complicates the situation further. It has been often noted that Le Corbusier, in his later Symbol to the Artist’s years, adopted the open hand motif as a form of signature, especially at Chandigarh.14 Yet here, we have Signature”, in Le Corbusier: The Measures of Man, 15 It also relates to Le Cor- 134-141. 15. Le Corbusier ties the Trois open hand to the gesture Poème de femmes as a version of the three graces, a reading that is immediately undercut by the corporeality of the l’angle droit (Paris: Tériade, writhing female forms, their racial and cultural identity unstable in spite of the red, white and blue colour sche- me. The tapestry sums up a series of contradictions and ambiguities that were at the heart of Le Corbusier’s original plates of the Poème career from the 1930s, and which are at the heart of the revival of tapestry production more generally. were exhibited alongside 17 of Le Corbusier’s tapestries at La Chaux-de-Fonds in Authorship and the level of control exerted by the patron, the artist or the weavers was a tension that was 1957. ever-present. As a student at the École national des arts décoratifs (ENAD, the design school set up in Aubus- 16. Claude Faux, Lurçat à haute voix (Paris: cartoons to indicate to the weavers the colours and stitching styles required for the execution of his designs, 16 Claire O’Mahoney has noted how Lurçat’s 17. O’Mahony, exactitude and the restricted colour palette were in fact a threat to the agency of the weavers, limiting their “Renaissance and freedom in interpreting the design into wool.17 The narrative of Le Corbusier’s approach to cartoon design, in Resistance”, 3-4. contrast, betrays the fact that he knew little about the process to begin with. From 1948, he worked closely 18. See Martine Mathias et al, Le Corbusier, L’oeuvre with the tapestry medium in 1936.18 Baudouin had been a tutor in Art History at the ENAD, and he sought the tissé (Aubusson/Arras, cooperation of artists to help revive the tradition of France’s great tapestry workshops, liaising with the tapestry -
- 80 -
Levitt, C. (2020). Weaving Words: Le Corbusier and Jean Lurçat Between Tapestry and Poetry. LC. Revue de recherches sur Le Corbusier. Nº 02, 76-89. LC. REVUE DE RECHERCHES SUR LE CORBUSIER Nº 2 (09/2020)